<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-3741-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonal lake surface water temperature trends reflected by heterocyst glycolipid-based molecular thermometers</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seasonal lake surface water temperature trends}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.~Bauersachs et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bauersachs</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          <email>thb@gpi.uni-kiel.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-9443</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rochelmeier</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Schwark</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Organic Geochemistry, Institute of Geosciences, Christian-Albrechts-University, Ludewig-Meyn-Straße 10, 24118 Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, WA-OIGC, Curtin University, G.P.O. Box U1987, 6845 Perth, Western Australia, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">T. Bauersachs (thb@gpi.uni-kiel.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>3741</fpage><lpage>3751</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>It has been demonstrated that the relative distribution of heterocyst
glycolipids (HGs) in cultures of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing heterocystous cyanobacteria
is largely controlled by growth temperature, suggesting a potential use of
these components in paleoenvironmental studies. Here, we investigated the
effect of environmental parameters (e.g., surface water temperatures, oxygen
concentrations and pH) on the distribution of HGs in a natural system using
water column filtrates collected from Lake Schreventeich (Kiel, Germany)
from late July to the end of October 2013. HPLC-ESI/MS (high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization–mass
spectrometry) analysis revealed a
dominance of 1-(O-hexose)-3,25-hexacosanediols (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diols) and
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-25-hexacosanol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol) in the solvent-extracted water column filtrates, which were accompanied by minor abundances
of 1-(O-hexose)-3,27-octacosanediol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol) and
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-27-octacosanol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol) as well as
1-(O-hexose)-3,25,27-octacosanetriol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> triol) and
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-25,27-octacosanediol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-diol). Fractional
abundances of alcoholic and ketonic HGs generally showed strong linear
correlations with surface water temperatures and no or only weak linear
correlations with both oxygen concentrations and pH. Changes in the
distribution of the most abundant diol and keto-ol (e.g., HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol and
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol) were quantitatively expressed as the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(heterocyst  diol  index of  26
carbon atoms) with values of this index ranging from 0.89 in mid-August
to 0.66 in mid-October. An average HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.79, which
translates into a calculated surface water temperature of 15.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
was obtained from surface sediments collected from Lake
Schreventeich. This temperature – and temperatures obtained from other HG
indices (e.g., HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – is similar to the one measured
during maximum cyanobacterial productivity in early to mid-September and
suggests that HGs preserved in the sediment record of Lake Schreventeich
reflect summer surface water temperatures. As N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing heterocystous
cyanobacteria are widespread in present-day freshwater and brackish
environments, we conclude that the distribution of HGs in sediments may
allow for the reconstruction of surface water temperatures of modern and
potentially ancient lacustrine settings.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Lipid paleothermometers have become an indispensable tool in
paleoenvironmental studies as they allow for the reconstruction of oceanic
surface water temperatures over geological timescales and thus provide
essential information on past climate changes. The two most commonly
employed lipid paleothermometers are the U<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Brassell et al., 1986) and the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Schouten et al., 2002), which use the distribution of long-chain alkenones or glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers  (GDGTs)  preserved in
marine sediments to reconstruct oceanic surface water temperatures. The more
recently introduced long-chain diol index (LDI), which is based on the
distribution of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> 1,13-, C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> 1,13-, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> 1,15-diols
produced by eustigmatophyte algae (Rampen et al., 2012),
provides an additional mean to determine past changes in sea surface
temperatures (SSTs) and has successfully been applied in a number of
paleoceanographic  studies (Smith et al., 2013; Rodrigo-Gámiz et al.,
2014).</p>
      <p>The TEX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy has previously been applied to a number of freshwater
environments but seems to reliably predict surface water temperatures only
in some large lakes, such as the North American Great Lakes and the African
Rift Valley lakes, where the contribution of isoprenoid GDGTs of a
terrestrial origin is only negligible (Powers et al., 2010).
Likewise, long-chain alkenones have been reported from some modern lake
systems (Volkman et al., 1988; Thiel et al., 1997; Theroux et al., 2012)
and were employed to reconstruct past changes in surface water temperatures
in Lake Steisslingen, SW Germany (Zink et al., 2001).
However, due to our incomplete knowledge on the biological sources of long-chain alkenones and their comparatively limited distribution in freshwater
environments, temperature estimates based on long-chain alkenones in
lacustrine sediments are comparatively few.</p>
      <p>Another lipid paleothermometer that has attracted considerable attention
over the recent past is the MBT (methylation index of branched
tetraethers)/CBT (cyclization ratio of branched tetraethers) index. This
proxy, based on the distribution of branched GDGTs that are ubiquitously
distributed in soils, peats as well as lacustrine and coastal marine
sediments (see Schouten et al., 2013, and references therein), has been shown
to correlate well with mean annual air temperature (MAAT) and soil pH
(Weijers et al., 2007). It has since also been applied to various lakes and
coastal marine environments, containing a large proportion of terrestrial
organic matter, to infer past changes in continental climate (Zink et al.,
2010; Niemann et al., 2012; Berke et al., 2014). However, a number of more
recent studies have demonstrated that branched GDGTs may also be produced in
aquatic systems, possibly complicating the application of the MBT/CBT index
as a tool for reconstructing MAAT (De Jonge et al., 2014; Weber et al.,
2015). Nonetheless, the MBT/CBT index and other lipid paleothermometers have
proven most valuable in determining trends in climate evolution both on
regional and global scales. A lipid-based proxy that allows deciphering past
changes in surface water temperatures in lacustrine environments on the
contrary is currently missing (Castañeda and Schouten, 2011).</p>
      <p>Heterocystous cyanobacteria are oxygenic photoautotrophs that are known to
be an abundant component of the phytoplankton community of many present-day
freshwater lakes of polar to tropical latitudes (Whitton, 2012). They
are also known to form massive blooms in river deltas and semi-enclosed
basins such as the Baltic Sea (Stal et al., 1999; Larsson et al., 2001).
