<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-4343-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Patterns of carbon processing at the seafloor: the role of faunal and
microbial communities in moderating carbon flows</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Patterns of carbon processing at the seafloor}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C. Woulds et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Woulds</surname><given-names>Clare</given-names></name>
          <email>c.woulds@leeds.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-1468</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bouillon</surname><given-names>Steven</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7669-2929</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Cowie</surname><given-names>Gregory L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Drake</surname><given-names>Emily</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Middelburg</surname><given-names>Jack J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-9072</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Witte</surname><given-names>Ursula</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven,
Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road,
Edinburgh, EH9 3JW, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Royal Netherlands Institute of Sea Research (NIOZ-Yerseke), P.O. Box
140, 4400 AC Yerseke, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80021, 3508
TA Utrecht, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Oceanlab,
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB41 6AA, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Clare Woulds (c.woulds@leeds.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>4343</fpage><lpage>4357</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Marine sediments, particularly those located in estuarine and coastal zones,
are key locations for the burial of organic carbon (C). However, organic C
delivered to the sediment is subjected to a range of biological C-cycling
processes, the rates and relative importance of which vary markedly between
sites, and which are thus difficult to predict.</p>
    <p>In this study, stable isotope tracer experiments were used to quantify the
processing of C by microbial and faunal communities in two contrasting
Scottish estuarine sites: a subtidal, organic C rich site in Loch Etive with
cohesive fine-grained sediment, and an intertidal, organic C poor site on an
Ythan estuary sand flat with coarse-grained permeable sediments.</p>
    <p>In both experiments, sediment cores were recovered and amended with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
labelled phytodetritus to quantify whole community respiration of the added C
and to trace the isotope label into faunal and bacterial biomass. Similar
respiration rates were found in Loch Etive and on the Ythan sand flat
(0.64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 and 0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively), which we attribute to the experiments being conducted at the
same temperature. Faunal uptake of added C over the whole experiment was
markedly greater in Loch Etive (204 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than on the
Ythan sand flat (0.96 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this difference was
driven by a difference in both faunal biomass and activity. Conversely,
bacterial C uptake over the whole experiment in Loch Etive was much lower
than that on the Ythan sand flat (1.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.66 and
127 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). This was not driven by
differences in biomass, indicating that the bacterial community in the
permeable Ythan sediments was particularly active, being responsible for
48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 % of total biologically processed C. This type of
biological C processing appears to be favoured in permeable sediments. The
total amount of biologically processed C was greatest in Loch Etive, largely
due to greater faunal C uptake, which was in turn a result of higher faunal
biomass. When comparing results from this study with a wide range of
previously published isotope tracing experiments, we found a strong
correlation between total benthic biomass (fauna plus bacteria) and total
biological C processing rates. Therefore, we suggest that the total C-cycling
capacity of benthic environments is primarily determined by total biomass.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The burial of organic carbon in marine sediments is a key flux in the global
carbon (C) cycle, linking the surface reactive C reservoirs to long-term
storage in the geological loop. In addition, organic detritus is the main
food source for most benthic ecosystems, and its supply and cycling are thus
important controlling factors for benthic ecology. Furthermore, the
degradation of organic carbon (OC) in sediments usually drives their redox
state, and together these determine nutrient regeneration rates and resupply
to the water column. Estuarine sediments are particularly important locations
for these functions. Of all marine benthic environments, estuarine
(particularly fjordic) and shelf sediments host the largest proportion of
marine sediment C burial (Berner, 1982; Duarte et al., 2005, Smith et al.,
2015). The shallow water depths in estuaries result in the potential of
benthic C burial and nutrient regeneration to control water column
biogeochemistry and productivity (e.g. Middelburg and Levin, 2009).
Therefore, there is a need to understand OC cycling and burial in marine
sediments, and in estuarine sediments in particular.</p>
      <p>Previous work has established that factors such as OC loading and degradation
state, sediment grain size, and the time for which OC is exposed to oxygen
before being buried below the oxycline combine to control the relative
importance of remineralisation and burial as a fate of C in marine sediments
(Canfield et al., 1994; Mayer, 1994; Hedges and Keil, 1995; Hartnett et al.,
1998). However, the pathways along which OC may travel towards burial or
remineralisation must be elucidated in order to further our understanding of
benthic C cycling and burial.</p>
      <p>There are many processes to which OM arriving at the sediment surface, either
of terrestrial origin delivered through riverine inputs or from surface
phytoplankton production, may be subjected. First, a major fraction of fresh
OC inputs may be fed upon by benthic fauna (Herman et al., 1999; Kristensen,
2001). Thus, C may be assimilated into faunal biomass, and may be transferred
through benthic and/or pelagic food webs. Alternately, ingested sedimentary
OC may survive gut transit and be egested back into the sediment, in which
case it is likely to have been biochemically altered and physically
re-packaged (e.g. Bradshaw et al., 1990a, b, 1991a, b; Woulds et al., 2012,
2014). In addition, at any trophic level of the food web, C may be
metabolised and returned to the water column as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further, during
bioturbation many fauna transport OC through the sediment column, which may
subject it to fluctuating redox conditions and accelerate decay, or sequester
it at depth below the digenetically active zone (Aller, 1994; Sun et al.,
2002). Secondly, deposited OC will be subject to microbial decay, and may
thus be incorporated into microbial biomass, which itself may then progress
through the food web, or may be returned to the water column as CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
through microbial respiration. In addition, it may be released as dissolved
organic C (DOC) and re-incorporated into microbial and, subsequently, faunal
biomass through the microbial loop (Pozzato et al., 2013, and references
therein).</p>
      <p>As the processes described above are all biologically driven, we will refer
to them collectively as biological C processing (as opposed to long-term C
burial). The relative importance of the different processes, in turn, will be
referred to as the biological C processing pattern.</p>
      <p>Isotope tracer experiments with organic matter labelled with an enriched
level of a naturally uncommon stable isotope (typically <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and/or
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N) are an excellent tool to derive direct quantitative data on
biological C processing patterns and rates (Middelburg, 2014). Such
experiments have been conducted in a wide range of benthic environments, from
estuarine sites (Moodley et al., 2000) to the deep abyssal plain (Witte et
al., 2003b), from OC rich sediments (Woulds et al., 2007) to oligotrophic
sites (Buhring et al., 2006b), and from polar regions (Gontikaki et al.,
2011a, b, c) to the tropics (Aspetsberger et al., 2007; Sweetman et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Many isotope tracer studies have found remineralisation by the entire benthic
community (i.e. bacteria fauna, meiofauna, and macrofauna combined) to form
the dominant fate of the OC supplied (e.g. Woulds et al., 2009; Gontikaki et
al., 2011b). It is reasonably well established that such benthic respiration
rates are strongly controlled by temperature (Moodley et al., 2005) and also
respond to OC input (Witte et al., 2003b) and benthic community biomass (e.g.
Sweetman et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>However, considerable variations in carbon processing patterns and rates have
been found between sites, with considerable differences in, for example, the
biomass pools into which OC is dominantly routed. Thus, some studies have
shown that OC uptake by foraminifera and/or bacteria can dominate in both the
short and long term (Moodley et al., 2002; Nomaki et al., 2005; Aspetsberger
et al., 2007), and others have shown a more prominent role for macrofauna
(Witte et al., 2003a). In some cases macrofaunal uptake can even be equal to
total respiration (Woulds et al., 2009). Trends in faunal OC uptake are
usually strongly determined by trends in the biomass of different faunal
groups (e.g. Woulds et al., 2007; Hunter et al., 2012), although this is not
always the case. For example, in sandy subtidal sediments, Evrard et
al. (2010) found that more microphytobenthos C was consumed by meiofauna than
by macrofauna, despite the lower biomass of the former. In cohesive sediments
from a deep fjord, however, the opposite pattern was observed, when
macrofaunal foraminifera ingested less OC than expected based on their
importance in terms of biomass (Sweetman et al., 2009). This was thought to
be due to their relatively deep dwelling lifestyle, suggesting they were not
adapted for rapid feeding on freshly deposited OM. Thus, the ecology and
community structure of any site is thought to exert significant control on
its biological C processing pathways and rates. Furthermore, the examples
given above illustrate how the extreme variability in the abundance and
characteristics of organisms found at seafloor sites throughout the marine
environment has resulted in the lack of a general understanding of how
benthic communities impact seafloor C-cycling patterns and rates.</p>
      <p>In a review of isotope tracer experiments carried out in marine sediments,
Woulds et al. (2009) proposed a categorisation of biological C processing
patterns into three main types. “Respiration dominated” sites were defined
as systems in which &gt; 75 % of biologically processed C was
found as respired CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this tended to occur mostly in deep, cold, OM
poor sites with relatively low faunal biomass. “Active faunal uptake”
systems were described as sites in which respiration was still the major fate
of biologically processed C, but where faunal uptake accounted for
10–25 %. This pattern was found in shallower, more nearshore and
estuarine sites, which were richer in OM, and which hosted correspondingly
higher benthic faunal biomass. A third category labelled “metazoan
macrofaunal dominated” displayed an unusual pattern in which uptake by
metazoan macrofauna accounted for &gt; 50 % of biological C
processing, and was chiefly exhibited in a lower oxygen minimum zone site on
the Pakistan margin, where high OC concentrations and just sufficient oxygen
supported an unusually high macrofaunal biomass (an “edge effect”, Mullins,
1985). This categorisation allowed predictions to be made regarding C
processing patterns at a range of sites, but this ability was limited to the
types of benthic environment in which isotope-tracing experiments had been
conducted to that date.</p>
      <p>The previously proposed categorisation was limited in the types of benthic
environments covered, and was biased towards subtidal and deep-sea settings
characterised by cohesive sediments. Therefore, a particular environment
missing in previous syntheses was coarse-grained, permeable sediments, such
as are typically found in coastal and shelf environments. One study in
subtidal sandy sediments of the German Bight found unexpectedly rapid C
processing rates, and suggested a C processing pattern that was dominated by
bacterial uptake (Buhring et al., 2006a). However, variation in results
between different experiment durations implies that it could not be used to
propose an additional category. The result was however consistent with
findings that coarse-grained, permeable sediments are capable of more dynamic
biogeochemical cycling than was previously assumed from their generally low
OC contents (Huettel et al., 2014). The rapid biogeochemical cycling is
driven by water flow over roughness on the sediment surface creating local
pressure gradients, which lead to advective exchange of porewaters. This
introduces fresh organic substrates and electron acceptors into the sediment,
and removes metabolites, enhancing OC turnover (Huettel et al., 2014, and
references therein). Therefore, further investigation of biological C
processing in previously understudied permeable sediments is warranted.</p>
      <p>Our study aimed broadly to investigate biological C processing rates and
patterns in estuarine sediments. In particular, we aimed to compare
biological C processing in cohesive, fine-grained sediments with that in
permeable, coarse-grained sediments and to contrast the roles played by two
communities with different compositions and structures. We hypothesised that,
in keeping with previous subtidal/shelf/fjordic sites, the cohesive sediments
would exhibit a C processing pattern dominated by respiration but with a
marked role for faunal uptake, while permeable sediments would exhibit rapid
OC turnover and an OC processing pattern dominated by bacterial uptake.
