<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-739-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Sourcing the iron in the naturally fertilised bloom around the
Kerguelen Plateau: particulate trace metal dynamics</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Kerguelen Plateau: particulate trace metal sources}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P. van der Merwe et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>van der Merwe</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          <email>pvander@utas.edu.au</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Bowie</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-7799</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Quéroué</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Armand</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Blain</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff7">
          <name><surname>Chever</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Davies</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Dehairs</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Planchon</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-9698</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Sarthou</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Townsend</surname><given-names>A. T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff11">
          <name><surname>Trull</surname><given-names>T. W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC, University of
Tasmania, TAS 7004, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of
Tasmania, Battery Point, TAS 7004, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (LEMAR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale,
CNRS,IRD, UMR6539, IUEM, Technopole Brest Iroise, Place Nicolas Copernic, 29280 Plouzané, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Biological Sciences and Climate Futures,
Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR7621,
Laboratoire d'Océanographie
Microbienne, Observatoire Océanologique, 66650 Banyuls/mer,
France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>CNRS, UMR7621, Laboratoire d'Océanographie
Microbienne, Observatoire Océanologique, 66650 Banyuls/mer,
France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>IFREMER/Centre de Brest, Département REM/EEP/Laboratoire Environnement Profond,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Analytical, Environmental and
Geo-Chemistry &amp; Earth System Sciences <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>research group, Brussels,
Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>CNRS, Université de Brest, IRD, Ifremer, UMR6539
LEMAR, IUEM ; Technopôle Brest Iroise, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Place Nicolas Copernic, 29280
Plouzané, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Central Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Sandy
Bay, TAS 7005, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
Organisation, Oceans and Climate Flagship, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania,
Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">P. van der Merwe (pvander@utas.edu.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>739</fpage><lpage>755</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>August</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>September</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015.html">This article is available from https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The KEOPS2 project aims to elucidate the role of natural Fe fertilisation on
biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem functioning, including quantifying the
sources and processes by which iron is delivered in the vicinity of the
Kerguelen Archipelago, Southern Ocean. The KEOPS2 process study used an
upstream high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC), deep water (2500 m), reference station to compare with a
shallow (500 m), strongly fertilised plateau station and continued the
observations to a downstream, bathymetrically trapped recirculation of the
Polar Front where eddies commonly form and persist for hundreds of
kilometres into the Southern Ocean. Over the Kerguelen Plateau, mean
particulate (1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) Fe and Al concentrations (pFe <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.4 nM, pAl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25.2 nM)
were more than 20-fold higher than at an offshore
(lower-productivity) reference station (pFe <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.53 nM, pAl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.83 nM).
In comparison, over the plateau dissolved Fe levels were only elevated by a
factor of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2. Over the Kerguelen Plateau, ratios of pMn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pAl
and pFe <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pAl resemble basalt, likely originating from glacial/fluvial inputs
into shallow coastal waters. In downstream, offshore deep-waters, higher
pFe <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pAl, and pMn <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pAl ratios were observed, suggesting loss of lithogenic
material accompanied by retention of pFe and pMn. Biological uptake of
dissolved Fe and Mn and conversion into the biogenic particulate fraction or
aggregation of particulate metals onto bioaggregates also increased these
ratios further in surface waters as the bloom developed within the
recirculation structure. While resuspension of shelf sediments is likely to
be one of the important mechanisms of Fe fertilisation over the plateau,
fluvial and glacial sources appear to be important to areas downstream of
the island. Vertical profiles within an offshore recirculation feature
associated with the Polar Front show pFe and pMn levels that were 6-fold and
3.5-fold lower, respectively, than over the plateau in surface waters, though
still 3.6-fold and 1.7-fold higher respectively than the reference station.
Within the recirculation feature, strong depletions of pFe and pMn were
observed in the remnant winter water (temperature-minimum) layer near 175 m,
with higher values above and below this depth. The correspondence between
the pFe minima and the winter water temperature minima implies a seasonal
cycle is involved in the supply of pFe into the fertilised region. This
observed association is indicative of reduced supply in winter, which is
counterintuitive if sediment resuspension and entrainment within the mixed
layer is the primary fertilising mechanism to the downstream recirculation
structure. Therefore, we hypothesise that lateral transport of pFe from
shallow coastal waters is strong in spring, associated with snow melt and
increased runoff due to rainfall, drawdown through summer and reduced supply
in winter when snowfall and freezing conditions predominate in the Kerguelen
region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Small scale fertilisation experiments have now clearly established that
Southern Ocean primary production is limited by the availability of the
micronutrient iron (Fe) (Boyd et al.,
2007; de Baar, 2005). This limitation on the biological pump means that the
Southern Ocean does not realise its full potential in transferring
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the ocean interior; a result illustrated in
Antarctic continental ice records over geological timescales and supported
by modelling studies
(Barnola et al., 1987;
Bopp et al., 2003; Martin, 1990; Watson et al., 2000). Less well understood
is the overall system response to the addition of Fe as efficiency estimates
(defined here as the amount of carbon exported relative to Fe added above
baseline conditions) can vary by an order of magnitude
(Blain et al., 2007;
Pollard et al., 2009; Savoye et al., 2008). Both the original and subsequent
KEOPS missions aimed to resolve not only the efficiency estimate, but also
the response of the ecosystem and the overall effect on biogeochemical
cycles due to natural Fe fertilisation in the vicinity of the Kerguelen
Plateau. The KEOPS natural fertilisation experiment is complementary to
artificial Fe enrichment experiments due to the fact that its scale is much
larger and its time frame longer than that which is currently feasible in artificial
fertilisation experiments. Furthermore, due to the sustained release of Fe
into the fertilised region, as opposed to a sudden pulse artificial
experiment, the technical challenges of monitoring carbon export are
reduced. Furthermore, there is growing evidence that sustained Fe
fertilisation favours large, highly silicified, slow growing diatoms that
are efficient at exporting carbon into the ocean interior
(Quéguiner, 2013). When the results of process studies
such as KEOPS are extrapolated over the whole Southern Ocean, a small change
in the efficiency estimate could result in different conclusions as to the
efficacy, for instance, of artificial Fe fertilisation as a means of
mitigating rising atmospheric concentrations of anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Dissolved Fe (dFe &lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) includes colloidal and
nanoparticulate Fe, which may only be partially bioavailable, as well as
soluble Fe (sFe &lt; 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) which is highly bioavailable
(de Baar and de Jong, 2001). As a result, the larger
particulate fraction (&gt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) is often less studied due
to the perception that it has low bioavailability. However, the particulate
fraction can yield important information for several reasons; firstly the
dissolved fraction is constantly in a state of change with uptake, particle
scavenging and remineralisation occurring simultaneously and at varying
rates depending on many factors including complexation with organic ligands
(Johnson et al., 1997) and the biological community
present (Sunda, 2001). Thus, interpretation of dFe data is
difficult without a rarely obtained perspective on the time varying aspects
of the dFe distribution. Secondly, as a fraction of the total Fe, the major
sources of Fe into fertilised regions (e.g. weathering products delivered by
fluvial and glacial processes, resuspension of sediments and porewaters,
atmospheric and extra-terrestrial dust) are small particles (&gt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), with the concentration being more stable over weeks to
months, due to its abundance and relatively slow biological uptake. The
particulate fraction is primarily lost from surface waters through sinking,
either directly or via adhesion to bioaggregates
(Frew et al., 2006). However, there
is a constant transfer of dissolved Fe to particulate Fe, either via
biological uptake or precipitation and, particulate Fe to dissolved Fe, via
dissolution and biologically mediated processes (Moffett,
2001). Thus, the particulate fraction that is small enough to avoid sinking
out of the water column rapidly (0.2–5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) can be considered as a
significant source of dissolved Fe, with the rate of supply into surrounding
waters dependent on the dissolution and leaching rate. Furthermore, there is
growing evidence that particles in this size fraction are readily produced
by mechanical erosion of bedrock due to glacial processes at high latitudes
and that this large source may be partially bioavailable
(Hawkings
et al., 2014; Poulton and Raiswell, 2005; Raiswell et al., 2008a, b,
2006).</p>
      <p>The first KEOPS process study was conducted in 2005 and specifically focused
on processes affecting the demise of the spring bloom over the Kerguelen
Plateau (Blain et al., 2007). Blain et al. (2007) and Chever et al. (2010)
demonstrated that dFe fertilisation from the plateau increased primary
production in the area. From the data gathered it was proposed that
resuspension of plateau-derived sediments and entrainment into the mixed
layer during increased wind mixing that deepened the mixed layer, was the
primary source of particulate and subsequently, dissolved Fe to the
downstream blooms. Resolution of the Fe budget (accounting for all sources
and sinks of Fe in the system), from observations made during the first
mission, found that the vertical supply of dissolved Fe was not sufficient
to supply phytoplankton demand. Blain et al. (2007) closed the KEOPS Fe budget by assuming
that dissolution of a small fraction of the unconstrained particulate Fe
pool must occur. The KEOPS2 mission aimed to improve on the successes of the
first process study by accounting for the missing Fe in the budget, namely
particulate Fe (pFe). Thus, we aim to test the KEOPS1 hypothesis that
unconstrained particulate Fe is the missing Fe of the KEOPS Fe budget by
documenting the particulate metal enrichment around the Kerguelen Plateau.
