<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-2279-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Optical properties and bioavailability of dissolved organic <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>matter along a
flow-path continuum from soil pore <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>waters to the Kolyma River mainstem, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>East
Siberia</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Optical properties and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K.~E. Frey et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Frey</surname><given-names>Karen E.</given-names></name>
          <email>kfrey@clarku.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sobczak</surname><given-names>William V.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Mann</surname><given-names>Paul J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6221-3533</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Holmes</surname><given-names>Robert M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Biology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geography, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts 02540, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Karen E. Frey (kfrey@clarku.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>2279</fpage><lpage>2290</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The Kolyma River in northeast Siberia is among the six largest Arctic rivers
and drains a region underlain by vast deposits of Holocene-aged peat and
Pleistocene-aged loess known as yedoma, most of which is currently stored in
ice-rich permafrost throughout the region. These peat and yedoma deposits
are important sources of dissolved organic matter (DOM) to inland waters
that in turn play a significant role in the transport and ultimate
remineralization of organic carbon to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the
terrestrial flow-path continuum. The turnover and fate of terrigenous DOM
during offshore transport largely depends upon the composition and amount of
carbon released to inland and coastal waters. Here, we measured the
ultraviolet-visible optical properties of chromophoric DOM (CDOM) from a
geographically extensive collection of waters spanning soil pore waters,
streams, rivers, and the Kolyma River mainstem throughout a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 km transect of the northern Kolyma River basin. During the period of
study, CDOM absorption coefficients were found to be robust proxies for the
concentration of DOM, whereas additional CDOM parameters such as spectral
slopes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were found to be useful indicators of DOM quality along the
flow path. In particular, the spectral slope ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of CDOM
demonstrated statistically significant differences between all four water
types and tracked changes in the concentration of bioavailable DOC,
suggesting that this parameter may be suitable for clearly discriminating
shifts in organic matter characteristics among water types along the full
flow-path continuum across this landscape. However, despite our observations
of downstream shifts in DOM composition, we found a relatively constant
proportion of DOC that was bioavailable (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–6 % of total
DOC) regardless of relative water residence time along the flow path. This
may be a consequence of two potential scenarios allowing for continual
processing of organic material within the system, namely (a) aquatic
microorganisms are acclimating to a downstream shift in DOM composition
and/or (b) photodegradation is continually generating labile DOM for
continued microbial processing of DOM along the flow-path continuum. Without
such processes, we would otherwise expect to see a declining fraction of
bioavailable DOC downstream with increasing residence time of water in the
system. With ongoing and future permafrost degradation, peat and yedoma
deposits throughout the northeast Siberian region will become more
hydrologically active, providing greater amounts of DOM to fluvial networks
and ultimately to the Arctic Ocean. The ability to rapidly and
comprehensively monitor shifts in the quantity and quality of DOM across the
landscape is therefore critical for understanding potential future feedbacks
within the Arctic carbon cycle.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>There is increasing evidence that inland freshwater ecosystems play a
significant role in the global carbon cycle owing to the metabolism of
terrestrially derived organic matter as it moves through fluvial networks
from land to ocean (Cole et al., 2007; Battin et al., 2009a, b). Recent
research suggests that Arctic watersheds may increasingly augment the role
of freshwater ecosystems in the global flux of terrestrial carbon to the
atmosphere (Walter et al., 2006; Denfeld et al., 2013; Vonk et al., 2013;
Hayes et al., 2014; Spencer et al., 2015) and ocean (Frey and Smith, 2005;
Frey and McClelland, 2009; Schreiner et al., 2014; Tesi et al., 2014) as a
result of climate warming and changing regional hydrology. Terrestrial
sources of organic matter generally dominate the energy and carbon fluxes
through stream, riverine, and estuarine ecosystems (Mulholland, 1997; Holmes
et al., 2008), but the lability and composition of this carbon remain poorly
characterized. Headwater and intermediate streams dominate overall channel
length in large dendritic drainage basins (e.g., Denfeld et al., 2013), thus
the functional role of streams and intermediate rivers is magnified when
assessing landscape controls on carbon and nutrient fluxes to the atmosphere
and Arctic Ocean.</p>
      <p>Following the publication of the “river continuum concept” (Vannote et
al., 1980), there has been much research focused on the delivery and
processing of terrestrially derived organic matter within temperate stream
ecosystems. Through these studies, it has been shown that biological
processes within streams alter the transport of organic matter to downstream
ecosystems (e.g., Webster and Meyer, 1997), but the fate of terrestrial
organic matter in Arctic streams and rivers has only more recently been
explored (e.g., Frey and Smith, 2005; Neff et al., 2006; Holmes et al.,
2008; Denfeld et al., 2013; Spencer et al., 2015). Furthermore, a variety of
conceptual and pragmatic issues complicate the study of Arctic rivers,
including: (i) large seasonal variations in discharge accompanied by large
seasonal variations in nutrient and organic matter inputs from rivers to the
coastal ocean (e.g., McClelland et al., 2012); (ii) the heterogeneity of
vegetation, permafrost extent, topography, and soil attributes within Arctic
watersheds (e.g., Frey and McClelland, 2009); and (iii) spatial and temporal
inaccessibility hindering comprehensive sampling; among others.</p>
      <p>Hydrologic flow paths and organic matter transport in Arctic regions
dominated by permafrost are markedly different than temperate regions with
well-drained soils. In particular, permafrost-dominated watersheds lack deep
groundwater flow paths owing to the permafrost boundary in soil that
prevents deep groundwater movement (Judd and Kling, 2002; Frey et al.,
2007). As a result, the delivery of terrestrial permafrost organic matter to
aquatic ecosystems may in fact lack significant in situ soil or groundwater
processing. Once dissolved organic matter (DOM) enters aquatic ecosystems,
processes remove DOM from the water column: (i) photochemical
reactions, where DOM is degraded to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or to compounds bioavailable
for bacterial uptake (Moran and Zepp, 1997; Laurion and Mladenov, 2013; Cory
et al., 2014); (ii) flocculation of terrestrial DOM resulting in the
settling of particulate organic matter (Wachenfeldt et al., 2009); (iii) loss via aggregation of DOM owing to changes in ionic strength when
freshwater mixes with sea water (Sholkovitz, 1976); (iv) DOM sorption to
particles and sedimentation (Chin et al., 1998); and/or (v) bacterial uptake
and utilization of the bioavailable fraction (Bronk, 2002; Karl and
Björkman, 2002; Mann et al., 2014; Spencer et al., 2015). Measurements
of waters along a hydrologic flow path may provide unique insights into the
characteristics of DOM as it is modified through these various processes
along the soil-stream-river continuum.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>The northern reaches of the Kolyma River in East Siberia and the
locations of the 47 water samples collected throughout the region in this
study (including soil pore waters, streams, rivers, and the Kolyma River
mainstem).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Recent work on the Kolyma River in northeast Siberia has identified marked
variation in annual discharge that is associated with large pulses of
organic matter flux to the Arctic Ocean during spring freshet, providing
detailed temporal characterization of DOM in the Kolyma River mainstem
across the annual hydrograph (e.g., Mann et al., 2012). Furthermore,
selective processing and loss of permafrost-derived DOM has been shown to
occur via microbial metabolism throughout the Kolyma River basin, as waters
move downstream through the fluvial network (Mann et al., 2014,
2015; Spencer et al., 2015). Here, we complement these previous studies by
providing extensive spatial characterization of DOM along a flow-path
continuum from soil pore waters to the Kolyma River mainstem during
mid-summer (July) baseflow. The heterogeneity of environmental
characteristics and extensive continuous permafrost of the Kolyma River
basin combine to make this a critical region to investigate and monitor. In
particular, we measured the ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra (200–800 nm) of chromophoric DOM (CDOM) from a geographically extensive collection of
waters throughout a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 km transect of the northern Kolyma
River basin, including samples of soil pore waters, streams, rivers, and the
Kolyma River mainstem. CDOM absorption and spectral slopes were used to investigate
contrasting water types and were found to be useful indicators of both the
concentration and reactivity of DOM. With ongoing permafrost degradation and
subsequent release of a long-term storehouse of organic material into the
contemporary carbon cycle, the ability to easily and comprehensively monitor
the quantity and quality of DOM across the landscape through investigation
of its optical properties is becoming critical for understanding the global
significance of the Arctic carbon cycle. Here, we explore a full suite of
