<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-11-6683-2014</article-id><title-group><article-title>Comparative organic geochemistry of Indian margin (Arabian Sea)
sediments: estuary to continental slope</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Comparative organic geochemistry of Indian margin sediments}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G. Cowie et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cowie</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          <email>glcowie@staffmail.ed.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mowbray</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kurian</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sarkar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>White</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vergnaud</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Johnstone</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Brear</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Woulds</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-1468</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Naqvi</surname><given-names>S. W. A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kitazato</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4990-3908</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Institute of Oceanography (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research), Dona Paula, Goa 403 004, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Geography, University of Leeds, University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>2–15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">G. Cowie (glcowie@staffmail.ed.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>6683</fpage><lpage>6696</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>January</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>February</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>

      <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014.html">This article is available from https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
    <p>Surface sediments from sites across the Indian margin of the Arabian Sea
were analysed for their elemental and stable isotopic organic carbon
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and total nitrogen compositions, grain size distributions and
biochemical indices of organic matter (OM) source and/or degradation state.
Site locations ranged from the estuaries of the Mandovi and Zuari rivers to
depths of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m on the continental slope, thus spanning
nearshore muds and sands on the shelf and both the oxygen minimum zone (OMZ)
on the upper slope (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–1300 m) and the seasonal hypoxic
zone that appears on the shelf. Source indices showed mixed marine and
terrigenous OM within the estuaries, but consistent predominance
(80–100 %) of marine OM on the shelf and slope. Thus, riverine terrigenous
OM is diluted or replaced by autochthonous marine OM and/or is efficiently
re-mineralised, within or immediately offshore of the estuaries. Organic C
contents of surface shelf sediments varied from &lt; 0.5 wt % in
relict shelf sands to up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 wt % for nearshore muds,
while upper slope sites within the OMZ showed a wide range (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> wt %), progressively decreasing below the OMZ to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 wt %
at 2000 m. Thus, major variability (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 wt %) was found at
slope sites within the OMZ of similar depth and near-identical bottom-water
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. A strong relationship between %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
sediment grain size was seen for sediments within the OMZ, but lower
relative C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents were found for sites on the shelf and below the
OMZ. Further, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings, when related to estimated sediment surface
area, indicated distinct enrichment of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the OMZ sediments
relative to sites above and below the OMZ and to sediments from normoxic
margins. Diagenetic indices confirmed that lower C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content below the
OMZ is associated with more extensive OM degradation, but that shelf
sediment OM is not consistently more degraded than that found within the
OMZ. Together, the results indicate that OM distribution across the margin
is controlled by interplay between hydrodynamic processes and varying
preservation associated with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability. This inference is
supported by multiple regression analysis. Hydrodynamic processes (expressed
as %Silt) followed by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability, can explain the large
majority of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability when the shelf and slope are
considered as a whole. However, while O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes the primary influence
on %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for sediments below the OMZ, %Silt is the primary
influence across the OMZ and, apparently, the shelf. Thus, reduced O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exposure is responsible for OM enrichment within the OMZ, but hydrodynamic
processes are the overriding control on sediment OM distributions across
both the shelf and the OMZ.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sediment sampling locations; <bold>(a)</bold> within the Mandovi–Zuari estuary
confluence (insert shows location relative to the Indian subcontinent as a
whole), <bold>(b)</bold> Yokosuka (north and south) and Ratnagiri transects, <bold>(c)</bold> Goa and
Karwar transects. Locations of panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> are immediately north and
south of the Mandovi–Zuari confluence shown in panel <bold>(a)</bold> , respectively.
Station labels are as defined in the legend to Fig. 4.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The Arabian Sea is exceptional both for monsoons that drive intense,
seasonally variable productivity, and for its mid-depth oxygen minimum zone
(OMZ, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–1300 m). The ring of organic-matter-rich sediments
that lines the Arabian Sea's margins coincides roughly with the OMZ, a
feature that led O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability to be proposed as a primary control on
sediment organic matter (OM) distributions (e.g. Paropkari et al., 1992,
1993; van der Weijden et al., 1998; Keil and Cowie, 1999), and the Arabian
Sea OMZ to be suggested as the modern equivalent of settings with OM-rich
deposits found in the geological record (Demaison and Moore, 1980).</p>
      <p>However, margins of the Arabian Sea differ markedly in productivity, and OMZ
sediments experience differing degrees of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion and thus have
different benthic communities and degrees of bioturbation (Cowie, 2005).
There is also variability in the magnitude and location (depth range) of
sediment organic C maxima. Moreover, there is often a mismatch in the depths
of organic C maxima and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> minima, and major variability in organic C content can occur
without parallel variability in O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. Pedersen et al., 1992; Calvert
et al., 1995; Cowie et al., 1999, 2009). This and other evidence has led to
multiple other (interrelated) factors, including productivity, winnowing and
cross-margin sediment transport, bottom topography and OM–mineral
interactions to be invoked as contributing controls. The interactions and
relative importance of these factors remain the subject of considerable
research and debate (Cowie 2005, and references therein).</p>
      <p>A further potential influence on margin sediment OM content and composition
is OM source. A notable feature of the Arabian Sea is that sediments from
all margins have generally been shown to contain OM that is overwhelmingly
of marine origin, often even in nearshore shelf deposits. This is not
surprising for the western margins (e.g. Smallwood and Wolff, 2000), where
there are no major rivers depositing sediments. However, on the basis of
stable isotopic, biomarker and petrographic evidence, it also appears to be
true of the Pakistan margin, directly offshore of the Indus River (e.g.
Cowie et al., 1999; Schulte et al., 2000; Jeffreys et al., 2009) and for the
Indian margin (e.g. Calvert et al., 1995; Agnihotri et al., 2008; Kurian et al., 2013). The damming of the Indus in the 1970s dramatically reduced sediment
export (e.g. Syvitski and Milliman, 2007), which might explain the present-day
paucity of terrigenous OM in offshore sediments. However, the same marine
predominance is also found throughout Holocene sediment records from the
Pakistan margin (e.g. Schubert et al., 1998). For the Indian margin, the lack
of a clear terrigenous OM signature in shelf and slope sediments is perhaps
surprising given that rivers on this coast have particularly large runoff
during the SW monsoons. The fate of the suspended sediments from these
rivers, and if/how they contribute to shelf and slope OM deposits, remain
unclear.</p>
      <p>The Indian margin is also of particular interest because, in addition to the
mid-depth OMZ that impinges on the upper slope, a belt of intense O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
depletion develops from south to north along the entire western Indian shelf
during the summer monsoons, usually peaking in September–October (Naqvi et al., 2000, 2006, 2009). This represents the largest coastal hypoxic zone on
Earth, and, as a result of seasonal fluctuations in redox conditions (and
therefore benthic communities), together with sediment bioturbation and
ventilation, a further potential influence on shelf sediment OM content and
composition.</p>
      <p>However, previous assessments of sediment OM distributions on the Indian
margin have lacked either comprehensive cross-margin sampling or systematic
determination of parameters necessary to delineate OM source and degradation
state, as well as content. We present here results from a range of analyses
of sediments from transects spanning the western Indian margin, from
estuaries to the continental shelf and across the upper slope, spanning both
the seasonal coastal hypoxic zone and the semi-permanent OMZ on the
continental slope. The broader objective was to elucidate the interactions
and relative importance of factors including source, hydrodynamic processes
and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability as OM distributional controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Setting, sampling locations and methods</title>
      <p>Sediment samples were collected at sites across the upper
Indian continental margin, from various points within the estuary confluence
of the Mandovi and Zuari rivers (Fig. 1a) and across transects spanning the
shelf and/or upper slope (to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m depth) (Fig. 1b and c).
