<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-3681-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Response of soil microorganisms to radioactive oil waste: <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>results
from a leaching experiment</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Response of soil microorganisms to radioactive oil waste}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P. Galitskaya et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Galitskaya</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          <email>gpolina33@yandex.ru</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Biktasheva</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Saveliev</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Ratering</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Schnell</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Selivanovskaya</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Landscape Ecology, Kazan State University,
Kazan, Russian Federation</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Applied Ecology, Kazan State University,
Kazan, Russian Federation</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Ecological Systems Modeling, Kazan State
University, Kazan, Russian Federation</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Applied Microbiology, Justus Liebig
University, Giessen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">P. Galitskaya (gpolina33@yandex.ru)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>3681</fpage><lpage>3693</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>29</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Oil wastes produced in large amounts in the processes of oil extraction,
refining, and transportation are of great environmental concern because of
their mutagenicity, toxicity, high fire hazardousness, and hydrophobicity.
About 40 % of these wastes contain radionuclides; however, the effects of
oil products and radionuclides on soil microorganisms are frequently studied
separately.</p>
    <p>The effects on various microbial parameters of raw waste containing 575 g of
total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> waste, 4.4 of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra, 2.8 of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, and 1.3 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K and its treated variant (1.6 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of TPH, 7.9
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra, 3.9 of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, and 183 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K) were examined in a leaching column experiment to separate the
effects of hydrocarbons from those of radioactive elements. The raw waste
sample (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was collected from tanks during cleaning and maintenance, and a
treated waste sample (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was obtained from equipment for oil waste
treatment. Thermal steam treatment is used in the production yard to reduce
the oil content.</p>
    <p>The disposal of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> waste samples on the soil surface led to an increase in
the TPH content in soil: it became 3.5, 2.8, and 2.2 times higher in the
upper (0–20 cm), middle (20–40 cm), and lower (40–60cm) layers,
respectively.</p>
    <p>Activity concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th increased in soil
sampled from both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- columns in comparison to their concentrations in
control soil. The activity concentrations of these two elements in samples
taken from the upper and middle layers were much higher for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-column
compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-column, despite the fact that the amount of waste added to
the columns was equalized with respect to the activity concentrations of
radionuclides.</p>
    <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> waste containing both TPH and radionuclides affected the functioning
of the soil microbial community, and the effect was more pronounced in the
upper layer of the column. Metabolic quotient and cellulase activity were
the most sensitive microbial parameters as their levels were changed 5–1.4
times in comparison to control ones. Changes in soil functional
characteristics caused by the treated waste containing mainly radionuclides
were not observed. PCR-SSCP (polymerase chain reaction – single strand
conformation polymorphism) analysis followed by MDS (metric multidimensional
scaling) and clustering analysis revealed that the shifts in microbial
community structure were affected by both hydrocarbons and radioactivity.
Thus, molecular methods permitted to reveal the effects on soil microbial
community not only from hydrocarbons, which significantly altered functional
characteristics of soil microbiome, but also from radioactive elements.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Oil wastes generated during processing, transportation, and refining of
petroleum are serious environmental threats, especially in
petroleum-producing regions (Liu et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2012). These
wastes contain oily components, water, and mineral fractions, which can
include naturally occurring radioactive elements such as thorium, potassium,
radium, and others (Abo-Elmagd et al., 2010; Bakr, 2010). Yearly, about
60 million tons of oily wastes are generated (Hu et al., 2013). About
30–40 % of the oil wastes are radioactive; thus, this type of waste is
very common (Al-Masri et al., 2004; Hamlat et al., 2001; Selivanovskaya et al., 2013).
The waste materials are hazardous to plants, animals, and microorganisms due
to the presence of toxic and mutagenic compounds and their interactions
(Marin et al., 2005; Verma et al., 2006). In Russia, these wastes are
usually disposed of on the soil surface along the roads, around the new
industrial buildings and buildings under construction, etc.
(Galitskaya et al., 2014; Selivanovskaya et al., 2012). When disposed
of on the surface soil and exposed to precipitation, components of the oil
wastes can leach into the soil, altering the chemical, physical, and
biological properties (Mikkonen et al., 2012). As oil wastes are mixtures
of inorganic and organic compounds which can degrade to metabolites of
unknown persistence and toxicity, chemical quantification is insufficient to
estimate the environmental risk (Morelli et al., 2005; Mikkonen et al.,
2012).</p>
      <p>Microorganisms are an essential part of terrestrial ecosystems, playing
important roles in soil biogeochemical cycles (Marcin et al., 2013; Li et
al., 2013). Soil microbial properties appear to be good indicators of soil
pollution, as they are very responsive and provide information about the
changes occurring in soil (Marin et al., 2005; Tejada et al., 2008). Soil
microbial biomass and basic respiration are the two parameters that are
traditionally used to estimate soil quality, particularly for soils polluted
by hydrocarbons (Labud et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2008; Lamy et al., 2013).
Another microbial parameter which can sensitively reflect the quality of
soils is microbial enzymes, as they participate in the biological cycling of
elements and the transformation of organic and mineral compounds
(Marin et al., 2005).</p>
      <p>Changes in abiotic and biotic ecological factors significantly affect the
structure of bacterial and fungal soil communities; therefore, these changes
can be used as a tool for soil impact assessment (Huang et al.,
2013). To investigate the microbial community, shifts in soils,
culture-independent molecular techniques such as clone libraries, gradient
gel electrophoresis, single strand polymorphisms, terminal restriction
fragment length polymorphism, deep sequencing, and quantitative real-time
polymerase chain reaction are used (Adetutu et al., 2013; Bacosa et al.,
2012; Liu et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The effects of crude oil and oil waste on soil and its microbial community
have been studied (Lee et al., 2008; Labud, 2007; Marin et al., 2005;
Admon et al., 2001), while fewer publications are devoted to the hazards of
naturally occurring radioactive elements (Abo-Elmagd et al., 2010; Hrichi
et al., 2013) or their effects on bacteria (Zakeri et al., 2012).
Hydrocarbons can cause direct toxic effects on microbial cells due to their
ability to change fluidity and permeability of cell membranes and to alter
cell homeostasis, to inhibit enzymes, to disrupt the electron transport
chain and oxidative phosphorylation, and to cause lipid proliferation
(Ruffing and Trahan, 2014). Besides, hydrocarbon may cause indirect effects
on soil bacteria by changing aeration and water regimes. Radionuclides
may cause chromosomal aberrations, single strand breaks and base pair
substitution in the DNA of microorganisms (Min et al., 2003). The combined
effects of wastes, consisting of both heavy fraction hydrocarbons and
radionuclides, on soil still need to be investigated.</p>
      <p>We hypothesized that the oil wastes disposed of on soil surfaces affect the
microbial communities due to both hydrocarbons and radioactive elements
contained in them. To assess these effects, column experiments were
performed. Raw (containing oily compounds and radionuclides) and treated
waste (containing mainly radionuclides) samples from a petroleum production
yard were investigated. The effects of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and radioactive elements on three
soil layers in columns (0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm) were investigated to
characterize: (a) the rate of migration of these contaminants, (b) the effects
on the microbiological characteristics of the soil layers (metabolic
coefficient and enzyme activities), and (c) shifts in the structure of
bacterial communities by means of polymerase chain reaction – single strand
conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Experimental design</title>
      <p>In the experiment we used six soil columns of
60 cm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm (height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> length <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> width) with undestroyed native soil
(Luvisol, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 %, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 %, K<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, P<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 125 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collected from the Matyushenski
forest nursery, Tatarstan, Russia (latitude: 55<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>07<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
longitude: 49<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). Two columns were not artificially
contaminated by waste samples and served as a control (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns). On the
top of the other four columns we disposed of two waste samples (each waste
sample in two replicates), and thus the soil of these columns was considered
to be contaminated.</p>
      <p>Sixteen waste samples were collected from tanks, pipes, and production
equipment in different seasons between 2010 and 2012 at the Tikchonovskii petroleum
production yard (Tatarstan, Russia; latitude: 54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>26<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
longitude: 52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>08<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). Two of these waste samples were used
for analysing the toxicity and in the soil column experiment: a raw waste
sample (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) collected from tanks during cleaning and maintenance, and a
treated waste sample (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) obtained from equipment for oil waste treatment.
