<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-3713-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Redox regime shifts in microbially mediated biogeochemical cycles</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Redox regime shifts in microbially mediated biogeochemical cycles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.~Bush et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bush</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          <email>t.bush@sms.ed.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Butler</surname><given-names>I. B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Free</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>R. J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings,  Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University
of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">T. Bush (t.bush@sms.ed.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>3713</fpage><lpage>3724</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3713/2015/bg-12-3713-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3713/2015/bg-12-3713-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3713/2015/bg-12-3713-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3713/2015/bg-12-3713-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Understanding how the Earth's biogeochemical cycles respond to
environmental change is a prerequisite for the prediction and
mitigation of the effects of anthropogenic perturbations. Microbial
populations mediate key steps in these cycles, yet they are often crudely
represented in biogeochemical models. Here, we show that microbial
population dynamics can qualitatively affect the response of
biogeochemical cycles to environmental change. Using simple and
generic mathematical models, we find that nutrient limitations on
microbial population growth can lead to regime shifts, in which the
redox state of a biogeochemical cycle changes dramatically as the
availability of a redox-controlling species, such as oxygen or
acetate, crosses a threshold (a “tipping point”). These redox regime
shifts occur in parameter ranges that are relevant to the present-day sulfur
cycle in the natural environment and the present-day nitrogen cycle in eutrophic
terrestrial environments. These shifts may also
have relevance to iron cycling in the iron-containing Proterozoic and
Archean oceans. We show that redox regime shifts also occur in models
with physically realistic modifications, such as additional terms,
chemical states, or microbial populations.  Our work reveals
a possible new mechanism by which regime shifts can occur in
nutrient-cycling ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles, and highlights
the importance of considering microbial population dynamics in models
of biogeochemical cycles.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Metabolic conversions mediated by microorganisms play a key role in
the Earth's biogeochemical cycles
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.1"/>. For example, microbial
nitrogen fixation contributes an estimated 100–200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
nitrogen to the world's oceans annually <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.2"/>, while the
microbial decomposition of soil carbon exceeds the anthropogenic
contribution of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere by an order of
magnitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.3"/>. Predicting the response of these cycles
to environmental changes, including climate change, is a central
current challenge in Earth system science <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.4"/>. However,
mathematical models for global geochemical cycles often represent
microbially mediated transformations as crude “black
boxes” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.5"/>: for example, microbial decomposition in
soil is often represented as a first-order decay process
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.6"/>. Indeed, many of the models cited in
the most recent IPCC report use linear representations of
microbially mediated processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.7"/>. This simplified
picture contrasts strongly with the wealth of data on microbial
community diversity and functional complexity which is being generated
by recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technology
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.8"/>. There is thus an urgent need to re-evaluate
the role of microbial population dynamics in biogeochemical models
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p>Here, we use simple mathematical models to show that microbial
population dynamics can have important qualitative effects on the
response of microbially mediated biogeochemical cycles to
environmental change. Specifically, nutrient limitations on microbial
population growth can lead to abrupt changes in redox state in
response to a gradual change in an environmental parameter. Sharp
transitions, often described as regime shifts, are known to occur in
diverse systems in response to diverse stimuli; examples range from
aquatic ecosystems in the leaves of carnivorous pitcher plants
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.10"/> to large-scale shifts in terrestrial vegetation
cover <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.11"/>. These shifts are usually attributed to
specific features of the system structure
(or “topology”; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="altparen.12"/>). Our work suggests that, for
biogeochemical cycles, nonlinear effects arising from microbial
population dynamics can lead to sharp transitions between broadly
oxidized and reduced system states, even for systems with simple
topologies. We term this a “redox regime shift”, i.e., a nonlinear
transition in the predominant redox state of a biogeochemical cycle in
response to a gradual change in an environmental stimulus. In
some other studies, the term “regime shift” has been associated with
bistability. Here, we use the term simply to describe a sharp
response, without any implied bistability.</p>
      <p>In a biogeochemical cycle, a chemical element is shuttled between its
oxidized and reduced forms in a series of steps that may be biotically
or abiotically mediated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.13"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>
illustrates simplified topologies of the iron, sulfur, carbon, and
nitrogen cycles (Fig. 1a–d) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.14"/>.  To encapsulate the basic topology
of these cycles, we begin by considering a simplified
two-state model (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e), in which an oxidized form of
a chemical element (here denoted <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is converted via
microbial metabolism to a reduced form (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is
recycled back to the oxidized form either by a second microbial
metabolism or by an abiotic reaction. Although this model is
topologically very simple, it reveals an important and nontrivial
regime shifting behavior. Later in this paper we show that this
behavior is preserved in more realistic models that include features
such as spatial heterogeneity, multiple redox states, and explicit
coupling to the environment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Schematic view of the biogeochemical redox cycles involving iron, sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen <bold>(a–d)</bold> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.15"/>, together with the model investigated in the first part of this work <bold>(e)</bold>. In all panels, oxidation reactions
proceed to the right, and reduction reactions proceed to the left.
Biologically catalyzed (metabolic) reactions are shown in blue, and abiotic reactions are shown in red. We note that abiotic reduction reactions are not
shown, as these are minor reactions in the
natural environment (but can be included in our model; see  Sect. S1). We also note that many intermediate chemical states
are not shown (particularly for the nitrogen and sulfur cycles) but inclusion of extra states does not affect our conclusions; see Supplement. In panel <bold>(e)</bold>,  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represent the reduced and oxidized forms of the chemical element being cycled.
