<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-841-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>The impact of sedimentary alkalinity release on the water column CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> system in the North Sea</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sedimentary alkalinity release in the North Sea}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H.~Brenner et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Brenner</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          <email>heiko.brenner@nioz.nl</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Braeckman</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-6363</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Le Guitton</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Meysman</surname><given-names>F. J. R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Ecosystem Studies, Royal Netherlands Institute for
Sea Research (NIOZ), Korringaweg 7, 4401 NT Yerseke, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 S8,
9000 Ghent, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Analytical, Environmental and
Geochemistry, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels,
Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">H. Brenner (heiko.brenner@nioz.nl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>841</fpage><lpage>863</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>It has been previously proposed that alkalinity release from sediments can
play an important role in the carbonate dynamics on continental shelves,
lowering the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of seawater and hence increasing the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
from the atmosphere. To test this hypothesis, sedimentary alkalinity
generation was quantified within cohesive and permeable sediments across the
North Sea during two cruises in September 2011 (basin-wide) and June 2012
(Dutch coastal zone). Benthic fluxes of oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), alkalinity
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) were determined using
shipboard closed sediment incubations. Our results show that sediments can
form an important source of alkalinity for the overlying water, particularly
in the shallow southern North Sea, where high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC fluxes
were recorded in near-shore sediments of the Belgian, Dutch and German
coastal zone. In contrast, fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC are substantially
lower in the deeper, seasonally stratified, northern part of the North Sea.
Based on the data collected, we performed a model analysis to constrain the
main pathways of alkalinity generation in the sediment, and to quantify how
sedimentary alkalinity drives atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the southern North
Sea. Overall, our results show that sedimentary alkalinity generation should
be regarded as a key component in the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics of shallow coastal
systems.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Coastal seas play a crucial role in the global carbon cycle by connecting the
terrestrial, oceanic and atmospheric reservoirs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.1"/>. Although
continental shelves cover only 7 % of the global ocean surface, they
account for up to 30 % of the oceanic primary production
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.2"/> and between 10 and 25 % of the present-day oceanic
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.3"/>. In general, most open shelves
in the temperate and high-latitude regions are undersaturated with respect to
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the low-latitude shelves tend to be supersaturated
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.4"/>. However, this rule is far from absolute. Although
temperate coastal areas generally act as a CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sink, considerable
variability has been observed in the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake within and between
systems, which may be explained by a dominance of different drivers of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake. High nutrient inputs from land fuel intense primary production and
hence stimulate atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, while respiration of organic
matter exported from terrestrial ecosystems stimulates the release of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
in coastal areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.5"/>. In
addition to these biological sinks and sources, the effect of temperature on
the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility controls the magnitude and direction of the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exchange between coastal waters and the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.6"/>. Therefore the question remains which particular drivers are
governing the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in a given coastal system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In addition to water column processes, sediments have also been suggested to
play a role in coastal CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, as the shallowness of coastal seas
permits a close interaction between the sediment, the water body, and the
atmosphere. Coastal water bodies are characterized by either a permanently or
seasonally mixed water column, which hence establishes a direct link between
the sediment and the atmosphere, acting on a timescale of days to months. In
contrast, in the open ocean, the sediment and the atmosphere can only
interact over much longer timescales (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years of global oceanic
circulation). However, the extent to which sediment geochemistry plays a role
in the overall CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake of coastal systems remains largely unresolved.</p>
      <p>It has been proposed that alkalinity generation caused by anaerobic organic
matter degradation in shallow coastal sediments can increase the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
buffer capacity of coastal waters and therefore increase atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake. When coining this hypothesis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.8"/> estimated that
alkalinity generation in Wadden Sea sediments could be responsible for
20–25 % of the total CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake of the entire North Sea. However,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.9"/> estimated much smaller <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes between the
Wadden Sea and the North Sea based on activity measurements of radium
isotopes in surface water. While the strength of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux
between the Wadden Sea and the North Sea remains under debate, the Wadden Sea
has been identified as a source of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the North Sea
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.10"/>. However, it remains
an open question whether this <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> export from the Wadden Sea drives
any CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the North Sea (maybe the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-induced CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake has already taken place in the Wadden Sea), and also, how important
the sediments of the North Sea proper are in driving CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the
North Sea. In the East China Sea it was already suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.11"/>
that alkalinity generation due to anaerobic degradation processes in
sediments adds considerably to the total alkalinity budget in this area.
Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.12"/> proposed that shelf-generated alkalinity
release from benthic anaerobic processes could be almost as important as
alkalinity generated by dissolution of carbonates in the open ocean. Finally,
based on modeled nitrogen and carbon budgets for the northwestern North
Atlantic continental shelf, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.13"/> suggested that shelf sediments
must be an important source of alkalinity. By contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.14"/>
estimated a much smaller mean alkalinity flux from global coastal sediments
based on the upscaling of local denitrification and sulfate reduction rates.
They concluded that sedimentary alkalinity fluxes are generally too low to
significantly affect the alkalinity budget of the global ocean, but also
stated that sedimentary anaerobic processes could be important on regional
scales as an alkalinity release mechanism. From these results, it is clear
that presently, there is uncertainty as to what extent coastal sediments are
an important source of alkalinity to the coastal ocean and whether this
benthic alkalinity release then induces any significant CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the
coastal ocean.</p>
      <p>In this study, the objective was to quantify sedimentary alkalinity
generation within various sediment types in the North Sea. During two
cruises, samples were collected in September 2011 (basin-wide) and June 2012
(Dutch coastal zone). Benthic fluxes of alkalinity, dissolved inorganic
carbon and oxygen were determined using closed sediment incubations and
microsensor profiling. Subsequently, we used this data set in a model
analysis to constrain the sources of the sedimentary alkalinity release in
the shallow southern North Sea. This way, we were able to construct an
alkalinity budget for both sediment and water column, and based on this
budget, we then could estimate the net CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake from the atmosphere
associated with the sedimentary alkalinity release.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>North Sea system</title>
      <p>In this paper we divide the North Sea into three different hydrogeographical
zones: the southern North Sea (SNS), the northern North Sea (NNS), and the
combination of the Skagerrak and the Norwegian Trench (SKNT). The SNS
(surface area: 279.2 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) encompasses the Southern Bight (between
Belgium–Netherlands and the UK), the shallow Wadden Sea (running along the
Dutch and German coast up to Esbjerg in Denmark), the German Bight, and the
central part of the North Sea (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The major
difference between the SNS and the NNS is the stratification regime. Whereas
the shallow SNS has a fully mixed water column throughout the year, the NNS
is thermally stratified in summer but fully mixed during winter, due to
strong wind forcing and surface cooling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.15"/>. As the
operational border between the SNS and NNS, we use the absence/presence of
stratification as observed in September 2011. Thus, all non-stratified
stations are classified as SNS, while all stratified stations belong to
either the NNS or the SKNT. The third hydrogeographical zone is the Skagerrak
and the Norwegian Trench (SKNT), which forms one of the major sediment
depositional areas of the North Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.16"/>. The Skagerrak is part
of the transition area that connects the North Sea with the Baltic Sea. It is
a rather small strait (200 by 100 km) between the southeastern coast of
Norway, the southwestern coast of Sweden, and the Jutland Peninsula of
Denmark. The average depth of the Skagerrak is about 210 m. The Skagerrak is
strongly stratified in summer, but also features a weak stratification in
winter driven by Baltic freshwater inputs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.17"/>.
The Skagerrak is connected to the Norwegian Sea through the Norwegian Trench,
with a sill depth of 270 m. The Norwegian Trench itself is a deep
sedimentary basin (250–700 m) that reaches from the Oslofjord in the
southeast to the Stad Peninsula in the upper northwest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.18"/>.
Like the Skagerrak, the Norwegian Trench is characterized by haline
stratified water masses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.19"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Map of sampled stations. Red symbols: southern North Sea; black
symbols: Skagerrak; blue symbols: northern North Sea; circles: sampled in
September 2011; squares: sampled in June 2012. Border of the Skagerrak as
defined by the International Hydrographic Organization; the border between
SNS and NNS roughly represents the 100 m depth isoline.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The water transport in the NNS is dominated by the large open boundary with
the North Atlantic. Water entering in the west through the Shetland Channel
and the Faire Island Channel turns eastwards and leaves the North Sea via the
Norwegian Trench in the east. The residence time of this water is about 1
year. Generally, water entering the NNS does not influence the SNS, as just
5 % of the North Atlantic water entering the northern boundary reaches
the SNS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.20"/>. The water transport in the SNS is mainly
determined by inflow from the Atlantic Ocean through the channel, which mixes
with low-salinity water coming from rivers and moves along the eastern
coastlines towards the northeast. Baltic Sea water entering through the
Kattegat and coastal run-off are important in maintaining the Norwegian
Coastal Current that initiates in the Skagerrak. This northwards-directed
current is the only net outflow of the North Sea and thus balances all
incoming water inputs as described above. Additionally, the shallow SNS is
influenced by strong tidally induced currents and mixing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.21"/>.
The tides in the SNS are diurnal, whereas maximum surface currents at spring
tide occur in the western and southern parts of the SNS. More to the north
and into the German Bight, the tidal current velocities decrease
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="paren.22"/>.</p>
      <p>The seafloor of the North Sea predominantly consists of permeable sediments.
Medium and fine sand is the main sediment type and occupies the largest part
of the North Sea basin. Coarse sand is found at confined locations throughout
the entire North Sea basin, with larger areas of coarse-grained sediments
present along the English coast and in front of the German and Danish coasts.
Mud and sandy mud are mainly found in the deep trenches along the Norwegian
coast, off the coast of Scotland, in particular locations along the Belgian
coast, in smaller areas north and east of the German Bight, and near
Helgoland in the German Bight <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sediment sampling</title>
      <p>During a cruise onboard R/V <italic>Pelagia</italic> in September 2011, we sampled a
total of 19 stations across the whole North Sea basin
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). On a second cruise in June 2012, we sampled seven
stations along a transect perpendicular to the Dutch coast from the Wadden
island of Terschelling up to the Oyster Ground in the central North Sea
(1b–7b in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Sediment cores were collected at each
site using a Reineck box corer. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) core barrels
(19 cm inner diameter) were subsequently inserted into the sediment of the
box core to a depth of 10 to 15 cm enclosing 15 to 20 cm of overlying
water. The cores were excavated from the box core, closed off with a lid at
the bottom, and immediately transferred to a water-filled reservoir in a
thermo-controlled container that was kept at in situ bottom water
temperature. These sediment cores were subsequently used for closed core flux
incubations as described below.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Sampled stations from both cruises in 2011 and 2012 with coordinates
and maximum water depth, as well as with sediment characteristics and bottom
water characteristics as measured by the CTD.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Latitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Longitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Water depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Salinity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Oxygen</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Porosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Median</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Sediment classification</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bottom water</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Bottom water</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Bottom water</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Grain size</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">North Sea basin-wide</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(PSU)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(vol vol<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(Wentworth)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52.60000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.50117</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">153.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">292</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51.52533</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.96633</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">153.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">499</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.19983</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.50083</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">157.290</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">287</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.80033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.00050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">237</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">54.40033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.10050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">151.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">209</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55.00000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.99950</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">155.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55.00000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.99983</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">154.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">215</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.99983</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.99983</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">81.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">140.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">138</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">56.00167</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.50033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">154.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">219</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57.00000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.25100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">53.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">146.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">287</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SKNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57.50050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.50150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">209.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">165.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Coarse silt</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.00000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.49933</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">109.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">143.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">119</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.00050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.25100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">95.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">151.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">314</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SKNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.00000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.50083</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">304.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">169.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Coarse silt</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SKNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">58.49983</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.49983</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">539.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">172.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium silt</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.00033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.50000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">115.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">148.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">149</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Fine sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.00017</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.50000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">116.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">283</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SKNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">61.00000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.49950</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">350.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">150.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium silt</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.99950</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.50033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">141.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">146.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">269</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Medium sand</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dutch coastal transect</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">54.43190</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.40820</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">43.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">267.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">54.24760</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.02550</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">260.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">54.08090</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.20060</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">47.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">253.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.55040</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.36280</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">264.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.82750</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.52470</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.41270</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.28640</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">272.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7b</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">53.42550</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.48820</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>During the September 2011 cruise, small sediment cores were retrieved for
solid-phase analysis and microsensor profiling, and these were taken from the
same box core as the flux cores. For solid-phase analysis, acrylic core
barrels (5 cm i.d.) were inserted into the sediment of the box core. The
upper 10 cm of each core were sliced into 1 cm intervals and sediment
samples were analyzed for porosity and grain size distribution. Porosity was
determined by weight loss after freeze-drying, accounting for salt
precipitation in the saline pore water. Grain size distribution was
determined using a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 particle analyzer.</p>
      <p>For O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and pH microsensor profiling, acrylic core liners (3 cm i.d.) were
inserted into the sediment of the box core, and afterwards, the sediment was
brought level to the rim of the core liner. Cores were subsequently placed in
an aquarium containing bottom water at in situ temperature, which was
constantly bubbled with ambient air, to ensure constant water flow over the
sediment. Bottom water was retrieved by casts with 25 L Niskin bottles
(Ocean Test Equipment, Fort Lauderdale, USA) retrieving water at
approximately 1 m above the sediment surface. A conductivity, temperature,
depth (CTD) was mounted on a standard rosette frame together with 24 Niskin
bottles. The CTD was equipped with a SBE3+ thermometer, a SBE4 conductivity
meter and a SBE43 dissolved oxygen sensor (Seabird, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Solute flux measurements</title>
      <p>Flux chamber incubations are potentially susceptible to various
methodological artifacts resulting from sediment enclosure, which relate to
the sensitivity of benthic fluxes to changes in ambient hydrodynamics and
altered benthic faunal activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.24"/>. In permeable sediments, fluxes are particularly susceptible to
the imposed stirring regime and the associated local pressure gradients that
are generated in the flux chamber, which drive the advective pore-water
exchange between sediment and overlying water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.25"/>. The flux chamber type employed here was based on the design in
Huettel and Gust (1992), which was specifically developed for flux studies in
permeable sediments. The sediment cores retrieved were closed off with a PMMA
top lid that was equipped with a large central stirring disc (diameter:
14 cm). The rotation of the disc mixes the overlying water and establishes a
specific radial pressure gradient, which drives pore-water exchange in the
chamber. A major challenge for flux chamber studies in permeable sediments is
the selection of the appropriate stirring regime. Without knowledge of the
local in situ hydrodynamics, it is impossible to predict a priori which
stirring regime is appropriate for a given site. Here we used two different
stirring rates at each station (40 and 80 rpm) to mimic a range of
interfacial pressure gradients and solute exchange conditions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.26"/>. By taking this approach, we are
able to discern how sensitive the fluxes at each station are to advective
exchange, and thus we get an idea of the uncertainty in our flux estimates
for the permeable sites that we visited.</p>
      <p>Prior to the start of the flux measurements, the overlying water in each core
was replaced with ambient bottom water to ensure that the chemical
composition of the overlying water closely resembled in situ conditions.
