<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-1635-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonal characterization of CDOM for lakes in semiarid regions of
Northeast China using excitation–emission matrix fluorescence <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>and parallel
factor analysis (EEM–PARAFAC)</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seasonal characterization of CDOM for lakes in semiarid regions of
Northeast China}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y.~Zhao et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Ying</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Kaishan</given-names></name>
          <email>songks@iga.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-2450</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>Zhidan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zang</surname><given-names>Shuying</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>Tiantian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Sijia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Jia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130102, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University–Purdue University,
Indianapolis, IN, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>College of Geographical Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin,
China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Kaishan Song (songks@iga.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1635</fpage><lpage>1645</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>October</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The seasonal characteristics of fluorescent components in chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) for lakes in
the semiarid region of Northeast China were examined by excitation–emission
matrix (EEM) spectra and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Two humic-like
(C1 and C2) and protein-like (C3 and C4) components were identified using
PARAFAC. The average fluorescence intensity of the four components differed
under seasonal variation from June and August 2013 to February and April
2014. Components 1 and 2 exhibited a strong linear correlation
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.628). Significantly positive linear relationships between CDOM
absorption coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>254</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72, 0.46, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(280) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.77, 0.47, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.76,
0.78, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for two humic-like components
(C1 and C2) were exhibited, respectively. A significant relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.930)
was found between salinity and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). However, almost no obvious
correlation was found between salinity and EEM–PARAFAC-extracted components
except for C3 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.469). Results from this investigation
demonstrate that the EEM–PARAFAC technique can be used to evaluate the
seasonal dynamics of CDOM fluorescent components for inland waters in the
semiarid regions of Northeast China, and to quantify CDOM components for
other waters with similar environmental conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Dissolved organic matter (DOM), a heterogeneous mixture of humic acids,
proteins and carbohydrates, plays an important role in aquatic ecosystems
(Zhang et al., 2010). Chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), the
colored fraction of DOM, absorbs light energy in the ultraviolet (UV) and
visible region of the spectrum and inhibits the propagation of UV radiation.
CDOM in waters also affects the transport and bio-availability of materials
such as trace metals and other pollutants (Song et al., 2013), so it can be
used as a proxy of water quality. In natural waterbodies, CDOM originates
from the degradation of plant materials and other organisms and
terrestrially imported substances, which varies in time and space and is
controlled by its structure and composition (Stedmon et al., 2003). CDOM is
compositionally complex, making it difficult to isolate hydrophobic from
hydrophilic acids using Amberlite XAD ion-exchange resins (Aiken et al., 1992; Spencer
et al., 2010). Nonetheless, some optically active components of CDOM can
emit fluorescence after absorbing light at certain wavelengths (Zhang et
al., 2010); therefore, fluorescence spectroscopic techniques can be used to
provide detailed information about the source and concentration of CDOM. Traditional fluorescence techniques, including fluorescence emission
spectrometry and synchronous fluorescence scanning, applied to examine CDOM
components have the drawback that the output was restricted to a linear scan
(Hudson et al., 2007).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Recently, excitation–emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy has
been applied to identify CDOM components because of its ability to produce
synchronous scan spectra in the form of contours (Stedmon et al., 2003;
Zhang et al., 2010). EEM spectroscopy is considered the most effective
technique for studying the composition of fluorophores given its high
selectivity and sensitivity to CDOM in water columns (Zhang et al., 2010).
In recent years, EEM spectroscopy has been widely used to investigate the
dynamics of marine, freshwater and ice meltwater ecosystems as well as snowmelt water (Barker et al., 2006, 2009, 2010, 2013; Coble, 2007; Fellman
al., 2010; Guo et al., 2010; Hudson et al., 2007; Stedmon et al., 2007).
Moreover, the EEM spectroscopy can also be used to distinguish allochthonous
and autochthonous CDOM sources in aquatic environments (Coble et al., 1998;
Mayer et al., 1999; Yamashita et al., 2008, 2010; Zhang et al., 2013). Based
on the peak positions in the EEM, two main fluorescent components, i.e.,
humic-like and protein-like substances, have been identified and
investigated (Del Castillo et al., 1999; Jaffé  et al., 2004).
However, overlapped fluorophores of CDOM EEM could make this traditional
“peak-picking” method unreliable to evaluate CDOM dynamics in aquatic
ecosystems (Coble, 1996; Stedmon et al., 2003). Recently, the combined
EEM-PARAFAC (parallel factor analysis) technique has been shown to
effectively decompose EEM of CDOM into independent fluorescent components
and assess the source of CDOM and relationships with other water quality
parameters. A number of investigators have used EEM–PARAFAC to characterize
DOM in freshwater and marine aquatic environments (Borisover et al., 2009;
Cory et al., 2005; Guo et al., 2010; Stedmon et al., 2003; Stedmon and
Markager, 2005; Yamashita, 2008; Zhang et al., 2010, 2011, 2013). Stedmon et
al. (2003) introduced PARAFAC and identified five distinct DOM components
for a Danish estuary and its catchment. In coastal environments, Yamashita
et al. (2008) reported on seven components using the combined EEM–PARAFAC
technique and assessed the dynamic of individual fluorophores and their
relationship with salinity in Ise Bay. Zhang et al. (2011) also found three
different components by PARAFAC modeling and analyzed the correlations
between the fluorescent components and absorption coefficients of CDOM for
Lake Tianmu and its catchment.</p>
      <p>The Songnen Plain is a fluvial plain with semiarid climate, in which many
fresh and brackish waters are distributed according to its geomorphological
characteristics (Song et al., 2013). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC)
characteristics of these fresh and brackish waters across the Songnen Plain
have been studied by Song et al. (2013); the results indicated that a huge
amount of DOC was stored in these waters. In particular, brackish waters
would exhibit high average DOC concentrations and significantly contributed
to the carbon budget to inland waters (Duarte et al., 2008; Song et al., 2013;
Tranvik et al., 2009). However, little study has been done on the detailed
information of DOC sources for these waters in the Songnen Plain. Therefore,
it motivated us to investigate the components in CDOM for both fresh and
brackish waters in the semiarid region. In the present study, the
absorption and fluorescence of CDOM were determined for the water samples
collected from seven lakes in the western part of the province of Jilin, which
varied in different seasons. The specific objectives of this study are to
(1) characterize CDOM components contained in these lakes using the EEM and
their origins through the EEM–PARAFAC method; (2) assess the dynamic of
individual fluorescent components of CDOM under seasonal variation; and most
importantly (3) link CDOM fluorescence intensities, absorption coefficients,
DOC concentrations and salinity to each other, in order to establish proxies
for CDOM bioavailability and photoreactivity in waters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Lakes and water sampling</title>
      <p>The waterbodies investigated in this study were located in the western part
of Jilin, which belongs to the semiarid part of the Songnen Plain
(Song et al., 2013). Two groups of lakes were investigated, i.e., the Chagan
lake group and the Yuelianghu lake group. The Chagan lake group is made up
of Lake Chagan (CGL), Xinmiaopao (XMP), Xindianpao (XDP) and Kulipao (KLP).
