<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-2227-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Organic-matter quality of deep permafrost carbon – <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>a study from Arctic
Siberia</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Organic-matter quality of deep permafrost carbon}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Strauss et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Strauss</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          <email>jens.strauss@awi.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-4982</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schirrmeister</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-0596</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mangelsdorf</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Eichhorn</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wetterich</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-1192</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Herzschuh</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and
Marine Research, Periglacial Research Unit Potsdam, Telegrafenberg A 43,
Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Potsdam University, Institute of Earth and Environmental
Science, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for
Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>International Max Planck Research School for Global
Biogeochemical Cycles (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry and
Friedrich Schiller University), Burgweg 11, 07749 Jena,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">J. Strauss (jens.strauss@awi.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>2227</fpage><lpage>2245</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>August</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The organic-carbon (OC) pool accumulated in Arctic permafrost (perennially
frozen ground) equals the carbon stored in the modern atmosphere. To give an
idea of how Yedoma region permafrost could respond under future climatic
warming, we conducted a study to quantify the organic-matter quality (here
defined as the intrinsic potential to be further transformed, decomposed,
and mineralized) of late Pleistocene (Yedoma) and Holocene (thermokarst)
deposits on the Buor-Khaya Peninsula, northeast Siberia. The objective of
this study was to develop a stratigraphic classified organic-matter quality
characterization. For this purpose the degree of organic-matter
decomposition was estimated by using a multiproxy approach. We applied
sedimentological (grain-size analyses, bulk density, ice content) and
geochemical parameters (total OC, stable carbon isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C), total organic carbon : nitrogen (C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N) ratios) as well as lipid
biomarkers (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids, hopanes, triterpenoids, and biomarker
indices, i.e., average chain length, carbon preference index (CPI), and
higher-plant fatty-acid index (HPFA)). Our results show that the Yedoma and
thermokarst organic-matter qualities for further decomposition exhibit no
obvious degradation–depth trend. Relatively, the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values and the HPFA index show a significantly better
preservation of the organic matter stored in thermokarst deposits compared
to Yedoma deposits. The CPI data suggest less degradation of the organic
matter from both deposits, with a higher value for Yedoma organic matter. As
the interquartile ranges of the proxies mostly overlap, we interpret this as indicating comparable quality for further decomposition for both kinds of
deposits with likely better thermokarst organic-matter quality. Supported by
principal component analyses, the sediment parameters and quality proxies of
Yedoma and thermokarst deposits could not be unambiguously separated from each other. This revealed that the organic-matter vulnerability is
heterogeneous and depends on different decomposition trajectories and the
previous decomposition and preservation history. Elucidating this was one of
the major new contributions of our multiproxy study. With the addition of biomarker
data, it was possible to show that permafrost organic-matter degradation
likely occurs via a combination of (uncompleted) degradation cycles or a
cascade of degradation steps rather than as a linear function of age or
sediment facies. We conclude that the amount of organic matter in the
studied sediments is high for mineral soils and of good quality and
therefore susceptible to future decomposition. The lack of depth trends
shows that permafrost acts like a giant freezer, preserving the constant
quality of ancient organic matter. When undecomposed Yedoma organic matter
is mobilized via thermokarst processes, the fate of this carbon depends
largely on the environmental conditions; the carbon could be preserved in an
undecomposed state till refreezing occurs. If modern input has occurred,
thermokarst organic matter could be of a better quality for future microbial
decomposition than that found in Yedoma deposits.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>During the late Quaternary, the rate of organic-matter decomposition in the
Arctic was slower than plant growth, sedimentation, and freezing rates.
Thus, a large pool of organic carbon (OC) accumulated in the Arctic and was sequestered deep in the permafrost. Hugelius et al. (2014) estimates an OC
storage of 1300 Gt for the circum-Arctic permafrost region with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 850 Gt OC sequestered in permafrost. This is approximately
the carbon stored in the modern atmosphere (Dlugokencky and Tans, 2014).
During warming and permafrost thawing, this formerly cryo-sequestered OC
gradually entered the modern biogeochemical cycle by microbial turnover. By
thawing and microbial activity, the permafrost deposits can turn from a
carbon sink to a source (Schuur et al., 2009), releasing greenhouse gases
such as carbon dioxide and methane to the atmosphere. In addition to the
near-surface carbon pool representing the uppermost 3 m below surface, deep OC
pools, especially those held in ice-rich permafrost deposits in the Yedoma
region, are of great significance for current concerns about the effects of
global warming because of rapid permafrost thaw, such as thermokarst and thermoerosion. According to Strauss et al. (2013) and Hugelius et al. (2014), the Yedoma region is defined as the area of potential distribution
of late Pleistocene ice-rich and organic-rich silty deposits (Yedoma),
covering large areas in Siberia and Alaska. Estimates of OC stored in the
Yedoma region amount to 83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 Gt for late Pleistocene Yedoma deposits
(ages shown in Table 1). Due to Holocene warming, subsequent ground ice melt
and surface subsidence, thermokarst basins formed and were partly occupied
by lakes. Holocene thermokarst deposits (ages shown in Table 1) contain
130 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 Gt organic carbon. In total, the Yedoma region extends to an
area of about 1 387 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, of which about 70 % is already
affected by permafrost degradation (thermokarst; Strauss et al., 2013).
Kuhry et al. (2009) and Schirrmeister et al. (2011a) showed that Yedoma
deposits accumulated at fast rates, implying a short time for the organic
matter to decay before it became locked into a perennially frozen state.
Therefore, the organic-matter availability for microorganisms is expected to
be excellent, resulting in great vulnerability to warming ground conditions
(Mu et al., 2014). To elucidate how the Yedoma region permafrost could respond
under conditions of future climatic warming, we studied the organic-matter
degradation state of Yedoma and its Holocene degradation features (called
thermokarst deposits) on the Buor-Khaya Peninsula, eastern Laptev Sea. As
mentioned above, Strauss et al. (2013) found that thermokarst deposits
contain the quantitatively more important carbon pool, but the unsolved
question is this: is the thermokarst organic-matter pool as degradable as
the frozen late Pleistocene Yedoma, or has the most labile carbon already
been emitted due to thermokarst degradation processes? In both kinds of
deposits the OC was incorporated deep (deeper than 3 m) into permafrost
(Schirrmeister et al., 2013; Strauss et al., 2013). As shown by models and
extrapolation from recent observations, the more southern portions of Yedoma
deposits thawed during the last deglaciation, resulting in large emissions
of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere (Walter et al., 2007a; Ciais et al.,
2012; Walter Anthony et al., 2014). Recent ground warming has been observed
in the permafrost zone (Romanovsky et al., 2010), and incubation experiments
reveal that permafrost warming is accompanied by a substantial outgassing of
greenhouse gases (Lee et al., 2012; Knoblauch et al., 2013; Schädel et
al., 2014). As an illustration of the important influence of ground
temperature on organic-matter degradation, a higher respiration rate at
greater depth close to the permafrost table (Mangelsdorf et al., 2009;
Waldrop et al., 2010) was found inside the seasonally thawed active layer
and interpreted as a greater lability of the organic matter close to the
perennially frozen ground. Focusing on permafrost deposits in the Laptev Sea
region, which includes our Buor-Khaya study site, Schirrmeister et al. (2011a) characterize the Yedoma region permafrost organic matter as weakly
decomposed.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Radiocarbon dating on plant macroremains. Calibrations were
done by using the Calib 6.0 software and the IntCal09 calibration curve (Stuiver
et al., 2010). Depth is given in meters below surface level (m b.s.l.) and
height in meters above sea level (m a.s.l.). Age is given as year before
present (yr BP). Poz: Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Poland.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lab. no.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sample</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depth</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Height</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Radiocarbon</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Calibrated ages 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">name</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m b.s.l.)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ages (yr BP)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(95.4 %) (yr BP)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42080</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-03-A-03</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4760</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5519</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">70</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \rotentry?>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9" morerows="7">thermokarst deposits</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42072</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-01-A-02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3665</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3990</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">100</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42073</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-01-A-04</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8140</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9075</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">78</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42086</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-05-A-04</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5990</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6837</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">103</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42087</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-05-B-10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">80</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8817</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">215</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42088</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-05-B-19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7940</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8811</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">122</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42090</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-05-C-23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5280</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6059</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42091</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-05-C-29</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6710</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">90</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7566</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">138</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42074</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-02-A-03</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30 100</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">300</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34 613</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">596</oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \rotentry?>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9" morerows="9">Yedoma deposits</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42075</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-02-B-09</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34 650</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">550</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">39 813</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1242</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42076</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-02-B-12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41 500</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1500</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45 312</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2649</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42077</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-02-D-20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">45 000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">47 614</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2386</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42078</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-02-D-23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43 000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1500</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46 830</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2678</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42081</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-04-A-02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">49 000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42082</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-04-A-08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&gt; 48 000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42083</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-04-B-10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&gt; 55 000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42084</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-04-C-16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&gt; 49 000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poz-42085</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Buo-04-C-20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">&gt; 55 000</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Biomarkers are used for the paleoenvironmental reconstruction of terrestrial
permafrost (Andersson et al., 2011) or the characterization of permafrost
organic-matter degradation (Andersson and Meyers, 2012; Vonk et al., 2013;
Routh et al., 2014). In our study we estimate molecular markers
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids, hopanes, and triterpenoids) and use biomarker
proxies and indices (absolute lipid concentration, average chain length (ACL),
carbon preference index (CPI), hop-17(21)-ene, higher-plant fatty-acid
(HPFA) index, and an oleanene ratio) to test whether they are useful mirrors
of organic-matter decomposition, i.e., of the organic-matter state of degradation in
permafrost deposits. Fairly established methods, both cryolithological
(grain-size analyses, bulk density, ice content) and biogeochemical (total
