<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-2511-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Looking beyond stratification:  a model-based analysis of  the <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> biological drivers of oxygen  deficiency in the North Sea</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Looking beyond stratification}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F.~Gro{\ss}e et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Große</surname><given-names>Fabian</given-names></name>
          <email>fabian.grosse@uni-hamburg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2801-5493</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Greenwood</surname><given-names>Naomi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7166-9455</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Kreus</surname><given-names>Markus</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lenhart</surname><given-names>Hermann-Josef</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Machoczek</surname><given-names>Detlev</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Pätsch</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Salt</surname><given-names>Lesley</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>Helmuth</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6720-8434</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>University of Hamburg, Department of Informatics, Scientific Computing, Bundesstraße 45a, 20146 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>University of East Anglia, School of Environmental Sciences, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>University of Hamburg, Institute for Hydrobiology and Fisheries Science, Olbersweg 24, 22767 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>University of Hamburg, CEN, Institute of Oceanography, Bundesstraße 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, Bernhard-Nocht-Straße 78, 20359 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>CNRS, UMR 7144, Equipe Chimie Marine, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680, Roscoff, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Dalhousie University, Department of Oceanography, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Fabian Große (fabian.grosse@uni-hamburg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>2511</fpage><lpage>2535</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Low oxygen conditions, often referred to as
oxygen deficiency, occur regularly in the North Sea, a temperate European
shelf sea. Stratification represents a major process regulating the seasonal
dynamics of bottom oxygen, yet, lowest oxygen conditions in the North Sea do
not occur in the regions of strongest stratification. This suggests that
stratification is an important prerequisite for oxygen deficiency, but that
the complex interaction between hydrodynamics and the biological processes
drives its evolution.</p>
    <p>In this study we use the ecosystem model HAMSOM-ECOHAM to provide a general
characterisation of the different zones of the North Sea with respect to
oxygen, and to quantify the impact of the different physical and biological
factors driving the oxygen dynamics inside the entire sub-thermocline volume
and directly above the bottom.</p>
    <p>With respect to oxygen dynamics, the North Sea can be subdivided into three
different zones: (1) a highly productive, non-stratified coastal zone, (2) a productive,
seasonally stratified zone with a small sub-thermocline volume,
and (3) a productive, seasonally stratified zone with a large sub-thermocline
volume. Type 2 reveals the highest susceptibility to oxygen deficiency due to
sufficiently long stratification periods (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) accompanied by
high surface productivity resulting in high biological consumption, and
a small sub-thermocline volume implying both a small initial oxygen inventory
and a strong influence of the biological consumption on the oxygen
concentration.</p>
    <p>Year-to-year variations in the oxygen conditions are caused by variations in
primary production, while spatial differences can be attributed to
differences in stratification and water depth. The large sub-thermocline
volume dominates the oxygen dynamics in the northern central and northern
North Sea and makes this region insusceptible to oxygen deficiency. In the
southern North Sea the strong tidal mixing inhibits the development of
seasonal stratification which protects this area from the evolution of low
oxygen conditions. In contrast, the southern central North Sea is highly
susceptible to low oxygen conditions (type 2).</p>
    <p>We furthermore show that benthic diagenetic processes represent the main
oxygen consumers in the bottom layer, consistently accounting for more than
50 % of the overall consumption. Thus, primary production followed by
remineralisation of organic matter under stratified conditions constitutes
the main driver for the evolution of oxygen deficiency in the southern
central North Sea. By providing these valuable insights, we show that
ecosystem models can be a useful tool for the interpretation of observations
and the estimation of the impact of anthropogenic drivers on the North Sea
oxygen conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Low oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">concentrations
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref>, often referred to as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency, occur regularly in the North Sea. A major process
regulating the seasonal dynamics of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the occurrence and
duration of thermal stratification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>,
which limits the vertical exchange of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the oxygenated
surface layer and the deeper layers. In combination with events of enhanced
primary production, and the subsequent degradation of organic matter, this
favours the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.
Although the northern North Sea reveals strongest stratification, lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations occur in the central North Sea, which is shallower
and where the duration of stratification is shorter and shows highest
year-to-year variability. Thus, one can argue that stratification is an
important prerequisite for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency, but its severity and
duration is controlled by the complex interaction between the hydrodynamical
condition and the biogeochemical processes involved.</p>
      <p>The North Sea is a temperate, semi-enclosed shelf sea adjacent to the
northeastern Atlantic ocean. It has an average depth of about 90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.4"/> with northward increasing bottom depth. The North Sea
circulation is characterised by a cyclonic pattern mainly driven by the
southward Atlantic inflow across the shelf edge defining its northern
boundary. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.5"/> showed that about 85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the incoming
Atlantic water is recirculated north of the Dogger Bank, a shallow area with
water depth less than 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of zonal extent at
about 55<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.6"/>. The
circulation south of the Dogger Bank is governed by the inflow through the
English Channel and follows the continental coast. At the southern tip of
Norway it joins the Norwegian coastal current leaving the North Sea at its
northern boundary.</p>
      <p>Stratification in the North Sea reveals some substantial regional
differences. While the shallower southern parts are permanently well-mixed
due to the strong influence of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tidal component <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.7"/>,
the deeper parts north of 54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N reveal seasonal, mostly thermal
stratification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Seasonal
haline stratification occurs to
a lesser extent along the Norwegian coast. The transition between these
permanently mixed and seasonally stratified regions occurs gradually
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.9"/>. In consequence, even areas relatively near to the coast,
which are affected by high riverine nutrient run-off, often reveal stratified
conditions at sub-seasonal timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>In the 1980s, events of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency reaching values below
3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred regularly in the stratified
southeastern central North Sea and in the German Bight
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.11"/>. During that time, the problem
of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions in the North Sea reached public awareness in
relation to eutrophication as demersal animals died across a large area due
to these low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.12"/>.
Eutrophication, or in other words, high anthropogenic nutrient loads mainly
supplied by rivers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.13"/>, may raise
the ambient nutrient concentrations followed by an increase in biomass
production. Under given physical conditions, eutrophication thus causes an
enhanced supply of organic matter sinking into the subsurface layer and
reinforces <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption near the sea floor due to bacterial
remineralisation.</p>
      <p>Even though the second International Conference on the Protection of the
North Sea (INSC-2) prescribed a 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction of river nutrient
loads (inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus) in order to mitigate the effects of
eutrophication <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.14"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency remains a persistent problem in the North Sea up to the
present day. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.15"/> these events can be classified as
“persistent seasonal”. Low bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations may cause death
of benthic organisms or fish eggs as well as avoidance of the affected areas
by benthic species. Therefore, low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations constitute
a major indicator of eutrophication <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">category 3 indicator, i.e.,
“evidence of undesirable disturbance”;</named-content></xref> and concentrations
lower than 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result in the classification as
“problem area” in terms of eutrophication within the OSPAR assessment
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.17"/>. In the present study the term “oxygen deficiency” is
used in this OSPAR context rather than “hypoxia”. While <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
deficiency is clearly defined within OSPAR by the
6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold, hypoxia refers to the negative
impact of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations on organisms. An overview of the
impact of hypoxia on marine biodiversity can be found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.18"/>. Further descriptions on the ecological disturbance
of different levels of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are summarised by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.19"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.20"/>.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Extent of observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the German Bight area from 1980 to
2010. Dotted lines indicate geographical limits of the individual surveys.
Light grey line marks German Maritime Area <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">from</named-content></xref>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Despite the relevance of the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for the
assessment of the ecological status of an ecosystem, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements
are sparse and either temporally or spatially limited. In addition, it is
difficult to place the measurement at the right time and location to obtain
a comprehensive picture of the duration and spatial extent of summer
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.22"/>. One way to address this problem
is to analyse the representativeness of available data with respect to
eutrophication assessment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p>Only in recent years continuous measurements for the North Sea have become
available by, e.g., the SmartBuoy programme of Cefas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">Centre for
Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, UK;</named-content></xref> or the
MARNET programme (MARine Monitoring NETwork in the North Sea and Baltic Sea)
of the BSH (Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, Germany). These
monitoring programmes provide daily time series of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and related
parameters (e.g., temperature, salinity, chlorophyll) in different depths and
allow for the analysis of the temporal evolution of stratification and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the location of observation.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.25"/> published the first data from continuous measurements
of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for two sites (“North Dogger” and
“Oyster Grounds”) in a European shelf sea. Using these measurements, the
dynamic interaction between stratification and the evolution towards low
bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations can be observed, as well as the rapid
recovery to saturated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions after the breakdown of
stratification due to mixing in autumn. However, even these continuous
measurements did not provide sufficient information to fully understand the
processes which caused the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.26"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.27"/>, who extended the locally
confined findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.28"/> to the spatial scale using survey
data from August 2010 and ICES historical data, refer to “plausible
mechanisms” like vertical mixing or advection when the measurements could
not be explained in detail. In consequence, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.29"/> stated
that the data provided insight into the processes affecting the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
dynamics but models are required to further elucidate the significance of the
seasonal drivers.</p>
      <p>Ecosystem models produce a temporally and spatially consistent picture on
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and can therefore provide insight into the balance between the
physical and biological factors and processes governing the evolution of the
bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. Thus, they can help understand and
interpret measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and related parameters and can further
describe the history of events of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
      <p>In this study we use the three-dimensional physical-biogeochemical model
system HAMSOM-ECOHAM to provide a detailed description of the current state
of the North Sea in terms of its <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, and the processes
leading to low bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The interpretation of the
model results will enable the following questions to be answered: what are
the main drivers for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in the various subregions of the
North Sea? Why are certain North Sea regions more susceptible to low
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions than others despite similar stratification patterns?</p>
      <p>For this purpose, we first validate the simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations with respect to their temporal evolution and spatial
distribution in order to show that the model captures the main features.
Subsequently, we present a regional characterisation of the parameters
controlling the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics and propose a simple <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
deficiency index which extends this characterisation to the entire North Sea.
Finally, we attribute the individual contributions of the governing processes
to the temporal and spatial variability of the overall <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution,
under particular consideration of the continuous <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements at
North Dogger <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>The ECOHAM model</title>
      <p>Our study is based on the coupled physical-biogeochemical model system
HAMSOM-ECOHAM. The physical model HAMSOM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.31"><named-content content-type="pre">HAMburg Shelf Ocean
Model;</named-content></xref> is a baroclinic primitive equation model using the
hydrostatic and Boussinesq approximation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.32"/>. HAMSOM
provides the temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and salinity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) distribution, in addition
to the advective flow fields and the vertical turbulent mixing coefficient,
which are used as forcing for the biogeochemical model ECOHAM (ECOsystem
model HAMburg). For a detailed description of HAMSOM the reader is referred
to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.33"/>. Further information on the application of HAMSOM can
be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.34"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.35"/>.</p>
      <p>The biogeochemical model ECOHAM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.36"/> represents
the pelagic and benthic cycles of carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
phosphorus (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), silicon (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
module within the ECOHAM model incorporates physical and biogeochemical
processes determining the pelagic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.37"/>.</p>
      <p>The air–sea exchange of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the sea surface constitutes an
important physical process besides the effects of advective transport and
vertical diffusion in the interior water column. The air-sea flux of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the present application is parameterised according to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.38"/>. In relation to the biology, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle is
linked to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle by photosynthesis, zooplankton respiration and
bacterial remineralisation. While photosynthesis is a source of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
zooplankton respiration and bacterial remineralisation act as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks.
A further sink of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is nitrification, the bacterial transformation
of ammonium to nitrate. Within ECOHAM, this process is light-dependent and
links the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle. Nitrification only occurs
under aerobic conditions (i.e., concentrations
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is a realistic constraint for
the pelagic North Sea environment. It is light-dependent, being stronger
under low light conditions. Pelagic denitrification is implemented, but is
negligible as it only occurs under anaerobic conditions. Pelagic anaerobic
ammonium oxidation (anammox) is not implemented, however, it can be neglected
for the same reason. Except for primary production, the biological processes
involved in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle are not temperature-dependent in the present
model setup.</p>
      <p>For the representation of the benthic remineralisation processes a simple
sediment module is used. A layer of zero extent is defined below the deepest
pelagic layer of each water column. There the deposited organic matter is
collected and remineralised <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.39"/>. The benthic remineralisation
of the organic matter is defined as a first-order process with relatively
high remineralisation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dissolution rates
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; opal) preventing year-to-year accumulation of deposited matter.
The released dissolved inorganic matter is returned directly into the pelagic
bottom layer. Different rates are applied to organic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting in different timescales for the release
into the pelagic. In ECOHAM, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle is affected by the benthic
remineralisation in a direct and indirect way. First, the remineralisation in
the sediment is accompanied by the direct reduction of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the pelagic bottom layer above. Second, inorganic nitrogen
is released from the sediment in the form of ammonium, which can be nitrified
within the water column under <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption. According to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.40"/>, who suggested a tight coupling between benthic
nitrification and denitrification, benthic denitrification depends on the
benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in our model. Direct benthic nitrification and
benthic anammox are neglected as the sediment has zero vertical extent
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
      <p>For a more detailed description of the ECOHAM model, including the full set
of the differential equations and parameter settings of ECOHAM, the reader is
referred to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.42"/>. A detailed description and analysis of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> module can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.43"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Model setup and forcing data</title>
      <p>The model domain extends from 15.250<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to
14.083<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and from 47.583 to 63.983<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
comprises the entire North Sea, large parts of the northwestern European
continental shelf and parts of the adjacent northeastern Atlantic. The
horizontal resolution is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with 82 grid points in latitudinal
direction and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with 88 grid points in longitudinal direction.
The horizontal grid of the model domain is shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The vertical dimension with a maximum depth of
4000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is resolved by 31 z-layers with a surface layer of
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The vertical has a resolution of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 10 and
50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth, which is relevant for the calculation of the MLD
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). Below 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the layer thicknesses
successively increase with depth.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Horizontal grid and bottom topography of the HAMSOM-ECOHAM model
domain. White numbers indicate depth levels. Yellow boxes A–D mark the
4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 regions used for the characterisation of key features
presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>. Black-filled boxes (1, 2) mark the
validation sites discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1"/>.