The TPH of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sample contained 36 % aromatics, 27 % alphaltenes,
16 % aliphatics, and 21 % resins. Thermal steam treatment is used in the
production yard to reduce the oil content. The quantity of waste samples <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> loaded onto soil columns was calculated to equalize the activity
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra (about 1 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns, correspondingly). Over 30 days, the waste samples were situated
on the top of the soil columns and the rainfall was simulated based upon
the average atmospheric precipitation for the European part of Russia (650 mm a year).</p>
      <p>After a month at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, soil from each column was divided into three
parts (upper layer: 0–20 cm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), middle layer: 20–40 cm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and lower
layer: 40–60 cm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to give soil samples Hu, Hm, Hl, Ru, Rm, Rl, and Cu,
Cm, Cl) and analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Chemical parameters</title>
      <p>The total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) content in waste and soil samples was determined
by IR-spectrometry with an AN-2 analyser (LLC NEFTEHIMAVTOMATIKA-SPb, Saint
Petersburg, Russia). Fractionation of TPH into aromatics, aliphatics,
asphaltenes, and resins was done by silica gel column chromatography
followed by gravimetric analysis (Walker et al., 1975). TPH
extracts were dissolved in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-pentane and separated into soluble and
insoluble fractions (asphaltene). The soluble fraction was loaded on the top
of a silica gel G (60–120 mesh) column (2 cm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm) and eluted
with solvents of different polarities. The alkane fraction was eluted with
100 mL of hexane and then the aromatic fraction was eluted with 100 mL of
toluene. The resin fraction was eluted with 100 mL of methanol and
chloroform (Mishra, 2001).</p>
      <p>Samples were dried for 24 h at 110 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, homogenized, and sieved
through a 0.8 mm mesh. The sieved samples were weighed, packed in a
Marinelli-type beaker (1000 mL), sealed, and stored for 4 weeks to reach
equilibrium between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra and its decay product. Gamma-ray
spectrometric measurements for natural radioactivity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K) were performed with a Progress gamma spectrometer
(SPC Doza, Zelenograd Moscow, Russia) using a scintillation block for
detection based on a crystal of sodium iodide (Fotiou et al.,1998) at a
resolution of 30 keV at the 662 keV Cs-137 gamma line.</p>
      <p>The total organic carbon content in waste samples was estimated according to
ISO 10694:1995, the total nitrogen content according to ISO
11261:1995, pH according to ISO 10390:2005, and
electroconductivity according to ISO 11265:1994.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Microbiological analysis</title>
      <p>Soil metabolic quotient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated as the ratio of basal
microbial respiration to soil microbial biomass (Anderson and
Domsch, 1990). Basal respiration rates were determined according to
Schinner et al. (1995), and microbial biomass according to ISO
14240-2 (1997).</p>
      <p>The dehydrogenase (DHA) activity of microorganisms was determined according
to the method described in Garcia et al., (1997). Soil (1 g) adjusted
to 60 % water-holding capacity was treated with 0.2 mL of 4 %
2-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-iodophenyl-3-<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nutrophenyl-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride and incubated at
22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in darkness (autoclaved soil samples were used as
controls). After 20 h, the iodonitrotetrazolium formazan (INTF) was
extracted with 10 mL of ethylene chloride / acetone (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), measured
spectrophotometrically at 490 nm, and the results were expressed as mg INTF
g<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dry soil h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Cellulase activity (CA) was estimated by hydrolysis of
carboxymethylcellulose according to the method described in Pancholy
and Rice, (1973) with modifications: soil (3 g) adjusted to 60 % water
holding capacity, 7.5 mL of 1.15 M phosphate buffer, 5 mL of 1 %
carboxymethylcellulose, and 0.5 mL of toluene were incubated at 28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 24 h. The samples were filtered and 2 mL of
dinitrosalicylic acid reagent (10 g of 3.5-dinitrosalicylic acid, 16 g of
NaOH, and 300 g of K-Na-tartrate tetrahydrate in 1 L of distilled water) was
added to 4 mL of filtrate. The samples were then incubated at 95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N for
10 min in a water bath, cooled, and measured at 540 nm. Results were
expressed as milligrams of reducing sugars in 1 g of dry soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Single strand conformation polymorphism</title>
      <p>Soil samples were sieved (4 mm mesh) and homogenized, DNA was extracted
using the FastDNA<sup>®</sup> SPIN Kit for Soil (Bio101, Qbiogene,
Heidelberg, Germany) according to the instructions provided, and the DNA
concentration was measured at 260 nm (Thermo Scientific GENESYS 20<sup>™</sup>,
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, USA). DNA extracts were stored at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for further analysis. Extraction was performed twice for
contaminated and control samples.</p>
      <p>SSCP fingerprinting of the bacterial communities was performed as described
by Kampmann et al. (2012). Briefly, a PCR was performed (MyCycler, Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) in a total volume
of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L using chemicals and enzymes purchased from Fermentas (St.