organic carbon (TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, stable carbon isotope ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in TOC), total nitrogen (TN), and TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TN (C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N) ratios),
are applied to our sample set. Finally, principal components analysis (PCA)
highlights the relationships between different organic-matter degradation
proxies.</p>
      <p>Because the future feedback from the Yedoma region permafrost OC to climate
forcing is driven by both (1) the pool size, estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 211 Gt (Strauss et al., 2013), and (2) the state of degradation of OC stored
in the studied deposits, the objective of this study is the development of a
stratigraphically differentiated organic-matter quality characterization
using sample material representative of widespread Yedoma and thermokarst
permafrost. We hypothesize increased organic-matter degradation during
thermokarst processes but also increased organic-matter input during
climatically favorable Holocene times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study area</title>
      <p>The Buor-Khaya Peninsula study site (71<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>34<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 132<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) is located in the northeastern part of Siberia (Fig. 1). The Buor-Khaya
Peninsula is framed by the Laptev Sea, a shallow epicontinental part of the
Arctic Ocean, and geologically by two rift structures (Drachev et al.,
1998). Buor-Khaya is underlain by continuous permafrost with ground
temperatures of less than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Drozdov et al., 2005). The
permafrost thickness is estimated to be between 450 and 650 m (Romanovskii
et al., 2004). Stratigraphically, outcrops from two sediment units are
distinguished and studied: (1) ice-rich permafrost, called Yedoma deposits,
and (2) deposits in permafrost rapid-thaw features, generalized as
thermokarst deposits. Three profiles of thermokarst deposits (in a
thermokarst basin: Buo-01 and Buo-05; initial thermokarst on top of a Yedoma
hill: Buo-03) and two profiles of Yedoma deposits (Buo-02, Buo-04) were
studied and sampled. Figure 1 shows an overview of the sampled profiles and
their position relative to each other.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Location of the Buor-Khaya Peninsula and the study area. The
square black box in the globe inset indicates the area shown in the map
below. The profile diagram and the photographs below it show the profiles
and their positions relative to each other. Adapted from Strauss and
Schirrmeister (2011); pictures taken by J. Strauss.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Field work</title>
      <p>Field studies were undertaken in summer 2010 at outcrops situated on the
western coast of the Buor-Khaya Peninsula. The sediment of the profiles and
sub-profiles, exposed at the cliff wall or partly in thermokarst mounds in
thaw slumps, was dug with spades and cleaned with hacks. The cryolithology,
sediment characteristics, and visible organic matter in the sediments of the sequences chosen were surveyed and described. Moreover, the profiles were
photographed and sketched. Sub-profiles were stacked together to create
composite profiles. Sampling positions in neighboring sub-profiles were
correlated by height estimation using measuring tape. The upper edge of each
profile was calibrated with tacheometer measurements (Günther et al.,
2012). In the field laboratory, all sample volumes were measured with a
balance following Archimedes principle, and the absolute ice content was
determined by drying the sample. In total, 91 samples were taken and cooled for transport to laboratories for further analysis. The detailed sampling
positions for each profile are shown in Strauss and Schirrmeister (2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Indicators of organic-matter quality for further decomposition</title>
      <p>To validate and to extend the sedimentological approach used and to
estimate the organic-matter quality for further decomposition, lipid
biomarkers were measured in order to estimate the degree of organic-matter
degradation. For biomarker studies we used a “fingerprint” approach by
focusing on identifiable markers related to the state of organic-matter
degradation. Below, the geochemical indicators and biomarkers used are
described.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Grain-size analyses</title>
      <p>Grain sizes were analyzed using a laser particle sizer (LS 200,
Beckmann-Coulter) with a measuring range of 0.375 to 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Figs. 2, S1 in the Supplement). Grain-size
calculations were done following Folk and Ward (1957) using Gradistat v8 (Blott
and Pye, 2001). A detailed description of these analytical techniques is
given in the Supplement (Sect. S1.1 in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Three-dimensional grain-size distributions of <bold>(a)</bold> Yedoma
and <bold>(b)</bold> thermokarst profiles. To avoid an overlap of Buo-05 and Buo-01 in <bold>(b)</bold>, the
altitude axis was adapted and does not ascend consistently. A
two-dimensional grain-size plot is shown in Fig. S1.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015-f02.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Elemental composition</title>
      <p>To determine the total elemental carbon and total nitrogen (TN) content, the
samples were measured by a carbon–nitrogen–sulfur analyzer (Vario EL III,
Elementar). TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured with a TOC analyzer (Vario Max C,
Elementar). The volumetric TOC content (TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated
according to Strauss et al. (2013). A detailed description of this
technique is given in the Supplement (Sect. S1.2).</p>
      <p>The TOC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TN (C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N) ratio has been used as a general indicator of the degree of
organic-matter decomposition (Stevenson, 1994). Based on the assumption that
organic-matter components are degraded selectively, degradation modifies
elemental compositions and hence C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N in deposits. Because a decrease in the
C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio has been observed in aerated deposits with microbial
immobilization of TN (nitrogen stays in the system) accompanied by the
remineralization of TOC (Sollins et al., 1984) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission, this
ratio is used in the following way: the higher the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio, the lower the
degree of decomposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Bulk density and volumetric carbon content</title>
      <p>BD (bulk density) was calculated using Eq. (1).

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BD</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sample  dry  weight</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sample  volume</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Estimating the BD is required in order to convert the measured-weight-based
TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content per sample to a volume-based value. Thus, the
TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated according to Eq. (2):

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>TOC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>BD</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>TOC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>wt%</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <title>Carbon isotope studies</title>
      <p>Stable TOC carbon isotopes were determined with a Finnigan MAT Delta-S mass
spectrometer combined with a FLASH elemental analyzer and a  ConFlo III gas
mixing system. A detailed methodology is given in the Supplement (Sect. S1.4). The stable carbon isotopes of OC reflect (1) an initial
contribution from different plant species and plant components and (2)
subsequent degradation processes (Gundelwein et al., 2007). Assuming
constant photosynthetic isotope fractionation in source plants in the region
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants are ubiquitous in the Arctic; Tieszen, 1973), we use
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C ratios as a degradation proxy. According to Heyer et al. (1976),
decomposition discriminates against the lighter isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C),
resulting in more negative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C ratios. Thus, this proxy is
used in the following way: lower (more negative) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values
are connected to less degraded material, while higher (less negative)
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values reflect greater decomposition.</p>
      <p>Ages were determined by radiocarbon dating of selected macroscopic plant
remains performed at the Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Poland (Goslar
et al., 2004). The presented radiocarbon ages are uncalibrated ages; Table 1
includes calibrated ages as well. Radiocarbon ages are given in year before
present (yr BP).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5">
  <title>Lipid biomarkers</title>
      <p>To look more closely at the molecular composition, we used specific lipid
biomarkers. Molecular fossils or biomarkers were studied by chromatography
methods coupled with mass spectrometers. Characteristic fractions like
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids, sterols, and hopanes were isolated. Because the
TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the profiles is not equally distributed, we calculated and
visualized the biomarker concentration as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gSediment<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gSed<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the results, we focus on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Every radiocarbon-dated sample and additional samples were
used for biomarker analysis. In total 25 biomarker samples were analyzed.
Independently of TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the sample selection for biomarkers was
based on their stratigraphic position with the aim of covering the maximum time
period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Extraction and fraction separation</title>
      <p>For lipid biomarker analyses, 2–12 g of ground sediment was weighed in an
extraction cell with an accelerated solvent extractor (ASE 200, Dionex).
Samples were extracted with dichloromethane <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> methanol (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>99</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Each sample was
held in a static phase for 20 min at 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (after 5 min
heating, no preheating) at a pressure of 5 MPa. Afterwards, the dissolved
compounds were concentrated with a TurboVap (Zymark) closed-cell
concentrator and further dried by evaporating the solvent in a stream of
nitrogen gas. After that, internal standards (5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-androstane for the
aliphatic fraction, ethylpyrene for the aromatic fraction, 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-androstan-17-on for nitrogen-, sulfur-, and oxygen- (NSO-) containing
compounds and erucic acid for the NSO fatty-acid fraction) were added. The
amount of internal standards depended on the TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content
(&lt; 10 wt%: 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g; &gt; 10 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 wt%:
20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g; &gt; 25 wt%: 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g). After the removal of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-hexane-insoluble fraction (by the addition of a large excess of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-hexane,
called “asphaltene” precipitation), the hexane-soluble portion of the
extract was separated by medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC; Radke
et al., 1980) into fractions of different polarity (aliphatic and aromatic
hydrocarbons as well as polar hetero- (NSO) components). Afterwards, the NSO
fraction was split into a fatty acids and an alcohol fraction using a
KOH-impregnated silica gel column (Schulte et al., 2000).</p>
      <p>For this study, the focus was placed on the aliphatic fraction (containing
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and triterpenoid compounds) and the NSO fraction (containing
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids). The fractions were measured by gas chromatography–mass
spectrometry (GC-MS). All compounds of interest were identified using the
Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>GC-MS measurement and compound quantification</title>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alcohols, hopenes (hop-17(21)-ene), and other triterpenoids
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-amyrin (olean-12-en-3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-ol), olean-12-ene, and
olean-13(18)-ene) were measured with a GC-MS system (GC – Trace GC Ultra; MS – DSQ; both Thermo Fisher Scientific). Prior to the measurements, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids were methylated with diazomethane and the alcohols were
silylated with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-methyl-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-trimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide (MSTFA). The GC was
equipped with a programmable temperature vaporization (PTV) injector system
(starting temperature of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, heating rate of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, isothermal holding time of 10 min, operated
in splitless mode) and a fused silica capillary column (SGE BPX5, 50 m
length, 0.22 mm inner diameter, 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m film thickness). For the
measurements the GC oven was programmed with a starting temperature of
50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, a heating rate of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 310 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
and an isothermal holding time of 30 min. Helium with a constant flow
rate of 1 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was used as a carrier gas. For the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty-acid fraction a
different temperature program (starting temperature of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 1 min isotherm, heating rate of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
isothermal holding time 25 min) was used. For compound identification,
the gas chromatograph was linked to a mass spectrometer, which was operated
in electron impact ionization mode at 70 eV. The temperature of the ion
source was set to 230 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Full scan mass spectra were recorded
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 to 600 Da at a scan rate of 2.5 scans s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty-acid
fraction, the scan rate was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 to 650 Da.</p>
      <p>The quantification of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-amyrin was done in
the GC-MS total ion current chromatogram by relating the peak area of the
target compound to the peak area of an internal standard of known
concentration. Other triterpenoids like olean-12-ene, olean-13(18)-ene, and
hopene were quantified using the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 191 mass trace relative to the peak
area of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-diploptene (in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 191 mass trace), the
concentration of which was calculated in the total ion current chromatogram
relative to the internal standard (5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-androstane).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS6">
  <title>Biomarker proxies and indices</title>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Absolute lipid concentration</title>
      <p>The absolute lipid concentration is used as a rough estimator of organic-matter quality for degradation in the following way: the higher the
concentration, the better the conservation of the lipid and the better the
quality of the organic matter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Carbon preference index</title>
      <p>The CPI was introduced by Bray and Evans (1961) as the ratio of odd- to
neighboring even-numbered alkanes; this is a measure of the alteration of
organic matter. Here we use the improved formula from Marzi et al. (1993).
