<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-1825-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Particle export fluxes to the oxygen minimum zone<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> of the eastern
tropical North Atlantic</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Particle export fluxes to the oxygen minimum zone}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Engel et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Engel</surname><given-names>Anja</given-names></name>
          <email>aengel@geomar.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-1955</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>Hannes</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Le Moigne</surname><given-names>Frédéric A. C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>Samuel T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7289-0909</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel,
24105 Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Daniel K. Inouye Center for Microbial Oceanography: Research and
Education, Department of Oceanography,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI
96822, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Anja Engel (aengel@geomar.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>April</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>1825</fpage><lpage>1838</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>In the ocean, sinking of particulate organic matter (POM) drives carbon
export from the euphotic zone and supplies nutrition to mesopelagic
communities, the feeding and degradation activities of which in turn lead to
export flux attenuation. Oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) minimum zones (OMZs) with suboxic
water layers (&lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show a lower
carbon flux attenuation compared to well-oxygenated waters
(&gt; 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, supposedly due to
reduced heterotrophic activity. This study focuses on sinking particle fluxes
through hypoxic mesopelagic waters
(&lt; 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; these represent
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 times more ocean volume globally compared to suboxic waters, but
they
have less been studied. Particle export fluxes and attenuation coefficients
were determined in the eastern tropical North Atlantic (ETNA) using two
surface-tethered drifting sediment trap arrays with seven trapping depths located
between 100 and 600 m. Data on particulate matter fluxes were fitted to the
normalized power function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
being the flux at a depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 100 m and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the attenuation
coefficient. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values suggest stronger flux attenuation and are
influenced by factors such as faster degradation at higher temperatures. In
this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of organic carbon fluxes varied between 0.74 and 0.80
and were in the intermediate range of previous reports, but lower than
expected from seawater temperatures within the upper 500 m. During this
study, highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were determined for fluxes of particulate
hydrolyzable amino acids (PHAA), followed by particulate organic phosphorus
(POP), nitrogen (PN), carbon (POC), chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and transparent
exopolymer particles (TEP), pointing to a sequential degradation of organic
matter components during sinking. Our study suggests that in addition to
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, organic matter composition co-determines transfer
efficiency through the mesopelagic. The magnitude of future carbon export
fluxes may therefore also depend on how organic matter quality in the surface
ocean changes under influence of warming, acidification and enhanced
stratification.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The biological carbon pump, defined as the export of biologically fixed
carbon dioxide (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the surface to the deeper ocean mainly in the
form of sinking particles (Volk and Hoffert, 1985), influences atmospheric
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and affects ecosystem structure and elemental
distributions in the ocean. The total amount of carbon export as well as the
efficiency of the biological carbon pump, i.e., the ratio between export and
primary production, are highly dynamic (Buesseler and Boyd, 2009; Lam et
al., 2011). Changes in the efficiency of the biological carbon pump may have
been responsible for past atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability between
glacial–interglacial transition periods (Kohfeld and Ridgewell, 2009) and
play a key role for future climate predictions (Heinze et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Most of the POM being exported below the surface mixed layer
(&lt; 200 m in general) is solubilized and remineralized within the
mesopelagic layer, i.e., between depths of 200 and 1000 m (Bishop et al.,
1978; Suess, 1980). The shallower the carbon remineralization depth, the more
likely CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is to exchange with the atmosphere and hence drive a shorter
carbon storage time in the ocean (Volk and Hoffert, 1985; Kwon et al., 2009).
The factors driving export flux attenuation in the mesopelagic therefore have a
large influence on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sequestration in the ocean. The vertical profile
of sinking particulate organic carbon (POC) flux has often been described by
a normalized power function: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the particle flux as a function of depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the flux at 100 m
depth and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the flux attenuation coefficient (Martin et al., 1987;
hereafter M87). The authors of the M87 study derived an
“open ocean composite” for POC export fluxes from North Pacific data with a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, strong
regional variations of both total export POC fluxes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
observed (Martin et al., 1987; Buesseler et al., 2007a; Torres Valdes et al.,
2014; Marsay et al., 2015) with several factors proposed to control export
flux attenuation. Increased attenuation, i.e., higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, have been
related to increased temperature (Marsay et al., 2015), zooplankton feeding
activity (Lampitt et al., 1990), coprophagy, coprorhexy and coprochaly
(Belcher et al. 2016), microbial cycling (Giering et al., 2014) and lack of
ballast (Le Moigne et al., 2012). Decreased flux attenuation, i.e., lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and thus higher transfer efficiencies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have
been associated to high particle sinking velocity depending on plankton
community composition, especially the presence of larger phytoplankton cells
(Buesseler, 1998; Buesseler and Boyd, 2009), particle aggregates (Alldredge
and Gotschalk, 1989) and fecal pellets (Cavan et al., 2015). Organic
polymers, such as transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), increase the rate of
aggregate formation due to their high stickiness (Alldredge et al., 1993;
Engel, 2000; Passow, 2002; Chow et al., 2015) and supposedly play an
important role in particle export fluxes (Passow, 2002; Arrigo, 2007; Chow et
al., 2015). TEP are carbon-rich particles that form from dissolved
polysaccharides (Engel et al., 2004). When included in sinking POM
inventories, TEP may increase carbon relative to nitrogen export fluxes, a
mechanism that potentially counteracts rising CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the
atmosphere (Schneider et al., 2004; Arrigo, 2007; Engel et al., 2014).
However, TEP themselves are non-sinking due to a high water content and low
density (Azetzu-Scott and Passow, 2004), and little quantitative data are
available on TEP export by sinking particles so far (Passow et al., 2000;
Martin et al., 2011; Ebersbach et al., 2014). Thus, the role of TEP in carbon
export is still unresolved.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Map of <bold>(a)</bold> the study area and <bold>(b)</bold> depth distribution of
oxygen concentration (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the eastern tropical North Atlantic (ETNA) during the RV <italic>Meteor</italic> 105 cruise, when two
surface-tethered drifting sediment traps (STDT) were deployed <bold>(c)</bold>.