Leon-Rot, Germany). The reaction mixture contained 0.6 of 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Dream Taq DNA Polymerase, 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Taq
Buffer, 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 2 mM MgCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 0.2 mM of each dNTP,
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of each primer, 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 0.16 mg mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> BSA, and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of DNA. Bacterial communities were analysed
using the universal bacterial 16S rRNA gene primer pair Com1/Com2 (CAG CAG
CCG CGG TAA TAC / CCG TCA ATT CCT TTG AGT TT) (Schwieger and Tebbe,
1998) purchased from Eurofins MWG Operon (Ebersberg, Germany). The PCR
parameters were 95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 3 min, followed by 16 cycles at 94 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, 64–57 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, and 72 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 30 s, followed by 9 cycles at 94 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, 57 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, and 72 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 30 s, with a final elongation step of
30 min at 72 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. PCR products were purified using the QiaQuick
PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Before electrophoresis,
ssDNA fragments were generated by lambda exonuclease digestion according to
Schwieger and Tebbe (1998). The ssDNA was separated using the
INGENYphorU electrophoresis system (Ingeny International BV, Goes,
Netherlands) at 450 V and 19.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 17 h in a non-denaturing
polyacrylamide gel consisting of 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MDE solution (Biozym
Scientific GmbH, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TBE buffer
(0.89 M Tris, 0.89 M boric acid, and 20 mM EDTA pH 8.0). The gel was
silver-stained using the Page Silver Staining Kit (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot,
Germany) according to the instructions provided and scanned to obtain
digitized gel images.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Identification of excised bands</title>
      <p>Dominant bands were excised from SSCP gels as described by Schwieger and
Tebbe (1998). The gel-extracted DNA was reamplified and cloned as
described by Kampmann et al. (2012) using the
pGEM-T<sup>®</sup> Vector System (Promega, Mannheim, Germany). The four
clones of each band to be sequenced (LGC Genomics GmbH, Berlin, Germany)
using the M13 (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) forward primer were sent to LGC
Genomics GmbH (Berlin, Germany) in a 96-well microtiter plate filled with LB
(Lysogeny Broth)-Agar with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of ampicillin.</p>
      <p>Quality checks and cutting of sequences were performed using the software
package MEGA version 5.0 (Tamura et al., 2011). Sequences were analysed
for chimeras with the Pintail programme (Version 1, Cardiff School of
Biosciences, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Ashelford et al., 2005), and
putative chimeras were removed from the data set. Alignments were done with
the SILVA web aligner (SINA v1.2.11, Microbial Genomics and Bioinformatics
Research Group, Bremen, Germany; Pruesse et al., 2007), and similarity
values were calculated using the PHYLIP neighbour-joining algorithm
(Felsenstein, 1989) implemented in the ARB software package
(Ludwig et al., 2004). For sequence comparison, the SILVA SSU 106 Ref
database was used. Sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database
with the accession numbers KF926419-KF926433.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p>Sampling and chemical analyses were carried out in triplicate and biological
analyses in quintuplicate, and all results were expressed on an air-dried
soil basis. Random variability of data was analysed to determine the mean
values and standard errors (S.E.). Statistical analyses were performed using
Origin 8.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, USA) and R Statistical Software (R
3.0.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version, Vienna, Austria; R Development Core Team, 2012) packages.</p>
      <p>SSCP gels were scanned at 400 dpi and the number of SCCP bands and their
areas and integrated intensities were estimated with Quantity One 1-D
Analysis Software (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). Each band was used as the
measured unit of biodiversity. Microbial community diversity was expressed
using several indices: Shannon-Weaver (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index) and Simpson (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index)
indices were calculated according to Shannon and Weaver, (1963) and
Simpson, (1949), respectively; the species diversity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index)
corresponded to the number of species in the line; the simple index
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index) was calculated as the number of bands in the SSCP line divided by
the number of bands in the line with the highest number of bands estimated
according to Silvestri et al., (2007); and the equitability of
the bands was calculated by Shannon's evenness (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index; Zornoza et al.,
2009).</p>
      <p>Two-way ANOVA with interaction was used to analyse the impact of factors
(e.g. depth of soil layers or type of contaminant) on the presence of bands
and microbial community diversity indices, and results yielding a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
less than 0.01 were considered highly significant (Chambers and
Hastie, 1992). In all ANOVA, the number of degrees of freedom was two for
the type of contaminant, two for the depth of soil layers, four for the
interaction of these two factors, and nine for the residuals. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-statistic was in the range [6, 17.6] (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value range [0.02, 0.001]) for the
type of contaminant, [0.7596, 11.5] (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value range [0.5, 0.003]) for the
depth of soil layers, and [1.9, 5.1] (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value range [0.2, 0.02]) for the
interaction of these two factors. To visualize the differences in microbial
communities, metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) plots were created, where
matrices of band abundance were assembled, and similarity matrices were
calculated according to the Bray–Curtis coefficient (Faith et al.,
1987).</p>
      <p>Cluster analysis was performed using hierarchic clusterization based on a
matrix of microbial communities dissimilarity. The Ward minimum variance
method from the Vegan package of the R software (R Foundation for
Statistical Computing Version 3.0.0, Vienna, Austria; R Development Core
Team, 2012), which aims to find compact, spherical clusters, was implemented
for clusterization (Ward, 1963).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Chemical characterization of the wide range of waste samples</title>
      <p>Oil wastes can contain radioactive elements and hydrocarbons in various
concentrations (Lazar et al., 1999). In our work, we estimated
TPH content and activity concentrations of 16 oily wastes sampled at a
petroleum production yard. As shown in Table 1, the TPH content ranged from
1.6 to 880.3 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the activity concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra ranged
from 0.03 to 7.92, that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th ranged from 0.02 to 5.09, and that of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K ranged from 0.03 to 2.28 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The values obtained are
comparable to or slightly exceed values reported by other authors (Liu et
al., 2009; Ros et al., 2010; Gazineu and Hazin, 2008; El Afifi and Awwad,
2005; Ayotamuno et al., 2007).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Chemical properties of the oil wastes from the Tikchonovskii
petroleum production yard.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.82}[.82]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waste sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TPH,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5">Activity concentration, kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.93 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">not detected</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">not detected</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">90.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">880.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 176.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">95.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">720.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 144.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.92 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">123.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">57.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">153.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (further <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">575.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 121.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (further <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.92 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.99 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">640.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 128.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.86 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.39 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.86 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pair of wastes in which waste sample no. 13 is raw waste and waste
sample no. 14 is the waste obtained by steam treatment of waste sample no. 13.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Pair of wastes in which waste sample no. 15 is raw waste and waste
sample no. 16 is the waste obtained by steam treatment of waste sample no.
15.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>The waste pairs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> marked in Table 1 represent the two pairs of
untreated and treated waste samples. The treatment of these wastes, which is
a thermal steam treatment with chemical agents, is part of the industrial
process. The goal of the treatment is to reduce the hazardous properties of
the wastes.</p>
      <p>For further investigation, we have chosen wastes 13 (further <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 14
(further <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the following reasons: (i) from the waste samples studied,
the initial waste sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> possesses quite a high concentration of TPH and,
at the same time, high activity concentrations of radionuclides; (ii) from
the waste samples studied, the treated waste sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> possesses the highest
activity concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra and the second highest activity
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K; (iii) the composition of the
mineral part of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sample is the same as that of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sample, so the
effects of removing hydrocarbons from the waste can be studied.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Chemical characterization of the waste samples $H$ and $R$}?><title>Chemical characterization of the waste samples <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>As shown in Table 1, the TPH content in sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated to be
575.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 121.0 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is typical for this waste
(Ayotamuno et al., 2007; Al-Futaisi et al., 2007; Tahhan and Abu-Ateih,
2009; Selivanovskaya et al., 2013). The other physico-chemical
characteristics of the wastes were determined as follows: the distribution
of fractions in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sample was 26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % asphaltenes, 23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % resins, 19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % aliphatics, and 32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % aromatics.
EC in this sample was estimated to be 4.78 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56, and the pH was 7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 0.1. The C : N ratio was equal to 187 (TOC 747 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32,
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The treatment of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sample decreased the TPH content to 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1) and increased the activity concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K 1.8-, 1.4-, and 1.8-fold, respectively; these
values are comparable with those reported by El Afifi and Awwad, (2005);
Bakr, (2010); Al-Saleh and Al-Harshan, (2008); Abo-Elmagd et al., (2010).
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra was the predominant isotope at 4.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra belongs to the uranium and thorium decay series, and the
awareness of radium isotopes is caused by the fact that it decays into radon
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>222</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Rn), which is a Class A carcinogen (Zakeri et al., 2012). A
comparison of the results with the recommended IAEA levels for natural
radionuclides (IBSS, 2001) indicated that the waste samples could cause
environmental changes, as the values were 2.1- to 2.8-fold higher than
recommended for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th and 1.3- to 2.3-fold lower than recommended for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra. Zakeri et al., (2012) reported that stress of 6
kBq or more from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra influences growth characteristics, and stress of
1 kBq or more up-regulates proteins in a <italic>Serratia marcescens</italic> strain isolated from a hot spring.
