<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-6683-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Variations in triple isotope composition of dissolved oxygen and primary
production in a subtropical reservoir</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Variations in triple isotope composition of dissolved oxygen}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Jurikova et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Jurikova</surname><given-names>Hana</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guha</surname><given-names>Tania</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Abe</surname><given-names>Osamu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shiah</surname><given-names>Fuh-Kwo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Chung-Ho</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Mao-Chang</given-names></name>
          <email>mcl@rcec.sinica.edu.tw</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-9344</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, 11529
Taipei, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Chikusa,
464-8601 Nagoya, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, 11529 Taipei, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Graduate Institute of Astronomy, National Central University, 32001
Jhongli, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>a</label><institution>now at: GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel,
Wischhofstr. 1–3, 24148 Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Mao-Chang Liang (mcl@rcec.sinica.edu.tw)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>24</issue>
      <fpage>6683</fpage><lpage>6698</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23</day><month>August</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Lakes and reservoirs play an important role in the carbon cycle,
and therefore monitoring their metabolic rates is essential. The triple
oxygen-isotope anomaly of dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ln(1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.518 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ln(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O)] offers
a new, in situ, perspective on primary production, yet little is known about
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from freshwater systems. We investigated the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
together with the oxygen : argon ratio [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar)] in the
subtropical Feitsui Reservoir in Taiwan from June 2014 to July 2015. Here, we
present the seasonal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, GP (gross production), NP
(net production) and the NP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GP (net to gross ratio) in association with
environmental parameters. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied with depth and season,
with values ranging between 26 and 205 per meg. The GP rates were observed to
be higher (702 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in winter than those
(303 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recorded during the summer. The
overall averaged GP was 220 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and NP was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 g
C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying the reservoir was net heterotrophic on an
annual basis. This is due to negative NP rates  from October to
February (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>198 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 78 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Comparisons between
GP rates obtained from the isotope mass balance approach and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C bottle
incubation method (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP) showed consistent values on the same order
of magnitude with a GP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP ratio of 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1. Finally
we noted that, although typhoon occurrences were scarce, higher than average
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and GP rates were recorded after typhoon events.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>It is well established that marine photosynthesis plays a critical role in
the global biogeochemical cycling of carbon and oxygen, which sustain the great
majority of ecosystems on our planet. Recent studies show that freshwater
systems constitute a significant component of these cycles and deserve closer
attention (Cole et al., 2007; Tranvik et al., 2009; Valdespino-Castillo et
al., 2013). Assessing primary production (PP) and providing accurate
estimates of ecosystem metabolic rates are therefore the key to understanding
each system's fluxes and variability in biogeochemical cycling.</p>
      <p>Traditionally, PP has been evaluated by in vitro <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C bottle incubation
method introduced by Steeman-Nielsen (1952). However, these measurements are
associated with a number of biases and the interpretation of the PP estimates
is problematic. The main drawback is the in vitro methodology, which involves
the removal of plankton communities from the natural environment and
confining them in a small volume of water, with variability in PP observed
under laboratory conditions. Because the distribution of plankton is
heterogeneous in time and space, these experiments can only provide local and
instantaneous PP rates, which do not reflect the time-averaged mean PP. The
PP rates observed in vitro therefore cannot be fully representative of
natural PP rates (e.g. Harrison and Harris, 1986; Marra, 2002).</p>
      <p>Over a decade and half ago, Luz et al. (1999) and Luz and Barkan (2000)
introduced the triple oxygen-isotope technique or the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O excess
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which allows us to assess PP in situ. The excess is defined as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where the isotopic compositions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O represent
the deviation of the abundance ratio of an isotopic and normal species in a
sample relative to that of a standard: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ([<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O])<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ([<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O])<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>standard</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O is either
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O are expressed
with respect to atmospheric air O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Following Luz and Barkan (2005), the
factor <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken to be 0.518. The basic premise of this method lies
in the processes fractionating O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopologues. While photochemical
reactions in the stratosphere (the coupled chemistry between O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> give rise to a non-mass-dependent signal in the
atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thiemens et al. 1995a, b), respiration and
photosynthesis fractionate O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a mass-dependent way (the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O
enrichment is approximately half of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O relative to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O), which
in a marine or aquatic system allows for distinguishing the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> produced
biologically from air O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> entraining during gas exchange. Respiration
modifies the dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in water but does not affect
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, because the relative proportions of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O remain the same. The respiratory effect on dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation can be evaluated using oxygen/argon ratios, considering the
biological oxygen supersaturation expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar)
(defined below in Eq. 4). This is because O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ar have similar
physical properties, but the latter does not have biological sources and
sinks. Although the PP evaluation based on the co-variation of both the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values provides a more accurate
assessment (Prokopenko et al., 2011; Kaiser, 2011), the concept of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains a valuable tool for tracing biologically produced
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and resolving the associated dynamics in the ocean. Until now this
joint geochemical budget approach (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, together with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar)) has been applied
widely to study marine production in the Atlantic (Luz and Barkan, 2009; Quay
et al., 2012), Pacific (Hendricks et al., 2005; Sarma et al., 2005, 2006,
2008; Quay et al., 2010; Stanley et al., 2010; Juranek and Quay, 2010;
Juranek et al., 2012; Munro et al., 2013), and the Southern (Reuer et al.,
2007; Hamme et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012; Castro-Morales et al., 2013)
oceans, yet other oceanic basins and freshwater systems in general, with the
exception of a case study in Lake Kinneret (Luz and Barkan, 2000), remain
largely unstudied.</p>
      <p>In this study, we extend the applicability of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> method into
an aquatic system. We use the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> method to trace the
photosynthetic O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fate and to investigate the seasonal changes in PP in
a semi-closed subtropical reservoir in Taiwan over a period of 1 year.
We demonstrate that this approach offers new perspectives on PP in lakes. In
an effort to contribute to the understanding of production rates measured in
situ using the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> method and the in vitro estimates from the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C bottle incubation approach, and to expand this to freshwater
systems, we provide comparisons between the respective rates. Additionaly, we show data on the isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of water from the reservoir. Understanding
the isotopic composition of the Feitsui Reservoir water is crucial for
accurate assessments of production rates using the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> method
and also offers insights into the biogeochemical/hydrological cycling of the
reservoir. Ultimately, this paper presents a contribution to the studies on
Feitsui Reservoir, a socioeconomically and ecologically important reservoir.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Site description</title>
      <p>The subtropical Feitsui Reservoir, located in northern Taiwan, is the
country's second largest reservoir by volume (first is Tsengwen Dam in the
south), serving as the main water source for over 5 million people in
the Taipei metropolitan area. The domestic demand is supplied by water
releases from the Feitsui Reservoir and unregulated flow from Nanshin Creek
downstream of the watershed. The upstream watershed encompasses the Beishi
stream basin a branch of Xindian River, one of the three major tributaries of
Tamsui River. The total catchment area of the reservoir is 303 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
storage volume at normal maximum water level is 406 million m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
mean depth of the watershed is 40 m with maximum depth of 113 m near the
dam site. The mean daily inflow to Feitsui Reservoir is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the amount of water released depends on the
reservoir's storage capacity and whether flow from Nanshin Creek is
sufficient to supply domestic demand (Shiau and Wu, 2010). In the past the
reservoir was found to alternate between mesotrophic and oligotrophic states
(Kuo et al., 2003), although more recent studies (Kuo et al., 2006) observed a
trend towards eutrophication. In 2012 the reservoir was in a mesotrophic state according to Carlson's Trophic State
Index (CTSI). In order to prevent
deterioration of water quality, the watershed is protected by the Feitsui
Reservoir Administration with restricted access to the water as well as
adjacent areas and any commercial and recreational activities are prohibited.