Depth distribution of oxygen concentration (mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at stations
visited in the deployment area showed an oxygen minimum zone in the upper
mesopelagic <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Reduced POC flux attenuation has also been suggested for oxygen minimum zones
(OMZs) (Martin et al., 1987; Haake et al., 1992; Devol and Hartnett, 2001;
Van Mooy et al., 2002; Keil et al., 2016) as a consequence of reduced
zooplankton feeding and microbial degradation activities in suboxic
(&lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> waters. So far, the vast
majority of mesopelagic downward POM flux measurements originate from well-oxygenated waters (&gt; 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
the M87 study, five sets of drifting sediment traps were deployed in
the oxygenated North Pacific and four sets were deployed in the eastern
tropical North Pacific (ETNP) OMZ. The flux attenuation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for the oxygenated North Pacific averaged 0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06, while lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values averaging to 0.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 were measured in the ETNP OMZ. In
agreement, Devol and Hartnett (2001) and Van Mooy et al. (2002) observed low
particle attenuation in the OMZ of the ETNP off Mexico, yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
coefficients of 0.36 and 0.40 respectively. Keil et al. (2016) found <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of 0.59–0.63 in the suboxic Arabian Sea. These studies thus indicate
that a greater proportion of the sinking POM escapes degradation while
sinking through suboxic waters. However, influence of oxygen on organic
matter degradation may vary between individual components. For instance,
degradation of hydrolyzable amino acid (PHAA) under suboxic conditions was found to
continue with the same rate as compared to oxic conditions (Van Mooy et al.,
2002; Pantoja et al., 2004), suggesting that anaerobic and micro-aerobic
bacteria preferentially utilize nitrogen-rich components.</p>
      <p>So far, little is known on sinking POM flux attenuation in hypoxic waters
(&lt; 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are more widespread
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 % of ocean volume) compared to suboxic waters
(&lt; 0.05 % of ocean volume). Laboratory studies indicated that
particle aggregates sinking through hypoxic waters can become suboxic within
their interior due to oxygen diffusion limitation and evolve microbial
degradation processes typical for suboxic waters (Alldredge and Cohen, 1987;
Ploug et al., 1997; Stief et al., 2016). For example, at an ambient O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by a 2 mm
(diameter) aggregate was diffusion-limited and a 0.5 mm wide anoxic core
occurred within its interior (Ploug and Bergkvist, 2015). Since OMZs are
expected to expand in the future as a consequence of global warming and
altered circulation patterns (Stramma et al., 2008), the role of oxygen in
controlling the biological pump efficiency needs to be better constrained for
predicting ocean–climate feedbacks. In order to assess what controls carbon
flux attenuation and depth-related changes in sinking particle composition in
hypoxic waters, we determined downward POM fluxes in the eastern tropical North Atlantic (ETNA) off the coast
of Mauritania, which exhibits an extensive hypoxic OMZ between 300 and
500 m. We used two parallel drifting, surface-tethered sediment trap devices
with particle interceptor traps (PITs) at seven to eight different depths between
60 and 600 m to estimate fluxes to and within the OMZ.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>The study area</title>
      <p>The study was conducted from 17 March to 16 April 2014 during a cruise of the
RV <italic>Meteor</italic> to the ETNA region off the coast of Mauritania (Fig. 1a). The study
area included hypoxic waters with minimum values of oxygen concentration of
40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as determined by CTD (Seabird) casts with two
calibrated oxygen sensors at midwater depths of 350–500 m (Fig. 1b)
(Visbeck, 2014).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sediment trap operation and sample analysis</title>
      <p>Free-drifting surface-tethered sediment trap devices were deployed for 196 h
during the first deployment and 281 h during the second deployment
(Fig. 1c). The first trap device was deployed on the 24 March 2014
(11:00 UTC) at 10.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N 21.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W with 12
PITs at each of eight depths: 60, 100, 150, 200,
300, 400, 500 and 600 m. The device was recovered on the 1 April 2014
(14:30 UTC) at 10.46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 21.39<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. The second device was
deployed on the 27 March 2014 (16:00 UTC) at 10.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W with 12 PITs at each of seven depths: 100, 150, 200, 300, 400,
500 and 600 m. The second trap device was recovered on the 8 April 2014
(09:00 UTC) at 10.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 21.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. Both devices slowly
drifted northwest and were recovered approximately 37 nm away from their
deployment location (Fig. 1c). Within the drifting area, oxygen concentration
in the OMZ resembled the overall pattern of the Mauritanian upwelling with
fully hypoxic conditions between 300 and 500 m (Fig. 1d).</p>
      <p>The design of the trap devices and the drifting array basically follows
Knauer et al. (1979), with 12 PITs mounted on a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cross
frame. The PITs were acrylic tubes with an inside diameter of 7 cm, an
outside diameter of 7.6 cm and a height of 53 cm, leading to an aspect
ratio of 7.5. The aspect ratio and a baffle system consisting of smaller
acrylic tubes attached to the top end of each PIT help to reduce drag-induced
movement within the trap (Soutar et al., 1977). PVC crosses with PITs were
attached to a free-floating line, which was buoyed at the surface and
weighted
at the bottom. The surface buoys of the arrays carried GPS/Iridium devices
and flashlights.</p>
      <p>Prior to each deployment, each PIT was filled with 1.5 L of filtered surface
seawater (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size cartridge) collected from the ship's
underway seawater system, up to three-quarters of the PIT's height. A brine solution
was prepared by dissolving 50 g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sodium chloride with filtered
surface seawater and subsequently filtered through a 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
cartridge to remove excess particulates. Then 20 mL of formalin was  added
per liter of the solution to achieve a brine solution with 2 % formalin. The
preservative solution was then slowly transferred into each PIT beneath the
1.5 L of filtered seawater using a peristaltic pump. PITs were covered with
lids immediately to minimize contamination before deployment.</p>
      <p>Sample treatment after trap recovery followed recommendations given by
Buesseler et al. (2007b). After recovery, all PITs were capped to minimize
contamination. The density gradient was visually inspected and found intact
at the position of prior to deployment or at a maximum 2 cm above. Then,
seawater was pumped out of each PIT using a peristaltic pump down to 2–3 cm
above the density gradient. The remaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 L was subsequently
transferred to canisters, pooled from 11 tubes per depth. Added to each canister was 40 mL formalin. Samples from each depth were passed through a
500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m nylon mesh. Swimmers were removed from the mesh with forceps
under a binocular microscope and the remaining particles, which stuck to the
mesh, were transferred back to the sample. Samples were subsequently split
into aliquots of the total sample. Therefore, the pooled sample was
transferred into a round 10 L canister and stirred at medium velocity with a
magnetic bar. Aliquots were transferred into 0.5 L Nalgene bottles with a
flexible tube using a peristaltic pump. Aliquots of samples were filtered
under low pressure (&lt; 200 mbar) onto different filter types
(combusted GF/F 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, polycarbonate 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m or
cellulose acetate 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m; see below) for different analyses and
stored frozen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) until analyses.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Biogeochemical analyses</title>
      <p>The following parameters were determined: total particulate mass (TPM),
POC, particulate nitrogen (PN), particulate