In the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sample we observed the following fractions in TPH: 36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %
asphaltenes, 33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % resin, 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % aliphatics, and 19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 2 % aromatics. The electroconductivity of this sample was equal to
5.13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4, the pH was 7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, and the C : N ratio was 35 (TOC:
2.10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2; N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Chemical characteristics of the soil samples</title>
      <p>The oil waste sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and its treated variant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were added to the soil
columns once, and then over 30 days an amount of water equal to the yearly
local precipitation was added. In control columns, the TPH content and
activity concentration of radioactive elements were typical for the natural
soils (Starkov and Migunov, 2003; Vera Tomé et al., 2002; Shawky et
al., 2001; Gumerova et al., 2013), and did not change significantly between
the upper (0–20 cm), middle (20–40 cm), and lower (40–60 cm) layers. The
TPH content ranged from 0.2 to 0.4 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the activity concentration
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra ranged from 0.01 to 0.02, that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th ranged from 0.021
to 0.023, and that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K ranged from 0.29 to 0.34 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; these
values are within the worldwide averages (UNSCEAR, 2000).</p>
      <p>Higher TPH and radionuclide content values were seen for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns in
comparison to corresponding controls (Fig. 1), which indicated leaching of
toxic compounds from the waste samples into soil layers. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> waste
samples increased the TPH content in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-soil columns, which was not observed
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns. In the Hu samples, TPH content was estimated to be 3.5-fold
higher than in the corresponding control (Nu), while lesser amounts of
hydrocarbons had migrated into the middle and lower soil layers (2.8- and
2.2-fold greater than control). The trend for TPH distribution in soil
layers indicated that TPH contamination of deeper soil layers was to be
expected.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>FExcess TPH content and activity concentrations of radionuclides in
soil sampled from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns (contaminated by the raw waste containing oily
compounds and radionuclides) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns (contaminated by treated waste
containing mainly radionuclides) in different layers [upper (0–20 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
middle (20–40 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and lower (40–60 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)] above the corresponding
values of the control columns.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Analyses of radionuclide activity concentrations indicated that
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K in the soil samples of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns did not
differ from control values. In soil, this natural radioactive element
predominated, and the concentration was not high in the waste samples. The
average migration of other elements did not exceed 0.8 %. Presumably, the
leakage of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K from waste samples was comparable with that of other
radionuclides, and therefore its migration did not change the natural level
of this radionuclide in soil samples.</p>
      <p>Activity concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th were increased in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-soil samples and 1.2- to 6.2-fold in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-soil samples over the control. The
activity concentrations of these two elements were much higher in Ru- and
Rm-samples compared to Hu- and Hm-samples, despite the fact that the amount
of waste added to the columns was equalized with respect to the activity
concentrations of radionuclides. Likely, radionuclides in raw waste samples
were part of organic complexes, which hindered their leakage into soil
layers with precipitation, while radionuclides migrated freely with water in
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral sample.</p>
      <p>Overall, it was shown that only low amounts (up to 0.8 %) of TPH and
radionuclides leaked into soil. But these relatively low concentrations did
alter the microbial community of soil as shown below.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Microbial community in soil samples</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Soil metabolic quotient, cellulase, and dehydrogenase activities</title>
      <p>Soil metabolic quotients (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which were expected to be higher in the
soil samples with higher microbial stress (Marin et al., 2005), are
presented in Fig. 2a. The lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed for the upper and
middle layers of the control columns, while the highest values were found
for the upper and middle layers of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns and in the lower layers of
all three columns, where the microbial community was affected by oxygen and
organic matter limitations. The first is probably due to the effects of
hydrocarbons leached from the oil wastes on microorganisms.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Microbial characteristics of the soil sampled from columns <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(uncontaminated soil), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (contaminated by the raw waste containing oily
compounds and radionuclides), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (contaminated by treated waste
containing mainly radionuclides) in different layers [upper (0–20 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
middle (20–40 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and lower (40–60 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)]. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – metabolic quotient
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – cellulase activity (CA), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – dehydrogenase activity (DHA).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015-f02.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Cellulases are important enzymes in the carbon cycle, and CA may be used to
indicate soil impacts (Sinegani and Sinegani, 2012). As shown in
Fig. 2b, CA in all soil columns decreased from the upper to the lower
layers. No significant differences were found between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples and
corresponding control samples, but in Hu and Hm samples, CA was
1.4-fold lower than that of the controls, which indicated that hydrocarbons
can decrease the cellulase activity of the soil.</p>
      <p>DHA is often used as a parameter for the estimation of soil quality, in
particular for the hydrocarbon degradation rate (Margesin et al., 2000;
Marin et al., 2005). In this study, no significant correlation between DHA
and the toxic element content or soil depth was found for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples
(from all three layers; Fig. 2c). This disagreed with the results reported
in Lee et al., (2008) and Tejada et al., (2008), where a
significant negative correlation between TPH content in soil and DHA was
seen. However, these authors worked with soils containing 4.5–100 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of hydrocarbons, whereas in this study, TPH levels did not exceed
1.3 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Microbial parameter values for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns were 62, 70, 95, and 80, 95,
110 % of corresponding control samples for the upper, middle, and lower
layers, respectively. These data indicated that the highest stress existed
in Hu and Hm samples, which were influenced by the raw waste. Radionuclides
appeared to play a less important role for microbial functional properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Microbial community structure</title>
      <p>Shifts in microbial community structure are sensitive indicators for
assessing the changes in soils under the influence of pollution as well as
other biotic and abiotic factors. Recently, culture-independent methods were
used to estimate the number of strains belonging to different ecological or
systematic groups (Adetutu et al., 2013). In this study, PCR-SSCP was
used to describe the changes in microbial community structure (Schwieger and
Tebbe, 1998).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Bacterial species identified after sequencing of bands obtained from SSCP
gels</title>
      <p>Total bacterial DNA was extracted, amplified by PCR using common bacterial
primers for 16S rDNA, and separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SSCP profiles are shown in Fig. 3). SSCP patterns demonstrated variations
between different soil layers and types of contaminants (oily components <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
radionuclides or only radionuclides), where 21 to 34 discrete bands of
various intensities were observed for each SSCP line, and the types of
bands were identified using relative electrophoretic distances. In total,
488 bands were detected and 25 were observed in at least two independent
SSCP profiles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>SSCP profiles of the bacterial communities of soil sampled from columns <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (uncontaminated soil), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (contaminated by the raw waste
containing oily compounds and radionuclides), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (contaminated by treated