Each set of flux measurements began by securing gas-tight lids equipped with
O-ring seals on each core. Core lids contained two sampling ports on opposite
sides for subsampling during the incubation, and these ports were carefully
purged with bottom water prior to the start of each incubation to remove any
air bubbles trapped. Fiber-optical oxygen sensors (FireSting OXF1100) were
inserted into a third opening in the top lid. The chambers were closely
inspected to ensure that no gas bubbles remained inside the chamber. Two or
three replicate chamber incubations were made per station.</p>
      <p>The temporal evolution of the oxygen concentration in the overlying water of
the flux chambers was continuously monitored using oxygen optodes at a sample
interval of 1 min. Optodes were pre-calibrated on the same day using a
two-point calibration with ambient seawater at 0 % (saturated with sodium
sulfite) and 100 % O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation (bubbled with air). Optode results
were verified with measurements of the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration by Winkler
titration in discrete water samples before and after incubation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
      <p>A water subsample (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL) was withdrawn from the chambers at 4–6 h
intervals for solute analysis as described below. When a water sample was
extracted via one sampling port, an equal amount of ambient bottom water
entered through the replacement tube connected to the other sampling port.
Samples were collected in plastic syringes for alkalinity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
in glass syringes for dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) analysis. Water
samples for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL) were filtered (0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
Millex-HA syringe filter) and stored in the dark at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. DIC water
samples (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mL) were not filtered, but were poisoned with
10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and stored submerged at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in a
fridge.</p>
      <p>The total oxygen uptake (TOU) rate and the flux of DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
determined from a linear regression of overlying water concentrations versus
incubation time (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>In this, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of overlying water, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface
area of sediment, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ow</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration in overlying water.
At the end of the incubation, the top lid was removed, the height of the
overlying water (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ow</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was measured at four points along the
side of the core using a ruler, and the mean height was calculated.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.28"/> suggested that an oxygen decrease by more than 10–15 %
from the initial conditions can already stimulate processes that cause a
nonlinear decrease in oxygen concentrations, which also might affect other
solute fluxes across the sediment–water interface. Here we found that the
linear regressions used to calculate the oxygen uptake were insensitive to an
oxygen decrease of 30 % or more (for examples, see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Analytical methods</title>
      <p>Total <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined via an open-cell titration procedure, using
a Metrohm Titrando 888 system with a combined Metrohm glass electrode
(Unitrode) following the SOP3a procedure as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.29"/>.
Samples (10 mL) were placed in a temperature-regulated open cell
(25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and titrated with a solution of hydrochloric acid (0.1 N)
in a two-stage process. First the sample (10 mL) was acidified to a pH close
to 3.5 and then titrated in small steps down to a pH of 3.0. Subsequently,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated using a nonlinear regression approach based on
SOP3a from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.30"/>. Two replicate measurements were carried out
for each sample analyzed. Titrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of certified reference
materials (CRM batch 116 provided by A.G. Dickson) were on average within
4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the nominal value, with a precision of
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>DIC was determined using an AS-C3 DIC analyzer (Apollo SciTEch, USA), in
which the sample (0.8 mL) was acidified and the released CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected
using a solid state infra-red CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> detector (LI-7000, LI-COR Biosciences,
USA). Two replicate measurements were carried out for each sample analyzed.
Quality assurance of the DIC analysis was also based on CRM (batch 116;
accuracy and precision: 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{2}$ and pH microprofiling}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and pH microprofiling</title>
      <p>Microsensor profiling was performed using commercial Clark-type O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
potentiometric pH microsensors operated with a motorized micromanipulator
(Unisense A.S., Denmark). To minimize the error by ship movement, the
microprofiling setup was placed in the center, the most stable location of
the ship. Under strong wind conditions, microprofiling was not performed, in
order to prevent sensor damage. Vertical depth profiles of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
recorded using an electrode with a tip size of 100 at 250 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m steps,
beginning at 2 mm above the sediment–water interface until either anoxia or
20 mm depth. The O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> microsensors were calibrated with a two-point
calibration made in air-saturated seawater (100 % saturation) and at
depth in anoxic sediment (0 % saturation). Depth profiles of pH were
measured using microsensors with a tip size of 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in 1 mm
steps, beginning 4 mm above the sediment surface until 35 mm depth.
Measurements were always started within 1 h after sampling. The pH
microsensors were calibrated using NBS buffers (pH 4 and 7) and TRIS buffers
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.31"/>, and the pH is reported on the total scale.</p>
      <p>The diffusive oxygen uptake (DOU) of the
sediment was calculated from the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depth profiles as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the depth and [O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] denotes O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. The slope
d[O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined from the gradient in the diffusive
boundary layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.32"/>, and while profiling, the overlying water was
bubbled with air to ensure a water flow over the sediment surface. The
molecular diffusion coefficient of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in seawater (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
calculated as a function of the bottom water salinity and temperature using
the CRAN:marelac extension package in the R open-source programming
language <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.33"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Statistical analyses</title>
      <p>Results are reported as the mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation (SD) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
replicate measurements. Nonparametric statistics were used in the
interpretation of results, including the Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
comparison of the mean of two independent groups of measurements. The
Spearman rank correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used as a measure of the
statistical dependence between two variables <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The more frequently
used Pearson correlation provides a measure of the linear relationship
between two continuous random variables, while Spearman's correlation allows
nonlinear correlation. More precisely, a perfect Spearman correlation results
when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are related by any monotonic function, while for the Pearson
correlation, a perfect correlation only results when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are related
by a linear function. As the environmental variables tested were nonlinearly
related (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>), we used the Spearman correlation.
Statistical analyses were conducted in R using the CRAN:stats package.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Bottom water characteristics</title>
      <p>Bottom water salinity, temperature and oxygen concentration as obtained by
CTD profiling are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, and characteristic
temperature depth profiles are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. Bottom water
salinity and temperature of stations from the basin-wide North Sea cruise
ranged from 35.12 PSU (NNS) to 33.01 PSU (SNS) and from 16.36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(SNS) to 6.13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (NNS). The bottom water in the NNS and SKNT was
generally colder and more saline than bottom water in the SNS (Mann–Whitney;
temperature: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; salinity: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A thermocline was formed
between 20 and 50 m water depth in all stations of the NNS and SKNT
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). As noted above, the
absence of stratification was used to classify stations within the SNS. The
bottom water oxygen concentrations did not however exhibit significant
differences between the SNS and other parts of the North Sea (Mann–Whitney;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Temperature profiles as recorded by a CTD cast for
<bold>(a)</bold> Station 11 (SNS), <bold>(b)</bold> Station 65 (SKNT), and
<bold>(c)</bold> Station 80 (NNS).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Sediment properties</title>
      <p>The median grain size for all stations visited during the basin-wide North
Sea campaign in 2011 ranged from 28 to 499 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (mean median grain
size: 215 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). In the SNS the median grain size ranged from 138 to
499 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (mean median grain size: 263 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), and according to
the Wentworth scale, the SNS sediments can be classified as fine to medium
sand (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Sediments in the NNS (median grain size
range: 119–314 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m; mean: 225 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) were not significantly
different from the SNS (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), hence also being
classified as fine to medium sand. In contrast, sediments from the Skagerrak
and Norwegian Trench (SKNT) were considerably finer (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with the median grain size ranging from 21 to 62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Thus,
sediments of SKNT are classified as fine to coarse silt on the Wentworth
scale (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Representative concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, DIC and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation over time for all three regions of the North Sea. Red: Station 11
(SNS); blue: Station 71 (NNS); black: Station 65 (SKNT).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Porosity for all stations in the North Sea basin varied from 0.32 to 0.74.
Between sediments of the SNS (mean: 0.35) and NNS (mean: 0.35), no
significant differences in porosity were found (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
However, sediments of the SKNT displayed a significantly higher porosity
(mean: 0.68) than sediments from the SNS or NNS (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Benthic flux chamber incubations</title>
      <p>The concentration changes over time of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, DIC, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
overlying water from flux chamber incubations are presented in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for representative stations from each of the
three zones (SNS, NNS, SKNT). Stations were chosen to represent average
benthic fluxes for the respective region of the North Sea, thus not
considering stations that are likely to underestimate or overestimate benthic
fluxes (e.g., Station 20). The oxygen data display a linear decrease, while
the DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data display a increasing trend, albeit with greater
variability due to the limited number of subsamples (four or five). Fluxes
were only included in further analysis if their calculation is based on a
linear regression of at least four points combined with an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value
greater than 0.8. Furthermore, fluxes were set to zero in case the slope of
the linear regression was not significantly different from zero.</p>
      <p>During the basin-wide campaign in September 2011, TOU rates ranged from 3.1
to 28.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SNS, 0.7 to
6.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the NNS, and 2.9 to
5.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SKNT. During the Dutch transect cruise
in June 2012, TOU rates ranged from 6.5 to 25.1 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Thereby, the highest oxygen uptake rates were
measured in the SNS, followed by the SKNT, while the lowest TOU rates were
measured in the NNS (mean SNS values: 10.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2011
and 13.5 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2012; SKNT:
3.9 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; NNS: 3.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). In
general, TOU rates in the SNS are significantly higher than TOU rates of the
NNS and the SKNT (Mann–Whitney; NNS: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; SKNT: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001).
Between TOU rates from the NNS and SKNT, no statistical difference could be
identified (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, TOU rates measured in the
SNS in June 2012 are not significantly different from TOU rates measured in
September 2011 (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Fluxes at the sediment–water interface for O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (TOU), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and DIC. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.34"/>; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.35"/>. Units  mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (DIC
flux),
mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux), and
mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (TOU rate).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">September 2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">June 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">Literature</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Range</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TOU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.1–28.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.5–25.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">14.9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.2–28.4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7–6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SKNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.9–5.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0–21.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5–18.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0–3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SKNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.4–9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DIC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5–29.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">flux</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0–6.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SKNT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.2–7.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Within the permeable sediments of the SNS and NNS, flux chamber incubations
were performed at two different stirring speeds (40 and 80 rpm). The TOU
values at these two stirring speeds were linearly correlated (Fig. 4a). In
general, the TOU rates were about 80 % higher at the higher stirring
speed, indicating that the pore-water transport was dominated by physical
advection, as expected in permeable sediments. On the other hand, a
correlation between median grain size of the sediments and TOU rates could
not be confirmed.</p>
      <p>In general, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC concentrations increased linearly with time
in the overlying water of the flux incubations for most stations.
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes for both campaigns ranged from 0 to 21.4, 0 to 3.0 and
1.4 to 9.9 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SNS, NNS and SKNT, respectively.
The highest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were observed in the SNS (mean:
6.6 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2011 and 5.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
2012) and in the SKNT (4.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The lowest mean
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux was calculated for the NNS (1.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Only the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes of the SNS are significantly higher than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes of the NNS (Mann–Whitney; SNS: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; SKNT: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes measured during the basin-wide cruise in 2011 are
similar to those measured along the Dutch transect in 2012 (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>DIC fluxes varied between 1.5 and 29.1, 0 and 6.2, and 4.2 and
7.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SNS, NNS, and SKNT, respectively. The
trends in DIC flux were similar to those obtained for the TOU rates and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes. The highest DIC fluxes were measured in the SNS,
followed by the SKNT and the NNS (mean: SNS: 11.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in 2011 and 12.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2012; SKNT:
6.1 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; NNS: 0.8 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). DIC
fluxes were significantly higher in the SNS than in the NNS, but showed no
differences to the DIC fluxes measured in the SKNT (Mann–Whitney; NNS: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; SKNT: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while no significant difference was found either
between DIC fluxes of the SKNT and the NNS (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As
found for TOU rates and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, the DIC fluxes in the SNS were
similar between both campaigns (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This allows us to
examine all solute fluxes recorded in the SNS as one single group in the
discussion section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{2}$ and pH microprofiling}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and pH microprofiling</title>
      <p>Representative examples of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and pH depth profiles in stations from all
three zones of the North Sea are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. In some
stations pore-water profiles could not be measured due to the coarse grain
size and the presence of carbonate shell fragments, which induce a high risk
of damaging the microsensors. In general, pore-water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> declines as a
result of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption associated with organic matter degradation. From
the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> depth profiles the DOU rates of the sediments were calculated as
detailed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>. In the SNS, DOU rates ranged from 0.20
to 6.95 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while in the NNS and SKNT, ranges of 1.47
to 4.33 and 0.83 to 2.49 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were found (Table
<xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The lowest mean DOU rate was measured in the SKNT, followed
by the DOU rates of the NNS and SNS (SKNT: 1.77 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
NNS: 1.92 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; SNS: 3.08 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Comparison between TOU rates as measured by FireSting optodes and diffusive
oxygen uptake rates (DOU) obtained from O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> microprofiles. Unit:  mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
oxygen penetration depth (OPD) for cores used for microprofiling in mm. NA
indicates that oxygen
does not deplete over the measured depth.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TOU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DOU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">OPD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The oxygen penetration depth (OPD) is defined as the thickness of the oxic
zone in marine sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.36"/>, and was operationally defined as
the depth below which the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration drops below
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In some permeable sediments, the oxygen did not
fully deplete over the measured depth profiles (first 2 cm), and so the OPD
could not be determined. In the remaining cores, the OPD was as shallow as
4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8 mm for the SNS, 18.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 mm for the SKNT, and
9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.9 mm for the NNS.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Total oxygen uptake rates measured in benthic incubation chambers at
two different stirring rates (RPM: pounds per minute); dashed line: 1 : 1
line; solid line: linear regression; red symbols: SNS. All rates in mmol
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Examples of microsensor depth profiles from different regions of the
North Sea. <bold>(a)</bold> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(b)</bold> pH; red: Station 11 (SNS); blue:
Station 65 (SKNT); black: Station 80 (NNS); solid line: sediment–water
interface.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlation plots between DIC fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, TOU rates
and water depth, porosity and grain size. Red: SNS; black: SKNT; blue: NNS.
