<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-11-6633-2014</article-id><title-group><article-title>Pasture degradation modifies the water and carbon cycles<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> of the Tibetan highlands</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Pasture degradation modifies the water and carbon cycles of the Tibetan highlands}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W.~Babel et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff17">
          <name><surname>Babel</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff18">
          <name><surname>Biermann</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Coners</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff19">
          <name><surname>Falge</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Seeber</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff20">
          <name><surname>Ingrisch</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-8689</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Schleuß</surname><given-names>P.-M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff5 aff21">
          <name><surname>Gerken</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5617-186X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Leonbacher</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Leipold</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Willinghöfer</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Schützenmeister</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7 aff8">
          <name><surname>Shibistova</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Becker</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Hafner</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff6">
          <name><surname>Spielvogel</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-4397</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff10">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-4932</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff10">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff13">
          <name><surname>Wesche</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Graf</surname><given-names>H.-F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Leuschner</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Guggenberger</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff14 aff15">
          <name><surname>Kuzyakov</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9863-8461</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff16">
          <name><surname>Miehe</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff17">
          <name><surname>Foken</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          <email>thomas.foken@uni-bayreuth.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-9083</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>University of Bayreuth, Department of Micrometeorology, Bayreuth, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Göttingen, Department of Plant Ecology and Ecosystem Research, Göttingen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Senckenberg Museum Görlitz, Department of Botany, Görlitz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>University of Göttingen, Department of Soil Sciences of Temperate Ecosystems, Göttingen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>University of Cambridge, Department of Geography, Centre for Atmospheric Science, Cambridge, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>University of Koblenz-Landau, Institute of Integrated Environmental Sciences, Koblenz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institute for Soil Science, Hanover, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>V. N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Krasnoyarsk, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environment Changes and Land Surface, Processes, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity Focuses, Processes, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff14"><label>14</label><institution>University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Soil Science, Göttingen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff15"><label>15</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff16"><label>16</label><institution>University of Marburg, Faculty of Geography, Marburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff17"><label>17</label><institution>Member of Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Ecosystem Research, Bayreuth, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff18"><label>*</label><institution>now at: Lund University, Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff19"><label>**</label><institution>now at: Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Braunschweig, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff20"><label>***</label><institution>now at: University of Innsbruck Institute of Ecology Research, Innsbruck, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff21"><label>****</label><institution>now at: The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Meteorology, University Park, PA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">T. Foken (thomas.foken@uni-bayreuth.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>6633</fpage><lpage>6656</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>May</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>

      <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014.html">This article is available from https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
    <p>The Tibetan Plateau has a significant role with regard to atmospheric circulation and the monsoon
in particular. Changes between a closed plant cover and open bare soil are one of the striking
effects of land use degradation observed with unsustainable range management or climate change,
but experiments investigating changes of surface properties and processes
together with atmospheric feedbacks
are rare and have not been undertaken in the world's two largest alpine ecosystems, the alpine
steppe and the <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pastures of the Tibetan Plateau. We
connected measurements
of micro-lysimeter, chamber, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labelling, and eddy covariance and combined the
observations with land surface and atmospheric models, adapted to the highland conditions. This
allowed us to analyse how three degradation stages affect the water and carbon cycle of pastures
on the landscape scale within the core region of the <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> ecosystem. The
study revealed that increasing degradation of the <italic>Kobresia</italic> turf affects carbon allocation
and strongly reduces the carbon uptake, compromising the function of <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures as
a carbon sink. Pasture degradation leads to a shift from transpiration to evaporation while
a change in the sum of
evapotranspiration over a longer period cannot be confirmed. The results show an earlier onset of
convection and cloud generation, likely triggered by a shift in
evapotranspiration timing when dominated by evaporation. Consequently,
precipitation starts earlier and clouds decrease the incoming solar radiation. In summary, the
changes in surface properties by pasture degradation found on the highland have a significant
influence on larger scales.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Alpine ecosystems are considered as being highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate and land use
change. This is especially the case for two of the world's highest and largest alpine ecosystems:
the <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pastures covering 450 000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the southeast and the
alpine steppe covering 600 000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the northwest of the Tibetan Plateau. The
<italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pastures typically form a closed grazing lawn of about 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
height with up to 98 % cover of <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic>, as main constituent of a felty turf
(Kaiser et al., 2008; Miehe et al., 2008b). The alpine steppe is a central Asian short grass steppe
with alpine cushions and a plant cover declining from 40 % in the east to 10 % in the west
(Miehe et al., 2011). Both ecosystems are linked by an ecotone of 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in width over
2000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> length (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).</p>
      <p>Obvious features of degradation in the <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures and their ecotone are
controversially discussed as being caused by either natural abiotic and biotic processes or human
impacts (Zhou et al., 2005). The most widespread pattern are mosaics of: (i) closed <italic>Kobresia</italic>
grazing lawns (later named as intact root Mat, IM); (ii) root turf that is only sparsely vegetated
by <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> but sealed with Cyanophyceae (later named as partly degraded root Mat,
DM); and (iii) open loess and gravels that are sparely colonised by cushions, rosettes and small
grasses of the alpine steppe (later named as bare soil, BS).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p><italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pastures (in green) dominate the southeastern quarter of the
Tibetan highlands, whereas the alpine steppe covers the arid northwestern highlands. The
experimental sites Xinghai and Kema are in montane and alpine <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures, whereas
the Nam Co site is situated in the ecotone towards alpine steppe (modified after Miehe et al.,
2008b).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Assessments of pasture degradation have been either based on biotic parameters such as decreasing
vegetation cover, species diversity, productivity and forage quality, or alternatively on abiotic
factors including nutrient loss, soil compaction and ongoing soil erosion (Harris,
2010). A definition of degradation stages was given by Liu et al. (2003, in Chinese) and later on used by Zhou
et al. (2005). According to a study by Niu (1999), 30 % of the <italic>Kobresia</italic> grassland is
degraded at various levels. Holzner and Kriechbaum (2000) reported that about 30 % is in optimal
condition, about 30 % shows characteristics of overgrazing where regeneration seems to be
possible after improved utilisation and about 40 % shows recent or ancient complete
degradation. Here, we regard bare silty soil as the final degradation stage of a former
<italic>Kobresia</italic> pasture with its intact root turf. Loss of <italic>Kobresia</italic> cover goes along with
a decrease of palatable species and thus pasture quality.</p>
      <p>The general lack of data on the alpine ecology of <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures is in strong contrast
to the relevance of this ecosystem.  However, it is important not only to gain more knowledge on
single aspects of the <italic>Kobresia</italic> pasture, but especially on ecological functions of the
ecosystem.  Therefore, modelling of the effects of degradation on atmospheric processes as well as
more general analysis of interactions is necessary (Cui and Graf, 2009). Only when this challenge
has been met can the effect be investigated in climate models, both for the past, but mainly for
a future climate. The model simulations of Cui et al. (2006) clearly demonstrate that
anthropogenic land use change on the Tibetan Plateau has far reaching implications for the
Indian and East Asian summer monsoons. In order to correctly reproduce the hydrological
regime on the plateau, a spatial resolution of the order of 10 km is required (Cui et al., 2007b).
This resolution is typical for state-of-the-art weather forecast models, but is by far not
reached by any climate model simulation. This lack of scale compatibility can to some degree
be compensated by sophisticated treatment of surface energy fluxes and their impact on convective clouds.
Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify the parameters and factors
influencing the pastures and to quantify energy and matter fluxes.</p>
      <p>In order to model fluxes over <italic>Kobresia</italic> and degraded areas, it is necessary to identify
those model parameters which change significantly due to any degradation present. Three
factors could reflect these problems:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Missing vegetation: the difference is considered in the simulation through the fraction of
vegetated areas and the respective parameter differences between bare soil evaporation and
grassland evapotranspiration, as well as assimilation and respiration.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Different soil properties: due to the missing <italic>Kobresia</italic> turf, soil properties of the
upper layer might be changed: less living and dead organic material lead to poor isolation and
switch from hydrophobic to more hydrophilic properties, thus leading to higher infiltration
capacity and higher soil hydraulic conductivity.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The available energy changes mostly due to albedo differences and outgoing long-wave
radiation. Furthermore, the direct solar irradiation is much larger than diffuse radiation
compared to other regions of the world.</p></list-item></list>
We expect that degradation of vegetation and soil surface at the plot scale leads to changes of water and carbon
fluxes, as well as carbon stocks, at the ecosystem level, with consequences for the whole Tibetan
Plateau. The aim of this study was to analyse and model for the first time the water and carbon
fluxes in the above-mentioned three types of surface patterns of <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures on the
Tibetan Plateau. We combine the benefits of observing water and carbon fluxes at the plot scale,
using micro-lysimeter, chamber-based gas exchange measurements and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labelling
studies, and also simultaneously at the ecosystem scale with eddy-covariance measurements. Our model
studies are focused on land surface models, where the description of plant and soil parameters is
more explicitly parameterised than in larger-scale models. They bridge between the plot and the
ecosystem scale and simulate the influence of increasing degradation on water and carbon fluxes,
which ultimately leads to changes of cloud cover and precipitation. Explicitly simulating the impact
of changes in vegetation on turbulent surface fluxes (Gerken et al., 2012), local to regional
circulation (Gerken et al., 2014) and variability in the evolution of convective clouds and rainfall
due to different tropospheric vertical profiles (Gerken et al., 2013) allows for the assessment
of the sensitivity of the energetic and hydrological regimes on the Tibetan Plateau. Such model
simulations on the local scale serve as an important tool for the interpretation of larger scale
simulations and sensitivity studies. The current study provides a link between degradation studies
(Harris, 2010) and remote sensing and modelling for the whole Tibetan Plateau (Ma et al., 2011, 2014; Maussion et al., 2014; Shi and Liang, 2014) and climate studies (Cui et al., 2006, 2007a;
Yang et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2014).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Characteristics of the three study sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="100pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xinghai</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kema</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Nam Co </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coordinates</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>32<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 99<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 92<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>46<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N, 90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>58<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>E </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Altitude a.s.l.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3440 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4410 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">4730 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil (IUSS-ISRIC-FAO,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2006)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Haplic<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Kastanozems</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Stagnic (mollic)<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Cambisol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Stagnic Cambisols and Arenosol </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pasture type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Montane <italic>Kobresia-</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Alpine <italic>Kobresia</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Alpine steppe pastures with </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Stipa</italic> winter pas- <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>tures</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>pygmaea</italic> pastures</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">mosaic <italic>Kobresia</italic> turfs </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source for soil and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>plant types</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kaiser et al. (2008),<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Miehe et al. (2008a), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Unteregelsbacher et al. (2012), and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Hafner et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">This study, Kaiser <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>et al. (2008), Miehe <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>et al. (2011), and <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Biermann et al. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(2011, 2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Kaiser et al. (2008), and Miehe et al. (2014) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Climate period <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Climate station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1971–2000 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Xinghai <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>3323 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 99<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1971–2000 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Naqu <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4507 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>31<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 92<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>04<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1971–2000 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Baingoin <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4700 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>31<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>01<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1971–2000 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Damxung <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 91<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Annual precipitation<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">353 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">430 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">322 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">460 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean annual temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean Jul temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source for climate<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>data</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center"><uri>http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Due to the East Asian monsoon, almost all of the
precipitation falls in the summer months from May to
Sep, most frequently in the form of torrential
rain during afternoon thunderstorms.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Criteria for a differentiation of main degradation classes at Kema site and survey results.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stage</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Intact root</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Degraded root</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bare soil</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mat   (IM)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mat   (DM)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(BS)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dominant plant species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic>,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Annuals, e.g.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lichens, Algae</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>Axyris prostrata</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Root mat layer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Proportion of total surface</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">area (%, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2618</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean vegetation cover within</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>88</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>26</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (SD)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">the respective stage (%)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maximal vegetation cover</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Minimal vegetation cover</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(%)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Level difference to BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>9.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(cm, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for IM, DM, BS;  considered are only “higher graduated plants” (grasses, herbs).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study sites</title>
