<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-4065-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Nitrogen fixation in sediments along a depth transect through <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>the Peruvian
oxygen minimum zone</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Nitrogen fixation in sediment}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Gier et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gier</surname><given-names>Jessica</given-names></name>
          <email>jgier@geomar.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sommer</surname><given-names>Stefan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Löscher</surname><given-names>Carolin R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2044-6849</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dale</surname><given-names>Andrew W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Schmitz</surname><given-names>Ruth A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Treude</surname><given-names>Tina</given-names></name>
          <email>ttreude@g.ucla.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6366-286X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute for Microbiology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>a</label><institution>present address: Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>b</label><institution>present address: University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Earth, Planetary &amp; Space Sciences and <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Department of
Atmospheric &amp; Oceanic Sciences, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jessica Gier (jgier@geomar.de) and  Tina Treude (ttreude@g.ucla.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>4065</fpage><lpage>4080</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The potential coupling of nitrogen (N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and sulfate reduction
(SR) was explored in sediments of the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone (OMZ).
Sediment samples were retrieved by a multiple corer at six stations along a
depth transect (70–1025 m water depth) at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, covering anoxic
and hypoxic bottom water conditions. Benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, determined by
the acetylene reduction assay, was detected at all sites, with highest rates
between 70 and 253 m and lower rates at greater depth. SR rates decreased
with increasing water depth. N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR overlapped in
sediments, suggesting a potential coupling of both processes. However, a
weak positive correlation of their activity distribution was detected by
principle component analysis. A potential link between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and
sulfate-reducing bacteria was indicated by the molecular analysis of <italic>nifH</italic> genes.
Detected <italic>nifH</italic> sequences clustered with the sulfate-reducing bacteria
<italic>Desulfonema limicola</italic> at the 253 m station. However, <italic>nifH</italic> sequences of other stations clustered with
uncultured organisms, Gammaproteobacteria, and Firmicutes (Clostridia)
rather than with known sulfate reducers. The principle component analysis
revealed that benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in the Peruvian OMZ is controlled by
organic matter (positive) and free sulfide (negative). No correlation was
found between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and ammonium concentrations (even at levels
&gt; 2022 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M). N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates in the Peruvian OMZ
sediments were in the same range as those measured in other organic-rich
sediments.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Only 6 % of nitrogen (N) in seawater is bioavailable
(Gruber, 2008). This bioavailable N is mainly present in
the form of nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the large pool of atmospheric
dinitrogen gas (N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is only available for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixing
microorganisms (diazotrophs). N often limits marine productivity
(Ward and Bronk, 2001;
Gruber, 2008) and the largest source of bioavailable N (i.e., ammonium;
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the marine environment is N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
(Falkowski et al.,
1998; Strous et al., 1999; Brandes and Devol, 2002).</p>
      <p>To date, the quantitative contribution of diazotrophs in the marine N cycle
remains unclear and numerous estimates of global sources and sinks of global
N have led to an unbalanced budget with deficits of around 200 Tg N yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Codispoti, 2007). This
suggests that either previous N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rate determinations have
been underestimated (Großkopf et al.,
2012) or that N loss processes are overestimated (Codispoti, 2007). However,
also balanced budgets such as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>265 Tg N yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for N sources and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>275 Tg N yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for N sinks exist (Gruber, 2004).
These budget discrepancies illustrate that the current knowledge on
diazotrophy and the marine N cycle is still limited.</p>
      <p>Recent investigations argue that N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in the water column cannot
be totally attributed to phototrophic cyanobacteria, but that also
heterotrophic prokaryotes contribute substantially
(Riemann
et al., 2010; Farnelid et al., 2011; Dekaezemacker et
al., 2013;
Löscher et al., 2014; Fernandez et al., 2015). This was shown for the
Peruvian oxygen minimum zone (OMZ), where proteobacterial clades dominated
with heterotrophic diazotrophs, indicating that cyanobacterial diazotrophs
are of minor importance in this area
(Löscher et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Cross-section of dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) along
the continental margin of the Peruvian OMZ at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The vertical
lines represent CTD cast for O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement during the cruise M92.
Stations 1 to 10 for multicorer (MUC) sampling are indicated by station
numbers according to Dale et al. (2015).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Pelagic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation has been studied mostly in the oligotrophic surface
oceans, but it was not until the past decade that benthic habitats began to
receive more attention (Fulweiler et al., 2007; Bertics et al., 2010, 2013). Most studies on benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation focused on
coastal environments (Capone et al., 2008 and references
therein). For example, subtidal sediments in Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island)
were found to switch from being a net sink in the form of denitrification to
being a net source of bioavailable N by N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, caused by a
decrease of organic matter deposition to the sediments
(Fulweiler et al., 2007). Shallow brackish-water
sediments off the Swedish coast revealed benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation along with
a diverse diazotrophic community (Andersson et al., 2014).
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was positively influenced by a variety of environmental
factors, such as salinity and dissolved inorganic Nitrogen, while wave
exposure had a negative influence. Recent work revealed that benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation is often linked to sulfate-reducing bacteria. For instance,
bioturbated coastal sediments showed enhanced N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation activity
mediated by sulfate-reducing bacteria, adding new dissolved inorganic N to
the system (Bertics et al.,
2010; Bertics and Ziebis, 2010). Further coupling of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation to SR
was observed in organic-rich sediments of the seasonal hypoxic
Eckernförde Bay (Baltic Sea, Bertics et al.,
2013), as well as in the sub-tidal, heterotrophic sediments of Narragansett
Bay (Rhode Island, USA; Fulweiler et al.,
2013). Several sulfate-reducing bacteria carry the functional gene marker
for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, the <italic>nifH</italic> gene
(Sisler and ZoBell, 1951;
Riederer-Henderson and Wilson,
1970; Zehr and Turner,
2001) and were shown to actively fix N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in culture experiments
(Riederer-Henderson and Wilson, 1970). However, information
on sulfate-reducing bacteria and their contribution to N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in
the environment is still sparse and restricted to a small selection of
environments.</p>
      <p>So far, the distribution of benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and its relevance for N
cycling in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone (OMZ), defined by dissolved
oxygen &lt; 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fuenzalida et al.,
2009), are unknown. The shelf and the upper slope in the Peruvian OMZ
represent recycling sites of dissolved inorganic N with dissimilatory
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction to NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the dominant process
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the benthic N cycle
(Dale et al., 2016). This
process is mediated by the filamentous sulfide-oxidizing <italic>Thioploca</italic> bacteria
(Schulz, 1999; Schulz and Jørgensen,
2001). Benthic denitrification, which is mediated by foraminifera at water
depth between 80 and 250 m of the Peruvian OMZ, represent a sink for
bioavailable N in sediments, accounting for a potential NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux,
i.e., N loss, of 0.01 to 1.5 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Glock et al., 2013; Dale
et al., 2016).</p>
      <p>The high input of labile organic carbon to Peruvian OMZ sediments
(Dale et al., 2015) and subsequent SR should
favor benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation. Sulfate-reducing bacteria could considerably
contribute to N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in these organic-rich OMZ sediments, given
that several sulfate-reducing bacteria (e.g., <italic>Desulfovibrio</italic> spp.;
Riederer-Henderson and Wilson, 1970; Muyzer
and Stams, 2008) carry the genetic ability to fix N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and provide an
important bioavailable N source for non-diazotrophic organisms
(Bertics
et al., 2010; Sohm et al., 2011; Fulweiler et al., 2013). We therefore
hypothesize a possible coupling of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR in sediments off
Peru. The aim of the present study was to identify and quantify benthic
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation along a depth transect through the Peruvian OMZ, together
with SR, and compare its distribution with environmental factors, such as
organic matter, to study its control mechanisms. The identification of
bacteria carrying the genetic ability to perform N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation should
further deliver information about benthic diazotrophic community structures
at the different stations. The overall knowledge gained is needed
to better constrain benthic N cycling in OMZs and to improve our knowledge
on sources and sinks of fixed N.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sampling deployments, including station number according to Dale et
al. (2015), core ID, sampling date and coordinates. Water depth (m) recorded
by the ship's winch and bottom water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and bottom water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M; bdl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> below detection
limit: 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) measured on the CTD.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Core ID</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Date (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Latitude (S)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Longitude (W)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Depth (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Temp. (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MUC 13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13.492<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10.511<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">bdl</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MUC 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January 9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>18.704<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>17.790<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">144</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">bdl</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MUC 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23.322<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>24.181<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">253</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">bdl</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MUC 23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January 15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>27.198<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29.497<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">407</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">bdl</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MUC 17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January 13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>31.374<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>35.183<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">770</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MUC 28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">January 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>35.377<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40.975<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study area</title>
      <p>The most extensive OMZ worldwide is found in the eastern tropical south
Pacific Ocean at the central Peruvian coast
(Kamykowski and Zentara,
1990). The Peruvian OMZ ranges between 50 and 700 m water depth with
oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations below the detection limit in the mid-waters
(Stramma et al., 2008). The mean water
depth of the upper OMZ boundary deepens during intense El Niño Southern
Oscillation years and can reach a depth of 200 m
(Levin et al.,
2002) with oxygenation episodes reaching concentrations of up to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gutiérrez et
al., 2008). O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Fig. 1, Table 1) off Peru are modulated
by coastal trapped waves
(Gutiérrez et al., 2008),
trade winds (Deutsch et al., 2014) and
subtropical–tropical cells (Duteil et al., 2014),
and can vary on monthly to interannual timescales
(Gutiérrez et al., 2008).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Biogeochemical porewater profiles in MUC cores from sampling
stations along the 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S depth transect. Graphs show
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M), SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mM), sulfide (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M),
organic carbon content (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, wt %) and the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio (molar). Water
depths and bottom water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (BW O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) are
detailed on the right.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>At 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, the OMZ extends from water depths between 50 and 550 m
(Dale et al., 2015; Fig. 1). During our field work, bottom water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations varied greatly with water depth and were below the detection
limit (5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) at stations from 70 to 407 m water depth. Bottom water
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased to 19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 770 m water depth and 53 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at
1025 m water depth, indicating the increase of dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> below the
lower boundary of the OMZ (Dale et al., 2015). Between 70 and 300 m water
depth, the sediment surface was colonized by dense filamentous mats of
sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, presumably of the genera <italic>Marithioploca</italic> spp. These bacteria are able
to glide up to 1 cm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> through the sediment in order to access
hydrogen sulfide
(Fossing et al., 1995;
Jørgensen and Gallardo, 1999; Schulz, 1999). Sediments at the lower
boundary (770 and 1025 m) of the OMZ host a variety of macrofaunal
organisms,
e.g., ophiuroids, gastropods, and crustaceans (Mosch et al.,
2012).</p>
      <p>The 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S region is in the center of an extensive upwelling zone
and features high primary productivity
(Pennington et al., 2006). Sediments at
12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S have higher rates of particulate organic carbon accumulation
(2–5 times) compared to other continental margins and a high carbon burial
efficiency, indicating preferential preservation of organic matter in the
Peruvian OMZ (Dale et al., 2015). The shelf (74 m) of the Peruvian OMZ is
characterized by high sedimentation rates of 0.45 cm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
mid-waters and below the OMZ show rates between 0.07 and
0.011 cm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sampling</title>
      <p>Sediment samples were taken in January 2013 at six stations (70, 144, 253,
407, 770, and 1025 m) along a depth transect at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in the OMZ
off Peru (Fig. 1) during an expedition on RV <italic>Meteor</italic> (M92). January
represents austral summer, i.e., the low upwelling, high productivity season
in this area (Kessler, 2006). Samples were
retrieved using a TV-guided multiple corer (MUC) equipped with seven core
liners. The core liners had a length of 60 cm and an inner diameter of 10 cm. Location, water depth, temperature, and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (from Dale
et al., 2015) at the six sampling stations are listed in Table 1. Retrieved
cores for microbial rate measurements were immediately transferred to cold
rooms (4–9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) for further processing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Geochemical analyses</title>
      <p>Porewater analysis and the determination of sediment properties and
geochemical data have been previously described in detail by Dale et al. (2015). In short, the first core was subsampled under anoxic conditions
using an argon-filled glove bag, to preserve redox sensitive constituents.