Further, we hypothesised that while faunal C uptake at the two sites would
necessarily involve different taxa, the overall contribution of fauna to
biological C processing would be related to their total biomass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study sites</title>
      <p>Two sites were selected for study: one fine-grained, organic carbon-rich
site in Loch Etive and a sandy site with low organic carbon content in the
Ythan estuary.</p>
      <p>Loch Etive lies on the west coast of Scotland (Fig. 1). It is a glacier
carved feature, 30 km long, and is divided into three basins by two shallow
sills at Bonawe and Connel. The loch exhibits positive estuarine circulation,
with a strong outflow of freshwater in the surface 10 m, and tidal exchange
of seawater beneath (tidal range is 2 m, Wood et al., 1973). Phytoplankton
standing stock has been found to be relatively high (Wood et al., 1973).
This, combined with input of substantial amounts of terrestrial OC and the
tendency of fine sediment to be resuspended from the shallower areas and
redeposited in the deeper areas (Ansell, 1974), leads to relatively OC rich
sediments in the deep basins. The site chosen for this study lies at the
deepest point (Airds Bay, 70 m) of the middle basin of Loch Etive (Fig. 1).
While the bottom water here is regularly renewed and is therefore well
oxygenated, the sediment has a relatively high oxygen demand, and sulfate
reduction occurs within 5 cm of the sediment–water interface (Overnell et
al., 1996). The experiment was conducted during July 2004, at which point the
bottom water dissolved oxygen saturation was close to 100 %. The sediment
had a median grain size of 21 m with 78 % fines (&lt; 63 m) and
contained <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 wt % organic C (Loh et al., 2008). The benthic
community was dominated by ophuroids, with polychaetes and molluscs also
being abundant (Gage, 1972, C. Whitcraft, unpublished data).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Map showing site locations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The Ythan estuary is a well-mixed estuary on the east coast of Scotland
(Fig. 1), 20 km north of Aberdeen. It is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 km long, with a mean
width of 300 m. The Ythan sand flat study site was located around halfway
along the estuary on an intertidal sand bar, and exhibited sandy, permeable
and OC poor (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 wt % organic C) sediments (Zetsche et al.,
2011b) which were subject to semi-diurnal tides and seasonal storms. The
median grain size was 336 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m with 11 % fines
(&lt; 63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, varying through the year), and the sand is
described as well sorted (Zetsche et al., 2011a). The study site was exposed
at low tide, and covered by 1–2 m of water at high tide. The benthic
community was dominated by oligochaetes, with polychaetes, molluscs,
nematodes and crustaceans also present (Zetsche et al., 2012). The Ythan sand
flat experiment was conducted during May 2008.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Isotope tracing experiments</title>
      <p>The experimental set-up varied slightly between sites, to account for the
differences in their depth and sediment grain size.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Loch Etive</title>
      <p>Four replicate sediment cores (up to 50 cm depth, 10 cm i.d.) were
collected and placed in a controlled temperature laboratory set to the
ambient temperature of 11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Phytodetritus (<italic>Thalassiosira</italic>,
a representative pelagic species) labelled with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %)
was added to the sediment surface of intact cores to give a dose of
1050 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (the standard deviation stated is due to
variation between replicate cores). The cores were then sealed with water
columns of 14–16.5 cm and incubated in the dark for 7 days (156 h). During
the incubation, the oxygen concentration in core-top water was maintained by
pumping the water through an “oxystat” gill, composed of gas permeable
tubing submerged in a reservoir of 100 % oxygenated seawater (see Woulds
et al., 2007) and monitored with Clark-type electrodes. As the tubing used in
the oxystat gill was permeable to all gases, there was the potential for loss
of some <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> generated during the experiment. However, the
dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration difference between the
incubation water and oxygenated reservoir will have remained small; thus,
this effect is thought to be minor. Samples of the overlying water were taken
at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h after the introduction of the labelled
phytodetritus. These were preserved in glass vials without a headspace and
poisoned with HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-DIC analysis.</p>
      <p>At the end of the incubation period, cores were sectioned at intervals of
0.5 cm up to 2 cm depth, then in 1 cm sections up to 10 cm depth, and
finally in 2 cm sections up to 20 cm depth. Half of each sediment slice was
sieved, with &gt; 300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (macrofauna) and
150–300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (meiofauna) fractions retained. The other half of each
slice was stored frozen in plastic bags. Sieve residues were examined under
the microscope and all fauna were extracted. Organisms were sorted to the
lowest taxonomic level possible and preserved frozen in pre-weighed tin boats
and pre-combusted glass vials. Fauna from two of the four cores were allowed
to void their guts before preservation. This was achieved by allowing them to
remain in dishes of filtered seawater for several hours before freezing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>The Ythan sand flat</title>
      <p>Four replicate sediment cores were collected by pushing 25 cm diameter
acrylic core tubes into the sediment at low tide, and digging them out to
obtain intact sediment cores 14–15 cm in length. These were returned to a
controlled temperature laboratory set to 11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at Oceanlab,
University of Aberdeen. Filtered Ythan estuary water was added to each core
to create a water column. A lid was placed on each core, leaving a headspace,
with exhaust ports open. Fully oxygenated conditions were maintained by
gentle bubbling with air, except during respiration measurements (see below).
Lids were mounted with stirring disks, the rotation rates of which were
calibrated to generate appropriate pressure gradients to prompt porewater
advection (Erenhauss and Huettel, 2004). The overlying water was changed
daily. Isotopically labelled (34 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) phytodetritus (freeze-dried
<italic>Navicula incerta</italic>, a representative benthic species) was added to the
water column and allowed to sink onto the sediment–water interface to give a
dose of 753 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.4 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Twice during the subsequent 7 days
(immediately after phytodetritus addition and 5 days later) the respiration
rate in each core was measured. This involved filling the headspace in each
core to exclude all air bubbles and sealing all lids. Time series water
samples were taken over the subsequent 24 h and preserved for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-DIC analysis as described above. At the end of each
respiration measurement, lids were removed and dissolved oxygen was measured
by Winkler titration to ensure it had not declined by more than 20 %.</p>
      <p>The experiment lasted 7 days (162 h), after which the overlying water was
removed and a 5 cm diameter sub-core was taken from each core. This was
sectioned at 1 cm intervals and frozen. The remaining sediment was sectioned
at intervals of 0–1, 1–2, 2–3 and 3–5 cm, and sieved on a
500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m mesh. Sediment and fauna remaining on the sieve were
preserved in buffered 10 % formaldehyde in seawater. Fauna were picked
from sieve residues under a microscope, identified, and placed in glass vials
or pre-weighed silver capsules.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Bulk stable isotope analyses</title>
      <p>Fauna samples were oven-dried at 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Fauna with calcite skeletons
(ophiuroids, molluscs, and foraminifera) were de-carbonated by the addition
of a few drops of 6 N HCl. For soft-bodied fauna, 1 N HCl was used to
eliminate possible traces of carbonates. In all cases whole organisms were
analysed. In the Loch Etive experiment fauna from two replicate cores were
allowed time to void their guts, but it was not clear that they actually did
so (see below). All samples were dried at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C before
analysis for OC content and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>Loch Etive samples were analysed on a Europa Scientific (Crew, UK) Tracermass
isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) with a Roboprep Dumas combustion
sample converter. Appropriately sized samples of acetanilide were used for
quantification, and all C abundance data were blank corrected. Replicate
analyses revealed relative standard deviations of 4.6 % for C abundance
and 0.7 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Ythan sand flat samples were analysed
using a Flash EA 1112 Series Elemental Analyser connected via a Conflo III to
a Delta<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>Plus</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> XP isotope ratio mass spectrometer (all ThermoFinnigan,
Bremen, Germany). Carbon contents of the samples were calculated from the
area output of the mass spectrometer calibrated against National Institute of
Standards and Technology standard reference material 1547 (peach leaves),
which was analysed with every batch of ten samples. The isotope ratios were
traceable to International Atomic Energy Agency reference materials USGS40
and USGS41 (both L-glutamic acid), certified for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (‰).
Long-term precisions for a quality control standard (milled flour) were total
carbon 40.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35 % and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13 ‰.</p>
      <p>Overlying water samples were analysed for concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
of DIC as described by Moodley et al. (2000). Briefly, a He headspace was
created in sample vials, the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of which were
quantified using a Carlo Erba MEGA 540 gas chromatograph and a Finnigan Delta
S isotope ratio mass spectrometer, respectively. The system was calibrated
with acetanilide (Schimmelmann et al., 2009) and the IAEA-CH-6 standard.
Repeat analyses of standard materials gave a relative standard deviation of
4.4 % for DIC concentrations and a standard deviation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Bacterial phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs)</title>
      <p>Aliquots of sediment were treated with a Bligh and Dyer extraction, involving
shaking at room temperature in a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mix of methanol, chloroform, and
water. Lipids were recovered in the chloroform layer and were loaded onto
silica gel columns. Polar lipids were eluted in methanol and methylated in
the presence of methanolic NaOH. The C12:0 and C19:0 fatty acid methyl esters
were used as internal standards. Fatty acids were separated by gas
chromatography on a 30 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m film thickness
BPX70 column and combusted in a Thermo GC-combustion II interface. Isotope
ratios were then determined using a Thermo Delta<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope ratio mass
spectrometer (for further details, see Woulds et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Data treatment</title>
      <p>Uptake of added C by fauna is reported in absolute terms (see below), and as
isotopic enrichments over the natural background faunal isotopic composition.