In addition, since January 1988 the Feitsui Reservoir Administration operates
a meteorological station that provided direct wind speed measurements 10 m
above the water level and rainfall data used in this study. Typhoon
information was obtained from a typhoon database
(<uri>http://rdc28.cwb.gov.tw/TDB/ctrl_typhoon_range_search</uri>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Physical structure and mixing in the water column of Feitsui
Reservoir</title>
      <p>Current assessments of PP rates rely on steady-state assumption. Whether the
approximation is valid requires careful assessment and can be verified by
studying the physical structure of the water body. Feitsui Reservoir is a
typical monomictic system (characteristic of subtropical lakes) that stays
thermally stratified throughout the greater part of the year, with changing
intensity of winter vertical mixing depending on the meteorological
conditions. The topographic characteristics of the reservoir, a large water
mass located in a valley, make its physical structure (i.e. water
temperature) fairly simple and stable over the seasonal scale (Itoh et al.,
2015). The residence time of water in the reservoir tends to be rather long;
throughout our study we estimated it to be about 150 days, comparable to
durations reported in the past (150 days reported by Kuo et al., 2003, and
115 days reported by Chen et al., 2006), sufficiently long to mix
horizontally well. Field measurements as well as model simulation by Kuo et
al. (2003) reported similar trends in dissolved oxygen concentration throughout
a period of 12 months, recorded at the Dam Site (S1) and at the Wu-Tan
station situated on the other side of the reservoir upstream of the Beishi
Creek. A comparison between the top, middle, and bottom layers of the water
column showed that the reservoir is horizontally rather uniform and is not
affected significantly by horizontal water advection (Kuo et al., 2003).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Water sampling and sample preparation</title>
      <p>Sampling was carried out at station S1 (24.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,
121.566667<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; Fig. 1) in the Feitsui Reservoir in the upper 100 m,
located in the deepest region of the lake (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 113 m). Water samples
were collected using 5 L GO-FLO samplers with a manual messenger. For
dissolved oxygen analysis, we collected waters at 9 depths (1, 5, 10, 15, 20,
30, 50, 70, and 90 m) during 13 separate trips to the reservoir, covering 1
full year from June 2014 to July 2015. Sampling for isotope analysis of water
started later in September 2014.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Location of Feitsui Reservoir in northern Taiwan. Small green
rectangle indicates the enlarged satellite map of the reservoir with the
position of the long-term station S1 near the dam indicated.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Vertical profiles of temperature, chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and dissolved oxygen
concentration were recorded routinely using Ocean Seven 316 CTD (IDRONAUT,
Italy) multiparameter probe. A PAR sensor (BioTech) was used to measure
photic irradiance. The casts were typically carried out on weekly basis
during the summer and every 2 weeks during the winter. The accuracy of
dissolved oxygen measurements was verified against in vitro measurements;
water samples collected from 10 depths (0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 50, 70, and
90 m) were siphoned intro triplicate 60 mL bottles (Wheaton) and a
colorimetric method of Pai et al. (1993) was adopted for in vitro dissolved
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> determination with precision of 0.2 % r.s.d. (full scale). We
used a conservative approach for determining the mixed-layer depth based on
visual inspections of vertical temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles to
ensure the well-mixed layer only is described, without influences from the
thermocline. For visualization and analysis of the profile data, we used
Ocean Data View (ODV; Schlitzer, 2015).</p>
      <p>Dissolved gasses were extracted from water following Emerson et al. (1995)
and Luz et al. (2002). In summary, 300 mL flasks with
LouwersHapert<sup>©</sup> O-ring stopcock, containing
50 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of saturated HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solution, were evacuated prior to
sampling and closed with a water lock. Approximately 150 mL of water sample
was collected in the flask, leaving 150 mL of headspace for gases to
exsolve. Once stopcock closed, the port was filled with the same water as
sampled and sealed with a rubber cap to avoid air contamination. All samples
were equilibrated for 24 h in a shaker at room temperature. After
equilibration, water was removed from the samples and the flasks were
subsequently connected to a preparation system for removal of water vapour,
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and other condensable molecules at liquid nitrogen temperature. The
extracted gases were then either stored in a sealed glass tube or directly
introduced to a GC system (Thermo Scientific TRACE gas chromatograph) for
complete removal of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, after which only O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ar remained the
main components in the gas mixture. The separation was done using a
chromatographic column (3 m long, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in. SS tube, packed with molecular
sieve 5A at mesh <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>60</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), modified from Barkan and Luz (2003). During the
separation the chromatographic column was kept at room temperature, and the
yielded oxygen–argon mixture was absorbed onto two pellets of molecular
sieve (1.6 mm, 5A, manufactured by SUPELCO) for subsequent isotopic
analysis, following Abe (2008) with slight modifications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{${}^{{{14}}}$C bottle incubations}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C bottle incubations</title>
      <p>In summary, water samples were incubated for approximately
2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 h and a chlorophyll-normalized
photosynthesis rate versus light intensity (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
model without the photoinhibition term, proposed by Jassby and Platt (1976),
was used to calculate primary production over 24 h performed using an
artificial light source to mimic the solar spectrum at an intensity
controlled according to the solar irradiance measured in situ. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
rates reflect gross C production and are integrated for the entire euphotic
zone. Detailed description of methodology for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C incubation experiments
is provided in Shiah et al. (1996).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Stable isotope analysis of dissolved oxygen</title>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O in O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the purified oxygen–argon
mixture (as explained in Sect. 2.3) were determined by dual inlet mass
spectrometry (Thermo Scientific Finnigan MAT 253 Stable Isotope Ratio Mass
Spectrometer). Each sample was run for 3 acquisitions, 12 changeover cycles
each, and thus the reported <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values represent the average of 36
cycles. The analytical errors (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error of the mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
multiplied by Student's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> factor for a 95 % confidence limits, reported
following Barkan and Luz, 2003) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O were
0.013 and 0.006 ‰, respectively. Our actual and long-term precision
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) established from routine measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36) of atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.017, 0.030 ‰, and 6 per meg, respectively (see
Supplement Table S1). Our current O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> scale, reported in Liang and
Mahata (2015), is in agreement with that of Luz and Barkan (2011).</p>
      <p>The O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar ratio was obtained by peak jumping; a sequential
measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> “32” and “40” in the same collector (with the idle
and integration times 20 and 4 s, respectively, following Barkan and Luz,
2003) prior to isotopic ratio analysis. The O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar ratio is
expressed in the standard <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> notations and calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar
(‰) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>32</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>standard</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The long-term precision (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) of routine
measurements of atmospheric air was better than 5 ‰. For all water
samples the final <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar values were corrected for the
distribution of gases between the headspace and water in the sampling flasks,
following Luz et al. (2002) and normalized to air. To verify the purity of
the collected oxygen–argon mixture after the GC separation, we have also
included regular monitoring of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> “28” signal during peak jumping. We did
not detect any significant presence of N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the course of the
study, either in atmospheric air or water samples for dissolved oxygen
analysis. For all analysed samples the N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signal ratio was
lower than 0.001.</p>
      <p>Similar to Barkan and Luz (2003) and Abe and Yoshida (2003), we found that
the values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are affected
by the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar ratio, presumably due to interference with the ion
source of the mass spectrometer. Although this effect on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O
and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values is minor, it may significantly affect the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We have calculated the dependencies of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar, derived
from measurements of aliquots of pure O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with added different amounts of
Ar and applied the correction to the reported final isotopic values. The
regression slopes for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
were <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.00001</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.00002</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 0.0217 per meg <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰  (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
respectively.</p>
      <p>To minimize the influence of Ar, and for obtaining more precise results, we
used a working O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–Ar reference mixture from pure gases
(&gt; 99.999 %) with the proportion of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, similar to the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–Ar solubility ratio in surface water
(Benson and Krause, 1984; Krause and Benson, 1989; Barkan and Luz, 2003). The
integrity of the standard was checked regularly by measuring aliquots of
atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. For every set of samples for dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis
from Feitsui Reservoir (one set representing one trip to the reservoir) three
aliquots of atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were prepared and measured against the same
aliquot of working reference gas mixture as used for the water sample set.</p>
      <p>To evaluate the reproducibility and performance of sample preparation, we
prepared air–equilibrated water. The equilibration was achieved by continuous
stirring of 8 L of deionized water with added HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in a circulator
with temperature control at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C over a period of 72 h. Dissolved
gases were extracted following the same procedure as applied for the
reservoir samples (see Sect. 2.2). The reproducibility (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard
deviation) for the analysis of equilibrated water samples (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3) was
0.020, 0.037 ‰, and 3 per meg for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and 4.6 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Air–equilibrated water results.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Deionized</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">water</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(‰)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(‰)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(‰)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(per meg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">vs. air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">vs. air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">vs. air</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">vs. air</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.346</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.645</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.314</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.591</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.310</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.573</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Stable isotope analysis of water</title>
      <p>To identify the source of water in the reservoir, we carried out additional
analyses of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O in the H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O molecule of
reservoir water. For this, water samples were collected in 15 mL centrifuged
vials and sealed with Parafilm M<sup>®</sup> to prevent
any isotopic alteration due to evaporation. Prior to analysis, water was
transferred to 2 mL vials with the aid of a pipette and analysed in a
Picarro L2130-I Isotopic H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O Analyser, following Laskar et al. (2014).
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values are expressed with respect to VSMOW
(‰). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined using CoF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluorination
method following Barkan and Luz (2005). Briefly, an aliquot of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L
of water was converted to O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by injecting it to a CoF<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing
reaction tube heated at 370<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under helium flow. The evolved oxygen
gas was collected in a 13X molecular sieve <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-trap at liquid nitrogen
temperature and then determined by dual-inlet mass spectrometry (Thermo
Scientific Delta Plus). Each sample was run for 80 changeover valve cycles,
i.e. 80 sample–standard combinations. Mean standard deviations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of multiple duplicate analyses for various waters (including VSMOW2, GISP,
and SLAP) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were
0.086 ‰, 0.168 ‰, and 11 per meg, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Seasonal variability in <bold>(a)</bold> temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), <bold>(b)</bold>
chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <bold>(c)</bold>
dissolved oxygen saturation (%) from S1 in the Feitsui Reservoir (Fig. 1).
