<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-5453-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Can C-band synthetic aperture radar be used to estimate soil organic carbon storage in tundra?</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Circumpolar quantification of soil organic carbon}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Bartsch et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Bartsch</surname><given-names>Annett</given-names></name>
          <email>annett.bartsch@zamg.ac.at</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-7931</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Widhalm</surname><given-names>Barbara</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kuhry</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hugelius</surname><given-names>Gustaf</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Palmtag</surname><given-names>Juri</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-5697</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Siewert</surname><given-names>Matthias Benjamin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, 1190 Vienna, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Stockholm University, Department of Physical Geography, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Annett Bartsch (annett.bartsch@zamg.ac.at)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>30</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>5453</fpage><lpage>5470</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>A new approach for the estimation of soil organic carbon (SOC)
pools north of the tree line has been developed based on synthetic aperture
radar (SAR; ENVISAT Advanced SAR Global Monitoring mode) data. SOC values are
directly determined from backscatter values instead of upscaling using land
cover or soil classes. The multi-mode capability of SAR allows application
across scales. It can be shown that measurements in C band under frozen
conditions represent vegetation and surface structure properties which relate
to soil properties, specifically SOC. It is estimated that at least 29 Pg C
is stored in the upper 30 cm of soils north of the tree line. This is
approximately 25 % less than stocks derived from the soil-map-based
Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (NCSCD). The total stored carbon is
underestimated since the established empirical relationship is not valid for
peatlands or strongly cryoturbated soils. The approach does, however,
provide the first spatially consistent account of soil organic carbon across
the Arctic. Furthermore, it could be shown that values obtained from 1 km
resolution SAR correspond to accounts based on a high spatial resolution
(2 m) land cover map over a study area of about 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 km in NE
Siberia. The approach can be also potentially transferred to medium-resolution C-band SAR data such as ENVISAT ASAR Wide Swath with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 m resolution but it is in general limited to regions without
woody vegetation. Global Monitoring-mode-derived SOC increases with unfrozen
period length. This indicates the importance of this parameter for modelling
of the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon storage.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The quantification of presently stored soil organic carbon (SOC) in the
Arctic is of high interest for the assessment of climate change impacts in
this environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.1"/>. These carbon pools are prone to changes,
specifically increasing temperatures which are predicted for large
proportions of the Arctic. Degradation of the underlying permafrost may
induce environmental changes that trigger or accelerate the release of
greenhouse gases at a scale that its impact is expected to be relevant to the
global climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p>The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (NCSCD) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.3"/>
and recently updated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.4"/> currently provides the only basis
for circumpolar accounts of soil organic carbon storage. Accounts for carbon
stored in soils down to 3 m depth and additional stocks of sediments with
various thicknesses are included. It relies on regionally differing
information sources, including soil maps. This leads to differences in
accuracies across the Arctic and upscaling artifacts. Uncertainties in the
SOC estimates for the northern permafrost region are large
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p>SOC can be derived from remotely sensed data using soil colour as an indicator
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.6"/>. The assumption is that SOC is related to wetness which
influences the soil colour. But this approach is only applicable in cases
without vegetation cover. A further method is the combination of in situ
measurements with land cover maps. Soil carbon and nitrogen upscaling down to
a depth of 100 cm based on land cover maps has been shown feasible at the site
scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.7"/>. Detailed, site-specific land
form and/or land cover classification schemes using high-resolution satellite
data have been applied. The method can be used to provide a weighted
“landscape-level” mean for the entire study area, for which a single SOC
value is attributed to each recognized thematic class. Spatially explicit
variations within a certain class and transitions cannot be derived.</p>
      <p>The major constrain for upscaling to circumpolar scale with such a method is
the insufficient thematic detail of existing land cover datasets
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. An approach which makes use of satellite data available
at multiple scales is required for the upscaling to larger regions and up to
circumpolar levels. One option would be the development of a land cover
dataset which includes the required thematic detail in order to represent the
range of carbon stocks across the high latitudes. A geospatial product which
has been proven applicable for many studies is the Circumpolar Arctic
Vegetation Map (CAVM) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.9"/>. It shows the types of vegetation
that occur across the Arctic, between the ice-covered Arctic Ocean to the
north and the northern limit of forests to the south. It is, however,
designed to map vegetation communities rather than soil types. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.10"/>
used the CAVM to derive four distinct landscape units in order to upscale SOC
for North America north of the tree line. A wide range of SOC stock values
have been observed for landscape unit averages due to environmental gradient
effects. A direct relationship between the normalized difference vegetation
index (NDVI) and SOC has been found for the high Arctic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.11"/> but
has not been shown applicable outside that region. An alternative approach
for direct derivation of SOC values is required which can represent gradients
and is applicable for the entire Arctic and subarctic domain.</p>
      <p>The land cover types which are of interest differ in surface structure,
including vascular plant cover as well as in microtopographic relief (e.g.
tussocks and hummocks). Such features can be captured with active microwave
data depending on frequency and polarization. The signal interacts with these
surfaces and a certain proportion is directed back to the sensor. The
backscatter intensity can be thus used to obtain information about the
surface properties. Radar satellite data are available at different scales
(metres to kilometres) based on usage of the synthetic aperture radar (SAR)
principle. A limitation of high- to medium-resolution applications is the
variable coverage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.12"/>. ENVISAT ASAR data acquired in
Global Monitoring mode are, however, available circumpolar, spanning several
years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.13"/> with approximately 1 km resolution. An
additional advantage of such data is the illumination independence. A
challenge is the complexity of the interaction of the signal with the Earth
surface. Water content of the near-surface soil contributes to the
backscatter during unfrozen periods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.14"/> as well as snow
grains in the wintertime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.15"/>. The impact of the latter is,
however, limited during early winter, when snow cover is low and metamorphosis
of snow grains is negligible at C band <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.16"/>. Such data are
available not only from SAR but also from the much coarser spatial resolution
scatterometer data. Applications across scale and instruments are common.
ENVISAT ASAR data acquired in Wide Swath (WS, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 m) and Global
Monitoring (GM, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km) mode were used, for example, to downscale
soil-moisture-related patterns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.17"/> or bias-correct
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.18"/> information from scatterometer. The applicability of
similar multitemporal analyses for both GM and WS data has already been
demonstrated for forest growing stock volume retrieval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.19"/>. WS
data resampled to GM resolution are also suggested as a substitute in the case of
missing GM records. In this study it is hypothesized that a relationship
exists between SOC and the C-band radar backscatter resulting from surface
roughness in tundra regions which is valid for SAR data acquired at different
spatial resolutions. The aim is to provide a circumpolar consistent account
of SOC which also provides information on gradients. Field measurements of
SOC- and land-cover-map-based upscaling results are used and results are
cross-compared to externally available soil type information (NCSCD and in
situ) as well as satellite-derived and potentially related parameters
(vegetation and growing season length).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Location of field sites with high-resolution land-cover-based soil
organic carbon  maps (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) and area covered by the Circumpolar Arctic
Vegetation Map <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">CAVM;</named-content></xref> as well as ENVISAT ASAR GM data
(medium grey)</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Datasets</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Synthetic aperture radar data</title>
      <p>The ASAR (Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar) instrument on board ESA's
ENVISAT satellite operated in C band (5.3 GHz) in five different modes, with
temporal and spatial resolution varying from 30 m to 1 km from 2002 to
spring 2012. Among these modes, the GM mode formed the
background mission and was active whenever no other mode had been requested.
GM data were obtained using the ScanSAR technique and provided low-resolution
images (1 km) with a wide swath width of 405 km and incidence angles
ranging from 15 to 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.21"/>. These data became accessible
starting from 2005. Data availability in the Arctic is high <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.22"/>
due to overlapping swaths related to the polar orbit and low demand of
higher-resolution acquisitions in these regions. All ASAR GM level 1b data used have
been acquired with HH polarization (horizontally – with respect to the Earth
surface – transmitted and received). They are gridded to
500 m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 m.</p>
      <p>For the study area Kytalyk (NE Siberia), ENVISAT ASAR data acquired in
WS mode and HH polarization have also been tested. These data cover the
same incidence angle range and swath but spatial resolution is finer,
although still medium, with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.23"/>. Data availability
of this mode is lower since it was acquired on request only. They are
commonly gridded to 75 m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 m
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.24"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Soil organic carbon data</title>
      <p>In situ measurements of SOC used in this study have been collected from five
different sites across the Arctic: Shalaurovo, Kytalyk and Arymas in Siberia;
Zackenberg in Greenland; and Tulemalu in Canada (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). All are
located within the tundra biome and are characterized by continuous
permafrost terrain. For these sites, the investigated SOC depth increments
are 0–5, 0–30 and 0–100 cm. Two types of input data are used. Soil pedon
point data and maps of SOC derived from thematic upscaling of the soil pedon
data using high to very high resolution optical satellite and airborne data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.25"/>. In order to obtain these maps,
collected soil pedons were grouped according to the thematic classes in these
schemes. Simple arithmetic means and standard deviations were then calculated
for each SOC storage depth increment per thematic class (and for the
calculation of 0–30 and 0–100 cm SOC stocks). These means were
subsequently weighted by the proportional representation of each thematic
class in the study area in order to arrive at a weighted “landscape-level” mean for
the entire study area. Statistical uncertainties in this type of approach
are described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.26"/>.</p>
      <p>Fourteen thematic classes (partially with subclasses for grasslands and fens)
based on the classes from the local land cover classifications are
distinguished across the Arctic for this study. The SOC stocks in the upper
30 and 100 cm of the soil for certain classes from different sites differ
from each other since they have been adjusted site by site. SOC values range
from almost 0 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at alpine and barren ground locations to more
than 80 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for peat bogs. The maximum of non-peat sites is
approximately 35 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 100 cm and 15 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 30 cm.