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfide concentrations were analyzed on a Hitachi U2800
UV/VIS spectrophotometer using standard photometric procedures
(Grasshoff et al., 1999), while sulfate (SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were determined by ion chromatography (Methrom 761).</p>
      <p>The second replicate core was sampled to determine porosity by the weight
difference of the fresh sediment subsamples before and after freeze-drying.
Particulate organic carbon and particulate organic nitrogen contents were
analyzed using a Carlo-Erba element analyzer (NA 1500).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Benthic nitrogen fixation</title>
      <p>At each of the six stations, one MUC core was sliced in a refrigerated
container (9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in 1 cm intervals from 0 to 6 cm, in 2 cm
intervals from 6 to 10 cm, and in 5 cm intervals from 10 to 20 cm. The
acetylene reduction assay (Capone, 1993; Bertics et
al., 2013) was applied to quantify nitrogenase activity. This application is
based on the reduction of acetylene (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to ethylene
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the nitrogenase enzyme
(Dilworth, 1966;
Stewart et al., 1967; Capone, 1993). To convert from nitrogenase activity to
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, a conversion factor of 3 C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : 1 N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
applied
(Patriquin
and Knowles, 1972; Donohue et al., 1991; Orcutt et al., 2001; Capone et
al., 2005), which was previously used to measure N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in
sediments (Welsh et al.,
1996;
Bertics et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Serum vials (60 mL) were flushed with N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and filled with 10 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
sediment from each sampling depth (triplicates). The samples were flushed
again with N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, crimp sealed with butyl stoppers and injected with 5 mL
of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to saturate the nitrogenase enzyme. Serum vials were
stored in the dark at 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which reflected the average in situ
temperature along the transect (compare with Table 1). Two sets of
triplicate controls (10 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were processed for every station. Sediment
was collected from each core liner from 0 to 5, 5 to 10, and from 10 to 20 cm and placed in 60 mL serum vials. One set of controls was used to
identify natural C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production without the injection of
acetylene, and the second control set was fixed with 1 mL 37.5 %
formaldehyde solution.</p>
      <p>The increase of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in each sediment slice was measured onboard
over 1 week (in total five time points, including time zero) using gas
chromatography (Hewlett Packard 6890 Series II). From each serum vial, a 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L headspace sample was injected into the gas chromatograph and the
results were analyzed with the HP ChemStation gas chromatograph software.
The gas chromatograph was equipped with a packed column (Haye SepT, 6 ft,
3.1 mm ID, Resteck) and a flame ionization detector. The carrier gas was
helium and the combustion gases were synthetic air (20 % O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hydrogen. The column had a temperature of 75 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
the detector temperature was 160 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>Standard deviation of individual N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates was calculated from
three replicates determined per sediment depth in one multicorer. Standard
deviation of depth-integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was calculated from the three
replicate integrated rates.</p>
      <p>It should be mentioned that the incubation with C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can
potentially lead to a lack of fixed N caused by the saturation of the
nitrogenase enzyme, which leads to a reduction of cell viability and
consequently N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation (Seitzinger and Garber, 1987).
These effects are expected to cause an underestimation of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
rates. However, the acetylene reduction method is to the best of our
knowledge still the standard method for the determination of benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation (Bertics et al., 2013). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N rate determinations are not feasible in sediments, as they would
require incubation times of several weeks to months to achieve signals that
are statistically above the natural <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N abundance of
sediments.</p>
      <p>We are further aware that our samples might have experienced a potential
microbial community shift during the N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation determination, which
was shown to be driven by the addition of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fulweiler et al., 2015). Again, a community
shift would be expected to cause rather an underestimation of absolute
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Sulfate reduction rates</title>
      <p>One MUC core per station was used for determination of SR activity (same MUC
cast as for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, but different core). First, two replicate push
cores (length 30 cm, inner diameter 2.6 cm) were subsampled from one MUC
core. The actual push core length varied from 21 to 25 cm total length. Then,
6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of the carrier-free <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radio tracer
(dissolved in water, 150 kBq, specific activity 37 TBq mmol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
injected into the replicate push cores in 1 cm depth intervals according to
the whole-core injection method (Jørgensen, 1978). The
push cores were incubated for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 h at 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. After
incubation, bacterial activity was stopped by slicing the push core into
1 cm intervals and transferring each sediment layer into 50 mL plastic
centrifuge tubes filled with 20 mL zinc acetate (20 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Controls were
done in triplicates from different depths and first fixed with zinc acetate
before adding the tracer. Rates for SR were determined using the cold
chromium distillation procedure according to
Kallmeyer et al. (2004).</p>
      <p>It should be mentioned that the yielded SR rates have to be treated with
caution due to long (up to 3 half-life times of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>S) and unfrozen
storage. Storage of SR samples without freezing has recently been shown to
result in the re-oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>S-sulfides
(Røy et al., 2014). In this reaction, FeS is
converted to ZnS. The released Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and forms
reactive Fe(III). The Fe(III) oxidizes ZnS and FeS, which are the major
components of the total reduced inorganic sulfur species, resulting in the
generation of SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence an underestimation of SR rates.
However, because all SR samples in the present study were treated the same
way, we trust the relative distribution of activity along sediment depth
profiles and recognize potential underestimation of absolute rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{\textit{nifH} gene analysis}?><title><italic>nifH</italic> gene analysis</title>
      <p>Core samples for DNA analysis were retrieved from the six stations and were
sliced in the same sampling scheme as described for benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation. Approximately 5 mL sediment from each depth horizon was
transferred to plastic whirl-paks<sup>®</sup> (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, USA),
frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and transported back to the home laboratory. To
check for the presence of the <italic>nifH</italic> gene, DNA was extracted using the
FastDNA<sup>®</sup> SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, CA, USA) following
the manufacturer's instructions with a small modification. Sample
homogenization was done in a Mini-Beadbeater<sup>™</sup> (Biospec Products,
Bartlesville, USA) for 15 s. PCR amplification, including primers and
PCR conditions, was done as described by Zehr
et al. (1998), using the GoTaq kit (Promega, Fitchburg, USA) and
additionally 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L bovine serum albumin (20 mg mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fermentas).
The TopoTA Cloning<sup>®</sup> Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) was used
for cloning of PCR amplicons, according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Sanger sequencing (122 <italic>nifH</italic> sequences) was performed by the Institute of
Clinical Molecular Biology, Kiel, Germany. For the sampling sites 70, 144, 253, 407, 770, and 1025 m water depth the number of obtained
sequences was 22, 24, 24, 13, 18, and 21, respectively. Negative controls
were performed using the PCR mixture as described without template DNA; no
amplification was detected. Sequences were ClustalW aligned in MEGA 6.0
(Tamura et al., 2007), and a maximum
likelihood tree was constructed on a 321 base pair fragment and visualized
in iTOL (Letunic and Bork, 2007, 2011).
Reference sequences were obtained using BlastX on  the NCBI database.
Sequences were submitted to Genbank (Accession numbers: KU302519 –
KU302594).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p>A principle component analysis (PCA) was applied to microbial rates and
environmental parameters to determine most likely explanatory variables for
active N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation at the sampling St. 1 to 9. The deepest St. 10 was
excluded from the analysis because at this site SR rates were below the
detection limit and the PCA only allows complete datasets, which otherwise
would have resulted in the exclusion of all SR rates. Prior to PCA, the
dataset was Hellinger transformed in order to make it compatible with PCA.
The PCA was performed in R v3.0.2 by using the R package “Vegan”
(Oksanen et al., 2013) according to the approach described in
Löscher et al. (2014).</p>
      <p>For the depth profiles of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
the variables water depth (m), sediment depth (cm), sulfate reduction (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, organic carbon content (wt %), C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio (molar),
ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M), and sulfide (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) were tested. A PCA of
integrated (0–20 cm) N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
environmental parameters could not be done due to the lack of sufficient
data points.</p>
      <p>Finally, two biplots for the depth profiles were produced, which allowed
having two different views from two different angles, i.e., one biplot for
principle component 1 and 2, and one biplot for principle component 2 and 3.
These biplots graphically reveal a potential negative, positive or zero
correlation between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and the tested variables.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Sediment properties</title>
      <p>Although sediments were sampled down to the bottom of the core, the focus
here is on the 0–20 cm depth interval where benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was
investigated.</p>
      <p>Sediments at the shelf station (St.) 1 (70 m) were black between 0 and 1 cm
and then olive green until 20 cm. Only a few metazoans (polychaetes) were
observed in the surface sediment. The sediment surface was colonized by
dense filamentous mats of sulfur-oxidizing <italic>Marithioploca</italic> spp. These bacteria extended down to
a sediment depth of 36 cm. The sediment on the outer shelf St. 4 (144 m) was
dark olive green from 0 to 13 cm and dark grey until 20 cm. At St. 6 (253 m), which was located within the core of the OMZ, the sediment appeared dark
olive green between 0 and 17 cm and olive green with white patches between 17 and 20 cm. At this station, <italic>Marithioploca</italic> spp. was abundant.
Uniquely, surface sediments (0–3 cm) at St. 8 (407 m), consisted of a fluffy, dark olive-green layer mixed
with white foraminiferal ooze. This layer also contained centimeter-sized
phosphorite nodules with several perforations (ca. 1–3 mm in diameter).
Below 2 cm, the sediment consisted of a dark olive green, sticky clay layer.