Isotopic compositions were expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, derived using
Eq. (1).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ratio
in the sample and the reference standard, respectively. Isotopic enrichments
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were then calculated using Eq. (2).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>background</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Carbon uptake by faunal groups was calculated by subtracting naturally
occurring <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, multiplying by the sample C contents, and correcting for
the fact that the added phytodetritus was not 100 % <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C labelled, as
shown in Eq. (3):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C  Uptake</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sample  </mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mtext>background</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>C 
Contents</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phytodetritus</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where at % is the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C atoms present as a percentage of the total C
atoms present. Data from individual specimens were summed to produce faunal C
uptake by different groups of fauna. For Loch Etive, background <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was
subtracted based on natural faunal isotopic data collected concurrently with
the C tracing experiment. For the Ythan sand flat, natural faunal isotopic
data were not available, and instead the natural C isotopic signature of
sedimentary organic C (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.2 ‰) was used. Isotopic signatures of
fauna at the end of the experiment had a maximum of 2460 ‰ and a
mean of 175 ‰. Therefore the small inaccuracies introduced by the
use of this natural background value will not have been significant.</p>
      <p>The DIC concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-DIC were used to calculate the
total amount of added <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C present as DIC in experimental chambers at
each sampling time. A linear regression was applied to these to yield a
separate respiration rate for each core and for each period of respiration
measurement (mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.909</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the exception of one measurement
showing poor linearity with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.368</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the rate was multiplied by
experiment duration to calculate total respiration of added C during the
experiment. In the case of the Ythan sand flat respiration was measured
during two separate 24 h periods through the experiment. In this case
average rates from the two measurements were used to calculate total
respiration of added C throughout the experiment.</p>
      <p>Bacterial C uptake was quantified using the compounds iC14:0, iC15:0,
aiC15:0, and iC16:0 as bacterial markers. Bacterial uptake of added C was
calculated from their concentrations and isotopic compositions (corrected for
natural <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C occurrence using data from unlabelled sediment), based on
these compounds representing 14 % of total bacterial PLFAs, and bacterial
PLFA comprising 5.6 % of total bacterial biomass (Boschker and
Middelburg, 2002). In the case of Loch Etive, the sediments from which PLFAs
were extracted had previously been centrifuged (10 min, 3500 rpm, room
temperature) for porewater extraction, which could have led to a slight
reduction in the bacterial biomass and C uptake measured.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>The mean recovery of added C from the bacterial, faunal and respired pools
together was 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 and 31 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % of that which was added for
Loch Etive and the Ythan sand flat, respectively. This is a good recovery
rate compared to other similar experiments (e.g. Woulds et al., 2007). Most
of the remaining C was likely left in the sediment as particulate organic C
or as dissolved organic C.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Remineralisation</title>
      <p>The average respiration rate of the added OC was similar in Loch Etive and on
the Ythan sand flat, and reached 0.64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 and
0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Thus, the total
amount of added C that was respired at each site (over 156 h in Loch Etive
and 162 h on the Ythan sand flat) was 99.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.5 and
102.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.4 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Loch Etive and the Ythan sand flat,
respectively (Fig. 2). In both experiments, respiration rates measured in the
first 48 h (1.41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 and
0.74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Etive and the Ythan sand
flat, respectively) were higher than those measured in the last 48 h of the
experiment (0.31 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 and 0.52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.22 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for Etive and the Ythan sand flat, respectively; this difference was
significant only for Loch Etive, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn> 0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The increase
in labelled DIC over time for each chamber is shown in Fig. S1 in Supplement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>The distribution of initially added C between different biological
pools at the end of the experiments in absolute terms (upper panel), and as
percentages of total biological C processing (lower panel). Note there are no
data for meiofaunal or foraminiferal uptake on the Ythan sand flat.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Faunal biomass and C uptake</title>
      <p>Macrofaunal biomass in the experimental cores was
4337 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1202 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Loch Etive and
455 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 167 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on the Ythan sand flat. Macrofaunal
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures (for individual specimens) reached maximal values
of 7647 and 2460 ‰ in Loch Etive and on the Ythan sand flat,
respectively. Total faunal C uptake was orders of magnitude greater in Loch
Etive (204 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than on the Ythan sand flat
(0.96 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2). This difference was driven
partly by a difference in biomass, but fauna on the Ythan sand flat were also
comparatively less active, as reflected by biomass-specific C uptake at the
two sites (0.047 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 and 0.0022 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0006 mg C uptake per mg C
biomass for Loch Etive and the Ythan sand flat, respectively).</p>
      <p>In Loch Etive, both faunal biomass and carbon uptake were dominated by two
ophuroids, <italic>Amphiura fillaformis</italic> and <italic>A. chiajei</italic>, which
contributed 75 and 95 % to the total biomass and to faunal C uptake,
respectively (Fig. 3). The molluscs and polychaetes contributed 11 and
6 % to biomass, but only 1.6 and 1 % to faunal C uptake,
respectively. Amongst the polychaetes, the <italic>Flabelligeridae</italic> and
<italic>Harmothoe</italic> tended to show lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C enrichment (i.e. a lower
specific uptake of labelled C), while representatives of all other families
(<italic>Capitellidae</italic>, <italic>Syllidae</italic>, <italic>Cirratulidae</italic>,
<italic>Cossura</italic>, and <italic>Terebellidae</italic>) showed much higher levels of
labelling.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Taxa responsible for biomass and C uptake in <bold>(a)</bold> Loch Etive
and <bold>(b)</bold> the Ythan sand flat.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>On the Ythan sand flat, the macrofaunal community was dominated by
oligochaetes and nematodes (Fig. 3). The proportion of total faunal C uptake
accounted for by oligochaetes (48 %) approximately matched their
contribution to faunal biomass (51 %). However, nematodes contributed
slightly less towards total faunal uptake (14 %) than they did to total
biomass (19 %). Other minor groups included amphipods (0.3 % of
biomass), polychaetes (2 % of biomass) and gastropods (1.5 % of
biomass). Of these groups, the polychaetes and gastropods made
disproportionately large contributions to faunal C uptake, accounting for
10 % and 18 %, respectively (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>In the Loch Etive experiment, metazoan meiofaunal and foraminiferal data were
also collected. Metazoan meiofaunal and foraminiferal biomasses in
experimental cores were 47 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
343 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 625 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. These two groups showed
maximal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of 1360 and 3313 ‰,
respectively. Metazoan meiofauna were not taxonomically sorted, but amongst
the foraminifera the highest labelling was observed in <italic>Crithionina</italic>
sp., while <italic>Pelosina</italic> did not show measurable label uptake. Compared
to the macrofauna, meiofaunal C uptake was minor, at 0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20 and
5.21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.15 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for metazoans and foraminifera,
respectively (Fig. 2). Thus, metazoan meiofauna and foraminifera contributed
1 and 7 % to the total faunal biomass, and 0.1 and 2.5 % to faunal C
uptake, respectively.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Bacterial biomass and C uptake</title>
      <p>Bacterial biomass in the surface 5 cm of sediment in Loch Etive was
5515 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3121 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and on the Ythan sand flat it was
7657 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3315 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The amount of added C incorporated into
bacterial biomass was 2 orders of magnitude greater on the Ythan sand flat
(127 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 89 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than in Loch Etive
(1.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.66 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 2). In the majority of cores,
&gt; 90 % of bacterial uptake occurred in the top 3 cm of
sediment. However, in one core from Loch Etive, 28 % of bacterial uptake
occurred between 3 and 6 cm depth. In comparison, 52 % of the bacterial
biomass from the top 5 cm occurred shallower than 3 cm for Loch Etive, and
this value was 66 % on the Ythan sand flat. Biomass-specific uptake for
the bacteria was 2 orders of magnitude greater on the Ythan sand flat
(0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004 mg C uptake per mg C biomass) than in Loch Etive
(0.00023 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> .00013 mg C uptake per mg C biomass). Thus it appears that
the rapid uptake of added C by bacteria at the sandy site was primarily
driven by a more active bacterial community, rather than by a larger
bacterial biomass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Biological carbon processing patterns</title>
      <p>The large differences in macrofaunal and bacterial C uptake rates between the
two sites resulted in markedly different biological C processing patterns
(Fig. 2). In both cases, respiration was an important, but usually not the
dominant, fate of biologically processed C, accounting for 25–60 %. In
the case of Loch Etive, the dominant fate of biologically processed C was
macrofaunal uptake (64 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 %), and this also resulted in a greater
amount of total biological C processing (Fig. 2) than on the Ythan sand flat.
On the Ythan sand flat, bacterial uptake (48 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 %) was the
dominant fate of biologically processed C. In Loch Etive, uptake of C by
bacterial, metazoan meiofaunal, and foraminiferal communities made only minor
contributions to total biological C processing (Fig. 2). On the Ythan sand
flat, macrofaunal uptake made a relatively minor contribution (Fig. 2).