Our goal is to determine the sources of Fe enrichment within areas of
interest (i.e. reference, plateau and the recirculation structure; see Fig. 1). Trace metal analysis of suspended particles, underlying sediment and
settling particulate material will elucidate the source to sink progression
of the particulate Fe pool. Following on from this work, and together with
dissolved Fe measurements (Quéroué et al.,
2015), a focused Fe budget will be constructed (Bowie
et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>SeaWiFS surface chlorophyll on 11 November 2011, approximately
half way through the KEOPS2 sampling program. Kerguelen and Heard Island are
visible in grey. Stations that were sampled for suspended particles are
indicated with black circles. Distinct regimes of interest for the KEOPS2
program are indicated in red.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>In situ pumps (ISPs)</title>
      <p>All sample handling, processing and preparation was performed in accordance
with general GEOTRACES protocols (<uri>http://www.geotraces.org/</uri>)
and specific methodologies outlined in Bowie et al. (2010). Briefly,
suspended particles were collected using up to 11 in situ pumps (ISPs) (McLane WTS
and Challenger) suspended simultaneously at varying depths throughout the
water column. Depths were chosen after viewing conductivity, temperature and
depth (CTD) data to sample within oceanographic features of interest as well
as obtaining a representative full water column profile. The ISPs were
fitted with 142 mm quartz micro fibre (QMA) (Sartorius) filters with 53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m Petex pre-filters and 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m polyester supports. QMA
filters were pre-combusted to remove particulate organic carbon and then
acid-washed with Seastar Baseline<sup>™</sup> HCl and rinsed with copious
amounts of ultra-pure water according to the methods outlined in the
GEOTRACES sample handling protocols handbook (Cutter et al.,
2010). The pre-filters and supports were carefully acid washed and rinsed
with copious amounts of ultra-pure water before use. Both the Petex
pre-filter and QMA filter were analysed for every pump giving two size
fractions at each sampling location. Therefore, all particles greater than
53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m were collected on the pre-filter and all particles within the 1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m size range were collected on the underlying QMA filter.
Lithogenics sourced from bedrock or sediments in the larger size range
(&gt; 53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) would have a high sinking velocity (&gt; 500 m day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to Stokes' law and as such would be expected to
make up a relatively small fraction of the total particles in this size
range. In comparison, the 1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m size class can potentially capture
both small biogenic and lithogenic particles. This is due to the prediction
that small lithogenic particles (1–5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) have significantly slower
sinking rates (0.1–10 m day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than large lithogenic particles
according to Stokes' law.</p>
      <p>The ISPs were programmed to pump for up to four hours, allowing up to 2000 L
of seawater to be filtered. After retrieval, the filters were bagged and
processed within an ISO class 5, containerised clean room. Replicate 14 mm
punches were taken using an acid-washed polycarbonate punch and stored
frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until analysis at the home laboratory. The 14 mm
punches were then used for particulate metal analysis, particulate organic
carbon and particulate organic nitrogen analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sediment traps (Technicap PPS3)</title>
      <p>For a full description of the sediment trap data during KEOPS2 see
Laurenceau et al. (2014) and Bowie et al. (2014). Two Technicap PPS3 free-floating sediment traps
were deployed below the mixed layer at a depth of 200 m. The two sediment
traps were deployed twice, giving a total of four deployments. The traps were
prepared with acid-cleaned sampling cups containing low-trace-metal brine
solution (salinity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60). The trap was programmed to sample
for 1.5–5.5 days, whilst the 12 individual sampling containers were open
for an equal portion of the total deployment. Upon retrieval, the sampling
containers were removed from the carousel, sealed and processed within an
ISO class 5, containerised clean room. The samples were filtered onto
acid-washed, 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m polycarbonate membrane filters via a 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
pre-filter using a Sartorius<sup>™</sup> PTFE filtration unit. The 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
pre-filter was selected to exclude large copepods and other large
plankton that would lead to unrealistic sample variability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Sediment coring</title>
      <p>An Oktopus Multicorer (<uri>www.oktopus-mari-tech.de</uri>) was used to
collect 8 replicate, 610 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95 mm sediment cores, simultaneously within a 1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> area at each station. The uppermost 5mm of surface sediment was
subsampled according to Armand et al. (2008)
representing an approximate sedimentation period of &lt; 1000 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>ISP filters for particulate metals</title>
      <p>All digestions and evaporations were carried out within a digestion hood
(SCP Science), where air was HEPA filtered during intake and subsequently
extracted through a fume hood. Filter blanks and sample filters were
digested in 15 mL acid cleaned, Teflon perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) screw cap vials
(Savillex<sup>™</sup>) using ultra-pure nitric acid (1 mL 16 M HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Seastar Baseline<sup>™</sup>) heated to 120 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 12 h
on a Teflon coated hotplate (SCP Science DigiPREP<sup>™</sup>), following
the method outlined in Bowie et al. (2010). Blanks containing only HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
were also analysed to determine the contribution of the digestion acid
without filter material.</p>
      <p>The digest solution was diluted with 9 mL of ultra-high purity water and
spiked to a final concentration of 10 ppb indium as an internal standard. Samples were analysed by
Sector Field ICP-MS (Finnigan Element II, Thermo Scientific)
(Cullen
and Sherrell, 1999; Townsend, 2000). A full suite of trace elements was
measured including Fe, Al, Mn, Ba and P. The data were quality controlled
by comparison with a certified reference material with a similar composition
to the material collected (BCR-414 trace metals in phytoplankton, European
Commission) (Table A1).</p>
      <p>Quartz micro-fibre (QMA) filters were chosen as they could be acid cleaned
to a trace-metal-clean level and the filter material allowed high particle
loading and low wash-off upon pump retrieval. Furthermore, the filters were
compatible for use with both Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
(ICP-MS) and elemental (CHN) analysis due to their ability to be combusted.
It should be noted that a compromise was made here by using QMA filters on
the ISPs. The compromise is that HF acid cannot be used with QMA filters as
it digests the filter material completely and leads to unacceptably high
analytical blanks. Therefore, we used HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the digestions of the
QMAs and for consistency regarding the suspended particles we also digested
the pre-filter with the same acid. On the other hand, we used a full HF acid
digestion for the underlying sediment analysis (Sect. 2.4.2). Therefore,
recoveries of lithogenic trace elements will be close to 100 % for the
sediment analysis, but somewhat lower for the lithogenic suspended
particles. However, a HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> only digestion will recover effectively
100 % of the trace elements of biogenic suspended particles (Table A1).
For further information see Bowie et al. (2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Sediment analysis for particulate metals</title>
      <p>Digestions and analysis were performed as per the ISP filters except that HF
acid was used to digest these highly refractory samples. The HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
digest used for the ISP filters is relatively weak but digests the biogenic
fraction completely as evidenced by the excellent recoveries on the BCR414
certified reference material (trace metals in phytoplankton) (Table A1) but
has limited recoveries of the lithogenic fraction as evidenced by the low
recoveries of pAl and pTi in MESS-3 and PACS-2 sediment certified reference
material (Bowie et al.,
2010).</p>
      <p>During the HF digest, a mixture of strong acids (250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L HF and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L HCl) were used as per Bowie et al.
(Bowie et al., 2010).