Spearman's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value given in each plot. Units mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(DIC), mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (TOU).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> compares the TOU with the corresponding DOU for the
basin-wide campaign in September 2011. The TOU / DOU ratio ranged from 50.1
(SNS) to 1.1 (NNS), and DOU rates were significantly lower than TOU rates
(Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating that physically or biologically driven
advective transport strongly enhanced the sedimentary oxygen uptake.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Depth pH
profiles of representative cores are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. Depth
profiles generally show a decline of pH in all profiled cores, which can be
attributed to the release of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting from organic matter
degradation. Furthermore, the cores from the NNS and SKNT were typically
characterized by a sub-surface minimum in pH, while the depths of these pH
minima matched the corresponding OPD. Hence, we interpret these sub-surface
pH minima as resulting from the aerobic oxidation of reduced substances
transported upwards from deeper sediment layers. Generally, the pH increased
again at depth in the cores, most likely due to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation
associated with the anoxic degradation of organic matter (see discussion
below).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Benthic mineralization in the North Sea</title>
      <p>Several studies have previously addressed benthic oxygen consumption in the
North Sea, although most studies are restricted to the southern North Sea
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). All TOU rates presented in the following
section are not subdivided between both stirring speeds, but are discussed
together. The TOU rates found in the present study for the North Sea (range
3.1–28.7 mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) fall within the range of
previously published TOU rates (range
0–57.1 mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is however large. Due to
temporal variability (seasonality), spatial variability (e.g., substrates
ranging from cohesive mud to highly permeable sand), but also differences in
methodology (see the discussion below on the impact of the stirring rate), it
remains difficult to intercompare the oxygen consumption rates that have been
obtained in different studies. So despite this growing database of TOU rates,
a more accurate assessment of the spatial and temporal variation of the
oxygen consumption in the North Sea remains an important challenge.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>TOU rates (mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured in the North Sea and other coastal
systems taken from the literature compared to this study. OG: Oyster Ground; FF: Frisian Front; DB:
Dogger Bank; BF: Broad Fourteens; U1–U3: (near) English Channel; U4–U6: central North Sea; F115bis,
F330, BM, BFS, BS: Belgian coast; Thms: Thames; USP: Outer Silver Pit; MS: Mediterranean Sea; FS:
Faroe Shelf; WS: Washington Shelf; BC: northern Bering and Chukchi seas; SD: San Diego
Trough;
AC: Arctic continental slope; AS: Arabian Sea; MB: Monterey Bay; BS: Black Sea; AP: western
Antarctic Peninsula; CS: Celtic Sea; SNS: southern North Sea; NNS: northern North Sea.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Literature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Month and year</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TOU</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North Sea</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">de Wilde et al. (1984)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OG</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5, 8, 9 (1980, 1981)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.6–14.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cramer (1990)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5, 6 (1986), 8, 9 (1987)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.3–51.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Van Raaphorst et al. (1990)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7, 8 (1988)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4–20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1, 4, 5, 8, 11 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2–22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Van Duyl et al. (1992)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1, 4, 5, 8, 11 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15–40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Upton et al. (1993)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">U1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9, 10 (1988), 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5–16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9, 10 (1988), 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5–28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">U3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9, 10 (1988), 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7–25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">U4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9, 10 (1988), 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10–11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">U5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9, 10 (1988), 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6–10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">U6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9, 10 (1988), 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7–18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lohse et al. (1996)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OG</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7 (1994)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.6–6.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Osinga et al. (1996)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 (1993), 7, 10 (1994)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OG</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 (1993), 7, 10 (1994)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boon et al. (1998)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11 (1993)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11 (1993)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trimmer et al. (2000)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Thms</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7, 10 (1996), 4, 7 (1997)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.4–5.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trimmer et al. (2005)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">USP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 (2001), 7 (2002)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.1–57.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Thms</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 (2001), 7 (2002)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14–43.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Weston et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OG</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9 (2003)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.6–30.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Franco et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F115bis</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2, 4, 10 (2003)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.5–18.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F330</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2, 4, 10 (2003)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.2–8.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Provoost et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">F115</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9, 10, 11, 12 (2002), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 (2003)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5–32.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Braeckman et al. (2014)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–41.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BFS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56.31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BFS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">43.88</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.63</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Other coastal systems</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lansard et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06 (2001 and 2002)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9–25.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nordi et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">04 05 06 07 08 (2011) 02 06 07 (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.3–6.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Archer et al. (1992)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06 (1988)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0–18.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Grebmeier and McRoy (1989)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">07 08 09 (1984–1986)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3–16.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Smith Jr. (1974)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 (1973)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4–3.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Boetius and Damm (1998)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">08 09 (1993)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2–2.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Witte and  Pfannkuche (2000)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 (1995)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9–6.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Devol and  Christensen (1993)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06 07 (1988) 06 (1991)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.9–18.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Berelson et al. (2003)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">06 (1991)–10 (1995)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.1–13.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Friedl et al. (1998)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Summer (1995)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0–33.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hartnett et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">03 06 10 (2000) 02 (2001)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5–2.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Larsen et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">07 (2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.8–9.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">This study</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9 (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.12–28.65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 (2012)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.50–25.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NNS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9 (2011)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.74–6.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In our basin-wide campaign in 2011, we obtained the highest mean TOU rate in
the SNS (10.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by the SKNT
(3.9 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the lowest TOU rates were measured in
the NNS (3.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). One important environmental factor
in controlling the TOU rates is the amount of primary production in these
different regions. Part of this organic matter produced during photosynthesis
is respired in the water column, while the remaining part sinks down to the
sediments and undergoes respiration there. As oxygen serves as the ultimate
electron acceptor for almost all respired organic carbon
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.37"/>, high primary production rates tend to relate to high
TOU rates in the sediments. Note that besides primary production rates, the
water depth and thereby the amount of organic carbon that reaches the
sediments are also of great importance. Because of the shallow water depth,
the fraction of organic carbon that reaches the sediments in the southern
North Sea is considerably higher than in the northern North Sea, hence
further increasing the TOU rates in the SNS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.38"/>. Based on
measured surface chlorophyll concentration in the southern North Sea,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.39"/> estimated primary production rates for a period from August
1988 to October 1989, and found clear regional differences in primary
production in the SNS ranging from 18 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> along the
British coast to 59 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the German Bight. A model
study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.40"/> covering the whole North Sea confirmed the large
regional variation in depth-integrated annual primary production rates
ranging from 21 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the NNS to
79 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the German Bight of the SNS. TOU rates
observed are congruent with these previous observational and modeling
studies, with high values in the southern North Sea, and in particular in the
German Bight, and lower values in the northern North Sea.</p>
      <p>A second important environmental factor controlling the north–south gradient
in TOU rates is the bottom temperature, which exhibits a similar gradient in
summer, with higher temperatures in the south. In a recent seasonal flux
study of shallow coastal sediments from the North Sea, a positive correlation
was found between benthic solute fluxes and water temperature
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.41"/>. These authors proposed that higher bottom water temperatures
in summer are a main driver for higher benthic fluxes, as increased
temperatures enhance the metabolic activity in the sediment. In September
2011, the thermocline was formed between 20 and 50 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>), and the whole NNS and SKNT were stratified, while in
contrast, the SNS was fully mixed (which is the basis of our station
classification). As a result, the bottom water in the NNS and SKNT was
substantially cooler than bottom water in the SNS (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
difference between SNS and NNS/SKNT – Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Adopting a
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for benthic respiration
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx90" id="paren.42"/>, one would expect a nearly doubling of the
TOU between the NNS and SNS due to bottom water temperature, all other
environmental factors being the same. Accordingly, lower bottom water
temperatures in the NNS and SKNT could indeed partially explain the lower TOU
values recorded compared to the SNS (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>).</p>
      <p>To further identify the drivers of the observed spatial variability across
the North Sea, we examined the correlation of TOU rates with water depth,
porosity and grain size (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). We found significant
correlations between TOU values and water depth (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
suggesting that increased water depth reduced the benthic pelagic coupling in
the NNS and SKNT. As more organic matter is remineralized upon the longer
transit through the water column, less detritus reaches the seafloor, and
this hence decreases the contribution of benthic mineralization in the
overall respiration. Finally, we also found both a negative correlation
between TOU and porosity (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a significant negative
correlation between TOU and median grain size (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This
contradicts the classical picture of sedimentary diagenesis, where high
oxygen consumption rates and intense biogeochemical cycling are typically
linked to fine-grained organic-rich sediments. Instead, we found the highest
TOU values in the permeable sediments of mostly the SNS (low porosity, high
median grain size), which supports the more recent ideas of permeable
sediments as active bio-catalytic filters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.43"/>, which actively
trap suspended detritus by means of advective currents through the upper
sediment layers and rapidly mineralize this trapped organic matter. As a
result, these permeable sediments display low standing stocks of organic
matter but high TOU values.</p>
      <p>The importance of wind- and tidal-induced advective transport for the benthic
oxygen dynamics is emphasized by the deep oxygenation of the surface sediment
at permeable sites (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a), the strong impact of benthic chamber
stirring speed on the TOU (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), and by the difference between
TOU values as measured by benthic incubations and the corresponding DOU
values as obtained by microprofiling (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). We found that DOU
values were always smaller than TOU values for all stations throughout the
North Sea. In general, the total oxygen uptake can be decomposed as
TOU <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DOU <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> BMU <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AMU <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.44"/>, where BMU represents
benthos mediated O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake resulting from burrow irrigation and the
respiration of infauna, and AMU represents the advection mediated O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake by purely physical transport processes, such as pore-water advection
induced by currents over bottom topography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.45"/>
and oscillatory pore-water mixing induced by waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.46"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Oxygen penetration depth (OPD) plotted versus diffusive
oxygen uptake (DOU) rate. <bold>(b)</bold> Correlation between measured OPD and
theoretical OPD. Dashed line: 1 : 1 line; red symbols: SNS; blue symbols:
NNS; black: SKNT. For calculation and details, see the text.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Correlation between DIC fluxes and TOU rates.
<bold>(b)</bold> Correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and TOU rates. Solid
line: linear regression; Spearman's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value given in each plot. TA and DIC
fluxes in mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. TOU rates in
mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Sensitivity of the benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux (dashed line) and the
net <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation (solid line) towards a range of mineralization
rates in the SNS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>A second signature of physical and or biological pore-water irrigation is the
deep oxygenation of the surface sediment. As already noted above, in some
highly permeable sites, the surface sediment remained completely oxygenated
over the whole surface layer that was examined by O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> microsensor profiling
(first 20 mm), and so no oxygen penetration depth (OPD) could be determined.
For those stations that did allow one to determine the OPD (i.e., the
pore-water O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> signal decreased to zero), we employed the analytical model
of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.47"/>, which provides an inverse relation between OPD and DOU
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a) (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>bw</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>In this expression, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the theoretical OPD of the sediment, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
porosity, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the effective diffusivity of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the pore water
(i.e., corrected for tortuosity); [O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>bw</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bottom water
concentration of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the benthic oxygen flux (i.e.,
the DOU). This relationship is based on the balance between diffusive oxygen
fluxes and oxygen consumption rates under steady-state conditions and
negligible advection. The above relation was used to estimate the theoretical
OPD from the measured DOU as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b. The actually
measured OPD is systematically larger than the predicted OPD for all stations
(with SKNT stations 52 and 65 being the exception to this rule). As
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) holds for sediments that only experience diffusive
transport, the discrepancy suggests that non-diffusive transport (i.e.,
bio-irrigation or physical advection) increases the oxygen availability and
penetration in the sediment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Benthic DIC release in the North Sea</title>
      <p>The benthic DIC release in the North Sea follows the same spatial pattern as
the benthic oxygen uptake: the highest DIC effluxes were recorded in the SNS
(mean: 11.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2011 and
12.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2012), followed by the SKNT (mean:
6.1 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the NNS (mean:
0.8 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). However, while TOU
values were comparable in the NNS and SKNT, the DIC flux in the SKNT was
significantly higher than in the NNS. As for the TOU, we found a significant
positive correlation between the DIC efflux and water depth (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a weak negative correlation between the DIC efflux and the
porosity (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a significant negative correlation
between the DIC efflux and median grain size (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Overall, this suggests that the same
environmental factors (pelagic primary production, temperature, water depth,
sediment permeability) that are driving the TOU are also controlling the
spatial pattern of the sedimentary DIC release in the North Sea.</p>
      <p>Overall, we found DIC fluxes to be positively correlated with TOU rates
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a; Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The ratio between the
DIC efflux and the TOU at a given site represents the respiratory quotient
(RQ), and we found that the mean RQ value for the SNS (0.95), NNS (0.94), and
SKNT (1.00) to be all similar. No significant differences were detected
between the three zones (Mann–Whitney; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In general, the RQ can
be used as an indicator of the degree of reoxidation of reduced compounds
associated with anaerobic remineralization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="paren.49"/>. Assuming
that (1) no carbonate dissolution occurs in the sediment, (2) that the
stoichiometry of organic matter follows the Redfield ratio
(C : N : P <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 106 : 16 : 1; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="altparen.50"/>), and (3) that
organic matter is oxidized using oxygen as the sole electron acceptor, one
would obtain a RQ of 0.77 (solid line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="altparen.51"/>). Note that a RQ close to the Redfield ratio serves as
a baseline for comparison rather than an expected result in this study, due
to the anticipated impact of anoxic respiration and carbonate dissolution. In
principle, the RQ value is expected to increase with increasing importance of
suboxic and anoxic respiration pathways, and subsequent accumulation of
reduced compounds such as pyrite, as respiration along these pathways is
releasing DIC without consuming oxygen. Alternatively, dissolution of
carbonates may also lead to an increased RQ due to the release of 1 mole DIC
per 1 mole CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolved. Equally, the RQ value is expected to decrease
when a stock of reduced compounds is being re-oxidized, i.e., the
annihilation of a previously accumulated oxygen debt.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Benthic alkalinity release in the North Sea</title>
      <p>Our results show that North Sea sediments can be a substantial source of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with sediment effluxes ranging from 0 to
28.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluxes reported here were obtained by monitoring the temporal evolution of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the overlying water of enclosed sediment incubations. In the
same sediment incubations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.52"/> measured the efflux of the
short-lived radium isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>224</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>223</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ra) and subsequently
estimated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes. To this end, these authors used the Ra-isotope
data to estimate the overall water exchange rate between the pore water and
the overlying water column. This water exchange rate was then multiplied by
the excess concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in pore water, which was estimated
from pore-water analysis. This indirect estimate procedure resulted in
benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes between 4.7 and 22.1 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and is in good agreement with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux values obtained here
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>). The disagreement (e.g., at Station 38) between
observed and calculated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux may result from applying the same
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pore-water concentration for all stations in calculating the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes based on Ra-isotope data. This assumption might be wrong
and could lead to an overestimation of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux at Station 38.
For a more detailed discussion on the correlation between both methods, see
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.53"/>.</p>
      <p>The benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release in the North Sea follows the same spatial
pattern as the benthic oxygen uptake and the DIC efflux, suggesting that
organic matter mineralization is the primary driver for the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
release from sediments. We observed the highest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release in the
SNS (mean: 6.6 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2011 and
5.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2012), closely followed by the SKNT (mean:
4.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The lowest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were obtained
in the NNS (mean: 1.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). As for the TOU and DIC
efflux, we found a weak positive correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and
water depth (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), though no significant correlation between
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and porosity (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a significant
negative correlation between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and median grain size
(Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. The lack of negative
correlation with porosity is mainly due to SKNT stations, which showed a high
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux at high porosity. Furthermore, the increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes with increasing TOU rates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>) is
an indication of metabolically driven dissolution of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as carbonate
dissolution is fueled by CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> released during organic matter
mineralization, or alternatively, of the increase in the relative importance
of anoxic respiration pathways at high TOU. Metabolic dissolution would
induce a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DIC flux ratio of 1, which is indeed confirmed in
some stations, though not for all (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>). A positive
correlation is obtained between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC fluxes (Spearman; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but there are marked differences in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DIC flux
ratio between different stations, which suggests that a different type of
biogeochemistry is acting at different locations. Below we will discuss in
more detail how different biogeochemical processes in the sediment are
releasing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC in distinct ratios.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Directly measured <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes for the SNS compared to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimations based on Ra measurements. Figure taken from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.54"/>. Fluxes in mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC fluxes for sites of the SNS
from both campaigns. Different lines represent different reaction
stoichiometry. For more explanation and reaction equations, see the text.