      <p>For the present study, measurements were taken at three study sites on the Tibetan Plateau. Details
are given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. For the experimental activities at the sites see Sect. 2.5.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?></p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><italic>Xinghai:</italic> The experimental site is located in Qinghai province in the
northeastern Tibetan Plateau, approximately 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> southwest of Xining, and about
15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> south of Xinghai city. The montane grassland has developed on a loess-covered
(1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) terrace of the Huang He River. The grassland is used as a winter pasture for yaks
and sheep for 6–7 months of the year (Miehe et al., 2008b; Unteregelsbacher et al., 2012). About
20 % of the pasture at the experiment site is completely covered with blue-green algae and
crustose lichens.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?></p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><italic>Kema:</italic> The “<italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> Research Station Kema”, established
in 2007, is located in the core area of alpine <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pasture. All measurements
were established either within or in the close surroundings of an area of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by
250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, fenced in 2009, on a pasture where grazing was restricted to a few months during
winter and spring. The growing season strongly depends on the availability of water, and usually
starts at the end of May with the onset of the monsoon and ends with longer frosts by the end of
August or September.  <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> has an average vegetation grazed height of
1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Miehe et al., 2008b) and forms a very tough felty root turf of living and dead
<italic>Kobresia</italic> roots, leaf bases and soil organic matter (Kaiser et al., 2008). It is designated
as <italic>Kobresia</italic> root mat throughout this study and attains a thickness of 14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Instrumentation of Kema site in 2010 (6 June–2 August) and 2012
(11 July–10 September, AWS: automatic weather station).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="52pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="90pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="55pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Complex 1 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Kobresia</italic> pasture, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Complex 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Kobresia</italic> pasture, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Complex 3 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>bare soil <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AWS <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Radiation and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>soil complex 2012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wind velocity and wind<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>direction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, CSAT3<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Campbell Sci. Ltd.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, CSAT3<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Campbell Sci. Ltd.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, WindSonic<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1 (Gill)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, LI-7500<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(LI-COR Biosciences)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, LI-7500 (LI-COR Biosciences)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Air temperature and<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>humidity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, HMP 45<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Vaisala)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, HMP 45<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Vaisala)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, CS 215<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Campbell Scientific<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Ltd.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient pressure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Inside Logger Box<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Vaisala)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Solar radiation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, CNR1 (Kipp &amp; Zonen)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.88 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; CNR1 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Kipp &amp; Zonen)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Pyranometer SP 110 (Apogee), NR Lite (Kipp &amp; Zonen), <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>LI 190 SB (LI-COR)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;  CNR1 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Kipp &amp; Zonen)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Precipitation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Tipping<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>bucket</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Tipping<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Bucket (Young)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Imko-TDR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Imko-TDR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Imko-TDR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.125, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25, Campbell CS 616</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Imko-TDR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil water potential</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.125 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25, Campbell 257-L</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.075, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.125,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Pt 100 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.075, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.125,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Pt 100 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.075, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.125, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Pt 100 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.075 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.125,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Pt 100 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.075, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.125, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.175, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Pt 100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil heat flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15, HP3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15, HP3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15, HP3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2, HP3, Hukseflux</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> This complex was used due to the higher data
availability. There was no difference between the two
instruments.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The site is covered with <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> (Cyperaceae), accompanied by other monocotyledons
(<italic>Carex ivanoviae</italic>, <italic>Carex</italic> spp., <italic>Festuca</italic> spec., <italic>Kobresia pusilla</italic>,
<italic>Poa</italic> spp., <italic>Stipa purpurea</italic>) and to a minor degree by perennial herbs. For more
details on the species diversity see Biermann et al. (2011, 2013).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><italic>Nam Co:</italic> The “Nam Co Monitoring and Research Station for Multisphere
Interactions” (NAMORS) of the Institute of <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Tibetan<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?><?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Plateau<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?><?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Research<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> of the Chinese Academy of
Science (Ma et al., 2008) is located within an intramontane basin, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> SE of Lake Nam Co
and in approximately 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distance NNW of the foot of the Nyainqentanglha mountain
range. The zonal vegetation comprises mosaics of <italic>Kobresia</italic> turfs and open alpine steppe;
water surplus sites have degraded Cyperaceae swamps (Mügler et al., 2010; Wei et al., 2012;
Miehe et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The three defined vegetation classes: <bold>(a)</bold> intact root Mat (IM); <bold>(b)</bold>
degraded root Mat (DM); and <bold>(c)</bold> bare soil (BS).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Classification of the degradation classes\hack{\\} at Kema site}?><title>Classification of the degradation classes<?xmltex \hack{\\}?> at Kema site</title>
      <p>At the Kema site a patchy structure of different degradation stages exists, which were
classified according to the following classes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>): intact root Mat (IM), degraded root
Mat (DM) and bare soil (BS).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Intact root Mat (IM)</title>
      <p>Although this degradation class is named as IM in this study, according to the definition of Miehe
et al. (2008b) it is already degraded. Closed <italic>Kobresia</italic> mats are normally characterized as
90–98 % cover of <italic>Kobresia pygmaea,</italic> and additionally occurring biennial rosette species
(Miehe et al., 2008b), which is not the case at Kema site. Nevertheless, soil is covered completely
with the characteristic root turf of these Cyperaceae communities and a fairly closed cover of
vegetation can be observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Degraded root Mat (DM)</title>
      <p>For the DM class, not only is the spatial cover of <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> much lower (less than
26 %), but also the proportion of crusts compared to IM is much higher; the root turf is still
present. Crusts were formed by Cyanophyceae (blue algae, Miehe et al., 2008b; Unteregelsbacher
et al., 2012) and were a characteristic property of this classification.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Bare soil (BS)</title>
      <p>In contrast to IM and DM, this surface class is missing the dense root turf and <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> completely, resulting in a height step change. Most of the surface is
unvegetated, nevertheless annual and perennial plants still occur, e.g. <italic>Lancea tibetica</italic> and
<italic>Saussurea stoliczkai</italic>, described as endemic biennial rosettes and endemic plants with
rhizomes, adapted to soil movement and the occurrence of trampling (Miehe et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>These classes co-exist on scales which are too small to be resolved by the eddy-covariance method.
Therefore we conducted a field survey within the eddy-covariance footprint to estimate
their spatial abundance (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The degradation classes were recorded at a defined area of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over
a regular grid according to the step point method (Evans and Love, 1957), yielding a total of 2618
observations. The proportion of total surface area is then calculated from the frequency of a given
class vs. the total number of sampling points.
With a <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> cover of approximately 65 %, an area of 16 %
crust-covered turf as well as 19 % bare soil spots, the main study site is considered to be
a typical alpine <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pasture with a low to medium degradation state (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Instrumentation of NamCo site in 2009 (25 June–8 August, only relevant
instruments are shown).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Device</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Type/manufacturer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Height</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ultrasonic anemometer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CSAT3 (Campbell Scientific Ltd.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gas analyser</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LI-7500 (LI-COR Biosciences)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature–humidity sensor</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HMP 45 (Vaisala)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Net radiometer</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CM3 &amp; CG3 (Kipp&amp;Zonen)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rain gauge</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tipping bucket</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil moisture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Imko-TDR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pt100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Logger</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CR5000 (Campbell Scientific Ltd.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Measuring methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Micrometeorological measurements</title>
      <p>The measurements of the water and carbon fluxes with the eddy-covariance (EC) method were conducted
at the Nam Co site in 2009 and at the Kema site in 2010. The EC towers were equipped with CSAT3 sonic
anemometers (Campbell Sci. Inc.) and LI-7500 (LI-COR Biosciences) gas analysers. The complete
instrumentation, including radiation and soil sensors, is given in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>
and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>; for more details see
Zhou et al. (2011) and Biermann et al. (2011, 2013).</p>
      <p>Turbulent fluxes were calculated and quality controlled based on micrometeorological standards
(Aubinet et al., 2012) through the application of the software package TK2/TK3 developed at the
University of Bayreuth (Mauder and Foken, 2004, 2011). This includes all necessary data correction
and data quality tools (Foken et al., 2012a), was approved by comparison with other commonly
used software packages (Mauder et al., 2008; Fratini and Mauder, 2014), and calculated fluxes
match up-to-date micrometeorological standards (Foken et al., 2012a; Rebmann et al., 2012).
It also offers a quality flagging system evaluating stationarity and development of
turbulence (Foken and Wichura, 1996; Foken et al., 2004).  Furthermore, a footprint analysis was
performed (Göckede et al., 2004, 2006), which showed that the footprint area was within the
classified land use type. This finding is in agreement with the results obtained by
Zhou et al. (2011) for the Nam Co site.</p>
      <p>For the interpretation of the results, the so-called un-closure of the surface energy balance
(Foken, 2008) with eddy-covariance data must be taken into account, especially when comparing
eddy-covariance measurements with models that close the energy balance, like SEWAB (Kracher et al.,
2009), or when comparing evapotranspiration sums with micro-lysimeter measurements. For the Nam Co site
Zhou et al. (2011) found that only 70 % of the available energy (net radiation minus ground heat
flux) contributes to the sensible and latent heat flux, which is similar to the findings of other
authors for the Tibetan Plateau (Tanaka et al., 2001; Yang et al., 2004). For the Nam Co 2009 data
set we found a closure of 80 %, while both eddy-covariance measurements in Kema 2010 showed
a closure of 73 %. Following recent experimental studies, we assume that the missing energy is
to a large extent part of the sensible heat flux (Foken et al., 2011; Charuchittipan et al., 2014),
which was also postulated from a model study (Ingwersen et al., 2011). We thus corrected the
turbulent fluxes for the missing energy according to the percentage of sensible and latent heat flux
contributing to the buoyancy flux according to Charuchittipan
et al. (2014), Eqns 21–23 therein. This
correction method attributes most of the residual to the sensible heat flux depending on the Bowen
ratio (see Charuchittipan et al., 2014, Fig. 8 therein). For the measured range of Bowen ratios from 0.12 (5 % quantile) to 3.3
(95 % quantile), 37 to 2 % of the available energy was moved to the latent heat flux.
For Kema in 2010, this is equal to an addition of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> missing energy to the latent
heat flux on average. In contrast, eddy-covariance-derived net ecosystem exchange (NEE) fluxes were not corrected (Foken et al.,
2012a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Soil hydrological measurements</title>
      <p>In order to directly assess hydrological properties of the different degradation stages we used
small weighing micro-lysimeters as a well-established tool to monitor evapotranspiration,
infiltration and volumetric soil water content (Wieser et al., 2008; van den Bergh et al., 2013). As
it was necessary to allow for quick installation with minimum disturbance, we developed a technique
based on near-natural monoliths extracted in transparent plexiglass tubes (diameter 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
length 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The monoliths were visually examined for intactness of the soil structure and
artificial water pathways along the sidewall and then reinserted in their natural place inside
a protecting outer tube (inner diameter 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>A general problem with soil monoliths is the disruption of the flow paths to the lower soil horizons
leading to artificially high water saturation in the lower part of the monolith (Ben-Gal and Shani,
2002; Gee et al., 2009). This was prevented by applying a constant suction with 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
a hanging water column maintained by a spread bundle of 20 glass wicks (2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter)
leading through the bottom plate into a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> long downward pipe (15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
diameter). Drained water was collected in a 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ml</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> PE bottle.</p>
      <p>Micro-lysimeters were set up in June 2010 on four subplots inside the fenced area of the Kema site
at a distance of 20 to 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the eddy-covariance station. On each subplot one
micro-lysimeter was installed in IM and one in BS at a maximum distance of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. All
micro-lysimeters were weighed every 2 to 10 days with a precision hanging balance from 23 June to
5 September 2010 and from 2 June to 5 September 2012. Soil cores (3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter,
30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth) were taken near every micro-lysimeter on 29 June 2010. The soil samples were
weighed fresh and after drying in the laboratory at Lhasa. By relating the given water content to
the weight of the corresponding micro-lysimeter at that date, we were able to calculate volumetric
soil water content for each micro-lysimeter over the whole measuring period. Further details
about the micro-lysimeter technique and set-up are given by Biermann et al. (2013).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Soil gas exchange measurements</title>
      <p>In 2012, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux measurements were conducted with an automatic
chamber system from LI-COR
Biosciences (Lincoln, NE, USA). This LI-COR long-term chamber system contains a LI-8100 Infrared Gas
Analyser (LI-COR Lincoln, NE, USA), is linked with an automated multiplexing system (LI-8150) and
two automated chambers, one opaque and the other transparent for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and net ecosystem
exchange (NEE), respectively. The chambers are equipped with a fully automatically rotating arm that
moves the chamber 180<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> away from the collar and therefore ensures undisturbed patterns of
precipitation, temperature and radiation. Furthermore, by moving the chamber in-between measurements
the soil and vegetation itself experiences less disturbance. The applied LI-COR chambers were
compared during a separate experiment against eddy-covariance measurements by Riederer
et al. (2014).  Besides differences – mainly under stable atmospheric stratification – the
comparison was satisfactory in daytime.</p>
      <p>The three surface types IM, DM and BS were investigated with respect to their <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes
between 30 July and 26 August 2012 at Kema. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-flux measurements of the three
treatments were conducted consecutively. Therefore, the long-term chambers were moved to a patch
representing the surface of interest. Measurements were conducted for 5 to 9 days before
rotating to another location, starting from IM (30 July–7 August), continuing at BS (7–15 August),
DM (15–21 August) and ending again at IM (21–26 August).</p>
      <p>Intact root Mat has been measured twice during the observation period to provide information about
possible changes in the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, due to changing meteorological
parameters. The two measurements will be denoted as IM period 1 and IM period 4. Note that during
the measurement of IM period 4, other collars than during IM period 1 have been investigated.