The Yuelianghu lake group mainly includes Lake Yueliang (YLL), Talahong
(TLH) and Xinhuangpao (XHP) (Fig. 1). The two groups are about 60 km away
from each other, each of which includes both fresh and brackish waters. The
primary economic value for these lakes is fisheries, agricultural irrigation
and recreation. The average annual precipitation is about 391 mm, but the
average evaporation is up to 1790 mm, resulting in water scarcity. Due to
the area dominated by saline-alkali soil, the rainfall flush and
agricultural catchment land use can result in an increase of lake
salinities. These seven lakes are endowed with similar geological,
hydrological and climatic settings; thus we presume that similar processes
may control the CDOM components. In order to characterize the CDOM
fluorescent components under seasonal variation using EEM–PARAFAC, 67 water
samples were collected from the surface of the seven lakes in 1 L
acid-cleaned plastic bottles during four field campaigns in June and August
2013 as well as in February and April 2014, respectively. These samples were
collected during the ice-covering period using an ice drilling auger. The
under-ice surface water came up when a hole was drilled in the ice
layer by the auger. The ice shavings were collected in plastic bags and the
under-ice surface water was collected in plastic bottles. The collected
samples were held on ice and immediately transported to the laboratory in
the city of Changchun in Jilin within 3–5 h. In the laboratory,
these samples were filtered within 24 h and then kept at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until
analysis within 2 days. Latitude and longitude of each sample location
were recorded in situ using a Trimble Global Positioning System (GPS).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Locations of the water sampling sites for seven lakes in the
western part of the province of Jilin, Northeast China. <bold>(a)</bold> Yueliang lake
group: YLL, Yueliang Lake; XHP, Xinhuangpao; TLH, Talahong; <bold>(b)</bold> Chagan lake
group: CGL, Chagan Lake; XDP, Xindianpao; XMP, Xinmiaopao; KLP, Kulipao.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Analytical procedures</title>
      <p>To characterize the basic parameters of water quality, salinity was measured
by a DDS-307 electrical conductivity meter in the laboratory.
Salinity was expressed on the basis of the UNESCO practical salinity unit.
The pH was measured using a PHS-3C pH meter at room temperature (20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
in the laboratory. Water turbidity was determined using the
Shimadzu UV-2600PC UV–visible dual beam spectrophotometer with matching 3 cm
quartz cells at room temperature (20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with Milli-Q
water as the reference (UV Talk Letter, 2013).
To determine DOC concentrations, water samples were filtered through 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m filters and
then measured using a Shimadzu TOC-5000 analyzer and a 1.2 % Pt on silica
catalyst at 680 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Potassium hydrogen phthalate was used as a reference. The reproducibility of the analytical procedure was within 2–3 %
for the current study (APHA/AWWA/WEF, 1998; Song et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Absorption measurement</title>
      <p>In the laboratory, all the samples were filtered at low pressure, first
through a precombusted Whatman GF/F filter (0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), and then through
a prerinsed 25 mm Millipore membrane cellulose filter (0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) into
glass bottles. Absorption spectra of the samples were measured between 200
and 800 nm at 1 nm increments using the Shimadzu UV-2600PC UV–visible dual beam
spectrophotometer with a 1 cm quartz cuvette and Milli-Q water as a reference.
The absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CDOM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated from the measured
optical density (OD) of the sample using Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CDOM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.303</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mtext>OD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>OD</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>(null)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cuvette path length (0.01 m) and the factor 2.303 converts from base
10 to base natural logarithm transformation. Some fine particles possibly
remained in the filtered solution (Babin et al., 2003; Bricaud et al.,
1995); therefore it was necessary to correct for scattering by fine
particles and in this case, OD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>null</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average optical
density over 740–750 nm where the absorbance of CDOM can be assumed to be
zero.</p>
      <p>A CDOM absorption spectrum (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CDOM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed as an
exponential function (Babin et al., 2003; Bricaud et al., 1995):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CDOM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CDOM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CDOM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the CDOM absorption at a given
wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CDOM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorption
estimate at the reference wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (440 nm) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
spectral slope of the CDOM absorption. According to Helms et al. (2008), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
calculated by fitting a linear model to the data over a wavelength range of
275 to 295 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or 350 to 400 nm (S2). To eliminate the inter-laboratory
variability, the slope ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined to indicate the molecular
weight and photobleaching of CDOM (Helms et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Three-dimensional fluorescence measurement</title>
      <p>The EEM analysis of CDOM was conducted using a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence
spectrometer (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) with a 700-voltage
xenon lamp. The scanning ranges were 200–450 nm for excitation, and
250–500 nm for emission. Readings were collected in the ratio mode at 5 nm
intervals for excitation, and at 1 nm intervals for emission, using a
scanning speed of 2400 nm min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The band passes were 5 nm for both
excitation and emission. A Milli-Q water blank of the EEM was subtracted to
eliminate the water Raman scatter peaks (McKnight et al., 2001; Stemdon et
al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2010, 2011).</p>
      <p>The inner-filter effect, which results from reabsorption and excitation of
the fluorescence itself, can reduce the fluorescence intensity by 5 %
(Larsson et al., 2007; McKnight et al., 2001). In order to eliminate the
inner-filter effect, the EEM was corrected for absorbance by multiplying
each value in the EEM by a correction factor based on the assumption that
the average path length of absorption of the excitation and emission light
is one half length of the cuvette (McKnight et al., 2001; Zhang et al.,
2010). The correction function is expressed as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>corr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>obs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>em</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Corr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>obs</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the corrected and uncorrected
fluorescence intensities and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ex</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>em</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the absorbance
values at the respective excitation and emission wavelengths.</p>
      <p>The measured fluorescence intensity is dependent on the concentration of the
dissolved fluorophores in waterbodies. Finally, the fluorescence
intensities of all samples' EEMs were normalized to the area under the
Milli-Q water Raman peak (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ex <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 nm, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>em <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 371–428 nm)
measured daily (Lawaetz and Stedmon, 2009). The contour figures of the EEMs
were plotted using the MATLAB 10.0 software package (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>PARAFAC modeling</title>
      <p>PARAFAC, a three-way method, is applied to divide the CDOM fluorescence
into separate fluorescent signals (Andersen and Bro, 2003; Stedmon and Bro,
2008). According to Stedmon and Bro (2008), a similar PARAFAC analysis is
carried out in the present study using the DOMFluor toolbox in MATLAB with
the “N-way toolbox for MATLAB” (Andersson and Bro, 2000). Before PARAFAC
modeling, the excitation wavelengths from 200 to 220 nm and the emission
wavelengths from 250 to 300 nm were deleted because of their poor quality.