Short dashed line: aerobic respiration; dotted line: denitrification;
dotted–dashed line: sulfate reduction coupled to pyrite formation and
burial; long dashed line: carbonate dissolution. Note that the latter two
lines are plotted along similar points and are thus hard to distinguish. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the correlation of all points
displayed in this scatter plot. All fluxes in mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>To our knowledge, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes presented here are the first field
observations of such fluxes in the North Sea area. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.55"/>
estimated sedimentary <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in the southeastern bight of the
North Sea and the Wadden Sea during summer and autumn based exclusively on
water column data. In this approach, the sedimentary <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release
appeared as the unknown closure term in an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget based on water
column data, which provided <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates of about
8.0 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These values are similar to the benthic
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes reported here for the SNS.</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release from sediments has also been the subject of a number of
studies on coastal systems other than the North Sea. Based on basin-wide
budget calculations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.56"/> estimated that sediments of the
Baltic Sea generate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean rate of
2.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is on the same order as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
input by rivers in that basin. As main sources of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, these authors
propose denitrification together with sulfate reduction and/or silicate
weathering. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.57"/> estimated that sediments in the East China Sea
generate between 2.9 and 4.9 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Over
80 % of this <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux was thereby attributed to iron and sulfate
reduction, with no contribution from carbonate dissolution.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.58"/> used a one-dimensional reactive transport model to
estimate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from coastal sediments. For that study, the
authors divided the global shelf into four different environments, each with
distinctive particular organic and inorganic carbon fluxes. Ultimately, they
identified non-carbonate shelves (e.g., the North Sea) as an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
source of 2.7 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>On a global scale, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.59"/> estimated an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux for the
coastal ocean of 29 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Whereas this estimate agrees well with
an independent estimation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.60"/>
(16–31 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.61"/> obtained a much smaller flux of
4–6 Tmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that all these three studies are based on
different assumptions about the underlying processes that are generating
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Whereas the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.62"/> is
mainly generated by sulfate reduction with zero contribution of carbonate
dissolution, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.63"/> acknowledged carbonate dissolution as a
benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source. The estimate of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.64"/> is based on
anaerobic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation alone; hence, possible contributions by
carbonate dissolution are not taken into account. Furthermore, these latter
authors treat the coastal sediment–water column system as a single system,
while the other two papers only consider the sediment.</p>
      <p>To put these different assumptions into perspective, and to verify their
consequences, we now develop an alkalinity budget for the SNS in which we
first provide a sediment budget, and subsequently we extend this argument to
arrive at a combined sediment and water column alkalinity budget. We restrict
this discussion to the SNS, as we have shown in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>
that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in the SNS significantly exceed those of the other
two zones. High primary production, riverine input of terrestrial organic
matter, and the shallow water depth favor a high benthic respiration rate in
the SNS. Furthermore, in the context of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, a direct
link between alkalinity release from the sediments and the atmosphere is
needed, which requires a non-stratified water column as encountered in most
parts of the SNS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Sources of alkalinity in sediments of the SNS</title>
      <p>The high benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effluxes observed in the SNS invoke the
question of which processes generate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sediment. In the
following we will discuss how different biogeochemical pathways contribute to
the overall <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release from sediments, and in this way, we will try
to assemble a closed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget for the SNS seafloor. To this end,
we developed a simplified biogeochemical model of the SNS sediment, which
accounts for carbonate dissolution (CD), aerobic respiration (AR),
nitrification (NI), denitrification (DNF), iron reduction (IR), sulfate
reduction (SR), free sulfide oxidation (SO), and pyrite formation (PF) as
biogeochemical pathways. The input parameters, diagenetic relations, and
output variables are summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DIC flux ratio for each of these reactions is indicated as
a straight line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. In the next paragraphs, we discuss
how the rates of the individual reactions can be constrained based on our
flux measurements and literature data.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Input parameters and rate expressions for all diagentic and pelagic
processes included in our model. Additionally, the impacts of the different
elemental cycles are expressed in percentages. For details on single reaction
rates, see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.9}[.9]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Input parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Expression</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Units</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mineralization rate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerobic respiration fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fraction of DNF supported by NI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pyrite formation fraction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Benthic fluxes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DNF</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Balance statements</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NIT</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NIT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DNF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NIT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pelagic processes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Primary production</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerobic respiration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">36.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.79</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbonate formation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrogen fixation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alkalinity generation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">See text</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Diagenetic processes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbonate dissolution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerobic respiration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AR <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ammonification</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrification</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NIT <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AM</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Denitrification</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DNF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NIT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mn>84.8</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulfate reduction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SR <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AR <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DNF)/(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pyrite formation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> IR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulfide oxidation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Iron reduction</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">IR <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alkalinity generation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">See text</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.32</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total oxygen uptake</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TOU <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AR <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NIT <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Respiratory quotient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RQ <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CD</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TOU</mml:mtext></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> turnover linked to</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbon cycle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> CF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrogen cycle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>84.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DNF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DNF</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IR</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NIT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>WAR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sulfur and iron cycle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phosphor cycle</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AR+DNF+IR+SR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>WAR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In theory, the dissolution of 1 mole of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> releases 2 mole of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming no other processes are acting.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The undersaturation of the pore water with respect to the phases of calcium
carbonate present (e.g., high Mg calcite, aragonite or calcite) determines
the rate at which carbonate will dissolve. In general the undersaturation of
the pore water can have two causes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.65"/>: (1) undersaturation
of the overlying water and (2) additional undersaturation of the pore water
due to metabolic respiration. In the North Sea, the overlying water is always
oversaturated with respect to all common carbonate phases
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.66"/>, and so, dissolution of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
sediment must be exclusively metabolically driven. Both the CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production
during organic matter mineralization as well as the oxidation of reduced
compounds produced during anaerobic respiration processes can make the pore
water undersaturated with respect to carbonates and, therefore, fuel
metabolic driven dissolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.67"/>. The increase in the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes with increasing TOU rates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b)
indeed forms an indication of metabolic driven dissolution of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.68"/>.</p>
      <p>From the flux data set available here, it is not possible to constrain the
actual CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution rate in each station. However, it is still
possible to provide an upper limit for the CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution rate on a
larger geographic scale. Gazeau et al. (personal communication, 2014)
recently estimated carbonate production in the southern North Sea to be
2.7 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Net carbon burial does not occur in the
North Sea, except for small amounts in the Skagerrak and the Norwegian
Channel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.69"/>. Therefore, we consider
carbonate production (in both water column and sediment) and dissolution (in
the sediment) to be in balance with each other. Accordingly, carbonate
dissolution in sediments can release up to 5.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In addition to carbonate
dissolution, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation can be linked to various organic matter
degradation pathways and secondary re-oxidation reactions. In the presence of
oxygen, aerobic respiration is used to break down organic matter:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>148.4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where we assume organic matter (OM) to be of Redfield elemental composition
and follow the classical expression for the composition of organic matter
(CH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (NH<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.70"/>
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.71"/> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.72"/>. This reaction essentially
generates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the consumption of protons linked to ammonium
release, and to a lesser extent, it consumes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the release of
phosphate. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="text.73"/> have estimated that aerobic respiration
accounts for between 5 and 25 % of the total benthic mineralization in
shelf and coastal sediments. If we adopt a value of the benthic
mineralization rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.3 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
is the mean TOU value recorded for the SNS in September 2011
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>; see also the discussion below), we can estimate the
aerobic respiration rate to range between 0.52 and
2.58 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SNS (mean:
1.55 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Accounting for stoichiometry
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the corresponding
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release ranges from 0.09 to 0.37 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
a mean of 0.22 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. A theoretical doubling of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would lead to a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 % increase in the benthic
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux, and to a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 115 % net <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase in
the water column (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>), that is, if <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
only parameter changed and thus the relative importance between different
diagenetic processes remains the same.</p>
      <p>Nitrification of ammonium released during mineralization consumes
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and can be represented by the reaction equation
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Per mole of ammonium that is released during mineralization, exactly 2 mole
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are consumed. If we use the TOU as a proxy for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(10.3 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the rate of ammonification (i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) becomes 1.55 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the SNS.
If all the ammonium is re-oxidized, and hence no ammonium escapes the
sediment, the nitrification rate should match the ammonification rate, and so
the associated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption becomes
3.10 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Also note that complete aerobic respiration,
i.e., the combination of aerobic respiration Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) with
nitrification Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), consumes 17 mole <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per 106 mole
of DIC released.</p>
      <p>Denitrification is a second mineralization pathway via which organic matter
degradation proceeds in the sediment, and can be represented as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>84.8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>99.8</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>42.4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Per mole C in POC (particulate organic carbon) denitrified, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>99.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mole. To discuss the impact of denitrification
on sedimentary <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release, we need to consider the origin of the
nitrate that is used for denitrification. A portion of the nitrate is
internally generated in the sediment through coupled
nitrification–denitrification, while another part of the nitrate is derived
externally (i.e., from the overlying water column). It has been estimated
that these coupled nitrification–denitrification reactions account for
80 % of the total denitrification rates in coastal environments
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx92" id="paren.74"/>, which thus implies that the total
denitrification rate should scale as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times the nitrification rate
(1.55 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This way, we obtain a denitrification
rate of 1.94 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or
2.43 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an associated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release of
2.29 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the North Sea, a tight coupling of
nitrification and denitrification has indeed been reported by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.75"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.76"/>, and observed benthic
denitrification rates in the SNS range from 1.6 to
4.6 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.77"/>, a range that
centrally embraces our estimate here. Note that the coupling of
ammonification, nitrification and subsequently denitrification does not lead
to net production of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only if nitrate is derived from the
overlying water column does one obtain a net production of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the pore water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.78"/>.</p>
      <p>Once nitrate and oxygen are fully consumed, dissimilatory iron reduction and
sulfate reduction are the prevailing respiration pathways (in the SNS we
assume manganese oxides to be a minor electron acceptor, and so we ignore
this pathway).</p>
      <p><disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>53</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>121</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn>53</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>424</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeOOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>863</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn>424</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>742</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Both reactions consume protons, and hence produce <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Per mole C in
POC oxidized, sulfate and iron reduction release 1.14 and 8.14 mole of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. However, to assess the net <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
generation in the sediment, we need to take the fate of the reduced species
into account. The free sulfide that is generated by sulfate reduction can
follow two major pathways. Some of the free sulfide (fraction <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) will react
with the reduced iron liberated by iron reduction to form pyrite. Due to its
thermodynamic stability, pyrite is considered to be the primary sink for both
iron and sulfur on the timescales of early diagenesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.79"/>.
Dissolved iron fluxes between the sediment and the overlying water column are
considered to be low throughout the southern North Sea and are thus ignored
for the following discussion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.80"/>. The overall process of pyrite
formation can be represented by the reaction equation
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>First, reduced iron reacts with HS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to form FeS, and in a second step the
produced FeS reacts with H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S to form pyrite (FeS<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.81"/>. The
remaining part of the free sulfide generated by sulfate reduction (fraction
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is transported upwards towards the oxic zone and re-oxidized with
oxygen:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Both pyrite formation and free sulfide reoxidation consume alkalinity.
However, when combined with the alkalinity impact of sulfate reduction,
pyrite formation results in a net generation of alkalinity, while the
alkalinity consumed in free sulfide reoxidation exactly compensates for the
alkalinity generated during sulfate reduction. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.82"/>
calculated for sediments of Aarhus Bay that the burial of reduced sulfur
accounts for only 20 % of the total sulfate reduction rate, and similar
values are reported in other studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.83"/>. The sediments of SNS are generally coarser and more permeable
than those of Aarhus Bay, which leads to more advection and reoxygenation,
which favors sulfide reoxidation as opposed to pyrite formation. Therefore,
here we adopt a reduced degree of pyrite formation (10 %;
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>).</p>
      <p>Adopting steady state, our simplified diagenetic model provides a set of
linear relations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>), which generate a particular
division of the total organic matter mineralization into aerobic respiration
(15 %), denitrification (24 %), iron reduction (0.4 %), and
sulfate reduction (61 %). These estimates are comparable to the model
analysis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.84"/>, who estimated that sulfate reduction is the
main respiratory pathway on continental shelves, accounting for 77–85 %
of the organic matter mineralization, followed by aerobic respiration
(16 %), denitrification (2–4 %) and iron reduction (0.3–0.7 %).
Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.85"/> estimated that sulfate reduction accounted for
10–53 % of the total organic matter mineralization in the SNS, while a
coupled benthic–pelagic model for the North Sea suggests that up to 30 %
of the organic matter is mineralized using sulfate as the electron acceptor
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.86"/>. The
TOU rate predicted by the model (10.4 mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) agrees well
with the mean TOU observed in the SNS in September 2011 (10.3 mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
but the predicted respiratory coefficient (RQ <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is higher than the observed one
(RQ <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This higher simulated RQ could be due to an overestimate of carbonate
dissolution rate. However, such a reduction of the carbonate dissolution rate would at
the same time lead to a substantial underprediction of the sedimentary alkalinity
release, and so we stick to the carbonate dissolution rate CD <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Accounting for the contributions of all biogeochemical reactions as discussed
in this section above, the total alkalinity generation in the sediment
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>)

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CD</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AR</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>84.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DNF</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>848</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IR</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SR</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NIT</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PF</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Note that all the calculations are based on measurements carried out in June
and September, and thus care should be taken when transferring these rates to
an annual scale. As we assume no alkalinity flux to deeper sediment layers,
the total alkalinity generation in the sediment should match the efflux of
alkalinity across the sediment–water interface. The model predicts a total
alkalinity production <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.32 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
is indeed in good agreement with the mean <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux of
6.60 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as measured in our flux incubations within the
SNS. Positive contributions to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux are due to carbonate
dissolution, aerobic respiration, denitrification, sulfate reduction and iron
reduction, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consumed during nitrification, sulfur
oxidation and pyrite formation. The most dominant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-producing
reaction is carbonate dissolution, followed by sulfate reduction and
denitrification. The most dominant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-consuming reactions are
sulfide oxidation and nitrification. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution of iron
reduction is small and balances that of pyrite formation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>Contribution of different processes to the benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
budget in the SNS. For more details on different reaction rates, see the
text. NI: nitrification; SO: sulfide oxidation; PF: pyrite formation; CD:
carbonate dissolution; DN: denitrification; SR: sulfate reduction; IR:
dissimilatory iron reduction; AR: aerobic respiration. Fluxes in
mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>System-wide alkalinity budget</title>
      <p>Above we have documented how the sediments of the SNS can be a source of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the water column of the SNS. However, before we can estimate
the resulting effect of this benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
dynamics of the southern North Sea, we first need to assess the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
balance of the water column. An efflux of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the sediment does
not necessarily result in an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the whole system, as
in the water column, some biogeochemical processes oppose the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
generation in the sediment. As noted above, the following calculations are
based on measurements in June and September, and hence represent a budget for
this period (not an annual average). Here, we identify carbonate formation
(CF), primary production (PP), aerobic respiration (AR), and nitrogen
fixation (NF) as processes that potentially produce or consume alkalinity in
the water column.</p>
      <p>As shown above, the dissolution of carbonates in the sediment
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) forms a strong source of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the production
of carbonates in the water column has the opposite effect on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>If the annual production of carbonate in the water column matches the
carbonate dissolution in the sediments, there will be no net generation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on a system-wide scale over a whole seasonal cycle. Note however
that when there is a temporal shift in production versus dissolution of
carbonates, these processes may still have
an impact on the coastal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> balance on shorter timescales. Here we assume that no
net burial or export of solid carbonates occurs in the SNS on an annual scale
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx103 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.87"/>. Accordingly, the annual benthic carbonate
dissolution must be fully compensated for by carbonate production in the
water column; hence, carbonate production in the water column will consume
5.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>A second process that consumes alkalinity in the water column is primary
production. This is mostly pelagic, but also benthic in some very shallow
waters of the SNS. If we assume that nitrate is the main nitrogen source,
primary production can be described by the reaction equation

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn>106</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>122</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>17</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>138</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.88"/> estimated primary production in the southern North Sea to
be 199 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, or equally,
45.36 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus producing
7.28 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.89"/>
estimated annual primary production rate, whereas rates estimated in this
study are based on summer measurements. In general, primary production rates
are expected to be greater than the annual average in summer. Aerobic
respiration in the water column can be described by the opposite reaction
equation of primary production (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>). To estimate the total
respiration rate, we need to account for two different sources of the organic
matter that is being respired. The majority of the organic matter is
derived from local primary production, while a smaller part originates from riverine input of terrestrial
compounds. It has been estimated that about 80 % of the locally produced organic matter respires in the
water column, whereas the remaining 20 % sinks down to the sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.90"/>. The
value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as derived in the previous section, compares well with this
assessment, as it comes down to 23 % of the PP value of 45.36 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as estimated above.
The pelagic mineralization rate derived from local net primary production hence becomes 35.06 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Additionally, organic matter input from land also fuels respiration, either in the
water column or in the benthic compartment. The total riverine input of organic matter
in the SNS was estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.91"/> to be in the range of 1.0 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is hence small compared to the local net primary production. Accordingly, the total
respiration rate in the water column must be 36.11 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
thus consuming 5.79 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Finally, the loss of fixed nitrogen due to denitrification in the sediment
can be compensated for by nitrogen fixation in the water column. However, the
salinity of the North Sea is too high for diazotrophic cyanobacteria and too
cold for open ocean cyanobacteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="paren.92"/>. Thus, we consider <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fixation in the North Sea to be negligible.</p>
      <p>Similar to what was done for the sediment, we can define the total alkalinity
generation in the water column <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn>17</mml:mn><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn>17</mml:mn><mml:mn>106</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>AR</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NF</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          which hence leads to a total consumption of 3.92 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Based on the analysis above, we can now write an alkalinity balance for the
combined sediment and water column of the SNS:</p>
      <p><disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E16"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E17"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wc</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>river</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>out</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>In summation of both mass balances, and assuming steady state, the alkalinity
for the complete SNS system comprising both water column and sediment becomes</p>
      <p><disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>river</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>This balance shows input and export processes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> terms) as well as processes that cause
internal alkalinity generation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> terms). The total net generation of alkalinity in the
SNS amounts to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>net</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
or 244 Gmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, the  riverine input  of alkalinity  was estimated
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.93"/> as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>river</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on a
river load compilation for the years 1977 to 2002. Accordingly, the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> export flux from the SNS to the rest of the North Sea (SKNT and
NNS) is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>out</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>river</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wc</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.90 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or 398 Gmol yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Additionally, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Wadden Sea might increase the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget of the SNS. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.94"/>
estimated that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 68 % of the yearly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change in the German Bight is due to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> export from the Wadden Sea. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.95"/>
estimated an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux from the Wadden Sea into the SNS of 9.6 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the important question is whether the
Wadden Sea exports “uncompensated” TA that then drives CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the
SNS. Any net <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation in the Wadden Sea will
generally also induce an atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in that area. If the residence time of the water is sufficiently long, water
masses of the Wadden Sea will be in equilibrium with respect to CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
atmosphere. In this scenario, the net <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation in the Wadden
Sea will be fully compensated for by CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the Wadden Sea, and so
this will not influence the air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
exchange of the SNS. In the absence of reliable estimates, uncompensated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs from the Wadden Sea were ignored in the budget
here, and so the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>river</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> terms for DIC and TA must be interpreted as
inputs from both rivers and the Wadden Sea to the SNS.</p>
      <p>As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>, the different terms that contribute to
net generation of alkalinity in the SNS have been attributed to four
different types of elemental cycling (carbon, nitrogen, sulfur + iron,
phosphate). This analysis reveals that no alkalinity is associated with
carbon and phosphate cycling, but that 26 % can be attributed to sulfur
and iron cycling (i.e., anoxic mineralization taking place in the sediment),
and the remaining 74 % is linked to nitrogen cycling (this part is
dominated by denitrification in the sediment). Sedimentary denitrification is
hence the most prominent driver of net alkalinity generation in the SNS.
Applying our estimated mean denitrification rate
(1.9 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the whole SNS, this implies a removal
of 194 Gmol N yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of bioavailable nitrogen, which is roughly twice
as high as the denitrification estimate of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.96"/> of
119 Gmol N yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the whole North Sea. However, whereas our
estimation covers mainly the summer months, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.97"/> calculated an
annual average rate. Accounting for the fact that the sediments of the SNS
are the prime locations for denitrification, our estimates of denitrification
rates and the associated alkalinity generation rate in the SNS seem to be in
line with previous studies.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets of the water column in the SNS. Bold
arrows: fluxes; dashed arrows: reaction rates. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sed</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: net flux from
the sediments; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>river</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: riverine input; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>out</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: flux into
the NNS/SKNT; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: atmospheric DIC uptake; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: primary
production rate; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>resp</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: aerobic respiration rate; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
carbonate production rate. Unit: mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/13/841/2016/bg-13-841-2016-f13.png"/>

          <p>.</p>
        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Impact on water column $p$CO${}_{2}$ dynamics of the SNS}?><title>Impact on water column <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics of the SNS</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/> shows the associated DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget
of the water column in the SNS. The direction of a CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux between the
surface water and the atmosphere is determined by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient
between water and atmosphere, which is ultimately governed by the ratio of
internal DIC over internal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.98"/>.
As shown above, the net generation of alkalinity amounts to 2.40 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly the net generation
of DIC amounts to 1.0 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As we assume that organic matter burial is negligible, there is no net
internal net DIC generation due to respiration of locally produced organic matter (the respiration of
autochtonous organic matter in both water column and sediment matches the primary production of autochtonous
organic matter in the water column). However, as noted above, riverine input of organic matter, and so
respiration of this organic matter, releases 1.0 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of DIC. At constant atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and retaining a constant alkalinity, one can calculate that the
addition of 1 mole <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
seawater will lead to an addition of 0.85 mole of DIC. This calculation was carried out in R using
the AquaEnv package, utilizing the values of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.99"/> for the
first and second dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.100"/>, and assuming mean parameters
of the SNS for the time of sampling (salinity: 34 PSU; temperature: 16.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
2270 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and an atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of 392 ppm). Accordingly, a net internal alkalinity release of
2.40 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> will hence lead to an associated DIC increase of 1.96 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Of this, 1.0 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is already supplied by internal DIC generation, and so, the remainder
of 0.96 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> will be supplied by CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake from the atmosphere. The CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake for
the SNS as a whole amounts to 98 Gmol C yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is around 14 % of the total CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake of the
entire North Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.101"/>. This value is slightly lower than the estimate by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.102"/>, who calculated that sedimentary <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can potentially facilitate up to 25 % of the
total CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake of the North Sea. This latter estimate was not based on direct flux measurements,
but was derived from an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget for the North Sea, where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation in Wadden Sea sediments was introduced as a closure
term.</p>
      <p>The idea that internal alkalinity generation in the SNS can drive atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is further supported by previous CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> studies, although
significant seasonality has been observed in the atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="text.103"/> reported an uptake of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the months of February to
August (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.52 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the SNS was reported to
be a source of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between September and January
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.60 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.104"/> described the SNS
as a strong source of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with fluxes of 0.8 to
1.7 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in late summer, while on an annual scale,
the SNS was characterized as a sink of CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with an air–sea flux of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to the temporal variability of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, and the seasonal cycles of primary production and respiration,
it is hard to compare these numbers with our calculated CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> air–sea flux
based on internal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation only, but the estimated impact on
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics of the SNS by benthic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release appears to
be on the same order of magnitude as determined in previous studies of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics of the SNS. Overall, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release from
sediments, driven by denitrification and anoxic respiration of organic
matter, seems to play an important role in the atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake of
the North Sea.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank W.-J. Cai and J. Paetsch for their reviews, which greatly improved
the manuscript. Furthermore, the excellent cooperation of the captain and the
crew of R/V <italic>Pelagia</italic> is gratefully acknowledged. We are further
indebted to Marco Houtekamer, Jurian Brasser and Jan Peene for help with the
sampling processing as well as to Alexandra Rao for providing training and
advice prior to the cruises. We also thank Will Burt for providing us with
the data of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> and further input regarding sediment–water
exchange rates. This paper has benefited significantly from fruitful
discussions with Mathilde Hagens. This work was supported by the ZKO program
of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and supported
by the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework
Programme (FP/2007-2013) through ERC grant 306933 to F. J. R. Meysman.
U. Braeckman was financially supported by FWO project no.
G.0033.11.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: G. Herndl</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Archer and Devol(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D. and Devol, A.: Benthic oxygen fluxes on the Washington shelf and
slope: A comparison of in situ microelectrode and chamber flux measurements,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 614–629, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bauer et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, J. E., Cai, W.-J., Raymond, P. A., Bianchi, T. S., Hopkinson, C. S., and
Regnier, P. A.: The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean, Nature, 504,
61–70, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Berelson et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Berelson, W., McManus, J., Coale, K., Johnson, K., Burdige, D., Kilgore, T.,
Colodner, D., Chavez, F., Kudela, R., and Boucher, J.: A time series of
benthic flux measurements from Monterey Bay, CA, Cont. Shelf Res.,
23, 457–481, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Berner and Westrich(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Berner, R. A. and Westrich, J. T.: Bioturbation and the early diagenesis of
carbon and sulfur, Am. J. Sci., 285, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2475/ajs.285.3.193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.285.3.193</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Boetius and Damm(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Boetius, A. and Damm, E.: Benthic oxygen uptake, hydrolytic potentials and
microbial biomass at the Arctic continental slope, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
45, 239–275, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Boon et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Boon, A., Duineveld, G., Berghuis, E., and Van der Weele, J.: Relationships
between benthic activity and the annual phytopigment cycle in near-bottom
water and sediments in the southern North Sea, Estuar. Coast. Shelf
S., 46, 1–13, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Borges and Frankignoulle(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Borges, A. V. and Frankignoulle, M.: Distribution of surface carbon dioxide
and air-sea exchange in the English Channel and adjacent areas, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, 2156–2209, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Boudreau et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Boudreau, B. P., Middelburg, J. J., Hofmann, A. F., and Meysman, F. J.:
Ongoing transients in carbonate compensation, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
24, GB4010, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003654" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003654</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bozec et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Elkalay, K., and de Baar, H. J.: The continental shelf
pump for CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the North Sea-evidence from summer observation, Mar.
Chem., 93, 131–147, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bozec et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Borges, A. V., Elkalay, K., and
De Baar, H. J.: Assessment of the processes controlling the seasonal
variations of dissolved inorganic carbon in the North Sea, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 51, 2746–2762, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Braeckman et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Braeckman, U., Foshtomi, M. Y., Van Gansbeke, D., Meysman, F., Soetaert, K.,
Vincx, M., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Variable importance of macrofaunal
functional biodiversity for biogeochemical cycling in temperate coastal
sediments, Ecosystems, 17, 720–737, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Brasse et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Brasse, S., Reimer, A., Seifert, R., and Michaelis, W.: The influence of
intertidal mudflats on the dissolved inorganic carbon and total alkalinity
distribution in the German Bight, southeastern North Sea, J. Sea
Res., 42, 93–103, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(99)00020-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1385-1101(99)00020-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Burt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Burt, W., Thomas, H., Pätsch, J., Omar, A., Schrum, C., Daewel, U.,
Brenner, H., and Baar, H.: Radium isotopes as a tracer of sediment-water
column exchange in the North Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28,
786–804, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Cai and Sayles(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W.-J. and Sayles, F. L.: Oxygen penetration depths and fluxes in marine
sediments, Mar. Chem., 52, 123–131, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Cai et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Cai, W.-J., Dai, M., and Wang, Y.: Air-sea exchange of carbon dioxide in ocean
margins: A province-based synthesis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026219</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Chen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-T. A.: Shelf-vs. dissolution-generated alkalinity above the chemical
lysocline, Deep-Sea Res. Part II, 49,
5365–5375, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Chen and Borges(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C.-T. A. and Borges, A. V.: Reconciling opposing views on carbon cycling
in the coastal ocean: Continental shelves as sinks and near-shore ecosystems
as sources of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 578–590, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Chen and Wang(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-T. A. and Wang, S.-L.: Carbon, alkalinity and nutrient budgets on the
East China Sea continental shelf, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 20675–20686, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Cramer(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Cramer, A.: Seasonal variation in benthic metabolic activity in a frontal
system in the North Sea, Trophic relationships, 54–76, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Dauwe(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B.: Organic matter quality in North Sea sediments, PhD thesis,
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>de Haas and van Weering(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
de Haas, H. and van Weering, T. C.: Recent sediment accumulation, organic
carbon burial and transport in the northeastern North Sea, Mar. Geol.,
136, 173–187, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>de Haas et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
de Haas, H., van Weering,
T. C., and de Stigter, H.: Organic carbon in shelf seas: sinks or sources,
processes and products, Cont. Shelf Res., 22, 691–717,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>DelValls and Dickson(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
DelValls, T. and Dickson, A.: The pH of buffers based on
2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1, 3-propanediol (“tris”) in synthetic sea
water, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 45,
1541–1554, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Denman and Pena(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Denman, K. and Pena, M.: The response of two coupled one-dimensional mixed
layer/planktonic ecosystem models to climate change in the NE subarctic
Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
49, 5739–5757, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Devol and Christensen(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Devol, A. H. and Christensen, J. P.: Benthic fluxes and nitrogen cycling in
sediments of the continental margin of the eastern North Pacific, J.