Station details are presented in Table 1. Firstly, push cores (8.5 cm i.d.)
were collected with the manned submersible <italic>Shinkai 6500</italic> on RV <italic>Yokosuka</italic> cruise YK0811 in 2008, at
stations (500–2000 m depth) forming two transects (Yokosuka N and Yokosuka
S) to the north of the Mandovi/Zuari estuary (Fig. 1b). Secondly, shelf
sediments were collected on RV <italic>Sindhu Sankalp</italic> cruises in October 2010 and May 2011 (Fig. 1b and c).
These were collected over three transects: offshore of the
Mandovi/Zuari estuary confluence (Goa transect) and to the north (Ratnagiri
transect, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, S. Maharashtra) and south
(Karwar transect, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, N. Karnataka). The Goa
transect also extended to a depth of 2056 m, thus fully spanning both the
shelf and the permanent OMZ on the upper slope. Sediments were collected
either by box core or grab, which were subsequently sub-cored with 8.5 cm i.d. plastic barrels.
Finally, sediments from the Mandovi/Zuari estuary
were collected by grab on a small coastal vessel. Sediment cores from
selected stations were vertically sectioned at 1 cm intervals, and sediments
were then freeze-dried, with weights being determined before and after
drying.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Cross-margin plots (to 800 m) of dissolved oxygen concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) during the late monsoon season (October 2010, upper panel) and
intermonsoon season (May 2011, lower panel).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Together, these sites span an estuarine gradient (river to mouth) as well as
the continental shelf and upper continental slope. Notably, the margin
transect includes stations above, within and below the mid-water OMZ
(dissolved oxygen (DO) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M as defined by Helly and Levin (2004),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1300 m). As we note in the
Discussion, a depth boundary of 1000 m is used for distinguishing sites
within and below the OMZ, as a distinct change in DO values is seen at
roughly this depth. The shelf sites span the full depth range
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 m to shelf break [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 m]), and
experience extreme seasonal variability in bottom-water DO concentrations,
from fully oxygenated during intermonsoon months to extreme hypoxia during
the summer southwest monsoon (Fig. 2). The shelf-to-slope transects also
span a wide range of sediment types, from fine muds nearshore and beyond the
shelf break, to mid-shelf relict carbonate sands (Ramaswamy and Nair, 1989;
Rao and Rao, 1995; see below).</p>
      <p>Finally, suspended sediment samples from both rivers were collected with
large-volume bottle sampling at sites upstream of the furthest inland
seawater incursion, in October 2010 and May 2011. The samples were filtered
onto pre-weighed glass fibre filters (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m nominal pore size).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Analytical</title>
      <p>Sediments were analysed for their organic C (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and total N (TN)
contents and  stable C and N isotopic compositions using CE Instruments NA2500
elemental analyser connected to a VG Isogas Prism III isotope ratio mass
spectrometer. Freeze-dried sediments were decalcified by vapour-phase HCl
acidification (Hedges and Stern, 1984) followed by the addition of 2–3 drops of
purified 6 N HCl. Acetanilide was used as the calibration standard for
elemental data, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C were
respectively determined relative to air and the PACS-2 reference standard
from the National Research Council Canada (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.228 ‰).
Replicate analyses of selected samples (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–5) produced precision (% standard deviation; %sd) of &lt; 2
and &lt; 3.3 % for %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and %TN, respectively, and
standard deviations of &lt; 0.12 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 0.16 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N. Grain size
analyses were conducted by laser diffractometry on slurries of sediments
disaggregated in an aqueous solution of sodium hexametaphosphate. Amino
acids were determined by the method of Cowie and Hedges (1992a), which
involved reverse-phase HPLC of 6 N HCl hydrolysates and fluorometric
detection of ortho-phthaldialdehyde derivatives. Quantification was relative
to charge-matched internal standards added after hydrolysis. Replicate
analyses of selected samples (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–3) produced a %sd of &lt; 7 % of the mean for all amino acid parameters other than trace component
yields and mole percentages (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 %). Lignin phenols were analysed
by the method of Ertel and Hedges (1982) as modified by Goni and Montgomery (2000)
and involved gas chromatographic separation and flame-ionisation
detection of phenols liberated by alkaline CuO hydrolysis, quantified
relative to internal standards added immediately post-hydrolysis. Precision
(%sd) for individual phenols in replicate analyses of selected samples (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–3) was &lt; 10 % of mean values in most estuary and shelf
samples, but was poorer for slope sites where phenol levels were close to
detection limits. Precision for total phenol yields was &lt; 20 % in
all cases. All concentrations were corrected for sediment salt content,
which were determined either by combining porewater contents with
bottom-water salinities or by silver nitrate titration of dried sediment
suspensions in distilled water.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Organic carbon weight percentage (%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in surficial
sediments (0–2 cm) from estuary, shelf and upper slope sites on the Indian
margin of the Arabian Sea. Shaded area indicates approximate depth of
permanent mid-depth OMZ (&lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>Station details, including locations, depths and bottom-water DO
concentration (at the time of sampling) are recorded in Table 1, alongside
results of all elemental, stable isotopic, biochemical and grain size
analyses.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Cross-margin organic matter distributions</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.60}[.60]?><oasis:tgroup cols="18">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="17" colname="col17" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="18" colname="col18" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Long.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">%salt</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">TN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C / N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">%(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>GABA)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">%AA-TN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">DI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">Median</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">%Clay</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">%Silt</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">%Sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">wt%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">wt%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">wt%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">molar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">‰</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">∅</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18" align="center">Upriver SPM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mandovi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2650</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.0628</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.24 / <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">nd</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zuari</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2667</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.1114</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.22 / <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">nd</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18" align="center">Estuary Sites </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zuari 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.9100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">32.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">4.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">nd</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zuari 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3675</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.9770</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">26.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">220.4 (2.18)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">5.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">6.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">88.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zuari 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3032</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.0150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">28.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">334.8 (1.58)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">7.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">9.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">83.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Canal 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4350</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.9340</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">26.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">4.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">nd</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Canal 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4795</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.9500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">32.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">14.81 (6.08)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">26.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">50.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">24.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mandovi 9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5364</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.9300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">26.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">209.4 (2.26)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">16.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">74.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mandovi 10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5398</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.9600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">26.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">nd</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mandovi 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">&lt; 3m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5068</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.9100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">149.8 (2.74)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">17.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">73.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18" align="center">Yokosuka Transect N </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1123 R10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5583</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1891</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">26.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">11.4 (6.45)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">19.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">73.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">7.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1123 R7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">575</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5555</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1924</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">12.61 (6.31)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">18.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">71.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">10.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1117 Y6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">693</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5365</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1769</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">21.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">61.3 (4.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">13.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">37.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">49.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1117 Y8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">746</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5333</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1753</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">21.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">55.4 (4.17)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">42.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">48.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1112 R8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">793</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5278</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1733</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">24.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">20.3( 5.62)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">14.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">49.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">35.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1119 R4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">812</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5249</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1704</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">21.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">29.2 (5.10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">13.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">48.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">37.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1115 R9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">813</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5248</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1696</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">15.2 (6.04)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">17.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">55.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">26.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1112 R6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">814</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5252</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1721</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">16.6 (5.91)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">16.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">55.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">27.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1110 Y8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">928</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5430</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">28.2 (5.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">14.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">47.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">37.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1116 Y3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5304</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.1002</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">23.0 (5.44)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">16.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">47.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">36.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1110 R7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1139</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5258</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.0850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">13.2 (6.24)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">18.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">67.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">14.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1114 Y10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1145</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5275</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.0806</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">11.7 (6.41)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">20.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">63.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">15.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1116 R10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1052</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5297</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.0936</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">9.3 (6.74)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">26.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">60.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">13.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1114 Y3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1156</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.5254</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.0822</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">8.4 (6.89)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">28.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">60.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">10.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18" align="center">Yokosuka Transect S </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1109 R4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">540</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.9804</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.9217</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">21.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">38.2 (4.71)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">14.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">41.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">44.