No <italic>Marithioploca</italic> mats were found here. St. 9 (770 m) was below the OMZ, and sediments
were brown to dark olive green with white particles between 0 and 12 cm, and
brown to olive green without white particles below this depth. Organisms
such as anemones, copepods, shrimps and various mussels were visible with
the TV-guided MUC and in the sediment cores. The deepest St. (10; 1025 m)
had dark olive green sediment from 0 to 20 cm and black patches from 17 to 20 cm. The sediment was slightly sandy and was colonized with polychaete
tubes at the surface and organisms that were also present at St. 9. For
further sediment core descriptions see also Dale et al. (2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sediment profiles of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation (nmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, average of three replicates) and sulfate reduction rates (SR,
nmol SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, two replicates; R1 and R2) from 0 to 20 cm at the six stations. The upper <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents the N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation,
while the lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents the SR. Error bars indicate standard
deviation of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Integrated nitrogen fixation (mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, grey bars,
average of three replicates) and integrated sulfate reduction (mmol
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, green bars, two replicates) from 0 to 20 cm, including dissolved inorganic carbon flux (DIC, mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
red curve from Dale et al., 2015) and bottom water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M,
blue curve) along the depth transect (m). Error bars indicate standard
deviation of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Geochemical porewater profiles of NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sulfide,
organic carbon content, and organic C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio between 0 and 20 cm at the six
stations are shown in Fig. 2. In all cores, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
increased with sediment depth. The highest NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was
reached at St. 1 (70 m), increasing from 316 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M in the upper cm to
2022 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 20 cm. St. 4 and 6 showed intermediate NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations between 300 and 800 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 20 cm,
respectively. At St. 8 (407 m) the NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration increased
from 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at the surface to 107 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 20 cm. The two deep
stations (St. 9 and 10) had the lowest NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with 33 and 22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 20 m sediment depth, respectively.</p>
      <p>The SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations remained relatively constant in the
surface sediments along the transect. A decrease was only observed at St. 1;
from 28.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M in the surface layer to 19.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 20 cm. In
parallel with the decrease in SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, only St. 1 revealed
considerable porewater sulfide accumulation, whereby sulfide increased from
280 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at the surface sediment to 1229 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 20 cm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Integrated nitrogen fixation (mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, grey
bars, average of three replicates), average organic carbon content
(C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, wt %, orange curve) and the average C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N molar ratio (yellow
curve) from 0 to 20 cm along the depth transect (m). Error bars indicate
standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Organic carbon content decreased with increasing sediment depth at St. 1 (70 m), 9 (770 m), and 10 (1025 m). The highest surface organic carbon content
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 wt %) was found at St. 6, whereas the lowest
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 wt %) was detected at the deep St. 10. The average (0–20 cm) organic carbon content (Fig. 5) increased from St. 1 to St. 6
(15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7 wt %) and decreased from St. 6 to the lowest value at St. 10
(2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 wt %).</p>
      <p>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios, as a proxy for the freshness of the organic matter, increased
with increasing sediment depth (Fig. 5). The lowest surface C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio (6.2)
was measured at the shallow St. 1, while the highest surface C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio (11)
was found at St. 10.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Benthic nitrogen fixation and sulfate reduction</title>
      <p>For a straightforward comparison of SR rates with benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
only the sediment depths between 0 and 20 cm are considered. Sediment depth
profiles are expressed as N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, that is, with the conversion
factor of 3 C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : 1 N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Highest N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR rates were detected in the surface sediments
(0–5 cm) and both rates tended to decrease with increasing sediment depth
(Fig. 3). N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR rates were high at St. 1, 4, and 6 (70,
144, 253 m) and lowest at the deeper St. 8–10 (407, 770, 1025m).</p>
      <p>At St. 1, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR rates showed different trends in the top
layer of the cores, but depth profiles were more aligned below. Although St.
1 had the highest SR rates of all sites, reaching 248 nmol SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0–1 cm, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was not highest at this
station. At St. 4 (144 m), both N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR revealed peaks close
to the surface. N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation decreased between 0 and 8 cm and increased
below 8 cm. This increase was not observed in SR rates, which were highest
at the surface (181 nmol SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreased
towards the bottom of the core. St. 6 (253 m) had the highest N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation of all stations, with rates of 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 nmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface centimeter. Yet, although N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
and SR had overlapping activity profiles, the highest SR rate of all
stations was not detected at St. 6. Very low N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates were
measured at St. 8 (407 m; 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 nmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the surface), as well as very low SR rates (0–4.3 nmol SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As mentioned, this station was unique due to the
presence of foraminiferal ooze, phosphorite nodules and a sticky clay layer
below 2 cm. N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR rates showed a peak at 5 and at 7 cm,
respectively. At St. 9 (770 m) N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was low in the surface and
at 20 cm sediment depth, with a peak in activity at 4–5 cm (0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 nmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At St. 10 (1025 m), N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
rates were low throughout the sediment core, not exceeding 0.16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 nmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This site had the lowest organic carbon
content throughout the core (between 2.6 wt % at the surface and 1.9 wt % at 20 cm), as well as low NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. At St. 9
(below 9 cm depth) and St. 10 (entire core) SR rates were below detection,
which could point either to the absence of SR or to the complete loss of
total reduced inorganic sulfur due to the long, unfrozen storage (see
methods).</p>
      <p>Integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation (0–20 cm) increased from St. 1 to St. 6, with
the highest rate (0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at St. 6 (253 m), and decreased from St. 6 (407 m) to St. 10 (1025 m; Fig. 4). Integrated
SR rates (0 to 20 cm) ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 mmol SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at St. 1 to below detection at St. 9 (Fig. 4).
Overall, integrated SR rates decreased with increasing water depth.
Integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates and SR were in general inversely
correlated between St. 1 and St. 6, and followed the organic carbon content
from St. 1 to St. 6 (70–253 m; Fig. 5). Both parameters had the highest
value at St. 6. This pattern did not hold for the relatively low integrated
SR rate at St. 6. The C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio, averaged over 20 cm, increased with
increasing water depth (Fig. 5). Regarding the three deep stations, the
lowest integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rate (0.008 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002 N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected at St. 8 (407 m). Also the integrated SR
rate was low at this site (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.46 mmol SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At St. 9 and 10 (770 and 1025 m), integrated
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was low at 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.005 and 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001 N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and integrated SR
rates were also lowest at St. 9 (770 m). From St. 8 to 10 a decrease of
integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR together with the average organic carbon
content was detected.</p>
      <p>No activity was detected in controls for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p>The PCA of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation depth profiles (Fig. 6a and b) showed a weak
positive correlation with sulfate reduction rates (Fig. 6a) and a strong
positive correlation between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and the organic matter content
in sediments (Fig. 6b). A negative correlation between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and
sediment depth (Fig. 6a), as well as between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and sulfide
concentration for St. 1 (Fig. 6b) was found. Furthermore, a weak negative
correlation was detected between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio (Fig. 6a). No correlation was found between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and ammonium
concentration and water depth (Fig. 6a and b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Molecular analysis of the \textit{nifH} gene}?><title>Molecular analysis of the <italic>nifH</italic> gene</title>
      <p>Sequences for the <italic>nifH</italic> gene analysis were pooled for each of the six stations,
making about 20 sequences per sample and 120 in total. <italic>NifH</italic> gene sequences were
detected at all six sampling sites and clustered with Cluster I
proteobacterial sequences and Cluster III sequences as defined by
Zehr and Turner (2001)
(Fig. 7). In Cluster I and Cluster III, three and seven novel clades were
detected, respectively. In general, most of the previously unidentified
clades belonged to uncultured bacteria. One distinct novel clade was found
for St. 1–6. No Cluster I cyanobacterial <italic>nifH</italic> sequences were detected and no
potential PCR contaminants were present
(Turk et al., 2011). Sequences
clustered with only one identified sulfate-reducing bacterium, <italic>Desulfonema limicola</italic> (Fukui et
al., 1999, OMZ 253). Other sequences from several stations (OMZ 70, 144,
253, 770) were distantly related to <italic>Desulfovibrio vulgaris</italic>
(Riederer-Henderson and Wilson, 1970; Muyzer
and Stams, 2008). One cluster (OMZ 144 m) was closely related to the
anaerobic marine bacterium <italic>Vibrio diazotrophicus</italic> (Guerinot
et al., 1982). Other organisms with which OMZ sequences clustered belonged
to the genera of fermenting bacteria, namely <italic>Clostridium beijerincki</italic> (Chen, 2005),  and
to the genera of iron-reducing bacteria, namely <italic>Geobacter bemidjiensis</italic> (Nevin et
al., 2005). In addition, several sequences were phylogenetically related to
a gamma proteobacterium
(Zehr and Turner, 2001)
from the Pacific Ocean.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Principle component analysis (PCA) from two different angles of
Hellinger transformed data of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and environmental parameters
along vertical profiles. Correlation biplots <bold>(a)</bold> of principle
components 1 and 2 and of <bold>(b)</bold> principle components 2 and 3 in a
multidimensional space are shown. Samples are displayed as dots while
variables are displayed as lines. Parameters pointing into the same
direction are positively related; parameters pointing in the opposite
direction are negatively related.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Phylogenetic tree of <italic>nifH</italic> genes based on the analysis of 122 sequences
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 sequences per sample) from the six sampling stations
between 70 and 1025 m water depth. Novel detected clusters consisting of
several sequences from the same sampling depth are indicated by grey
triangles. Reference sequences consist of the alternative nitrogenase <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Cluster III sequences as defined by Zehr and Turner (2001) are
highlighted in blue; Cluster I cyanobacterial sequences are highlighted in
green and Cluster I proteobacterial sequences are highlighted in orange. The
scale bar indicates the 10 % sequences divergence. Sequences marked with
an asterisk represent potential PCR contaminated products, with novel
clusters distant from those clusters. Sequences determined in this study are
termed OMZ plus the corresponding water depth.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4065/2016/bg-13-4065-2016-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Coupling of benthic nitrogen fixation and sulfate reduction</title>
      <p>Based on the high organic matter input to Peruvian sediments underneath the
OMZ we hypothesized a presence of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and its coupling to
sulfate reduction (SR). We confirmed the presence of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in
sediments at all sampled stations along the depth transect. N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
activity was often enhanced where SR peaked and sometimes both activity
depth profiles revealed similar trends. However, while peaks in SR were very
pronounced, maximum N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation showed a much broader distribution over
depth. These findings are in line with the PCA of depth profiles, which
revealed a weak positive correlation between activities of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
and sulfate reduction. But it should be kept in mind that the N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation and SR were determined in replicate MUC cores, which were taken up
to 50 cm apart, depending on where the core liners were situated in the
multicorer. Nonetheless, it appears that the observed N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation is
not exclusively fueled by SR activity.</p>
      <p>The coupling between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR has been previously suggested
for coastal sediments off California, where N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation significantly
decreased when SR was inhibited
(Bertics and Ziebis, 2010). Different
studies confirmed that sulfate-reducing bacteria, such as <italic>Desulfovibrio vulgaris </italic>can supply
organic-rich marine sediments with bioavailable N through N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
(Welsh et al., 1996;
Nielsen et al., 2001; Steppe and
Paerl, 2002; Fulweiler et al., 2007;
Bertics et al., 2013;
Fulweiler et al., 2013). Fulweiler et al. (2013) conducted a study in sediments of the Narrangaset Bay and found
several <italic>nifH</italic> genes related to sulfate-reducing bacteria, such as <italic>Desulfovibrio</italic> spp.,
<italic>Desulfobacter</italic> spp. and <italic>Desulfonema</italic> spp., suggesting that sulfate-reducing bacteria were the dominant
diazotrophs.</p>
      <p>The more surprising finding in this study is that integrated rates of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR showed opposite trends at the three shallowest
stations, pointing to potential environmental control mechanisms (see Sect. 5.2).
