<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-5229-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Reconstruction of super-resolution ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and air–sea fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from satellite imagery in
the southeastern Atlantic</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Super-resolution CO${}_{{2}}$ fluxes from Earth observations}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{I.~Hern\'{a}ndez-Carrasco et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hernández-Carrasco</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
          <email>ismael.hernandez@legos.obs-mip.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sudre</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8876-5179</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Garçon</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4041-1379</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Yahia</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Garbe</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Paulmier</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dewitte</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Illig</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-3326</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dadou</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>González-Dávila</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Santana-Casiano</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>LEGOS, Laboratoire d'Études en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales (CNES-CNRS-IRD-UPS),<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 31401 Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>INRIA, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Bordeaux, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>IWR, Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">I. Hernández-Carrasco (ismael.hernandez@legos.obs-mip.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>17</issue>
      <fpage>5229</fpage><lpage>5245</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>An accurate quantification of the role of the ocean as source/sink of
greenhouse gases (GHGs) requires to access the high-resolution of the GHG
air–sea flux at the interface. In this paper we present a novel method to
reconstruct maps of surface ocean partial pressure of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes at super resolution (4 km, i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at these latitudes) using sea
surface temperature (SST) and ocean color (OC) data at this resolution, and
CarbonTracker CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes data at low resolution (110 km). Inference of
super-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes is performed using
novel nonlinear signal processing methodologies that prove efficient in the
context of oceanography. The theoretical background comes from the
microcanonical multifractal formalism which unlocks the geometrical
determination of cascading properties of physical intensive variables. As a
consequence, a multi-resolution analysis performed on the signal of the
so-called singularity exponents allows for the correct and near optimal
cross-scale inference of GHG fluxes, as the inference suits the geometric
realization of the cascade. We apply such a methodology to the study offshore
of the Benguela area. The inferred representation of oceanic partial pressure
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> improves and enhances the description provided by CarbonTracker,
capturing the small-scale variability. We examine different combinations of
ocean color and sea surface temperature products in order to increase the
number of valid points and the quality of the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field. The
methodology is validated using in situ measurements by means of statistical
errors. We find that mean absolute and relative errors in the inferred values
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to in situ measurements are smaller than for
CarbonTracker.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The ocean can be thought of as a complex system in which a large number of
different processes (e.g., physical, chemical, biological, atmosphere–ocean
interactions) interact with each other at different spatial and temporal
scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.1"/>. These scales extend from millimeters to
thousands of kilometers and from seconds to centuries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.2"/>.
There is a growing body of evidence that the upper few hundred meters of the
oceans are dominated by submesoscale (1–10 km) activity and that this
activity is important to understand global ocean properties
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.3"/>. Accurately estimating the sources and sinks of greenhouse
gases (GHGs) at the air–sea interface requires resolving these small scales
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.4"/>. However, the scarcity of oceanographic cruises and the
lack of available satellite products for GHG concentrations at high
resolution prevent us from obtaining a global assessment of their spatial
variability at small scales. For example, from the in situ ocean measurements
the uncertainty of the net global ocean–atmosphere CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes is
between 20 and 30 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.5"/>, and could be higher in the oxygen
minimum zones (OMZ) of the eastern boundary upwelling systems (EBUSs) due to
the extreme regional variability in these areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.6"/>. Indeed, this supports the design of proper methodologies to
infer fluxes at high resolution from presently available satellite image data
in order to improve current estimates of gas exchanges between the ocean and
the atmosphere.</p>
      <p>The most commonly used methods to estimate air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes are based
either on statistical methods, inverse modeling with atmospheric transport
models or global coupled physical–biogeochemical models. Among others,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="text.7"/> interpolate sea surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements with advanced statistical methods to provide climatological
monthly maps of air–sea fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the global surface waters at a
spatial resolution of 4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Global maps at the
same spatial resolution but at higher temporal resolution (daily) have been
estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.8"/> by fitting the mixed-layer carbon budget
equation to ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations. An international effort to
compile global surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fugacity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) measurements has
recently been performed and reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx4" id="text.9"/>, and
interpolated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.10"/>, generating a monthly gridded product with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values in a 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell. Other
statistical approaches based on the neural-network statistical method have
been shown to be useful to estimate climatological and monthly
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> maps of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.11"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.12"/>, respectively).
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.13"/> used inverse modeling of sources and sinks from the
network of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations jointly with transport models.
The third type of method is based on direct computations of the air–sea
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in coupled physical–biogeochemical models incorporating the
biogeochemical processes of the carbon dioxide system. In this method,
simulated surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be constrained with available ship
observations as shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.14"/>.</p>
      <p>Another new avenue for inferring air–sea GHG fluxes is through inverse modeling
applied to vertical column densities (VCDs) extracted from satellite
spectrometers, i.e., Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) and SCanning
Imaging Absorption SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY), at
low spatial resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.15"/>. A global estimation of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in the ocean has been derived at
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial resolution from global atmosphere
observations used in a data assimilation system for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> called
CarbonTracker <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.16"/>. In all these data sets the rather coarse
spatial resolution leads to uncertainties in the actual estimate of the
sources and sinks of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, calling for an improvement of the resolution
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates.</p>
      <p>In this regard, the last few years have seen the appearance of interesting
new developments on multiscale processing techniques for complex signals
coming from Earth observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.17"/>. These methods make use of
phenomenological descriptions of fully developed turbulence (FDT) in
nonlinear physics, motivated by the values taken on by the Reynolds number in
ocean dynamics. As predicted from the theory and also observed in the ocean,
in a turbulent flow the coherent vortices (eddies) interact with each other
stretching and folding the flow, generating smaller eddies or small-scale
filaments and transition fronts characterized by strong tracer gradients
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.18"/>. This results in a cascade of energy from large to smaller
scales. Therefore the inherent cascade of tracer variance under the turbulent
flow dominates the variability of the geometrical distribution of tracers
such as temperature or dissolved inorganic carbon, as shown by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.19"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.20"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.21"/>. Geometrical
organization of the flow linked to the energy cascade allows for the study of its
properties from the geometrical properties of any tracer for which the
advection is the dominant process. The relationships between the cascade and
the multifractal organization of FDT has been set up either with canonical
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.22"/> or microcanonical
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.23"/> descriptions. Within the microcanonical
framework (MMF) the singularity exponents unlock the geometrical realization
of the multifractal hierarchy. Setting up a multi-resolution analysis on the
singularity exponents computed in the microcanonical framework allows near
optimal cross-scale inference of physical variables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p>These advances open a wide field of theoretical and experimental research and
their use in the analysis of complex data coming from satellite imagery has
been proven innovative and efficient, showing a particular ability to perform
fusion of satellite data acquired at different spatial resolutions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.25"/> and to reconstruct from satellite data current maps at
submesoscale resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.26"/>. In this paper we apply these novel
techniques emerging from nonlinear physics and nonlinear signal processing
for inferring submesoscale resolution maps of the air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and
associated sinks and sources from available remotely sensed data. We use this
methodology to derive cross-scale inference according to the effective
cascade description of an intensive variable, through a fusion process
between appropriate physical variables which account for the flux exchanges
between the ocean and the atmosphere. This approach is not only very novel in
signal processing, but also connects the statistical descriptions of acquired
data with their physical content. This makes the approach useful to
reconstruct all GHGs.</p>
      <p>Unlike the Lagrangian approach to reconstruct tracer maps at high resolution
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.27"/>, our methodology works in the Eulerian framework and we do
not need to know the trajectories of oceanic tracer particles, but only high-resolution instantaneous maps of tracers which can be directly obtained from
remote sensing.</p>
      <p>The eastern boundary upwelling systems (EBUSs) and oxygen minimum zones
(OMZs) are likely to contribute significantly to the gas exchange between the
ocean and the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.28"/>. The
Benguela upwelling system, the region of interest in this study, is one of
the highest productivity areas in the world ocean and may contribute
significantly to the global air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux. Some studies using data
from in situ samples have found the region of Benguela to be an annual sink
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with uptakes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.70 (in 1995 and 1996) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.02 Mt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2005 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.29"/>,
with a strong variability between 2005 and 2006 from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.17 to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.24 mol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per year, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
      <p>This paper is organized as follows: Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the
data sets used as input in our algorithm. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> describes the methodology used through the study. Statistical
description of the input data sets is presented in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>. Results of the inference method are given in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> by providing outputs of our algorithm, then
evaluating the various satellite products and assessing the performance of
the method using in situ measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data</title>
      <p>The input data combines air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes at low resolution and
satellite ocean data at high resolution. To validate the method we use in
situ measurements of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Input data: air--sea CO${}_{{2}}$ fluxes at low resolution}?><title>Input data: air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes at low resolution</title>
      <p>It is known that the evolution of a concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the atmosphere is
given by the advection–reaction–diffusion equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with the wind field <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the density of the air <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the turbulent
diffusivity tensor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the chemical reaction rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the net
flux at the air–sea interface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.31"/>. Using
optimal control and inverse problem modeling, a map of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be derived
using Earth observation data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.32"/>. It would be ideal if
we could use data of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from space measured
by satellite sensors such as SCIAMACHY (SCanning Imaging Absorption
SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY) aboard ENVISAT (Environmental
Satellite), in orbit since 2002, and GOSAT (Greenhouse gases Observing
SATellite), in orbit since January 2009, to derive the air–sea flux. However
SCIAMACHY and GOSAT sampling is not dense enough, with very suboptimal
sampling of the Benguela upwelling system. This led us to use data of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from CarbonTracker
(<uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/carbontracker/</uri>) at spatial
resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.33"/>.