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1105 R6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">795</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.9794</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.8683</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">25.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">11.5 (6.44)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">18.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">74.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">7.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1101 Y4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">798</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.9793</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.8678</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">20.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">12.1 (6.37)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">19.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">70.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">9.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1100 Y2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">900</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.9663</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.8518</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">21.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">12.0 (6.38)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">21.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">64.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">14.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1098 Y2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.7831</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.3356</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">108.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">8.9 (6.82)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">28.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">63.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">8.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18" align="center">Ratnagiri Transect </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.7135</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.2079</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">10.4 (6.59)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">25.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">69.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">5.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.6660</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.0512</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">66.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">29.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">7.7 (7.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">34.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">61.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.5608</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.6289</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">78.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">30.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">102.8 (3.28)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">21.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">21.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">57.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">227</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.5383</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.2284</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">15.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">199.4 (2.33)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">11.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">19.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">68.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18" align="center">Goa Transect </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5182</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.7036</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">78.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">14.1 (6.15)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">15.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">78.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">6.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.5133</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.6518</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">85.4 (1.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">13.4 (6.23)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">17.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">76.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">6.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4989</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.5827</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">88.2 (3.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">16.4 (5.93)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">12.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">81.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">6.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4820</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.5150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">90.2 (1.7)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">29.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">14.2 (6.14)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">19.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">72.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">8.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">73.4530</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.4020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">176.0 (2.51)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">8.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">13.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">77.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4277</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.2827</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">57.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">17.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">176.1 (2.51)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">8.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">12.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">78.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3685</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.1307</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">21.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">65.4 (3.94)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">11.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">38.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">51.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">127</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3413</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.0035</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.6 (7.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">25.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">149.0 (2.75)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">16.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">73.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">164</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2354</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.9810</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">76.8 (3.6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">26.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">196.7 (2.35)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">10.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">13.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">76.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G12B</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2253</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.9299</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">48.8 (4.36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">18.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">34.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">47.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G12C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">346</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3567</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.8241</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">114.2 (3.13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">13.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">30.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">55.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G12D</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">543</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.3063</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.8078</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">31.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">6.8 (7.19)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">32.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">63.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">4.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G12E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">760</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2767</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.7644</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">23.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">8.4 (6.89)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">26.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">68.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">4.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">960</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2801</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.6742</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">11.0 (6.50)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">22.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">69.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">8.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G13B</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1290</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.2050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.6107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">9.0 (6.79)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">27.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">66.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">6.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1642</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.1170</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.4067</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">70.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">18.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">5.6 (7.49)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">41.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">52.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">5.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2056</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.9968</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">71.0000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">104.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">16.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">6.2 (7.33)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">38.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">57.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col18" align="center">Karwar Transect </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.4698</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.2416</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">17.6 (5.83)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">13.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">73.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">12.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.4679</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.1725</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">28.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">15.1 (6.05)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">20.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">67.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">12.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.3975</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.0004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">27.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">83.1 (3.59)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">11.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">26.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">62.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.3195</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.7729</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">83.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">31.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">179.2 (2.48)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">8.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">86.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">235</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.1713</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.2607</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">17.1 (5.87)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">21.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">45.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">32.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">K9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.1714</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.2316</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">6.5 (7.27)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">36.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col17">57.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col18">5.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>Site and sample compositional data. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  DO values as recorded at
time of sampling, intermonsoon (late monsoon); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total
lignin phenol yields in mg 100 mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <?xmltex \hack{\\}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  riverine suspended
particulate material (SPM) collected in intermonsoon / late monsoon seasons.
Median <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> median grain size; Clay, silt and sand are percentages<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>by volume.
Other parameters are as defined in the text.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Plots against station depth (m) of <bold>(a)</bold> stable C isotopic
composition (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ‰), <bold>(b)</bold> total
lignin phenol yield (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, mg 100 mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(c)</bold> molar ratios of
organic C to total N [(C / N)a], for surficial sediments from estuary, shelf
and slope sites. Shaded area indicates approximate depth of permanent
mid-depth OMZ (&lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Sediment  organic C concentrations (%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, wt %) range from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 % in selected estuary and mid-shelf deposits (all
coarser sediments, see below) to a maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 % at
upper slope sites (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500–800 m) (Fig. 3). Below the lower
boundary of the permanent mid-water OMZ there is a progressive drop,
reaching <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–1.5 wt % at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m. While
maximal %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are found at sites within the core of the OMZ
(200–1000 m), there is also major variability in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1–2 to 6–7 %) at sites of similar depth within the
OMZ , especially in the more northern (Yokosuka) transects. This is in
contrast to DO concentrations, which, apart from seasonal fluctuation at the
upper OMZ boundary (Fig. 2), are comparatively constant, with season and at
any given depth within the OMZ (as observed in repeat CTD profiles). There
is also a large range of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in shelf sediments (i.e. above
the permanent OMZ), with values in shallow nearshore deposits notably
reaching values (up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 %) similar to many observed on
the slope (within the OMZ). Thus, the observed variability in sediment
organic C content is not associated only with variations in DO. The
cross-margin distributions are consistent with others reported previously
for the Indian margin (e.g. Calvert et al., 1995), which also have shown
maximal concentrations on the upper slope, but also, for some transects,
major variability within the OMZ and, on occasion, maximal C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values
at or below the lower OMZ boundary.</p>
      <p>By contrast, similar cross-margin transects from the Pakistan margin of the
Arabian Sea (Cowie et al., 1999, 2009) showed less pronounced %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
maxima on the upper slope (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 % max.) and these were found
at the lower boundary of the OMZ (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000–1200 m), whereas DO
was minimal at 300–400 m depth. However, within any given transect area on
the Pakistan margin, %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values were remarkably constant at a given
depth and DO value. Thus, the scatter observed within the OMZ on the Indian
margin (Fig. 3 and Calvert et al., 1995) was not apparent off Pakistan. On the
Oman margin, %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> maxima are comparable to those observed in the
present study (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7–8 %) but, like the Pakistan margin, show
elevated values at, or even well below, the lower OMZ boundary (e.g.
Pedersen et al., 1992).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Organic matter sources</title>
      <p>The fate of terrigenous OM that enters estuaries and the coastal  ocean is a
subject of long-standing debate and current research (e.g. Hedges and Ertel, 1982;
Hedges et al., 1997; Bianchi, 2012). For the present study, it is also
important to establish the extent of terrigenous OM inputs in order to
deconvolve observed cross-margin trends in C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration.
Distributions of parameters that serve as potentially diagnostic indices of
terrigenous (versus autochthonous/marine) OM inputs are plotted in Fig. 4.