Nevertheless, the patches selected for the collar installation consisted of the same plant
community, and showed the same soil characteristics. Because of lack of time the other two surfaces
BS and DM were only measured once, but for as long as possible to gather sufficient information on
diurnal cycles for these treatments.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{{$\chem{{}^{{13}}C}$} labelling}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labelling</title>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse labelling experiments were used to trace allocation of assimilated C in the
shoot–root–soil system in a montane <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pasture 2009 in Xinghai (Hafner
et al., 2012) and in alpine <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pasture 2010 in Kema (Ingrisch et al., 2014).
Plots (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with plants were labelled with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in transparent chambers over 4 h at the periods of maximal <italic>Kobresia</italic>
growth in summer. Afterwards, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was traced
in the plant–soil system over a period of 2
months with increasing sampling intervals (10 times).</p>
      <p>Aboveground biomass was clipped and belowground pools were sampled with a soil core (0–5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
5–15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and in Xinghai additionally in 15–30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). After drying and sieving
(2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), two belowground pools were separated into soil and roots. As the only means of
obtaining measurements of soil <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and its <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a remote location,
the static alkali absorption method with installation of NaOH traps was used (Lundegardh, 1921;
Singh and Gupta, 1977; Hafner et al., 2012).  Natural <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance in the pools of
plant–soil systems, including <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, was sampled with a similar procedure on
unlabelled spots. Total carbon and nitrogen content and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the samples were
analysed with an Isotope-Ratio Mass Spectrometer.  All details of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse
labelling experiments were described in Hafner et al. (2012) and Ingrisch et al. (2014). All data
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labelling experiments are presented as means <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard errors. The
significance of differences was analysed by ANOVA at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer models</title>
      <p>We conducted model experiments in order to estimate the impact of the defined degradation classes on
water and carbon fluxes, including feedback on atmospheric circulation. Therefore three 1-D
soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer models were utilised to examine evapotranspiration
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1"/>), carbon fluxes (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2"/>),
and surface feedbacks (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3"/>).
While the first two models were driven by measured standard meteorological forcing
data, the latter is fully coupled to the atmosphere, which allows
for feedbacks of land surface exchange to the atmosphere.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Evapotranspiration – the SEWAB model</title>
      <p>To model the sensible and latent heat flux (evapotranspiration) the 1-D soil–vegetation–atmosphere
transfer scheme SEWAB (Surface Energy and WAter Balance model) was applied (Mengelkamp et al., 1999,
2001). The soil temperature distribution is solved by the diffusion equation and vertical movement
of soil water is described by the Richards equation (Richards, 1931).  Relationships between soil
moisture characteristics are given by Clapp and Hornberger (1978). Atmospheric exchange is given by
bulk approaches, taking into account aerodynamic and thermal roughness lengths with respect to
atmospheric stability (Louis, 1979). The latent heat flux is split up into vegetated surface flux
and bare soil evaporation. The flux from vegetation is composed of wet foliage evaporation and
transpiration of dry leaves. For the latter, the stomata resistance is constrained by minimum
resistance and stress factors in a Jarvis-type scheme (Noilhan and Planton, 1989). In contrast to
many other SVAT models, SEWAB parameterises all energy balance components separately and closes the
energy balance by an iteration for the surface temperature using Brent's method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Carbon dioxide exchange – the SVAT-CN</title>
      <p>The model SVAT-CN (Reichstein, 2001; Falge et al., 2005) simulates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas
exchange of vegetation and soil. It consists of a 1-D canopy model
(Caldwell et al., 1986; Tenhunen
et al., 1995), a 1-D soil physical model of water and heat fluxes (Moldrup et al., 1989, 1991), and
a model of root water uptake (Reichstein, 2001). The model has been further developed with respect
to soil gas emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from forest, grassland, and fallow (Reth
et al., 2005a, b, c). In combination with a <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>3-D<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> model, it has been used to simulate vertical
profiles of latent heat exchange and successfully compared to vertical profiles of latent heat
exchange in a spruce forest canopy (Staudt et al., 2011; Foken et al., 2012b). Plant canopy and
soil are represented by several horizontally homogeneous layers, for which microclimate and gas
exchange is computed. The soil module simulates unsaturated water flow according to Richards
equation (Richards, 1931) parameterised with van Genuchten (1980) soil hydraulic
parameters. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photosynthesis is modelled using the basic formulation described by
Farquhar et al. (1980). Stomatal conductance is linked linearly to assimilation and environmental
controls via the Ball–Berry equation (Ball et al., 1987). The slope of this equation (gfac) is
modelled depending on soil matrix potential (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the main root layer.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Experimental setup during the different experiments, with the corresponding measuring technique and
the degree of degradation, (intact root Mat: IM, degraded root Mat: DM, bare soil: BS, alpine
steppe: AS).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Eddy-covariance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Micro-lysimeter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Chamber <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">flux LI-8100,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">labelling,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NEE)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chasing</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plot area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>   (footprint)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.018 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.031 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xinghai 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IM, DM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nam Co   2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kema 2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65 % IM, 16 % DM, 19 % BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IM, BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IM, DM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kema 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IM, BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">IM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, DM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, BS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> From 30 July to 7 August and from 21 to 26 August<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> From 7 to 15 August<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> From 15 to 21 August
</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6"><caption><p>Overview of model scenarios conducted with SEWAB and SVAT-CN for Kema site, periods 2010 and 2012
and Nam Co 2009. The numbers for vegetation fraction and the tile approach have been derived by the
classification survey described in Sect. 2.2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.9}[.9]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Proportion of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Vegetation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total surface area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cover</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">parameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100 % Alpine steppe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Nam Co AS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100 % IM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Kema RM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100 % DM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Kema RM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100 % BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Kema BS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tile approach:</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of the models SEWAB and SVAT-CN against eddy-covariance and chamber
measurements, using the squared Pearson correlation coefficient r<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as slope and
offset of the linear regression; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of observations</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Comparison</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Class</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Variable</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Unit</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">r<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Offset</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nam Co 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC vs. SEWAB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 min ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">572</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC vs. SVAT-CN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Median NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">124</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kema 2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC vs. SEWAB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RefEC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 min ET</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">577</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">EC vs. SVAT-CN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RefEC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Median NEE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">124</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kema 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chamber vs.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">IM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 min NEE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">537</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SVAT-CN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 min NEE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">363</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 min NEE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">195</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ET at Nam Co 2009 is already published by Biermann et al. (2014), offset recalculated in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Hourly medians from an ensemble diurnal cycle over the entire period <?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Both period 1 and period 4
</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <title>2-D atmospheric model – ATHAM</title>
      <p>For estimation of surface feedbacks the Hybrid vegetation dynamics and biosphere model
(Friend et al., 1997; Friend and Kiang, 2005) was utilised, which is coupled to the
cloud-resolving Active Tracer High-resolution Atmospheric Model (ATHAM, Oberhuber et al., 1998;
Herzog et al., 2003). In a separate work (Gerken et al., 2012),
the SEWAB model compared well with Hybrid. The fully coupled system was successful
in simulating surface–atmosphere
interactions, mesoscale circulations and convective evolution in the Nam Co basin (Gerken et al.,
2013, 2014). In a coupled simulation, surface fluxes of energy and moisture interact with the flow
field. At the same time, wind speed as well as clouds, which modify the surface radiation balance,
provide a feedback to the surface and modify turbulent fluxes. Such simulations can produce
a complex system of interactions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Problems of land surface modelling on\hack{\\} the Tibetan Plateau}?><title>Problems of land surface modelling on<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> the Tibetan Plateau</title>
      <p>Land surface modelling of energy and carbon dioxide exchange faces specific problems on the Tibetan
Plateau. Most influential is the strong diurnal cycle of the surface temperature, observed in dry
conditions over bare soil or very low vegetation, leading to overestimation of surface sensible heat
flux (Yang et al., 2009; Hong et al., 2010) caused by too high turbulent diffusion
coefficients. Land surface models usually parameterise these coefficients by a fixed fraction
between the roughness length of momentum and heat, however, Yang et al. (2003) and Ma et al. (2002)
observed a diurnal variation of the thermal roughness length on the Tibetan Plateau. As another
special feature, land surface models tend to underestimate bare soil evaporation in semiarid areas
(e.g. Agam et al., 2004; Balsamo et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>Especially the <italic>Kobresia</italic> mats are characterised by changing fractions of vegetation cover
and partly missing root mats, exposing almost bare soil with properties different from the turf
below the <italic>Kobresia</italic>. From investigations of soil vertical
heterogeneity by Yang et al. (2005) it can be concluded that such variations will significantly
influence the exchange processes, posing a challenge for land surface modelling.
The models have therefore been adapted to these conditions and specific
parameter sets have been elaborated from field measurements for Nam Co and Kema (Gerken et al.,
2012; Biermann et al., 2014), see Appendix A for more details.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Experimental and modelling concept</title>
      <p>Experimental investigations on the Tibetan Plateau are not comparable with typical meteorological
and ecological experiments. Not only do the high altitude and the remoteness of the area impose limitations,
but also unforeseeable administrative regulations challenge the organisation of experiments with
different groups and large equipment. It was initially planned to investigate small degraded plots
with chambers and micro-lysimeters and to use a larger plot, in the size of the eddy-covariance
footprint, as a reference area to investigate the daily fluctuations of the evaporation and carbon
dioxide flux. Due to customs and permit problems, this was unfortunately only partly possible at
Kema site in 2010, and not at all during the main chamber experiment in 2012.</p>
      <p>Therefore, model-specific
parameters were investigated in 2012 and the models were adapted to the specific Tibetan conditions
with the chamber data. These model versions were then tested with the eddy-covariance data in 2010
at the Kema site with nearly intact <italic>Kobresia</italic> cover.
Forced with measured atmospheric conditions, these simulations are used to examine
the differences among degradation
classes in carbon and water exchange between surface and atmosphere. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labelling
studies enabled us to relate the differences in carbon exchange to the specific
vegetation and soil compartments. Finally, a surface scheme coupled with a meso-scale atmospheric
model served to estimate feedbacks of surface forcing on the atmosphere.
A summary of the experimental setup
according to measurement technique is given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>.</p>
      <p>In accordance with this concept, we adapted both SEWAB and SVAT-CN to the Kema site using the
vegetation and soil parameters elaborated in 2012, and chamber measurements from 2012 for
calibration. Two parameter sets were established: one for surfaces with root mat (Kema RM: IM and DM
differ only in vegetation fraction), and one for BS conditions (Kema BS). Simulations with in situ
measured atmospheric forcing data were performed specifically for each of the degradation classes
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to the definition in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. These
model runs serve to expand the chamber data beyond their measurement period, and we are now able to
compare the class-specific fluxes over a 46-day period (12 July to 26 August 2012).</p>
      <p>Furthermore, we compared the adapted model versions with eddy-covariance data from 2010 using the
respective forcing data measured in situ in 2010. The eddy-covariance measurements integrate the
fluxes from a source area ranging 50–200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> around the instrument (for detailed
footprint analysis see Biermann et al., 2011, 2013), and therefore represent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from IM, DM and BS according to their proportion of total surface area in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. In order to ensure comparability, we reproduce this composition with the simulations as well
using the tile approach (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). An overview of model scenarios conducted at the Kema site
is given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T6"/>.</p>
      <p>The differences in flux simulations among the degradation stages were controlled by the variation
of the vegetation fraction and soil properties. A consistent parameter set for several experiments
and multiple target variables (evapotranspiration, net/gross ecosystem exchange, ecosystem respiration)
is a necessary pre-condition to ensure that the model physics implemented reflect these changes in a realistic manner.