Red-framed boxes (2–5) indicate regions used for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass balance
calculations in
Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>–<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS7"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The model system was run over the period 1977 to 2012. HAMSOM was initialised
with a monthly-averaged climatology based on the World Ocean Atlas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">WOA;</named-content></xref>. The meteorological forcing was derived from
NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.45"/> and provides
6 hourly information for air temperature, cloud coverage, relative humidity,
wind speed and direction. Short wave radiation was calculated from astronomic
insulation and cloud coverage applying a correction factor of 0.9
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.46"/>. The data were interpolated to the model grid and time
step according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.47"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.48"/>. Daily
freshwater run-off data for 249 rivers were provided by Cefas and represent
an updated data set of that used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.49"/> covering the entire
simulation period. The same data set encompassed nutrient loads used for the
ECOHAM.</p>
      <p>At open boundaries, surface elevation was prescribed as a fixed (Dirichlet)
open boundary condition (OBC) according to the M2 tide, while for horizontal
transport velocities radiation OBCs were applied. For tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
radiation and radiative-nudging OBCs were used in the case of inflow and
outflow, respectively. A detailed description of the OBCs is provided by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.50"/>. The HAMSOM simulation was carried out with a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
time step.</p>
      <p>ECOHAM was run off-line with a time step of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using the 24 h
averages of the hydrographic and hydrodynamic fields generated by HAMSOM. In
the model setup used, short wave radiation is attributed to the first layer
(surface) only and the specific effect of light attenuation due to SPM and
planktonic self-shading on the thermal structure is not taken into account. A
sensitivity study allowing for deeper light penetration and feedback on the
thermal structure confirmed this effect to be only of minor importance (not
shown).</p>
      <p>For the biogeochemical state variables a climatology of depth-dependent
monthly averages was prescribed at the boundaries and solely for DIC yearly
changing data were provided <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.51"/>. To include the effect of
SPM on the light climate, a daily climatology from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.52"/> was
used. Data for atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deposition were compiled using a hybrid
approach. This was required since the overall simulation period (1977–2012)
exceeds the period of data available from the EMEP (Cooperative program for
monitoring and evaluation of the long-range transmissions of air pollutants
in Europe) model (1995–2012). First, the EMEP results for total deposition
of oxidised (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and reduced nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
interpolated to the model grid. Second, we calculated the average annual
deposition rates for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each grid cell,
based on the 1995–2012 EMEP data. The resulting spatially resolved arrays of
average deposition rates were subsequently normalised by the spatial average
of the entire domain to yield the spatially resolved anomaly fields. Finally,
gridded deposition rates for individual years were obtained using (1) the
gridded anomaly fields, (2) EMEP's spatially averaged (over our model domain)
deposition rates for year 2005, and (3) long-term trends (normalised towards
year 2005) for the temporal evolution of European emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.53"><named-content content-type="pre">Fig. 2 in</named-content></xref>. The output of the
biogeochemical simulation was stored as daily values (cumulative fluxes,
state variable snapshots) for the entire domain and simulation period.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Extracting stratification parameters from model results</title>
      <p>Stratification constitutes the prerequisite for the potential evolution of
low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions in the North Sea. In this study (1) its duration
and (2) the mixed layer depth (MLD) are used to describe stratification.
Seasonal stratification in the North Sea is mainly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-driven
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.54"/>, except for the regions of haline stratification along the
Norwegian coast. As observations do not cover the entire model domain and
simulation period we determined the duration of stratification and the MLD
from the simulation results. For this purpose we developed a simple 2-step
algorithm based on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. First, the stratified period is determined using
a temperature difference criterion:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnspacing="1em" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>otherwise</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a switch defining if a water column at location <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is stratified (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or not
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) depending on the temperature difference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
between the surface and bottom depth <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The critical temperature difference
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>crit</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined by evaluating
different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>crit</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against the temporal evolution of
simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at different locations within the model domain.
In addition, periods of stratified conditions are only considered as such, if
they last for at least 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> without any interruption. Otherwise
bottom waters are considered to be ventilated again.</p>
      <p>In the second step, in the case of stratification the MLD of a model water
column is determined using the vertical <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MLD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>otherwise</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated for each grid cell interface within the
considered water column. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> difference between two
vertically adjacent model layers and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the distance
between the centre points of these two grid cells. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is then defined as the
depth level of the interface where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has its maximum. As
the described stratification and MLD criterion differ significantly from
common MLD criteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., Table 1 in</named-content></xref>, an evaluation is
provided in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Validation data</title>
      <p>For the validation of the model results we used observation data from
different sources. The data sets can be subdivided into two types:
(1) temporally resolved, localised data and (2) spatially resolved
“snapshots”. The first type was used for the validation of the seasonal
evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the second type was used to validate the
general spatial patterns and year-to-year variability of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during late summer.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Localised, temporally resolved data – Cefas-SmartBuoy and MARNET</title>
      <p>Cefas operates a network of SmartBuoys to provide autonomous in situ
measurements of physical, chemical and biological parameters
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.56"/>. A SmartBuoy was located directly north of the Dogger Bank
(“North Dogger”) at 55<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>41<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16.80<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E
(see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, region 2) between 24 February 2007 to 15
September 2008 in 85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> water depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.57"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were continuously recorded with a frequency of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
31 and 85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These autonomous <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were corrected
for drift using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations determined from discrete water
samples to give an accuracy of 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.58"/>. For
validation purposes the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data derived from the sensor at
85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth were used. North Dogger data are published and can be
accessed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.59"/>.</p>
      <p>The BSH operates a continuous monitoring station at 54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, region 1; hereafter
referred to as station “Ems”). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation is measured hourly
using opto-chemical sensors (optodes). Sensors are located in 6 and
30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth, respectively, and the bottom depth is 33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
applied sensors have a resolution of 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
an accuracy better than 0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Before deploying
the sensors a 0–100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration is conducted, and they are
re-calibrated after operation to quantify any drift. In addition, a regular
on-site validation takes place using a calibrated fast optode (accuracy of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) or by applying the Winkler titration (accuracy better than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Spatially resolved “snapshot” data – the North Sea programme</title>
      <p>During the North Sea programme, carried out by the Royal Netherlands
Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ) with support from the Dutch Science
Foundation (NWO) and the European Union, the North Sea was sampled from
18 August to 13 September 2001, and from 17 August to 5 September 2005 and
2008. The North Sea was covered by an approximate
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid, sampling approximately 90
stations in each of the years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.60"/>. During
each cruise, a total of 750 water samples were collected for dissolved
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In 2001, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were determined by the
Winkler titration using a potentiometric end-point determination with an
accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (less than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). In 2005
and 2008, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were obtained applying the
spectrophotometric Winkler approach with a precision of less than
0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A detailed description of the
measurement system used is given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.61"/>.
The data for the years 2001 and 2005 have been
published and can be accessed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.62"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.63"/>, respectively.</p>
      <p>The data available were gridded to the model grid
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). In the case of multiple measurements for the
same model grid cell and date, the average of these measurements was used for
validation. To compare our model results to these data, we calculated the
averages and standard deviations of our simulation over the observation
period of the corresponding year.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Deriving a~regional {$\chem{O_{2}}$} characterisation of the North Sea}?><title>Deriving a regional <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> characterisation of the North Sea</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Identification of the key parameters</title>
      <p>For the development of a regional <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> characteristic, potential
controlling factors were analysed in relation to bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Besides
stratification, eutrophication is considered as a major driver for developing
low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.64"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Thus, primary
production within the mixed layer and the resulting organic matter export
into the layers below the MLD must be considered to be the main source for
degradable organic matter. In addition, organic matter can be advected from
surrounding waters in the form of phyto- or zooplankton and detritus,
subsequently sinking out of the mixed layer.</p>
      <p>Another important criterion is the water volume below the thermocline
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.65"/>. A smaller volume separated from the surface due to
stratification holds a lower initial inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than a larger
volume even though concentrations can be similar or even higher in the
smaller volume. Thus, our set of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related characteristics consists
of mixed layer primary production (PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), horizontal advection
of organic matter into and out of the mixed layer (ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,in</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,out</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; including phyto-/zooplankton and detritus), vertical
organic matter export below the MLD (EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; only detritus) and
mixing of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the MLD (MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the sub-MLD
volume <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>To detect regional characteristics within the North Sea area, we defined four
different sub-domains encompassing 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 model water columns each
(see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, red boxes): (A) southern North Sea (SNS)
under strong tidal influence, (B) southern central North Sea (SCNS) with high
year-to-year variability in stratification, (C) northern central North Sea
(NCNS) with a dominant summer stratification each year, and (D) northern
North Sea (NNS) with a dominant summer stratification each year and a strong
influence of the Atlantic. For all these regions, the parameters described
above were calculated for the years 2000–2012 relative to a reference depth
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is defined as the bottom depth of the model layer
directly below the annual maximum MLD among all four regions. We decided to
use a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MLD to ensure that for the different regions all
parameters were determined on a comparable level. This implies that the
values for PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,in</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,out</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are integrated from the surface to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
whereas EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the vertical fluxes
through <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The same <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was applied to all
regions, but year-to-year variations were allowed.</p>
      <p>To determine the annual maximum MLD, we first calculated the stratification
period for the 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 regions B–D using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>).
Region A was excluded from this calculation as no persistent MLD developed
due to tidal mixing. In this context, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a region is
only 1 if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all 16 water columns within
a 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 region. The daily MLD for each water column within
a region was calculated by applying <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), and subsequently the daily MLD of the region is defined
as the median of these 16 daily values. The annual MLD for each region was
then determined as the median of this daily time series. Finally, the annual
maximum MLD among all four
regions is used to determine the reference depth <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
defined as the bottom depth of the layer directly below this maximum MLD.</p>
      <p>The values for these <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related quantities were calculated for
individual years relative to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and temporally integrated over
the period from 1 April to 30 September (hereafter “summer”). Consequently,
the average values over the entire period 2000–2012 are calculated and
presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, additionally including the
average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the beginning and end of the summer
period as well as the average duration of stratification.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average critical quantities (2000–2012) characterising the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
dynamics in the four different 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4-regions (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, yellow boxes). Fluxes are cumulated from 1 April
to 30 September and relate to a surface layer of thickness
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Region </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">A – SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">B – SCNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C – NCNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">D – NNS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">169.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">147.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">134.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">148.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,in</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">95.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">109.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">92.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">111.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,out</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">89.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">107.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">92.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">114.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">116.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">initial <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">final <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">151</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">220</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">226</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">93.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">113.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7643.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7454.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7108.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6677.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">111.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">138.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">483.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">590.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Development of a~spatially resolved index for North Sea {$\chem{O_{2}}$} deficiency}?><title>Development of a spatially resolved index for North Sea <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency</title>
      <p>In order to obtain a North Sea wide indicator for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency under
stratified conditions, it is necessary to extend the regionally confined
characteristic described in the previous section. For this purpose, we
extract the key factors affecting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from this regional information
and combine them into a single index – the oxygen deficiency index (ODI).
The ODI aims to represent the main spatial and temporal patterns of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency in the North Sea under stratified conditions, while
being as simple as possible and incorporating only a very limited number of
parameters.</p>
      <p>Stratification period, organic matter export and sub-thermocline volume are
considered as the key parameters controlling the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics.
Surface primary production can be used as a proxy for organic matter export
assuming that most of the exported organic matter is produced locally. Bottom
depth can be used as an indicator for the sub-MLD volume assuming only minor
fluctuations of the MLD during the summer stratified period. In addition, the
bottom depth directly influences the amount of organic matter reaching the
bottom layer relative to the amount being produced near the surface, due to
the exposure of sinking matter to pelagic remineralisation. Thus, the
following key factors are used for the calculation of this index: (longest
continuous) stratification period (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), summer
surface primary production (PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 1 April
to 30 September), and bottom depth (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>First, individual dimensionless indices are calculated for each of these
quantities. The individual indices range between 0 and 1, indicating
conditions counteracting and supporting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency, respectively.
The calculation of the stratification and production indices,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is based
on the work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.66"/>
and reads as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> with </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pp</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the index corresponding to the actual value of the
quantity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with its defined upper and lower thresholds,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are set to 50 and 150 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. Stratification periods of less than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are
considered to be too short to facilitate the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
deficiency, while periods longer than 150 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered
seasonally well-stratified. The lower threshold for PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was set
to 120 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> does not reach lower values in
most parts of the North Sea. The upper threshold was set to
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as such high values and even higher are simulated in
the southeastern North Sea.</p>
      <p>For the depth index, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a different definition was chosen as
lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations occur in areas of intermediate depth, where
seasonal stratification can develop and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory is limited
due to a small volume below the thermocline. Therefore, we defined
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.7}{8.7}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>peak</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>peak</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>peak</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>peak</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>otherwise</mml:mtext><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the actual bottom depth at location <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>peak</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom depth we found to be most
favourable for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency in the North Sea. The lower threshold
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the maximum MLD we found for the
shallower southern North Sea. The upper threshold <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>90</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was chosen to exclude the areas where the initial <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
inventory is sufficient to prevent <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency due to the large
volume below the thermocline.</p>
      <p>Finally, the ODI combines the three individual indices according to the
following equation:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ODI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> with </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              Here, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the index for a quantity and the
related weight, respectively. The values for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are referred to
by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and those for PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The equation for ODI implies
that it is zero in areas where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The stronger weighting of
PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that variations in the ODI between different years
are more strongly affected by variations in summer surface productivity than
by the duration of stratification.</p>
      <p>The ODI ranges between 0 (low risk of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency) and 1 (high
risk) and is calculated for each water column <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the model
domain. By this we obtain a spatially resolved indicator for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
deficiency in the North Sea, which helps regionalise the North Sea in terms
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Quantification of driving processes: spatial and temporal variability, and data interpretation</title>
      <p>In order to quantify the processes driving the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in
different regions, we calculated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass balances for three different
regions encompassing 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 grid cells (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, regions 3–5). First, mass balances for the entire
volume below the thermocline (hereafter “sub-MLD”) in region 3 are compared
with the corresponding bottom layer mass balances to identify differences
between the bottom layer dynamics and the dynamics within the entire sub-MLD
volume. This is done for 2 years, 2002 and 2010, to analyse variations
between these years. Region 3 was chosen as it shows the lowest bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations within the entire model domain, with the overall
minimum in 2002 and relatively high concentrations in 2010. The daily
resolved MLD defines the upper integration limit for the sub-MLD mass
balances, i.e., the integration depth may vary during the stratified period.
The daily MLD is defined as the vertical level of the model grid which is
closest to the daily average MLD of the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 region according to
Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>).</p>
      <p>Second, we compare the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass balances of the bottom layer for
regions 4 and 5 in 2002 with that of region 3 to unveil regional differences.
