<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-6655-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Response of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in a mountainous tropical
rainforest in equatorial Indonesia to El Niño events</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Response of CO${}_{{2}}$ and H${}_{{2}}$O fluxes}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Olchev et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Olchev</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          <email>aoltche@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-5826</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ibrom</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1341-921X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Panferov</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Gushchina</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kreilein</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Popov</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Propastin</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>June</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Rauf</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Gravenhorst</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Knohl</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7615-8870</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of RAS,
Moscow, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Bioclimatology, Faculty of Forest Sciences
and Forest Ecology, Georg August University of Goettingen, Goettingen,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department for Environmental Engineering, Technical
University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Climatology and Climate Protection, Faculty of Life
Sciences and Engineering, University of Applied Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Bingen am Rhein,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Meteorology and Climatology, Faculty of
Geography, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University,
Moscow, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Financial University under the Government of the Russian
Federation, Moscow, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Bogor Agricultural University, Department of Geophysics
and Meteorology, Bogor, Indonesia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>*</label><institution>retired</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">A. Olchev (aoltche@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>22</issue>
      <fpage>6655</fpage><lpage>6667</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The possible impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events on the
main components of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes between the tropical rainforest
and the atmosphere is investigated. The fluxes were continuously measured in an
old-growth mountainous tropical rainforest in Central Sulawesi in
Indonesia using the eddy covariance method for the period from January 2004
to June 2008. During this period, two episodes of El Niño and one
episode of La Niña were observed. All these ENSO episodes had moderate
intensity and were of the central Pacific type. The temporal variability
analysis of the main meteorological parameters and components of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O exchange showed a high sensitivity of evapotranspiration (ET)
and gross primary production (GPP) of the tropical rainforest to
meteorological variations caused by both El Niño and La Niña
episodes. Incoming solar radiation is the main governing factor that is
responsible for ET and GPP variability. Ecosystem respiration (RE) dynamics
depend mainly on the air temperature changes and are almost insensitive to
ENSO. Changes in precipitation due to moderate ENSO events did not have any
notable effect on ET and GPP, mainly because of sufficient soil moisture
conditions even in periods of an anomalous reduction in precipitation in the
region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The contribution of tropical rainforests to the global budget of greenhouse
gases, their possible impact on the climatic system, and their sensitivity
to climatic changes are key topics of numerous theoretical and experimental
studies (Clark and Clark, 1994; Grace et al., 1995, 1996; Malhi et al.,
1999; Ciais et al., 2009; Lewis et al., 2009; Phillips et al., 2009; Malhi,
2010; Fisher et al., 2013; Moser et al., 2014). The area covered by tropical
rainforests was drastically reduced during the last century, mainly due to
human activity, and presently there are less than 11.0 million km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
remaining (Malhi, 2010). While deforestation rates in the tropical forests
of Brazil are now declining, countries in southeast Asia, particularly
Indonesia, show the largest increase in forest loss globally (FAO, 2010; Hansen et al.,
2013), resulting in major changes in carbon and water fluxes between the
land surface and the atmosphere. Therefore, during the last decade the
tropical forest ecosystems of southeast Asia and especially Indonesia are
the focus area of intensive studies of biogeochemical cycle and land-surface–atmosphere interactions. It is necessary to know, on the one hand, how
these tropical forests influence the global and regional climate, and on the
other hand, how they respond to changes in regional climatic conditions.</p>
      <p>Climate and weather conditions in the equatorial Pacific and southeastern
part of Asia are mainly influenced by the Intertropical Convergence Zone
(ITCZ) which is seasonally positioned north and south of the Equator.
Another very important factor affecting the climate of southeast Asia is
the well-known coupled oceanic and atmospheric phenomenon, El
Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). During the warm phase of ENSO, termed
“El Niño”, sea surface temperature (SST) in the central and eastern
parts of the equatorial Pacific sharply increases, and during a cold phase
of the phenomenon, termed “La Niña”, the SST in these areas is lower
than usual. Both phenomena, El Niño and La Niña, lead to essential
changes in pressure distribution and atmospheric circulation and, as a
result, to anomalous changes in precipitation amount, solar radiation, and
temperature fields, both in the regions of sea surface temperature anomalies
and in a wide range of remote areas through the mechanism of atmospheric
bridges (Wang, 2002; Graf and Zanchettin, 2012; Yuan and Yan, 2013).
Typically, in Indonesia El Niño results in dryer conditions and La
Niña results in wetter conditions, potentially impacting the land
vegetation (Erasmi et al., 2009). ENSO events are irregular, characterized
by different intensities and, are usually observed at intervals of 2–7 years.</p>
      <p>To describe the possible effects of ENSO events on the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
exchange between the land surface and the atmosphere, many studies for different
western Pacific regions were carried out during recent decades (Feely et
al., 1999; Malhi et al., 1999; Rayner and Law, 1999; Aiba and Kitayama,
2002; Hirano et al., 2007; Erasmi et al., 2009; Gerold and Leemhuis, 2010).
They are mainly based on the results of modeling experiments and remote-sensing data (Rayner and Law, 1999). Experimental results based on the direct
measurements of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes, which allow studying the
response of individual terrestrial ecosystems to anomalous weather
conditions, are still very limited (e.g., Hirano et al., 2007; Moser et al.,
2014). Existing monitoring networks in equatorial regions of the western
Pacific are associated mainly with lowland areas and do not cover
mountainous rainforest regions, even though mountainous regions cover some
of the last remaining undisturbed rainforest in southeast Asia. Most
attention in previous studies was paid to the description of plant response to
anomalously dry and warm weather during El Niño events (Aiba and
Kitayama, 2002; Hirano et al., 2007; Moser et al., 2014). The possible
changes in plant functioning during La Niña events have not yet been clarified. In particular, Malhi et al. (1999) reported that for the Amazon
region in South America, El Niño periods are strongly associated with
enhanced dry seasons that probably result in increased carbon loss, either
through water stress causing reduced photosynthesis or increased tree
mortality. Aiba and Kitayama (2002) examined the effects of the 1997–1998 El
Niño drought on nine rainforests of Mount Kinabalu in Borneo using
forest inventory and showed that El Niño increased the tree mortality
for lowland forests. However, it did not affect the growth rate of the trees
in upland forests (higher than 1700 m) where mortality was restricted by
some understorey species only. Eddy covariance measurements of the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluxes in a tropical peat swamp forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, for
the period from 2002 to 2004, provided by Hirano et al. (2007), showed that
during the El Niño event in the period November–December 2002, the annual
net CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> release reached maximal values, mainly due to a strong decrease
of GPP in the late dry season because of dense smoke emitted from
large-scale fires. The effects of El Niño on annual ecosystem respiration (RE) in 2002 were
insignificant.</p>
      <p>There is a lack of experimental data on CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in
mountainous rainforests in equatorial regions of the western Pacific and on
their response to ENSO. Hence, the main objective of this study was to
evaluate and quantify the impact of ENSO events on the main components of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in an old-growth mountainous tropical
rainforest in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. The methodology used was the analysis of long-term eddy covariance flux measurement data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{El Ni\~{n}o's types and intensity}?><title>El Niño's types and intensity</title>
      <p>Today, two types of ENSO can be distinguished: (1) the canonical or
conventional El Niño, which is characterized by SST anomalies located in
the eastern Pacific near the South American coast (Rasmusson and Carpenter,
1982), and (2) the central Pacific El Niño or El Niño Modoki (Larkin
and Harrison, 2005; Ashok et al., 2007; Kug et al., 2009; Ashok and
Yamagata, 2009; Gushchina and Dewitte, 2012). In 2003, a new definition of
the conventional El Niño was accepted by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the USA, in referring to the warming of
the Pacific region between 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
170–120<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. According to Ashok et al. (2007) the central Pacific El Niño, or El Niño Modoki, – i.e., unusually high SST –
occurs roughly in the region between 160<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E–140<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>
      <p>As criteria to assess the intensity of ENSO events, a wide range of indexes
based on different combinations of sea level pressure and SST data in
various areas of the Pacific is used. For diagnostics of the central
Pacific El Niño, the SST anomalies (in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in the Nino4 region
(5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 160<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E–150<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)
are commonly used (Fig. 1). The monthly SST anomalies (in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
in the Nino3.4 region (5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 170–120<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)
are used to diagnose both types of El Niño phenomenon:
canonical and central Pacific (Download Climate Timeseries, 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Geographical location of the study area (marked by black triangle)
in tropical rain forest in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia) and Nino4 and
Nino3.4 regions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Experimental site</title>
      <p>The tropical rainforest selected for the study is situated near the village
of Bariri in the southern part of the Lore Lindu National Park of Central
Sulawesi in Indonesia (1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>39.47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 120<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10.409<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E or
UTM 51S 185482 M east and 9816523 M north) (Fig. 1). The site is located
on a large plateau of several kilometers in size at about 1430 m above sea
level surrounded by mountain chains rising above the plane by another 300
to 400 m. Within 500 m around the tower the elevation varies between 1390
and 1430 m. Wind field measurement with a sonic anemometer indicate a
slope of around 2–3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is similar to many FLUXNET sites.