Overall, these findings indicate that N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation might be partly
coupled to processes other than SR or that the two processes are controlled
by different parameters. The <italic>nifH</italic> gene sequence analyses indicated only a weak
potential of sulfate reducers to conduct N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in the Peruvian
sediments. Sequences clustered only with the sulfate-reducing bacteria
<italic>Desulfonema limicola</italic> (Fukui et al., 1999) exclusively at the 253 m Station. <italic>D. limicola</italic> is known from other
benthic environments through <italic>nifH</italic> gene analyses
(Mussmann
et al., 2005; Bertics et al., 2010, 2013). A distant relation to the
confirmed diazotrophic sulfate reducer <italic>Desulfovibrio vulgaris</italic> (Sisler and ZoBell, 1951;
Riederer-Henderson and Wilson, 1970) was detected at several
stations. <italic>D. limicola</italic> and <italic>D. vulgaris</italic>  clustered with sequences taken from the seasonally hypoxic
Eckernförde Bay in the Baltic Sea (Bertics et al., 2013), suggesting a
major involvement of these sulfate-reducing bacteria in N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in
organic-rich sediments. Further, sequences related to
<italic>Vibrio</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were detected, which has the unique ability for a known
<italic>Vibrio</italic> species to perform N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and which was found previously in the
water column of the OMZ off Peru
(Fernandez et al., 2011;
Löscher et al., 2014). Interestingly, we detected several new <italic>nifH</italic> gene
clusters in the Peruvian OMZ that have not been identified yet and which
have, consequently, yet unknown metabolic processes (Fig. 7). Thus, a
coupling of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation to processes other than SR is also possible,
which might also explain some of the discrepancies between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
and SR activity (see above). However, the coupling to heterotrophic
metabolic processes such as denitrification or methanogenesis was not
supported by our molecular data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Environmental factors controlling benthic N${}_{{2}}$ fixation}?><title>Environmental factors controlling benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation</title>
      <p>The observed differences between integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR along
the depth transect indicate potential environmental factors that control the
extent of benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation, which will be discussed in the following
section.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Organic matter</title>
      <p>A major driver for microbial processes such as SR and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation by
potentially heterotrophic organisms is the availability of the organic
material
(Jørgensen,
1983; Howarth et al., 1988; Fulweiler et al., 2007).
Integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and average organic carbon content showed
similar trends along the Peruvian OMZ depth transect (Fig. 5), and a strong
positive correlation was detected by PCA in the sediment depth profiles
(Fig. 6). Thus, organic matter availability appears to be a major factor
controlling N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation at this study site. Low organic matter content
was previously shown to result in low N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates in slope
sediments in the Atlantic Ocean (Hartwig and
Stanley, 1978). Correlation to organic matter was further confirmed by the
study of Bertics et al. (2010), which showed that burrow
systems of the bioturbating ghost shrimp <italic>Neotrypaea californiensis</italic> can lead to enhanced organic
matter availability in deeper sediment layers, resulting in high rates of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation. However, high organic matter availability does not always
result in enhanced N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates. Subtidal sediments in the
Narragansett Bay were found to switch from being a net sink via
denitrification to being a net source of bioavailable N via N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
(Fulweiler et al., 2007). This switch was caused by
a decrease of organic matter deposition to the sediments, which was in turn
triggered by low primary productivity in the surface waters.</p>
      <p>Besides quantity also the quality of organic matter in sediments is a major
factor influencing microbial degradation processes
(Westrich and Berner, 1984). In the Peruvian OMZ
sediments, the average C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio increased with water depth indicating that
the shallow stations received a higher input of fresh, labile organic
material compared to the deeper stations. Similar trends were reported for a
different depth transect off Peru
(Levin et al.,
2002). The C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios did not follow the pattern of integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation (Fig. 5), which is in line with the PCA of depth profiles, which
showed a weak negative correlation between N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N
ratio. These results indicate that the C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratio is not a major factor
controlling N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in Peruvian OMZ sediments.</p>
      <p>DIC fluxes, which were determined in benthic chamber lander incubations at
the same stations and during the same expedition as our study (Dale et al.,
2015), can be used as an indicator for organic matter degradation rates,
e.g., by SR. The DIC flux did not follow the pattern of the integrated
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates (Fig. 4) and thus does not indicate that N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation and SR are coupled. Instead, the benthic DIC flux roughly followed
the pattern of SR rates along the depth transect. The highest integrated SR
rate and DIC flux were found at St. 1 (70 m), whereas the lowest occurred at
St. 10 (1025 m). Assuming that SR is largely responsible for organic matter
remineralization in the sediments below the OMZ (Bohlen et al., 2011; Dale
et al., 2015), the difference between integrated SR and DIC flux is expected
to be mainly caused by the loss of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>S-sulfides during the long
duration of unfrozen storage of the SR samples (see methods).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Ammonium</title>
      <p>Interestingly, the highest N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was measured in sediments
colonized by the sulfur-oxidizing and nitrate-reducing filamentous bacteria
<italic>Marithioploca</italic> spp. (Schulz, 1999; Schulz and
Jørgensen, 2001;
Gutiérrez et al., 2008; Salman et al., 2011; Mosch et al., 2012).
<italic>Marithioploca</italic> facilitates dissimilatory NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction to NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
preserves fixed N in the form of NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the environment
(Kartal
et al., 2007). OMZ sediments off Peru are generally rich in NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Bohlen
et al., 2011; Dale et al., 2016). This co-occurrence of <italic>Marithioploca</italic> and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation was puzzling since high concentrations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
expected to inhibit N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
(Postgate,
1982; Capone, 1988; Knapp, 2012). It remains questionable why microorganisms
should fix N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in marine sediments, when reduced N species are abundant.
Some doubt remains as to the critical NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration that
inhibits N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and whether the inhibitory effect is the same for
all environments
(Knapp,
2012). For example, NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations up to 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M did
not fully suppress benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in a hypoxic basin in the Baltic
Sea (Bertics et al., 2013), indicating that
additional environmental factors must control the distribution and
performance of benthic diazotrophs
(Knapp,
2012). We observed high porewater NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at the
shallow St. 1 with 316 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at the sediment surface (0–1 cm)
increasing to 2022 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 20 cm (Fig. 2), while no inhibition of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was found. This observation is verified by the PCA, which
showed no correlation with ammonium for the N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation depth profiles.
Hence, ammonium did not seem to have a significant influence on benthic
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates in the Peruvian OMZ.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Integrated rates of benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation (mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Peruvian OMZ sediments from this study compared to other
marine benthic environments. Only the highest and lowest integrated rates
are shown, as well as the integrated sediment depth (cm) and the method used
(ARA <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> acetylene reduction assay, MIMS <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> membrane inlet mass spectrometry).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Benthic environment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depth of integration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Method</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(cm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Peru OMZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01–0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coastal region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Baltic Sea, hypoxic basin</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.08–0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Bertics et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bioturbated coastal lagoon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.8–8.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Bertics et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Brackish-water</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03–3.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Andersson et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coral reef</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.09 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.62)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Capone (1983)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Eelgrass meadow</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15–0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cole and McGlathery (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Eutrophic estuary</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MIMS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Rao and Charette (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mangrove</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–1.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Lee and Joye (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salt marsh</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.38 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.41)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Capone (1983)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Subtidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.6–15.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MIMS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Fulweiler et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zostera estuary</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Capone (1983)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Open ocean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic Ocean (2800 m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.00008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Howarth et al. (1988)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">&lt; 200 m, various sites</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Capone (1983)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mauritania OMZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05–0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ARA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Bertics and Treude, unpubl.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>One debated explanation for why diazotrophs still fix N under high
NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is that bacteria fix N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to remove
excess electrons and to preserve their intracellular redox state,
particularly with a deficient Calvin–Benson–Bassham pathway, as shown for
photoheterotrophic nonsulfur purple bacteria
(Tichi and Tabita, 2000). Another
explanation could be that microniches, depleted in NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exist
between sediment grains, which we were unable to track with the applied
porewater extraction techniques (Bertics et al.,
2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Sulfide</title>
      <p>Sulfide is a known inhibitor for many biological processes
(Reis, et al., 1992; Joye and Hollibaugh,
1995) and could potentially affect N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation (Tam
et al., 1982). The shallow St. 1 was the only station with sulfide in the
porewater, reaching 280 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M in surface sediments and 1229 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M in
20 cm (Fig. 2). The presence of relatively high concentrations of sulfide at
St. 1 might explain why N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation was lower at this site when
compared to St. 6, which had the highest N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates.
Statistically, depth profiles of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and sulfide showed a
negative correlation (Fig. 6b). Generally, interactions of sulfide with
benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation have so far not been investigated, and the PCA did
not provide a complete pattern, as sulfide was not widespread in the
sediments along the transect and thus does not allow robust interpretation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Oxygen</title>
      <p>Dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can have a considerable influence on N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation due
to the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity of the key enzyme nitrogenase
(Postgate, 1998; Dixon and Kahn, 2004).
Bioturbating and bioirrigating organisms can transport O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> much deeper
into sediments than molecular diffusion
(Orsi
et al., 1996; Dale et al., 2011). In coastal waters, the bioturbation and
bioirrigation activity of ghost shrimps was found to reduce N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
when sediments were highly colonized by these animals
(Bertics et al., 2010). While bottom water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the Peruvian OMZ were below the detection limit at St. 1
to 8 (70 to 407 m), thereby mainly excluding benthic macrofauna, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations increased to above 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at St. 10 (1025 m) where a
diverse bioturbating and bioirrigating benthic macrofauna community was
observed (Mosch et al., 2012). Accordingly, St. 10 revealed some of the
lowest N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation activity. We speculate that the low organic matter
content at this St. was mainly responsible for the low N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
rates and not the high bottom water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, as the
statistics showed a positive correlation between integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
and organic carbon content.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of benthic N${}_{{2}}$ fixation in different environments}?><title>Comparison of benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation in different environments</title>
      <p>We compiled a list of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates from different marine
sedimentary environments to gain an overview of the magnitude of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation rates measured in the Peruvian OMZ sediments (Table 2). We found
that N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates from the Peruvian sediments exceed those
reported for open ocean sediments (2800 m; Howarth et al.,
1988), bioturbated coastal lagoon sediment (Bertics et
al., 2010) and sediments &gt; 200 m water depth from various sites
worldwide (Capone, 1988). The highest integrated N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation rate determined in our study (0.4 mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, St. 6)
closely resembles highest rates found in salt marshes (0.38 mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Zostera estuarine sediments (0.39 mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Capone, 1988). Further, our rates were characterized by a
similar range of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates that were previously measured in an
organic-rich hypoxic basin in the Baltic Sea (0.08–0.22 mmol N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Bertics et al., 2013). In contrast to
the above examples, our N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates were 8.5 times lower compared
to shallow (&lt; 1 m) soft-bottom sediment off the Swedish coast
(Andersson et al., 2014) and 17 times lower than coral reef
sediments (Capone, 1988). However, in these environments,
phototrophic cyanobacterial mats contributed to benthic N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation.