CDOM parameters as well as concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC)
and bioavailable DOC as they vary across a full flow-path continuum in the
Kolyma River basin in northeast Siberia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
      <p>The Kolyma River in northeast Siberia is among the six largest Arctic rivers
and drains a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 650 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> region underlain by vast
deposits of Holocene-aged peat and Pleistocene-aged loess known as yedoma,
much of which is currently stored in ice-rich permafrost throughout the
region (Holmes et al., 2012, 2013). These peats and yedoma
deposits are important sources of DOM to terrestrial waters that in turn
play a significant role in the transport and ultimate remineralization of
organic carbon to atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Walter et al.,
2006; Mann et al., 2012; Denfeld et al., 2013; Spencer et al., 2015). The
Kolyma River basin and its subwatersheds exhibit extreme hydrologic
seasonality, with ice breakup and peak river discharge typically occurring
in late May or early June. In this study, sampling took place along the most
northern <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 km of the Kolyma River in the vicinity of
Cherskiy, Sakha Republic, Russia (68.767<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 161.333<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)
during the mid-summer period of July 2009 (Fig. 1). Samples were collected
over a narrow temporal window from 11–25 July  2009 in order to capture a
“snapshot” of observations during the mid-summer period. In total, 47
water samples were collected, including soil pore waters in shallow wetlands
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 9), small streams with watersheds &lt; 100 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 15),
major river tributaries with watersheds 900–120 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 14), and
Kolyma mainstem locations with watersheds &gt; 400 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 9). Although we did not determine residence times directly for our
sampled sites, Vonk et al. (2013) estimated that in higher-relief areas near
Duvanny Yar (adjacent to the Kolyma River mainstem), the transport time
from permafrost thaw to entry into the Kolyma River may be less than 1
hour. Furthermore, with respect to the mainstem, it has been estimated that
water residence times in the Kolyma River from Duvanny Yar to the river
mouth may be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–7 days, assuming average mainstem velocities
of 0.5–1.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Holmes et al., 2012; Vonk et al., 2013). As such,
permafrost-derived carbon may not be easily detectable at the river mouth, as
this time is likely comparable to the rapid removal rates of highly labile
permafrost carbon determined through incubation experiments (e.g., Holmes et al.,
2012; Vonk et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Samples were collected by hand using a 1 L acid-washed high-density
polyethylene (HDPE) bottle as a collection vessel, where sample waters were
used to rinse the bottle several times before filling. Soil pore waters were
collected by depressing the soil surface within the wetlands and allowing
the water to slowly seep into the collection vessel. In shallow streams,
less than 0.5 m in depth, samples were collected approximately midway below
the surface and the bottom. In larger tributaries and rivers, samples were
collected at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 m. Water samples were then
filtered through precombusted (450 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 6 h) Whatman 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m GF/F filters in the field and stored in acid-washed HDPE bottles
without headspace to minimize degassing and algal growth. Upon returning to
the laboratory (typically within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 day), DOC samples were
acidified with concentrated HCl to a pH of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 and stored refrigerated
and in the dark until analysis via high-temperature combustion using a
Shimadzu TOC-VCPH Analyzer (within 1 month of collection). DOC was
calculated as the mean of 3–5 injections with a coefficient of variance
less than 2 %.</p>
      <p>We additionally conducted a series of organic matter bioavailability assays
to assess the total and relative amounts of bioavailable DOC in soil,
stream, and river environments. These assays relied upon 5-day biological
oxygen demand (BOD) incubations, with methods similar to those in Mann et al. (2014). Water samples were collected in triplicate glass 300 mL BOD
bottles and filtered as DOC (above). The samples were initially allowed to
equilibrate via filtering in a controlled laboratory environment at
15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, after which <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 was the start time of the incubations.
The Winkler titration method was used to measure dissolved oxygen (DO)
concentrations at the start (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0; i.e., in situ DO) and after 5-day
incubations at 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C , where bottles were kept in the dark in
between measurements. At <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, DO measurements were at concentrations
expected at equilibrium with the 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C laboratory temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5–9.0 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This temperature was only slightly warmer
than environmental sampling conditions (i.e., the Kolyma River mainstem
samples ranged from 11.40 to 13.90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, river samples ranged from
10.70 to 14.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and stream samples ranged from
4.40 to 13.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). However, we maintained samples at 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
as is standard in the BOD method, which allowed samples to be treated
identically in the controlled experiment (in situ temperatures varied
depending not only upon location but also date and time of day).
Furthermore, bottles were wrapped tightly with parafilm such that physical
degassing should have been minimal during the incubations. BOD was then
calculated as the difference between DO concentrations at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 and
following the 5-day incubations. We assumed 100 % of DO consumed was
converted to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> via aerobic respiration and that the carbon source
respired was DOM, where resulting BOD measurements were used an analog for
bioavailable DOC. The Winkler method we used here has been used extensively
and is attractive for a variety of reasons, including: (i) enabling DO to be
measured with precision of 0.01 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus low respiration rates can be
accurately measured; (ii) allowing for convenient replication of assays
within habitats; (iii) permitting experimental manipulation of standard
bioassays (e.g., N and P amendments, photolysis experiments, alteration of
initial microbial consortia, and temperature manipulation; (iv) helping to
segregate the relative roles of water column and sediment processes (through
comparisons with sediment analyses); and (v) helping to inform more
realistic ecosystem-level experiments that are much more laborious and time
intensive.</p>
      <p>In order to investigate the optical characteristics of the DOM in these
samples, we additionally measured the ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra
of CDOM from this broad collection of waters. CDOM absorbance was measured
on filtered (precombusted Whatman 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m GF/F), unacidified waters
stored in acid-washed HDPE bottles immediately after collection (within
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 day) at the Northeast Science Station in Cherskiy using a
Thermo Scientific GENESYS 10 UV-Vis spectrophotometer across wavelengths
800–200 nm (1 nm interval) with a 1 cm quartz cuvette. All sample spectra
were blank corrected using Milli-Q water (18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Measurements were
made after samples had equilibrated to the laboratory temperature in order
to minimize temperature effects. Null-point adjustments were performed on
all spectra, such that CDOM absorbance was assumed to be zero across
wavelengths greater than 750 nm and the average absorbance between 750
and 800 nm was subtracted from each spectrum to correct for offsets owing to
instrument baseline drift, temperature, scattering, and refractive effects
(Green and Blough, 1994; Helms et al., 2008). CDOM absorption coefficients
were calculated as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.303</mml:mn><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Napierian absorption coefficient (m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a specified
wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in nanometers), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorbance at the
wavelength, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cell path length in meters (Green and Blough, 1994).
To avoid inner-filtering effects, several highly absorbing samples
(primarily the soil pore waters) were diluted with Milli-Q water before
analysis (to the point where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 for a 1 cm path
length) to avoid saturation of the spectra at short wavelengths, where the
final CDOM absorbance and therefore absorption coefficients were corrected
for these procedures.</p>
      <p>CDOM spectral slopes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 290 and 350 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
275 and 295 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 350 and 400 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated
within log-transformed absorption spectra, were also utilized to investigate
DOM characteristics of contrasting water types, and were calculated as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorption coefficient at a specified wavelength,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a reference wavelength, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the slope-fitting
parameter (Hernes et al., 2008; Helms et al., 2008; Spencer et al., 2009a).