In order to remove the effect of Rayleigh scatter on PARAFAC modeling, the
missing values (NaN – “not a number”) were inserted in the regions
(Ex<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">⩽</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Em <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">≦</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Ex<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2Ex<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">≦</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Em <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">≦</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Ex<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; unit: nm) which are significantly
influenced by the first- and second-order scattering from the measured
spectroscopic data (Hua et al., 2007; Stedmon and Bro, 2008).</p>
      <p>To determine the appropriate number of PARAFAC components, the split-half
validation procedure was executed to verify whether the model was valid by
comparing the emission and excitation loadings from each half (Stedmon and
Bro, 2008). Split-half analysis is the most effective method for
implementing the PARAFAC models, in which the EEM is randomly divided into
four groups of equal size, and then analyzed for two split halves (1–2 and
3–4 half) respectively. If the correct number of components is chosen, the
excitation and emission loadings from the two groups should show the same
shape and size (Bro, 1997, 1999). The fluorescence intensity of every
component was represented by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Raman unit: nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Stedmon and
Markager, 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p>Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS 16.0 software package
(Statistical Program for Social Sciences). Regression and correlation
analysis was used to describe the relationship between the CDOM absorption
coefficient, DOC concentration, salinity and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A model II-ANOVA (analysis of variance) was
performed to determine whether the seasonal variability is higher than between-lake
variability. The difference is considered to be statistically significant
when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are less than or equal to 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Water quality conditions</title>
      <p>The water quality parameters, i.e., pH, salinity, and turbidity, for the 67 water
samples collected from June 2013 to April 2014 in the western part of Jilin
are displayed in Table 1. When the set of samples from various
field trips was pooled together, the waters had high pH values and high salt
contents. The highest salinity was present when the lakes were frozen in
February 2014, whereas relatively constant values (around 0.40) were
exhibited in the other three seasons. In addition, the waterbodies were highly
turbid. The highest turbidity was present in June 2013, and then reduced in
August 2013, and the lowest value was recorded in February 2014. Compared
with February 2014, the turbidity had almost no change in April 2014 (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Mean value of water quality parameters from June 2013 to April
2014. Turb denotes water turbidity; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes sampling numbers.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling season</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">pH</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Salinity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Turb (NTU)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jun 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">166.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 108.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aug 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63.13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feb 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Apr 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">62.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 79.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>EEM characterization of CDOM</title>
      <p>Based on the EEM “peak picking” technique, the key fluorescence peaks can
be observed in 67 water samples: two humic-like and two protein-like
substances (Coble, 1996; Stedmon et al., 2003). The humic-like components
are the mixture of the humic-like acids of aromatic and aliphatic compounds from
terrestrial substances, and aquatic humic-like substances of phytoplankton
origin. With respect to the protein-like components (i.e., tyrosine-like and
tryptophan-like substances), they mainly consist of dissolved amino acids. As
an example, Fig. S1 in the Supplement displays the EEMs of samples from Lake Xindianpao
in different seasons. The peaks comprise two humic-like fluorescence peaks: one
in the ultraviolet range (Ex/Em <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 220–240<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>410–430 nm) and the other in the
visible range (Ex/Em <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300–340<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>410–450 nm); and protein-like
fluorescence peaks: tyrosine-like (Ex/Em <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 210–230, 270–280<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>310–330 nm)
and tryptophan-like (Ex/Em <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 220–230, 280–300<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>350–370 nm).</p>
      <p>In our study, four separate fluorescent components (Fig. 2a–d) and the
excitation and emission loadings (e–h) of the four components identified by
EEM–PARAFAC are summarized in Fig. 2 and Table 2. The first fluorescent
component (C1) was a biological degradation humic-like component comparable
to humic-like peaks (M and N) in marine and in phytoplankton degradation
experiments for inland waters (Coble, 1996; Zhang et al., 2009). Component 2
was consistent with the humic-like peaks (A and C) defined by Coble (1996).
Component 3 resembles the tryptophan-like (T) component as found by
Baker et al. (2004) and Hudson et al. (2007). Component 4 is likely related
to the tyrosine-like component (B) (Hudson et al., 2007). Components 3 and 4
represent autochthonous semi-labile CDOM associated with bacteria activity
and phytoplankton degradation (Borisover et al., 2009; Stedmon et al.,
2003). In particular, there was a shoulder (i.e., deflection but not peak) at the excitation wavelength
310–330 nm in component 4 and 330–340 nm in component 3, which may be due to
the residual Raman peaks in some water samples (Fig. 2c–d). In this study,
not all of the four components were present in all of the samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>The PARAFAC modeling output shows the contour plots of
the four PARAFAC fluorescent components <bold>(a–d)</bold> and excitation (black) and
emission (red) loadings <bold>(e–h)</bold> of each component. Fluorescence is in Raman
units: nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Positions of the fluorescence maximum peaks of the four components
identified by PARAFAC modeling in the present study compared with those
previously identified. Secondary excitation maxima are given in brackets.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.96}[.96]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Component</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ex<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Em<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Description and</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Components</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Components</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">no.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(nm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(nm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(Coble and Zhang)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(Stedmon and Markager)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">230 (300)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">425</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Marine humic-like  (phytoplankton degradation)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">M</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">255 (350)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">460</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Terrestrial humic-like</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">A and C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1 and 4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">225 (290)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">360</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Autochthonous tryptophan-like</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">T</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">220 (275)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">320</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Autochthonous tyrosine-like</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">B</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.96}[.96]?><table-wrap-foot><p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{2mm}}?>Fluorescence peaks were named as Coble and
Zhang components by Coble et al. (1996, 1998) and Zhang et al. (2010, 2011), while as Stedmon
and Markager components by Stedmon and Markager (2005).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Temporal distribution of PARAFAC components</title>
      <p>These fresh and brackish water in Jilin in Northeast China are
endowed with similar geological, hydrological and climatic settings; thus it
is presumed that similar processes may control the CDOM components. When a
model II-ANOVA using season and lake as random effect factors was performed,
it shows that the seasonal variability (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>crit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) is higher than between-lake variability. Therefore, the water samples
from different lakes for every season were pooled together in order to study
the seasonal variation of the fluorescent components. As shown in Fig. 3a,
the average fluorescence intensity of the four components had seasonal
variation. When all the water samples in different seasons were pooled
together, the average value of total fluorescence intensity was 2.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.93 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
corresponding to the intensities of 0.71 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32 (C1),
0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11 (C2), 0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 (C3) and 0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.26 (C4)
nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for different components. These results can demonstrate that the
fluorescence intensity was dominated by C1, implying most of the CDOM for
the seven inland lakes originated from the degradation of phytoplankton and
microorganisms. The protein-like components (C3 and C4), related to
bioavailability and microbial activity of CDOM, had almost the same
magnitude. In all four seasons, the fluorescent component C2, which was
terrestrially imported to waterbodies, contributed less to total
fluorescence than the other three. The total fluorescence intensity differed
under seasonal variation, varying from 2.54 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in June
to 1.93 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in August 2013, and then increased to
2.34 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.92 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in February and reduced to the lowest intensity
of 1.57 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.55 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in April 2014 (Fig. 3c). The intensities of four fluorescent
components (i.e., 0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 (C1), 0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 (C2), 0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 (C3)
and 0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20 (C4) nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3d) from the
samples collected in June 2013 exhibited similar trends to that for the
pooled data set. These values were higher than the seasonal average except
C2 (0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This can be explained by enhanced
activities from plant degradation and microbial activities, but fewer
terrestrial substances were imported to the waterbodies in June; therefore, the fluorescence intensity of C2 was lower than the seasonal
average. Compared to the fluorescence intensity in June, the three
fluorescence intensities (0.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 (C1), 0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 (C3) and
0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36 (C4) nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the samples collected in August 2013
were reduced, but an increased value was recorded for C2 (0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 3d). Particularly, the fluorescence intensities of two
protein-like components showed an obvious difference. This can be attributed
to substantially increased precipitation up to 180 mm in July from June to
August 2013 (Fig. 3b); therefore, floods occurred when rainfall continued to
increase in August. Gradually, DOM contained in terrestrial CDOM was flushed
by rainfall to the lakes; therefore, the C2 (0.42 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluorescence intensity became higher. In accordance with Cheng et al. (2010),
the rainwater CDOM for this study was largely characterized by protein-like
components (Cheng et al., 2010). The fluorescence intensity of the rainwater
CDOM was very weak, and the rainwater CDOM also had a much lower
humic-like concentration (Fig. S2b). The intensities of the other three
components decreased because of dilution resulting from heavy rain and
relatively weak microbial decomposition of plants.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Seasonal average of   <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for EEM–PARAFAC components (C1, C2, C3 and C4) for lakes in the western part
of Jilin; <bold>(b)</bold> monthly variation of rainfall for the lakes in the western
part of Jilin from April 2013 to February 2014; <bold>(c)</bold> seasonal
variation of the total fluorescence intensity in different seasons;
<bold>(d)</bold> seasonal variation of the four EEM–PARAFAC components in different seasons.