organic phosphorus (POP), biogenic silica (BSi), chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
particulate PHAA and TEP.</p>
      <p>TPM was analyzed in triplicate. The following aliquots were filtered in
triplicate onto pre-weighed 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m polycarbonate filters: 800 mL
(2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 mL; 8 % of total sample) for the depths of 600 to
300 m of deployment no. 1, 400 mL (4 % of total sample) for the depths
of 200 and 150 m of deployment no. 1 and for all depths of deployment no. 2,
and
420 mL (4 % of total sample) for the depth of 100 and 60 m of
deployment no. 1. Filters were rinsed twice with Milli-Q water, dried at
60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 4 h and stored until weight measurement on a Mettler
Toledo XP2U microbalance.</p>
      <p>POC and PN aliquots were filtered in triplicate onto combusted (8 h at
500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) GF/F filters (Whatmann, 25 mm): 400 mL (4 % of total
sample) for the depths of 600 to 150 m of deployment no. 1, 420 mL (4 %
of total sample) for the depths of 100 and 60 m of deployment no. 1, and 100 mL
(1 % of total sample) for all depths of deployment no. 2. For the depths
of 150, 100 and 60 m of deployment no. 1, 400–420 mL (4 % of total
sample) was filtered onto two filters due to the high particle load at these
depths. Filters were exposed to fuming hydrochloric acid in a fuming box overnight to remove carbonate and subsequently dried (60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 12 h). For
analysis, the filters were enclosed in tin cups and analyzed using an Euro EA
elemental analyzer calibrated with an acetanilide standard. For the depths of
150, 100 and 60 m of deployment no. 1 the sum of both filters was taken.</p>
      <p>POP was determined in triplicate, except for 60 m depth of deployment no. 1,
which was only determined in duplicate. The following aliquots were filtered
onto combusted GF/F filters (Whatmann, 25 mm): 400 mL (4 % of total
sample) for the depths of 600 to 150 m of deployment no. 1, 420 mL (4 %
of total sample) for the depths of 100 and 60 m of deployment no. 1, and 100 mL
(1 % of total sample) for all depths of deployment no. 2. For the depths
of 200 to 60 m of deployment no. 1, the volume of 400 mL/420 mL (4 %
of total sample) was filtered onto two filters due to the high particle load
at these shallower depths. Organic phosphorus collected on the filters was
digested in the potassium peroxodisulfate-containing substance Oxisolv
(Merck) for 30 min in a pressure cooker and measured colorimetrically as
orthophosphate following the method of Hansen and Koroleff (1999).</p>
      <p>PHAAs were determined in duplicate. The following aliquots were filtered onto
combusted GF/F filters (25 mm): 400 mL (4 % of total sample) for the
depths of 600 m to 150 m of deployment no. 1, 420 mL (4 % of total
sample) for the depths of 100 m and 60 m of deployment no. 1, and 100 mL
(1 % of total sample) for all depths of deployment no. 2. For the depths
of 150, 100 and 60 m of deployment no. 1, the volume of 400 mL/420 mL
(4 % of total sample) was filtered onto two filters due to the high
particle load at these shallower depths. PHAA analysis was performed
according to Lindroth and Mopper (1979) and Dittmar et al. (2009) with some
modifications. Duplicate samples were hydrolyzed for 20 h at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
with hydrochloric acid (30 %, Suprapur, Merck) and neutralized by acid
evaporation under vacuum in a microwave at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Samples were
washed with water to remove remaining acid. Analysis was performed on a 1260
HPLC system (Agilent). Thirteen different amino acids were separated with a
C18 column (Phenomenex Kinetex, 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 mm)
after in-line derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde  and mercaptoethanol. The
following standard amino acids were used: aspartic acid (AsX), glutamic acid
(GlX), histidine (His), serine (Ser), arginine (Arg), glycine (Gly),
threonine (Thr), alanine (Ala), tyrosine (Tyr), valine (Val), phenylalanine
(Phe), isoleucine (Ileu), leucine (Leu) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-amino butyric acid (GABA).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Amino butyric acid was used as an internal standard to account for
losses during handling. Solvent A was 5 % acetonitrile (LiChrosolv,
Merck, HPLC gradient grade) in sodium dihydrogen phosphate (Merck, Suprapur)
buffer (pH 7.0); solvent B was acetonitrile. A gradient was run from
100 % solvent A to 78 % solvent A in 50 min. The detection limit for
individual amino acids was 2 nmol monomer L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The precision was
&lt; 5 %, estimated as the standard deviation of replicate
measurements divided by the mean. The degradation index (DI) was calculated
from the amino acid composition following Dauwe et al. (1999).</p>
      <p>BSi was determined in triplicate. The following aliquots were filtered onto
cellulose acetate filters (0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m): 400 mL (4 % of total
sample) for the depths of 600 m to 150 m of deployment no. 1, 420 mL
(4 % of total sample) for the depths of 100 m and 60 m of deployment
no. 1, and 200 mL (2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 mL; 2 % of total sample) for all depths
of deployment no. 2. Filters were incubated with 25 mL NaOH (0.1 M) at
85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 h 15 min in a shaking water bath. After cooling of the
samples, analysis was conducted according to the method for determination of
Si(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by Hansen and Koroleff (1999). Fluxes of biogenic opal were
calculated assuming a water content of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % and therefore the
chemical formula SiO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O with a density of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mortlock and Fröhlich 1989).</p>
      <p>Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined in duplicate. The following aliquots were filtered
onto GF/F filters (25 mm): 400 mL (4 % of total sample) for the depths
of 600 to 150 m of deployment no. 1, 420 mL (4 % of total sample) for
the depths of 100 m and 60 m of deployment no. 1, and 100 mL (1 % of total
sample) for all depths of deployment no. 2. For the depths of 200 to 60 m of
deployment no. 1, the volume of 400 mL/420 mL (4 % of total sample) was
filtered onto two filters due to the high particle load at these shallower
depths. Samples were analyzed after extraction with 10 mL of acetone
(90 %) on a Turner fluorimeter after Welschmeyer (1994). Calibration of
the instrument was conducted with spinach extract standard (Sigma Aldrich).</p>
      <p>TEP were determined in quadruplet by microscopy after Engel (2009). Between
3.5 and 10 mL (0.03–0.1 % of total sample) for the depths of deployment
no. 1 and no. 2 were filtered onto 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m Nuclepore membrane
filters (Whatmann) and stained with 1 mL Alcian Blue solution. Filters were
mounted onto Cytoclear© slides and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
until microscopy analysis using a light microscope (Zeiss Axio Scope A.1)
connected to a camera (AxioCam MRc). Filters were screened at 200x
magnification. Thirty pictures were taken randomly from each filter in two
perpendicular cross sections (15 pictures each; resolution
1040 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1040 pixel, 8-bit color depth). Image analysis software WCIF
ImageJ (version 1.44, public domain, developed at the US National Institutes
of Health, courtesy of Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland) was used to semiautomatically analyze particle numbers
and area.</p>
      <p>The carbon content of TEP (TEP-C) was estimated after Mari (1999) using the
size-dependent relationship:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the number of TEP in the size class <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
mean equivalent spherical radius of the size class. The constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C) and the fractal dimension of aggregates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were proposed by Mari (1999). TEP-C was only calculated for the size
fraction &lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, including mainly free TEP, because larger
TEP included TEP covered aggregates with solid particles. Estimating carbon
content of these larger particles would overestimate TEP-C as the volume of
the other particles would be included.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Calculations and statistics</title>