Profile data were normally collected on weekly basis throughout the warmer months
and every 2 weeks in winter. Solid yellow line indicates the limit of
euphotic zone and dashed yellow line the depth of mixed layer.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Gross (GP) and net production (NP) calculations</title>
      <p>Aquatic PP, the synthesis of organic compounds from
aqueous carbon-containing species, in a steady-state system may be
distinguished as GP and NP. The GP
represents the total carbon fixed by primary producers, and the NP
represents the carbon available to the heterotrophic community. The NP is
therefore the difference between GP and community respiration and
corresponds to the overall metabolic balance of an ecosystem. NP can be
positive or negative. NP is positive when GP exceeds respiration and the
ecosystem may export or store organic C. The value is negative when
respiration exceeds GP and the ecosystem respires more organic C than was
able to produce. Both GP and NP are terms of fundamental interest in carbon
cycle studies.</p>
      <p>To quantify GP rates from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, a simple box
model may be applied; mixed-layer gross oxygen production (GOP) is assumed at
steady state with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, and
vertical mixing is neglected, following Luz and Barkan (2000).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GOP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at saturation using
solubility coefficients from Benson and Krause (1984) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is piston
velocity (the coefficient for gas exchange; Crusius and Wanninkhof, 2003;
Wanninkhof et al., 2009). Here the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the air–water
equilibrium, deviating from zero due to isotopic fractionation during O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
invasion and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the value of purely
biologically produced O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. We calculated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the piston velocity) from
daily wind speeds at Feitsui Reservoir according to Wanninkhof et al. (1987)
and Vachon and Prairie (2013), based on studies of gas transfer velocities in
lakes of comparable sizes to Feitsui Reservoir. Because the gas
concentrations in the mixed layer depend on the recent history of wind
speeds, we averaged <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over the residence time of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the mixed-layer
preceding sampling, based on the mixed-layer depth and gas transfer
coefficient.</p>
      <p>Equation (2), however, represents a mathematical approximation to provide a
first order realization of processes and sources that affect the GP. This
simplified formulation may introduce large errors, in particular in
ecosystems with elevated export ratios. Prokopenko et al. (2011) and
Kaiser (2011) derived an improved “dual-delta approach”, which we applied
for estimating GP rates in the Feitsui Reservoir, where the GOP may be
directly calculated from the measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O
values, as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GOP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.518</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.518</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O is the measured value in a sample, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the air–water equilibrium, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the photosynthetic O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>To estimate the net oxygen production (NOP) rates, we have used the
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar measurements, following the biological O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
supersaturation concept for net photosynthetic production. Because the
physical properties of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ar are similar, and Ar has no biological
sources and sinks, measurements of Ar concentration in water may be used to
remove physical contributions to O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> supersaturation. The biological
oxygen supersaturation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) is defined as the relative
deviation of the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar in a sample to the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar at
equilibrium with the atmosphere (Craig and Hayward, 1987; Spitzer and
Jenkins, 1989; Emerson et al., 1995; Kaiser et al., 2005) and may be
calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sample</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Assuming the mixed layer is at steady state, NOP can be calculated following
Luz et al. (2002):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NOP </mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          A shortcoming associated with the calculation of PP rates from dissolved
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes is that the rates are in O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> units, instead of C-based
units, and the conversion between them is not straightforward. To convert
between O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C-based rates, we follow the common approach presented
earlier (e.g. Hendricks et al., 2014; Juranek et al., 2012). GOP from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is greater than gross C production because it measures total
oxygen produced regardless of its fate, such as the fraction of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
produced which is linked to Mehler reaction and photorespiration. To scale
GOP to gross C production, we account for this fraction following Laws et
al. (2000) and apply a photosynthetic quotient (PQ) of 1.2. We convert NOP to
a comparable C flux using a PQ of 1.4, for new production (Laws, 1991).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Seasonal variability in <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(‰ vs. air) and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (‰ vs. VSMOW). Solid white
line indicates the limit of euphotic zone and dashed white line the depth of
mixed layer.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Hydrography</title>
      <p>We refer to our monthly sampling dates as MMMYY for convenience. The
subtropical Feitsui Reservoir was thermally stratified for the great part of
the year, with a distinct seasonal thermocline (Fig. 2a). In spring, seasonal
stratification developed (APR15), and the lake remained well stratified with
a shallow epilimnion with temperature above <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C throughout
the warmer months in the top 10 m layer. In summer, the reservoir was
strongly stratified as the result of continued heating of the surface water
and the mixed layer remained shallow, typically about 3–5 m deep, as
observed in JUN14, AUG14, APR15, MAY15, and JUL15. Although the thermal
structure of the reservoir controls the gas exchange during the warm months,
processes such as rainfall and windstorms may entrain atmospheric air to the
thermocline, as indicated from dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) vertical profiles (Figs. 2c and 4c), playing a critical
role in influencing the conditions in the mixed layer. From SEP14 and OCT14,
as a result of decreasing ambient temperature and gradual cooling of surface
water, the mixed layer deepened and reached 11 and 23 m, respectively. In
DEC14 the thermal stratification became weaker, initiating the winter
overturn and resulting in well-mixed epilimnion of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to
34 m depth and a decreasing temperature gradient in the metalimnion. In
JAN15 the mixed layer was deepest at 51 m. The mixed layer remained deep
throughout FEB15 (40 m) when the reservoir was coolest and nearly
homothermal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the epilimnion and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in
the hypolimnion.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Seasonal variability in <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(‰ vs. air), <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (per meg vs. air),
and <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) (%) in Feitsui
Reservoir. Solid white line indicates the limit of euphotic zone and dashed
white line shows the depth of mixed layer.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 2b) in the reservoir was
predominantly restricted to the epilimnion and the upper thermocline. The
distribution and concentration varied with seasons and with the occurrence of
stochastic events (such as storms, strong rainfall, or typhoons) that
enhanced the photosynthetic activity in the phytoplankton. Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration was high from JUN14 to SEP14, with a subsurface maximum below
the mixed layer at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 m, averaging to 15 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
occasionally above 20 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In late SEP14, the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum
shifted to the surface. No apparent maximum was observed in OCT14 when
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was rather uniform throughout the mixed layer of
average <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper 23 m. From DEC14 to FEB15,
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> remained low at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In spring, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration started to increase at the surface
averaging <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by later appearance of a
subsurface maximum at 12 m of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A short episodic
decrease in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was recorded in APR15, a likely result of cooler ambient
temperature than normal and frequent precipitation. In MAY15, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration increased again and high subsurface maximum of
&gt; 10 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> formed at 15 m.</p>
      <p>The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration and saturation levels (Fig. 2c)
varied in association with O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–Ar ratios measured, indicating the
availability of dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> supplied by primary production, aeration, or
mixing processes. The epilimnion remained saturated throughout the year, and in
the thermocline DO varied greatly; DO was undersaturated from AUG14 to DEC14
(&lt; 50 %), reached near-saturation levels during the winter, and
remained supersaturated from APR15 to JUN15 (&gt; 100 %). In
spring and summer the DO reached the hypolimnion where the saturation was
typically above 50 %. Conversely, from early AUG14, throughout autumn and
winter the hypolimnion was undersaturated (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %) with minimal DO
content.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Isotopic composition of water</title>
      <p>In addition to dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we have measured the isotopic composition
of water in the Feitsui Reservoir throughout the different seasons. The
isotopic composition of water varied in both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O (Fig. 3a) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D (Fig. 3b) seasonally and vertically. Overall, the variation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O was smaller than that of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D, varying between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.73 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.18 ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.5 and  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.3 ‰ vs. VSMOW) in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37.1 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.4 ‰ in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D. The general pattern for both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O showed more depleted values during autumn, followed by gradual
enrichment throughout the winter, spring, and early summer. No statistically
significant (within errors) seasonal variation was found in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. We therefore averaged the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the year, with
the resultant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 257 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 per meg, representing the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of water in the Feitsui Reservoir. The insignificance in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonality is consistent with the small overall variation in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and also with the long residence of water in the reservoir.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The ${}^{{17}}\Delta$ of dissolved
O${}_{{{2}}}$}?><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of dissolved
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal of dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varied with depth and seasons
(Fig. 4b). The overall range of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured varied
between the maximum of 205 per meg in late AUG14 and JUL15 and minimum of 26
per meg in JUN14. The annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface (1 m) was
65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 per meg and remained constant throughout the year, with the
exception of late SEP14 and JUL15, when the surface values were higher,
recording 97 and 76 per meg, respectively, and coinciding with an episodic
shift of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum towards the surface (Fig. 2b). During months with
persistent thermal stratification in the reservoir, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
followed a similar vertical pattern, with distinct <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.
From JUN14 to early SEP14, when the mixed layer was very shallow
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3–5 m), the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal accumulated below, in the upper
thermocline, with a peak exceeding 150 per meg observed typically at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–20 m depth. Below the thermocline at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m depth in
AUG14 and SEP14 the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was low, showing signals characteristic of
surface water. In late SEP14 and OCT14 as the mixed layer deepened gradually,
we observed a corresponding trend for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the peak in
the signal deepening (205 and 156 per meg at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 and 30 m,
respectively) following the mixed-layer boundary. In DEC14 the deep mixed
layer and decreasing importance of the thermal stratification facilitated
increased gas exchange throughout the water column resulting in low and
rather uniform <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the water column of
63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 per meg. This trend continued throughout the winter period,
during which the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values stayed comparatively low and less
variable. The onset of thermal stratification during the spring allowed for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to increase below the mixed layer; in APR15 we observed a
developing peak in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal of 105 per meg at 10 m. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased throughout MAY15, and in JUN15 and JUL15 the
accumulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal  at 10–30 m,
reached up to 193 per meg, coinciding with the observed DO supersaturation
(Fig. 2c) and elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) (Fig. 4c). In contrast to the trend
from JUL14, in JUL15 the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal was high below the mixed layer
and throughout the whole water column. Although samples from regions below 50
and 70 m were limited due to insufficient amount of gas for isotope
analysis, overall the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values tend to increase towards the
bottom of the hypolimnion, in particular high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured at
70 m in late AUG14, SEP14, and JUL15 of 152, 157, and 174 per meg,
respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Gross and net production</title>
      <p>Following Prokopenko et al. (2011) and Kaiser (2011), we estimated PP rates
using the dual-delta approach in the Feitsui Reservoir from JUN14 to
JUL15.</p>
      <p>The GP rates, NP rates and the NP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GP ratio obtained by the dual-delta
approach are summarized in Table 2. Overall, the GP rates varied between 187
and 1372 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The general pattern showed higher values
during the cooler months and in winter, averaging to
702 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between OCT14 and APR15. This may
be considered as maximum production because the mixed layer is deeper than
the euphotic zone in winter. A decrease in the GP was observed in summer,
averaging to 303 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 66 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout JUN14, AUG14,
MAY15 and JUN14. This represents the minimum GP for this period, because the
mixed layer is shallower than the euphotic zone and therefore some production
also took place below the mixed layer, which may not be evaluated by the
present model. Production was highest in late SEP14 and in JUL15, 1372 and
1162 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, coinciding with typhoon events
affecting the area of the Feitsui Reservoir.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summary of PP rates in the Feitsui Reservoir from June 2014 to
July 2015. Dates marked with an asterisk indicate post-typhoon sampling days.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–GP, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–GP, NP, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP and CI–GP are in mg
C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Abbrev.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PLD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MLD<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–GP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–GP<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">NP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">NP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">CI–GP</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(m d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–GP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10/06/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">JUN14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">249.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">187</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">492</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19/08/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AUG14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">232.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">190</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">289</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">988</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">293</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">26/08/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AUG14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">232.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">193</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">297</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1580</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">6314</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">02/09/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SEP14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">232.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">204</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">313</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1510</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23/09/2014*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SEP14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">240.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">834</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1372</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">961</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">28/10/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OCT14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">258.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">448</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">737</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>149</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1197</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">09/12/2014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DEC14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">273.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">408</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">699</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>311</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">190</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20/01/2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">JAN15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">289.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">397</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">696</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">275</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">67</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10/02/2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FEB15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">295.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">476</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">837</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>194</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">292</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">244</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14/04/2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">APR15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">278.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">333</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">541</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">307</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">135</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19/05/2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MAY15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">244.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">223</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">351</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">708</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">628</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23/06/2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">JUN15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">232.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">247</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">379</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">442</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">376</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14/07/2015*</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">JUL15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">240.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">758</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1162</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">228</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1328</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">657</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Photic layer depth. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Mixed-layer depth. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Following Luz and Barkan (2000). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Following Prokopenko et al. (2011) and Kaiser (2011).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Overall, the NP ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>311 and 228 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
NP was negative from OCT14 to FEB15, averaging <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>198 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 78 mg
C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating the reservoir was net heterotrophic in the
mixed layer during the winter. Positive NP rates dominated in the warmer
months with values typically averaging 57 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26 mg
C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, implying the reservoir remained net autotrophic during
the greater part of the year. Highest NP rates were observed in JUL15
measuring 228 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The NP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GP ratio varied between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.44 and 0.30.</p>
      <p>Using the GP and NP rates measured in our study, we estimated the annual C
production in the Feitsui Reservoir. Excluding the measurements obtained
during typhoons (late SEP14 and JUL15), the average annual GP amounted to
177 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the average annual NP was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 g
C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Taking into consideration typhoon events, the average
annual GP increases to 220 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the average annual
NP to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For comparison, a model study by
Lewis (2011) estimates the global average annual production per unit area for
a lake 200 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for GP and 160 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for NP. While our GP estimates agree well with this projection, in particular
when the production rates take into account typhoon events, our NP rates lie
at the lower end of the global average. The measured NP rates in the Feitsui
Reservoir thus indicate that over the year the respiration exceeds gross
primary production in the reservoir, affecting the net balance of carbon.