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> provides further details and the data sources and land
cover map thematic content.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Top: sketch of scattering from different surfaces. The length of the
arrows represents the backscatter intensity: left – rough surface with, for
example,
pebbles at the surface; middle – surface with partial high and low signal
return; right – smooth surface with almost specular reflection (adapted from
ESA 2004). Bottom: photographs (G. Hugelius) representing different roughness
and soil carbon types: left – soil pit in carbon-poor landscape; middle:
hummocky carbon-rich soil profile across the active layer of a frost boil;
right: carbon-poor slope in the front and carbon-rich valley in the
background (Zackenberg).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Available SOC data upscaled from high-resolution remotely sensed
data.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site name</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Upscaling source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Harmonized land cover classes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Pedon data</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kytalyk</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">QuickBird</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">grass, willow, fen, other, tussock</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="normal.27"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zackenberg</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Airborne Hyperspectral</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">grass, heath, willow, fen, fell, boulder, other</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="normal.28"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shalaurovo</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">QuickBird</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">grass, willow, fen, tussock</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="normal.29"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tulemalu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Landsat 7 ETM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">dry, moist and wet tundra, fen, bog</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.30"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Arymas</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">QuickBird</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">grass, willow, trees, fen, dry tundra</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Palmtag et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (NCSCD) by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="text.31"/> provides SOC stocks in the circumpolar
permafrost region. The NCSCD is a polygon-based digital database compiled
from harmonized regional soil classification maps in which data on soils have
been linked to pedon data from the northern permafrost regions to calculate
SOC content and mass. It includes SOC values for 0–30, 0–100, 0–200 and
0–300 cm. For this study, only the NCSCD area north of the Arctic tree line
as defined in the CAVM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.32"/> is considered.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Background</title>
      <p>Radar backscatter is dependent on sensor parameters such as incidence angle,
polarisation and wavelength as well as target parameters like surface
roughness and vegetation structure as well as dielectric properties
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.33"/>. Roughness and permittivity are the governing factors in the case
of bare soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.34"/>. The dielectric constant highly depends on moisture
content, leading to higher backscatter values in the microwave range under
wet soil conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.35"/>. Regions with soil conditions close
to saturation near the surface can be therefore identified using SAR data.
This has been demonstrated applicable for peatland detection at high
latitudes with C band <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.36"/>. The wet and at
the same time high SOC areas have a low bulk density over several tens of
centimetres and are water/ice-rich  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.37"><named-content content-type="pre">more than 60 % at, for example, Kytalyk,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>The dielectric constant is significantly lower under frozen conditions.
Frozen soils cause therefore similar backscatter like dry soils which has
been specifically exploited for C-band applications
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.38"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Winter backscatter is thus determined by the
above-surface remains of vascular plants, surface roughness, near-surface
soil texture and, if present, also snow cover. The last of these has little
influence in early winter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.39"/>. Interaction of C-band signals
with snow are lower than for shorter wavelengths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.40"/>. The signal
may also penetrate a few centimetres into the soil. In undisturbed environments (no
buildings or agriculture) it can be assumed that scattering is governed by
soil type and vegetation cover. The influence of vascular plants on signal
interaction is, however, limited at C band
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">approximately 5.6 cm wavelength;</named-content></xref>. Surface roughness thus plays an important role for spatial
differences in backscatter during frozen conditions in tundra regions.
Specifically, data acquired in HH (horizontally sent and received)
polarization are expected to represent soil conditions better than VV
(vertically sent and received) polarization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.42"/>. Vertically (with
respect to the Earth surface) polarized waves interact more with vertically
structured vegetation parts (stems) than horizontally polarized waves. HH as
well as HV polarizations are thus more sensitive to roughness than VV
polarizations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
      <p>It has been shown for C band <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.44"/> that volume scattering (at
anisotropic particles) dominates for peatland soil during unfrozen conditions
and it changes to surface scattering when frozen. The dielectric contrasts
between scattering components decrease, and surface roughness indeed
determines the magnitude of backscatter.</p>
      <p>Tundra and in general wetland environments are commonly classified based on
non-frozen period data when SAR data are employed. There are to date only
very few studies which make use of frozen period acquisitions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.45"/>. The advantage for using winter data is that
only roughness and volume scattering contributes to the return signal
intensity. In addition, during summer, there is the influence of liquid water.
High C-band backscatter areas are therefore often open wetlands  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">especially
peatlands; e.g.</named-content></xref> but can be also areas with high
roughness and/or volume scattering. Locations with higher soil organic carbon
(SOC) are areas with low roughness (with respect to C band, 5.6 cm
wavelength). They have a smoother surface than drier low-carbon sites in the high Arctic, which leads to the
hypothesis that C-band backscatter can be used as a proxy for SOC content
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).</p>
      <p>Interaction of the C-band signal with snow grains needs to be accounted for.
There is especially an impact when ice crusts form
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.47"/>. Backscatter does increase in such cases. C band
is, however, less sensitive to snowpack changes than shorter wavelengths
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. Ku band;</named-content></xref>. Backscatter can increase during
the course of the winter by about 1 dB at some locations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.49"/>.
In a case study for Yakutia, no increase in ASAR GM backscatter with
increasing SWE (snow water equivalent) could be observed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.50"/>. In
order to account for possible contributions by snow cover, (1) only December data should be used, assuming that there are frozen conditions and snow depth is still limited, and (2) the minimum from as many years as possible should be calculated in order to have the lowest possible impact (this also accounts for the GM-specific
noise).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC from land cover classifications (0–30 cm) versus winter and
summer backscatter from ENVISAT ASAR GM for Kytalyk.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>SAR data processing</title>
      <p>First, automatic geocoding and radiometric calibration were performed. The
SAR Geophysical Retrieval Toolbox <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.51"><named-content content-type="pre">SGRT, Vienna University of
Technology;</named-content></xref> was used for the required preprocessing of the
ENVISAT ASAR GM level 1b data. This is a collection of routines which manages
SAR geocoding and radiometric calibration by calling other non-commercial and
commercial software packages. By incorporating orbit information (DORIS
(Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite) orbit
files) and digital elevation data (US Geological Survey GTOPO30 digital elevation model, improved by Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data), geocoded images were
produced with sub-pixel accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.52"/>. The data are
resampled into a fixed 15 arcsec grid (datum WGS-84), within 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by
0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> tiles, to allow for efficient spatial and temporal analysis. The
data (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8000 scenes north of 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) was normalized to a reference
angle of 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by fitting a linear model to the backscatter data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.53"/> in order to remove the influence of local incidence
angle on radar backscatter. The model provides an estimate of the slope in
units of decibels per degree of incidence angle, which characterizes the
decrease in the radar backscatter from near range to far range. The model is
calibrated for each pixel separately using the acquisitions from overlapping
orbits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.54"/>. No data can be processed with the tools used for
orthorectification (SGRT) for scenes which cross the dateline. This leads to a data gap in the Russia Far East. The dataset was
eventually resampled to a grid with polar stereographic projection with
500 m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 m pixel size.</p>
      <p>On average, 45 December acquisitions were available per pixel. Since GM
data exhibit comparably high noise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.55"/>, temporal and/or spatial
statistical measures (averaging, filtering etc.) need to be applied. The mean
value could be used in order to account for noise alone. There are, however,
also other effects that need to be accounted for, especially snow-related
changes such as the formation of ice layers due to rain on snow. They would
increase the backscatter, but they are not expected to be present in all years at
that time of the year. The usage of the minimum backscatter value (from
several years) reduces the probability that structure change affects the
backscatter dataset used for SOC retrieval. The minimum of the entire record
for each pixel was therefore calculated in this study instead of single
values representing a certain date. Summer (July and August) data have been
processed in addition for the Kytalyk site and mean values derived. This
dataset is used to exemplify the advantage of using winter data opposed to
summer records. Data are derived as sigma nought and converted to decibels. The
dataset has been masked for lakes and glaciers based on the map classes of
the Global Lakes and Wetlands Database <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.56"/> and GlobCover
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.57"/>, as well as for tree line <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.58"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Determination of relationship between backscatter and SOC</title>
      <p>The C-band backscatter is directly compared to locally upscaled SOC maps and
underlying pedon (point) data (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).