CarbonTracker system assimilates and integrates a diversity of atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data into a computation of surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, using a
state-of-the-art atmospheric transport model and an ensemble Kalman filter.</p>
      <p>We obtain the partial pressure of ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by using the equation of the
net flux in the air–sea interface:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ocean</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas solubility, which depends on sea surface temperature (SST) and sea surface
salinity (SSS), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the gas transfer velocity, is a function of wind,
salinity, temperature, and sea state, which can be obtained from satellite data.
To estimate the gas transfer velocity we use well-accepted relationships
for the transfer velocity in air–sea gas exchange from wind speed, the
parameterization developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.34"/>. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas solubility
is derived according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.35"/>. Input data for SST are derived
from OSTIA (Operational SST and Sea Ice Analysis system) product, SSS are
derived from LEGOS (Laboratoire d'Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie
Spatiales) product compiled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.36"/> and winds from Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform Ocean surface winds from JPL (Jet Propulsion
Laboratory) PO.DAAC (Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center,
<uri>http://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/</uri>). We assume <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to be constant in the domain of study, and it is derived from the
Globalview-CO2 product of the Cooperative Atmospheric Data Integration
Project coordinated by Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases Group
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.37"/> (<uri>www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/globalview/</uri>). We use
values taken at the closest sea-level station to the Benguela, located at
Ascension Island (7.97<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 14.40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) as our reference
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The partial pressure of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined from its
mole fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), using the following equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.38"/>:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total pressure of
the mixture. We assume this pressure to be close to 1 atm for the conversion
following ORNL/CDIAC 105 report (program developed for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> systems
calculation).</p>
      <p>The raw data of CarbonTracker fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the area of interest are
strongly binned and exhibit strong gradients across those bins. This turns
out to be suboptimal for our super-resolution approach.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.39"/> developed an optimal control approach to
invert interfacial fluxes using a simplified inverse problem of atmospheric
transport. The inverse problem is solved using the Galerkin finite element
method and the dual weighted residual (DWR) method for goal-oriented mesh
optimization. An adaptation of this approach has been applied to the
CarbonTracker data set. However, the estimations are expensive and computing
results for all the time frames of interest was infeasible. Therefore, an
anisotropic diffusion-based approach has been applied to the raw fluxes of
the CarbonTracker data set. The diffusion is steered by the direction of the
low-altitude wind field. The results thus retain the structure of the
CarbonTracker fluxes very well while suppressing artifacts. Examples of this
process are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Results are
comparable to the physically more accurate approach of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.40"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Input data: satellite ocean data at high resolution</title>
      <p>Oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a complex signal depending, at any spatial resolution,
on sea surface temperature, salinity, chlorophyll concentration, dissolved
inorganic carbon, alkalinity and nutrient concentrations. Both the
biological pump, with chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a proxy, and the physical pump, driven
by the temperature and salinity (e.g., solubility, water mass), govern the
evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface ocean.</p>
      <p>We use here the high-resolution satellite ocean data for chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a
proxy for the biological carbon pump and for SST,
as a proxy for the thermodynamical pump, (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> for more details on the connection of
these oceanic variables).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Estimated fluxes from CarbonTracker data. Shown are the results on
the Benguela upwelling system on 23 March 2006. Left are the CarbonTracker
fluxes, right are our results.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Chlorophyll~$a$ (Chl~$a$) from ocean color (OC)}?><title>Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from ocean color (OC)</title>
      <p>In this study we use Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from two different ocean color
products: MERIS and GLOBCOLOUR. MERIS (MEdium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer
Instrument) is on board the ENVISAT satellite and provides daily maps of
ocean color at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 km). Ocean color from GLOBCOLOUR
product is obtained by merging data provided by MODIS (MODerate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer), MERIS and SeaWiFS (Sea-viewing
Wide Field-of-view Sensor) instruments. The Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration is provided daily and at the spatial resolution equal to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 km). Ocean color data have been regridded at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by linear interpolation. GLOBCOLOUR products are generated
using different merging methods (see the GLOBCOLOUR Product User Guide
document in <uri>http://www.globcolour.info/CDR_Docs/GlobCOLOUR_PUG.pdf</uri>):
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p><italic>Averaging from single-instrument Chl a concentration</italic>. In this case
CHL1 daily level 3 (L3) products are generated for each instrument using the
corresponding L2 data. At the beginning of the averaging process, an
inter-calibration correction is applied to the MODIS and SeaWiFS CHL1 daily L3 products in order to get compatible
concentrations with respect to the MERIS sensor. The merged CHL1
concentration is then computed as the average of the MERIS, MODIS and SeaWiFS
quantities, both as an <italic>arithmetic mean</italic> or a <italic>weighted average value (AVW)</italic>. In the AVW method, values of CHL1 are weighted by the
relative error for each sensor on the results of the simple averaging.</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Garver–Siegel–Maritorena model (GSM)</italic>. In this method single-instrument daily L3 fully normalized water leaving radiances (individually
computed for each band) and their associated error bars are used by the GSM
model. These radiances are not inter-calibrated before incorporation in the
model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for more details</named-content></xref>.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>Snapshots of both Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fields derived from MERIS and GSM GLOBCOLOUR
corresponding to 21 September 2006 are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a and
b, respectively. This example shows the clear difference in the remote
sensing coverage between the two products. The merged GLOBCOLOUR product
yields a more covered Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> field than the one obtained from MERIS. The merging
algorithm in the GLOBCOLOUR product tends to decrease the missing points induced
by clouds for each individual instrument.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Snapshot of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fields corresponding to 21 September 2006,
regridded at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of spatial resolution from MERIS <bold>(a)</bold>
and GSM GLOBCOLOUR <bold>(b)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are the
spatial distribution of singularity exponents of the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plotted in
<bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Snapshot of SST fields corresponding to 21 September 2006 regridded
at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of spatial resolution from OSTIA <bold>(a)</bold> and MODIS
<bold>(b)</bold>. <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are the spatial distribution of
singularity exponents of the SST plotted in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>,
respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Sea surface temperature (SST)</title>
      <p>We use SST derived from OSTIA and MODIS products. OSTIA (Operational SST and
Sea Ice Analysis system) is a new analysis of SST that uses satellite data
provided by the GHRSST (Group for High Resolution SST) project, together with
in situ observations, to determine the SST with a global coverage and without
gaps in data. The data sets are produced daily and at spatial resolution of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 km) performing a multi-scale optimal
interpolation using correlation length scales from 10 to 100 km  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.42"><named-content content-type="pre">more
details in</named-content></xref>. The other SST product used in this study is
derived from MODIS (MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) sensors
carried on board the Aqua satellite since December 2002. This SST product is
derived from the MODIS mid-infrared (IR) and thermal IR channels and is
available in various spatial and temporal resolutions. We use Level-3 daily
maps of SST at the spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 km)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.43"/>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and b, we show one snapshot of
SST from OSTIA and MODIS, respectively corresponding to the same day on
21 September 2006. In the case of OSTIA products, the SST field is fully
covered with points while for MODIS products there are gaps due to cloudiness.
