<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-4767-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effect of the silica content of diatom prey on the production, decomposition
and sinking of fecal pellets of <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>the copepod <italic>Calanus sinicus</italic></article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effect of the silica content of diatom prey}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H. Liu and C.-J. Wu}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Hongbin</given-names></name>
          <email>liuhb@ust.hk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Chih-Jung</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hongbin Liu (liuhb@ust.hk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>4767</fpage><lpage>4775</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The effects of changing the amount of silica in the cell wall of diatom
prey, on the production, decomposition rate and sinking velocity of fecal
pellets of the calanoid copepod, <italic>Calanus sinicus</italic>, were examined. Using different light
intensities to control the growth of the diatom <italic>Thalassiosira weissflogii</italic> also led to the accumulation
of different amounts of biogenic silica. Copepods were then fed either
low (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1600 cells L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or high (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8000 cells L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of this diatom. Copepods fed a high
concentration of diatoms with high-silica content exhibited a lower grazing
rate and lower fecal pellet production rate than those fed a high
concentration of diatoms with low-silica content. However, there was no
difference in either the grazing or fecal pellet production rates at low
prey concentrations with high- or low-silica content. The size of the fecal
pellets produced was only affected by the prey concentration, and not by the
silica content of prey. In addition, the degradation rate of the fecal
pellets was much higher for copepods fed a low-silica diet than for those
fed a high-silica diet. Significantly lower densities and sinking rates
only occurred in the fecal pellets of copepods fed a low-silica diet and a
low prey concentration. Calculating the L ratio (the ratio of degradation
rate : sinking rate) for each group indicated that the fecal pellets produced
by copepods fed highly silicified diatoms are likely to transport both
biogenic silica and organic carbon to the deep layer, whereas those produced
following the consumption of low-silica diatoms are likely to decompose in
the mixing layer.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>In the marine environment, zooplankton fecal pellets constitute a main
vehicle for transporting biogenic elements to the sediments, although a
substantial proportion of this flux is recycled or repackaged in the water
column by microbial decomposition and zooplankton coprophagy (Turner, 2002,
2015). Diatoms are among the most abundant phytoplankton, and they represent
a main component in the diet of zooplankton in marine environments. Studies
show that zooplankton with a diatom diet usually produce fecal pellets that
sink faster than those on other diets (Feinberg and Dam, 1998). Dagg et al. (2003) reported that the contribution of fecal pellets to the flux of
particulate organic carbon (POC) and biogenic silica (bSi) is higher during
the spring diatom bloom than during the summer within the Antarctic Polar
Front region. Similarly, Goldthwait and Steinberg (2008) reported an
increase in mesozooplankton biomass and fecal production and flux inside
cyclonic and mode-water eddies. However, González et al. (2007) reported
a negative correlation between the vertical carbon flux of diatoms and the
production of fecal material in a time-series study in the upwelling waters
off Chile.</p>
      <p>The quantity and characteristics of the fecal pellets produced by
zooplankton depend on several factors. The pellet production rate is
reported to be affected by the rate of ingestion and assimilation efficiency
(Butler and Dam, 1994; Besiktepe and Dam, 2002). It has also been
demonstrated that the type of diet can affect the characteristics of the
fecal pellets produced – including size, density and sinking rates (e.g.,
Feinberg and Dam, 1998, and references therein). In addition, the decomposition
rate of pellets varies with water temperature, as well as with both
microbial and metazoan activity (Poulsen and Iversen, 2008; Svensen et al.,
2012). Factors that contribute to the sinking velocity of the pellets
include size, density and shape, all of which can vary dramatically both
among different zooplankton species and within the same zooplankton species
feeding on different types of prey (Fowler and Small, 1972; Turner, 1977;
Feinberg and Dam, 1998). Turbulence in the water column, the presence or
absence of a peritrophic membrane, and the production of microbial gas
within a peritrophic membrane might also affect the sinking rate of pellets
(Honjo and Roman, 1978; Bathmann et al., 1987). Indeed, the sinking rate and
decomposition rate are the two most important parameters used, to determine
whether a pellet will or will not be successfully transported into deeper
water before its contents are degraded. For example, a slowly sinking pellet
is more likely to decompose and become part of the recycled materials before
it exits the euphotic zone (Dagg and Walser, 1986).</p>
      <p>The cell wall (frustrule) of diatoms is composed of two silicate shells,
which are believed to act as a defense mechanism to prevent ingestion by
grazers (Pondaven et al., 2007); thus different levels of silicification of
the frustrule might affect the grazing rate of copepods (Friedrichs et al.,
2013, Liu et al., 2016). The silica content of the cell wall of
diatoms is not only species-specific, but it is also affected by
environmental parameters such as light, temperature, salinity, pH, nutrients
and trace metals (Martin-Jézéquel et al., 2000, and references therein;
Claquin et al., 2002; Vrieling et al., 2007; Herve et al., 2012; Liu et al.,
2016). Although the frustule has no nutritional value for
zooplankton, it is thought to provide ballast, which is especially
advantageous when the fecal pellets are sinking. Hence, pellets with a high
diatom biomass generally exhibit higher levels of export of POC (Armstrong
et al., 2002; François et al., 2002; Klaas and Archer, 2002). Thus, the
content of the zooplankton diet (and therefore the type and concentration of
ballast minerals ingested) might strongly affect the sinking velocity of the
fecal pellets produced, and hence the vertical flux of biogenic silica and
carbon.</p>
      <p>Most of the studies describing the production rates and characteristics of
copepod fecal pellets have focused on aspects such as food types (Feinberg
and Dam, 1998), or the different periods of phytoplankton blooms (Butler and
Dam, 1994). There are currently no reports that describe the effect of the
silica content of diatoms on the production, degradation and sinking of
fecal pellets. Liu et al. (2016) recently demonstrated that the diatom <italic>Thalassiosira weissflogii</italic>, when
grown at different light levels, contains varying amounts of silica and that
the small calanoid copepod <italic>Parvocalanus crassirostris</italic>, when fed diatoms containing high levels of
silica, exhibited a reduced feeding rate and stagnant growth, as well as low
egg production and hatching success. In this study we used the same diatom
species with different silica content as prey to study the characteristics
of the fecal pellets produced by the herbivorous copepod, <italic>Calanus sinicus</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Copepod and prey culture conditions</title>
      <p>The herbivorous copepod <italic>Calanus sinicus</italic> was collected
from the coastal waters around Hong Kong in February 2013. Copepods were