These include stable C isotopic compositions (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
[‰], Fig. 4a), total lignin phenol yields (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, mg 100 mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. 4b) and molar organic-C-to-total-N ratios
([C / N]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 4c).</p>
      <p>Firstly, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for sediments from the
Zuari/Mandovi estuary sites ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.6 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.2 ‰ (Fig. 4a, Table 1). These compare to more negative
values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30.6 ‰ found in suspended
particulate organic matter (SPOM) from upriver sites on the Zuari and
Mandovi rivers (Table 1). These values in turn are in line with
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>previous<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>
studies which showed SPOM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranging from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 towards the mouths to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32 ‰ towards the upstream ends of the estuaries, with
values varying with season/discharge and tidal stage (Maya et al., 2011;
Khodse and Bhosle, 2012; Kessarkar et al., 2003). Like these SPOM data, the
results of the present study therefore indicate mixed OM inputs to sediments
across the Zuari and Mandovi estuaries, with varying proportions of marine
and terrigenous OM.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of shelf sediments (Fig. 4a) become
sharply heavier (more marine) even at the shallowest sites, with all but one
site (K2, 24 m depth, Karwar transect) having values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.3 ‰ or heavier (with low- to mid-latitude planktonic
signatures typically being in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 ‰, Emerson and Hedges, 1988). There is some fluctuation
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.4 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.3 ‰)
across the shelf (all three shelf transects) but relatively uniform values
beyond the shelf break, with a possible trend towards slightly more positive
values below 1300 m. These results indicate a strong and relatively uniform
predominance of marine OM in the sediments at all sites except the
shallowest and closest to shore. The more negative signature in the
nearshore sediments on the Karwar transect may reflect a somewhat greater
terrigenous input locally, possibly from the nearby Kali river (isotopic
signature unknown). Finally, the lack of a clear trend in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the slope and OMZ is in stark contrast to trends
observed on the Pakistan margin (Cowie et al., 1999, 2009), where distinctly
more negative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures within the OMZ were
attributed to the imprint of chemosynthetic bacteria and/or to enhanced OM
preservation. The lack of trend across the Indian margin may therefore be
due to better ventilation and less pronounced hypoxia than off Pakistan
(there is a progressive intensification of hypoxia from S to N), leading to
absence of chemosynthetic processes and/or to less enhanced preservation of
OM (see further discussion below).</p>
      <p>Total lignin phenol yields (Fig. 4b) and molar C / N ratios (Fig. 4c) provide
very similar indications to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures. Total
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-normalised lignin phenol yields (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are quite variable in
the estuarine sediments, with a maximum of 5.4 mg 100 mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However,
there is a steep decrease offshore of the shallowest nearshore sites on all
shelf transects. At all sites with depths greater than 100 m, on all
transects, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 mg 100 mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Carbon-to-nitrogen ratios are more ambiguous tracers of marine versus
terrestrial OM inputs due the common and variable effects of diagenetic
imprints (Meyers, 1994). However, the range of (C / N)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the
estuarine sediments (10.0–14.5) again suggests varying proportions of marine
and terrigenous OM (Fig. 4c). Moreover, lower, more typically marine values
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7–11) are found on the shelf, even in nearshore deposits,
and at sites beyond the shelf break (although there is considerable scatter
across the Yokosuka slope transects). There is also a possible trend towards
lower values at greater depth (below the OMZ) due to lowering of C / N ratios
with advanced degradation (Cowie et al., 1999, 2009).</p>
      <p>A cross-plot of lignin phenol yields and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(Fig. 5a) provides strongly coherent source indications. Sites from within
the Mandovi/Zuari estuary system show variable lignin phenol yields and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values that fall within the range of values
previously recorded for SPOM across the length of the estuary, but more
positive (marine) than values recorded at upriver sites. These results
confirm mixed marine and terrigenous OM inputs to the estuarine sediments,
though it would appear that the lignin yield of terrigenous inputs is
variable (i.e. there is not a uniform lignin yield for the terrigenous OM
end-member). The two shallowest, nearshore sites on the Ratnagiri and Karwar
transects show significant terrigenous OM inputs, based on both <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>parameters<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>,
but all sites further offshore on these transects, and all sites on the Goa
and Yokosuka transects, have <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.54 mg 100 mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 ‰
or heavier. For illustrative purposes, taking a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
value for the terrigenous OM end-member of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29 ‰
(average of values for upriver Mandovi–Zuari SPOM, Fig. 6a) and a value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.5 ‰ for the marine OM end-member
(approximate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis intercept at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) gives an estimated marine
OM contribution of 84 % or greater (up to 100 % on the slope) for all
shelf and slope sites on all transects, other than the shallowest nearshore
sites on the Ratnagiri and Karwar transects (81 and 65 %,
respectively). Although the lignin and isotopic signatures of SPOM from
other rivers along this section of the Indian coast are not established,
they can be expected to be comparable as these rivers drain similar
catchments with similar vegetation (also supported by very similar lignin
phenol compositions for shelf sediments from all three transects; Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Plot for surficial sediments of total lignin phenol yield
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, mg 100 mg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against stable C isotopic composition
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Shaded areas indicate the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values found in upriver SPM samples (darker shading, this
study) and across the Mandovi and Zuari estuaries (previous studies; see
text).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The apparent strong predominance of marine OM across both shelf and slope is
characteristic of many margins (e.g. Burdige, 2005), even offshore of major
river systems such as the Amazon (e.g. Keil et al., 1997). This, alongside
significant contributions of marine OM to the Mandovi–Zuari estuarine
sediments (41–57 %, by the same calculation as above), suggests that the
large majority of terrigenous OM carried by these rivers (and others along
this coast) is turned over close to source. As the large majority of OM in
both riverine particulates and in coastal sediments typically is intimately
attached to associated mineral surfaces (Hedges and Keil, 1995), the results
indicate that terrigenous OM is efficiently re-mineralised and replaced by
marine OM (Keil et al., 1997; Mayer et al., 1998; Burdige, 2005; Bianchi, 2012).
We lack the surface area data for riverine particulates and sediments that
would allow quantification of loss and/or replacement of terrigenous C as
performed for the Amazon and other settings by Keil et al., 1997. However, the
main conclusion to be drawn from the source indices is that, based on
uniformly low lignin yields and narrow range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values in shelf and slope sediments (Fig. 4), factors other than source are
responsible for the large range of sediment OM content observed across this
margin (Fig. 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Controls on OM distribution</title>
      <p>Previous studies across the slope and OMZ on various margins of the Arabian
Sea have concluded O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability to be a primary control on sediment
OM distribution (e.g. Paropkari et al., 1992, 1993; van der Weijden et al., 1998), based on correspondence between mid-slope C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment and
the OMZ. Also, in studies of size-fractionated sediments from sites across
the Pakistan margin OMZ, Keil and Cowie (1999) showed evidence of enhanced
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings (relative to available surface area) at sites within the
OMZ and close to its lower boundary. Moreover, differences in OM degradation
state also have pointed to an O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> effect, with enhanced preservation
generally being linked to O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion within the OMZ (e.g. Schulte et al., 2000;
Suthhof et al., 2000; Sinninghe Damste et al., 2002; Vandewiele et al., 2009). However, observed differences in preservation indices are slight
compared to the several-fold range in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values found below versus
within the OMZ, and, moreover, other studies have found clear exceptions to
any relationship between O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and either C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content or OM quality.
