<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-4915-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Can mud (silt and clay) concentration be used to predict soil organic carbon
content within seagrass ecosystems?</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Mud content as blue carbon proxy}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{O.~Serrano et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Serrano</surname><given-names>Oscar</given-names></name>
          <email>o.serranogras@ecu.edu.au</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Lavery</surname><given-names>Paul S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5162-273X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Duarte</surname><given-names>Carlos M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff5">
          <name><surname>Kendrick</surname><given-names>Gary A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Calafat</surname><given-names>Antoni</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>York</surname><given-names>Paul H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Steven</surname><given-names>Andy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9 aff10">
          <name><surname>Macreadie</surname><given-names>Peter I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Natural Sciences &amp; Centre for Marine Ecosystems
Research, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Science, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edith Cowan
University, Joondalup, 6027, Western Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia,
Crawley, WA, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes, Consejo Superior de
Investigaciones Científicas, Blanes,  17300, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>The School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia,
Crawley, WA, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>GRC Geociències Marines, Departament de Dinàmica de la Terra i
de l'Oceà, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER),
James Cook University,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Cairns QLD 4870, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>CSIRO, EcoSciences Precinct – Dutton Park 41 Boggo Road Dutton Park
QLD 4102, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental
Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Victoria 3125, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Plant Functional Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of
Technology Sydney, Broadway,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> New South Wales 2007, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Oscar Serrano (o.serranogras@ecu.edu.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>17</issue>
      <fpage>4915</fpage><lpage>4926</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4915/2016/bg-13-4915-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4915/2016/bg-13-4915-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4915/2016/bg-13-4915-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4915/2016/bg-13-4915-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The emerging field of blue carbon science is seeking cost-effective ways to
estimate the organic carbon content of soils that are bound by coastal
vegetated ecosystems. Organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content in terrestrial
soils and marine sediments has been correlated with mud content (i.e., silt
and clay, particle sizes &lt; 63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), however, empirical
tests of this theory are lacking for coastal vegetated ecosystems. Here, we
compiled data (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1345) on the relationship between C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
mud contents in seagrass ecosystems (79 cores) and adjacent bare sediments
(21 cores) to address whether mud can be used to predict soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
content. We also combined these data with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures of
the soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to understand the sources of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stores.
The results showed that mud is positively correlated with soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
content only when the contribution of seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the
sedimentary C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pool is relatively low, such as in small and
fast-growing meadows of the genera <italic>Zostera</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and
<italic>Halophila</italic>, and in bare sediments adjacent to seagrass ecosystems. In
large and long-living seagrass meadows of the genera <italic>Posidonia</italic> and
<italic>Amphibolis</italic> there was a lack of, or poor relationship between mud and
soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content, related to a higher contribution of
seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the sedimentary C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pool in
these meadows. The relatively high soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents with relatively
low mud contents (e.g., mud-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation) in bare sediments and
<italic>Zostera</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Halophila</italic> meadows was
related to significant allochthonous inputs of terrestrial organic matter,
while higher contribution of seagrass detritus in <italic>Amphibolis</italic> and
<italic>Posidonia</italic> meadows disrupted the correlation expected between soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents. This study shows that mud is not a universal
proxy for blue carbon content in seagrass ecosystems, and therefore should
not be applied generally across all seagrass habitats. Mud content can only
be used as a proxy to estimate soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content for scaling up
purposes when opportunistic and/or low biomass seagrass species (i.e.,
<italic>Zostera</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Halophila</italic>) are present
(explaining 34 to 91 % of variability), and in bare sediments (explaining
78 % of the variability). The results obtained could enable robust
scaling up exercises at a low cost as part of blue carbon stock
assessments.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The sedimentary organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stores of seagrass meadows –
often referred to as “blue carbon” – can vary among seagrass species and
habitats, with reports of up to 18-fold differences (Lavery et al., 2013).
Ambiguity remains in the relative importance of the depositional environment
and species characteristics contributing to this variability. Seagrasses
occur in a variety of coastal habitats, ranging from highly depositional
environments to highly exposed and erosional habitats (Carruthers et al.,
2007). Since seagrass species differ in their biomass and canopy structure,
and occur in a variety of habitat types, this raises the question of whether
mud content can be used to predict C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content within coastal
sediments, or whether the species composition will significantly influence
the soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stores independently of the geomorphological nature of
the habitat.</p>
      <p>Geomorphological settings (i.e., topography and hydrology), soil
characteristics (e.g., mineralogy and texture) and biological features (e.g.,
primary production and remineralization rates) control soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
storage in terrestrial ecosystems (Amundson, 2001; De Deyn et al., 2008;
Jonsson and Wardle, 2009) and in mangrove and tidal salt marshes
(Donato et al., 2011; Adame et al., 2013; Ouyang and Lee, 2014). While it is clear that
habitat interactions have a large influence on stores of soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, our
understanding of the factors regulating this influence in seagrass meadows
is limited (Nellemann et al., 2009; Duarte et al., 2010; Serrano et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The accumulation of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in seagrass meadows results from several
processes: accretion (autochthonous plant and epiphyte production, and
trapping of allochthonous C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Kennedy et al., 2010), erosion
(e.g.,
export; Romero and Pergent, 1992; Hyndes et al., 2014) and decomposition
(Mateo et al., 1997). Previous studies demonstrate that both autochthonous
(e.g., plant detritus and epiphytes) and allochthonous (e.g., macroalgae,
seston and terrestrial matter) sources contribute to the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pool in
seagrass soils (Kennedy et al., 2010; Watanabe and Kuwae, 2015). Plant net
primary productivity is a key factor controlling the amount of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
potentially available for sequestration in seagrass ecosystems (Serrano et al., 2014), but the depositional environment is an important factor
controlling C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> storage in coastal habitats (De Falco et al., 2004;
Lavery et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Previous studies have shown a large variation in C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stores among
morphologically different seagrass species (Lavery et al., 2013;
Rozaimi et al., 2013). Also, that C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulates more in estuaries compared to
coastal ocean environments (estimated at 81 and 45 Tg C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively; Nellemann et al., 2009). This is due
largely to estuaries being highly depositional environments, receiving
fine-grained particles from terrestrial and coastal ecosystems which enhance
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation (i.e., silt and clay sediments retain more C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared to sands; Keil and Hedges, 1993; Burdige, 2007) and preservation
(i.e., reducing redox potentials and remineralization rates; Hedges and Keil,
1995; Dauwe et al., 2001; Burdige, 2007; Pedersen et al., 2011). The inputs of
seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sedimentary pool could break the linear
relationship among mud (i.e., silt and clay particles) and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents
typically found in terrestrial (Nichols, 1984; McGrath and Zhang, 2003) and
marine sedimentary environments (Bergamaschi et al., 1997; De Falco et al.,
2004). However, the amount of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that can be associated with mud
particles is limited (Hassink, 1997), which could lead to a poor
relationship between mud and soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents. Also, other factors
found to play a key role in controlling soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation in
terrestrial and coastal ecosystems, such as chemical stabilization of
organic matter (Percival et al., 1999; Burdige, 2007), carbon in microbial
biomass (Sparling, 1992; Danovaro et al., 1995), and soil temperature
(Pedersen et al., 2011), could also influence C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> storage in seagrass
meadows.</p>
      <p>A significant relationship between mud and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents would allow
mud to be used as a proxy for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content, thereby enabling robust
scaling up exercises at a low cost as part of blue carbon stock assessments.
Furthermore, since most countries have conducted geological surveys within
the coastal zone to determine sediment grain size, a strong, positive
relationship between mud and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents would allow the development
of geomorphology models to predict blue carbon content within seagrass
meadows, dramatically improving global estimates of blue carbon storage. The
purpose of this study was therefore to test for relationships between
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents within seagrass ecosystems and adjacent bare
sediments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Material and methods</title>
      <p>Data were compiled from a number of published and unpublished studies from
Australia and Spain, in seagrass meadows across diverse habitats (Table 1).