All slopes are reported here as positive values, such that higher (i.e.,
steeper) slopes indicate a greater decrease in absorption with increasing
wavelength. Additional CDOM parameters investigated here include the
spectral slope ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated as the ratio between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the ratio between CDOM absorption
coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 250 nm and 365 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and specific UV
absorbance (SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, determined by dividing UV absorbance (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 254 nm
by the sample DOC concentration and reported in units of L mg C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Weishhar et al., 2003). These six CDOM parameters
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been shown to provide insights for various DOM
characteristics such as molecular weight, composition, age,
and aromatic content for a variety of geographic regions (e.g., Weishaar
2003; Neff et al., 2006; Helms et al., 2008; Spencer et al., 2008, 2009a, b; Mann et al., 2012). As such, we chose
our method for spectral slope calculations to be consistent with previous
studies to foster intercomparisons between data sets, however future studies
may derive further insight by utilizing methods that calculate a continuous
spectral slope curve over the full 200–800 nm span (e.g., Loiselle et al.,
2009) rather than only specific wavelength intervals as presented here.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Concentrations of <bold>(a)</bold> dissolved organic carbon (DOC),
<bold>(b)</bold> bioavailable DOC, and <bold>(c)</bold> percentage of total DOC that is bioavailable for
the four water sample types. The mean (hollow squares), median (horizontal
lines), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 standard deviation (gray boxes), and total range
(whiskers) for each sample population are shown.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Chromophoric dissolved organic carbon (CDOM) absorption spectra
from 200–800 nm for <bold>(a)</bold> all samples; and <bold>(b)</bold> streams, rivers, and the
Kolyma River mainstem only.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>Total DOC concentrations (and the variance among values within each water
type) decreased markedly downstream along the flow-path continuum from soil
pore waters to the Kolyma River mainstem (Fig. 2a). Mean (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1
standard deviation) DOC values were 43.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.8 (soil pore
waters), 11.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.0 (streams), 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6
(rivers), and 3.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mainstem waters). Soil pore
waters, in particular, showed highly variable DOC concentrations (ranging
from 13.2 to 64.7 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> demonstrating the heterogeneous supply of DOM
from terrestrial systems to streams. By contrast, DOC concentrations in the
Kolyma mainstem along the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 km stretch sampled were
remarkably similar (ranging from 3.0 to 4.4 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during this
mid-summer July period (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, DOC concentrations of the
four water types sampled were found to be significantly different from one
another (one-way ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05).</p>
      <p>Concentrations of bioavailable DOC showed similar patterns to DOC, declining
downstream along the flow-path continuum with increasing water residence
time in the system (Fig. 2b). Bioavailable DOC concentrations averaged 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 (soil pore waters), 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1
(streams), 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 (rivers), and 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (mainstem waters), and showed relative greater variability than DOC
within the stream, river and mainstem water types. Concentrations of
bioavailable DOC in soil pore waters were statistically different from the
other three water types (one-way ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05), although by
contrast, streams, rivers, and mainstem waters were not statistically
different from one another (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.05). Importantly, the percentage
of bioavailable DOC (i.e., calculated as the amount of bioavailable DOC
divided by total DOC) did not significantly decrease downstream (one-way
ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.05) and showed relatively similar values among the
four water sample types along the flow-path continuum (Fig. 2c), where
percentages averaged 3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.8 (soil pore waters), 3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 (streams), 6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3 (rivers), and 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 %
(mainstem waters).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mean spectral slope and other CDOM parameters for soil pore waters,
streams, rivers, and the Kolyma River mainstem.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(L mg C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil pore waters</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Streams</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rivers</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.98</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kolyma mainstem</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>CDOM absorption spectra (200–800 nm) showed clear separation between soil
pore waters, streams, rivers, and the Kolyma mainstem, where soil pore
waters exhibited values markedly higher than the other three water sample
types (Fig. 3a). CDOM absorption also clearly declined downstream from
streams and rivers
to mainstem waters when assessing those waters only (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, we investigated the potential for utilizing CDOM
absorption as a proxy for DOC concentrations in these waters. Our data
revealed that, independent of water type along the stream river mainstem
flow path, CDOM absorption was strongly linearly correlated to DOC
concentrations at 254, 350, and 440 nm (Fig. 4). In particular, CDOM
absorption at 254 nm had the highest predictive capability of DOC (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.958, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01), with CDOM absorption at 350 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.855, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) and 440 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.667, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) less
strongly predictive (Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Relationships between DOC and CDOM absorption at 254, 350, and 440 nm for streams, rivers, and the Kolyma River mainstem.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>We additionally investigated the quantitative distribution of the six
derived CDOM parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the four water types
(Fig. 5; Table 1). In general, four parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed an increasing pattern
along the flow-path continuum, whereas two parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed a decreasing pattern. In terms of whether the values of
the six parameters were statistically significantly different among water
sample types, one-way ANOVA tests (at the 0.05 level) revealed inconsistent
results. Most commonly, soil pore waters were statistically different from
all other water types for four of the parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but no consistent pattern was
observed in significant differences across other water types. However, the
spectral slope ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was the only CDOM parameter of the six
investigated that showed statistically significant differences between all
four water types (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Relationships between concentrations of bioavailable DOC and each of the six CDOM
metrics investigated. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows the highest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value, with a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of &lt; 0.001.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.356</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.450</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.044</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.240</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.265</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.002</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.198</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.454</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Lastly, we examined the relationships between CDOM optical properties and
DOM bioavailability. To this end, we performed linear regressions between
all six of our derived CDOM parameters and bioavailable DOC concentrations
to determine the strength of their ability to predict bioavailable DOC. Our
results indicated that five of the CDOM parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
statistically significant predictors at the 0.05 level (Table 2). In
particular, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed the strongest relationship with bioavailable DOC
concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.454, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001). The relationship
between bioavailable DOC concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6) showed a
distinct negative trend (bioavailable DOC mg L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>2.204 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn> 2.518</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with the highest bioavailable DOC concentrations and lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for soil pore waters, and lowest bioavailable DOC
concentrations and highest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for Kolyma River mainstem waters.
We found a clear gradation in the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
bioavailable DOC down the flow-path continuum, as one would also expect by
examining these parameters individually (e.g., Figs. 2b, 5f). In summary,
not only was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the only CDOM parameter that showed statistically
significant separation between all four water types examined but it also
had the strongest relationship when compared with concentrations of
bioavailable DOC.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The six presented CDOM metrics, <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, show the separation between soil pore, stream, river, and Kolyma
mainstem waters. The mean (hollow squares), median (horizontal lines),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 standard deviation (gray boxes), and total range (whiskers) for
each sample population are shown.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>The CDOM metric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a relatively strong relationship with
concentrations of bioavailable DOC present in the sampled waters, with an
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.454 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value &lt; 0.001.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2279/2016/bg-13-2279-2016-f06.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study, we present a full suite of DOC, bioavailable DOC, and CDOM
parameters throughout the permafrost-dominated Kolyma River basin in
northeast Siberia with the purpose of helping to elucidate the processing of
DOM along a full flow-path continuum from soil pore waters to the mainstem.
Our findings show that average concentrations of DOC and bioavailable DOC
generally decrease as waters travel downstream from soil pore waters,
streams, rivers, and ultimately to the Kolyma River mainstem. This pattern
suggests the occurrence of rapid in-stream processing of DOM and potential
remineralization of DOC to atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during this July baseflow
period, well before these waters reach the Arctic Ocean (e.g., Denfeld et
al., 2013; Mann et al., 2015; Spencer et al., 2015). The amount of total DOC
putatively lost to remineralization is a relatively small fraction
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–6 % depending upon water type), but on par with
similar studies across the Arctic for this time of year (e.g., Holmes et
al., 2008). Although this may be a relatively small proportion,
it likely includes permafrost-derived ancient DOC, particularly in the upper headwaters that will contribute to permafrost carbon feedbacks to climate warming (Mann et al., 2015).