About 1000 m to the east of the experimental site, the forest is replaced
by a meadow; in all other directions it extends for several kilometers
(Ibrom et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>According to the Köppen climate classification the study area relates to
tropical rainforest climate (<italic>Af</italic>) (Chen and Chen, 2013). Weather conditions
in the region are mainly influenced by the ITCZ. During the wet season
(typically, from November to April), the area is influenced by very moist
northeast monsoons coming from the Pacific. Maximum precipitation during the
observation period from January 2004 to July 2008 was observed in April –
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>258.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>148.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The drier season usually lasts from
May to October. The precipitation minimum was observed in September with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>195.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>48.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The September–October period was also
characterized by maximal incoming solar radiation, up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>650</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>47.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
mainly because of a significant decrease in convective clouds, due to the reversing of an oceanic northeast monsoon to a
southeast monsoon blowing from the Australian continent. The mean annual
precipitation amount exceeded 2000 mm. The mean monthly air temperature
varies between 19.4 and 19.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The mean annual
air temperature was 19.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Falk et al., 2005; Ibrom et al.,
2007).</p>
      <p>The vegetation at the experimental site is very diverse and representative
of the mountainous rainforest communities of Central Sulawesi. There are
about 88 different tree species per hectare. Among the dominant species are
<italic>Castanopsis accuminatissima</italic> BL. (29 %), <italic>Canarium vulgare</italic>
Leenh. (18 %) and <italic>Ficus spec.</italic> (9.5 %). The density of trees, with
diameter at breast height larger than 0.1 m, is 550 trees per ha. In
addition, there is more than times that number of smaller trees per
hectare with a stem diameter smaller than 0.1 m. The total basal area of trees
reached 53 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per ha. Leaf area index (LAI) is about 7.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
LAI was estimated using an indirect hemispherical photography
approach with a correction for leaf clumping effects. The height of the
trees, with diameters at breast height larger than 0.1 m, varies between the
lowest at 12 m and the highest at 36 m. The mean tree height is 21 m (Ibrom
et al., 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Flux measurements and gap filling</title>
      <p>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes were measured from 2004 to 2008 within the
framework of the STORMA project (Stability of Rainforest Margins in
Indonesia, SFB 552), supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG). Eddy
covariance equipment for flux measurements was installed on a meteorological
tower of 70 m height at 48 m, i.e., ca. 12 m higher than the
maximal tree height. The measuring system consists of a three-dimensional
sonic anemometer (USA-1, Metek, Germany) and an open-path CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O infrared gas analyzer (IRGA, LI-7500, LI-COR, USA) (Falk et al.,
2005; Ibrom et al., 2007; Panferov et al., 2009). The open-path IRGA was
chosen due to its smaller power requirements compared to closed-path
sensors. The sensor was calibrated with calibration gases two times per year
and showed no considerable sensitivity drift within 1 year of operation.
Turbulence data were sampled at 10 Hz and stored as raw data on an
industrial mini PC (Kontron, Germany). All instruments were powered by
batteries, which were charged by solar panels, mounted on the tower. The
system is entirely self-sustaining and has been proven to run unattended
over a period of several months. Post-field data processing on eddy
covariance flux estimates was carried out strictly according to the
established recommendations for data analysis (Aubinet et al., 2012). In
addition to the procedures described in Falk et al. (2005) and Ibrom et al. (2007),
we corrected the flux data for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O density
fluctuations due to heat conduction from the open-path sensor (Burba et al.,
2008; Järvi et al., 2009) using the suggested method as
described in Reverter et al. (2011).</p>
      <p>The system operated ca. 70 % of the time. About 30 % of the measured
flux data were negatively affected by rain and other unfavorable conditions
and removed. From nighttime ecosystem respiration data, a friction velocity
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold value of 0.25 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated (Aubinet et
al., 2000), i.e., at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values above this threshold the measured
nighttime flux became independent of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Nighttime flux values
that were measured at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.25 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were removed,
which left 15 % of the measured nighttime flux data in the data set. In order to fill the gaps in the measured net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and
evapotranspiration, net radiation and sensible and latent heat flux records as
well as to quantify GPP, RE and forest canopy transpiration, the
process-based Mixfor-SVAT model (Olchev et al., 2002, 2008) was used.</p>
      <p>Mixfor-SVAT is a one-dimensional model of the energy, H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exchange between vertically structured mono- or multi-specific forest stands
and the atmosphere. The main model advantage is its ability both to describe
seasonal and daily patterns of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes at individual
tree and entire ecosystem levels and to estimate the contributions of soil,
different forest layers, and various tree species to the total ecosystem
fluxes taking into account individual structure, biophysical properties and
responses of plant species to changes in environmental conditions. The model
also allows us to take into account the non-steady-state water transport in the
trees, rainfall interception, dew generation, turbulence and convection
flows within the canopy and plant canopy energy storage. As model input the
measured meteorological variables (air temperature, water vapor pressure,
wind speed, precipitation, CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, global solar radiation)
are used. The model was tested with long-term meteorological and flux data
from different experimental sites including the investigated forest under
well-developed turbulent conditions and showed a good agreement over a broad
spectrum of weather and soil moisture conditions (Olchev et al., 2002, 2008; Falk
et al., 2005; Falge et al., 2005). Using the model is
superior to common statistical gap-filling approaches because these depend
on calibration under all relevant weather conditions, including those that
were systematically excluded when the open-path sensor did not work, e.g.,
under rain. For this reason one might argue that statistical gap filling is
biased by calibration during dry weather conditions. The process-based model
is, however, able to take these weather situations into account because it
is based on general physical principles. As was shown in previous studies,
the model is able to predict both CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and water fluxes under various
weather and soil moisture conditions at sites where closed-path sensors were
used (Oltchev et al., 1996; Falge et al., 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Micrometeorological measurements</title>
      <p>Air temperature, relative humidity and horizontal wind speed were measured
at four levels above and at two levels inside the forest canopy using ventilated
and sheltered thermo-hygrometers and cup anemometers (Friedrichs Co.,
Germany) installed on the tower. Short- and long-wave radiation components
were measured below and above the canopy with CM6B and CG1 sensors (Kipp
&amp; Zonen, The Netherlands). Rainfall intensity was measured on top of the
tower with a tipping bucket in a Hellman-type rain gauge. To fill the gaps
in measuring records the meteorological data from an automatic
meteorological station, situated about 900 m away from the tower outside the
forest on a nearby meadow, were used. For the analysis, the monthly mean
air temperature values and monthly sums of precipitation and solar energy
were calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
      <p>To estimate the possible impact of ENSO events on CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
fluxes in the tropical rainforest at Bariri the temporal variability in
monthly NEE, GPP, RE and ET in periods with different ENSO intensity was
analyzed. To quantify the ENSO impacts on meteorological parameters and
fluxes and to distinguish them from effects caused by the seasonal migration
of the ITCZ, the intra-annual patterns of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes as
well as meteorological conditions during the measuring period were also
evaluated.</p>
      <p>In the first step, to assess the possible impact of ENSO events on
meteorological parameters (global solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), precipitation amount
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes), the correlation
between the absolute values of monthly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, NEE, GPP, RE, ET and monthly
SST anomalies in the Nino4 and Nino3.4 regions (Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes) were
analyzed.</p>
      <p>In the second step, we analyzed the correlation between the deviations of
monthly meteorological parameter and flux values from their monthly averages
over the entire measuring period and the Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes. The
deviation in the case of GPP (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP) was estimated as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Month</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Month</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Year</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2004</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2008</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Month</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Month</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is total monthly GPP for a particular month
(January to December) and corresponding year (2004 to 2008);
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Year</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2004</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2008</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GPP</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Month</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Year</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
monthly GPP for this particular month averaged for the entire measuring
period (2004 to 2008); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is number of years. Positive values in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RE, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NEE indicate GPP, RE higher and NEE (carbon
uptake) lower than average.</p>
      <p>The typical timescale of the full ENSO cycle is estimated to be about 48–52 months
(Setoh et al., 1999), whereas the timescale of the main meteorological
parameters (global solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), precipitation amount (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), air
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)) is characterized by much higher month-to-month variability
even after annual trend filtering. In order to filter the high-frequency
oscillation in the time series of atmospheric characteristics and monthly
NEE, GPP, RE, and ET anomalies, the simple centered moving average smoothing
procedure was applied. The moving averages (MAs) of variables were calculated
over 7 months (centered value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months).</p>
      <p>Statistical analysis included both simple correlation and cross-correlation
analysis (Chatfield, 2004). Cross-correlation analysis was used to take into
account the possible forward and backward time shifts in maximal anomalies
of meteorological parameters and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in respect to
time of the ENSO culmination. To describe the relationships between
atmospheric fluxes and meteorological parameters, the monthly non-smoothed
values were used.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>During the measuring period, two El Niño (August 2004–March 2005 and
October 2006–January 2007) and one La Niña (November 2007–April
2008) phenomena were observed. All events had moderate intensity. Both warm
events could be classified as the central Pacific or Modoki type, according
to Ashok et al. (2007), since the SST anomalies were centered in Nino3.4 and
Nino4 regions (Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Mean intra-annual values of air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), global solar
radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), NEE, GPP, RE and ET for the tropical rain
forest in Bariri. Vertical whiskers indicate standard deviations (SD).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Analysis of the intra-annual pattern of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes shows a
relatively weak seasonal variability (Fig. 2). The maximal values of GPP
were obtained during the second part of the drier season – from August to
October (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>278</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) – which is also
characterized by maximal values of incoming solar radiation. The mean
monthly air temperature in the period varied from minimal values in August
(19.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) to maximal values in October (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>19.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The minimal GPP values were obtained in transition
periods between wetter and drier seasons – in May–June and November–December
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>240</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>249</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). These periods are also characterized by minimal amounts of
incoming solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>512</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Maximal
RE (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>206</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were obtained in
October, which corresponds to the period of maximal air temperature and
insolation. The local maximum of RE in April–May (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>199</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is also well correlated with a small increase in the
air temperature in these months. The minimal RE was observed in February and
June–August (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>174</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>187</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). The intra-annual pattern of ET was closely related to the
seasonal variability in GPP. The maximum values of ET were also observed in
October (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>136</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm), in the month of maximal incoming solar radiation
and highest air temperature values. In spite of a large amount of
precipitation and a high air temperature during the period from March to
June, ET in this period was much lower than in September and October (e.g.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>105</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm in April).</p>
      <p>Comparisons of monthly NEE, GPP, RE, ET and absolute values of SST anomalies
in the Nino4 and Nino3.4 regions (henceforth Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes) indicate
relatively low correlations. Changes in the Nino4 index can explain about
12 % of the observed variability in GPP (coefficient of determination,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at significance level <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 9 % of RE
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 9 % of NEE (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 6 % of ET (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and only
about 1 % of transpiration (TR) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Similar values were obtained for the Nino3.4 index. In the periods of El
Niño peak phases (September 2004–January 2005 and October 2006–January 2007)
the values for ET and GPP tend to increase in the study area. An
increase in RE was indicated only during the second El Niño event from
October 2006 to January 2007. The effect of El Niño on NEE was
insignificant. The effect of La Niña on CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O flux
components was very small and manifested itself only in a slight increase in NEE.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparisons of interannual patterns of SST anomalies in Nino4 and
Nino3.4 zones of the equatorial Pacific with variability in both deviations and
7-month (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months) moving average deviations of monthly GPP, RE and
NEE values from mean monthly values of GPP, RE and NEE averaged over the
entire measuring period from 2004 to 2008.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Analysis of the temporal variability in the centered moving average values
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3) in contrast to comparisons
of absolute monthly GPP indicates a relatively high correlation between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and both Nino4 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
Nino3.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indexes. Close correlation between
the intensity of ENSO events and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can be explained by the
influence of ENSO-initiating processes and ENSO itself on total cloud amount
in the region and, as a result, on monthly sums of incoming <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4).