Their dominant role in the primary production of freshwater and brackish
environments is related to their unique ability to simultaneously perform
oxygenic photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation, enabling them to outcompete
eukaryotic algae under nitrogen limiting conditions (Levine and
Schindler, 1999). For this, heterocystous cyanobacteria confine the fixation
of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to heterocysts, which host the oxygen-sensitive enzyme
nitrogenase that catalyzes the reduction of dinitrogen gas to ammonia. These
specialized cells are enveloped in a set of unique glycolipids, so-called
heterocyst glycolipids (HGs), which are exclusively present in
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing heterocystous cyanobacteria (Nichols and Wood, 1968;
Gambacorta et al., 1999; Bauersachs et al., 2009a) and are considered to act
as a gas diffusion barrier that limits the entry of oxygen into the
heterocyst (Wolk, 1982). These components are composed of sugar
head groups that are glycosidically bound to long-chain diols, triols,
keto-ols or keto-diols with an even carbon chain ranging from C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon atoms (Fig. 1). The distribution of HG diols and keto-ols
has previously been shown to strongly correlate with growth temperature in
cultures of the heterocystous cyanobacteria <italic>Anabaena</italic> CCY9613 and <italic>Nostoc</italic> CCY9926
(Bauersachs et al., 2009a, 2014). These authors demonstrated that in both
types of cyanobacteria the relative proportion of HG diols significantly
increased compared to their corresponding HG keto-ols with increasing growth
temperature and introduced the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (heterocyst glycolipid index of 26
carbon atoms) and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (heterocyst glycolipid index of 28 carbon atoms) as
means to quantify structural changes in the HG composition of the heterocyst
cell envelope. It should be pointed out though that the overall change in
the structural composition of the heterocyst cell envelope varied
significantly between both cyanobacteria with HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranging from
0.10 to 0.18 in <italic>Anabaena</italic> CCY9613 and from 0.12 to 0.30 in <italic>Nostoc</italic> CCY9926 (Bauersachs et
al., 2014), indicating that individual species of heterocystous cyanobacteria
may tune the properties of the gas diffusion barrier in a slightly different
fashion. Nonetheless, the finding of temperature-induced changes in the
heterocyst glycolipid composition of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing heterocystous
cyanobacteria may offer the exciting possibility to reconstruct surface
water temperatures of modern and possibly also fossil lacustrine
environments given that (1) heterocystous cyanobacteria are a common
component of the phytoplankton community in many contemporary and fossil
freshwater environments (Whitton, 2012) and (2) HGs have been shown to
preserve well in the geological record (Bauersachs et al.,
2010). Here, we investigated temporal variations in the distribution of
heterocyst glycolipids in water column filtrates of Lake Schreventeich
(Kiel, Germany). We also analyzed the distribution of HGs in the lake's surface
sediments  and discuss the potential use of HGs
in the reconstruction of surface water temperatures in modern and fossil
freshwater environments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Structures of heterocyst glycolipids detected in water column
filtrates and surface sediments of Lake Schreventeich.
1-(O-hexose)-3,25-hexacosanediol (I),
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-25-hexacosanol (II),
1-(O-hexose)-3,27-octacosanediol (III),
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-27-octacosanol (IV),
1-(O-hexose)-3,25,27-octacosanetriol (V) and
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-25,27-octacosanediol (VI).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study site and sampling</title>
      <p>Lake Schreventeich is a small holomictic lake situated in northern Germany
(54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>36.79<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>07<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>17.57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). Its surface area
covers approximately 0.38 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and it has an average depth of 1.4–1.6 m
(maximum depth of 3.4 m). The lake has no tributaries and is solely fed by
precipitation and ground water inflow.</p>
      <p>Surface water samples for the analysis of HGs were taken from late July to
the end of October 2013. Oxygen concentrations and surface water
temperatures were measured at time of sampling using the portable oxygen
measuring instrument  Oxi 1970i  coupled to a  CellOx325  oxygen probe
(WTW, Germany). The pH of all water samples was determined using a
FG2-FiveGo  (Mettler-Toledo, Germany) using a two-point calibration on
certified reference solutions obtained from Hanna Instruments. Surface
sediments (0–1 cm) from two locations within Lake Schreventeich were
obtained in March 2014 using a  Uwitec gravity corer (Uwitec,
Switzerland). All sediments were freeze-dried and ground to a homogenous
powder using pestle and mortar.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Determination of algal biomass</title>
      <p>A total of 100 mL of surface water was collected during each sampling and filtered
over a preweighed Whatman filter GF/C (1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, diameter 47 mm). After
filtration, filters were manually inspected and non-phytoplankton biomass
was removed using a pair of tweezers. All filters were subsequently dried in
an oven at 105 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 24 h. Phytoplankton biomass was
calculated as the weight difference between the preweighed and the
oven-dried filters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Bligh and Dyer extraction of water column filtrates and core top sediments</title>
      <p>Measured volumes (e.g., 3–4 L) of surface water were filtered through a MN
85/70 BF (binder free) glass fiber filter with a pore size of 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(Macherey-Nagel, Germany). All filters were freeze-dried and extracted
following a modified Bligh and Dyer procedure as described by Rütters et
al. (2002). Briefly, filters were cut into fine pieces with a
solvent-cleaned scissor and ultrasonically extracted using a solvent mixture
of methanol (MeOH), dichloromethane (DCM) and phosphate buffer (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and the residue
extracted twice with the solvent mixture specified above. DCM and phosphate
buffer were added to the pooled supernatants to achieve a ratio of
MeOH / DCM / phosphate buffer of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), allowing the separation of two
phases. The bottom layer, containing the organic fraction, was transferred
to a glass vial and the remaining aqueous phase was extracted twice with
DCM. The combined extracts were reduced under rotary vacuum, transferred to
preweighed vials and dried under a gentle stream of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. All Bligh and
Dyer extracts were subsequently dissolved in DCM / MeOH (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to a
concentration of 2–4 mg mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and filtered through a
0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size, regenerated cellulose filter (13 mm; LLG Labware, Germany)
prior to analysis. In addition to water column filtrates, 0.5 g of
freeze-dried core top sediments obtained from Lake Schreventeich
were
extracted using the procedure outlined above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Analysis of heterocyst glycolipids</title>
      <p>Heterocyst glycolipids were analyzed following the procedure described by
Bauersachs et al. (2014) with some brief modifications.