Moving downstream, the river continuum concept predicts that relative
diversity of organic molecules decreases from the headwaters to the river
mouth (Vannote et al., 1980). As energetically favorable compounds are
converted to living tissue or respired as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, bulk DOM in the Kolyma
basin has indeed been shown in previous studies to become less diverse
moving from headwaters to mainstem waters before being exported to the Arctic
Ocean (Spencer et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>CDOM parameters presented in this study give further insight into
characteristics of DOM along the full flow-path continuum throughout the
Kolyma River basin. For instance, the specific ultraviolet absorbance
(SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been shown to be correlated with DOM composition, where
SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are positively correlated with percent aromaticity and
molecular size of DOM (and for a given river have been shown to be greatest
during spring flood) (e.g., Weishaar et al., 2003; Spencer et al., 2009a;
Mann et al., 2012). In this study, we generally found progressively
decreasing SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the flow-path from soil pore waters
towards mainstem waters, suggesting that soil pore waters contain higher
molecular weight and
aromatic terrestrial DOM that generally becomes lower in
molecular weight and aromaticity along the flow-path continuum towards the
Kolyma River mainstem. In addition, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio has been
shown to be negatively correlated to aromaticity and molecular size of DOM
(Peuravuori and Pihlaja, 1997). In fact (similar to samples from the Yukon
River, Alaska; Spencer et al., 2009a), our data showed that the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio is significantly negatively correlated with
SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.947</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.947;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01). As such, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>250</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio may
potentially be utilized as a first-order proxy for SUVA<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>254</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> when DOC
concentrations cannot be easily determined.</p>
      <p>However, despite our observations of downstream shifts in DOM
composition,
interestingly we find a relatively constant proportion of DOC that was bioavailable
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–6 % of total DOC) regardless of relative water
residence time along the flow path. This suggests that continual microbial
processing of organic matter is able to occur with similar rates during
transit from headwaters throughout the Kolyma River drainage network to the
Arctic Ocean concurrent with ongoing downstream CDOM compositional changes.
Microbial demand in headwater streams of the Kolyma River basin is
subsidized by significant quantities of DOC specifically derived from
permafrost and aged soils, yet the proportion of permafrost supporting DOC
mineralization declines as waters move downstream through the fluvial
network (Mann et al., 2015). Thus, our results importantly show that
microbial metabolism continues at similar rates independent of dominant DOM
source and radiocarbon age.</p>
      <p>There may be several reasons for why microbial metabolism maintains this
consistent rate along the flow path, including the possibility that aquatic
microorganisms are acclimating to a downstream shift in DOM composition. The
higher overall amounts of bioavailable DOC we measured in soil pore waters
may reflect a highly bioreactive permafrost or aged surface soil derived
fraction of the bulk DOC pool (e.g., Vonk et al., 2013; Mann et al., 2014).
Further downstream in larger tributary and Kolyma mainstem waters, it has
been shown that lower total amounts of bioavailable DOC is supported almost
entirely from predominantly modern radiocarbon aged surface soils and
vegetation sources (Mann et al., 2015). Aquatic microorganisms may therefore
be readily acclimating to significant shifts in DOM composition caused by
selective losses of unique DOM fractions (e.g., Kaplan and Bott, 1983;
Spencer et al., 2015) alongside high internal demand for labile DOM by
stream communities in lower-order streams, which would otherwise generally
be expected to result in decreased DOM lability with increasing water
residence time (Stepanauskas et al., 1999a, b; Wikner et al., 1999;
Langenheder et al., 2003; Sondergaard et al., 2003; Fellman et al., 2010, 2014).</p>
      <p>Additional mechanisms such as continual photodegradation downstream may
also account for our observed patterns in downstream DOM. Previous studies
have indicated that CDOM spectral slopes (particularly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can serve as indicators of DOM source and composition, where a
steeper spectral slope typically suggests lower molecular weight material
with decreasing aromatic content and a shallower (i.e., lower) slope
typically suggests higher molecular weight material with increasing aromatic
content (Green and Blough, 1994; Blough and Del Vecchio, 2002; Helms et al.,
2008; Spencer et al., 2008; Spencer et al., 2009a). Furthermore,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been identified as a reliable proxy for dissolved lignin
and therefore terrigenous DOM supply across Arctic Ocean coastal waters, as
well as photobleaching history (Helms et al., 2008; Fichot et al., 2013). We
found a general increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>290</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>275</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>295</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> moving
downstream through the network, indicative of progressive photodegradation
of DOM alongside likely reductions in average DOM molecular weight and
aromaticity. We found spectral slopes over longer wavelength regions
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>350</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased through the network, also suggesting constant
photochemical degradation of DOM as waters flowed downstream (e.g., Helms et
al., 2008). The slope ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has also been shown to be a proxy for
DOM molecular weight and source, where low ratios typically correspond to
more allochthonous, higher molecular weight DOM (Helms et al., 2008; Spencer
et al., 2009b; Mann et al., 2012). The advantage of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios over
individual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values is apparent when each spectral slope responds to a process
in an opposing manner, emphasizing the response in calculated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.
The clear increases in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we observed moving downstream in the fluvial
network (from a minimum of 0.74 in soil pore waters to a maximum of 1.24 in
the mainstem) indicate that during July summer conditions, soil pore waters
contain higher molecular weight, aromatic terrestrial DOM that generally
becomes lower in average molecular weight and aromaticity along the
flow-path continuum towards the Kolyma River mainstem. The maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value of 1.24 we report in the Kolyma River mainstem is markedly higher than
the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.82–0.92) reported in Stedmon et al. (2011) for the
Kolyma from 2004 and 2005, demonstrating the heterogeneity of DOM properties
even in mainstem waters and the necessity for greater temporal resolution in
monitoring. Similar to spectral slopes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values may also be
indicative of photobleaching history (e.g., Helms et al., 2008) and our
observed increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> downstream through the network suggests evidence
of ongoing photochemical degradation of surface water DOM during transit.</p>
      <p>Photodegradation may indeed play an important and direct role in our
observed consistent fraction of bioavailable DOC along the flow path.