In addition, we also applied the CPI for fatty acids in which even-numbered
fatty acids predominate over adjacent odd <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids (Glombitza et al.,
2009).

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CPI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the starting dominating chain length/2, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ending dominating chain length/2, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the index (carbon number), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
concentration.</p>
      <p>The CPI is used as a degradation and alteration proxy by quantifying the
odd over even (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, Fig. S2) or even over odd (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids, Fig. S3) predominance of the carbon
chains (Bray and Evans, 1961; Glombitza et al., 2009). A low CPI means
mature or degraded organic matter (e.g., CPI of crude oil <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Average chain length</title>
      <p>As introduced by Poynter (1989), the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane ACL value is the
concentration-weighted mean of different carbon chain lengths in a
geological sample. For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes we use the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>33</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> interval, for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>34</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ACL</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the index (carbon number) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is concentration.</p>
      <p>The ACL is a rough OC source parameter. A schematic showing different chain
lengths in different organisms is given in Fig. S4. The higher C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> land
plants are expected to have an ACL of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28–29.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx6" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Hop-17(21)-ene</title>
      <p>We use hop-17(21)-ene as another marker for low-maturity organic material.
The hop-17(21)-ene is produced by bacteria. The assumption here is that
during degradation and diagenesis the hop-17(21)-ene will be transformed
into saturated hopane (Luo et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx7" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Higher-plant fatty-acid index</title>
      <p>The ratio of the major even wax alcohols over the sum of major odd wax
alkanes plus even alcohols was introduced by Poynter (1989) as the higher-plant alcohol (HPA) index. It is applied as an indicator for chemical
degradation of the wax components. Based on this index, but using fatty
acids instead of alcohols, we developed the HPFA index. The general
assumption for this index is that it reflects the preservation degree of organic matter due to the higher lability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids in relation to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes.
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8}{8}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">HPFA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-fatty acids</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-fatty  acids</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-alkanes</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The HPFA ratio cannot be considered an absolute index of degradation but is
an indicator of the relative amounts of the more labile fatty acids that
remain in a sample. Since <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes are preserved preferentially compared to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids, a decrease in this index indicates increased decomposition (the
more degraded, the lower the HPFA index).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx8" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Oleanene ratio</title>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Amyrin (olean-12-en-3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-ol) is a triterpenoid produced by
higher land plants. As a first degradation step, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-amyrin is expected
to lose its hydroxy group and will be transformed to olean-12-ene. A second
step would be a shift of the double-bond-forming olean-13(18)-ene. Thus,
fresh organic material is associated with a lower oleanene ratio, while more
degraded organic matter is reflected in a higher ratio. This index is
calculated as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9}{9}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">oleanene  ratio</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>olean-12-ene</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>olean-13(18)-ene</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-amyrin</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn>100.</mml:mn><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSSx9" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Acetate</title>
      <p>Pore water was obtained from each sample by centrifugation in specific pore
water tubes. Water extracts were analyzed twice using ion chromatography
with conductivity detection (ICS 3000, Dionex). An analytical column (AS 11
HC, 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 mm, Dionex) was used at a constant 35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The
sample was eluted with a KOH solution of varying concentration over time. The
initial concentration was 1.4 mM. Between 0 and 6 min, the KOH solution
was increased at a constant rate to 1.6 mM. Between 6 and 12 min the
solution was increased to 10.0 mM KOH, and a concentration of 15.0 mM KOH was
reached at 22 min. After 32 min, 60.0 mM KOH concentration was
achieved, maintained for 1 min, and followed by a rapid decrease to 1.4 mM after 33 min, when samples were fixed for 45 min to equilibrate
the system. For the quantification of acetate, standards containing the
investigated compound were measured. The standard deviation of the sample
and of standard quantification was &lt; 5 %. Because acetate can act
as excellent feedstock for microbes (Smith and Mah, 1980; Vieth et al.,
2008) and it has been shown that acetate was rapidly consumed in the
presence of oxygen and nitrate (Kuesel and Drake, 1995), we use the acetate
pore water concentrations in the different deposits as a parameter to assess
the quality of the organic matter and to compare the potential of the
different deposits for future microbial degradation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Statistical methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Significance testing</title>
      <p>For testing the samples concerning their statistical distribution, the
Shapiro–Wilk normality test was applied. Because of non-normal distribution,
we used the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test for significance testing of Yedoma
and thermokarst samples. In order to compare the five different profiles, we
used the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Principal component analysis</title>
      <p>Multivariate statistical techniques, such as the PCA used here, allow the
analysis of multiple variables in order to investigate connections between
the different degradation proxies. Prior to the PCA, concentration data were
transformed using a log (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>1) transformation. As the square root
transformation is commonly applied to count data, especially if the values
are mostly rather small, we decided to use this weaker (compared to
logarithm) transformation for the TOC (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data.
Both transformations were applied to reduce right skewness and to put the
parameters on the same scale. We performed three PCA runs. First, a PCA of
the sediment parameters was implemented to infer differences between Yedoma
and thermokarst deposits. Second, a PCA of biomarker proxies was performed.
For this purpose, other characteristics were added as supplementary
variables (TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, grain
size, BD, ice content, and depth) without being included in the PCA calculation.
These supplementary variables have no influence on the PCA and were plotted
afterwards in the PCA biplot. Third, a PCA was conducted on samples of the
major odd <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes to infer possible changes in the source organisms with the
same supplementary variables as described above. Computations were performed using the
“vegan” package of R software (Oksanen, 2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>Stratigraphically, there are two types of deposition units at the study
site. The first unit is composed of Yedoma deposits. The second unit
represents thermokarst deposits resulting from thermal degradation of
Yedoma. Grain-size distributions (Figs. 2, S1) and PCA of sediments
illustrate that thermokarst deposits are made up of degraded Yedoma
sediments. According to Gubin and Veremeeva (2010) and Zanina et al. (2011), the
Yedoma deposit soil types are mainly less developed cryopedoliths
containing more developed paleocryosol parts (Figs. 3 and 4, labeled and
grey shaded areas).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of sedimentological, biogeochemical, and biomarker
parameters for the Buo-04 and Buo-02 Yedoma profiles. All diagrams are drawn
in such a way as to show more degraded samples on the left and less degraded
samples on the right side. Thus, the axis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C shows descending values. In the text, the paleocryosol parts are reported with altitude
measurements from the lowest to the highest sample of each paleocryosol. The
grey shaded areas are for visualization, not for exact height estimations of
the paleocryosols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of sedimentological, biogeochemical, and biomarker
parameters for the Buo-05, Buo-01, and Buo-03 thermokarst profiles. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty-acid symbols are explained in Fig. 3. All diagrams are
drawn in such a way as to show more degraded samples on the left and less
degraded samples on the right side (descending axis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values). In the text, the paleocryosol parts are reported with altitude
measurements from the lowest to the highest sample of each paleocryosol. The
grey shaded areas are for visualization, not for exact height estimations of
the paleocryosols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Organic-matter quality of Yedoma deposits</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Sedimentological and biogeochemical proxies</title>
      <p>The radiocarbon ages (Table 1, Fig. S5) of the Yedoma deposits range from
infinite ages (&gt; 55 000 yr BP) at the very bottom to 30 100 yr BP
at the uppermost sampled Yedoma unit. This is comparable to other Yedoma
sequences in the region (Schirrmeister et al., 2011b). The mean grain sizes
show a decreasing trend in the Buo-04 lower Yedoma profile, from 28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m at the bottom to 11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in the upper part of Buo-04-A. The Buo-02
Yedoma profile shows no trend but exhibits a more heterogeneous mean grain
size, including three maxima at 22.5 m a.s.l. (32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), 23.7 m a.s.l. (34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), and 25.5 m a.s.l. (33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m).
Nevertheless, all Yedoma deposit samples are classified as poorly sorted
medium-to-coarse silts with a stable low clay fraction (&lt; 15 %).</p>
      <p>The TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents vary from 0.2 wt% at 5 m a.s.l to 24.0 wt% in a peaty paleocryosol horizon at 24 m a.s.l. (Fig. 3). The mean
TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content is 2.4 wt% (median 0.97 wt%). Calculating the
TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> according to Strauss et al. (2013), by utilizing the BD
(between 0.1 and 1.5 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ice content (without ice wedges; 21 to 90 vol %), the Yedoma
sediments contain from 3 to 46 kg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean of 14 kg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (median 9 kg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ). The maxima
correspond to the peaty horizons with large TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents and a low
BD. Within the paleocryosol horizons, located at 6.8, 24.0 to 24.5, 24.8,
and 27.8 to 28.9 m a.s.l., maxima in the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio are observable. The C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N
range in these horizons is 8 to 31. In the cryopedolith profile parts, the
C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N maximum is reached in the lowermost Buo-04-C sub-profile (17.7 and
16.7). The C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N of the rest of the Yedoma profile falls between 4.1 (at
Buo-02-C, 23.7 m a.s.l.) and 14.3 (below the paleocryosol at 23.5 m a.s.l.)</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the Yedoma deposits ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.0 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The minima fit the maxima of the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N
ratio well in the paleocryosol horizons at 6.8, 24.0 to 24.5, 24.8, and 27.8 to 28.9 m a.s.l. The minimum C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N of the Buo-02-C sub-profile corresponds approximately
to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.0 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Biomarker proxies and indices</title>
      <p>A series of long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes that exhibit a strong odd-carbon preference
ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>33</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are identified in all Yedoma samples (Fig. S2). Moreover, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes show a unimodal distribution maximizing at the
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, or C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>alkane (Fig. S2). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids show
strong even over odd carbon number predominance and a bimodal distribution
ranging from C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3). The maxima are generally
located at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the lower carbon number range and at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the higher carbon number range. Total <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty-acid concentrations
related to TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and sediment weight show a homogeneous pattern
similar to that of the TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N values. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane
concentration ranges from 3 to 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gSed<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gSed<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and from 387 to 1715 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean 1132 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids range from 4 to 306 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gSed<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean 51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gSed<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and from 475 to 4669 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean 2196 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>This Yedoma series shows a distinct preference between even and odd carbon.