The study sites encompass monospecific and/or mixed meadows from a variety
of temperate and tropical seagrass species of the genera
<italic>Posidonia</italic>, <italic>Amphibolis</italic>, <italic>Zostera</italic>, <italic>Halophila</italic> and
<italic>Halodule</italic>, and adjacent bare sediments, while including a variety of depositional
environments (from estuarine to exposed coastal areas encompassing different
water depths, from intertidal to the deep limit of seagrass distribution;
Table 1). Data from 100 cores (79 from seagrass meadows and 21 from bare
sediments) on sediment grain size, organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content and
stable carbon isotope signatures of the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) were
explored in this study (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1345).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Data on soil organic carbon and mud contents, and stable
carbon isotope from coastal soils were gathered from a variety of seagrass
meadows (and also from adjacent bare sediments) and habitat types.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Study site</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Geomorphology</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Core depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Water depth</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">of cores</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">of samples</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(cm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis</italic> (mixed spp.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rottnest Island, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shark Bay, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–170</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis antarctica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shark Bay, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2–3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis griffithii</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jurien Bay, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia australis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oyster Harbour, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Waychinicup Inlet, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Robbins Island, TAS, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–180</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia sinuosa</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Frenchman's Bay, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2–8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cockburn Sound, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Garden Island, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">147</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2–8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Portlligat, Spain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">192</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">475</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Balearic Islands, Spain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–270</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halodule uninvervis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carnarvon, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–210</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gladstone, QLD, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">intertidal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halophila decipiens</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gladstone, QLD, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">intertidal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halophila ovalis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rottnest Island, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Swan River, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Leschenault Inlet, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Harvey Inlet, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gladstone, QLD, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">intertidal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Zostera muelleri</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fagans Bay, NSW, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">intertidal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gladstone, QLD, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">intertidal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tuggerah Lakes, NSW, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bare</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cockburn Sound, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">131</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2–9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Garden Island, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oyster Harbour, WA, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gladstone, QLD, Australia</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">intertidal</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content (in
%), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures and mud content in all habitats and soil
depths studied. <bold>(a)</bold> Descriptive statistics based on species identity.
<bold>(b)</bold> Descriptive statistics based on habitat geomorphology (estuarine vs. coastal
environments). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, number of samples.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(a)</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Habitat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Organic carbon (%) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (‰) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">Mud (%) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(species)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">SE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">217</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">217</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">217</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia australis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">248</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">244</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">248</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">11.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia sinuosa</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">297</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">291</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">297</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis</italic> (mixed spp.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">106</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">106</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">106</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis antarctica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis griffithii</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halodule uninervis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Zostera muelleri</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">31.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halophila decipiens</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">65.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halophila ovalis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">24.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bare</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">182</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">182</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">182</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Grand Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1345</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1265</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1345</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(b)</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Habitat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Organic carbon (%) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (‰) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">Mud (%) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(geomorphology)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">SE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">319</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">251</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">319</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">23.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Sediment cores were sampled by means of percussion and rotation, or
vibrocoring (ranging from 10 to 475 cm long). The core barrels consisted of
PVC or aluminium pipes (50 to 90 mm inside diameter) with sharpened ends to
cut fibrous material and minimize core shortening (compression) during
coring (Serrano et al., 2012, 2014). All cores were sealed at both ends,
transported vertically to the laboratory and stored at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C before
processing.</p>
      <p>The cores were sliced at regular intervals, each slice and/or sample was weighed
before and after oven drying to constant weight at 70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (DW), and
subsequently sub-divided for analysis. The C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> elemental and isotopic
composition of the organic matter was measured in milled subsamples from
several slices along the cores. The sediment core sub-samples were acidified
with 1 M HCl, centrifuged (3500 RPM; 5 min) and the supernatant with
acid residues was removed using a pipette, then washed in deionized water,
centrifuged again and the supernatant removed. The residual samples were
re-dried (70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) before carbon elemental and isotopic analyses.
The samples were encapsulated and the organic carbon elemental and isotopic
composition was analyzed using an elemental analyzer interfaced with an
isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Percentage C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated for the
bulk (pre-acidified) samples. Carbon isotope ratios are expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in parts per thousand (‰) relative to VPDB
(Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite). For sediment grain size analysis, a Coulter
LS230 laser-diffraction particle analyzer was used following digestion of
the samples with 10 % hydrogen peroxide. The mud content in the sediments
(&lt; 63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) was determined, and expressed as a percentage of the
bulk sample.</p>
      <p>Pearson correlation analysis was used to test for significant relationships
among C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents, and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
signatures. Correlations between the variables studied were tested among
seagrass species (nine categories) and bare sediments, seagrass genera (four categories),
habitat geomorphology (coastal and estuarine habitats) and soil
depth (in 1 to 10 and 11 to 110 cm thick deposits).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>The soil organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents varied within the
seagrass meadows and bare sediments studied in Australia and Spain. The soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents were higher in seagrass meadows
(average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE, 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 % and 18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4 %,
respectively) compared to bare sediments (0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 % and
10.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 %, respectively; Table 2). On average, seagrass meadows
of the genera <italic>Amphibolis</italic> and <italic>Posidonia</italic> contained higher
soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 %) and lower mud (7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4)
than meadows of <italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic>
(1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 % and 34.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.4 %, respectively; Table 2).
Overall, carbon isotopic ratios from sedimentary organic matter
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) were similar between seagrass soils and bare sediments
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ‰,
respectively). The C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in soils from <italic>Posidonia</italic> and
<italic>Amphibolis</italic> meadows were <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ‰) compared with seagrass soils from
<italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic> meadows
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 ‰; Table 2). The C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content in
soils from estuarine and coastal habitats were similar, while mud content in
estuarine sediments was higher and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values depleted when
compared to coastal habitats (Table 2).</p>
      <p>The relationships between the variables studied (i.e., %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
%mud, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures of sedimentary C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among
different species and habitat geomorphologies, and among different soil
depths were explored in Figs. 1 to 3, and Table 3. When accounting for the
whole data set (up to 475 cm long cores), the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content increased
with increasing mud content in bare sediments (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78) and at
species level, except for <italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> (i.e., C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content decreased with increasing
mud content; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.15) and <italic>Amphibolis griffithii</italic> (i.e., no relationship was found, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05;
Table 3). Although most of the correlations at species level were
significant, they only explain 2 to 39 % of the variance in trends
described, except for <italic>Halophila ovalis</italic> (91 %; Table 3). In particular, <italic>Posidonia</italic> meadows (<italic>P. australis</italic>, <italic>P. sinuosa</italic> and
<italic>P. oceanica</italic>) had the lower correlation values (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.02 to 0.15). When
combining mud and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents in seagrass meadows of the colonizing
and opportunistic genera <italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic> (Kilminster et al., 2015), a relatively high