Previous studies in the Arctic underscore the importance of residence times
as well as a significant combined role for photo- and biological degradation
along the flow path in Arctic watersheds (Cory et al., 2007, 2013; Merck et al.,
2012;  Laurion and Mladenov, 2013). These previous results
show that the photochemical “pretreatment” of stream DOM that occurs
during export into lakes and coastal zones may impact the ability of
microorganisms to mineralize DOM. Therefore, the residence times and
flow paths of waters should greatly influence the ultimate fate of DOM
(e.g., DOM vs. CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exported to the adjacent ocean. In our case, we
find that our increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values downstream suggest important
photodegradation processes are occurring along the flow-path continuum,
where this photodegradation may potentially release significant quantities
of labile DOM for continued microbial processing of DOM further downstream
in these stream networks. In other words, our results suggest that more
abundant newly exposed bioavailable molecules upstream are replaced
downstream by photobleached smaller molecules (originating from aromatic
compounds), resulting in the fraction of DOC used relatively constant
without any clear pattern overall. If this were not the case, we would
expect to see a declining fraction of bioavailable DOC along the flow-path
continuum.</p>
      <p>In this study, we have provided new and important findings with regards to
the spatial distribution of DOM concentration, bioavailability, and optical
properties during mid-summer hydrologic conditions throughout the Kolyma
River basin in northeast Siberia. Freshwater DOC measurements across the
network were strongly positively correlated to CDOM absorption at 254 nm
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.958, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01), confirming the utility of simple CDOM
optical measurements for estimating carbon concentrations in Arctic
freshwaters (Spencer et al., 2008, 2009a; Stedmon et al., 2011) and across
water types within the Kolyma River basin in particular. Furthermore, the
optical parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proved to be the only CDOM compositional measure
that showed statistically significant separation between all four water
types examined during the study period, suggesting that this parameter may
be useful for easily distinguishing characteristics and processes occurring
in organic matter among water types along the full flow-path continuum. The
significant increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values we observed downstream through the
network suggests evidence of ongoing photochemical degradation of surface
water DOM during transit. Additionally, of all the CDOM parameters,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were most closely related to concentrations of bioavailable
DOC (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.454, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.001), suggesting that this value may be
correlated with a decline in bioavailable DOC through the network. However,
biological degradation has previously been shown to typically slightly
decrease <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Helms et al., 2008), which indicates that the
opposite relationship observed here may instead be a consequence of
covariance with photodegradation of DOM, or demonstrate that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values may reflect a broader, more complex range of physical and
biological processes than previously recognized. Garnering further insight
from our measurements, the relatively constant proportion of DOC that was
bioavailable regardless of relative water residence time along the flow path
may be a consequence of two potential scenarios allowing for continual
processing of organic material within the system, namely (a) aquatic
microorganisms are acclimating to a downstream shift in DOM composition
and/or (b) photodegradation is continually generating labile DOM for
continued microbial processing of DOM along the flow-path continuum. Without
such processes, we would otherwise expect to see a declining fraction of
bioavailable DOC downstream with increasing residence time of water in the
system.</p>
      <p>Unlike many previous studies that focus on only mainstem rivers in the
Arctic, we focus here on a variety of waters along a full flow-path
continuum, showing that CDOM metrics (in particular, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflect
important compositional differences in DOM of waters along the transit from
headwaters to the Arctic Ocean. The range in DOM properties of waters
traveling downstream through the Kolyma Basin often spanned wider ranges
than DOM compositional differences reported annually among the six major
Arctic rivers. For example, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values across the major Arctic rivers
over the years 2004 and 2005 spanned a minimum of 0.79 in the Yenisey River,
to a maximum value of 1.11 in the Mackenzie River (Stedmon et al., 2011),
compared to the range of 0.74 to 1.24 for waters in our study within a single
basin. It is therefore essential that changes taking place in the quality of
CDOM exported by these rivers be examined throughout entire river basins in
order to adequately assess climate-driven shifts in terrigenous carbon
supply and reactivity. Future work that includes both photo- and microbial
degradation experiments may further elucidate the ability for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
serve as a direct proxy for these processes along a flow-path gradient. Our
overall results thus far demonstrate promise for utilizing
ultraviolet-visible absorption characteristics to easily, inexpensively, and
comprehensively monitor the quantity and quality of DOM (over broad ranges)
across permafrost landscapes in the Arctic. This is particularly critical
for remote Arctic landscapes such as those in northeast Siberia, where the
future fate of organic carbon currently frozen in permafrost soils (and
whether it ultimately is released as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is tightly
linked to the lability of this material.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was part of the Polaris Project (<uri>www.thepolarisproject.org</uri>), supported through grants from the National
Science Foundation Arctic Sciences Division (Grants ARC-1044560 and
DUE-0732586 to Karen E. Frey and Grants ARC-1044610 and DUE-0732944 to Robert M. Holmes).
We thank E. Bulygina, A. Bunn, B. Denfeld, S. Davydov, A. Davydova, M. Hough, J. Schade, E. Seybold, N. Zimov, and S. Zimov for assistance with
field sampling collections and/or overall project coordination. We
additionally thank Isabelle Laurion and two anonymous reviewers for their
constructive comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this
manuscript.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: I. Laurion</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Battin, T. J., Kaplan, L. A., Findlay, S., Hopkinson, C. S., Marti, E.,
Packman, A. I., Newbold, J. D., and Sabater, F.: Biophysical
controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks, Nat. Geosci., 1,
95–100, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Battin, T. J., Luyssaert, S., Kaplan, L. A., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Richter,
A., and Tranvik, L. J.: The boundless carbon cycle, Nat. Geosci., 2, 598–600, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Blough, N. V. and Del Vecchio, R.: Chromophoric DOM in the coastal
environment, in: Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter, edited
by: Hansell, D. A. and Carlson, C. A.,  Elsevier, San Diego,
California, 509–546, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bronk D. A.: Dynamics of DON, in: Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved
Organic Matter, edited by: Hansell, D. A. and Carlson, C. A., Academic Press,
San Diego,  153–249, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chin, Y. P., Traina, S. J., Swank, C. R., and Backhus, D.: Abundance and
properties of dissolved organic matter in pore waters of a freshwater
wetland, Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 1287–1296, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the global carbon cycle:
Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget, Ecosystems,
10, 171–184, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M., McKnight, D. M., Chin, Y.-P., Miller, P., and Jaros, C. L.:
Chemical characteristics of fulvic acids from Arctic surface waters:
Microbial contributions and photochemical transformations, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, G04S51, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000343" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JG000343</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M., Crump, B. C., Dobkowski, J. A., and Kling, G. W.: Surface
exposure to sunlight stimulates CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> release from permafrost soil carbon
in the Arctic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
3429–3434, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M., Ward, C. P., Crump, B. C., and Kling, G. W.: Sunlight controls
water column processing of carbon in arctic fresh waters, Science,
345, 925–928, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1253119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1253119</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Denfeld, B. A., Frey, K. E., Sobczak, W. V., Mann, P. J., and Holmes, R. M.:
Summer CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> evasion from streams and rivers in the Kolyma River basin,
north-east Siberia, Polar Res., 32, 19704,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v32i0.19704" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/polar.v32i0.19704</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Fellman, J. B., Spencer, R. G. M., Hernes, P. J., Edwards, R. T., D'Amore,
D. V., and Hood, E.: The impact of glacier runoff on the biodegradability
and biochemical composition of terrigenous dissolved organic matter in
near-shore marine ecosystems, Mar. Chem., 121, 112–122, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Fellman, J. B., Spencer, R. G. M., Raymond, P. A., Pettit, N. E., Skrzypek,
G., Hernes, P. J., and Grierson, P. F.: Dissolved organic carbon biolability
decreases along with its modernization in fluvial networks in an ancient
landscape, Ecology, 95, 2622–2632, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fichot, C. G., Kaiser, K., Hooker, S. B., Zmon, R. M. W., Babin, M.,
Belanger, S., Walker, S. A., and Benner, R.: Pan-Arctic distributions of
continental runoff in the Arctic Ocean, Sci. Rep., 3, 1053,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep01053</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, K. E. and McClelland, J. W.: Impacts of permafrost
degradation on arctic river biogeochemistry, Hydrol. Process., 23,
169–182, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Frey, K. E. and Smith, L. C.: Amplified carbon release from vast West
Siberian peatlands by 2100, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09401,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL022025</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Frey, K. E., Siegel, D. I., and Smith, L. C.: Geochemistry of West Siberian
streams and their potential response to permafrost degradation, Water
Resour. Res., 43, W03406, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006WR004902</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Green, S. A. and Blough, N. V.: Optical absorption and fluorescence
properties of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in natural waters,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1903–1916, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hayes, D. J., Kicklighter, D. W., McGuire, A. D., Chen, M., Zhuang, Q. L.,
Yuan, F. M., Melillo, J. M., and Wullschleger, S. D.: The impacts of recent
permafrost thaw on land-atmosphere greenhouse gas exchange, Environ.
Res. Lett., 9, 045005, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045005</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Helms, J. R., Stubbins, A., Ritchie, J. D., Minor, E. C., Kieber, D. J., and
Mopper, K.: Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of
molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved
organic matter, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 955–969, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hernes, P. J., Spencer, R. G. M., Dyda, R. Y., Pellerin, B. A., Bachand, P.