Variability in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is very closely correlated with Nino4
and Nino3.4 indexes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both indexes)
(Fig. 4) and it can explain 69 % of variability in GPP (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The maximal deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from mean values (averaged for the entire measuring period) occur 2–3 months before the peak phase of the ENSO events (Fig. 5).
The maximal cross-correlation coefficients in this period reached 0.76 for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.86 – for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The effect of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP is very low (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparisons of interannual patterns of SST anomalies in Nino4 and
Nino3.4 zones of the equatorial Pacific with variability in both deviations and
7-month (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months) moving average deviations of monthly air
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and global radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values from mean
monthly values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over the entire measuring period from
2004 to 2008.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015-f04.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Cross-correlation functions between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and midday <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
values and SST anomalies in the Nino4 zone of the equatorial Pacific. Filled
symbols correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value &lt; 0.05 and non-filled symbols
– to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.05. The time lag is expressed in months.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015-f05.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes
is relatively low (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino4 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino3.4), and it can explain the very
weak correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and ENSO indexes
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino4 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino3.4) (Figs. 3–4). The maximal deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from mean values (averaged for the entire measuring period) occur 2 months after the peak phase of the ENSO events and
have a negative sign (Fig. 5). The cross-correlation coefficient in this period
is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.53 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Despite the relatively close dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on ENSO
intensity, the correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Nino4 and Nino3.4
indexes are lower (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino4 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino3.4), mainly because of their very low
correlation during the first part of the measuring period (before December
2005). During the second part of the considered period (from June 2006 to
June 2008), with one strong El Niño (October 2006–January 2007) and one
La Niña (November 2004–April 2008) event, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes are correlated much better. This can be explained by
the influence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>RE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics, which
are mainly governed by temperature variability and which is, as already
mentioned, very poorly correlated with Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes (Figs. 3–4).</p>
      <p>Taking into account that the monthly anomalies of NEE might be biased by nighttime advection effects still unaccounted for, despite <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
filtering, we additionally examined NEE at midday (10:00–14:00 WITA), when
turbulent mixing is typically well developed. Data analysis based on midday
NEE shows a similarly clear relationship with the ENSO index (Fig. 6) with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximal deviations of both
NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and midday NEE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the their mean values occurred
simultaneously within the peak phase of the ENSO events (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparisons of interannual patterns of SST anomalies in Nino4 and
Nino3.4 zones of the equatorial Pacific with variability in both deviations and
7-month (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months) moving average deviations of midday NEE
(10:00–14:00 WITA) values from mean monthly midday values of NEE averaged over
the entire measuring period from 2004 to 2008.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015-f06.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Analysis of the temporal variability in the moving average values of monthly
ET (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a high correlation with ENSO activity as well:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino4 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Nino3.4 (Fig. 7), probably also triggered by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which in
turn correlated strongly with both the Nino4 and the Nino3.4 index. Periods
of extreme <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values and maximal ENSO intensity occurred
simultaneously (Fig. 5). Correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
as well as between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are insignificant –
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
respectively. However, Figs. 4 and 5 clearly show a time delay in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oscillation relative to Nino4 and Nino3.4 patterns. The maximal
negative deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed about 8 months
before (cross correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Nino 4 index 0.72,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the maximal positive deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – about
4–5 months after the peak phases of ENSO (cross correlation between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Nino 4 index – 0.40, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>To explain a very low sensitivity of ET to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes, we analyzed the
intra-annual variability in the ratio between ET and potential evaporation
(PET), as well as between ET and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. PET was derived using the well-known
Priestley and Taylor (1972) approach, and it is equal to evaporation from wet
ground or open-water surface.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparisons of interannual patterns of SST anomalies in Nino4 and
Nino3.4 zones of the equatorial Pacific with variability in both deviations and
7-month (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> months) moving average deviations of monthly ET rate and
ratio ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from mean monthly ET rate and ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over the entire
measuring period from 2004 to 2008.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/12/6655/2015/bg-12-6655-2015-f07.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The mean annual ET during the measuring period is considerably lower than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.742</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Annually, the ratio varied between 0.58 (in
March and November) to 1.85 (in August and October). During dry periods
before the positive phase of ENSO, the mean values of the ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio grew up
to 1.9–2.1. During the periods of negative Nino4 and Nino3.4 anomalies, the
mean monthly ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio fell, in some months, down to 0.3. Correlation
analysis of the temporal variability in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes (Fig. 7) did not show
any statistically significant relationships. However, it should be mentioned
that the temporal pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
characterized by two peaks that were observed in July 2005 and April
2007, about 6–8 months prior to the El Niño culmination (Fig. 7).</p>
      <p>The monthly mean ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET ratio has a weak intra-annual development with a maximum
in June (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and with minima in February and October
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The averaged annual ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET ratio for the entire
measuring period was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.880</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.055</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The minimal values of
(ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ((ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were observed during the El
Niño culmination in 2005–2006, and the maximal values were observed during the period
of maximal intensity of La Niña in 2008 ((ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thus,
monthly ET rates are relatively close to PET values during the whole year
including the periods of maximal ENSO activity. The relative soil water
content of the upper 30 cm horizon calculated using the Mixfor-SVAT model
during the entire period of the field measurements, including the periods
with maximal values of the ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, was always higher than 80 %. This,
together with the ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET ratio, is a clear indicator of permanently
sufficient soil moisture conditions in the study area, including periods of
El Niño and La Niña culminations, explaining the very low
sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Uncertainty of the analysis</title>
      <p>Eddy covariance flux measurements in tropical mountainous conditions are
challenging. Our tower and eddy covariance system was designed to minimize
power consumption by using an open-path sensor, which had the consequence
that rainy conditions systematically caused gaps in the flux data. To
minimize a potential bias on the flux sums, we used a process-based forest
model that is not biased by a lack of data in wet conditions in the same way as the statistical gap-filling algorithms often
used are (Reichstein et al., 2005, see also
Sect. 2.3). The weather in the tropics typically has a relatively high
percentage of calm nights. The selected forest is located on a plateau in a
mountainous region, and this increases the risk of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich air draining
downhill in calm nights. We investigated this effect very carefully and found
that the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes showed a very clear <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold above
which the nighttime CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission rates did not depend on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
anymore. Using only data from nights with sufficient turbulence (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
&gt;<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold value), we minimized advection and drainage
affecting the NEE estimates. Also, here we benefitted from the use of the
process-based model for gap filling. We then analyzed the statistical
relationships between our gap-filled monthly fluxes with climate anomaly
indices and corroborated these analyses also with midday NEE data only. As
time data are independent from nighttime data, we made sure that our
analysis was not affected by nighttime flux loss. The correlations with
midday data and ENSO indices were very similar to those with daily mean NEE
data. This demonstrated the robustness of our analysis.</p>
      <p>In addition we compared the model-predicted mean annual soil respiration
rate with soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux data that were measured in the study region
with soil chambers (van Straaten et al., 2011). The Mixfor-SVAT model
estimated an average annual soil respiration rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1110</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for the investigated site. This value was very close to
the measured average soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux of the Central Sulawesi region
of 1170 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which shows realistic behavior of the model.</p>
      <p>The relatively high annual NEE sums need further investigation. After
applying all corrections including the correction for open-path sensor
heating and after gap filling, we found an average annual uptake of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>782</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (standard deviation between 5 different
years). This value is higher than the range found in lowland rain forests,
i.e., ranging from, e.g., 75 to 538 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Luyssaert et al.,
2007). The clarification of this very interesting phenomenon, maybe relating
to the site history and regrowth after selected use of large individual
trees by the local population, does not, however, lie within the scope of this
article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Effects of large-scale climate anomalies on carbon and water exchange in
the investigated site</title>
      <p>The main components of carbon and water balances in the tropical rainforest
showed a high correlation between Nino4 and Nino3.4 SST anomalies and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values over the entire measuring
period. The smoothing procedure allowed us to remove the high-frequency
month-to-month oscillations in the time series of atmospheric
characteristics. These are caused by local and regional circulation
processes that are not directly connected with ENSO activity and thus disturb the analysis. The relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Nino4 and Nino3.4 indexes are governed via the dependency of
the incoming solar radiation on ENSO development – surface water warming in
Nino3.4 and 4 regions generally results in a decrease in cloudiness above
the study region and thus in an increase in incoming solar radiation. The
high correlation of monthly GPP and ET rates with incoming and absorbed
solar radiation at this site is well described (e.g., Ibrom et al., 2008).