correlation was found (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56; Fig. 1), while soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
mud contents in persistent genera were only slightly positively correlated
in combined <italic>Amphibolis</italic> spp. and not correlated in <italic>Posidonia</italic> spp. meadows (Fig. 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Pearson correlation analyses to test for significant
relationships among soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents, and soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures in up to 475 cm long cores; based on <bold>(a)</bold> species
identity and <bold>(b)</bold> habitat geomorphology. ns, non significant
correlation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(a)</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Habitat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Organic carbon (%) vs. mud (%) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">Organic carbon (%) vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (‰) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(species)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Formula</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Formula</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.59 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia australis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Posidonia sinuosa</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis</italic> (mixed spp.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis antarctica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Amphibolis griffithii</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halodule uninervis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Zostera muelleri</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Halophila ovalis</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bare</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>(b)</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Habitat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Organic carbon (%) vs. mud (%) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">Organic carbon (%) vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (‰) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(geomorphology)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Formula</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Formula</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coastal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Estuarine</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> mud <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationships among soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents, and soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures in all habitats and all soil depths
studied: bare sediments, combined <italic>Halodule</italic>, <italic>Halophila</italic> and
<italic>Zostera</italic> species, and combined <italic>Amphibolis</italic> and
<italic>Posidonia</italic> species. Only correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.5
are shown. The grey shaded areas showed the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
signatures of plant detritus (based on literature values; see main text). The
white circles indicate the samples obviating the expected correlation between
soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4915/2016/bg-13-4915-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The relationships between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents within different
core depths (from 1 to 10 cm thick deposits, and from 11 to up to 110 cm thick
deposits) for bare sediments and each group of seagrass species
were explored in Fig. 2. The C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content increased with increasing
mud content in bare sediments for both 1 to 10 cm thick (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.74)
and 11 to 110 cm thick (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.81) soils. When combining mud and
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents in seagrass meadows of the genera <italic>Halophila</italic>,
<italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic>, a higher
correlation was found for deeper core sections (11 to 110 cm-thick; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.74)
compared to top core sections (1 to 10 cm-thick; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17). For combined
<italic>Amphibolis</italic> and <italic>Posidonia</italic> species, soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents were only
slightly positively correlated in deeper <italic>Amphibolis</italic> spp. sections (11 to 110 cm-thick;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23) and not correlated in <italic>Posidonia</italic> spp. meadows (Fig. 2). The
classification of habitats based on geomorphology (i.e., coastal and
estuarine) showed a lack of correlation between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud
contents in coastal ecosystems, and a poor correlation in estuarine
ecosystems (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14; Fig. 3 and Table 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationships among soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents in 1 to 10 cm
and 11 to 110 cm thick soils: bare sediments, combined <italic>Halodule</italic>,
<italic>Halophila</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic> species, and combined
<italic>Amphibolis</italic> and <italic>Posidonia</italic> species. Only correlations with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.5 are shown. The white circles indicate the samples
obviating the expected correlation between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4915/2016/bg-13-4915-2016-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationships among soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents, and soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures in the coastal and estuarine habitats
studied. The grey shaded areas showed the range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures
of plant detritus (based on literature values; see main text). The white
circles indicate the samples obviating the expected correlation between soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/4915/2016/bg-13-4915-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The relationships between soil %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
signatures were poor for all individual <italic>Amphibolis</italic> and <italic>Posidonia</italic> species studied (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ranging from 0.09 to 0.3; Table 3), and for combined <italic>Amphibolis</italic> spp. (Fig. 1), with a
tendency of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich soils being enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 1). In
contrast,  %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures were not correlated
in any of the small and fast-growing <italic>Halodule</italic>, <italic>Zostera</italic>, <italic>Halophila</italic> meadows studied (Table 3), neither
individually nor when combined (Fig. 1 and Table 3). A lack of correlation
between soil  %C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures was also found
in bare sediments adjacent to seagrass meadows (Fig. 3 and Table 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Overall mud content is a poor predictor of soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in seagrass
meadows and care should be taken in its use as a cost-effective proxy or
indicator of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for scaling-up purposes in the emerging field of blue
carbon science. Although we describe some promise for opportunistic and
early colonizing <italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic>
meadows (i.e., mud content explained 34 to 91 % of
variability in C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content) and in bare sediments adjacent to seagrass
meadows (explaining 78 % of the variability), mud is not a universal proxy
for blue carbon content and therefore should not be applied generally across
all seagrass habitats. In particular, mud content only explained 5 to 32 %
of soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content in <italic>Amphibolis</italic> spp. meadows and 2 to 15 % of soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
content in <italic>Posidonia</italic> spp. meadows, and therefore, mud content is not a good proxy for
blue carbon content in these meadows.</p>
      <p>A tenet of carbon cycling within the coastal ocean is that fine-grained
sediments (i.e., mud) have higher C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents. The positive
relationship found between mud and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents in coastal bare
sediments (explaining 78 % of the variability) is in agreement with
previous studies (e.g., Bergamaschi et al., 1997; De Falco et al., 2004), and
is related to their larger surface areas compared to coarse-grained
sediments, providing more binding sites for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the surface of
minerals (Keil and Hedges, 1993; Mayer, 1994a, b; Galy et al., 2007;
Burdige, 2007). In addition, the predominance of fine sediments reduces
oxygen exchange and results in low sediment redox potentials and
remineralization rates, contributing to the preservation of sedimentary
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> after burial (Hedges and Keil, 1995; Bergamaschi et al., 1997;
Dauwe et al., 2001; Burdige 2007; Pedersen et al., 2011). However, the maximum
capacity of a given soil to preserve C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by their association with
clay and silt particles is limited (i.e., mud-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation; Hassink,
1997). The results obtained showed that bare sediment samples with relatively
high C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (i.e., &gt; 4 % C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relatively
low mud contents were also <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted (Fig. 1), suggesting
significant contributions of soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from allochthonous sources
(e.g.,
terrestrial and sestonic; Kennedy et al., 2010). This could have disrupted
the correlation found between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents in the bare
sediments studied.</p>
      <p>Mud is not a universal proxy for soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content in seagrass meadows,
which could be mainly explained by additional inputs of seagrass-derived
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or allochthonous C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the sedimentary C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pool,
obviating the linear relationship between mud and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents found
in the absence of vegetation. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values indicated that
both seagrass-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and non-seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., epiphytes,
algae, seston or terrestrial matter) were buried in the soils of all studied
meadows, but are consistent with a model of increasing capture of
seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at meadows formed by persistent, high-biomass
seagrasses (i.e., genera <italic>Posidonia</italic> and <italic>Amphibolis</italic>) relative to opportunistic, low-biomass
seagrasses (i.e., genera <italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic>).</p>
      <p>On one hand, the soil <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures measured in these
long-living and large seagrass meadows (averaging <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ‰
in both cases) were closer to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
signatures of <italic>Posidonia</italic> and <italic>Amphibolis</italic> tissues (ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 ‰;
Hyndes and Lavery, 2005; Hindell et al., 2004; Cardona et al., 2007; Fourqurean
et al., 2007; Collier et al., 2008; Kennedy et al., 2010; Hanson et al., 2010;
Serrano et al., 2016) than to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of algae or
terrestrial organic matter (ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32 ‰;
e.g., Smit et al., 2006; Cardona et al., 2007; Kennedy et al., 2010; Hanson et
al., 2010; Deudero et al., 2011). The poor relationship between mud and soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents in <italic>Amphibolis</italic> soils could be explained by samples with
relatively high C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (i.e., &gt; 2.5 % C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relatively
low mud contents, as a result of both the contribution of seagrass-derived
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched) and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from allochthonous sources
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted; Fig. 1). In <italic>Posidonia</italic> soils, the poor relationship between
mud and soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents could be explained by samples with
relatively high C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (i.e., &gt; 10 % C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relatively
low mud contents, as a result of the contribution of seagrass-derived
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched; Fig. 1). The contribution of
seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., root, rhizome and sheath detritus) in
<italic>Posidonia</italic> soils play a much larger role than the accumulation of fine, organic-rich
allochthonous particles.</p>
      <p>On the other hand, the soil <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signatures measured in
<italic>Halodule</italic>, <italic>Halophila</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic> meadows (averaging <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 ‰) were more
similar to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of algae or terrestrial organic matter
than to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of their seagrass tissues (ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14 ‰; e.g., Hemminga and Mateo, 1996; Kennedy et al.,
2010; Hanson et al., 2010). The positive relationship between mud and soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents in <italic>Halodule</italic>, <italic>Halophila</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic>
soils could be explained by their relatively high
mud content and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that allochthonous
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs and mud content play a major role in soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
accumulation in these opportunistic and early-colonizing seagrasses.