The error bars represent 1 standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationships between CDOM absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350) with
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C1), <bold>(b)</bold> with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C2), <bold>(c)</bold> peak  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(C1) vs.  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C2), <bold>(d)</bold> peak
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C3) vs. DOC, <bold>(e)</bold> salinity vs. DOC,
<bold>(f)</bold> salinity vs.  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/1635/2016/bg-13-1635-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The highest C1 (1.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.38 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, presented in February 2014, and
the C2 (0.39 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intensity remained almost the same as
that in August 2013. However, the protein-like components indicated that the
C3 (0.57 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intensity was higher than the C4 (0.35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
intensity, which was opposite to the results from
other months (Fig. 3d). In cold winters, the surface waters formed a thick
layer of ice covering the lake waters. Because the ice cover reduced light
penetration and restricted gas exchange between the underlying water and
atmosphere, vigorous biological activity in the lakes would be reduced
at low temperature and low light level (Thomas, 1983; Uusikiv et
al., 2010; Wharton Jr., et al., 1993). Although the biological activity was very
weak, there could still be a bit of production of C1 and C3 in lake water.
Also, dissolved materials were left in the underlying surface waters and
little terrestrial matter was imported to the lakes once covered by ice
(Stedmon et al., 2007). Therefore, the C1 and C3 in the water of the lakes
beneath the ice layers would have been produced and accumulated simultaneously,
whereas the C2 remained the same. Obviously, the fluorescence intensity of
component 1 reached the highest value for the winter samples. As shown in
Fig. S2a, another striking feature for the winter samples was that the
fluorescence of CDOM in the ice was dominated by the tyrosine-like C4
component, which is consistent with the findings of Barker et al. (2009,
2013) and Stedmon et al. (2007). It showed that the C4 component was left in
the ice cover when the lakes were frozen. Therefore, it is not surprising
that the intensity of component C4 for water beneath ice layers was reduced
and the concentrated C3 showed a much higher fluorescence intensity. In
April 2014, the intensities of four fluorescent components (0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17
(C1), 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 (C2), 0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 (C3) and 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13
(C4) nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3d) exhibited similar seasonal trends, though
these values were much lower than the average. Our interpretation is that
the ice CDOM was characterized by the tyrosine-like component (C4) (Fig. S2a),
and the fluorescence intensity of C4 contributed by the ice meltwater was
very weak. However, the underlying lake CDOM included both humic-like (C1
and C2) and protein-like (C3 or C4) components. When the ice in the lakes
melted into water during warming weather and biological degradation, and human
activity was weak, the lake CDOM was diluted by the ice meltwater and the
fluorescence intensity reached its lowest value in early spring.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>CDOM vs. EEM–PARAFAC-extracted components</title>
      <p>The concentration of DOC, CDOM absorption coefficients and the slope ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are shown in Table 3. The DOC concentrations ranged from 835.83 to
7345.83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average value of 3133.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1504.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the period from June 2013 to April 2014,
demonstrating seasonal dynamics that can be attributed to hydrological,
climatic and landscape variations (Song et al., 2013). The highest average
DOC concentration (4587.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1666.83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was present
in February 2014 (ice-covered period); whereas relatively constant values
of approximate 2500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed in the ice-free
season. The relative high DOC concentration in the ice-free season was caused by
the evapo-condensed effect due to the prolonged sunshine duration for the lakes
in the Songnen Plain. The higher DOC concentration in
winter can be attributed to the accumulated DOC left in the liquid phase
when ice formation took place, resulting in the higher DOC concentration in
the underlying water (unpublished material). Generally, the absorption
coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350) is used as a proxy for characterizing CDOM concentration
(Guo et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(280) is related to DOC
biodegradation (McDowell et al., 2006), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(254) can be used to
characterize the optical properties of DOC aromaticity (Jaffé
et al., 2004; Weishaar et al., 2003). The highest averaged CDOM absorption
coefficients, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(280) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(254), were also present in February 2014,
corresponding to the highest DOC concentration. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the
two wavelength ranges (275–295 over 350–400 nm) were used to represent
DOM molecular weight (Helms et al., 2008). The lowest mean of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
present in August 2013, suggesting that the relatively weak microbial
decomposition of plants and lots of terrestrially imported substances
through rainwash resulted in the higher average molecular weight of DOC.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mean values of DOC concentration and CDOM absorption coefficients
groups in different seasons. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the slope ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>275–295 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>350–400 nm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling season</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(254) m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(280) m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350) m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">DOC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jun 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">38.39 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.98 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.73 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.29 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2653.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1222.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aug 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.71 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.82 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.96 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2735.99 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1231.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feb 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52.88 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4587.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1666.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Apr 2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.43 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.32 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2571.38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 909.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.73 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3133.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1504.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and significance levels (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
linear relationships between CDOM absorption, DOC, salinity and fluorescent