On other hand, MODIS product offers a more detailed visualization of the
small structures. All SST data have been regridded at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
bilinear interpolation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Validation data: in situ measurements</title>
      <p>Among the available data in SOCAT version 2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.44"/> (Surface Ocean
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas, <uri>http://www.socat.info</uri>) over the 2000–2010 period in
our region of interest, we find the following cruises with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>2000, one cruise: ANT-18-1</p></list-item><list-item><p>2004, one cruise: 0404SFC-PRT</p></list-item><list-item><p>2005, five cruises: QUIMA2005-0804, QUIMA2005-0821, QUIMA2005-0922, QUIMA2005-1202, QUIMA2005-1220</p></list-item><list-item><p>2006, nine cruises: GALATHEA, QUIMA2006-0326, QUIMA2006-0426, QUIMA2006-0514,
QUIMA2006-0803, QUIMA2006-0821, QUIMA2006-0921, QUIMA2006-1013, QUIMA2006-1124</p></list-item><list-item><p>2008, seven VOS cruises: QUIMA2008-1, QUIMA2008-2, QUIMA2008-3, QUIMA2008-4,
QUIMA2008-5, QUIMA2008-6, QUIMA2008-7</p></list-item><list-item><p>2010, one cruise: ANT27-1</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>The small number of cruises found in 1 decade (24 cruises) shows that the
scarcity of cruises in the Benguela region is a fact. This indeed demonstrates
the crucial need of developing a robust method to infer high-resolution
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from space. Moreover for some of these cruises, for instance, the
track of GALATHEA cruise is too close to the coast and is out of the original
CarbonTracker domain. Due to this restriction we only document the offshore
conditions of this upwelling system. Owing to the relatively large number of
cruises during 2005, 2006 and 2008 (a total of 20 cruises, representing
83 % of all available cruise data from 2000 through 2010), in this
validation, we focus the analysis on the set of QUIMA-cruises during 2005
(QUIMA2005), 2006 (QUIMA2006) and 2008 (QUIMA2008) and we present the global
analysis using all available cruises during these 3 years.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.45"/> analyzed this data to study the sea surface
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air–sea fluxes in the offshore Benguela
upwelling system between 2005 and 2006 (for each month from July 2005 up to
November 2006) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.46"/> extended the study including
cruises data from 2007 to 2008. The QUIMA line crosses the region between 5
and 35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, with all the cruises following the same track.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Method</title>
      <p>The idea behind the methodology hinges on the fundamental discovery of a
simple functional dependency between the transitions – those being measured
by the dimensionless values of the singularity exponents computed within the
framework of the microcanonical multifractal formalism – of the respective
physical variables under study: SST, ocean color and oceanic partial pressure
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). With that functional dependency being adequately fitted into a
linear regression model, it becomes possible to compute, at any given time, a
precise evaluation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> singularity exponents using SST, ocean color
and low resolution acquired <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Once these singularity exponents are
computed, they generate a multi-resolution analysis from which low-resolution
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be cross-scale-inferred to generate a high-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
product. In this study we choose SST and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and not other variables
such as sea surface height, because we focus on the use of physical variables
which are correlated spatially and temporally to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and that can be
obtained from satellite at high resolution.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Singularity exponents and the multifractal hierarchy of turbulence</title>
      <p>In the ocean, the turbulence causes the formation of unsteady eddies on many scales
which interact with each other <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.47"/>. Most of the kinetic energy of the
turbulent motion is contained in the large-scale structures. The energy cascades
from the large-scale structures to smaller-scale structures by an inertial and
essentially inviscid mechanism. This process continues, creating smaller and smaller
structures which produces a hierarchy of eddies.
Moreover, the ocean is a system displaying scale-invariant behavior,
that is, the correlations of variables do not change when we zoom in
or we zoom out the system, and can be represented by power laws in particular, with the
scaling exponents <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>It can be shown that the scaling exponents are the values taken on by
localized singularity exponents, which can be computed at high precision in
the acquired data using the microcanonical multifractal formalism. Hence,
within that framework, the multifractal hierarchy of turbulence, defined by a
continuum of sets (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indexed by scaling exponents
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), is obtained as the level sets of the geometrically localized
singularity exponents.</p>
      <p>We will not review here the details of the computation of the singularity
exponents <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leaving the reader to consult references
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.48"/> for an effective
description of an algorithm able to compute the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at every point <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
in a signal's domain.</p>
      <p>Some examples of the singularity exponents of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and SST images for the
different products described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> are shown in
Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d,
respectively. As compared to the corresponding images of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and SST
shown
in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b, one
can see the ability of the singularity exponents to unveil the cascade
structures arisen by tracer-gradient variances hidden in satellite images.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Functional dependencies between the singularity exponents of intensive physical variables</title>
      <p>Another important idea implemented in the methodology is the coupling of the
physical information contained in SST and OC images with the ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
For instance, it is known that marine primary production is a key process in
oceanic carbon cycling, and variations in the concentration of
phytoplankton biomass can be related to variations in carbon
concentrations. Surface temperature is also related to gas solubility in
the ocean, and areas with high temperatures are more suitable for releasing
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere. We have studied the relationship of SST and
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> variables with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using the outputs of a coupled Regional
Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with the BIOgeochemical model of the Eastern
Boundary Upwelling System (BIOEBUS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.49"/>. The ROMS includes
several levels of nesting and composed grids, which makes it an ideal model
for the basis of our methodology in working in two spatial resolutions.
BIOEBUS has been developed for the Benguela to simulate the first trophic
levels of the Benguela ecosystem functioning and also to include a more
detailed description of the complete nitrogen cycle, including
denitrification and anammox processes as well as the oxygen cycle and the
carbonate system. This model coupled to ROMS has been also shown to be
skillful in simulating many aspects of the biogeochemical environment in the
Peru upwelling system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.50"/>. When one compares SST and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> one finds undetermined functional dependency. However, when
comparing their corresponding singularity exponents one obtains a clear
simpler dependency. This is due to the fact that SST, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are
variables of different dimensions while singularity exponents are
dimensionless quantities. These results show that there is a good correlation
between the turbulent transitions given by the singularity exponents and that
singularity exponents are good candidates for a multi-resolution analysis
performed on the three signals, SST, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, the
log-histograms and singularity spectrum show that singularity exponents of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> images possess a multifractal character. Therefore, such signals
are expected to feature cascading, multiscale and other characteristic
properties found in turbulent signals as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.51"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.52"/>. Consequently the use of nonlinear and multiscale signal
processing techniques is justified to assess the properties of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
signal along the scales.</p>
      <p>Therefore, in our methodology, the local connection between different tracer
concentrations (SST and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is performed in order to
obtain a proxy for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at high resolution by using the following linear
combination of multiple linear regressions:

                <disp-formula specific-use="eqnarray" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SST</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Chl</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>LR</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the singularity exponent of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SST</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to singularity exponent of
SST at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to singularity exponent of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
signal at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In order to propagate the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signal itself along the
scales in the multi-resolution analysis we introduce
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>LR</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to refer to the singularity exponent
from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at low resolution interpolated on the high-resolution grid.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the regression coefficients associated with
singularity exponents, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the error associated with the
multiple-linear regression. These regression coefficients are estimated using
simulated data from the ROMS-BIOEBUS model developed for the Benguela
upwelling system and described above.</p>
      <p>Once we have introduced these coefficients in the linear combination on
satellite data, we obtain a proxy for singularity exponents of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
high resolution and we can perform the multi-resolution analysis to infer the
information across the scales.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Cross-scale inference of $p$CO${}_{2}$ data}?><title>Cross-scale inference of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data</title>
      <p>Among the functionals that are most commonly used for analyzing the scaling
properties of multifractal systems, wavelets occupy a prominent position.
Wavelets projections are integral transforms that separate the relevant
details of a signal at different scale levels, and since they are
scale-tunable, they are appropriate for analyzing the multiscale behavior of
cascade processes and for representing them. However, as shown in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.53"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.54"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.55"/>, not all
multi-resolution analyses are equivalent; the most interesting are those
which are optimal for inferring information along scales, in particular, in a
context where information is to be propagated along the scales from low
resolution to high resolution.</p>
      <p>The effective determination of an optimal wavelet for a given category of
turbulent signals is, in general, a very difficult open problem. This
difficulty can be contoured by considering multi-resolution analysis
performed on the signal of the singularity exponents <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> themselves.
Indeed, since the most singular manifold (the set <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">F</mml:mtext><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated
with the lowest singularity exponents) is associated with the highest
frequencies in a turbulent signal, and since the multifractal hierarchy
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">F</mml:mtext><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converges to this set, it is physically evident that the
multifractal hierarchy corresponds to a description of the detail spaces of a
multi-resolution analysis performed on a turbulent signal. Consequently,
designating the approximation and detail spaces computed on the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext mathvariant="monospace">S</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
and their corresponding orthogonal projections from space <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reconstruction formula,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          consists of reconstructing a signal across the scales using the detail spaces
of the singularity exponents and hence re-generating a physical variable
according to its cascade decomposition. From these ideas, which are described
more fully in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.56"/>, we can deduce the following
algorithm for reconstructing a super-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signal from
available high-resolution SST, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and low-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>(i)</label><p>After selecting a given area of study, compute the singularity exponents of SST, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
low and high resolution from ROMS-BIOEBUS output. This is done once and then they can be used for every
computation performed over the same area.</p></list-item><list-item><label>(ii)</label><p>Using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) estimate ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at low resolution: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ocean</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: air–sea surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes provided by CarbonTracker
product;</p></list-item><list-item><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: gas transfer velocity obtained by the parameterization
developed by Sweeney et al, 2007, as a function of the wind.</p></list-item><list-item><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: gas solubility derived according to Weiss (1974);</p></list-item><list-item><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:  provided by Globalview-CO2 product.</p></list-item></list></p></list-item><list-item><label>(iii)</label><p>Obtain the regression coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) for the singularity
exponents obtained in step (ii).</p></list-item><list-item><label>(iv)</label><p>Calculate the singularity exponents of available satellite SST, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at high resolution
and ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at low resolution (step i).</p></list-item><list-item><label>(v)</label><p>Use coefficients obtained in step (iii) and apply Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) to the singularity exponents from satellite
data (step iv) to estimate a proxy of singularity exponents of high-resolution ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <monospace>S</monospace>(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></list-item><list-item><label>(vi)</label><p>Using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), reconstruct <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at high resolution from the multi-resolution analysis computed on
signal <monospace>S</monospace>(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and cross-scale inference on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at low resolution.</p></list-item><list-item><label>(vii)</label><p>Use Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) to calculate air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained in step
(vi).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>The methodology has been successfully applied to dual ROMS simulation data at
two resolutions, obtaining a mean absolute error of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstructed
values with respect to ROMS simulated high-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> equal to
3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm (0.89 % of relative error) (V. Garçon, personal
communication, 2014).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Preliminary analysis of sea surface temperature (SST) and chlorophyll~$a$ images}?><title>Preliminary analysis of sea surface temperature (SST) and chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> images</title>
      <p>Since the key element for the application of our inferring algorithm relies
on the ability to obtain the singularity exponents and their quality, the
success of our methodology applied to satellite data depends on the quality
and the properties of the input data. In order to assess such properties, we
perform a statistical analysis of the different data sets. First, we analyze
the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and SST probability distribution functions (PDFs). In
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a we present the PDFs for Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from MERIS,
GLOBCOLOUR-GSM and GLOBCOLOUR-AVW; the required histograms are built using
daily Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values over 2006 and 2008 at each point of the spatial grid in the
area of Benguela. Each one of these PDFs is broad and asymmetric, with a
small mode (i.e., the value of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at which the probability reaches its
maximum) between 0.1 and 0.2 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a heavy tail. The heavy tail
(i.e., non-Gaussianity) means that the extreme values can not be neglected. In
this case Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are mostly low (small mode) but there is a significant
number of isolated and dispersed patches with very high Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values producing
intermittency (long tails in the PDF). Intermittency in the context of
turbulence is the tendency of the probability distributions of some
quantities to develop long tails, i.e., the occurrence of very extreme events.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Probability distribution functions (PDF) of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values derived from the three products: MERIS, GLOBCOLOUR-AVW and
GLOBCOLOUR-GSM. <bold>(b)</bold> PDF of SST values for OSTIA and MODIS products.