      <p>Fluxes of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and lithogenic matter (lith) were calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M123" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lith</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TPM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Total mineral ballast (ballast<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M125" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ballast</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TPM</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The percentage of ballast<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (%ballast<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
was calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M128" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ballast</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TPM</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TPM</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The transfer efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of particulate components was
calculated as the ratio of fluxes at 600 m to those at 100 m.</p>
      <p>Calculated mean values include replicate measurements of both deployments.
Data fits and statistical tests were performed with the software packages
Microsoft Office Excel 2010, Sigma Plot 12.0 (Systat) and Ocean Data View 4
(ODV) (Schlitzer, 2015). Weighted-average gridding was used in ODV to display
data according to data coverage with automatic scale lengths. The overall
significance level was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Fluxes of different compounds</title>
      <p>Export fluxes of TPM and particulate organic elements determined during both
trap deployments showed good overall agreement and a decrease with depth,
fitting well to the power law function of M87 (Figs. 2a–d, 3a–d
and Table 1). Averaging fluxes from both deployments yielded a total mass
flux of 240 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m decreasing to
141 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the core of the OMZ (400 m)
(Fig. 2a). Fluxes of POC, PN and POP at 100 m depth were 73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8,
13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 and 0.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
and decreased to 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5, 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41 and
0.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 400 m depth (Fig. 2b–d). The
contribution of POC flux to total mass flux (% OC) decreased from about
30 % at 60–150 m depth to 17–20 % at 400 m depth and showed only
a minor decrease below 400 m, to 14–16 % at 600 m depth. Similarly,
the percentage of PN flux to total mass flux (% N) showed the largest
decrease between 60 and 400 m, i.e., from 6.6 to 2.0–2.3 %, with less decline observed below, reaching 1.7–1.8 % at 600 m. The percentage of POP flux
to total mass flux (% P) decreased from 0.37 % at 60 m depth to
0.11–0.16 % at 400 m depth and remained constant below 400 m depth.
No previous data are available for POM export fluxes at our study site for
direct comparison. However, our trap data compare well to carbon export
fluxes estimated from particle size data (i.e., 10–300 mg
C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported for 100 m depth in the area off Cape Blanc
(Mauritania) by Iversen et al. (2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Fluxes of <bold>(a)</bold> total mass and <bold>(b)</bold> particulate organic carbon
(POC), <bold>(c)</bold> particulate nitrogen (PN) and <bold>(d)</bold> particulate
organic phosphorus (POP) during the deployment of two STDT in the
ETNA. Solid symbols are used for deployment no. 1 and open symbols for deployment no. 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Fluxes of <bold>(a)</bold> chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> opal, <bold>(c)</bold>
TEP and <bold>(d)</bold> PHAA during the deployment of two STDT in
the ETNA. Solid symbols are used for deployment no. 1 and open symbols for deployment no. 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Fluxes of particulate components at 100m depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and in
the core of the OMZ at 400m (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMZ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the associated
attenuation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) and transfer efficiencies
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, %) over the depth range of 100 to 600 m during two traps
deployments in the ETNA. All units are in mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> except for
TEP fluxes, which is reported in total particle area
cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Mean values and standard deviations (SD) were
calculated from analytical replicates.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Component</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMZ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ( %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(600/100 m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mass</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">249</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">141</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.429</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.090</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.987</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">231</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">141</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.355</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.998</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">52</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">69.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.795</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.031</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.989</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">76.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.741</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.044</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.989</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">22</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PN</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.992</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">POP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.081</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.074</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.992</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.034</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Opal</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0195</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.987</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.345</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.052</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.987</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.035</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.820</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.053</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.625</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.082</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.988</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TEP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1650</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">548</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1190</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">368</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.498</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.548</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2990</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">348</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1644</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.451</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.069</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.810</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PHAA-C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">I</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.324</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.067</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.994</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">II</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.978</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.096</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.991</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Fluxes of phytoplankton biomass, as indicated from Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, were similar at
100 m during both deployments, with 104 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the first and
116 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the second
deployment, but behaved differently below, with a stronger flux attenuation
above the OMZ during the first compared to the second deployment (Fig. 3a).