Unfortunately, uptake by meiofaunal organisms could not be quantified at the
latter site.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Experimental approach</title>
      <p>This study compares data from two experiments which, while following the same
principle, nevertheless had slightly different experimental set-ups. The
water depth, core size, stirring regime, light availability and C dose added
all differed between the two study sites. The differences in stirring regime
and light availability were enforced to properly replicate natural conditions
in each experiment; thus, any contrasts caused by these conditions reflect
differences in functioning of the two habitats. The presence of light in the
Ythan sand flat experiment means it is possible that some labelled DIC
produced by respiration may have been utilised during photosynthesis, leading
to an underestimation of respiration rate. However, as the isotopic labelling
level of DIC always remained below 1.33 at %, this is unlikely to have
had a measurable effect. The difference in water depth and core diameters was
driven by the practicality of collecting undisturbed sediment cores from the
two contrasting sediment types. While the difference in depth means that
photosynthesis and flux of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas to the atmosphere during emergent
periods would normally occur on the Ythan sand flat but not in Loch Etive,
they remain comparable in their temperatures and estuarine locations. The
difference in C dose added was minor (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %) and also driven by
practical constraints. Previous studies have found little impact of such
minor differences in C dose (Woulds et al., 2009). Where the amount of added
C has been observed to control biological processing patterns and rates, the
difference in C dose has been much more pronounced (10-fold, Buhring et al.,
2006b). We acknowledge that the C dose represented a different proportion of
naturally present OC at each site, and this could have led to an enhanced
response at the Ythan sand flat. However, surface sediment OC concentrations
are not necessarily a good reflection of actual C delivery to the seafloor,
given the different transport mechanisms in permeable and cohesive sediments
(see below). Further, there is a sparsity of data available on primary
production rates, particularly for the Ythan sand flat. Therefore maintaining
a uniform C addition was judged to yield the most comparable data. Thus,
while experimental details varied between Loch Etive and the Ythan sand flat,
we are confident that direct comparisons between the results of the two
experiments are valid.</p>
      <p>Due to practical constraints, meiofauna were not included in the analysis of
the Ythan sand flat experiment. Previous studies have found both that
meiofauna consume disproportionate amounts of C relative to their biomass
(Evrard et al., 2010) and that nematodes (a major meiofaunal group) made a
negligible contribution to C cycling (Moens et al., 2007). We are unable to
speculate how active the meiofauna were in C cycling in the present study,
but, despite wide variations in the importance of meiofaunal uptake (Nomaki
et al., 2005; Sweetman et al., 2009; Evrard et al., 2010), it is usually
similar to or less than macrofaunal C uptake (Nomaki et al., 2005; Evrard et
al., 2010). Thus, we consider it unlikely that the meiofaunal community was
involved in C processing on the same scale as observed for bacterial uptake
and total respiration, and exclusion of meiofauna in the Ythan sand flat
experiment is unlikely to have markedly altered the overall pattern of
biological C processing that we observed.</p>
      <p>There was a difference in the sieve mesh sizes used to collect macrofauna in
the two experiments (300 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in Loch Etive and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m on
the Ythan sand flat). The use of larger mesh sizes is more conventional and
practical in coarser-grained sediments. The larger mesh used on the Ythan
sand flat is likely to have reduced the macrofaunal biomass and C uptake
measured. However, the effect is likely to have been insufficient to explain
the striking differences in macrofaunal C uptake and biomass-specific uptake
seen between the two sites.</p>
      <p>Finally, the majority of fauna were too small for manual removal of gut
contents, and were therefore analysed with their gut contents in place. The
exception to this was two of the Loch Etive cores, which were allowed time to
void their guts before freezing. However, this did not produce a significant
difference in the macrofaunal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C pool between those cores and the other
two in which fauna retained their gut contents (Mann–Whitney, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.245</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Some infauna respond to starvation by retaining their gut contents for days
or weeks. Therefore it is possible that organisms either voided their guts
incompletely, or not at all. It is also possible that the amount of added C
residing in macrofaunal guts was comparatively small, as shown by Herman et
al. (2000), and thus not measurable above variation caused by faunal
patchiness. Thus the values reported here as faunal C uptake include C in
both gut contents' faunal tissue.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Respiration rates</title>
      <p>The respiration rates observed in Loch Etive and on the Ythan sand flat were
very similar (Fig. 2). This is unsurprising, as the two experiments were
conducted at the same temperature, and similar C loadings were applied.
Temperature is known to control sediment respiration rates through impacts on
diffusion and microbial process rates (Yvon-Durochet et al., 2015), and
benthic respiration has been shown to respond to temperature changes with a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2–3 (Kristensen, 2000). Further, after manipulating the
temperatures at which cores from both a deep-sea site and an estuarine site
were incubated, Moodley et al. (2005) found similar respiration rates of
added phytodetritus at similar temperatures, despite differences in water
depth and faunal community. Our finding of similar rates of respiration,
despite marked differences in influential factors such as macrofaunal
biomass, organic C concentration, and solute transport processes (Kristensen,
2000; Hubas et al., 2007; Huettel et al., 2014), supports the suggestion that
temperature is the dominant control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Faunal uptake</title>
      <p>In Loch Etive, the macrofauna overwhelmingly dominated total faunal C uptake
(accounting for 97 %) compared to metazoan meiofauna (0.1 %) and
foraminifera (2.5 %). These contributions were broadly similar to their
contributions to total faunal biomass (92, 1 and 7 % for macrofauna,
metazoan meiofauna and foraminifera, respectively). Thus, in line with
previous findings (Middelburg et al., 2000; Woulds et al., 2007; Hunter et
al., 2012), the distribution of C uptake amongst faunal classes was largely
determined by the relative biomass of each group. The dominance of faunal C
uptake by macrofauna has been observed previously. For example, in shorter
experiments on the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (Witte et al., 2003b), in the deep
Sognefjord (Witte et al., 2003a) and at certain sites on the Pakistan margin
(Woulds et al., 2007), macrofauna dominated faunal C uptake, and at an
Antarctic site, Moens et al. (2007) found that meiofaunal nematodes made a
negligible contribution to C uptake. However, uptake into the macrofaunal
pool can be most important during the initial response to an OC pulse, with
bacterial uptake and respiration becoming more important over longer
timescales (Moodley et al., 2002; Witte et al., 2003b). Also in contrast to
the findings above, metazoan meiofaunal and foraminiferal uptake have
previously been shown to be more important pathways for C (e.g. Moodley et
al., 2000). Where macrofauna are absent, or where conditions are
unfavourable, smaller taxa can dominate C uptake, such as within the Arabian
Sea oxygen minimum zone (Woulds et al., 2007). At other sites, meiofauna and
foraminifera have been shown to take up more C than macrofauna without the
presence of a stress factor. This was the case at 2170 m water depth in the
north-east Atlantic, in Sagami Bay and at a subtidal Wadden Sea site;
foraminifera and meiofauna have been observed to consume more C than
macrofauna, sometimes despite having lower biomass (Moodley et al., 2002;
Nomaki et al., 2005; Evrard et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>The marked uptake of C by macrofauna in Loch Etive was largely driven by two
species of ophuroid, which also dominated the macrofaunal biomass (Fig. 3).
However, the ophuroids accounted for a greater percentage of macrofaunal C
uptake than they accounted for macrofaunal biomass (Fig. 3), and thus were
disproportionately responsible for macrofaunal C uptake. On the Ythan sand
flat, the contribution to C uptake by the dominant oligochaetes was in line
with their biomass (both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %, Fig. 3). However, other faunal
groups contributed differently to biomass and C uptake. Nematodes were
responsible for less C uptake than expected, while the polychaetes,
amphipods, and molluscs fed comparatively efficiently on the added C. This is
in line with previous studies in which certain polychaete families have been
found to be selective or rapid feeders on fresh algal detritus (e.g. Woulds
et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>When C uptake is plotted against biomass for each faunal specimen analysed
across both study sites, a positive correlation is apparent (Fig. 4). This
correlation has been reported previously (Moodley et al., 2005; Woulds et
al., 2007), and suggests that faunal C uptake is largely driven by faunal
biomass, despite the fact that they are auto-correlations (uptake data are
derived by multiplying C contents of a specimen by its isotopic signature).
Within each site the distribution of C uptake amongst faunal groups was also
predominantly driven by biomass. However, the lower faunal biomass on the
Ythan sand flat does not fully explain the lower faunal C uptake observed
there, as biomass-specific C uptake was also considerably lower than in Loch
Etive. We suggest that the low OC standing stock in the permeable sediment of
the Ythan sand flat supports a lower biomass and a less active faunal
community with lower metabolic rates.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Log<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake against Log<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> C biomass for <bold>(a)</bold> all
specimens analysed in Loch Etive and on the Ythan sand flat, <bold>(b)</bold>
Loch Etive with taxonomic detail, and <bold>(c)</bold> the Ythan sand flat with
taxonomic detail.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The identity of fauna responsible for C uptake was in line with expectations
from some previous studies, but not with others, and the reasons for this
variation are not clear. Therefore, while overall faunal uptake is dictated
by biomass, it remains challenging to predict which faunal groups and taxa
will dominate C uptake in a particular benthic setting. This appears to be
determined by the complex interplay of factors that determine benthic
community composition, such as the nature and timing of food supply (Witte et
al., 2003a, b), environmental stressors (Woulds et al., 2007), feeding
strategies, and competition (Hunter et al., 2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Total biological C processing rates</title>
      <p>Loch Etive showed the largest amount of total biologically processed C
(Fig. 2). As both sites showed very similar respiration rates, the difference
in total biological C processing was driven by greater faunal uptake in Loch
Etive (Fig. 2), and this was a result of greater faunal biomass. The
relationship between biomass and total biological C processing is also shown
by data gathered from previously published isotope tracing experiments
(Table 1), which show a correlation between total biomass (faunal plus
bacterial) and total biological C processing rate (Pearson's correlation,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.499</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We therefore suggest that benthic community structure
impacts the total C processing capacity of benthic environments, through a
relationship between biomass and total biological C processing rates, with an
emphasis on the importance of macrofaunal biomass as indicated by the
importance of macrofauna in Loch Etive, and the fact that the proportion of
the bacterial biomass which is active can be rather variable (see below).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Short-term biological C processing categories</title>
      <p>The distribution of biologically processed C between different C pools
(biological C processing pattern, Fig. 2) varied markedly between the two
sites. While they both showed respiration to be an important process, the
dominant fate of biologically processed C in Loch Etive was uptake by
macrofauna, while on the Ythan sand flat it was uptake by bacteria (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p>A review of previous isotope tracing experiments proposed a categorisation of
short-term biological C processing patterns (Woulds et al., 2009), which can
be used as a framework to explain patterns observed in this study.</p>
      <p>Loch Etive was expected to show a short-term biological C processing pattern
in line with the category labelled “active faunal uptake”. In this
category, biological C processing is dominated by respiration, but faunal
uptake accounts for 10–25 % (Woulds et al., 2009). This category is
found in estuarine and nearshore sites which are warmer than the deep sea,
have slightly more abundant OM, and thus support higher biomass and more
active faunal communities. However, the short-term biological C processing
pattern observed in Loch Etive was most similar to the category labelled
“macrofaunal uptake dominated” (Fig. 5), in which uptake of C by macrofauna
accounts for a greater proportion of biologically processed C than total
community respiration (Woulds et al., 2009). This is an unusual pattern,
previously only observed in the lower margin of the Arabian Sea oxygen
minimum zone. It was hypothesised in that case that the occurrence of a
macrofaunal population capable of this magnitude of C uptake was due to the
presence of particularly high OC concentrations in the sediment, coupled with
sufficient oxygen for larger organisms. This explanation also applies to Loch
Etive, where the sediment OC concentration was nearly 5 %. In contrast to
the Arabian Sea site however, Loch Etive featured fully oxygenated bottom
water. Thus, the occurrence of macrofaunal uptake dominated short-term
biological C processing appears to be facilitated by high OC availability,
rather than by low oxygen conditions. Experiments conducted in Pearl Harbor
sites impacted by invasive mangroves also show OC availability controlling
the relative importance of faunal C uptake (Sweetman et al., 2010). A control
site was OC poor (0.5 % wt % OC) and showed respiration dominated
biological C processing (Fig. 5), while a nearby site from which invasive
mangroves had been removed showed active (macro)faunal uptake (Fig. 5), in
line with higher sediment OC content (3.1 % wt % OC) and an elevated
macrofaunal biomass.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Biological C processing pattern categories adapted from Woulds et
al. (2009), with the experiments from this study and the new category
“bacterial uptake dominated” added. Data sources are as follows: eastern
Mediterranean (E. Med.), north-eastern Atlantic, northern Aegean (N. Aegean)
and Scheldt Estuary 2: Moodley et al. (2005); Pakistan margin (Pak. 140, 300,
940, and 1850 m): Woulds et al. (2009); Sognefjord: Witte et al. (2003 a);
Scheldt Estuary 1: Moodley et al. (2000); Pearl Harbour: Sweetman et
al. (2010); Gulf of Gdansk: Evrard et al. (2012); German Bight: Buhring et
al. (2006).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4343/2016/bg-13-4343-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We hypothesised that the Ythan sand flat would show a short-term biological C
processing pattern that did not fit with the categories suggested by Woulds
et al. (2009). Our hypothesis was supported, as biological C processing on
the Ythan sand flat was dominated by bacterial C uptake (Fig. 2). There have
been indications in previous isotope tracing experiments in sandy sediments
of the German Bight that bacterial C uptake may be particularly important in
sandy sediments (Buhring et al., 2006a). Thus we now combine the previous and
current results and propose a new biological C processing category labelled
“bacterial uptake dominated” (Fig. 5). In the new category, bacterial
uptake is the dominant short-term fate of biologically processed C,
accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35–70 %. Respiration remains important,
accounting for 25–40 % of biologically processed C, and faunal uptake
tends to account for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5–20 %.</p>
      <p>The new category of biological C processing so far has only been observed in
two experiments targeting sandy, permeable sediments, and so the features of
such sediments appear to favour bacterial C uptake. Advective porewater
exchange in permeable sediments has been shown to enhance the rates of
microbial processes such as remineralisation and nitrification (Huettel et
al., 2014) through rapid supply of oxygen and flushing of respiratory
metabolites. This is balanced by introduction of fresh OC as algal cells are
filtered out of advecting porewater (Ehrenhauss and Huettel, 2004); thus,
substrate and electron acceptors for bacterial respiration are supplied.</p>
      <p>While permeable sediments generally have similar or lower bacterial
abundances than muddy sediments, their bacterial communities tend to be
highly active, and it has been suggested that, because they are subjected to
rapidly changing biogeochemical conditions, they are poised to respond
rapidly to OC input (Huettel et al., 2014). Notably however, the rapid rates
of bacterial activity observed in permeable sediments do not typically lead
to build-up of bacterial biomass (Huettel et al., 2014). This may be due to
regular removal of bacterial biomass during sediment reworking, in line with
observations of seasonal changes in clogging of pore spaces in sandy
sediment (Zetsche et al., 2011a).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sources and site details of previous isotope tracing experiment
data. PAP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Porcupine Abyssal Plain. For Woulds et al. (2009)
experiments, PM is the Pakistan margin, “pre” and “post” indicate pre- or
post-monsoon seasons, and 2d or 5d indicate approximate experiment durations
in days. In some other cases experiment durations are indicated in hours