<bold>(c)</bold> PDFs for the singularity exponents of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the different
ocean color products. <bold>(d)</bold> PDFs for the singularity exponents of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
for the different SST products. <bold>(e)</bold> Singularity spectra
corresponding to <bold>(c)</bold>. <bold>(f)</bold> Singularity spectra corresponding
to <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Further information can be obtained by computing statistical quantities such
as standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>
shows that standard deviation is rather the same for the three OC products
while skewness and kurtosis values differ greatly. The degree of intermittency
is measured by the kurtosis, the higher the kurtosis, the higher the
intermittency. We found that kurtosis is almost 10 times higher in the
GLOBCOLOUR products than in MERIS.</p>
      <p>We have repeated the same analysis for SST data sets. The PDFs of the SST
values for OSTIA and MODIS products are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b.
In this case both PDFs possess similar shape, broad with the mode around
18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with a much less deviation from Gaussianity as compared to Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values. This is confirmed with the computation of the statistical moments
shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. We obtain small values of the standard
deviation and kurtosis in both cases, although slightly higher in the case of
MODIS. The kurtosis is less than 3, meaning that there is not an important
number of atypical values of SST and therefore weak and short tails in the
PDFs.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Values of the standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis for the
different products.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PRODUCT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Standard</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Skewness</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Kurtosis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">deviation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MERIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.116 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLOBCOLOUR-AVW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.122 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">204.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLOBCOLOUR-GSM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.123 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">215.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OSTIA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.97<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">-0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.11<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">-0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>If turbulence is dominated by coherent structures localized in space and
time, then PDFs are non-Gaussian, and the kurtosis will be higher than 3. To
analyze this feature we turn to the statistical analysis of the singularity
exponents, which, as explained before, have the ability to unveil the cascade
structures given by the tracer gradients. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c, it
can be seen that the PDFs of the singularity exponents of the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
three products are rather similar with almost the same standard deviation and
with a slightly higher value of the kurtosis in the GLOBCOLOUR-GSM product,
4.3, than for MERIS, 3.1, and GLOBCOLOUR-AVW, 3.1, (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). This shows that Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from GLOBCOLOUR-GSM product
contains more extreme values which produce intermittency likely given by the
strongest structures. The PDFs of the singularity exponents of the SST for
OSTIA is narrower and with a highest peak than for MODIS SST. However,
surprisingly the kurtosis is larger for singularity exponents of OSTIA SST,
5.1 than for MODIS SST, 3.2.</p>
      <p>Finally, we obtain the singularity spectra from the empirical distributions
of singularity exponents shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c and d. One can
see in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>e that for the two GLOBCOLOUR products the
shape of the spectrum is closer to binomial cascade of multiplicative
processes than for MERIS. This is discussed in more depth in the next
sections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Inference of super-resolution $p$CO${}_{2}$ and air--sea fluxes of CO${}_{{2}}$ offshore the Benguela upwelling system}?><title>Inference of super-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and air–sea fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> offshore the Benguela upwelling system</title>
      <p>We now apply the methodology to infer ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> maps at super resolution from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at low resolution derived from CarbonTracker
data (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>) in the offshore area of the Benguela
region.</p>
      <p>Henceforward we use the following notation for the three different sources of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: we refer to the values of ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from
CarbonTracker as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, values of inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
higher resolution from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at low resolution together with computation
of the cascade onto SST and chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and finally <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the
values of the in situ measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Values of the standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of the
singularity exponents for the different products.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PRODUCT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Standard</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Skewness</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Kurtosis</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">deviation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MERIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLOBCOLOUR-AVW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.36 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLOBCOLOUR-GSM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OSTIA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.29<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.32<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>For the inference we use the following three combinations of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and SST
products described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>: MERIS-OSTIA,
GLOBCOLOUR-OSTIA, GLOBCOLOUR-MODIS. We do not include the MERIS-MODIS
combination in the analysis due to the fact that the use of such satellite
data results in a too drastic reduction of the coverage of the resulting
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field, but using merged products offers wider
coverage instead. The inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from two merged products
for Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, GLOBCOLOUR GSM and GLOBCOLOUR AVW is very similar, with a
slight improvement when GSM is used. Thus for the sake of clarity, we only
show figures for GLOBCOLOUR-GSM and some statistical results making
comparisons with AVW. Therefore from now on we use GLOBCOLOUR to refer to the
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained with the GSM merged method.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d shows one example of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
field corresponding to 22 March 2006, when we use SST data from OSTIA
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a), ocean color from GLOBCOLOUR
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) at high resolution and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at low resolution
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c) derived from CarbonTracker air–sea flux of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e) and using the Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). The
air–sea flux of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at super resolution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f) is
obtained from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field and a constant value of
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> equal to 385.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm. On this day the images
of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> combine to give good coverage
and clear identification of small-scale structures and gradients, as
described below. Note that the air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux from CarbonTracker
presents a large land mask close to the coast and consequently, we
study the offshore area of the Benguela upwelling. Comparing the figures one
can see that values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux over the domain (from
4.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E to coast (taking out the mask of the CarbonTracker domain and
from 20.5 to 35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) vary between 360 and 380 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm and
between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol
C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The resultant flux of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
positive (towards the atmosphere) in the region 25–28<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and from
7<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E eastward to the coast and is negative (into the ocean) south of
30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and east of 6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. Thus, we see that in the southern
part offshore the Benguela area there is a strong CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sink and the
northern part behaves as a weak CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Maps of <bold>(a)</bold> SST from OSTIA at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of spatial
resolution, <bold>(b)</bold> Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of spatial resolution
from GSM GLOBCOLOUR products, <bold>(c)</bold> ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from CarbonTracker
at the spatial resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at
super resolution (4 km, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) derived from OSTIA SST and
GLOBCOLOUR-GSM Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, respectively,
<bold>(e)</bold> Air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux as derived from CarbonTracker and
<bold>(f)</bold> Air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux computed from super-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
shown in <bold>(d)</bold> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All images correspond to
22 March 2006. White color corresponds to invalid pixels due to cloudiness
and points inside of the CarbonTracker land mask.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>What is new in the reconstructed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is, for instance, that the cascade
of information across the scales enhances gradients in the field of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is striking that the high-resolution map provides the position
of the north–south dipole “front” located at 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> isoline in green) which could not be inferred
accurately from the low-resolution map. The low-resolution map provides
an estimate of the location of the “front” that is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
north of the location inferred from the high-resolution map. Moreover one
can see small structures in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field at
33–35<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 9–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
field (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d). The small spatial scale variability is
captured in the super-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field and not in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as shown in the longitudinal profile of the images
plotted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> at latitude 33.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The same high spatial variability given by the
small-scale structures of the SST and OC images can be seen in their
corresponding longitudinal profiles displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b. It is worth noting the change in the shape of
the profiles between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at large scale, from
5.5–10.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, showing that the method not only introduces small-scale features but also modifies the large-scale spatial variability.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Longitudinal profiles of <bold>(a)</bold> SST from OSTIA products in
units of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <bold>(b)</bold> Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from GLOBCOLOUR-GSM ocean in
mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black line) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red line) in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm, and <bold>(d)</bold>
air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from CarbonTracker (black line) and inferred air–sea
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (red line) in mol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. All these
longitudinal profiles correspond to the fixed latitude equal to
33.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S of the plots shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> for
22 March 2006.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Map of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field at low resolution from
CarbonTracker. Reconstructed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field at super resolution using
<bold>(b)</bold> OSTIA SST and MERIS Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> OSTIA SST and
GSM-GLOBCOLOUR Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(d)</bold> MODIS SST and GSM-GLOBCOLOUR Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
All maps correspond to 21 September 2006.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Evaluation of using different satellite products</title>
      <p>Since the underlying aim of this work is to develop a methodology to infer
super-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from space using remote observations, we perform a
validation study of the different data used in the inferring computations.