Separation of the target compounds was achieved using an Alliance 2690 HPLC
(high-performance liquid chromatography)
system (Waters, UK) fitted with a Luna Hilic 200A column
(150 mm <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mm inner diameter; 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size; Phenomenex, Germany) maintained at 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The
following linear gradient was used with a flow rate of
0.2 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : 95 % eluent A<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 % eluent B to 70 % A<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 % B in 10 min (held 20 min),
followed by 70 % A<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 % B to 35 % A<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65 % B in 15 min (held 15 min),
then back to 95 % A<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 % B in 1 min (held 20 min) to re-equilibrate the
column. Eluent A was hexane / isopropanol / formic acid / 14.8 M aqueous
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>79</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and eluent B was isopropanol / water / formic
acid / 14.8 M aqueous NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>88</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Detection of heterocyst glycolipids was accomplished using a Quattro LC
triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Micromass, UK). The positive
electrospray ionization (ESI) conditions were as follows: capillary voltage,
3.2 kV; cone voltage, 25 V; source temperature, 120 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C;
desolvation temperature, 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; cone gas flow, 1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
and desolvation gas flow, 4 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To qualitatively determine the
distribution of HGs in water column filtrates of Lake Schreventeich, all
Bligh and Dyer extracts were analyzed in data-dependent mode with two scan
events, where a positive ion scan (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 300–1000) was followed by a product ion
scan of the base peak of the mass spectrum of the first scan event.
Identification of HGs was based on comparison with published mass spectra
(Bauersachs et al., 2009b). To improve the sensitivity of the
measurement and therewith increase reproducibility, HGs were also detected
via single ion recording (SIR) of their protonated molecules [M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(dwell time 234 ms) with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 575.5 (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 577.5 (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
diol), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 603.5 (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 605.5 (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 619.5
(HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-diol) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 621.5 (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> triol). Selected samples were
analyzed in duplicate and fractional abundances of HGs as well as calculated
HG ratios (e.g., HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given in the text
represent average values of these measurements. Quantification was done by
integration of the peak area using the QuanLynx application manager.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Variation of environmental parameters and algal biomass in Lake Schreventeich</title>
      <p>Physical and biological data of Lake Schreventeich collected from late July
to the end of October 2013 are summarized in Fig. 2. All investigated
physical parameters (i.e., temperature, oxygen concentration and pH) show
maxima in late July or at the beginning of August and gradually decline to
yield minima in late October. Surface water temperatures ranged from 10.5 to
24.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and were highest in late July (Fig. 2a). Oxygen
concentrations in the surface waters varied from 2.5 to 7.6 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with
highest values occurring in late July and they subsequently declined over
the investigated time interval to yield minimum values in late October (Fig. 2b).
The pH values ranged from 7.18 to 7.79 and were comparatively high during
the first half of the sampling campaign with values averaging 7.56 in August
(Fig 2c). In contrast, the pH showed a significant drop by almost 0.2 units
at the beginning of September and stayed around 7.32 throughout the first
half of September before increasing again to values of ca. 7.50 at the
beginning of October. Lake productivity was determined by measuring the
amount of biomass present at time of sampling. Comparatively low amounts of
biomass were found in late July with values of 11.6 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> that almost
doubled in August with an average value of 20.7 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2d). After
a pronounced peak in the first half of September (maximum 50.1 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
average 35.3 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, biomass concentrations declined to an average
value of 22.5 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in October.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Surface water temperature  (SWT), <bold>(b)</bold> oxygen concentration,
<bold>(c)</bold> pH and <bold>(d)</bold> amount of phytoplankton biomass measured in Lake Schreventeich
from late July until the end of October 2013.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Distribution and fractional abundances of heterocyst glycolipids in water
column filtrates of Lake Schreventeich</title>
      <p>Heterocyst glycolipids were below detection limit in late July and early
August. They were first identified in mid-August in  relatively low
abundances and gradually increased in late August to reach peak abundances in early to
mid-September (Fig. 3). In late September, the relative abundance of HGs
declined to reach comparatively low but constant values from mid- to late
October. As shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, two structural isomers of
1-(O-hexose)-3,25-hexacosanediol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol) and
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-25-hexacosanol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol) generally dominated
the HG pool and together they constituted 71–100 % (average 82.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2 %) of all heterocyst glycolipids over the investigated time
interval. The early eluting HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol, however, generally constituted
only a minute fraction of all HGs (on average &lt; 0.5 %). The
heterocyst glycolipids 1-(O-hexose)-3,25,27-octacosanetriol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
triol) and 1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-25,27-octacosanediol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-diol)
were particularly abundant in late August with fractional abundances of up
to 25 % but in general they contributed 6–17 % (average 12.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2 %)
to the heterocyst glycolipid content of Lake Schreventeich.
1-(O-hexose)-3,27-octacosanediol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol) and
1-(O-hexose)-3-keto-27-octacosanol (HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol) were below detection
limit in water column filtrates taken before early September (Fig. 3) and
they usually constituted a minor component of the total HG pool with
fractional abundances of both compounds ranging from 0 to 13 % (average
4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 %).</p>
      <p>It is interesting to note that the fractional abundance of all HG diols and
triols declined over the investigated time interval, while the fractional
abundance of their corresponding keto-ol and keto-diol varieties showed a
concomitant increase (Fig. 3). For example, the fractional abundance of the
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol was highest (&gt; 70 %) in late August to early
September and thereafter declined gradually to yield values around 50 % at
the end of October. Over the same time period, the fractional abundance of
the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol significantly increased from 9 % at the end of
August to 25 % in late October. Overall, similar trends were also observed
for the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> triol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-diol as well as for the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
diol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol. It should be pointed out though that for the
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol and the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol this trend was less apparent, which
may be due to the low analytical response and the resulting uncertainties in
determining the contribution of both components to the total HG pool.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Fractional abundances of  HGs  in surface
waters of Lake Schreventeich. Dashed line indicates relative abundances of
the sum of all heterocyst glycolipids normalized to the amount of phytoplankton biomass  over the investigated time interval.