Neither all classes nor the full range of SOC values can be found at single sites. A
region with lower SOC (Zackenberg) and a site with medium to high values
(Kytalyk) are therefore used in combination to obtain a representative range
for the establishment of the empirical relationship for upscaling. The maps
of the remaining sites have been used for validation.</p>
      <p>Zonal mean values (a zone refers to a land cover class) have been extracted
for the SOC classes available for Kytalyk and Zackenberg for model
calibration. The advantage of the zonal mean as opposed to the pedon (point) data is that the scale is comparable to the 1 km resolution GM data.</p>
      <p>The Pearson correlation has been derived for the zonal means and thereafter a
function determined by least-squares regression. The obtained function has
been subsequently applied to the circumpolar dataset. The land-cover-based
SOC maps available from Tulemalu, Arymas and Shalaurovo have been used for
validation. Regional differences have been assessed using the soil-map-based
NCSCD (v2.2) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.59"/>, which has been converted to a
500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 m gridded dataset with separate layers for each SOC class
and percentages of the soil types turbel, histel and histosols. This dataset
has not been applied for training since it is based on different types of data
sources around the Arctic. The impact of soil type on the SOC retrieval is, in
addition, investigated using the information available from the original pedon
(point) information from all study sites since this information is not
preserved in the land cover classifications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Circumpolar evaluation</title>
      <p>The validity of the approach to the tundra area is also assessed with
satellite records of vegetation (NDVI) and unfrozen period length  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">as
obtained from Metop ASCAT;</named-content></xref>. MODIS NDVI data were
retrieved from the online data pool, courtesy of the NASA Land Processes
Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC), USGS/Earth Resources Observation
and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota (<uri>https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/dataaccess/datapool</uri>). The NDVI records have been
re-classified to represent ranges of 0.05 for each class. The number of
unfrozen days has been aggregated for each available year (2007–2013) and
averaged for the available time period. The average SOC values from the GM
approach as well as from the NCSCD have been extracted for each NDVI and
unfrozen period length class. Wetness level classes based on C-band radar
backscatter ranges as defined in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.61"/> are also converted into
SOC and discussed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC from land cover classifications and pedon data (points) for all
depths versus backscatter from ENVISAT ASAR GM, for Kytalik (Kyt) and
Zackenberg (Zac). Five-centimetre data are only available for Kytalyk.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC results from ENVISAT ASAR GM <bold>(a)</bold> 0–30 and <bold>(b)</bold>
0–100 cm, and SOC difference between NCSCD and ENVISAT ASAR GM <bold>(c)</bold>
0–30 and <bold>(d)</bold> 0–100 cm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC for 30 and 100 cm depths versus backscatter from ENVISAT ASAR
WS (offset corrected) for Kytalyk and Zackenberg including function for
linear fit of the GM data (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>)</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC in kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the GM results averaged over a class range
of 5 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the NCSCD</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Subset maps (Alaska–Canada border region and parts of the Brooks Range
and North Slope) of SOC 0–100 cm results from ENVISAT ASAR GM and the
NCSCD. For legend, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a; medium-grey values correspond to
0 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Transfer of the approach to WS data</title>
      <p>The higher spatial resolution (but lower sampling rate and inconsistent
coverage) data from ENVISAT ASAR WS (also HH polarization) have been
used in order to test the transferability of the approach across scales for
the Kytalyk study site in NE Siberia. Due to the limited data availability,
normalization cannot be applied as for the GM data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.62"><named-content content-type="pre">approach
by</named-content></xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.63"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.64"/> exploit the
availability of a representative range of incidence angles for a certain
location by using acquisitions from several overlapping orbits. A
conventional method which corrects for local terrain-related effects only (as
available with the free NEST toolbox by the European Space Agency) has been
used instead. The radiometric normalization available with NEST only accounts
for terrain effects. This leads to a location-specific bias with respect to
the circumpolar GM-based dataset. It was therefore required to adjust the WS
data to the value range of the GM dataset. The incidence angle differs,
however, by less than 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across the Kytalyk and Zackenberg sites. A
single offset value per site can be therefore used to adjust the WS
backscatter to GM. It has been derived from the average regional backscatter
of both datasets.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC from land cover classifications (all sites: Kytalik, Zackenberg,
Tulemalu, Shalaurovo and Arymas) vs. SOC from ENVISAT ASAR GM, by land cover
(harmonized classes) and depth: left, 0–30 cm; right, 0–100 cm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>SOC determination</title>
      <p>No relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be found for the SOC zones at Kytalyk in
the case of comparison to summer backscatter as soil moisture adds to the
backscatter of the wetter (and at the same time higher SOC) sites. This
differs for winter data. The higher the SOC, the lower the winter backscatter
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) since it excludes the soil moisture effect
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>
      <p>The range of decibels of the GM data which represents the SOC values in the reference datasets is about 8 dB for land cover class
averages and almost 10 dB for pedon data. An <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.86 was determined
for the linear relationship between backscatter of GM data and SOC of
0–30 cm from SOC maps of Kytalyk and Zackenberg derived from land cover unit
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Only 82 % of the variation can be explained in the case
of SOC 0–100 cm. SOC variation for 5 cm depth cannot be resolved with the
C-band data.</p>
      <p>Average/maximum SOC for the CAVM domain reaches 7.4/14 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
30 cm and 19.6/36 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 100 cm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and b) when
the linear models are applied to the entire GM dataset.</p>
      <p>Similar coefficients of determination can be obtained using WS data
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The linear relationship for GM and SOC is also valid
for the higher spatial resolution WS data – however, only after offset
correction. Furthermore, we cannot rule out the possibility that snow conditions with ice
layers (leading to higher backscatter) are included in the WS sample. In the case
of Kytalyk, the GM backscatter values are more than 2 dB lower than in WS.</p>
      <p>The root mean square error (RMSE) determined using the Tulemalu and Arymas reference (point) data is
7.67 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 0–30 cm and 17.24 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 0–100 cm. If
peat bog sites are excluded values are reduced to 3.79  and
7.58 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively. This corresponds to 20–25 % of the
range of in situ SOC values. This is in the order of the standard deviation
found for SOC values within the specified land cover classes at, for example,
Zackenberg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.65"/>. The averages of the GM results (100 cm) over
the validation sites reflect the differences between Shalaurovo and Arymas
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). SOC is lower at the latter site, which agrees with the in
situ records.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Averaged SOC in kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (30 or 100 cm as indicated) for in
situ (pedons – P), remotely sensed (ASAR GM – Global Monitoring mode; WS –
Wide Swath mode) and the NCSCD soil data. Only points with available values
for pedon as well as ASAR data are used.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site name</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">P 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WS 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GM 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NCSCD 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">P 100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GM 100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NCSCD 100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kytalyk</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zackenberg</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shalaurovo</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">38.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tulemalu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Arymas</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Total SOC values (30 and 100 cm as indicated) derived from the
different data sources: LC – land cover; WS – Wide Swath; GM – Global Monitoring
mode; and NCSCD</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LC 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WS 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GM 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NCSCD 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">LC 100<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GM 100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NCSCD 100</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kytalyk (in Tg C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.495</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CAVM domain (in Pg C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">80.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">94.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Excluding areas with cloud cover, approximately 5 %.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC from GM and the NCSCD (including mean % of turbels, histosols
and histels) in comparison to unfrozen period length
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.66"><named-content content-type="pre">source</named-content></xref>. Left: 0–100 cm SOC; right: 0–30 cm SOC. Values
and soil type % have been averaged for class increments of 1 day. Samples
correspond to pixels of 12.5 km <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5 km</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Comparison with independent datasets</title>
      <p>Large negative deviations of more than 10 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the high-resolution land cover maps (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) are only found for peat bogs
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) which are located at Tulemalu. This is also consistent
with the pedon derived information for soil types (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). SOC
stocks at sites with histels are in most cases underestimated.</p>
      <p>The mean difference between the NCSCD and the GM result is 3.8 and
5.8 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 30 and 100 cm respectively (standard deviation of 6.3 and
15.1 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). SOC totals within the CAVM domain are listed in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>.</p>
      <p>The differences increase with increasing SOC in the NCSCD
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). SOC values from GM for both 30 and 100 cm are mostly
higher across North America and lower across Siberia (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).
Transitions between areas of positive and negative value regions are sharp,
reflecting boundaries of maps which underlie the NCSCD (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).
SOC values change at country borders, e.g. between the USA and Canada along
141<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. Gradients are only to a certain level of detail represented.</p>
      <p>The residual plots (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>) for the depth of organic layer and
cryoturbated carbon also confirm that the SAR method is biased low in sites
with substantial cryoturbation and deep O horizons. The SAR method is biased
high for sites with limited cryoturbation and/or less than 10 cm organic
layer thickness. The differences do not relate to cryoturbated carbon in the case
of 30 cm estimates (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but do to some extent for 100 cm values
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>The results obtained from the NCSCD for the NDVI classes suggest a bimodal
behaviour with the first maximum for NDVI of 0.3, a local minimum for 0.45
and a second maximum for 0.7. The majority of pixels between an NDVI of 0.4
and 0.5 are located within the Canadian Arctic. GM-derived SOC is higher than
in the NCSCD over large parts of this region, in contrast to what is observed
for Siberia.</p>
      <p>GM and NCSCD averages for the length of unfrozen period classes
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>) differ from each other. Maximum SOC in GM corresponds to
about 110–120 days of unfrozen period length. A local maximum can be also
found for NCSCD over that period, but SOC is higher for more than 150 days.</p>
      <p>In the case of the NCSCD as well as the GM records, an increase in SOC with
increasing length of the unfrozen period can be shown (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>).
The variability increases for unfrozen period lengths over 120 days due to
substantially lower numbers of samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC differences between results from ENVISAT ASAR GM and pedon
(point) measurements from Kytalyk and Tulemalu in comparison to amount of
cryoturbated carbon (left; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 and 0.14 for 100 and 30 cm
respectively), depth of organic layer (middle; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59 and 0.62 for 100
and 30 cm respectively) and SOC stored in the organic layer (right; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
0.66 and 0.69 for 100 and 30 cm respectively).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC 0–30 cm from QuickBird <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.67"/>, NCSCD
(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.68"/>), ENVISAT ASAR WS and GM (resampled to a grid with polar
stereographic projection) for Kytalyk. Water bodies and clouds from QuickBird
classification are shown in blue and white respectively. NCSCD contains a constant
value of 17 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across the area.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>SOC over 0–30 cm for the Kytalyk map extent amounts to 0.5 Tg C for GM (mean
of 10.7 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, standard deviation of 1.7), which agrees with optical data
results (0.495 Tg C). The values obtained from WS data are similar with 0.47 Tg C (mean 9.7kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The standard deviation is higher with
4.4 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. General spatial patterns in the GM and WS maps are similar
to the QuickBird-based results (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The
river floodplain shows lower SOC than the thermokarst landscape to the
north. Drained lake basin patterns and associated gradients are still
captured with WS but not with GM. These differences are not captured in the
NCSCD database. NCSCD SOC 0–30 cm over the complete area is
17 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which adds up to 0.81 Tg C.</p>
      <p>The same satellite data source as in this study has been used for
discrimination of wetness levels by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.69"/>. Areas with backscatter
below <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.5 dB have been shown to correspond to wet areas with potentially
higher methane emissions. These areas would correspond to SOC 0–100 cm
larger than 25 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is confirmed by the fen and moist tundra
records from the reference datasets (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>).