waste containing mainly radionuclides) in different layers [upper (0–20 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), middle (20–40 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and lower (40–60 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)].</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015-f03-part01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Selected bands 1–4 (Fig. 3) were excised from the gel, cleaned, cloned, and
sequenced. Bands 1 and 2 were considered stable, as they were present in all
samples (except Ru) in relatively large amounts. Band 3 dominated in control
samples, and its relative abundance expressed in terms of area and band
intensity was 1.5- to 3.8-fold higher in control samples than in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples. Band 4 was present in all samples, but was predominant in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples.</p>
      <p>Four randomly-picked clones of each band (after blue-white selection) were
sequenced, and the next relatives were identified by a similarity matrix
using the neighbour-joining algorithm implemented in the ARB software and the
SILVA database SSU 106 Ref. Clones of band 1 (KF926419-KF926422) were
phylogenetically similar to <italic>Burkholderia </italic> strains found in unpolluted and polluted sites
(AF247491, DQ465451, FJ210816; Weisskopf et al., 2011; Friedrich et al.,
2000), while clones of band 2 (KF926423-926425) were similar to strains of
<italic>Burkholderia</italic> and <italic>Bradyrhizobium jicamae</italic> (JX010967, JN662515). Bacteria from the genus <italic>Burkholderia</italic> are typical soil
inhabitants, and certain <italic>Burkholderia</italic> strains are resistant to hydrocarbons and are used
in the bioremediation of oil-polluted sites (Bacosa et al., 2012;
Weisskopf et al., 2011; Hamamura et al., 2008; Adetutu et al., 2013). Band 3
(KF926426-KF926429), which is sensitive to oily and radioactive components
in the waste samples (not seen in contaminated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples), was
genetically similar to <italic>Hydrogenobacter hydrogenophilus</italic> (Z30242) uncultured <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> isolated from unpolluted
grassland and forest soils (HQ598830, HQ599021; Naether et al., 2012)
and an uncultured <italic>Chlorobiales </italic>bacterium found in a uranium mining waste pile (AJ295649,
AJ536877; Selenska-Pobell, 2002). Band 4 (KF926430-KF926433), which
dominated in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns, was related to an uncultured bacterium from mineral
soils of the Atacama desert (JX098489, JX098426; Lynch
et al., 2012) and actinomycetes from the genus <italic>Catenulispora </italic> (CP001700, AJ865857; Busti et al., 2006) as well as strains isolated from
gasoline-polluted sites (or able to degrade hydrocarbons; JQ919514; Hilyard et al., 2008), including a <italic>Parvibaculum</italic> strain that catabolizes
linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (AY387398; Schleheck et al.,
2004).</p><?xmltex \hack{\addtocounter{figure}{-1}}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Continued.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015-f03-part02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>SSCP analysis of PCR products and statistical analysis</title>
      <p>The microbial diversity of each sample was calculated using five indices,
and the results are presented in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>The biodiversity indices of the soil sampled from the upper (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
middle (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and lower (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) layers of the control (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), raw waste (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
treated waste (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) contaminated columns.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Samples</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.83</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ru</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ru</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.96</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index – Shannon-Weaver index, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index – Simpson index, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index – number
of species (bands) in SSCP profile, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index – simple index, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index –
Shannon's evenness (index of equitability of the bands).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index represented the number of SSCP bands in a line (in the sample).
The number of bands ranged between 25 and 34 in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns, between 23 and 29
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns, and between 21 and 29 in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns. No significant differences
were seen between samples from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and control columns with respect to
depth. Only in the Rl-samples did the number of the SSCP patterns decrease
significantly in comparison to samples from the upper and middle layers. The
average number of bands tended to be higher in the control samples (29.7)
compared to the contaminated samples (25.8 each). According to the data
presented in the literature, the influence of combined hydrocarbon and
mineral contamination of soil can lead to both increases and decreases in
its microbial diversity. Thus, the increase of microbial diversity is
explained by the fact that TPH can be used by microorganisms as carbon
sources. Therefore, a relatively low TPH input could lead to the development
of a new hydrocarbon-degrading species without suppression of indigenous microbes
(Gao et al., 2015; Nie et al., 2009). Negative effects on soil biodiversity are explained
by significant inhibition of indigenous microflora in the oil-contaminated
sites because of the toxic influence of hydrocarbons or their metabolites,
oxygen deficit, and other factors (Hui et al., 2007; Morelli et al.,
2005; Marcin et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index reflected the diversity of bands in the sample with respect to
the sample with the highest biodiversity; the highest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-indices were
observed in Cm samples and the lowest in Rl samples. The community diversity
Shannon-Weaver index (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index), which is expected to be higher in samples
with the highest number of bands but with similar frequencies, fluctuated
from 2.72 to 3.38. This reflected the variety of band profiles among
samples, which indicated changes in the microbial community due to waste
compounds or depth. The evenness (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index) was higher in the samples with
higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-indices (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86). The Simpson <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index was smaller when one band
predominated, and the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-indices were observed for Rl and Hu samples.
The sample compositions differed significantly between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples and other
samples, and the bands labelled 4 (Fig. 4) were dominant while band 3
disappeared. These results were in agreement with those of Morelli et al. (2005), who observed that organisms in polluted ecosystems which
are capable of degrading contaminants or resisting toxicity are dominant,
while other species do not survive.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Cluster analysis of the SSCP bands observed on SSCP profiles of
soil sampled from the columns <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (uncontaminated soil), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (contaminated by
the raw waste containing oily compounds and radionuclides), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(contaminated by treated waste containing mainly radionuclides) in different
layers [upper (0–20 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), middle (20–40 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and lower (40–60 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)].</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The ANOVA of the linear model of influence of factors (type of waste, depth,
their interdependence, and residuals) on biodiversity was performed. The
presence of oil waste was significant only for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-index (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01), while other indices of biodiversity did not depend on the factors
investigated.</p>
      <p>The correlation between factors describing soil samples (type of waste,
depth, their interdependence, and residuals) and microbial community
structure was examined. ANOVA of the presence or absence of 25 bands (which
were observed in at least two samples) was carried out, and it was found
that depth was a significant factor for five bands, the presence of
contaminant for six, and the combined influence of these two factors for
three (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01). An ANOVA for the MDS values was performed as
suggested by Lin et al., (2012) to reduce the dimensions of the values
analysed. The type of waste, as well as the interaction between waste and
depth, was significant for the structure of the microbial community. Depth
did not play an important role in the bacterial community structure (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) and the control columns did not differ between soil layers,
as opposed to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns.</p>
      <p>Samples were grouped using MDS and clustering analysis methods. Cluster
analysis, which orders samples according to their similarity indices, is
commonly used to show the differences or classification between groups of
clusters (Kadali et al., 2012). To determine the number of
clusters on the dendrogram (Fig. 4), the method of natural break was
implemented. The samples were divided into two groups: the first group
included all control samples, while the second group contained <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples
from the upper and middle layers as well as all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples from lower
layers (the samples of the second group contained fewer microbial strains).