Episodic events such as typhoon events seem to play a key role in the
metabolism of Feitsui Reservoir, and it is plausible that during years with
frequent typhoon events the annual balance of the reservoir may shift to net
autotrophy. Although some carbon storage is expected in the form of
accumulation of organic matter to the sediments (Dean and Gorham, 1988), our
results indicate that from 2014 to 2015 the Feitsui Reservoir acted as a
positive though minor carbon source to the atmosphere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The ${}^{{{17}}}\Delta$ and $\Delta$(O${}_{{{2}}}$\,$/$\,Ar) tracers for photosynthesis and
respiration}?><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) tracers for photosynthesis and
respiration</title>
      <p>The schematics of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport and variation are summarized in
Fig. 5. The near-surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value represents a balance between
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> produced photosynthetically, which tends to increase the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and that from gaseous exchange with atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which reduces the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. The nearly constant surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
measured in the Feitsui Reservoir throughout the year (65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 per meg)
suggest that the balance of these processes does not typically vary with
seasons. In late SEP14 and in JUL15, the surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were
32 and 10 per meg higher, respectively, than the annual mean, indicating
additional input from photosynthesis. Further analysis showed that in both
cases, the samples were taken within a few days after typhoon occurrences.
Thus the resulting elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is likely to be a consequence of
nutrient enrichment caused by typhoons, mediating enhanced vertical mixing
and hence photosynthesis (see Sect. 4.5 for further details). Previous
studies showed that in the Feitsui Reservoir phosphate plays a key role as
the limiting nutrient, restricting the microbial production. The key
processes that determine its availability are vertical mixing from changes in
the mixed-layer depth in the spring and typhoon intensity in summer and
autumn (Tseng et al., 2010; Itoh et al., 2012). These processes therefore
likely play a role in the distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal in the
water column as well as increase photosynthetic activity as a result of
intensified production after nutrient enrichment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>A schematic diagram showing the effects of photosynthesis,
respiration, and air–water gas exchange on dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O changes with all
the processes and additionally is also affected by mixing. Because of
non-mass-dependent processes occurring in the stratosphere, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in air has a different signal to the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
produced biologically where fractionation is mass-dependent. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases due to photosynthesis, decreases due to gas exchange but is not
affected by respiration. Respiration removes O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreases the
dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration but fractionates O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes in a
mass-dependent way, which does not affect the relative proportion of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and therefore the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum value of pure biological signal,
which amounts to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of water. The slope of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increase towards <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the kinetic slope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
for respiration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.518</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at air–water equilibrium, which has a small offset from
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is by definition 0, due to fractionation at
equilibrium where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O slopes during
invasion and evasion follow a slightly different slope to that of
respiration.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison between dual-delta (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-GP) estimates and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP
rates (mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). PLD and MLD indicate photic layer depth and mixed-layer
depth, respectively, and precipitation shows the total daily rainfall (mm).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>High subsurface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be primarily attributed to the decreasing
importance of gas exchange with depth. This is particularly characteristic of
the warmer months during which strong thermal stratification developed,
confining the primary producers to the thermocline (also shown by Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Fig. 2b) where the conditions are optimal for phytoplankton growth,
representing a compromise between light, temperature, and nutrient
availability. From AUG14 to OCT14 we recorded high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (often
above 150 per meg) values below the thermocline (5–30 m). It is likely that
the local primary production was initially high, a possible result of a
phytoplankton bloom influencing the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition.
However, the measured low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) values (about
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 %) and undersaturation of DO indicate O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption from
AUG14 to OCT14 in the upper thermocline. In the absence of photosynthesis,
the residual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal thus points towards the lack of vertical
mixing in the reservoir during this period as well as no influence from
atmospheric air. At 50 m depth, we recorded <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, typical
of near-surface water. Here, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows an inverse relationship
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) as well as DO, with lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
higher <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) and DO observed in AUG14 and SEP14 and
increasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) DO
saturation observed in OCT14. Additionally, the signal also follows the
thermal structure of the reservoir; from July to about November 2014 we
observe well-mixed epilimnion in the upper <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 to 20 m and an
extensive metalimnion to about 50–60 m, with strong thermal gradient before
reaching hypolimnion below. It is likely that the low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> origins
from atmospheric air entrainment during early summer (June and July, DO
profile, Fig. 2c).</p>
      <p>Intrusion of surface water below the metalimnion has  been observed in
previous studies and may also be supported by dust loading, which results in
an increase in total suspended material at depth (Tseng et al., 2010). Strong
vertical mixing of air–saturated water down the water column in JUN15,
indicated by the low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar), and DO, as a result of heavy rainfall (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 700 mm
accumulated precipitations during JUN14 compared to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 340 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 mm measured in JUL14 and AUG14, respectively; Fig. 6) may have
supplied atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the metalimnion and the hypolimnion. As of
early AUG14 at 50 m, the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal possibly traces the
remaining <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal from JUN15, locally confined due to the
strong thermal gradient and unaltered by photosynthesis due to the lack of
primary producers at this depth. The breaking down of both the high
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 to 30 m and the low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 50 m
throughout autumn is controlled by decreasing air temperatures and the
consequent weakening thermal stratification in the reservoir, also observed
in other years (Itoh et al., 2012). Apart from storms and typhoons causing
wind stress at the air–water interface or heavy precipitation,  lake processes such as
seiches may contribute to vertical mixing. Seiches were never evaluated in the Feitsui Reservoir, but they may
play an important role in affecting the vertical transfer of the water
masses, dissolved gases, and nutrients in the Feitsui Reservoir and should be
considered in future studies.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>The relative difference between production rates obtained from mixed-layer model (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–GP, following Luz and Barkan, 2000) and our whole column inventory
approach (CI–GP).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/6683/2016/bg-13-6683-2016-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>An increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> towards the bottom of the lake (90 m samples)
was observed during all seasons, likely originating from the transport of
enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the upper part of the water column and
any photosynthetically induced changes to the signal before it reached the
bottom. These samples, however, contained only small amounts of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(saturation less than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %), and therefore it is possible that
minor photosynthetic contributions could significantly increase the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as a result of vertical entrainment mentioned
previously.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Uncertainties in PP rates</title>
      <p>Although the improved dual-delta method presents a mathematically more
accurate approximation than the previous <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model, a number of
uncertainties associated with both methods for estimating PP rates remain,
which need closer attention. Luz and Barkan (2000), Prokopeno et al. (2011),
and Kaiser (2011) demonstrated that GP in the mixed layer could be determined
from the measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in dissolved
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using a steady-state mixed-layer oxygen budget model which allows for
estimation of integrated gross productivity in the mixed layer over the
residence time of mixed-layer O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is important to note that this
approach may underestimate GP on occasions when the euphotic zone is deeper
than the mixed layer since the calculation accounts for GP in the mixed layer
only. This may particularly affect PP estimates during summer months, when
the photic layer is typically deeper than the mixed layer in subtropical
reservoirs in general, and about 4 times deeper in the Feitsui Reservoir.
Furthermore, this model lacks terms for advection and vertical mixing. While
the effect of these simplifications may be negligible in the open ocean
(Emerson et al., 1997), lakes and reservoirs often feature a complex vertical
and horizontal structure, the effect of which needs to be considered.
Fortunately, given the rather simple physical structure of the Feitsui
Reservoir (see Sect. 2.2), horizontal inhomogeneities may be neglected. The column inventory
approach presented below (Sect. 4.3) provides a robust technique for
assessing the contributions of vertical mixing and to estimate the production
below the mixed layer.</p>
      <p>The key parameter to constrain the GP and NP rates is the gas exchange rate
between the mixed layer and the atmosphere. Presently this is best achieved
by parameterization of wind speeds, which is commonly used in models with
several empirical relationships between the wind speed and gas exchange rate
(e.g. Clark et al., 1995; Ho et al., 2006; Wanninkhof et al., 2009). However,
parameterization of wind speeds does not come without inaccuracies. In
most of the oceanic studies, the error associated with the parameterization
is attributed to the accuracy of wind speed measurements and the relationship
between the wind speed and gas exchange rate at very high or low wind speed
conditions (Wanninkhof, 1992). In freshwater systems, factors such as lake
size and ecosystem heterogeneity present another important factor (Vachon and
Prairie, 2013) and should be taken into consideration when choosing an
appropriate parameterization.</p>
      <p>Apart from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured in samples, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are important constituents of this method.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is rather well
established and can be determined experimentally by air–water
equilibrations, usually achieved by bubbling or stirring (Keedakkadan et al.,
2015). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the
photosynthetic O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> composition, with controversy on these values
discussed in the literature (e.g. Kaiser 2011; Luz and Barkan, 2011;
Nicholson, 2011). The major problem lies in proper quantification of the
value for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Being closely dependent on the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of substrate water and less straightforward to measure, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was previously often assumed to be the same as
that of water. Recently, Luz and Barkan (2011) showed that a small difference
exists between the substrate water values and the average composition of
photosynthetic O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> produced by phytoplankton. This potential bias has to
be considered in order to improve the accuracy of primary production
estimates. Furthermore, whereas a uniform value for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
seawater may be applied to study PP in the ocean, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a
freshwater system of interest has to be determined because the isotopic
composition of freshwater tends to vary geographically and among different
water sources (Luz and Barkan, 2010). For Feitsui Reservoir we determined
257 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 per meg for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of water based on measurements of
water samples collected throughout the year. The difference between the
isotopic composition of Feitsui Reservoir water and that of photosynthetic
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> provided by Luz and Barkan (2011) therefore reflects the associated
fractionation between the substrate water and the photosynthetic O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. To
obtain the representative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the Feitsui Reservoir, we consider these additional
fractionations of 26 per meg and 3.306 ‰ for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, respectively, to our measured
values of water and retrospectively calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting annual mean values for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.156 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.192 ‰,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.975 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.370 ‰, and 283 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 per meg, respectively.</p>
      <p>Compared to the GP, estimating the NP is less complicated, since the model
only requires the coefficient for gas exchange and a term describing the
biological supersaturation. The second term can be constrained by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) based on measurements from flask samples or determined in
situ using a sensor for dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> supersaturation, although the
accuracy of the latter is inferior and may be less suitable for this purpose.