maintained on a 14 h light : 10 h dark cycle at 23.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 2 L glass
containers with 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m filtered seawater. The copepods were fed a mixed
algal diet consisting of <italic>Rhodomonas</italic> sp. and <italic>Thalassiosira weissflogii</italic> at a concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5000 cells L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
this food suspension was supplied to the cultures twice a
week and the whole culture seawater was replaced every week. The copepods
were maintained for more than 1 month prior to the start of the experiment
to ensure that all the adults were grown in approximately the same
conditions and were of approximately the same age.</p>
      <p>The diatom <italic>T. weissflogii</italic> was maintained in exponential growth in f/2 medium (Guillard,
1975), under light intensities of either
15 or 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to generate cells
with different cellular silica contents (Liu et al., 2016). The diatom
cultures were transferred every 4 or 8 days for the high- and low-light
batches, respectively. After two transfers the amount of biogenic silica in
the diatom cells was measured using a modified version of the method
described by Paasche (1980), following the procedures described more
recently by Grasshoff et al. (1999). Cells were collected on a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
polycarbonate filter (47 mm diameter) and washed with 10 mL autoclaved
seawater and 0.01M HCl during filtration to remove the intercellular
silicate pools. The folded filter was immediately placed into a 15 mL
polypropylene tube and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Hydrolysis was carried
out using 4 mL of 5 % NaOH, digested at 85 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 h. After
cooling, 0.72 mL of 1.0 M HCl was added to each tube, lowering the pH to
3–4. Silicic acid concentration of samples was determined colorimetrically,
through the formation of blue-colored silica complexes.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of the concentration and cellular silica content of the
diatom prey in each experiment.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Measurements</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[Prey]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Silica</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Initial prey density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cellular silica</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">level</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(cells mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(pg SiO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cell<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fecal pellet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8194 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 166.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">production</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7976 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1640 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1490 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 84.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fecal pellet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8194 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 166.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">55.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">degradation<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7976 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7499 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">58.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7344 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 169.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1640 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 28.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1490 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 84.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fecal pellet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8114 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 138.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">sinking</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7904 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 124.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1790 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">52.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1545 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The incubation time of the three fecal pellet degradation experiments can be
found in Table 3.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Experimental design</title>
      <p>Active adult female <italic>Calanus sinicus</italic> specimens with intact appendages were
selected and starved for 24 h before an experiment. A total of seven
experiments were conducted to determine fecal pellet production, degradation
and sinking, and in each experiment these parameters were measured both at
low and high food concentrations, and at high and low levels of silica
contained in the diatom prey (Table 1). In each experiment, the copepods
were fed the same species of diatom (i.e., <italic>T. weissflogii</italic>), at either ca. 1600 cells L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (low concentration)
or ca. 8000 cell L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (high
concentration), the latter being above the food saturation level according
to Frost (1972). The abundance and volume of diatoms were measured
(triplicate subsamples) using a Beckman Coulter Z2 particle counter and size
analyzer.</p>
      <p>In the fecal pellet production experiments, five replicate bottles
containing one copepod per bottle and two control bottles without a grazer
were used. All the bottles were filled with 100 mL freshly prepared media
consisting of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m prefiltered seawater and suspensions of the
respective prey for each treatment. All incubations were conducted at
23.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and in the dark for 24 h. At the end of the incubation
period, a 2 mL sample was collected from each bottle and fixed with acid
Lugol's
at a final concentration of 2 %, for subsequent diatom
quantification. The remaining water was collected in a 50 mL polypropylene
tube and fixed with glutaraldehyde at a final concentration of 1 %, for
further quantification of the fecal pellets.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Degradation rate of the fecal pellets produced by <italic>C. sinicus</italic> after they were
fed diatoms with different silica content.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.93}[.93]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prey</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Incubation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Silicon status</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Degradation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of prey</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">rate (day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HSi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LSi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HSi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LSi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 h</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HSi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">LSi</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.93}[.93]?><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: HSi: high silica content, LSi: low silica content.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p>In order to obtain fresh pellets for the degradation experiments, two
plastic beakers were prepared for the high- and low-silica content prey.