The effects of monthly air temperature and precipitation changes on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET variability are, on the contrary, relatively poor.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ENSO intensity are not very much
related.</p>
      <p>The cross-correlation analysis (Fig. 5) shows that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>G<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have a small 2–3 month backward shift relative to
the course of Nino4 SST, i.e., the maxima in GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> occur earlier than
ENSO culmination in the central Pacific (Nino4 SST anomaly). The maximal
values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred simultaneously with El Niño and La
Niña culminations. Such an effect of El Niño episodes on G can be
explained, as mentioned above, by a decrease in the cloud cover in the
region of Indonesia, due to the El Niño-associated shift in the Walker
circulation cell and the corresponding zone of deep convection from the
maritime continent of Indonesia toward the dateline, following SST anomaly
displacement. El Niño usually begins in April, and toward August–September
the ascending branch of the Walker cell leaves Indonesia and migrates
eastward to the Pacific. Therefore, 3–4 months before the El Niño
culmination in December–January, a decrease in cloud amount is observed over
Indonesia. The weakening of El Niño, in turn, leads to a backward, westward shift
in the intensive convection zone. It can result in increasing
precipitation amounts in the region during the second half of the wet period
after passing the maximal El Niño activity, in the gradual increase
of the cloudiness, and in a decrease in incoming solar radiation. The opposite
effect takes place during the La Niña with similar phase shift:
simultaneously, with the spreading of a negative SST anomaly over the
Pacific, the increasing of deep convection over Indonesia occurs, which
results in an increase in cloudiness and precipitation, being more
pronounced as it falls into the dry period of the year. The lower panels of
Fig. 4 indicate, however, that the decrease in radiation due to an increase in cloudiness does not depend linearly on La Niña intensity, reaching a
saturation state at approximately <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>A relatively poor correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns and ENSO
activity and an insignificant influence of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET can mainly be explained by the small intra-annual amplitude of
the air temperature in the study area not exceeding 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C as
well as by the low dependence of the air temperature on incoming solar
radiation. The mean monthly temperatures ranged between 19.5 and 20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the intra-annual
development. Maximal air temperatures
did not exceed 28.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, even on sunny days. Such optimal thermal
conditions with high precipitation amounts provide sufficient soil moistening
and relatively comfortable conditions for tree growth during the whole year.
As was already mentioned, even during the El Niño culmination in
2005–2006 the ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET did not decrease below 0.74,
(ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PET)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the relative soil water content of the
upper 30 cm horizon was always higher than 80 %.</p>
      <p>The analysis of absolute and relative changes in GPP and ET during the
periods of maximal El Niño and La Niña activities showed that GPP
during the El Niño culminations of 2005 and 2007 increased by about 20 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(6–7 %). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was about 9 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (2–3 %),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET – about 40 mm month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(about 30 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> – about 10 mm month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (6–7 %).
Thus, the maximal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP was 2 times lower than the mean annual
amplitude of GPP (Fig. 2). The maximal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET was equal to the annual
amplitude of ET (Fig. 2). During the La Niña culmination of 2008 the
maximal relative changes in GPP were higher than the relative changes
observed during El Niño events: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP was about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(8 %), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>GPP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> – about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (4 %).
The maximal decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET in the period was
relatively small: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET decreased  by about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 mm month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (10 %) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 mm month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (4 %). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ET was about
3 times lower than the mean annual amplitude of ET. Interestingly the
radiation-dependent GPP (as represented by the smoothed 7-month mean) does not
demonstrate any prolonged constant period during La Niña phases though the
radiation does. During the first cold event the GPP reduction is not as
strong as during the second one, although the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reductions are nearly of
the same strength. It could be assumed that in the first case the effect of
radiation decrease on GPP was compensated by other factors, like a slight
increase in the air temperature.</p>
      <p>Additionally, we investigated the influence of other climatic anomalies in
the region on CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in the tropical rainforest, such
as the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) and the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD).
The MJO is characterized by an eastward propagation of large regions of
enhanced and suppressed deep convection from the Indian Ocean toward the central
Pacific (Zhang, 2005). Each MJO cycle lasts approximately 30–60 days and
includes wetter (positive) and drier (negative) phases. The outgoing long-wave radiation
(OLR) measured at the top of the atmosphere is commonly used as an estimation of
deep convection intensity in the tropics. It was
recently shown that 6–12 months prior to the onset of an El
Niño episode, a drastic intensification of the MJO occurs in the western Pacific (Zhang
and Gottschalck, 2002; Lau, 2005; Hendon et al., 2007; Gushchina and
Dewitte, 2011). Furthermore, MJO behavior varies significantly during the
ENSO cycle: it is significantly decreased during the maxima in conventional
El Niño episodes, while it is still active during the peak phase of
central Pacific events. MJO rarely occurs during La Niña episodes
(Gushchina and Dewitte, 2012). As MJO is strongly responsible for
intra-seasonal variation of precipitation in the study region, the
occurrence of MJO events was compared to the significant anomalies of the ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio and of key meteorological variables. No evidence of MJO influence is
observed: the positive and negative anomalies of the ET <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio are associated with positive, negative and zero anomalies of OLR, filtered in the MJO
interval. Also, no significant relation emerged from the correlation
analysis.</p>
      <p>Correlations between the MJO index (Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999; Gushchina and
Dewitte, 2011) and the deviations of key meteorological parameters from
monthly averages during the study period were very low: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in
all cases).</p>
      <p>The IOD is characterized by changes in the SST in the
western Indian Ocean, resulting in intensive rainfall in the western part of
Indonesia during the positive phase and a corresponding precipitation
reduction during the negative phase (Saji et al., 1999). To find a possible
influence of IOD events on temporal variability in meteorological parameters
and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes, the monthly mean IOD index (Dipole Mode
Index, DMI) was used. Results showed that with respect to the western part
of Indonesia situated close to Indian Ocean, the IOD phenomenon has no
significant impact on meteorological conditions and fluxes in the area of
Central Sulawesi.</p>
      <p>Our case study showed a high sensitivity of the main components of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in the investigated mountainous tropical rainforest in
Bariri to El Niño and La Niña phenomena as well as a low sensitivity
to IOD and MJO events. The time lag between the respective indices and their
effect on the fluxes at our site indicates that the timing and the extent of
the effects are site specific. The fluxes respond to the local weather and
only indirectly to the large-scale weather anomalies, i.e., in the same way that the
local weather is affected by the large-scale weather phenomena. The observed
phenomena are thus not representative of all mountainous forest sites in
the tropics. The conclusion is that large-scale weather anomalies do have
systematic effects on local fluxes, but the timing and the extent are likely
to differ across different regions.</p>
      <p>Even though remote-sensing analyses have shown that the site is
representative of the region (Ibrom et al., 2007; Propastin et al., 2012),
the response to ENSO might differ in the region due to differences in
altitude and land use (Erasmi et al., 2009). In general, anthropogenic
deforestation has removed most parts of lowland forests so that the
remaining forest cover consists mostly of mountainous forests. At the
moment, there are no other FLUXNET sites situated in the equatorial mountainous
rainforests of southeast Asia with which we could directly compare our
findings and investigate whether a similar response to ENSO can be observed.