A. M., and Bergamaschi, B. A.: The role of hydrologic regimes on dissolved
organic carbon composition in an agricultural watershed, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 5266–5277, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, R. M., McClelland, J. W., Raymond, P. A., Frazer, B. B., Peterson,
B. J., and Stieglitz, M.: Lability of DOC transported by Alaskan
rivers to the Arctic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L03402,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032837</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, R. M., McClelland, J. W., Peterson, B. J., Tank, S. E., Bulygina,
E., Eglinton, T. I., Gordeev, V. V., Gurtovaya, T. Y., Raymond, P. A.,
Repeta, D. J., Staples, R., Striegl, R. G., Zhulidov, A. V., and Zimov, S.
A.: Seasonal and annual fluxes of nutrients and organic matter from
large rivers to the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas, Estuar. Coast.,
35, 369–382, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9386-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12237-011-9386-6</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, R. M., Coe, M. T., Fiske, G. J., Gurtovaya, T., McClelland, J. W.,
Shiklomanov, A. I., Spencer, R. G. M., Tank, S. E., and Zhulidov, A. V.:
Climate change impacts on the hydrology and biogeochemistry of Arctic
Rivers, in: Global Impacts of Climate Change on Inland Waters, edited by:
Goldman,  C. R., Kumagai, M., and Robarts, R. D., Wiley, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Judd, K. E. and Kling, G. W.: Production and export of dissolved C in arctic
tundra mesocosms: the roles of vegetation and water flow, Biogeochemistry,
60, 213–234, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kaplan, L. A. and Bott, T. L.: Microbial heterotrophic utilization of
dissolved organic matter in a piedmont stream, Freshwater Biol., 13,
363–377, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Karl, D. M. and Björkman, K. M.: Dynamics of DOP, in:  Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter,
edited by: Hansell, D. and Carlson, C., Academic Press, San Diego,  249–366, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Langenheder, S., Kisand, V., Wikner, J., and Tranvik, L. J.: Salinity as a
structuring factor for the composition and performance of bacterioplankton
degrading riverine DOC, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 45, 189–202, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Laurion, I. and Mladenov, N.: Dissolved organic matter photolysis in Canadian
arctic thaw ponds, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 035026, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035026</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Loiselle, S. A., Bracchini, L., Dattilo, A. M., Ricci, M., Tognazzi, A.,
Cozar, A., and Rossi, C.: Optical characterization of chromophoric dissolved
organic matter using wavelength distribution of absorption spectral sopes,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 590–597, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Mann, P. J., Davydova, A., Zimov, N., Spencer, R. G. M., Davydov, S.,
Bulygina, E., Zimov, S., and Holmes, R. M.: Controls on the
composition and lability of dissolved organic matter in Siberia's Kolyma
River basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 117, G01028,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JG001798</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, P. J., Sobczak, W. V., LaRue, M. M., Bulygina, E., Davydova, A., Vonk,
J., Schade, J., Davydov, S., Zimov, N., Holmes, R. M., and Spencer, R. G.
M.: Evidence for key enzymatic controls on metabolism of Arctic river
organic matter, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 1089–1100, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Mann, P. J., Eglinton, T. I., McIntyre, C. P., Zimov, N., Davydova, A.,
Vonk, J. E., Holmes, R. M., and Spencer, R. G. M.: Utilization of ancient
permafrost carbon in headwaters of Arctic fluvial networks, Nat.
Commun.,     6,
7856, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8856" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms8856</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
McClelland, J. W., Holmes, R. M., Dunton, K. H., and Macdonald, R. W.: The
Arctic Ocean Estuary, Estuar. Coast., 35, 353–368, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Merck M., Neilson, B., Cory, R., and Kling, G.: Variability of in-stream and
riparian storage in a beaded arctic stream, Hydrol. Process., 26,
2938–2950, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Moran, M. A. and Zepp, R. G.: Role of photoreactions in the formation of
biologically labile compounds from dissolved organic matter, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1307–1316, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mulholland, P. J.: Dissolved organic matter concentrations and flux in
streams, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16,
131–141, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Neff, J. C., Finlay, J. C., Zimov, S. A., Davydov, S. P., Carrasco, J. J.,
Schuur, E. A. G., and Davydova, A. I.: Seasonal changes in the age
and structure of dissolved organic carbon in Siberian rivers and streams,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23401, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028222</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Peuravuori, J. and Pihlaja, K.: Molecular size distribution and
spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances, Anal. Chim. Acta, 337,
133–149, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Schreiner, K. M., Bianchi, T. S., and Rosenheim, B. E.: Evidence for
permafrost thaw and transport from an Alaskan North Slope watershed,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3117–3126, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Sholkovitz, E. R.: Flocculation of dissolved organic and inorganic matter
during mixing of river water and seawater, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
40, 831–845, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Sondergaard, M., Stedmon, C. A., and Borch, N. H.: Fate of terrigenous
dissolved organic matter (DOM) in estuaries: Aggregation and
bioavailability, Ophelia, 57, 161–176, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Spencer, R. G. M., Aiken, G. R., Wickland, K. P., Striegl, R. G.,
and Hernes, P. J.: Seasonal and spatial variability in dissolved organic
matter quantity and composition from the Yukon River basin, Alaska, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB4002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003231</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Spencer, R. G. M., Aiken, G. R., Butler, K. D., Dornblaser, M. M., Striegl,
R. G., and Hernes, P. J.: Utilizing chromophoric dissolved organic
matter measurements to derive export and reactivity of dissolved organic
carbon exported to the Arctic Ocean: A case study of the Yukon River,
Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L06401, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036831</ext-link>,
2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Spencer, R. G. M., Stubbins, A., Hernes, P. J., Baker, A., Mopper, K.,
Aufdenkampe, A. K., Dyda, R. Y., Mwamba, V. L., Mangangu, A. M.,
Wabakanghanzi, J. N., and Six, J.: Photochemical degradation of dissolved
organic matter and dissolved lignin phenols from the Congo River, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, G03010, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JG000968" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JG000968</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Spencer, R. G. M., Mann, P. J., Dittmar, T., Eglinton, T. I., McIntyre, C.,
Holmes, R. M., Zimov, N., and Stubbins, A.: Detecting the signature of
permafrost thaw in Arctic rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1–6,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-8007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1944-8007</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A., Amon, R. M. W., Rinehart, A. J., and Walker, S. A.: The supply and characteristics of colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM)
in the Arctic Ocean: Pan Arctic trends and differences, Mar. Chem.,
124, 108–118, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Stepanauskas, R., Edling, H., and Tranvik, L. J.: Differential dissolved
organic nitrogen availability and bacterial smniopeptidase activity in
limnic and marine waters, Microb. Ecol., 38, 264–272, 1999a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Stepanauskas, R., Leonardson, L., and Tranvik, L. J.: Bioavailability of
wetland-derived DON to freshwater and marine bacterioplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1477–1485, 1999b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Tesi, T., Semiletov, I., Hugelius, G., Dudarev, O., Kuhry, P., and
Gustafsson, O.: Composition and fate of terrigenous organic matter along the
Arctic land-ocean continuum in East Siberia: Insights from biomarkers and
carbon isotopes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 133, 235–256, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., and Cushing,
C. E.: The River Continuum Concept, Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Vonk, J. E., Mann, P. J., Davydov, S., Davydova, A., Spencer, R. G. M.,
Schade, J., Sobczak, W. V., Zimov, N., Bulygina, E., Eglinton, T. I., and
Holmes, R. M.: High biolability of ancient permafrost carbon upon thaw,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2689–2693, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wachenfeldt, E. von, Bastviken, D., and Tranvika, L. J.: Microbially induced
flocculation of allochthonous dissolved organic carbon in lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 1811–1818, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Walter, K. M., Zimov, S. A., Chanton, J. P., Verbyla, D., and Chapin III, F.