Note that heterocyst glycolipids were not detected in water column filtrates
taken before mid-August. Fractional abundances of HGs in the sediment of Lake
Schreventeich represent average values obtained from the analysis of two core
top samples.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlations of fractional abundances (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of individual heterocyst
glycolipids and heterocyst glycolipid  indices with  SWT, oxygen concentration, pH and biomass. Significant
correlations were observed, among others, between fractional abundances of
heterocyst glycolipids and SWT as well as between the different HG indices
and SWT. Note that certain environmental parameters were also positively
correlated with each other. Significant correlations are indicated in bold.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation coefficient; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SWT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Oxygen Con.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Biomass</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HG26 diol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.807</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.746</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.424</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.216</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.115</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.439</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HG26 keto-ol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.954</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.777</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.671</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.027</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.925</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HG28 diol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.714</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.621</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.494</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.444</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.031</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.103</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.148</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HG28  keto-ol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.715</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.467</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.624</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.571</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.126</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.030</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.052</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HG28 triol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.680</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.445</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.856</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.257</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.111</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.374</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>HG28 keto-diol</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.288</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.251</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.550</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.574</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.318</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.387</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.042</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.032</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.962</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.803</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.591</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.070</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.805</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.835</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.530</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.590</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.624</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.077</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.044</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.030</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.884</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.646</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.109</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.451</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.711</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.105</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SWT (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.866</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.335</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.316</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.124</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxygen Con. (mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.430</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.232</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.036</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.275</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">0.415</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.039</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Distribution and fractional abundances of heterocyst glycolipids in surface
sediments \hack{\\}of Lake Schreventeich}?><title>Distribution and fractional abundances of heterocyst glycolipids in surface
sediments <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>of Lake Schreventeich</title>
      <p>The distribution of HGs in surface sediments of Lake Schreventeich largely
resembled those observed in the water column filtrates with the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
diol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol being most abundant (Fig. 3). Both components
constituted ca. 81 % of the total HG pool with HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol and
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol accounting for 64 and 17 % of all HGs, respectively.
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> triol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-diol were the second most abundant types
of HGs in Lake Schreventeich sediments, contributing 7 and 4 % of all
HGs. Similar to the distribution of HGs in the water column filtrates,
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol constituted only   minor components  of
the HG pool with 5 and 3 %, respectively. Fractional abundances of HGs
found in the core top sediments of Lake Schreventeich are thus well in line
with those observed in water column filtrates, in particular with those
obtained in mid-September.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Sources and environmental controls on the HG distribution in water column filtrates of Lake Schreventeich</title>
      <p>Heterocyst glycolipids were below the detection limit in water column filtrates
collected throughout July to early August and were first observed in
mid-August. In general, the distribution of heterocyst glycolipids in Lake
Schreventeich is well in line with those previously reported from
nostocalean cyanobacteria (Bauersachs et al., 2009a; Wörmer et al., 2012)
and likely suggests that members of the genera <italic>Anabaena</italic> and/or <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> were part of the
phytoplankton community of Lake Schreventeich in late summer 2013. This
agrees well with microbiological studies of the phytoplankton community of
other lakes in northern Germany, for which representatives of both genera have
indeed been reported in abundance (Arp et al., 2013). The
simultaneous increase in total HG abundances and aquatic biomass in early to
mid-September (Figs. 2 and 3) may also suggest that heterocystous
cyanobacteria constituted a significant component of the lake's
phytoplankton.</p>
      <p>We observed systematic changes in the distribution of heterocyst glycolipids
in water column filtrates of Lake Schreventeich over the time interval
investigated. The most apparent was a systematic decline in the fractional
abundances of HG diols and the HG triol from mid-August to late October,
which was significantly positively correlated with surface water temperature
(Table 1). On the contrary, fractional abundances of HG keto-ols and
keto-diols gradually increased from late August to the end of the sampling
campaign. This increase in fractional abundances was significantly
negatively correlated with changes in surface water temperatures (Table 1).
Similar changes in the fractional abundances of HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
diols and keto-ols with growth temperature have previously been described
from cultures of the N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing heterocystous cyanobacteria <italic>Anabaena</italic> CCY9613 and
<italic>Nostoc</italic> CCY9926 (Bauersachs et al., 2009a, 2014) and been explained as a
physiological adaptation to compensate for greater gas diffusion rates of
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at higher temperatures in order to keep the entry of atmospheric
gases into the heterocyst at a minimum, which is considered a prerequisite
for optimum N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation. To quantitatively express these structural
changes of the heterocyst cell envelope, Bauersachs et al. (2009a) introduced
the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> index (heterocyst glycolipid
index of   26 carbon atoms), which is defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>keto-ol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diol</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>keto-ol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>This notation, however, is somewhat counterintuitive as values of the
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> index decline with increasing growth temperature. Therefore, we
here used the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (heterocyst diol index of 26 carbon atoms), which in
contrast to the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> index is positively correlated with temperature
and defined as given below. It should be pointed out though that the
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> index and the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  have the same statistical significance.