The first group was subdivided into three parts according to the type of
waste or depth: Rm-samples, C-samples of the upper and middle layers
(further subdivided into Rl-samples, Hl-samples, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-samples of the upper
and middle layers), and Ru/Cl samples.</p>
      <p>MDS is the most common ordination method used for ecological community data
(Wilson et al., 2013; Terahara et al., 2004). Figure 5 shows the MDS plot
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56 for distance correspondence), where the closer to one
another the points representing microbial communities were situated on the
plot, the more similar these microbial communities were. Samples were
positioned according to the type of contaminant (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and uncontaminated
control, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which could be explained by the selective influence of toxic
compounds from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the strains present in soil. This finding is
consistent with that of Hamamura et al. (2008), who suggested
that the population shifts corresponding to the prominent bands in soils are
due to the content of hydrocarbons. It is important to note that communities
from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns were separated from the communities from C-columns,
despite the fact that the activity concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra was below the
recommended level (IBSS, 2001) and not in line with the estimates for
functional characteristics of the microbial community. This confirmed that
PCR-based estimates of environmental influence can be more sensitive than
traditional methods (Lin et al., 2012; Bialek et al., 2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Metric multidimensional scaling analysis based on distance matrix
of SSCP profiles of soil sampled from the columns <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (uncontaminated soil),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (contaminated by the raw waste containing oily compounds and radionuclides),
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (contaminated by treated waste containing mainly radionuclides) on
different layers [upper (0–20 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), middle (20–40 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and lower
(40–60 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)].</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3681/2015/bg-12-3681-2015-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Oil wastes generated during processing, transportation, and refining of
petroleum, which are frequently disposed on the soil surface, are serious
environmental threats, especially in petroleum-producing regions. In this
study, we have investigated the combined effects of hydrocarbons and
radionuclides contained in oil waste on the soil microbial community. Such
effects have not been studied before, although a large amount of oil waste
is radioactive. We analysed the wastes from tanks, pipes, and production
equipment sampled in different seasons between 2010 and 2012 and established a wide
range of TPH content from 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 to 880.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 176.8 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, activity concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra from 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 to
7.92 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.93, activity concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th from 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 to 5.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.02, and activity concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>K from
0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 to 2.28 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.34 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To distinguish between
the effects of hydrocarbons and radionuclides, we chose the raw waste <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with
a typical content of TPH and radionuclides and its treated variant with
reduced hydrocarbon content but containing radionuclides (waste <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contained 4.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.31 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra, 2.85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th,
and 575.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 121.0 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of TPH and the sample <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contained 7.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra, 3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 kBq kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>232</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, and 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 g kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of TPH. The last two compounds exceeded the levels
reported to be non-toxic in the environment, indicating that the traditional
practice where oil waste was spread on the soil surface could have negative
effects on the soil.</p>
      <p>Disposal of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> waste samples on the soil surface increased the TPH content in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-soil columns, which was not observed for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns. In the soil sampled
from the upper layer of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-column, the TPH content was estimated to be
3.5-fold higher than in the corresponding control sample, while lesser
amounts of hydrocarbons had migrated into the middle and lower soil layers
(2.8 and 2.2 times higher than control). Despite the fact that the amount of
waste samples disposed of on the tops of soil columns was equalized
according to the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>226</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra, a greater amount of this radionuclide
was observed in the soil of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns: it was 4.3, 1.4, and 1.2 times higher
than that in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns in the upper, middle, and lower layers, respectively.
It is likely that radionuclides in raw waste samples were part of organic
complexes which hindered their leakage into soil layers with precipitation,
while radionuclides migrated freely with water in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> mineral sample.</p>
      <p>By analysing the functional characteristics of soil microorganisms, oil
compounds (but not radionuclides) were found to influence soil microflora.
The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and cellulase activity in soil samples from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns were
reduced 1.3 to 2.2 times more than in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-columns, where microbial activity
values were close to the control values. In contrast, PCR-SSCP demonstrated
that both oil compounds and radioactive elements could cause shifts in the microbial
community structure.</p>
      <p>We conclude that oil waste containing radioactive elements caused negative
changes of soil microbial community by its disposal, while petroleum
hydrocarbons played the more pronounced negative role. The effects of
radionuclides contained in oily waste on soil can be evaluated using
culture-independent analyses of microbial communities.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was funded by the subsidy allocated to the Kazan Federal University
for the state assignment in the sphere of scientific activities.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Y. Kuzyakov</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abo-Elmagd, M., Soliman, H. A., Salman Kh, A., and El-Masry, N. M.:
Radiological hazards of TENORM in the wasted petroleum pipes, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 101, 51–54, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adetutu, E. M., Smith, R. J., Weber, J., Aleer, S., Mitchell, J. G., Ball,
A. S., and Juhasz, A. L.: A polyphasic approach for assessing the
suitability of bioremediation for the treatment of hydrocarbon-impacted
soil, Sci. Total Environ., 450, 51–58, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Admon, S., Green, M., and Avnimelech, Y.: Biodegradation kinetics of
hydrocarbons in soil during land treatment of oily sludge, Biorem. J., 5,
193–209, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Al-Futaisi, A., Jamrah, A., Yaghi, B., and Taha, R.: Assessment of
alternative management techniques of tank bottom petroleum sludge in Oman,
J. Hazard. Mater., 141, 557–564, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.023</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Al-Masri, M. S., Aba, A., Al-Hamwi, A., and Shakhashiro, A.: Preparation of
in-house reference soil sample containing high levels of naturally occurring
radioactive materials from the oil industry, Applied radiation and isotopes: including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture,
industry and medicine, 1397–1402, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Al-Saleh, F. S. and Al-Harshan, G. A.: Measurements of radiation level in
petroleum products and wastes in Riyadh City Refinery, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 99, 1026–1031, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. H., and Domsch, K. H.: Application of eco-physiological
quotients (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different
cropping histories, Soil Biol. Biochem., 22, 251–255, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Ashelford, K. E., Chuzhanova, N. A., Fry, J. C., Jones, A. J., and
Weightman, A. J.: At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held
in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies, Appl.
Environ. Microbiol., 71, 7724–7736, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ayotamuno, M. J., Okparanma, R. N., Nweneka, E. K., Ogaji, S. O. T., and
Probert, S. D.: Bio-remediation of a sludge containing hydrocarbons, Appl.
Energy, 84, 936–943, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bacosa, H. P., Suto, K., and Inoue, C.: Bacterial community dynamics during
the preferential degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons by a microbial
consortium, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 74, 109–115, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bakr, W. F.: Assessment of the radiological impact of oil refining industry,
J. Environ. Radioactiv., 101, 237–243, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bialek, K., Kim, J., Lee, C., Collins, G., Mahony, T., and O'Flaherty, V.:
Quantitative and qualitative analyses of methanogenic community development
in high-rate anaerobic bioreactors, Water Res., 45, 1298–1308, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Busti, E., Monciardini, P., Cavaletti, L., Bamonte, R., Lazzarini, A.,
Sosio, M., and Donadio, S.: Antibiotic-producing ability by representatives
of a newly discovered lineage of actinomycetes, Microbiology-Sgm, 152,
675–683, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chambers, J. M., and Hastie, T. J.: Statistical Models in S, Wadsworth &amp;
Brooks/Cole, 624 pp., 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
El Afifi, E. M. and Awwad, N. S.: Characterization of the TE-NORM waste
associated with oil and natural gas production in Abu Rudeis, Egypt, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 82, 7–19, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R., and Belbin, L.: Compositional dissimilarity as
a robust measure of ecological distance, Vegetatio, 69, 57–68, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Felsenstein, J.: PHYLIP – Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2),
Cladistics, 5, 164–166, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fotiou, F., Goulas, A., Fountoulakis, K., Koutlas, E., Hamlatzis, P., and
Papakostopoulos, D.: Changes in psychophysiological processing of vision in
myasthenia gravis, International journal of psychophysiology : official
journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 29, 303–310,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Friedrich, M., Grosser, R. J., Kern, E. A., Inskeep, W. P., and Ward, D. M.:
Effect of model sorptive phases on phenanthrene biodegradation: Molecular
analysis of enrichments and isolates suggests selection based on
bioavailability, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 2703–2710, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Galitskaya, P. Y., Gumerova, R. K., and Selivanovskaya, S. Y.: Bioremediation of
oil waste under field experiment, World Appl. Scien. J., 30, 1694–1698, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, Y-ch., Wang J-n., Guo, Sh-h., Hu, Y-L., Li T-t., Mao, R., and Zeng, D-H.:
Effects of salinization and crude oil contamination on soil bacterial
community structure in the Yellow River Delta region, China. Appl. Soil
Ecol., 86, 165–173, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, C., Hernandez, T., and Costa, F.: Potential use of dehydrogenase
activity as an index of microbial activity in degraded soils, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 28, 123–134, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gazineu, M. H. and Hazin, C. A.: Radium and potassium-40 in solid wastes
from the oil industry, Appl. Radiat. Isot., 66, 90–94, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gumerova, R. K., Galitskaya, P. Y., Badrutdinov, O. R., and Selivanovskaya,
S. Y.: Changes of hydrocarbon and oil fractions contents in oily waste
treated by different methods of bioremediation, Neftyanoe Khozyaistvo – Oil
Industry, 118–120, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hamamura, N., Fukui, M., Ward, D. M., and Inskeep, W. P.: Assessing Soil
Microbial Populations Responding to Crude-Oil Amendment at Different
Temperatures Using Phylogenetic, Functional Gene (alkB) and Physiological
Analyses, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7580–7586, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlat, M. S., Djeffal, S., and Kadi H.: Assessment of radiation exposures from
naturally occurring radioactive materials in the oil and gas industry,
Applied radiation and isotopes: including data, instrumentation and methods
for use in agriculture, industry and medicine, 141–146, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hilyard, E. J., Jones-Meehan, J. M., Spargo, B. J., and Hill, R. T.:
Enrichment, isolation, and phylogenetic identification of polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from Elizabeth River sediments,
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74, 1176–1182, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hrichi, H., Baccouche, S., and Belgaied, J. E.: Evaluation of radiological
impacts of tenorm in the Tunisian petroleum industry, J. Environ. Radioactiv.,
115, 107–113, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, G., Lia, J., Zeng, G. Recent development in the treatment of oily sludge from petroleum industry: A review, J. Hazard. Mater., 261, 470–490, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, J., Li, Z., Zeng, G., Zhang, J., Li, J., Nie, X., Ma, W., and Zhang,
X.: Microbial responses to simulated water erosion in relation to organic
carbon dynamics on a hilly cropland in subtropical China, Ecol. Engin., 60,
65–75, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hui, L., Zhang, Y., Kravchenko, I., Hui, X., and Zhang, C.-G.: Dynamic
changes in microbial activity and community structure during biodegradation
of petroleum compounds: A laboratory experiment, J. Environ. Sci.-China,
19, 1003–1013, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
IBSS: IAEA 115-1, in: Safety Series, International Basic Safety Standards,
Vienna, 17 pp., 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
ISO 11265:1994: Soil quality – Determination of the specific electrical
conductivity; International Organization for Standardization, 4 pp., 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
ISO 10694:1995: Soil quality – Determination of organic and total carbon
after dry combustion (elementary analysis); International Organization for
Standardization, 7 pp., 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
ISO 11261:1995: Soil quality – Determination of total nitrogen – Modified
Kjeldahl method; International Organization for Standardization, 4 pp.,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
ISO 14240-2: Soil quality – Determination of soil microbial biomass – Part
2: Fumigation-extraction method; International Organization for
Standardization, 4 pp., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kadali, K. K., Simons, K. L., Skuza, P. P., Moore, R. B., and Ball, A. S.: A
complementary approach to identifying and assessing the remediation
potential of hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria, J. Microbiol. Meth., 88,
348–355, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kampmann, K., Ratering, S., Kramer, I., Schmidt, M., Zerr, W., and Schnell,
S.: Unexpected Stability of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes Communities in
Laboratory Biogas Reactors Fed with Different Defined Substrates, Appl.
Environ. Microbiol., 78, 2106–2119, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Labud, V. G. C. and Hernandez, T.: Effect of hydrocarbon pollution on the
microbial properties of a sandy and a clay soil, Chemosph., 66, 1863–1871,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lamy, E., Tran, T. C., Mottelet, S., Pauss, A., and Schoefs, O.:
Relationships of respiratory quotient to microbial biomass and hydrocarbon
contaminant degradation during soil bioremediation, Int. Biodeter.
Biodegrad., 83, 85–91, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lazar, I., Dobrota, S., Voicu, A., Stefanescu, M., Sandulescu, L., and
Petrisor, I. G.: Microbial degradation of waste hydrocarbons in oily sludge
from some Romanian oil fields, J. Petrol. Scien. Engin., 22, 151–160, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, S. H., Oh, B. I., and Kim, J. G.: Effect of various amendments on heavy
mineral oil bioremediation and soil microbial activity, Biores. Technol.,
99, 2578–2587, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Li, F., Liu, M., Li, Z., Jiang, C., Han, F., and Che, Y.: Changes in soil
microbial biomass and functional diversity with a nitrogen gradient in soil
columns, Appl. Soil Ecol., 64, 1–6, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J., Zuo, J. E., Ji, R. F., Chen, X. J., Liu, F. L., Wang, K. J., and
Yang, Y. F.: Methanogenic community dynamics in anaerobic co-digestion of
fruit and vegetable waste and food waste, J. Environ. Sci.-China, 24,
1288–1294, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P. W. G., Chang, T. C., Chen, C. H., Wang, M. Z., and Hsu, H. W.:
Effects of soil organic matter and bacterial community shift on
bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil, Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad., 85,
661–670, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W. X., Luo, Y. M., Teng, Y., Li, Z. G., and Christie, P.: Prepared bed
bioremediation of oily sludge in an oilfield in northern China, J. Hazard.
Mater., 161, 479–484, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Westram, R., Richter, L., Meier, H., Yadhukumar,
Buchner, A., Lai, T., Steppi, S., Jobb, G., Forster, W., Brettske, I.,
Gerber, S., Ginhart, A. W., Gross, O., Grumann, S., Hermann, S., Jost, R.,
Konig, A., Liss, T., Lussmann, R., May, M., Nonhoff, B., Reichel, B.,
Strehlow, R., Stamatakis, A., Stuckmann, N., Vilbig, A., Lenke, M., Ludwig,
T., Bode, A., and Schleifer, K. H.: ARB: a software environment for sequence
data, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1363–1371, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lynch, R. C., King, A. J., Farias, M. E., Sowell, P., Vitry, C., and
Schmidt, S. K.: The potential for microbial life in the highest-elevation
(&gt; 6000 m.a.s.l.) mineral soils of the Atacama region, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 117, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Marcin, C., Marcin, G., Justyna, M. P., Katarzyna, K., and Maria, N.:
Diversity of microorganisms from forest soils differently polluted with
heavy metals, Appl. Soil Ecol., 64, 7–14, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Margesin, R., Zimmerbauer, A., and Schinner, F.: Monitoring of
bioremediation by soil biological activities, Chemosphere, 40, 339–346,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Marin, J. A., Hernandez, T., and Garcia, C.: Bioremediation of oil refinery
sludge by landfarming in semiarid conditions: Influence on soil microbial
activity, Environ. Res., 98, 185–195, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Mikkonen, A., Hakala, K. P., Lappi, K., Kondo, E., Vaalama, A., and
Suominen, L.: Changes in hydrocarbon groups, soil ecotoxicity and
microbiology along horizontal and vertical contamination gradients in an old
landfarming field for oil refinery waste, Environ. Pollution, 162, 374–380,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Min, J., Lee Ch. W., and Gu M. B.: Gamma-radiation dose-rate effects on DNA
damage and toxicity in bacterial cells, Radiat. Environ. Bioph., 42, 189–192, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Mishra, S., Jyot, J., Kuhad, R. C., and Lal, B.: Evaluation of inoculum addition
to stimulate in situ bioremediation of oily-sludge-contaminated soil, Appl.