Medium or mixed wetness corresponds to about 20–25 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Several
willow, grass, fen and dry tundra samples fall into this category. Dry
areas as defined in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.70"/> correspond to mostly fell, heath and
boulder classes. The majority of pedon records from histels and
non-permafrost mineral soils can also be found in this category (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>). Turbels and orthels can be associated with the mixed
and wet classes with about 50 % of the turbels and 25 % of the
orthels in the wet class based on the pedon data. Orthels also
represent about 50 % in the wet class using the GM quantification.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Representativeness of C-band backscatter</title>
      <p>The observed GM backscatter range for frozen conditions of 10 dB for
terrestrial surfaces provides sufficient sensitivity to SOC variations in
this landscape type. It is larger than for other common C-band backscatter-based applications. In comparison, freeze–thaw detection algorithms rely on a
difference of about 1–3 dB between frozen and unfrozen conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.71"/>. On average, backscatter decreases about 1–1.5 dB during
freeze-up for wetlands compared to dry land cover types with about 0.5 dB
over the CAVM domain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.72"/>. A differentiation of wetland types
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.73"/> from December minimum backscatter is based on class ranges
starting at only 1.5 dB. Potential backscatter increase due to snow property
changes is also lower than the observed range for SOC with about 2–3 dB
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.74"/>. Soil moisture variation (dry to saturated) in tundra
regions without significant proportion of water bodies causes about 5 dB
variation during summertime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.75"/>.</p>
      <p>The empirically derived function for ASAR GM is also applicable to WS when
incidence angle effects are accounted for. The location-specific
normalization applied for the GM records to solely December data ensures that
the underlying samples represent the same surface type and condition. The
number of available WS records is, however, in general lower than for GM in
the Arctic and varies spatially and temporally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.76"/>. When just a
few images are available, as in most cases for WS, only conventional
normalization can be applied. The local multi-annual backscatter minimum of
December (derived to reduce impact from a potential unusually large snow
depth or ice layers) might be therefore different between WS and GM. GM data
are in addition characterized by much larger noise than data acquired in WS
mode <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.77"/>. This effect is, however, reduced by using the minimum of
the 7-year record <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.78"/>. The noise may still contribute to
the slightly larger range of values observed in the GM data
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).</p>
      <p>The foreshortening effects that are typical for SAR acquisitions would need to be
accounted for when this method is applied in mountain areas, especially for
WS data. An application of the approach to WS over larger areas would also
require appropriate normalization in order to account for incidence angle
effects. In addition, the utilization of the effect of incidence angle on sensitivity to
roughness effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.79"/> could be exploited. The
currently operating Sentinel-1 satellite, which is a follow-on mission of
ENVISAT ASAR, also acquires data in C band. The polarizations vary (VV and VH
are common). For this study, only HH was available. The sensitivity to
SOC may differ for other polarizations and thus impact the transferability of
this approach to, for example, Sentinel-1.</p>
      <p>In cases where the near-surface soil is close to saturation
during summer, C band can be used to distinguish peatlands to some extent
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.80"/>. However, this only leads to a yes/no
classification. Such maps (or any other appropriate land cover classification)
could be used in addition to the presented approach in order to indicate
areas where it is expected that SOC is underestimated.</p>
      <p>The correlation with winter backscatter is expected to result from a
combination of roughness (surface response) and volume scattering within the
remains of the vegetation (regarding snow; see below). In order to
distinguish the different scattering types, polarimetric SAR data as
used, for
example, in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.81"/> would be required. Such data are, however, not
available from ENVISAT ASAR GM. Since winter data are used, only interaction
with the remaining woody parts is expected. The contribution from volume
scattering from woody vegetation becomes important when stems reach a certain
size with respect to the wavelength used. The training and validation
sites used also include willow-dominated land cover. The obtained results from
these locations do not indicate that the chosen approach is not applicable.
SOC derived from ASAR GM is close to SOC from high-resolution optical data
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) for willow classes. SOC might, however, be underestimated
in the case of thicker stems (more than 5 cm).</p>
      <p>L band (approximately 23 cm wavelength) is expected to penetrate better into the
ground in the tundra–taiga transition zone, and it may in general give better
indications of soil moisture during the summer season. The interaction with
the surface material (roughness and volume scattering) is, however, expected to
be much lower than with C band with respect to the tundra surface
characteristics (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). The sensitivity to the relevant
surface features which are used as a proxy for SOC is expected to be lower at
L band.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC 0–30 (left) and 0–100 cm (right) results from ENVISAT ASAR GM
in comparison to pedon (point) measurements from Kytalyk, Zackenberg,
Shalaurovo, Arymas and Tulemalu by soil type.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Averaged differences of SOC in kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between NCSCD and GM by
soil type (averaging intervals 1 %; source: NCSCD).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Evaluation results</title>
      <p>The large difference (about half of the values in the NCSCD) in SOC observed
between the upscaled maps (from both optical and radar data,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>) at Kytalyk is similar to the NCSCD-GM differences
throughout the entire Arctic (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Such a deviation is,
however, not found when GM is compared to pedon data across all sites
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). NCSCD values are also considerably higher than in situ
records for the Siberian sites (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SOC from the GM results as well as the NCSCD in comparison to
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI; source: MODIS). SOC values have
been averaged for class increments of 0.05 NDVI</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/5453/2016/bg-13-5453-2016-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The difference between deviations of SOC estimates from the NCSCD for both 30
and 100 cm between the Siberian and North American part can be to some
extent explained by the presence of peatlands. The SAR approach
underestimates SOC for histels as well as histosols (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>).
Similarly, SOC from the GM datasets is lower when the proportion of turbels
exceeds 20 %. This applies to the 30 cm as well as 100 cm results.
Large parts of the Canadian Arctic as well as the Brooks Range in Alaska
have, however, higher SOC in the GM results than in the NCSCD. This might be
due to inconsistencies in the underlying maps. For example, most of the Alaskan
Brooks Range has a value of zero SOC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).</p>
      <p>Deviations from the land cover based SOC data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) could be
also partially due to the limited availability of the reference dataset
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The included data represent only a small area within
the high-resolution satellite data classifications of several-kilometre
extent. The available evaluation datasets (Tulemalu and Arymas) do not
provide the full range of possible SOC values over areas which are large
enough to be detected with the spatial resolution of the SAR data. Validation
data only represent SOC values above 10 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 100 cm. Only
medium to high SOC values are thus used for the determination of the RMSE. A
larger range may lead to a reduction in the RMSE.</p>
      <p>The larger standard deviation in the WS-derived SOC stocks compared to GM for
Kytalyk is expected due to its higher spatial resolution. This reflects the
complexity of the landscape at Kytalyk <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.82"/>. Future studies
should consider measures of variation within the SAR resolution cell when
using coarse data such as ASAR GM or make use of higher-resolution SAR as
demonstrated applicable for WS.</p>
      <p>The high coefficient of determination for 30 cm as well as 100 cm implies
that a relationship exists between SOC accounted for over these horizons. This
agrees with the NCSCD. Based on linear correlation of the NCSCD version 2.2
pedon database (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>523</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, log transformation of
data; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="altparen.83"/>) the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 30 and 100 cm SOC stocks is 0.78. The
applied linear relationship between backscatter and SOC is not valid for
high-carbon areas such as peat soils. Surface properties as seen by C-band SAR do not change for SOC 0–100 cm values higher than approximately
35 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Peat deposits can have similar surface properties but
variable depths. Peat accumulation is related to age, and the accumulation
rates decrease exponentially in thermokarst basins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.84"/>.</p>
      <p>SOC values are also underestimated in areas with extensive cryoturbation, e.g. in North America (like northern Alaska and the coast of the Canadian
Archipelago, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c and d). Soil types are not reflected in the
reference maps (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) but are in the original pedon data. A
comparison with the in situ records shows that SOC is underestimated in most
cases for histels (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>), which are equivalent to permafrost
peatlands (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 cm O horizon). Turbels (in this study defined as
permafrost soils with more than 1 kg cryoturbated carbon) are also underestimated
in some cases. This can be clearly observed for SOC over 100 cm. The process
of cryoturbation may lead to a roughening of the surface and thus ambiguities
with characteristics typical for lower SOC content soil types.</p>
      <p>SOC of non-permafrost mineral soils and orthels (mineral permafrost soil
without cryoturbation) is mostly overestimated, although the assumption that
carbon content increases with decreasing backscatter seems to be valid. This
could be due to the inclusion of areas with cryoturbated soils into the
training dataset. Turbels are typical at Kytalyk. Furthermore, the occurrence
of mixed pixels may contribute to this overestimation. Non-permafrost mineral
soils are often found at river banks and the area they cover is smaller than
the resolution of ASAR GM data. Backscatter within such a GM pixel would be
lower in the case of grounded ice within that cell. This is partially possible
for shallow river sections. There is interaction of microwaves at the water–ice boundary of floating ice. If ice on water bodies is freezing to the
ground, the backscatter mechanisms change and the backscatter intensity
recorded at the sensor drops significantly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.85"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This
has an effect on SOC retrieval in the case of pixels which include very shallow
water which freezes to the bed as early as in the beginning of winter, thus resulting in
higher SOC estimates. A value of more than 30 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 100 cm is, for example, derived from GM for a pedon with 1 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from Arymas which
represents a sandbar. A water surface map with higher spatial resolution
than the SAR data used would be required in order to mask out affected
pixels.</p>
      <p>The land cover types of the reference maps (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) can be
associated with a certain SOC range (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>), which supports the
chosen upscaling approaches of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.86"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.87"/>.