In a last step the mass balance analysis is applied to interpret the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution observed at North Dogger (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>,
region 2).</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and saturation concentrations shown in the
different mass balances represent the average values within the analysed
volume. Values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation concentrations were calculated
according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.67"/> using simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fluxes
presented are cumulative changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of the
considered volume, i.e., the values at the end of the stratified period
reflect the total net change of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations due to the
corresponding physical or biological process. Positive and negative values at
the end of the stratification period indicate net gain and loss,
respectively. The slope of each line represents the intensity of the
corresponding flux at the specific moment in time, i.e., a steep positive
(negative) slope implies a strong gain (loss) effect.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Model validation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Temporal evolution of bottom {$\chem{O_{2}}$}}?><title>Temporal evolution of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the comparison of simulated bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against time series data at the Cefas station North Dogger for the
years 2007 (a) and 2008 (b) and the MARNET station Ems during 2010 (c) and
2011 (d). The indicated stratification period was derived from the simulated
temperature fields using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>).</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Annual time series of observed and simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations at Cefas station North Dogger in <bold>(a)</bold> 2007 and
<bold>(b)</bold> 2008, and at MARNET station Ems in <bold>(c)</bold> 2010 and
<bold>(d)</bold> 2011. Same legend for all panels. Grey shaded areas indicate the
stratification periods derived from simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> according to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>At North Dogger, observed and simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations show
a steady decrease after the onset of stratification. While stratification
according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) starts a bit earlier compared to that
described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.68"/>, the beginning of the decrease in bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations coincides well. The simulated and observed
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at this time are in good agreement.</p>
      <p>Some small-scale fluctuations in the observations are not fully reproduced by
the simulation, however, the general evolution is represented well by the
model. The average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in the simulation is slightly less
than in the observations, visible in the difference between the
concentrations at beginning and end of the stratified period. Stratification
ends a bit earlier in the simulation, with the result that simulated bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> starts to recover while the observed concentrations continue to
decline. The observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the end of the stratified
period is about 6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the simulation
results in about 7.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In 2008, we can see a similar slight overestimation of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, but less than in 2007. Some minor fluctuations in the
observations are again not represented by the model, but the general
evolution of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is represented well. It should be noted, that
the different depths of the time series (76 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for simulation,
85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for observation) may also affect the difference between
simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <p>At MARNET station Ems the observed bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations show
significantly larger intra-seasonal fluctuations than at North Dogger. This
applies to both years 2010 and 2011, and mainly results from the shallower
station depth, i.e., sampling depth (sensor in 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). As at North
Dogger, differences may also relate to different depths of the time series
(32.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for observation) and the vertical resolution with only six
layers.</p>
      <p>In 2010, the onset of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decline in the observations is in good
agreement with that in the simulations. Stratification lasts shorter and is
less persistent than at North Dogger. As at North Dogger, intra-seasonal
fluctuations in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution are not fully reproduced. The model
tends to overestimate bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2010, revealing a maximum
difference of about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In 2011, persistent stratified periods derived from the simulation do not
exceed 2 months at station Ems. Consequently, the temporal evolution of
bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents mainly the temporal evolution of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation concentrations. Again large fluctuations of up to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be seen in the observations which
are not fully reproduced by the model. Besides these short-term changes, the
difference between simulated and observed bottom concentrations is less than
0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with higher summer values in the
simulation.</p>
      <p>The validation of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the stations North Dogger and Ems
shows that the HAMSOM-ECOHAM model is capable of reproducing the main
features of the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics at these two stations. The minor
differences in the concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the beginning and end of
the year, representing mainly the saturation concentrations, show that the
general physical setting provided by the model is reasonable. The slightly
slower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction in the simulation may indicate an underestimation
of the biological consumption, e.g., due to benthic remineralisation.
Intra-seasonal fluctuations at both stations are not fully reproduced, due to
the limited spatial resolution of the model grid. Additionally, the tides may
have an effect at station Ems on the short-term. However, they are not
resolved due to the daily time step of the simulated current fields.</p>
      <p>The generally good agreement between simulation and observation is also shown
by the Taylor diagram <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.69"><named-content content-type="post">see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, markers
“a” for North Dogger and “b” for Ems</named-content></xref>, which presents the
correlation coefficients (COR), standard deviations (SDs) and centred root-mean-square differences (RMSD) of the simulation
relative to the observations. SDs and RMSDs are normalised by the SD of the
corresponding observations. For analysis, the data of each data set was
merged into a continuous series of data. For both stations, COR is high with
values of about 0.95 and the normalised RMSD is less than 0.38. The RMSD
values are mainly due to the larger range and higher (seasonal and
intra-seasonal) variability in the observed bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is also
indicated by the normalised SDs of about 0.73 and 0.82 for Cefas North Dogger
and MARNET Ems, respectively.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of observed and simulated average bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in late summer <bold>(a)</bold> 2001, <bold>(b)</bold> 2005
and <bold>(c)</bold> 2008, and <bold>(d)</bold> standard deviation in 2005. Colour
scale of panel <bold>(b)</bold> applies to panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold>.
Circles indicate sample sites, underlying colours show simulation results.
Averages and standard deviation were calculated for the entire observation
period (bottom-left corner of each panel). White circles in <bold>(d)</bold> mark
model bottom grid cells with only one corresponding observed value (i.e., no
standard deviation).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Taylor diagram of simulated (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations compared to observations (OBS) for time series (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>) at <bold>(a)</bold> Cefas North Dogger and
<bold>(b)</bold> MARNET Ems, and <bold>(c)</bold> spatially resolved data (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Standard deviations and centred root-mean-square differences (RMSD)
were normalised by the standard deviation of the corresponding observations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Spatial distribution of late summer bottom {$\chem{O_{2}}$}}?><title>Spatial distribution of late summer bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the spatial distribution of the average
simulated and observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the model bottom layer
for the years 2001 (a), 2005 (b) and 2008 (c), and the
SD related to the averages in
2005 (d). The averaging period for the simulations corresponds to the
complete observation period for each year, listed in the bottom right corner
of each panel.</p>
      <p>In 2001, the observations show the lowest concentrations of all years with
minimum values of 5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the area
54–57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.5–7<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. This minimum is similarly
present in the model yielding 6.96 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Maximum
observed concentrations were found off the southern tip of Norway
(9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in the deepest parts of the
Norwegian Trench (8.7 to 8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The very high
observed value at the northwesternmost sampling site represents an outlier
due to the decreasing vertical resolution of the model in greater depth.</p>
      <p>In 2005, the observed minimum values are about
0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than in 2001. This relative
increase compared to 2001 is reproduced well by the simulation showing
a similar increase by about 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
observations show lowest bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a bit north and south of the
simulated minimum, but still relatively low values less than
7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the centre of the simulated minimum.
Highest observed concentrations of 9.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
located in the very deep area at the eastern end of the Norwegian Trench, and
in the inner German Bight. In the German Bight, the model indicates only
slightly higher values compared to 2001, while in the northern North Sea,
the simulation shows lower values compared to 2001, which can be seen in
the observations as well.</p>
      <p>In 2008, the observations reveal significantly higher bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the area of the 2001 minimum, compared to the previous
years. In contrast, observed concentrations in most other parts of the North
Sea are lower than in 2001 and 2005. The overall minimum concentration in
2008 of 7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reached close to the Dutch
coast. In the southern North Sea, the simulation yields lower bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, and significantly higher values in the 2001
minimum area. For the western central and northern North Sea the picture is
different. Here, the observations result in consistently lower values
compared to 2001 and 2005, whereas the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows higher
values in most areas, except for the eastern Norwegian Trench.</p>
      <p>The simulated SD in 2005 is mainly representative for the years 2001 and 2008
as well. It shows that in most areas of the North Sea the changes in bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during August/September are very low throughout a period of 3 to 4
weeks, indicated by a SD of less than 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
observations also show only small SDs in most areas.</p>
      <p>In general, the basin-wide distributions of simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represent the observed spatial patterns and their year-to-year variations
quite well, even though absolute values are not always reflected. Both
observed and simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations show that the
50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> isobath <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.70"><named-content content-type="pre">broadly along 54<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E to 57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 8<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</named-content></xref>
marks the separation line between the northern regions unaffected by low
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and the southeastern parts, which are more vulnerable
to low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. In addition, the model demonstrated it is
capable of capturing variations in the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution between
different years. In combination with the results of the time series
validation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1"/>), this confirms that the
described model setup provides reliable information on the internal physical
and biological processes driving the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in the North Sea.</p>
      <p>The small SD of simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> confirms that using the averages
over a period of up to 4 weeks provides a reasonable measure for most areas.
In addition, these small values imply that measurements taken late
August/early September (before the breakdown of stratification) can be
considered as a representative synoptic picture of the late summer bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. However, the time series validation showed that in
some areas lowest concentrations of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may occur remarkably
later in the year (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). Consequently, the
picture obtained from observations taken in August/September does not
necessarily reflect the spatial distribution of minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, which underlines the importance of choosing the appropriate
point in time for the monitoring of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
      <p>The small SD of the observations, which is a result of the data gridding,
shows that in most regions vertical <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients near the bottom are
negligible. The high values of 0.75 and 0.59 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
southeast of the Dogger Bank and northwest of Denmark, respectively, result
from the fact that values above and below the thermocline were taken into
account for the averaging.</p>
      <p>As for the time series, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> (marker c) shows the
statistical measures of the validation for the spatially resolved data. Here,
COR reaches only about 0.64 which is also indicated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> by the variations between year 2008 and the
previous years, when the simulation revealed a relative change inverse to
that in the observations in the northern North Sea. The normalised RMSD of
0.77 is about twice as high as for the time series, which can be attributed
to the greater regional differences in the observed bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations with higher maximum and lower minimum values. The normalised
SD equals 0.67 which indicates the less strong spatial gradients in the
simulation. These statistics confirm that the spatial patterns in the
observed bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are basically reproduced by the
model, with only slight shortcomings with respect to the amplitude of the
bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and year-to-year variations in some
regions of the North Sea.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Simulated stratification periods and minimum bottom {$\chem{O_{2}}$}}?><title>Simulated stratification periods and minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b show the spatial distribution of the
longest persistent stratification periods (after Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>)
using simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the years 2002 and 2010, respectively. Both years
show similar stratification patterns with stratification periods of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 180 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in large parts of the central and northern North Sea.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distributions of <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> longest
continuous stratification period derived from simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> according to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> simulated annual
minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations for the years 2002 <bold>(a, c)</bold>
and 2010 <bold>(b, d)</bold>. Same scales for <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold>, and
<bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Comparing the corresponding minimum concentrations of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c and d) shows significant differences. The
minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in 2002 in the region from
55–56.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.5–7.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E constitute the lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during the entire period 2000–2012 reaching values
of below 5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the duration of
stratification in this area is similar or even longer in 2010 than in 2002.
The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in 2002 are even below the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold
applied by OSPAR <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.71"><named-content content-type="pre">6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref> and
persist for about one month (not presented). In contrast, 2010 represents
a year with relatively high minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations being
above 7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the entire model domain. The
areas directly north and south of the Doggerbank also reveal lower bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in both years.</p>
      <p>The stratification periods derived from the simulation are in good agreement
with the different stratification regimes described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.72"/>
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.73"/>. The latter applied a density-based stratification
criterion on model results to subdivide the North Sea into areas of different
stratification characteristics, and showed that most areas of the seasonally
stratified central and northern North Sea reveal stratification periods of
170 to 230 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The increased potential for low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions north and south of the
Doggerbank corresponds well to observed bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series in
these regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.74"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.75"/> also observed lower
bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations north of the Dogger Bank in August 2010,
however, they found the minimum concentrations a bit further north around
57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p>
      <p>The discrepancy between minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the 2 years
and the quite similar stratification patterns demonstrates that
stratification is an important prerequisite for low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions,
but other physical or biological factors do have a strong effect on the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in the North Sea.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{An {$\chem{O_{2}}$}-related characteristic of the North Sea}?><title>An <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related characteristic of the North Sea</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Key parameters</title>
      <p>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> shows the 2000–2012 summer (1 April to
30 September) averages of the quantities considered potentially relevant for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the regions A–D (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The
quantities were calculated relative to a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
addition, the stratification period (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), average MLD
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), average bottom depth (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and area of the
regions are provided.</p>
      <p>The mixed layer net primary production, PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is strongest in
the coastal region A and shows decreasing values towards the central North
Sea. In the SCNS region B, PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for about 87 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of that in the highly productive coastal region A. The corresponding value
for the NCNS region C and NNS region D is about 80 and 88 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively.</p>
      <p>Despite the highest PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the coastal region A, the SCNS
region B shows the strongest contribution of gross advection of organic
matter, ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,in</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and ADH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org,out</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both regions show
positive net advection of organic matter, while the two northern regions C
and D are characterised by negative net advection, i.e., advective loss in
organic matter. The latter regions are located north of the Dogger Bank,
thus, they are affected by the northern Atlantic inflow. In this region, net
advection results in a loss in organic matter as the recirculated northward
flowing water has higher concentrations of organic matter than the incoming
Atlantic water.</p>
      <p>The vertical export of organic matter, EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, below
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consistently adds up to about 12–14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating the clear link between these quantities. Region
B yields an EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of that in the coastal
region A, which corresponds to a higher net advective import of organic
matter of 6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in region A, compared to only
1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Region B. EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in region C
and D reach about 69 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 79 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to region A,
respectively.</p>
      <p>The vertical mixing of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is highest within
the coastal region A and adds up to 116.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is due to strong tidal mixing. The stratification period,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of 151 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in region B is shorter than in region C
(220 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and does not cover the entire summer period. Thus,
MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in region B is significantly larger than in regions C
and D.</p>
      <p>The evolution of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations between the beginning and end
of the summer period reveals some interesting aspects in relation to the
previously mentioned parameters. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at 1 April
show significant differences between the regions ranging between
9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (regions C and D) and
10.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (region A). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
at the 30 September yield values between 7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(region A) and 8.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (region D). This implies
a consistently decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption during summer from region A
to D. This spatial gradient in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption is opposite to that
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which shows a steady increase from regions A to D.</p>
      <p>In order to give an impression of the impact of EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics of the water volume below the MLD, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we
link the amount of exported organic matter to the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
available within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assuming the organic matter is
remineralised completely in the area of settlement. Based on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration at the beginning of April, the total amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
available is 1365 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kt</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for region B and 4590 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kt</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for region C.