The mean CPI values of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (12.2, ranging from 8.3 to 15.9) are
higher than the CPI values of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids (4.9, ranging from 3.8 to 7.6). Because <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids are functional compounds (including a functional
group, e.g., a carboxyl group), their degradation rates are much higher
compared to those of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (Poynter and Eglinton, 1990). This statement is
also based on the assumption of similar sources. The ACL of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids is very stable at around 28.4 (range: 27.6 to 29.2) and 25.0
(range: 23.8 to 25.6), respectively.</p>
      <p>Relatively higher hop-17(21)-ene concentrations are used as an indicator for
a lower organic-matter degradation state. In the lower Yedoma profile, the
hop-17(21)-ene ranges from 0.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the lowermost and uppermost
samples (4.3 and 18.5 m a.s.l.) to the overall maximum of 19.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the Buor-Khaya
site (9.1 m a.s.l.). At Buo-02, the hop-17(21)-ene
concentration is lower compared to the other Yedoma profile, with a mean of
1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a maximum of 7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the potentially Holocene-contaminated uppermost sample. The HPFA ratio
for the Yedoma samples is very stable around the mean value of 0.50 (median
0.54), with a minimum in 18.5 m a.s.l. (0.15) and a maximum at the uppermost
sample (0.69) at 29.7 m a.s.l. For Yedoma, the oleanene ratio is 0.0 (except
for a ratio of 10.0 in the uppermost sample). The acetate content of the Yedoma
sample is between 0.6 and 57.5 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a mean of 6.7 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (median 1.2 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Organic-matter quality of thermokarst deposits</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Sedimentological and biogeochemical proxies</title>
      <p>The radiocarbon dating shows Holocene ages between 8140 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 and
3665 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 yr BP (Fig. S6, Table 1). The lowermost Buo-05-C profile shows
an age inversion for the two samples (0.3 and 2.2 m a.s.l.). The mean grain
size at Buo-05 from the bottom to 6.7 m a.s.l. is 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Above, the
mean grain size increases to 19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The Buo-05 clay fraction is stable
at a low level (&lt; 15 %). The Buo-01 profile shows a very scattered
grain size ranging from 4 to 44 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m mean grain size. For the whole
data set, there is a maximum in the clay fraction (35 %) in the peat
horizon at 8.7 m a.s.l. Buo-03 shows a slight decrease from 18 to 11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. All thermokarst deposits are classified as (very) poorly sorted silts.
Similarly to the Yedoma deposits, the BD of the thermokarst deposits is
between 0.1 and 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the ice
content (without the ice wedges) is 23 to 87 wt% (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p>The mean TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents of the thermokarst deposits, 4.7 wt%
(median 1.7 wt%), are higher compared to Yedoma deposits, varying between
0.2 and 43.0 wt%. Minimum and maximum TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> both occur at
Buo-01 and exhibit the same scatter as in the grain sizes. TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ranges between 2.8 and 93.5 kg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean 24, median 19 kg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ).</p>
      <p>At Buo-05 the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio is stable at around 9 to 10 (Fig. 4), except for a
paleocryosol horizon at 9.2 m a.s.l. that shows a value of 22. At Buo-01,
the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio below the paleocryosol horizon is remarkably low, between 2
and 9, followed by the overall maximum in the peaty horizon with a ratio of
34. The Buo-03 cryopedolith samples show C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios around 10, while the
paleocryosol samples exhibit C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios from 16 to 19. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values range between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.5 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with minima
corresponding to the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N maxima at the paleocryosol horizons
(anticorrelated to the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, Fig. 5a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Scatterplots of selected degradation markers. In all three plots, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis shows
the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio. Yedoma deposits are shown as black triangles,
thermokarst deposits as grey diamonds. Regression equations, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the sample number (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value are given to the right of the graph.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015-f05.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Biomarker proxies and indices</title>
      <p>The absolute lipid concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes are in the same range but
slightly higher compared to the Yedoma profiles. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane average is
1275.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (median 1260.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
ranging from 599.7 (8.7 m a.s.l.) to 1907.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (29.5 m a.s.l.). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty-acid average is nearly double that found in the Yedoma
samples. On average, 4096.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (median 3805.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are stored in the thermokarst deposits of Buor-Khaya,
ranging from 554.5 (uppermost Buo-01 sample) to 11013.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (uppermost Buo-03
sample).</p>
      <p>A series of long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes were recognized in all thermokarst samples
with a strong odd carbon number preference ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>33</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Nearly all samples show a unimodal distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes
maximized at C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, or C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S2). Sample Buo-03-A-03
alone does not fit into this scheme because it maximizes at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Compared to Yedoma samples, the short-chain fraction &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
more pronounced (Fig. S2). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids show a strong even-carbon-number
preference and a bimodal distribution between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S3), but the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is less pronounced than in the Yedoma deposits. An
exception to this is found in sample Buo-01-A-02, where the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> monomer
reaches the overall maximum of the distribution. Apart from that, the maxima
are generally located at the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acid.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane CPI of thermokarst averages 9.6 (median 9.3) and is lower
compared to the Yedoma deposits, although the CPI values are in the same
range (between 7.0 and 15.3). The CPI of the fatty acids ranges from 4.0 to
9.0 (mean 5.3, median 4.9). The ACL of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and fatty acids reveal a
homogeneous signal between 27.2 and 29.2 (mean 28.3) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and 23.6
to 25.6 (mean 24.8) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids.</p>
      <p>Except for the maximum value of 16.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 8.7 m a.s.l., the hop-17(21)-ene concentration at Buo-05 varies between 0.1 and
4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Buo-01 paleocryosol values are 0.9 (8.7 m a.s.l.) and 8.4 in the lowermost sample (7.8 m a.s.l.). For Buo-03 the
hop-17(21)-ene concentration ranges from 5 up to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g gTOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The HPFA ratio for the Buo-05 thermokarst samples is high, between 0.6 and
0.8; only the uppermost sample (9.3 m a.s.l.) shows a lower value of 0.2.
The Buo-01 profile decreases from 0.7 in the lowest sample to 0.2 at the
top. Buo-03 shows high parameter values of 0.8 and 0.9. The oleanene ratio
for the thermokarst deposits ranges between 0 (Buo-01) and 13.8 (Buo-03).
The overall mean oleanene ratio in thermokarst is 3.7 (median 2.2), which is
remarkably higher compared to the Yedoma deposits.</p>
      <p>The acetate content of the thermokarst samples is between 0.4 and
109.4 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
with a mean of 23.5 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (median 2.8 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Large acetate contents are found
especially in the middle part of Buo-05, from 3.4 m a.s.l. (74.1 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
6.1 m a.s.l. (109.4 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and in the uppermost Buo-03 sample (35.3 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Statistical methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Significance testing</title>
      <p>Except for the Yedoma CPI, the Yedoma HPFA and the thermokarst
hop-17(21)-ene Shapiro–Wilk normality tests reveal a non-normal
distribution. Based on this, we chose non-parametric significance testing.