However, only boulder areas,
fells, heath, dry tundra and tussock sites are distinct and with a low range of values. Fen, willow and grass classes
require further separation into subclasses to represent their SOC value
range. This needs to be considered when landscape-based upscaling is pursued
from land cover maps.</p>
      <p>The average amount of carbon across the CAVM domain of 19.6 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
over 100 cm is lower than the estimate of 34 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.88"/>
over the North American part. This could be attributed to the presence of
peatlands and deeply cryoturbated soils in this region. The carbon stock
total by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.89"/> is, however, 98.2 Pg C for North America alone, which
is higher than the circumpolar account from the NCSCD (94 Pg C).
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.90"/> obtained an RMSE of 17.8 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the active layer
in Alaska using environmental parameters including topography and
temperature. Active layer ranges from 14 to 93 cm according to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.91"/>. This RMSE is in the same order of magnitude as for the
C-band approach (RMSE of 17.24 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 100 cm).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Potential and limitations of the C-band approach</title>
      <p>The conclusion of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.92"/> that NDVI might be only applicable for
upscaling in the high Arctic is confirmed when GM SOC values are compared to
NDVI (MODIS July 2010, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>). SOC increases with NDVI, but
decreases when a certain level is reached. This differs between the GM and
NCSCD values. In the case of GM, values increase linearly until NDVI values of
0.6. They decrease for higher NDVI values. As SOC increases with decreasing
backscatter, the same can be assumed for low to medium NDVI. A linear
relationship between C-band backscatter at HH polarization and NDVI has also been
found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.93"/> for values higher than 0.6 for subtropical
regions. They report increasing NDVI with increasing backscatter, which agrees
with our findings. As described above, C-band backscatter relates to higher
woody vegetation in areas south of the tree line. Winter backscatter spatial
variability in forested regions represents growing stock volume
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.94"/>. This is reflected in the NDVI as well as unfrozen period
comparisons.</p>
      <p>GM-derived SOC indicates a maximum of SOC production in areas where there is
reasonable plant productivity and litter input and continuous permafrost-promoting soil cryoturbation. This corresponds to an unfrozen period length
less than approximately 110–120 days. NCSCD as well as GM SOC values
increase with in increasing unfrozen period length below that length. Both
calibration sites (Kytalyk and Zackenberg) fall into that zone of similar
behaviour. This suggests an applicability of the GM approach to areas with up
to 4 months of unfrozen conditions. An increase in SOC with mean annual air
temperature until a certain threshold, followed by an inverted relationship
similar to that found for the comparison of ASAR GM-derived SOC and the length of
unfrozen period, has been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.95"/> for Alaska.</p>
      <p>The local SOC minimum in the NCSCD around an unfrozen period length of
130 days corresponds to western Alaska and western Russia. The peak and high
differences in SOC between the datasets at around 120 days also correspond
to the maximum in turbel occurrence. This confirms the limitation of the
approach in areas with intensive cryoturbation as obtained from comparison
with the in situ records (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>).</p>
      <p>The wetland (wetness level) classification by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.96"/>, which is based
on the same principle (December minimum C-band backscatter), can also be
interpreted for carbon levels. High-SOC areas coincide with high wetness
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.97"/>. Conventional approaches for near-surface saturation
determination based on C-band data utilize unfrozen period data only
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.98"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This does, however, require a location-specific
calibration and at least one dense record of one summer season to identify
high SOC areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.99"/>. A consistent coverage is, however, not
available for SAR data. The sensitivity to saturation levels also varies
by vegetation coverage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.100"/>. Such approaches furthermore rely on
the assumption that roughness and scatting mechanisms do not change over
time, which is not the case over many areas in the high latitudes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.101"/>. C-band winter backscatter can be shown to be used as an
alternative, as a proxy for wetness levels as well as soil organic carbon
storage.</p>
      <p>At the panarctic scale the method and dataset created currently provides in the
first place a means to assess the consistency of maps from conventional
sources (soil maps). In order to produce a reliable panarctic map which fully
accounts for peat, combination with other sources (e.g. NCSCD) is required.
To use the current version, areas with high SOC content (e.g.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 100 cm) should be masked (replaced with other
estimates if available). For future studies, we propose in addition a fusion
with other land cover information (especially peatland extent from remotely sensed data) to spatially confine the high SOC area better. This requires a
reliable circumpolar peatland map, which is currently not available.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Upper limits of the applicability of the C-band SAR approach are
approximately 0.6 NDVI and about 120 days of unfrozen surface conditions.
Near-surface soil organic carbon can be quantified with C-band SAR data for
Arctic and subarctic environments for non-peatlands and soils with limited
cryoturbation. Results suggest that in total <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 29 Pg C soil organic carbon
is stored in the upper 30 cm north of the tree line (CAVM domain). The
ENVISAT ASAR GM circumpolar estimates for SOC are about 25 % lower than
the NCSCD account (including peatlands). This underestimation differs between
regions and points to inconsistencies in the NCSCD. The spatial continuity of
our approach allows the quantification of sparsely vegetated areas that are
mapped as 0 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the NCSCD, as exemplified for the Brooks Range
in Alaska. The estimates of total SOC stored in the upper soil layer is similar
for the different investigated sources (land-cover-based estimate and C-band
backscatter from satellite data) and across scales (different C-band
resolutions) for the Kytalyk test site. The results from ASAR GM as well as
in situ records suggest that NCSCD estimates for the Siberian tundra area are
too high.</p>
      <p>Carbon-rich soils (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over 100 cm) cannot be captured
with this approach. Soil processes such as cryoturbation may in addition lead
to increased surface roughness and therefore underestimation of SOC when
using the SAR approach. A fusion of traditional land cover information and
backscatter (frozen ground and low snow cover as used in this study) may
provide a means to produce spatially consistent circumpolar estimates
including peat soils. The length of unfrozen period in addition to the
normalized difference vegetation index are circumarctic-available products
that might be suitable supporting variables for modelling the spatial
distribution of soil organic carbon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The circumpolar SOC retrievals are available at <uri>https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864712</uri> (Bartsch et al., 2016).
The dataset contains four layers: SOC 0–30 cm; SOC 0–100 cm; first quality flag – value 1 for potential area of
underestimation; and second quality flag – value 1 for potential area of overestimation (based on class “other” from Widhalm et al., 2015b).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Annett Bartsch developed the initial concept for the study, performed all analyses  on the preprocessed datasets and
drafted the manuscript. Barbara Widhalm performed all preprocessing of the satellite data. Peter Kuhry, Gustaf Hugelius, Juri Palmtag and Matthias Siewert
collected the in situ data and prepared them for this analysis. All co-authors contributed to concept development and writing of the manuscript, including discussion.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Financial support by the European Commission (FP7-ENV-2011, grant agreement
no. 282700) through the project Changing Permafrost in the Arctic and its
Global Effects in the 21st Century (PAGE21) is gratefully acknowledged.
In situ data sharing was made possible through the same project. The Kytalyk
soil organic carbon inventory was conducted with support of the
above-mentioned EU PAGE21 project; Arymas and Shalaurovo soil sampling and
analyses were possible through the financial support provided by the VR ESF
CryoCarb project; the Tulemalu fieldwork and subsequent SOC analysis were
supported through the EU GLIMPSE project (contract EVK2-2001-00337) and the
Swedish Research Council (VR); and the Zackenberg soil organic carbon inventory
was made possible through support of the Norden Permanor and Nordforsk
DEFROST projects.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: K. Thonicke<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Baghdadi et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Baghdadi, N., King, C., Bourguignon, A., and Remond, A.: Potential of ERS and
RADARSAT data for surface roughness monitoring over bare agricultural fields:
application to catchments in Northern France, Int. J.