Most of the existing FLUXNET sites (AsiaFlux) are not comparable with the
investigated site as they are situated in subequatorial and tropical climate
zones. These are characterized by a higher seasonality of air temperature and
precipitation compared to our equatorial site. Thus, our site provides a
unique opportunity to investigative the response of an equatorial
mountainous rainforest to ENSO in the western Pacific region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in the mountainous tropical rainforest in
Central Sulawesi in Indonesia showed a high sensitivity of monthly GPP and
ET to ENSO intensity for the period from January 2004 to June 2008. This was
mainly governed by the high dependency of incoming solar radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
Nino4 and Nino3.4 SST changes and the strong sensitivity of GPP and ET to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Interestingly, we observed time shifts between the SST anomalies and
smoothed GPP anomalies driven by radiation anomalies. The maximal deviations
of GPP and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from their mean values occurred 2–3 months before the peak
phase of the ENSO events. The effect of ENSO intensity on RE was relatively small, mainly due to its weak effect on air
temperature. In any case, the small cross correlation between RE and ENSO
intensity had a compensatory effect on the respective timing of NEE, which was thus – like evapotranspiration – in synchrony with El Niño
culminations. Unlike the observations at other tropical sites, precipitation
variations had no influence on the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes at the study
site, mainly due to the permanently sufficient soil moisture condition in
the study area.</p>
      <p>Other climatic anomalies in the western Pacific region, such as the Indian
Ocean Dipole and the Madden–Julian oscillation, did not show any
significant effect on either the meteorological conditions or the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O fluxes in the investigated rainforest in Central Sulawesi.</p>
      <p>It is important to emphasize that the observation period does not cover any
period with extreme El Niño events, such as, e.g., the 1982–1983 and
1997–1998 events, when the anomaly of Nino3.4 SST, during several months,
exceeded 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and more significant changes in surface water
availability were observed. Also, in lowland parts of Sulawesi,
characterized by higher temperatures and lower precipitation, the vegetation
response to ENSO events is likely to be different and more pronounced
(Erasmi et al., 2009).</p>
      <p>All observed ENSO events during the selected period are classified as
the central Pacific type. Recently, Yeh et al. (2009) showed that under
projected climate change the proportion of central Pacific ENSO events might
increase. Furthermore, Cai et al. (2014, 2015) showed that current
projections of climate change for the 21st century suggest an increased
future likelihood of both El Niño and La Niña events. Based on the
results of our study, potential increases in ENSO activity would results in
an increased variability in the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O exchange between the atmosphere and the tropical rainforests in these and similar regions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The study was supported by the German Research Foundation as part of the projects
“Stability of Rainforest Margins in Indonesia”, STORMA (SFB 552),
“Ecological and Socioeconomic Functions of Tropical Lowland Rainforest
Transformation Systems (Sumatra, Indonesia)” (SFB 990) and KN 582/8-1. The
Russian Science Foundation (grant RSCF
14-27-00065) supported A. Olchev during the model development.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>This open-access publication was funded<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>by the University of Göttingen.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: P. Stoy</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiba, S. and Kitayama, K.: Effects of the 1997–98 El Niño drought on
rain forests of Mount Kinabalu, Borneo, J. Trop. Ecol., 18,
215–230, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ashok, K. and Yamagata, T.: The El Niño with a difference, Nature, 461,
481–484, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ashok, K., Behera, S. K., Rao, S. A., Weng, H., and Yamagata, T.: El Niño
Modoki and its possible teleconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
C11007, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JC003798</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Aubinet, M., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Rannik, U., Moncrieff, J., Foken, T.,
Kowalski, A. S., Martin, P. H., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Clement, R., Elbers,
J., Granier, A., Grunwald, T., Morgenstern, K., Pilegaard, K., Rebmann, C.,
Snijders, W., Valentini, R., and Vesala, T.: Estimates of the annual net carbon and
water exchange of forests: The EUROFLUX methodology, Adv. Ecol. Res., 30, 113–175,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds.): Eddy Covariance: A Practical
Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer Atmospheric Sciences,
Springer Verlag, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 438 pp., 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Burba, G. G., McDermitt, D. K., Grelle, A., Anderson, D. J., and Xu, L.:
Addressing the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux from open-path gas analyzers, Global Change Biol., 14, 1854–1876,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Burba, G. G., McDermitt, D. K., Grelle, A., Anderson, D. J., and Xu, L.: Addressing
the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux from open-path gas analyzers, Global Change Biol., 14, 1–23,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W., Borlace, S., Lengaigne, M., van Rensch, P., Collins, M., Vecchi,
G., Timmermann, A., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M. J., Wu, L., England, M. H.,
Wang, G., Guilyardi, E., and Jin, F.-F.: Increasing frequency of extreme El
Niño events due to greenhouse warming, Nature Climate Change, 4,
111–116, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W., Wang, G., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M., Wu, L., Jin, F.-F., Timmermann,
A., Collins, M., Vecchi, G., Lengaigne, M., England, M., Dommenget, D.,
Takahashi, K., and Guilyardi, E.: More frequent extreme La Niña events under
greenhouse warming, Nature Climate Change, 5, 132–137, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chatfield, C.: The Analysis of Time series, An Introduction, sixth edition,
Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, New York, 333 pp., 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, D. and Chen, H. W.: Using the Koppen classification to quantify
climate variation and change: An example for 19012010, Environmental Development, 6, 69–79,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ciais, P., Piao, S.-L., Cadule, P., Friedlingstein, P., and Chédin, A.:
Variability and recent trends in the African terrestrial carbon balance,
Biogeosciences, 6, 1935–1948, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1935-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-1935-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, D. A. and Clark, D. B.: Climate-induced variation in canopy tree
growth in a Costa Rican tropical rain forest, J. Ecol., 82,
865–872, 1994</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Download Climate Timeseries:
<uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/gcos_wgsp/Timeseries/</uri> (last access: 2 March 2015), 24 April
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Erasmi, S., Propastin, P., Kappas, M., and Panferov, O.: Patterns of NDVI
variation over Indonesia and its relationship to ENSO during the period
1982–2003, J. Climate, 22, 6612–6623, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Falge, E., Reth, S., Brüggemann, N., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Goldberg, V.,
Oltchev, A., Schaaf, S., Spindler, G., Stiller, B., Queck, R., Köstner,
B., and Bernhofer, C.: Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy
flux data in forest and grassland ecosystems of Germany, J. Ecol.
Modell., 188, 174–216, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Falk, U., Ibrom, A., Kreilein, H., Oltchev, A., and Gravenhorst, G.: Energy and
water fluxes above a cacao agroforestry system in Central Sulawesi,
Indonesia, indicate effects of land-use change on local climate,
Meteorol. Z., 14, 219–225, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
FAO: Global forest resources assessment 2010: Main report, FAO Forestry
Paper 163, Rome, Italy, 340 pp., 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Feely, R. A., Wanninkhof, R., Takahashi, T., and Tans, P.: Influence of El
Niño on the equatorial Pacific contribution to atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation, Nature, 398, 597–601, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fisher, J. B., Sikka, M., Sitch, S., Ciais, P., Poulter, B., Galbraith, D.,
Lee, J.-E., Huntingford, C., Viovy, N., Zeng, N., Ahlstrom, A., Lomas, M. R.,
Levy, P. E., Frankenberg, C., Saatchi, S., and Malhi, Y.: African tropical
rainforest net carbon dioxide fluxes in the twentieth century, Phil. Trans.