(h).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.66}[.66]?><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Site/experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Incubation duration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Macrofaunal biomass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Bacterial biomass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Respiration rate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Total processing rate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(h)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2000)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oosterschelde</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.758</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">13.150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North-western Spain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2170</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.083</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.290</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Witte et al. (2003b)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PAP 60 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.167</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.225</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Witte et al. (2003b)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PAP 192 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">192</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.167</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.188</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Witte et al. (2003b)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PAP 552 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">552</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.236</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.263</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Witte et al. (2003a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sognefjord 36 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1265</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">250</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.539</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.781</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Witte et al. (2003a)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sognefjord 72 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1265</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">250</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.451</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.715</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Sea (perturbed)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">756</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2688</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.735</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N. Agean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">102</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">522</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.895</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.075</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N. Agean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">698</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">366</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.290</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">E. Med.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1552</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">254</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.750</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.830</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">E. Med.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3859</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">312</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.495</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.610</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North-eastern Atlantic 24 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2170</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">313</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.330</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Sea</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">732</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2304</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.600</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Moodley et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Estuary</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1356</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1260</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.545</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.705</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bhuring et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">German Bight 12 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.258</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.592</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bhuring et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">German Bight 30 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.620</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.523</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bhuring et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">German Bight 132 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">132</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.258</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.667</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bhuring et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">German Bight in situ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n.d.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.338</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.834</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 140 2 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.827</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.750</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 140 2 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.066</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.977</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 140 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">118</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.164</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.611</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 140 in situ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.705</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.955</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 300 2 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.365</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.487</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 300 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">127</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.285</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.386</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 300 2 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.527</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.931</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 300 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">155</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.477</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.865</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 300 in situ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.035</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.250</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 850 2 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.064</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.934</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 940 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">940</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">112</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">910</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">700</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.469</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.933</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 940 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">940</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">113</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">910</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">700</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.486</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.274</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 940 in situ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">940</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">910</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">700</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.155</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.986</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 1000 2 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.411</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 1200 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">114</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.274</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.289</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 1850 2 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.065</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.235</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM pre 1850 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">117</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.434</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.506</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Woulds et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM post 1850 5 d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1850</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.459</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.623</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sweetman et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearl Harbour control</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">337</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.835</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.343</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sweetman et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearl Harbour removal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3391</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.349</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.401</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sweetman et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pearl Harbour mangrove</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">713</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18154</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.456</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.048</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sweetman et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kaneohe Bay control</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">882</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.125</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.849</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sweetman et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kaneohe Bay removal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1435</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.295</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.475</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Evrard et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wadden Sea</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Photic subtidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.031</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.034</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Evrard et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gulf of Gdansk (sandy)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">558</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">407</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.047</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.061</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This study</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Loch Etive</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">156</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4337</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5515</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.638</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.994</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This study</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ythan sand flat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intertidal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">162</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">455</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7657</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.633</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.421</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The domination of short-term biological C processing by bacterial uptake
implies a high value for bacterial growth efficiency (BGE). This is
calculated as bacterial secondary production divided by the sum of bacterial
secondary production and bacterial respiration. Bacterial respiration is not
quantified here; however, it is likely that a large proportion of total
community respiration is attributable to bacteria (Schwinghamer et al., 1986;
Hubas et al., 2006). For the sake of discussion, BGE has been approximated
for the Ythan sand flat experiments as bacterial C uptake divided by the sum
of bacterial C uptake and total community respiration, giving a conservative
estimate of 0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18. This is at the high end of the range of values
(&lt; 0.05 to &gt; 0.5) reported in a review of growth
efficiency for planktonic bacteria (Del Giorgio and Cole, 1998), but is in
line with the modelled value of &gt; 0.5 for the most productive
coastal and estuarine sites (Del Giorgio and Cole, 1998). Bacterial growth
efficiency is widely variable, both spatially and temporally, and the factors
that control it are not well understood. However, both the rate of supply of
organic substrate and its composition (bioavailable energy) seem to be
positively correlated with BGE, and it tends to increase from oligotrophic to
eutrophic environments (Del Giorgio and Cole, 1998). This is consistent with
high BGE in permeable sediments, which have a high input of fresh OC from
filtering during advective porewater flow (Ehrenhauss and Huettel, 2004), and
where a high proportion of bacterial cells may be active (as indicated by
higher biomass-specific uptake on the Ythan sand flat).</p>
      <p>Finally, faunal uptake was relatively minor in the Ythan sand flat
experiment, and this suggests that bacterial C uptake may have been favoured
by a lack of competition from or grazing by macrofauna. A negative
relationship has previously been observed between macrofaunal biomass and
bacterial C and N uptake in the Arabian Sea, and a similar effect has been
observed in the Whittard Canyon (Hunter et al., 2012, 2013).</p>
      <p>The short-term biological C processing patterns presented in Fig. 5 can
accommodate most observations in the literature, but some findings do not fit
in this conceptual scheme. For example, an experiment conducted in permeable
sediments of the Gulf of Gdansk does not show the expected bacterial
dominated biological C processing pattern. Instead it shows respiration
dominated biological C processing, with bacterial uptake responsible for only
16 % (Fig. 5). Further, an OC rich site with invasive mangroves in Hawaii
shows respiration dominated biological C processing, instead of an “active
faunal uptake” pattern (Fig. 5, Sweetman et al., 2010), due to mangrove
roots and detritus making the sediment inhospitable to macrofauna.</p>
      <p>Finally, bacterial uptake dominated short-term biological C processing has
also been observed over 3 days in sediments from the Faroe–Shetland channel
at a depth of 1080 m (Gontikaki et al., 2011). This is considerably deeper
than all other observations, and the sediments contained a muddy fraction,
although also featuring grains up to gravel size. Thus this site does not fit
the same general description as others showing bacterial uptake dominated
biological C processing. In this case bacterial uptake dominated C processing
was observed over the initial 3 days of the experiment, and after 6 days
biological C processing was respiration dominated, in line with expectations.
The authors explained the initial rapid uptake of C by bacteria as a reaction
to the initially available reactive fraction of the added OM, before
hydrolysis of the remaining OC began in earnest (Gontikaki et al., 2011b). The
Porcupine Abyssal Plain also showed a change in short-term biological C
processing category between different experiment durations, showing an
unexpected active faunal uptake pattern after 60 h and the more expected
“respiration dominated” pattern after 192 and 552 h (Table 1). This was
explained as being due to the motility and selective feeding abilities of the
macrofauna, allowing them to initially outcompete bacteria. The majority of
studies which have included experiments of multiple short-term durations at
the same site have showed consistency of short-term biological C processing
patterns (Table 1; Witte et al., 2003; Bhuring et al., 2006; Woulds et al.,
2009); therefore, variation in experiment duration amongst the studies cited
is not thought to be a major driver of short-term biological C processing
patterns.</p>
      <p>In summary, the proposed categorisation of short-term biological C processing
patterns works well across many different sites, but variation in
characteristics of individual sites can still lead to some unexpected
results.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The rate of respiration of added phytodetritus was dominantly controlled by
temperature, rather than other factors such as benthic community biomass,
sediment OC concentration, or solute transport mechanism.</p>
      <p>Faunal C uptake was related to faunal biomass. Further, total biological C
processing rates in this and previous studies appear to be dominantly
determined by benthic biomass. Therefore benthic community structure has a
role in controlling the C processing capacity of benthic environments.</p>
      <p>A new biological C processing pattern category was proposed to be titled
“bacterial uptake dominated”, which seems usually to be observed in
permeable sediments, where conditions are particularly conducive to active
bacterial populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>Data associated with this work are available from the Research Data Leeds
repository under a CC-BY license at: <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5518/92" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5518/92</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4343-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-13-4343-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>C. Woulds designed and conducted the experiments with input from G. Cowie, J.