S.: Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to
climate warming, Nature, 443, 71–75, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Webster, J. R. and Meyer, J. L.: Organic matter budgets for streams: A
synthesis, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16,
141–161, 1997.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Weishaar, J. L., Aiken, G. R., Bergamaschi, B. A., Fram, M. S., Fujii, R.,
and Mopper, K.: Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an
indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic
carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 4702–4708, 2003.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wikner, J., Cuadros, R., and Jansson, M.: Differences in consumption of
allochthonous DOC under limnic and estuarine conditions in a watershed,
Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 17, 289–299, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Optical properties and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter along a
flow-path continuum from soil pore waters to the Kolyma River mainstem, East
Siberia</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The Kolyma River in northeast Siberia is among the six largest Arctic rivers
and drains a region underlain by vast deposits of Holocene-aged peat and
Pleistocene-aged loess known as yedoma, most of which is currently stored in
ice-rich permafrost throughout the region. These peat and yedoma deposits
are important sources of dissolved organic matter (DOM) to inland waters
that in turn play a significant role in the transport and ultimate
remineralization of organic carbon to CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> along the
terrestrial flow-path continuum. The turnover and fate of terrigenous DOM
during offshore transport largely depends upon the composition and amount of
carbon released to inland and coastal waters. Here, we measured the
ultraviolet-visible optical properties of chromophoric DOM (CDOM) from a
geographically extensive collection of waters spanning soil pore waters,
streams, rivers, and the Kolyma River mainstem throughout a  ∼  250 km transect of the northern Kolyma River basin. During the period of
study, CDOM absorption coefficients were found to be robust proxies for the
concentration of DOM, whereas additional CDOM parameters such as spectral
slopes (<i>S</i>) were found to be useful indicators of DOM quality along the
flow path. In particular, the spectral slope ratio (<i>S</i><sub>R</sub>) of CDOM
demonstrated statistically significant differences between all four water
types and tracked changes in the concentration of bioavailable DOC,
suggesting that this parameter may be suitable for clearly discriminating
shifts in organic matter characteristics among water types along the full
flow-path continuum across this landscape. However, despite our observations
of downstream shifts in DOM composition, we found a relatively constant
proportion of DOC that was bioavailable ( ∼  3–6 % of total
DOC) regardless of relative water residence time along the flow path. This
may be a consequence of two potential scenarios allowing for continual
processing of organic material within the system, namely (a) aquatic
microorganisms are acclimating to a downstream shift in DOM composition
and/or (b) photodegradation is continually generating labile DOM for
continued microbial processing of DOM along the flow-path continuum. Without
such processes, we would otherwise expect to see a declining fraction of
bioavailable DOC downstream with increasing residence time of water in the
system. With ongoing and future permafrost degradation, peat and yedoma
deposits throughout the northeast Siberian region will become more
hydrologically active, providing greater amounts of DOM to fluvial networks
and ultimately to the Arctic Ocean. The ability to rapidly and
comprehensively monitor shifts in the quantity and quality of DOM across the
landscape is therefore critical for understanding potential future feedbacks
within the Arctic carbon cycle.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Battin, T. J., Kaplan, L. A., Findlay, S., Hopkinson, C. S., Marti, E.,
Packman, A. I., Newbold, J. D., and Sabater, F.: Biophysical
controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks, Nat. Geosci., 1,
95–100, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Battin, T. J., Luyssaert, S., Kaplan, L. A., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Richter,
A., and Tranvik, L. J.: The boundless carbon cycle, Nat. Geosci., 2, 598–600, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Blough, N. V. and Del Vecchio, R.: Chromophoric DOM in the coastal
environment, in: Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter, edited
by: Hansell, D. A. and Carlson, C. A.,  Elsevier, San Diego,
California, 509–546, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bronk D. A.: Dynamics of DON, in: Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved
Organic Matter, edited by: Hansell, D. A. and Carlson, C. A., Academic Press,
San Diego,  153–249, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chin, Y. P., Traina, S. J., Swank, C. R., and Backhus, D.: Abundance and
properties of dissolved organic matter in pore waters of a freshwater
wetland, Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 1287–1296, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the global carbon cycle:
Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget, Ecosystems,
10, 171–184, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M., McKnight, D. M., Chin, Y.-P., Miller, P., and Jaros, C. L.:
Chemical characteristics of fulvic acids from Arctic surface waters:
Microbial contributions and photochemical transformations, J. Geophys. Res.,
112, G04S51, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000343" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JG000343</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M., Crump, B. C., Dobkowski, J. A., and Kling, G. W.: Surface
exposure to sunlight stimulates CO<sub>2</sub> release from permafrost soil carbon
in the Arctic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110,
3429–3434, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M., Ward, C. P., Crump, B. C., and Kling, G. W.: Sunlight controls
water column processing of carbon in arctic fresh waters, Science,
345, 925–928, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1253119" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1253119</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Denfeld, B. A., Frey, K. E., Sobczak, W. V., Mann, P. J., and Holmes, R. M.:
Summer CO<sub>2</sub> evasion from streams and rivers in the Kolyma River basin,
north-east Siberia, Polar Res., 32, 19704,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/polar.v32i0.19704" target="_blank">doi:10.3402/polar.v32i0.19704</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Fellman, J. B., Spencer, R. G. M., Hernes, P. J., Edwards, R. T., D'Amore,
D. V., and Hood, E.: The impact of glacier runoff on the biodegradability
and biochemical composition of terrigenous dissolved organic matter in
near-shore marine ecosystems, Mar. Chem., 121, 112–122, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Fellman, J. B., Spencer, R. G. M., Raymond, P. A., Pettit, N. E., Skrzypek,
G., Hernes, P. J., and Grierson, P. F.: Dissolved organic carbon biolability
decreases along with its modernization in fluvial networks in an ancient
landscape, Ecology, 95, 2622–2632, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fichot, C. G., Kaiser, K., Hooker, S. B., Zmon, R. M. W., Babin, M.,
Belanger, S., Walker, S. A., and Benner, R.: Pan-Arctic distributions of
continental runoff in the Arctic Ocean, Sci. Rep., 3, 1053,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01053" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep01053</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, K. E. and McClelland, J. W.: Impacts of permafrost
degradation on arctic river biogeochemistry, Hydrol. Process., 23,
169–182, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, K. E. and Smith, L. C.: Amplified carbon release from vast West
Siberian peatlands by 2100, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09401,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022025" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GL022025</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Frey, K. E., Siegel, D. I., and Smith, L. C.: Geochemistry of West Siberian
streams and their potential response to permafrost degradation, Water
Resour. Res., 43, W03406, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004902" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006WR004902</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Green, S. A. and Blough, N. V.: Optical absorption and fluorescence
properties of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in natural waters,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1903–1916, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, D. J., Kicklighter, D. W., McGuire, A. D., Chen, M., Zhuang, Q. L.,
Yuan, F. M., Melillo, J. M., and Wullschleger, S. D.: The impacts of recent
permafrost thaw on land-atmosphere greenhouse gas exchange, Environ.
Res. Lett., 9, 045005, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045005" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045005</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Helms, J. R., Stubbins, A., Ritchie, J. D., Minor, E. C., Kieber, D. J., and
Mopper, K.: Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of
molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved
organic matter, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 955–969, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hernes, P. J., Spencer, R. G. M., Dyda, R. Y., Pellerin, B. A., Bachand, P.
A. M., and Bergamaschi, B. A.: The role of hydrologic regimes on dissolved
organic carbon composition in an agricultural watershed, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 5266–5277, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, R. M., McClelland, J. W., Raymond, P. A., Frazer, B. B., Peterson,
B. J., and Stieglitz, M.: Lability of DOC transported by Alaskan
rivers to the Arctic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L03402,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032837" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007GL032837</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, R. M., McClelland, J. W., Peterson, B. J., Tank, S. E., Bulygina,
E., Eglinton, T. I., Gordeev, V. V., Gurtovaya, T. Y., Raymond, P. A.,
Repeta, D. J., Staples, R., Striegl, R. G., Zhulidov, A. V., and Zimov, S.