Therefore we abstained from optimising the parameter space, but used parameter estimates from
field and laboratory measurements as far as possible (Appendix A), and inevitable calibration
has been done for SVAT-CN by scaling the leaf area index with a single factor as well as a complete
set of leaf physiology parameters.</p>
      <p>For the investigation of the impact of surface degradation on the
atmosphere, it was decided to run
a relatively simple numerical experiment prescribing a symmetric, two-dimensional Tibetan valley
with 150 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> width, and surrounded by Gaussian hills with 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> altitude. A sounding
taken at Nam Co on 17 July 2012 was used as the initial profile. The setup is comparable to Gerken
et al. (2013, 2014). A total of four cases were chosen for this preliminary analysis. A dry scenario
with initial soil moisture of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field capacity and a wet scenario with soil moisture at
field capacity, as might be the case during the monsoon season, were used. For both surface states,
simulations were performed with a vegetation cover of 25 and 75 % corresponding to
a degraded and intact soil-mat scenario.</p>
      <p>The study is limited by conceptual restrictions, which are mainly due to the scale problem in the different
compartments (Foken et al., 2012b, see Appendix of this paper) and the working conditions in remote
and high altitudes. Only one more-or-less uniform type of degradation has been investigated within
the footprint area of the eddy-covariance measurements (Göckede et al., 2006) of
50–200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> extent, which is, in the case of this study, an almost non-degraded
<italic>Kobresia</italic> pasture. The other types could only be found on much smaller plots, and had no
significant influence on the whole footprint area, even when the non-linear influence of
the different land-cover areas on the fluxes of the larger area is considered (Mölders, 2012).  However, the
investigation of degraded stages could only be done with small-scale measurements,
such as those obtained with chambers and
micro-lysimeters.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>We used separate
experiments in 2009 (Nam Co) and 2010 (Kema) to validate models against eddy-covariance data
(Sect. 3.1). These models were compared in 2012 against micro-lysimeters (Sect. 3.2) and
against chambers (Sect. 3.3). The specific results – in the sense of our research questions –
are given in Sects. 3.4–3.6.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Comparison of eddy-covariance flux measurements with modelled fluxes</title>
      <p>In order to test the performance of evapotranspiration (ET) with SEWAB and net ecosystem exchange
(NEE) with SVAT-CN, we compared the model results for Kema with the eddy-covariance measurements
from 2010 (Sect. 2.5). The results show that SEWAB simulations represent the half-hourly measured
turbulent fluxes at Kema generally well (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T7"/>, see scatter plots and diurnal cycles in the
Appendix, Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F5"/>).
Model performance at Nam Co for the measurements in 2009 was very similar, as well as
the magnitude of the fluxes (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T7"/>, from Biermann et al., 2014).
Measured hourly medians (from an ensemble diurnal cycle over the entire period) of NEE at Kema ranged
between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.8 and 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the course of the day, whereas modelled
medians reached a minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0 and a maximum of 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the
model overestimated the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, especially in the midday hours, the correlation between
hourly medians of model output and measured NEE was generally realistic (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T7"/>).
Compared to Kema data, mean diurnal
patterns of measured and modelled NEE at Nam Co site showed smaller fluxes and less variation. Measured hourly
medians of NEE ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 and 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the course of the
day, and modelled medians between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 and 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T7"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Evapotranspiration (ET) derived with SEWAB and with micro-lysimeter measurements at Kema in
2010 (33 days: 23 June–25 July) and Kema in 2012 (40 days: 16 July–24 August) for intact root
mat (IM), degraded root Mat (DM) and bare soil (BS). Hatched bars denote the simulated evaporation
(Ev) as part of the total simulated ET, the remainder is transpiration. Black lines on top of the
bars for the micro-lysimeter illustrate standard deviations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Class-specific comparison of evapotranspiration\hack{\\} with micro-lysimeter measurements
and\hack{\\} SEWAB simulations}?><title>Class-specific comparison of evapotranspiration<?xmltex \hack{\\}?> with micro-lysimeter measurements
and<?xmltex \hack{\\}?> SEWAB simulations</title>
      <p>Daily evapotranspiration (ET) of the <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> ecosystem was about
2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during dry periods and increased to 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after sufficient
precipitation (not shown). This was confirmed with small weighable
micro-lysimeters giving a direct measure of ET from small soil columns over several days and SEWAB
simulations. For a 33-day period at Kema 2010, ET for both micro-lysimeter and simulations varied
around 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, reflecting drier conditions, while in 2012 the micro-lysimeter showed
a maximum ET of 2.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at BS, and the simulations 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at IM
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). In both periods, the lysimeter measurements do not differ significantly between IM and BS
(two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The model results support this finding in general, as they
are within the 95 % confidence interval (1.96 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error) of the lysimeter
measurements in three cases; however they differ significantly from the lysimeter measurements
for IM in 2012. The model results suggest that even
for dense vegetation cover (IM), a considerable part of ET stems from evaporation. At DM
and BS, transpiration of the small aboveground part of <italic>Kobresia</italic> is lower, but it is
compensated by evaporation. Therefore, the water balance is mainly driven by physical factors,
i.e. atmospheric evaporative demand and soil water content.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of measured and modelled daily carbon exchange sums from 31 July to
25 August 2012 at Kema. Hatched bars denote the simulated gross ecosystem exchange (GEE) and
ecosystem respiration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the sum is the net ecosystem exchange (NEE, coloured
bars). The four periods represent different stages of vegetation degradation (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Leaf
physiology and soil respiration was parameterised for best representation of the gas exchange
chamber data over the entire time period (see Sect. 2.5.2). Missing dates indicate days when
chambers were set up or relocated to another treatment.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Class-specific comparison of carbon fluxes with\hack{\\} chamber measurements and SVAT-CN
simulations}?><title>Class-specific comparison of carbon fluxes with<?xmltex \hack{\\}?> chamber measurements and SVAT-CN
simulations</title>
      <p>During the Kema 2012 campaign, the carbon fluxes for different degradation levels were investigated
with chamber-based gas exchange measurements. Parallel measurements could not be established due to
instrumental limitations, therefore the SVAT-CN model is utilised to compare the degradation classes
over the whole period. In order to adapt SVAT-CN to the chamber measurements, the parameters of leaf
physiology and soil respiration have been set to values that accommodate the different vegetation
types and cover of the plots (Appendix A, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T2"/>).</p>
      <p>Daily sums of ecosystem respiration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over IM were overestimated by the model
during period 1, but underestimated during the second setup over IM (period 4); see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.
This might be attributable to a difference in leaf area index (LAI) between the rings for period 1 and period 4,
as they differed in biomass content at the end of the measurement campaign
(Ring P1, NEE chamber: 3.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and P4, NEE chamber: 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The model has been
adapted to both periods with one parameter set in order to reflect average conditions. Overall,
the model predicted a mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for IM, whereas the
mean of the chamber data yielded 2.31 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the chamber setup over bare
soil (BS, period 2), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were, on average, represented well by the model (on average
0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as compared to the data average of
0.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly, for DM (period 3) modelled
(1.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and measured (1.69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) average
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared well. Analogous patterns were found for daily sums of gross ecosystem
exchange (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GEE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NEE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): under- and overestimations of the daily
sums characterised the setups over IM (period 1 and 4), but were compensated to some extent when
analysing period 1 and 4 together (modelled average GEE <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.39 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
measured average GEE <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.96 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Average modelled GEE over BS with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared well to measured GEE for period 2
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Over DM, the average modelled GEE was
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and measured GEE showed an average of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.94 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The model performance with respect to 30 min NEE is
shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T7"/>, scatter plots of the regression are given in a supplement.</p>
      <p>The mean carbon fluxes derived from SVAT-CN simulations for the different degradation classes over
the vegetation period are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. A noticeable carbon uptake of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.89 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for IM reduces to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 for BS and even shifts to a weak
release of 0.2 at DM. This is mainly related to a drop in GEE by 83 % for BS and 64 % for
DM, compared to IM (100 %). While <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for BS is reduced by 66 %, it only reduces by
12 % for DM, leading to the small net release already mentioned.</p>
      <p>Cumulative NEE was calculated applying the four different model setups previously described: IM; DM
and BS stages of <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures at Kema; and alpine steppe (AS) ecosystem at Nam Co
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The simulation period ranged from the period 12 July to 26 August 2012. For this period, only
the IM stage showed significant carbon uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>133 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. DM and BS ecosystems were
more or less carbon neutral (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake at BS, and 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release
at DM). The model for AS resulted in a carbon loss of 24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the investigated
period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Distribution of the assimilated carbon in \textit{Kobresia}\hack{\\} pastures and the soil}?><title>Distribution of the assimilated carbon in <italic>Kobresia<?xmltex \hack{\\}?></italic> pastures and the soil</title>
      <p>The results from two <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse labelling experiments at Xinghai 2009 (Hafner et al.,
2012) and Kema 2010 (Ingrisch et al., 2014) show the distribution of assimilated carbon (C) in
a montane and alpine <italic>Kobresia</italic> pasture (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>).  The study in Xinghai showed that C
translocation was different on plots where vegetation had changed from Cyperaceae to Poaceae
dominance, induced by grazing cessation. Less assimilated C was stored in belowground pools. The
study in Kema showed that roots within the turf layer act as the main sink for recently assimilated
C (65 %) and as the most dynamic part of the ecosystem in terms of C turnover. This is also the
main difference between the experiments on the two sites as in the case of the alpine pasture (Kema)
more C was allocated belowground than in montane pasture, where such a turf layer does not exist.
However, as the experiments were conducted
under different conditions and in consecutive years, a comparison of absolute values is not possible
as the determined C fraction varies also throughout the growing season (Swinnen et al., 1994;
Kuzyakov and Domanski, 2000).</p>
      <p>At Kema, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labelling was furthermore coupled with eddy-covariance measurements to
determine the absolute values of the carbon distribution in the plants, roots and the soil following
a method developed by Riederer (2014): The relative C distribution within the various pools
of the ecosystem, at the end of the allocation period (i.e. when the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixing reaches a steady state,
in our case 15 days after the labelling) was multiplied with a nearly steady-state daily carbon uptake measured
with the eddy-covariance method. Besides the determination of absolute values,
the continuous observation of the exchange
regime with the EC confirms that the pulse labelling was conducted under atmospheric conditions
similar to those of the whole allocation period. This leads to more representativeness of the
result of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labelling experiment, which could not be repeated due to the short
vegetation period
and restricted access to this remote area. Please note that repetitions
have been carried out, leading to standard errors as depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Influence of plant cover on convection\hack{\\} and precipitation}?><title>Influence of plant cover on convection<?xmltex \hack{\\}?> and precipitation</title>
      <p>For investigating the influence of degradation on the development of convection and precipitation,
the ATHAM model was applied for 25 % (V25) and 75 % (V75) plant cover at the Nam Co basin,
with each of these in a dry and a wet scenario. From Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> it becomes immediately apparent that wet
surface conditions are associated with higher deposited precipitation. At the same time,
near-surface relative humidities are higher (not shown). For both the dry and wet cases an earlier
cloud and convection development is observed for the less vegetated surface: simulations produce
higher cloud cover and more convection from 10:00 local mean time (LMT) onward. At Nam Co we
observed the frequent development of locally generated convective systems at similar hours in the
field. Thus clouds block more incoming solar radiation between 10:00 and 14:00 LMT, the time with
the potentially highest short-wave radiation forcing, for the less vegetated system compared to the
intact vegetation scenario.  Consequently, simulated surface temperatures were higher for the V75
scenario, leading to higher surface fluxes and a stronger simulated convection development over the
day as a whole. A potential albedo effect can be excluded since the observed albedo of the vegetated
surface is similar to that of the bare surface and surface temperatures remain virtually identical
until convection develops.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Simulated carbon fluxes at Kema in 2012 (46 days: 12 July to 26 August 2012) for IM, DM,
and BS. Hatched bars denote the simulated GEE and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eco</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the sum is the NEE (brown
bar).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The mechanism for this process is presumably that the vegetation cover reduces bare soil
evaporation. At the same time, higher surface temperatures due to higher radiation input result in
both larger sensible and latent heat fluxes in the afternoon hours, while the plant cover is able to
access water that is not available for surface evaporation.</p>
      <p>This hypothesis obviously needs to be investigated more thoroughly with field observations and
simulations, but the findings indicate that changes in surface conditions can affect convective
dynamics and local weather. This preliminary investigation of vegetation–atmosphere feedbacks did
not take into account any spatial patterns in surface degradation that may result in larger patches
with different surface conditions that may then affect circulation. However, such circulation
effects are typically found in modelling studies using patch sizes with length scales that are
several times the boundary-layer height.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Simulation of different degradation states</title>
      <p>The results for the different degradation states allow the simulation of the NEE and
evapotranspiration for a gradual change from IM to BS using a tile approach of the fluxes (Avissar
and Pielke, 1989). Such a tile approach is exemplarily shown for different percentages of the
ecosystem types IM and BS for a 46 days period in July and August 2012 at Kema site, with simulated
NEE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a) and evapotranspiration (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b).