For example, Calvert et al. (1995), in a synthesis of results from the Indian
margin, demonstrated multiple cases of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched sediments at sites
below the OMZ, and no clear cross-margin trends in hydrogen indices (a
measure of hydrocarbon richness). Rather, they showed a strong positive
correlation between %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and sediment grain size, expressed as
%(Silt<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Clay), for all slope sites falling in the depth range of roughly
200 m to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1500 m, with lower %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings found
above and below these depths. These findings are evidence of a further
important contributing factor, namely hydrodynamic processes. Thus,
variability in C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration within the 200–1500 m depth range was
attributed to hydrodynamic equivalence of OM and fine sediment and/or to
sorption of OM onto finer particles. Organic-poor sediments on the shelf
were attributed to extensive reworking and/or winnowing of OM from carbonate
sand deposits on the mid- and outer shelf, or to dilution of nearshore muds
with organic-poor terrestrial clays. The paucity of OM at sites below 1500 m
attributed not to increasing oxygen levels but to decreasing OM input to the sediment due to progressive
offshore decrease in productivity and to greater decay within the increasing
water column. In short, the interplay and relative importance of oxygen
availability and hydrodynamic factors remains unclear and the subject of
debate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Plots against station depth (m) of <bold>(a)</bold> bottom-water dissolved
oxygen concentration (DO, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) at time of sampling, <bold>(b)</bold> percentage of
silt and clay (by volume) in surficial sediments, and <bold>(c)</bold> median grain size
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in surficial sediments, from shelf and slope sites. DO
concentrations were either measured directly from a submersible (Yokosuka
transects) or in near-bottom bottle samples. All sediment samples and DO
data for Goa, Ratnagiri and Karwar transect sites were collected during
intermonsoon (normoxic) period. Horizontal lines for five Goa transect shelf
sites indicate bottom-water DO values encountered during the late monsoon
season (shelf hypoxia).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Bottom-water oxygen concentrations (Fig. 6a) exhibit the cross-margin trend
expected for the intermonsoon (April/May) sampling period during which
sediments from the Ratnagiri, Goa and Karwar transects were collected, thus
showing oxygenated conditions on the shelf. However, as indicated in Fig. 2
and by bottom-water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations recorded at some of the Goa shelf
stations during the late monsoon (Fig. 6a, October), the entire shelf
experiences dramatic seasonal fluctuations in DO concentration, reaching
&lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M across the entire shelf during the
monsoon, and 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M (sulfidic) at some inner shelf sites (Naqvi et al., 2000, 2006, 2009). Below a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 m, values on the
upper slope are comparatively stable, and reach a minimum (&lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M, but non-zero) between depths of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 m and 800 m. Below
this, values progressively rise to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100–110 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m. Apparent differences between transects across the
lower OMZ boundary (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800–1000 m; Fig. 6a) are most likely due
to sampling method (direct on-bottom measurement on Yokosuka transects vs.
near-bottom CTD casts on Goa transect). However, there may also be real
spatial and/or temporal variation bottom-water DO levels across the lower
OMZ boundary; (e.g. considerable fluctuation was observed at a single
location over a 1-day benthic lander deployment, apparently related to tidal
currents; H. Kitazato, personal observation, 2014). Problems with the accuracy of
near-zero DO concentration measurements with many DO sensors have now been
widely recognised (e.g. Revsbech et al., 2009). Thus, some values, especially
those determined with CTD profiling, may be overestimates, but the presence
of macrofauna in non-laminated sediments across the entire OMZ (e.g. Ingole
et al., 2010), and the absence of sulfidic waters, are consistent with
non-zero DO concentrations. This indicates better ventilation within the OMZ
than off Pakistan, where sediments at the core of the OMZ are laminated and
devoid of macrofauna (Cowie and Levin, 2009, and references therein).</p>
      <p>Sediment grain size distributions show considerable cross-margin variation,
both in %(Silt <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Clay) (Fig. 6b) and in median grain size (Fig. 6c), as
previously noted by Calvert et al. (1995). Sediments at all sites have
non-normal distributions and are poorly sorted. Consistent with previous
studies (e.g. Ramaswamy and Nair, 1989; Rao and Rao, 1995; Kessarkar et al.,
2013), there is a narrow nearshore belt of muds (&lt; 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m median,
&gt; 85 %(Silt<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Clay)) at depths shallower than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m, and a belt of coarser sediments extending to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–300 m
(depending on transect). On the slope, sediments below <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 m
are generally finer (&lt; 61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m median), with an apparent gradual
(slight) decrease with depth, and reaching 9–14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m median at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2000 m (Fig. 6c). These trends are paralleled in
%(Silt <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Clay) values (Fig. 6b), but this parameter more clearly shows
that there is considerable variability in grain size distributions,
especially for slope sediments from the Yokosuka transects.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Plots of surface sediment organic C content (%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
against bottom-water dissolved oxygen concentration (DO, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M); <bold>(a)</bold> all
sites, and <bold>(b)</bold> for slope sites (&gt; 200 m) for the Goa and Yokosuka
transects. DO concentrations were either measured directly from a
submersible (Yokosuka transects) or in near-bottom bottle samples. All
sediment samples and DO data for Goa, Ratnagiri and Karwar transect sites
were collected during intermonsoon (normoxic) period. Horizontal lines for five
Goa transect shelf sites indicate bottom-water DO values encountered during
the monsoon season (shelf hypoxia). Data labels show station depths for
shelf sites and slope sites near and below the lower OMZ boundary
(&gt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 m).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>A plot of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> against bottom-water DO concentration for shelf and slope
surface sediments (Fig. 7a) does not provide definitive evidence for an
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability effect on sediment OM content across the margin. Again,
this mainly reflects the inclusion of shelf stations, for which appropriate
DO values are uncertain. Considering the slope stations from the Goa and
Yokosuka transects only (&gt; 200 m; Fig. 7b), a wide range of
%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is found for sites within the OMZ (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2–7 %),
but there is a progressive decrease in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values from a site near
the lower OMZ boundary (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 m) to sites below, as
bottom-water DO levels rise. The latter feature suggests that elevated
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values within the OMZ, where they occur, may be associated with
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion. However, the wide range of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> amongst sites
within the OMZ includes proximal sites; i.e. at equal depths as well as DO
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>concentrations<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>. Further, %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values at some sites within the OMZ
are as low as those found above or below (Fig. 3). Thus, while increasing DO
levels may cause the decrease in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> below the OMZ, it is apparent
that O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability is not the universal or overriding control on
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions across the slope. Its role on the shelf cannot be
deduced from this analysis.</p>
      <p>The relationship between %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and sediment grain size previously
observed for other Indian margin sediments by Calvert et al. (1995) is also
found for the present sample set, for both slope and shelf sediments.
Specifically, %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for sediments within the permanent OMZ
(&gt; 200 m to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 m) show a strong positive
correlation with %(Silt <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Clay), while values for sites from the shelf
and below the OMZ (depths indicated by labels) show lower relative C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
loadings (Fig. 8a). Thus, while DO depletion may be responsible for
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichments within the OMZ, hydrodynamic processes appear also to
be an important factor, and can explain the wide range of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values observed at sites with low and relatively uniform DO values within
the core of the OMZ.</p>
      <p>To test these inferences, we conducted a Pearson correlation analysis on the
full data set (excluding station co-ordinates and metadata, and the estuary
stations for which no DO data were available). Aside from expected (auto)
correlations, such as between %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and %TN, and between %
Sand, %Silt and %Clay, the strongest correlations were for
%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, firstly with %Silt (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.742), followed by that
with %Sand (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.719), and in turn by that with DO (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.650). These are entirely
consistent with the concept that interplay between hydrodynamic processes
and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability controls sediment %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution across
this margin.</p>
      <p>Taking this forward as a hypothesis, we conducted sequential multiple
regression analysis of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> against the applicable variables in
Table 1. The results (as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) indicate that %Silt (46 %) followed
by DO (30 %) can account for 76 % of the variance in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (with
%Sand adding another 3 % and no other parameter responsible for more
than 1 %). Furthermore, a similar analysis for slope sediments only (to
eliminate uncertainty in DO values for shelf sediment) shows that variance
in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounted for by %Silt and DO rose to 84 % (50
and 34 % respectively). No normalisation of data was conducted as the
value ranges for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, silt and sand (percentages) were roughly similar
to the range in DO values (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0–100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M). It should be noted that
 % Clay was a minor factor in all tests; this is consistent with findings
of Keil and Cowie (1999) for size-fractionated sediments from the Pakistan
margin, in which the major fractions of mass, OM and surface area were found
in the silt fractions.</p>
      <p>Therefore, hydrodynamic processes, expressed as %Silt, appear to explain
more of the variance in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across this margin than DO or any
other measured parameter, and this is most pronounced on the slope, for
sites within and below the OMZ. However, even this masks important detail.