Given the dark incubation, N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation of the present study seems to be
attributed to heterotrophic diazotrophs, which is additionally confirmed by
the <italic>nifH</italic> gene analysis, where none of the sequences clustered with cyanobacteria
(Fig. 7).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study combining N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation and SR rate measurements together with molecular analysis in OMZ
sediments. We have shown that N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation occurred throughout the
sediment and that activity often overlapped with SR. The PCA showed a weak
positive correlation between activity depth profiles of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and
SR. The molecular analysis of the <italic>nifH</italic> gene confirmed the
presence of heterotrophic diazotrophs at all sampling sites, but only a few
of the sequences were related to known sulfate reducers. Instead, many
sequences clustered with uncultured organisms. In combination, our results
indicate that N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation and SR were coupled to some extent, but
additional coupling to other metabolic pathways is very likely. The major
environmental factor controlling benthic diazotrophs in the OMZ appears to
be the organic matter content. Sulfide was identified as a potential
inhibitor for N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation. We further found no inhibition of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation by high NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, highlighting gaps in our
understanding of the relationship between NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability and
the stimulation of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation. N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation rates determined in
the Peruvian OMZ sediments were in the same range of other organic-rich
benthic environments, underlining the relation between organic matter,
heterotrophic activity, and N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Jessica Gier and Tina Treude collected samples and designed experiments. Jessica Gier performed
nitrogen fixation experiments and Tina Treude conducted sulfate reduction
experiments. Stefan Sommer and Andrew W. Dale measured porosity, DIC, organic carbon
content and C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Jessica Gier, Tina Treude, Carolin R. Löscher and Stefan Sommer analyzed the data. Jessica Gier
and Carolin R. Löscher performed molecular analysis and statistical analysis. Jessica Gier
prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors and Tina Treude
supervised the work.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank the captain and the crew of the RV <italic>Meteor</italic> cruise M92,
as well as S. Kriwanek, A. Petersen and S. Cherednichenko of the GEOMAR
Technology and Logistics Center, for all of their assistance in field
sampling. We also thank B. Domeyer, A. Bleyer, U. Lomnitz, R. Suhrberg, S. Trinkler and V. Thoenissen for geochemical analyses. Additional thanks goes
to the members of the Treude and Schmitz-Streit working groups, especially
V. Bertics for her methological guidance, G. Schuessler, P. Wefers, N. Pinnow, and B. Mensch for their laboratory assistance and to J. Maltby and
S. Krause for scientific discussions. We further thank the authorities of
Peru for the permission to work in their territorial waters. We thank the
editor and three reviewers for their valuable comments. This study is a
contribution of the Sonderforschungsbereich 754 “Climate – Biogeochemistry
Interactions in the Tropical Ocean” (<uri>www.sfb754.de</uri>), which is supported by
the German Research Foundation. Further funding was provided by the European
Union under the H2020 framework package (Marie Curie grant to Carolin R. Löscher, grant # 704272).
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication  were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: K. Küsel<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: L. Riemann and D. Ionescu</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, B., Sundbäck, K., Hellman, M., Hallin, S., and Alsterberg, C.:
Nitrogen fixation in shallow-water sediments: Spatial distribution
and controlling factors, Limnol. Oceanogr., 59,  1932–1944,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bertics, V. J. and Ziebis, W.: Bioturbation and the role of
microniches for sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments,
Environ. Microbiol., 12.  3022–3034, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bertics, V. J., Sohm, J., Treude, T., Chow, C., Capone, D., Fuhrman, J., and
Ziebis, W.: Burrowing deeper into benthic nitrogen cycling: the
impact of bioturbation on nitrogen fixation coupled to sulfate reduction,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 409,  1–15, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bertics, V. J., Löscher, C. R., Salonen, I., Dale, A. W., Gier, J., Schmitz, R. A., and Treude, T.:
Occurrence of benthic microbial nitrogen fixation coupled to sulfate reduction in the seasonally hypoxic Eckernförde Bay,
Baltic Sea, Biogeosciences, 10, 1243–1258, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1243-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1243-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bohlen, L., Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Mosch, T., Hensen, C., Noffke, A.,
Scholz, F., and Wallmann, K.: Benthic nitrogen cycling traversing the
Peruvian oxygen minimum zone, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 75,  6094–6111, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brandes, J. A. and Devol, A. H.: A global marine-fixed nitrogen
isotopic budget: Implications for Holocene nitrogen cycling, Global Biogeochem. Cy. 16, 1–14, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brandes, A., Devol, A. H., and Deutsch, C.: New developments in the
marine nitrogen cycle, Chem. Rev. 107,  577–89, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: Benthic nitrogen fixation, in:  Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, edited by:  Carpenter,  E. J. and Capone, D. G.,
New York: John Wiley, and Sons Ltd,  85–123, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: Benthic Nitrogen Fixation, in: Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine environments, edited by:  Blackburn, T. H. and Sorensen, J.,
John Wiley, and Sons Ltd,  85–123, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: Determination of nitrogenase activity in aquatic
samples using the acetylene reduction procedure, in: Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology,  edited by:
Kemp, P. F.,
Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B., and Coles, J. J., Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC,
621–631, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G., Burns, J. A., Montoya, J. P., Subramaniam, A., Mahaffey, C.,
Gunderson, T., Michaels, A. F., and Carpenter, E. J.: Nitrogen fixation
by Trichodesmium spp.: An important source of new nitrogen to the tropical
and subtropical North Atlantic Ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19,  1–17, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G., Bronk, A. A., Mulholland, M. R., and Carpenter, E. J.:
Nitrogen in the marine environmen, 2nd Edn. Elsevier, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J.-S.: Nitrogen Fixation in the Clostridia, in:   Genetics and Regulation of Nitrogen Fixation in Free-Living Bacteria, Nitrogen Fixation:
Origins, Applications, and Research Progress, edited by: Klipp, W., Masepohl, B., Gallon, J. R., and Newton, W. E., Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic
Publishers,  53–64, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Codispoti, L. A.: An oceanic fixed nitrogen sink exceeding 400 Tg N a<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> vs the concept of homeostasis in the
fixed-nitrogen inventory, Biogeosciences, 4, 233–253, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-233-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-233-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, L. W. and McGlathery, K. J.:  Nitrogen fixation in restored
eelgrass meadows, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 448, 235–246, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Bohlen, L., Treude, T., Bertics, V. J., Bange, H. W.,
Pfannkuche, O., Schorp, T., Mattsdotter, M., and Wallmann, K.:  Rates
and regulation of nitrogen cycling in seasonally hypoxic sediments during
winter (Boknis Eck, SW Baltic Sea): Sensitivity to environmental variables,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 95,   14–28, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Lomnitz, U., Montes, I., Treude, T., Liebetrau, V., Gier, J., Hensen, C., Dengler, M., Stolpovsky, K.,
Bryant, L. D., and Wallmann, K.: Organic carbon production, mineralisation and preservation on the Peruvian margin, Biogeosciences,
12, 1537–1559, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1537-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-1537-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Lomnitz, U., Bourbonnais, A., and Wallmann, K.:
Biological nitrate transport in sediments on the Peruvian margin
mitigates benthic sulfide emissions and drives pelagic N loss during
stagnation events, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 112,  123–136, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dekaezemacker, J., Bonnet, S., Grosso, O., Moutin, T., Bressac, M., and
Capone, D. G.: Evidence of active dinitrogen fixation in surface
waters of the eastern tropical South Pacific during El Niño and La
Niña events and evaluation of its potential nutrient controls, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 27,
768–779, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Deutsch, C., Berelson, W., Thunell, R., Weber, T., Tems, C., McManus, J.,
Crusius, J., Ito, T., Baumgartner, T., Ferreira, V., Mey, J., and van Geen,
A.:  Centennial changes in North Pacific anoxia linked to tropical
trade winds, Science, 345,   665–668, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Dilworth, M. J.: Acetylene reduction by nitrogen-fixing preparations
from Clostridium pasteurianum, Biochim. Biophys. Ac. 127,  285–294, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Dixon, R. and Kahn, D.: Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen
fixation, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2,  621–631, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Donohue, M. J. O., Moriarty, D. J. W., and Rae, I. C.: Nitrogen
Fixation in Sediments and the Rhizosphere of the Seagrass Zostera
capricorni, Microbiol. Ecol., 22,  53–64, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Duteil, O., Böning, C. W., and Oschlies, A.: Variability in
subtropical-tropical cells drives oxygen levels in the tropical Pacific
Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,  1–9, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., and Smetacek, V.: Biogeochemical
Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production, Science, 281,
200–207, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Farnelid, H., Andersson, A. F., Bertilsson, S., Al-Soud, W. A., Hansen, L. H.,
Sørensen, S., Steward, G. F., Hagström, Å., and Riemann, L.:
Nitrogenase gene amplicons from global marine surface waters are
dominated by genes of non-cyanobacteria, PloS One, 6,  1–9, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fernandez, C., Farías, L., and Ulloa, O.: Nitrogen fixation in denitrified marine waters, PloS one, 6, 1–9, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Fernandez, C., González, M.L., Muñoz, C., Molina, V., and Farias, L.:
Temporal and spatial variability of biological nitrogen fixation off
the upwelling system of central Chile (35–38.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
120,  3330–3349, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H., Gallardo, V. A., Jørgensen, B. B., Hüttel, M., Nielsen,
L. P., Schulz, H., Canfield, D. E., Forster, S., Glud, R. N., Gundersen, J. K.,
Küver, J., Ramsing, N. B., Teske, A., Thamdrup, B., and Ulloa, O.:
Concentration and transport of nitrate by the mat-forming sulphur bacterium
Thioploca, Nature, 374,  713–715, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fuenzalida, R., Schneider, W., Garces-Vargas, J., Bravo, L., and Lange, C.:
Vertical and horizontal extension of the oxygen minimum zone in the
eastern South Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 992–1008, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Fukui, M., Teske, A., Assmus, B., Muyzer, G., and Widdel, F.:
Physiology, phylogenetic relationships, and ecology of filamentous
sulfate-reducing bacteria (genus desulfonema), Arch. Microbiol., 172,  193–203, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R., Brown, S., Nixon, S., and Jenkins, B.: Evidence and a
conceptual model for the cooccurrence of nitrogen fixation and
denitrification in heterotrophic marine sediments, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 482,  57–68, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R. W., Nixon, S. W., Buckley, B. A., and Granger, S. L.:
Reversal of the net dinitrogen gas flux in coastal marine sediments,
Nature, 448,  180–182, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R. W., Heiss, E. M., Rogener, M. K., Newell, S. E., LeCleir, G. R.,
Kortebein, S. M., and Wilhelm, S. W.:  Examining the impact of acetylene
on N-fixation and the active sediment microbial community, Front. Microbiol.,
6,
1–9, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Glock, N., Schönfeld, J., Eisenhauer, A., Hensen, C., Mallon, J., and Sommer, S.: The role of benthic foraminifera in
the benthic nitrogen cycle of the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone, Biogeosciences, 10, 4767–4783, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4767-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-4767-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Kremlingl, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of Seawater Analysis, 3rd Edn.,
Weinheim, Wiley–VCH, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Großkopf, T., Mohr, W., Baustian, T., Schunck, H., Gill, D., Kuypers,
M. M. M., Lavik, G., Schmitz, R. A., Wallace, D. W. R., and LaRoche, J.:
Doubling of marine dinitrogen-fixation rates based on direct measurements,
Nature, 488, 1–4, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, N.: The dynamics of the marine nitrogen cycle and its
influence on atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, in:
Carbon Climate interactions, edited by:  Oguz, T. and Follows, M., 97–148, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N.: The Marine Nitrogen Cycle?, in: Overview and Challenges, edited
by:
Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A., Mulholland, M. R., and Carpenter, E. J.,
Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1–50, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Guerinot, M. L., West, P. A., Lee, J. V., and Colwell, R. R.: Vibrio
diazotrophicus sp. nov., a Marine Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterium, Int. J. Syst.