Each beaker contained 7–8 copepods and 700 mL culture medium, prepared as
described for the production experiments. After 12 h of incubation
(except for experiment 3, which was incubated for 18 h), the medium
was sieved through a 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m mesh to collect the fecal pellets and then
rinsed with autoclaved 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m filtered seawater. At least 20 intact
fecal pellets were selected using a glass Pasteur pipette under a
stereomicroscope and poured into a 250 mL polycarbonate bottle containing
200 mL of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pre-filtered sea water taken from the field. The number
of replicate bottles and the incubation period of each experiment are shown
in Table 2. All the bottles were put on a roller at 0.4 rpm in the dark at
23.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; then at the end of the respective incubation times,
the whole water of each bottle was collected in a plastic bottle and fixed
with glutaraldehyde at a final concentration of 1 % for further fecal
pellet analysis.</p>
      <p>Experiments to estimate the fecal pellet sinking rate were conducted by
obtaining fecal pellets using the degradation experiment procedure
(described above) but with an incubation time of 24 h. After collecting
all the fecal pellets from the beakers, 50 intact pellets were selected and
suspended in 260 mL 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m prefiltered autoclaved seawater. The fecal
pellet sinking rate was measured using a SETCOL chamber (49 cm height, 2.6 cm inner diameter) made by 4 mm Plexiglas (Bienfang, 1981), filled with
well-mixed pellet-containing seawater. The chamber was allowed to settle for
6 min, and then the whole column of water was collected from outflow tubes
in a top-to-bottom order. The water was collected in a plastic bottle and
fixed with glutaraldehyde as described above, for subsequent fecal pellet
analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Determining the number and size of fecal pellets</title>
      <p>The water samples containing the fecal pellets in the 50 mL polypropylene tubes were allowed
to settle for 24 h. The upper water was then removed smoothly and the
remainder was poured into the well of a six-well plate and the number of
pellets was counted using an inverted microscope (Olympus IX51) at
100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> magnification. Only intact fecal pellets and fragments with
end points were counted. The total number of fecal pellets was then
calculated to include all of the intact fecal pellets plus half of the
pellet fragments. Images of at least 30 intact fecal pellets were acquired
with a CCD camera (Model 4.2, Diagnostic Instrument Inc., USA), after which
the length and width of each fecal pellet were measured, and the volume was
calculated assuming that they are cylindrical in shape.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Calculating the fecal pellet degradation rate</title>
      <p>The rate of degradation of the fecal pellets was calculated from the loss of fecal pellet equation,
described by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of fecal pellets in the incubation bottle at the
beginning (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and end of the experiment (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the incubation
time (in days); and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the degradation rate (d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The degradation
rate estimated in this study only considered the effect of microbial
organisms and assumed that the loss rate was exponential.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Calculating the fecal pellet sinking velocity</title>
      <p>The rate that fecal pellets
sank was calculated from the formula reported by Bienfang et al. (1982),
which was originally used to measure the average sinking rate of
phytoplankton. Thus,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average sinking velocity; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the height of the sinking
column; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the duration of the trial; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of fecal
pellets within the settling water volume; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of
fecal pellets that settled during the trial time.</p>
      <p>In addition, the density of the fecal pellets was calculated using the
semi-empirical equation deduced by Komar (1980), as follows:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.079</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.664</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sinking velocity of the fecal pellets; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the fluid viscosity and density, respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
length and diameter of the fecal pellets, respectively, assuming they are in
the cylindrical shape; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the acceleration of gravity; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the density of fecal pellet.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>The cellular silica content of <italic>T. weissflogii</italic> grown under different light
intensities. The error bars show 1 standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Grazing response</title>
      <p>The cellular silica content of first- and second-generation <italic>T. weissflogii</italic> when cultured at
high and low light intensities is shown in Fig. 1. After two transfers the
cellular biogenic silica content was significantly different (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05; Fig. 1) when comparing the high-light and low-light culture
conditions. The silica content of high- and low-silica diatoms used in all
the experiments was consistent, and the differences between the two
treatments were all statistically significant (Table 1). Other cellular
parameters, such as cell size and carbon and nitrogen contents, were also
measured for selected samples (data not shown), and the results were
consistent with those reported in a previous study (Liu et al., 2016), which
showed no significant difference between the two types of prey.</p>
      <p>The grazing response of <italic>C. sinicus</italic> to diatoms with different silica contents showed
similar patterns between high (ca. 8000 cells mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low (ca.
1600 cells mL<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prey concentration (Fig. 2). At high concentrations of
prey, <italic>C. sinicus</italic> grazed the diatoms with low cellular silica content 2 times faster
than when they had a high silica content (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05). The same
trend was also observed at low concentrations of the prey, although in this
case the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, the rate
of clearance was significantly higher for the low-silica prey than for the
high-silica prey at both low and high prey concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05). These results indicate that the silica content of diatoms
can affect the grazing activity of copepods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Grazing rate <bold>(a)</bold> and clearance rate <bold>(b)</bold> of <italic>C. sinicus</italic> fed high and low
concentration of diatoms with different silica content. HSi and LSi are high-
and low-silica diatom prey, respectively. The error bars show 1 standard
deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Fecal pellet production</title>
      <p>The rate of fecal pellet production varied both with the silica content and
the concentration of the prey (Fig. 3a). At a high prey concentration, <italic>C. sinicus</italic> that
were fed low-silica prey produced significantly higher amounts of fecal
pellets (192 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 FP ind<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than those fed high-silica
prey (113 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47 FP ind<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, p&lt; 0.05), which
corresponds well with the rate of ingestion (Figs. 2a and 3a). At a low prey
concentration, however, the production of fecal pellets by <italic>C. sinicus</italic> fed the
low- and high-silica prey was not significantly different (Fig. 3a). In addition,
the size of the fecal pellets was only affected by the concentration of the
prey, and not by the silica content of the prey (Fig. 3b). Thus, the fecal
pellets produced in the high concentration of prey groups had a mean length
and width of 582.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98.7 and 72.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m,
respectively, which are significantly larger than the size of those produced
in the low concentration of prey groups, which had an average length and
width of 352.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 54.7 and 59.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, respectively
(ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Fecal pellet degradation rate and sinking rate</title>
      <p>The degradation rate of fecal pellets was significantly different when the
copepods fed diatoms with different silica content (Table 2). The
degradation rate of the fecal pellets produced from the low-silica prey was
approximately 4–5-fold higher than that of the pellets generated from the
high-silica prey, irrespective of the prey concentration or the period of
degradation incubation. In addition, the degradation rate of the fecal
pellets from low prey concentration was significantly higher than ones from
high prey concentration after an incubation period of 24 h (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, ANOVA). Furthermore, the degradation rate obtained following 48 h
incubation was significantly higher than that following just 24 h incubation
(only high prey concentration experiments) for both the high-silica (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.05, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) and low-silica (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> textless 0.01, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) prey (Table 2),
indicating an acceleration of degradation on the second day of incubation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Production rate <bold>(a)</bold> and average volume <bold>(b)</bold> of fecal pellet produced
by <italic>C. sinicus</italic> fed different concentration of diatom prey. HSi and LSi indicate
high-
and low-silica diatom prey, respectively. The error bars show 1 standard
deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The sinking rate of fecal pellets was also different for the high and low
prey concentrations (Fig. 4). At a high concentration of prey, the sinking
rates of the pellets produced by the high- and low-silica prey (i.e., 3.05
and 3.13 cm min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) were not significantly different.