The total amount of exported organic matter is calculated as the product of
EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the total area of the considered region. This
calculation yields 130 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 115 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kt</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
the regions B and C, respectively. As <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
release occur with a molar ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during bacterial remineralisation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.76"/>, we obtain the daily <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption by dividing
by the total duration of the considered 6-month period
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 183 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), yielding 0.71 and 0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kt</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for regions B and C, respectively.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of oxygen deficiency index (ODI) according to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) for the years 2002 <bold>(a)</bold> and 2010 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The initial <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass is calculated as the product of the initial
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming the daily <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
consumption to be constant for each region, division of this mass by the
daily consumption rate calculated above provides an estimate of the amount of
time required for the consumption of the entire amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
available in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This calculation yields a period of about
2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for region B, whereas the corresponding value for region C is
significantly higher with almost 12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This great difference
between the resulting periods (factor 6), compared to the relatively small
difference between the daily consumption rates (factor 1.1), illustrates
clearly the large influence of the sub-MLD volume, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, on the
temporal evolution of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations below the MLD.</p>
      <p>The same calculation based on the threshold of
6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used by OSPAR <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.77"/>
yields a consumption period of 283 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for region B, which indicates
the relatively high potential for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency in this region.</p>
      <p>This characteristic based on the four different North Sea
regions demonstrated that the duration of stratification alone cannot explain
the temporal evolution of sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. It shows the
great importance of the organic matter export which drives the biological
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption. In addition, the volume below the MLD plays a key
role as it governs the amount of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which is available throughout the
stratified period, and in combination with the organic matter export defines
whether <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency may occur or not. Thus, these three quantities
can be considered as the key parameters governing the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics of
the seasonally stratified North Sea.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>The oxygen deficiency index (ODI)</title>
      <p>The ODI resulting from the simulated stratification duration
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), summer surface primary production (PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
model topography for the years 2002 and 2010 is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a
and b, respectively. It can be seen that the ODI tends to be higher in 2002
than in 2010 in the region where minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lowest in both
years (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). North of the Doggerbank, the ODI also
shows slightly higher values than in the surrounding waters which corresponds
to the lowered bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this region. The variations of the
minimum concentrations between the 2 years in this region are also
well-reproduced by the ODI. Especially in 2002, the highest ODI coincides
with the lowest concentrations in the entire domain. In 2010, the highest ODI
is located a bit south of the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, which is
mainly caused by the high surface production in this region. Along the
northern British coast, the ODI also shows high values for both years which
is in good agreement with the slightly lower minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
this area. However, ODI values tend to be too high and do not represent the
slightly lower minimum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations off the eastern Scottish
coast around 57–58 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N as the bottom depth in this area exceeds
90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>D</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Directly northwest of Denmark, the ODI
also yields high values for both years with higher values in 2002. This
corresponds well to the simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in this
area, even though ODI values are too high, compared to ODI values in the
central North Sea.</p>
      <p>With respect to the factors selected for the calculation of the ODI,
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> shows that stratification alone is not
sufficient to explain the North Sea <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics. While the reduction
in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is steadily decreasing from regions A to D,
stratification duration is characterised by a steady increase from regions A
(80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to D (226 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Regarding the PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
strongest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction occurs in the regions of highest productivity
A and B. In the northern regions, the higher PP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>mld</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in region D does
not correspond to stronger reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>strat</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
also higher in this region, a further factor is needed to describe the basic
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics. The reduced effect of surface production in the
northernmost area is likely to result from the dilution effect due to the
higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering the bottom depth <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a proxy
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is shown that the strongest decrease occurs in the
shallower regions A and B with average depths of about 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
the regions deeper than 90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (C and D) show a weaker decrease.</p>
      <p>Net advection of organic matter, which is not taken into account in the ODI,
appears to be of minor importance for subsurface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the
local surface production as the net advective input of organic matter is
significantly less than the local production. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
at the beginning of the stratified period were also not taken into account as
they show lower values in regions with higher minimum concentrations and vice
versa.</p>
      <p>In summary, the ODI represents well the spatial and temporal variations of
minimum bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations despite the small set of controlling
factors. This confirms that a simple combination of only stratification
duration, organic matter production and bottom depth is sufficient to
reproduce the main spatial and temporal patterns of the minimum bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the seasonally stratified North Sea. Thus, the findings from
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> can be applied to most parts of the North Sea.
In addition, the similarity of the ODI inside the regions analysed in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1"/> and inside the regions selected for the
mass balance analyses (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, regions 2–4) and their
surrounding areas shows that these regions can be considered as
representative, allowing for a meaningful analysis of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics
in these regions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Driving mechanisms and year-to-year variability of sub-thermocline {$\chem{O_{2}}$} dynamics}?><title>Driving mechanisms and year-to-year variability of sub-thermocline <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics</title>
      <p>The previous analyses showed that stratification constitutes a necessary
condition for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency, but year-to-year variations especially
in the biological factors mainly control the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics. For
a better understanding of the processes controlling sub-thermocline
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a more detailed analysis is provided by the mass balances in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. As the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics are also
influenced by the processes in the mid-water, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and
b show the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass balances for the sub-MLD volume (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in region 3 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) for the years 2002 and 2010,
respectively.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mass balances of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in region 3 (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) during stratification (grey shaded):
<bold>(a, b)</bold> for the entire volume below the MLD (grey dash-dotted;
according to Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), <bold>(c)</bold> and
<bold>(d)</bold> only for the bottom layer for the years 2002 <bold>(a, c)</bold> and
2010 <bold>(b, d)</bold>. Same legend for all panels. Black <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes apply to
processes, magenta <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes apply to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (saturation) concentrations.
Values of black <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> also apply to MLD
(unit: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to different processes are
cumulative. Text boxes list relevant stratification parameters, average
volume of the analysed water body and bottom depth. Note different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes
for <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The stratification characteristics are similar for both years with an average
MLD of about 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a stratification period (grey area) of
187 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in both years, only differing by a later onset (and
breakdown) of stratification in 2010. The temporal evolution of the MLD
(dash-dotted grey) is also similar, with deeper MLDs at the beginning and end
of the stratified period and few events of enhanced mixing during the summer
months (May to August).</p>
      <p>The sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (solid magenta) at the beginning of the
stratified period in 2002 is about 9.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, being
about 0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than in 2010. At the end of
stratification, the 2002 value of 6.85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
about 0.81 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than in 2010.</p>
      <p>In 2002, the clearly diverging temporal evolution of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the corresponding saturation concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>;
dash-dotted magenta) reveals that the different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution is
caused not only by decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility. Hence, other factors
must play an important role for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution below the MLD.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>The influence of advection and mixing</title>
      <p>The comparison of advection (ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; including horizontal and
vertical components; dashed light blue) and vertical mixing
(MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; turbulent diffusion; dashed dark blue) for the years
2002 and 2010 shows strong variations between the 2 years.
ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> regularly changes its influence on the sub-MLD
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during stratification in both years. However,
considering the temporally integrated effect, ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> causes
a net gain of about 25.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2002, whereas in
2010 it results in a slight net loss in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Advection positively
affects the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during the last 2–3 weeks of the
stratified period in both years and even causes a net <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in
2002.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p>The vertical mixing of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through the mixed layer (MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
adds up to 26.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2002 (1.5-fold of 2010 value).
In late April and late June 2002, two events of enhanced mixing cause a rapid gross
increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, in the latter case even resulting in a net
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During August 2002, MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> even has a negative
effect on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which coincides with a very shallow MLD of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> bottom of first model layer). In 2010, this negative effect on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is even more persistent. The increased positive net effect of ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2002 relates to the stronger spatial <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients due to the local <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum in region 3.</p>
      <p>The daily rates of change in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (averaged over the stratification
period) due to these factors for the different years provide a comparable
measure of their effect on sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, independent of the duration of
stratification. The averages of these daily rates for the entire period
2000–2012 result in
0.008 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.060 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
0.153 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.042 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The small positive average value and the large SD for
ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> show that on average advection is only a minor source of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, however, with large year-to-year variability. The average and SD
for MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> show that vertical mixing consistently causes a net
increase in sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Biological drivers of the sub-thermocline {$\chem{O_{2}}$} dynamics}?><title>Biological drivers of the sub-thermocline <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics</title>
      <p>In contrast to the integrated effect of the physical factors,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and b show that the biological processes cause
a net loss in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The only source process for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is primary
production (PP; dashed light blue) which causes a gross increase of about
61.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2002 (1.4-fold of 2010 value).
Considering the biological sink processes, pelagic remineralisation of
organic matter (REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; dashed light green) has the strongest
effect on the sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, accounting for 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the overall
biological consumption. Benthic remineralisation (REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; dashed
yellow) accounts for 18.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while zooplankton respiration
(RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; dashed dark green) and nitrification (NIT; dashed red)
contribute 22 and 8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. This order in the relative
importance is consistent throughout the entire period 2000–2012 (not shown).</p>
      <p>In 2002, REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongest among all years yielding
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>103.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while 2010 represents the year of
weakest REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2002 yields a value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.8-fold of 2010 value). The 2002 and
2010 values constitute the highest and lowest among all years, respectively.
The same applies to REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with a 2002 value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.2-fold of 2010 value). NIT is also
strongest in 2002 resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
in 2010 it is about 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> below the average value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The integrated effect of all biological sink processes (REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NIT) adds up to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>204.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2002 and to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>136.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2010, i.e., the biological
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in 2002 is 1.5 times higher than in 2010 and 1.2 times
higher than the 2000–2012 average of
169.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relative contribution
of the individual processes to the biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption shows
only minor variations during the analysed period. REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
contributes to 53.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts
for 17.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NIT the average
contributions result in 21.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 and 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. The EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> below 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth (not presented;
calculation analogous to Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) in 2002 is nearly 1.6
times larger than in 2010, which is in good agreement with the differences in
the integrated effect of the biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks.</p>
      <p>In late April and late June 2002 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a) two events of
enhanced mixing reveal direct and indirect effects on the biological
processes. The renewal of the nutrient pool causes short-term increases in PP
around the MLD which in turn enhances RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, only the stronger event in late June causes
a net increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It should be noted that the shown strengthening
in the different biological effects is also influenced by the change in the
MLD (i.e., integration depth), however, it is also visible when considering
a constant MLD (not shown).</p>
      <p>PP shows the strongest effects on sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when the MLD is
shallowest which indicates the existence of a deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM).
This explains the negative influence of MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during these
periods as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are highest within the DCM due to high
PP. The only minor positive or even negative effect of MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
during most of the stratified period emphasises the importance of
stratification for the sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics as it efficiently limits
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply.</p>
      <p>The good agreement between the variations in EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
integrated effect of the biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks between the 2 years
confirms that the supply of detrital matter to the deep layers is the driving
force of sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption. The strong influence of pelagic
remineralisation demonstrates its crucial role for the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations as it directly affects the potential <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply from
the mid-water into the bottom layer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Bottom layer dynamics of the North Sea {$\chem{O_{2}}$} minimum zone}?><title>Bottom layer dynamics of the North Sea <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum zone</title>
      <p>Even though the dynamics in the mid-water affect the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels, lowest concentrations occur in the bottom layer. In order to show
which processes are the main contributors to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in this
layer, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c and d show the mass balances for the bottom
layer in region 3 for 2002 and 2010. The average bottom depth in this
region is 47.75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the model bottom layer encompasses a volume of
about 14.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the beginning of the stratified period, 9.79
and 10.12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2002 and 2010, respectively, are
similar to those in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The concentrations at the end of
stratification, 6.76 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2002 and
7.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2010, show larger differences to those
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The effect of the physical factors, ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, on the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is different to that for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While in 2002 ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a similar effect
on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as for the sub-MLD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, its effect in 2010 is opposite
to that for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in a minor increase of about
1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the last 3 weeks of stratification
in 2002, the same positive effect of ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as in the sub-MLD
mass balance is shown, initiating the recovery of the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
before MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> intensifies. MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has
a consistently positive effect on the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both years. Its
integrated effect is increased relative to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the factor 1.7
and 1.4 in 2002 and 2010, respectively.</p>
      <p>The relative contribution of the biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sinks in the bottom
layer is also different to the sub-MLD volume. The 2000–2012 averages reveal
that in the bottom layer REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for
50.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption,
while REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributes to 32.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus,
aerobic remineralisation consistently adds up to more than 80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
the biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in the bottom layer. This shift results
from the different volumes considered, and the fact that REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
only has a direct effect on the deepest pelagic layer. Average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
consumption due to REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> results in values between 3.9 and
6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>For RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the influence on the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
is lower than in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sub</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (11.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during
2000–2012). This relates to the fact that zooplankton tends to stay in the
upper part of the water column where phytoplankton concentrations are higher.
NIT represents the weakest sink for bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average
contribution of 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during these years. PP as
a potential source for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negligible in the bottom layer due to
light limitation.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The analysis clearly shows vertical mixing is the only efficient gain term
for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the bottom layer. Benthic aerobic remineralisation
constitutes the major driver for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency in the North Sea
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum zone, although pelagic aerobic remineralisation still has
a significant effect on bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but accounts for a remarkably
lower proportion than in the entire sub-MLD volume. The simulated benthic
remineralisation rates are in the same order as those derived from
observations giving a range from 7 to
25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a nearby station
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.78"><named-content content-type="pre">station 3 in</named-content></xref>, however, rather at the lower end of this
range.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mass balances of simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
regions 4 <bold>(a)</bold> and 5 <bold>(b)</bold>; (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>)
during stratification (grey shaded) in 2002. Same legend for <bold>(a)</bold> and
<bold>(b)</bold>. Black <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes apply to processes, magenta <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes apply to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (saturation) concentrations. Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to
different processes are cumulative.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Spatial variability in the North Sea bottom {$\chem{O_{2}}$} dynamics}?><title>Spatial variability in the North Sea bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a and b show the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mass balances
of regions 4 (southern North Sea) and 5 (northern North Sea) in 2002 (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> for location of regions). Both regions show
different stratification periods than in region 3. In region 4, the period
between the first and last day of stratification accounts for only
163 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to 187 in region 3. Additionally, stratification is
temporarily intermittent in late April and early July. In region 5,
stratification lasts for 211 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> without any interruptions. The water
depths and bottom layer volumes also differ between the regions. Region 3 has
an average water depth of 47.75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a bottom layer volume of about
14.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while region 4 is characterised by an average depth of
45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a bottom layer volume of 11.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Region 5 has
an average bottom depth of 99.23 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a bottom layer volume of
16.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the beginning of the stratified period in
regions 4 (9.74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 5
(9.46 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are lower than in region 3. In
contrast, both regions show higher concentrations at the end of
stratification compared to region 3. These values reach
6.98 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in region 4 and
7.61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in region 5, compared to
6.76 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in region 3.</p>
      <p>In region 4, intense mixing in late June/early July, indicated by the steep
increase in MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, causes the breakdown of stratification and
the complete replenishment of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Integrated over the
stratified period the effect of MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost 1.5 times
higher than in region 3. In region 5, MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents
a significantly lower supply of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which mainly relates to the
significantly greater water depth favouring more stable stratification.
ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has an opposite effect in regions 4 and 5 relative to
region 3, however, showing only minor negative integrated effects.</p>
      <p>The integrated biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in region 4 is about
7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> less than in region 3. Referring to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, the consumption even exceeds that in region 3 by about
6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to the thinner bottom layer, and corresponds to an
EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> below 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth (calculation analogous to
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) in region 4 being 19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than in
region 3. In the deeper region 5, EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for
62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of that in region 3, while biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption
accounts for only 35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of that in region 3.</p>
      <p>Despite the differences in the overall biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption, the
relative contributions of the different sink processes in region 4 are in the
same order as in region 3. REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the largest
contributor with about 54.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total biological consumption,
while REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for 27.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the combined
effect of REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for
81.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> which is similar to region 3. Average daily benthic
remineralisation rates are higher than in region 3 and yield
8.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relative contributions for
RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NIT result in 13.6 and 4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p>The comparison of the relative contribution of REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in region 5 reveals some changes compared to regions 3 and
4. REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for about 70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total
biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption, while REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributes to
only about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This relates to the generally lower amount of
exported organic matter reaching the model bottom layer (63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
that in region 3). On the one hand, this causes lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption
due to REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and on the other hand, enhances REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
relative to REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as more organic matter reaches the bottom.</p>
      <p>Considering the combined effect of stratification and biological consumption
in region 4 reveals that the shorter stratification period and the strong
mixing prohibit the evolution of low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions in this region,
despite the highest biological consumption. The higher benthic
remineralisation rate compared to region 3 underlines the high potential for
low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions in the Oyster Grounds under persistent seasonal
stratification. This is in good agreement with the findings by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.79"/>, who observed bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations less
than 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this area. As in region 3, the
simulated benthic remineralisation rate lies at the lower end of the range of
5.6 to 30.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from
observational studies near this site <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.80"/>. This
suggests that the model most likely underestimates benthic remineralisation
rates.</p>
      <p>In region 5, the amount of exported organic matter reaching the bottom layer (deepest
pelagic model layer) is limited due to the great water depth. Thus, biological consumption
in the bottom layer is low, preventing the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency, even though
stratification lasts longer and is more stable than in the other regions. This suggests that
region 5 is unlikely to be affected by low bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. However,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.81"/> found bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of about
6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near this area in 2010, which indicates that this area can be affected by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Interpreting observed bottom {$\chem{O_{2}}$} at North Dogger}?><title>Interpreting observed bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at North Dogger</title>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations at station North Dogger <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.82"/>
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and b showed similar <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations of about 9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the beginning
of the stratified period, but revealed a faster decrease in bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during 2007 compared to 2008. As the simulation showed the same tendency with
respect to the differences between the 2 years, the mass balances for
station North Dogger for 2007 and 2008 are presented in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a and b, respectively, in order to interpret the
observed temporal evolution of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The simulation yields an average rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction during the
stratified period of about 0.009 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2007, and a rate of about 0.007 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2008. The integrated effect of the physical factors, ADV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
MIX<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is quite similar for both years providing a gross
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about 16.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> integrated
over the stratified period. Thus, the main variations between the 2 years
must be related to biological factors.</p>
      <p>The temporal evolution of the biological consumption processes is also
similar in both years, with higher rates in 2007. The integrated effect of
all biological sink processes results in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which corresponds to an average
consumption rate of 0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For 2008, the
simulation yields a 6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower biological
consumption due to a 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower
consumption rate. This constitutes a relative difference of 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
between the 2 years. For EXP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> below 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth during
summer (calculation analogous to Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), the same
relative difference is found.</p>
      <p>The relative contribution of the different processes to the overall bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption shows only minor changes between the 2 years. In
both years REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for about 58 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for about 31 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. RES<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>zoo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
NIT contribute to about 3 and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in both years, respectively. This
shows that the variations in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics between 2007 and 2008 at
North Dogger are mainly driven by differences in the organic matter export.
The steeper decrease in bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2007 results from the enhanced
supply of organic matter and the subsequent increased degradation by
bacteria. The enhanced release of ammonium due to pelagic and benthic
remineralisation consequently triggers an increase in nitrification.</p>

      <fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Mass balances for simulated bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Cefas North Dogger
(see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, region 2) during stratification (grey shaded)
in <bold>(a)</bold> 2007 and <bold>(b)</bold> 2010. Same legend for <bold>(a)</bold> and
<bold>(b)</bold>. Black <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes apply to processes, magenta <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes apply to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (saturation) concentrations. Changes in concentrations due to
different processes are cumulative.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In contrast to the findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.83"/>, who argued that the
relatively strong advection at North Dogger may ventilate the bottom layers
in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, our results suggest that advection only has a minor
positive effect due to the only slightly higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
the surrounding waters. The large contribution of bacterial remineralisation
(REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and REM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>pel</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) accounting for almost
90 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the overall biological consumption at station North Dogger
confirms that the estimates for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remineralisation rates made by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.84"/> provide reasonable results. However, as NIT also
accounts for about 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total biological <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
consumption, this process should be considered to obtain more precise
estimates for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remineralisation rates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions and perspectives</title>
      <p>The North Sea is one of the shelf regions regularly experiencing seasonal
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency in the bottom water
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.85"/>. However, not all areas of the North
Sea are similarly affected by low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.86"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> due to different characteristics with respect to
stratification and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption. Observations and model results
suggest that the area between 54–57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
4.5–7<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E shows the highest potential for low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions, but also areas around the Doggerbank experience lowered bottom
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The model-based analysis of different factors affecting <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed
that besides sufficiently long stratification (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">days</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), surface
layer primary production (driving organic matter export) and sub-thermocline
volume are the key parameters influencing the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution.
Based on this, the North Sea can be subdivided into three different zones in
terms of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics: (1) a highly productive, non-stratified coastal
zone (region A), (2) a productive, seasonally stratified zone with a small
sub-thermocline volume (region B), and (3) a productive, seasonally
stratified zone with a large sub-thermocline volume (regions C and D). While
the zones of types 1 and 3 are unlikely to be affected by low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions due to either continuously ongoing ventilation (type 1) or the
large sub-thermocline volume diluting the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption
(type 3), type 2 is highly susceptible to low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. This
results from the specific combination of high upper layer productivity and
small sub-thermocline volume, which causes a strong impact of the consumption
processes on the decrease in the bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
      <p>The ODI demonstrates that this regional characterisation, based on only three
controlling parameters, can be applied to most parts of the North Sea. The
ODI is rather simple compared to the eutrophication risk index
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.87"><named-content content-type="pre">EUTRISK;</named-content></xref> as it is designed to indicate regions with
higher risk for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency. Therefore, it may also allow for an
operational use as the information on stratification can be derived from
operational hydrodynamical models and information on net primary production
from satellite data.</p>
      <p>The model-based mass balances showed that pelagic bacterial remineralisation
constitutes the largest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consuming process within the
sub-thermocline volume. In the bottom layer, benthic remineralisation
constitutes the major <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink, which consistently contributes more
than 50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the overall bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption. Pelagic
remineralisation consistently contributes to more than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
overall bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption. Zooplankton respiration and
nitrification are less important, however, can contribute to up to 14 and
8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. In addition, the results suggest that the
relative contribution of the different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consuming processes in the
bottom layer at a certain location depends on the water column depth and is
independent of the overall consumption.</p>
      <p>The mass balances also showed that differences in the surface layer primary
production drive variations in the sub-thermocline and bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
evolution between different years. Increased primary production directly
enhances the export of dead phytoplankton into the deeper layers.
Furthermore, it enhances zooplankton growth which causes an additional
increase in organic matter production and export. This enhanced zooplankton
growth further increases <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption due to respiration. The
overall increase in organic matter export results in stronger bacterial
remineralisation which in turn triggers nitrification due to the stronger
release of ammonium.</p>
      <p>Our analysis suggests that advection usually only has a minor effect on the
bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in most North Sea regions which contradicts the
interpretation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.88"/>. However, during years of especially low
bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations it may play an important role for the
recovery of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels before the breakdown of stratification in
autumn. In addition, we showed that during the summer period only very strong
mixing results in a net increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the enhanced nutrient
supply triggers primary production, eventually increasing the biological
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption, which balances or even exceeds the enhanced
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply.</p>
      <p>This study demonstrated that ecosystem models are capable of describing the
key features of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics as an integral part of the North Sea
ecosystem. This, in combination with the provision of a spatially and
temporally consistent picture is useful for the detection of
regions susceptible to low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions which therefore require
enhanced management. Additionally, this is of importance for monitoring
authorities as our model showed that bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements taken in
late summer provide a synoptic picture of the North Sea <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions.</p>
      <p>This study provides a general characterisation and process-based analysis of
the North Sea <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in its present state, including the actual
eutrophication status in the “continental coastal region” as defined for
the OSPAR assessment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.89"/>. The question on the anthropogenic
contribution to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency problem in relation to elevated
nutrient supply is beyond the scope of this study. However, the capability of
three-dimensional models to describe the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in the context
of the natural variability of the ecosystem can be related to changes in
anthropogenic drivers, such as increased atmospheric deposition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.90"/> or riverine nutrient input <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.91"/>.</p>
      <p>Similar model studies are essential for the assessment within the Water
Framework Directive (WFD), in which dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used as a key
parameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.92"/>. As the WFD assessment depends strongly on the
description of pristine conditions, related to natural nutrient levels
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.93"/>, ecosystem models can provide a consistent picture of the
North Sea <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics under these pristine conditions and of the
effects of WFD reductions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.94"/>. As river load reductions
within the WFD regulation affect the entire North Sea ecosystem, also in
terms of bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, these scenarios can also be
interpreted within the frame of the Marine Framework Directive (MSFD), which
involves <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as one of the main descriptors for the definition of the
“Good Environmental Status”.</p>
      <p>Recent observational studies explicitly highlight the importance of organic
nutrient loads on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in the context of nutrient
reductions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.95"/>. Thus, future modelling studies on the
effects of nutrient reductions on the marine environment should differentiate
between the effects of organic and inorganic nutrient inputs in order to
optimise measures in the catchment area with respect to cost efficiency.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.96"/> report an exponential expansion of global <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
deficiency (and hypoxia) since the 1960s and argue that future changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions will strongly depend on the effects of climate change
on stratification and riverine nutrient supply. For the North Sea, several
model studies predict a rise in water temperature
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.97"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> which will reduce the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.98"/>. Stratification intensity may either
increase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.99"/> or even decrease <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.100"/>,
implying opposed effects on bottom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Primary production could
increase due to enhanced nutrient supply caused by changes in weather
conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.101"/> or due to a temperature-driven increase in
metabolic rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.102"/>, which could eventually aggravate the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.103"/>. In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.104"/>
predicted a North Sea wide reduction in primary production by about
30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to reduced winter nutrient import from the Atlantic. As
these potential changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions will also affect the
biocoenosis of the North Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.105"/>, it is important to foster the
analysis of potential impacts of climate change and changes in nutrient loads
on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The time series data from the Cefas station North Dogger can be accessed
via the Cefas Data Hub (<uri>https://www.cefas.co.uk/cefas-data-hub/</uri>) according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.106"/>. The time
series data of MARNET station Ems can be retrieved from the Deutsches Ozeanographisches Datenzentrum (DOD Data Centre)
via email query to <ext-link xlink:href="mailto:dod@bsh.de">dod@bsh.de</ext-link>.
The spatially resolved data from the North Sea cruises in 2001 and 2005
have been released in the framework of the EU-FP6 project CARBOOCEAN. These data can be accessed via the CARBOOCEAN
data portal (<uri>http://dataportal.carboocean.org/</uri>) according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.107"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.108"/>, respectively.
The data of the North Sea cruise 2008 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.109"><named-content content-type="pre">R/V <italic>Pelagia</italic> 64PE294;</named-content></xref> have not been published, yet, but
can be requested via the CODIS data portal (<uri>http://www.nioz.nl/portals-en</uri>; registration required).</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Evaluation of the stratification and MLD criterion</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/> shows the Hovmöller diagram of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
at station North Dogger (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, region 2) for the
year 2007, including the MLD (dashed magenta line) derived from the simulated
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> field according to Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>).
Regarding the onset of stratification in late March, it is shown that the
near-surface (0–25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> starts to increase relatively to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the deeper layers. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>crit</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reached on 26 April,
marking the beginning of the stratified period according to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). The maximum vertical <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient at the onset
occurs in 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth. From that moment stratification according to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) persists until 31 October, which may represent
a slight overestimation as the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient is found in 60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
depth already, indicating deep mixing.</p>
      <p>During the first two months of the stratified period (April/May) the MLD
shows stronger fluctuations in terms of its actual depth. This results from
the relatively weak near-surface stratification, and thus, the stronger
effect of mainly wind-induced mixing reaching depths of up to 35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
These events are indicated by the episodic increase and decrease of surface
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. From early June to end of July, the MLD is less variable in depth due to
the persistent surface heating and less strong wind events. In late June
a short-term decrease in surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicating enhanced mixing occurs which
also results in a deepening of the MLD. From August until the end of the
stratified period the MLD shows a deepening trend which is caused by the
decreasing surface heating and increasing wind activity.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Hovmöller diagram of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and MLD according to
Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) at Cefas station North Dogger
(see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, region 2) in 2007. Depth levels represent the
centre depth of model layers.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/2511/2016/bg-13-2511-2016-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The main assumption behind the rather small critical <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> difference of
0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is, that even if the surface mixed layer is interrupted due to
mixing, this does not necessarily result in a complete overturning of the
water column. Thus, even a minor difference in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates a bottom layer
unaffected from vertical mixing. Despite this significant difference to
common MLD criteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.110"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g</named-content><named-content content-type="post">therein Table 1</named-content></xref>, the criterion
applied in this study represents the stratification conditions quite well.