R. Soc. B, 368, 20120376, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2012.0376</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gerold, G. and Leemhuis, C.: Effects of “ENSO-events” and rainforest
conversion on river discharge in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia), in: Tropical
Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change Environmental Science and
Engineering, edited by: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner, Ch., Veldkamp, E., Faust, H.,
Guhardja, E., and Bidin, A., 327–350, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Grace, J., Lloyd, J., McIntyre, J., Miranda, A., Meir, P., Miranda, H.,
Nobre, C., Moncrieff, J. B., Massheder, J. M., Malhi, Y., Wright, I., and
Gash, J. C.: Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain forest in
south-west Amazonia, 1992 to 1993, Science, 270, 778–780, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Grace, J., Malhi, Y., Lloyd, J., McIntyre, J., Miranda, A. C., Meir, P., and
Miranda, H. S.: The use of eddy covariance to infer the net carbon uptake of
Brazilian rain forest, Glob. Change Biol., 2, 209–218, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Graf, H.-F. and Zanchettin, D.: Central Pacific El Niño, the
“subtropical bridge”, and Eurasian climate, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D01102,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016493" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016493</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Gushchina, D. and Dewitte, B.: The relationship between intraseasonal
tropical variability and ENSO and its modulation at seasonal to decadal
timescales, Central European Journal of Geosciences, 1, 175–196, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s13533-011-0017-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2478/s13533-011-0017-3</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gushchina, D. and Dewitte, B.: Intraseasonal tropical atmospheric
variability associated to the two flavors of El Niño, Mon. Weather
Rev., 140, 3669–3681, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A.,
Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R.,
Komardeey, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., and Townshend, J. R. G.:
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change, Science,
342, 850–853, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hendon, H. H., Wheeler, M. C., and Zhang, C.:
Seasonal Dependence of the MJO-ENSO Relationship, J. Climate, 20, 531–543,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hirano, T., Segah, H., Harada, T., Limin, S., June, T., Hirata, R., and
Osaki, M.: Carbon dioxide balance of a tropical peat swamp forest in
Kalimantan, Indonesia, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 412–425, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01301.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01301.x</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ibrom, A., Olchev, A., June, T., Ross, T., Kreilein, H., Falk, U., Merklein,
J., Twele, A., Rakkibu, G., Grote, S., Rauf, A., and Gravenhorst, G.:
Effects of land-use change on matter and energy exchange between ecosystems
in the rain forest margin and the atmosphere, in: The stability of tropical
rainforest margins: Linking ecological, economic and social constraints,
edited by: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner,  C., Zeller, M., Guhardja, E., and Bidin,
A.,
Springer Verlag, Berlin, 463–492, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ibrom, A., Oltchev, A., June, T., Kreilein, H., Rakkibu, G., Ross, Th.,
Panferov, O., and Gravenhorst, G.: Variation in photosynthetic light-use
efficiency in a mountainous tropical rain forest in Indonesia, Tree
Physiol., 28, 499–508, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Järvi, L., Mammarella, I., Eugster, W., Ibrom, A., Siivola, E., Dellwik,
E., Keronen, P., Burba, G., and Vesala, T.: Comparison of net CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes
measured with open- and closed-path infrared gas analyzers in urban complex
environment, Boreal Environ. Res., 14, 499–514, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kug, J.-S., Jin, F.-F., and An, S.-I.: Two types of El Niño events: Cold
tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño, J. Climate, 22, 1499–1515,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Larkin, N. K. and Harrison, D. E.: Global seasonal temperature and
precipitation anomalies during El Niño autumn and winter, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L13705, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022738</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lau, W. K. M.: El Niño Southern Oscillation connection. Intraseasonal
Variability of the Atmosphere-Ocean Climate System, edited by: Lau, W. K. M. and
Waliser,  D. E., Praxis Publishing, Chichester, UK, 271–300, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, S. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Sonke, B., Affum-Baffoe, K., Baker, T. R.,
Ojo, L. O., Phillips, O. L., Reitsma, J. M., White, L., Comiskey, J. A.,
Djuikouo, K. M.-N., Ewango, C. E. N., Feldpausch, T. R., Hamilton, A. C., Gloor,
M., Hart, T., Hladik, A., Lloyd, J., Lovett, J. C., Makana, J.-R., Malhi, Y.,
Mbago, F. M., Ndangalasi, H. J., Peacock, J., Peh, K. S.-H., Sheil, D.,
Sunderland, T., Swaine, M. D., Taplin, J., Taylor, D., Thomas, S. C., Votere,
R., and Woll, H.: Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical
forests, Nature, 457, 1003–1006, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Luyssaert, S., Inglima, I., Jung, M., Richardson, A. D., Reichstein, M.,
Papale, D., Piao, S. L., Schulze, E.-D., Wingate, L., Matteucci, G., Aragao,
L., Aubinet, M., Beer, C., Bernhofer, C., Black, K. G., Bonal, D., Bonnefond,
J.-M., Chambers, J., Ciais, P., Cook, B., Davis, K. J., Dolman, A. J., Gielen,
B., Goulden, M., Grace, J., Granier, A., Grelle, A., Griffis, T.,
Grünwald, T., Guidolotti, G., Hanson, P. J., Harding, R., Hollinger,
D. Y., Hutyra, L. R., Kolari, P., Kruijt, B., Kutsch, W., Lagergren, F.,
Laurila, T., Law, B. E., Le Maire, G., Lindroth, A., Loustau, D., Malhi, Y.,
Mateus, J., Migliavacca, M., Misson, L., Montagnani, L., Moncrieff,
J., Moors, E., Munger, J. W., Nikinmaa, E., Ollinger, S. V., Pita, G.,
Rebmann, C., Roupsard, O., Saigusa, N., Sanz, M. J., Seufert, G., Sierra, C.,
Smith, M.-L., Tang, J., Valentini, R., Vesala, T., and Janssens, I. A.:
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a
global database, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 2509–2537, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Malhi, Y.: The carbon balance of tropical forest regions, 1990–2005,
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 237–244, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Malhi, Y., Baldocchi, D. D., and Jarvis, P. G.: The carbon balance of
tropical, temperate and boreal forests, Plant Cell Environ., 22,
715–740, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Moser, G., Schuldt, B., Hertel, D., Horna, V., Coners, H., Barus, H., and
Leuschner, C.: Replicated throughfall exclusion experiment in an Indonesian
perhumid rainforest: wood production, litter fall and fine root growth under
simulated drought, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 1481–1497, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12424" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12424</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Oltchev, A., Constantin, J., Gravenhorst, G., Ibrom, A., Heimann, J.,
Schmidt, J., Falk, M., Morgenstern, K., Richter, I., and Vygodskaya, N.:
Application of a six-layer SVAT model for simulation of evapotranspiration
and water uptake in a spruce forest, Phys. Chem. Earth,
21, 195–199, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Oltchev, A., Cermak, J., Nadezhdina, N., Tatarinov, F., Tishenko, A., Ibrom,
A., and Gravenhorst, G.: Transpiration of a mixed forest stand: field
measurements and simulation using SVAT models, J. Boreal Environ.
Res., 7, 389–397, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Olchev, A., Ibrom, A., Ross, T., Falk, U., Rakkibu, G., Radler, K., Grote,
S., Kreilein, H., and Gravenhorst G.: A modelling approach for simulation of
water and carbon dioxide exchange between multi-species tropical rain forest
and the atmosphere, J. Ecol. Modell., 212, 122–130, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Panferov, O., Ibrom, I., Kreilein, H., Oltchev, A., Rauf, A., June, T.,
Gravenhorst, G., and Knohl, A.: Between deforestation and climate impact: the
Bariri Flux tower site in the primary montane rainforest of Central
Sulawesi, Indonesia, The Newsletter of FLUXNET, 2, 17–19, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, O. L., Aragao, L., Lewis, S. L., Fisher, J. B., Lloyd, J.,
Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Malhi, Y., Monteagudo, A., Peacock, J., Quesada, C. A.,
van der Heijden, G., Almeida, S., Amaral, I., Arroyo, L., Aymard, G., Baker,
T. R., Banki, O., Blanc, L., Bonal, D., Brando, P., Chave, J., de Oliveira,
A. C. A., Cardozo, N. D., Czimczik, C. I, Feldpausch, T. R., Freitas, M. A.,
Gloor, E., Higuchi, N., Jimenez, E., Lloyd, G., Meir, P., Mendoza, C.,
Morel, A., Neill, D. A., Nepstad, D., Patino, S., Penuela, M. C., Prieto, A.,
Ramirez, F., Schwarz, M., Silva, J., Silveira, M., Thomas, A. S., ter Steege,
H., Stropp, J., Vasquez, R., Zelazowski, P., Davila, E. A., Andelman, S.,
Andrade, A., Chao, K.-J., Erwin, T., Di Fiore, A., Honorio, C. E., Keeling,
H., Killeen, T. J., Laurance, W. F., Cruz, A. P., Pitman, N. C. A., Vargas, P. N.,
Ramirez-Angulo, H., Rudas, A., Salamao, R., Silva, N., Terborgh, J., and
Torres-Lezama, A.: Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest, Science, 323,
1344–1347, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.: On the assessment of surface heat flux
and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 100,
81–92, 1972.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Propastin, P., Ibrom, A., Erasmi, S., and Knohl, A.: Effects of canopy
photosynthesis saturation on the estimation of gross primary productivity
from MODIS data in a tropical forest, Remote Sens. Environ., 121,
252–260, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmusson, E. M. and Carpenter, T. H.: Variations in tropical sea surface
temperature and surface wind fields associated with the Southern
Oscillation/El Niño, Mon. Weather Rev., 110, 354–384, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Rayner, P. J. and Law, R. M.: The relationship between tropical CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes
and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
493–496, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL900008</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Reichstein, M., Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Papale, D., Aubinet, M., Berbigier, P.,
Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Gilmanov, T., Granier, A., Grunwald, T., Havrankova, K.,
Ilvesniemi, H., Janous, D., Knohl, A., Laurila, T., Lohila, A., Loustau, D.,
Matteucci, G., Meyers, T., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.-M., Pumpanen, J., Rambal, S.,
Rotenberg, E., Sanz, M., Tenhunen, J., Seufert, G., Vaccari, F., Vesala, T.,
Yakir, D., and Valentini, R.: On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into
assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm, Global Change Biol.,
11, 1424–1439, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Reverter, B. R., Carrara, A., Fernández, A., Gimeno, C., Sanz, M. J.,
Serrano-Ortiz, P., Sánchez-Cañete, E. P., Were, A., Domingo, F.,
Resco, V., Burba, G. G., and Kowalski, A. S.: Adjustment of annual NEE and ET for
the open-path IRGA self-heating correction: Magnitude and approximation over
a range of climate, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1856–1861,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Saji, N. H., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P. N., and Yamagata, T.: A dipole