This provides us an evaluation where satellite products are more suitable
for our methodology and thus gives confidence to our method as well as a
better understanding of its limitations. The evaluation analysis is addressed
taking into account two main concerns: one related to the number of valid
points yielded in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field, and another with regard
to the degradation of the information contained in the transition fronts. A
valid point is a pixel where we have simultaneous Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, SST and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values from CarbonTracker, from which we can obtain a value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in other words without missing information. One
example comparing the reconstructed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field obtained from the
above-mentioned product combinations is plotted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>.
The general pattern is quite similar in all of them with some differences in
the details of the small scales and in the missing points due to cloudiness
(white patches). This example clearly shows how different coverage of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be in the field depending on the product combination.</p>
      <p>Similar results are found when one compares the spatial distribution of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values to the time averages over 2006 and 2008 for
the three product combinations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). The same pattern
with an area of higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 24 and 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and lower
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values outside this region is produced with the three combinations.
The most noticeable differences are located in the most northern region and
in the southeastern region off Benguela. This can be quantified by computing
the standard deviation of the reconstructed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values among the
different combination of data sets. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d shows the
spatial distribution of the time average over 2006 and 2008 of the standard
deviation computed in each pixel among the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
obtained from the three product combinations. The larger values of the
dispersion (not greater than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) are found in the area between
the latitudes of 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 23<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S – and in the southern
region, in particular, between the latitudes of 31.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
35.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S – and between the longitudes of 11<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and
13.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. The low value of the dispersion indicates that the method
is robust when different data sets are used in the
inference.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of the time averages of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values over the years 2006 and 2008 using
<bold>(a)</bold> OSTIA SST and MERIS Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> OSTIA SST and
GSM-GLOBCOLOUR Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(c)</bold> MODIS SST and GSM-GLOBCOLOUR Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<bold>(d)</bold> Map with spatial distribution of the standard deviation for the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among the different combination of the data sets.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Number of valid points in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fields and their difference
between the three combinations of MERIS or GLOBCOLOUR Chl with OSTIA or MODIS
SST in the area of Benguela.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">Valid points in the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fields: 2006/2008 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. total pixels domain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">55 711 378</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. points OSTIA-MERIS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9800 776</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. points OSTIA-GLOBCOLOUR(AVW)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26 382 072</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. points OSTIA-GLOBCOLOUR(GSM)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27 313 043</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. points MODIS-GLOBCOLOUR(GSM)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 397 047</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OSTIA-GSM/OSTIA-MERIS ratio</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.78</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OSTIA-GSM/MODIS-GSM ratio</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS-GSM-/OSTIA-MERIS ratio</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>OM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">82 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>OG</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(AVW)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>OG</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>(GSM)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">63 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Comparison of the probability distribution functions of
CarbonTracker and inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values over the Benguela area for the
three different SST and OC product combinations: MERIS
Chl and OSTIA SST, GLOBCOLOUR merged Chl and
OSTIA SST, and GLOBCOLOUR merged Chl and MODIS SST.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>First, we compute the number of valid points in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
field for each product combination. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> summarizes
the total number of valid points for each product combination for both years
2006 and 2008. As expected, the number of valid points is found to be the
highest for the combination of merged products OSTIA SST and GLOBCOLOUR-GSM,
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>GO</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>27 313 043</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> points, followed by the combination MODIS SST
and GLOBCOLOUR Chl with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MG</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>20 397 047</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> points and finally by the
OSTIA SST and MERIS Chl combination with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>OM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>98 00 776</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> points.
Looking at the different proportions, we find that the number of valid points
is 2.78 times larger when using the merged products OSTIA and GLOBCOLOUR-GSM
than using OSTIA and MERIS, 1.33 times larger than using MODIS and
GLOBCOLOUR-GSM and 1.08 times larger using OSTIA SST and GSM Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> than
using MODIS SST and GSM Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, if we know that the total
number of pixels in the domain taking out the points of the CarbonTracker
mask and for the 2 years is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>55 711 378</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, one can estimate the
loss of valid points for each combination, LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is computed by
taking the relative difference between the number of total available pixels
in the domain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the number of points in the inferred
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field obtained for each product combination, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and dividing
it by the total number of pixels <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Here the subscript
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the product combination (e.g., LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>OM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>OG</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>MG</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the loss of valid points with the
OSTIA-MERIS, OSTIA-GLOBCOLOUR and MODIS-GLOBCOLOUR product combinations,
respectively). The loss of valid points due to cloudiness in the ocean color
and SST images is less severe for the OSTIA-GLOBCOLOUR combination, with a
loss of 51 %, and is more affected by the cloudiness the OSTIA-MERIS
combination with a loss of 82 %.</p>
      <p>Next we explore the quality of the information contained in the transition
fronts, in particular, in the non-merged products such as MERIS OC and MODIS
SST as compared to the merged products: GLOBCOLOUR OC and OSTIA SST. The PDFs
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values from CarbonTracker and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
for the three combinations of OC and SST products, i.e., MERIS-OSTIA,
GLOBCOLOUR-OSTIA, MODIS-GLOBCOLOUR (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) show
that there is a good correspondence of all <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
with those from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed the histograms show also a
better agreement between merged products and CarbonTracker: the peak of the
PDF for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is closer to the CarbonTracker peak in the case
of OSTIA and GLOBCOLOUR than when using MERIS and MODIS products.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Empirical PDFs for the singularity exponents of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fields from CarbonTracker and from the cascade of the three product
combinations. <bold>(b)</bold> Associated singularity spectra. In these
computations we use all the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained in 2006 and 2008.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Furthermore, to examine the transition fronts for the different products, we
compute the singularity spectra for the three product combinations (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). At low values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (singularity exponent),
related to the most singular manifolds, the shape of singularity spectrum for
inferred data from merged products better matches a binomial cascade, with an
improved description of the dimension of the sharpest transition fronts. We
know from the theory that tracers advected by the flow in the turbulent
regime, as happens in the ocean, shows multifractal behavior with a
characteristic singularity spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is similar, for some types of
turbulence, to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the binomial multiplicative process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Validation with in situ measurements</title>
      <p>Next, we perform a validation analysis of the results of our super-resolution
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm with field observations of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. We perform
the validation using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ocean data from in situ measurements
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) taken in the Benguela region (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). We decided to carry out the validation
directly on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rather than on the air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux since the
field measurements provide oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data.</p>
      <p>An example of the qualitative comparison of values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all the product
combinations and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the intersections of the QUIMA
cruise during 4–7 July 2008, as a function of the longitudinal coordinate of
the intersections, is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. While there
are visible differences between various <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values, the values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approximate better <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
than those of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The small-scale patterns are well
reproduced in the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field. Values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit gradients and small-scale fluctuations,
likely induced by the presence of fronts, which can be also detected in the
profile of the in situ measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most days
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values overestimate
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. On some days, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values follow the same trend, with the same small-scale fluctuations as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black points),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MODIS-SST/GLOBCOLOUR Chl) (red points),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (OSTIA-SST/GLOBCOLOUR Chl) (blue points)
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (OSTIA-SST/MERIS Chl) (yellow points) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green points) as a function of latitude
corresponding to the valid intersections during the QUIMA cruise through
4–6 July 2008.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/5229/2015/bg-12-5229-2015-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>First, we analyze the number of valid intersections for each product
combination. A valid intersection is a placement in space and time common to
the inferred, CarbonTracker and in situ <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, without missing values.
Among the 20 available cruises in the Benguela during 2005, 2006 and 2008, we
find that the total number of in situ measurements in the Benguela region
under study is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>17 355</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and within the CarbonTracker
domain this number is reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8377</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. To
estimate the loss of valid intersections due to the land mask of the
CarbonTracker, we compute the relative difference of the number of
intersections between the cruise trajectories and the CarbonTracker domain
with respect to the number of the in situ measurements,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Crack</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>100 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 %,
showing that half of the measurements fall within the coastal region of the
Benguela (land masked by CarbonTracker).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><caption><p>Mean difference, absolute error and relative error of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values obtained from CarbonTracker and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values inferred at super
resolution with respect to values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements during the
QUIMA2005/QUIMA2006/QUIMA2008 cruises in the Benguela region.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OST-MER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OST-GLOB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MOD-GLOB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. valid intersections</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">747</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1928</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1460</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.059</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.060</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.061</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.048</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.045</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.046</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The number of valid intersections is the largest with the OSTIA-GLOBCOLOUR
combination (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). To quantify the loss of
valid intersections between the in situ measurements and points in the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>infer</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field, likely due to cloudiness, we compute the
relative difference between the number of measurements in the CarbonTracker
domain and the valid points in the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field with respect to
the number of intersections measurements of each cruise and the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>Ctrack</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>100 %.