However, the relatively high C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents found with relatively low mud
contents (i.e., mud-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation) disrupted the correlation found
between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents in these meadows (C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 1 %
in samples with 0–20 % mud; C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 2 %
in samples with 20–70 % mud and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 3.5 in
samples with 70–100 % mud; Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>The results obtained showed a tendency for high-biomass and persistent
meadows (i.e., <italic>Posidonia</italic> and <italic>Amphibolis</italic>) to accumulate higher C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stores and
seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to ephemeral and low-biomass meadows
(i.e., <italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic>), suggesting that factors (biotic and abiotic) affecting the
production, form and preservation of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within habitats exert a
significant influence on soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content (Lavery et al., 2013; Serrano
et al., 2014, 2016). The above- and below-ground biomass in meadows of the
genus <italic>Posidonia</italic> (averaging 535 and 910 g DW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) is up to 2-fold
higher than in <italic>Amphibolis</italic> meadows (averaging 641 and 457 g DW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively)
and 4 to 18-fold higher than in small and opportunistic seagrasses of the
genera <italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic> (125 and 49 g DW m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, on average; respectively; Duarte
and Chiscano, 1999; Paling and McComb, 2000). Indeed, larger seagrasses tend
to have larger and more persistent rhizomes, constituted by more refractory
forms of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, more prone to be preserved in soils than simpler, more
labile forms of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> such as seston and algal detritus which are more
suitable to experience remineralization during early diagenesis (Henrichs,
1992; Burdige, 2007). In addition, the larger size of detritus within
<italic>Amphibolis</italic> and <italic>Posidonia</italic> meadows compared to <italic>Halophila</italic>,
<italic>Halodule</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic> meadows could also contribute to the
larger accumulation of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the former, since decay rates of
seagrass detritus increase with decreasing particle size due to larger
surfaces available for microbial attack (Harrison, 1989). Differences in
above- and below-ground biomass and recalcitrance between <italic>Posidonia</italic> and <italic>Amphibolis</italic> spp. could
explain the larger contribution of seagrass-derived C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched) in the former, thereby obviating the linear relationship
between mud and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>The soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content tends to decrease with soil depth and ageing in
seagrass ecosystems (e.g., Serrano et al., 2012), thereby the persistence of
discrete organic detritus within upper soil horizons could lead to organic
matter concentrations above those levels explained by the association with
clay and silt particles, as previously demonstrated for terrestrial soils
(Mayer and Xing, 2001; Gami et al., 2009). The organic matter preserved in
most marine sediments is intimately associated with mineral surfaces (i.e.,
selective preservation by sorption of organic matter into minerals; Keil et
al., 1994) and therefore the correlation between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud
contents in seagrass meadows could vary as a function of soil depth and
ageing. The results obtained show that soil depth is not an important factor
when attempting to predict soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content based on mud content in
bare sediments (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0.74 for all core depths explored;
1 to 110, 1 to 10, and 11 to 110 cm thick; Fig. 2).
However, a clearer pattern appeared when exploring the correlation between
soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents in top 10 cm and within 11–110 cm soil
depths of combined <italic>Halodule</italic>, <italic>Halophila</italic> and <italic>Zostera</italic> species (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.74,
respectively). These results suggest that the relatively small below-ground
biomass of these species (i.e., organic detritus) only has an impact on the
expected positive correlation between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud content within
the top 10 cm, while the correlation for deeper soil depths (11–110 cm)
improved (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.74) compared to the whole data set (1 to 110 cm thick;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56). For combined <italic>Amphibolis</italic> and <italic>Posidonia</italic> species, the results
obtained show that soil depth is not an important factor when attempting to
predict soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content based on mud content (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 0.2
in all cases; 1 to 110, 1 to 10, and 11 to 110 cm
thick; Fig. 2). These results suggest that the relatively large
below-ground biomass of these species (i.e., organic detritus) has an impact
on the expected positive correlation between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud content
within all depths studied.</p>
      <p>Habitat conditions in seagrass meadows not only influence the amount of
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation through detrital plant inputs, but the capacity of
the plant canopies to retain particles (Gacia et al., 1999). The amount of
fine suspended particles available for burial varies among sites, driven by
geomorphological features (e.g., run-off, hydrodynamic energy and water
depth), while meadow structure (i.e., density, cover and morphology of the
canopy) constrains their capacity to accumulate sediment particles (Hendriks
et al., 2010; Peralta et al., 2008). Although the number of cores and species
studied in coastal and estuarine ecosystems was unbalanced (i.e.,
<italic>Amphibolis</italic> and <italic>Posidonia</italic> dominate in coastal habitats
and <italic>Halophila</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic>, <italic>Zostera</italic> dominate in estuarine habitats),
the lack of, or poor correlations found within estuarine and coastal
ecosystems, precludes the general use of mud as a predictor of blue carbon
content based on habitat geomorphology (Fig. 3). Seagrass meadows and bare
sediments in environments conducive for depositional processes (i.e.,
estuaries) accumulated up to 4-fold higher amounts of mud compared to other
coastal ecosystems, but the saturation of mud with C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the large
contribution of seagrass detritus into the sedimentary C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> pool
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched soils) in some study sites disrupted the positive
relationship expected between mud and soil-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents. In estuarine
ecosystems, soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> originated from both mud inputs linked to
allochthonous-C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> via deposition from upstream transport (e.g., Aller,
1998) and seagrass inputs (i.e., in samples with C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 5 %;
Fig. 3). The insignificant relationship between mud and soil
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents in coastal habitats could be explained by their
relatively low mud content and the accumulation of seagrass-derived
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in particular in samples with C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 5 %
(Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>In sum, mud is not a universal proxy for blue carbon content in seagrass
ecosystems and should not be applied generally across all habitat and
vegetation types. Overall, the positive relationship between mud and
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents found in bare sediments and in opportunistic and/or low
biomass seagrass meadows (i.e., genera <italic>Zostera</italic>, <italic>Halodule</italic>
and <italic>Halophila</italic>) allow mud to be used as a
proxy for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content in these ecosystems, thereby enabling robust
scaling up exercises (i.e., benefiting from existing geological surveys and
models) at low cost as part of blue carbon stock assessment programs.
However, mud content is not a good predictor of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content in highly
productive meadows such as those constituted by <italic>P. oceanica</italic> in the Mediterranean Sea and
<italic>P. australis, P. sinuosa</italic> and <italic>Amphibolis</italic> spp. in Australia. Analyses of soil grain size (i.e.,  %mud) could
constitute a relatively cheap method to estimate soil organic carbon content
in seagrass ecosystems, particularly dry and wet sieving using standard
geological sieves (Erftemeijer and Koch, 2001). These could be used to
cheaply quantify mud content as a proxy for carbon, particularly in student
projects, citizen science and in countries where funding for science is
limited and they do not have access to higher technology methods or cannot
afford to pay for analysis. In addition, since most countries have conducted
geological surveys within the coastal zone to determine sediment grain size
(e.g., Passlow et al., 2005), a strong, positive relationship between mud and
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents could allow the development of geomorphology models to
predict blue carbon content within seagrass meadows, dramatically improving
global estimates of blue carbon storage. Indeed, maps of soil grain-size
could be obtained using remote sensing (Rainey et al., 2003; De Falco et al.,
2010), opening new opportunities for scaling exercises.</p>
      <p>Previous studies suggested that the relationship between organic matter and
the sediment matrix is best seen with clay-sized fractions (&lt; 0.004 mm;
Bergamaschi et al., 1997; De Falco et al., 2004). However, the grain size
cut-off selected in this study (mud, &lt; 0.063 mm) is more
representative of the bulk soil and their C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content
(Pedrosa-Pàmies et al., 2013) and therefore a higher correlation is
expected when comparing bulk soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with a larger and more
representative fraction of the sediment (i.e., including the silt fraction,
0.004–0.063 mm, also provides binding sites for C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Burdige, 2007).