This reveals significant differences for TOC, C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and
HPFA on the stratigraphical level (Yedoma vs. thermokarst,
Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test, Table S1 in the Supplement). On the profile level, we found
significant differences for C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and HPFA by applying the
Kruskal–Wallis test (Table S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Principal component analyses</title>
      <p>The first PCA diagram (Fig. 6a) shows that thermokarst sediments, especially
at Buo-05, could not be separated from Yedoma deposits. This diagram,
including the first two principal components, explains 79 % (pc1 57 %,
pc2 22 %) of the total data set variance. The second PCA diagram (Fig. 6b)
illustrates that biomarker quality estimators in Yedoma samples have
slightly lower variability because they cluster in an area at pc1 and
pc2 &gt; 0, while the thermokarst samples do not cluster. In this
diagram 53 % of the data set variance is explained. Moreover, this PCA
shows that there is good consistency between the CPI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alkane</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> quality
estimator and the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio (Fig. 6b). The PCA of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane chain length
(Fig. 6c) shows that the best separating variables for thermokarst are the
shorter-chain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>19</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, contrary to
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the majority of the Yedoma samples. The pc1 explains 39 and
pc2 explains 29 % (total 68 %) of the data set variance.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Ordination plots of the principal component analyses (PCA). In
diagram <bold>(a)</bold> the sedimentological parameters are plotted. In <bold>(b)</bold> a PCA of
biomarker proxies is shown. Supplementary variables (in blue: TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, grain size, BD, ice content) were added without
including them in the PCA calculation. In diagram <bold>(c)</bold> the PCA of the major
odd <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes is visualized using the same supplementary variables as in <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The Buor-Khaya Peninsula is a typical Yedoma hill–thermokarst basin
landscape of the Yedoma region (Strauss et al., 2013). The Yedoma deposits
cover <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % of the peninsula (Günther et al., 2013),
which is less than the Yedoma region mean of 30 %, but within the overall
range of Yedoma deposit coverage (Grosse et al., 2013; Strauss et al.,
2013). Thus, the current study of Yedoma and thermokarst deposits is
representative of an area covered by similar permafrost deposits of late
Pleistocene and Holocene age.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Sediment facies</title>
      <p>The grain-size distribution curves (Figs. 2, S1) indicate a constant
deposition environment for the Yedoma sequences. According to Strauss et al. (2012), there have been stable deposition conditions during Yedoma
accumulation; this hypothesis is supported by the data presented here. The
three thermokarst profiles include three different kinds of thermokarst
deposits. Buo-05 is dominated by a lake facies containing valves of two
freshwater ostracod taxa: <italic>Cytherissa lacustris</italic> and <italic>Cypria</italic> sp. Moreover, shells have been found in
Buo-05 (Strauss and Schirrmeister, 2011). An ice wedge is located next to
Buo-01, which points to subaerial conditions, such as a polygon mire. Buo-03 is
interpreted as initial thermokarst on top of a Yedoma hill. Thus, the
grain-size distributions of Buo-05 and Buo-01 reveal that the thermokarst is
granulometrically composed of the same material as Yedoma. The grain-size
distributions in Buo-03 paint a different picture. This distribution is
likely caused by the early state of thermokarst development dominated by
peat aggradation. This peat can act like a selective sediment trap
influencing the grain-size distributions, e.g., by producing a less distinct
coarse-silt–fine-sand peak.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Organic-matter degradation</title>
      <p>The organic-matter proxies of Yedoma deposits are less variable than those
of thermokarst deposits (Buo-01 and 03). Except for the paleocryosols, the
cryopedolith parts of the Yedoma and the Buo-05 thermokarst profile reveal a
rather homogeneous picture (Figs. 3, 4, S5, S6). Constant grain-size
distributions, less TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and smaller absolute lipid concentration
scattering reveal that the OC stored in the Yedoma deposits has likely been
kept perennially frozen since incorporation. The organic-matter signatures
(Figs. 4, S2, and S3) as well as the grain-size distributions (Figs. 2, S1) of
thermokarst deposits, especially in Buo-01 and Buo-03, show broader
variations. This is caused by a more complex degradation and redeposition
history due to reworking. The degradation markers of organic matter found in
the paleocryosol parts of all profiles reveal a less degraded state,
indicating that the organic matter in these portions is the best preserved.</p>
      <p>The mean TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content for Yedoma deposits is comparable to other
sites (Fig. S7) in the Yedoma region (Schirrmeister et al., 2011b, 2013). Intense accumulation and frozen preservation of
plant remains (14 kgC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Yedoma and 24 kgC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for thermokarst deposits) is caused by syngenetic
permafrost formation in polygonal tundra landscapes over long periods in the
Quaternary (Schirrmeister et al., 2013). However, comparing the studied deposits
to the overall Yedoma region mean (19 kgC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Yedoma
deposits and 33 kgC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (disregarding wedge-ice content) for
thermokarst deposits; Strauss et al., 2013) on the Buor-Khaya Peninsula reveals
that both deposit types contain less OC. Nevertheless, these numbers show
that such deposits comprise a large pool of dormant carbon, which could be
reactivated due to permafrost thawing. Moreover, thermokarst deposits seem
to be the quantitatively more important OC pool (Yedoma : thermokarst carbon
ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The higher carbon inventory in thermokarst
deposits is partially related to a concentration effect for reworked Yedoma
OC due to thaw subsidence progression, including ground ice loss plus the input
of Holocene OC. Together with ecosystem recovery, thermokarst basins can act
as a local sink for portions of the carbon released from thawing permafrost
deposits (van Huissteden and Dolman, 2012). Nevertheless, at the same time,
thermokarst lakes also promote intense organic-matter degradation, including
methane production in the anaerobic environments of organically rich lake
sediments and unfrozen deposits (Walter et al., 2007b; Shirokova et al.,
2013). To answer the question raised in the introduction of whether the
thermokarst organic-matter pool is as degradable as the frozen late
Pleistocene Yedoma, we visualized the stratigraphically differentiated main
proxies in Fig. 7.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Conceptual scheme of the organic-matter degradation state,
estimated using the different applied proxies with boxplots. The merged
profiles of Yedoma deposit boxplots (white boxes) are shown below the
thermokarst deposits (grey boxes). The whiskers illustrate the data range,
and the box ends indicate the 25th and the 75th quartile
(interquartile range). The vertical lines inside each box show the median
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50th quartile), including the 95 % confidence intervals,
represented by notches. Grey numbers show the sample size. All diagrams are drawn in such a way as to show more
degraded samples on the left and less degraded samples on the right side.
Thus, the axis of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C shows descending values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/2227/2015/bg-12-2227-2015-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In our study the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N data show some overlap (Fig. 7b). The average values are
relatively close together for all profiles, but the differences are
statistically significant (Table S1). Thus, the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N medians and means suggest a lower degradation state or better organic-matter quality of thermokarst
deposits (especially Buo-05 and Buo-03). Moreover, in both Yedoma and
thermokarst deposits, the same pattern is visible: a positive linear
relationship exists between TOC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>wt</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios (Fig. 5b). In soil
science literature, it is agreed that the elemental composition of organic
matter is affected by the degree of humification and microbial activity that metabolize the organic matter (Kumada, 1987). Ongoing organic-matter
decomposition will release stored C to the atmosphere and N to the soil
(Weintraub and Schimel, 2005), resulting in a lower C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio for
more degraded deposits (Gundelwein et al., 2007). This was found in (sub-) Arctic peat deposits and soils, where the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio decreases with depth
(Kuhry and Vitt, 1996; McKane et al., 1997; Ping et al., 1998). Because a
high TN content can promote the stabilization of organic matter at late stages
of decomposition (Berg, 2000), this further supports the interpretation that
a low C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio indicates recalcitrant or matured organic matter (Rumpel and
Kögel-Knabner, 2011). Schädel et al. (2014) found, in incubation
studies, that the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio is a good estimator for organic-matter
decomposability and vulnerability. Although the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios are lower than in
Arctic peat deposits (Hugelius et al., 2012; Routh et al., 2014), the ratios
are still in the range of or higher than those found in many other deep
mineral soils of the temperate zone (Jenkinson et al., 2008; Rumpel and
Kögel-Knabner, 2011). Thus, both Yedoma and thermokarst deposits show
relatively good organic-matter quality for microbial decay after becoming
available by thaw. The C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios, especially for the paleocryosols, suggest
that good quality organic matter was preserved (by temperature near or below 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C during thermokarst processes) for future decomposition. This
is shown by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C ratio as well. Neglecting the influence of
different sources of organic matter on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C ratio, which is
justified by constant ACL values of &gt; 28 (higher land plants,
Fig. S4) for Yedoma and thermokarst deposits, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C ratio is
an appropriate proxy for estimating the intrinsic state of degradation.
Therefore, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values indicate a significantly lower organic-matter
degradation for the thermokarst samples, implying a better quality than that
found in Yedoma samples. The high CPI values of the thermokarst and the
Yedoma organic matter (around 9 and higher) indicate fresh and less degraded
terrigenous organic matter (Brassell et al., 1978) for both deposits (Fig. 7d). The CPI values of the Yedoma deposit
organic matter, which are (significantly) higher than in the thermokarst deposits, indicate a better quality for further decomposition (Fig. 7d).</p>
      <p>Routh et al. (2014) states that other, more labile compounds like
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alcohols and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty acids are degraded to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes. Thus, an increase
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (Figs. 3 and 4, absolute lipid concentration column) is an indicator
for cumulative decay. We do not see a decreasing trend, which points to a
constantly low decomposition state. In addition, no increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty-acid CPI
with depth (as was shown in an Arctic peat by Andersson and Meyers, 2012)
was obvious. Andersson and Meyers (2012) interpreted this to reflect fatty-acid production during humification, but we do not see this humification
effect in our data, neither in Yedoma nor in the thermokarst deposits.