</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3713/2015/bg-12-3713-2015-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>A redox reaction in a biogeochemical cycle couples the
oxidation/reduction of the element being cycled to the
reduction/oxidation of another chemical species.  For example, in the
sulfur cycle, the microbial reduction of sulfate can be coupled to the
oxidation of acetate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.16"/>, while in the nitrogen
cycle, the oxidation of ammonia can be coupled to the reduction of
molecular oxygen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.17"/>. In this paper, in order to avoid
confusion, we refer to the latter chemical species (in these examples
acetate or oxygen) as the “auxiliary electron donor/acceptor”. The
auxiliary electron donor/acceptor may be supplied from some external
source (e.g., oxygen from the atmosphere) or may be generated by
another biogeochemical process (e.g., microbial decomposition producing
acetate).  Many different chemical species can act as auxiliary
electron donors or acceptors; for example, acetate or hydrogen can
function as the electron donor for reductive reactions, while nitrate
or oxygen can function as the electron acceptor for oxidative
reactions. The redox-shifting behavior which arises in our models is
generic, independent of which chemical species performs the role of
auxiliary electron donor/acceptor.</p>
      <p>Crucially, if the auxiliary electron acceptor/donor is in short supply
then its availability can control the rate of the redox reaction, and
hence the flux of the biogeochemical cycle. Moreover, in natural
environments, the availability of electron acceptors and donors is
strongly dependent on the environmental conditions. For example, in
aquatic ecosystems, the supply of oxygen depends on its solubility,
which is temperature-dependent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.18"/>, and on the rate
of photosynthesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.19"/>, while the supply of
acetate depends on the rate of microbial decomposition of organic
matter, which can be drastically affected by factors like sewage
effluent or phosphorus inflow from agricultural runoff
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.20"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Description of the notation used in the text.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.75}[.75]?><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Notation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Meaning</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Concentration of the oxidized form of the chemical species being cycled</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Concentration of the reduced form of the chemical species being cycled</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Population density of the oxidizing microbial population</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Population density of the reducing microbial population</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Here, we show that changes in the supply of auxiliary electron
acceptors or donors (such as oxygen or acetate) caused by
environmental perturbations can have drastic effects on
microbially mediated biogeochemical cycles.  We first show that these
perturbations can cause regime shifts in redox state for simple,
spatially homogenous models. We then demonstrate that the same
phenomena can also occur in more realistic models which include
features such as explicit supply of auxiliary electron acceptors or
donors via microbial metabolism, intermediate redox states, and
spatial heterogeneity (such that the nutrient supply is limited by
transport processes). These regime shifts do not depend sensitively on
the detailed structure of our equations or model, but instead result
from the interplay between cyclic system topology and nonlinear
microbial population growth requiring multiple nutrients. These redox
regime shifts are predicted to occur in parameter ranges relevant to
the natural sulfur and nitrogen cycles, and may also be relevant to
iron cycling in the iron-containing ancient oceans.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Mathematical models for redox-cycling dynamics</title>
      <p>Our aim is to predict the response of microbially mediated
biogeochemical cycles to changes in the availability of auxiliary
electron acceptors and donors, such as oxygen and acetate. We begin
with a simple and generic “two-state” representation of
a biogeochemical cycle; later we show that the same phenomena also
occur in more complex models. In our two-state model
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e), a chemical element is cycled between its oxidized
and reduced forms, whose concentrations are denoted by
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The reduction step
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue right-to-left arrow in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e) is assumed to be biotic, i.e., mediated by microbial
metabolism. This step requires an auxiliary electron donor, such as
acetate. The oxidation step <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
may occur biotically or abiotically (indicated by the blue and red
left-to-right arrows in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>e), and requires an auxiliary
electron acceptor, such as oxygen.  We have not included the
possibility of an abiotic reduction reaction in our model because
these are typically minor reactions at ambient temperatures in the
natural environment (with the notable exception of the reaction of
Fe(III) with sulfide; e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="altparen.21"/>); further work
could extend this model to include such reactions. It is
important to note that, in reality, a given biogeochemical function may
be performed by many coexisting microbial species (taxa); for example
many different genetically distinct taxa can use acetate to reduce
sulfate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.22"/>. In our models, we group together all these
“metabolically equivalent” taxa into a single effective
population.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Fully biotic redox cycles</title>
      <p>If both the oxidative and reductive steps in the redox cycle are
mediated by microorganisms, the dynamics of our two-state model can be
represented by the following set of differential equations (in which
the dot represents a time rate of change):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The variables in this dynamical system are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the population densities of the oxidizing and
reducing microbial populations, respectively, and the concentrations
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the oxidized and reduced
forms of the chemical species being cycled (Table 1 presents a key for
this terminology). Equations (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) describe the
microbial population dynamics; the reducing and oxidizing populations
have growth rates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, which
depend not only explicitly on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but also
implicitly on the concentrations of the auxiliary electron
donor and acceptor, respectively. Both populations are assumed to be
removed from the system at a constant rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., due to viral
predation and/or washout). Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) describes changes in the
substrate dynamics due to microbial consumption and production; here
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a yield coefficient, which is assumed for simplicity to be
the same for both reactions.</p>
      <p>The growth rate functions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> play
a crucial role in the model. The microbial growth rate on a limiting
nutrient is often described by a Monod function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the nutrient concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximal growth rate, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the nutrient concentration at which the growth rate is half-maximal
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.23"/>. While other, more complicated growth rate
functions have been proposed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.24"/>, the Monod form
encapsulates the key fact that the growth rate is nutrient-dependent
at low nutrient concentration but becomes saturated at high nutrient
concentration. For a microbial population performing a redox reaction,
the “nutrient” <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is likely to be the chemical species being cycled,
while the concentration of the auxiliary electron acceptor/donor can
be implicitly included in the value of the maximal growth rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Importantly, however, in the natural environment, the rate of
microbial growth may be limited by other factors such as the
availability of carbon or micronutrients, toxin or waste product
formation at high densities, or simply competition for space
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.25"/>. To account for this in a generic way, we
multiply the Monod term by a population density-limitation factor
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sets
a maximal population density. This type of logistic population density
limitation is a convenient and commonly used way to encapsulate
growth limitation by factors not explicitly included in the model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.26"/>.  To check the
validity of this approach, we also simulated a model in which
population growth is instead explicitly limited by availability of an
additional nutrient (e.g., carbon). These simulations gave
qualitatively similar results to those presented here; see Supplement.</p>
      <p>These considerations lead to simple forms for the microbial growth
rates in our “two-state” model:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            in which the parameters are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
maximal growth rates for the reducing and oxidizing microorganisms,
respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the concentrations
of the chemical species <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at which the growth rate is half-maximal;
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the maximal densities
of the two populations. Importantly, the concentrations of the
auxiliary electron donors and acceptors (e.g., acetate and oxygen) are
implicit in the maximal growth rate parameters <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: we expect <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to increase with the
availability of the auxiliary electron donor, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
will increase with the availability of the auxiliary electron
acceptor. By including the auxiliary electron acceptor/donor
concentrations as parameters controlling the maximal growth rates, we
neglect the possibility that they may be depleted by utilization. This
is, however, included in the more realistic versions of the model
presented later in the paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Biotic–abiotic redox cycles</title>
      <p>If the oxidation step in the redox cycle is instead abiotic, the model
has only three variables: the population density of the reducing microbial