However, at a low prey concentration, the sinking rate of pellets from the
high-silica-content prey (i.e., 2.59 cm min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly
greater (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.01) than that of pellets from the
low-silica-content prey (i.e., 0.53 cm min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The average density of
the fecal pellets was calculated as being 1.093–1.095 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
high prey concentration and 1.035–1.097 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the low prey
concentration. The variation in the calculated density of fecal pellets is
consistent with the pattern of sinking rate, with the lowest density
occurring in fecal pellets from low-silica prey at the low prey concentration
(Fig. 4).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The grazing activity of copepods varies not only with the concentration of
the prey but also with the nutritional quality of the prey. In our study,
the grazing and clearance rates determined with varying food concentrations
followed a similar trend to that described in the literature (e.g., Frost,
1972). In addition, the grazing activity was affected by the cellular silica
content of the prey, as has been observed with other copepod species (Liu et
al., 2016). Silicification has been suggested to be one of the strategies
that is used by diatoms to protect them from ingestion by grazers (Pondaven
et al., 2007). Friedrichs et al. (2013) examined the mechanical strength of
the frustules of three diatom species and measured the feeding efficiency of
copepods on these diatoms. Their results showed that the diatom species with
the more weakly silicified frustules and the highest growth rate was the
least stable and was fed upon the most, whereas the species with the most
complex frustule exhibited the greatest stability and was fed upon the
least. Within the same species of diatom, different growth rates have
resulted in different amounts of silica in the frustule (Claquin et al.,
2002). This results in higher copepod ingestion and clearance rates for
diatoms with a low silica content when compared with those for diatoms with
a higher silica content (Liu et al., 2016). The results obtained in the
current study are consistent with those reported by Friedrichs et al. (2013)
and Liu et al. (2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>The sinking rate (bars) and calculated density (open dots) of the
fecal pellets generated by <italic>C. sinicus</italic> following each treatment. HSi and LSi are
high- and low-silica diatom prey, respectively. The error bars show 1 standard
deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Previous studies indicate that while there is a linear relationship between
the ingestion rate and the total number of fecal pellets produced per unit
time (Ayukai and Nishizawa, 1986; Ayukai, 1990), there is a high level of
variation among different diets (Båamstedt et al., 1999, and references
therein; Besiktepe and Dam, 2002). In addition, the size of fecal pellets
increases as the concentration of the food increases, such that they reach a
maximum size when the concentration of food is above the saturation level
(Dagg and Walser, 1986; Butler and Dam, 1994). Our results confirmed these
previous findings and demonstrated that the size of fecal pellets produced
was only affected by the concentration of prey, and fecal pellets did not
show any significant size differences when comparing prey of high and low
cellular silica content. Butler and Dam (1994) reported that when sufficient
food was available, the size of the fecal pellets varied with the
nutritional quality (e.g., the C : N ratio) of the prey. Since diatoms with
different silica content (generated by varying the light intensity) do not
differ in their cellular C : N ratio (Claquin et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2016),
these ratios did not affect the size of the pellets produced.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>The relationship between degradation rates and surface : volume ratio
of fecal pellets from different experimental treatments. HSi and LSi are
high- and low-silica-content diatoms, respectively; high and low prey are
high and low prey concentrations, respectively; 48  and 24 h are the
incubation periods used for the degradation experiments. The error bars show
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 standard deviation, and the dashed line shows the relationship
curve generalized by Olesen et al. (2005).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The degradation rate and sinking velocity of the fecal pellets are highly
dependent on the characteristics of the pellets, which are in turn affected
by the quality and quantity of the food ingested (Feinberg and Dam, 1998;
Turner, 2002, 2015, and references therein). For example, it is known that
the decomposition rate of the fecal pellets is affected by diet, pellet size
and the producer of the pellets (e.g., Shek and Liu, 2010), but no research
has addressed the degradation rates of fecal pellets produced by prey under
different stoichiometric conditions. Hansen et al. (1996) estimated the
degradation rate of fecal pellets produced from diets of <italic>Thalassiosira weissflogii</italic>, a diatom;
<italic>Rhodomonas baltica</italic>, a nanoflagellate; or <italic>Heterocapsa triquetra</italic>, a dinoflagellate. Fecal pellets produced from a
diet of the diatom species presented the slowest rate of degradation when
compared with those produced from diets of the nanoflagellate or
dinoflagellate species. Similarly, Olesen et al. (2005) compared the
degradation rate of fecal pellets produced on a diet of the diatom,
<italic>Skeletonema costatum</italic>, or the nanoflagellate, <italic>Rhodomonas salina</italic>, and reported a similar trend but higher
degradation rates than Hansen et al. (1996). The relationship between the
surface : volume ratio and the degradation rate of fecal pellets was used to
explain the variation in the degradation rate of pellets produced with
different diets. Our results (Table 2) were higher than those reported by
Hansen et al. (1996), which were 0.024 d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>T. weissflogii</italic>, but our results showed
a similar trend to those summarized by Olesen et al. (2005) (dashed line in
Fig. 5), in that there was an increase in the degradation rate with the
increase in fecal pellet surface : volume ratio, although the degradation
rates that we measured exceeded the predicted rates in most cases,
particularly for fecal pellets produced with low-silica diatom prey (Fig. 5).