However, it should be noted that the end of the stratified period may be
slightly overestimated. In addition, in regions with a less pronounced onset
of stratification, i.e., a less distinct increase in surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
determined timing of the onset may be slightly too early. The use of the
maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient to determine the MLD under stratified conditions yields
reasonable results, and is closely related to real conditions as the
thermocline is defined as the layer with the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank Sonja van Leeuwen from Cefas for providing updated
data on freshwater and nutrient loads for the major rivers across Europe. We
further thank Jerzy Bartnicki for providing atmospheric nitrogen deposition
data from the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP). We thank
Dilek Topcu and Uwe Brockmann from the University of Hamburg for providing
the map of observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficiency in the North Sea. Furthermore, we
thank the editor Veronique Garçon and two anonymous referees for the
valuable comments and constructive criticism, which helped to significantly
improve the manuscript. The model simulation was conducted on Blizzard, the
IBM Power6 mainframe at the German Climate Computing Centre (DKRZ) in
Hamburg. The North Sea sampling in 2001, 2005 and 2008 was supported by the
Dutch Science Foundation (NWO), CARBOOCEAN (EU-FP6) and the Royal Netherlands
Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ). Cefas SmartBuoy data were collected under
the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) contract
ME3205 (Marine Ecosystems Connections: essential indicators of healthy,
productive and biologically diverse seas). Markus Kreus was partly
financially supported by the Cluster of Excellence “CliSAP” (EXC177),
University of Hamburg, funded by the German Science Foundation (DFG). This
study was supported by the German Environmental Protection Agency (UBA) in
Dessau, in the frame of the project “Implementation of Descriptor 5
Eutrophication to the MSFD”, SN: 3713225221. The publication costs were
covered by Thomas Ludwig (Scientific Computing, University of Hamburg) and
“CliSAP”. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: V. Garçon</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Arakawa and Lamb(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V.: Computational design of the basic dynamical
processes of the UCLA general circulation model, Methods in Computational
Physics, 17, 173–265, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Azam et al.(1983)</label><mixed-citation>Azam, F., Fenchel, T., Field, J., Gray, J., Meyer-Reil, L., and
Thingstad, F.: The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 10, 257–263, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps010257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps010257</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Backhaus(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Backhaus, J.: A three-dimensional model for the simulation of shelf sea
dynamics, Deutsche Hydrografische Zeitschrift, 38, 165–187,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02328975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02328975</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Backhaus and Hainbucher(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Backhaus, J. and Hainbucher, D.: A finite difference general circulation
model for shelf seas and its application to low frequency variability on the
North European Shelf, Elsev. Oceanogr. Serie, 45, 221–244,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0422-9894(08)70450-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0422-9894(08)70450-1</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Benson and Krause(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Benson, B. and Krause, D.: The concentration and isotopic fractionation of
oxygen dissolved in freshwater and seawater in equilibrium with the
atmosphere, Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, 620–632, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0620" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0620</ext-link>,
1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Best et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Best, M., Wither, A., and Coates, S.: Dissolved oxygen as a physico-chemical
supporting element in the Water Framework Directive, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 55,
53–64, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.037</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bozec et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Elkalay, K., and de Baar, H.: The continental shelf
pump for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the North Sea – evidence from summer observation,
Mar. Chem., 93, 131–147, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2004.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2004.07.006</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bozec et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Borges, A., Elkalay, K., and
de Baar, H.: Assessment of the processes controlling the seasonal variations
of dissolved inorganic carbon in the North Sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51,
2746–2762, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2746" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2746</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Brockmann and Eberlein(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Brockmann, U. and Eberlein, K.: River input of nutrients into the German
Bight, in: The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, available at:
<uri>http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-70886-2_15</uri> (last
access: 29 June 2015), 231–240, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Brockmann and Topcu(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Brockmann, U. and Topcu, D.: Confidence rating for eutrophication assessments, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 82, 127–136,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Brockmann et al.(1988)</label><mixed-citation>Brockmann, U., Billen, G., and Gieskes, W.: North Sea nutrients and
eutrophication, in: Pollution of the North Sea, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg,
available at:
<uri>http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-73709-1_20</uri> (last
access: 29 June 2015), 348–389, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Brockmann et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Brockmann, U., Laane, R., and Postma, J.: Cycling of nutrient elements in the
North Sea, Neth. J. Sea Res., 26, 239–264, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90092-U" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0077-7579(90)90092-U</ext-link>,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Burt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Burt, W., Thomas, H., Pätsch, J., Omar, A., Schrum, C., Daewel, U.,
Brenner, H., and de Baar, H.: Radium isotopes as a tracer of sediment-water
column exchange in the North Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 786–804,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB004825</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Liu, C., O'Driscoll, K., Mayer, B., Su, J., and Pohlmann, T.: On
the nudging terms at open boundaries in regional ocean models, Ocean Model.,
66, 14–25, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.02.006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Chen et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X., Dangendorf, S., Narayan, N., O'Driscoll, K., Tsimplis, M., Su, J.,
Mayer, B., and Pohlmann, T.: On sea level change in the North Sea influenced
by the North Atlantic Oscillation: local and remote steric effects, Estuar.
Coast. Shelf S., 151, 186–195, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.10.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2014.10.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Claussen et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Claussen, U., Zevenboom, W., Brockmann, U., Topcu, D., and Bot, P.:
Assessment of the eutrophication status of transitional, coastal and marine
waters within OSPAR, Hydrobiologia, 629, 49–58,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9763-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-009-9763-3</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Conkright et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Conkright, M. E., Locarnini, R. A., Garcia, H. E., O'Brien, T. D., Boyer, T.
P., Stephens, C., and Antonov, J. I.: World Ocean Atlas 2001: objective
analyses, data statistics and figures CD-ROM documentation, National
Oceanographic Data Center Internal Report, National Oceanographic Data
Center, Silver Spring, MD, 17, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>de Jong(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
de Jong, F.: Marine Eutrophication in Perspective: On the Relevance of
Ecology for Environmental Policy, Springer Science and Business Media,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Diaz and Rosenberg(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Diaz, R. and Rosenberg, R.: Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine
ecosystems, Science, 321, 926–929, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1156401</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Druon et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Druon, J.-N., Schrimpf, W., Dobricic, S., and Stips, A.: Comparative
assessment of large-scale marine eutrophication: North Sea area and Adriatic
Sea as case studies, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 272, 1–23, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Ducrotoy et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Ducrotoy, J., Elliott, M., and de Jonge, V.: The North Sea, Mar. Pollut.
Bull., 41, 5–23, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00099-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00099-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Emeis et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Emeis, K.-C., van Beusekom, J., Callies, U., Ebinghaus, R., Kannen, A.,
Kraus, G., Kröncke, I., Lenhart, L., Lorkowski, I., Matthias, V.,
Möllmann, C., Pätsch, J., Scharfe, M., Thomas, H., Weisse, R., and
Zorita, Z.: The North Sea – a shelf sea in the Anthropocene, J. Marine
Syst., 141, 18–33, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.03.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.03.012</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Friedrich et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Friedrich, J., Janssen, F., Aleynik, D., Bange, H. W., Boltacheva, N.,
Çagatay, M. N., Dale, A. W., Etiope, G., Erdem, Z., Geraga, M., Gilli,
A., Gomoiu, M. T., Hall, P. O. J., Hansson, D., He, Y., Holtappels, M., Kirf,
M. K., Kononets, M., Konovalov, S., Lichtschlag, A., Livingstone, D. M.,
Marinaro, G., Mazlumyan, S., Naeher, S., North, R. P., Papatheodorou, G.,
Pfannkuche, O., Prien, R., Rehder, G., Schubert, C. J., Soltwedel, T.,
Sommer, S., Stahl, H., Stanev, E. V., Teaca, A., Tengberg, A., Waldmann, C.,
Wehrli, B., and Wenzhöfer, F.: Investigating hypoxia in aquatic
environments: diverse approaches to addressing a complex phenomenon,
Biogeosciences, 11, 1215–1259, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1215-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-1215-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Greenwood et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Greenwood, N., Parker, E. R., Fernand, L., Sivyer, D. B., Weston, K.,
Painting, S. J., Kröger, S., Forster, R. M., Lees, H. E., Mills, D. K.,
and Laane, R. W. P. M.: Detection of low bottom water oxygen concentrations
in the North Sea; implications for monitoring and assessment of ecosystem
health, Biogeosciences, 7, 1357–1373, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1357-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-1357-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Greenwood et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Greenwood, N., Sivyer, D., Pearce, D., and Cutchey, S.: SmartBuoy observational
network – North Dogger, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
(Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14466/CefasDataHub.29" ext-link-type="DOI">10.14466/CefasDataHub.29</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Gröger et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Gröger, M., Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., Moll, A., and Sein, D.:
NW European shelf under climate warming: implications for open ocean – shelf
exchange, primary production, and carbon absorption, Biogeosciences, 10,
3767–3792, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3767-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-3767-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Heath et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Heath, M., Edwards, A., Pätsch, J., and Turrell, W.: Modelling the
Behaviour of Nutrients in the Coastal Waters of Scotland, Scottish Executive
Central Research Unit, Edinburgh, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Jickells(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Jickells, T.: Nutrient biogeochemistry of the coastal zone, Science, 281, 217–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5374.217" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.281.5374.217</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Justić et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Justić, D., Turner, R., and Rabalais, N.: Climatic influences on riverine
nitrate flux: implications for coastal marine eutrophication and hypoxia,
Estuaries, 26, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02691688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02691688</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kalnay et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J.,
Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year
reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kara et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Kara, A., Rochford, P., and Hurlburt, H.: An optimal definition for ocean
mixed layer depth, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 105, 16803–16821,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JC900072</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kemp et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Kemp, W. M., Testa, J. M., Conley, D. J., Gilbert, D., and Hagy, J. D.:
Temporal responses of coastal hypoxia to nutrient loading and physical
controls, Biogeosciences, 6, 2985–3008, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2985-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-2985-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Kistler et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Kistler, R., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Kalnay, E.,
Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Kanamitsu, M., Kousky, V., van den Dool, H.,
Jenne, R., and Fiorino, M.: The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means
CD-ROM and documentation, B. Am. Meterorol. Soc., 82, 247–267,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082&lt;0247:TNNYRM&gt;2.3.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082&lt;0247:TNNYRM&gt;2.3.CO;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Kröncke and Knust(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Kröncke, I. and Knust, R.: The Dogger Bank: a special ecological
region in the central North Sea, Helgoland Mar. Res., 49, 335–353,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02368361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02368361</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Lenhart and Pohlmann(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Lenhart, H.-J. and Pohlmann, T.: The ICES-boxes approach in relation to
results of a North Sea circulation model, Tellus A, 49, 139–160,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1997.00010.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0870.1997.00010.x</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Lenhart et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Lenhart, H.-J., Mills, D., Baretta-Bekker, H., van Leeuwen, S., van der
Molen, J., Baretta, J., Blaas, M., Desmit, X., Kühn, W., Lacroix, G.,
Los, H., Ménesguen, A., Neves, R., Proctor, R., Ruardij, P., Skogen, M.,
Vanhoutte-Brunier, A., Villars, M., and Wakelin, S.: Predicting the
consequences of nutrient reduction on the eutrophication status of the North
Sea, J. Marine Syst., 81, 148–170, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.12.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.12.014</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Lohse et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lohse, L., Kloosterhuis, H., van Raaphorst, W., and Helder, W.:
Denitrification rates as measured by the isotope pairing method and by the
acetylene inhibition technique in continental shelf sediments of the North
Sea, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 132, 169–179, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lorkowski et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Lorkowski, I., Pätsch, J., Moll, A., and Kühn, W.: Interannual
variability of carbon fluxes in the North Sea from 1970 to 2006 – Competing
effects of abiotic and biotic drivers on the gas-exchange of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 100, 38–57, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.037</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lowe et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Lowe, J., Howard, T., Pardaens, A., Tinker, J., Holt, J., Wakelin, S.,
Milne, G., Leake, J., Wolf, J., Horsburgh, K., Reeder, T., Jenkins, G.,
Ridley, J., Dye, S., and Bradley, S.: UK Climate Projections Science Report:
Marine and Coastal Projections, Tech. rep., Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter,
UK, available at: <uri>http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/9734/</uri> (last access: 29 June
2015), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Mathis and Pohlmann(2014)Mathis, and Pohlmann</label><mixed-citation>Mathis, M., and Pohlmann, T.: Projection of physical conditions in the North
Sea for the 21st century. Clim. Res., 61, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr01232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/cr01232</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Meire et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Meire, L., Soetaert, K. E. R., and Meysman, F. J. R.: Impact of global change
on coastal oxygen dynamics and risk of hypoxia, Biogeosciences, 10,
2633–2653, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Mills et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Mills, D. K., Greenwood, N., Kröger, S., Devlin, M., Sivyer, D. B.,
Pearce, D., Cutchey, S., and Malcolm, S.: New approaches to improve the
detection of eutrophication in UK coastal waters, Environ. Res. Eng. Manag.,
2, 36–42, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Müller(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, L.: Sauerstoffdynamik der Nordsee – Untersuchungen mit einem
drei-dimensionalen Ökosystemmodell, Berichte des BSH, 43, 1–171, 2008
(in German only).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Neumann(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Neumann, T.: Towards a 3D-ecosystem model of the Baltic Sea, J. Marine Syst.,
25, 405–419, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(00)00030-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0924-7963(00)00030-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>O'Boyle and Nolan(2010)</label><mixed-citation>O'Boyle, S. and Nolan, G.: The influence of water column stratification on dissolved
oxygen levels in coastal and shelf waters around Ireland, Biol. Environ., 110B, 195–209,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3318/BIOE.2010.110.3.195" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3318/BIOE.2010.110.3.195</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>O'Driscoll et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>O'Driscoll, K., Mayer, B., Ilyina, T., and Pohlmann, T.: Modelling the
cycling of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the North Sea system:
fluxes, loading, seasonality, trends, J. Marine Syst., 111, 69–82,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.09.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.09.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>OSPAR-Commission(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
OSPAR-Commission: OSPAR integrated report 2003 on the eutrophication status
of the OSPAR maritime area based upon the first application of the
Comprehensive Procedure, London, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>OSPAR-Commission(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
OSPAR-Commission: Common procedure for the identification of the
eutrophication status of the OSPAR maritime area, London, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Otto et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Otto, L., Zimmerman, J., Furnes, G., Mork, M., Saetre, R., and Becker, G.:
Review of the physical oceanography of the North Sea, Neth. J. Sea Res., 26,
161–238, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90091-T" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0077-7579(90)90091-T</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Pätsch and Kühn(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Pätsch, J. and Kühn, W.: Nitrogen and carbon cycling in the North Sea