After 12 h at 95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C the digest PFA vials were uncapped and
evaporated to dryness under HEPA filtered air at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 4 h. The digest was then resuspended in 10 % HNO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with 10 ppb
indium as internal standard. A 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dilution factor (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
considered sufficient to place the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 mg sediment samples
within the calibration range of the SF-ICP-MS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <title>Particulate organic carbon (POC) and nitrogen (PN)</title>
      <p>All glassware in contact with POC samples was pre-combusted prior to field
work (450 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 12 h). Total nitrogen, carbon and hydrogen were
determined at the Central Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, using
a Thermo Finnigan EA 1112 Series Flash Elemental Analyzer (estimated
precision <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Station types</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>KEOPS2 sampling locations and station types.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.70}[.70]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A3-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">A3-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">R-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">F-L</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">E-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">E-3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">E-5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">E-4E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">E-4W</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kerguelen</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kerguelen</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">HNLC reference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Northern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Recirculation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Recirculation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Recirculation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Eastern recirculation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Western recirculation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Plateau 1st visit</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Plateau 2nd visit</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Polar Front</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">structure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">structure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">structure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">structure</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">structure</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20/10/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16/11/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25/10/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6/11/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29/10/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3/11/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18/11/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13/11/2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">11/11/2011</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Latitude (S)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37.7574<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37.4306<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21.52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>31.394<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29.5728<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>42.1334<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>24.698<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>42.9218<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>45.927<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longitude (E)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>4.8193<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3366<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>43.00<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">74<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40.036<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">72<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>14.1467<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">71<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>58.0027<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">71<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>53.7894<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">72<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>33.7792<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">71<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>25.51<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bottom depth (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">505</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">505</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2528</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2690</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1910</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1920</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1400</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time series</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particulate trace metals</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Yes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POC PON</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Yes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment samples</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Yes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment trap samples</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Yes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">No</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">No</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Surface (10 m) temperature in spring–summer <bold>(a)</bold> and autumn–winter <bold>(b)</bold> as
well as surface salinity in spring–summer <bold>(c)</bold> and autumn–winter <bold>(d)</bold> within
the study area from 1970 until 2013. The PF is identified as a solid black
line. Kerguelen and Heard Island are visible in dark grey and black
respectively and the Leclaire Rise can be identified as the shallow
bathymetry, north of the PF, near the western boundary of the map. Data
obtained from the World Ocean Database (<uri>http://www.nodc.noaa.gov</uri>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The sampling locations of KEOPS2 (Fig. 1) were designed to capture the key
regime types of the Kerguelen Archipelago including the high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) reference waters (station R-2), the high-trace-metal
plateau waters (station A3), the northern Polar Front (station F-L) and a
quasi-stationary, bathymetrically trapped recirculation structure (E-1, E-3
and E-5) to the east of Kerguelen Island (Table 1). Stations E-1, E-3 and
E-5 can be thought of as a pseudo-Lagrangian time series. In addition, two
stations were sampled at the eastern and western extremes of the
recirculation structure (E-4W and E-4E) which proved to contrast in absolute
concentrations as well as elemental ratios of particulate trace metals.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Surface water flow around the Kerguelen Plateau</title>
      <p>During KEOPS1, van Beek et al. (2008), Zhang et al. (2008) and Chever et al. (2010)
revealed that the water column south-east of Kerguelen Island was modified by
passing over the Heard Island Plateau. Park et al. (2008)
demonstrated that the interaction of the water masses over the Kerguelen
Plateau could be divided into the southern and northern water masses
separated by the Polar Front (PF, Fig. 1). The southern water mass has
source waters being derived from the Antarctic surface waters (AASW),
south-west of Kerguelen which is bound to the north by the shallow bathymetry
of the Leclaire Rise. These surface waters are generally colder and saltier
than to the north (Fig. 2). The AASW also flows around Heard Island and a
weaker surface current flows north-west over the Kerguelen Plateau towards
the north-east of Kerguelen Island where it is bound to the north by the PF.
This cold surface current can be seen during winter in Fig. 2. The
northern water mass has a source of easterly flowing Sub Antarctic Surface
Waters (SASW). The portion of the SASW that interacts with Kerguelen Island
is termed Kerguelen Island source waters and is bound to the south by the PF
(Fig. 2). A broad and poorly defined mixing zone to the east of Kerguelen
Island has been identified at the junction of these southern and northern
water masses. As a result of the mixing, eddies commonly form in this
region. Also within this mixing zone, surface filaments, identified by
elevated Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be seen in SeaWiFS images diverging from the PF
and entering the eastern boundary of the recirculation structure (see the
Supplement in Trull et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The Kerguelen Archipelago is isolated, being a relatively small and
localised source of Fe fertilisation surrounded by the large and deep, HNLC,
low Fe, Southern Ocean. Therefore, when identifying an Fe source to the
region, our focus is on the plateau and the two islands, Kerguelen and
Heard. Over geological timescales, all pFe distributed throughout the water
column within this region must be derived from all forms of weathering of
bed rock including fluvial and glacial outflow as well as dust from the
islands, hydrothermal and extra-terrestrial input. Over shorter time frames,
shelf sediments in the region contain recycled Fe as the vast majority of
these sediments are a combination of siliceous ooze
(Armand et al., 2008) and glacio-marine sediments;
the exported product of the highly productive overlying waters together with
some lithogenics (sourced from bed-rock) that were unutilised or
non-bioavailable and fast-sinking. Therefore, understanding the pathways of
supply of this new Fe is important to understanding the processes
controlling the long term productivity and therefore, carbon sequestration,
in the area.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mean elemental molar ratios of marine snow particles captured in
free-floating sediment traps, particulate matter (1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)
below the mixed layer and authigenic sediments at each station. Note that
station TEW-1 is a near-coastal station located within Hillsborough Bay,
Kerguelen Island. Station TEW-1 is not discussed in detail in the MS as no
samples were collected for suspended particles; however, details are
included here to show the influence of close proximity to the island and
fluvial/glacial sources.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment trap @ 210 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">pFe : pAl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">pMn : pAl</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">pMn : pFe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pBa : pAl</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A3-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.025</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.162</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.285</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.318</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Suspended particles mean (&gt; MLD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A3-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.027</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A3-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.034</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.036</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.059</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.322</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-L</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.027</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.190</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-4E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.037</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.045</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.383</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-4W</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.021</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.078</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.023</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.034</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.185</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.258</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.030</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.260</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment analysis</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TEW-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A3-1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.026</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R-2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.063</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.086</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.892</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F-L</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.019</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.040</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-4W</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E-3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.125</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kerguelen Archipelago</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08–0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.004–0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.021–0.050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.002–0.004</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Basalt mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(Gautier et al., 1990)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Upper continental crust</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.017</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.002</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(Wedepohl, 1995)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Underlying sediment analysis</title>
      <p>Analysis of sediments sourced from cores taken at each station revealed a
distinctly different sediment signature at station R-2 compared with any
other station (Table 2). The reference station signature was approximately
six times enriched in Mn relative to Al (Mn : Al 0.063) in comparison to the
plateau station (A3) (Mn : Al 0.011). The Mn : Al sedimentary signature at A3
was almost identical to authigenic sediments previously reported from the
Amundsen Sea (Angino, 1966). We consider that the enriched Mn at R-2
could be due to either MnO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment in the surface sediments during
redox cycling of early diagenesis (Planquette et al.,
2013), or supplied via a Mn enriched source such as hydrothermal venting
near the Leclaire Rise. The extremely low carbon content of the sediment at
station R-2, as evidenced by its near white colour, low diatom content (L.
Armand, pers. obs., 2012) and low carbon export flux
(Laurenceau et al., 2014;
Planchon et al., 2014), suggests that MnO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment in the surface
sediments during redox cycling is more likely at R-2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Profiles of particulate Fe <bold>(a)</bold>, Al <bold>(b)</bold> and Mn <bold>(c)</bold> (1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) at the
reference HNLC station (R-2), the northern PF station (F-L) and pre- and
post-bloom over the plateau station (A3-1, A3-2),
highlighting the contrasting particulate trace metal supply to these
locations. Biogenic Fe <bold>(d)</bold> (as a percentage of the total Fe) in surface
waters shows a clear progression that can be explained by the location of
each station within the study area whereby, biogenic Fe at R-2 &gt; &gt; F-L &gt; A3-2 &gt; A3-1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Particulate Fe at the plateau station (A3) by size class. The integrated
full water column pFe (&gt; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) reduced by 51 % between
A3-1 and A3-2 (9.1–4.5 mMol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at A3-1 and A3-2 respectively). The
integrated mixed layer pFe reduced by 70 % between A3-1 and A3-2 (1.4–0.56 mMol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at A3-1 and A3-2 respectively). The mixed layer shoaled
between A3-1 and A3-2 as illustrated by the dashed horizontal line. The
calculation of integrated mixed layer pFe used a constant mixed layer depth
of 165 m for both A3-1 and A3-2 to allow comparison between these stations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The authigenic sediment ratio of Fe : Al was also lower at station R-2 (Fe : Al <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.73) in comparison to any other station
(Fe : Al range 0.81–1.1).