Combining <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) measurements we can
get the NP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GP ratio, which is equivalent to an export ratio
(Laws et al., 2000) describing the capacity of an ecosystem to export C. The
NP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> GP ratio can be far better constrained than the GP on its own, since
it is independent of the gas exchange rate and the uncertainty in the ratio
only depends on the error in the measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Column inventory approach</title>
      <p>As discussed previously (Sect. 4.1), in case of fast changing physical
dynamics in a reservoir, a mixed-layer budget by isotope mass balance
calculation may not be applicable for the assessment of PP rates. To assess
the relevance of this method for the Feitsui Reservoir, we tested an
alternative mass balance model based on a whole column inventory approach
(onwards referred to as column inventory approach or CI-GP). Unlike isotope
mass balance limited to the mixed layer, the column inventory model requires
time-series data of full profiles from the surface to the bottom of the lake,
and it is able to obtain the GP rates below the mixed layer without
steady-state assumptions.</p>
      <p>Calculating the GP by the column inventory model is done by solving the
following simultaneous equations:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the total amount of oxygen isotope
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the water column from the surface to the bottom of lake at the time
slice <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (a step before time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>P, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>I, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>E are GP, consumption rate for entire water column, influx
from the atmosphere, and efflux to the atmosphere, respectively, for oxygen
isotope <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Equation (6) can be substituted by column inventory or rates of
total dissolved oxygen in Eq. (9).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Equations (7) and (8) can be obtained by multiplying isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and/or isotope fractionation factor (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in Eq. (9).</p>
      <p>While a non-steady-state model is beyond the scope of this paper, the column
inventory approach enables us to introduce dynamics into the calculations of
GP and evaluate the feasibility of the mixed-layer approach for estimating PP
rates in the Feitsui Reservoir. Because the purpose of this model is to
compare two different approaches rather than produce accurate estimates, and
for simplicity, we calculated the mixed-layer approach GP rates using Eq. (2)
and present the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-GP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CI–GP ratio (Fig. 7). Overall, the
GP rates obtained from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-GP and CI–GP model showed a good
agreement with each other, indicating the calculation of GP rates using a
mixed-layer model may be valid for the Feitsui Reservoir, not only for open
oceans. A better fit between the respective rates may be obtained using
lambda slope 0.520, although the reasons for this remain presently unclear.
Further adjustments of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bio</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
could also improve the fit.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Comparisons between dual-delta  GP and
${}^{{{14}}}$C--GP rates}?><title>Comparisons between dual-delta  GP and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP rates</title>
      <p>While both methods aim to evaluate the natural GP rates, direct comparisons
between estimates from the dual-delta method and from the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C bottle
incubation are impractical because of the principal differences in the
methodologies (in situ vs. in vitro). Each method provides rates integrated
over different spatial and temporal scales, and clearly methodological biases
are associated with each. A number of studies have addressed the dual-delta
GP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP in the ocean, but the ratios were found to vary significantly
from 2.2 (Quay et al., 2010) to 8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.0 (Stanley et al., 2010; see
also Juranek and Quay, 2013, for an extensive review). The variability in the
ratios remains a conundrum. Overall, the dual-delta GP method showed a
tendency to yield higher production rates. The factors responsible for the
variability in the GP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP are, however, yet to be properly identified,
before the gross O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production and C fixation can be properly
linked and compared.</p>
      <p>Contrasting the GP rates from dual-delta approach and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP rates
(Table 2 and Fig. 6) we note that both estimates show a very similar trend.
Moreover the production rates are on the same order of magnitude, with an
average GP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP ratio of 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1. Although, due to the
reasons mentioned above, it is unclear why the respective GP rates may agree
or disagree, our results support the findings from an earlier study by Luz
and Barkan (2000) who demonstrated near equivalence of GP rates obtained from
incubation-dependent and incubation-independent methods from Lake Kinneret.
Presumably, near 1 GP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP ratios are characteristic of
systems with shallow mixed-layer and rapid O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> turnover, such as
subtropical reservoirs in general, including the Feitsui Reservoir. The
disparity between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GP and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP rates from AUG14 and
early SEP14 could be explained by the shallow summer mixed layer, which would
provide minimal GP rates due to the limitations of this approach. Conversely,
it could also be that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP is overestimating the production rates
particularly during this period, when algal blooms are more likely to occur.
This highlights one of the key assets of the GP method, which in principle is
not significantly affected by small-scale short-term events.
From
DEC14 onwards the dual-delta GP rates and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP show a close fit. Throughout
the winter months, both methods showed rather invariable GP rates, though the
dual-delta results were by approximately a factor of 2 higher than the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP rates, a possible attribute of the integration on which each
method operates. A similar, but reverse, trend was also observed in MAY15, but
onwards in JUN15 and JUL15 both methods showed a close fit.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Typhoon effects</title>
      <p>Passing of tropical cyclones has been documented to cause entrainment and
upwelling or “atmospheric pumping”, i.e. injecting nutrients into the mixed
layer which may significantly elevate PP. In the South China Sea, Lin et
al. (2003) reported that the occurrence of only a moderate cyclone led to a
30-fold increase in the concentration of surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Ko et al. (2015)
studied the phytoplankton responses to typhoons in the Feitsui Reservoir and
found a 2-fold increase in the phytoplankton level during typhoon periods.
Conversely, in regions with deep mixed layer and nutricline, typhoon events
may not be sufficient to increase PP or induce phytoplankton blooms (Lin,
2012). The effect of typhoon events on ecosystems is, however, complex and
difficult to document properly because of their sporadic occurrence. Although
our data are too limited to draw solid conclusions, we briefly discuss our
results in context of typhoon events.</p>
      <p>Two typhoons closely affected the north-eastern Taiwan and the Feitsui
Reservoir during our study period. Typhoon Fung Wong hit Taiwan on
22 September 2014 and typhoon Chan Hom on 10 July 2015, 1 and 4 days before
the sample collection, respectively. Post-typhoon sampling occasions are
indicated in Table 2. On both occasions, we found a considerable increase in
the GP in the mixed layer (to 1372 and 1162 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
representing approximately a 3-fold increase in the GP rates to those
obtained on previous sampling days (Fig. 6), suggesting a critical role of
typhoons in modifying the seasonal metabolic balance of the reservoir. This
corresponds to 32 and 10 per meg increase in surface <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However,
short episodic events of high production are normally expected to average out
by the lower background <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the mixed layer due to elevated gas
exchange with air. It is plausible that if the mixed layer is very shallow
and the photosynthetic O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production is high, the elevated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal would remain for an extended period of time. Alternatively,
increased <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values could arise from ventilation from water below
the mixed layer or enhanced vertical mixing. Greater <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> caused by higher
wind speeds during a typhoon event could explain the higher GP rates;
however, it does not explain the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal.
Nevertheless it is important to note that these GP rates should be considered
as minimum values because on both occasions the thermocline was situated in
the photic zone and therefore some of the production also took place below
the mixed layer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In summary, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar) values showed
strong seasonal and vertical variations, enabling us to monitor the
photosynthetic activity vs. atmospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> input in the Feitsui
reservoir. While our GP estimates situate the Feitsui Reservoir close to the
global average, the low average annual NP indicated overall net
heterotrophy in the reservoir in 2014–2015. The extent to which the
reservoir acts as a carbon sink or source to the atmosphere is likely
determined by typhoons, which may play a key role in enhancing seasonal
mixing in the water column. The application of the geochemical budget approach may offer us new perspectives on studying PP in situ in freshwater systems, but
it is less straightforward to use than in the ocean, and a prior assessment is required to determine whether steady-state assumption may be valid.
Although we showed that the dual-delta GP
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP rates display to some extent a comparable trend, it is
necessary to resolve the varying ranges in GP <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C–GP observed
between studies and whether it reflects a real difference between
gross O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution and C fixation or  should be attributed to
methodological biases. Further studies addressing the questions on various
spatial and temporal scales will help us understand the full scope of the
geochemical approach to PP evaluation, in particular in dynamic and well-characterized environments that
could serve as “natural laboratories”, such as the Feitsui Reservoir.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The critical data used in this study are available in the Supplement accompanying this contribution.
CTD and meteorological
data are available upon request.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6683-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-13-6683-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the Taipei Feitsui Reservoir Administration Bureau and the
Environmental Ecosystem Laboratory group for assistance with fieldwork and
making their data available to us. The authors would like to thank Sasadhar Mahata and Ho Wei Kang for their invaluable technical expertise and
insights, and two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to significantly
improve this manuscript. The work was supported in part by MOST grants
101-2628-M-001-001-MY4 and 105-2111-M-001-006-MY3 to Academia Sinica.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: J. Middelburg<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abe, O.: Isotope fractionation of molecular oxygen during adsorption/desorption by molecular sieve zeolite, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 22, 2510–2514, doi10.1002/rcm.3634, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Abe, O. and Yoshida, N.: Partial pressure dependency of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O of molecular oxygen in the mass spectrometer, Rapid
Commun. Mass Spectrom., 17, 395–400, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Barkan, E. and Luz, B.: High-precision measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar ratio in air, Rapid
Commun.