mode in the tropical Indian Ocean, Nature, 401, 360–363, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Setoh, T., Imawaki, S., Ostrovskii, A., and Umatani S.: Interdecadal
Variations of ENSO Signals and Annual Cycles Revealed by Wavelet Analysis,
J. Oceanography, 55, 385–394, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>van Straaten, O., Veldkamp, E., and Corre, M. D.: Simulated drought reduces soil
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and production in a tropical forest in Sulawesi, Indonesia,
Ecosphere, 2, art119, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504628112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1504628112</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C.: Atmospheric circulation cells associated with the El
Niño-Southern Oscillation, J. Climate, 15, 399–419, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wheeler, M. C. and Kiladis, G. N.: Convectively coupled equatorial waves:
Analysis of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber–frequency domain,
J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 374–399, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Yeh, S.-W., Kug, J.-S., Dewitte, B., Kwon, M.-H., Kirtman, B., and Jin,
F.-F.: El Niño in a changing climate, Nature, 461, 511–514, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, Y. and Yan, H.: Different types of La Niña events and different
responses of the tropical atmosphere, Chinese Sci. Bull., 58, 406–415,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, C.: Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 43, RG2003,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004RG000158</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, C. and Gottschalck, J.: SST Anomalies of ENSO and the Madden–Julian
oscillation in the equatorial Pacific, J. Climate, 15, 2429–2445, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Response of CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="3"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> and H<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="3"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math>O fluxes in a mountainous tropical
rainforest in equatorial Indonesia to El Niño events</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><h6 xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">Abstract. </h6><p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="p">The possible impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events on the
main components of CO<m:math display="inline"><m:msub level="3"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> and H<m:math display="inline"><m:msub level="3"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math>O fluxes between the tropical rainforest
and the atmosphere is investigated. The fluxes were continuously measured in an
old-growth mountainous tropical rainforest in Central Sulawesi in
Indonesia using the eddy covariance method for the period from January 2004
to June 2008. During this period, two episodes of El Niño and one
episode of La Niña were observed. All these ENSO episodes had moderate
intensity and were of the central Pacific type. The temporal variability
analysis of the main meteorological parameters and components of CO<m:math display="inline"><m:msub level="3"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math>
and H<m:math display="inline"><m:msub level="3"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math>O exchange showed a high sensitivity of evapotranspiration (ET)
and gross primary production (GPP) of the tropical rainforest to
meteorological variations caused by both El Niño and La Niña
episodes. Incoming solar radiation is the main governing factor that is
responsible for ET and GPP variability. Ecosystem respiration (RE) dynamics
depend mainly on the air temperature changes and are almost insensitive to
ENSO. Changes in precipitation due to moderate ENSO events did not have any
notable effect on ET and GPP, mainly because of sufficient soil moisture
conditions even in periods of an anomalous reduction in precipitation in the
region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiba, S. and Kitayama, K.: Effects of the 1997–98 El Niño drought on
rain forests of Mount Kinabalu, Borneo, J. Trop. Ecol., 18,
215–230, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ashok, K. and Yamagata, T.: The El Niño with a difference, Nature, 461,
481–484, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Ashok, K., Behera, S. K., Rao, S. A., Weng, H., and Yamagata, T.: El Niño
Modoki and its possible teleconnection, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
C11007, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2006JC003798</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Aubinet, M., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Rannik, U., Moncrieff, J., Foken, T.,
Kowalski, A. S., Martin, P. H., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Clement, R., Elbers,
J., Granier, A., Grunwald, T., Morgenstern, K., Pilegaard, K., Rebmann, C.,
Snijders, W., Valentini, R., and Vesala, T.: Estimates of the annual net carbon and
water exchange of forests: The EUROFLUX methodology, Adv. Ecol. Res., 30, 113–175,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds.): Eddy Covariance: A Practical
Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer Atmospheric Sciences,
Springer Verlag, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 438 pp., 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Burba, G. G., McDermitt, D. K., Grelle, A., Anderson, D. J., and Xu, L.:
Addressing the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements
of CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> flux from open-path gas analyzers, Global Change Biol., 14, 1854–1876,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Burba, G. G., McDermitt, D. K., Grelle, A., Anderson, D. J., and Xu, L.: Addressing
the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements of
CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> flux from open-path gas analyzers, Global Change Biol., 14, 1–23,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W., Borlace, S., Lengaigne, M., van Rensch, P., Collins, M., Vecchi,
G., Timmermann, A., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M. J., Wu, L., England, M. H.,
Wang, G., Guilyardi, E., and Jin, F.-F.: Increasing frequency of extreme El
Niño events due to greenhouse warming, Nature Climate Change, 4,
111–116, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W., Wang, G., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M., Wu, L., Jin, F.-F., Timmermann,
A., Collins, M., Vecchi, G., Lengaigne, M., England, M., Dommenget, D.,
Takahashi, K., and Guilyardi, E.: More frequent extreme La Niña events under
greenhouse warming, Nature Climate Change, 5, 132–137, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chatfield, C.: The Analysis of Time series, An Introduction, sixth edition,
Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, New York, 333 pp., 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, D. and Chen, H. W.: Using the Koppen classification to quantify
climate variation and change: An example for 19012010, Environmental Development, 6, 69–79,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Piao, S.-L., Cadule, P., Friedlingstein, P., and Chédin, A.:
Variability and recent trends in the African terrestrial carbon balance,
Biogeosciences, 6, 1935–1948, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1935-2009" title="" class="ref">10.5194/bg-6-1935-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, D. A. and Clark, D. B.: Climate-induced variation in canopy tree
growth in a Costa Rican tropical rain forest, J. Ecol., 82,
865–872, 1994
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Download Climate Timeseries:
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/gcos_wgsp/Timeseries/" title="" class="ref">http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/gcos_wgsp/Timeseries/</a> (last access: 2 March 2015), 24 April
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Erasmi, S., Propastin, P., Kappas, M., and Panferov, O.: Patterns of NDVI
variation over Indonesia and its relationship to ENSO during the period
1982–2003, J. Climate, 22, 6612–6623, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Falge, E., Reth, S., Brüggemann, N., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Goldberg, V.,
Oltchev, A., Schaaf, S., Spindler, G., Stiller, B., Queck, R., Köstner,
B., and Bernhofer, C.: Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy
flux data in forest and grassland ecosystems of Germany, J. Ecol.
Modell., 188, 174–216, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Falk, U., Ibrom, A., Kreilein, H., Oltchev, A., and Gravenhorst, G.: Energy and
water fluxes above a cacao agroforestry system in Central Sulawesi,
Indonesia, indicate effects of land-use change on local climate,
Meteorol. Z., 14, 219–225, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
FAO: Global forest resources assessment 2010: Main report, FAO Forestry
Paper 163, Rome, Italy, 340 pp., 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Feely, R. A., Wanninkhof, R., Takahashi, T., and Tans, P.: Influence of El
Niño on the equatorial Pacific contribution to atmospheric
CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> accumulation, Nature, 398, 597–601, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fisher, J. B., Sikka, M., Sitch, S., Ciais, P., Poulter, B., Galbraith, D.,
Lee, J.-E., Huntingford, C., Viovy, N., Zeng, N., Ahlstrom, A., Lomas, M. R.,
Levy, P. E., Frankenberg, C., Saatchi, S., and Malhi, Y.: African tropical
rainforest net carbon dioxide fluxes in the twentieth century, Phil. Trans.
R. Soc. B, 368, 20120376, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0376" title="" class="ref">10.1098/rstb.2012.0376</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gerold, G. and Leemhuis, C.: Effects of “ENSO-events” and rainforest
conversion on river discharge in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia), in: Tropical
Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change Environmental Science and
Engineering, edited by: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner, Ch., Veldkamp, E., Faust, H.,
Guhardja, E., and Bidin, A., 327–350, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Grace, J., Lloyd, J., McIntyre, J., Miranda, A., Meir, P., Miranda, H.,
Nobre, C., Moncrieff, J. B., Massheder, J. M., Malhi, Y., Wright, I., and
Gash, J. C.: Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain forest in
south-west Amazonia, 1992 to 1993, Science, 270, 778–780, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Grace, J., Malhi, Y., Lloyd, J., McIntyre, J., Miranda, A. C., Meir, P., and
Miranda, H. S.: The use of eddy covariance to infer the net carbon uptake of
Brazilian rain forest, Glob. Change Biol., 2, 209–218, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Graf, H.-F. and Zanchettin, D.: Central Pacific El Niño, the
“subtropical bridge”, and Eurasian climate, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D01102,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016493" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2011JD016493</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Gushchina, D. and Dewitte, B.: The relationship between intraseasonal
tropical variability and ENSO and its modulation at seasonal to decadal
timescales, Central European Journal of Geosciences, 1, 175–196, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s13533-011-0017-3" title="" class="ref">10.2478/s13533-011-0017-3</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gushchina, D. and Dewitte, B.: Intraseasonal tropical atmospheric
variability associated to the two flavors of El Niño, Mon. Weather
Rev., 140, 3669–3681, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A.,
Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R.,