The generally higher rates in our study might be caused by the higher
temperature that we used when compared with the previous studies (i.e.,
23.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in our study vs. 17 and 18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in Olesen et al., 2005, and
Hansen et al., 1996, respectively), but the differences in predator and prey
quality, particularly the cellular Si content in this study, cannot be
ignored.</p>
      <p>The sinking rate of fecal pellets is usually considered to be related to
their size and density, which is in turn dependent on the concentration and
composition of the prey (Bienfang, 1980; Urban et al., 1993; Feinberg and
Dam, 1998). We also demonstrated that fecal pellet size, sinking rate and
density were correlated with the concentration of prey (Figs. 3b, 4),
especially in the low-silica diatom prey treatment. Using the ratio of
ingestion rate : fecal pellet production rate ratio as an index to compare
the diatom content per fecal pellet, no differences were found in pellets
produced from diets of the same silica content (Fig. 6), indicating that
prey concentration does not affect the package content of the fecal pellets.
On the other hand, copepods were shown to pack fewer hard-shelled (i.e.,
high-silica) diatoms into each fecal pellet in comparison to the soft-shelled
(i.e., low-silica) diatoms, although these data were not significantly different
statistically (Fig. 6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>The grazing rate : fecal pellet production rate ratio of each
treatment. HSi and LSi are the high- and low-silica diatom prey,
respectively. The error bars show 1 standard deviation.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4767/2016/bg-13-4767-2016-f06.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The fecal pellets of copepods are formed in the midgut surrounded by a
peritrophic membrane, which is believed to protect the gut wall from the
sharp edges of the prey's cell wall. Moreover, the different sizes of fecal
pellets with similar prey content per fecal pellet are thought to result
from the decrease gut passage time with the increase of food
concentration. A high prey concentration results in the food passing through
the gut more quickly and results in incomplete digestion, whereas a low prey
concentration allows the food to be kept in the intestinal tract for a
longer time and therefore digestion is relatively more complete. We showed
that the silica content of the diatom cell wall determines the density and
sinking rate of the fecal pellets when the prey concentration was low due to
complete digestion. In addition, we showed that only the low concentration
of low-silica prey group resulted in a significantly lower fecal pellet density
and sinking rate. In previous studies, the sinking rate and density of the
fecal pellets of <italic>Calanus</italic> were shown to be 70–171 m day<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.07–1.17 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively (Bienfang, 1980; Urban et al., 1993), which are
considerably higher than our results (Fig. 4). We suggest that these
differences might be caused by the differences in methodology used (Griffin,
2000).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>The L ratio (m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, determined as the mean degradation rate
constant (t<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, divided by the mean sinking rate (m d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for each
treatment.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Prey silica</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High food</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low food</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">content</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">concentration</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High Si</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.91 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.56 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Low Si</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.09 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>To compare the combined effects of sinking and degradation rates for each
treatment, the reciprocal length scale, or L ratio, which is the fraction of
pellet degradation per unit length traveled, was calculated (Feinberg and
Dam, 1998). The product of the L ratio multiplied by the depth of the mixed
layer can then be used to provide the degree of degradation of a pellet
within this layer. The results from such calculations suggest that some
diets might result in pellets that are substantially recycled within the
epipelagic layer whereas others result in pellets that are exported out of
the mixed layer in a relatively non-degraded manner. It should be pointed
out, however, that the degradation rates we calculated are likely to be
highly underestimated due to the absence of zooplankton activities. For
example, it has been reported that copepod ingestion of entire fecal pellets
(i.e., coprophagy) or only partial breakdown of fecal pellets might
dramatically reduce the overall downward transport of fecal material and
thus increase its retention in the epipelagic layer (Lampitt et al., 1990;
Gonzalez and Smetacek, 1994; Svensen et al., 2012). For the same reason,
plus the absence of turbulence in our experimental set-up, our sinking rate
measurements are likely to be overestimated. Nevertheless, the L ratio
provides a relative indicator of the export efficiency of the fecal pellets
produced on diatom diets of different silica content and can be used for a
comparison with copepod fecal pellets produced with other diets. Our results
also show that pellets produced from high-silica-content diatoms are more
likely to sink out of the mixed layer before being degraded, when compared
with pellets from low-silica-content diatoms. On the other hand, fecal
pellets produced from a low concentration of prey with low-silica content are
the most likely to be degraded in the mixed layer (Table 3). Our results
suggest that the grazing activity of copepods might result in organic matter
being mostly recycled in the mixed layer during the fast-growth period of
diatoms (e.g., at the beginning of the bloom), whereas it could accelerate
the export of POC to the deep ocean by producing fast-sinking fecal pellets
during the slow-growth period of diatoms (e.g., during the senescent stage
of the diatom bloom).</p>
      <p>In conclusion, the silica content of the cell wall of diatoms can affect the
grazing activity of copepods and influence the rates of production,
decomposition and sinking of their fecal pellets. Our findings suggest that
it is not only the nutritional quality but also the digestion process of
copepods that can result in the different characteristics of the pellets
produced. In addition, it is a combination of both degradation and sinking
rates (which are affected by the abundance and cellular silica content of
the diatom prey among other physicochemical factors) that determines the
efficiency of the downward export of biogenic silica and organic carbon by
fecal pellets.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4767-2016-supplement" xlink:title="zip">doi:10.5194/bg-13-4767-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Financial support for this study was from the Research Grant Council of Hong
Kong (661610, 661911 and 661912) and the National Key Scientific Research
Projects of China (2015CB954003). Additional support was provided by the
TUYF Charitable Trust (TUYF10SC08).