As expected from the cumulative carbon gains for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> developed the largest carbon
sink over the investigated summer period, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is nearly carbon neutral in summer
and a source for longer periods. The intermediate stages showed decreasing average carbon uptake
with increasing amount of bare soil. Diurnal variability is largest for 100 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and smallest for 100 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ecosystem, as indicated by the interquartile
ranges in the box plot.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Model results of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) over 46 days of July and August 2012 at
Kema. <bold>(a)</bold>: mean diurnal cycle, and <bold>(b)</bold>: cumulative NEE. The four lines represent
different stages of vegetation degradation (IM, DM, BS, and AS).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning and distribution of recently allocated C within the various
pools, namely <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, shoot respiration, shoots, roots and soil for Xinghai site
(grazed and ungrazed) in 2009 and Kema site (IM) in 2010, determined at the end of a 29 day and 15
day allocation period, respectively. Vertical lines in the bars denote standard errors (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
Xinghai 2009 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Kema 2010).
Total fluxes of C in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the
different C pools at Kema site are based on the combination of eddy-covariance measurements and
labelling. Shoot respiration is not measured, but determined as difference between the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery at the first sampling and the sampling at the end of the allocation
period. First sampling in Xinghai was 1 day after the labelling and in Kema at the labelling
day. Figure modified after Hafner et al. (2012) and Ingrisch et al. (2014).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Simulated convection development and deposited precipitation (blue bars) for a symmetric
Tibetan Valley with 150 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> width. The black lines indicate cloud base and cloud top in
kilometres above ground level; the dashed line shows the centre of the cloud mass and the contours
give the mean cloud water and ice concentration integrated over the model domain. V25 and V75
refer to 25 % and 75 % vegetation cover, while wet and dry indicate initial soil moisture
corresponding to 1.0 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field capacity, respectively. Times are given in local mean time (LMT), which is two hours before Beijing standard time (CST).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Modelled daily net ecosystem exchange (top, NEE) and modelled daily evapotranspiration (bottom,
ET) for 46 days (12 July to 26 August 2012) at Kema (varying combination of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): box plot with median, 25 % and 75 % quartiles; bars represent quartiles
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 times interquartile range.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Evapotranspiration decreases from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this model degradation
experiment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b), but
this reduction is small compared to the overall day-to-day variability and is not supported by the
lysimeter measurements (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). Therefore a change in mean ET due to degradation cannot be
confirmed in this study. The day-to-day variability, however, increases from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This is connected to a larger
variability of simulated soil moisture in the uppermost layer, as the turf layer retains more water
due to its higher field <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>capacity<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> and lower soil hydraulic conductivity, and the roots can extract
water for transpiration from lower soil layers as well.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Increasing degradation of the <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> turf significantly reduces the carbon uptake
and the function of <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures as a carbon sink, while the influence on the
evapotranspiration is less dominant. However, the shift from transpiration to evaporation was found
to have a significant influence on the starting time of convection and cloud and precipitation
generation: convection above a degraded surface occurs before noon instead of after noon.  Due to the dominant direct solar radiation on the Tibetan Plateau, the early-generated
cloud cover reduces the energy input and therefore the surface temperatures. Therefore the
degradation state of the <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures has a significant influence on the water and
carbon cycle and, in consequence, on the climate system. Due to the relevance of the Tibetan Plateau
on the global circulation changes, the surface properties on the highland have influences on larger
scales. These changes in the water and carbon cycle are furthermore influenced by global warming and
an extended growing season (Che et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Plot scale experiments are a promising mechanistic tool for investigating processes that are relevant
for larger scales. Since all results showed a high correlation between modelled and experimental
data, a combination is possible with a tile approach with flux averaging to realise model studies
that consider gradual degradation schemata. The consequent combination of plot scale, ecosystem
scale and landscape scale shows the importance of the integration of experimental and modelling
approaches.</p>
      <p>The palaeo-environmental reconstruction (Miehe et al., 2014) as well as the simulations of the
present study suggest that the present grazing lawns of <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> are a synanthropic
ecosystem that developed through long-lasting selective free-range grazing of livestock. This
traditional and obviously sustainable rangeland management would be the best way to conserve and
possibly increase the carbon stocks in the turf and its functions. Otherwise, an overgrazing
connected with erosion would destroy the carbon sink. Considering the large area, even the loss of
this small sink would have an influence on the climate relevant carbon balance of China.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>From our investigation we propose the need for the following additional research:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Extension of this integrated experimental-modelling research scheme to the full annual cycle.
This cannot done by a single campaign but is possible within the Third Pole initiative (Yao et al., 2012).
The modelling studies of this paper make such investigations realistic.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The results obtained so far on just these three sites should be extended to an increased
number of experimental sites, supported by appropriate remote sensing tools, in order to
regionalise degradation patterns and related processes.
The methodical and data basis is available for this (Ma et al., 2008, 2011, 2014;
Yang et al., 2013)</p></list-item><list-item><p>Investigation of the processes along elevation gradients, with special reference to functional
dependences. Therefore biological data (Miehe et al., 2014) as well as atmospheric data
(Ma et al., 2008) should be combined.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The use of remote sensing cloud cover studies to evaluate simulations of cloud generation and
precipitation depending on surface structures. This should be combined with high resolution
WRF modelling studies, which are already available for the Tibetan Plateau (Maussion et al., 2014).</p></list-item></list></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Model adaption to the Tibetan Plateau</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relevant parameters to describe the surface characteristic in SEWAB and SVAT-CN. Kema represents two
parameter sets: (i) root mat (RM) for IM and DM; and (ii) BS.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.83}[.83]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="140pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="45pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="45pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="45pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="45pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="45pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="justify" colwidth="45pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unit</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Description</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col6" align="center">SEWAB </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col9" align="center">SVAT-CN </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Kema   RM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Kema   BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">NamC   AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Kema   RM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Kema   BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">NamC   AS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Albedo</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.18<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.148<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.196</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.18<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.148<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.196</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Emissivity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>veg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Fraction of vegetated area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.88 (IM) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.26 (DM)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.88 (IM) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.26 (DM)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LAI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Leaf area index</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Root depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Canopy height</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>om</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Roughness length</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s, min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s, dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Thermal conductivity, dry soil</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Thermal conductivity at saturation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Soil heat capacity (solid matter)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Porosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.593</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.533</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.396</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.593<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.533<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.533</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.396</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Matrix potential at saturation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.074</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.022</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Saturated hydraulic conductivity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>FC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Volumetric water content at field capacity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.252</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.201</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.210</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>WP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Volumetric water content at wilting point</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.088</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.087</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.060</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Exponent<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Soil residual water content<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.025<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.05<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.025</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Scale parameter<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.006<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.003<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.0466</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Shape parameter<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.17<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.443</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.83}[.83]?><table-wrap-foot><p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{2mm}}?>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> From measurements in 2010;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from measurements in 2012;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  parameter not available due to different parameterisation;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> organic layer (0–15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth);
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral layer (15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> cm depth);
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> exponent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for relationships after Clapp and Hornberger (1978);
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter according to van Genuchten (1980).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>Adaption of SEWAB</title>
      <p>Considering the specific problems on the Tibetan Plateau, three changes have been implemented in
SEWAB. Those are a variable thermal roughness length (Yang et al., 2008), soil thermal conductivity
calculation (Yang et al., 2005) and the parameterisation of bare soil evaporation (Mihailovic
et al., 1993).  These changes have been already applied and evaluated at the alpine steppe site Nam
Co using the same data set (Gerken et al., 2012; Biermann et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Furthermore, all relevant model parameters have been adapted to the site-specific conditions (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T1"/>). The parameters for the alpine steppe site Nam Co have been used as published in Biermann
et al. (2014), which were inferred from field and laboratory measurements. Specific parameters for
the Kema site have been elaborated as follows: albedo has been estimated from radiation measurements
individually for the 2010 and 2012 data set. The fraction of vegetated area has been surveyed
(Sect. 2.2), root depth is assessed from soil profiles (Biermann et al., 2011, 2013) and the roughness
length for momentum is estimated from eddy-covariance friction velocity under neutral
conditions. The LAI for the vegetated area has been calculated from a biomass survey (September
2012, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and subsequent scans of leaf surface using WinSeedle.  Maximum stomatal conductance has
been elaborated by gas exchange measurements with <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> in Göttingen (see
Appendix B2), which has been translated to minimum stomatal resistance.</p>
      <p>Soil properties have been estimated from measurements separately for conditions with root mat (RM:
IM and DM) and without root mat (BS). As SEWAB accepts only one soil parameter set for the whole
soil column, the properties of the uppermost 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have been used. The bulk density has been
surveyed in 2012 for soil layers of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> thickness, down to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for RM and
14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for BS (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plots <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> replicates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each layer). Average soil
organic carbon content of the turf layer was 9 %, measured by dry combustion (Vario EL,
Elementar, Hanau), corresponding to approximately 18 % organic matter, which is in agreement
with previous analyses by Kaiser et al. (2008). This amount has been distributed to three layers of
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> according to the relative content of root mass in each layer, sampled in 2010 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
plots <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 replicates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each layer). From bulk density and mass fraction of organic
matter the porosity in 0–5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth is estimated with 0.593 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming
densities of 2.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for mineral content and 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for organic
content. The soil heat capacity of solid matter is combined from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for mineral content and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for organic matter according to Hillel (1980). Thermal
conductivities for dry soil and at saturation, needed for the conductivity calculation (Yang et al.,
2005), have been investigated for a similar turf layer (Chen et al., 2012: Anduo site for RM, BJ
site for BS).  Further, we derived saturated hydraulic conductivities of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as mean values for RM and BS,
respectively, using infiltrometer measurements from 2010 (Biermann et al., 2011, 2013). An in situ
soil water retention curve was established from tensiometer and TDR profile measurements in 2012,
reflecting the properties of RM in the first 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the properties of BS in 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
depth. From this data the matrix potential at saturation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the exponent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
for the relationship by Clapp and Hornberger (1978) is estimated via linear regression of the
logarithmic form: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further, the soil water content at field capacity and
wilting point has been derived from this relationship assuming pF values (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>hPa</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>hPa</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>FC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>WP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <title>Adaption of SVAT-CN</title>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Species parameterisation of the leaf model\hack{\\} for \textit{Kobresia pygmaea}:}?><title>Species parameterisation of the leaf model<?xmltex \hack{\\}?> for <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic>:</title>
      <p>Measurements of in situ <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leaf gas exchange in response to temperature, radiation,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio, and relative humidity were made using a portable gas exchange system (WALZ
GFS3000, Walz, Effeltrich/Germany). Single factor dependencies of leaf gas exchange to light,
temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio, and relative humidity, were performed for copiously watered
<italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> plants from greenhouse experiments at the University of Göttingen.