We repeat such a computation for the three product combinations. The
percentage of losses of intersections in inferred field <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
becomes twice as large than in the case of the OSTIA-SST and MERIS Chl
combination, and even higher than with the CarbonTracker domain mask.</p>
      <p>In order to quantitatively study the difference between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as well as the
difference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements, we compute the following statistical quantities:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p><italic>Mean difference (MD)</italic>: average of all the intersections of the difference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as well as the difference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at the same intersection, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,<disp-formula specific-use="eqnarray" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ctrack</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>MD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>infer</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p><p>where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of intersections.</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Mean absolute error (AE)</italic>: average of all the intersections of the absolute values of
the difference between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the same intersection,<disp-formula specific-use="eqnarray" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ctrack</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>infer</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Mean relative error (RE)</italic>: average of all the intersections of the errors of the
estimated values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (CarbonTracker or inferred) with respect to the
reference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values (in situ) at the same intersection,<disp-formula specific-use="eqnarray" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ctrack</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>infer</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>insitu</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>We started the statistical validation by analyzing each QUIMA cruise
separately (not shown) and we found that in most of the cruises, the absolute
error for inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively small (less than
15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) except on 21 August 2006 and 17 May 2008, with an error of
44 and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm, respectively. Then we address the global validation
using all available cruises during these years.</p>
      <p>We summarize in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> the results of the
computations of the errors given by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>–<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>)
by taking averages of all valid intersections found during 2005, 2006 and
2008. The absolute error, AE is smaller in the three cases of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (17.77, 16.47 and 16.62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm for
OSTIA-MERIS, OSTIA-GLOBCOLOUR and MODIS-GLOBCOLOUR combinations,
respectively) than for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (21.34, 22.08 and
22.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm, respectively), showing that the estimated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
field at super resolution using our algorithm is improving the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
field obtained from CarbonTracker. The smallest AE is for the combination
of SST and Chl provided by merged products. The values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are, on average, larger than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 8.83 and
14.93 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) while the differences between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values compensate each other
(MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 3.42 and 8.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm). In all cases the
MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are positive, meaning that the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are overestimated. Finally, comparing the relative error of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insitu</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we found that the relative error is low in all
cases, smaller for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Finally, if we only compare the statistical errors at the common valid
intersections between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the three product
combinations with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and with the in situ measurements
(see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>), we obtain 458 mutual intersections.
We obtain similar results when taking into account all the intersections. The
absolute error is smaller in the case of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(17.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) than with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (20.24
 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm), indicating that our algorithm improves the estimation of
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The smallest AE is again for the combination with merged
products. MD is positive showing that most of the time
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
overestimated (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>). Again the relative error
is small, less than 0.06, for all the product combinations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><caption><p>Mean difference, absolute error and relative error of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values obtained from CarbonTracker and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values inferred at super
resolution with respect to values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements during the
QUIMA2005/QUIMA2006/QUIMA2008 cruises in the Benguela region at the same
intersections.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OST-MER</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">OST-GLOB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MOD-GLOB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No. valid intersections</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">458</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">458</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">458</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ctrack</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.065</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.065</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.065</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">infer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.055</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.045</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.051</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this work we have presented a method to infer high-resolution CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluxes by propagating the small-scale information given in satellite images
across scales. The method is based on a multi-resolution analysis applied to
the critical transitions given by singularity exponent
analysis. More
specifically, we have reconstructed maps of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes at high
resolution (4 km) in the region offshore Benguela using SST and ocean color
data at this resolution, and CarbonTracker CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux data at low
resolution (110 km). The inferred representation of ocean surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
improves the description provided by CarbonTracker, enhancing the small-scale
variability. Spatial fluctuations observed in latitudinal profiles of in situ
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have also been obtained in the inferred <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, showing that the
inferring algorithm captures the small-scale features of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field.
The examination of different combinations of ocean color and sea surface
temperature (SST) products reveals that using merged products, i.e.,
GLOBCOLOUR, increases the quality and the number of valid points in the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field. We show that mean absolute errors of the inferred values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to in situ measurements are smaller than for
CarbonTracker. The statistical comparison of inferred and CarbonTracker
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values with in situ data shows the potential of our method as well
as the shortcomings of using CarbonTracker data for the estimation of
air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes. These results indicate that the outputs of our
algorithm will be only as good as the inputs.</p>
      <p>We are aware that further investigations could improve the algorithm. The
multiple linear regression coefficients could be derived differentiating the
seasons (i.e., coefficients would vary as a function of calendar month)
considering the marked seasonal cycle in the Benguela upwelling system.
Additionally, future work will focus on the extension of the computations to
larger areas in order to infer global high-resolution CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes. This
will allow more comprehensive and robust validation from more in situ
measurements.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the ESA Support To Science Element Grant
no. 400014715/11/I-NB OceanFlux-Upwelling Theme. The Surface Ocean
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT) is an international effort, supported by the
International Ocean Carbon Coordination Project (IOCCP), the Surface Ocean
Lower Atmosphere Study (SOLAS), and the Integrated Marine Biogeochemistry and
Ecosystem Research program (IMBER), to deliver a uniformly quality-controlled
surface ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> database. The many researchers and funding agencies
responsible for the collection of data and quality control are thanked for
their contributions to SOCAT.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: B. Currie</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Abraham and Bowen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Abraham, E. and Bowen, M.: Chaotic stirring by a mesoscale surface-ocean flow,
Chaos, 12, 373–381, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Abraham et al.(2000)Abraham, Law, Boyd, Lavender, Maldonado, and
Bowie</label><mixed-citation>
Abraham, E., Law, C., Boyd, P., Lavender, S., Maldonado, M., and Bowie, A.:
Importance of stirring in the development of an iron-fertilized phytoplankton
bloom, Nature, 407, 727–730, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Arneodo et al.(1995)Arneodo, Argoul, Bacry, Elezgaray, and
J.F.</label><mixed-citation>
Arneodo, A., Argoul, F., Bacry, E., Elezgaray, J., and J.F., M.: Ondelettes,
multifractales et turbulence, Diderot Editeur, Paris, France, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bakker et al.(2014)Bakker, Pfeil, Smith, and et al.</label><mixed-citation>Bakker, D. C. E., Pfeil, B., Smith, K., Hankin, S., Olsen, A., Alin, S. R.,
Cosca, C., Harasawa, S., Kozyr, A., Nojiri, Y., O'Brien, K. M., Schuster, U.,
Telszewski, M., Tilbrook, B., Wada, C., Akl, J., Barbero, L., Bates, N. R.,
Boutin, J., Bozec, Y., Cai, W.-J., Castle, R. D., Chavez, F. P., Chen, L.,
Chierici, M., Currie, K., de Baar, H. J. W., Evans, W., Feely, R. A.,
Fransson, A., Gao, Z., Hales, B., Hardman-Mountford, N. J., Hoppema, M.,
Huang, W.-J., Hunt, C. W., Huss, B., Ichikawa, T., Johannessen, T., Jones, E.
M., Jones, S. D., Jutterström, S., Kitidis, V., Körtzinger, A.,
Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Manke, A. B., Mathis,
J. T., Merlivat, L., Metzl, N., Murata, A., Newberger, T., Omar, A. M., Ono,
T., Park, G.-H., Paterson, K., Pierrot, D., Ríos, A. F., Sabine, C. L.,
Saito, S., Salisbury, J., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Schlitzer, R., Sieger, R.,
Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T., Sullivan, K. F., Sun, H., Sutton, A. J., Suzuki,
T., Sweeney, C., Takahashi, T., Tjiputra, J., Tsurushima, N., van Heuven, S.