components.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(254)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(280)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">DOC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Salinity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">C1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">C2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">C4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DOC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.711<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.646<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.294<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salinity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.650<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.579<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.159</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.965<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.850<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.875<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.873<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.496<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.383<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.677<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.686<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.885<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.414<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.270<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.796<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.452<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.417<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.134</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.648<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.685<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.267<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.103</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.040</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.078</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.135</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.084</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.069</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.225</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05 level; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01 level.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>When the whole data set (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 67) was pooled together, there were
significantly positive linear relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>254</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(280), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350)
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for two humic-like components (C1 and C2), respectively, but
mostly, such correlations were not observed for the protein-like components
(Fig. 4a and b, Table 3). These results were in accordance with previous
investigations (Zhang et al., 2010, 2011). Components 1 and 2 were strongly
linearly correlated with each other (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.628) (Fig. 4c),
indicating that the concentrations of the two humic-like components were
controlled by common sources (Baker and Spencer, 2004). There was a weak
relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.051) between the protein-like components (C3
and C4), possibly because of a complex origin of CDOM such as rainfall in
summer, ice in winter and organic pollutants derived from domestic,
agricultural and industrial sewerage, which represent the complex origins of
CDOM. However, there was almost no correlation between the humic-like and
protein-like components. The linkage of a fluorescence signal to DOC was
very complicated because of the seasonal impacts, i.e., increased rainfall,
algal blooms and ice cover, which affect the DOC concentration. Due to both
steady and labile CDOM fluorescent components in DOC, the fluorescent signal
changed with the ratio of fluorescent and non-fluorescent CDOM
components (Henderson et al., 2009). A weak relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.411)
(Fig. 4d) was found between DOC and component 3, likely from the decay
of plants through microbial activity or the pollution from human and animal
waste.</p>
      <p>Different from the findings by Yamashita et al. (2008) for ocean water, this
study did not find obvious correlation between salinity and EEM–PARAFAC-extracted components, with the exception of C3 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.469) (Table 4
and Fig. 4f). The most important finding for the water samples collected in
different seasons from the Songnen Plain is a significant relationship
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.930) between salinity and DOC (Fig. 4e). This is because
DOC is evapo-condensed from spring to autumn and freeze-accumulated in
winter in the semiarid region. A prolonged sunshine duration can result in
an evapo-condensed DOC concentration in the ice-free season. On the other hand,
the DOC accumulates when the lakes freeze in winter, leaving DOC in the
liquid phase.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>A model II-ANOVA using season and lake as random effect factors shows that
the seasonal variability (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>crit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05) is
higher than between-lake variability. In this study, the application of
EEM–PARAFAC to characterize four fluorescent components under seasonal
variation in CDOM was presented with 67 water samples collected from June
2013 to April 2014 in the semiarid region of the Songnen Plain. Two
humic-like components and protein-like components were identified using the PARAFAC
modeling. The average fluorescence intensity of the four components differed
under seasonal variation from June 2013 to April 2014. The highest C1 1.02 nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
was presented in February 2014, probably due to the condensed CDOM
caused by ice formation in winter. Especially in summer, when rainfall occurs, and in winter when water is frozen, the fluorescence
intensity is dominated by tyrosine-like components in rain and ice meltwater. Components 1 and 2 exhibited a strong linear correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.628).
There were significantly positive linear relationships between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CDOM absorption coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>254) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72, 0.46,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(280) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.77, 0.47, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(350)
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.76, 0.78, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) for two humic-like components (C1
and C2), respectively. A weak relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.411) was found
between DOC and component 3 from the decay of plants through microbial
activity or the pollution from human and animal waste. However, almost no
obvious correlation was found between salinity and EEM–PARAFAC-extracted
components, except C3 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.469), though the correlation was not
as strong as with DOC concentration. Most importantly, a significant
relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.930) was found between salinity and DOC. In
order to understand the biogeochemical effects on the aquatic ecosystem,
further study is required to identify the source of CDOM and assess
physical/chemical, bioavailable and photoreactive transformation in various
lakes with larger saline gradients in the semiarid region of Northeast
China.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1635-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-13-1635-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The research was jointly supported by the “One Hundred Talents” program
from Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (no. 41471290). The authors thank Zhi Ding, Ying Guan, Lei Liu and
Ming Wang for their persistent assistance with both field sampling and
laboratory analysis.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: G. Herndl</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, G. R., McKnight, D. M., Thorn, K. A., and Thurman, E. M.: Isolation
of hydrophobic organic-acids from water using nonionic macro porous resins,
Org. Geochem., 18, 567–573, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andersen, C. M.  and Bro, R.: Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of
fluorescence excitation-emission data, J. Chemometr., 17, 200–215, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, C. A. and Bro, R.: The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB, Chemometr. Intell.
Lab., 52, 1–4, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
APHA/AWWA/WEF: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, Washington, DC, American Public Health Associstion,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Babin, M., Stramski, D., Ferrari, G. M., Claustre, H., Bricaud, A.,
Obolensky, G., and Hoepffner, N.: Variations in the light absorption
coefficients of phytoplankton, nonalgal particles, and dissolved organic
matter in coastal waters around Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3211–3230,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, A. and Spencer, R. G. M.: Characterization of dissolved organic matter
from source to sea using fluorescence and absorbance spectroscopy, Sci. Total
Environ., 333, 217–232, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, A., Ward, D., Lieten, Shakti H., Periera, R., Simpson, Ellie C., and
Slater, M.: Measurement of protein-like fluorescence in river and waste
water using a handheld spectrophotometer, Water Res., 38, 2934–2938, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Sharp, M. J., Fitzsimons, S. J., and Turner, R. J.: Abundance
and dynamics of dissolved organic carbon in glacier systems, Arct. Antarct.