Bacteriol.,
32,
350–357, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Gutiérrez, D., Enríquez, E., Purca, S., Quipúzcoa, L.,
Marquina, R., Flores, G., and Graco, M.: Oxygenation episodes on the
continental shelf of central Peru: Remote forcing and benthic ecosystem
response, Prog. Oceanogr. 79,  177–189, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hartwig, E. O. and Stanley, S. O.: Nitrogen fixation in Atlantic
deep-sea and coastal sediments, Deep-Sea Res., 25,  411–417, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Howarth, R. W., Marino, R., Lane, J., and Cole, J. J.: Nitrogen
fixation in freshwater, estuarine, and marine ecosystems, 1. Rates and
importance, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33,  669–687, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: A comparison of methods for the quantification of
bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments, Geomicrobiol. J., 1,  11–27, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: SCOPE 21 – The Major Biogeochemical Cycles and Their Interactions, Processes at the Sediment-Water Interface, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B. and Gallardo, V. A.:  Thioploca spp.: filamentous
sulfur bacteria with nitrate vacuoles, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 28,  301–313, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Joye, S. B. and Hollibaugh, J. T.: Influence of sulfide inhibition of
nitrification on nitrogen regeneration in sediments, Sciences, 270,  623–625, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kallmeyer, J., Ferdelman, T. G., Weber, A., Fossing, H., and Jørgensen,
B. B.: Evaluation of a cold chromium distillation procedure for
recovering very small amounts of radiolabeled sulfide related to sulfate
reduction measurements, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Methods, 2, 171–180, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kamykowski, D. and Zentara, S.-J.: Hypoxia in the world ocean as
recorded in the historical data set, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 37,  1861–1874, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Kartal, B., Kuypers, M. M. M., Lavik, G., Schalk, J., Op den Camp, H. J. M.,
Jetten, M. S. M., and Strous, M.: Anammox bacteria disguised as
denitrifiers: nitrate reduction to dinitrogen gas via nitrite and ammonium,
Environ. Microbiol., 9,  635–642, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, W. S.: The circulation of the eastern tropical Pacific: A
review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69,  181–217, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Knapp, A. N.: The sensitivity of marine N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation to dissolved
inorganic nitrogen, Front. Microbiol. 3,  1–14, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, R. Y. and Joye, S. B.: Seasonal patterns of nitrogen fixation
and rdenitrification in oceanic mangrove habitats, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
307,
127–141, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Letunic, I. and Bork, P.: Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): An online
tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation, Bioinformatics, 23,  127–128, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Letunic, I. and Bork, P.: Interactive Tree of Life v2: Online
annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy, Nucl. Acids Res., 39, 1–4, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Levin, L., Gutierrez, D., Rathburn, A., Neira, C., Sellanes, J., Munoz, P.,
Gallardo, V., and Salamanca, M.: Benthic processes on the Peru
margin: a transect across the oxygen minimum zone during the 1997–98 El
Nino, Prog. Oceanogr., 53,  1–27, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Löscher, C. R., Großkopf, T., Desai, F. D., Gill, D., Schunck, H.,
Croot, P. L., Schlosser, C., Neulinger, S. C., Pinnow, N., Lavik, G., Kuypers,
M. M. M., Laroche, J., and Schmitz, R. A.: Facets of diazotrophy in the
oxygen minimum zone waters off Peru, ISME J., 8, 1–13, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Mosch, T., Sommer, S., Dengler, M., Noffke, A., Bohlen, L., Pfannkuche, O.,
Liebetrau, V., and Wallmann, K.: Factors influencing the distribution
of epibenthic megafauna across the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt.
I,
68,
123–135, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Mussmann, M., Ishii, K., Rabus, R., and Amann, R.: Diversity and
vertical distribution of cultured and uncultured Deltaproteobacteria in an
intertidal mud flat of the Wadden Sea, Environ. Microbiol., 7,  405–418,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Muyzer, G. and Stams, A. J. M.: The ecology and biotechnology of
sulphate-reducing bacteria, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 6,  441–54, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Nevin, K. P., Holmes, D. E., Woodard, T. L., Hinlein, E. S., Ostendorf, D. W., and Lovley, D. R.: Geobacter bemidjiensis sp. nov. and Geobacter psychrophilus sp.
nov., two novel Fe(III)-reducing subsurface isolates, Int. J. Syst. Evol.Microbiol.,
55,
1667–1674, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Nielsen, L. B., Finster, K., Welsh, D. T., Donelly, A., Herbert, R. A., de Wit,
R., and Lomstein, B. A.: Sulphate reduction and nitrogen fixation
rates associated with roots, rhizomes and sediments from Zostera noltii and
Spartina maritima meadows, Environ. Microbiol. 3, 63–71, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P., and O'Hara,
R.: vegan: Community ecology package, R package version 2.0-10, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Orcutt, K. M., Lipschultz, F., Gundersen, K., Arimoto, R., Michaels, A. F.,
Knap, A. H., and Gallon, J. R.: A seasonal study of the significance of
N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation by Trichodesmium spp. at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study
(BATS) site, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48,   1583–1608, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Orsi, T. H., Werner, F., Milkert, D., Anderson, A. L., and Bryant, W. R.:
Environmental overview of Eckernförde Bay , northern Germany,
Geo-Mar. Lett., 16,  140–147, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Patriquin, D. and Knowles, R.:  Nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere
of marine angiosperms, Mar. Biol., 16,  49–58, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Pennington, J. T., Mahoney, K. L., Kuwahara, V. S., Kolber, D. D., Calienes, R., and Chavez, F. P.: Primary production in the eastern tropical
Pacific: A review, Prog. Oceanogr.,  69,  285–317, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Postgate, J. R.:  The Fundamentals of Nitrogen Fixation, Cambridge University Press, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Postgate, J. R.: Nitrogen fixation, 3rd Edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, A. M. F, and Charette, M. A.: Benthic Nitrogen Fixation in an
Eutrophic Estuary Affected by Groundwater Discharge, J.
Coast.
Res.,
280,
477–485, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Reis, M. A., Almeida, J. S., Lemos, P. C., and Carrondo, M. J.: Effect of
hydrogen sulfide on growth of sulfate reducing bacteria, Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 40,
593–600, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Riederer-Henderson, M.-A. and Wilson, P. W.: Nitrogen Fixation by
Sulphate-reducing Bacteria, J. General Microbiol., 61,  27–31, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Riemann, L., Farnelid, H., and Steward, G. F.: Nitrogenase genes in
non-cyanobacterial plankton: Prevalence, diversity and regulation in marine
waters, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 61,  235–247, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Røy, H., Weber, H. S., Tarpgaard, I. H., Ferdelman, T. G., and Jørgensen,
B. B.: Determination of dissimilatory sulfate reduction rates in
marine sediment via radioactive 35 S tracer, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Methods. 12,  196–211, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Salman, V., Amann, R., Girnth, A. C., Polerecky, L., Bailey, J. V., Høgslund, S., Jessen, G.,
Pantoja, S., and Schulz-Vogt, H. N.:  A single-cell sequencing approach to the classification of large, vacuolated
sulfur bacteria, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 34, 243–259, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, H. N.: Dense Populations of a Giant Sulfur Bacterium in
Namibian Shelf Sediments, Science, 284,  493–495, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, H. N. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Big bacteria, Annu. Rev. microbiol.,
55, 105–137, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Seitzinger, S. P. and Garber, J. H.: Nitrogen fixation and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
calibration of the acetylene reduction assay in coastal marine sediments,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 37,  65–73, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Sisler, F. D. and ZoBell, C. E.: Nitrogen Fixation by Sulfate-reducing
Bacteria Indicated by Nitrogen/Argon Ratios, Science, 113,  511–512, 1951.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Sohm, J. A., Webb, E. A., and Capone, D. G.: Emerging patterns of marine
nitrogen fixation, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9, 499–508, 2011.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Steppe, T. and Paerl, H.:  Potential N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation by sulfate-reducing
bacteria in a marine intertidal microbial mat, Aquat. Microb.Ecol.,
28,
1–12, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, W. D. P., Fitzgerald, G. P., and Burris, R. H.: In situ studies
on N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation using the acetylene reduction technique, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA,
58,
2071–2078, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Stramma, L., Johnson, G. C., Sprintall, J., and Mohrholz, V.:
Expanding oxygen-minimum zones in the tropical oceans, Science,
320, 655–658, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Strous, M., Kuenen, J. G., and Jetten, M. S.: Key physiology of
anaerobic ammonium oxidation, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65,  3248–3250, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tam, T.-Y., Mayfield, C. I., Inniss, W. E., and Knowles, R.:  Effect of
Sulfide on Nitrogen Fixation in a Stream Sediment- Water System, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol.,
43,
1076–1079, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Kumar, S.: MEGA4: Molecular
Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0, Mol.
Biol.