Middelburg, and U. Witte. Sample analysis was completed by C. Woulds, S.
Bouillon, and E. Drake. C. Woulds prepared the manuscript with the assistance
of all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank Eva-Maria Zetsche, Val Johnson, Owen
McPherson, Caroline Gill, and Gwylim Lynn for assistance with the Ythan sand
flat fieldwork, and Matthew Schwartz, Rachel Jeffreys, Kate Larkin, Andy
Gooday, and Christine Whitcraft for assistance with the Loch Etive fieldwork.
Jonathan Carrivick created Fig. 1. The work was funded by the Natural
Environment Research Council and the Netherlands Earth System Science Center.
We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments which
helped to improve the manuscript. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:
C. Heinze</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C.: Bioturbation and remineralisation of sedimentary organic
matter: Effects of redox oscillation, Chem. Geol., 114, 331–345, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ansell, A. D.: Sedimentation of organic detritus in lochs-etive and creran,
argyll, scotland, Mar. Biol., 27, 263–273, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Aspetsberger, F., Zabel, M., Ferdelman, T., Struck, U., Mackensen, A., Ahke,
A., and Witte, U.: Instantaneous benthic response to different organic matter
quality: in situ experiments in the Benguela Upwelling System, Mar. Biol.
Res., 3, 342–356, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, R. A.: Burial of organic carbon and pyritic sulphur in the modern
ocean: Its geochemical and environmental significance, Am. J. Sci., 282,
451–473, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bradshaw, S. A., O'Hara, S. C. M., Corner, E. D. S., and Eglinton, G.:
Changes in lipids during simulated herbivorous feeding by the marine
crustacean <italic>Neomysis integer</italic>, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 70, 225–243,
1990a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bradshaw, S. A., O'Hara, S. C. M., Corner, E. D. S., and Eglinton, G.: Dietry
lipid changes during herbivory and corophagy by the marine invertebrate
<italic>Nereis diversicolor</italic>, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 70, 771–787, 1990b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, S. A., Eglinton, G., O'Hara, S. C. M., and Corner, E. D. S.:
Biogeochemical changes in lipids in a model marine food chain, in: Diversity
of Environmental Biogeochemistry, edited by: Berthelin, J., Developments in
Geochemistry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bradshaw, S. A., O'Hara, S. C. M., Corner, E. D. S., and Eglinton, G.:
Effects on dietry lipids of the marine bivalve <italic>Scrobicularia plana</italic>
feeding in different modes, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 71, 635–653, 1991b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Buhring, S. I., Ehrenhauss, S., Kamp, A., Moodley, L., and Witte, U.:
Enhanced benthic activity in sandy sublittoral sediments: Evidence from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C tracer experiments, Mar. Biol. Res., 2, 120–129, 2006a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Buhring, S. I., Lampadariou, N., Moodley, L., Tselepides, A., and Witte, U.:
Benthic microbial and whole-community responses to different amounts of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched algae: In situ experiments in the deep Cretan Sea (Eastern
Mediterranean), Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 157–165, 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E.: Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine
sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 315–329, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
del Giorgio, P. A. and Cole, J. J.: Bacterial growth efficiency in natural
aquatic systems, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29, 503–541, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J., and Caraco, N.: Major role of marine
vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle, Biogeosciences, 2, 1–8,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-1-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2-1-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ehrenhauss, S. and Huettel, M.: Advective transport and decomposition of
chain-forming planktonic diatoms in permeable sediments, J. Sea Res., 52,
179–197, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Evrard, V., Soetaert, K., Heip, C. H. R., Huettel, M., Xenopoulos, M. A., and
Middelburg, J. J.: Carbon and nitrogen flows through the benthic food web of
a photic subtidal sandy sediment, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 416, 1–16, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Evrard, V., Huettel, M., Cook, P. L. M., Soetaert, K., Heip, C. H. R., and
Middelburg, J. J.: Importance of phytodetritus and microphytobenthos for
heterotrophs in a shallow subtidal sandy sediment, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
455, 13–31, 2012.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gage, J. D.: Community structure of the benthos in Scottish sea-lochs, I.
Introduction and species diversity, J. Mar. Biol., 14, 281–297, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gontikaki, E., Mayor, D. J., Narayanaswamy, B. E., and Witte, U.: Feeding
strategies of deep-sea sub-Arctic macrofauna of the Faroe-Shetland Channel:
Combining natural stable isotopes and enrichment techniques, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. I, 58, 160–172, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gontikaki, E., Mayor, D. J., Thornton, B., Black, K., and Witte, U.:
Processing of C-13-labelled diatoms by a bathyal community at sub-zero
temperatures, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 421, 39–50, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gontikaki, E., van Oevelen, D., Soetaert, K., and Witte, U.: Food web flows
through a sub-arctic deep-sea benthic community, Prog. Oceanogr., 91,
245–259, 2011c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hartnett, H. E., Keil, R. G., Hedges, J. I., and Devol, A. H.: Influence of
oxygen exposure time on organic carbon preservation in continental margin
sediments, Nature, 391, 572–574, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Keil, R. G.: Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an
assesment and speculative synthesis, Mar. Chem., 49, 81–115, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Herman, P. M. J., Middelburg, J. J., Van de Koppel, J., and Heip, C. H. R.:
Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos, in: Advances in Ecological Research, Vol.
29, Estuaries, edited by: Nedwell, D. B. and Raffaelli, D. G., Adv. Ecol.
Res., 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Herman, P. M. J., Middelburg, J. J., Widdows, J., Lucas, C. H., and Heip, C.
H. R.: Stable isotopes' as trophic tracers: combining field sampling and
manipulative labelling of food resources for macrobenthos, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 204, 79–92, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hubas, C., Davoult, D., Cariou, T., and Artigas, L. F.: Factors controlling
benthic metabolism during low tide along a granulometric gradient in an
intertidal bay (Roscoff Aber Bay, France), Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 316,
53–68, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hubas, C., Artigas, L. F., and Davoult, D.: Role of the bacterial community
in the annual benthic metabolism of two contrasted temperate intertidal sites
(Roscoff Aber Bay, France), Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 344, 39–48, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M., Berg, P., and Kostka, J. E.: Benthic Exchange and Biogeochemical
Cycling in Permeable Sediments, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 6, 23–51, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hunter, W. R., Levin, L. A., Kitazato, H., and Witte, U.: Macrobenthic
assemblage structure and organismal stoichiometry control faunal processing
of particulate organic carbon and nitrogen in oxygen minimum zone sediments,
Biogeosciences, 9, 993–1006, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-993-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-993-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hunter, W. R., Jamieson, A., Huvenne, V. A. I., and Witte, U.: Sediment
community responses to marine vs. terrigenous organic matter in a submarine
canyon, Biogeosciences, 10, 67–80, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-67-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-67-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, E.: organic matter diagenesis at the oxic/anoxic interface in
coastal marine sediments with emphasis on the role of burrowing animals,
Hydrobiologia, 426, 1–24, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kristensen, E: Impact of polychaetes (Nereis spp. and Arenicola marina) on
carbon biogeochemistry in coastal marine sediments, Geochem. Trans, 12,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b108114d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/b108114d</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Loh, P. S., Reeves, A. D., Harvey, S. M., Overnell, J., and Miller, A. E. J.:
The fate of terrestrial organic matter in two Scottish sea lochs, Estuar.
Coast. Shelf Sci., 76, 566–579, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in
continental shelf sediments, Geochem. Cosmochem. Ac., 58, 1271–1284, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J.: Stable isotopes dissect aquatic food webs from the top to
the bottom, Biogeosciences, 11, 2357–2371, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2357-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-2357-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J. and Levin, L. A.: Coastal hypoxia and sediment
biogeochemistry, Biogeosciences, 6, 1273–1293, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1273-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-1273-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Middelburg, J. J., Barranguet, C., Boschker, H. T. S., Herman, P. M., Moens,
T., and Heip, C. H. R.: The fate of intertidal microphytobenthos carbon: An
in situ <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-labeling study, Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 1224–1234, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Moens, T., Vanhove, S., De Mesel, I., Kelemen, B., Janssens, T., Dewicke, A.,
and Vanreusel, A.: Carbon sources of Antarctic nematodes as revealed by
natural carbon isotope ratios and a pulse-chase experiment, Polar Biol., 31,
1–13, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Moodley, L., Boschker, H. T. S., Middelburg, J. J., Pel, R., Herman, P. M.
J., de Deckere, E., and Heip, C. H. R.: Ecological significance of benthic
foraminifera: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C labelling experiments, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 202,
289–295, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Moodley, L., Middelburg, J. J., Boschker, H. T. S., Duineveld, G. C. A., Pel,
R., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H. R.: Bacteria and foraminifera: Key players
in a short-term deep-sea benthic response to phytodetritus, Mar. Ecol. Prog.
Ser., 236, 23–29, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Moodley, L., Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Boschker, H. T. S., Herman, P.
M., and Heip, C. H. R.: Similar rapid response to phytodetritus deposition on
shallow and deep-sea sediments, J. Mar. Res., 63, 457–469, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mullins, H. T., Thompson, J. B., McDougall, K., and Vercoutere, T. L.:
Oxygen-minimum zone edge effects – evidence from the central California
coastal upwelling system, Geology, 13, 491–494, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Nomaki, H., Heinz, P., Hemleben, C., and Kitazato, H.: Behaviour and response
of deep-sea benthic foraminifera to freshly supplied organic matter: A
laboratory feeding experiment in microcosm environments, J. Foramin. Res.,
35, 103–113, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Overnell, J., Harvey, S. M., and Parkes, R. J.: A biogeochemical comparison
of sea loch sediments. Manganese and iron contents, sulphate reduction and
oxygen uptake rates, Oceanol. Acta, 19, 41–55, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Pozzato, L., Van Oevelen, D., Moodley, L., Soetaert, K., and Middelburg, J.