Further scrutiny reveals that for OMZ sites only (&gt; 200–1000 m),
%Silt and DO again account for a large fraction of the total variance
(81 %), but %Silt is by far the dominant control (78 % vs. 3 %).
The situation below the OMZ (&gt; 1000 m) is reversed; the sample
set is smaller but, while %Silt and DO account for 92 % of the
variance in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, DO becomes much more important than %Silt
(79 % vs. 13 %).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> A plot of organic C content (%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against percentage
(by volume) of silt and clay (%(Silt <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Clay)) in surficial shelf and
slope sediments. Marker labels show station depths for selected sites. <bold>(b)</bold> A
plot of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> against estimated specific surface area (SA,
m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for sediments from sites within, above and below the OMZ, here
defined as sites at depths &lt; 200, 200–1000 and &gt; 1000 m,
respectively. Dashed lines indicate the approximate 0.5–1.0 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
range of organic C loadings commonly observed on normoxic margins (Hedges
and Keil, 1995). Surface area values are estimated from a relationship
observed for surface sediments from the Oman and Pakistan margins; SA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
251.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.761</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> is mean grain size (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Together, these results strongly indicate that progressively lower
%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values below the OMZ, and enrichments within it, are due to
enhanced OM preservation under O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted conditions, However, despite
the enhanced preservation effect, the approximately fourfold variability in
%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within the OMZ, where DO is almost invariant, is ultimately
due to hydrodynamic effects, which become the overriding factor.</p>
      <p>The C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment associated with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion is more readily
observed when C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content is related to mineral surface area (e.g.
Keil and Cowie, 1999; Arnarson and Keil, 2007). Using specific surface area
values estimated from a relationship between measured surface area and mean
grain size (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) determined for sediments from the Oman and Pakistan margins
(Cowie, unpublished data), all OMZ sediments showed %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values that are
elevated relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5–1.0 mg C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range
that is common to most normoxic shelf and upper slope sediments (Keil and
Hedges, 1995) (Fig. 8b). Only sites at 1600<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> m depth (i.e. with longest
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure times, well below the OMZ) showed C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings below
this range (as is characteristic of sediments on the continental rise and
abyssal plain). The “excess” C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> found in sediments within the OMZ,
for all grain sizes, indicates enhanced OM loadings over what would be
attributable to hydrodynamic processes alone (Arnarson and Keil, 2007).
Notably, the loadings for the OMZ sites are also elevated relative to those
for sites with corresponding grain size distributions on the shelf. Thus, a
possible explanation for the reduced C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings in shelf sediments
is seasonal exposure to O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that does not occur within the OMZ (see
further discussion below).</p>
      <p>The interplay between hydrodynamics and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability as controls is
further illustrated and clarified through plotting %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> against
%Silt, and separating sites within and outside the OMZ (Fig. 9a). This
confirms the importance of grain-size/hydrodynamics at low and relatively
uniform DO values within the OMZ (here defined as &lt; 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M), as
reflected through the positive correlation between %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and %Silt
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78) over a wide range of %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Although
uncertainty remains over applicable DO values for shelf sites, a
relationship is still seen with grain size at sites with higher DO levels
(i.e. outside the OMZ), but C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings are consistently lower.
Further, there appears to be a progressive O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure effect; the
extent to which %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values depart from the relationship with grain
size observed within the OMZ in Fig. 9a increases with increasing
bottom-water DO concentration (Fig. 9b). This is most evident for slope
sediments. Shelf sediments adhere less well to this relationship, with sites
having coarser sediments in particular appearing to have anomalously high
%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values. However, this cannot be concluded with confidence due
to uncertainty in DO values for shelf sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Organic matter preservation</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> A plot of organic C content (%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against percentage
by volume of silt (%Silt) for sediments from shelf and slope sites
within the OMZ (closed blue circles; here defined by DO &lt; 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M),
and with normoxic (here defined by DO &gt; 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) and
intermediate (DO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) bottom-water oxygen concentrations (at
the time of sampling, intermonsoon). Dashed lines indicate linear regression
results for the OMZ and normoxic sites. <bold>(b)</bold> A plot of residual C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values (departure from OMZ regression line in panel <bold>(a)</bold> for slope
(&gt; 200 m; red circles) and shelf (&lt; 200 m; open circles)
sites. Dashed line indicates linear regression results for all slope sites.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Three amino acid parameters that provide indices of OM degradation state
may offer further insight into the role that enhanced OM preservation in the
absence of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plays in causing observed cross-margin OM distributions.
These are the percentages of total N in the form of amino acids (%AA-TN;
Cowie and Hedges 1994; Fig. 10a), the percentages of total amino acids in the
form of the non-protein amino acids <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alanine and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-amino
butyric acid (%(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GABA); Cowie and Hedges 1994; Fig. 10b) and a
Degradation Index based on multivariate analysis of whole amino acid suites
across a sample set representing a full diagenetic spectrum (DI; Dauwe and
Middelburg, 1998; Dauwe et al., 1999; Fig. 10c). Although these parameters may
be sensitive at different stages of OM alteration (e.g. Cowie and Hedges,
1994), the clearest signal shown by all three parameters is that in both the
Yokosuka and Goa transects, which extend below the OMZ, there is a
consistent trend towards a greater degree of alteration that parallels the
increase in DO levels from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 m near the base of the OMZ
to the maximum sampling depth of 2056 m. Thus, the lower %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values observed below the OMZ appear  to be linked to increasing extent
of OM decay, as previously observed on the Pakistan margin (Vandewiele et al., 2009), which can be linked to a progressive rise in O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure time
(e.g. Hartnett et al., 1998; Hedges et al., 1999).</p>
      <p>At sites within the OMZ, %AA-TN values vary without clear trend with
depth or difference between transects (Fig. 10a). Values for
%(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GABA) and DI (Fig. 10b and c) similarly show no clear trend
with depth within the OMZ. However, while the Yokosuka transect sites
generally show lower %(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GABA) values (less degraded), DI values are
generally more negative (i.e. more degraded) than at corresponding sites on
the Goa transect. Reasons for the slight contrasts between the three
parameters are unclear, though it has previously been shown that
%(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GABA) values become most reliable as tracers of degradation
state at late stages of alteration (Cowie and Hedges, 1994). Overall, results
indicate no consistent trend in degradation state within the OMZ, and better
OM preservation than at sites below the OMZ.</p>
      <p>For the shelf sites, %(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GABA) and DI values (Fig. 10b and c)
show consistent differences between nearshore muds and mid-to-outer shelf
relict sands, but provide directly contrasting indications of degradation
state. Whereas the nearshore muds appear less degraded in terms of DI values
(more positive, Fig. 10c), they appear more degraded in terms of
%(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GABA) values. Again, reasons for these discrepancies are
unclear, but it is possible that the more terrigenous nearshore muds or the
carbonate-rich sands were not amongst the sample types used in assessments
of either parameter as indices of degradation state (Cowie and Hedges, 1994;
Dauwe and Middelburg, 1998; Dauwe et al., 1999). Previous studies (e.g. Keil et al., 2000, and references therein) have indicated that preferential
preservation of proteins and amino acids distinctively associated with
specific phases, such as carbonate or silica tests or bacterial
peptidoglycan, can influence sediment amino acid composition (and diagenetic
indices) alongside the general process of diagenetic alteration. Although
there are also differences in %AA-TN values (Fig. 10a) between the
nearshore muds and some of the relict sands, there is more scatter and no
consistent cross-shelf pattern. Overall, the three parameters suggest that
OM at shelf sites is similar to or less degraded than at sites within the
OMZ (e.g. when comparing muds at nearshore sites and on the slope). Thus,
there are no consistent indications of more degraded OM at sites above the
OMZ, as is seen at sites below the OMZ.</p>
      <p>The central finding from the degradation indicators is therefore that the
progressively more advanced OM degradation state at sites below the OMZ
indicates that elevated C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings within the OMZ (Figs. 8b and 9a)
and the decrease in %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values below the OMZ (Fig. 3), are not due
to decreasing OM delivery offshore as argued by Calvert et al. (1995).