Other biological, chemical and geological factors not explored in detail in
this study may also play a key role in C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> storage, and ultimately in
the relationship between soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and mud contents. For example, the
effects of habitat geomorphology (e.g., hydrodynamic energy, terrestrial mud
and C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs, export of seagrass biomass) and species identity
(e.g.,
variation in terms of productivity, oxygen exposure and recalcitrance of
C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stores, and plant influence on sediment retention) within both
coastal and estuarine environments, are among the factors identified in this
study which might explain significant variation in the C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stores of
meadows in relatively similar exposure conditions (Serrano et al., 2016).
Other factors found to play a key role in controlling soil C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
accumulation in terrestrial ecosystems, such as chemical stabilization of
organic matter (Percival et al., 1999; Galy et al., 2008) and microbial
biomass carbon (Danovaro et al., 1994), could also influence C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
storage in seagrass ecosystems. Further studies are needed to identify the
influences of these other factors on C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> storage in seagrass meadows,
and in addition to the mud content, other characteristics should be taken
into account when attempting to obtain robust estimates of C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stores
within coastal areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The raw data compiled for this study was published in ECU Research Online Portal (<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/75/56c55ab91d417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4225/75/56c55ab91d417</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the ECU Faculty Research Grant Scheme,
the ECU Early Career Research Grant Scheme, and the CSIRO Flagship Marine
&amp; Coastal Carbon Biogeochemical Cluster (Coastal Carbon Cluster) with
funding from the CSIRO Flagship Collaboration Fund. Peter Macreadie was supported by an
ARC DECRA DE130101084. The authors are grateful to M. Rozaimi, A. Gera, P. Bouvais,
A. Ricart, C. Bryant, G. Skilbeck, M. Rozaimi, A. Esteban, M. A. Mateo,
P. Donaldson, C. Sharples and R. Mount for their help in field and/or
laboratory tasks.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: G. Abril  <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: M. Plus and two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adame, M. F., Kauffman, J. B., Medina, I., Gamboa, J. N., Torres, O., Caamal
J. P., Reza, M., and Herrera-Silveira, J.: Carbon stocks of tropical coastal
wetlands within the karstic landscape of the Mexican Caribbean, PLoS ONE, 8,
e56569, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056569" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0056569</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C.: Mobile deltaic and continental shelf muds as suboxic,
fluidized bed reactors, Mar. Chem., 61, 143–155, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Amundson, R.: The carbon budget in soils, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 29,
535–562, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bergamaschi, B. A., Tsamakis, E., Keil, R. G., and Eglinton, T. I.: The
effect of grain size and surface area on organic matter, lignin and
carbohydrate concentration, and molecular compositions in Peru Margin
sediments, Geochem. Cosmochim. Ac., 61, 1247–1260, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Burdige, D. J.: Preservation of Organic Matter in Marine Sediments:
Controls, Mechanisms, and an Imbalance in Sediment Organic Carbon Budgets?,
Chem. Rev., 107, 467–485, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr050347q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr050347q</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cardona, L., Revelles, M., Sales, M., Aguilar, A., and Borrell, A.: Meadows
of the seagrass <italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> are a significant source of organic matter for adjoining
ecosystems, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 335, 123–131, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Carruthers, T. J. B., Dennison, W. C., Kendrick, G. A., Waycott, M., Walker,
D. I., and Cambridge, M. L.: Seagrasses of south-west Australia: A conceptual
synthesis of the world's most diverse and extensive seagrass meadows, J.
Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 350, 21–45, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.036</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Collier, C. J., Lavery, P. S., Masini, R. J., and Ralph, P.: Physiological
characteristics of the seagrass <italic>Posidonia sinuosa</italic> along a depth-related gradient of light
availability, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 353, 65–79, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Danovaro, R., Fabiano, M., and Boyer, M.: Seasonal changes of benthic
bacteria in a seagrass bed (<italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic>) of the Ligurian Sea in relation to origin,
composition and fate of the sediment organic matter, Mar. Biol., 119,
489–500, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Danovaro, R., Della Croce, N., Eleftheriou, A., Fabiano, M., Papadopoulou,
N., Smith, C., and Tselepides, A.: Meiofauna of the deep Eastern
Mediterranean Sea: distribution and abundance in relation to bacterial
biomass, organic matter composition and other environmental factors, Prog.
Oceanogr., 36, 329–341, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B., Middelburg, J. J., and Herman, P. M. J.: Effect of oxygen on the
degradability of organic matter in subtidal and intertidal sediments of the
North Sea area, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 215, 13–22, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H., and Bardgett, R. D.: Plant functional
traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes, Ecol. Lett., 11,
516–531, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>De Falco, G., Magni, P., Teräsvuori, L. M. H., and Matteucci, G.:
Sediment grain size and organic carbon distribution in the Cabras lagoon
(Sardinia, Western Mediterranean), Chem. Ecol., 20, 367–377,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757540310001629189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02757540310001629189</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>De Falco, G., Tonielli, R., Di Martino, G., Innangi, S., Simeone, S., and
Parnum, I.M.: Relationships between multibeam backscatter, sediment grain
size and <italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> seagrass distribution, Cont. Shelf Res., 30, 1941–1950,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Deudero, S., Box, A., Alós, J., Arroyo, N. L., and Marbà, N.:
Functional changes due to invasive species: Food web shifts at shallow
<italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> seagrass beds colonized by the alien macroalga <italic>Caulerpa racemosa</italic>, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S.,
93, 106–116, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Donato, D. C., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M.,
and Kanninen, M.: Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the
tropics, Nat. Geosci., 4, 293–297, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1123</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, C. and Chiscano, C. L.: Seagrass biomass and production: a
reassessment, Aquat. Bot., 65, 159–174, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Duarte, C. M., Marbà, N., Gacia, E., Fourqurean, J. W., Beggins, J.,
Barrón, C., and Apostolaki, E. T.: Seagrass community metabolism:
Assessing the carbon sink capacity of seagrass meadows, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 24, GB4032, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003793" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003793</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Erftemeijer, P. L. and Koch, E. W.: Sediment geology methods for seagrass
habitat, in: Global seagrass research methods, edited by: Short, F. T. and Coles, R. G.,
345–367, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fourqurean, J. W., Marba, N., Duarte, C. M, Diaz-Almela, E., and
Ruiz-Halpern, S.: Spatial and temporal variation in the elemental and stable
isotopic content of the seagrass <italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> and
<italic>Cymodocea nodosa</italic> from the Illes Balears, Spain, Mar.
Biol., 151, 219–232, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gacia, E., Granata, T. C., and Duarte, C. M.: An approach to measurement of
particle flux and sediment retention within seagrass (<italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic>) meadows, Aquat.
Bot., 65, 255–268, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Galy, V., France-Lanord, C., Beyssac, O., Faure, P., Kudrass, H., and Palhol,
F.: Efficient organic carbon burial in the Bengal fan sustained by the
Himalayan erosional system, Nature, 450, 407–410, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Galy, V., Beyssac, C., France-Lanord, C., and Eglinton, T.: Recycling of
graphite during Himalayan erosion: a geological stabilization of carbon in
the crust, Science, 322, 943–945, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gami, S. K., Lauren, J. G., and Duxbury, J. M.: Influence of soil texture and
cultivation on carbon and nitrogen levels in soils of the eastern
Indo-Gangetic plains, Geoderma, 153, 304–311, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, C. E., Hyndes, G. A., and Fang Wang, S.: Differentiation of benthic
marine primary produces using stable isotopes and fatty acids: implications
to food web studies, Aquat. Bot., 93, 114–122, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, P. G.: Detrital processing in seagrass systems: A review of
factors affecting decay rates, remineralization and detritivory, Aquat.