J.: Sink or link? The bacterial role in benthic carbon cycling in the Arabian
Sea's oxygen minimum zone, Biogeosciences, 10, 6879–6891,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6879-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6879-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Schimmelmann, A., Albertino, A., Sauer, P. E., Qi, H., Molinie, R., and
Mesnard, F.: Nicotine, acetanilide and urea multi-level H-2-, C-13- and
N-15-abundance reference materials for continuous-flow isotope ratio mass
spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 23, 3513–3521, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Schwinghamer, P., Hargrave, B., Peer, D., and Hawkins, C. M.: Partitioning of
production and respiration among size groups of organisms in an intertidal
benthic community, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 31, 131–142, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, R. W., Bianchi, T. S., Allison, M., Savage, C., and Galy, V.: High
rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally, Nat. Geosci., 8,
450–453, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, M. Y., Cai, W. J., Joye, S. B., Ding, H., Dai, J., and Hollinbaugh, J.
T.: Degradation of algal lipids in microcosm sediments with different mixing
regimes, Org. Geochem., 33, 445–459, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sweetman, A. K., Sommer, S., Pfannkuche, O., and Witte, U.: Retarded response
by macrofauna-size foraminifera to phytodetritus in a deep norwegian fjord,
J. Foramin. Res., 39, 15–22, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Sweetman, A. K., Middelburg, J. J., Berle, A. M., Bernardino, A. F.,
Schander, C., Demopoulos, A. W. J., and Smith, C. R.: Impacts of exotic
mangrove forests and mangrove deforestation on carbon remineralization and
ecosystem functioning in marine sediments, Biogeosciences, 7, 2129–2145,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2129-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-2129-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Witte, U., Aberle, N., Sand, M., and Wenzhofer, F.: Rapid response of a
deep-sea benthic community to POM enrichment: an <italic>in situ</italic>
experimental study, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 251, 27–36, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Witte, U., Wenzhofer, F., Sommer, S., Boetius, A., Heinz, P., Aberle, N.,
Sand, M., Cremer, A., Abraham, W.-R., Jorgensen, B. B., and Pfannkuche, O.:
In situ experimental evidence of the fate of a phytodetritus pulse at the
abyssal sea floor, Nature, 424, 763–766, 2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, B. J. B., Tett, P. B., and Edwards, A.: Introduction to phytoplankton,
primary production and relevant hydrography of Loch Etive, J. Ecol., 61,
569–585, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Woulds, C., Cowie, G. L., Levin, L. A., Andersson, J. H., Middelburg, J. J.,
Vandewiele, S., Lamont, P. A., Larkin, K. E., Gooday, A. J., Schumacher, S.,
Whitcraft, C., Jeffreys, R. M., and Schwartz, M. C.: Oxygen as a control on
seafloor biological communities and their roles in sedimentary carbon
cycling, Limnol. Oceanogr., 52, 1698–1709, 2007.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Woulds, C., Andersson, J. H., Cowie, G. L., Middelburg, J. J., and Levin, L.
A.: The short-term fate of organic carbon in marine sediments: Comparing the
Pakistan margin to other regions, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 393–402, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Woulds, C., Middelburg, J. J., and Cowie, G. L.: Alteration of organic matter
during infaunal polychaete gut passage and links to sediment organic
geochemistry, Part I: Amino acids, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 77, 396–414,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Woulds, C., Middelburg, J. J., and Cowie, G. L.: Alteration of organic matter
during infaunal polychaete gut passage and links to sediment organic
geochemistry, Part II: Fatty acids and aldoses, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 136,
38–59, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Yvon-Durocher, G., Caffrey, J. M., Cescatti, A., Dossena, M., del Giorgio,
P., Gasol, J. M., Montoya, J. M., Pumpanen, J., Staehr, P. A., Trimmer, M.,
Woodward, G., and Allen, A. P.: Reconciling the temperature dependence of
respiration across timescales and ecosystem types, Nature, 487, 472–476,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zetsche, E., Paterson, D. M., Lumsdon, D. G., and Witte, U.: Temporal
variation in the sediment permeability of an intertidal sandflat, Mar. Ecol.
Prog. Ser., 441, 49–63, 2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zetsche, E., Thornton, B., Midwood, A. J., and Witte, U.: Utilisation of
different carbon sources in a shallow estuary identified through stable
isotope techniques, Cont. Shelf Res., 31, 832–840, 2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zetsche, E., Bulling, M. T., and Witte, U.: Permeability of intertidal
sandflats: Impact of temporal variability on sediment metabolism, Cont. Shelf
Res., 42, 41–50, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Patterns of carbon processing at the seafloor: the role of faunal and
microbial communities in moderating carbon flows</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Marine sediments, particularly those located in estuarine and coastal zones,
are key locations for the burial of organic carbon (C). However, organic C
delivered to the sediment is subjected to a range of biological C-cycling
processes, the rates and relative importance of which vary markedly between
sites, and which are thus difficult to predict.</p><p class="p">In this study, stable isotope tracer experiments were used to quantify the
processing of C by microbial and faunal communities in two contrasting
Scottish estuarine sites: a subtidal, organic C rich site in Loch Etive with
cohesive fine-grained sediment, and an intertidal, organic C poor site on an
Ythan estuary sand flat with coarse-grained permeable sediments.</p><p class="p">In both experiments, sediment cores were recovered and amended with <sup>13</sup>C
labelled phytodetritus to quantify whole community respiration of the added C
and to trace the isotope label into faunal and bacterial biomass. Similar
respiration rates were found in Loch Etive and on the Ythan sand flat
(0.64 ± 0.04 and 0.63 ± 0.12 mg C m<sup>−2</sup>h<sup>−1</sup>,
respectively), which we attribute to the experiments being conducted at the
same temperature. Faunal uptake of added C over the whole experiment was
markedly greater in Loch Etive (204 ± 72 mg C m<sup>−2</sup>) than on the
Ythan sand flat (0.96 ± 0.3 mg C m<sup>−2</sup>), and this difference was
driven by a difference in both faunal biomass and activity. Conversely,
bacterial C uptake over the whole experiment in Loch Etive was much lower
than that on the Ythan sand flat (1.80 ± 1.66 and
127 ± 89 mg C m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively). This was not driven by
differences in biomass, indicating that the bacterial community in the
permeable Ythan sediments was particularly active, being responsible for
48 ± 18 % of total biologically processed C. This type of
biological C processing appears to be favoured in permeable sediments. The
total amount of biologically processed C was greatest in Loch Etive, largely
due to greater faunal C uptake, which was in turn a result of higher faunal
biomass. When comparing results from this study with a wide range of
previously published isotope tracing experiments, we found a strong
correlation between total benthic biomass (fauna plus bacteria) and total
biological C processing rates. Therefore, we suggest that the total C-cycling
capacity of benthic environments is primarily determined by total biomass.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C.: Bioturbation and remineralisation of sedimentary organic
matter: Effects of redox oscillation, Chem. Geol., 114, 331–345, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ansell, A. D.: Sedimentation of organic detritus in lochs-etive and creran,
argyll, scotland, Mar. Biol., 27, 263–273, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Aspetsberger, F., Zabel, M., Ferdelman, T., Struck, U., Mackensen, A., Ahke,
A., and Witte, U.: Instantaneous benthic response to different organic matter
quality: in situ experiments in the Benguela Upwelling System, Mar. Biol.
Res., 3, 342–356, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, R. A.: Burial of organic carbon and pyritic sulphur in the modern
ocean: Its geochemical and environmental significance, Am. J. Sci., 282,
451–473, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, S. A., O'Hara, S. C. M., Corner, E. D. S., and Eglinton, G.:
Changes in lipids during simulated herbivorous feeding by the marine
crustacean <i>Neomysis integer</i>, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 70, 225–243,
1990a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, S. A., O'Hara, S. C. M., Corner, E. D. S., and Eglinton, G.: Dietry
lipid changes during herbivory and corophagy by the marine invertebrate
<i>Nereis diversicolor</i>, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 70, 771–787, 1990b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, S. A., Eglinton, G., O'Hara, S. C. M., and Corner, E. D. S.:
Biogeochemical changes in lipids in a model marine food chain, in: Diversity
of Environmental Biogeochemistry, edited by: Berthelin, J., Developments in
Geochemistry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, S. A., O'Hara, S. C. M., Corner, E. D. S., and Eglinton, G.:
Effects on dietry lipids of the marine bivalve <i>Scrobicularia plana</i>
feeding in different modes, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 71, 635–653, 1991b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Buhring, S. I., Ehrenhauss, S., Kamp, A., Moodley, L., and Witte, U.:
Enhanced benthic activity in sandy sublittoral sediments: Evidence from
<sup>13</sup>C tracer experiments, Mar. Biol. Res., 2, 120–129, 2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Buhring, S. I., Lampadariou, N., Moodley, L., Tselepides, A., and Witte, U.:
Benthic microbial and whole-community responses to different amounts of
<sup>13</sup>C-enriched algae: In situ experiments in the deep Cretan Sea (Eastern
Mediterranean), Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 157–165, 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E.: Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine
sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 315–329, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
del Giorgio, P. A. and Cole, J. J.: Bacterial growth efficiency in natural
aquatic systems, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29, 503–541, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J., and Caraco, N.: Major role of marine
vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle, Biogeosciences, 2, 1–8,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-1-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-2-1-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Ehrenhauss, S. and Huettel, M.: Advective transport and decomposition of
chain-forming planktonic diatoms in permeable sediments, J. Sea Res., 52,
179–197, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Evrard, V., Soetaert, K., Heip, C. H. R., Huettel, M., Xenopoulos, M. A., and
Middelburg, J. J.: Carbon and nitrogen flows through the benthic food web of
a photic subtidal sandy sediment, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 416, 1–16, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Evrard, V., Huettel, M., Cook, P. L. M., Soetaert, K., Heip, C. H. R., and
Middelburg, J. J.: Importance of phytodetritus and microphytobenthos for
heterotrophs in a shallow subtidal sandy sediment, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
455, 13–31, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gage, J. D.: Community structure of the benthos in Scottish sea-lochs, I.