Evolut.,
24,
1596–1599, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Tichi, M. A. and Tabita, F. R.: Maintenance and control of redox poise
in Rhodobacter capsulatus strains deficient in the Calvin-Benson-Bassham
pathway, Arch. Microbiol., 174,  322–333, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Turk, K. A., Rees, A. P., Zehr, J. P., Pereira, N., Swift, P., Shelley, R.,
Lohan, M., Woodward, E. M. S., and Gilbert, J.: Nitrogen fixation and
nitrogenase (nifH) expression in tropical waters of the eastern North
Atlantic,  ISME J., 5,  1201–1212, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, B. B. and Bronk, D. A.: Net nitrogen uptake and DON release in
surface waters: importance of trophic interactions implied from size
fractionation experiments, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 219,  11–24, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Welsh, D. T., Bourgues, S., de Wit, R., and Herbert, R. A.: Seasonal
variations in nitrogen-fixation (acetylene reduction) and sulphate-reduction
rates in the rhizosphere of Zostera noltii: nitrogen fixation by
sulphate-reducing bacteria, Mar. Biol., 125,  619–628, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Westrich, J. T. and Berner, R. A.: The role of sedimentary organic
matter in bacterial sulfate reduction?: The G model tested, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
29,
236–249, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zehr, J. P. and Turner, P. J.: Nitrogen Fixation?, Nitrogenase Genes
and Gene Expression, in:  Methods in microbiology, edited by: Paul, J. H., Volume 30 San Diego, CA, Academic Press,
271–286, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zehr, J. P., Mellon, M. T., and Zani, S.: New Nitrogen-Fixing
Microorganisms Detected in Oligotrophic Oceans by Amplification of
Nitrogenase (nifH) Genes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64,  3444–3450, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Nitrogen fixation in sediments along a depth transect through the Peruvian
oxygen minimum zone</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The potential coupling of nitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>) fixation and sulfate reduction
(SR) was explored in sediments of the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone (OMZ).
Sediment samples were retrieved by a multiple corer at six stations along a
depth transect (70–1025 m water depth) at 12° S, covering anoxic
and hypoxic bottom water conditions. Benthic N<sub>2</sub> fixation, determined by
the acetylene reduction assay, was detected at all sites, with highest rates
between 70 and 253 m and lower rates at greater depth. SR rates decreased
with increasing water depth. N<sub>2</sub> fixation and SR overlapped in
sediments, suggesting a potential coupling of both processes. However, a
weak positive correlation of their activity distribution was detected by
principle component analysis. A potential link between N<sub>2</sub> fixation and
sulfate-reducing bacteria was indicated by the molecular analysis of <i>nifH</i> genes.
Detected <i>nifH</i> sequences clustered with the sulfate-reducing bacteria
<i>Desulfonema limicola</i> at the 253 m station. However, <i>nifH</i> sequences of other stations clustered with
uncultured organisms, Gammaproteobacteria, and Firmicutes (Clostridia)
rather than with known sulfate reducers. The principle component analysis
revealed that benthic N<sub>2</sub> fixation in the Peruvian OMZ is controlled by
organic matter (positive) and free sulfide (negative). No correlation was
found between N<sub>2</sub> fixation and ammonium concentrations (even at levels
&gt; 2022 µM). N<sub>2</sub> fixation rates in the Peruvian OMZ
sediments were in the same range as those measured in other organic-rich
sediments.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, B., Sundbäck, K., Hellman, M., Hallin, S., and Alsterberg, C.:
Nitrogen fixation in shallow-water sediments: Spatial distribution
and controlling factors, Limnol. Oceanogr., 59,  1932–1944,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bertics, V. J. and Ziebis, W.: Bioturbation and the role of
microniches for sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments,
Environ. Microbiol., 12.  3022–3034, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bertics, V. J., Sohm, J., Treude, T., Chow, C., Capone, D., Fuhrman, J., and
Ziebis, W.: Burrowing deeper into benthic nitrogen cycling: the
impact of bioturbation on nitrogen fixation coupled to sulfate reduction,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 409,  1–15, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bertics, V. J., Löscher, C. R., Salonen, I., Dale, A. W., Gier, J., Schmitz, R. A., and Treude, T.:
Occurrence of benthic microbial nitrogen fixation coupled to sulfate reduction in the seasonally hypoxic Eckernförde Bay,
Baltic Sea, Biogeosciences, 10, 1243–1258, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1243-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-1243-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bohlen, L., Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Mosch, T., Hensen, C., Noffke, A.,
Scholz, F., and Wallmann, K.: Benthic nitrogen cycling traversing the
Peruvian oxygen minimum zone, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 75,  6094–6111, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brandes, J. A. and Devol, A. H.: A global marine-fixed nitrogen
isotopic budget: Implications for Holocene nitrogen cycling, Global Biogeochem. Cy. 16, 1–14, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brandes, A., Devol, A. H., and Deutsch, C.: New developments in the
marine nitrogen cycle, Chem. Rev. 107,  577–89, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: Benthic nitrogen fixation, in:  Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, edited by:  Carpenter,  E. J. and Capone, D. G.,
New York: John Wiley, and Sons Ltd,  85–123, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: Benthic Nitrogen Fixation, in: Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine environments, edited by:  Blackburn, T. H. and Sorensen, J.,
John Wiley, and Sons Ltd,  85–123, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: Determination of nitrogenase activity in aquatic
samples using the acetylene reduction procedure, in: Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology,  edited by:
Kemp, P. F.,
Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B., and Coles, J. J., Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC,
621–631, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G., Burns, J. A., Montoya, J. P., Subramaniam, A., Mahaffey, C.,
Gunderson, T., Michaels, A. F., and Carpenter, E. J.: Nitrogen fixation
by Trichodesmium spp.: An important source of new nitrogen to the tropical
and subtropical North Atlantic Ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19,  1–17, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G., Bronk, A. A., Mulholland, M. R., and Carpenter, E. J.:
Nitrogen in the marine environmen, 2nd Edn. Elsevier, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, J.-S.: Nitrogen Fixation in the Clostridia, in:   Genetics and Regulation of Nitrogen Fixation in Free-Living Bacteria, Nitrogen Fixation:
Origins, Applications, and Research Progress, edited by: Klipp, W., Masepohl, B., Gallon, J. R., and Newton, W. E., Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic
Publishers,  53–64, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Codispoti, L. A.: An oceanic fixed nitrogen sink exceeding 400 Tg N a<sup>−1</sup> vs the concept of homeostasis in the
fixed-nitrogen inventory, Biogeosciences, 4, 233–253, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-233-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-4-233-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, L. W. and McGlathery, K. J.:  Nitrogen fixation in restored
eelgrass meadows, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 448, 235–246, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Bohlen, L., Treude, T., Bertics, V. J., Bange, H. W.,
Pfannkuche, O., Schorp, T., Mattsdotter, M., and Wallmann, K.:  Rates
and regulation of nitrogen cycling in seasonally hypoxic sediments during
winter (Boknis Eck, SW Baltic Sea): Sensitivity to environmental variables,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 95,   14–28, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Lomnitz, U., Montes, I., Treude, T., Liebetrau, V., Gier, J., Hensen, C., Dengler, M., Stolpovsky, K.,
Bryant, L. D., and Wallmann, K.: Organic carbon production, mineralisation and preservation on the Peruvian margin, Biogeosciences,
12, 1537–1559, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1537-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-12-1537-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Dale, A. W., Sommer, S., Lomnitz, U., Bourbonnais, A., and Wallmann, K.:
Biological nitrate transport in sediments on the Peruvian margin
mitigates benthic sulfide emissions and drives pelagic N loss during
stagnation events, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 112,  123–136, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dekaezemacker, J., Bonnet, S., Grosso, O., Moutin, T., Bressac, M., and
Capone, D. G.: Evidence of active dinitrogen fixation in surface
waters of the eastern tropical South Pacific during El Niño and La
Niña events and evaluation of its potential nutrient controls, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 27,
768–779, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Deutsch, C., Berelson, W., Thunell, R., Weber, T., Tems, C., McManus, J.,
Crusius, J., Ito, T., Baumgartner, T., Ferreira, V., Mey, J., and van Geen,
A.:  Centennial changes in North Pacific anoxia linked to tropical
trade winds, Science, 345,   665–668, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Dilworth, M. J.: Acetylene reduction by nitrogen-fixing preparations
from Clostridium pasteurianum, Biochim. Biophys. Ac. 127,  285–294, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Dixon, R. and Kahn, D.: Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen
fixation, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2,  621–631, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Donohue, M. J. O., Moriarty, D. J. W., and Rae, I. C.: Nitrogen
Fixation in Sediments and the Rhizosphere of the Seagrass Zostera
capricorni, Microbiol. Ecol., 22,  53–64, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Duteil, O., Böning, C. W., and Oschlies, A.: Variability in
subtropical-tropical cells drives oxygen levels in the tropical Pacific
Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,  1–9, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., and Smetacek, V.: Biogeochemical
Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production, Science, 281,
200–207, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Farnelid, H., Andersson, A. F., Bertilsson, S., Al-Soud, W. A., Hansen, L. H.,
Sørensen, S., Steward, G. F., Hagström, Å., and Riemann, L.:
Nitrogenase gene amplicons from global marine surface waters are
dominated by genes of non-cyanobacteria, PloS One, 6,  1–9, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fernandez, C., Farías, L., and Ulloa, O.: Nitrogen fixation in denitrified marine waters, PloS one, 6, 1–9, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fernandez, C., González, M.L., Muñoz, C., Molina, V., and Farias, L.:
Temporal and spatial variability of biological nitrogen fixation off
the upwelling system of central Chile (35–38.5° S), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
120,  3330–3349, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H., Gallardo, V. A., Jørgensen, B. B., Hüttel, M., Nielsen,
L. P., Schulz, H., Canfield, D. E., Forster, S., Glud, R. N., Gundersen, J. K.,
Küver, J., Ramsing, N. B., Teske, A., Thamdrup, B., and Ulloa, O.:
Concentration and transport of nitrate by the mat-forming sulphur bacterium
Thioploca, Nature, 374,  713–715, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fuenzalida, R., Schneider, W., Garces-Vargas, J., Bravo, L., and Lange, C.:
Vertical and horizontal extension of the oxygen minimum zone in the
eastern South Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 992–1008, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Fukui, M., Teske, A., Assmus, B., Muyzer, G., and Widdel, F.:
Physiology, phylogenetic relationships, and ecology of filamentous
sulfate-reducing bacteria (genus desulfonema), Arch. Microbiol., 172,  193–203, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R., Brown, S., Nixon, S., and Jenkins, B.: Evidence and a
conceptual model for the cooccurrence of nitrogen fixation and
denitrification in heterotrophic marine sediments, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 482,  57–68, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R. W., Nixon, S. W., Buckley, B. A., and Granger, S. L.:
Reversal of the net dinitrogen gas flux in coastal marine sediments,
Nature, 448,  180–182, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R. W., Heiss, E. M., Rogener, M. K., Newell, S. E., LeCleir, G. R.,
Kortebein, S. M., and Wilhelm, S. W.:  Examining the impact of acetylene
on N-fixation and the active sediment microbial community, Front. Microbiol.,
6,
1–9, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Glock, N., Schönfeld, J., Eisenhauer, A., Hensen, C., Mallon, J., and Sommer, S.: The role of benthic foraminifera in
the benthic nitrogen cycle of the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone, Biogeosciences, 10, 4767–4783, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4767-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-4767-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Kremlingl, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of Seawater Analysis, 3rd Edn.,
Weinheim, Wiley–VCH, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Großkopf, T., Mohr, W., Baustian, T., Schunck, H., Gill, D., Kuypers,
M. M. M., Lavik, G., Schmitz, R. A., Wallace, D. W. R., and LaRoche, J.:
Doubling of marine dinitrogen-fixation rates based on direct measurements,
Nature, 488, 1–4, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N.: The dynamics of the marine nitrogen cycle and its
influence on atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> variations, in:
Carbon Climate interactions, edited by:  Oguz, T. and Follows, M., 97–148, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N.: The Marine Nitrogen Cycle?, in: Overview and Challenges, edited
by:
Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A., Mulholland, M. R., and Carpenter, E. J.,
Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1–50, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Guerinot, M. L., West, P. A., Lee, J. V., and Colwell, R. R.: Vibrio
diazotrophicus sp. nov., a Marine Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterium, Int. J. Syst.