Komardeey, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., and Townshend, J. R. G.:
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change, Science,
342, 850–853, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hendon, H. H., Wheeler, M. C., and Zhang, C.:
Seasonal Dependence of the MJO-ENSO Relationship, J. Climate, 20, 531–543,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hirano, T., Segah, H., Harada, T., Limin, S., June, T., Hirata, R., and
Osaki, M.: Carbon dioxide balance of a tropical peat swamp forest in
Kalimantan, Indonesia, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 412–425, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01301.x" title="" class="ref">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01301.x</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ibrom, A., Olchev, A., June, T., Ross, T., Kreilein, H., Falk, U., Merklein,
J., Twele, A., Rakkibu, G., Grote, S., Rauf, A., and Gravenhorst, G.:
Effects of land-use change on matter and energy exchange between ecosystems
in the rain forest margin and the atmosphere, in: The stability of tropical
rainforest margins: Linking ecological, economic and social constraints,
edited by: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner,  C., Zeller, M., Guhardja, E., and Bidin,
A.,
Springer Verlag, Berlin, 463–492, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ibrom, A., Oltchev, A., June, T., Kreilein, H., Rakkibu, G., Ross, Th.,
Panferov, O., and Gravenhorst, G.: Variation in photosynthetic light-use
efficiency in a mountainous tropical rain forest in Indonesia, Tree
Physiol., 28, 499–508, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Järvi, L., Mammarella, I., Eugster, W., Ibrom, A., Siivola, E., Dellwik,
E., Keronen, P., Burba, G., and Vesala, T.: Comparison of net CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> fluxes
measured with open- and closed-path infrared gas analyzers in urban complex
environment, Boreal Environ. Res., 14, 499–514, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Kug, J.-S., Jin, F.-F., and An, S.-I.: Two types of El Niño events: Cold
tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño, J. Climate, 22, 1499–1515,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Larkin, N. K. and Harrison, D. E.: Global seasonal temperature and
precipitation anomalies during El Niño autumn and winter, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L13705, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022738" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2005GL022738</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Lau, W. K. M.: El Niño Southern Oscillation connection. Intraseasonal
Variability of the Atmosphere-Ocean Climate System, edited by: Lau, W. K. M. and
Waliser,  D. E., Praxis Publishing, Chichester, UK, 271–300, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, S. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Sonke, B., Affum-Baffoe, K., Baker, T. R.,
Ojo, L. O., Phillips, O. L., Reitsma, J. M., White, L., Comiskey, J. A.,
Djuikouo, K. M.-N., Ewango, C. E. N., Feldpausch, T. R., Hamilton, A. C., Gloor,
M., Hart, T., Hladik, A., Lloyd, J., Lovett, J. C., Makana, J.-R., Malhi, Y.,
Mbago, F. M., Ndangalasi, H. J., Peacock, J., Peh, K. S.-H., Sheil, D.,
Sunderland, T., Swaine, M. D., Taplin, J., Taylor, D., Thomas, S. C., Votere,
R., and Woll, H.: Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical
forests, Nature, 457, 1003–1006, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Luyssaert, S., Inglima, I., Jung, M., Richardson, A. D., Reichstein, M.,
Papale, D., Piao, S. L., Schulze, E.-D., Wingate, L., Matteucci, G., Aragao,
L., Aubinet, M., Beer, C., Bernhofer, C., Black, K. G., Bonal, D., Bonnefond,
J.-M., Chambers, J., Ciais, P., Cook, B., Davis, K. J., Dolman, A. J., Gielen,
B., Goulden, M., Grace, J., Granier, A., Grelle, A., Griffis, T.,
Grünwald, T., Guidolotti, G., Hanson, P. J., Harding, R., Hollinger,
D. Y., Hutyra, L. R., Kolari, P., Kruijt, B., Kutsch, W., Lagergren, F.,
Laurila, T., Law, B. E., Le Maire, G., Lindroth, A., Loustau, D., Malhi, Y.,
Mateus, J., Migliavacca, M., Misson, L., Montagnani, L., Moncrieff,
J., Moors, E., Munger, J. W., Nikinmaa, E., Ollinger, S. V., Pita, G.,
Rebmann, C., Roupsard, O., Saigusa, N., Sanz, M. J., Seufert, G., Sierra, C.,
Smith, M.-L., Tang, J., Valentini, R., Vesala, T., and Janssens, I. A.:
CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a
global database, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 2509–2537, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Malhi, Y.: The carbon balance of tropical forest regions, 1990–2005,
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 237–244, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Malhi, Y., Baldocchi, D. D., and Jarvis, P. G.: The carbon balance of
tropical, temperate and boreal forests, Plant Cell Environ., 22,
715–740, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Moser, G., Schuldt, B., Hertel, D., Horna, V., Coners, H., Barus, H., and
Leuschner, C.: Replicated throughfall exclusion experiment in an Indonesian
perhumid rainforest: wood production, litter fall and fine root growth under
simulated drought, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 1481–1497, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12424" title="" class="ref">10.1111/gcb.12424</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Oltchev, A., Constantin, J., Gravenhorst, G., Ibrom, A., Heimann, J.,
Schmidt, J., Falk, M., Morgenstern, K., Richter, I., and Vygodskaya, N.:
Application of a six-layer SVAT model for simulation of evapotranspiration
and water uptake in a spruce forest, Phys. Chem. Earth,
21, 195–199, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Oltchev, A., Cermak, J., Nadezhdina, N., Tatarinov, F., Tishenko, A., Ibrom,
A., and Gravenhorst, G.: Transpiration of a mixed forest stand: field
measurements and simulation using SVAT models, J. Boreal Environ.
Res., 7, 389–397, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Olchev, A., Ibrom, A., Ross, T., Falk, U., Rakkibu, G., Radler, K., Grote,
S., Kreilein, H., and Gravenhorst G.: A modelling approach for simulation of
water and carbon dioxide exchange between multi-species tropical rain forest
and the atmosphere, J. Ecol. Modell., 212, 122–130, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Panferov, O., Ibrom, I., Kreilein, H., Oltchev, A., Rauf, A., June, T.,
Gravenhorst, G., and Knohl, A.: Between deforestation and climate impact: the
Bariri Flux tower site in the primary montane rainforest of Central
Sulawesi, Indonesia, The Newsletter of FLUXNET, 2, 17–19, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, O. L., Aragao, L., Lewis, S. L., Fisher, J. B., Lloyd, J.,
Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Malhi, Y., Monteagudo, A., Peacock, J., Quesada, C. A.,
van der Heijden, G., Almeida, S., Amaral, I., Arroyo, L., Aymard, G., Baker,
T. R., Banki, O., Blanc, L., Bonal, D., Brando, P., Chave, J., de Oliveira,
A. C. A., Cardozo, N. D., Czimczik, C. I, Feldpausch, T. R., Freitas, M. A.,
Gloor, E., Higuchi, N., Jimenez, E., Lloyd, G., Meir, P., Mendoza, C.,
Morel, A., Neill, D. A., Nepstad, D., Patino, S., Penuela, M. C., Prieto, A.,
Ramirez, F., Schwarz, M., Silva, J., Silveira, M., Thomas, A. S., ter Steege,
H., Stropp, J., Vasquez, R., Zelazowski, P., Davila, E. A., Andelman, S.,
Andrade, A., Chao, K.-J., Erwin, T., Di Fiore, A., Honorio, C. E., Keeling,
H., Killeen, T. J., Laurance, W. F., Cruz, A. P., Pitman, N. C. A., Vargas, P. N.,
Ramirez-Angulo, H., Rudas, A., Salamao, R., Silva, N., Terborgh, J., and
Torres-Lezama, A.: Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest, Science, 323,
1344–1347, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J.: On the assessment of surface heat flux
and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 100,
81–92, 1972.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Propastin, P., Ibrom, A., Erasmi, S., and Knohl, A.: Effects of canopy
photosynthesis saturation on the estimation of gross primary productivity
from MODIS data in a tropical forest, Remote Sens. Environ., 121,
252–260, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmusson, E. M. and Carpenter, T. H.: Variations in tropical sea surface
temperature and surface wind fields associated with the Southern
Oscillation/El Niño, Mon. Weather Rev., 110, 354–384, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Rayner, P. J. and Law, R. M.: The relationship between tropical CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> fluxes
and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
493–496, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900008" title="" class="ref">10.1029/1999GL900008</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Reichstein, M., Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Papale, D., Aubinet, M., Berbigier, P.,
Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Gilmanov, T., Granier, A., Grunwald, T., Havrankova, K.,
Ilvesniemi, H., Janous, D., Knohl, A., Laurila, T., Lohila, A., Loustau, D.,
Matteucci, G., Meyers, T., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.-M., Pumpanen, J., Rambal, S.,
Rotenberg, E., Sanz, M., Tenhunen, J., Seufert, G., Vaccari, F., Vesala, T.,
Yakir, D., and Valentini, R.: On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into
assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm, Global Change Biol.,
11, 1424–1439, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Reverter, B. R., Carrara, A., Fernández, A., Gimeno, C., Sanz, M. J.,
Serrano-Ortiz, P., Sánchez-Cañete, E. P., Were, A., Domingo, F.,
Resco, V., Burba, G. G., and Kowalski, A. S.: Adjustment of annual NEE and ET for
the open-path IRGA self-heating correction: Magnitude and approximation over
a range of climate, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1856–1861,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Saji, N. H., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P. N., and Yamagata, T.: A dipole
mode in the tropical Indian Ocean, Nature, 401, 360–363, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Setoh, T., Imawaki, S., Ostrovskii, A., and Umatani S.: Interdecadal
Variations of ENSO Signals and Annual Cycles Revealed by Wavelet Analysis,
J. Oceanography, 55, 385–394, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
van Straaten, O., Veldkamp, E., and Corre, M. D.: Simulated drought reduces soil
CO<m:math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" display="inline"><m:msub level="2"><m:mi/><m:mn mathvariant="normal">2</m:mn></m:msub></m:math> efflux and production in a tropical forest in Sulawesi, Indonesia,
Ecosphere, 2, art119, <a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504628112" title="" class="ref">10.1073/pnas.1504628112</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C.: Atmospheric circulation cells associated with the El
Niño-Southern Oscillation, J. Climate, 15, 399–419, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wheeler, M. C. and Kiladis, G. N.: Convectively coupled equatorial waves:
Analysis of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber–frequency domain,
J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 374–399, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Yeh, S.-W., Kug, J.-S., Dewitte, B., Kwon, M.-H., Kirtman, B., and Jin,
F.-F.: El Niño in a changing climate, Nature, 461, 511–514, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, Y. and Yan, H.: Different types of La Niña events and different
responses of the tropical atmosphere, Chinese Sci. Bull., 58, 406–415,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, C.: Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 43, RG2003,
<a xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158" title="" class="ref">10.1029/2004RG000158</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, C. and Gottschalck, J.: SST Anomalies of ENSO and the Madden–Julian
oscillation in the equatorial Pacific, J. Climate, 15, 2429–2445, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