The respective plant individuals have been collected in 2012 at the Kema site with underlying soil monoliths,
and regrown/recovered in Göttingen. The
measurement setup was situated in a greenhouse chamber regulated to 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.  GFS3000 gas
exchange measurements were performed at six different temperatures (7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and
30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) inside the cuvette and a series of different relative humidities of the inlet air,
ranging between 20 and 65 %, matching meteorological conditions found at the field site during
the intensive campaign in 2010. As high humidity inside the chamber system leads to problems with
water condensation in the tubes, the conditions were restricted to relative humidity up to
65 %. Data have been analysed using the
physiology-based leaf gas exchange model
(Farquhar et al., 1980; Ball et al., 1987) to derive estimates for those parameters that describe
the carboxylase kinetics, electron transport, respiration and stomatal function. We used
a non-linear least trimmed squares regression tool (Reth et al., 2005c), that minimises the sum of
squared residuals excluding the largest 5 % of residuals, assumed to indicate data contamination
or data–model inconsistencies. Sets of parameter values for <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> (Appendix,
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T2"/>) were obtained as the basis for calculating canopy flux rates at the different field sites.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Parameters applied to describe leaf physiology of <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic>. For detailed
explanation of the leaf model and use of the parameters see Falge (1997) and Falge et al. (2003).
The equations are also available in Wohlfahrt et al. (1998).
Output of the model is on a projected leaf area basis.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Description</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Unit</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">original</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Kema</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NamCo</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dark</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">respiration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72 561</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Electron</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ml</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">99.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">transport</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ml</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50 224</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">capacity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ml</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">200 000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ml</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">436.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">85.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carboxylase</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41 953</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">capacity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">200 000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">206.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">299.469</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65 000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carboxylase</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">159.597</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">kinetics</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">36 000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2339.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Light use</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0332</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0332</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0111</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(mol <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">efficiency</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(mol photons)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stomatal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">conductance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">gfac<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>
For the Kema site, the respective formulation was adapted to: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>gfac</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>gfac</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.025</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in MPa, simulated in 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Parameterisation of soil retention curve:</title>
      <p>In SVAT-CN the relationship between soil
matrix potential <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (or better water suction, in units of m) and soil water content <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is described by a retention curve after van Genuchten (1980)
              <disp-formula content-type="numbered" id="App1.Ch1.E1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is soil water content (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil residual water
content (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil saturated water content
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a scale parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shape parameters,
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Site-specific data of measured retention curves (soil moisture and soil water
potential from AWS, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) have been used to parameterise <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Appendix, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T1"/>) by non-linear least square regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Parameterisation of soil respiration:</title>
      <p>Soil respiration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is modelled as a function of modelled soil temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (K) and soil water content <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth as
follows:

                  <disp-formula content-type="numbered" specific-use="align"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>half</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the base rate at optimum soil water content and reference temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> an activation energy parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) that determines
temperature sensitivity; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reference temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, a regression parameter from Lloyd and Taylor, 1994), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the soil water
content where the rate is reduced to zero (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>half</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the soil
water content where the rate is reduced by half (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The original formulation in SVAT-CN was changed to accommodate the much higher soil organic content
in the <italic>Kobresia</italic> ecosystems. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were adapted to match soil respiration
data measured with gas exchange chambers. For Kema a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the
“<italic>Kobresia</italic>”, and 24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the “bare soil” plots, were used. At Nam Co
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set to 16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. For all sites an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was employed.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>norm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  At all sites only weak dependences on
soil water content were implemented, with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> set to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the retention
parameterisations, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>half</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> set to 0.035 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Parameterisation of leaf gas exchange:</title>
      <p>Species-specific parameters (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T2"/>) for the
physiology-based leaf gas exchange model have been derived from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
leaf gas exchange measurements in the greenhouse (see “Species-specific parameterisation of the
leaf model for <italic>Kobresia</italic> pygmaea” in this section). For the simulation of the Kema campaign
in 2012, at first the original parameters of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T2"/> were used for the vegetated area of the
different degradation states of “<italic>Kobresia</italic>” (IM and DM) and “bare soil” plots, but
underestimated the measured chamber gas exchange data. Consequently, three scaling parameters
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ml</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were increased to 160 % of the
original values (Appendix, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T2"/>) for better comparison with measured data. The same parameters
were used for the Kema 2010 campaign. The slope of the linear equation, which links stomatal
conductance to assimilation and environmental controls, is modelled depending on soil matrix
potential (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the main root layer: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>gfac</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>gfac</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.025</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in MPa, simulated in 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth. For the campaign in 2010 –
a year with drought stress effects, the respective formulation was adapted to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>gfac</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>gfac</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>For the Nam Co site, which is characterised by a vegetation composition of alpine steppe species
different from the <italic>Kobresia</italic> pastures, no specific leaf gas exchange parameters are
available. As a first attempt, leaf parameter sets of <italic>Kobresia</italic> were applied, but these
overestimated measured eddy-covariance fluxes. Consecutive reduction of scaling parameters
(Appendix, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.T2"/>) yielded a better representation of the measured eddy-covariance fluxes.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model evaluation</title>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Evapotranspiration: EC – SEWAB</title>
      <p>In order to test the performance of simulations of evapotranspiration with SEWAB, we compared the
model results for Kema with the eddy-covariance measurements from 2010. Therefore the simulations
for IM, DM and BS have been aggregated as weighted sums according to the eddy-covariance footprint
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T6"/>) and the measurements have been corrected according to the energy
balance closure gap (Sect. 2.3.1). The results show that SEWAB simulations represent the measured
evapotranspiration well (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>). Similarly, the simulations generally capture the diurnal cycle
of evapotranspiration (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>), with median fluxes of approximately 6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at noon,
and a large day-to-day variation caused by variable moisture conditions within the observation
period in 2010. The simulations slightly overestimate daytime fluxes and underestimate night-time
fluxes, the overall bias with high quality flux data (flag 1–3 out of a scheme ranging from 1–9,
Foken et al., 2004) is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Carbon flux: EC – SVAT-CN</title>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Kema 2010:</title>
      <p>For best representation of the eddy-covariance data footprint, model
results (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T6"/>) are calculated as weighed sums of IM, DM and BS according to
the proportion of total surface area in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. Due to drier conditions in 2010, the vegetation was
partially considered to be photosynthetically inactive, therefore the LAI of vegetated area has been
reduced from 1 to 0.5. Mean diurnal patterns of both, measured and modelled net ecosystem exchange
showed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release during night, and uptake during daytime hours, with a pronounced peak in
the late morning hours, and a smaller peak in the late afternoon (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F3"/>).  However, measured
hourly medians of net ecosystem exchange ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.8 and 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
over the course of the day, whereas modelled medians reached a minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0 and a maximum of
1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the model overestimated the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake,
especially in the midday hours, the comparison between
hourly medians of model output and measured NEE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F4"/>, left) showed that the simulations were
generally realistic.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Scatter plot of measured vs. SEWAB modelled <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evapotranspiration (ET) over
61 days of 2010 (3 June to 2 August) at Kema. Measured and modelled values are restricted to high
data quality (flag 1–3 out of a scheme ranging from 1 to 9, Foken et al., 2004).  Measured EC data
is corrected according to the surface energy imbalance with the buoyancy flux correction.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f10.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Nam Co 2009 (AS):</title>
      <p>Compared to Kema data, mean diurnal patterns of measured and modelled
net ecosystem exchange showed much smaller variation within a given hour (smaller interquartile
ranges), and lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release during night, and lower uptake during daytime hours (lower
diurnal amplitudes, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F5"/>). As leaf physiological parameters were adapted to match
measurements and model results, the ranges of both measured and modelled medians showed a better
overlap: measured hourly medians of net ecosystem exchange ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 and
1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the course of the day, and modelled medians between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7 and 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The wide range of measured NEE from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at mid-day results from variable
moisture conditions during the monsoon season and is consistent with chamber-based observations at
a similar spot near Nam Co station (Hu et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>At Nam Co the model overestimated the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake especially in the afternoon hours,
indicating a larger influence of soil respiration than currently represented by the model. Simulated
soil respiration depends on simulated driving variables (soil temperature and moisture) and
parameters. The latter have not been measured at Nam Co directly; instead the values from the Kema field
site have been employed, eventually introducing the observed bias. Nevertheless, the correlation
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.90 between hourly medians of modelled and measured NEE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F4"/>, right) was better
than at Kema.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F2" position="anchor"><caption><p>Mean diel course of measured and energy balance corrected evapotranspiration ET (left
panel) and SEWAB modelled ET (tile approach according to the EC footprint: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
right panel) over 61 days during 2010 (3 June to 2 August) at Kema: box plot with median, 25 % and
75 % quartiles; bars represent quartiles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 times interquartile range, dots are
outliers. Measured and modelled values are restricted to high flux data quality (flag
1–3). Measured data is corrected according to the surface energy imbalance with the buoyancy flux
correction.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f11.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F3" position="anchor"><caption><p>Mean diel course of measured (left panel) and modelled (tile approach according to the EC
footprint: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RefEC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, right panel) net ecosystem exchange (NEE) over 61 days of 2010
(3 June to 2 August) at Kema: box plot with median, 25 % and 75 % quartiles; bars
represent quartiles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 times interquartile range, dots are outliers. Measured and modelled
values are restricted to high data quality (flag 1–3 out of a scheme ranging from 1 to 9, Foken
et al., 2004).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f12.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F4" position="anchor"><caption><p>Comparison of hourly medians (see Fig. D3) of measured and modelled net ecosystem exchange
for the 2010 campaign at Kema (left panel) and 2009 campaign at Nam Co (right panel). The
regression line (dashed, black) is shown as well as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line (solid, grey).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f13.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F5" position="anchor"><caption><p>Mean diel course of measured (left panel) and modelled (right panel) net ecosystem exchange
(NEE) over 44 days during 2009 (26 June to 8 August) at Nam Co: box plot with median, 25 and
75 % quartiles; bars represent quartiles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 times interquartile range, dots are
outliers. Measured and modelled values are restricted to high data quality (flag 1–3 out of
a scheme ranging from 1 to 9, Foken et al., 2004).  Model parameters for leaf physiology and soil
respiration were adapted for best representation of eddy-covariance data (see Sect. 3.2.1).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6633/2014/bg-11-6633-2014-f14.pdf"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6633-2014-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-11-6633-2014-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</sec>
</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The project was funded within the DFG (German Science Foundation) priority programme 1372
“Tibetan Plateau – Formation – Climate – Ecosystems (TiP)” with the contracts FO 226/18-1,2; GU
406/22-1,2; KU 1184/14-1,2; LE 762/12-1,2; MI 338/7-1,2; WE 2601/4-1,2.  Special thanks for
the additional funding of the modelling study with the contract AP 34/32-3. The Chinese scientists
in the Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, the Chinese Academy of Sciences were supported by
the Chinese National Key Programme for Developing Basic Sciences with the contract 2010CB951701
and the National Natural Science Foundation of China with the contracts 91337212 and 41275010. The
research station at Kema was supported by the Volkswagen foundation, in cooperation with the
Marburg University and the Tibet University Lhasa, now managed by the Institute of Tibetan Plateau
Research, (CAS) as “<italic>Naqu Ecological and Environmental Observation and Research Station”</italic>. All the authors are very grateful to the staff of the research stations at Kema and Nam
Co for their support. Furthermore, we thank LI-COR Biosciences for the lending of the chamber
system and for their support. This publication is funded by the DFG and the University of Bayreuth in the