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: G. Herndl <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Armstrong, R. A., Lee, C., Hedges, J. I., Honjo, S., and Wakeham, S. G.: A new,
mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the
quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49,
219–236, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ayukai, T.: Fecal pellet production by two species of planktonic calanoid
copepods fed on naturally occurring particles, Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan, 37,
3–10, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ayukai, T. and Nishizawa, S.: Defecation rate as a possible measure of
ingestion rate of <italic>Calanus pacificus</italic> (Copepoda: Calanoida),  Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan, 33, 3–10,
1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Båmstedt, U., Nejstgaard, J. C., and Solberg, P. T.: Utilisation of
small-sized food algae by <italic>Calanus finmarchicus</italic> (Copepoda, Calanoida) and the significance of
feeding history, Sarsia, 84, 19–38, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bathmann, U. V., Noji, T. T., Voss, M., and Peinert, R.: Copepod fecal
pellets: abundance, sedimentation and content at a permanent station in the
Norwegian Sea in May/June 1986, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 38, 45–51, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Besiktepe, S. and Dam, H.G.: Coupling of ingestion and defecation as a
function of diet in the calanoid copepod <italic>Acartia tonsa</italic>, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 229,
151–164, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bienfang, P. K.: Herbivore diet affects fecal pellet settling, Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci., 37, 1352–1357, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bienfang, P. K.: SETCOL-A technologically simole and reliable method for
measuring phytoplankton sinking rates, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 38,
1289–1294, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bienfang, P., Harrison, P., and Quarmby, L.: Sinking rate response to
depletion of nitrate, phosphate and silicate in four marine diatoms, Mar.
Biol., 67, 295–302, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Butler, M. and Dam, H. G.: Production rates and characteristics of fecal
pellets of the copepod <italic>Acartia tonsa</italic> under simulated phytoplankton bloom conditions:
implications for vertical fluxes, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 114, 81–91, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Claquin, P., Martin-Jézéquel, V., Kromkamp, J. C., Veldhuis, M. J. W.,
and Kraay, G. W.: Uncoupling of silicon compared with carbon and nitrogen
metabolisms and the role of the cell cycle in continuous cultures of
<italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> (Bacillariophyceae) under light, nitrogen, and phosphorus control, J.
Phycol., 38, 922–930, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dagg, M. and Walser, W. E.: The effect of food concentration on fecal pellet
size in marine copepods, Limnol. Oceanogr., 31, 1066–1071, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Dagg, M. J., Urban-Rich, J., and Peterson, J. O.: The potential contribution
of fecal pellets from large copepods to the flux of biogenic silica and
particulate organic carbon in the Antarctic Polar Front region near
170<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W., Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 50, 675–691, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Feinberg, L. R. and Dam, H. G.: Effects of diet on dimensions, density and
sinking rates of fecal pellets of the copepod <italic>Acartia tonsa</italic>,  Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 175,
87–96, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, S. W. and Small, L.: Sinking rates of euphausid fecal pellets,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 17, 293–296, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>François, R., Honjo, S., Krishfield, R., and Manganini, S.: Factors
controlling the flux of organic carbon to the bathypelagic zone of the
ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1087, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001722</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Friedrichs, L., Hörnig, M., Schulze, L., Bertram, A., Jansen, S., and
Hamm, C.: Size and biomechanic properties of diatom frustules influence food
uptake by copepods, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 481, 41–51, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Frost, B. W.: Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the
feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod <italic>Calanus pacificus</italic>, Limnol. Oceanogr., 17,
805–815, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Goldthwait, S. A. and Steinberg, D. K.: Elevated biomass of mesozooplankton
and enhanced fecal pellet flux in cyclonic and mode-water eddies in the
Sargasso Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55, 1360–1377, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>González, H. E. and Smetacek, V.: The possible role of the cyclopoid
copepod <italic>Oithona</italic> in retarding vertical flux of zooplankton fecal material, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 113, 233–246, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>González, H. E., Menschel, E., Aparicio, C., and Barría, C.: Spatial
and temporal variability of microplankton and detritus, and their export to
the shelf sediments in the upwelling area off Concepción, Chile
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), during 2002–2005, Prog. Oceanogr., 75,
435–451, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of seawater analysis,
Wiley-Vch, Weinheim, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Griffin, S. L.: Influence of food type on the production and setting rate of
faecal pellets produced by an estuarine copepod, Mar. Freshwater Res., 51,
371–378, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Guillard, R. R. L.: Culture of phytoplankton for feeding invertebrates, in:
Culture of marine invertebrates, edited by: Smith, W. L. and Chanley, M. H.,
Plenum Press, New York, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, B., Fotel, F. L., Jensen, N. J., and Madsen, S. D.: Bacteria associated
with a marine planktonic copepod in culture, II Degradation of fecal pellets
produced on a diatom, a nanoflagellage or a dinoflagellate diet, J. Plankton
Res., 18, 275–288, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Herve, V., Derr, J., Douady, S., Quinet, M., Moisan, L., and Lopez, P. J.:
Multiparametric analyses reveal the pH-dependence of silicon
biomineralization in diatoms, PLoS ONE, 7, 1–12, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S. and Roman, M. R.: Marine copepod fecal pellets production,
preservation and sedimentation, J. Mar. Res., 36, 45–57, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.: Association of sinking organic matter with
various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: implications for the rain
ratio, Global Biogeochem. Cy. 16, 1116, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001765</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Komar, P. D.: Settling velocities of circular cylinders at low Reynolds
numbers, J. Geol., 88, 327–336, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lampitt, R. S., Noji, T., and Bodungen, B. V.: What happens to zooplankton
fecal pellets? Implications for material flux, Mar. Biol., 104, 15–23, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Chen, M., Zhu, F., and Harrison, P. J.: Effect of diatom silica
content on copepod grazing, growth and reproduction, Front. Mar. Sci., 3,
89, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2016.00089</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Martin-Jézéquel, V., Hildebrand, M., and Brzezinski, M. A.: Silicon
metabolism in diatoms: implications for growth, J. Phycol., 36, 821–840,
2000.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Olesen, M., Strake, S., and Andrushaitis, A.: Egestion of non-pellet-bound
fecal material from the copepod <italic>Acartia tonsa</italic>: implication for vertical flux and
degradation, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 293, 131–142, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Paasche, E.: Silicon content of five marine plankton diatom species measured
with a rapid filter method, Limnol. Oceanogr., 25, 474–480, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Pondaven, P., Gallinari, M., Chollet, S., Bucciarelli, E., Sarthou, G.,
Schultes, S., and Jean, F.: Grazing-induced changes in cell wall
silicification in a marine diatom, Protist, 158, 21–28, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Poulsen, L. K. and Iversen, M. H.: Degradation of copepod fecal pellets: key
role of protozooplankton, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 367, 1–13, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Shek, L. and Liu, H.: Oxygen consumption rates of fecal pellets produced by
three coastal copepod species fed with a diatom <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic>, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 60,
1005–1009, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Svensen, C., Riser, C. W., Reigstad, M., and Seuthe, L.: Degradation of
copepod faecal pellets in the upper layer: role of microbial community and
<italic>Calanus finmarchicus</italic>, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 462, 39–49, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, J. T.: Sinking rates of fecal pellets from the marine copepod
Pontella meadii, Mar. Biol., 40, 249–259, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, J. T.: Zooplankton fecal pellets, marine snow and sinking
phytoplankton blooms, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 27, 57–102, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, J. T.: Zooplankton fecal pellets, marine snow, phytodetritus and the
ocean's biological pump, Prog. Oceanogr., 130, 205–248, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Urban, J. L., Deibel, D., and Schwinghamer, P.: Seasonal variations in the
densities of fecal pellets produced by <italic>Oikopleura vanhoeffeni</italic> (C. Larvacea) and <italic>Calanus finmarchicus</italic> (C.