Mass Spectrom., 17, 2809–2814, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barkan, E. and Luz, B.: High-precision measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O ratios in H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.,
19, 3737–3742, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Benson, B. B. and Krause Jr., D. K.: The concentration and isotopic
fractionation of oxygen dissolved in freshwater and seawater in equilibrium
with the atmosphere, Limnol. Oceanogr., 29. 620–632, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Castro-Morales, K., Cassar, N., Shoosmith, D. R., and Kaiser, J.: Biological
production in the Bellingshausen Sea from oxygen-to-argon ratios and oxygen
triple isotopes, Biogeosciences, 10, 2273–2291, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2273-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-2273-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y.-J. C., Wu, S.-C., Lee, B.-S., and Hung, C.-C.: Behaviour of
storm-induced suspension interflow in subtropical Feitsui Reservoir, Taiwan,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 1125–1133, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland
Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget, Ecosystems, 10, 172–185, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, J. F., Schlosser, P., Simpson, H. J., Stute, M., Wanninkhof, R., and
Ho, D. T.: Relationship between Gas Transfer Velocities and Wind Speeds in
The Tidal Hudson River Determined by the Dual Tracer Technique, in:
Air-Water Gas Transfer, edited by: Jähne, B. and Monahan, E., AEON Verlag,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, H. and Hayward, T.: Oxygen Supersaturation in the Ocean: Biological
versus Physical Contributions, Science, 235, 199–202, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Crusius, J. and Wanninkhof, R.: Gas transfer velocities measured at low wind speeds over a lake,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 48, 1010–1017, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dean, W. and Gorham, E.: Magnitude and significance of carbon burial in
lakes, reservoirs, and peatlands, Geology, 26, 535–538, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S., Quay, P. D., Stump, C., Wilbur, D., and Schudlich, R.: Chemical
tracers of productivity and respiration in the subtropical Pacific Ocean, J.
Geophys. Res., 100, 15873–15887, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S., P. Quay, D. Karl, C. Winn, L. Tupas, and M. Landry: Experimental
determination of the organic carbon flux from open-ocean surface waters,
Nature, 389, 951–954, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Hamme, R. C., Cassar, N., Lance, V. P., Vaillancourt, R. D., Bender, M. L.,
Strutton, P. G., Moore, T. S., DeGrandpre, M. D., Sabine, C. L., Ho, D. T.,
and Hargreaves, B. R.: Dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar and other methods reveal
rapid changes in productivity during a Lagrangian experiment in the Southern
Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C00F12, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007046</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, W. G. and Harris, L. R.: Isotope-dilution and its effects on
measurements of nitrogen and phosphorous uptake by oceanic microplankton,
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 27, 253–261, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hendricks, M. B., Bender, M. L., and Barnett, B. A.: Net and gross O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production in the Southern ocean from measurements of biological O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation and its triple isotope composition, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51,
1541–1561, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Hendricks, M. B., Bender, M. L., Barnett, B. A., Strutton, P., and Chavez, F.
P.: Triple oxygen isotope composition of dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the equatorial
Pacific: A tracer of mixing, production, and respiration, J. Geophys. Res.,
110, C12021, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JC002735</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Ho, D. T., Law, C. S., Smith, M. J., Schlosser, P., Harvey, M., and Hill, P.:
Measurements of air-sea gas exchange at high wind speeds in the Southern
Ocean: Implications for global parameterizations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L16801, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026817</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Huang, K., Ducklow, H., Vernet, M., Cassar, N., and Bender, M. L.: Export
production and its regulating factors in the West Antarctica Peninsula region
of the Southern Ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2005,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB004028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB004028</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Itoh, M., Kobayashi, Y., Chen, T. Y., Tokida, T., Fukui, M., Kojima, H.,
Miki, T., Tayasu, I., Shiah, F.-K., and Okuda, N.: Effect of inter-annual
variation in winter vertical mixing on CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in a subtropical
reservoir, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 1177–1195, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Jassby, A. D. and Platt, T.: Mathematical formulation of the relationship
between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 21,
540–547, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Juranek, L. W. and Quay, P. D.: Basin-wide photosynthetic production rates in
the subtropical and tropical Pacific Ocean determined from dissolved oxygen
isotope ratio measurements, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB2006,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003492" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003492</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Juranek, L. W. and Quay, P. D.: Using triple isotopes of dissolved oxygen to
evaluate global marine productivity, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 5, 503–524, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Juranek, L. W., Quay, P. D., Feely, R. A., Lockwood, D., Karl, D. M., and
Church, M. J.: Biological production in the NE Pacific and its influence on
air-sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux: Evidence from dissolved oxygen isotopes and
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C05043, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007450</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J.: Technical note: Consistent calculation of aquatic gross
production from oxygen triple isotope measurements, Biogeosciences, 8,
1793–1811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1793-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-1793-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Kaiser, J., Reuer, M. K., Barnett, B., and Bender, M. L.: Marine productivity
estimates from O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar ratio measurements by membrane inlet mass
spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res., 32, L19605, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023459</ext-link>, 2005</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Keedakkadan, H. R. and Abe, O.: Cryogenic separation of an oxygen-argon
mixture in natural air samples for the determinationof isotope and molecular
ratios, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 29, 775–781, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Krause Jr., D. K. and Benson B. B.: The solubility and Isotopic Fractionation
of Gases in Dilute Aqueous Solution, IIa. Solubilities of the Noble Gases, J.
Solut. Chem., 18 823, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00685062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00685062</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ko, C.-Y., Lai, C.-C., Chen, T.-Y., Hsu, H.-H., and Shiah, F.-K.: Typhoon
effects on phytoplankton responses in a semi-closed freshwater ecosystem,
Mar. Freshw. Res., 67, 546–555, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF14294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/MF14294</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kuo, J.-T.,  Liu, W. C.,  Lin, R. T.,  Lung, W. S.,  Yang, M. D.,
Yang, C.-P., and  Chu, S.-C.: Water quality modeling for the Feitsui Reservoir in
northern Taiwan, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 39, 671–687, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kuo, J. T., Wang, Y. Y., and Lung, W. S.: A hybrid neural-genetic algorithm
for reservoir water quality management, Water Res., 40, 1367–1376, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Laskar A. H., Huang J.-C., Hsu S.-C., Bhattacharya S. K., Wang C.-H., and
Liang M.-C.: Stable isotopic composition of near surface atmospheric water
vapour and rain-vapour interaction in Taipei, Taiwan, J. Hydrol., 519,
2091–2100 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Laws, E. A.: Photosynthetic quotients, new production and net community
production in the open ocean, Deep-Sea Res. I, 38, 143–167, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Laws, E. A., Landry, M. R., Barber, R. T., Campbell, L., Dickson, M. L., and
Marra, J.: Carbon cycling in primary production bottle incubations:
inferences from grazing experiments and photosynthetic studies using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O in the Arabian Sea, Deep-Sea Res. II, 47, 1339–1352, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, W.: Global primary production of lakes: 19th Baldi Memorial Lecture,
Inland Waters, 1, 1–28, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Liang, M.-C. and Mahata, S.: Oxygen anomaly in near surface carbon dioxide reveals deep stratospheric intrusion, Scientific Reports, 5, 11352, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11352" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep11352</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lin, I.-I.: Typhoon-induced phytoplankton blooms and primary productivity
increase in the western North Pacific subtropical ocean, J. Geophys. Res.,
117, C03039, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007626" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007626</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lin, I.-I., Liu, W.-T., Wu, C.-C., Wong, G.T.F., Hu, C., Chen, Z., Liang,
W.-D., Yang, Y., and Liu, K.-K.: New evidence for enhanced ocean primary
production triggered by tropical cyclone, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
30, 1718, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017141</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: Assessment of Oceanic Productivity with the
Triple-Isotope Composition of Dissolved Oxygen, Science, 288, 2028–2031
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: The isotopic ratios <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O in molecular oxygen and their significance in
biogeochemistry, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 69, 1099–1110, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: Net and gross oxygen production from
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O ratios,
Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 56, 133–145, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: Proper estimation of marine gross O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>O ratios of dissolved
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L19606, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049138</ext-link>, 2011</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B., Barkan, E., Bender, M. L., Thiemens, M. H., and Boering, K. A.:
Triple-isotope composition of atmospheric oxygen as a tracer of
biosphere productivity, Nature, 400, 547–550, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B., Barkan, E., Sagi, Y., and Yacobi, Y. Z.: Evaluation of community
respiratory mechanisms with oxygen isotopes: A case study in Lake Kinneret,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 33–42, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Marra, J.: Approaches to the measurement of plankton production,
Phytoplankton productivity: carbon assimilation in marine and freshwater
ecosystem, edited by: le Willams, P. J. B., Thomas, D. N., and Reynolds, C.
S., Cambridge, Blackwells, 78–108, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Munro, D. R., Quay, P. D., Juranek, L. W., and Goericke, R.: Biological
production rates off the Southern California coast estimated from triple
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopes and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : Ar gas ratios, Limnol. Oceanogr., 58,
1312–1328, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Nicholson, D. P.: Comment on “Technical note: Consistent calculations of
aquatic gross production from oxygen triple isotope measurements” by Kaiser
(2011), Biogeosciences, 8, 2993–2997, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2993-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-2993-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Pai, S. C., Gong, G. C., and Liu, K. K.: Determination of dissolved oxygen in
seawater by direct spectrophotometry of total iodine, Mar. Chem., 41,
343–351, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Prokopenko, M. G., Pauluis, O. M., Granger, J., and Yeung, L. Y.: Exact
evaluation of gross photosynthetic production from the oxygen triple-isotope
composition of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: Implications for the net-to-gross primary production
ratios, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L14603, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047652</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Quay, P., Stutsman, J., and Steinhoff, T.: Primary production and carbon
export rates across the subpolar N. Atlantic Ocean basin based on triple
oxygen isotope and dissolved O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ar gas measurements, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB004003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB004003</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Quay, P. D., Peacock, C., Björkman, K., and Karl, D. M.: Measuring
primary production rates in the ocean: Enigmatic results between incubation
and non-incubation methods at Station ALOHA, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24,
GB3014, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003665</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Reuer, M. K., Barnett, B. A., Bender, M. L., Falkowski, P. G., and Hendricks,
M. B.: New estimates of Southern Ocean biological production rates from
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ar ratios and the triple isotope composition of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54, 951–974, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Sarma, V. V. S. S., Abe, O., Hashimoto, S., Hinuma, A., and Saino, T.:
Seasonal variations in triple oxygen isotopes and gross oxygen production in
the Sagami Bay, central Japan, Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 544–552, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Sarma, V. V. S. S., Abe, O., Hinuma, A., and Saino, T.: Short-term variation
of triple oxygen isotopes and gross oxygen production in the Sagami Bay,
central Japan, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 1432–1442, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Sarma, V. V. S. S., Abe, O., and Saino, T.: Spatial variations in
time-integrated plankton metabolic rates in Sagami Bay using triple oxygen
isotopes and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : Ar ratios, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1776–1783, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Schlitzer, R.: Ocean Data View, <uri>odv.awi.de.https://odv.awi.de/</uri>, (last access: 20 October 2016),
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Spitzer, W. S. and Jenkins, W. J.: Rates of vertical mixing, gas exchange and
new production-estimates from seasonal gas cycles in the upper ocean near
Bermuda, J. Mar. Res., 47, 169–196, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Shiah, F.-K., Gong, G.-C., and Liu, K.-K.: Light effects on phytoplankton
photosynthetic performance in the southern East China Sea north of Taiwan,
Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 37, 133–140, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Shiau, J.-T. and Wu, F.-C.: A dual active-restrictive approach to
incorporating environmental flow targets into existing reservoir operation
rules, Water Resour. Res., 46, W08515, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009WR008765</ext-link>,  2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Stanley, R. H. R., Kirkpatrick, J. B., Cassar, N., Barnett, B. A., and
Bender, M. L.: Net community production and gross primary production rates in
the western equatorial Pacific, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB4001,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003651" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003651</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Steeman-Nielsen, E.: The use of radioactive carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) for measuring
organic production in the sea, J. Conseil, 18, 117–140, 1952.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Thiemens, M. H., Jackson, T. L., Zipf, E. C., Erdman, P. W., and van Egmond,
C.: Carbon dioxide and oxygen isotope anomalies in the mesosphere and
stratosphere, Science, 270, 969–972, 1995a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Thiemens, M. H., Jackson, T. L., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Observation of
a mass independent oxygen isotopic composition in terrestrial CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
link to ozone chemistry and the possible occurrence in the Martian
atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 225–257, 1995b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Cotner, J. B., Loiselle, S. A., Striegl, R.