population <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the concentrations of the oxidized and
reduced forms of the chemical species being cycled, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this case, the dynamics of the microbial
population <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are still described by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>),
but the chemical dynamics obey

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, the abiotic oxidation rate is described by the function
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Abiotic oxidation reactions can occur
spontaneously (e.g., the abiotic oxidation of hydrogen sulfide;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.27"/>), or they can be catalyzed (e.g., some electron
transfer processes on mineral surfaces; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="altparen.28"/>) or
limited by transport processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.29"/>. To account for
these factors in a generic way, we assume a Michaelis–Menten form for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.30"/>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximal abiotic rate constant (which may
implicitly depend on a catalyst concentration) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the concentration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at which the abiotic reaction
rate is half-maximal. If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is large such that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reaction rate becomes linear
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, describing a spontaneous process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Steady-state solutions</title>
      <p>Analytical predictions for the steady-state population densities and
the concentrations of the oxidized and reduced forms of the chemical
species being cycled (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be
obtained for both the fully biotic model (Eqs. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>–<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>)
and the biotic–abiotic model (Eqs. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>). These
are given in the Supplement, Sects. S1 and S2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Regime shifts caused by population-density limitation</title>
      <p>Our models allow us to investigate system-level responses to
environmental change. We focus on environmental changes that affect
the availability of auxiliary electron acceptors or donors, such as
temperature-related changes in oxygen solubility
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.31"/>, changes in photosynthesis rate, or changes in
the abundance or rate of decomposition of organic matter
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.32"/>. For the fully biotic cycle, the parameters
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are proxies for the availability
of auxiliary electron donors and acceptors, respectively. For the
biotic–abiotic cycle, the equivalent parameters are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We quantify the response of the ecosystem to
changes in auxiliary electron donor or acceptor abundance via the
steady-state fraction of the oxidized chemical species,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which acts as a proxy for the
global redox state of the system.</p>
      <p>Our main result is that, for both the fully biotic and the
biotic–abiotic models, our model can undergo regime shifts: sharp
changes in the predominant redox state of the system as the
availability of auxiliary electron acceptors or electron donors (such
as oxygen or acetate) crosses a critical threshold
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). These regime shifts happen under
circumstances where the total concentration of the chemical element
being cycled (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is high,
such that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying that the microbial population density is limited by
factors other than the availability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, for lower concentrations of the
chemical element being cycled, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the model predicts a more gradual change
in system state as the availability of the auxiliary electron acceptor
or donor varies.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Redox regime shifts in model nutrient cycles. The global redox state,
as measured by the oxidized fraction <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
predicted by the steady-state solution of the model equations for the
fully biotic cycle (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>c</bold>, Eqs. 1–3) or the
biotic–abiotic cycle (<bold>b</bold> and <bold>d</bold>, Eqs. 1, 2, and 6) is
plotted as a function of parameters that form proxies for the degree
of reductive or oxidative driving. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken as a proxy
for electron donor (acetate) availability, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken as a proxy
for electron acceptor (oxygen) availability. These parameters are, for reductive
driving,  the maximal growth rate of the reductive population,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>, keeping <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixed at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and, for oxidative driving, either the maximal growth
rate of the oxidative population <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>c</bold>, keeping
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixed at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or the maximal abiotic
oxidation rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>d</bold>, also with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  The results show a shift between
oxidized and reduced ecosystem states as a threshold in reductive or
oxidative  driving is crossed; the sharpness of this transition
increases with the concentration of the chemical species being cycled,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (shown in the color bar). The other parameters are
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.33"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cells L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moles</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cell</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.34"/>. The analytic forms for the steady-state solutions are given in  Sect. S1.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3713/2015/bg-12-3713-2015-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a and c show results for the fully biotic
cycle model; in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, we vary the maximal reducer
growth rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mimicking a change in auxiliary electron
acceptor abundance, while in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c we vary the
maximal oxidizer growth rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mimicking a change in
auxiliary electron donor abundance. As expected, these perturbations
lead to profound changes in the system's global redox state (as
measured by the fraction of the oxidized chemical species
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), from oxidized to reduced
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a) or vice versa
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c). Crucially, the sharpness of this
transition increases as we increase the total abundance of the
chemical species being cycled, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is large enough to saturate the growth rates of the relevant microbial
populations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), we
obtain a “switch-like” response, which we term a redox regime shift.
For the fully biotic cycle, the model prediction is symmetric with
respect to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (electron
donor and acceptor; compare Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a and c).
Consequently, it is the <italic>ratio</italic> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> / <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(mimicking a change in the ratio of auxiliary electron donor/acceptor
abundance) that drives the behavior of the model.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b and d show equivalent results for the
biotic–abiotic cycle model. In this case also, the model predicts
regime shifts in response to both increasing auxiliary electron donor
or acceptor availability (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b and d,
respectively), for large concentrations of the chemical species being
cycled (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, in contrast to the situation for
the fully biotic cycle, here the responses to changes in auxiliary
electron acceptor and donor are qualitatively different in shape
(compare Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b and d). This is because the biotic
and abiotic reaction rates (the two terms in Eq. 6) have different
functional dependences on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Importantly, the behavior of our model does not depend strongly on
its other parameters. In particular, the total microbial population
density is not important for the results of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>,
as we show analytically in  Sect. S3. For the
fully biotic cycle, the steady-state solution of the model depends
only on the ratio of the maximal population density parameters
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and not on the absolute values
of the maximal population density <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover the ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affects only the threshold point
at which the regime shift happens, not the qualitative switching
behavior (see Sect. S3 for more details). Thus we
expect to see redox regime shifts across environments with very
different microbial population densities, even for systems with very
large microbial populations, and for those where the sizes of the
oxidizing and reducing populations are different, as long as the
microbial population density is ultimately limited by a factor other
than the concentration of the chemical element being cycled. It is
important to note, however, that the <italic>timescale</italic> over which the
system responds to environmental change does depend on the population
density; for large populations, the system responds more slowly. For
the biotic–abiotic cycle, the mathematical results are slightly more
complicated but the conclusions are broadly similar (see Sect. S3).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Regime shifts also occur in models with spatial heterogeneity and chemical sinks</title>
      <p>The oxidation and reduction steps in natural microbial nutrient cycles
are usually spatially separated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.35"/>. Extending our
model, we find that our prediction of redox regime shifting behavior
is robust to the inclusion of spatial separation between reductive and
oxidative zones; indeed, the resulting transport limitation of
chemical species <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> actually
enhances the switching phenomenon (see Sect. S5).</p>
      <p>In the natural environment, coupling between the different redox