Alp. Res., 38, 163–172, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Sharp, M. J., and Turner, R. J.: Using synchronous
fluorescence spectroscopy and principal components analysis to monitor
dissolved organic matter dynamics in a glacier system, Hydrol. Process.,
23, 1487–1500, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Klassen, J. L., Sharp, M. J., Fitzsimons, S. J., and Turner,
R. J.: Detecting biogeochemical activity in basal ice using fluorescence
spectroscopy, Ann. Glaciol., 51, 47–55, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Dubnick, A., Lyons, W. B., and Chin, Y. P.: Changes in
Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) Fluorescence in Proglacial Antarctic Streams,
Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 45, 305–317, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Borisover, M., Laor, Y., Parparov, A., Bukhanovsky, N., and Lado, M.:
Spatial and seasonal patterns of fluorescent organic matter in Lake Kinneret
(Sea of Galilee) and its catchment basin, Water Res., 43, 3104–3116, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bricaud, A., Babin, M., Morel, A., and Claustre, H.: Variability in the
chlorophyll-specific absorption coefficients of natural phytoplankton:
Analysis and parameterization, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 13321–13332, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bro, R.: PARAFAC tutorial and applications, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 38,
149–171, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bro, R.: Exploratory study of sugar production using fluorescence
spectroscopy and multi-way analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 46, 133–147,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y. Y., Guo, W. D., Long, A. M., and Chen, S. Y.: Study on optical
characteristic of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in rainwater by
fluorescence excitation-emission matrix and absorbance spectroscope, Spectrosc. Spect. Anal., 30, 2413–2416, 2010 (in
Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G.: Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater
using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy, Mar. Chem., 51, 325–346,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G.: Marine optical biogeochemistry: the chemistry of ocean color,
Chem. Rev., 107, 402–418, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G., Del Castillo, C. E., and Avril, B.: Distribution and optical
of CDOM in the Arabian Sea during the 1995 Southwest Monsoon, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. II, 45, 2195–2223, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M.  and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals
ubiquitous presence of oxidized and reduced quinines in dissolved organic
matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Del Castillo, C. E., Coble, P. G., Morell, J. M., Lopez, J. M., and Corredor,
J. E.: Analysis of the optical properties of the Orinoco River plume by
absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy, Mar. Chem., 66, 35–51, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Duarte, C. M., Montes, C., Cole, J. J., Striegl, R. G., Melackand, J., and
Downing, J. A.: CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from saline lakes: Aglobal estimate of
asurprisingly large flux, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G04041, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000637" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JG000637</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fellman, J. B., Hood, E., and Spencer, R. G. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy
opens new windows into dissolved organic matter dynamics in freshwater
ecosystems: A review, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2452–2462, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, W. D., Xu, J., Wang, J. P., Wen, Y. G., Zhou, J. F., and Yan, Y. C.:
Characterization of dissolved organic matter in urban sewage using
excitation emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy and parallel factor
analysis, J. Environ. Sci., 22, 1728–1734, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Helms, J. R., Stubbins, A., Ritchie, J. D., Minor, E. C., Kieber, D. J., and
Mopper, K.: Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of
molecular weight, source, and photo bleaching of chromophoric dissolved
organic matter, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 955–969, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Stuetz, R. M., and
Khan, S. J.: Fluoresence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water
system: A review, Water Res., 43, 863–881, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hua, B., Dolan, F., Mcghee, C., Clevenger, T. E., and Deng, B. L.:
Water-source characterization and classification with fluorescence EEM
spectroscopy: PARAFAC analysis, Int. J. Environ. An. Ch., 87, 135–147,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, N., Baker, A., and Reynolds, D.: Fluorescence analysis of dissolved
organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters – a review, River Res.
Appl., 23, 631–649, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffé, R., Boyer, J. N., Lu, X., Maie, N., Yang, C., Scully,
N. M., and Mock, S.: Source characterization of dissolved organic matter in
subtropical mangrove-dominated estuary by fluorescence analysis, Mar. Chem.,
84, 195–210, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Larsson, T., Wedborg, M., and Turner, D.: Correction of inner-filter effect
in fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectrometry using Raman scatter,
Anal. Chim. Acta., 583, 357–363, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lawaetz, A. J.  and Stedmon, C. A.: Fluorescence Intensity Calibration Using
the Raman Scatter Peak of Water, Appl. Spectrosc., 63, 936–940, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M., Schick, L. L., and Loder, T. C.: Dissolved protein
fluorescence in two Maine estuaries, Mar. Chem., 64, 171–179, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
McDowell, W. H., Zsolnay, A., Aikenhead-Peterson, J. A., Gregorich, E. G.,
Jones, D. L., Jödermann, D., Kalbitz, K., Marschner, B.,
and Schwesig, D.: A comparison of methods to determine the biodegradable
dissolved organic carbon from different terrestrial sources, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 38, 1933–1942, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
McKnight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P. K., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T.,
and Andersen, D. T.: Spectrofluorometriccharacterization of dissolved
organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 38–48, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Song, C. C., Wang, L. L., Guo, Y. D., Song, Y. Y., Yang, G. S., and Li, Y.
C.: Impacts of natural wetland degradation on dissolved carbon dynamics in
the Sanjiang Plain, Northeastern China, J. Hydrol., 398, 26–32, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Song, K. S., Zang, S. Y., Zhao, Y., Li, L., Du, J., Zhang, N. N., Wang, X.
D., Shao, T. T., Guan, Y., and Liu, L.: Spatiotemporal characterization of
dissolved carbon for inland waters in semi-humid/semi-arid region, China,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4269–4281, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4269-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-4269-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Spencer, R. G. M., Hernes, P. J., Ruf, R., Baker, A., Dyda, R. Y., Stubbins,
A., and Six, J.: Temporal controls on dissolved organic matter and lignin
biogeochemistry in apristine tropical river, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 115,
G03013, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001180" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JG001180</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A. and Bro, R.: Characterizing dissolved organic matter
fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: a tutorial, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 6, 572–579, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A. and Markager, S.: Tracing the production and degradation of
autochthonous fractions of dissolved organic matter by fluorescence analysis,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 1415–1426, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S., and Bro, R.: Tracing dissolved organic matter
in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy,
Mar. Chem., 82, 239–254, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A., Thomas, D. N., Granskog, M., Kaartokallio, H., Papadimitriou,
S., and Kuosa, H.: Characteristics of dissolved organic matter in Baltic
coastal sea ice: allochthonous or autochthonous origins?, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 41, 7273–7279, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas K. B.: Under Landfast ice, Arctic, 36, 328–340, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Cotner, J. B., Loiselle, S. A., Striegl, R.
G., Ballatore, T. J., Dillon, P., Finlay, K., Fortino, K., Knoll, L. B.,
Kortelainen, P. L., Kutser, T., Larsen, S., Laurion, I., Leech, D. M.,
McCallister, S. L., McKnight, D. M., Melack, J. M., Overholt, E., Porter, J.
A., Prairie, Y., Renwick, W. H., Roland, F., Sherman, B. S., Schindler, D.
W., Sobek, S., Tremblay, A., Vanni, M. J., Verschoor, A. M., Wachenfeldt, E.
V., and Weyhenmeyer, G. A.: Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon
cycling and climate, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2298–2314, 2009.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Uusikiv, J., Vahatal, A. V., Granskog, M. A., and Sommaruga, R.: Contribution
of mycosporine-like amino acids and colored dissolved and particulate matter
to sea ice optical properties and ultraviolet attenuation, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
55, 703–713, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>UV Talk Letter:
<uri>https://shimadzu.com.au/uv-talk-letter-volume-10</uri> (last access:  12 March  2016), Volume 10, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Weishaar, J. L., Aiken, G. R., Bergamaschi, B. A., Farm, M. S., Fujii, R.,
and Mopper, K.: Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator
of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 4702–4708, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wharton Jr., R. A., McKay, C. P., Clow, G. D., and Andersen, D. T.: Perennial
ice covers and their influence on Antarctic lake ecosystems, Antarct. Res.