Fluxes within the OMZ core were
35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (no. 1) and
53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (no. 2) respectively.</p>
      <p>Opal fluxes were also similar during both deployments, yielding an average of
47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m, steadily decreasing to
32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 400 m depth (Fig. 3b). Similar to
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, opal fluxes were slightly higher above the OMZ during the second
compared to the first deployment but quite similar or even lower below the
OMZ. This may indicate that the second trap device, which drifted more
northerly (Fig. 1c), exploited waters of a more recent diatom bloom compared
to the first deployment.</p>
      <p>Fluxes of [CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lith] were similar to opal fluxes during the first
deployment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but considerably lower
during the second (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.8 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (data not
shown).</p>
      <p>During this study, export fluxes of TEP were estimated from decrease over
depth of total particle area and showed the strongest depth attenuation
between 60 and 100 m during the first deployment (Fig. 3c). Like Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluxes, TEP export fluxes were slightly higher during the second compared to
the first deployment. At 100 m depth, average TEP flux was
2323 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 859 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreased to
1418 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 342 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 400 m. Using a TEP size to
carbon conversion according to Mari (1999) yielded to an average TEP-C
(&lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) flux of 1.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.35 mg
C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m depth, slightly decreasing to
1.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.28 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 400 m and further to
0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 600 m. Although TEP supposedly
play an important role in particle export fluxes (Passow, 2002; Arrigo, 2007;
Chow et al., 2015), only a few previous estimates for TEP export fluxes based
on sediment traps have been given so far to which we can compare our data.
Martin et al. (2011) measured TEP export fluxes during a spring bloom in the
Iceland Basin (northeast Atlantic Ocean) using the PELAGRA neutrally buoyant
sediment traps and determined values in the range of 30–120 mg xanthan gum
equivalent m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Ebersbach et al. (2014) obtained lower values
of 0.03–5.14 mg xanthan gum equivalent m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the
LOHAFEX iron fertilization experiment in the Southern Ocean. Assuming a
conversion factor of 0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> xanthan gum
after Engel (2004), these previous estimates suggest TEP-C export fluxes
ranging from 0.02 to 3 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Southern Ocean and
from 19 to 75 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the North Atlantic spring bloom.
Our data on TEP export fluxes for ETNA region are within the range of these
previous studies but closer to the lower estimates for the Southern Ocean.
It has to be emphasized, though, that our calculated TEP-C fluxes are likely
underestimates, since only suspended, i.e., “free” TEP
&lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, were taken into account. TEP-C associated to
aggregates cannot be determined with the applied microscopic technique.
Overall, TEP-C export fluxes in the ETNA were significantly related to
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, yielding [TEP-C, mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.9
[Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.74 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>A strong decrease at shallow depth (60–100 m) was also observed for PHAA
fluxes during the first deployment (Fig. 3d). Average PHAA fluxes were
330 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 m and
90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the OMZ core at 400 m.
These fluxes are equivalent to amino-acid-related fluxes of 16.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6
(100 m) and 4.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 mg C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (400 m),
respectively, which are typical values for PHAA-C fluxes in the ocean (Lee
and Cronin, 1984). PHAA fluxes decreased slightly within the OMZ, i.e., from
300 to 500 m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Flux attenuation in the ETNA OMZ</title>
      <p>Fluxes from both deployments were fitted to the exponential decrease model
(Martin et al., 1987) and attenuation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) were
estimated for all components (Table 1). Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values suggest stronger
attenuation and may hint to either reduced sinking velocities of particles or
faster degradation of more labile components. During this study, PHAAs were
the most rapidly attenuated components of sinking particles, followed by POP,
PN, POC, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and TEP (Table 1). Attenuation of mineral fluxes was less
pronounced than for TPM.</p>
      <p>Attenuation coefficient of POC export fluxes was 0.80 during the first and
0.74 during the second deployment. These values are in the intermediate range
of previously determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for POC attenuation in the mesopelagic,
shown to vary between 0.51 as determined in the North Pacific (K2) and 1.59
as determined for the North Atlantic subpolar gyre (NASG) (Buesseler et al., 2007a; Marsay et al., 2015).
Based on trap data from fully oxygenated water columns, Marsay et al. (2015)
recently suggested a linear relationship between POC flux attenuation and
median water temperature within the upper 500 m of the water column
according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.062</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.303</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Applying this relationship to our study area,
with temperature decreasing from 26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at the surface to
9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 500 m and a median temperature value of 12.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
would give a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 1.05. This estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is higher than the
values observed in this study (0.74–0.80) and suggests that oxygen
deficiency may reduce attenuation of POC fluxes in the ETNA, resulting in
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of organic matter though the OMZs compared to well-oxygenated waters.</p>
      <p>Differences in flux attenuation coefficients translate into different
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual components, with PHAA being the least and TEP
being the most efficiently exported organic component (Table 1). In
particular, values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for TEP and therewith for TEP-C were
about 3 times higher than for PHAA-C and even  higher than for
bulk POC, suggesting a preferential export of carbon included in TEP below
100 m. However, a steep decrease of TEP flux was observed between 60 and
100 m during the first deployment. TEP are produced by a variety of
organisms, i.e., different phytoplankton and bacterial species, and cannot be
considered as of homogenous composition. Several mechanisms may therefore be
responsible for a change in TEP transfer efficiency with depth: (1) change of
TEP degradability with depth; (2) differences in TEP composition over depth
related to association with particles of different settling speed; (3) new
production of TEP, abiotically or by bacteria, during solubilization and
degradation of sinking particles; (4) capture of suspended TEP by sinking
aggregates; or (5) reduced degradation rate of TEP at lower oxygen. In
support of the latter hypothesis, an attenuation of TEP fluxes within the OMZ
(300–500 m) was not detectable but did occur again below the OMZ.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Changes in POM composition during export</title>
      <p>POM, assumed to be 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [POC] following Klaas and Archer (2002),
made the greatest contribution to TPM flux at 60 m but decreased below.
Conversely, [%ballast<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] increased with depth, namely from
30 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 60 m to 68 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 600 m.</p>
      <p>Biogenic opal (density: 2.1 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean is produced mainly by
diatoms and radiolaria. During this study, opal made a rather constant
contribution to TPM fluxes with 20–25 % weight below 100 m. Hence, the
observed increase in the [%ballast<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] with depth was due to
an increasing contribution of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and lithogenic material.
[CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lith] to TPM increased from 10 to 15 % above 150 m to
45 % at 600 m. As a consequence, the ballast ratio, defined as
[Opal]:[CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lith], changed from a dominance of opal above the OMZ to
a dominance [CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lith] within and below the OMZ (Fig. 4). Slight
differences were observed between the two deployments. Contribution of opal
and of [CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lith] to TPM at 100 m was almost equal during the first
deployment with a share of 18 and 22 % respectively. During the second
deployment the contribution of opal to TPM at 100 m was 21 % but only
6 % for [CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lith]. Thus, the higher contribution of opal to TPM
fluxes together with higher Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes indicated that diatomaceous
material had a higher share of particles sinking out of the euphotic zone
down to the OMZ core during the second compared to the first deployment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Changes in mineral ballast ratios of sinking particles with depth
during the two deployments in the ETNA. Black bars are used for deployment no. 1 and gray
bars for deployment no. 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Changes in organic matter composition of particles sinking through
the OMZ during the deployment of two STDT in the ETNA. Solid symbols are used for deployment no. 1 and open symbols for deployment no. 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Molar [POC] : [PN] ratios were close to the Redfield ratio at depths
shallower than 100 m, increased to a ratio of 10 at 400 m depth and
remained constant between 400 and 600 m depth (Fig. 5a). [PN] : [POP]
ratios were much above Redfield, with values varying between 30 and 45
throughout the water column (Fig. 5b). Also, [POC] : [POP] ratios were much
higher than Redfield ratios and showed an increasing trend down to
300–400 m depth, while decreasing below (Fig. 5c). These changes in
elemental ratios suggested a preferential remineralization of POP in the
upper 300 m, followed by PN and POC deeper down.</p>
      <p>The percentage of total organic matter in TPM fluxes decreased from 67 %
at 100 m to 32 % at 600 m (Fig. 6d). As a consequence of higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of TEP relative to bulk POC, contribution of TEP-C to POC
increased significantly with depth during both deployments
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and was 2 % at 100 m
and 6 % within and 5 % below the OMZ (Fig. 5e). Because TEP are neutrally buoyant, their export to depth depends on their incorporation into
settling aggregates. In a laboratory study, Engel et al. (2009) observed that
decomposition of TEP was faster relative to bulk POC for aggregates formed
from calcifying and non-calcifying <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> cultures. In
that experiment, aggregate decomposition was investigated under oxic
conditions. Other studies also showed fast microbial degradation of TEP under
oxic conditions (Bar-Zeev and Rahav, 2015). One possible explanation for
increasing [TEP-C] : [POC] in the hypoxic OMZ of the ETNA region could be
that TEP are mostly included in sinking aggregates, whereas POC could be
included in various particle types, such as large cells, detritus or fecal
pellets. Ploug et al. (1997) estimated that carbon turnover time inside
anoxic aggregates can be strongly reduced. Due to high microbial activity and
reduced water, exchange aggregates sinking into hypoxic waters are more likely
to experience anoxic conditions than individual particles (Ploug and
Bergkvist, 2015). Thus, TEP settling into hypoxic waters by aggregates may be
exposed to anoxia, and therewith to reduced microbial degradation, in
consequence leading to a preferential TEP transfer through the OMZ. This may
also explain the decrease of [TEP-C] : [POC] ratios below the OMZ at 600 m
water depth, which was, however, only observed during the second deployment.
Since PN was more rapidly degraded than POC this also implied that the ratio
of [PN] : [TEP-C] became lower with depth.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Molar percentages of selected amino acids contained in PHAA during
the deployment of two STDT in the ETNA. Solid symbols are used for deployment no. 1 and open symbols for deployment no. 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Degradation index (DI) of organic matter in trap-collected sinking
particles based on amino acid composition and calculated according to Dauwe et
al. (1999). Black bars are used for deployment no. 1 and gray
bars for deployment no. 2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/1825/2017/bg-14-1825-2017-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Composition (%Mol) and degradation index (DI) of PHAA collected
at different depths during two trap deployments (1 and 2) in the ETNA
region.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="15">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AsX</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GlX</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ser</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Gly</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Thr</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Arg</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Ala</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GABA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Tyr</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Val</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Iso</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">Phe</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">Leu</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">DI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col15" align="center">Deployment 1  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">6.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">8.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">6.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">8.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">6.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">8.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.03</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col15" align="center">Deployment 2 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">8.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">8.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">4.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">6.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">5.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">3.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In contrast to [TEP-C] : [POC], values of [PHAA-C] : [POC] in POM fluxes
declined during both deployments above the OMZ. However, within the core of the
OMZ, at 400 m, [PHAA-C] : [POC] was higher than at 300 and 500 m
(Fig. 5f); the same pattern was also observed for [PHAA-N] : [PN] (data not
shown). A faster decline in PHAA in sinking particles mainly above but not
within the OMZ is different to observations gained for more extensively
oxygen-deficient to full anoxic waters of the eastern tropical South Pacific
(ETSP), which suggested that PHAAs are preferentially degraded under low-oxygen conditions (Van Mooy et al., 2002). In those studies, total
hydrolyzable amino acid (THAA) degradation under anoxic conditions was found
to continue with the same rate compared to oxic conditions, while degradation
of non-amino acid compounds was found to slow down (Pantoja et al., 2004; Van
Mooy et al., 2002). A preferential degradation of N-rich compounds
over POC suggests that microbes degrading organic matter under strongly
oxygen-deficient conditions via denitrification preferentially utilize
nitrogen-rich amino acids (Van Mooy et al., 2002). Our data on PHAA do not
suggest preferential amino acid loss due to components of sinking POM
degradation in the ETNA OMZ. This is in accordance with the absence of
microbial N-loss processes and absence of denitrifying bacteria in ETNA oxygen-deficient waters (Löscher et al., 2016). Instead, a slight increase of
[PHAA-C] : [POC] in the OMZ may point to higher protein production by
bacterial growth as previously observed for mesopelagic waters (Lee and
Cronin, 1982, 1984) and may be related to increased growth efficiency of
bacteria experiencing low-oxygen condition as suggested by Keil et
al. (2016).</p>
      <p>Among all amino acids determined, GlX, Gly, GABA and Leu showed the most
pronounced variations with depth (Fig. 6a–d, Table 2). Whereas GlX and Leu
decreased with depth (Fig. 6a, c), Gly continuously increased. It has
been shown that Gly is enriched in the silica–protein complex of diatom
frustules (Hecky et al., 1973). Preservation of frustules relative to POM may
therefore explain the relative increase of Gly with depth in sinking
particles. GlX has been used as a biomarker (Abramson et al., 2010), since
GlX was shown to be enriched in calcareous plankton (Weiner and Erez, 1984).