funding programme Open Access Publishing.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by:  P. Stoy</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Agam, N., Berliner, P. R., Zangvil, A., and Ben-Dor, E.: Soil water evaporation during
the dry season in an arid zone, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D16103, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004802" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004802</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance: a Practical Guide to
Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 438 pp., 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Avissar, R. and Pielke, R. A.: A parametrization of heterogeneous land surface for
atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology, Mon. Weather
Rev., 117, 2113–2136, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal conductance
and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions,
in: Progress in Photosynthesis Research, Proceedings of the VII International Photosynthesis
Congress, edited by: Binggins, I., 221–224, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Dutra, E., Beljaars, A., Viterbo, P., and van den Hurk, B.:
Evolution of land surface processes in the IFS, ECMWF Newsletter, 127, 17–22, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Ben-Gal, A. and Shani, U.: A highly conductive drainage extension to control the lower
boundary condition of lysimeters, Plant Soil, 239, 9–17, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014942024573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1014942024573</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Biermann, T., Leipold, T., Babel, W., Becker, L., Coners, H., Foken, T.,
Guggenberger, G., He, S., Ingrisch, J., Kuzyakov, Y., Leuschner, C., Miehe, G., Richards, K.,
Seeber, E., and Wesche, K.: Tibet Plateau Atmosphere–Ecology–Glaciology Cluster, Joint
<italic>Kobresia</italic> Ecosystem Experiment: Documentation of the first Intensive Observation Period
Summer 2010 in Kema, Tibet, Arbeitsergebn., Univ. Bayreuth, Abt. Mikrometeorol.,  ISSN 1614-8916, 44,
105 pp., <uri>http://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/356/</uri>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Biermann, T., Seeber, E., Schleuß, P., Willinghöfer, S., Leonbacher, J.,
Schützenmeister, K., Steingräber, L., Babel, W., Coners, H., Foken, T., Guggenberger, G.,
Kuzyakov, Y., Leuschner, C., Miehe, G., and Wesche, K.: Tibet Plateau
Atmosphere–Ecology–Glaciology Cluster Joint <italic>Kobresia</italic> Ecosystem Experiment:
Documentation of the second Intensive Observation Period, Summer 2012 in KEMA, Tibet,
Arbeitsergebn., Univ. Bayreuth, Abt. Mikrometeorol., ISSN 1614-8916, 54, 52 pp.,
<uri>http://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/145/</uri>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Biermann, T., Babel, W., Ma, W., Chen, X., Thiem, E., Ma, Y., and Foken, T.: Turbulent
flux observations and modelling over a shallow lake and a wet grassland in the Nam Co basin,
Tibetan Plateau, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 116, 301–316, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Caldwell, M. M., Meister, H. P., Tenhunen, J. D., and Lange, O. L.: Canopy structure,
light microclimate and leaf gas exchange of <italic>Quercus coccifera</italic> L. in a Portugese macchia:
measurements in different canopy layers and simulations with a canopy model, Trees, 1, 25–41,
1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Charuchittipan, D., Babel, W., Mauder, M., Leps, J.-P., and Foken, T.: Extension of the
averaging time of the eddy-covariance measurement and its effect on the energy balance closure
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 152, 303–327,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Che, M., Chen, B., Innes, J. L., Wang, G., Dou, X., Zhou, T., Zhang, H., Yan, J.,
Xu, G., and Zhao, H.: Spatial and temporal variations in the end date of the vegetation growing
season throughout the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2011, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 189/190, 81–90, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Chen, Y., Yang, K., Tang, W., Qin, J., and Zhao, L.: Parameterizing soil organic
carbon's impacts on soil porosity and thermal parameters for Eastern Tibet grasslands, Sci. China
Ser. D, 55, 1001–1011, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Clapp, R. B. and Hornberger, G. M.: Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic
properties, Water Resour. Res., 14, 601–604, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Cui, X. F. and Graf, H.-F.: Recent land cover changes on the Tibetan Plateau: a review,
Clim. Change, 94, 47–61,  2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Cui, X. F., Graf, H.-F., Langmann, B., Chen, W., and Huang, R.-H.: Climate impacts
of anthropogenic land use changes on the Tibetan Plateau, Global Planet. Change, 54, 33–56,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.07.006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Cui, X. F., Graf, H.-F., Langmann, B., Chen, W., and Huang, R.-H.: Hydrological
impacts of deforestation at the Southeast Tibetan Plateau, Earth Interact., 11, 1–18,
2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Cui, X. F., Langmann, B., and Graf, H.-F.: Summer Monsoonal Rainfall Simulation
on the Tibetan Plateau with a Regional Climate Model Using a One-way Double-nesting System, SOLA, 3,
49–52,  2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Evans, R. A. and Love, R. M.: The step-point method of sampling – a practical tool in
range research, J. Range Manage., 10, 208–212, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Falge, E.: Die Modellierung der Kronendachtranspiration von Fichtenbeständen
(<italic>Picea abies</italic> (L.) Karst., Bayreuther Forum Ökologie, 48, 215 pp.,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Falge, E., Tenhunen, J., Aubinet, M., Bernhofer, C., Clement, R.,
Granier, A., Kowalski, A., Moors, E.,
Pilegaard, K., Rannik, Ü., and Rebmann, C.: A model-based study of carbon fluxes at ten European
forest sites, in: Fluxes of Carbon, Water and Energy of European Forests, Ecological Studies Series
163, edited by: Valentini, R., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 151–177, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Falge, E., Reth, S., Brüggemann, N., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Goldberg, V.,
Oltchev, A., Schaaf, S., Spindler, G., Stiller, B., Queck, R., Köstner, B., and Bernhofer, C.:
Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy flux data in forest and grassland
ecosystems of Germany, Ecol. Model., 188, 174–216, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., and Berry, J. A.: A biochemical of photosynthetic
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assimilation in leaves of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species, Planta, 149, 78–90, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Foken, T.: The energy balance closure problem – an overview, Ecol. Appl., 18,
1351–1367, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux
measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 78, 83–105, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Foken, T., Göckede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B. D., and Munger, J. W.:
Post-field data quality control, in: Handbook of Micrometeorology: a Guide for Surface Flux
Measurement and Analysis, edited by: Lee, X., Massman, W. J., and Law, B., Kluwer, Dordrecht,
181–208, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Foken, T., Aubinet, M., Finnigan, J., Leclerc, M. Y., Mauder, M., and Paw U, K. T.:
Results of a panel discussion about the energy balance closure correction for trace gases,
B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 92,  ES13–ES18,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Foken, T., Leuning, R., Oncley, S. P., Mauder, M., and Aubinet, M.: Corrections and
data quality in: Eddy Covariance: a Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by:
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York,
85–131, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Foken, T., Meixner, F. X., Falge, E., Zetzsch, C., Serafimovich, A., Bargsten, A.,
Behrendt, T., Biermann, T., Breuninger, C., Dix, S., Gerken, T., Hunner, M., Lehmann-Pape, L.,
Hens, K., Jocher, G., Kesselmeier, J., Lüers, J., Mayer, J.-C., Moravek, A., Plake, D.,
Riederer, M., Rütz, F., Scheibe, M., Siebicke, L., Sörgel, M., Staudt, K., Trebs, I.,
Tsokankunku, A., Welling, M., Wolff, V., and Zhu, Z.: Coupling processes and exchange of energy
and reactive and non-reactive trace gases at a forest site – results of the EGER experiment,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1923–1950, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1923-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1923-2012</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Fratini, G. and Mauder, M.: Towards a consistent eddy-covariance processing:
an intercomparison of EddyPro and TK3, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2273–2281,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2273-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-2273-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation> Friend, A. D. and Kiang, N. Y.: Land surface model development
for the GISS GCM: effects of improved canopy physiology on
simulated climate, J. Climate, 18, 2883–2902, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Friend, A. D., Stevens, A. K., Knox, R. G., and Cannell, M. G. R.: A process-based,
terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v3.0), Ecol. Model., 95, 249–287,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Gee, G. W., Newman, B. D., Green, S. R., Meissner, R., Rupp, H., Zhang, Z. F.,
Keller, J. M., Waugh, W. J., van der Velde, M., and Salazar, J.: Passive wick fluxmeters: design
considerations and field applications, Water Resour. Res., 45, W04420, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008WR007088</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gerken, T., Babel, W., Hoffmann, A., Biermann, T., Herzog, M., Friend, A. D., Li, M.,
Ma, Y., Foken, T., and Graf, H.-F.: Turbulent flux modelling with a simple 2-layer soil model and
extrapolated surface temperature applied at Nam Co Lake basin on the Tibetan Plateau,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1095–1110, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1095-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-16-1095-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Gerken, T., Babel, W., Sun, F., Herzog, M., Ma, Y., Foken, T., and Graf, H.-F.:
Uncertainty in atmospheric profiles and its impact on modeled convection development at Nam Co
Lake, Tibetan Plateau, J. Geophys.  Res.-Atmos., 118, 12317–12331, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020647</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation> Gerken, T., Biermann, T., Babel, W., Herzog, M., Ma, Y., Foken, T., and Graf, H.-F.:
A modelling investigation into lake-breeze development and convection triggering in the Nam Co
Lake basin, Tibetan Plateau, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 117, 149–167,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Göckede, M., Rebmann, C., and Foken, T.: A combination of quality assessment tools
for eddy covariance measurements with footprint modelling for the characterisation of complex
sites, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 127, 175–188, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Göckede, M., Markkanen, T., Hasager, C. B., and Foken, T.: Update of
a footprint-based approach for the characterisation of complex measuring sites, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 118, 635–655, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Hafner, S., Unteregelsbacher, S., Seeber, E., Lena, B., Xu, X., Li, X.,
Guggenberger, G., Miehe, G., and Kuzyakov, Y.: Effect of grazing on carbon stocks and assimilate
partitioning in a Tibetan montane pasture revealed by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse labeling,
Glob. Change
Biol., 18, 528–538,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Harris, R. B.: Rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: A review of the
evidence of its magnitude and causes, J. Arid Environ., 74, 1–12,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation> Herzog, M., Oberhuber, J. M., and Graf, H. F.: A prognostic turbulence scheme for the
nonhydrostatic plume model ATHAM, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 2783–2796, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation> Hillel, D.: Applications of Soil Physics, Academic Press, New York, 385 pp., 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Holzner, W. and Kriechbaum, M.: Pastures in South and Central Tibet (China), I. Methods
for a rapid assessment ofpasture conditions, Bodenkultur, 51, 259–266, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Hong, J., Kim, J., Ishikawa, H., and Ma, Y.: Surface layer similarity in the nocturnal
boundary layer: the application of Hilbert–Huang transform, Biogeosciences, 7, 1271–1278,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1271-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-1271-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Hu, J., Hopping, K. A., Bump, J. K., Kang, S., and Klein, J. A.: Climate change and
water use partitioning by different plant functional groups in a grassland on the Tibetan Plateau,
PLOS ONE, 8, e75503, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0075503</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Ingrisch, J., Biermann, T., Seeber, E., Leipold, T., Li, M., Ma, Y., Xu, X., Miehe, G.,
Guggenberger, G., Foken, T., and Kuzyakov, Y.: Carbon pools and fluxes in a Tibetan alpine
<italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> pasture partitioned by coupled eddy-covariance measurements and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse labeling, Sci. Total Environ., in print, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation> Ingwersen, J., Steffens, K., Högy, P., Warrach-Sagi, K., Zhunusbayeva, D.,
Poltoradnev, M., Gäbler, R., Wizemann, H.-D., Fangmeier, A., Wulfmeyer, V., and Streck, T.:
Comparison of Noah simulations with eddy covariance and soil water measurements at a winter wheat
stand, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 345–355, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> IUSS-ISRIC-FAO: World Reference Base for Soil Resources: a Framework for International
Classification, Correlation and Communication, 2nd edn., World soil resources reports, 103, Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 128 pp., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Kaiser, K., Miehe, G., Barthelmes, A., Ehrmann, O., Scharf, A., Schult, M.,
Schlütz, F., Adamczyk, S., and Frenzel, B.: Turf-bearing topsoils on the central Tibetan
Plateau, China: pedology, botany, geochronology, Catena, 73, 300–311,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Kracher, D., Mengelkamp, H.-T., and Foken, T.: The residual of the energy balance
closure and its influence on the results of three SVAT models, Meteorol. Z., 18, 647–661,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation> Kuzyakov, Y. and Domanski, G.: Carbon input by plants into the soil, review, J. Plant
Nutr. Soil Sc., 163, 421–431, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Liu, W., Wang, X., Zhou, L., and Zhou, H.: Studies on destruction, prevention and
control of Plateau Pikas in <italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> meadow, Acta Theriol. Sin., 23,
214–219, 2003 (in Chinese with English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Lloyd, J. and Taylor, J. A.: On the temperature dependence of soil respiration,
Funct. Ecol., 8, 315–323, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation> Louis, J. F.: A parametric model of vertical fluxes in the atmosphere, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 17, 187–202, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation> Lundegardh, H.: Ecological studies in the assimilation of certain forest plants and
shore plants, Svensk Botaniska Tidskrift, 15, 46–94,
1921.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation> Ma, Y., Tsukamoto, O., Wang, J., Ishikawa, H., and Tamagawa, I.: Analysis of
aerodynamic and thermodynamic parameters on the grassy marshland surface of Tibetan Plateau,
Prog. Nat. Sci., 12, 36–40, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Ma, Y., Kang, S., Zhu, L., Xu, B., Tian, L., and Yao, T.: Roof of the world: Tibetan
observation and research platform, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 89, 1487–1492,  2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Ma, Y., Zhong, L., Wang, B., Ma, W., Chen, X., and Li, M.: Determination of land
surface heat fluxes over heterogeneous landscape of the Tibetan Plateau by using the MODIS and
in situ data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10461–10469,  2011, <?xmltex \hack{\\}?><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/10461/2011/">https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/10461/2011/</ext-link>.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> Ma, Y., Han, C., Zhong, L., Wang, B., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Meng, C.,
Xu, C., and Amatya, P.: Using MODIS and AVHRR data to determine regional surface heating field
and heat flux distributions over the heterogeneous landscape of the Tibetan Plateau,
Theor. Appl. Climatol., 117, 643–652,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Mauder, M. and Foken, T.: Documentation and Instruction Manual of the Eddy Covariance
Software Package TK2, Arbeitsergebn., Univ. Bayreuth, Abt. Mikrometeorol., 26, 42 pp.,
<uri>http://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/884/</uri>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Mauder, M. and Foken, T.: Documentation and Instruction Manual of the Eddy Covariance
Software Package TK3, Arbeitsergebn., Univ. Bayreuth, Abt. Mikrometeorol., 46, 58 pp.,
<uri>http://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/342/</uri>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Mauder, M., Foken, T., Clement, R., Elbers, J. A., Eugster, W., Grünwald, T.,
Heusinkveld, B., and Kolle, O.: Quality control of CarboEurope flux data – Part 2:
Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software, Biogeosciences, 5, 451–462,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-451-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-451-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Maussion, F., Scherer, D., Mölg, T., Collier, E., Curio, J., and Finkelnburg, R.:
Precipitation Seasonality and Variability over the Tibetan Plateau as Resolved by the High Asia
Reanalysis, J. Climate, 27, 1910–1927,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation> Mengelkamp, H.-T., Warrach, K., and Raschke, E.: SEWAB a parameterization of the
surface energy and water balance for atmospheric and hydrologic models, Adv. Water Res., 23,
165–175, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> Mengelkamp, H. T., Kiely, G., and Warrach, K.: Evaluation of the hydrological
components added to an atmospheric land-surface scheme, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 69, 199–212,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation> Miehe, G., Kaiser, K., Co, S., and Liu, J.: Geo-ecological transect studies in
northeast Tibet (Qinghai, China) reveal human-made mid- Holocene environmental changes in the
upper Yellow River catchment changing forest to grassland, Erdkunde, 62, 187–199,
2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Miehe, G., Miehe, S., Kaiser, K., Liu, J. Q., and Zhao, X. Q.: Status and dynamics of
<italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> ecosystem on the Tibetan plateau, Ambio, 37, 272–279, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Miehe, G., Miehe, S., Bach, K., Nölling, J., Hanspach, J., Reudenbach, C.,
Kaiser, K., Wesche, K., Mosbrugger, V., Yang, Y. P., and Ma, Y. M.: Plant communities of central
Tibetan pastures in the Alpine Steppe/<italic>Kobresia pygmaea</italic> ecotone, J. Arid Environ., 75,
711–723,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation> Miehe, G., Miehe, S., Böhner, J., Kaiser, K., Hensen, I., Madsen, D., Liu, J., and
Opgenoorth, L.: How old is the human footprint in the world's largest alpine ecosystem? A review
of multiproxy records from the Tibetan Plateau from the ecologists' viewpoint, Quaternary
Sci.