Moreover, as indicated by the dominance of long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-fatty-acid compounds vs. compounds of shorter chain length (Höfle et
al., 2013), we confirm the interpretation that there is good organic-matter
preservation in both Yedoma and thermokarst deposits. At first view, the
hop-17(21)-ene (Fig. 7e) concentration does not show a significant
preservation difference between both kinds of deposits because the Buo-04
Yedoma profile contains hopene concentrations in the same range as those
found in thermokarst deposits. However, if we focus on the median values,
the Yedoma deposits again appear to be slightly more degraded than
the thermokarst deposits. With the exception of Buo-01, the HPFA index (Fig. 7f) also suggests lower degradation and better organic-matter quality in the
thermokarst deposit profiles (Buo-05 and Buo-03). Our HPFA index, introduced
based on the HPA index of Poynter (1989), which was tested in the Arctic
environment by Routh et al. (2014), is an appropriate indicator of the
relative amount of the labile fatty acids that remain in a sample. The
uppermost samples just below the surface at Buo-04, Buo-05, and Buo-01 and with
lower HPFA values are clearly an exception and suggest the entrainment of
higher proportions of material influenced by Holocene degradation. This is
likely caused by the fairly recent influence of an active layer or transient
layer and warmer permafrost temperatures. The oleanene ratio shows a
separation of Yedoma and thermokarst deposits, but this ratio is dominated
by numerous 0.0 measurements in the Yedoma deposits. These results might be
caused not only by the transformation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-amyrin to olean-12-ene (by
losing the hydroxyl group) or to olean-13(18)-ene (by losing the double
bond) but also by processes so far unknown in the Yedoma deposits. Thus,
because of sparse data and to avoid overinterpretation, this proxy is interpreted only as a weak indication of better Yedoma organic-matter quality for further decomposition.</p>
      <p>Summing up Fig. 7, thermokarst organic matter is partly less degraded
compared to the organic matter sequestered in Yedoma deposits (see Table S1,
significance for C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the HPFA index). The CPI points
in the other direction (Fig. 7 and Table S1). For hop-17(21)-ene, we do not
see significant differences. Nevertheless, the interquartile ranges show an
overlap for most proxies. We interpret this in the following way: compared to
unaltered Yedoma deposits, degradation during thermokarst processes, but
also heightened amounts of OC input during climatically more favorable
Holocene times, balance each other out with regard to the organic-matter
quality for future degradation. Nevertheless, as there is more carbon stored
in the thermokarst basins (Strauss et al., 2013), thermokarst deposits imply
a higher intrinsic potential to contribute greenhouse gases in a warmer
future. This is supported by the acetate data indicating a higher mean
content for the thermokarst deposits. Acetate is an excellent substrate for
microbial turnover, e.g., acetoclastic methanogenesis (Kotsyurbenko et al.,
2004). The PCA confirms this picture that shows little difference between the organic-matter preservation of the Yedoma and the thermokarst samples. Especially
Fig. 6a, supported by Fig. 2, reveals that Yedoma and thermokarst deposits are
composed of similar sediments. The Buo-05 thermokarst profile is very
similar to both Yedoma profiles. The PCA of the degradation proxies (Fig. 6b) also shows no clusters but exhibits slightly better separation between
both kinds of deposits. Figure 6b reveals that the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C ratio, and the CPI are correlated. This is also separately
illustrated in Fig. 5a and c. Thus, these proxies seem to confirm each
other. The PCA of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane chain length points to a potential dominance
of longer-chain alkanes in Yedoma and shorter-chain alkanes in thermokarst,
indicating better quality for further decomposition of Yedoma samples
(Höfle et al., 2013). Exceptions are the Buo-05-A-01 and Buo-03-A-03
thermokarst samples, which point in the same direction as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration.</p>
      <p>The abovementioned overlap of the interquartile range (Fig. 7) and
especially the PCA of the biomarkers (Fig. 6b and c) show that the organic-matter degradation and decomposition vulnerability is heterogeneous and depends
on different decomposition trajectories and differing former
decomposition and incorporation histories. This is likely shown in both Yedoma
and thermokarst deposits, covering the whole range of degradation proxy
values (Fig. 7b, c, e). To elucidate this was one of the benefits of the
applied multiproxy approach. With the addition of biomarker data, it is
possible to show that the permafrost organic-matter degradation is not a
linear function of age or sediment facies but likely a combination of
(interrupted) degradation cycles and a cascade of degradation steps. In
particular, the reasonably good organic-matter preservation of thermokarst
deposits reveals that the sediment degradation processes do not necessarily
degrade the organic matter. Potentially, the loss of labile OC during
thermokarst processes was compensated for by high rates of Holocene OC
accumulation in, e.g., lake sediments. Nutrient release from thawing
permafrost could have stimulated lake productivity, whereas decomposition
was slow because of low lake temperatures, resulting in cold anoxic lake
environments (Boike et al., 2013; Walter Anthony et al., 2014). When the
lake drained, permafrost formation rapidly recovered the sediments (Jones et
al., 2011), including any possibly newly accumulated OC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Fate of organic matter</title>
      <p>The permafrost OC resilience or vulnerability is a topic of recent research
(Schuur and Abbott, 2011; Knoblauch et al., 2013; Hodgkins et al., 2014; Li
et al., 2014; Mu et al., 2014). Any warming permafrost is potentially
vulnerable to thawing. The remaining important question is this: what is the
fate of the organic matter exposed to degradation after permafrost has
thawed? The lipid biomarker data discussed (CPI etc.) indicate that the
organic matter in the sediments was, after initial degradation processes,
relatively quickly protected against microbial alteration by freezing. This
is confirmed by an absent degradation–depth trend which reveals good
organic-matter quality independent of age. Thus, the very old frozen organic
matter is also vulnerable to degradation after thawing. This interpretation
fits results from studies of permafrost-affected Arctic peats (Hugelius et
al., 2012; Routh et al., 2014). Walter Anthony et al. (2014) found a net
accumulation in thermokarst basins since the last deglaciation but predict
that these will change to a large carbon source when permafrost thaws and the OC will be
available for oxidation. Due to ongoing climate warming in the Arctic,
Grosse et al. (2011b) supposed an increasing occurrence in and magnitude of
disturbance processes, especially fire and thermokarst, which will
accelerate permafrost degradation. Because our sedimentological and
biomarker proxies show a low degradation state, especially for the
paleocryosol sequences, we expect a significant vulnerability to microbial
degradation after thawing. As evidence that the OC is vulnerable when
thawed, Gaglioti et al. (2014) found that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 times more
ancient OC found in permafrost was made available for degradation during
warm times of the Holocene (Holocene Thermal Maximum (11.7–9.0 ka) and
Bølling–Allerød periods) than is available today. Through increased
disturbances, such as deep surface subsidence caused by thawing and the draining
of excess water from melting ice in a warmer climate, the Yedoma and, to a
lesser degree because of lower excess ice content, the thermokarst organic
matter could become bioavailable deep in the sediment. The wedge-ice volume is estimated
to be up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 vol % for Yedoma and up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 vol % for thermokarst deposits (Ulrich et al., 2014). When added to
segregated ice, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 80 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65 vol %
mean sedimentary ice volume exists in Yedoma and thermokarst, respectively
(Strauss et al., 2013). When it becomes available and is exported as
dissolved OC to, e.g., river systems, Vonk et al. (2013) and Mann et al. (2014) found that dissolved OC (&lt; 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in ancient Yedoma is
exceptionally biolabile. However, if it is not dissolved, the suspended
(&gt; 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) eroded ancient organic matter could be protected
from extensive degradation by organo-mineral bonds, which stabilize the
organic matter (Höfle et al., 2013) and, in an aquatic environment,
promote rapid settling because they weigh down the organic matter (Vonk et
al., 2010).</p>
      <p>From the modeling perspective, global-scale models have, so far, been limited because they implement one-dimensional vertical thaw only (Koven et al.,
2011; Schneider von Deimling et al., 2012; Schaphoff et al., 2013). Thus,
the potentially labile Yedoma and thermokarst deep OC pool described in this
study is not realistically implemented in these models because the models
disregard rapid phenomena, such as thermokarst processes. Thermokarst processes,
despite being local in nature, are widespread on the regional scale (Grosse
et al., 2011a) and may constitute the crucial process making the deep OC
studied here microbiologically available.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Being freeze-locked, a great amount of organic matter in the studied
sediments is highly decomposable. Generally, in all applied proxies there is
no degradation–depth trend obvious, revealing that permafrost acts like a
freezer, preserving the organic matter after freezing. Based on interpreting
the mean values of the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio, isotope ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C), and the
HPFA index, the thermokarst organic matter is less degraded and of better
quality for degradation after thawing compared to the organic matter
sequestered in Yedoma deposits. The CPI data suggest less degradation of the
organic matter from both deposits, with a higher value for Yedoma organic
matter. For the hop-17(21)-ene concentration, no significant difference was
found. We do not see any conflict between these two determinations because
the interquartile ranges overlap for most proxies. We interpret this as
indicating a comparable magnitude of organic-matter quality in both kinds of
deposits, but with a likely better thermokarst organic-matter quality for
further degradation. For a modeling approach, this conclusion could be
extrapolated to the Laptev Sea region as the studied deposits are akin to
other Yedoma and thermokarst deposits of the northeast Siberian Arctic
(Schirrmeister et al. 2011a).</p>
      <p>The fate of mobilized Yedoma deposit OC depends largely on the environmental
conditions that exist during the thermokarst processes and in the resulting
thermokarst basin. In conclusion, when the conditions during the thermokarst processes are good for organic-matter preservation, for example cold (slightly above 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) or
anoxic (lake) conditions, and when reworked fossil organic matter can rapidly
refreeze to permafrost, good-quality organic matter for further
decomposition can be maintained and inputs likely compensate for losses due
to thermokarst degradation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2227-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-12-2227-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>J. Strauss, L. Schirrmeister, and S. Wetterich sampled and coordinated all
sediment sampling at the Buor-Khaya field campaign in 2010. K. Mangelsdorf
supported the biomarker analysis and interpretation. J. Strauss carried out
the laboratory analyses, except for one profile, which was analyzed by L. Eichhorn.
U. Herzschuh designed the statistical analyses. J. Strauss planned
and wrote the publication with input from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge support of this research by the German Ministry of Education
and Research (the “System Laptev Sea” and “CarboPerm” (03G0836A)
projects). We also thank the Russian and German partners who were involved
in the “Eastern Laptev Sea – Buor Khaya Peninsula 2010” expedition. J. Strauss was supported by a grant from the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes
(German National Academic Foundation), the European Research Council
Starting Grant (PETA-CARB, #338335), and the Initiative and Networking
Fund of the Helmholtz Association (#ERC-0013).