and exchange with the North Atlantic – a model study. Part I. Nitrogen
budget and fluxes, Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 767–787,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2007.12.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2007.12.013</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Pingree et al.(1978)</label><mixed-citation>Pingree, R., Holligan, P., and Mardell, G.: The effects of vertical stability
on phytoplankton distributions in the summer on the northwest European Shelf,
Deep-Sea Res., 25, 1011–1016, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6291(78)90584-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0146-6291(78)90584-2</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Pohlmann(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Pohlmann, T.: Untersuchung hydro- und thermodynamischer Prozesse in der
Nordsee mit einem dreidimensionalen numerischem Modell, Berichte aus dem
Zentrum für Meeres- und Klimaforschung, Reihe B, Zentrum für Meeres-
und Klimaforschung der Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 1–116, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Pohlmann(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Pohlmann, T.: Predicting the thermocline in a circulation model of the North
Sea – Part I: model description, calibration and verification, Cont. Shelf
Res., 16, 131–146, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)90885-S" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0278-4343(95)90885-S</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Queste et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Queste, B., Fernand, L., Jickells, T., and Heywood, K.: Spatial extent and
historical context of North Sea oxygen depletion in August 2010,
Biogeochemistry, 113, 53–68, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9729-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-012-9729-9</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Rabalais et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Rabalais, N. N., Díaz, R. J., Levin, L. A., Turner, R. E., Gilbert, D.,
and Zhang, J.: Dynamics and distribution of natural and human-caused hypoxia,
Biogeosciences, 7, 585–619, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-585-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-585-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Rachor and Albrecht(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Rachor, E. and Albrecht, H.: Sauerstoff-Mangel im Bodenwasser der Deutschen
Bucht, Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerh., 19, 209–227, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Reinthaler et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Reinthaler, T., Bakker, K., Manuels, R., Van Ooijen, J., and Herndl, G.:
Fully automated spectrophotometric approach to determine oxygen
concentrations in seawater via continuous-flow analysis, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 4, 358–366, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lom.2006.4.358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2006.4.358</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Salt et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Salt, L., Thomas, H., Prowe, A., Borges, A., Bozec, Y., and de Baar, H.:
Variability of North Sea pH and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to North Atlantic
Oscillation forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 1584–1592,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JG002306</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Schernewski et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Schernewski, G., Friedland, R., Carstens, M., Hirt, U., Leujak, W.,
Nausch, G., Neumann, T., Petenati, T., Sagert, S., Wasmund, N., and von
Weber, M.: Implementation of European marine policy: new water quality
targets for German Baltic waters, Mar. Policy, 51, 305–321,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.002</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Schöpp et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Schöpp, W., Posch, M., Mylona, S., and Johansson, M.: Long-term
development of acid deposition (1880–2030) in sensitive freshwater regions
in Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 436–446,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-7-436-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-7-436-2003</ext-link>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Seitzinger and Giblin(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. and Giblin, A.: Estimating denitrification in North Atlantic
continental shelf sediments, Biogeochemistry, 35, 235–260, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Steele(1962)</label><mixed-citation>Steele, J.: Environmental control of photosynthesis in the sea, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 7, 137–150, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1962.7.2.0137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1962.7.2.0137</ext-link>, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Taylor(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Thomas et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., Elkalay, K., de Baar, H. J. W., Borges, A. V., and
Schiettecatte, L.-S.: Controls of the surface water partial pressure of CO2
in the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 2, 323–334, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-323-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2-323-2005</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Thomas and Borges(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, H. and Borges, A.: Carbon Dioxide, Hydrographic, and Chemical Data Obtained
During the R/V Pelagia Cruise 64PE239 in the North Sea (17 August–6 September, 2005), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis
Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_64PE239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_64PE239</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Thomas et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, H., Borges, A., Derksen, J., and Bakker, K.: Carbon Dioxide, Hydrographic, and
Chemical Data Obtained During the R/V Pelagia CANOBA Cruises in the North Sea (2001–2002), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis
Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_CANOBA" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_CANOBA</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Topcu and Brockmann(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Topcu, H. D. and Brockmann, U. H.: Seasonal oxygen depletion in the North Sea,
a review, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 99, 5–27
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.021</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Topcu et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Topcu, D., Brockmann, U., and Claussen, U.: Relationship between
eutrophication reference conditions and boundary settings considering OSPAR
recommendations and the Water Framework Directive – examples from the German
Bight, Hydrobiologia, 629, 91–106, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9778-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-009-9778-9</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Troost et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Troost, T., Blaas, M., and Los, F.: The role of atmospheric deposition in the
eutrophication of the North Sea: a model analysis, J. Marine Syst., 125,
101–112, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.10.005</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Upton et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Upton, A., Nedwell, D., Parkes, R., and Harvey, S.: Seasonal benthic
microbial activity in the southern North Sea; oxygen uptake and sulphate
reduction, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 101, 273–281, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps101273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps101273</ext-link>,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>van der Molen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>van der Molen, J., Aldridge, J., Coughlan, C., Parker, E., Stephens, D., and
Ruardij, P.: Modelling marine ecosystem response to climate change and
trawling in the North Sea, Biogeochemistry, 113, 213–236,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>van Leeuwen et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>van Leeuwen, S., Tett, P., Mills, D., and van der Molen, J.: Stratified and
non-stratified areas in the North Sea: long-term variability and biological
and policy implications, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010485</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Vaquer-Sunyer and Duarte(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Vaquer-Sunyer, R., and Duarte, C. M.: Thresholds of hypoxia for marine
biodiversity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 15452–15457,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803833105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0803833105</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>von Westernhagen et al.(1986)</label><mixed-citation>von Westernhagen, H., Hickel, W., Bauerfeind, E., Niermann, U., and
Kröncke, I.: Sources and effects of oxygen deficiencies in the
south-eastern North Sea, Ophelia, 26, 457–473,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1986.10422006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00785326.1986.10422006</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Wanninkhof(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 7373–7382, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/92JC00188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JC00188</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Weston et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Weston, K., Fernand, L., Nicholls, J., Marca-Bell, A., Mills, D., Sivyer, D.,
and Trimmer, M.: Sedimentary and water column processes in the Oyster
Grounds: a potentially hypoxic region of the North Sea, Mar. Environ. Res.,
65, 235–249, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.11.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.11.002</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Zemmelink(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Zemmelink, H.: Cruise Report of the cruise 64PE294, Texel, NL – Texel, NL, 19.08.2008–11.09.2008, Royal Netherlands
Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), available at: <uri>http://melia.nioz.nl/public/dmg/rpt/crs/64pe294.pdf</uri> (last access: 26 April 2016), 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Looking beyond stratification:  a model-based analysis of  the  biological drivers of oxygen  deficiency in the North Sea</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Low oxygen conditions, often referred to as
oxygen deficiency, occur regularly in the North Sea, a temperate European
shelf sea. Stratification represents a major process regulating the seasonal
dynamics of bottom oxygen, yet, lowest oxygen conditions in the North Sea do
not occur in the regions of strongest stratification. This suggests that
stratification is an important prerequisite for oxygen deficiency, but that
the complex interaction between hydrodynamics and the biological processes
drives its evolution.</p><p class="p">In this study we use the ecosystem model HAMSOM-ECOHAM to provide a general
characterisation of the different zones of the North Sea with respect to
oxygen, and to quantify the impact of the different physical and biological
factors driving the oxygen dynamics inside the entire sub-thermocline volume
and directly above the bottom.</p><p class="p">With respect to oxygen dynamics, the North Sea can be subdivided into three
different zones: (1) a highly productive, non-stratified coastal zone, (2) a productive,
seasonally stratified zone with a small sub-thermocline volume,
and (3) a productive, seasonally stratified zone with a large sub-thermocline
volume. Type 2 reveals the highest susceptibility to oxygen deficiency due to
sufficiently long stratification periods ( &gt;  60 days) accompanied by
high surface productivity resulting in high biological consumption, and
a small sub-thermocline volume implying both a small initial oxygen inventory
and a strong influence of the biological consumption on the oxygen
concentration.</p><p class="p">Year-to-year variations in the oxygen conditions are caused by variations in
primary production, while spatial differences can be attributed to
differences in stratification and water depth. The large sub-thermocline
volume dominates the oxygen dynamics in the northern central and northern
North Sea and makes this region insusceptible to oxygen deficiency. In the
southern North Sea the strong tidal mixing inhibits the development of
seasonal stratification which protects this area from the evolution of low
oxygen conditions. In contrast, the southern central North Sea is highly
susceptible to low oxygen conditions (type 2).</p><p class="p">We furthermore show that benthic diagenetic processes represent the main
oxygen consumers in the bottom layer, consistently accounting for more than
50 % of the overall consumption. Thus, primary production followed by
remineralisation of organic matter under stratified conditions constitutes
the main driver for the evolution of oxygen deficiency in the southern
central North Sea. By providing these valuable insights, we show that
ecosystem models can be a useful tool for the interpretation of observations
and the estimation of the impact of anthropogenic drivers on the North Sea
oxygen conditions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Arakawa and Lamb(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V.: Computational design of the basic dynamical
processes of the UCLA general circulation model, Methods in Computational
Physics, 17, 173–265, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Azam et al.(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Azam, F., Fenchel, T., Field, J., Gray, J., Meyer-Reil, L., and
Thingstad, F.: The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 10, 257–263, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps010257" target="_blank">doi:10.3354/meps010257</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Backhaus(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Backhaus, J.: A three-dimensional model for the simulation of shelf sea
dynamics, Deutsche Hydrografische Zeitschrift, 38, 165–187,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02328975" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/BF02328975</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Backhaus and Hainbucher(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Backhaus, J. and Hainbucher, D.: A finite difference general circulation
model for shelf seas and its application to low frequency variability on the
North European Shelf, Elsev. Oceanogr. Serie, 45, 221–244,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0422-9894(08)70450-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0422-9894(08)70450-1</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Benson and Krause(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Benson, B. and Krause, D.: The concentration and isotopic fractionation of
oxygen dissolved in freshwater and seawater in equilibrium with the
atmosphere, Limnol. Oceanogr., 29, 620–632, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0620" target="_blank">doi:10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0620</a>,
1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Best et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Best, M., Wither, A., and Coates, S.: Dissolved oxygen as a physico-chemical
supporting element in the Water Framework Directive, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 55,
53–64, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.037" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.037</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bozec et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Elkalay, K., and de Baar, H.: The continental shelf
pump for CO<sub>2</sub> in the North Sea – evidence from summer observation,
Mar. Chem., 93, 131–147, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2004.07.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2004.07.006</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bozec et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Borges, A., Elkalay, K., and
de Baar, H.: Assessment of the processes controlling the seasonal variations
of dissolved inorganic carbon in the North Sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51,
2746–2762, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2746" target="_blank">doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2746</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Brockmann and Eberlein(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Brockmann, U. and Eberlein, K.: River input of nutrients into the German
Bight, in: The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, available at:
<a href="http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-70886-2_15" target="_blank">http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-70886-2_15</a> (last
access: 29 June 2015), 231–240, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Brockmann and Topcu(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Brockmann, U. and Topcu, D.: Confidence rating for eutrophication assessments, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 82, 127–136,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.007</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Brockmann et al.(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Brockmann, U., Billen, G., and Gieskes, W.: North Sea nutrients and
eutrophication, in: Pollution of the North Sea, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg,
available at:
<a href="http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-73709-1_20" target="_blank">http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-73709-1_20</a> (last
access: 29 June 2015), 348–389, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brockmann et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Brockmann, U., Laane, R., and Postma, J.: Cycling of nutrient elements in the
North Sea, Neth. J. Sea Res., 26, 239–264, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90092-U" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0077-7579(90)90092-U</a>,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Burt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Burt, W., Thomas, H., Pätsch, J., Omar, A., Schrum, C., Daewel, U.,
Brenner, H., and de Baar, H.: Radium isotopes as a tracer of sediment-water
column exchange in the North Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 786–804,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004825" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014GB004825</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, X., Liu, C., O'Driscoll, K., Mayer, B., Su, J., and Pohlmann, T.: On
the nudging terms at open boundaries in regional ocean models, Ocean Model.,
66, 14–25, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.02.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.02.006</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chen et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, X., Dangendorf, S., Narayan, N., O'Driscoll, K., Tsimplis, M., Su, J.,
Mayer, B., and Pohlmann, T.: On sea level change in the North Sea influenced
by the North Atlantic Oscillation: local and remote steric effects, Estuar.
Coast. Shelf S., 151, 186–195, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.10.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2014.10.009</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Claussen et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Claussen, U., Zevenboom, W., Brockmann, U., Topcu, D., and Bot, P.:
Assessment of the eutrophication status of transitional, coastal and marine
waters within OSPAR, Hydrobiologia, 629, 49–58,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9763-3" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10750-009-9763-3</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Conkright et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Conkright, M. E., Locarnini, R. A., Garcia, H. E., O'Brien, T. D., Boyer, T.
P., Stephens, C., and Antonov, J. I.: World Ocean Atlas 2001: objective
analyses, data statistics and figures CD-ROM documentation, National
Oceanographic Data Center Internal Report, National Oceanographic Data
Center, Silver Spring, MD, 17, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>de Jong(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
de Jong, F.: Marine Eutrophication in Perspective: On the Relevance of
Ecology for Environmental Policy, Springer Science and Business Media,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Diaz and Rosenberg(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Diaz, R. and Rosenberg, R.: Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine
ecosystems, Science, 321, 926–929, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1156401</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Druon et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Druon, J.-N., Schrimpf, W., Dobricic, S., and Stips, A.: Comparative
assessment of large-scale marine eutrophication: North Sea area and Adriatic
Sea as case studies, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 272, 1–23, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Ducrotoy et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Ducrotoy, J., Elliott, M., and de Jonge, V.: The North Sea, Mar. Pollut.