However, all of our observed pFe : pAl molar ratios were higher than upper
crustal molar ratios (Fe : Al 0.19) (Wedepohl, 1995) or Amundsen
Sea surface sediments (Fe : Al 0.26) (Angino, 1966). Interestingly,
our observed pFe : pAl sedimentary ratios were similar to the ratio found in
phytoplankton such as the BCR-414 certified reference material (freshwater
phytoplankton) (Fe : Al <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.01) used in this study (Table A1). Furthermore,
the pFe : pAl ratio of sinking particles captured by the free floating PPS3
sediment traps (marine snow) had similar ratios of pFe : pAl of 1.02, 1.05,
0.91 and 0.70 for stations E-1, E-3, E-5 and A3-2, respectively (Table 2).
These observations highlight the major contribution of sinking biogenic
material to the authigenic sediments in the area around the Kerguelen
Plateau which was in contrast to the signature at station R-2 due to its low
productivity. The pFe in the sediments at all stations and primarily at
station R-2 (as a fraction of its total weight) were similar to Weddell Sea
surface sediments (Angino and Andrews, 1968) which ranged from 0.9–3.2 %. In comparison, station R-2 has a mean value of 0.1 % Fe while
station E-3, A3, F-L and E-4W had mean values of 0.3, 0.8, 1.5 and 2.5 %
respectively. The low fraction of Fe within the authigenic sediment at R-2
indicates limited pFe supply at this station in comparison to either the
Weddell Sea or the Kerguelen Plateau presented here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Plateau, reference and Polar Front stations</title>
      <p>The reference station (R-2) has a bottom depth of 2528 m and is
characterised by low surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(Lasbleiz et al., 2014) and nutrient concentrations
characteristic of HNLC waters (Blain et al., 2014).
Station F-L is approximately 313 km northeast of Kerguelen Island with a
bottom depth of 2690 m and represents the northern PF. Station F-L is
downstream of Kerguelen Island, with the PF delivering waters that
originated near station R-2. In this case, the waters crossing Station F-L
have interacted with both the plateau and shallow coastal waters of
Kerguelen Island. In contrast, station A3 is located over the Kerguelen
Plateau and has a bottom depth of 527 m, making it the shallowest station
sampled for trace metal analysis of suspended particles and one of the most
likely to be influenced by resuspension of shelf sediments (Fig. 1). The
proximity of the station to Heard and Kerguelen Island (roughly half way
between the two) means that fluvial and glacial runoff may also drive
fertilisation at this site. However, the hydrography of the area dictates
that waters which previously interacted with upstream Heard Island are a
more likely source to A3 than downstream Kerguelen Island
(Park et al., 2008).</p>
      <p>The pFe, pAl and pMn concentrations at the reference station (R-2) only
increase slightly towards the sea floor; however, enrichment in pFe, pAl and
primarily pMn is evident at 500 m likely due to proximity to the Leclaire
Rise (Fig. 3) (discussed in detail below). The northern PF station (F-L)
exhibits moderate concentrations of pFe, pAl and pMn throughout the water
column, somewhat higher than the reference station, and much higher
concentrations are observed in close proximity to the sea floor. It should
be noted that the deepest sample at R-2 was 148 m above the seafloor, while
at F-L it was only 90 m above the sea floor and this could well <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>explain<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> the
observed difference, given the strong decrease of nepheloid layers away from
the seabed (Blain et al., 2007;
Jouandet et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Profiles of pFe and pAl in the 1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m size range from station R-2, A3 and
F-L are shown in Fig. 3. The plateau station (A3) was sampled twice during
the study (A3-1 and A3-2), separated by 20 days. Surface chlorophyll images
revealed that between visits to the site, a large bloom developed in the
vicinity and extended over the site, and was beginning to fade again by the
time of the second sampling (Trull et al., 2014).
Thus, station A3-1 can be thought of as pre-bloom and A3-2 as post-bloom
conditions. Particulate Fe, Al and Mn generally increased towards the sea
floor at station A3, with the exception of a slight enrichment below the
mixed layer during the second visit (A3-2) to the station in the
&gt; 53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m size fraction (Fig. 4). To investigate the
progression of pFe through time, we integrated the pFe throughout the full
water column, and observed a decrease in the pFe stock from 9.1 to 4.5 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between the first and second visit to station A3. This translates
to a 51 % reduction in pFe for all size classes combined (i.e.
&gt; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). However, if we look closer at the pFe
distribution only within the surface mixed layer (165 m) between A3-1 and
A3-2, we observe a loss of 70 % of the integrated total pFe (&gt; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) (Fig. 4). Concurrently, using an Underwater Vision Profiler to track
particle size distribution, Jouandet et al. (2014)
noted a four-fold increase in particle numerical abundance through the full
water column. Their one dimensional particle dynamic model supported the
hypothesis that the increase in biogenic particles, due to blooming
conditions, resulted in the rapid formation of large particles due to
coagulation and subsequent vertical transport to the base of the mixed
layer. This result is supported in the current data set, in that we see a
large decrease in small pFe particles within the mixed layer and a moderate
increase in large pFe particles at the base of the mixed layer when
comparing pre (A3-1) to post (A3-2) bloom conditions (Fig. 4). Furthermore,
we observed an increase in biogenic pFe within the surface mixed layer
between A3-1 and A3-2 (Sect. 3.7).</p>
      <p>Thus, it appears that physical aggregation within the mixed layer of the
particles onto biogenic phyto-aggregates during the bloom development and
export to the base of the mixed layer, combined with significantly lower
concentrations above the seafloor resulted in the observed 51 % reduction
in pFe (&gt; 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) between A3-1 and A3-2. The significantly
lower concentration at 440 m during the post-bloom conditions of A3-2 may be
due to increased small particle scavenging resulting from sinking
phyto-aggregates or alternatively, small-scale variation in the thickness of
the nepheloid layer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Profiles of elemental ratios at the reference station (R-2), northern PF
(F-L) and pre- and post-bloom over the plateau station (A3-1, A3-2). Note the increase in pMn and pBa relative
to pAl at station R-2 below 500 m.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Elemental ratios at stations R-2, F-L and A3</title>
      <p>As station A3 is located over the Kerguelen Plateau and also is in close
proximity to fluvial and glacial runoff from Heard Island, we would expect
the trace metal source signature of suspended particles to be unique here in
comparison to our reference (R-2) and PF (F-L) stations. The particles over
the Kerguelen Plateau were characterised by very high pFe (0.94–30.4 nM)
and pAl (1.5–58.6 nM) with concentrations an order of magnitude higher
than R-2 (&lt; DL–1.35 nM Fe and &lt; DL–2.08 nM Al). The
reference station was characterised by low surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
characteristic of HNLC waters (Lasbleiz et al.,
2014), however, it is relatively close to the Leclaire Rise; a seamount with
its shallowest point 135 km west north-west of station R-2 rising up to
approximately 395 m. The Leclaire Rise extends to 70km north-west of station
R-2 where it reaches a depth of approximately 550 m. It is important to
recall in this context that the PF divides the northeast flowing AASW from
the eastward flowing SASW to the north (Park et al.,
2008). Classical theory suggests that this oceanographic feature should
block much of the enrichment from the Leclaire Rise to station R-2. However,
enrichment was evident in the vertical profiles of pFe, pMn and pAl at
station R-2 at 500 m depth (Fig. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Molar ratio of pMn : pAl of suspended particles versus depth, separated by station type. Vertical
lines represent the median molar ratios within Kerguelen Island basalts
(Gautier et al., 1990) (black), authigenic Kerguelen
Plateau sediments (red) and station R-2 authigenic sediments (green).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 5 illustrates the full water column elemental ratios at the reference
station (R-2) in comparison to the Kerguelen Plateau stations (A3-1 and
A3-2) and reveals that Mn : Fe as well as Ba : Al are strikingly unique. At