A.: Seasonal and annual fluxes of nutrients and organic matter from
large rivers to the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas, Estuar. Coast.,
35, 369–382, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9386-6" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s12237-011-9386-6</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, R. M., Coe, M. T., Fiske, G. J., Gurtovaya, T., McClelland, J. W.,
Shiklomanov, A. I., Spencer, R. G. M., Tank, S. E., and Zhulidov, A. V.:
Climate change impacts on the hydrology and biogeochemistry of Arctic
Rivers, in: Global Impacts of Climate Change on Inland Waters, edited by:
Goldman,  C. R., Kumagai, M., and Robarts, R. D., Wiley, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Judd, K. E. and Kling, G. W.: Production and export of dissolved C in arctic
tundra mesocosms: the roles of vegetation and water flow, Biogeochemistry,
60, 213–234, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kaplan, L. A. and Bott, T. L.: Microbial heterotrophic utilization of
dissolved organic matter in a piedmont stream, Freshwater Biol., 13,
363–377, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Karl, D. M. and Björkman, K. M.: Dynamics of DOP, in:  Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter,
edited by: Hansell, D. and Carlson, C., Academic Press, San Diego,  249–366, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Langenheder, S., Kisand, V., Wikner, J., and Tranvik, L. J.: Salinity as a
structuring factor for the composition and performance of bacterioplankton
degrading riverine DOC, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 45, 189–202, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Laurion, I. and Mladenov, N.: Dissolved organic matter photolysis in Canadian
arctic thaw ponds, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 035026, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035026" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035026</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Loiselle, S. A., Bracchini, L., Dattilo, A. M., Ricci, M., Tognazzi, A.,
Cozar, A., and Rossi, C.: Optical characterization of chromophoric dissolved
organic matter using wavelength distribution of absorption spectral sopes,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 590–597, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, P. J., Davydova, A., Zimov, N., Spencer, R. G. M., Davydov, S.,
Bulygina, E., Zimov, S., and Holmes, R. M.: Controls on the
composition and lability of dissolved organic matter in Siberia's Kolyma
River basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 117, G01028,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001798" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JG001798</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, P. J., Sobczak, W. V., LaRue, M. M., Bulygina, E., Davydova, A., Vonk,
J., Schade, J., Davydov, S., Zimov, N., Holmes, R. M., and Spencer, R. G.
M.: Evidence for key enzymatic controls on metabolism of Arctic river
organic matter, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 1089–1100, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, P. J., Eglinton, T. I., McIntyre, C. P., Zimov, N., Davydova, A.,
Vonk, J. E., Holmes, R. M., and Spencer, R. G. M.: Utilization of ancient
permafrost carbon in headwaters of Arctic fluvial networks, Nat.
Commun.,     6,
7856, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8856" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ncomms8856</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
McClelland, J. W., Holmes, R. M., Dunton, K. H., and Macdonald, R. W.: The
Arctic Ocean Estuary, Estuar. Coast., 35, 353–368, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Merck M., Neilson, B., Cory, R., and Kling, G.: Variability of in-stream and
riparian storage in a beaded arctic stream, Hydrol. Process., 26,
2938–2950, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Moran, M. A. and Zepp, R. G.: Role of photoreactions in the formation of
biologically labile compounds from dissolved organic matter, Limnol. Oceanogr., 42, 1307–1316, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mulholland, P. J.: Dissolved organic matter concentrations and flux in
streams, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16,
131–141, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Neff, J. C., Finlay, J. C., Zimov, S. A., Davydov, S. P., Carrasco, J. J.,
Schuur, E. A. G., and Davydova, A. I.: Seasonal changes in the age
and structure of dissolved organic carbon in Siberian rivers and streams,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23401, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028222" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL028222</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Peuravuori, J. and Pihlaja, K.: Molecular size distribution and
spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances, Anal. Chim. Acta, 337,
133–149, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Schreiner, K. M., Bianchi, T. S., and Rosenheim, B. E.: Evidence for
permafrost thaw and transport from an Alaskan North Slope watershed,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3117–3126, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Sholkovitz, E. R.: Flocculation of dissolved organic and inorganic matter
during mixing of river water and seawater, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
40, 831–845, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Sondergaard, M., Stedmon, C. A., and Borch, N. H.: Fate of terrigenous
dissolved organic matter (DOM) in estuaries: Aggregation and
bioavailability, Ophelia, 57, 161–176, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Spencer, R. G. M., Aiken, G. R., Wickland, K. P., Striegl, R. G.,
and Hernes, P. J.: Seasonal and spatial variability in dissolved organic
matter quantity and composition from the Yukon River basin, Alaska, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB4002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003231" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GB003231</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Spencer, R. G. M., Aiken, G. R., Butler, K. D., Dornblaser, M. M., Striegl,
R. G., and Hernes, P. J.: Utilizing chromophoric dissolved organic
matter measurements to derive export and reactivity of dissolved organic
carbon exported to the Arctic Ocean: A case study of the Yukon River,
Alaska, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L06401, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036831" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GL036831</a>,
2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Spencer, R. G. M., Stubbins, A., Hernes, P. J., Baker, A., Mopper, K.,
Aufdenkampe, A. K., Dyda, R. Y., Mwamba, V. L., Mangangu, A. M.,
Wabakanghanzi, J. N., and Six, J.: Photochemical degradation of dissolved
organic matter and dissolved lignin phenols from the Congo River, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, G03010, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JG000968" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JG000968</a>, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Spencer, R. G. M., Mann, P. J., Dittmar, T., Eglinton, T. I., McIntyre, C.,
Holmes, R. M., Zimov, N., and Stubbins, A.: Detecting the signature of
permafrost thaw in Arctic rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 1–6,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-8007" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1944-8007</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A., Amon, R. M. W., Rinehart, A. J., and Walker, S. A.: The supply and characteristics of colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM)
in the Arctic Ocean: Pan Arctic trends and differences, Mar. Chem.,
124, 108–118, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Stepanauskas, R., Edling, H., and Tranvik, L. J.: Differential dissolved
organic nitrogen availability and bacterial smniopeptidase activity in
limnic and marine waters, Microb. Ecol., 38, 264–272, 1999a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Stepanauskas, R., Leonardson, L., and Tranvik, L. J.: Bioavailability of
wetland-derived DON to freshwater and marine bacterioplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1477–1485, 1999b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Tesi, T., Semiletov, I., Hugelius, G., Dudarev, O., Kuhry, P., and
Gustafsson, O.: Composition and fate of terrigenous organic matter along the
Arctic land-ocean continuum in East Siberia: Insights from biomarkers and
carbon isotopes, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 133, 235–256, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., and Cushing,
C. E.: The River Continuum Concept, Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci., 37, 130–137, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Vonk, J. E., Mann, P. J., Davydov, S., Davydova, A., Spencer, R. G. M.,
Schade, J., Sobczak, W. V., Zimov, N., Bulygina, E., Eglinton, T. I., and
Holmes, R. M.: High biolability of ancient permafrost carbon upon thaw,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2689–2693, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wachenfeldt, E. von, Bastviken, D., and Tranvika, L. J.: Microbially induced
flocculation of allochthonous dissolved organic carbon in lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 1811–1818, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Walter, K. M., Zimov, S. A., Chanton, J. P., Verbyla, D., and Chapin III, F.
S.: Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to
climate warming, Nature, 443, 71–75, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Webster, J. R. and Meyer, J. L.: Organic matter budgets for streams: A
synthesis, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 16,
141–161, 1997.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Weishaar, J. L., Aiken, G. R., Bergamaschi, B. A., Fram, M. S., Fujii, R.,
and Mopper, K.: Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an
indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic
carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 4702–4708, 2003.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wikner, J., Cuadros, R., and Jansson, M.: Differences in consumption of
allochthonous DOC under limnic and estuarine conditions in a watershed,
Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 17, 289–299, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