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HDI</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diol</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>keto-ol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diol</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HDI</mml:mi><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0224</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SWT</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4381</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>In Lake Schreventeich, HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged from 0.89 in mid-August to
0.66 in late October (Fig. 4) and closely followed variations in surface
water temperatures (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). For example, HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values gradually declined over the investigated time period until
mid-October and afterwards slightly increased again, in agreement with a rise
in measured surface water temperature in late October. Least squares
analysis of the data showed that variations in HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
strongly linearly correlated with surface water temperatures. As the
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol and keto-ol as well as the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> triol and keto-diol
showed similar changes in fractional abundances compared to the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
diol and the HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol, we also employed the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(heterocyst diol index of 28 carbon atoms) and the HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (heterocyst
triol index of 28 carbon atoms) in order to quantitatively
determine changes in HG distributions with environmental parameters. Both
indices were calculated as given in the following equations:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HDI</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diol</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>keto-ol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diol</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HDI</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0405</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SWT</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0401</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HTI</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">triol</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>keto-diol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HG</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">triol</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HTI</mml:mi><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0288</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SWT</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2292</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.78.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Cross-plots of the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a–c)</bold>, HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d–f)</bold> and HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<bold>(g–i)</bold> obtained from water column filtrates with measured  SWT, oxygen concentration and pH of Lake Schreventeich's
surface waters. Red triangles represent HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-, HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>- and
HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-reconstructed SWTs obtained from the analysis of surface sediments
of Lake Schreventeich.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/3741/2015/bg-12-3741-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Similar to the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> closely
followed measured surface water temperatures with absolute values of these
indices gradually declining over the investigated time period from 0.82 to
0.42 and from 0.81 to 0.49, respectively (Fig. 4). Least squares analysis of
the data demonstrates that both indices are significantly correlated with
surface water temperatures, although correlations are generally less strong
as compared to the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. All three HG indices, however, seem to track
temperature changes in the lake's surface waters in a similar fashion,
albeit with slight differences in absolute values and trends between the
individual indices (see Fig. S2 in the Supplement). One explanation for the
slight offsets between the individual indices may be the contribution of
heterocyst glycolipids from different cyanobacterial sources. Bauersachs et
al. (2009a, 2014) as well as Wörmer et al. (2012)
noticed that fractional abundances of heterocyst glycolipids may vary
between different genera of heterocystous cyanobacteria and even within
heterocystous cyanobacteria belonging to the same genus. Moreover,
Bauersachs et al. (2014) observed that fractional abundances
of HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diols and keto-ols changed differently in
<italic>Anabaena</italic> CCY9613 and <italic>Nostoc</italic> CCY9926, resulting in slightly deviating HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values for each of the investigated species. As multiple members
of heterocystous cyanobacteria (e.g., <italic>Anabaena</italic> and <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic>), adapting the composition of
the heterocyst cell envelope in slightly different fashions, likely
contributed to the total pool of HGs in Lake Schreventeich, absolute values
of the different HG indices may have varied depending on the amount of
heterocyst glycolipids contributed by each individual cyanobacterium. In
this context it is interesting to note that the different HG indices show a
similar trend with surface water temperatures but that HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
generally higher compared to HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values, resulting in
a deviation from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line as shown in Fig. S3. HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values, on the contrary, are very similar to each other and fall close to the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line, indicating that they may have the same biological origin.</p>
      <p>When the different HG indices are plotted against environmental parameters
other than surface water temperatures (Fig. 4), it is apparent that the
HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64) and the HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42) are positively correlated with decreasing
oxygen concentrations and that the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35)
and the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35) also show a
weak positive correlation with pH. However, these correlations are generally
less significant and not as strong as observed for the correlation with
surface water temperatures. It should also be noted that oxygen
concentrations and pH are strongly correlated with surface water
temperatures and that both parameters show a positive correlation with each
other (Table 1). Therefore, the observed correlations between the different
HG indices and oxygen concentrations as well as pH are likely indirect
rather than indicating a statistically significant relationship between the
individual environmental parameters and changes in the heterocyst glycolipid
distribution. However, <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>Kangatharalingam<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> et al. (1992) reported
that the heterocyst cell envelope of <italic>Anabaena flos-aquae</italic> increased in thickness when this
cyanobacterium was grown under increased levels of oxygen stress and it can
therefore not be excluded that environmental factors other than growth
temperature may affect the distribution of heterocyst glycolipids in
heterocystous cyanobacteria (although these authors did not analyze changes
in the chemical structure of the heterocyst cell envelope). Additional
investigations employing culture-dependent approaches and studying the
effect of environmental parameters other than growth temperature will be
needed to elucidate whether and to which extent oxygen concentrations and pH
exert a control on the structural composition of the heterocyst cell
envelope of heterocystous cyanobacteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Accuracy of surface water reconstructions based on HG indices</title>
      <p>The accuracy with which surface water temperatures of a given aquatic
environment can be reconstructed is essential for any novel lipid
thermometer. Based on replicate analysis of individual water column
filtrates and surface sediments, the average analytical precision with which
the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be determined is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.006. Using the respective
temperature calibration (see Eq. 3), this equals a standard error in
temperature estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The determination of
HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.012) and HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.010) values is slightly
less accurate than for   HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which may be due to the lower
abundance of HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diols, triols, keto-ols and keto-diols in the
analyzed water column filtrates, with the standard error in temperature
estimates being <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for the HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the overall analytical
precision in the analysis of the different HG indices is of the same order
of magnitude or even slightly better when compared to other well-established
temperature proxies, such as the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and U<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
indicates that reconstructions of surface water temperatures using the
HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other HG indices may be achieved with a relatively high
accuracy. This is also suggested by analysis of the residual errors of the
HG-estimated SWTs (calculated SWTs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> measured SWTs), which are generally
&lt; 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with   mean standard errors of 0.97,
1.62 and 1.69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-, HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>- and
HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-reconstructed SWTs, respectively, and without following a clear
trend with SWT (see Fig. S4 in the Supplement).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Distribution of heterocyst glycolipids in Lake Schreventeich surface
sediments</title>
      <p>In order to determine if the heterocyst glycolipid signal observed in the
water column filtrates is transferred to the sedimentary realm, we also
analyzed two surface sediments collected from Lake Schreventeich for their
HG content. Sedimentary HG distributions were indeed very similar to those
observed in water column filtrates with HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol
dominating over smaller quantities of HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> triol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
keto-diol as well as HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diol and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> keto-ol. It is interesting
to note that the distribution of HGs in the two surface sediment samples
most closely resembled the one observed during the period of maximum lake
productivity and peak abundances of HGs in early to mid-September (Figs. 2, 3), suggesting that the preserved HGs were mainly produced during
maximum activity of heterocystous cyanobacteria in Lake Schreventeich.
HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of surface sediments from Lake Schreventeich averaged
0.791 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.008. Using the temperature calibration obtained from the
analysis of the water column filtrates, the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value translates into
an average surface water temperature of 15.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.
Considering the current accuracy for the detection of heterocyst glycolipids, the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-based temperature reconstructed for Lake
Schreventeich largely agrees with surface water temperatures measured from
early to mid-September and thus during the time period of highest
productivity of heterocystous cyanobacteria. Likewise, reconstructed surface
water temperatures based on HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.575 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.018) and HTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(0.637 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012) values, obtained from the analysis of surface sediments
of Lake Schreventeich and using their respective temperature calibrations,
are 13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 and 14.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
respectively. Although slightly lower than the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-based SWT
estimates, both values again agree well with surface water temperatures
measured during mid-September. Together, these observations suggest that the
analysis of sedimentary HGs may allow reconstructing summer surface water
temperatures in Lake Schreventeich and possibly also other lacustrine
environments with sufficient export and incorporation of
cyanobacterial-derived organic matter into the sediment.</p>
      <p>Despite the good agreement between measured and reconstructed surface water
temperatures, it should be pointed out that the recovered surface sediments
most likely not only contained HGs produced during the investigated time
interval but HG distributions probably reflect a time-integrated signal that
covers several years. In addition, surface water temperatures of Lake
Schreventeich are expected to vary over the  course of a day and the
obtained temperatures (though always recorded at the same time of the day)
provide only a snapshot of the actual temperature variance of the lake.
Parts of the uncertainties in the correlation of HG indices and surface
water temperatures may in fact be related to the low number of diurnal
temperature measurements but may be improved by continuous temperature
logging of the lake's surface waters in future studies. As discussed above,
contributions of HGs from heterocystous cyanobacteria with slightly
different HG distribution patterns and absolute abundances of HGs may also
result in the observed offsets between the HG-based SWT calculations.
Nonetheless, the overall good agreement of HG distributions in surface
sediments and water column filtrates seems to indicate that (1) HGs in Lake
Schreventeich are largely produced in late summer, coinciding with blooms of
heterocystous cyanobacteria, and that (2) HG-reconstructed surface water
temperatures primarily reflect a summer signal in this temperate lake.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Geochemical implications</title>
      <p>As mentioned previously, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing heterocystous cyanobacteria are a
common component of the phytoplankton community in contemporary freshwater
and brackish environments of polar to tropical latitudes, where they may
form massive blooms during summer (Whitton, 2012). Likewise, HGs seem
to be widely distributed in modern freshwater and brackish environments.
They have been reported from surface sediments of several European and
African lakes including Lake Ohrid, Lake Malawi and Lake Challa
(Bauersachs et al., 2010) as well as in phytoplankton
collected from a number of Spanish freshwater reservoirs (Wörmer et al., 2012). HG distributions dominated by
HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diols and HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  triols have been reported from core top sediments
recovered from the Landsort Deep, Baltic Sea (Bauersachs et
al., 2010). They have also been described in several microbial mats growing
along the coast of the southern North Sea (Bauersachs et al., 2011;
Bühring et al., 2014) and western Spitsbergen (Rethemeyer
et al., 2010) as well as in an Icelandic hot spring
(Bauersachs et al., 2013). A suite of HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diols, triols, keto-ols and keto-diols was detected in suspended
particulate matter in the surface waters of 23 oligotrophic and eutrophic
lakes in Minnesota and Iowa, USA (Schoon, 2013), while HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–HG<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diols and keto-ols were present in variable abundances and
distributions in microbial mats recovered from Shark Bay, Western Australia
(Bauersachs et al., unpublished data).</p>
      <p>The remarkably strong linear correlations found for the distribution of HGs
in water column filtrates of Lake Schreventeich and its surface water
temperatures indicate that HG distributions, in form of the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
other HG indices, may be well suited to track changes in water temperatures
of the photic zone in freshwater environments. The generally good agreement
of HG indices obtained from core top sediments of Lake Schreventeich with
summer surface water temperatures furthermore suggests that the distribution
of sedimentary HGs may also record surface water temperatures of lacustrine
settings over time. In addition, it may indicate that no or only little
selective degradation of HGs (e.g., diols vs. keto-ols) upon sinking and
transport through the water column as well as during the incorporation into
the sediment record occurred in this shallow lake system. At this point,
however, it cannot be ruled out that microbial reworking may bias the
initially synthesized HG signal in deeper lakes. Hence, additional studies
determining degradation rates of individual HGs as well as changes in the
overall HG distribution patterns with water depth will be necessary in order
to elucidate whether and to which extend the HG inventory of lakes
experiences early diagenetic alteration. Likewise, only limited information
on the preservation potential of HGs over geological timescales exists.