Rev., 86, 190–209,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation> Mihailovic, D. T., Pielke, R. A., Rajkovic, B., Lee, T. J., and Jeftic, M.:
A resistance representation of schemes for evaporation from bare and partly plant-covered surfaces
for use in atmospheric models, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 32, 1038–1054, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation> Mölders, N.: Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes, Impact on Climate and Air Quality,
Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 189 pp., 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation> Moldrup, P., Rolston, D. E., and Hansen, A. A.: Rapid and numerically stable simulation
of one dimensional, transient water flow in unsaturated, layered soils, Soil Sci., 148, 219–226,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation> Moldrup, P., Rolston, D. E., Hansen, A. A., and Yamaguchi, T.: A simple, mechanistic
model for soil resistance to plant water uptake, Soil Sci., 151, 87–93, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation> Mügler, I., Gleixner, G., Günther, F., Mäusbacher, R., Daut, G.,
Schütt, B., Berking, J., Schwalb, A., Schwark, L., Xu, B., Yao, T., Zhu, L., and Yi, C.:
A multi-proxy approach to reconstruct hydrological changes and Holocene climate development of Nam
Co, Central Tibet, J. Paleolimnol., 43, 625–648,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation> Niu, Y.: The study of environment in the Plateau of Qin-Tibet,
Progr. Geogra., 18, 163–171, 1999 (in Chinese
with English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation> Noilhan, J. and Planton, S.: A Simple parameterization of land surface processes for
meteorological models, Mon. Weather
Rev., 117, 536–549, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation> Oberhuber, J. M., Herzog, M., Graf, H. F., and Schwanke, K.: Volcanic plume simulation
on large scales, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 87, 29–53,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation> Rebmann, C., Kolle, O., Heinesch, B., Queck, R., Ibrom, A., and Aubinet, M.:
Data acquisition and flux calculations, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement
and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer, Dordrecht,
Heidelberg, London, New York, 59–83, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation> Reichstein, M.: Drought Effects on Ecosystem Carbon Anwater Exchange in Three
Mediterranean Forest Ecosytems – a Combined Top-Down and Bottom-Up Analysis, Bayreuther Forum
Ökologie, 89, 1–150, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Reth, S., Göckede, M., and Falge, E.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from agricultural soils in
Eastern Germany – comparison of a closed chamber system with eddy covariance measurements,
Theor. Appl. Climatol., 80, 105–120, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Reth, S., Hentschel, K., Drösler, M., and Falge, E.: DenNit – experimental
analysis and modelling of soil <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in response on changes of soil water content,
soil temperature, soil pH, nutrient availability and the time after rain event, Plant Soil, 272,
349–363, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Reth, S., Reichstein, M., and Falge, E.: The effect of soil water content, soil
temperature, soil pH-value and the root mass on soil <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux – a modified model, Plant
Soil, 268, 21–33, 2005c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation> Richards, L. A.: Capillary conductivity of liquids in porous mediums,
Physics, 1, 318–333, 1931.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation> Riederer, M.: Carbon fluxes of an extensive meadow and attempts for flux partitioning,
Ph.D. thesis, University of Bayreuth, 167 pp., 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Riederer, M., Serafimovich, A., and Foken, T.: Net ecosystem <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange
measurements by the closed chamber method and the eddy covariance technique and their dependence
on atmospheric conditions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1057–1064, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1057-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1057-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation> Shen, M., Zhang, G., Cong, N., Wang, S., Kong, W., and Piao, S.: Increasing altitudinal
gradient of spring vegetation phenology during the last decade on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau,
Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 189–190, 71–80,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Q., and Liang, S.: Surface-sensible and latent heat fluxes over the
Tibetan Plateau from ground measurements, reanalysis, and satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 5659–5677, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5659-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-5659-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation> Singh, J. and Gupta, S.: Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial
ecosystems, Bot. Rev., 43, 449–528, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation> Staudt, K., Serafimovich, A., Siebicke, L., Pyles, R. D., and Falge, E.: Vertical
structure of evapotranspiration at a forest site (a case study), Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 151, 709–729, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation> Swinnen, J., Vanveen, J. A., and Merckx, R.: C-14 Pulse labeling of field-grown spring
whean – an evaluation of its use in rhizosphere carbon budget estimations, Soil Biol. Biochem.,
26, 161–170, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation> Tanaka, K., Ishikawa, H., Hayashi, T., Tamagawa, I., and Ma, Y.: Surface energy budget
at Amdo on the Tibetan Plateau using GAME/Tibet IOP98 data, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 79, 505–517,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Tenhunen, J. D., Siegwolf, R. A., and Oberbauer, S. F.: Effects of phenology,
physiology, and gradients in community composition, structure, and microclimate on tundra
ecosystem <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange., in: Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis, edited by: Schulze, E.-D.
and Caldwell, M. M., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 431–460, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation> Unteregelsbacher, S., Hafner, S., Guggenberger, G., Miehe, G., Xu, X., Liu, J., and
Kuzyakov, Y.: Response of long-, medium- and short-term processes of the carbon budget to
overgrazing-induced crusts in the Tibetan Plateau, Biogeochemistry, 111, 187–201,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>van den Bergh, T., Inauen, N., Hiltbrunner, E., and Körner, C.: Climate and plant
cover co-determine the elevational reduction in evapotranspiration in the Swiss Alps, J. Hydrol.,
500, 75–83,  2013.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation> van Genuchten, M. T.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity
of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Wei, D., Ri, X., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., and Yao, T.: Responses of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes to livestock exclosure in an alpine steppe on the Tibetan
Plateau, China, Plant Soil, 359, 45–55, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1105-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-011-1105-3</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation> Wieser, G., Hammerle, A., and Wohlfahrt, G.: The water balance of grassland ecosystems
in the Austrian Alps, Arct. Antarct. Alp.
Res., 40, 439–445,  2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation> Wohlfahrt, G., Bahn, M., Horak, I., Tappeiner, U., and Cernusca, A.: A nitrogen
sensitive model of leaf
carbon dioxide and water vapour gas exchange: application to 13 key species from differently
managed mountain grassland ecosystems, Ecol. Model., 113, 179–199,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation> Yao, T., Thompson, L. G., Mosbrugger, V., Zhang, F., Ma, Y., Luo, T., Xu, B.,
Yang, X., Joswiak, D. R., Wang, W., Joswiak, M. E., Devkota, L. P., Tayal, S., Jilani, R.,
and Fayziev, R.: Third Pole Environment (TPE), Environ. Dev., 3, 52–64,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation> Yang, K., Koike, T., and Yang, D.: Surface flux parameterization in the Tibetan
Plateau, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 116, 245–262, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation> Yang, K., Koike, T., Fuji, H., Tamura, T., Xu, X., Bian, L., and Zhou, M.: The daytime
evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer and convection over the Tibetan Plateau: observations
and simulations, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 82, 1777–1792, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Yang, K., Koike, T., Ye, B., and Bastidas, L.: Inverse analysis of the role of soil
vertical heterogeneity in controlling surface soil state and energy partition, J. Geophys. Res.,
110, D08101, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005500</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation> Yang, K., Koike, T., Ishikawa, H., Kim, J., Li, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., Ma, Y., and
Wang, J.: Turbulent flux transfer over bare-soil surfaces: characteristics and parameterization,
J. Appl.  Meteorol. Clim., 47, 276–290, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Yang, K., Chen, Y.-Y., and Qin, J.: Some practical notes on the land surface modeling
in the Tibetan Plateau, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 687–701, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-687-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-13-687-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation> Yang, K., Ye, B., Zhou, D., Wu, B., Foken, T., Qin, J., and Zhou, Z.: Response
of hydrological cycle to recent climate changes in the Tibetan Plateau, Clim. Change,
109, 517–534,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation> Yang, K., Qin, J., Zhao, L., Chen, Y., Tang, W., Lazhu, M. H.,
Chen, Z., Lv, N., Ding, B., Wu, H., and Lin, C.: A Multiscale Soil Moisture and Freeze–Thaw
Monitoring Network on the Third Pole, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1907–1916,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation> Yang, K., Wu, H., Qin, J., Lin, C., Tang, W., and Chen, Y.: Recent climate changes
over the Tibetan Plateau and their impacts on energy and water cycle: A review, Global Planet. Change, 112, 79–91,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, D., Xu, W., Li, J., Cai, Z., and An, D.: Frost-free season lengthening and its
potential cause in the Tibetan Plateau from 1960 to 2010, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 115, 441–450,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation> Zhou, D., Eigenmann, R., Babel, W., Foken, T., and Ma, Y.: Study of near-ground free
convection conditions at Nam Co station on the Tibetan Plateau, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 105,
217–228, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation> Zhou, H., Zhao, X., Tang, Y., Gu, S., and Zhou, L.: Alpine grassland degradation and
its control in the source region of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers, China, Grassland
Sci., 51, 191–203, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