Mar. Res., 51, 345–372, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Dickson et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Dickson, A. G., Sabine, C. L., Christian, J. R.: Guide to best
practices for ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, no. 3 in PICES Special Publication,
North Pacific Marine Science Organization, Sidney, British Columbia, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Egleston et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Egleston, E. S., Sabine, C. L., and Morel, F. M.: Revelle revisited: Buffer
factors that quantify the response of ocean chemistry to changes in DIC and
alkalinity, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003407</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Elliott et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Elliott, A., Clarke, T., and Li, Z.: Monthly distributions of surface and
bottom temperatures in the northwest European shelf seas, Cont. Shelf
Res., 11, 453–466, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Fennel(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Fennel, K.: The role of continental shelves in nitrogen and carbon cycling:
Northwestern North Atlantic case study, Ocean Sci., 6, 539–548,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/os-6-539-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-6-539-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Franco et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Franco, M. d. A., Vanaverbeke, J., Van Oevelen, D., Soetaert, K., Costa, M. J.,
Vincx, M., and Moens, T.: Respiration partitioning in contrasting subtidal
sediments: seasonality and response to a spring phytoplankton deposition,
Mar. Ecol., 31, 276–290, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Frankignoulle(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Frankignoulle, M.: A complete set of buffer factors for acid/base CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
system
in seawater, J.  Marine Syst., 5, 111–118, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Frankignoulle et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Frankignoulle, M., Abril, G., Borges, A., Bourge, I., Canon, C., Delille, B.,
Libert, E., and Théate, J.-M.: Carbon dioxide emission from European
estuaries, Science, 282, 434–436, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Friedl et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Friedl, G., Dinkel, C., and Wehrli, B.: Benthic fluxes of nutrients in the
northwestern Black Sea, Mar. Chem., 62, 77–88, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Gattuso et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Gattuso, J.-P., Frankignoulle, M., and Wollast, R.: Carbon and carbonate
metabolism in coastal aquatic ecosystems, Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics, 29, 405–434, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Glud(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Glud, R. N.: Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4,
243–289, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Grasshoff et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of
seawater analysis,
John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Grebmeier and McRoy(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Grebmeier, J. M. and McRoy, C. P.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the shelf of
the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. 111. Benthic food supply and carbon
cycling, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 53, 79–91, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Gustafsson and Stigebrandt(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Gustafsson, B. and Stigebrandt, A.: Dynamics of the freshwater-influenced
surface layers in the Skagerrak, J. Sea Res., 35, 39–53, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Gustafsson et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Gustafsson, E., Wällstedt, T., Humborg, C., Mörth, C.-M., and
Gustafsson, B. G.: External total alkalinity loads versus internal
generation: The influence of nonriverine alkalinity sources in the Baltic
Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 1358–1370, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Hartnett et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Hartnett, H., Boehme, S., Thomas, C., DeMaster, D., and Smith, C.: Benthic
oxygen fluxes and denitrification rates from high-resolution porewater
profiles from the Western Antarctic Peninsula continental shelf, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. II, 55, 2415–2424, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Hebbeln et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Hebbeln, D., Scheurle, C., and Lamy, F.: Depositional history of the Helgoland
mud area, German Bight, North Sea, Geo-Mar. Lett., 23, 81–90, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Hofmann et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Hofmann, A. F., Soetaert, K., Middelburg, J. J., and Meysman, F. J. R.: AquaEnv
: An Aquatic Acid-Base Modelling Environment in R, Aquat. Geochem.,
16, 507–546, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Hu and Cai(2011a)</label><mixed-citation>Hu, X. and Cai, W.-J.: An assessment of ocean margin anaerobic processes on
oceanic alkalinity budget, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003859" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003859</ext-link>,
2011a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Hu and Cai(2011b)</label><mixed-citation>Hu, X. and Cai, W.-J.: The impact of denitrification on the atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake potential of seawater, Mar. Chem., 127, 192–198,
2011b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Huettel and Gust(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M. and Gust, G.: Solute release mechanisms from confined sediment
cores in stirred benthic chambers and flume flows, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 82, 187–197, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Huettel and Rusch(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M. and Rusch, A.: Transport and degradation of phytoplankton in
permeable sediment, Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 534–549, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Hydes et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Hydes, D., Kelly-Gerreyn, B., Le Gall, A., and Proctor, R.: The balance of
supply of nutrients and demands of biological production and denitrification
in a temperate latitude shelf sea – a treatment of the southern North Sea as
an extended estuary, Mar. Chem., 68, 117–131, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Jahnke and Jahnke(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A. and Jahnke, D. B.: Calcium carbonate dissolution in deep sea
sediments: reconciling microelectrode, pore water and benthic flux chamber
results, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 68, 47–59, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Jahnke et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A., Craven, D. B., and Gaillard, J.-F.: The influence of organic
matter diagenesis on CaCO 3 dissolution at the deep-sea floor, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 2799–2809, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Janssen et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Janssen, F., Faerber, P., Huettel, M., Meyer, V., and Witte, U.: Pore-water
advection and solute fluxes in permeable marine sediments(I): Calibration and
performance of the novel benthic chamber system Sandy, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 50, 768–778, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Joint and Pomroy(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Joint, I. and Pomroy, A.: Phytoplankton biomass and production in the southern
North Sea, North East Atlantic Marine Research Programme, Great Britain,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Jönsson et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Jönsson, B. F., Salisbury, J. E., and Mahadevan, A.: Large variability in
continental shelf production of phytoplankton carbon revealed by satellite,
Biogeosciences, 8, 1213–1223, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1213-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-1213-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Jørgensen(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: The sulfur cycle of a coastal marine sediment
(Limfjorden, Denmark) , Limnol. Oceanogr., 22, 814–832, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Jørgensen et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B., Bang, M., and Blackburn, T. H.: Anaerobic mineralization
in marine-sediments from the Baltic-Sea-North-Sea transition, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 59, 39–54, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Kitidis et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Kitidis, V., Hardman-Mountford, N. J., Litt, E., Brown, I., Cummings, D.,
Hartman, S., Hydes, D., Fishwick, J. R., Harris, C., Martinez-Vicente, V.,
and Woodward, E. M. S.: Seasonal dynamics of the carbonate system in the
Western English
Channel, Cont. Shelf Res., 42, 30–40, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Krumins et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Krumins, V., Gehlen, M., Arndt, S., Van Cappellen, P., and Regnier, P.:
Dissolved inorganic carbon and alkalinity fluxes from coastal marine
sediments: model estimates for different shelf environments and sensitivity
to global change, Biogeosciences, 10, 371–398, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-371-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-371-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Kühn et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Kühn, W., Pätsch, J., Thomas, H., Borges, A. V., Schiettecatte, L.-S.,
Bozec, Y., and Prowe, A. F.: Nitrogen and carbon cycling in the North Sea
and exchange with the North Atlantic – A model study, Part II: Carbon budget
and fluxes, Cont. Shelf Res., 30, 1701–1716, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Lansard et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Lansard, B., Rabouille, C., Denis, L., and Grenz, C.: In
situ oxygen uptake rates by coastal sediments under the influence of the
Rhône River (NW
Mediterranean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 1501–1510, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Larsen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Larsen, M., Thamdrup, B., Shimmield, T., and Glud, R. N.:
Benthic
mineralization and solute exchange on a Celtic Sea sand-bank (Jones Bank),
Prog.  Oceanogr., 117, 64–75, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Lehrter et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehrter, J. C., Beddick, D. L., Devereux, R., Yates, D. F.,
and Murrell, M. C.:
Sediment-water fluxes of dissolved inorganic carbon, O2, nutrients, and N2
from the hypoxic region of the Louisiana continental shelf, Biogeochemistry,
109, 233–252, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Lenhart and Pohlmann(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Lenhart, H. and Pohlmann, T.: The ICES-boxes approach in relation to results
of a North Sea circulation model, Tellus A, 49, 139–160, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Lohse et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Lohse, L., Malschaert, J. F. P., Slomp, C. P., Helder, W., and
van Raaphorst,
W.: Nitrogen cycling in North Sea sediments: interaction of denitrification
and nitrification in offshore and coastal areas, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 101, 283–283, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Lohse et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lohse, L., Kloosterhuis, H. T., Van Raaphorst, W., and Helder, W.:
Denitrification rates as measured by the isotope pairing method and by the
acetylene inhibition technique in continental shelf sediments of the North
Sea, Marine ecology progress series, Oldendorf, 132, 169–179, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Lüders(1955)</label><mixed-citation>
Lüders, K.: Sediments of the North Sea, Special Publications of SEPM,
Wilhelmshaven, Germany, 1955.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Luff and Moll(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Luff, R. and Moll, A.: Seasonal dynamics of the North Sea sediments using a
three-dimensional coupled sediment-water model system, Cont. Shelf
Res., 24, 1099–1127, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Meysman et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Meysman, F. J. R., Galaktionov, O. S., Cook, P. L. M., Janssen, F., Huettel,
M., and Middelburg, J. J.: Quantifying biologically and physically induced
flow and tracer dynamics in permeable sediments, Biogeosciences, 4, 627–646,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-627-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-627-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Middelburg et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H.:
Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 661–673, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Millero et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Millero, F. J., Graham, T. B., Huang, F., Bustos-Serrano, H.,
and Pierrot, D.:
Dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater as a function of salinity
and temperature, Mar. Chem., 100, 80–94, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Moll(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Moll, A.: Regional distribution of primary production in the North Sea
simulated by a three-dimensional model, J. Marine Syst., 16,
151–170, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Moore et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, W., Beck, M., Riedel, T., van der Loeff, M. R., Dellwig, O., Shaw,
T. J., Schnetger, B., and Brumsack, H.-J.: Radium-based pore water fluxes of
silica, alkalinity, manganese, DOC, and uranium: A decade of studies in the
German Wadden Sea, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 6535–6555, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Nedwell et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Nedwell, D., Parkes, R., Upton, A., and Assinder, D.:
Seasonal fluxes across
the sediment-water interface, and processes within sediments, Philos.
T. R. S.-A., 343, 519–529, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Nordi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Nordi, G., Debes, H., and Christensen, J. T.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the
Faroe shelf: a pilot study, Tech. rep., Faroe Marine Research Institute,
Tórshavn, Faroe Island, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Osinga et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Osinga, R., Kop, A. J., Duineveld, G. C. A., Prins, R. A.,
Duyl, F. C. V., and
Fleur, C.: Benthic mineralization rates at two locations in the southern
North Sea, J. Sea Res., 36, 181–191, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Pätsch and Kühn(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Pätsch, J. and Kühn, W.: Nitrogen and carbon cycling in the North Sea
and exchange with the North Atlantic – a model study. Part I. Nitrogen budget
and fluxes, Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 767–787, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Paulmier et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Paulmier, A., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.: Stoichiometries of
remineralisation and denitrification in global biogeochemical ocean models,
Biogeosciences, 6, 923–935, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-923-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Provoost et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Provoost, P., Heuven, S. V., Soetaert, K., Laane, R. W. P. M., Middelburg,
J. J., and van Heuven, S.: Seasonal and long-term changes in pH in the Dutch
coastal zone, Biogeosciences, 7, 3869–3878, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3869-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-3869-2010</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Provoost et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Provoost, P., Braeckman, U., Van Gansbeke, D., Moodley, L., Soetaert, K.,
Middelburg, J. J., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Modelling benthic oxygen consumption
and benthic-pelagic coupling at a shallow station in the southern North Sea,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 120, 1–11, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Radach and Moll(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Radach, G. and Moll, A.: Estimation of the variability of production by
simulating annual cycles of phytoplankton in the central North Sea, Prog.
Oceanogr., 31, 339–419, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Rao et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, A. M., Polerecky, L., Ionescu, D., Meysman, F. J. R., and
De Beer, D.:
The influence of pore-water advection, benthic photosynthesis, and
respiration on calcium carbonate dynamics in reef sands, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 57, 809–825, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Rao et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, A. M., Malkin, S. Y., Montserrat, F., and Meysman, F. J.: Alkalinity
production in intertidal sands intensified by lugworm bioirrigation,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 148, 36–47, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Redfield(1958)</label><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The biological control of chemical factors in the
environment, Am. Sci., 46, 230A–221, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Regnier et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Regnier, P., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Mackenzie, F. T., Gruber, N.,
Janssens, I. A., Laruelle, G. G., Lauerwald, R., Luyssaert, S., Andersson, A.