Introduction and species diversity, J. Mar. Biol., 14, 281–297, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gontikaki, E., Mayor, D. J., Narayanaswamy, B. E., and Witte, U.: Feeding
strategies of deep-sea sub-Arctic macrofauna of the Faroe-Shetland Channel:
Combining natural stable isotopes and enrichment techniques, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. I, 58, 160–172, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gontikaki, E., Mayor, D. J., Thornton, B., Black, K., and Witte, U.:
Processing of C-13-labelled diatoms by a bathyal community at sub-zero
temperatures, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 421, 39–50, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gontikaki, E., van Oevelen, D., Soetaert, K., and Witte, U.: Food web flows
through a sub-arctic deep-sea benthic community, Prog. Oceanogr., 91,
245–259, 2011c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hartnett, H. E., Keil, R. G., Hedges, J. I., and Devol, A. H.: Influence of
oxygen exposure time on organic carbon preservation in continental margin
sediments, Nature, 391, 572–574, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Keil, R. G.: Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an
assesment and speculative synthesis, Mar. Chem., 49, 81–115, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Herman, P. M. J., Middelburg, J. J., Van de Koppel, J., and Heip, C. H. R.:
Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos, in: Advances in Ecological Research, Vol.
29, Estuaries, edited by: Nedwell, D. B. and Raffaelli, D. G., Adv. Ecol.
Res., 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Herman, P. M. J., Middelburg, J. J., Widdows, J., Lucas, C. H., and Heip, C.
H. R.: Stable isotopes' as trophic tracers: combining field sampling and
manipulative labelling of food resources for macrobenthos, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 204, 79–92, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hubas, C., Davoult, D., Cariou, T., and Artigas, L. F.: Factors controlling
benthic metabolism during low tide along a granulometric gradient in an
intertidal bay (Roscoff Aber Bay, France), Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 316,
53–68, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hubas, C., Artigas, L. F., and Davoult, D.: Role of the bacterial community
in the annual benthic metabolism of two contrasted temperate intertidal sites
(Roscoff Aber Bay, France), Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 344, 39–48, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M., Berg, P., and Kostka, J. E.: Benthic Exchange and Biogeochemical
Cycling in Permeable Sediments, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 6, 23–51, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hunter, W. R., Levin, L. A., Kitazato, H., and Witte, U.: Macrobenthic
assemblage structure and organismal stoichiometry control faunal processing
of particulate organic carbon and nitrogen in oxygen minimum zone sediments,
Biogeosciences, 9, 993–1006, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-993-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-993-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hunter, W. R., Jamieson, A., Huvenne, V. A. I., and Witte, U.: Sediment
community responses to marine vs. terrigenous organic matter in a submarine
canyon, Biogeosciences, 10, 67–80, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-67-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-67-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, E.: organic matter diagenesis at the oxic/anoxic interface in
coastal marine sediments with emphasis on the role of burrowing animals,
Hydrobiologia, 426, 1–24, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kristensen, E: Impact of polychaetes (Nereis spp. and Arenicola marina) on
carbon biogeochemistry in coastal marine sediments, Geochem. Trans, 12,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b108114d" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/b108114d</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Loh, P. S., Reeves, A. D., Harvey, S. M., Overnell, J., and Miller, A. E. J.:
The fate of terrestrial organic matter in two Scottish sea lochs, Estuar.
Coast. Shelf Sci., 76, 566–579, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in
continental shelf sediments, Geochem. Cosmochem. Ac., 58, 1271–1284, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J.: Stable isotopes dissect aquatic food webs from the top to
the bottom, Biogeosciences, 11, 2357–2371, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2357-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-11-2357-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J. and Levin, L. A.: Coastal hypoxia and sediment
biogeochemistry, Biogeosciences, 6, 1273–1293, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1273-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-6-1273-2009</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J., Barranguet, C., Boschker, H. T. S., Herman, P. M., Moens,
T., and Heip, C. H. R.: The fate of intertidal microphytobenthos carbon: An
in situ <sup>13</sup>C-labeling study, Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 1224–1234, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Moens, T., Vanhove, S., De Mesel, I., Kelemen, B., Janssens, T., Dewicke, A.,
and Vanreusel, A.: Carbon sources of Antarctic nematodes as revealed by
natural carbon isotope ratios and a pulse-chase experiment, Polar Biol., 31,
1–13, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Moodley, L., Boschker, H. T. S., Middelburg, J. J., Pel, R., Herman, P. M.
J., de Deckere, E., and Heip, C. H. R.: Ecological significance of benthic
foraminifera: <sup>13</sup>C labelling experiments, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 202,
289–295, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Moodley, L., Middelburg, J. J., Boschker, H. T. S., Duineveld, G. C. A., Pel,
R., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H. R.: Bacteria and foraminifera: Key players
in a short-term deep-sea benthic response to phytodetritus, Mar. Ecol. Prog.
Ser., 236, 23–29, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Moodley, L., Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Boschker, H. T. S., Herman, P.
M., and Heip, C. H. R.: Similar rapid response to phytodetritus deposition on
shallow and deep-sea sediments, J. Mar. Res., 63, 457–469, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mullins, H. T., Thompson, J. B., McDougall, K., and Vercoutere, T. L.:
Oxygen-minimum zone edge effects – evidence from the central California
coastal upwelling system, Geology, 13, 491–494, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Nomaki, H., Heinz, P., Hemleben, C., and Kitazato, H.: Behaviour and response
of deep-sea benthic foraminifera to freshly supplied organic matter: A
laboratory feeding experiment in microcosm environments, J. Foramin. Res.,
35, 103–113, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Overnell, J., Harvey, S. M., and Parkes, R. J.: A biogeochemical comparison
of sea loch sediments. Manganese and iron contents, sulphate reduction and
oxygen uptake rates, Oceanol. Acta, 19, 41–55, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Pozzato, L., Van Oevelen, D., Moodley, L., Soetaert, K., and Middelburg, J.
J.: Sink or link? The bacterial role in benthic carbon cycling in the Arabian
Sea's oxygen minimum zone, Biogeosciences, 10, 6879–6891,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6879-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-6879-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Schimmelmann, A., Albertino, A., Sauer, P. E., Qi, H., Molinie, R., and
Mesnard, F.: Nicotine, acetanilide and urea multi-level H-2-, C-13- and
N-15-abundance reference materials for continuous-flow isotope ratio mass
spectrometry, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 23, 3513–3521, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Schwinghamer, P., Hargrave, B., Peer, D., and Hawkins, C. M.: Partitioning of
production and respiration among size groups of organisms in an intertidal
benthic community, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 31, 131–142, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, R. W., Bianchi, T. S., Allison, M., Savage, C., and Galy, V.: High
rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally, Nat. Geosci., 8,
450–453, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, M. Y., Cai, W. J., Joye, S. B., Ding, H., Dai, J., and Hollinbaugh, J.
T.: Degradation of algal lipids in microcosm sediments with different mixing
regimes, Org. Geochem., 33, 445–459, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sweetman, A. K., Sommer, S., Pfannkuche, O., and Witte, U.: Retarded response
by macrofauna-size foraminifera to phytodetritus in a deep norwegian fjord,
J. Foramin. Res., 39, 15–22, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Sweetman, A. K., Middelburg, J. J., Berle, A. M., Bernardino, A. F.,
Schander, C., Demopoulos, A. W. J., and Smith, C. R.: Impacts of exotic
mangrove forests and mangrove deforestation on carbon remineralization and
ecosystem functioning in marine sediments, Biogeosciences, 7, 2129–2145,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2129-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-7-2129-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Witte, U., Aberle, N., Sand, M., and Wenzhofer, F.: Rapid response of a
deep-sea benthic community to POM enrichment: an <i>in situ</i>
experimental study, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 251, 27–36, 2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Witte, U., Wenzhofer, F., Sommer, S., Boetius, A., Heinz, P., Aberle, N.,
Sand, M., Cremer, A., Abraham, W.-R., Jorgensen, B. B., and Pfannkuche, O.:
In situ experimental evidence of the fate of a phytodetritus pulse at the
abyssal sea floor, Nature, 424, 763–766, 2003b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, B. J. B., Tett, P. B., and Edwards, A.: Introduction to phytoplankton,
primary production and relevant hydrography of Loch Etive, J. Ecol., 61,
569–585, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Woulds, C., Cowie, G. L., Levin, L. A., Andersson, J. H., Middelburg, J. J.,
Vandewiele, S., Lamont, P. A., Larkin, K. E., Gooday, A. J., Schumacher, S.,
Whitcraft, C., Jeffreys, R. M., and Schwartz, M. C.: Oxygen as a control on
seafloor biological communities and their roles in sedimentary carbon
cycling, Limnol. Oceanogr., 52, 1698–1709, 2007.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Woulds, C., Andersson, J. H., Cowie, G. L., Middelburg, J. J., and Levin, L.
A.: The short-term fate of organic carbon in marine sediments: Comparing the
Pakistan margin to other regions, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 393–402, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Woulds, C., Middelburg, J. J., and Cowie, G. L.: Alteration of organic matter
during infaunal polychaete gut passage and links to sediment organic
geochemistry, Part I: Amino acids, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 77, 396–414,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Woulds, C., Middelburg, J. J., and Cowie, G. L.: Alteration of organic matter
during infaunal polychaete gut passage and links to sediment organic
geochemistry, Part II: Fatty acids and aldoses, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 136,
38–59, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Yvon-Durocher, G., Caffrey, J. M., Cescatti, A., Dossena, M., del Giorgio,
P., Gasol, J. M., Montoya, J. M., Pumpanen, J., Staehr, P. A., Trimmer, M.,
Woodward, G., and Allen, A. P.: Reconciling the temperature dependence of
respiration across timescales and ecosystem types, Nature, 487, 472–476,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zetsche, E., Paterson, D. M., Lumsdon, D. G., and Witte, U.: Temporal
variation in the sediment permeability of an intertidal sandflat, Mar. Ecol.
Prog. Ser., 441, 49–63, 2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zetsche, E., Thornton, B., Midwood, A. J., and Witte, U.: Utilisation of
different carbon sources in a shallow estuary identified through stable
isotope techniques, Cont. Shelf Res., 31, 832–840, 2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zetsche, E., Bulling, M. T., and Witte, U.: Permeability of intertidal
sandflats: Impact of temporal variability on sediment metabolism, Cont. Shelf
Res., 42, 41–50, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