Copepoda),
Mar. Biol., 117, 607–613, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Vrieling, E. G., Sun, Q., Tian, M., Kooyman, P. J., Gieskes, W. W., van Santen,
R. A., and Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M.: Salinity-dependent diatom biosilicification
implies an important role of external ionic strength, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 104,
10441–10446, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effect of the silica content of diatom prey on the production, decomposition
and sinking of fecal pellets of the copepod <i>Calanus sinicus</i></article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The effects of changing the amount of silica in the cell wall of diatom
prey, on the production, decomposition rate and sinking velocity of fecal
pellets of the calanoid copepod, <i>Calanus sinicus</i>, were examined. Using different light
intensities to control the growth of the diatom <i>Thalassiosira weissflogii</i> also led to the accumulation
of different amounts of biogenic silica. Copepods were then fed either
low ( ∼  1600 cells L<sup>−1</sup>) or high ( ∼  8000 cells L<sup>−1</sup>) concentrations of this diatom. Copepods fed a high
concentration of diatoms with high-silica content exhibited a lower grazing
rate and lower fecal pellet production rate than those fed a high
concentration of diatoms with low-silica content. However, there was no
difference in either the grazing or fecal pellet production rates at low
prey concentrations with high- or low-silica content. The size of the fecal
pellets produced was only affected by the prey concentration, and not by the
silica content of prey. In addition, the degradation rate of the fecal
pellets was much higher for copepods fed a low-silica diet than for those
fed a high-silica diet. Significantly lower densities and sinking rates
only occurred in the fecal pellets of copepods fed a low-silica diet and a
low prey concentration. Calculating the L ratio (the ratio of degradation
rate : sinking rate) for each group indicated that the fecal pellets produced
by copepods fed highly silicified diatoms are likely to transport both
biogenic silica and organic carbon to the deep layer, whereas those produced
following the consumption of low-silica diatoms are likely to decompose in
the mixing layer.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Armstrong, R. A., Lee, C., Hedges, J. I., Honjo, S., and Wakeham, S. G.: A new,
mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the
quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49,
219–236, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ayukai, T.: Fecal pellet production by two species of planktonic calanoid
copepods fed on naturally occurring particles, Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan, 37,
3–10, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Ayukai, T. and Nishizawa, S.: Defecation rate as a possible measure of
ingestion rate of <i>Calanus pacificus</i> (Copepoda: Calanoida),  Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan, 33, 3–10,
1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Båmstedt, U., Nejstgaard, J. C., and Solberg, P. T.: Utilisation of
small-sized food algae by <i>Calanus finmarchicus</i> (Copepoda, Calanoida) and the significance of
feeding history, Sarsia, 84, 19–38, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bathmann, U. V., Noji, T. T., Voss, M., and Peinert, R.: Copepod fecal
pellets: abundance, sedimentation and content at a permanent station in the
Norwegian Sea in May/June 1986, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 38, 45–51, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Besiktepe, S. and Dam, H.G.: Coupling of ingestion and defecation as a
function of diet in the calanoid copepod <i>Acartia tonsa</i>, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 229,
151–164, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bienfang, P. K.: Herbivore diet affects fecal pellet settling, Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci., 37, 1352–1357, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bienfang, P. K.: SETCOL-A technologically simole and reliable method for
measuring phytoplankton sinking rates, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 38,
1289–1294, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bienfang, P., Harrison, P., and Quarmby, L.: Sinking rate response to
depletion of nitrate, phosphate and silicate in four marine diatoms, Mar.
Biol., 67, 295–302, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Butler, M. and Dam, H. G.: Production rates and characteristics of fecal
pellets of the copepod <i>Acartia tonsa</i> under simulated phytoplankton bloom conditions:
implications for vertical fluxes, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 114, 81–91, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Claquin, P., Martin-Jézéquel, V., Kromkamp, J. C., Veldhuis, M. J. W.,
and Kraay, G. W.: Uncoupling of silicon compared with carbon and nitrogen
metabolisms and the role of the cell cycle in continuous cultures of
<i>Thalassiosira pseudonana</i> (Bacillariophyceae) under light, nitrogen, and phosphorus control, J.