Remote Sens., 23, 3427–3442, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bartsch(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A.: Monitoring of Terrestrial Hydrology at High Latitudes with
Scatterometer Data, in: Geoscience and Remote Sensing, New Achievements,
edited by: Imperatore, P. and Riccio, D.,   Intechweb, Vokuvar,
247–262, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bartsch et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A., Kidd, R., Pathe, C., Wagner, W., and Scipal, K.: Satellite Radar
Imagery for Monitoring Inland Wetlands in Boreal and Sub-Arctic Environments,
Journal of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 17,
305–317, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bartsch et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A., Wagner, W., Scipal, K., Pathe, C., Sabel, D., and Wolski, P.:
Global Monitoring of Wetlands – the Value of ENVISAT ASAR Global Mode,
J. Environ. Manag., 90, 2226–2233, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bartsch et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Bartsch, A., A.Trofaier, Hayman, G., Sabel, D., Schlaffer, S., Clark, D., and
Blyth, E.: Detection of Open Water Dynamics with ENVISAT ASAR in Support
of Land Surface Modelling at High Latitudes,  Biogeosciences, 9, 703–714, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-703-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-703-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bartsch, A., Widhalm, B., Kuhry, P., Hugelius, G., Palmtag, J., and Siewert, M.: Can C-Band SAR be
used to estimate soil organic carbon storage in tundra?, Biogeosciences Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2016-157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2016-157</ext-link>, in review,
2016 (data available at: <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.864712</ext-link>).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bicheron et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Bicheron, P., Defourny, P., Brockmann, C., Schouten, L., Vancutsem, C., Huc,
M., and Bontemps, S.: GlobCover: Products Description and Validation Report,
Tech. Rep., MEDIASFrance, Toulouse, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Brown et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, S. C. M., Quegan, S., Morrison, K., Bennett, J. C., and Cookmartin, G.:
High-resolution measurements of scattering in wheat canopies?Implications
for crop parameter retrieval, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41,
1602–1610, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Closa et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Closa, J., Rosich, B., and Monti-Guarnieri, A.: The ASAR Wide Swath Mode
Products, in: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
2003,  IEEE, 2,  1118–1120, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Duguay et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Duguay, Y., Bernier, M., Lévesque, E., and Tremblay, B.: Potential of C and X
Band SAR for Shrub Growth Monitoring in Sub-Arctic Environments, Remote
Sens., 7, 9410–9430,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>ESA(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA: ENVISAT ASAR Product Handbook, European Space Agency, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Högström and Bartsch(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Högström, E. and Bartsch, A.: Impact of backscatter variations over water
bodies on coarse scale radar retrieved soil moisture and the potential of
correcting with meteorological data, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
accepted,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Högström et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Högström, E., Trofaier, A. M., Gouttevin, I., and Bartsch, A.: Assessing
Seasonal Backscatter Variations with Respect to Uncertainties in Soil
Moisture Retrieval in Siberian Tundra Regions, Remote Sens., 6, 8718–8738,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Holah et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Holah, N., Baghdadi, N., Zribi, M., Bruand, A., and King, C.: Potentiel of
ASAR/ENVISAT for the caracterisation of soil surface parameters over bare
agricultural fields, Remote Sens. Environ., 96, 78–86,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Horwath Burnham and Sletten(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Horwath Burnham, J. and Sletten, R. S.: Spatial distribution of soil organic
carbon in northwest Greenland and underestimates of High Arctic carbon
stores, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB3012,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003660</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Hugelius(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Hugelius, G.: Spatial upscaling using thematic maps: An analysis of
uncertainties in permafrost soil carbon estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
26, GB2026, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011gb004154" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011gb004154</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Hugelius et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Hugelius, G., Kuhry, P., Tarnocai, C., and Virtanen, T.: Soil organic carbon
pools in a periglacial landscape: a case study from the central Canadian
Arctic, Permafrost  Periglac., 21, 16–29,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.677" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ppp.677</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hugelius et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Hugelius, G., Virtanen, T., Kaverin, D., Pastukhov, A., Rivkin, F., Marchenko,
S., Romanovsky, V., and Kuhry, P.: High-resolution mapping of ecosystem
carbon storage and potential effects of permafrost thaw in periglacial
terrain, European Russian Arctic, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
G03024, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JG001606</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hugelius et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Hugelius, G., Tarnocai, C., Broll, G., Canadell, J. G., Kuhry, P., and Swanson,
D. K.: The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database: spatially distributed
datasets of soil coverage and soil carbon storage in the northern permafrost
regions, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 3–13, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-3-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-3-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Hugelius et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Hugelius, G., Strauss, J., Zubrzycki, S., Harden, J. W., Schuur, E. A. G.,
Ping, C.-L., Schirrmeister, L., Grosse, G., Michaelson, G. J., Koven, C. D.,
O'Donnell, J. A., Elberling, B., Mishra, U., Camill, P., Yu, Z., Palmtag, J.,
and Kuhry, P.: Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with
quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps, Biogeosciences, 11,
6573–6593, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6573-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-6573-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Jagdhuber et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Jagdhuber, T., Stockamp, J., Hajnsek, I., and Ludwig, R.: Identification of
Soil Freezing and Thawing States Using SAR Polarimetry at C-Band, Remote
Sens., 6, 2008–2023, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Jeffries et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Jeffries, M., Wakabayashi, H., and Weeks, W.: ERS-1 SAR backscatter changes
associated with ice growing on shallow lakes in Arctic Alaska, in:
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4,
2001–2004, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322048</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Jones et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Jones, M. C., Grosse, G., Jones, B. M., and Anthony, K. W.: Peat accumulation
in drained thermokarst lake basins in continuous, ice-rich permafrost,
northern Seward Peninsula, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 117, G00M07, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JG001766</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Lehner and Döll(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehner, B. and Döll, P.: Development and Validation of a Global Database of
Lakes, Reservoirs and Wetlands, J. Hydrol., 296, 1–22, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Mishra and Riley(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Mishra, U. and Riley, W. J.: Alaskan soil carbon stocks: spatial variability
and dependence on environmental factors, Biogeosciences, 9, 3637–3645,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3637-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-3637-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Mishra and Riley(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mishra, U. and Riley, W. J.: Active-Layer Thickness across Alaska: Comparing
Observation-Based Estimates with CMIP5 Earth System Model Predictions, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 78, 894–902, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Naeimi et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Naeimi, V., Paulik, C., Bartsch, A., Wagner, W., Kidd, R., Boike, J., and
Elger, K.: ASCAT Surface State Flag (SSF): Extracting Information on
Surface Freeze/Thaw Conditions from Backscatter Data Using an Empirical
Threshold-Analysis Algorithm, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote
Sens., 50, 2566–2582,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Oh et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Oh, Y., Sarabandi, K., and Ulaby, F.: An empirical model of an inversion
technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces, IEEE Trans. Geosci.
Remote Sens., 30, 370–381, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Palmtag et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Palmtag, J., Hugelius, G., Lashchinskiy, N., Tamstorf, M. P., Richter, A.,
Elberling, B., and Kuhry, P.: Storage, Landscape Distribution, and Burial
History of Soil Organic Matter in Contrasting Areas of Continuous Permafrost,
Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 47, 71–88,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Park et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S.-E., Bartsch, A., Sabel, D., Wagner, W., Naeimi, V., and Yamaguchi, Y.:
Monitoring Freeze/Thaw Cycles Using ENVISAT ASAR Global Mode, Remote
Sens. Environ., 115, 3457–3467, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Pathe et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Pathe, C., Wagner, W., Sabel, D., Doubkova, M., and Basara, J.: Using ENVISAT
ASAR Global Mode Data for Surface Soil Moisture Retrieval Over Oklahoma,
USA, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 47, 468–480,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Palmtag, J., Ramage, J., Hugelius, G., Gentsch, N., Lashchinskiy, N., Richter, A., and
Kuhry, P.: Controls on the storage of organic carbon in permafrost soils in northern Siberia,
Eur. J. Soil Sci., 67, 478–491, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ejss.12357</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Paulik et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Paulik, C., Melzer, T., Hahn, S., Bartsch, A., Heim, B., Elger, K., and Wagner,
W.: Circumpolar surface soil moisture and freeze/thaw surface status remote
sensing products (version 2) with links to geotiff images and NetCDF files
(2007–2001 to 2010–2009), <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.775959" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.775959</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Ping et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Ping, C.-L., Michaelson, G. J., Jorgenson, M. T., Kimble, J. M., Epstein, H.,
Romanovsky, V. E., and Walker, D. A.: High stocks of soil organic carbon in
the North American Arctic region, Nat. Geosci., 1, 615–619, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Reschke et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Reschke, J., Bartsch, A., Schlaffer, S., and Schepaschenko, D.: Capability of
C-Band SAR for Operational Wetland Monitoring at High Latitudes, Remote
Sens., 4, 2923–2943, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Sabel et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Sabel, D., Bartalis, Z., Wagner, W., Doubkova, M., and Klein, J.-P.:
Development of a Global Backscatter Model in support to the Sentinel-1
mission design, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 102–112, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Santoro et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Santoro, M., Beer, C., Cartus, O., Schmullius, C., Shvidenko, A., McCallum, I.,
Wegmüller, U., and Wiesmann, A.: Retrieval of growing stock volume in
boreal forest using hyper-temporal series of Envisat ASAR ScanSAR backscatter
measurements, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 490–507, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Schuur et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Schuur, E., Bockheim, J., Canadell, J., Euskirchen, E., Field, C. B.,
Goryachkin, S. V., Hagemann, S., Kuhry, P., Lafleur, P., Lee, H., Mazhitova,
G., Nelson, F. E., Rinke, A., Romanovsky, V., Shiklomanov, N., Tarnocai, C.,
Venevsky, S., Vogel, J. G., and Zimov, S. A.: Vulnerability of permafrost
carbon to climate change: Implications for the global carbon cycle,
BioScience, 58, 701–714, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Schuur et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Schuur, E. A. G., McGuire, A. D., Schadel, C., Grosse, G., Harden, J. W.,
Hayes, D. J., Hugelius, G., Koven, C. D., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D. M., Natali,
S. M., Olefeldt, D., Romanovsky, V. E., Schaefer, K., Turetsky, M. R., Treat,
C. C., and Vonk, J. E.: Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback,
Nature, 520, 171–179,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Siewert et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Siewert, M. B., Hanisch, J., Weiss, N., Kuhry, P., Maximov, T. C., and
Hugelius, G.: Comparing carbon storage of Siberian tundra and taiga
permafrost ecosystems at very high spatial resolution, J. Geophys.