Bot., 35, 263–288, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hassink, J.: The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their
association with clay and silt particles, Plant  Soil, 191, 77–87, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Keil R. G.: Sedimentary organic matter preservation: An
assessment and speculative synthesis, Mar. Chem., 49, 81–115, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hemminga, M. A. and Mateo, M. A.: Stable carbon isotopes in seagrasses:
Variability in ratios and use in ecological studies, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
140, 285–298, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hendriks, I. E., Bouma T. J., Morris E. P., and Duarte C. M.: Effects of
seagrasses and algae of the <italic>Caulerpa</italic> family on hydrodynamics and particle-trapping
rates, Mar. Biol., 157, 473–481, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Henrichs, S. M.: Early diagenesis of organic matter in marine sediments:
progress and perplexity, Mar. Chem., 39, 119–149, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hindell, J., Jenkins, G., Connolly, R., and Hyndes, G. A.: Assessment of the
Importance of Different Near-shore Marine Habitats to Important Fishery
Species in Victoria Using Standardised Survey Methods, and in Temperate and
Sub-tropical Australian Using Stable Isotope Analysis, Fisheries Research
and Development Corporation and Primary Industries Research Victoria, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hyndes, G. A. and Lavery, P. S.: Does transported seagrass provide an
important trophic link in unvegetated, nearshore areas?, Estuar. Coast.
Shelf S., 63, 633–643, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hyndes, G. A., Nagelkerken, I., McLeod, R. J., Connolly, R. M., Lavery, P.
S., and Vanderklift, M. A.: Mechanisms and ecological role of carbon transfer
within coastal seascapes, Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos., 89, 232–254, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Jonsson, M. and Wardle, D. A.: Structural equation modelling reveals
plant-community drivers of carbon storage in boreal forest ecosystems, Biol.
Lett., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0613" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsbl.2009.0613</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. and Hedges, J.: Sorption of organic matter to mineral surfaces and
the preservation of organic matter in coastal marine sediments, Chem. Geol.,
107, 385–388, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. G., Montluçon, D. B., Prahl, F. G., and Hedges, J. I.: Sorptive
preservation of labile organic matter in marine sediments, Nature, 370,
549–552, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kennedy, H., Beggins, J., Duarte, C. M., Fourqurean, J. W., Holmer, M.,
Marba, N., and Middelburg, J.: Seagrass sediments as a global carbon sink:
Isotopic constraints, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, 1–9, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kilminster, K., McMahon, K., Waycott, M., Kendrick, G. A., Scanes, P.,
McKenzie, L., O'Brien, K. R., Lyons, M., Ferguson, A., Maxwell, P., Glasby,
T., and Udy, J.: Unravelling complexity in seagrass systems for management:
Australia as a microcosm, Sci. Total Environ., 534, 97–109, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lavery, P. S., Mateo, M. A., Serrano, O., and Rozaimi, M.: Variability in the
carbon storage of seagrass habitats and its implications for global
estimates of blue carbon ecosystem service, PLoS One, 8, e73748, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073748" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0073748</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Mateo, M. A., Romero, J., Pérez, M., Littler, M. M., and Littler, D. S.:
Dynamics of Millenary Organic Deposits Resulting from the Growth of the
Mediterranean Seagrass <italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic>, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 44, 103–110, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in
continental shelf sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1271–1284, 1994a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M.: Relationships between mineral surfaces and organic carbon
concentrations in soils and sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 347–363, 1994b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M. and Xing, B.: Organic matter-surface area relationships in acid
soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 250–258, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
McGrath, D. and Zhang, C.: Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon
concentrations in grassland of Ireland, Appl. Geochem., 18, 1629–1639, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Nellemann, C., Corcoran, E., Duarte, C., Valdés, L., DeYoung, C.,
Fonseca, L., and Grimsditch, G. (Eds): Blue carbon. A rapid response
assessment, United Nations Environ, Program, GRID-Arendal, <uri>www.grida.no</uri>, last access: August 2015,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nichols, J. D.: Relation of organic carbon to soil properties and climate in
the Southern Great Plains, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 1382–1384, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ouyang, X. and Lee, S. Y.: Updated estimates of carbon accumulation rates
in coastal marsh sediments, Biogeosciences, 11, 5057–5071, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5057-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-5057-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Paling, E. I. and McComb, A. J.: Autumn biomass, below-ground productivity,
rhizome growth at bed edge and nitrogen content in seagrasses from Western
Australia, Aquat. Bot., 67, 207–219, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Passlow, V., Rogis, J., Hancock, A., Hemer, M., Glenn, K., and Habib, A.:
Final Report, National Marine Sediments Database and Seafloor
Characteristics Project, Geoscience Australia, Record 2005/08, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Pedersen, M. Ø., Serrano O., Mateo M. A., and Holmer M.: Decomposition of
<italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> matte in a climate change setting, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 65, 169–182,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Pedrosa-Pàmies, R., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Calafat, A., Canals, M., and
Durán, R.: Impact of storm-induced remobilization on grain size
distribution and organic carbon content in sediments from the Blanes Canyon
area, NW Mediterranean Sea, Prog. Oceanogr., 118, 122–136, 2013.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Peralta, G., Van Duren, L. A., Morris, E. P., and Bouma, T. J.: Consequences
of shoot density and stiffness for ecosystem engineering by benthic
marcrophytes in flow dominated areas: a hydrodynamic flume study, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 368, 103–115, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Percival, H. J., Parfitt, R. L., and Scott, N. A.: Factors controlling soil
carbon levels in New Zealand grasslands is clay content important?, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1623–1630, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rainey, M. P., Tyler, A. N., Gilvear, D. J., Bryant, R. G., and McDonald, P.:
Mapping intertidal estuarine sediment grain-size distributions through
airbone remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 86, 480–490, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Romero, J. and Pergent, G.: The detritic compartment in a <italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> meadow litter
features decomposition rates and mineral stocks, Mar. Ecol., 13, 69–83,
1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rozaimi, M., Serrano, O., and Lavery, P. S.: Comparison of carbon stores by
two morphologically different seagrasses, J. R. Soc. West. Aust., 96, 81–83,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Serrano, O., Mateo, M. A., Renom P., and Julià, R.: Characterization of
soils beneath a <italic>Posidonia oceanica</italic> meadow, Geoderma, 185–186, 26–36, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Serrano, O., Lavery, P. S., Rozaimi, M., and Mateo, M. A.: Influence of water
depth on the carbon sequestration capacity of seagrasses, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 301–314, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB004872</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Serrano, O., Ricart, A. M., Lavery, P. S., Mateo, M. A., Arias-Ortiz, A.,
Masque, P., Rozaimi, M., Steven, A., and Duarte, C. M.: Key biogeochemical
factors affecting soil carbon storage in <italic>Posidonia</italic> meadows,
Biogeosciences, 13, 4581–4594, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4581-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-4581-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Serrano, O., Lavery, P. S., Duarte, C. M., Kendrick, G. A., Calafat, A.,
York, P., Stevens, A., and Macreadie, P.: Can mud (silt and clay)
concentration be used to predict soil organic carbon content within seagrass
ecosystems? [dataset], Edith Cowan University,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/75/56c55ab91d417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4225/75/56c55ab91d417</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Smit, A. J., Brearley, A., Hyndes, G. A., Lavery, P. S., and Walker D. I.:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N analysis of a <italic>Posidonia sinuosa</italic>
seagrass bed, Aquat. Bot., 84, 277–282, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Sparling, G. P.: Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as
a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter, Aust. J. Soil Res.,
30, 195–207, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Watanabe, K. and Kuwae, T.: How organic carbon derived from multiple sources
contributes to carbon sequestration processes in a shallow coastal system?,
Glob. Change Biol., 21, 2612–2623, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Can mud (silt and clay) concentration be used to predict soil organic carbon
content within seagrass ecosystems?</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The emerging field of blue carbon science is seeking cost-effective ways to
estimate the organic carbon content of soils that are bound by coastal
vegetated ecosystems. Organic carbon (C<sub>org</sub>) content in terrestrial
soils and marine sediments has been correlated with mud content (i.e., silt
and clay, particle sizes &lt; 63 µm), however, empirical
tests of this theory are lacking for coastal vegetated ecosystems. Here, we
compiled data (<i>n</i> =  1345) on the relationship between C<sub>org</sub> and
mud contents in seagrass ecosystems (79 cores) and adjacent bare sediments
(21 cores) to address whether mud can be used to predict soil C<sub>org</sub>
content. We also combined these data with the <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C signatures of
the soil C<sub>org</sub> to understand the sources of C<sub>org</sub> stores.