During this study %Mol of GlX was higher during the first deployment,
which is in accordance with the observed higher contribution of
[CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lith] to TPM flux. GABA has been used as an indicator for
bacterial decomposition activity (Lee and Cronin, 1982; Dauwe and Middelburg,
1998; Engel et al., 2009). During this study %Mol GABA behaved differently
during the first compared to the second deployment with similar values within
the OMZ, a pattern also observed for opal fluxes (Fig. 3b). Moreover, %Mol
of GABA showed a local peak at 300 m, i.e., within the upper oxycline, and
may point to high bacterial activity at this depth. Leu is an essential amino
acids and readily taken up by heterotrophic microorganisms. Little change in
%Leu in the OMZ core (Fig. 3d) compared to above (&lt; 300 m)
indicated reduced microbial reworking of organic matter under hypoxic
conditions. Another indication of microbial reworking of organic matter can
be derived from the degradation index (Dauwe et al., 1999). During this
study, the DI decreased with increasing depth, but with differences between
the deployments (Fig. 7). During no. 2, DI was slightly higher above the OMZ,
indicating fresher material. During no. 1, the DI did not decrease within the OMZ,
but it continued to decrease from 300 to 500 m depth during
no. 2. Together with observations on Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and opal fluxes, as well as
changes in ballast ratio, data on DI suggest that the particles of more
diatomaceous origin likely continued to decompose under hypoxic conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Despite an improvement in our understanding of the principle processes and drivers of
particle export processes over the past decades, spatial and temporal
variability of export fluxes in the ocean is still difficult to predict.
This is partly due to the lack of observations in different regions of the
mesopelagic realm. Our study is the first to describe fluxes of POM in the
hypoxic mesopelagic waters of the ETNA. Our data suggest a higher transfer
efficiency than expected from seawater temperature solely, suggesting reduced
degradation of organic matter by heterotrophic communities at low oxygen
concentration (&lt; 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
biological carbon pump in high-productivity regimes associated to OMZs, i.e.,
eastern boundary upwelling systems such as the ETNA region off Mauritania,
may therewith be more efficient than in fully oxygenated waters of comparable
temperature. In contrast to suboxic systems (&lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a relatively higher loss of amino acids from POM fluxes
was not evident for the hypoxic water column, suggesting microbial N-loss
processes were comparatively minor within particles. This, however, requires
further investigation since no corresponding rate measurements of
denitrification or anammox were conducted during this study. Organic matter
composition seems to have a large impact on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as carbon
fluxes associated to amino acids were much more attenuated over depth than
carbon fluxes associated to polysaccharide-rich TEP. If these findings are
transferable to other oceanic regions, changes in surface ocean organic
matter composition in response to climate change may also impact the carbon
remineralization depth and therewith may have a feedback potential to
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration that has yet to be assessed.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>All data will become
available at <uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.874268</uri> upon publication.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study is a contribution to the Collaborative Research Center 754/SFB
Sonderforschungsbereich 754 “Climate-Biogeochemistry Interactions in the
Tropical Ocean”. We thank Martin Visbeck, Toste Tanhua, Tobias Hahn,
Sunke Schmidtko and Gerd Krahmann for scientific and technical support as
well as for providing oxygen and CTD data. Many thanks go to the shipboard
scientific party and crew of <italic>Meteor</italic> cruise M105. Jon Roa,
Ruth Flerus, Scarlett Sett and Tania Klüver are acknowledged for
technical assistance. We thank Cindy Lee (Stony Brook University) for helpful
advices. FACLM is supported by the DFG Excellence cluster Future Ocean. All
data will become available at <uri>www.pangea.de</uri> upon publication.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: G. Herndl<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed
by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abramson, L., Lee, C., Liu, Z. F., Wakeham, S. G., and Szlosek, J.: Exchange
between suspended and sinking particles in the northwest Mediterranean as
inferred from the organic composition of in situ pump and sediment trap
samples, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 725–739, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.55.2.0725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2009.55.2.0725</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Cohen, Y.: Can microscale chemical patches persist in
the sea? Microelectrode study of marine snow, fecal pellets, Science, 235,
689–691, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Gotschalk, C. C.: Direct observation of the mass
flocculation of diatom blooms: characteristics, settling velocities and
formation of diatom aggregates, Deep-Sea Res., 36, 159–171, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Passow, U., and Logan, B. E.: The abundance and
significance of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean,
Deep-Sea Res., 40, 1131–1140, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arrigo, K. R.: Carbon cycle – Marine manipulations, Nature, 450, 491–492,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Azetsu-Scott, K. and Passow, U.: Ascending marine particles: Significance of
transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the upper ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
49, 741–748, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bar-Zeev, E. and Rahav, E.: Microbial metabolism of transparent exopolymer
particles during the summer months along a eutrophic estuary system, Front.