Ser., 59, 53–70, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Yamashita, Y.: Assessing the dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in
coastal environments by excitation emission matrix fluorescence and parallel
factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC), Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1900–1908, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Yamashita, Y., Cory, R. M., Nishioka, J., Kuma, K., Tanoue, E., and
Jaffé, R.,: Fluorescence characteristics of
dissolved organic matter in the deep waters of the Okhotsk Sea and the
northwestern North Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 57, 1478–1485, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., VanDijk, M. A., Liu, M. L., Zhu, G. W., and Qin, B. Q.: The
contribution of phytoplankton degradation to chromophoric dissolved organic
matter (CDOM) in eutrophic shallow lakes: Field and experimental evidence,
Water Res., 43, 4685–4697, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Zhang, E. L., Yin, Y., VanDijk, M. A., Feng, L. Q., Shi, Z. Q.,
Liu, M. L., and Qin, B. Q.: Characteristics and sources of chromophoric
dissolved organic matter in lakes of the Yungui Plateau, China, differing in
trophic state and altitude, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2645–2659, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Yin, Y., Feng, L. Q., Zhu, G. W., Shi, Z. Q., Liu, X. H., and
Zhang, Y. Z.: Characterizing chromophoric dissolved organic matter in Lake
Tianmuhu and its catchment basin using excitation-emission matrix
fluorescence and parallel factor analysis, Water Res., 45, 5110–5122, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L., Liu, X. H., Osburn, C. L., Wang, M. Z., Qin, B. Q., and Zhou,
Y. Q.: Photo bleaching response of different Source of Chromophoric Dissolved
Organic Matter Exposed to Natural Solar Radiation Using Absorption and
Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectra, Plos One, 8, e77515, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077515" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0077515</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Seasonal characterization of CDOM for lakes in semiarid regions of
Northeast China using excitation–emission matrix fluorescence and parallel
factor analysis (EEM–PARAFAC)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The seasonal characteristics of fluorescent components in chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) for lakes in
the semiarid region of Northeast China were examined by excitation–emission
matrix (EEM) spectra and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Two humic-like
(C1 and C2) and protein-like (C3 and C4) components were identified using
PARAFAC. The average fluorescence intensity of the four components differed
under seasonal variation from June and August 2013 to February and April
2014. Components 1 and 2 exhibited a strong linear correlation
(<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> =  0.628). Significantly positive linear relationships between CDOM
absorption coefficients <i>a</i>(254) (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> =  0.72, 0.46, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01),
<i>a</i>(280) (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> =  0.77, 0.47, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), <i>a</i>(350) (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> =  0.76,
0.78, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and <i>F</i><sub>max</sub> for two humic-like components
(C1 and C2) were exhibited, respectively. A significant relationship (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> =  0.930)
was found between salinity and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). However, almost no obvious
correlation was found between salinity and EEM–PARAFAC-extracted components
except for C3 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> =  0.469). Results from this investigation
demonstrate that the EEM–PARAFAC technique can be used to evaluate the
seasonal dynamics of CDOM fluorescent components for inland waters in the
semiarid regions of Northeast China, and to quantify CDOM components for
other waters with similar environmental conditions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, G. R., McKnight, D. M., Thorn, K. A., and Thurman, E. M.: Isolation
of hydrophobic organic-acids from water using nonionic macro porous resins,
Org. Geochem., 18, 567–573, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andersen, C. M.  and Bro, R.: Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of
fluorescence excitation-emission data, J. Chemometr., 17, 200–215, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, C. A. and Bro, R.: The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB, Chemometr. Intell.
Lab., 52, 1–4, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
APHA/AWWA/WEF: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, Washington, DC, American Public Health Associstion,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Babin, M., Stramski, D., Ferrari, G. M., Claustre, H., Bricaud, A.,
Obolensky, G., and Hoepffner, N.: Variations in the light absorption
coefficients of phytoplankton, nonalgal particles, and dissolved organic
matter in coastal waters around Europe, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3211–3230,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, A. and Spencer, R. G. M.: Characterization of dissolved organic matter
from source to sea using fluorescence and absorbance spectroscopy, Sci. Total
Environ., 333, 217–232, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, A., Ward, D., Lieten, Shakti H., Periera, R., Simpson, Ellie C., and
Slater, M.: Measurement of protein-like fluorescence in river and waste
water using a handheld spectrophotometer, Water Res., 38, 2934–2938, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Sharp, M. J., Fitzsimons, S. J., and Turner, R. J.: Abundance
and dynamics of dissolved organic carbon in glacier systems, Arct. Antarct.
Alp. Res., 38, 163–172, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Sharp, M. J., and Turner, R. J.: Using synchronous
fluorescence spectroscopy and principal components analysis to monitor
dissolved organic matter dynamics in a glacier system, Hydrol. Process.,
23, 1487–1500, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Klassen, J. L., Sharp, M. J., Fitzsimons, S. J., and Turner,
R. J.: Detecting biogeochemical activity in basal ice using fluorescence
spectroscopy, Ann. Glaciol., 51, 47–55, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Barker, J. D., Dubnick, A., Lyons, W. B., and Chin, Y. P.: Changes in
Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM) Fluorescence in Proglacial Antarctic Streams,
Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 45, 305–317, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Borisover, M., Laor, Y., Parparov, A., Bukhanovsky, N., and Lado, M.:
Spatial and seasonal patterns of fluorescent organic matter in Lake Kinneret
(Sea of Galilee) and its catchment basin, Water Res., 43, 3104–3116, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bricaud, A., Babin, M., Morel, A., and Claustre, H.: Variability in the
chlorophyll-specific absorption coefficients of natural phytoplankton:
Analysis and parameterization, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 13321–13332, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bro, R.: PARAFAC tutorial and applications, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 38,
149–171, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bro, R.: Exploratory study of sugar production using fluorescence
spectroscopy and multi-way analysis, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 46, 133–147,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y. Y., Guo, W. D., Long, A. M., and Chen, S. Y.: Study on optical
characteristic of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in rainwater by
fluorescence excitation-emission matrix and absorbance spectroscope, Spectrosc. Spect. Anal., 30, 2413–2416, 2010 (in
Chinese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G.: Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater
using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy, Mar. Chem., 51, 325–346,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G.: Marine optical biogeochemistry: the chemistry of ocean color,
Chem. Rev., 107, 402–418, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Coble, P. G., Del Castillo, C. E., and Avril, B.: Distribution and optical
of CDOM in the Arabian Sea during the 1995 Southwest Monsoon, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. II, 45, 2195–2223, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M.  and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy reveals
ubiquitous presence of oxidized and reduced quinines in dissolved organic
matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Del Castillo, C. E., Coble, P. G., Morell, J. M., Lopez, J. M., and Corredor,
J. E.: Analysis of the optical properties of the Orinoco River plume by
absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy, Mar. Chem., 66, 35–51, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, C. M., Montes, C., Cole, J. J., Striegl, R. G., Melackand, J., and
Downing, J. A.: CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from saline lakes: Aglobal estimate of
asurprisingly large flux, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G04041, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000637" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JG000637</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fellman, J. B., Hood, E., and Spencer, R. G. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy
opens new windows into dissolved organic matter dynamics in freshwater
ecosystems: A review, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2452–2462, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, W. D., Xu, J., Wang, J. P., Wen, Y. G., Zhou, J. F., and Yan, Y. C.:
Characterization of dissolved organic matter in urban sewage using
excitation emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy and parallel factor
analysis, J. Environ. Sci., 22, 1728–1734, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Helms, J. R., Stubbins, A., Ritchie, J. D., Minor, E. C., Kieber, D. J., and
Mopper, K.: Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of
molecular weight, source, and photo bleaching of chromophoric dissolved
organic matter, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 955–969, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Stuetz, R. M., and
Khan, S. J.: Fluoresence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water
system: A review, Water Res., 43, 863–881, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hua, B., Dolan, F., Mcghee, C., Clevenger, T. E., and Deng, B. L.:
Water-source characterization and classification with fluorescence EEM
spectroscopy: PARAFAC analysis, Int. J. Environ. An. Ch., 87, 135–147,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, N., Baker, A., and Reynolds, D.: Fluorescence analysis of dissolved
organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters – a review, River Res.