Bull., 41, 5–23, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00099-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00099-0</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Emeis et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Emeis, K.-C., van Beusekom, J., Callies, U., Ebinghaus, R., Kannen, A.,
Kraus, G., Kröncke, I., Lenhart, L., Lorkowski, I., Matthias, V.,
Möllmann, C., Pätsch, J., Scharfe, M., Thomas, H., Weisse, R., and
Zorita, Z.: The North Sea – a shelf sea in the Anthropocene, J. Marine
Syst., 141, 18–33, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.03.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.03.012</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Friedrich et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Friedrich, J., Janssen, F., Aleynik, D., Bange, H. W., Boltacheva, N.,
Çagatay, M. N., Dale, A. W., Etiope, G., Erdem, Z., Geraga, M., Gilli,
A., Gomoiu, M. T., Hall, P. O. J., Hansson, D., He, Y., Holtappels, M., Kirf,
M. K., Kononets, M., Konovalov, S., Lichtschlag, A., Livingstone, D. M.,
Marinaro, G., Mazlumyan, S., Naeher, S., North, R. P., Papatheodorou, G.,
Pfannkuche, O., Prien, R., Rehder, G., Schubert, C. J., Soltwedel, T.,
Sommer, S., Stahl, H., Stanev, E. V., Teaca, A., Tengberg, A., Waldmann, C.,
Wehrli, B., and Wenzhöfer, F.: Investigating hypoxia in aquatic
environments: diverse approaches to addressing a complex phenomenon,
Biogeosciences, 11, 1215–1259, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1215-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-11-1215-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Greenwood et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Greenwood, N., Parker, E. R., Fernand, L., Sivyer, D. B., Weston, K.,
Painting, S. J., Kröger, S., Forster, R. M., Lees, H. E., Mills, D. K.,
and Laane, R. W. P. M.: Detection of low bottom water oxygen concentrations
in the North Sea; implications for monitoring and assessment of ecosystem
health, Biogeosciences, 7, 1357–1373, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1357-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-7-1357-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Greenwood et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Greenwood, N., Sivyer, D., Pearce, D., and Cutchey, S.: SmartBuoy observational
network – North Dogger, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
(Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14466/CefasDataHub.29" target="_blank">doi:10.14466/CefasDataHub.29</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Gröger et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Gröger, M., Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., Moll, A., and Sein, D.:
NW European shelf under climate warming: implications for open ocean – shelf
exchange, primary production, and carbon absorption, Biogeosciences, 10,
3767–3792, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3767-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-3767-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Heath et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Heath, M., Edwards, A., Pätsch, J., and Turrell, W.: Modelling the
Behaviour of Nutrients in the Coastal Waters of Scotland, Scottish Executive
Central Research Unit, Edinburgh, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Jickells(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Jickells, T.: Nutrient biogeochemistry of the coastal zone, Science, 281, 217–222,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5374.217" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.217</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Justić et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Justić, D., Turner, R., and Rabalais, N.: Climatic influences on riverine
nitrate flux: implications for coastal marine eutrophication and hypoxia,
Estuaries, 26, 1–11, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02691688" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/BF02691688</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kalnay et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J.,
Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year
reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077&lt;0437:TNYRP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kara et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kara, A., Rochford, P., and Hurlburt, H.: An optimal definition for ocean
mixed layer depth, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 105, 16803–16821,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900072" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2000JC900072</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kemp et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kemp, W. M., Testa, J. M., Conley, D. J., Gilbert, D., and Hagy, J. D.:
Temporal responses of coastal hypoxia to nutrient loading and physical
controls, Biogeosciences, 6, 2985–3008, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2985-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-6-2985-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kistler et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kistler, R., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Kalnay, E.,
Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Kanamitsu, M., Kousky, V., van den Dool, H.,
Jenne, R., and Fiorino, M.: The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means
CD-ROM and documentation, B. Am. Meterorol. Soc., 82, 247–267,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082&lt;0247:TNNYRM&gt;2.3.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082&lt;0247:TNNYRM&gt;2.3.CO;2</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kröncke and Knust(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Kröncke, I. and Knust, R.: The Dogger Bank: a special ecological
region in the central North Sea, Helgoland Mar. Res., 49, 335–353,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02368361" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/BF02368361</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Lenhart and Pohlmann(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Lenhart, H.-J. and Pohlmann, T.: The ICES-boxes approach in relation to
results of a North Sea circulation model, Tellus A, 49, 139–160,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1997.00010.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1034/j.1600-0870.1997.00010.x</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Lenhart et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Lenhart, H.-J., Mills, D., Baretta-Bekker, H., van Leeuwen, S., van der
Molen, J., Baretta, J., Blaas, M., Desmit, X., Kühn, W., Lacroix, G.,
Los, H., Ménesguen, A., Neves, R., Proctor, R., Ruardij, P., Skogen, M.,
Vanhoutte-Brunier, A., Villars, M., and Wakelin, S.: Predicting the
consequences of nutrient reduction on the eutrophication status of the North
Sea, J. Marine Syst., 81, 148–170, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.12.014" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.12.014</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Lohse et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lohse, L., Kloosterhuis, H., van Raaphorst, W., and Helder, W.:
Denitrification rates as measured by the isotope pairing method and by the
acetylene inhibition technique in continental shelf sediments of the North
Sea, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 132, 169–179, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Lorkowski et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Lorkowski, I., Pätsch, J., Moll, A., and Kühn, W.: Interannual
variability of carbon fluxes in the North Sea from 1970 to 2006 – Competing
effects of abiotic and biotic drivers on the gas-exchange of CO<sub>2</sub>,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 100, 38–57, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.037" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.037</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lowe et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Lowe, J., Howard, T., Pardaens, A., Tinker, J., Holt, J., Wakelin, S.,
Milne, G., Leake, J., Wolf, J., Horsburgh, K., Reeder, T., Jenkins, G.,
Ridley, J., Dye, S., and Bradley, S.: UK Climate Projections Science Report:
Marine and Coastal Projections, Tech. rep., Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter,
UK, available at: <a href="http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/9734/" target="_blank">http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/9734/</a> (last access: 29 June
2015), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Mathis and Pohlmann(2014)Mathis, and Pohlmann</label><mixed-citation>
Mathis, M., and Pohlmann, T.: Projection of physical conditions in the North
Sea for the 21st century. Clim. Res., 61, 1–17, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr01232" target="_blank">doi:10.3354/cr01232</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Meire et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Meire, L., Soetaert, K. E. R., and Meysman, F. J. R.: Impact of global change
on coastal oxygen dynamics and risk of hypoxia, Biogeosciences, 10,
2633–2653, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-2633-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Mills et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Mills, D. K., Greenwood, N., Kröger, S., Devlin, M., Sivyer, D. B.,
Pearce, D., Cutchey, S., and Malcolm, S.: New approaches to improve the
detection of eutrophication in UK coastal waters, Environ. Res. Eng. Manag.,
2, 36–42, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Müller(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, L.: Sauerstoffdynamik der Nordsee – Untersuchungen mit einem
drei-dimensionalen Ökosystemmodell, Berichte des BSH, 43, 1–171, 2008
(in German only).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Neumann(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Neumann, T.: Towards a 3D-ecosystem model of the Baltic Sea, J. Marine Syst.,
25, 405–419, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(00)00030-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0924-7963(00)00030-0</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>O'Boyle and Nolan(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
O'Boyle, S. and Nolan, G.: The influence of water column stratification on dissolved
oxygen levels in coastal and shelf waters around Ireland, Biol. Environ., 110B, 195–209,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3318/BIOE.2010.110.3.195" target="_blank">doi:10.3318/BIOE.2010.110.3.195</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>O'Driscoll et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
O'Driscoll, K., Mayer, B., Ilyina, T., and Pohlmann, T.: Modelling the
cycling of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the North Sea system:
fluxes, loading, seasonality, trends, J. Marine Syst., 111, 69–82,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.09.011" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.09.011</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>OSPAR-Commission(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
OSPAR-Commission: OSPAR integrated report 2003 on the eutrophication status
of the OSPAR maritime area based upon the first application of the
Comprehensive Procedure, London, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>OSPAR-Commission(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
OSPAR-Commission: Common procedure for the identification of the
eutrophication status of the OSPAR maritime area, London, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Otto et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Otto, L., Zimmerman, J., Furnes, G., Mork, M., Saetre, R., and Becker, G.:
Review of the physical oceanography of the North Sea, Neth. J. Sea Res., 26,
161–238, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(90)90091-T" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0077-7579(90)90091-T</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Pätsch and Kühn(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Pätsch, J. and Kühn, W.: Nitrogen and carbon cycling in the North Sea
and exchange with the North Atlantic – a model study. Part I. Nitrogen
budget and fluxes, Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 767–787,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2007.12.013" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.csr.2007.12.013</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Pingree et al.(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Pingree, R., Holligan, P., and Mardell, G.: The effects of vertical stability
on phytoplankton distributions in the summer on the northwest European Shelf,
Deep-Sea Res., 25, 1011–1016, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6291(78)90584-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0146-6291(78)90584-2</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Pohlmann(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Pohlmann, T.: Untersuchung hydro- und thermodynamischer Prozesse in der
Nordsee mit einem dreidimensionalen numerischem Modell, Berichte aus dem
Zentrum für Meeres- und Klimaforschung, Reihe B, Zentrum für Meeres-
und Klimaforschung der Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 1–116, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Pohlmann(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Pohlmann, T.: Predicting the thermocline in a circulation model of the North
Sea – Part I: model description, calibration and verification, Cont. Shelf
Res., 16, 131–146, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)90885-S" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0278-4343(95)90885-S</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Queste et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Queste, B., Fernand, L., Jickells, T., and Heywood, K.: Spatial extent and
historical context of North Sea oxygen depletion in August 2010,
Biogeochemistry, 113, 53–68, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9729-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10533-012-9729-9</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Rabalais et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Rabalais, N. N., Díaz, R. J., Levin, L. A., Turner, R. E., Gilbert, D.,
and Zhang, J.: Dynamics and distribution of natural and human-caused hypoxia,
Biogeosciences, 7, 585–619, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-585-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-7-585-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Rachor and Albrecht(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Rachor, E. and Albrecht, H.: Sauerstoff-Mangel im Bodenwasser der Deutschen
Bucht, Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerh., 19, 209–227, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Reinthaler et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Reinthaler, T., Bakker, K., Manuels, R., Van Ooijen, J., and Herndl, G.:
Fully automated spectrophotometric approach to determine oxygen
concentrations in seawater via continuous-flow analysis, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 4, 358–366, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lom.2006.4.358" target="_blank">doi:10.4319/lom.2006.4.358</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Salt et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Salt, L., Thomas, H., Prowe, A., Borges, A., Bozec, Y., and de Baar, H.:
Variability of North Sea pH and CO<sub>2</sub> in response to North Atlantic
Oscillation forcing, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 1584–1592,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002306" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2013JG002306</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Schernewski et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Schernewski, G., Friedland, R., Carstens, M., Hirt, U., Leujak, W.,
Nausch, G., Neumann, T., Petenati, T., Sagert, S., Wasmund, N., and von
Weber, M.: Implementation of European marine policy: new water quality
targets for German Baltic waters, Mar. Policy, 51, 305–321,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.002" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.002</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Schöpp et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Schöpp, W., Posch, M., Mylona, S., and Johansson, M.: Long-term
development of acid deposition (1880–2030) in sensitive freshwater regions
in Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 436–446,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-7-436-2003" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-7-436-2003</a>, 2003.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Seitzinger and Giblin(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. and Giblin, A.: Estimating denitrification in North Atlantic
continental shelf sediments, Biogeochemistry, 35, 235–260, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Steele(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
Steele, J.: Environmental control of photosynthesis in the sea, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 7, 137–150, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1962.7.2.0137" target="_blank">doi:10.4319/lo.1962.7.2.0137</a>, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Taylor(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Thomas et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., Elkalay, K., de Baar, H. J. W., Borges, A. V., and
Schiettecatte, L.-S.: Controls of the surface water partial pressure of CO2
in the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 2, 323–334, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-323-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-2-323-2005</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Thomas and Borges(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, H. and Borges, A.: Carbon Dioxide, Hydrographic, and Chemical Data Obtained
During the R/V Pelagia Cruise 64PE239 in the North Sea (17 August–6 September, 2005), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis
Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_64PE239" target="_blank">doi:10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_64PE239</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Thomas et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, H., Borges, A., Derksen, J., and Bakker, K.: Carbon Dioxide, Hydrographic, and
Chemical Data Obtained During the R/V Pelagia CANOBA Cruises in the North Sea (2001–2002), Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis
Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_CANOBA" target="_blank">doi:10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.PELAGIA_CANOBA</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Topcu and Brockmann(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Topcu, H. D. and Brockmann, U. H.: Seasonal oxygen depletion in the North Sea,
a review, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 99, 5–27
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.021" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.021</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Topcu et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Topcu, D., Brockmann, U., and Claussen, U.: Relationship between
eutrophication reference conditions and boundary settings considering OSPAR
recommendations and the Water Framework Directive – examples from the German
Bight, Hydrobiologia, 629, 91–106, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9778-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10750-009-9778-9</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Troost et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Troost, T., Blaas, M., and Los, F.: The role of atmospheric deposition in the
eutrophication of the North Sea: a model analysis, J. Marine Syst., 125,
101–112, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.10.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2012.10.005</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Upton et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Upton, A., Nedwell, D., Parkes, R., and Harvey, S.: Seasonal benthic
microbial activity in the southern North Sea; oxygen uptake and sulphate
reduction, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 101, 273–281, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps101273" target="_blank">doi:10.3354/meps101273</a>,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>van der Molen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
van der Molen, J., Aldridge, J., Coughlan, C., Parker, E., Stephens, D., and
Ruardij, P.: Modelling marine ecosystem response to climate change and
trawling in the North Sea, Biogeochemistry, 113, 213–236,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10533-012-9763-7</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>van Leeuwen et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
van Leeuwen, S., Tett, P., Mills, D., and van der Molen, J.: Stratified and
non-stratified areas in the North Sea: long-term variability and biological
and policy implications, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010485" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014JC010485</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Vaquer-Sunyer and Duarte(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Vaquer-Sunyer, R., and Duarte, C. M.: Thresholds of hypoxia for marine
biodiversity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 15452–15457,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803833105" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0803833105</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>von Westernhagen et al.(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
von Westernhagen, H., Hickel, W., Bauerfeind, E., Niermann, U., and
Kröncke, I.: Sources and effects of oxygen deficiencies in the
south-eastern North Sea, Ophelia, 26, 457–473,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1986.10422006" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/00785326.1986.10422006</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Wanninkhof(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 7373–7382, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/92JC00188" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/92JC00188</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Weston et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Weston, K., Fernand, L., Nicholls, J., Marca-Bell, A., Mills, D., Sivyer, D.,
and Trimmer, M.: Sedimentary and water column processes in the Oyster
Grounds: a potentially hypoxic region of the North Sea, Mar. Environ. Res.,
65, 235–249, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.11.002" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.11.002</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Zemmelink(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Zemmelink, H.: Cruise Report of the cruise 64PE294, Texel, NL – Texel, NL, 19.08.2008–11.09.2008, Royal Netherlands
Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), available at: <a href="http://melia.nioz.nl/public/dmg/rpt/crs/64pe294.pdf" target="_blank">http://melia.nioz.nl/public/dmg/rpt/crs/64pe294.pdf</a> (last access: 26 April 2016), 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