The results showed that mud is positively correlated with soil C<sub>org</sub>
content only when the contribution of seagrass-derived C<sub>org</sub> to the
sedimentary C<sub>org</sub> pool is relatively low, such as in small and
fast-growing meadows of the genera <i>Zostera</i>, <i>Halodule</i> and
<i>Halophila</i>, and in bare sediments adjacent to seagrass ecosystems. In
large and long-living seagrass meadows of the genera <i>Posidonia</i> and
<i>Amphibolis</i> there was a lack of, or poor relationship between mud and
soil C<sub>org</sub> content, related to a higher contribution of
seagrass-derived C<sub>org</sub> to the sedimentary C<sub>org</sub> pool in
these meadows. The relatively high soil C<sub>org</sub> contents with relatively
low mud contents (e.g., mud-C<sub>org</sub> saturation) in bare sediments and
<i>Zostera</i>, <i>Halodule</i> and <i>Halophila</i> meadows was
related to significant allochthonous inputs of terrestrial organic matter,
while higher contribution of seagrass detritus in <i>Amphibolis</i> and
<i>Posidonia</i> meadows disrupted the correlation expected between soil
C<sub>org</sub> and mud contents. This study shows that mud is not a universal
proxy for blue carbon content in seagrass ecosystems, and therefore should
not be applied generally across all seagrass habitats. Mud content can only
be used as a proxy to estimate soil C<sub>org</sub> content for scaling up
purposes when opportunistic and/or low biomass seagrass species (i.e.,
<i>Zostera</i>, <i>Halodule</i> and <i>Halophila</i>) are present
(explaining 34 to 91 % of variability), and in bare sediments (explaining
78 % of the variability). The results obtained could enable robust
scaling up exercises at a low cost as part of blue carbon stock
assessments.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adame, M. F., Kauffman, J. B., Medina, I., Gamboa, J. N., Torres, O., Caamal
J. P., Reza, M., and Herrera-Silveira, J.: Carbon stocks of tropical coastal
wetlands within the karstic landscape of the Mexican Caribbean, PLoS ONE, 8,
e56569, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056569" target="_blank">doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056569</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C.: Mobile deltaic and continental shelf muds as suboxic,
fluidized bed reactors, Mar. Chem., 61, 143–155, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Amundson, R.: The carbon budget in soils, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 29,
535–562, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bergamaschi, B. A., Tsamakis, E., Keil, R. G., and Eglinton, T. I.: The
effect of grain size and surface area on organic matter, lignin and
carbohydrate concentration, and molecular compositions in Peru Margin
sediments, Geochem. Cosmochim. Ac., 61, 1247–1260, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Burdige, D. J.: Preservation of Organic Matter in Marine Sediments:
Controls, Mechanisms, and an Imbalance in Sediment Organic Carbon Budgets?,
Chem. Rev., 107, 467–485, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr050347q" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/cr050347q</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cardona, L., Revelles, M., Sales, M., Aguilar, A., and Borrell, A.: Meadows
of the seagrass <i>Posidonia oceanica</i> are a significant source of organic matter for adjoining
ecosystems, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 335, 123–131, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Carruthers, T. J. B., Dennison, W. C., Kendrick, G. A., Waycott, M., Walker,
D. I., and Cambridge, M. L.: Seagrasses of south-west Australia: A conceptual
synthesis of the world's most diverse and extensive seagrass meadows, J.
Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 350, 21–45, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.036" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.036</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Collier, C. J., Lavery, P. S., Masini, R. J., and Ralph, P.: Physiological
characteristics of the seagrass <i>Posidonia sinuosa</i> along a depth-related gradient of light
availability, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 353, 65–79, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Danovaro, R., Fabiano, M., and Boyer, M.: Seasonal changes of benthic
bacteria in a seagrass bed (<i>Posidonia oceanica</i>) of the Ligurian Sea in relation to origin,
composition and fate of the sediment organic matter, Mar. Biol., 119,
489–500, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Danovaro, R., Della Croce, N., Eleftheriou, A., Fabiano, M., Papadopoulou,
N., Smith, C., and Tselepides, A.: Meiofauna of the deep Eastern
Mediterranean Sea: distribution and abundance in relation to bacterial
biomass, organic matter composition and other environmental factors, Prog.
Oceanogr., 36, 329–341, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B., Middelburg, J. J., and Herman, P. M. J.: Effect of oxygen on the
degradability of organic matter in subtidal and intertidal sediments of the
North Sea area, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 215, 13–22, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H., and Bardgett, R. D.: Plant functional
traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes, Ecol. Lett., 11,
516–531, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
De Falco, G., Magni, P., Teräsvuori, L. M. H., and Matteucci, G.:
Sediment grain size and organic carbon distribution in the Cabras lagoon
(Sardinia, Western Mediterranean), Chem. Ecol., 20, 367–377,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757540310001629189" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02757540310001629189</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
De Falco, G., Tonielli, R., Di Martino, G., Innangi, S., Simeone, S., and
Parnum, I.M.: Relationships between multibeam backscatter, sediment grain
size and <i>Posidonia oceanica</i> seagrass distribution, Cont. Shelf Res., 30, 1941–1950,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Deudero, S., Box, A., Alós, J., Arroyo, N. L., and Marbà, N.:
Functional changes due to invasive species: Food web shifts at shallow
<i>Posidonia oceanica</i> seagrass beds colonized by the alien macroalga <i>Caulerpa racemosa</i>, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S.,
93, 106–116, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Donato, D. C., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M.,
and Kanninen, M.: Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the
tropics, Nat. Geosci., 4, 293–297, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo1123</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, C. and Chiscano, C. L.: Seagrass biomass and production: a
reassessment, Aquat. Bot., 65, 159–174, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Duarte, C. M., Marbà, N., Gacia, E., Fourqurean, J. W., Beggins, J.,
Barrón, C., and Apostolaki, E. T.: Seagrass community metabolism:
Assessing the carbon sink capacity of seagrass meadows, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 24, GB4032, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003793" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GB003793</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Erftemeijer, P. L. and Koch, E. W.: Sediment geology methods for seagrass
habitat, in: Global seagrass research methods, edited by: Short, F. T. and Coles, R. G.,
345–367, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fourqurean, J. W., Marba, N., Duarte, C. M, Diaz-Almela, E., and
Ruiz-Halpern, S.: Spatial and temporal variation in the elemental and stable
isotopic content of the seagrass <i>Posidonia oceanica</i> and
<i>Cymodocea nodosa</i> from the Illes Balears, Spain, Mar.
Biol., 151, 219–232, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gacia, E., Granata, T. C., and Duarte, C. M.: An approach to measurement of
particle flux and sediment retention within seagrass (<i>Posidonia oceanica</i>) meadows, Aquat.
Bot., 65, 255–268, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Galy, V., France-Lanord, C., Beyssac, O., Faure, P., Kudrass, H., and Palhol,
F.: Efficient organic carbon burial in the Bengal fan sustained by the
Himalayan erosional system, Nature, 450, 407–410, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Galy, V., Beyssac, C., France-Lanord, C., and Eglinton, T.: Recycling of
graphite during Himalayan erosion: a geological stabilization of carbon in
the crust, Science, 322, 943–945, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gami, S. K., Lauren, J. G., and Duxbury, J. M.: Influence of soil texture and
cultivation on carbon and nitrogen levels in soils of the eastern
Indo-Gangetic plains, Geoderma, 153, 304–311, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, C. E., Hyndes, G. A., and Fang Wang, S.: Differentiation of benthic
marine primary produces using stable isotopes and fatty acids: implications
to food web studies, Aquat. Bot., 93, 114–122, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, P. G.: Detrital processing in seagrass systems: A review of
factors affecting decay rates, remineralization and detritivory, Aquat.