Appl., 23, 631–649, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffé, R., Boyer, J. N., Lu, X., Maie, N., Yang, C., Scully,
N. M., and Mock, S.: Source characterization of dissolved organic matter in
subtropical mangrove-dominated estuary by fluorescence analysis, Mar. Chem.,
84, 195–210, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Larsson, T., Wedborg, M., and Turner, D.: Correction of inner-filter effect
in fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectrometry using Raman scatter,
Anal. Chim. Acta., 583, 357–363, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lawaetz, A. J.  and Stedmon, C. A.: Fluorescence Intensity Calibration Using
the Raman Scatter Peak of Water, Appl. Spectrosc., 63, 936–940, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M., Schick, L. L., and Loder, T. C.: Dissolved protein
fluorescence in two Maine estuaries, Mar. Chem., 64, 171–179, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
McDowell, W. H., Zsolnay, A., Aikenhead-Peterson, J. A., Gregorich, E. G.,
Jones, D. L., Jödermann, D., Kalbitz, K., Marschner, B.,
and Schwesig, D.: A comparison of methods to determine the biodegradable
dissolved organic carbon from different terrestrial sources, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 38, 1933–1942, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
McKnight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P. K., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T.,
and Andersen, D. T.: Spectrofluorometriccharacterization of dissolved
organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 38–48, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Song, C. C., Wang, L. L., Guo, Y. D., Song, Y. Y., Yang, G. S., and Li, Y.
C.: Impacts of natural wetland degradation on dissolved carbon dynamics in
the Sanjiang Plain, Northeastern China, J. Hydrol., 398, 26–32, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Song, K. S., Zang, S. Y., Zhao, Y., Li, L., Du, J., Zhang, N. N., Wang, X.
D., Shao, T. T., Guan, Y., and Liu, L.: Spatiotemporal characterization of
dissolved carbon for inland waters in semi-humid/semi-arid region, China,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4269–4281, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4269-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-17-4269-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Spencer, R. G. M., Hernes, P. J., Ruf, R., Baker, A., Dyda, R. Y., Stubbins,
A., and Six, J.: Temporal controls on dissolved organic matter and lignin
biogeochemistry in apristine tropical river, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 115,
G03013, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001180" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JG001180</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A. and Bro, R.: Characterizing dissolved organic matter
fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: a tutorial, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 6, 572–579, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A. and Markager, S.: Tracing the production and degradation of
autochthonous fractions of dissolved organic matter by fluorescence analysis,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 1415–1426, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S., and Bro, R.: Tracing dissolved organic matter
in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy,
Mar. Chem., 82, 239–254, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A., Thomas, D. N., Granskog, M., Kaartokallio, H., Papadimitriou,
S., and Kuosa, H.: Characteristics of dissolved organic matter in Baltic
coastal sea ice: allochthonous or autochthonous origins?, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 41, 7273–7279, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas K. B.: Under Landfast ice, Arctic, 36, 328–340, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Cotner, J. B., Loiselle, S. A., Striegl, R.
G., Ballatore, T. J., Dillon, P., Finlay, K., Fortino, K., Knoll, L. B.,
Kortelainen, P. L., Kutser, T., Larsen, S., Laurion, I., Leech, D. M.,
McCallister, S. L., McKnight, D. M., Melack, J. M., Overholt, E., Porter, J.
A., Prairie, Y., Renwick, W. H., Roland, F., Sherman, B. S., Schindler, D.
W., Sobek, S., Tremblay, A., Vanni, M. J., Verschoor, A. M., Wachenfeldt, E.
V., and Weyhenmeyer, G. A.: Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon
cycling and climate, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2298–2314, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Uusikiv, J., Vahatal, A. V., Granskog, M. A., and Sommaruga, R.: Contribution
of mycosporine-like amino acids and colored dissolved and particulate matter
to sea ice optical properties and ultraviolet attenuation, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
55, 703–713, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
UV Talk Letter:
<a href="https://shimadzu.com.au/uv-talk-letter-volume-10" target="_blank">https://shimadzu.com.au/uv-talk-letter-volume-10</a> (last access:  12 March  2016), Volume 10, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Weishaar, J. L., Aiken, G. R., Bergamaschi, B. A., Farm, M. S., Fujii, R.,
and Mopper, K.: Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator
of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 4702–4708, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wharton Jr., R. A., McKay, C. P., Clow, G. D., and Andersen, D. T.: Perennial
ice covers and their influence on Antarctic lake ecosystems, Antarct. Res.
Ser., 59, 53–70, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Yamashita, Y.: Assessing the dynamics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in
coastal environments by excitation emission matrix fluorescence and parallel
factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC), Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1900–1908, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Yamashita, Y., Cory, R. M., Nishioka, J., Kuma, K., Tanoue, E., and
Jaffé, R.,: Fluorescence characteristics of
dissolved organic matter in the deep waters of the Okhotsk Sea and the
northwestern North Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 57, 1478–1485, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., VanDijk, M. A., Liu, M. L., Zhu, G. W., and Qin, B. Q.: The
contribution of phytoplankton degradation to chromophoric dissolved organic
matter (CDOM) in eutrophic shallow lakes: Field and experimental evidence,
Water Res., 43, 4685–4697, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Zhang, E. L., Yin, Y., VanDijk, M. A., Feng, L. Q., Shi, Z. Q.,
Liu, M. L., and Qin, B. Q.: Characteristics and sources of chromophoric
dissolved organic matter in lakes of the Yungui Plateau, China, differing in
trophic state and altitude, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2645–2659, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Yin, Y., Feng, L. Q., Zhu, G. W., Shi, Z. Q., Liu, X. H., and
Zhang, Y. Z.: Characterizing chromophoric dissolved organic matter in Lake
Tianmuhu and its catchment basin using excitation-emission matrix
fluorescence and parallel factor analysis, Water Res., 45, 5110–5122, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. L., Liu, X. H., Osburn, C. L., Wang, M. Z., Qin, B. Q., and Zhou,
Y. Q.: Photo bleaching response of different Source of Chromophoric Dissolved
Organic Matter Exposed to Natural Solar Radiation Using Absorption and
Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectra, Plos One, 8, e77515, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077515" target="_blank">doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077515</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