J., and Arndt, S.: Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land
to
ocean, Nat. Geosci., 6, 597–607, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Reid and Edwards(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, P. C. and Edwards, M.: Long-term changes in the pelagos, benthos and
fisheries of the North Sea, Senck. Marit., 31, 107–115, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Richards(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
Richards, F.: Anoxic basins and Fjords In Chemical Oceanography, 611–643,
edited by: Richards, F. A., Ripley, J. P., and Skirrow, G., 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Rodhe(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodhe, J.: The large-scale circulation in the Skagerrak; interpretation of
some observations, Tellus A, 39, 245–253, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Rodhe(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodhe, J.: On the dynamics of the large-scale circulation of the Skagerrak,
J. Sea Res., 35, 9–21, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Santschi et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Santschi, P. H., Anderson, R. F., Fleisher, M. Q., and Bowles, W.:
Measurements of diffusive sublayer thicknesses in the ocean by alabaster
dissolution, and their implications for the measurements of benthic fluxes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 96, 10641–10657,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Schiettecatte et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Schiettecatte, L.-S., Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., and
Borges, A.: High temporal
coverage of carbon dioxide measurements in the Southern Bight of the North
Sea, Mar. Chem., 106, 161–173, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Schlüter and Jerosch(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Schlüter, M. and Jerosch, K.: Digital Atlas of the North Sea, Alfred
Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Schrum et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schrum, C., Alekseeva, I., and John, M. S.: Development of a coupled
physical–biological ecosystem model ECOSMO: part I: model description and
validation for the North Sea, J. Marine Syst., 61, 79–99, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Schwichtenberg(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwichtenberg, F.: Drivers of the carbonate system variability in the southern
North Sea: River input, anaerobic alkalinity generation in the Wadden Sea and
internal processes, PhD thesis, Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und
Naturwissenschaften im Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Universität
Hamburg, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Seitzinger et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J., Bouwman, A., Lowrance, R.,
Peterson, B., Tobias, C., and Drecht, G. V.: Denitrification across
landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 16,
2064–2090, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Shum(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Shum, K.: Wave-induced advective transport below a rippled water-sediment
interface, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 97,
789–808, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Slomp et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Slomp, C., Malschaert, J., Lohse, L., and Van Raaphorst, W.:
Iron and manganese
cycling in different sedimentary environments on the North Sea continental
margin, Cont. Shelf Res., 17, 1083–1117, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Smith Jr.(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Smith Jr., K.: Oxygen demands of San Diego Trough sediments: an in situ
study,
Limnol. Oceanogr, 19, 939–944, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Soetaert et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K., Petzoldt, T., and Meysman, F. J. R.: marelac: Tools for Aquatic
Sciences, NIOO-KNAW, Yerseke, the Netherlands, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Stal(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Stal, L. J.: Is the distribution of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in the oceans
related to temperature?, Environ. Microbiol., 11, 1632–1645, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Tengberg et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Tengberg, A., Hall, P. O. J., Andersson, U., Lindén, B., Styrenius, O.,
Boland, G., de Bovee, F., Carlsson, B., Ceradini, S., Devol, A., and
Duineveld, G.:
Intercalibration of benthic flux chambers, Mar. Chem., 1, 147–173,
2005.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Thamdrup and Canfield(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Canfield, D. E.: Benthic respiration in aquatic sediments, in:
Methods in ecosystem science,   Springer, New York,  86–103, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Thamdrup et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B., Fossing, H., and Jørgensen, B. B.:
Manganese, iron and sulfur
cycling in a coastal marine sediment, Aarhus Bay, Denmark, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 5115–5129, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Therkildsen and Lomstein(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Therkildsen, M. S. and Lomstein, B. A.: Seasonal variation in net benthic
C-mineralization in a shallow estuary, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 12,
131–142, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Thomas et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., Elkalay, K., and de Baar, H. J. W.: Enhanced open ocean
storage of CO2 from shelf sea pumping, Science, 304,
1005–1008, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Thomas et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., de Baar, H. J. W., Elkalay, K., Frankignoulle, M.,
Schiettecatte, L.-S., Kattner, G., and Borges, A. V.: The carbon budget of
the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 2, 87–96, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-87-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2-87-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Thomas et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, H., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Suykens, K., Koné, Y. J. M., Shadwick,
E. H., Prowe, A. E. F., Bozec, Y., de Baar, H. J. W., and Borges, A. V.:
Enhanced ocean carbon storage from anaerobic alkalinity generation in coastal
sediments, Biogeosciences, 6, 267–274, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-267-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-267-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Trimmer et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M., Nedwell, D., Sivyer, D., and Malcolm, S.: Seasonal benthic
organic matter mineralisation measured by oxygen uptake and denitrification
along a transect of the inner and outer River Thames estuary, UK, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 197, 103–119, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Trimmer et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M., Petersen, J., Sivyer, D., Mills, C., Young, E., and Parker, E.:
Impact of long-term benthic trawl disturbance on sediment sorting and
biogeochemistry in the southern North Sea, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
298, 79–94, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Upton(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Upton, A.: Seasonal benthic microbial activity in the southern North Sea;
oxygen uptake and sulphate reduction, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 101, 273–281,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Van der Molen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Van der Molen, J.: The influence of tides, wind and waves on the net sand
transport in the North Sea, Con. Shelf Res., 22, 2739–2762,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Van Duyl et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Duyl, F. C., Bak, R. P., Kop, A. J., Nieuwland, G., Berghuis, E. M., and
Kok, A.: Mesocosm experiments: mimicking seasonal developments of microbial
variables in North Sea sediments, Hydrobiologia, 235, 267–281, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Van Raaphorst et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Raaphorst, W., Kloosterhuis, H. T., Cramer, A., and Bakker, K. J.:
Nutrient early diagenesis in the sandy sediments of the Dogger Bank area,
North Sea: Pore water results, Neth. J. Sea Res., 26,
25–52, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Weston et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Weston, K., Fernand, L., Nicholls, J., Marca-Bell, A., Mills, D., Sivyer, D.,
and Trimmer, M.: Sedimentary and water column processes in the Oyster
Grounds: a potentially hypoxic region of the North Sea, Mar. Environ.
Res., 65, 235–249, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Wilde et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Wilde, P., Berghuis, E., and Kok, A.: Structure and energy demand of the
benthic community of the Oyster Ground, central North Sea, Neth.  J. Sea
Res., 18, 143–159, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(84)90029-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0077-7579(84)90029-2</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Witte and Pfannkuche(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Witte, U. and Pfannkuche, O.: High rates of benthic carbon remineralisation
in
the abyssal Arabian Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 2785–2804, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The impact of sedimentary alkalinity release on the water column CO<sub>2</sub> system in the North Sea</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">It has been previously proposed that alkalinity release from sediments can
play an important role in the carbonate dynamics on continental shelves,
lowering the <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> of seawater and hence increasing the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake
from the atmosphere. To test this hypothesis, sedimentary alkalinity
generation was quantified within cohesive and permeable sediments across the
North Sea during two cruises in September 2011 (basin-wide) and June 2012
(Dutch coastal zone). Benthic fluxes of oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>), alkalinity
(<i>A</i><sub>T</sub>) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) were determined using
shipboard closed sediment incubations. Our results show that sediments can
form an important source of alkalinity for the overlying water, particularly
in the shallow southern North Sea, where high <i>A</i><sub>T</sub> and DIC fluxes
were recorded in near-shore sediments of the Belgian, Dutch and German
coastal zone. In contrast, fluxes of <i>A</i><sub>T</sub> and DIC are substantially
lower in the deeper, seasonally stratified, northern part of the North Sea.
Based on the data collected, we performed a model analysis to constrain the
main pathways of alkalinity generation in the sediment, and to quantify how
sedimentary alkalinity drives atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in the southern North
Sea. Overall, our results show that sedimentary alkalinity generation should
be regarded as a key component in the CO<sub>2</sub> dynamics of shallow coastal
systems.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Archer and Devol(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D. and Devol, A.: Benthic oxygen fluxes on the Washington shelf and
slope: A comparison of in situ microelectrode and chamber flux measurements,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 614–629, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bauer et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, J. E., Cai, W.-J., Raymond, P. A., Bianchi, T. S., Hopkinson, C. S., and
Regnier, P. A.: The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean, Nature, 504,
61–70, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Berelson et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Berelson, W., McManus, J., Coale, K., Johnson, K., Burdige, D., Kilgore, T.,
Colodner, D., Chavez, F., Kudela, R., and Boucher, J.: A time series of
benthic flux measurements from Monterey Bay, CA, Cont. Shelf Res.,
23, 457–481, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Berner and Westrich(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, R. A. and Westrich, J. T.: Bioturbation and the early diagenesis of
carbon and sulfur, Am. J. Sci., 285, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2475/ajs.285.3.193" target="_blank">doi:10.2475/ajs.285.3.193</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Boetius and Damm(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Boetius, A. and Damm, E.: Benthic oxygen uptake, hydrolytic potentials and
microbial biomass at the Arctic continental slope, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
45, 239–275, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boon et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Boon, A., Duineveld, G., Berghuis, E., and Van der Weele, J.: Relationships
between benthic activity and the annual phytopigment cycle in near-bottom
water and sediments in the southern North Sea, Estuar. Coast. Shelf
S., 46, 1–13, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Borges and Frankignoulle(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Borges, A. V. and Frankignoulle, M.: Distribution of surface carbon dioxide
and air-sea exchange in the English Channel and adjacent areas, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, 2156–2209, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Boudreau et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Boudreau, B. P., Middelburg, J. J., Hofmann, A. F., and Meysman, F. J.:
Ongoing transients in carbonate compensation, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
24, GB4010, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003654" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GB003654</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bozec et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Elkalay, K., and de Baar, H. J.: The continental shelf
pump for CO<sub>2</sub> in the North Sea-evidence from summer observation, Mar.
Chem., 93, 131–147, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bozec et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Bozec, Y., Thomas, H., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Borges, A. V., Elkalay, K., and
De Baar, H. J.: Assessment of the processes controlling the seasonal
variations of dissolved inorganic carbon in the North Sea, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 51, 2746–2762, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Braeckman et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Braeckman, U., Foshtomi, M. Y., Van Gansbeke, D., Meysman, F., Soetaert, K.,
Vincx, M., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Variable importance of macrofaunal
functional biodiversity for biogeochemical cycling in temperate coastal
sediments, Ecosystems, 17, 720–737, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brasse et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Brasse, S., Reimer, A., Seifert, R., and Michaelis, W.: The influence of
intertidal mudflats on the dissolved inorganic carbon and total alkalinity
distribution in the German Bight, southeastern North Sea, J. Sea
Res., 42, 93–103, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(99)00020-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1385-1101(99)00020-9</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Burt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Burt, W., Thomas, H., Pätsch, J., Omar, A., Schrum, C., Daewel, U.,
Brenner, H., and Baar, H.: Radium isotopes as a tracer of sediment-water
column exchange in the North Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28,
786–804, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Cai and Sayles(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W.-J. and Sayles, F. L.: Oxygen penetration depths and fluxes in marine
sediments, Mar. Chem., 52, 123–131, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Cai et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W.-J., Dai, M., and Wang, Y.: Air-sea exchange of carbon dioxide in ocean
margins: A province-based synthesis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026219" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006GL026219</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Chen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-T. A.: Shelf-vs. dissolution-generated alkalinity above the chemical
lysocline, Deep-Sea Res. Part II, 49,
5365–5375, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Chen and Borges(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-T. A. and Borges, A. V.: Reconciling opposing views on carbon cycling
in the coastal ocean: Continental shelves as sinks and near-shore ecosystems
as sources of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 578–590, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Chen and Wang(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-T. A. and Wang, S.-L.: Carbon, alkalinity and nutrient budgets on the
East China Sea continental shelf, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 20675–20686, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Cramer(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Cramer, A.: Seasonal variation in benthic metabolic activity in a frontal
system in the North Sea, Trophic relationships, 54–76, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Dauwe(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B.: Organic matter quality in North Sea sediments, PhD thesis,
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>de Haas and van Weering(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
de Haas, H. and van Weering, T. C.: Recent sediment accumulation, organic
carbon burial and transport in the northeastern North Sea, Mar. Geol.,
136, 173–187, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>de Haas et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
de Haas, H., van Weering,
T. C., and de Stigter, H.: Organic carbon in shelf seas: sinks or sources,
processes and products, Cont. Shelf Res., 22, 691–717,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>DelValls and Dickson(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
DelValls, T. and Dickson, A.: The pH of buffers based on
2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1, 3-propanediol (“tris”) in synthetic sea
water, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 45,
1541–1554, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Denman and Pena(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Denman, K. and Pena, M.: The response of two coupled one-dimensional mixed
layer/planktonic ecosystem models to climate change in the NE subarctic
Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
49, 5739–5757, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Devol and Christensen(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Devol, A. H. and Christensen, J. P.: Benthic fluxes and nitrogen cycling in
sediments of the continental margin of the eastern North Pacific, J.