Bot., 35, 263–288, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hassink, J.: The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their
association with clay and silt particles, Plant  Soil, 191, 77–87, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I. and Keil R. G.: Sedimentary organic matter preservation: An
assessment and speculative synthesis, Mar. Chem., 49, 81–115, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hemminga, M. A. and Mateo, M. A.: Stable carbon isotopes in seagrasses:
Variability in ratios and use in ecological studies, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
140, 285–298, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hendriks, I. E., Bouma T. J., Morris E. P., and Duarte C. M.: Effects of
seagrasses and algae of the <i>Caulerpa</i> family on hydrodynamics and particle-trapping
rates, Mar. Biol., 157, 473–481, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Henrichs, S. M.: Early diagenesis of organic matter in marine sediments:
progress and perplexity, Mar. Chem., 39, 119–149, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hindell, J., Jenkins, G., Connolly, R., and Hyndes, G. A.: Assessment of the
Importance of Different Near-shore Marine Habitats to Important Fishery
Species in Victoria Using Standardised Survey Methods, and in Temperate and
Sub-tropical Australian Using Stable Isotope Analysis, Fisheries Research
and Development Corporation and Primary Industries Research Victoria, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hyndes, G. A. and Lavery, P. S.: Does transported seagrass provide an
important trophic link in unvegetated, nearshore areas?, Estuar. Coast.
Shelf S., 63, 633–643, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hyndes, G. A., Nagelkerken, I., McLeod, R. J., Connolly, R. M., Lavery, P.
S., and Vanderklift, M. A.: Mechanisms and ecological role of carbon transfer
within coastal seascapes, Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos., 89, 232–254, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jonsson, M. and Wardle, D. A.: Structural equation modelling reveals
plant-community drivers of carbon storage in boreal forest ecosystems, Biol.
Lett., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0613" target="_blank">doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0613</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. and Hedges, J.: Sorption of organic matter to mineral surfaces and
the preservation of organic matter in coastal marine sediments, Chem. Geol.,
107, 385–388, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. G., Montluçon, D. B., Prahl, F. G., and Hedges, J. I.: Sorptive
preservation of labile organic matter in marine sediments, Nature, 370,
549–552, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kennedy, H., Beggins, J., Duarte, C. M., Fourqurean, J. W., Holmer, M.,
Marba, N., and Middelburg, J.: Seagrass sediments as a global carbon sink:
Isotopic constraints, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, 1–9, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kilminster, K., McMahon, K., Waycott, M., Kendrick, G. A., Scanes, P.,
McKenzie, L., O'Brien, K. R., Lyons, M., Ferguson, A., Maxwell, P., Glasby,
T., and Udy, J.: Unravelling complexity in seagrass systems for management:
Australia as a microcosm, Sci. Total Environ., 534, 97–109, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lavery, P. S., Mateo, M. A., Serrano, O., and Rozaimi, M.: Variability in the
carbon storage of seagrass habitats and its implications for global
estimates of blue carbon ecosystem service, PLoS One, 8, e73748, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073748" target="_blank">doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073748</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mateo, M. A., Romero, J., Pérez, M., Littler, M. M., and Littler, D. S.:
Dynamics of Millenary Organic Deposits Resulting from the Growth of the
Mediterranean Seagrass <i>Posidonia oceanica</i>, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 44, 103–110, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M.: Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in
continental shelf sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1271–1284, 1994a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M.: Relationships between mineral surfaces and organic carbon
concentrations in soils and sediments, Chem. Geol., 114, 347–363, 1994b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mayer, L. M. and Xing, B.: Organic matter-surface area relationships in acid
soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65, 250–258, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
McGrath, D. and Zhang, C.: Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon
concentrations in grassland of Ireland, Appl. Geochem., 18, 1629–1639, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Nellemann, C., Corcoran, E., Duarte, C., Valdés, L., DeYoung, C.,
Fonseca, L., and Grimsditch, G. (Eds): Blue carbon. A rapid response
assessment, United Nations Environ, Program, GRID-Arendal, <a href="www.grida.no" target="_blank">www.grida.no</a>, last access: August 2015,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nichols, J. D.: Relation of organic carbon to soil properties and climate in
the Southern Great Plains, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 1382–1384, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Ouyang, X. and Lee, S. Y.: Updated estimates of carbon accumulation rates
in coastal marsh sediments, Biogeosciences, 11, 5057–5071, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5057-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-11-5057-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Paling, E. I. and McComb, A. J.: Autumn biomass, below-ground productivity,
rhizome growth at bed edge and nitrogen content in seagrasses from Western
Australia, Aquat. Bot., 67, 207–219, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Passlow, V., Rogis, J., Hancock, A., Hemer, M., Glenn, K., and Habib, A.:
Final Report, National Marine Sediments Database and Seafloor
Characteristics Project, Geoscience Australia, Record 2005/08, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Pedersen, M. Ø., Serrano O., Mateo M. A., and Holmer M.: Decomposition of
<i>Posidonia oceanica</i> matte in a climate change setting, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 65, 169–182,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Pedrosa-Pàmies, R., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Calafat, A., Canals, M., and
Durán, R.: Impact of storm-induced remobilization on grain size
distribution and organic carbon content in sediments from the Blanes Canyon
area, NW Mediterranean Sea, Prog. Oceanogr., 118, 122–136, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Peralta, G., Van Duren, L. A., Morris, E. P., and Bouma, T. J.: Consequences
of shoot density and stiffness for ecosystem engineering by benthic
marcrophytes in flow dominated areas: a hydrodynamic flume study, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 368, 103–115, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Percival, H. J., Parfitt, R. L., and Scott, N. A.: Factors controlling soil
carbon levels in New Zealand grasslands is clay content important?, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1623–1630, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rainey, M. P., Tyler, A. N., Gilvear, D. J., Bryant, R. G., and McDonald, P.:
Mapping intertidal estuarine sediment grain-size distributions through
airbone remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 86, 480–490, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Romero, J. and Pergent, G.: The detritic compartment in a <i>Posidonia oceanica</i> meadow litter
features decomposition rates and mineral stocks, Mar. Ecol., 13, 69–83,
1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rozaimi, M., Serrano, O., and Lavery, P. S.: Comparison of carbon stores by
two morphologically different seagrasses, J. R. Soc. West. Aust., 96, 81–83,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Serrano, O., Mateo, M. A., Renom P., and Julià, R.: Characterization of
soils beneath a <i>Posidonia oceanica</i> meadow, Geoderma, 185–186, 26–36, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Serrano, O., Lavery, P. S., Rozaimi, M., and Mateo, M. A.: Influence of water
depth on the carbon sequestration capacity of seagrasses, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 301–314, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004872" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014GB004872</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Serrano, O., Ricart, A. M., Lavery, P. S., Mateo, M. A., Arias-Ortiz, A.,
Masque, P., Rozaimi, M., Steven, A., and Duarte, C. M.: Key biogeochemical
factors affecting soil carbon storage in <i>Posidonia</i> meadows,
Biogeosciences, 13, 4581–4594, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4581-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-13-4581-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Serrano, O., Lavery, P. S., Duarte, C. M., Kendrick, G. A., Calafat, A.,
York, P., Stevens, A., and Macreadie, P.: Can mud (silt and clay)
concentration be used to predict soil organic carbon content within seagrass
ecosystems? [dataset], Edith Cowan University,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/75/56c55ab91d417" target="_blank">doi:10.4225/75/56c55ab91d417</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Smit, A. J., Brearley, A., Hyndes, G. A., Lavery, P. S., and Walker D. I.:
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N analysis of a <i>Posidonia sinuosa</i>
seagrass bed, Aquat. Bot., 84, 277–282, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Sparling, G. P.: Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as
a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter, Aust. J. Soil Res.,
30, 195–207, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Watanabe, K. and Kuwae, T.: How organic carbon derived from multiple sources
contributes to carbon sequestration processes in a shallow coastal system?,
Glob. Change Biol., 21, 2612–2623, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