cycles shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> may also be important. For example,
sulfide reacts with iron ultimately to form pyrite, which represents
a stable sink for iron and sulfide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.36"/>. We
find that our model still produces redox regime shifts when we include
extra terms to simulate these sink effects (see Sect. S6).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Origin of the regime shifts</title>
      <p>The redox regime shifts which we observe in our model arise from the
interplay between nonlinear population growth, which can be limited
by factors other than the chemical species being cycled, and the
topology of the biogeochemical cycle. In our model, the global redox
state is controlled by the balance between oxidative and reductive
chemical fluxes. An increase in the availability of the auxiliary
electron acceptor stimulates the oxidation reaction, resulting in an
increase in concentration of the oxidized chemical species,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If there were no other growth-limiting factor, this
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would stimulate the growth of the
reducing microbial population, which consumes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; thus
the global redox state would respond only gradually to changes in
electron acceptor availability (and likewise for changes in the
electron donor availability), as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> for
small values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red lines). However, the situation is
different if the microbial population density is limited by other
factors (such as carbon availability). In this case an increase in
auxiliary electron acceptor availability increases <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
but the reducer population cannot respond to this increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because it is already close to its maximal population
density.  Once the auxiliary electron acceptor supply crosses
a critical threshold, the production rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeds
the maximal consumption capacity of the reducer population and the
system undergoes a regime shift to an oxidized state, as in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> for large values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue
lines). The same scenario holds in reverse for changes in the
availability of the auxiliary electron donor; here, as electron donor
availability increases, a redox regime shift from an oxidized to
a reduced system state occurs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Mapping to enzyme kinetics</title>
      <p>Interestingly, the system-scale regime shifts that we observe in our
biogeochemical models can be mapped directly onto a well-known
molecular-scale phenomenon in intracellular biochemical signaling
networks. In biological cells, responses to environmental signals are
often mediated by phosphorylation–dephosphorylation cycles, in which
a target enzyme is activated by addition of a phosphate group, and
deactivated by removal of the phosphate group; the kinase and
phosphatase enzymes mediating these reactions act in opposition to
each other <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.37"/>. Phosphorylation–dephosphorylation
cycles can exhibit “zero-order ultrasensitivity”, in which they
respond extremely sensitively to changes in the level of signal,
because the enzymes have become saturated, decoupling the enzymatic
conversion rates from the concentration of substrate
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.38"/>. Although they act on very different length and
timescales, biogeochemical cycles are topologically similar to
phosphorylation–dephosphorylation cycles. In fact, one can show
mathematically that our models, in the steady state, map exactly onto
the classic Goldbeter–Koshland model for
phosphorylation–dephosphorylation cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.39"/>, and
that the regime shifts observed in our models are equivalent to the
ultrasensitive signal responses predicted by this model (see Sect. S7). This raises the interesting possibility of
mapping molecular-level dynamic phenomena onto biogeochemical models
more generally – a direction that may prove fruitful in future work.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Redox regime shifts in a more realistic model</title>
      <p>Thus far our investigation has focused on a rather simplified model
for microbially mediated biogeochemical cycles. In this simple model,
varying <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was assumed to be
analogous to varying the availability of auxiliary electron acceptors
(such as oxygen or nitrate) and electron donors (such as acetate or
hydrogen), respectively. In reality, however, auxiliary electron
acceptors or donors may be supplied, or utilized by, other biotic or
abiotic processes, and thus we expect their concentrations to vary with
the system dynamics. We now introduce a more ecologically realistic
model in which the concentrations of the auxiliary electron
acceptor/donor are explicitly represented, and allowed to vary. For
this model, we find the same redox regime-shifting behavior as in the
simple model described previously.</p>
      <p>Specifically, we focus on an example in which acetate is the auxiliary
electron donor and oxygen is the auxiliary electron acceptor. We
suppose that acetate is produced by microbial decomposition of organic
matter (long-chain organics such as lignin or cellulose;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.40"/>); we represent explicitly in the model not
only the concentration of acetate but also the population density of
the decomposer population. Likewise, we suppose that oxygen is
generated by photosynthetic microorganisms; the model includes explicitly
the dynamics of the photosynthesizer population as well as
the oxygen concentration. External environmental inputs control the
population dynamics of the decomposers and the photosynthesizers;
these inputs are the organic matter concentration and the light
intensity, respectively. Our model is shown schematically in Fig. 3a;
we assume that oxidative and reductive processes occur in different
spatial zones, represented by boxes and coupled by chemical transport
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For simplicity, we
consider transport only of the chemical species being cycled
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); allowing transport of
oxygen/acetate would cause spatial shifting of the redox zones, which,
although interesting, would be better investigated in a model with
more detailed spatial resolution. In the model, the growth rate of
the oxidizing microbial population (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is assumed to
depend on the concentrations of both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
auxiliary electron acceptor (i.e., oxygen), via a multiplicative Monod
term, with explicit population density limitation, and the equivalent
scenario holds for the reducer population. Multiplicative
Monod kinetics is the most widely used method of modeling microbial
growth limitation by multiple substrates
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.41"/>. However we note that Liebig's law of
the minimum provides an alternative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.42"/>, which would
not affect our qualitative results. Our model also includes a linear
loss term for the auxiliary electron acceptors or donors, which
represents competitive consumption by other populations.  Full details
and dynamical equations for this model are presented in Sect. S8.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Redox regime shifts in a “complete ecosystem” model. <bold>(a)</bold> Illustration of the model.
Oxidative and reductive processes take place in separate spatial zones, linked by chemical diffusion. The model
explicitly represents the population dynamics of microbial photosynthesizers, decomposers, reducers, and oxidizers,
and the chemical dynamics of oxygen, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and acetate. Light intensity and organic
matter availability are treated as control parameters. The dynamical equations corresponding to the model are
presented in  Sect. S8, Eqs. (S45)–(S54); these are integrated numerically to find the steady-state
solution. Parameter values are also listed in the Supplement. <bold>(b)</bold> Steady-state solution of the model
illustrated in <bold>(a)</bold>, obtained numerically, plotted as a function of the control parameters, light intensity
(relative to the typical value 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="altparen.43"/>) and organic
matter concentration (relative to the typical value  100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.44"/>). The color
represents the global redox state (see color key). The model shows redox regime shifts as the organic matter
concentration is varied at fixed light intensity (vertical dashed line) or as the light intensity is varied at
fixed organic matter concentration (horizontal dashed line).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3713/2015/bg-12-3713-2015-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Our simulations show that this model indeed undergoes redox regime
shifts (Fig. 3b). In particular, the system redox state, as measured
by the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (shown by color in
Fig. 3b), changes sharply in response to changes in either organic
matter availability (which stimulates the decomposer population and
hence the reducer population), or to changes in light intensity (which
stimulates the photosynthesizers and hence the oxidizer population).
As organic matter availability increases at fixed light intensity
(vertical dashed line in Fig. 3b), the redox state of the system
changes sharply from oxidized to reduced (red to purple). Likewise, as
the light intensity increases for fixed organic matter concentration
(horizontal dashed line in Fig. 3b), the redox state also undergoes
a regime shift, in this case from reduced (purple) to oxidized
(red). We observe similar regime-shifting behavior in equivalent
models where the oxidation step is abiotic (see Sect. S8). We have also shown that the qualitative behavior of the
model is not dependent on the strength of the loss term representing
competition for auxiliary electron acceptors/donors (see Sect. S10).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Since many natural redox cycles involve intermediate steps between the
most oxidized and most reduced states (e.g., the nitrogen and sulfur
cycles in Fig. 1), we have also simulated a version of the model which
includes a redox state intermediate between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This model also shows regime shifts between
predominantly oxidized and predominantly reduced system states (see Sect. S9).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Conditions for redox regime shifts</title>
      <p>Our analysis provides a clear set of criteria that need to be
satisfied for redox regime shifts to occur. These are as follows:
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>The density of the redox-cycling microbial populations must ultimately be limited by a factor other than the concentration of the chemical element
being cycled. This factor could be the concentration of another nutrient (see Sect. S4), or space limitation.