Phycol., 38, 922–930, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dagg, M. and Walser, W. E.: The effect of food concentration on fecal pellet
size in marine copepods, Limnol. Oceanogr., 31, 1066–1071, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dagg, M. J., Urban-Rich, J., and Peterson, J. O.: The potential contribution
of fecal pellets from large copepods to the flux of biogenic silica and
particulate organic carbon in the Antarctic Polar Front region near
170° W., Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 50, 675–691, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Feinberg, L. R. and Dam, H. G.: Effects of diet on dimensions, density and
sinking rates of fecal pellets of the copepod <i>Acartia tonsa</i>,  Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 175,
87–96, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, S. W. and Small, L.: Sinking rates of euphausid fecal pellets,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 17, 293–296, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
François, R., Honjo, S., Krishfield, R., and Manganini, S.: Factors
controlling the flux of organic carbon to the bathypelagic zone of the
ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1087, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001722" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GB001722</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Friedrichs, L., Hörnig, M., Schulze, L., Bertram, A., Jansen, S., and
Hamm, C.: Size and biomechanic properties of diatom frustules influence food
uptake by copepods, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 481, 41–51, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Frost, B. W.: Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the
feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod <i>Calanus pacificus</i>, Limnol. Oceanogr., 17,
805–815, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Goldthwait, S. A. and Steinberg, D. K.: Elevated biomass of mesozooplankton
and enhanced fecal pellet flux in cyclonic and mode-water eddies in the
Sargasso Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55, 1360–1377, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
González, H. E. and Smetacek, V.: The possible role of the cyclopoid
copepod <i>Oithona</i> in retarding vertical flux of zooplankton fecal material, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 113, 233–246, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
González, H. E., Menschel, E., Aparicio, C., and Barría, C.: Spatial
and temporal variability of microplankton and detritus, and their export to
the shelf sediments in the upwelling area off Concepción, Chile
( ∼  36° S), during 2002–2005, Prog. Oceanogr., 75,
435–451, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of seawater analysis,
Wiley-Vch, Weinheim, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Griffin, S. L.: Influence of food type on the production and setting rate of
faecal pellets produced by an estuarine copepod, Mar. Freshwater Res., 51,
371–378, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Guillard, R. R. L.: Culture of phytoplankton for feeding invertebrates, in:
Culture of marine invertebrates, edited by: Smith, W. L. and Chanley, M. H.,
Plenum Press, New York, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, B., Fotel, F. L., Jensen, N. J., and Madsen, S. D.: Bacteria associated
with a marine planktonic copepod in culture, II Degradation of fecal pellets
produced on a diatom, a nanoflagellage or a dinoflagellate diet, J. Plankton
Res., 18, 275–288, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Herve, V., Derr, J., Douady, S., Quinet, M., Moisan, L., and Lopez, P. J.:
Multiparametric analyses reveal the pH-dependence of silicon
biomineralization in diatoms, PLoS ONE, 7, 1–12, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S. and Roman, M. R.: Marine copepod fecal pellets production,
preservation and sedimentation, J. Mar. Res., 36, 45–57, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.: Association of sinking organic matter with
various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: implications for the rain
ratio, Global Biogeochem. Cy. 16, 1116, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GB001765</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Komar, P. D.: Settling velocities of circular cylinders at low Reynolds
numbers, J. Geol., 88, 327–336, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lampitt, R. S., Noji, T., and Bodungen, B. V.: What happens to zooplankton
fecal pellets? Implications for material flux, Mar. Biol., 104, 15–23, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, H., Chen, M., Zhu, F., and Harrison, P. J.: Effect of diatom silica
content on copepod grazing, growth and reproduction, Front. Mar. Sci., 3,
89, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00089" target="_blank">doi:10.3389/fmars.2016.00089</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Martin-Jézéquel, V., Hildebrand, M., and Brzezinski, M. A.: Silicon
metabolism in diatoms: implications for growth, J. Phycol., 36, 821–840,
2000.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Olesen, M., Strake, S., and Andrushaitis, A.: Egestion of non-pellet-bound
fecal material from the copepod <i>Acartia tonsa</i>: implication for vertical flux and
degradation, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 293, 131–142, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Paasche, E.: Silicon content of five marine plankton diatom species measured
with a rapid filter method, Limnol. Oceanogr., 25, 474–480, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Pondaven, P., Gallinari, M., Chollet, S., Bucciarelli, E., Sarthou, G.,
Schultes, S., and Jean, F.: Grazing-induced changes in cell wall
silicification in a marine diatom, Protist, 158, 21–28, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Poulsen, L. K. and Iversen, M. H.: Degradation of copepod fecal pellets: key
role of protozooplankton, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 367, 1–13, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Shek, L. and Liu, H.: Oxygen consumption rates of fecal pellets produced by
three coastal copepod species fed with a diatom <i>Thalassiosira pseudonana</i>, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 60,
1005–1009, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Svensen, C., Riser, C. W., Reigstad, M., and Seuthe, L.: Degradation of
copepod faecal pellets in the upper layer: role of microbial community and
<i>Calanus finmarchicus</i>, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 462, 39–49, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, J. T.: Sinking rates of fecal pellets from the marine copepod
Pontella meadii, Mar. Biol., 40, 249–259, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, J. T.: Zooplankton fecal pellets, marine snow and sinking
phytoplankton blooms, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 27, 57–102, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, J. T.: Zooplankton fecal pellets, marine snow, phytodetritus and the
ocean's biological pump, Prog. Oceanogr., 130, 205–248, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Urban, J. L., Deibel, D., and Schwinghamer, P.: Seasonal variations in the
densities of fecal pellets produced by <i>Oikopleura vanhoeffeni</i> (C. Larvacea) and <i>Calanus finmarchicus</i> (C.
Copepoda),
Mar. Biol., 117, 607–613, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Vrieling, E. G., Sun, Q., Tian, M., Kooyman, P. J., Gieskes, W. W., van Santen,
R. A., and Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M.: Salinity-dependent diatom biosilicification
implies an important role of external ionic strength, P. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 104,
10441–10446, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