Rather, these trends are due to increasing decay with longer O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exposure, as concluded previously for several other margins, such as off
Washington, Mexico and Pakistan (e.g. Hartnett et al., 1998; Hedges et al., 1999; Vandewiele et al., 2009).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Plots against station depth (m) of <bold>(a)</bold> percentage of total N as
hydrolysable amino acids (%AA-TN), <bold>(b)</bold> mole percentage of total
hydrolysable amino acids in the form of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alanine and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-aminobutyric acid (%(BALA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GABA)) and <bold>(c)</bold> Degradation Index (DI) as
per Dauwe and Middelburg (1998), Dauwe et al. (1999), for surficial shelf and
slope sediments. Shaded area indicates the approximate depth of permanent
mid-depth OMZ (&lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/11/6683/2014/bg-11-6683-2014-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>On the other hand, there is a lack of consistent difference in degradation
state between shelf and upper slope sediments from the OMZ, despite apparent
difference in surface-area normalised C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loadings (Fig. 8b). This
indicates that the large cross-shelf differences in sediment OM content,
which range from &lt; 0.3%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in offshore sands to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4%C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in nearshore muds, under near-identical
(seasonally fluctuating) bottom-water redox conditions, are due more to
physical effects (e.g. winnowing and redistribution) than to differences in
OM preservation related to O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability. The lack of a clear O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
effect is perhaps to be expected at nearshore sites with short O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exposure times (Cowie and Hedges, 1992b; Hartnett et al., 1998), especially
with the impact of seasonal hypoxia across the entire shelf.</p>
      <p>Finally, down-core distributions of OM content and all compositional
parameters over the upper 30–50 cm showed at most slight change (data not
presented; Cowie, unpublished data). Cross-margin differences in sediment OM
content and composition observed in surface sediments therefore are
maintained down-core. This phenomenon, also <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>observed<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> on the Pakistan margin,
even at OMZ sites devoid of macrofauna and thus without masking of down-core
profiles by bioturbation (Cowie et al., 1999, 2009), indicates that in situ OM
alteration is generally limited. Thus, sediment OM contents and compositions
are predominantly determined by processes occurring prior to deposition,
within the water column or across the benthic interface.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In overview, the main findings of the present study are as follows:</p>
      <p><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>

      <p>Source indices confirm mixed marine and terrigenous OM inputs to estuarine sediments,
but little terrigenous OM outside the estuaries, indicating nearshore retention of terrigenous
OM or, more likely, efficient re-mineralisation and replacement with autochthonous marine OM.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>Organic matter enrichment in upper-slope sediments is due to a combination of hydrodynamic
processes (winnowing, cross-margin transport and sorting), enhanced preservation associated with
low O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability within the OMZ, and progressive decay of OM with increasing O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure below the OMZ.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>Major variability in sediment OM content across the shelf and within the OMZ is strongly
linked to grain size distributions. Thus, while low O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure leads to OM enrichments
within the OMZ, hydrodynamic processes are the overriding control on OM distribution, both across the shelf and within the OMZ.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was made possible by a research grant from the Carnegie Trust for
the Universities of Scotland and a UK–India International Joint Project
grant (Royal Society of London and the Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research of India). We also wish to thank JAMSTEC (Japan) for enabling
participation of UK and Indian scientists in the <italic>Yokosuka-Shinkai</italic> Indian margin research
cruise and submersible dives in 2008, and the crews and engineers on those
vessels. Finally, we thank two anonymous referees for their thorough and
helpful reviews.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: A. Gooday</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agnihotri, R., Kurian, S., Fernandes, M., Reshma, K., D'Souza, W., and Naqvi,
S. W. A.: Variability of subsurface denitrification and surface productivity
in the coastal eastern Arabian Sea over the past seven centuries, Holocene,
18, 1–10, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arnarson, T. S. and Keil, R. G.: Changes in organic matter-mineral
interactions for marine sediments with varying oxygen exposure times.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 71, 3545–3556, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bianchi, T. S.: The role of terrestrially derived organic carbon in the
coastal ocean: A changing paradigm and the priming effect, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 19473–19481, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Burdige, D.: Burial of terrestrial organic matter in marine sediments: A
re-assessment, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4011, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002368" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002368</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Calvert, S. E., Pedersen, T. F., Naidu, P. D., and von Stackelberg, U.: On the
organic carbon maximum on the continental slope of the eastern Arabian Sea,
J. Mar. Res., 53, 269–296, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cowie, G. L.: The biogeochemistry of Arabian Sea surficial sediments: A
review of recent studies, Prog. Oceangr., 65, 260–289, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cowie, G. L. and Hedges, J. I.: Improved amino acid quantification in
environmental samples – Charge-matched recovery standards and reduced
analysis time, Mar. Chem., 37, 223–238, 1992a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cowie, G. L. and Hedges, J. I.: The role of anoxia in organic matter
preservation in coastal sediments – Relative stabilities of the major
biochemical under oxic and anoxic depositional conditions, Org. Geochem., 19,
229–234, 1992b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cowie G. L. and Hedges J. I.: Biochemical indicators of diagenetic alteration
in natural organic matter mixtures, Nature, 369, 304–307, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cowie, G. L. and Levin, L. A.: Benthic biological and biogeochemical patterns
and processes across an oxygen minimum zone (Pakistan margin, NE Arabian
Sea), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 261–270, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cowie, G. L., Calvert, S. E., Pedersen, T. F., Schulz, H., and von Rad, U.:
Organic content and preservational controls in surficial shelf and slope
sediment from the Arabian Sea (Pakistan margin), Mar. Geol., 161, 23–38,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cowie, G. L., Mowbray, S., Lewis, M., Matheson, H., and McKenzie, R.: Carbon
and nitrogen elemental and stable isotopic compositions of surficial
sediments from the Pakistan margin of the Arabian Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
56, 271–282, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B. and Middelburg, J. J.: Amino acids and hexosamines as indicators of
organic matter degradation state in North Sea sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
43, 782–798, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B., Middelburg, J. J., Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. H. R.: Linking
diagenetic alteration of amino acids and bulk organic matter reactivity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1809–1814, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Demaison, G. J. and Moore, G. T.: Anoxic environments and oil source bed
genesis, AAPG Bull., 64, 1179–1209, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S. and Hedges, J. I.: Processes controlling the organic carbon
content of open ocean sediments, Paeleoceanogr., 3, 621–634, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Goni, M. A. and Montgomery, S.: Alkaline CuO oxidation with a microwave
digestion system: Lignin analyses of geochemical samples, Anal. Chem., 72,
3116–3121, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hartnett, H. E., Keil, R. G., Hedges, J. I., and Devol, A. H.: Influence of
oxygen exposure time on organic carbon preservation in continental margin
sediments, Nature, 391, 572–574, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I.: Global biogeochemical cycles: progress and problems,
Marine Chemistry, 39, 67–93, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Ertel, J. R.: Characterization of lignin by gas capillary
chromatography of cupric oxide oxidation products, Anal. Chem., 54, 174–178,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Keil, R. G.: Sedimentary organic matter preservation – An
assessment and speculative synthesis, Mar. Chem., 49, 81–115, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Stern J. H.: Carbon and nitrogen determinations of
carbonate-containing solids, Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, 657–663, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I., Keil, R. G., and Benner, R.: What happens to terrestrial organic
matter in the ocean?, Org. Geochem., 27, 195–212, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I., Hu, F. S., Devol, A. H., Hartnett, H. E., Tsamakis, E., and Keil,
R. G.: Sedimentary organic matter preservation: A test for selective
degradation under oxic conditions, Am. J. Sci., 299, 529–555, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Helly, J. J. and Levin, L. A.: Global distribution of naturally occurring
marine hypoxia on continental margins, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 1159–1168,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Ingole, B. S., Sautya, S., Sivadas, S., Singh, R., and Nanajkar, M.:
Macrofaunal community structure in the western Indian continental margin
including the oxygen minimum zone, Mar. Ecol-Evol Persp., 31, 148–166, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jeffreys, R. M., Wolff, G. A., and Cowie, G. L.: Influence of oxygen on
heterotrophic reworking of sedimentary lipids at the Pakistan margin,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 358–375, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. G. and Cowie, G. L.: Organic matter preservation through the
oxygen-deficient zone of the NE Arabian Sea as discerned by organic
carbon:mineral surface area ratios, Mar. Geol., 161, 13–22, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. G., Mayer, L. M., Quay, P. D., Richey, J. E., and Hedges, J. I.: Loss of
organic matter from riverine particles in deltas, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
61, 1507–1511, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. G., Tsamakis, E., and Hedges, J. I.: Early diagenesis of particulate
amino acids in marine systems, in: Perspectives in Amino Acid and Protein
Geochemistry, edited by: Goodfriend, G. A., Collins, M. J., Fogel, M. L., Macko, S.