Bacteriol.,
32,
350–357, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Gutiérrez, D., Enríquez, E., Purca, S., Quipúzcoa, L.,
Marquina, R., Flores, G., and Graco, M.: Oxygenation episodes on the
continental shelf of central Peru: Remote forcing and benthic ecosystem
response, Prog. Oceanogr. 79,  177–189, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hartwig, E. O. and Stanley, S. O.: Nitrogen fixation in Atlantic
deep-sea and coastal sediments, Deep-Sea Res., 25,  411–417, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Howarth, R. W., Marino, R., Lane, J., and Cole, J. J.: Nitrogen
fixation in freshwater, estuarine, and marine ecosystems, 1. Rates and
importance, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33,  669–687, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: A comparison of methods for the quantification of
bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments, Geomicrobiol. J., 1,  11–27, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: SCOPE 21 – The Major Biogeochemical Cycles and Their Interactions, Processes at the Sediment-Water Interface, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B. and Gallardo, V. A.:  Thioploca spp.: filamentous
sulfur bacteria with nitrate vacuoles, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 28,  301–313, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Joye, S. B. and Hollibaugh, J. T.: Influence of sulfide inhibition of
nitrification on nitrogen regeneration in sediments, Sciences, 270,  623–625, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kallmeyer, J., Ferdelman, T. G., Weber, A., Fossing, H., and Jørgensen,
B. B.: Evaluation of a cold chromium distillation procedure for
recovering very small amounts of radiolabeled sulfide related to sulfate
reduction measurements, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Methods, 2, 171–180, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kamykowski, D. and Zentara, S.-J.: Hypoxia in the world ocean as
recorded in the historical data set, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 37,  1861–1874, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Kartal, B., Kuypers, M. M. M., Lavik, G., Schalk, J., Op den Camp, H. J. M.,
Jetten, M. S. M., and Strous, M.: Anammox bacteria disguised as
denitrifiers: nitrate reduction to dinitrogen gas via nitrite and ammonium,
Environ. Microbiol., 9,  635–642, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, W. S.: The circulation of the eastern tropical Pacific: A
review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69,  181–217, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Knapp, A. N.: The sensitivity of marine N<sub>2</sub> fixation to dissolved
inorganic nitrogen, Front. Microbiol. 3,  1–14, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, R. Y. and Joye, S. B.: Seasonal patterns of nitrogen fixation
and rdenitrification in oceanic mangrove habitats, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
307,
127–141, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Letunic, I. and Bork, P.: Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): An online
tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation, Bioinformatics, 23,  127–128, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Letunic, I. and Bork, P.: Interactive Tree of Life v2: Online
annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy, Nucl. Acids Res., 39, 1–4, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Levin, L., Gutierrez, D., Rathburn, A., Neira, C., Sellanes, J., Munoz, P.,
Gallardo, V., and Salamanca, M.: Benthic processes on the Peru
margin: a transect across the oxygen minimum zone during the 1997–98 El
Nino, Prog. Oceanogr., 53,  1–27, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Löscher, C. R., Großkopf, T., Desai, F. D., Gill, D., Schunck, H.,
Croot, P. L., Schlosser, C., Neulinger, S. C., Pinnow, N., Lavik, G., Kuypers,
M. M. M., Laroche, J., and Schmitz, R. A.: Facets of diazotrophy in the
oxygen minimum zone waters off Peru, ISME J., 8, 1–13, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Mosch, T., Sommer, S., Dengler, M., Noffke, A., Bohlen, L., Pfannkuche, O.,
Liebetrau, V., and Wallmann, K.: Factors influencing the distribution
of epibenthic megafauna across the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt.
I,
68,
123–135, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Mussmann, M., Ishii, K., Rabus, R., and Amann, R.: Diversity and
vertical distribution of cultured and uncultured Deltaproteobacteria in an
intertidal mud flat of the Wadden Sea, Environ. Microbiol., 7,  405–418,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Muyzer, G. and Stams, A. J. M.: The ecology and biotechnology of
sulphate-reducing bacteria, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 6,  441–54, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Nevin, K. P., Holmes, D. E., Woodard, T. L., Hinlein, E. S., Ostendorf, D. W., and Lovley, D. R.: Geobacter bemidjiensis sp. nov. and Geobacter psychrophilus sp.
nov., two novel Fe(III)-reducing subsurface isolates, Int. J. Syst. Evol.Microbiol.,
55,
1667–1674, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Nielsen, L. B., Finster, K., Welsh, D. T., Donelly, A., Herbert, R. A., de Wit,
R., and Lomstein, B. A.: Sulphate reduction and nitrogen fixation
rates associated with roots, rhizomes and sediments from Zostera noltii and
Spartina maritima meadows, Environ. Microbiol. 3, 63–71, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P., and O'Hara,
R.: vegan: Community ecology package, R package version 2.0-10, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Orcutt, K. M., Lipschultz, F., Gundersen, K., Arimoto, R., Michaels, A. F.,
Knap, A. H., and Gallon, J. R.: A seasonal study of the significance of
N<sub>2</sub> fixation by Trichodesmium spp. at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study
(BATS) site, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48,   1583–1608, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Orsi, T. H., Werner, F., Milkert, D., Anderson, A. L., and Bryant, W. R.:
Environmental overview of Eckernförde Bay , northern Germany,
Geo-Mar. Lett., 16,  140–147, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Patriquin, D. and Knowles, R.:  Nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere
of marine angiosperms, Mar. Biol., 16,  49–58, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Pennington, J. T., Mahoney, K. L., Kuwahara, V. S., Kolber, D. D., Calienes, R., and Chavez, F. P.: Primary production in the eastern tropical
Pacific: A review, Prog. Oceanogr.,  69,  285–317, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Postgate, J. R.:  The Fundamentals of Nitrogen Fixation, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Postgate, J. R.: Nitrogen fixation, 3rd Edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, A. M. F, and Charette, M. A.: Benthic Nitrogen Fixation in an
Eutrophic Estuary Affected by Groundwater Discharge, J.
Coast.
Res.,
280,
477–485, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Reis, M. A., Almeida, J. S., Lemos, P. C., and Carrondo, M. J.: Effect of
hydrogen sulfide on growth of sulfate reducing bacteria, Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 40,
593–600, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Riederer-Henderson, M.-A. and Wilson, P. W.: Nitrogen Fixation by
Sulphate-reducing Bacteria, J. General Microbiol., 61,  27–31, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Riemann, L., Farnelid, H., and Steward, G. F.: Nitrogenase genes in
non-cyanobacterial plankton: Prevalence, diversity and regulation in marine
waters, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 61,  235–247, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Røy, H., Weber, H. S., Tarpgaard, I. H., Ferdelman, T. G., and Jørgensen,
B. B.: Determination of dissimilatory sulfate reduction rates in
marine sediment via radioactive 35 S tracer, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Methods. 12,  196–211, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Salman, V., Amann, R., Girnth, A. C., Polerecky, L., Bailey, J. V., Høgslund, S., Jessen, G.,
Pantoja, S., and Schulz-Vogt, H. N.:  A single-cell sequencing approach to the classification of large, vacuolated
sulfur bacteria, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 34, 243–259, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, H. N.: Dense Populations of a Giant Sulfur Bacterium in
Namibian Shelf Sediments, Science, 284,  493–495, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, H. N. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Big bacteria, Annu. Rev. microbiol.,
55, 105–137, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. P. and Garber, J. H.: Nitrogen fixation and <sup>15</sup>N<sub>2</sub>
calibration of the acetylene reduction assay in coastal marine sediments,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 37,  65–73, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Sisler, F. D. and ZoBell, C. E.: Nitrogen Fixation by Sulfate-reducing
Bacteria Indicated by Nitrogen/Argon Ratios, Science, 113,  511–512, 1951.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Sohm, J. A., Webb, E. A., and Capone, D. G.: Emerging patterns of marine
nitrogen fixation, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 9, 499–508, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Steppe, T. and Paerl, H.:  Potential N<sub>2</sub> fixation by sulfate-reducing
bacteria in a marine intertidal microbial mat, Aquat. Microb.Ecol.,
28,
1–12, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, W. D. P., Fitzgerald, G. P., and Burris, R. H.: In situ studies
on N<sub>2</sub> fixation using the acetylene reduction technique, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA,
58,
2071–2078, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Stramma, L., Johnson, G. C., Sprintall, J., and Mohrholz, V.:
Expanding oxygen-minimum zones in the tropical oceans, Science,
320, 655–658, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Strous, M., Kuenen, J. G., and Jetten, M. S.: Key physiology of
anaerobic ammonium oxidation, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65,  3248–3250, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tam, T.-Y., Mayfield, C. I., Inniss, W. E., and Knowles, R.:  Effect of
Sulfide on Nitrogen Fixation in a Stream Sediment- Water System, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol.,
43,
1076–1079, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Kumar, S.: MEGA4: Molecular
Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0, Mol.
Biol.
Evolut.,
24,
1596–1599, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Tichi, M. A. and Tabita, F. R.: Maintenance and control of redox poise
in Rhodobacter capsulatus strains deficient in the Calvin-Benson-Bassham
pathway, Arch. Microbiol., 174,  322–333, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Turk, K. A., Rees, A. P., Zehr, J. P., Pereira, N., Swift, P., Shelley, R.,
Lohan, M., Woodward, E. M. S., and Gilbert, J.: Nitrogen fixation and
nitrogenase (nifH) expression in tropical waters of the eastern North
Atlantic,  ISME J., 5,  1201–1212, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, B. B. and Bronk, D. A.: Net nitrogen uptake and DON release in
surface waters: importance of trophic interactions implied from size
fractionation experiments, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 219,  11–24, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Welsh, D. T., Bourgues, S., de Wit, R., and Herbert, R. A.: Seasonal
variations in nitrogen-fixation (acetylene reduction) and sulphate-reduction
rates in the rhizosphere of Zostera noltii: nitrogen fixation by
sulphate-reducing bacteria, Mar. Biol., 125,  619–628, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Westrich, J. T. and Berner, R. A.: The role of sedimentary organic
matter in bacterial sulfate reduction?: The G model tested, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
29,
236–249, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zehr, J. P. and Turner, P. J.: Nitrogen Fixation?, Nitrogenase Genes
and Gene Expression, in:  Methods in microbiology, edited by: Paul, J. H., Volume 30 San Diego, CA, Academic Press,
271–286, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Zehr, J. P., Mellon, M. T., and Zani, S.: New Nitrogen-Fixing
Microorganisms Detected in Oligotrophic Oceans by Amplification of
Nitrogenase (nifH) Genes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64,  3444–3450, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