station R-2, below 500 m, we see Mn : Fe 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than A3, Mn : Al 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> higher
and Ba : Al ratios 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than at A3, making this source signature
relatively clear (Table 2). The unique ratios below 500 m at R-2 may arise
from a source of dissolved or particulate Mn (uncoupled from pFe and pAl)
from the Leclaire Rise. Furthermore, the elemental ratios over station A3
are generally much lower (Fig. 5) due to high pFe and pAl supply over the
Kerguelen Plateau that is relatively deficient in pMn, such as would be found
in glacial runoff that has a signature which reflects fresh weathering of
basaltic rocks (Doucet et al., 2005). This source theory is
supported by the observation of high dissolved Mn (dMn) near the Leclaire
Rise (Quéroué et al., 2015) and uniquely
high pMn : pFe in sediments found below station R-2 (Table 2). Surface water
particulate trace metals also reveal distinct differences. The ratios of
pFe : pAl, pMn : pAl and pMn : pFe all increase from the bottom of the mixed layer
to the surface at stations R-2 and F-L (Fig. 5). This profile characteristic
is in contrast to stations A3-1. The observed modification of the elemental
ratios in the surface mixed layer at R-2 and F-L is most likely due to
biological uptake of dissolved trace elements and conversion into the
biogenic particulate fraction.</p>
      <p>Particulate Al and pFe were closely coupled across all stations (Spearman's
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 70). However, pAl and pMn, although still
strongly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>&lt; 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 70), appeared more
variable than pFe versus pAl. Figure 6 illustrates this variability in the
pMn in comparison to pAl as a function of its location within the study
area. The observed variability in pMn but not pFe relative to pAl highlights
the uncoupling between some of the sources of pMn and pFe. Specifically, the
observed variability points to a uniquely high Mn : Fe source either in the
authigenic sediments of the Leclaire Rise and/or a hydrothermal source
(German et al., 1991), or a process whereby pAl is
preferentially stripped out with distance from the source. A study by
Shigemitsu et al. (2013) showed that the concentration of
pAl in suspended particulate material in the intermediate water of the Sea
of Okhotsk (western Pacific Ocean) decreased with distance from the shelf
source preferentially in relation to pFe and pMn. They concluded that
increasing pFe : pAl and pMn : pAl ratios occurred with distance from the source
and suggested that the denser, lithogenic particles settled out
preferentially, stripping out pAl. Furthermore, they found pFe became
associated with organic matter more readily than pAl and therefore, remained
suspended in the water column more readily than pAl. These processes could
explain the observed modification of the elemental ratios between stations
R-2, A3 and possibly F-L. The stations that were in close proximity to the
shelf source such as A3-1 and A3-2 were indeed enriched in lithogenic pAl
and as such pFe : pAl was relatively low (Fig. 5). In contrast, F-L was at the
greatest distance from a sedimentary source and displayed the highest
pFe : pAl ratio.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>What are the sources of particulate trace metals over the plateau and
downstream?</title>
      <p>The high particulate trace metal concentrations found at 440 m, at A3-1 and
A3-2, near the sea floor, most likely originated from resuspension of deep
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 m) shelf sediments. The cause of the variability
between A3-1 and A3-2 at this depth remains unclear, but could reflect small
scale variability in the depth of the nepheloid layer or be the result of
temporal variability due to the action of tides and internal waves
(McCave, 1986). The pMn : pAl, pMn : pFe and pBa : pAl ratios for A3-1
and A3-2 are similar from the sea floor to the approximate base of the
surface mixed layer, with values higher than the mean crustal ratios
(Wedepohl, 1995), but lower than either basalt
(Gautier et al., 1990) or the underlying sediment ratios
(Table 2). Within the surface mixed layer, A3-1 maintains similar ratios to
the deep water column, while at A3-2 the ratios diverge towards the surface.
The particulate trace metal signature within the mixed layer at A3-2
increases in pMn and pBa relative to pAl, which is most likely driven by
biogenic conversion of dissolved bioessential elements into biogenic
particles (Sect. 3.7).</p>
      <p>Glacial flour is the result of mechanical erosion of bed rock by glaciers.
Typical particle sizes are within the silt size range but can overlap with
clays (0.002–0.063 mm). Recent research suggests that Fe sourced from
glacial erosion can be a major source of bioavailable Fe to the Southern
Ocean
(Poulton
and Raiswell, 2005; Raiswell et al., 2008a, b, 2006). Assuming no mixing
and a dilute suspension, Stokes' law predicts that the small grain size of
glacial flour allows it to remain suspended within a 500 m water column for
between 2 and 2500 days or within a 165m mixed layer for 1–831 days
depending on particle size. Certainly, mixing within the surface mixed layer
would increase this duration significantly, meaning that glacial and fluvial
input from both Heard and Kerguelen Island could remain suspended in the
mixed layer for long enough to travel well past any of the stations in the
present study, excluding the reference station (R-2). Furthermore, it has
been shown that 2–3 % of the Fe within glacial rock flour can be
leached into the dissolved size fraction (&lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) with
ultrapure water; a large proportion of which should be bioavailable
(Schroth et al., 2009). It is thought that this dFe is
leached from nanoparticulate Fe (oxyhydr)oxides in glacial rock flour over
time (Raiswell, 2011; Raiswell et al., 2010)
following an exponential decay, so it is possible that this source could be
excluded from the &lt; 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m dissolved fraction, but included
in the 1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m particulate fraction presented here. This is
especially true of nanoparticulate Fe that is attached to the surface of
larger sediment grains as has been observed previously in glacial sediments
(Shaw et al., 2011). Given that the
particulate fraction is generally an order of magnitude higher in
concentration than the dissolved fraction, this source may well be more
significant in stimulating phytoplankton blooms than previously estimated.
Overall, station A3 appeared to be directly fertilised by resuspension of
shelf sediments at depth, and entrainment of this pFe-rich water occurred
during events that deepen the mixed layer periodically. However, lateral
supply above the mixed layer of small particles from shallow coastal sources
around Heard Island, including glacial melt waters, cannot be ruled out.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>Biogenic and sedimentary particulate trace metals</title>
      <p>If we assume that all particulate phosphorus (pP) is of biogenic origin, we
can calculate the biogenic Fe fraction of the total Fe concentration by
normalising to pP and comparing with published elemental ratios of Southern
Ocean diatoms (Planquette et al., 2013). For the
calculations we used the upper limit of Fe : P (1.93 mmol mol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reported by Twinning et al. (2004) for Southern Ocean
diatom assemblages. Given that pP and POC are remineralised throughout the
water column and are generated within the surface mixed layer, calculations
of biogenic trace metals will only be valid within the surface mixed layer,
as the concentration of pP and POC decreases strongly with depth. It should
also be noted that Kerguelen Island basalts and upper continental crust can
contribute particulate phosphorus concomitantly with pFe to the particulate
pool. However the Fe : P ratio found within Kerguelen Island basalts and the
continental crust is 12.8 and 25.8 (mol : mol) respectively
(Gautier et al., 1990; Wedepohl, 1995). Thus, the
factor of 1000 increase in pP observed within suspended particles compared
to these rock sources indicates that this pP is likely produced in situ within the
mixed layer from dissolved PO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rather than supplied from rock
weathering together with Fe. Furthermore, within the upper 200 m of the
water column, biogenic Fe correlates significantly with both fluorescence
(Spearman's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.518, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30) and dissolved oxygen
(Spearman's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.507, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30) confirming the
autotrophic composition of the particles identified as high in biogenic Fe.