Mar. Res., 51, 345–372, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Dickson et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Dickson, A. G., Sabine, C. L., Christian, J. R.: Guide to best
practices for ocean CO<sub>2</sub> measurements, no. 3 in PICES Special Publication,
North Pacific Marine Science Organization, Sidney, British Columbia, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Egleston et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Egleston, E. S., Sabine, C. L., and Morel, F. M.: Revelle revisited: Buffer
factors that quantify the response of ocean chemistry to changes in DIC and
alkalinity, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB1002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003407" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GB003407</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Elliott et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Elliott, A., Clarke, T., and Li, Z.: Monthly distributions of surface and
bottom temperatures in the northwest European shelf seas, Cont. Shelf
Res., 11, 453–466, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Fennel(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Fennel, K.: The role of continental shelves in nitrogen and carbon cycling:
Northwestern North Atlantic case study, Ocean Sci., 6, 539–548,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/os-6-539-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/os-6-539-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Franco et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Franco, M. d. A., Vanaverbeke, J., Van Oevelen, D., Soetaert, K., Costa, M. J.,
Vincx, M., and Moens, T.: Respiration partitioning in contrasting subtidal
sediments: seasonality and response to a spring phytoplankton deposition,
Mar. Ecol., 31, 276–290, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Frankignoulle(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Frankignoulle, M.: A complete set of buffer factors for acid/base CO<sub>2</sub>
system
in seawater, J.  Marine Syst., 5, 111–118, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Frankignoulle et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Frankignoulle, M., Abril, G., Borges, A., Bourge, I., Canon, C., Delille, B.,
Libert, E., and Théate, J.-M.: Carbon dioxide emission from European
estuaries, Science, 282, 434–436, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Friedl et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Friedl, G., Dinkel, C., and Wehrli, B.: Benthic fluxes of nutrients in the
northwestern Black Sea, Mar. Chem., 62, 77–88, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Gattuso et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Gattuso, J.-P., Frankignoulle, M., and Wollast, R.: Carbon and carbonate
metabolism in coastal aquatic ecosystems, Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics, 29, 405–434, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Glud(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Glud, R. N.: Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4,
243–289, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Grasshoff et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M.: Methods of
seawater analysis,
John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Grebmeier and McRoy(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Grebmeier, J. M. and McRoy, C. P.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the shelf of
the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. 111. Benthic food supply and carbon
cycling, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 53, 79–91, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Gustafsson and Stigebrandt(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Gustafsson, B. and Stigebrandt, A.: Dynamics of the freshwater-influenced
surface layers in the Skagerrak, J. Sea Res., 35, 39–53, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Gustafsson et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Gustafsson, E., Wällstedt, T., Humborg, C., Mörth, C.-M., and
Gustafsson, B. G.: External total alkalinity loads versus internal
generation: The influence of nonriverine alkalinity sources in the Baltic
Sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 1358–1370, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Hartnett et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Hartnett, H., Boehme, S., Thomas, C., DeMaster, D., and Smith, C.: Benthic
oxygen fluxes and denitrification rates from high-resolution porewater
profiles from the Western Antarctic Peninsula continental shelf, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. II, 55, 2415–2424, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Hebbeln et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Hebbeln, D., Scheurle, C., and Lamy, F.: Depositional history of the Helgoland
mud area, German Bight, North Sea, Geo-Mar. Lett., 23, 81–90, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Hofmann et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Hofmann, A. F., Soetaert, K., Middelburg, J. J., and Meysman, F. J. R.: AquaEnv
: An Aquatic Acid-Base Modelling Environment in R, Aquat. Geochem.,
16, 507–546, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Hu and Cai(2011a)</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, X. and Cai, W.-J.: An assessment of ocean margin anaerobic processes on
oceanic alkalinity budget, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3003, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003859" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GB003859</a>,
2011a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Hu and Cai(2011b)</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, X. and Cai, W.-J.: The impact of denitrification on the atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub>
uptake potential of seawater, Mar. Chem., 127, 192–198,
2011b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Huettel and Gust(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M. and Gust, G.: Solute release mechanisms from confined sediment
cores in stirred benthic chambers and flume flows, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 82, 187–197, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Huettel and Rusch(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Huettel, M. and Rusch, A.: Transport and degradation of phytoplankton in
permeable sediment, Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 534–549, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Hydes et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Hydes, D., Kelly-Gerreyn, B., Le Gall, A., and Proctor, R.: The balance of
supply of nutrients and demands of biological production and denitrification
in a temperate latitude shelf sea – a treatment of the southern North Sea as
an extended estuary, Mar. Chem., 68, 117–131, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Jahnke and Jahnke(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A. and Jahnke, D. B.: Calcium carbonate dissolution in deep sea
sediments: reconciling microelectrode, pore water and benthic flux chamber
results, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 68, 47–59, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Jahnke et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A., Craven, D. B., and Gaillard, J.-F.: The influence of organic
matter diagenesis on CaCO 3 dissolution at the deep-sea floor, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 2799–2809, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Janssen et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Janssen, F., Faerber, P., Huettel, M., Meyer, V., and Witte, U.: Pore-water
advection and solute fluxes in permeable marine sediments(I): Calibration and
performance of the novel benthic chamber system Sandy, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 50, 768–778, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Joint and Pomroy(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Joint, I. and Pomroy, A.: Phytoplankton biomass and production in the southern
North Sea, North East Atlantic Marine Research Programme, Great Britain,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Jönsson et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Jönsson, B. F., Salisbury, J. E., and Mahadevan, A.: Large variability in
continental shelf production of phytoplankton carbon revealed by satellite,
Biogeosciences, 8, 1213–1223, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1213-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-8-1213-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Jørgensen(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: The sulfur cycle of a coastal marine sediment
(Limfjorden, Denmark) , Limnol. Oceanogr., 22, 814–832, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Jørgensen et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B., Bang, M., and Blackburn, T. H.: Anaerobic mineralization
in marine-sediments from the Baltic-Sea-North-Sea transition, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 59, 39–54, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Kitidis et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Kitidis, V., Hardman-Mountford, N. J., Litt, E., Brown, I., Cummings, D.,
Hartman, S., Hydes, D., Fishwick, J. R., Harris, C., Martinez-Vicente, V.,
and Woodward, E. M. S.: Seasonal dynamics of the carbonate system in the
Western English
Channel, Cont. Shelf Res., 42, 30–40, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Krumins et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Krumins, V., Gehlen, M., Arndt, S., Van Cappellen, P., and Regnier, P.:
Dissolved inorganic carbon and alkalinity fluxes from coastal marine
sediments: model estimates for different shelf environments and sensitivity
to global change, Biogeosciences, 10, 371–398, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-371-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-371-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Kühn et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Kühn, W., Pätsch, J., Thomas, H., Borges, A. V., Schiettecatte, L.-S.,
Bozec, Y., and Prowe, A. F.: Nitrogen and carbon cycling in the North Sea
and exchange with the North Atlantic – A model study, Part II: Carbon budget
and fluxes, Cont. Shelf Res., 30, 1701–1716, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Lansard et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Lansard, B., Rabouille, C., Denis, L., and Grenz, C.: In
situ oxygen uptake rates by coastal sediments under the influence of the
Rhône River (NW
Mediterranean Sea), Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 1501–1510, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Larsen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Larsen, M., Thamdrup, B., Shimmield, T., and Glud, R. N.:
Benthic
mineralization and solute exchange on a Celtic Sea sand-bank (Jones Bank),
Prog.  Oceanogr., 117, 64–75, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Lehrter et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lehrter, J. C., Beddick, D. L., Devereux, R., Yates, D. F.,
and Murrell, M. C.:
Sediment-water fluxes of dissolved inorganic carbon, O2, nutrients, and N2
from the hypoxic region of the Louisiana continental shelf, Biogeochemistry,
109, 233–252, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Lenhart and Pohlmann(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Lenhart, H. and Pohlmann, T.: The ICES-boxes approach in relation to results
of a North Sea circulation model, Tellus A, 49, 139–160, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Lohse et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Lohse, L., Malschaert, J. F. P., Slomp, C. P., Helder, W., and
van Raaphorst,
W.: Nitrogen cycling in North Sea sediments: interaction of denitrification
and nitrification in offshore and coastal areas, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 101, 283–283, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Lohse et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Lohse, L., Kloosterhuis, H. T., Van Raaphorst, W., and Helder, W.:
Denitrification rates as measured by the isotope pairing method and by the
acetylene inhibition technique in continental shelf sediments of the North
Sea, Marine ecology progress series, Oldendorf, 132, 169–179, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Lüders(1955)</label><mixed-citation>
Lüders, K.: Sediments of the North Sea, Special Publications of SEPM,
Wilhelmshaven, Germany, 1955.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Luff and Moll(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Luff, R. and Moll, A.: Seasonal dynamics of the North Sea sediments using a
three-dimensional coupled sediment-water model system, Cont. Shelf
Res., 24, 1099–1127, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Meysman et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Meysman, F. J. R., Galaktionov, O. S., Cook, P. L. M., Janssen, F., Huettel,
M., and Middelburg, J. J.: Quantifying biologically and physically induced
flow and tracer dynamics in permeable sediments, Biogeosciences, 4, 627–646,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-627-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-4-627-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Middelburg et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Middelburg, J. J., Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M., and Heip, C. H.:
Denitrification in marine sediments: A model study, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 661–673, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Millero et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Millero, F. J., Graham, T. B., Huang, F., Bustos-Serrano, H.,
and Pierrot, D.:
Dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater as a function of salinity
and temperature, Mar. Chem., 100, 80–94, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Moll(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Moll, A.: Regional distribution of primary production in the North Sea
simulated by a three-dimensional model, J. Marine Syst., 16,
151–170, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Moore et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, W., Beck, M., Riedel, T., van der Loeff, M. R., Dellwig, O., Shaw,
T. J., Schnetger, B., and Brumsack, H.-J.: Radium-based pore water fluxes of
silica, alkalinity, manganese, DOC, and uranium: A decade of studies in the
German Wadden Sea, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 6535–6555, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Nedwell et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Nedwell, D., Parkes, R., Upton, A., and Assinder, D.:
Seasonal fluxes across
the sediment-water interface, and processes within sediments, Philos.
T. R. S.-A., 343, 519–529, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Nordi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Nordi, G., Debes, H., and Christensen, J. T.: Pelagic-benthic coupling on the
Faroe shelf: a pilot study, Tech. rep., Faroe Marine Research Institute,
Tórshavn, Faroe Island, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Osinga et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Osinga, R., Kop, A. J., Duineveld, G. C. A., Prins, R. A.,
Duyl, F. C. V., and
Fleur, C.: Benthic mineralization rates at two locations in the southern
North Sea, J. Sea Res., 36, 181–191, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Pätsch and Kühn(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Pätsch, J. and Kühn, W.: Nitrogen and carbon cycling in the North Sea
and exchange with the North Atlantic – a model study. Part I. Nitrogen budget
and fluxes, Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 767–787, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Paulmier et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulmier, A., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.: Stoichiometries of
remineralisation and denitrification in global biogeochemical ocean models,
Biogeosciences, 6, 923–935, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-6-923-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Provoost et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Provoost, P., Heuven, S. V., Soetaert, K., Laane, R. W. P. M., Middelburg,
J. J., and van Heuven, S.: Seasonal and long-term changes in pH in the Dutch
coastal zone, Biogeosciences, 7, 3869–3878, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3869-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-7-3869-2010</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Provoost et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Provoost, P., Braeckman, U., Van Gansbeke, D., Moodley, L., Soetaert, K.,
Middelburg, J. J., and Vanaverbeke, J.: Modelling benthic oxygen consumption
and benthic-pelagic coupling at a shallow station in the southern North Sea,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 120, 1–11, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Radach and Moll(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Radach, G. and Moll, A.: Estimation of the variability of production by
simulating annual cycles of phytoplankton in the central North Sea, Prog.
Oceanogr., 31, 339–419, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Rao et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, A. M., Polerecky, L., Ionescu, D., Meysman, F. J. R., and
De Beer, D.:
The influence of pore-water advection, benthic photosynthesis, and
respiration on calcium carbonate dynamics in reef sands, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 57, 809–825, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Rao et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, A. M., Malkin, S. Y., Montserrat, F., and Meysman, F. J.: Alkalinity
production in intertidal sands intensified by lugworm bioirrigation,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 148, 36–47, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Redfield(1958)</label><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The biological control of chemical factors in the
environment, Am. Sci., 46, 230A–221, 1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Regnier et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Regnier, P., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Mackenzie, F. T., Gruber, N.,
Janssens, I. A., Laruelle, G. G., Lauerwald, R., Luyssaert, S., Andersson, A.
J., and Arndt, S.: Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land
to
ocean, Nat. Geosci., 6, 597–607, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Reid and Edwards(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, P. C. and Edwards, M.: Long-term changes in the pelagos, benthos and
fisheries of the North Sea, Senck. Marit., 31, 107–115, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Richards(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
Richards, F.: Anoxic basins and Fjords In Chemical Oceanography, 611–643,
edited by: Richards, F. A., Ripley, J. P., and Skirrow, G., 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Rodhe(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodhe, J.: The large-scale circulation in the Skagerrak; interpretation of
some observations, Tellus A, 39, 245–253, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Rodhe(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodhe, J.: On the dynamics of the large-scale circulation of the Skagerrak,
J. Sea Res., 35, 9–21, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Santschi et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Santschi, P. H., Anderson, R. F., Fleisher, M. Q., and Bowles, W.:
Measurements of diffusive sublayer thicknesses in the ocean by alabaster
dissolution, and their implications for the measurements of benthic fluxes,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 96, 10641–10657,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Schiettecatte et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Schiettecatte, L.-S., Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., and
Borges, A.: High temporal
coverage of carbon dioxide measurements in the Southern Bight of the North
Sea, Mar. Chem., 106, 161–173, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Schlüter and Jerosch(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Schlüter, M. and Jerosch, K.: Digital Atlas of the North Sea, Alfred
Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Schrum et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schrum, C., Alekseeva, I., and John, M. S.: Development of a coupled
physical–biological ecosystem model ECOSMO: part I: model description and
validation for the North Sea, J. Marine Syst., 61, 79–99, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Schwichtenberg(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwichtenberg, F.: Drivers of the carbonate system variability in the southern
North Sea: River input, anaerobic alkalinity generation in the Wadden Sea and
internal processes, PhD thesis, Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und
Naturwissenschaften im Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Universität
Hamburg, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Seitzinger et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J., Bouwman, A., Lowrance, R.,
Peterson, B., Tobias, C., and Drecht, G. V.: Denitrification across
landscapes and waterscapes: a synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 16,
2064–2090, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Shum(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Shum, K.: Wave-induced advective transport below a rippled water-sediment
interface, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 97,
789–808, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Slomp et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Slomp, C., Malschaert, J., Lohse, L., and Van Raaphorst, W.:
Iron and manganese
cycling in different sedimentary environments on the North Sea continental
margin, Cont. Shelf Res., 17, 1083–1117, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Smith Jr.(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Smith Jr., K.: Oxygen demands of San Diego Trough sediments: an in situ
study,
Limnol. Oceanogr, 19, 939–944, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Soetaert et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K., Petzoldt, T., and Meysman, F. J. R.: marelac: Tools for Aquatic
Sciences, NIOO-KNAW, Yerseke, the Netherlands, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Stal(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Stal, L. J.: Is the distribution of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in the oceans
related to temperature?, Environ. Microbiol., 11, 1632–1645, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Tengberg et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Tengberg, A., Hall, P. O. J., Andersson, U., Lindén, B., Styrenius, O.,
Boland, G., de Bovee, F., Carlsson, B., Ceradini, S., Devol, A., and
Duineveld, G.:
Intercalibration of benthic flux chambers, Mar. Chem., 1, 147–173,
2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Thamdrup and Canfield(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Canfield, D. E.: Benthic respiration in aquatic sediments, in:
Methods in ecosystem science,   Springer, New York,  86–103, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Thamdrup et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B., Fossing, H., and Jørgensen, B. B.:
Manganese, iron and sulfur
cycling in a coastal marine sediment, Aarhus Bay, Denmark, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 5115–5129, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Therkildsen and Lomstein(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Therkildsen, M. S. and Lomstein, B. A.: Seasonal variation in net benthic
C-mineralization in a shallow estuary, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 12,
131–142, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Thomas et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., Elkalay, K., and de Baar, H. J. W.: Enhanced open ocean
storage of CO2 from shelf sea pumping, Science, 304,
1005–1008, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Thomas et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, H., Bozec, Y., de Baar, H. J. W., Elkalay, K., Frankignoulle, M.,
Schiettecatte, L.-S., Kattner, G., and Borges, A. V.: The carbon budget of
the North Sea, Biogeosciences, 2, 87–96, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2-87-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-2-87-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Thomas et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, H., Schiettecatte, L.-S., Suykens, K., Koné, Y. J. M., Shadwick,
E. H., Prowe, A. E. F., Bozec, Y., de Baar, H. J. W., and Borges, A. V.:
Enhanced ocean carbon storage from anaerobic alkalinity generation in coastal
sediments, Biogeosciences, 6, 267–274, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-267-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-6-267-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Trimmer et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M., Nedwell, D., Sivyer, D., and Malcolm, S.: Seasonal benthic
organic matter mineralisation measured by oxygen uptake and denitrification
along a transect of the inner and outer River Thames estuary, UK, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 197, 103–119, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Trimmer et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M., Petersen, J., Sivyer, D., Mills, C., Young, E., and Parker, E.:
Impact of long-term benthic trawl disturbance on sediment sorting and
biogeochemistry in the southern North Sea, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
298, 79–94, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Upton(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Upton, A.: Seasonal benthic microbial activity in the southern North Sea;
oxygen uptake and sulphate reduction, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 101, 273–281,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Van der Molen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Van der Molen, J.: The influence of tides, wind and waves on the net sand
transport in the North Sea, Con. Shelf Res., 22, 2739–2762,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Van Duyl et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Duyl, F. C., Bak, R. P., Kop, A. J., Nieuwland, G., Berghuis, E. M., and
Kok, A.: Mesocosm experiments: mimicking seasonal developments of microbial
variables in North Sea sediments, Hydrobiologia, 235, 267–281, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Van Raaphorst et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Raaphorst, W., Kloosterhuis, H. T., Cramer, A., and Bakker, K. J.:
Nutrient early diagenesis in the sandy sediments of the Dogger Bank area,
North Sea: Pore water results, Neth. J. Sea Res., 26,
25–52, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Weston et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Weston, K., Fernand, L., Nicholls, J., Marca-Bell, A., Mills, D., Sivyer, D.,
and Trimmer, M.: Sedimentary and water column processes in the Oyster
Grounds: a potentially hypoxic region of the North Sea, Mar. Environ.
Res., 65, 235–249, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Wilde et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Wilde, P., Berghuis, E., and Kok, A.: Structure and energy demand of the
benthic community of the Oyster Ground, central North Sea, Neth.  J. Sea
Res., 18, 143–159, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(84)90029-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0077-7579(84)90029-2</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Witte and Pfannkuche(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Witte, U. and Pfannkuche, O.: High rates of benthic carbon remineralisation
in
the abyssal Arabian Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 2785–2804, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