Res.-Biogeo., 120, 1973–1994, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Tarnocai et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G., and
Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost
region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB2023,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003327</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Ulaby and Stiles(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F. and Stiles, W.: Microwave response of snow, Adv. Space Res., 1,
131–149, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Ulaby et al.(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K., and Fung, A.: Microwave Remote Sensing–Active and
Passive, vol. II, Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Ullmann et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Ullmann, T., Schmitt, A., Roth, A., Duffe, J., Dech, S., Hubberten, H.-W., and
Baumhauer, R.: Land Cover Characterization and Classification of Arctic
Tundra Environments by Means of Polarized Synthetic Aperture X- and C-Band
Radar (PolSAR) and Landsat 8 Multispectral Imagery – Richards Island,
Canada, Remote Sens., 6, 8565–8593,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Wagner et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, W., Lemoine, G., and Rott, H.: A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture
from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data, Remote Sens. Environ.,
70, 191–207, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Wagner et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, W., Pathe, C., Doubkova, M., Sabel, D., Bartsch, A., Hasenauer, S.,
Blöschl, G., Scipal, K., Martínez-Fernández, J., and Löw, A.:
Temporal Stability of Soil Moisture and Radar Backscatter Observed by the
Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR), Sensors, 8, 1174–1197, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Walker et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Walker, D., Gould, W., Maier, H., and Raynolds, M.: The Circumpolar Arctic
Vegetation Map: AVHRR-derived base maps, environmental controls, and
integrated mapping procedures, Int. J. Remote Sens., 23,
4551–4570, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Wang et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Ge, L., and Li, X.: Pasture Monitoring Using SAR with COSMO-SkyMed,
ENVISAT ASAR, and ALOS PALSAR in Otway, Australia, Remote Sens., 5, 3611,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs5073611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs5073611</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Waring et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Waring, R., Way, J., Hunt, R., Morrissey, L., Ranson, J., Weishampel, J., Oren,
R., and Frankling, S.: Imaging radar for ecosystem studies, Bio-Science, 4,
715–723, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Weiss et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Weiss, N., Blok, D., Elberling, B., Hugelius, G., Jorgensen, C. J., Siewert,
M. B., and Kuhry, P.: Thermokarst dynamics and soil organic matter
characteristics controlling initial carbon release from permafrost soils in
the Siberian Yedoma region, Sediment. Geol.,   340,  38–48,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.12.004</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Widhalm et al.(2015a)</label><mixed-citation>
Widhalm, B., Bartsch, A., and Heim, B.: A novel approach for the
characterization of tundra wetland regions with C-band SAR satellite data,
Int. J. Remote Sens., 36, 5537–5556, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Widhalm, B., Bartsch, A., and Heim, B.: Circumarctic wetland dataset based on ENVISAT ASAR Global
Monitoring Mode with links to geotiff image and NetCDF files (2005–01 to 2011–12), <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.840548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.840548</ext-link>,
Supplement to:  A novel approach for the characterization of tundra wetland regions with C-band SAR satellite data,
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36, 5537–5556,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1101505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2015.1101505</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Woodhouse(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Woodhouse, I.: Introduction to Microwave Remote Sensing, Taylor &amp; Francis, New
York, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Wulf et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Wulf, H., Mulder, T., Schaepman, M. E., Keller, A., and Jörg, P.: Remote
Sensing of Soils, Tech. Rep., Remote Sensing Laboratories, University of
Zürich, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1098.0649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13140/2.1.1098.0649</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Can C-band synthetic aperture radar be used to estimate soil organic carbon storage in tundra?</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">A new approach for the estimation of soil organic carbon (SOC)
pools north of the tree line has been developed based on synthetic aperture
radar (SAR; ENVISAT Advanced SAR Global Monitoring mode) data. SOC values are
directly determined from backscatter values instead of upscaling using land
cover or soil classes. The multi-mode capability of SAR allows application
across scales. It can be shown that measurements in C band under frozen
conditions represent vegetation and surface structure properties which relate
to soil properties, specifically SOC. It is estimated that at least 29 Pg C
is stored in the upper 30 cm of soils north of the tree line. This is
approximately 25 % less than stocks derived from the soil-map-based
Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (NCSCD). The total stored carbon is
underestimated since the established empirical relationship is not valid for
peatlands or strongly cryoturbated soils. The approach does, however,
provide the first spatially consistent account of soil organic carbon across
the Arctic. Furthermore, it could be shown that values obtained from 1 km
resolution SAR correspond to accounts based on a high spatial resolution
(2 m) land cover map over a study area of about 7  ×  7 km in NE
Siberia. The approach can be also potentially transferred to medium-resolution C-band SAR data such as ENVISAT ASAR Wide Swath with
 ∼  120 m resolution but it is in general limited to regions without
woody vegetation. Global Monitoring-mode-derived SOC increases with unfrozen
period length. This indicates the importance of this parameter for modelling
of the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon storage.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Baghdadi et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Baghdadi, N., King, C., Bourguignon, A., and Remond, A.: Potential of ERS and
RADARSAT data for surface roughness monitoring over bare agricultural fields:
application to catchments in Northern France, Int. J.
Remote Sens., 23, 3427–3442, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bartsch(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A.: Monitoring of Terrestrial Hydrology at High Latitudes with
Scatterometer Data, in: Geoscience and Remote Sensing, New Achievements,
edited by: Imperatore, P. and Riccio, D.,   Intechweb, Vokuvar,
247–262, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bartsch et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A., Kidd, R., Pathe, C., Wagner, W., and Scipal, K.: Satellite Radar
Imagery for Monitoring Inland Wetlands in Boreal and Sub-Arctic Environments,
Journal of Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 17,
305–317, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bartsch et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A., Wagner, W., Scipal, K., Pathe, C., Sabel, D., and Wolski, P.:
Global Monitoring of Wetlands – the Value of ENVISAT ASAR Global Mode,
J. Environ. Manag., 90, 2226–2233, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bartsch et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A., A.Trofaier, Hayman, G., Sabel, D., Schlaffer, S., Clark, D., and
Blyth, E.: Detection of Open Water Dynamics with ENVISAT ASAR in Support
of Land Surface Modelling at High Latitudes,  Biogeosciences, 9, 703–714, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-703-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-703-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bartsch, A., Widhalm, B., Kuhry, P., Hugelius, G., Palmtag, J., and Siewert, M.: Can C-Band SAR be
used to estimate soil organic carbon storage in tundra?, Biogeosciences Discuss., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2016-157" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-2016-157</a>, in review,
2016 (data available at: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.864712" target="_blank">doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.864712</a>).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bicheron et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Bicheron, P., Defourny, P., Brockmann, C., Schouten, L., Vancutsem, C., Huc,
M., and Bontemps, S.: GlobCover: Products Description and Validation Report,
Tech. Rep., MEDIASFrance, Toulouse, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Brown et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, S. C. M., Quegan, S., Morrison, K., Bennett, J. C., and Cookmartin, G.:
High-resolution measurements of scattering in wheat canopies?Implications
for crop parameter retrieval, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41,
1602–1610, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Closa et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Closa, J., Rosich, B., and Monti-Guarnieri, A.: The ASAR Wide Swath Mode
Products, in: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
2003,  IEEE, 2,  1118–1120, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Duguay et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Duguay, Y., Bernier, M., Lévesque, E., and Tremblay, B.: Potential of C and X
Band SAR for Shrub Growth Monitoring in Sub-Arctic Environments, Remote
Sens., 7, 9410–9430,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>ESA(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA: ENVISAT ASAR Product Handbook, European Space Agency, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Högström and Bartsch(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Högström, E. and Bartsch, A.: Impact of backscatter variations over water
bodies on coarse scale radar retrieved soil moisture and the potential of
correcting with meteorological data, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,
accepted,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Högström et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Högström, E., Trofaier, A. M., Gouttevin, I., and Bartsch, A.: Assessing
Seasonal Backscatter Variations with Respect to Uncertainties in Soil
Moisture Retrieval in Siberian Tundra Regions, Remote Sens., 6, 8718–8738,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Holah et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Holah, N., Baghdadi, N., Zribi, M., Bruand, A., and King, C.: Potentiel of
ASAR/ENVISAT for the caracterisation of soil surface parameters over bare
agricultural fields, Remote Sens. Environ., 96, 78–86,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Horwath Burnham and Sletten(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Horwath Burnham, J. and Sletten, R. S.: Spatial distribution of soil organic
carbon in northwest Greenland and underestimates of High Arctic carbon
stores, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB3012,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003660" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GB003660</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Hugelius(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hugelius, G.: Spatial upscaling using thematic maps: An analysis of
uncertainties in permafrost soil carbon estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
26, GB2026, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011gb004154" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011gb004154</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Hugelius et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Hugelius, G., Kuhry, P., Tarnocai, C., and Virtanen, T.: Soil organic carbon
pools in a periglacial landscape: a case study from the central Canadian
Arctic, Permafrost  Periglac., 21, 16–29,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ppp.677" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/ppp.677</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Hugelius et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Hugelius, G., Virtanen, T., Kaverin, D., Pastukhov, A., Rivkin, F., Marchenko,
S., Romanovsky, V., and Kuhry, P.: High-resolution mapping of ecosystem
carbon storage and potential effects of permafrost thaw in periglacial
terrain, European Russian Arctic, J. Geophys. Res., 116,
G03024, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001606" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JG001606</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Hugelius et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Hugelius, G., Tarnocai, C., Broll, G., Canadell, J. G., Kuhry, P., and Swanson,
D. K.: The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database: spatially distributed
datasets of soil coverage and soil carbon storage in the northern permafrost
regions, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 3–13, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-3-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/essd-5-3-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Hugelius et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Hugelius, G., Strauss, J., Zubrzycki, S., Harden, J. W., Schuur, E. A. G.,
Ping, C.-L., Schirrmeister, L., Grosse, G., Michaelson, G. J., Koven, C. D.,
O'Donnell, J. A., Elberling, B., Mishra, U., Camill, P., Yu, Z., Palmtag, J.,
and Kuhry, P.: Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with
quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps, Biogeosciences, 11,
6573–6593, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6573-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-11-6573-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Jagdhuber et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Jagdhuber, T., Stockamp, J., Hajnsek, I., and Ludwig, R.: Identification of
Soil Freezing and Thawing States Using SAR Polarimetry at C-Band, Remote
Sens., 6, 2008–2023, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Jeffries et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Jeffries, M., Wakabayashi, H., and Weeks, W.: ERS-1 SAR backscatter changes
associated with ice growing on shallow lakes in Arctic Alaska, in:
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4,
2001–2004, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322048" target="_blank">doi:10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322048</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Jones et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, M. C., Grosse, G., Jones, B. M., and Anthony, K. W.: Peat accumulation
in drained thermokarst lake basins in continuous, ice-rich permafrost,
northern Seward Peninsula, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 117, G00M07, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001766" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JG001766</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Lehner and Döll(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehner, B. and Döll, P.: Development and Validation of a Global Database of
Lakes, Reservoirs and Wetlands, J. Hydrol., 296, 1–22, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Mishra and Riley(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Mishra, U. and Riley, W. J.: Alaskan soil carbon stocks: spatial variability
and dependence on environmental factors, Biogeosciences, 9, 3637–3645,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3637-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-3637-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Mishra and Riley(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mishra, U. and Riley, W. J.: Active-Layer Thickness across Alaska: Comparing
Observation-Based Estimates with CMIP5 Earth System Model Predictions, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 78, 894–902, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Naeimi et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Naeimi, V., Paulik, C., Bartsch, A., Wagner, W., Kidd, R., Boike, J., and
Elger, K.: ASCAT Surface State Flag (SSF): Extracting Information on
Surface Freeze/Thaw Conditions from Backscatter Data Using an Empirical
Threshold-Analysis Algorithm, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote
Sens., 50, 2566–2582,  2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Oh et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Oh, Y., Sarabandi, K., and Ulaby, F.: An empirical model of an inversion
technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces, IEEE Trans. Geosci.