Figure 3 illustrates the contribution of biogenic Fe in surface waters at
stations R-2, A3 and F-L. Station R-2 and F-L have biogenic Fe fractions
that are higher near the surface than at depth (Fig. 3). In contrast, at
stations A3-1 and A3-2, biogenic Fe and Mn only make up a relatively small
fraction of the total pFe throughout the water column although at station
A3-2 we see a slight increase in biogenic pFe towards the surface,
corresponding with the development of a bloom. Biogenic Fe at stations A3-1
and A3-2 constitutes less than 1 and 5 % respectively of the total Fe. The
low biogenic fraction at station A3-1 most likely results from an excess of
lithogenic Fe, Al and Mn to the water column from the shelf sediments as
well as fluvial/glacial runoff from nearby islands of the Kerguelen
Archipelago, which are excess to demand. A similar pattern was observed
during a study located in the Amundsen Sea (Planquette
et al., 2013) where the percentage of biogenic Fe (full water column mean)
reduced with proximity to the trace metal source.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Profiles of particulate trace metals during the pseudo-Lagrangian
recirculation-structure study. Station E-4W (gray triangle) exhibits unique
trace metal profiles in comparison to the remaining stations (see text for
details). Note the distinct pFe and pMn minima at 150–175 m. Particulate Al
exhibits a similar profile albeit without surface enrichment.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Temperature profiles within the upper 500 m within the
recirculation structure are shown alongside particulate Fe (1–53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) within the upper
500 m within the recirculation structure. Correspondence between the
temperature minimum depth of winter water and pFe minimum is illustrated.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.biogeosciences.net/12/739/2015/bg-12-739-2015-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Alternatively, the relative importance of sedimentary input at each of the
stations can be gauged by observing the pMn : pAl molar ratio within suspended
particles and comparing these to known molar ratios of pMn : pAl within
Kerguelen Island basalts, A3 authigenic sediments and R-2 authigenic
sediments (Fig. 6). At station A3 we see that almost all the suspended
particles lie within the ratio of plateau sediments and Kerguelen Island
basalts with the remaining suspended particles associated with the
development of a bloom in surface waters at A3-2, which is also where we see
an increase in biogenic Fe. Mid-depth suspended particles at E4-W (red dots)
also lie between Kerguelen Island basalts and plateau sediments, indicating
a similar source to station A3. The reference station exhibits highly
modified pMn : pAl molar ratios within the suspended particles and its
underlying sediment. This modification is most likely due to biogenic
incorporation of bioessential elements such as Mn into particles. The
remaining stations are intermediate between A-3 and R-2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS8">
  <title>Pseudo-Lagrangian, recirculation structure</title>
      <p>Station E-4W has trace metal concentrations, elemental ratios and community
size structure (Trull et al., 2014) similar to A3
and as such, will be excluded from the discussion in this section. The
remaining recirculation structure stations exhibit profiles of pFe and pMn
which show a minimum at approximately 150–175 m (Fig. 7). Our detailed
depth profile indicates that the pFe and pMn minima coincide with the
remnant winter water temperature minimum (Fig. 8). Interestingly, Blain et al. (2014) also estimated a winter water depth of
approximately 150 m. They observed, at 150 m, that nitrate and phosphate
profiles within the recirculation feature, from multiple years and seasons,
converged with striking consistency. Particulate Fe and pMn, concentrations
increase above and below the temperature minimum, however, pAl only
increases below 175 m. Particulate Al is stripped out preferentially with
settling lithogenics while pFe and pMn are retained either through
conversion to the biogenic particulate fraction (uptake) or adsorbed onto
organic particles. It should be noted here that the work of Raiswell (2011)
indicates that iceberg and glacially derived Fe nanoparticulate material is
typically high in Fe and low in Al. Thus, supply of glacially derived
nanoparticulate Fe from Kerguelen Island, via the north-east of the
recirculation structure could also cause the observed high Fe, low Al
surface enrichment within the recirculation structure.</p>
      <p>Given that the pFe and pMn minima coincides with the remnant-winter-water
temperature minimum, the total amount of particulate trace metals
distributed throughout the winter mixed layer must be lower than during
summer. This is counterintuitive if sediment resuspension is the primary
source of particulate trace metals into the recirculation feature. During
winter we would expect increased wind mixing, leading to more entrainment of
pFe over the plateau and more supply into the recirculation feature leading
to a maximum at the temperature minimum. Given that we observe the inverse
situation, supply into the recirculation structure must be low during
winter. Thus, we suggest that the lateral supply of fluvial and glacial
derived particulate trace metals must be an important source. This source
would be expected to reduce in winter when precipitation as snow and glacial
freezing is at a maximum and conversely, during spring, snow and ice melt
and rainfall increases runoff into the coastal areas and induces a
fertilisation event downstream of Heard and Kerguelen Islands. Kerguelen
Island is a subantarctic island, and its climatology is cold and wet, with
the Port-aux-Français weather station recording mean daily temperatures of
2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in winter and 8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in summer and year round
consistent precipitation (730 mm annually) (Meteo France). It should be
noted that due to its sheltered location and sea-level altitude, the
Port-aux-Français location is relatively mild compared to the west coast and
interior of the island which is estimated to receive three times the rainfall of
the east coast, or 2124 mm annually. Therefore, having a climate of high
precipitation and seasonal thawing, increased seasonal runoff can be
expected in spring and summer from Kerguelen Island.</p>
      <p>The importance of glacial/fluvial sources in supplying dissolved Fe and Mn
into coastal waters to the north-east of Kerguelen, north of the PF, has
been shown previously by Bucciarelli et al. (2001).
The authors found a linear relationship between dissolved Fe and lithogenic
silica and suggested that this was indicative of weathering of silicate rich
minerals that characterise the Kerguelen Islands with a concomitant release
of dissolved Fe and Mn. Indeed, in the present study, using the lithogenic
and biogenic silica data presented in Closset et al. (2014), total particulate Fe correlated significantly
with total lithogenic silica (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.76, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) but not with
biogenic silica. However, this significant correlation was not limited to
the coastal regions in the present study and instead was observed for all
stations and depths combined. Bucciarelli et al. (2001)
found an exponential decrease in dissolved Fe with distance from the coast,
further supporting their theory of a dominant coastal source in this region.
This exponential decrease would be expected to apply to the particulate
fraction also; however, it appears that even with an exponential decrease in
pFe with distance from the coast, particulate Fe enrichment, sourced from
fluvial runoff, is evident on the southern side of the PF within the
recirculation feature.</p>
      <p>The hypothesis of pFe supply from north of the PF into the eastern side of
the recirculation feature via the mixing zone is supported by radium isotope
data (Sanial et al., 2014) collected during the KEOPS2
mission. Apparent radium ages derived from the ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>224</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>223</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra (and using the ratio observed within the Baie des
Baleiniers as the starting time) suggest that the age of water since
fertilisation within the recirculation feature was only 5–8 days. This
indicates that there is likely rapid transfer across the PF of fertilised
waters which were sourced from nearby shallow coastal areas such as the Baie
des Baleiniers, Kerguelen Island. The authors go on to highlight that the
heterogeneous distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>224</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>223</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra indicates that
transfer across the Polar Front is sporadic in nature.</p>
      <p>The observation of pFe enrichment in surface waters of the recirculation
structure without proportional concentrations of pAl may be due to
biological uptake and conversion from a bioavailable pool into the biogenic
particulate pool. Settling of refractory lithogenics that are high in Al may
also partially explain the observation. Alternatively or in combination, a
high pFe, low pAl source such as nanoparticulate Fe characteristic of
glacial/fluvial runoff
(Hawkings
et al., 2014; Raiswell et al., 2008b, 2006) on Kerguelen Island could
explain this observation. Indeed, temperature and salinity profiles within
the recirculation structure reveal fresher and warmer water within the upper
110 m than either the R-2 or A3 stations, suggesting that glacial/fluvial runoff
from Kerguelen Island may well be delivering this high pFe, low pAl surface
enrichment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study has identified two distinct areas of Fe fertilisation in the
vicinity of Kerguelen Island. Firstly, the plateau itself is a major source
of resuspended shelf sediments to station A3 especially below the mixed
layer. Secondly, fluvial and glacial runoff into coastal waters in
combination with resuspension of shallow coastal sediments fertilises areas
to the north of the PF, east of Kerguelen Island, but also across the PF and
into the recirculation feature from the north-east. Indications of particle
transport across the PF were observed at station R-2 sourced from the
Leclaire Rise to the north of the PF. Satellite imagery also revealed
filaments clearly diverging from the main jet of the PF and into the north
east of the recirculation structure. Within the recirculation structure, the
correspondence of the winter water temperature minimum with the particulate
trace metal minimum implies that a seasonal cycle is involved in the supply
of trace elements. This is most likely driven by increased fluvial and
glacial runoff in summer, associated with rainfall and basal melt and
reduced supply in winter when snowfall and freezing conditions predominate.
In this complex region, it appears that weathering of the islands themselves
are direct sources of new Fe and help stimulate the seasonal bloom that is
significant in terms of the regional carbon cycle.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Over the mesoscale, it appears that physical processes associated with
settling of refractory lithogenic particles was an important process in
modifying the particulate elemental ratios. However, on the individual
profile scale, biological processes seem important in modifying the
elemental ratios in surface waters through preferential uptake of
bio-essential elements, even from the particulate fraction.</p>
      <p>Repeat sampling over the plateau provided a perspective on the persistence
of the particulate Fe availability. Small particles containing pFe were
efficiently transported out of the mixed layer during a bloom event over
stations A3. This resulted in a 70 % reduction in the integrated pFe stock
within the mixed layer as a result of physical aggregation of small
particles onto phyto-aggregates, presumably decreasing particle buoyancy and
increasing export out of the mixed layer. This is likely to be an important
aspect of the complex interaction between iron supply and biological
availability, capable of mediating bloom duration and thus the efficiency of
carbon sequestration.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Certified reference material analysis</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T1" position="anchor"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><caption><p>Percentage recoveries of BCR-414 certified reference
material. Certified and single lab values taken from the final report of the
Commission of the European Communities, Community Bureau of Reference for
BCR-414, EUR14558.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.80}[.80]?><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rep 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Rep 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Rep 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RSD (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Certified</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">% recovery</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Single lab analysis</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">% recovery</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ba</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Al</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2243</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1349</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1943</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1845</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">454.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">102</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">278</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">284</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">283</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">282</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">299</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1874</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1878</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1867</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative
Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Australia. This work was also
supported by the French research program of INSU-CNRS LEFE<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CYBER (Les
enveloppes fluides et l'environnement – Cycles biogéochimiques,
environnement et ressources), the French ANR (Agence Nationale de la
Recherche, SIMI-6 program, ANR-10-BLAN-0614), the French CNES (Centre
National d'Etudes Spatiales) and the French Polar Institute IPEV (Institut
Polaire Paul<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Emile Victor). We would like to thank the captain and the
crew of the R/V <italic>Marion Dufresne</italic>, Stephane Blain and  Bernard Quéguiner as
chief scientist and project coordinator of the KEOPS2 cruises, respectively.