G., Ballatore, T. J., Dillon, P., Finlay K., and Fortino, K.: Lakes and
reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
54, 2298–2314, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tseng, Y.-F., Hsu, T.-C., Chen, Y.-L., Kao, S.-J., Wu, J.-T., Lu, J.-C., Lai,
C.-C., Kuo, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Yamamoto, Y., Xiao, T., and Shiah, F.-K.:
Typhoon effects on DOC dynamics in a phosphate-limited reservoir,
Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 60, 247–260, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Vachon, D. and Prairie, Y. T.: The ecosystem size and shape dependence of gas
transfer velocity versus wind speed relationships in lakes, Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci., 70, 1757–1764, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Valdespino-Castillo, P.M., Merino-Ibarra, M., Jimenez-Contreras, J.,
Castillo-Sandoval, F. S., and Ramirez-Zierold, J. A.: Community metabolism in
a deep (stratified) tropical reservoir during a period of high-water
fluctuations, Environ. Monit. Assess., 186, 6505–6520, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the
ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7373–7382, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R., Ledwell, J. R., Broecker, W. S., and Hamilton, M.: Gas
exchange on Mono Lake and Crowley Lake, California, J. Geophys. Res., 92,
14567–14580, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R., Asher, W. E., Ho, D. T., Sweeney, C., and McGillis, W. R.:
Advances in quantifying air-sea gas exchange and environmental forcing, Ann.
Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 213–244, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Variations in triple isotope composition of dissolved oxygen and primary production in a subtropical reservoir</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Lakes and reservoirs play an important role in the carbon cycle,
and therefore monitoring their metabolic rates is essential. The triple
oxygen-isotope anomaly of dissolved O<sub>2</sub> [<sup>17</sup>Δ =  ln(1+<i>δ</i><sup>17</sup>O) − 0.518  ×  ln(1 + <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O)] offers
a new, in situ, perspective on primary production, yet little is known about
<sup>17</sup>Δ from freshwater systems. We investigated the <sup>17</sup>Δ
together with the oxygen : argon ratio [Δ(O<sub>2</sub> ∕ Ar)] in the
subtropical Feitsui Reservoir in Taiwan from June 2014 to July 2015. Here, we
present the seasonal variations in <sup>17</sup>Δ, GP (gross production), NP
(net production) and the NP ∕ GP (net to gross ratio) in association with
environmental parameters. The <sup>17</sup>Δ varied with depth and season,
with values ranging between 26 and 205 per meg. The GP rates were observed to
be higher (702 ± 107 mg C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>) in winter than those
(303 ± 66 mg C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>) recorded during the summer. The
overall averaged GP was 220 g C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> and NP was −3 g
C m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, implying the reservoir was net heterotrophic on an
annual basis. This is due to negative NP rates  from October to
February (−198 ± 78 mg C m<sup>−2</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). Comparisons between
GP rates obtained from the isotope mass balance approach and <sup>14</sup>C bottle
incubation method (<sup>14</sup>C–GP) showed consistent values on the same order
of magnitude with a GP ∕ <sup>14</sup>C–GP ratio of 1.2 ± 1.1. Finally
we noted that, although typhoon occurrences were scarce, higher than average
<sup>17</sup>Δ values and GP rates were recorded after typhoon events.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abe, O.: Isotope fractionation of molecular oxygen during adsorption/desorption by molecular sieve zeolite, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 22, 2510–2514, doi10.1002/rcm.3634, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Abe, O. and Yoshida, N.: Partial pressure dependency of <sup>17</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O
and <sup>18</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O of molecular oxygen in the mass spectrometer, Rapid
Commun. Mass Spectrom., 17, 395–400, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barkan, E. and Luz, B.: High-precision measurements of <sup>17</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O
and <sup>18</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O of O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> ∕ Ar ratio in air, Rapid
Commun.
Mass Spectrom., 17, 2809–2814, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Barkan, E. and Luz, B.: High-precision measurements of <sup>17</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O
and <sup>18</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O ratios in H<sub>2</sub>O, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.,
19, 3737–3742, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Benson, B. B. and Krause Jr., D. K.: The concentration and isotopic
fractionation of oxygen dissolved in freshwater and seawater in equilibrium
with the atmosphere, Limnol. Oceanogr., 29. 620–632, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Castro-Morales, K., Cassar, N., Shoosmith, D. R., and Kaiser, J.: Biological
production in the Bellingshausen Sea from oxygen-to-argon ratios and oxygen
triple isotopes, Biogeosciences, 10, 2273–2291, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2273-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-2273-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y.-J. C., Wu, S.-C., Lee, B.-S., and Hung, C.-C.: Behaviour of
storm-induced suspension interflow in subtropical Feitsui Reservoir, Taiwan,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 1125–1133, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G., Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland
Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget, Ecosystems, 10, 172–185, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, J. F., Schlosser, P., Simpson, H. J., Stute, M., Wanninkhof, R., and
Ho, D. T.: Relationship between Gas Transfer Velocities and Wind Speeds in
The Tidal Hudson River Determined by the Dual Tracer Technique, in:
Air-Water Gas Transfer, edited by: Jähne, B. and Monahan, E., AEON Verlag,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, H. and Hayward, T.: Oxygen Supersaturation in the Ocean: Biological
versus Physical Contributions, Science, 235, 199–202, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Crusius, J. and Wanninkhof, R.: Gas transfer velocities measured at low wind speeds over a lake,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 48, 1010–1017, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dean, W. and Gorham, E.: Magnitude and significance of carbon burial in
lakes, reservoirs, and peatlands, Geology, 26, 535–538, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S., Quay, P. D., Stump, C., Wilbur, D., and Schudlich, R.: Chemical
tracers of productivity and respiration in the subtropical Pacific Ocean, J.
Geophys. Res., 100, 15873–15887, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Emerson, S., P. Quay, D. Karl, C. Winn, L. Tupas, and M. Landry: Experimental
determination of the organic carbon flux from open-ocean surface waters,
Nature, 389, 951–954, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hamme, R. C., Cassar, N., Lance, V. P., Vaillancourt, R. D., Bender, M. L.,
Strutton, P. G., Moore, T. S., DeGrandpre, M. D., Sabine, C. L., Ho, D. T.,
and Hargreaves, B. R.: Dissolved O<sub>2</sub> ∕ Ar and other methods reveal
rapid changes in productivity during a Lagrangian experiment in the Southern
Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C00F12, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007046" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JC007046</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Harrison, W. G. and Harris, L. R.: Isotope-dilution and its effects on
measurements of nitrogen and phosphorous uptake by oceanic microplankton,
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 27, 253–261, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hendricks, M. B., Bender, M. L., and Barnett, B. A.: Net and gross O<sub>2</sub>
production in the Southern ocean from measurements of biological O<sub>2</sub>
saturation and its triple isotope composition, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51,
1541–1561, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hendricks, M. B., Bender, M. L., Barnett, B. A., Strutton, P., and Chavez, F.
P.: Triple oxygen isotope composition of dissolved O<sub>2</sub> in the equatorial
Pacific: A tracer of mixing, production, and respiration, J. Geophys. Res.,
110, C12021, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002735" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JC002735</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, D. T., Law, C. S., Smith, M. J., Schlosser, P., Harvey, M., and Hill, P.:
Measurements of air-sea gas exchange at high wind speeds in the Southern
Ocean: Implications for global parameterizations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L16801, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026817" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL026817</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, K., Ducklow, H., Vernet, M., Cassar, N., and Bender, M. L.: Export
production and its regulating factors in the West Antarctica Peninsula region
of the Southern Ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2005,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB004028" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GB004028</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Itoh, M., Kobayashi, Y., Chen, T. Y., Tokida, T., Fukui, M., Kojima, H.,
Miki, T., Tayasu, I., Shiah, F.-K., and Okuda, N.: Effect of inter-annual
variation in winter vertical mixing on CH<sub>4</sub> dynamics in a subtropical
reservoir, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 120, 1177–1195, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Jassby, A. D. and Platt, T.: Mathematical formulation of the relationship
between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr., 21,
540–547, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Juranek, L. W. and Quay, P. D.: Basin-wide photosynthetic production rates in
the subtropical and tropical Pacific Ocean determined from dissolved oxygen
isotope ratio measurements, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB2006,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003492" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GB003492</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Juranek, L. W. and Quay, P. D.: Using triple isotopes of dissolved oxygen to
evaluate global marine productivity, Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 5, 503–524, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Juranek, L. W., Quay, P. D., Feely, R. A., Lockwood, D., Karl, D. M., and
Church, M. J.: Biological production in the NE Pacific and its influence on
air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux: Evidence from dissolved oxygen isotopes and
O<sub>2</sub> ∕ Ar, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C05043, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007450" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JC007450</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, J.: Technical note: Consistent calculation of aquatic gross
production from oxygen triple isotope measurements, Biogeosciences, 8,
1793–1811, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1793-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-8-1793-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, J., Reuer, M. K., Barnett, B., and Bender, M. L.: Marine productivity
estimates from O<sub>2</sub> ∕ Ar ratio measurements by membrane inlet mass
spectrometry, J. Geophys. Res., 32, L19605, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023459" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005GL023459</a>, 2005
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Keedakkadan, H. R. and Abe, O.: Cryogenic separation of an oxygen-argon
mixture in natural air samples for the determinationof isotope and molecular
ratios, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 29, 775–781, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Krause Jr., D. K. and Benson B. B.: The solubility and Isotopic Fractionation
of Gases in Dilute Aqueous Solution, IIa. Solubilities of the Noble Gases, J.