A., and Wehmiller, J. F., Oxford University Press, NY, 69–82, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kessarkar, P. M., Shynu, R., Rao, V. P., Chong, F. Narvekar, T., and Zhang, J.:
Geochemistry of the suspended sediment in the estuaries of the Mandovi and
Zuari Rivers, central west coast of India, Mar. Geol., 202, 55–69, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kessarkar, P. M., Rao V. P., Ahmad, S. M., and Babu, A. G.: Clay minerals and
Sr-Nd isotopes of the sediments along the western margin of India and their
implication for sediment provenance, Environ. Monit. Assess., 185, 4461–4480,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Khodse, V. B. and Bhosle, N. B.: Nature and sources of suspended particulate
organic matter in a tropical estuary during the monsoon and pre-monsoon:
Insights from stable isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CPOC, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NTPN)
and carbohydrate signature compounds, Mar. Chem., 14, 16–28, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Kurian, S., Nath, B. N. Kumar, N. C., and Nair, K. K. C.: Geochemical and
isotopic signatures of surficial sediments from the western continental
shelf of India: Inferring provenance, weathering and the nature of organic
matter, J. Sed. Res., 83, 427–442, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Maya, M. V., Soares, M. A., Agnihotri, R., Pratihary, A. K., Karapurkar, S.,
Naik, H., and Naqvi, S. W. A.: Variations in some environmental characteristics
including C and N stable isotopic composition of suspended organic matter in
the Mandovi estuary, Environ. Monit. Assess., 175, 501–517, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M., Keil, R. G., Macko, S. A., Joye, S. B., Ruttenberg, K. C., and
Aller, R. C.: Importance of suspended particulates in riverine delivery of
bioavailable nitrogen to coastal zones, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 573–579,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Meyers, P. A.: Preservation of elemental and isotopic source identification
of sedimentary organic matter, Chem. Geol., 114, 289–302, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Naqvi, S. W. A., Jayakumar, D. A., Narvekar, P. V., Naik, H., Sarma, V. S. S.,
D'Souza, W., Joseph, S., and George, D. M.: Increased marine production of N2O
due to intensifying anoxia on the Indian continental shelf, Nature, 408,
346–349, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Naqvi, S. W. A., Naik, H., Jayakumar, D. A., Shailaja, M. S., and Narvekar, P. V.:
Seasonal oxygen deficiency over the western continental shelf of India, in:
Past and Present Water Column Anoxia, edited by: Neretin, L. N., NATO Science
Series IV, Springer, 195–224, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Naqvi, S. W. A., Naik, H., Jayakumar, A., Pratihary, A. K., Narvekar, G.,
Kurian, S., Agnihotri, R., Shailaja, M. S., and Narvekar, P.: Seasonal anoxia over the
western continental shelf, in: Indian Ocean Biogeochemical Processes and
Ecological Variability, edited by: Wiggert, J. D, Hood, R. R., Naqvi, S. W. A ., Brink,
K. H., and Smith, S. L., Geophysical Monograph Series, American
Geophysical Union, 185, 333–345, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Paropkari, A. L., Babu, C. P., and Mascarenhas, A.: A critical evaluation of
depositional parameters controlling the variability of organic carbon in
Arabian Sea sediments, Mar. Geol., 107, 213–226, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Paropkari, A. L., Babu, C. P., and Mascarenhas, A.: New evidence for enhanced
preservation of organic carbon in contact with oxygen minimum zone on the
western continental slope of India, Mar. Geol., 111, 7–13, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pedersen, T. F., Shimmield, G. B., and Price, N. B.: Lack of enhanced
preservation of organic matter in sediments under the oxygen minimum on the
Oman margin, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 56, 545–551, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ramaswamy, V. and Nair, R. R.: Lack of cross-shelf transport of sediments on
the western margin of India: Evidence from clay mineralogy, J Coastal. Res.,
5, 541–546, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, V. P. and Rao, B. R.; Provenance and distribution of clay minerals in the
sediments of the western continental shelf and slope of India, Cont. Shelf Res., 15, 1757–1771, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Revsbech, N. P., Larsen, L. H., Gundersen, J., Dalsgaard, T. Ulloa, O., and
Thamdrup, B.: Determination of ultra-low oxygen concentrations in oxygen
minimum zones by the STOX sensor, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 7, 371–381, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Schubert, C. J., Villanueva, J., Calvert, S. E., Cowie, G. L., von Rad, U.,
Schulz, H., Berner, U., and Erlenkeuser, H.: Stable phytoplankton community
structure in the Arabian Sea over the past 200 000 years, Nature, 394,
563–566, 1998.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Schulte, S., Mangelsdorf, K., and Rullkotter, J.: Organic matter
preservation on the Pakistan continental margin as revealed by biomarker
geochemistry, Org. Geochem., 31, 1005–1022, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sinninghe Damste, J. S., Rijpstra, W. I. C., and Reichart, G.: The influence
of oxic degradation on the sedimentary biomarker record II: Evidence from
Arabian Sea sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66, 2737–2754, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Smallwood, B. J. and Wolff, G. A.: Molecular characterisation of organic
matter in sediments underlying the oxygen minimum zone at the Oman margin,
Arabian Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 353–375, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Suthhof, A., Jennerjahn, T. C., Schafer, P., and Ittekkot, V.: Nature of
organic matter in surface sediments from the Pakistan margin and the deep
Arabian Sea: Amino acids and hexosamines, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 329–351,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Syvitski, J. P. M. and Milliman, J. D.: Geology, geography, and humans battle
for dominance over the delivery of fluvial sediment to the coastal ocean, J. Geol., 115, 1–19, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
van der Weijden, C. H., Reichart, G. J., and Visser, H. J.: Enhanced
preservation of organic matter in sediments deposited within the oxygen
minimum zone in the northeastern Arabian Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 46,
807–830, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Vandewiele, S., Cowie, G. L., Soetaert, K., and Middelburg, J. J.: Amino acid
biogeochemistry and organic matter degradation state across the Pakistan
margin oxygen minimum zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 376–392, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