Remote Sens., 30, 370–381, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Palmtag et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Palmtag, J., Hugelius, G., Lashchinskiy, N., Tamstorf, M. P., Richter, A.,
Elberling, B., and Kuhry, P.: Storage, Landscape Distribution, and Burial
History of Soil Organic Matter in Contrasting Areas of Continuous Permafrost,
Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 47, 71–88,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Park et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S.-E., Bartsch, A., Sabel, D., Wagner, W., Naeimi, V., and Yamaguchi, Y.:
Monitoring Freeze/Thaw Cycles Using ENVISAT ASAR Global Mode, Remote
Sens. Environ., 115, 3457–3467, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Pathe et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Pathe, C., Wagner, W., Sabel, D., Doubkova, M., and Basara, J.: Using ENVISAT
ASAR Global Mode Data for Surface Soil Moisture Retrieval Over Oklahoma,
USA, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 47, 468–480,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Palmtag, J., Ramage, J., Hugelius, G., Gentsch, N., Lashchinskiy, N., Richter, A., and
Kuhry, P.: Controls on the storage of organic carbon in permafrost soils in northern Siberia,
Eur. J. Soil Sci., 67, 478–491, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12357" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/ejss.12357</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Paulik et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulik, C., Melzer, T., Hahn, S., Bartsch, A., Heim, B., Elger, K., and Wagner,
W.: Circumpolar surface soil moisture and freeze/thaw surface status remote
sensing products (version 2) with links to geotiff images and NetCDF files
(2007–2001 to 2010–2009), <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.775959" target="_blank">doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.775959</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Ping et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Ping, C.-L., Michaelson, G. J., Jorgenson, M. T., Kimble, J. M., Epstein, H.,
Romanovsky, V. E., and Walker, D. A.: High stocks of soil organic carbon in
the North American Arctic region, Nat. Geosci., 1, 615–619, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Reschke et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Reschke, J., Bartsch, A., Schlaffer, S., and Schepaschenko, D.: Capability of
C-Band SAR for Operational Wetland Monitoring at High Latitudes, Remote
Sens., 4, 2923–2943, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Sabel et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Sabel, D., Bartalis, Z., Wagner, W., Doubkova, M., and Klein, J.-P.:
Development of a Global Backscatter Model in support to the Sentinel-1
mission design, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 102–112, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Santoro et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Santoro, M., Beer, C., Cartus, O., Schmullius, C., Shvidenko, A., McCallum, I.,
Wegmüller, U., and Wiesmann, A.: Retrieval of growing stock volume in
boreal forest using hyper-temporal series of Envisat ASAR ScanSAR backscatter
measurements, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 490–507, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Schuur et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Schuur, E., Bockheim, J., Canadell, J., Euskirchen, E., Field, C. B.,
Goryachkin, S. V., Hagemann, S., Kuhry, P., Lafleur, P., Lee, H., Mazhitova,
G., Nelson, F. E., Rinke, A., Romanovsky, V., Shiklomanov, N., Tarnocai, C.,
Venevsky, S., Vogel, J. G., and Zimov, S. A.: Vulnerability of permafrost
carbon to climate change: Implications for the global carbon cycle,
BioScience, 58, 701–714, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Schuur et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Schuur, E. A. G., McGuire, A. D., Schadel, C., Grosse, G., Harden, J. W.,
Hayes, D. J., Hugelius, G., Koven, C. D., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D. M., Natali,
S. M., Olefeldt, D., Romanovsky, V. E., Schaefer, K., Turetsky, M. R., Treat,
C. C., and Vonk, J. E.: Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback,
Nature, 520, 171–179,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Siewert et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Siewert, M. B., Hanisch, J., Weiss, N., Kuhry, P., Maximov, T. C., and
Hugelius, G.: Comparing carbon storage of Siberian tundra and taiga
permafrost ecosystems at very high spatial resolution, J. Geophys.
Res.-Biogeo., 120, 1973–1994, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Tarnocai et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G., and
Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost
region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB2023,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003327" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GB003327</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Ulaby and Stiles(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F. and Stiles, W.: Microwave response of snow, Adv. Space Res., 1,
131–149, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Ulaby et al.(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K., and Fung, A.: Microwave Remote Sensing–Active and
Passive, vol. II, Artech House, Norwood, Mass., 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Ullmann et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Ullmann, T., Schmitt, A., Roth, A., Duffe, J., Dech, S., Hubberten, H.-W., and
Baumhauer, R.: Land Cover Characterization and Classification of Arctic
Tundra Environments by Means of Polarized Synthetic Aperture X- and C-Band
Radar (PolSAR) and Landsat 8 Multispectral Imagery – Richards Island,
Canada, Remote Sens., 6, 8565–8593,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Wagner et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, W., Lemoine, G., and Rott, H.: A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture
from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data, Remote Sens. Environ.,
70, 191–207, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Wagner et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, W., Pathe, C., Doubkova, M., Sabel, D., Bartsch, A., Hasenauer, S.,
Blöschl, G., Scipal, K., Martínez-Fernández, J., and Löw, A.:
Temporal Stability of Soil Moisture and Radar Backscatter Observed by the
Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR), Sensors, 8, 1174–1197, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Walker et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Walker, D., Gould, W., Maier, H., and Raynolds, M.: The Circumpolar Arctic
Vegetation Map: AVHRR-derived base maps, environmental controls, and
integrated mapping procedures, Int. J. Remote Sens., 23,
4551–4570, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Wang et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Ge, L., and Li, X.: Pasture Monitoring Using SAR with COSMO-SkyMed,
ENVISAT ASAR, and ALOS PALSAR in Otway, Australia, Remote Sens., 5, 3611,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs5073611" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/rs5073611</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Waring et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Waring, R., Way, J., Hunt, R., Morrissey, L., Ranson, J., Weishampel, J., Oren,
R., and Frankling, S.: Imaging radar for ecosystem studies, Bio-Science, 4,
715–723, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Weiss et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss, N., Blok, D., Elberling, B., Hugelius, G., Jorgensen, C. J., Siewert,
M. B., and Kuhry, P.: Thermokarst dynamics and soil organic matter
characteristics controlling initial carbon release from permafrost soils in
the Siberian Yedoma region, Sediment. Geol.,   340,  38–48,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.12.004" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.12.004</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Widhalm et al.(2015a)</label><mixed-citation>
Widhalm, B., Bartsch, A., and Heim, B.: A novel approach for the
characterization of tundra wetland regions with C-band SAR satellite data,
Int. J. Remote Sens., 36, 5537–5556, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Widhalm, B., Bartsch, A., and Heim, B.: Circumarctic wetland dataset based on ENVISAT ASAR Global
Monitoring Mode with links to geotiff image and NetCDF files (2005–01 to 2011–12), <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.840548" target="_blank">doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.840548</a>,
Supplement to:  A novel approach for the characterization of tundra wetland regions with C-band SAR satellite data,
International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36, 5537–5556,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1101505" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/01431161.2015.1101505</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Woodhouse(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Woodhouse, I.: Introduction to Microwave Remote Sensing, Taylor &amp; Francis, New
York, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Wulf et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Wulf, H., Mulder, T., Schaepman, M. E., Keller, A., and Jörg, P.: Remote
Sensing of Soils, Tech. Rep., Remote Sensing Laboratories, University of
Zürich, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1098.0649" target="_blank">doi:10.13140/2.1.1098.0649</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