It is important to note, however,
that the population density need not be small; large populations are also predicted to show regime shifts, albeit with longer response times.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The total concentration of the element being cycled must be high enough to saturate the growth rates of the microbial reducers and oxidizers (or the abiotic
oxidation reaction): <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This ensures that the growth of the redox-cycling populations will become saturated with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, causing a switch-like response to changes in auxiliary electron acceptor or donor availability (as in Fig. 2).</p></list-item><list-item><p>The growth rates of the redox-cycling populations must be unsaturated with respect to the concentrations of the auxiliary electron acceptor and/or donor, so that the system responds to changes in auxiliary electron acceptor or donor availability.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Are redox regime shifts likely in the natural environment?</title>
      <p>Thus far we have established our model, demonstrated that the
predicted redox regime shift is robust as complications are
introduced, and defined the conditions required for redox regime
shifts to occur. We now assess whether these conditions are likely to
be prevalent in the natural environment.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SS1">
  <title>Condition 1: a factor exists that ultimately limits population density </title>
      <p>In the natural environment, there are many possible limiting factors
for microbial population density.  Microbial growth requires sources
not only of energy but also of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur,
and other, trace biomass components <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.45"/>. For
redox-cycling microbial populations, the redox reaction provides an
energy source, but cannot satisfy all the requirements for formation
of biomass. It is thus almost inevitable that growth is ultimately
limited by the availability of biomass components rather than the
redox species. Indeed, carbon limitation is common in microbial
soil/sediment communities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.46"/>, while in ocean
communities nitrogen or phosphorus is often growth-limiting
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.47"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SS2">
  <title>Condition 2: high  concentration of the chemical element being
cycled </title>
      <p>Our second condition states that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., the oxidizer/reducer growth rate must be
saturated with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). To
assess whether this condition is fulfilled in the natural environment,
we surveyed measured values of the half-saturation constants
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for redox-cycling microorganisms
reported in the literature, and compared these values with typical
concentrations of the chemical species being cycled, in various
environmental settings. The results of this survey are shown in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>. For sulfur-cycling organisms,
these data suggest that the concentration of the chemical species
being cycled can exceed the half-saturation constant of the relevant
microbial populations, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, marine sulfate reducers are generally not
limited by sulfate, because sulfate is highly abundant (indeed it is
the second most abundant anion in the oceans;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.48"/>). For nitrogen-cycling organisms these data suggest
that redox regime shifts are unlikely to occur in “typical” nitrogen-cycling
environments, such as the open ocean. However, there are many examples where
anthropogenic influences such as agricultural runoff can lead to very high
concentrations of nitrate such as lakes or groundwater aquifers.
For example, groundwater sources often contain in excess of 400 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
nitrate. Data on the proportion of groundwater bodies across the EU in 2003 with a
mean nitrate concentration in excess of 400 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported 80 % in Spain, 50 % in the UK,
36 % in Germany, 34 % in France, and 32 % in Italy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.49"/>. Such high nitrate
levels exceed the relevant half-saturation constant of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
for this reason, we would expect redox regime shifts in the nitrogen cycle to
occur in eutrophic terrestrial ecosystems.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Typical values for the half saturation constants <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for microbial growth, for various nutrient-cycling organisms, compared
to typical values for the concentrations of the relevant  nutrients in marine environments. All values are given rounded to an order of magnitude.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="156.490157pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="142.26378pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nutrient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reaction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Organism</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Concentration range</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">cycle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulfur</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Thiothrix</italic> or<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Thiobacillus</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.50"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.51"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Desulfovibrio</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.52"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 mM<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.53"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iron</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Thiobacillus<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></italic> <italic>ferrooxidans</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 mM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.54"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.55"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fe(III) oxide <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Shewanella<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></italic> <italic>putrefaciens</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 mM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.56"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [Fe(III) oxide] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 mM<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.57"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Methylocystis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.58"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.59"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Methanosarcina</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 mM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.60"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.61"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrogen</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Nitrosomonas</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.62"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.63"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Flavobacterium</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.64"/></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.65"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In contrast, our data survey suggests that
redox regime shifts are unlikely to be associated with carbon cycles,
because the typical half-saturation constant for methanogenesis is
large relative to typical environmental concentrations of acetate.</p>
      <p>For the iron cycle, our survey suggests that redox regime shifts are
unlikely in modern-day environments, but may have occurred in the
past. While modern oceanic concentrations of dissolved
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2+</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions are low, the ancient oceans may have contained
high concentrations of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>2+</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM), suggesting
that redox regime shifts could have occurred in the comparatively
iron-rich Archean or Proterozoic iron cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.66"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SS3">
  <title>Condition 3: low auxiliary electron acceptor or donor
availability</title>
      <p>Condition 3 states that, for biotic redox reactions, the concentration
of the auxiliary electron donor or acceptor must be low enough that
changes in their availability affect the growth rate of the microbial
reducers/oxidizers (i.e., the oxidative and reductive microbial
metabolic reactions must be unsaturated with respect to the auxiliary
electron acceptor/donor).</p>
      <p>Biotic reduction processes often take place in the presence of strong
competition for auxiliary electron
donor, for example,
sulfate-reducing microorganisms typically compete with methanogens for
acetate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.67"/>. The concentration of acetate in freshwater
sediments is typically about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.68"/> but
can be as high as 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.69"/>. This compares
to approximate half-saturation constants for growth with respect to
acetate of 70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for sulfate reduction and 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
methanogenesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.70"/>, suggesting that
indeed these reactions are very likely to be unsaturated with respect
to acetate.</p>
      <p>For oxidative processes, oxygen is the most widely used auxiliary
electron acceptor. The supply of oxygen is expected to be
rate-limiting for growth in oxygen-poor environments (which are
becoming more common in the coastal oceans; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.71"/>). The
half-saturation constant with respect to oxygen for bacterial sulfide
oxidation is 1–20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.72"/>, and while the
concentration of oxygen in oxygen-saturated (i.e., fully aerated) water
is 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mM</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.73"/>, significant competition for
oxygen means that the concentration is much lower in many environments
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.74"/>. It is interesting to note that oxygen
concentrations were also low in the Proterozoic and Archean oceans
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.75"/>.</p>
      <p>Taken together, this analysis suggests that the redox regime shifts
predicted by our model are likely to be relevant in the present-day
natural environment, with respect to the sulfur and nitrogen cycles,
and may also have played a role in iron cycling in the iron-containing
Proterozoic and Archean oceans.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7.SS4">
  <title>What perturbations might cause redox regime shifts?</title>
      <p>How likely are the changes in auxiliary electron acceptor/donor
concentrations that could trigger redox regime shifts in
biogeochemical cycles?  Focusing on oxygen as the most significant
natural auxiliary electron acceptor, oxygen concentrations in oceans
or inland water bodies can be affected by temperature changes (for
example, a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> global temperature increase
has been predicted to cause a 68 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in the mean
oceanic oxygen concentration; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="altparen.76"/>) and by
perturbations which affect the balance between photosynthesis and
oxygenic respiration, such as eutrophication (which can lead to
drastic increases of biomass, generating “oxygen minimum zones”;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.77"/>). Furthermore, over Phanerozoic time,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied between 15 and 37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which represents
a variation large enough to generate redox regime shifts
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.78"/>. Further work could parameterize our model to
investigate whether a redox regime shift is possible within the range
of published values for atmospheric oxygen and oceanic iron and
sulfate on the early Earth, taking into account the evidence for
the progressive changes in these parameters through geologic time
from the Paleoproterozoic to the Phanerozoic.</p>
      <p>The availability of auxiliary electron donors (such as acetate,
lactate, or hydrogen) is expected to be altered by changes in the rate
of organic matter degradation, which has been predicted to increase
with temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.79"/>, and is also sensitive to
changes in the abundance of organic matter due to sewage or phosphorus
influx <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.80"/>. Changes in electron donor availability
could also arise due to competition effects, such as reductive
degradation of pollutants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.81"/>, or perturbations in
other biogeochemical cycles. This raises the interesting possibility
that a redox regime shift in one biogeochemical cycle could trigger
shifts in others, due to changes in the level of competition for
auxiliary electron donors.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, it is possible that redox
regime shifts could occur in response to changes in the inflow rates of auxiliary
electron donors and acceptors, instead of changes in the growth rates
of the microbial populations within the environment that supply them. It is highly
likely that such a system would produce redox regime shifts in response to
variation in these fixed input rates. For example, future models
could look at whether seasonal temperature-induced mixing
effects can generate redox regime shifts.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Microbial populations are key mediators of the Earth's biogeochemical
cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.82"/>.  Our work shows that microbial
population dynamics can have important consequences for the response
of biogeochemical cycles to environmental changes. Under circumstances
where the microbial population density is limited by factors other
than the concentration of the chemical being cycled (e.g., by the
concentration of another limiting nutrient), our models predict that
redox-cycling systems can undergo regime shifts in their predominant
redox state in response to small changes in the availability of
auxiliary electron acceptors or donors (such as oxygen and acetate),
which drive the oxidative and reductive redox-cycling reactions,
respectively.  These regime shifts arise from the interplay between
the nonlinearity of microbial population dynamics, multiple nutrient
limitation, and the cyclic system topology.  Diverse environmental
perturbations are expected to affect the availability of auxiliary
electron acceptors and donors, including temperature-mediated changes
in oxygen solubility and changes in organic matter abundance due to
eutrophication, suggesting that these redox regime shifts may be
common in the natural environment.</p>
      <p>Regime shifts are a well-known phenomenon in many ecosystems
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.83"/>, including microbial ecosystems
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.84"/>. They are known to occur in biogeochemical
cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.85"/> and have played an important role in the
Earth's history – a notable example being the transition to an oxic
atmosphere around 2.3 Ga <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.86"/>.  Our work suggests a new
mechanism by which regime shifts may occur in microbially mediated
biogeochemical cycles. This mechanism is identified here in a very
simple and generic model but also shown to exist in more realistic
models.  Further work could extend our models to include detailed
spatial or temporal dynamics and/or additional environmental variables
such as temperature or pH.</p>
      <p>Our analysis also predicts clear criteria for the conditions under
which redox regime shifts should be expected. By analyzing parameter
values for a range of natural environments, we show that these
criteria are likely to be satisfied for the natural sulfur and
nitrogen cycles. This phenomenon may also be relevant for iron cycling
in the Archean or Proterozoic oceans, due to their much lower oxygen
concentrations and potentially much higher concentrations of iron than
present-day oceans. Indeed, redox regime shifts may even help to
explain changes in the Earth's biogeochemical cycles associated with
mass extinction events, such as the rise in ocean sulfide levels
during the end-Permian extinction event (251 Ma), which is believed to
have poisoned the oceans and killed as much as 90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of all
macroscopic species on Earth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.87"/>. More generally, our
work reveals that microbial population dynamics can lead to
qualitative changes in the behavior of biogeochemical cycles, with
significant system-level consequences. Better understanding of
microbial population dynamics is vital for accurate prediction of the
effects of anthropogenic changes on the Earth's systems, both on small
and large scales.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3713-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-12-3713-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>T. Bush performed the calculations, data analysis, and
computer simulations. All authors contributed to the project design, data
interpretation, and writing of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Charles Cockell, Jan Haeberle, Casey Bryce, Sophie Nixon,
Patrick Warren, and Justin Whitehouse for discussions. T. Bush is supported
by an EPSRC DTA studentship and R. J. Allen by a Royal Society University
Research Fellowship. This work was supported by the US Army Research
Office under grant number 64052-MA.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: J. Middelburg</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aguilos et al.(2013)Aguilos, Takagi, Liang, Watanabe, Teramoto, Goto,
Takahashi, Mukai, and Sasa</label><mixed-citation>
Aguilos, M., Takagi, K., Liang, N., Watanabe, Y., Teramoto, M., Goto, S., Takahashi, Y., Mukai, H., and Sasa, K.:
Sustained large stimulation of soil heterotrophic respiration rate and its temperature sensitivity by soil
warming in a cool-temperate forested peatland, Tellus B, 65, 20792, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Alberts et al.(2002)Alberts, Johnson, Lewis, Raff, Roberts, and Walter</label><mixed-citation>
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter, P.: Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4 edn., New York, Garland Science, 183–208, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Allison and Martiny(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Allison, S. D. and Martiny, J. B. H.: Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 11512–11519, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Allison et al.(2010)Allison, Wallenstein, and Bradford</label><mixed-citation>