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: D. Obrist</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Andersson, R. A. and Meyers, P. A.: Effect of climate change on delivery
and degradation of lipid biomarkers in a Holocene peat sequence in the
eastern European Russian Arctic, Org. Geochem., 53, 63–72,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.05.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.05.002</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Andersson, R. A., Kuhry, P., Meyers, P., Zebühr, Y., Crill, P., and
Mörth, M.: Impacts of paleohydrological changes on n-alkane biomarker
compositions of a holocene peat sequence in the eastern European Russian
Arctic, Org. Geochem., 42, 1065–1075,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.06.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.06.020</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Berg, B.: Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern
forest soils, Forest Ecol. Manag., 133, 13–22,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00294-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00294-7</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Blott, S. J. and Pye, K.: Gradistat: A grain size distribution and
statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 26, 1237–1248, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.261</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Boike, J., Kattenstroth, B., Abramova, K., Bornemann, N., Chetverova, A.,
Fedorova, I., Fröb, K., Grigoriev, M., Grüber, M., Kutzbach, L., Langer, M.,
Minke, M., Muster, S., Piel, K., Pfeiffer, E.-M., Stoof, G., Westermann, S., Wischnewski, K.,
Wille, C., and Hubberten, H.-W.: Baseline characteristics of climate, permafrost and land cover
from a new permafrost observatory in the Lena River Delta, Siberia (1998–2011), Biogeosciences, 10, 2105–2128, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2105-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-2105-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brassell, S., Eglinton, G., Maxwell, J., and Philp, R.: Natural background
of alkanes in the aquatic environment, in: Aquatic pollutants:
Transformation and biological effects, edited by: Hutzinger, O., Lelyveld, I. H., and
Zoetman, B. C. J., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 519 pp., 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bray, E. E. and Evans, E. D.: Distribution of n-paraffins as a clue to
recognition of source beds, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 22, 2–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(61)90069-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(61)90069-2</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Ciais, P., Tagliabue, A., Cuntz, M., Bopp, L., Scholze, M., Hoffmann, G.,
Lourantou, A., Harrison, S. P., Prentice, I. C., Kelley, D. I., Koven, C.,
and Piao, S. L.: Large inert carbon pool in the terrestrial biosphere during
the last glacial maximum, Nat. Geosci., 5, 74–79, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1324</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Dlugokencky, E. and Tans, P.: Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide:
available at: <uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html</uri>, last access 23 March
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Drachev, S. S., Savostin, L. A., Groshev, V. G., and Bruni, I. E.: Structure
and geology of the continental shelf of the Laptev Sea, eastern Russian
Arctic, Tectonophysics, 298, 357–393, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00159-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00159-0</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Drozdov, D. S., Rivkin, F. M., Rachold, V., Ananjeva-Malkova, G. V.,
Ivanova, N. V., Chehina, I. V., Koreisha, M. M., Korostelev, Y. V., and
Melnikov, E. S.: Electronic atlas of the Russian Arctic coastal zone,
Geo-Mar. Lett., 25, 81–88, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00367-004-0189-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00367-004-0189-7</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Folk, R. L. and Ward, W. C.: Brazos river bar: A study in the significance
of grain size parameters, J. Sediment. Petrol., 27, 3–26, 1957.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Gaglioti, B. V., Mann, D. H., Jones, B. M., Pohlman, J. W., Kunz, M. L., and
Wooller, M. J.: Radiocarbon age-offsets in an Arctic lake reveal the
long-term response of permafrost carbon to climate change, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 1630–1651,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014jg002688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jg002688</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Glombitza, C., Mangelsdorf, K., and Horsfield, B.: Maturation related
changes in the distribution of ester bound fatty acids and alcohols in a
coal series from the New Zealand coal band covering diagenetic to
catagenetic coalification levels, Org. Geochem., 40, 1063–1073,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.07.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.07.008</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Goslar, T., Czernik, J., and Goslar, E.: Low-energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ams in
Poznań radiocarbon laboratory, Poland, Nuclear Instruments and Methods
in: Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms,
223–224, 5–11, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/:" ext-link-type="DOI">:</ext-link>10.1016/j.nimb.2004.04.005, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Grosse, G., Harden, J., Turetsky, M. R., McGuire, A. D., Camill, P.,
Tarnocai, C., Frolking, S., Schuur, E. A. G., Jorgenson, T., Marchenko, S.,
Romanovsky, V., Wickland, K. P., French, N., Waldrop, M. P.,
Bourgeau-Chavez, L., and Striegl, R. G.: Vulnerability of high-latitude soil
organic carbon in North America to disturbance, J. Geophys. Res., 116, G00K06, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JG001507</ext-link>, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Grosse, G., Romanovsky, V., Jorgenson, T., Anthony, K. W., Brown, J., and
Overduin, P. P.: Vulnerability and feedbacks of permafrost to climate
change, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 92, 73–74,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011eo090001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011eo090001</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Grosse, G., Robinson, J. E., Bryant, R., Taylor, M. D., Harper, W., DeMasi,
A., Kyker-Snowman, E., Veremeeva, A., Schirrmeister, L., and Harden, J.:
Distribution of late Pleistocene ice-rich syngenetic permafrost of the
yedoma suite in east and central Siberia, Russia, U.S. Geological Survey
Open File Report, 1078, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, USA, 37 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gubin, S. V. and Veremeeva, A. A.: Parent materials enriched in organic
matter in the northeast of Russia, Eurasian Soil Sci., 43, 1238–1243,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s1064229310110062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s1064229310110062</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gundelwein, A., Muller-Lupp, T., Sommerkorn, M., Haupt, E. T. K., Pfeiffer,
E., and Wiechmann, H.: Carbon in tundra soils in the lake labaz region of
Arctic Siberia, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 58, 1164–1174, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Günther, F., Overduin, P. P., Sandakov, A., Grosse, G., and Grigoriev,
M. N.: Thermo-erosion along the yedoma coast of the Buor Khaya peninsula,
Laptev Sea, east Siberia, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference
on Permafrost, Volume 1: International Contributions, Salekhard, Russia,
25–29 June 2012, 137–142, 2012</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Günther, F., Overduin, P. P., Sandakov, A. V., Grosse, G., and
Grigoriev, M. N.: Short- and long-term thermo-erosion of ice-rich permafrost
coasts in the Laptev Sea region, Biogeosciences, 10, 4297–4318, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4297-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-4297-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Heyer, J., Hübner, H., and Maaß, I.: Isotopenfraktionierung des
Kohlenstoffs bei der mikrobiellen Methanbildung, Isot. Environ. Health S., 12, 202–205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10256017608543912" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10256017608543912</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hodgkins, S. B., Tfaily, M. M., McCalley, C. K., Logan, T. A., Crill, P. M.,
Saleska, S. R., Rich, V. I., and Chanton, J. P.: Changes in peat chemistry
associated with permafrost thaw increase greenhouse gas production,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 5819–5824,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314641111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1314641111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Höfle, S., Rethemeyer, J., Mueller, C. W., and John, S.: Organic matter
composition and stabilization in a polygonal tundra soil of the Lena Delta,
Biogeosciences, 10, 3145–3158, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3145-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-3145-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hugelius, G., Routh, J., Kuhry, P., and Crill, P.: Mapping the degree of
decomposition and thaw remobilization potential of soil organic matter in
discontinuous permafrost terrain, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 117, G02030, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jg001873" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jg001873</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hugelius, G., Strauss, J., Zubrzycki, S., Harden, J. W., Schuur, E. A. G.,
Ping, C.-L., Schirrmeister, L., Grosse, G., Michaelson, G. J., Koven, C. D.,
O'Donnell, J. A., Elberling, B., Mishra, U., Camill, P., Yu, Z., Palmtag, J.,
and Kuhry, P.: Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified
uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps, Biogeosciences, 11, 6573–6593, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6573-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-6573-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Jenkinson, D. S., Poulton, P. R., and Bryant, C.: The turnover of organic
carbon in subsoils, Part 1., Natural and bomb radiocarbon in soil profiles
from the Rothamsted long-term field experiments, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 391–399, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01025.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01025.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Jones, B. M., Grosse, G., Arp, C. D., Jones, M. C., Walter Anthony, K. M.,
and Romanovsky, V. E.: Modern thermokarst lake dynamics in the continuous
permafrost zone, northern Seward Peninsula, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
G00M03, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JG001666</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Knoblauch, C., Beer, C., Sosnin, A., Wagner, D., and Pfeiffer, E.-M.:
Predicting long-term carbon mineralization and trace gas production from
thawing permafrost of northeast Siberia, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 1160–1172,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12116</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kotsyurbenko, O. R., Chin, K.-J., Glagolev, M. V., Stubner, S., Simankova,
M. V., Nozhevnikova, A. N., and Conrad, R.: Acetoclastic and
hydrogenotrophic methane production and methanogenic populations in an
acidic West-Siberian peat bog, Environ. Microbiol., 6, 1159–1173,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00634.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00634.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Koven, C. D., Ringeval, B., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Cadule, P.,
Khvorostyanov, D., Krinner, G., and Tarnocai, C.: Permafrost carbon-climate
feedbacks accelerate global warming, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 108, 14769–14774, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103910108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1103910108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kuesel, K. and Drake, H. L.: Effects of environmental parameters on the
formation and turnover of acetate by forest soils, Appl. Environ. Microb., 61, 3667–3675, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Kuhry, P. and Vitt, D. H.: Fossil carbon/nitrogen ratios as a measure of
peat decomposition, Ecology, 77, 271–275, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265676" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/2265676</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Kuhry, P., Ping, C.-L., Schuur, E. A. G., Tarnocai, C., and Zimov, S.:
Report from the international permafrost association: Carbon pools in
permafrost regions, Permafrost Periglacial Process, 20, 229–234,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.648</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kumada, K.: Chemistry of soil organic matter, Developments in soil science,
Elsevier/Japan Scientific Societies Press, Amsterdam, 241 pp., 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lee, H., Schuur, E. A. G., Inglett, K. S., Lavoie, M., and Chanton, J. P.:
The rate of permafrost carbon release under aerobic and anaerobic conditions
and its potential effects on climate, Glob. Change Biol., 18, 515–527,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02519.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02519.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Luo, Y., Natali, S., Schuur, E. A. G., Xia, J., Kowalczyk, E., and
Wang, Y.: Modeling permafrost thaw and ecosystem carbon cycle under annual
and seasonal warming at an Arctic tundra site in Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 1129–1146,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013jg002569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013jg002569</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Luo, Q., Yu, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Han, H., Qi, L., and Zhong, N.:
Existence and implications of hop-17(21)-enes in the lower cretaceous of the
Saihantala Sag, Erlian Basin, China, Pet. Sci., 9, 154–160,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12182-012-0195-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12182-012-0195-8</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Mangelsdorf, K., Finsel, E., Liebner, S., and Wagner, D.: Temperature
adaptation of microbial communities in different horizons of Siberian
permafrost-affected soils from the Lena Delta, Chemie der Erde –
Geochemistry, 69, 169–182, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2009.02.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemer.2009.02.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Mann, P. J., Sobczak, W. V., LaRue, M. M., Bulygina, E., Davydova, A., Vonk,