These components have been reported from Pleistocene Mediterranean sapropels
as well as lacustrine deposits from the Oligocene Lake Enspel and the Eocene
Messel oil shale (Bauersachs et al., 2010), indicating that they may readily
preserve in the sediment record. However, detailed studies investigating the
preservation of HGs in sedimentary sequences and their stability under
varying environmental conditions are currently missing but will be essential
to determine the robustness of HGs as lipid paleothermometers.</p>
      <p>It has previously been demonstrated that changes in the distribution of HGs
as a function of growth temperature can vary significantly between different
cyanobacterial species as reported for <italic>Anabaena</italic> CCY9613 and <italic>Nostoc</italic> CCY9928 (Bauersachs et
al., 2014). A finding that we confirmed for other nostocalean cyanobacteria
such as <italic>Aphanizomenon</italic> sp. and <italic>Nodularia</italic> sp. in recent culture experiments (Bauersachs et al.,
unpublished data). The application of HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other HG-based indices
may thus potentially be biased in lakes that are characterized by
simultaneous growth of multiple species of heterocystous cyanobacteria, each
modifying the composition of the heterocyst cell envelope in a slightly
different fashion. It should also be pointed out that core top calibrations may not be applicable to
accurately determine surface water temperatures in lake environments, in
which the cyanobacterial community gradually changed over time.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The presence of heterocyst glycolipids in core top sediments of Lake
Schreventeich, the overall good agreement of HG-based temperature estimates
with measured surface water temperatures and the ubiquitous distribution of
heterocystous cyanobacteria in modern freshwater and brackish environments,
suggests that the HDI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other HG-based indices may hold great
promise as proxies for the reconstruction of surface water temperatures in
modern and possibly also fossil lacustrine environments, something that is
currently not achieved by any other organic geochemical proxy. As heterocyst
glycolipids constitute highly specific biological markers for diazotrophic
heterocystous cyanobacteria, they also allow for a direct study of the overall
impact of surface water temperature changes on the cyanobacterial community
structure of a given lake system. However, additional analyses of HG
distributions in freshwater environments in combination with environmental
parameters (such as water temperatures, oxygen concentrations, pH, light
intensities, etc.) and molecular studies are clearly needed to evaluate the
potential use of HG-based proxies in the determination of lacustrine surface
water temperatures on a larger scale.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3741-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-12-3741-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>T. Bauersachs and L. Schwark designed the experiments. J. Rochelmeier was involved in sample
collection, the determination of the physical properties of the lake's
surface waters and quantification of phytoplankton biomass. T. Bauersachs analyzed
the water column filtrates for their HG content and prepared the manuscript
with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank M. Pohling for assistance during sample  collection and
extraction of the water column filtrates. Two anonymous reviewers are
acknowledged for their constructive comments on the manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: H. Niemann</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arp, W., Maier, G, and Michels, U.: Untersuchungen des Phyto- und
Zooplanktons schleswig-holsteinischer Seen 2012, Landesamt für
Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume, Schleswig-Holstein,
Flintbek, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bauersachs, T., Compaoré, J., Hopmans, E. C., Stal, L. J., Schouten, S.,
and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Distribution of heterocyst glycolipids in
cyanobacteria, Phytochemistry, 70, 2034–2039,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.08.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.08.014</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bauersachs, T., Hopmans, E. C., Compaoré, J., Stal, L. J., Schouten, S.,
and Sinninghe Damsté J. S.: Rapid analysis of long-chain glycolipids in
heterocystous cyanobacteria using high-performance liquid chromatography
coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, Rapid Commun.
Mass Sp., 23, 1387–1394, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.4009</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bauersachs, T., Speelman, E. N., Hopmans, E. C., Reichart, G. J., Schouten,
S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Fossilized glycolipids reveal past
oceanic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation by heterocystous cyanobacteria, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 107, 19190–19194, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007526107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1007526107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bauersachs, T., Compaoré, J., Severin, I., Hopmans, E. C., Schouten, S.,
Stal, L. J., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Diazotrophic microbial
community of coastal microbial mats of the southern North Sea, Geobiology,
9, 349–359, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4669.2011.00280.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1472-4669.2011.00280.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bauersachs, T., Miller, S. R., van der Meer, M. T. J., Hopmans, E. C.,
Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Distribution of long chain
heterocyst glycolipids in cultures of the thermophilic cyanobacterium
<italic>Mastigocladus laminosus</italic> and a hot spring microbial mat, Org. Geochem., 56, 19–24,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.11.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.11.013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bauersachs, T., Stal, L. J., Grego, M., and Schwark, L.: Temperature induced
changes in the heterocyst glycolipid composition of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-fixing
heterocystous cyanobacteria, Org. Geochem., 69, 98–105,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.02.006</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Berke, M. A., Johnson, T. C., Werne, J. P., Livingstone, D. A., Grice, K.
Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Characterization of the last
deglacial transition in tropical East Africa: Insights from Lake Albert,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 409, 1–8,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.04.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.04.014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Brassell, S. C., Eglinton, G., Marlowe, I. T., Pflaumann, U., and Sarnthein,
M.: Molecular stratigraphy – A new tool for climatic assessment, Nature,
320, 129–133, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/320129a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/320129a0</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bühring, S. I., Kamp, A., Wörmer, L., Ho, S., and Hinrichs, K. U.:
Functional structure of laminated microbial sediments from a supratidal
sandy beach of the German Wadden Sea (St. Peter-Ording), J. Sea Res., 85,
463–473, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.08.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.seares.2013.08.001</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Castañeda, I. S. and Schouten, S.: A review of molecular organic
proxies for examining modern and ancient lacustrine environments, Quaternary
Sci. Rev., 30, 2851–2891, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.07.009</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>De Jonge, C., Stadnitskaia, A., Hopmans, E. C., Cherkashov, G., Fedotov, A.,
and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: In situ produced branched glycerol dialkyl
glycerol tetraethers in suspended particulate matter from the Yenisei River,
Eastern Siberia, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 125, 476–491,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.10.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2013.10.031</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gambacorta, A., Trincone, A., Soriente, A., and Sodano, G.: Chemistry of
glycolipids from the heterocysts of nitogen-fixing cyanobacteria, Cur. T.