Solut. Chem., 18 823, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00685062" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/BF00685062</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ko, C.-Y., Lai, C.-C., Chen, T.-Y., Hsu, H.-H., and Shiah, F.-K.: Typhoon
effects on phytoplankton responses in a semi-closed freshwater ecosystem,
Mar. Freshw. Res., 67, 546–555, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF14294" target="_blank">doi:10.1071/MF14294</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Kuo, J.-T.,  Liu, W. C.,  Lin, R. T.,  Lung, W. S.,  Yang, M. D.,
Yang, C.-P., and  Chu, S.-C.: Water quality modeling for the Feitsui Reservoir in
northern Taiwan, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 39, 671–687, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Kuo, J. T., Wang, Y. Y., and Lung, W. S.: A hybrid neural-genetic algorithm
for reservoir water quality management, Water Res., 40, 1367–1376, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Laskar A. H., Huang J.-C., Hsu S.-C., Bhattacharya S. K., Wang C.-H., and
Liang M.-C.: Stable isotopic composition of near surface atmospheric water
vapour and rain-vapour interaction in Taipei, Taiwan, J. Hydrol., 519,
2091–2100 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Laws, E. A.: Photosynthetic quotients, new production and net community
production in the open ocean, Deep-Sea Res. I, 38, 143–167, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Laws, E. A., Landry, M. R., Barber, R. T., Campbell, L., Dickson, M. L., and
Marra, J.: Carbon cycling in primary production bottle incubations:
inferences from grazing experiments and photosynthetic studies using <sup>14</sup>C
and <sup>18</sup>O in the Arabian Sea, Deep-Sea Res. II, 47, 1339–1352, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, W.: Global primary production of lakes: 19th Baldi Memorial Lecture,
Inland Waters, 1, 1–28, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, M.-C. and Mahata, S.: Oxygen anomaly in near surface carbon dioxide reveals deep stratospheric intrusion, Scientific Reports, 5, 11352, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11352" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep11352</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, I.-I.: Typhoon-induced phytoplankton blooms and primary productivity
increase in the western North Pacific subtropical ocean, J. Geophys. Res.,
117, C03039, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007626" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JC007626</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, I.-I., Liu, W.-T., Wu, C.-C., Wong, G.T.F., Hu, C., Chen, Z., Liang,
W.-D., Yang, Y., and Liu, K.-K.: New evidence for enhanced ocean primary
production triggered by tropical cyclone, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
30, 1718, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017141" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003GL017141</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: Assessment of Oceanic Productivity with the
Triple-Isotope Composition of Dissolved Oxygen, Science, 288, 2028–2031
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: The isotopic ratios <sup>17</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O and
<sup>18</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O in molecular oxygen and their significance in
biogeochemistry, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 69, 1099–1110, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: Net and gross oxygen production from
O<sub>2</sub> ∕ Ar, <sup>17</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O and <sup>18</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O ratios,
Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 56, 133–145, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B. and Barkan, E.: Proper estimation of marine gross O<sub>2</sub> production
with <sup>17</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O and <sup>18</sup>O ∕ <sup>16</sup>O ratios of dissolved
O<sub>2</sub>, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L19606, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049138" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011GL049138</a>, 2011
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B., Barkan, E., Bender, M. L., Thiemens, M. H., and Boering, K. A.:
Triple-isotope composition of atmospheric oxygen as a tracer of
biosphere productivity, Nature, 400, 547–550, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Luz, B., Barkan, E., Sagi, Y., and Yacobi, Y. Z.: Evaluation of community
respiratory mechanisms with oxygen isotopes: A case study in Lake Kinneret,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 33–42, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Marra, J.: Approaches to the measurement of plankton production,
Phytoplankton productivity: carbon assimilation in marine and freshwater
ecosystem, edited by: le Willams, P. J. B., Thomas, D. N., and Reynolds, C.
S., Cambridge, Blackwells, 78–108, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Munro, D. R., Quay, P. D., Juranek, L. W., and Goericke, R.: Biological
production rates off the Southern California coast estimated from triple
O<sub>2</sub> isotopes and O<sub>2</sub> : Ar gas ratios, Limnol. Oceanogr., 58,
1312–1328, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Nicholson, D. P.: Comment on “Technical note: Consistent calculations of
aquatic gross production from oxygen triple isotope measurements” by Kaiser
(2011), Biogeosciences, 8, 2993–2997, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2993-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-8-2993-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Pai, S. C., Gong, G. C., and Liu, K. K.: Determination of dissolved oxygen in
seawater by direct spectrophotometry of total iodine, Mar. Chem., 41,
343–351, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Prokopenko, M. G., Pauluis, O. M., Granger, J., and Yeung, L. Y.: Exact
evaluation of gross photosynthetic production from the oxygen triple-isotope
composition of O<sub>2</sub>: Implications for the net-to-gross primary production
ratios, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L14603, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047652" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011GL047652</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Quay, P., Stutsman, J., and Steinhoff, T.: Primary production and carbon
export rates across the subpolar N. Atlantic Ocean basin based on triple
oxygen isotope and dissolved O<sub>2</sub> and Ar gas measurements, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2003, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB004003" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GB004003</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Quay, P. D., Peacock, C., Björkman, K., and Karl, D. M.: Measuring
primary production rates in the ocean: Enigmatic results between incubation
and non-incubation methods at Station ALOHA, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24,
GB3014, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003665" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GB003665</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Reuer, M. K., Barnett, B. A., Bender, M. L., Falkowski, P. G., and Hendricks,
M. B.: New estimates of Southern Ocean biological production rates from
O<sub>2</sub> ∕ Ar ratios and the triple isotope composition of O<sub>2</sub>,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54, 951–974, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Sarma, V. V. S. S., Abe, O., Hashimoto, S., Hinuma, A., and Saino, T.:
Seasonal variations in triple oxygen isotopes and gross oxygen production in
the Sagami Bay, central Japan, Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 544–552, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Sarma, V. V. S. S., Abe, O., Hinuma, A., and Saino, T.: Short-term variation
of triple oxygen isotopes and gross oxygen production in the Sagami Bay,
central Japan, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 1432–1442, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Sarma, V. V. S. S., Abe, O., and Saino, T.: Spatial variations in
time-integrated plankton metabolic rates in Sagami Bay using triple oxygen
isotopes and O<sub>2</sub> : Ar ratios, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1776–1783, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Schlitzer, R.: Ocean Data View, <a href="odv.awi.de.https://odv.awi.de/" target="_blank">odv.awi.de.https://odv.awi.de/</a>, (last access: 20 October 2016),
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Spitzer, W. S. and Jenkins, W. J.: Rates of vertical mixing, gas exchange and
new production-estimates from seasonal gas cycles in the upper ocean near
Bermuda, J. Mar. Res., 47, 169–196, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Shiah, F.-K., Gong, G.-C., and Liu, K.-K.: Light effects on phytoplankton
photosynthetic performance in the southern East China Sea north of Taiwan,
Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 37, 133–140, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Shiau, J.-T. and Wu, F.-C.: A dual active-restrictive approach to
incorporating environmental flow targets into existing reservoir operation
rules, Water Resour. Res., 46, W08515, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008765" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009WR008765</a>,  2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Stanley, R. H. R., Kirkpatrick, J. B., Cassar, N., Barnett, B. A., and
Bender, M. L.: Net community production and gross primary production rates in
the western equatorial Pacific, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB4001,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003651" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GB003651</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Steeman-Nielsen, E.: The use of radioactive carbon (<sup>14</sup>C) for measuring
organic production in the sea, J. Conseil, 18, 117–140, 1952.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Thiemens, M. H., Jackson, T. L., Zipf, E. C., Erdman, P. W., and van Egmond,
C.: Carbon dioxide and oxygen isotope anomalies in the mesosphere and
stratosphere, Science, 270, 969–972, 1995a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Thiemens, M. H., Jackson, T. L., and Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.: Observation of
a mass independent oxygen isotopic composition in terrestrial CO<sub>2</sub>, the
link to ozone chemistry and the possible occurrence in the Martian
atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 225–257, 1995b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Cotner, J. B., Loiselle, S. A., Striegl, R.
G., Ballatore, T. J., Dillon, P., Finlay K., and Fortino, K.: Lakes and
reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
54, 2298–2314, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Tseng, Y.-F., Hsu, T.-C., Chen, Y.-L., Kao, S.-J., Wu, J.-T., Lu, J.-C., Lai,
C.-C., Kuo, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Yamamoto, Y., Xiao, T., and Shiah, F.-K.:
Typhoon effects on DOC dynamics in a phosphate-limited reservoir,
Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 60, 247–260, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Vachon, D. and Prairie, Y. T.: The ecosystem size and shape dependence of gas
transfer velocity versus wind speed relationships in lakes, Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci., 70, 1757–1764, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Valdespino-Castillo, P.M., Merino-Ibarra, M., Jimenez-Contreras, J.,
Castillo-Sandoval, F. S., and Ramirez-Zierold, J. A.: Community metabolism in
a deep (stratified) tropical reservoir during a period of high-water
fluctuations, Environ. Monit. Assess., 186, 6505–6520, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the
ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7373–7382, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R., Ledwell, J. R., Broecker, W. S., and Hamilton, M.: Gas
exchange on Mono Lake and Crowley Lake, California, J. Geophys. Res., 92,
14567–14580, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R., Asher, W. E., Ho, D. T., Sweeney, C., and McGillis, W. R.:
Advances in quantifying air-sea gas exchange and environmental forcing, Ann.
Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 213–244, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