J. E., Schade, J., Davydov, S., Zimov, N., Holmes, R. M., and Spencer, R. G.
M.: Evidence for key enzymatic controls on metabolism of Arctic river
organic matter, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 1089–1100, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12416</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Marzi, R., Torkelson, B. E., and Olson, R. K.: A revised carbon preference
index, Org. Geochem., 20, 1303–1306,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(93)90016-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0146-6380(93)90016-5</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>McKane, R. B., Rastetter, E. B., Shaver, G. R., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Giblin,
A. E., Laundre, J. A., and Chapin, F. S.: Climatic effects on tundra carbon
storage inferred from experimental data and a model, Ecology, 78, 1170–1187,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1170:ceotcs]2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1170:ceotcs]2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Mu, C., Zhang, T., Schuster, P. F., Schaefer, K., Wickland, K. P., Repert,
D. A., Liu, L., Schaefer, T., and Cheng, G.: Carbon and geochemical
properties of cryosols on the north slope of Alaska, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 100, 59–67, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.01.001</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Oksanen, J.: Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in r: Vegan
tutorial, University of Oulu, Oulu, 43 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Ping, C. L., Bockheim, J. G., Kimble, J. M., Michaelson, G. J., and Walker,
D. A.: Characteristics of cryogenic soils along a latitudinal transect in
Arctic Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103,
28917–28928, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98jd02024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98jd02024</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Poynter, J.: Molecular stratigraphy: The recognition of palaeoclimatic
signals in organic geochemical data, PhD, School of Chemistry, University of
Bristol, Bristol, 324 pp., 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Poynter, J. and Eglinton, G.: 14. Molecular composition of three sediments
from hole 717c: The Bengal fan, Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program:
Scientific results, 116, 155–161, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Radke, M., Willsch, H., and Welte, D. H.: Preparative hydrocarbon group type
determination by automated medium pressure liquid chromatography, Anal. Chem., 52, 406–411, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac50053a009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac50053a009</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Romanovskii, N. N., Hubberten, H. W., Gavrilov, A. V., Tumskoy, V. E., and
Kholodov, A. L.: Permafrost of the east Siberian Arctic shelf and coastal
lowlands, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 23, 1359–1369,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.12.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.12.014</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Romanovsky, V. E., Smith, S. L., and Christiansen, H. H.: Permafrost thermal
state in the polar northern hemisphere during the international polar year
2007–2009: A synthesis, Permafrost Periglacial Process, 21, 106–116,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.689</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Routh, J., Hugelius, G., Kuhry, P., Filley, T., Tillman, P. K., Becher, M.,
and Crill, P.: Multi-proxy study of soil organic matter dynamics in
permafrost peat deposits reveal vulnerability to climate change in the
European Russian Arctic, Chem. Geol., 368, 104–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.12.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.12.022</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Rumpel, C. and Kögel-Knabner, I.: Deep soil organic matter – a key but
poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle, Plant Soil, 338,
143–158, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Schädel, C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bracho, R., Elberling, B., Knoblauch, C.,
Lee, H., Luo, Y. Q., Shaver, G. R., and Turetsky, M. R.: Circumpolar
assessment of permafrost C quality and its vulnerability over time using
long-term incubation data, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 641–652,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12417</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Schaphoff, S., Heyder, U., Ostberg, S., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., and Lucht,
W.: Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget,
Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 014026, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014026</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Schirrmeister, L., Grosse, G., Wetterich, S., Overduin, P. P., Strauss, J.,
Schuur, E. A. G., and Hubberten, H.-W.: Fossil organic matter
characteristics in permafrost deposits of the northeast Siberian Arctic,
J. Geophys. Res., 116, G00M02, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011jg001647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011jg001647</ext-link>,
2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Schirrmeister, L., Kunitsky, V., Grosse, G., Wetterich, S., Meyer, H.,
Schwamborn, G., Babiy, O., Derevyagin, A., and Siegert, C.: Sedimentary
characteristics and origin of the late pleistocene ice complex on north-east
Siberian Arctic coastal lowlands and islands – a review, Quatern. Int., 241, 3–25, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2010.04.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quaint.2010.04.004</ext-link>, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Schirrmeister, L., Froese, D. G., Tumskoy, V., Grosse, G., and Wetterich,
S.: Yedoma: late Pleistocene ice-rich syngenetic permafrost of Beringia, in:
Encyclopedia of quaternary sciences, 2 ed., edited by: Elias, S. A.,
Quaternary glaciation cold regions landforms, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
542–552,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Schneider von Deimling, T., Meinshausen, M., Levermann, A., Huber, V.,
Frieler, K., Lawrence, D. M., and Brovkin, V.: Estimating the near-surface
permafrost-carbon feedback on global warming, Biogeosciences, 9, 649–665, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-649-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-649-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Schulte, S., Mangelsdorf, K., and Rullkötter, J.: Organic matter
preservation on the Pakistan continental margin as revealed by biomarker
geochemistry, Org. Geochem., 31, 1005–1022,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00108-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00108-X</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A. G. and Abbott, B.: High risk of permafrost thaw, Nature, 480,
32–33, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/480032a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/480032a</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A. G., Vogel, J. G., Crummer, K. G., Lee, H., Sickman, J. O., and
Osterkamp, T. E.: The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and
net carbon exchange from tundra, Nature, 459, 556–559,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08031</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Shirokova, L. S., Pokrovsky, O. S., Kirpotin, S. N., Desmukh, C., Pokrovsky,
B. G., Audry, S., and Viers, J.: Biogeochemistry of organic carbon,
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and trace elements in thermokarst water bodies in
discontinuous permafrost zones of Western Siberia, Biogeochemistry, 113,
573–593, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9790-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-012-9790-4</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. R. and Mah, R. A.: Acetate as sole carbon and energy source for
growth of methanosarcina strain 227, Appl. Environ. Microb.,
39, 993–999, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Sollins, P., Spycher, G., and Glassman, C. A.: Net nitrogen mineralization
from light- and heavy-fraction forest soil organic matter, Soil Biol. Biochem., 16, 31–37, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(84)90122-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(84)90122-6</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, F. J.: Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions, John
Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 512 pp., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Strauss, J. and Schirrmeister, L.: Permafrost sequences of buor khaya
peninsula, in: Reports on polar and marine research – Russian-German
cooperation system Laptev Sea: The expedition eastern Laptev Sea-Buor Khaya
Peninsula 2010, edited by: Wetterich, S., Overduin, P. P., and Grigoriev,
M., Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven,
Germany, 35–50, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Strauss, J., Schirrmeister, L., Wetterich, S., Borchers, A., and Davydov, S.
P.: Grain-size properties and organic-carbon stock of yedoma ice complex
permafrost from the Kolyma lowland, northeastern Siberia, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB3003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004104</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Strauss, J., Schirrmeister, L., Grosse, G., Wetterich, S., Ulrich, M.,
Herzschuh, U., and Hubberten, H.-W.: The deep permafrost carbon pool of the
yedoma region in Siberia and Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 6165–6170,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL058088</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Stuiver, M., Reimer, P., and Reimer, R.: Calib 6.0, in, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C CHRONO
Centre, Queens University Belfast, Belfast,  2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Tieszen, L.: Photosynthesis and respiration in Arctic tundra grasses: Field
light intensity and temperature responses, Arctic Alpine Res., 5,
239–251, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Ulrich, M., Grosse, G., Strauss, J., and Schirrmeister, L.: Quantifying
wedge-ice volumes in yedoma and thermokarst basin deposits, Permafrost
Periglacial Process, 25, 151–161, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.1810</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>van Huissteden, J. and Dolman, A. J.: Soil carbon in the Arctic and the
permafrost carbon feedback, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,
4, 545–551, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.008</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Vieth, A., Mangelsdorf, K., Sykes, R., and Horsfield, B.: Water extraction
of coals – potential for estimating low molecular weight organic acids as
carbon feedstock for the deep terrestrial biosphere, Org. Geochem.,
39, 985–991, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.02.012</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Vonk, J. E., Sánchez-García, L., Semiletov, I., Dudarev, O.,
Eglinton, T., Andersson, A., and Gustafsson, Ö.: Molecular and radiocarbon constraints
on sources and degradation of terrestrial organic carbon along the Kolyma paleoriver
transect, East Siberian Sea, Biogeosciences, 7, 3153–3166, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3153-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-3153-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Vonk, J. E., Mann, P. J., Davydov, S., Davydova, A., Spencer, R. G. M.,
Schade, J., Sobczak, W. V., Zimov, N., Zimov, S., Bulygina, E., Eglinton, T.
I., and Holmes, R. M.: High biolability of ancient permafrost carbon upon
thaw, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2689–2693, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50348</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Waldrop, M. P., Wickland, K. P., White, R., Berhe, A. A., Harden, J. W.,
and Romanovsky, V. E.: Molecular investigations into a globally important
carbon pool: Permafrost-protected carbon in Alaskan soils, Glob. Change
Biol., 16, 2543–2554, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02141.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02141.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Walter Anthony, K. M., Zimov, S. A., Grosse, G., Jones, M. C., Anthony, P.
M., Chapin, F. S., Finlay, J. C., Mack, M. C., Davydov, S., Frenzel, P.,
and Frolking, S.: A shift of thermokarst lakes from carbon sources to sinks
during the Holocene epoch, Nature, 511, 452–456, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13560" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13560</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Walter, K. M., Edwards, M. E., Grosse, G., Zimov, S. A., and Chapin, F. S.:
Thermokarst lakes as a source of atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the last
deglaciation, Science, 318, 633–636, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1142924" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1142924</ext-link>, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Walter, K. M., Smith, L. C., and Chapin, S. F.: Methane bubbling from
northern lakes: Present and future contributions to the global methane
budget, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 365, 1657–1676,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2007.2036</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Weintraub, M. N. and Schimel, J. P.: Nitrogen cycling and the spread of
shrubs control changes in the carbon balance of Arctic tundra ecosystems,
BioScience, 55, 408–415,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0408:ncatso]2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0408:ncatso]2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zanina, O. G., Gubin, S. V., Kuzmina, S. A., Maximovich, S. V., and
Lopatina, D. A.: Late-Pleistocene (MIS 3-2) palaeoenvironments as recorded
by sediments, palaeosols, and ground-squirrel nests at Duvanny Yar, Kolyma
Lowland, northeast Siberia, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30, 2107–2123,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.01.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.01.021</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