M. A. C., Vandemark, D., Vlahos, P., Wallace, D. W. R., Wanninkhof, R., and
Watson, A. J.: An update to the Surface Ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT version 2),
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 69–90, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-69-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-6-69-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Berti and Lapeyre(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Berti, S. and Lapeyre, G.: Lagrangian reconstructions of temperature and
velocity in a model of surface ocean turbulence, Ocean Modell., 76, 59–71,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bouchet and Venaille(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Bouchet, F. and Venaille, A.: Statistical mechanics of two-dimensional and
geophysical flows, Physics Reports, 515, 227–295, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Delcroix et al.(2011)Delcroix, Alory, Cravatte, Correge, and
McPhaden</label><mixed-citation>
Delcroix, T., Alory, G., Cravatte, S., Correge, T., and McPhaden, M.: A gridded
sea surface salinity dataset for the tropical Pacific with sample
applications (1950–2008), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 38–48, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Dickey(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Dickey, T.: Emerging ocean observations for interdisciplinary data assimilation
systems, J. Marine Syst., 40/41, 5–48, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Dickson et al.(2007)Dickson, Sabine, Christian</label><mixed-citation>Dickson, A. G., Sabine, C. L., and Christian, J. R.: Guide to best practices
for ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, PICES Special Publication, 3, 191 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Donlon et al.(2012)Donlon, Martin, Stark, Roberts-Jones, Fiedler, and
Wimmer</label><mixed-citation>
Donlon, C. J., Martin, M., Stark, J., Roberts-Jones, J., Fiedler, E., and
Wimmer, W.: The Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis
(OSTIA) system, Remote Sens. Environ., 116, 140–158, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Franco et al.(2014)Franco, Hernández-Ayón, Beier, Garçon,
Maske, Paulmier, Färber-Lorda, Castro, and Sosa-Ávalos</label><mixed-citation>Franco, A. C., Hernández-Ayón, J. M., Beier, E., Garçon, V., Maske, H.,
Paulmier, A., Färber-Lorda, J., Castro, R., and Sosa-Ávalos, R.:
Air-sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes above the stratified oxygen minimum zone in the
coastal region off Mexico, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 119, 2923–2937, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Frisch(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Frisch, U.: Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolgomorov, Cambrige
University Press, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Garbe and Vihharev(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Garbe, C. and
Vihharev, J.: Modeling of atmospheric transport of chemical species
in the Polar regions, in: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote
Sensing Symposium, IEEE, Munich, Germany, 6047–6050, 22–27 July,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Garbe et al.(2007)Garbe, Handler, and Jahne</label><mixed-citation>
Garbe, C., Handler, R. A., and Jahne, B.: Transport at the Air–Sea
Interface – Measurements, Models and Parameterizations,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, ISBN: 978-3-540-36904-2, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Garbe et al.(2014)Garbe, Rutgersson, Boutin, Delille,
Fairall, Gruber, Hare, Ho, Johnson, de Leeuw, Nightingale,
Pettersson, Piskozub, Sahlee, Tsai, Ward, Woolf, and
Zappa</label><mixed-citation>
Garbe, C., Rutgersson, A., Boutin, J.,
Delille, B., Fairall, C., Gruber, N., Hare, J., Ho, D., Johnson, M.,
de Leeuw, G., Nightingale, P., Pettersson, H., Piskozub, J.,
Sahlee, E., Tsai, W., Ward, B., Woolf, D., and Zappa, C.: Transfer
across the air–sea interface, in: Ocean–Atmosphere
Interactions of Gases and Particles, edited by: Liss, P. and
Johnson, M., Springer-Verlag, Norwich, UK, 55–112, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>GLOBALVIEW(2013)</label><mixed-citation>GLOBALVIEW: Cooperative Global Atmospheric Data Integration Project,
updated annually. Multi-laboratory compilation of synchronized and gap-filled
atmospheric carbon dioxide records for the period 1979–2012. Compiled by NOAA
Global Monitoring Division: Boulder, Colorado, USA Data product available
at: <uri>http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/OBSPACK/1002</uri>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>González-Dávila et al.(2009)González-Dávila,
Santana-Casano, and Ucha</label><mixed-citation>González-Dávila, M., Santana-Casano, J., and Ucha, I.: Seasonal
variability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Angola-Benguela region, Prog.
Oceanogr., 83, 124–133, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Gruber et al.(2009)Gruber, Gloor, Fletcher, Doney, Dutkiewicz, and
co authors</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, N., Gloor, M., Fletcher, S., Doney, S., Dutkiewicz, S., and co authors:
Oceanic sources, sinks and transport of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB1005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003349</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Gutknecht et al.(2013)Gutknecht, Dadou, Vu, Cambon, Sudre,
Garçon, Machu, Rixen, Kock, Flohr, Paulmier, and Lavik</label><mixed-citation>Gutknecht, E., Dadou, I., Le Vu, B., Cambon, G., Sudre, J., Garçon, V.,
Machu, E., Rixen, T., Kock, A., Flohr, A., Paulmier, A., and Lavik, G.:
Coupled physical/biogeochemical modeling including O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent processes
in the Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems: application in the Benguela,
Biogeosciences, 10, 3559–3591, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3559-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-3559-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Hales et al.(2005)Hales, Takahashi, and Bandstra</label><mixed-citation>Hales, B., Takahashi, T., and Bandstra, L.: Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by a
coastal upwelling system, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB1009, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002295" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002295</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>IOCCP(2007)</label><mixed-citation>IOCCP: Surface Ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Variability and Vulnerabilities Workshop, Rep. 7,
U.N.
Educ., Sci. and Cult. Organ., Paris, 5, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Klein and Lapeyre(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Klein, P. and Lapeyre, G.: The oceanic Vertical Pump Induced by Mesoscale and
Submesoscale Turbulence, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 351–75, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Landschützer et al.(2014)Landschützer, Gruber, Bakker, and
Schuster</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D., and Schuster, U.: Recent
variability of the global ocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
28, 927–949, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Mahadevan et al.(2004)Mahadevan, Lévy, and
Mémery</label><mixed-citation>Mahadevan, A., Lévy, M., and Mémery, L.: Mesoscale variability of sea
surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: What does it respond to?, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
18, GB1017, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GB002102</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Maji and Yahia(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Maji, S. K. and Yahia, H. M.: Edges, transitions and criticality, Pattern
Recognition, 47, 2104–2115, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Maritorena and Siegel(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Maritorena, S. and Siegel, D. A.: Consistent merging of satellite ocean color
data sets using a bio-optical model, Remote Sens. Environ., 94,
429–440, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Monteiro(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Monteiro, P.: Eastern boundary currents: The Benguela Current System,
in: Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes in: Continental Margins: A Global
Synthesis, Chap. 2, edited by: Liu, K., Atkinson, L., Quiñones, R.,
and Talaue-McManus, L., Springer, Berlin, 65–78, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Montes et al.(2014)Montes, Dewitte, Gutknecht, Paulmier, Dadou,
Oschlies, and Garçon</label><mixed-citation>
Montes, I., Dewitte, B., Gutknecht, E., Paulmier, A., Dadou, I., Oschlies,
A., and Garçon, V.: High-resolution modeling of the Eastern
Tropical Pacific Oxygen Minimum Zone: Sensitivity to the
tropical oceanic circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 5515–5532,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Paulmier et al.(2008)Paulmier, Ruiz-Pino, and
Garçon</label><mixed-citation>Paulmier, A., Ruiz-Pino, D., and Garçon, V.: The Oxygen Minimum Zone
(OMZ) off Chile as intense source of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O,
Contin. Shelf Res., 28, 2746–2756, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Paulmier et al.(2011)Paulmier, Ruiz-Pino, and
Garçon</label><mixed-citation>Paulmier, A., Ruiz-Pino, D., and Garçon, V.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum in the oxygen
minimum zone (OMZ), Biogeosciences, 8, 239–252, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-239-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-239-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Peters et al.(2007)Peters, Jacobson, C. Sweeney, Conway, Masarie,
J.B. Miller, Petron, Hirsch, Worthy, van der Werf, Randerson, Wennberg, Krol,
and Tans</label><mixed-citation>
Peters, W., Jacobson, A., C. Sweeney, A. A., Conway, T., Masarie, K.,
J.B. Miller, a. L. B., Petron, G., Hirsch, A., Worthy, D., van der Werf, G.,
Randerson, J., Wennberg, P., Krol, M., and Tans, P.: An atmospheric
perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange : CarbonTracker,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104,
18925–18930, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Pfeil et al.(2013)Pfeil, Olsen, Bakker, Hankin, Koyuk, and
et al.</label><mixed-citation>Pfeil, B., Olsen, A., Bakker, D. C. E.,
Hankin, S., Koyuk, H., Kozyr, A., Malczyk, J., Manke, A., Metzl, N.,
Sabine, C. L., Akl, J., Alin, S. R., Bates, N., Bellerby, R. G. J.,
Borges, A., Boutin, J., Brown, P. J., Cai, W.-J., Chavez, F. P.,
Chen, A., Cosca, C., Fassbender, A. J., Feely, R. A.,