Phytochem., 2, 145–150, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kangatharalingam, N., Priscu, J. C., and Paerl, H. W.: Heterocyst envelope
thickness, heterocyst frequency and nitrogenase activity in <italic>Anabaena flos-aqua</italic>: influence of
exogenous oxygen tension, J. Appl. Microbiol., 138, 2673–2678, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Larsson, U., Hajdu, S., Walve, J., and Elmgren, R.: Baltic Sea nitrogen
fixation estimated from the summer increase in upper mixed layer total
nitrogen, Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 811–820, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Levine, S. N. and Schindler, D. W.: Influence of nitrogen to phosphorus
supply ratios and physicochemical conditions on cyanobacteria and
phytoplankton species composition in the Experimental Lakes Area, Canada,
Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 56, 451–466, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-56-3-451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/cjfas-56-3-451</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Nichols, B. W. and Wood, B. J. B.: New glycolipid specific to
nitrogen-fixing blue-green algae, Nature, 217, 767–768,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/217767a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/217767a0</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Niemann, H., Stadnitskaia, A., Wirth, S. B., Gilli, A., Anselmetti, F. S.,
Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., and Lehmann, M.
F.: Bacterial GDGTs in Holocene sediments and catchment soils of a high
Alpine lake: application of the MBT/CBT-paleothermometer, Clim. Past, 8,
889–906, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-889-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-889-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Powers, L., Werne, J. P., Vanderwoude, A. J., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.,
Hopmans, E. C., and Schouten, S.: Applicability and calibration of the
TEX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> paleothermometer in lakes, Org. Geochem., 41, 404–413,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.11.009</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Rampen, S. W., Willmott, V., Kim, J. H., Uliana, E., Mollenhauer, G.,
Schefuss, E., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.: Long chain
1,13-and 1,15-diols as a potential proxy for palaeotemperature
reconstruction, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 84, 204–216,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.024</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Rethemeyer, J., Schubotz, F., Talbot, H. M., Cooke, M. P., Hinrichs, K. U.,
and Mollenhauer, G.: Distribution of polar membrane lipids in permafrost
soils and sediments of a small high Arctic catchment, Org. Geochem., 41,
1130–1145, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.06.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.06.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Rodrigo-Gámiz, M., Martinez-Ruis, F., Rampen, S. W., Schouten, S., and
Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Sea surface temperature variations in the
western Mediterranean Sea over the last 20 kyr: a dual-organic proxy
(U<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and LDI) approach, Paleoceanography, 29, 87–98, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Rütters, H., Sass, H., Cypionka, H., and Rullkötter, J.: Phospholipid
analysis as a tool to study complex microbial communities in marine
sediments, J. Microbiol. Meth., 48, 149–160,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00319-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00319-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Schoon, P. L.: Impact of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and pH on the distribution and stable
carbon isotopic composition of microbial biomarker lipids, PhD thesis,
Utrecht Univeristy, The Netherlands, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Schefuss, E., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Distributional variations in marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids: a new
tool for reconstructing ancient sea water temperatures?, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 204, 265–274, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00979-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00979-2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: The organic
geochemistry of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids: A review, Org.
Geochem., 54, 19–61, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Smith, M., De Deckker, P., Rogers, J., Brocks, J., Hope, J., Schmidt, S., dos
Santos, R. L., and Schouten, S.: Comparison of U<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, TEX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>86</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and LDI temperature proxies for reconstruction of south-east Australian ocean
temperatures, Org. Geochem., 64, 94–104, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Stal, L. J., Staal, M., and Villbrandt, M.: Nutrient control of
cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 18, 165–173,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ame018165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/ame018165</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Theroux, S., Huang, Y., and Amaral-Zettler, L.: Comparative molecular
microbial ecology of the spring haptophyte bloom in a Greenland arctic
oligosaline lake, Front. Microbiol., 3, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2012.00415</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Thiel, V., Jenisch, A., Landmann, G., Reimer, A., and Michaelis, W.: Unusual
distributions of long-chain alkenones and tetrahymanol from the highly
alkaline Lake Van, Turkey, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 61, 2053–2064,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00038-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00038-0</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Volkman, J. K., Burton, H. R., Everitt, D. A., and Allen, D. I.: Pigment and
lipid compositions of algal and bacterial communities in Ace lake, Vestfold
Hills, Antarctica, Hydrobiologia, 165, 41–57, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00025573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00025573</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Weber, Y., De Jonge, C. Rijpstra, W. I. C., Hopmans, E. C., Stadnitskaia, A.,
Schubert, C. J., Lehmann, M. F., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Niemann,
H.: Identification and carbon isotope composition of a novel branched GDGT
isomer in lake sediments: Evidence for lacustrine branched GDGT production,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 154, 118–129, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.01.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2015.01.032</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Weijers, J. W. H., Schouten, S., van den Donker, J. C., Hopmans, E. C., and
Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Environmental controls on bacterial tetraether
membrane lipid distribution in soils, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 71, 703–71,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2006.10.003</ext-link>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Whitton, B. A.: Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and
Time, second Edn., Springer, Dordrecht, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Wolk, C. P.: Heterocysts, in: The Biology of Cyanobacteria, edited by: Carr,
N. G. and Whitton, B. A., Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK, 359–386,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Wörmer, L., Cires, S., Velazquez, D., Quesada, A., and Hinrichs, K. U.:
Cyanobacterial heterocyst glycolipids in cultures and environmental samples:
diversity and biomarker potential, Limnol. Oceanogr., 57, 1775–1788,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.6.1775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2012.57.6.1775</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Zink, K. G., Leythaeuser, D., Melkonian, M., and Schwark, L.: Temperature
dependency of long-chain alkenone distributions in recent to fossil limnic
sediments and in lake waters, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 65, 253–265,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(00)00509-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0016-7037(00)00509-3</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Zink, K. G., Vandergoes, M. J., Mangelsdorf, K., Dieffenbacher-Krall, A. C.,
and Schwark, L.: Application of bacterial glycerol dialkyl glycerol
tetraethers (GDGTs) to develop modern and past temperature estimates from New
Zealand lakes, Org. Geochem., 41, 1060–1066,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.03.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