Allison, S. D., Wallenstein, M. D., and Bradford, M. A.: Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology, Nat. Geosci., 3, 336–340, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Baani and Liesack(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Baani, M. and Liesack, W.: Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 10203–10208, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Beaudet et al.(1998)Beaudet, Lévesque, Villemur, Lanthier, Chénier, Lépine, and Bisaillon</label><mixed-citation>
Beaudet, R., Lévesque, M. J., Villemur, R., Lanthier, M., Chénier, M., Lépine, F., and Bisaillon, J. G.:
Anaerobic biodegradation of pentachlorophenol in a contaminated soil inoculated with a methanogenic consortium or with
Desulfitobacterium frappieri strain PCP-1., Appl. Microbiol. Biot., 50, 135–141, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Benton and Twitchett(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Benton, M. J. and Twitchett, R. J.: How to kill (almost) all life: the end-Permian extinction event, Trends Ecol. Evol., 8, 358–365, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Berner(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, R. A.: Atmospheric oxygen over Phanerozoic time., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 10955–10957, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Berry and Widder(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Berry, D. and Widder, S.: Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks, Front. Microbiol., 5, 219,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219">10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Betlach and Tiedje(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Betlach, M. R. and Tiedje, J. M.: Kinetic explanation for accumulation of nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide during bacterial denitrification, Appl. Environ. Microb., 42, 1074–1084, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Blackburn et al.(1993)Blackburn T H, Blackburn, Mortimer, Coleman, and Lovley</label><mixed-citation>
Blackburn, T. H., Blackburn, N., Mortimer, R., Coleman, M., and Lovley, D. R.: Rates of microbial processes in sediments, Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond. A, 344, 49–58, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Blodau and Knorr(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Blodau, C. and Knorr, K.-H.: Experimental inflow of groundwater induces a “biogeochemical regime shift” in iron-rich and acidic sediments, J. Geophys. Res., 111, G02026, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JG000165</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bonneville et al.(2004)Bonneville, Van Cappellen, and Behrends</label><mixed-citation>
Bonneville, S., Van Cappellen, P., and Behrends, T.: Microbial reduction of iron(III) oxyhydroxides: effects of mineral solubility and availability, Chem. Geol., 212, 255–268, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Burdige(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Burdige, D.: Sediment pore waters, in: Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter, edited by: Hansell, D. and Carlson, C., Academic Press, Massachusetts, 611–663, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Bürgmann et al.(2011)Bürgmann, Jenni, Vazquez, and Udert</label><mixed-citation>Bürgmann, H., Jenni, S., Vazquez, F., and Udert, K. M.: Regime shift and microbial dynamics in a sequencing batch reactor for nitrification and anammox treatment of urine, Appl. Environ. Microb., 77, 5897–907,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02986-10">10.1128/AEM.02986-10</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Button(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Button, D. K.: Kinetics of nutrient-limited transport and microbial growth, Microbiol. Rev., 49, 270–297, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Canfield(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E.: Reactive iron in marine sediments, Geochim. Cosomochim. Ac., 53, 619–632, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Canfield(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E.: A new model for Proterozoic ocean chemistry, Nature, 396, 450–453, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Canfield et al.(1993)Canfield, Thamdrup, and Hansen</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Hansen, J.: The anaerobic degradation of organic matter in Danish coastal sediments: iron reduction, manganese
reduction and sulfate reduction, Geochim. Cosomochim. Ac., 57, 3867–3883, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Canfield et al.(2005)Canfield, Thamdrup, and Kristensen</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Kristensen, E.: Aquatic geomicrobiology, Adv. Mar. Biol., 48, 347–357, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Conant et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Conant, R. T., Ryan, M. G., Ågren, G. I., Birge, H. E., Davidson, E. A., Eliasson, P. E., Evans, S. E., Frey, S. D., Giardina, C. P.,
Hopkins, F. M., Hyvönen, R., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Lavallee, J. M., Leifeld, J., Parton, W. J., Megan Steinweg, J., Wallenstein, M. D.,
Martin Wetterstedt, J. A., and Bradford, M. A.: Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 3392–3404,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Dale et al.(2006)Dale, Regnier, and Van Cappellen</label><mixed-citation>
Dale, A. W., Regnier, P., and Van Cappellen, P.: Bioenergetic controls on anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in coastal marine sediments: a theoretical analysis, Am. J. Sci., 306, 246–294, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Demoling et al.(2007)Demoling, Figueroa, and Baath</label><mixed-citation>
Demoling, F., Figueroa, D., and Baath, E.: Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 2485–2495, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Diaz and Rosenberg(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Diaz, R. J. and Rosenberg, R.: Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems, Science, 321, 926–929, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Falkowski et al.(2008)Falkowski, Fenchel, and Delong</label><mixed-citation>Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T., and Delong, E. F.: The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles, Science, 320, 1034–1039,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1153213">10.1126/science.1153213</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Fenchel et al.(1998)Fenchel, King, and Blackburn T H</label><mixed-citation>
Fenchel, T., King, G., and Blackburn. T. H.: Bacterial Biogeochemistry: The Ecophysiology of Mineral Cycling, Elsevier, San Diego, 1–34, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Galloway et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., K
arl, D. M., Michaels, A. F., Porter, J. H., Townsend, A. R., and Vorosmarty, C. J.: Nitrogen cycles: past, present and future, Biogeochemistry, 70, 153–226, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Goldbeter and Koshland(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Goldbeter, A. and Koshland, D. E.: An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78, 6840–6844, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Goldhaber(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Goldhaber, M.: Sulfur-rich sediments, in: Treatise on Geochemistry, Vol. 7, edited by: Mackenzie, F., Holland, H., and Turekian, K., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 257–288, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>González-Sánchez and Revah(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
González-Sánchez, A., and Revah, S.: The effect of chemical oxidation on the biological sulfide
oxidation by an alkaliphilic sulfoxidizing bacterial consortium, Enzyme. Microb. Tech., 40, 292–298, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Hibbing et al.(2010)Hibbing, Fuqua, Parsek, and Peterson</label><mixed-citation>
Hibbing, M. E., Fuqua, C., Parsek, M. R., and Peterson, S. B.: Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 8, 15–25, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Higgins and Scheiter(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Higgins, S. I. and Scheiter, S.: Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> forces abrupt vegetation shifts locally, but not globally, Nature, 488, 209–212, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Huisman et al.(2006)Huisman, Pham Thi, Karl, and Sommeijer</label><mixed-citation>
Huisman, J., Pham Thi, N., Karl, D. M., and Sommeijer, B.: Reduced mixing generates oscillations and chaos in the oceanic deep chlorophyll maximum, Nature, 439, 322–325, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Ingraham et al.(1983)Ingraham, Maaloe, and Neidhardt</label><mixed-citation>
Ingraham, J. L., Maaloe, O., and Neidhardt, F. C.: Growth of the Bacterial Cell, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass, 227–265, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Ingvorsen and Jorgensen(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Ingvorsen, K. and Jorgensen, B. B.: Kinetics of sulfate uptake by freshwater and marine species of Desulfovibrio, Arch. Microbiol, 139, 61–66, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Ingvorsen et al.(1984)Ingvorsen, Zehnder, and Jorgensen</label><mixed-citation>
Ingvorsen, K., Zehnder, A. J. B., and Jorgensen, B. B.: Kinetics of sulfate and acetate uptake by Desulfobacter postgatei, Appl. Environ. Microb., 47, 403–408, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>IPPC(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