González-Dávila, M., Goyet, C., Hales, B.,
Hardman-Mountford, N., Heinze, C., Hood, M., Hoppema, M.,
Hunt, C. W., Hydes, D., Ishii, M., Johannessen, T., Jones, S. D.,
Key, R. M., Körtzinger, A., Landschützer, P.,
Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lourantou, A.,
Merlivat, L., Midorikawa, T., Mintrop, L., Miyazaki, C., Murata, A.,
Nakadate, A., Nakano, Y., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., Omar, A. M.,
Padin, X. A., Park, G.-H., Paterson, K., Perez, F. F., Pierrot, D.,
Poisson, A., Ríos, A. F., Santana-Casiano, J. M.,
Salisbury, J., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Schlitzer, R., Schneider, B.,
Schuster, U., Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T., Suzuki, T.,
Takahashi, T., Tedesco, K., Telszewski, M., Thomas, H.,
Tilbrook, B., Tjiputra, J., Vandemark, D., Veness, T.,
Wanninkhof, R., Watson, A. J., Weiss, R., Wong, C. S., and
Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: A uniform, quality controlled Surface Ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 125–143, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-125-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-125-2013</ext-link>,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Pont et al.(2011a)Pont, Turiel, and J.</label><mixed-citation>
Pont, O., Turiel, A., and J., P.-V. C.: On optimal wavelet bases for the
realization of microcanonical cascade processes, Int. J. Wavelets
Multiresolut Inf. Process., 9, 35–61, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Pont et al.(2011b)Pont, Turiel, and Yahia</label><mixed-citation>
Pont, O., Turiel, A., and Yahia, H.: An optimized algorithm for the evaluation
of local singularity exponents in digital signals., vol. LNCS 6636 of  14th International Workshop on Combinatorial Image Analysis
(IWCIA 2011), Springer-Verlag, Madrid, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Pottier et al.(2008)Pottier, Turiel, and Garçon</label><mixed-citation>
Pottier, C., Turiel, A., and Garçon, V.: Inferring mising data in satellite
chlorophyll maps using turbulent cascading, Remote Sens. Environ.,
112, 4242–4260, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Rind(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Rind, D.: Complexity and
climate, Science, 284, 105–107, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Rödenbeck et al.(2014)Rödenbeck, Bakker, Metzl, Olsen, Sabine,
Cassar, Reum, Keeling, and Heimann</label><mixed-citation>Rödenbeck, C., Bakker, D. C. E., Metzl, N., Olsen, A., Sabine, C.,
Cassar, N., Reum, F., Keeling, R. F., and Heimann, M.: Interannual sea–air
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux variability from an observation-driven ocean mixed-layer scheme,
Biogeosciences, 11, 4599–4613, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4599-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-4599-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Sabine et al.(2013)Sabine, Hankin, Koyuk, Bakker, Pfeil,
Smith, and et al.</label><mixed-citation>Sabine, C. L., Hankin, S.,
Koyuk, H., Bakker, D. C. E., Pfeil, B., Olsen, A., Metzl, N.,
Kozyr, A., Fassbender, A., Manke, A., Malczyk, J., Akl, J.,
Alin, S. R., Bellerby, R. G. J., Borges, A., Boutin, J.,
Brown, P. J., Cai, W.-J., Chavez, F. P., Chen, A., Cosca, C.,
Feely, R. A., González-Dávila, M., Goyet, C.,
Hardman-Mountford, N., Heinze, C., Hoppema, M., Hunt, C. W.,
Hydes, D., Ishii, M., Johannessen, T., Key, R. M.,
Körtzinger, A., Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K.,
Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lourantou, A., Merlivat, L.,
Midorikawa, T., Mintrop, L., Miyazaki, C., Murata, A., Nakadate, A.,
Nakano, Y., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., Omar, A. M., Padin, X. A.,
Park, G.-H., Paterson, K., Perez, F. F., Pierrot, D., Poisson, A.,
Ríos, A. F., Salisbury, J., Santana-Casiano, J. M.,
Sarma, V. V. S. S., Schlitzer, R., Schneider, B., Schuster, U.,
Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T., Suzuki, T., Takahashi, T.,
Tedesco, K., Telszewski, M., Thomas, H., Tilbrook, B.,
Vandemark, D., Veness, T., Watson, A. J., Weiss, R., Wong, C. S.,
and Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: Surface Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT)
gridded data products, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 145–153, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-145-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-145-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Santana-Casiano et al.(2009)Santana-Casiano, González-Dávila,
and Ucha</label><mixed-citation>
Santana-Casiano, J., González-Dávila, M., and Ucha, I.: Carbon dioxide
fluxes in the Benguela upwelling system during winter and spring: A
comparison between 2005 and 2006, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56,
533–541, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Savtchenko et al.(2004)Savtchenko, Ouzounov, Ahmad, Acker, Leptoukh,
Koziana, and Nickless</label><mixed-citation>
Savtchenko, A., Ouzounov, D., Ahmad, S., Acker, J., Leptoukh, G., Koziana, J.,
and Nickless, D.: Terra and Aqua MODIS products available from NASA
GES DAAC, Adv. Space Res., 34, 710–714, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Sudre et al.(2015)Sudre, Yahia, Pont, and Garçon</label><mixed-citation>Sudre, J., Yahia, H., Pont, O., and Garçon, V.: Ocean turbulent dynamics at
super resolution from optimal multiresolution analysis and multiplicative
cascade,  IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 53, 6274–6285, 2015.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Sweeney et al.(2007)Sweeney, Gloor, Jacobson, Key, McKinley,
Sarmiento, and Wanninkhof</label><mixed-citation>Sweeney, C., Gloor, E., Jacobson, A., Key, R., McKinley, G., Sarmiento, J., and
Wanninkhof, R.: Constraining global air-sea gas exchange for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
recent bomb 14C measurements, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB2015, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002784</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Takahashi et al.(2002)Takahashi, Sutherland, Sweeney, Poisson, Metzl,
Tilbrook, Bates, Wanninkhof, Feely, Sabine, Olafsson, and
Nojiri</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Sweeney, C., Poisson, A., Metzl, N.,
Tilbrook, B., Bates, N., Wanninkhof, R., Feely, R., Sabine, C., Olafsson, J.,
and Nojiri, Y.: Global sea-air <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux based on climatological surface
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and seasonal biological and temperature effects, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. II, 49, 1601–1622, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Takahashi et al.(2009)Takahashi, Sutherland, Sweeney, Feely, Chipman,
Hales, Friederich, Chavez, Sabine, Watson, Bakker, Schuster, Metzl,
Yoshikawa-Inoue, Ishii, Midorikawa, Nojiri, Kortzinger, Steinhoff, Hoppema,
Olaffson, Anarson, Tilbrook, Johannessen, Olsen, Bellerby, Wong, Delille,
Bates, and de Baar</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Sweeney, C., Feely, R. A., Chipman, D. W.,
Hales, B., Friederich, G., Chavez, F., Sabine, C., Watson, A., Bakker, D.
C. E., Schuster, U., Metzl, N., Yoshikawa-Inoue, H., Ishii, M., Midorikawa,
T., Nojiri, Y., Kortzinger, A., Steinhoff, T., Hoppema, M., Olaffson, J.,
Anarson, T. S., Tilbrook, B., Johannessen, T., Olsen, A., Bellerby, R., Wong,
C. S., Delille, B., Bates, N. R.,  and de Baar, H. J. W.: Climatological
mean and decadal change in surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and net sea-air <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
flux over the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 554–577, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Telszewski et al.(2009)Telszewski, Chazottes, Schuster, Watson,
Moulin, Bakker, M. González-Dávila and, Körtzinger, Lüger, Olsen,
Omar, Padin, Ríos, Steinhoff, Santana-Casiano, Wallace, and
Wanninkhof</label><mixed-citation>Telszewski, M., Chazottes, A., Schuster, U., Watson, A. J., Moulin, C.,
Bakker, D. C. E., González-Dávila, M., Johannessen, T.,
Körtzinger, A., Lüger, H., Olsen, A., Omar, A., Padin, X. A.,
Ríos, A. F., Steinhoff, T., Santana-Casiano, M., Wallace, D. W. R., and
Wanninkhof, R.: Estimating the monthly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution in the North
Atlantic using a self-organizing neural network, Biogeosciences, 6,
1405–1421, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1405-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-1405-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Turiel et al.(2005)Turiel, Isern-Fontanet, García-Ladona, and
Font</label><mixed-citation>Turiel, A., Isern-Fontanet, J., García-Ladona, E., and Font, J.:
Multifractal Method for the Instantaneous Evaluation of the Stream
Function in Geophysical Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 104502, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.104502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.104502</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Turiel et al.(2008)Turiel, Yahia, and Pérez-Vicente</label><mixed-citation>
Turiel, A., Yahia, H., and Pérez-Vicente, C.: Microcanonical multifractal
formalism-a geometrical approach to multifractal systems: Part I. Singularity
analysis., J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 41, 15501–15536, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Valsala and Maksyutov(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Valsala, V. and Maksyutov, S.: Simulation and assimilation of global ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes using ship observations of surface
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a simplified biogeochemical offline model, Tellus B, 62,
821–840, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Waldron et al.(2009)Waldron, Monteiro, and Swart</label><mixed-citation>Waldron, H. N., Monteiro, P. M. S., and Swart, N. C.: Carbon export and
sequestration in the southern Benguela upwelling system: lower and upper
estimates, Ocean Sci., 5, 711–718, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/os-5-711-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-5-711-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Weiss(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss, R.: Carbon doxide in water and sewater: the solubility of a non-ideal
gas, Mar. Chem., 2, 203–215, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Yahia et al.(2010)Yahia, Sudre, Pottier, and Garçon</label><mixed-citation>
Yahia, H., Sudre, J., Pottier, C., and Garçon, V.: Motion analysis in
oceanographic satellite images using multiscale methods and the energy
cascade, Pattern Recognition, 43, 3591–3604, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