Environ. Microbiol., 4, 1675–1681, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Morelli, I. S., Del Panno, M. T., De Antoni, G. L., and Painceira, M. T.:
Laboratory study on the bioremediation of petrochemical sludge-contaminated
soil, Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad., 55, 271–278, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Naether, A., Foesel, B. U., Naegele, V., Wust, P. K., Weinert, J.,
Bonkowski, M., Alt, F., Oelmann, Y., Polle, A., Lohaus, G., Gockel, S.,
Hemp, A., Kalko, E. K. V., Linsenmair, K. E., Pfeiffer, S., Renner, S.,
Schoning, I., Weisser, W. W., Wells, K., Fischer, M., Overmann, J., and
Friedrich, M. W.: Environmental Factors Affect Acidobacterial Communities
below the Subgroup Level in Grassland and Forest Soils, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol., 78, 7398–7406, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Nie, M., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Jiang, L., Yang, J., Quan, Z., Cui, X., Fang,
C., and Li, B.: Rhizosphere effects on soil bacterial abundance and diversity
in
the Yellow River Deltaic ecosystem as influenced by petroleum contamination
and soil salinization, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 2535–2542, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Pancholy, S. K. and Rice, E. L.: Soil enzymes in relation to old field
succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase, and urease,
Proceedings of American Soil Science Society, 37, 47–50, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Plaza, G., Nalecz-Jawecki, G., Ulfig, K., and Brigmon, R. L.: The
application of bioassays as indicators of petroleum-contaminated soil
remediation, Chemosphere, 59, 289–296, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pruesse, E., Quast, C., Knittel, K., Fuchs, B. M., Ludwig, W. G., Peplies,
J., and Glockner, F. O.: SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality
checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB, Nucleic
Acids Res., 35, 7188–7196, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical
computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Ros, M., Rodriguez, I., Garcia, C., and Hernandez, T.: Microbial communities
involved in the bioremediation of an aged recalcitrant hydrocarbon polluted
soil by using organic amendments, Biores. Technol., 101, 6916–6923, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Ruffing, A. M. and Trahan C. A.: Biofuel toxicity and mechanisms of biofuel
tolerance in three model cyanobacteria, Algal Research, 5, 121–132, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Schinner, F., Ohlinger, R., Kandeler, E., and Margesin, R.: Methods in Soil
Biology, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 418 pp., 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Schleheck, D., Tindall, B. J., Rossello-Mora, R., and Cook, A. M.:
Parvibaculum lavamentivorans gen. nov., sp nov., a novel heterotroph that
initiates catabolism of linear alkylbenzenesulfonate, Int. J. System.
Evolut. Microbiol., 54, 1489–1497, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Schwieger, F. and Tebbe, C. C.: A new approach to utilize
PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism for 16s rRNA gene-based
microbial community analysis, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 4870–4876,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Selenska-Pobell, S.: Diversity and activity of bacteria in uranium mining
waste piles, Radioactiv. Environm., 22, 225–254, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Selivanovskaya, S. Y., Kuritsyn, I. N., Akhmetzynova, L. G., Galitskaya,
P. Y., and Solovjev, D. A.: Use of biological activity index for determination of
the oil polluted area meant for remediation, Neftynoe Khozyaistvo – Oil
Industry, 102–103, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Selivanovskaya, S. Y., Gumerova, R. K., and Galitskaya, P. Y.: Assessing
the
efficiency of methods for the bioremediation of oil production wastes,
Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 6, 542–548, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.: The mathematical theory of communication,
Urbana, IS: University of Illinois Press, 125 pp., 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Shawky, S., Amer, H., Nada, A. A., Abd el-Maksoud, T. M., and Ibrahiem, N.
M.: Characteristics of NORM in the oil industry from Eastern and Western
deserts of Egypt, Appl. Radiat. Isot., 55, 135–139, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Silvestri, G., Santarelli, S., Aquilanti, L., Beccaceci, A., Osimani, A.,
Tonucci, F., and Clementi, F.: Investigation of the microbial ecology of
Ciauscolo, a traditional Italian salami, by culture-dependent techniques and
PCR-DGGE, Meat Science, 77, 413–423, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Simpson, E. H.: Measurement of diversity, Nature, 163, 688, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Sinegani, A. A. S. and Sinegani, M. S.: The effects of carbonates removal
on adsorption, immobilization and activity of cellulase in a calcareous
soil, Geoderma, 173, 145–151, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Starkov, V. D. and Migunov, V. I.: Radiation ecology (in Russian), FGU IPP
“Tumen”, Tumen (Russia), 304 pp., 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Tahhan, R. A. and Abu-Ateih, R. Y.: Biodegradation of petroleum industry
oily-sludge using Jordanian oil refinery contaminated soil, Intern.
Biodeter. Biodegrad., 63, 1054–1060, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., and Kumar, S.:
MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood,
Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods, Mol. Biol. Evol., 28,
2731–2739, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Tejada, M., Gonzalez, J. L., Hernandez, M. T., and Garcia, C.: Application
of different organic amendments in a gasoline contaminated soil: Effect on
soil microbial properties, Bioresource Technol., 99, 2872–2880, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Terahara, T., Hoshino, T., Tsuneda, S., Hirata, A., and Inamori, Y.:
Monitoring the microbial population dynamics at the start-up stage of
wastewater treatment reactor by terminal restriction fragment length
polymorphism analysis based on 16S rDNA and rRNA gene sequences, J.
Bioscien. Bioengineer., 98, 425–428, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
UNSCEAR: Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Scientific Committee on
the Effects of Atomic Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the
Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York, 17, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Vera Tomé, F., Blanco Rodrìguez, P., and Lozano, J. C.: Distribution
and mobilization of U, Th and 226Ra in the plant–soil compartments of a
mineralized uranium area in south-west Spain, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 59,
41–60, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Verma, S., Bhargava, R., and Pruthi, V.: Oily sludge degradation by bacteria
from Ankleshwar, India, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 57, 207–213, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Walker, J. D., Colwell, R. R., Hamming, M. C., Ford, H. T.: Extraction of
petroleum hydrocarbons from oil contaminated sediments, Bull. Environ.
Contam. Toxicol., 13, 245–248, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Wang, Q. H., Wang, S. J., Li, F. S., and Guo, G. L.: Effect of
biostimulation on community level physiological profiles of microorganisms
in field-scale biopiles composed of aged oil sludge, Biores. Technol., 111,
308–315, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, J. H.: Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 301, 236–244, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Weisskopf, L., Heller, S., and Eberl, L.: Burkholderia Species Are Major
Inhabitants of White Lupin Cluster Roots, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77,
7715–7720, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, L. P., Loetscher, L. H., Sharvelle, S. E., and De Long, S. K.:
Microbial community acclimation enhances waste hydrolysis rates under
elevated ammonia and salinity conditions, Biores. Technol., 146, 15–22,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zakeri, F., Sadeghizadeh, M., Kardan, M. R., Zahiri, H. S., Ahmadian, G.,
Masoumi, F., Sharafi, H., Rigi, G., Vali, H., and Noghabi, K. A.:
Differential proteome analysis of a selected bacterial strain isolated from
a high background radiation area in response to radium stress, J. Proteom.,
75, 4820–4832, 2012.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zornoza, R., Guerrero, C., Mataix-Solera, J., Scow, K. M., Arcenegui, V.,
and Mataix-Beneyto, J.: Changes in soil microbial community structure
following the abandonment of agricultural terraces in mountainous areas of
Eastern Spain, Appl. Soil Ecol., 42, 315–323, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