IPPC: Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, 465–570, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Jin and Bethke(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, Q. and Bethke, C. M.: Predicting the rate of microbial respiration in geochemical environments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 69, 1133–1143, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Jin et al.(2013)Jin, Roden, and Giska</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, Q., Roden, E. E., and Giska, J. R.: Geomicrobial kinetics: extrapolating laboratory studies to natural environments, Geomicrobiol. J., 30, 173–185, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Jones and Lennon(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, S. E. and Lennon, J. T.: Dormancy contributes to the maintenance of microbial diversity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 5881–5886, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Kamyshny et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Kamyshny, A., Zerkle, A. L., Mansaray, Z. F., Ciglenečki, I., Bura-Nakić, E., Farquhar, J., and Ferdelman, T. G.:
Biogeochemical sulfur cycling in the water column of a shallow stratified sea-water lake: Speciation and quadruple sulfur isotope composition, Mar. Chem., 127, 144–154,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.09.001">10.1016/j.marchem.2011.09.001</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Karl et al.(2002)Karl, Michaels, Bergman, and Capone</label><mixed-citation>
Karl, D., Michaels, A., Bergman, B., and Capone, D.: Dinitrogen fixation in the world's oceans, Biogeochemistry, 57, 47–98, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Klok et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Klok, J. B. M., Graaff, M. D., Bosch, P. L. F. V. D., Boelee, N. C., Keesman, K. J., and Janssen, A. J. H.:
A physiologically based kinetic model for bacterial sulfide oxidation, Water Res., 47, 483–492, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Koper et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Koper, T. E., Stark, J. M., Habteselassie, M. Y., and Norton, J. M.: Nitrification
exhibits Haldane kinetics in an agricultural soil treated with ammonium sulfate or dairy-waste compost, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 74, 316–322, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Landing and Bruland(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Landing, W. and Bruland, K.: The contrasting biogeochemistry of iron and manganese in the Pacific Ocean, Geochim. Cosomochim. Ac., 51, 29–43, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Lenton and Watson(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lenton, T. M. and Watson, A.: Revolutions that Made the Earth, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 845–852, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>López-Urrutia et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
López-Urrutia, A., San Martin, E., Harris, R. P., and Irigoien, X.: Scaling the metabolic balance of the oceans, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 8739–8744, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Madigan et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Madigan, M. T., Martinko, J. M., Dunlap, P. V., and Clark, D. P.: Brock Biology of Microorganisms, 12th edn., Pearson Education Inc., San Francisco, 673–703, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Marino et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Marino, S., Baxter, N. T., Huffnagle, G. B., Petrosino, J. F., and Schloss, P. D.:
Mathematical modeling of primary succession of murine intestinal microbiota, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 1–6, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Mills et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Mills, M. M., Moore, C. M., Langlois, R., Milne, A., Achterberg, A., Nachtigall, K., and Lochte, K.:
Nitrogen and phosphorus co-limitation of bacterial productivity and growth in the oligotrophic subtropical North Atlantic, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 824–834, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Moore et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., Kleypas, J. A., Glover, D. M., and Fung, I. Y.: An intermediate complexity
marine ecosystem model for the global domain, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 403–462, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Muyzer and Stams(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Muyzer, G. and Stams, A. J. M.: The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 6, 441–454, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Naidja and Huang(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Naidja, A. and Huang, P. M.: Significance of the Henri–Michaelis–Menten theory in abiotic catalysis: catechol oxidation by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-MnO2, Surf. Sci., 506, L243–L249, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Nikolaki and Tsiamis(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Nikolaki, S. and Tsiamis, G.: Microbial diversity in the era of omic technologies, BioMed Research International, 2013, 958719, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Raiswell and Canfield(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Raiswell, R. and Canfield, D. E.: The iron biogeochemical cycle past present and future, Geochemical Perspectives, 1, 1–220, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Reeburgh(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Reeburgh, W.: Oceanic methane biogeochemistry, Chem. Rev., 107, 486–513, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Rees et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Rees, A. P., Woodward, E. M. S., and Joint, I.: Concentrations and uptake of nitrate and ammonium in the
Atlantic Ocean between 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, Deep-Sea. Res. Pt. II., 53, 1649–1665, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Rickard(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Rickard, D.: Sulfidic Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 319–343, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Rivett et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Rivett, M. O., Buss, S. R., Morgan, P., Smith, J. W. N., and Bemmett, C. D.: Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: A review of biogeochemical controlling processes, Water. Res., 42, 4215–4232,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org.10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.020">10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.020</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Roden(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Roden, E. E.: Analysis of long-term bacterial vs. chemical Fe(III) oxide reduction kinetics, Geochim. Cosomochim. Ac., 68, 3205–3216,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.028">10.1016/j.gca.2004.03.028</ext-link>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Roden and Wetzel(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Roden, E. E. and Wetzel, R. G.: Competition between Fe(III)-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for acetate in iron-rich freshwater sediments., Microb. Ecol., 45, 252–258, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Saito et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Saito, M., Goepfert, T. J., and Ritt, J.: Some thoughts on the concept of colimitation: three definitions and the importance of bioavailability, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 276–290, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Scheffer et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Nes, E. H.,
Rietkerk, M., and Sugihara, G.: Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature, 461, 53–59, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Schoonen and Strongin(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Schoonen, M. and Strongin, D.: Catalysis of electron transfer reactions at mineral surfaces,
in: Environmental Catalysis, edited by: Grassian, V., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 37–60, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Shaffer et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Shaffer, G., Olsen, S. M., and Pedersen, J. O. P.: Long-term ocean oxygen depletion in response to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, Nat. Geosci., 2, 105–109, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Sirota et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Sirota, J., Baiser, B., Gotelli, N. J., and Ellison, A. M.: Organic-matter loading determines regime shifts and alternative states in an aquatic ecosystem, P. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7742–7747, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Tarpgaard et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Tarpgaard, I. H., Roy, H., and Jorgensen, B. B.: Concurrent low- and high-affinity sulfate reduction kinetics
in marine sediment, Geochim. Cosomochim. Ac., 75, 2997–3010, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Thamdrup and Canfield(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Canfield, D. E.: Pathways of carbon oxidation in continental margin sediments off central Chile, Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 1629–1650, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Todd-Brown et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Hopkins, F. M., Kivlin, S. N., Talbot, J. M., and Allison, S. D.: A framework for representing microbial decomposition in coupled climate models, Biogeochemistry, 109, 19–33, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Westrich and Berner(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Westrich, J. T. and Berner, R. A.: The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: the G model tested, Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, 236–249, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Wichlacz and Unz(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Wichlacz, P. L. and Unz, R. F.: Growth kinetics of attached iron-oxidizing bacteria., Appl. Environ. Microb., 50, 460–467, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