L. Armand was supported by grant Australian Antarctic Division, AAS
grant #3214. Access to Sector Field ICP-MS instrumentation was supported
through ARC LIEF funding (LE0989539). F. Dehairs was supported by Belgian Science Policy
grant SD/CA/05A; Flanders Research Foundation grant G071512N and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Strategic Research
Plan.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: I. Obernosterer</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Angino, E.: Geochemistry of Antarctic pelagic sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 30, 939–961, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Angino, E. and Andrews, R.: Trace element chemistry, heavy minerals, and
sediment statistics of Weddell Sea sediments, J. Sediment. Res., 38,
634–642, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Armand, L. K., Crosta, X., Quéguiner, B., Mosseri, J., and Garcia, N.:
Diatoms preserved in surface sediments of the northeastern Kerguelen
Plateau, Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II, 55, 677–692, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barnola, J. M., Raynaud, D., Korotkevich, Y. S., and Lorius, C.: Vostok ice
core provides 160000-year record of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 329, 408–414, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Blain, S., Queguiner, B., Armand, L., Belviso, S., Bombled, B., Bopp, L.,
Bowie, A. R., Brunet, C., Brussaard, C., Carlotti, F., Christaki, U.,
Corbiere, A., Durand, I., Ebersbach, F., Fuda, J. L., Garcia, N., Gerringa,
L., Griffiths, B., Guigue, C., Guillerm, C., Jacquet, S. H. M., Jeandel, C.,
Laan, P., Lefevre, D., Lo Monaco, C., Malits, A., Mosseri, J., Obernosterer,
I., Park, Y. H., Picheral, M., Pondaven, P., Remenyi, T., Sandroni, V.,
Sarthou, G., Savoye, N., Scouarnec, L., Souhaut, M., Thuiller, D.,
Timmermans, K., Trull, T., Uitz, J., Van Beek, P., Veldhuis, M., Vincent,
D., Viollier, E., Vong, L., and Wagener, T.: Effect of natural iron
fertilization on carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean, Nature, 446,
1070–1074, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Blain, S., Capparos, J., Guéneuguès, A., Obernosterer, I., and Oriol, L.:
Distributions and stoichiometry of dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus in the iron
fertilized region near Kerguelen (Southern Ocean), Biogeosciences Discuss., 11, 9949–9977, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/:" ext-link-type="DOI">:</ext-link>10.5194/bgd-11-9949-2014, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., and Aumont, O.: Dust impact
on marine biota and atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during glacial periods,
Paleoceanography, 18, 1–24, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bowie, A. R., Townsend, A. T., Lannuzel, D., Remenyi, T. A., and van der Merwe, P.:
Modern sampling and analytical methods for the determination of trace
elements in marine particulate material using magnetic sector inductively
coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta, 676, 15–27, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bowie, A. R., van der Merwe, P., Quéroué, F., Trull, T., Fourquez, M.,
Planchon, F., Sarthou, G., Chever, F., Townsend, A. T., Obernosterer, I.,
Sallée, J.-B., and Blain, S.: Iron budgets for three distinct biogeochemical
sites around the Kerguelen archipelago (Southern Ocean) during the natural
fertilisation experiment KEOPS-2, Biogeosciences Discuss., 11, 17861–17923, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-17861-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bgd-11-17861-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W., Jickells, T., Law, C. S., Blain, S., Boyle, E. A., Buesseler,
K. O., Coale, K. H., Cullen, J. J., de Baar, H. J. W., Follows, M., Harvey, M.,
Lancelot, C., Levasseur, M., Owens, N. P. J., Pollard, R., Rivkin, R. B.,
Sarmiento, J., Schoemann, V., Smetacek, V., Takeda, S., Tsuda, A., Turner,
S., Watson, A. J., and Baar, H. J. W. De: Mesoscale iron enrichment
experiments 1993-2005: Synthesis and future directions, Science,
315, 612–617, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bucciarelli, E., Bowie, A. R., and Tréguer, P.: Iron and manganese in
the wake of the Kerguelen Islands (Southern Ocean), Mar. Chem., 73, 21–36, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chever, F., Sarthou, G., Bucciarelli, E., Blain, S., and Bowie, A. R.: An iron budget
during the natural iron fertilisation experiment KEOPS (Kerguelen Islands, Southern Ocean),
Biogeosciences, 7, 455–468, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-455-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-455-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Closset, I., Lasbleiz, M., Leblanc, K., Quéguiner, B., Cavagna, A.-J., Elskens, M.,
Navez, J., and Cardinal, D.: Seasonal evolution of net and regenerated silica production
around a natural Fe-fertilized area in the Southern Ocean estimated with Si isotopic
approaches, Biogeosciences, 11, 5827–5846, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5827-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-5827-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cullen, J. T. and Sherrell, R. M.: Techniques for determination of trace
metals in small samples of size-fractionated particulate matter:
Phytoplankton metals off central California, Mar. Chem., 67, 233–247, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cutter, G., Andersson, P., Codispoti, L., Croot, P., Francois, R., Lohan,
M., Obata, H., and Rutgers van der Loeff, M.: Sampling and Sample-handling
Protocols for GEOTRACES Cruises, <uri>http://www.geotraces.org/images/stories/documents/intercalibration/Cookbook.pdf</uri>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>De Baar, H. J. W., Boyd, P. W., Coale, K. H., Landry, M. R., Tsuda, A., Assmy, P.,
Bakker, D. C. E., Bozec, Y., Barber, R. T., Brzezinski, M. A., Buesseler, K. O., Boye, M.,
Croot, P. L., Gervais, F., Gorbunov, M., Harrison, P. J., Hiscock, W. T., Laan, P.,
Lancelot, C., Law, C. S., Levasseur, M., Marchetti, A., Millero, F. J., Nishioka, J.,
Nojiri, Y., van Oijen, T., Riebesell, U., Rijkenberg, M. J. A., Saito, H., Takeda, S.,
Timmermans, K. R., Veldhuis, M. J. W., Waite, A., and Wong, C.-S.: Synthesis of iron fertilization experiments: From the
Iron Age in the Age of Enlightenment, J. Geophys. Res., 110, C09S16, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JC002601</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
De Baar, H. J. W. and de Jong, J. T.: Distribution, sources and sinks of
iron in seawater,  edited by: Turner, D. R. and Hunter, K. A., in: The
Biogeochemistry of Iron in Seawater, IUPAC Series on Analytical and Physical
Chemistry of Environmental Systems, 123–253, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Doucet, S., Scoates, J. S., Weis, D., and Giret, A.: Constraining the
components of the Kerguelen mantle plume: A Hf-Pb-Sr-Nd isotopic study of
picrites and high-MgO basalts from the Kerguelen Archipelago, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 6, 1–28, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Frew, R. D., Hutchins, D. A., Nodder, S., Sanudo-Wilhelmy, S., Tovar-Sanchez,
A., Leblanc, K., Hare, C. E., and Boyd, P. W.: Particulate iron dynamics
during FeCycle in subantarctic waters south-east of New Zealand, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1S93, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gautier, I., Weis, D., Mennessier, J.-P., Vidal, P., Giret, A., and Loubet, M.:
Petrology and geochemistry of the Kerguelen Archipelago basalts (South Indian Ocean)
evolution of the mantle sources from ridge to
intraplate position, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 100, 59–76, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
German, C., Campbell, A., and Edmond, J.: Hydrothermal scavenging at the
Mid-Atlantic Ridge: modification of trace element dissolved fluxes, Earth
Planet. Sci. Lett., 107, 101–114, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hawkings, J. R., Wadham, J. L., Tranter, M., Raiswell, R., Benning, L. G.,
Statham, P. J., Tedstone, A., Nienow, P., Lee, K., and Telling, J.: Ice
sheets as a significant source of highly reactive nanoparticulate iron to
the oceans, Nat. Commun., 5, 3929, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, K. S., Gordon, R. M., and Coale, K. H.: What controls dissolved iron
concentrations in the world ocean?, Mar. Chem., 57, 137–161, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Jouandet, M.-P., Jackson, G. A., Carlotti, F., Picheral, M., Stemmann, L.,
and Blain, S.: Rapid formation of large aggregates during the spring bloom of
Kerguelen Island: observations and model comparisons, Biogeosciences, 11, 4393–4406, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4393-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-4393-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Lasbleiz, M., Leblanc, K., Blain, S., Ras, J., Cornet-Barthaux, V., Hélias Nunige, S.,
and Quéguiner, B.: Pigments, elemental composition (C, N, P, and Si), and
stoichiometry of particulate matter in the naturally iron fertilized region of
Kerguelen in the Southern Ocean, Biogeosciences, 11, 5931–5955, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5931-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-5931-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Laurenceau, E. C., Trull, T. W., Davies, D. M., Bray, S. G., Doran, J.,
Planchon, F., Carlotti, F., Jouandet, M.-P., Cavagna, A.-J., Waite, A. M.,
and Blain, S.: The relative importance of phytoplankton aggregates and zooplankton
fecal pellets to carbon export: insights from free-drifting sediment trap
deployments in naturally iron-fertilised waters near the Kerguelen plateau,
Biogeosciences Discuss., 11, 13623–13673, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-13623-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bgd-11-13623-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> change: The iron hypothesis.
Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
McCave, I. N.: Local and global aspects of the bottom nepheloid layers
in the world ocean, Neth. J. Sea Res., 20, 167–181, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Moffett, J. W.: Transformations Among Different Forms of Iron in the
Ocean, edited by: Turner, D. R. and  Hunter, K. A.,  in: The Biogeochemistry of Iron
in Seawater, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 343–372, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Park, Y.-H., Roquet, F., Durand, I., and Fuda, J.-L.: Large-scale
circulation over and around the Northern Kerguelen Plateau, Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II, 55, 566–581, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Planchon, F., Ballas, D., Cavagna, A.-J., Bowie, A. R., Davies, D., Trull, T.,
Laurenceau, E., Van Der Merwe, P., and Dehairs, F.: Carbon export in the naturally
iron-fertilized Kerguelen area of the Southern Ocean based on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th approach,
Biogeosciences Discuss., 11, 15991–16032, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-15991-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bgd-11-15991-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Planquette, H., Sherrell, R. M., Stammerjohn, S., and Field, M. P.:
Particulate iron delivery to the water column of the Amundsen Sea,
Antarctica, Mar. Chem., 153, 15–30, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Pollard, R., Salter, I., Sanders, R., and Lucas, M.: Southern Ocean
deep-water carbon export enhanced by natural iron fertilization, Nature, 457,
577–581, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Poulton, S. W. and  Raiswell, R.: Chemical and physical characteristics of
iron oxides in riverine and glacial meltwater sediments, Chem. Geol., 218,
203–221, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Quéguiner, B.: Iron fertilization and the structure of planktonic
communities in high nutrient regions of the Southern Ocean, Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II, 90, 43–54, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Quéroué, F., Sarthou, G., Planquette, H. F., Bucciarelli, E., Chever, F.,
van der Merwe, P., Lannuzel, D., Townsend, A. T., Cheize, M., Blain, S., d'Ovidio, F.,
and Bowie, A. R.: High variability of dissolved iron concentrations in the
vicinity of Kerguelen Island (Southern Ocean), Biogeosciences Discuss., 12, 231–270, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-231-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bgd-12-231-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Raiswell, R.: Iceberg-hosted nanoparticulate Fe in the Southern Ocean:
Mineralogy, origin, dissolution kinetics and source of bioavailable Fe, Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II, 58, 1364–1375, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Raiswell, R., Tranter, M., Benning, L. G., Siegert, M., Death, R.,
Huybrechts, P., Payne, T., and Death, R.: Contributions from glacially
derived sediment to the global iron (oxyhydr)oxide cycle: Implications for
iron delivery to the oceans, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 70, 2765–2780, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Raiswell, R., Benning, L. G., Tranter, M., and Tulaczyk, S.: Bioavailable
iron in the Southern Ocean: The significance of the iceberg conveyor belt,
Geochem. Trans., 9, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-9-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/1467-4866-9-7</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Raiswell, R., Benning, L. G. L., Davidson, L., and Tranter, M.:
Nanoparticulate bioavailable iron minerals in icebergs and glaciers,
Mineral. Mag., 72, 345–348, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Raiswell, R., Vu, H. P., Brinza, L., and Benning, L. G.: The determination
of labile Fe in ferrihydrite by ascorbic acid extraction: Methodology,
dissolution kinetics and loss of solubility with age and de-watering, Chem.
Geol., 278, 70–79, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Sanial, V., van Beek, P., Lansard, B., Souhaut, M., Kestenare, E., d'Ovidio, F.,
Zhou, M., and Blain, S.: Use of Ra isotopes to deduce rapid transfer of sediment-derived
inputs off Kerguelen, Biogeosciences Discuss., 11, 14023–14061, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-14023-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bgd-11-14023-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Savoye, N., Trull, T., Jacquet, S. H. M., Navez, J., and Dehairs, F.:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th-based export fluxes during a natural iron fertilization experiment in
the Southern Ocean (KEOPS)- Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II- 55,
841–855, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Schroth, A. W., Crusius, J., Sholkovitz, E. R., and Bostick, B. C.: Iron
solubility driven by speciation in dust sources to the ocean, Nat. Geosci.,
2, 337–340, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Shaw, T. J., Raiswell, R., Hexel, C. R., Vu, H. P., Moore, W. S., Dudgeon,
R., and Smith, K. L.: Input, composition, and potential impact of terrigenous
material from free-drifting icebergs in the Weddell Sea, Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II, 58, 1376–1383, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Shigemitsu, M., Nishioka, J., Watanabe, Y. W., Yamanaka, Y., Nakatsuka, T.,
and Volkov, Y. N.: Fe/Al ratios of suspended particulate matter from
intermediate water in the Okhotsk Sea: Implications for long-distance
lateral transport of particulate Fe, Mar. Chem., 157, 41–48, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sunda, W. G.: Bioavailability and Bioaccumulation of Iron in the Sea,
edited by: Turner, D. R. and Hunter, K. H., in: The Biogeochemistry of Iron in
Seawater, IUPAC Series on Analytical and Physical Chemistry of Environmental
Systems, 41–84, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, S. R., McLennan, S. M., and Scott, M.: The continental crust, its
composition and evolution?: an examination of the geochemical record
preserved in sedimentary rocks, edited by:  Taylor, S. R. and  McLennan, S.
M., Oxford, Melbourne: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 45–49, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Townsend, A. T.: The accurate determination of the first row transition
metals in water, urine, plant, tissue and rock samples by sector field
ICP-MS, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 15, 307–314, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Trull, T. W., Davies, D. M., Dehairs, F., Cavagna, A.-J., Lasbleiz, M.,
Laurenceau, E. C., d'Ovidio, F., Planchon, F., Leblanc, K., Quéguiner, B.,
and Blain, S.: Chemometric perspectives on plankton community responses to natural
iron fertilization over and downstream of the Kerguelen Plateau in the Southern
Ocean, Biogeosciences Discuss., 11, 13841–13903, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-13841-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bgd-11-13841-2014</ext-link>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Twining, B. S., Baines, S. B., and Fisher, N. S.: Element stoichiometries of
individual plankton cells collected during the Southern Ocean Iron
Experiment (SOFeX), Limnol. Oceanogr., 49, 2115–2128, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Van Beek, P., Bourquin, M., Reyss, J. L., Souhaut, M., Charette, M. A., and
Jeandel, C.: Radium isotopes to investigate the water mass pathways on
the Kerguelen Plateau (Southern Ocean), Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II, 55, 622–637, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Watson, A. J., Bakker, D. C. E., Ridgwell, A. J., Boyd, P. W., and Law, C. S.:
Effect of iron supply on Southern Ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake and implications for
407, 730–733, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Wedepohl, K. H.: The composition of the continental crust, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 59, 1217–1232, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Lacan, F., and Jeandel, C.: Dissolved rare earth elements
tracing lithogenic inputs over the Kerguelen Plateau (Southern Ocean), Deep-Sea Res.-Pt. II, 55, 638–652, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