Microbiol., 6, 403, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00403" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2015.00403</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Belcher, A., Iversen, M., Manno, C., Henson, S. A., Tarling, G. A., and
Sanders, R.: The role of particle associated microbes in remineralization of
fecal pellets in the upper mesopelagic of the Scotia Sea, Antarctica, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 61, 1049–1064, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lno.10269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10269</ext-link>, 2016</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bishop, J. K. B., Ketten, D. K., and Edmon, J. M.: The chemistry, biology and
vertical flux of particulate organic matter from the upper 400 m of the Cape
Basin in the southeast Atlantic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res., 25, 1121–1161, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O.: The decoupling of production and particulate export in the
surface ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 297–310, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O. and Boyd, P. W.: Shedding light on processes that control
particle export and flux attenuation in the twilight zone, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
54, 1210–1232, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O., Lamborg, C. H., Boyd, P. W., Lam, P. J., Trull, T. W.,
Bidigare, R. R., Bishop, J. K. B., Casciotti, K. L., Dehairs, F., Elskens,
M., Honda, M., Karl, D. M., Siegel, D. A., Silver, M. W., Steinberg, D. K.,
Valdes, J., Van Mooy, B., and Wilson, S.: Revisiting carbon flux through the
ocean's twilight zone, Science, 316, 567–570, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O., Antia, A., Chen, M., Fowler, S. W., Gardner, W.D.,
Gustafsson, O., Harada, K., Michaels, A. F., van der Loeff, M. R., Sarin, M.,
Steinberg, D. K., and Trull, T.: An assessment of the use of sediment traps
for estimating upper ocean particle fluxes, J. Mar. Res., 65, 345–416,
2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cavan, E. L., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Poulton, A. J., Tarling, G. A., Ward, P.,
Daniels, C. J., Fragoso, G. M., and Sanders, R. J.: Attenuation of
particulate organic carbon flux in the Scotia Sea, Southern Ocean, is
controlled by zooplankton fecal pellets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 821–830,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062744</ext-link>, 2015</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. S., Lee, C., and Engel, A.: The influence of extracellular
polysaccharides, growth rate, and free coccoliths on the coagulation
efficiency of <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>, Mar. Chem., 175, 5–17,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B. and Middelburg, J. J.: Amino acids and hexosamines as indicators of
organic matter degradation state in North Sea sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
43, 782–798, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B., Middelburg, J. J., Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. H. R.: Linking
diagenetic alteration of amino acids and bulk organic matter reactivity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1809–1814, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Devol, A. H. and Hartnett, H. E.: Role of the oxygen minimum zone in transfer
of organic carbon to the deep ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 25, 1684–1690, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dittmar, T., Cherrier, J., and Ludwichowski, K.-U.: The Analysis of Amino
Acids in Seawater, in: Practical Guidelines for the Analysis of Seawater, CRC
Press, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ebersbach, F., Assmy, P., and Martin, P., Schulz, I, Wolzenburg, S., and Nöthig, E. M.: Particle flux characterisation and sedimentation patterns of
protistan plankton during the iron fertilisation experiment LOHAFEX in the
Southern Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 89, 94–103, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the increase
in apparent particle stickiness (alpha) during the decline of a diatom bloom,
J. Plankton Res., 22, 485–497, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: Distribution of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the
northeast Atlantic Ocean and their potential significance for aggregation
processes, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 83–92, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: Determination of Marine Gel Particles, in: Practical Guidelines
for the Analysis of Seawater, edited, CRC Press, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Thoms, S., Riebesell, U., Rochelle-Newall, E., and Zondervan, I.:
Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic
carbon, Nature, 428, 929–932, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Engel, A., Abramson, L., Szlosek, J., Liu, Z., Stewart, G., Hirschberg, D.,
and Lee, C.: Investigating the effect of ballasting by CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
<italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>, II: Decomposition of particulate organic matter,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 1408–1419, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Engel, A., Piontek, J., Grossart, H. P., Riebesell, U., Schulz, K. G., and
Sperling, M.: Impact of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment on organic matter dynamics during
nutrient induced coastal phytoplankton blooms, J. Plankton Res., 36,
641–657, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/fbt125</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Giering, S. L. C., Sanders, R., Lampitt, R. S.,, Anderson, T. A.,Tamburini,
C., Boutrif, M., Zubkov, M. V., Marsay, C. M., Henson, S. A., Saw, K., Cook,
K., and Mayor, D. J.: Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean's
twilight zone, Nature, 507, 480–483, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Haake, B., Ittekkot, V., Ramaswamy, V., Nair, R. R., and Honjo, S. Fluxes of
amino acids and hexosamines to the deep Arabian Sea, Mar. Chem., 40,
291–314, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, H. P. and Koroleff, F.: Determination of nutrients, in: Methods of
seawater analysis, edited by: Grasshof, K., 159–228, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hecky, R. E., Mopper, K., Kilham, P., and Degens, E. T.: Amino acid and sugar
composition of diatom cell-walls, Mar. Biol., 19, 323–331,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00348902" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00348902</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Heinze, C., Meyer, S., Goris, N., Anderson, L., Steinfeldt, R., Chang, N., Le
Quere, C., and Bakker, D. C. E.: The ocean carbon sink – impacts,
vulnerabilities and challenges, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 327–358,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-327-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-6-327-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Iversen, M. H., Nowald, N., Ploug, H., Jackson, G. A., and Fischer, G.: High
resolution profiles of vertical particulate organic matter export off Cape
Blanc, Mauritania: Degradation processes and ballasting effects, Deep-Sea
Res., 57, 771–784, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Keil, R. G., Neibauer, J. A., Biladeau, C., van der Elst, K., and Devol, A.
H.: A multiproxy approach to understanding the “enhanced” flux of organic
matter through the oxygen-deficient waters of the Arabian Sea,
Biogeosciences, 13, 2077–2092, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2077-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-2077-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.: Association of sinking organic matter with
various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: Implications for the rain
ratio, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1116, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001765</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Knauer, G. A., Martin, J. H., and Bruland, K. W.: Fluxes of particulate
carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the upper water column of the northeast
Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 26, 97–108, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kohlfeld, K. E. and Ridgewell, A. Glacial-Interglacial Variability in
Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in: Surface Ocean–Lower Atmosphere Processes Geophysical
Research Series, American Geophysical Union, 187, 251–286, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GM000845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GM000845</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento J. L.: The impact of remineralization
on the air-sea carbon balance, Nat. Geosci., 2, 630–635, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo612" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo612</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lam, P. J, Doney, S. C., and Bishop J. K. B.: The dynamic ocean biological
pump: Insights from a global compilation of particulate organic carbon,
CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and opal concentrations profiles from the mesopelagic, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3009, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003868</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lampitt, R. S., Noji, T., and Von Bodungen, B.: What happens to zooplankton
fecal pellets-implications for material flux, Mar. Biol., 104, 15–23,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01313152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF01313152</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, C. and Cronin, C.: The vertical flux of particulate nitrogen in the sea:
Decomposition of amino acids in the Peru upwelling area and the equatorial
Atlantic, J. Mar. Res., 40, 227–251, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, C. and Cronin, C., Particulate amino acids in the sea: Effects of
primary productivity and biological decomposition, J. Mar. Res., 42,
1075–1097, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Le Moigne F., Sanders, R., Villa, M., Martin,  A., Pabortsava, K.,
Planquette, H., Morris, P. J., and Thomalla, S.: On the proportion of ballast
vs. non-ballast associated sinking POC in the surface ocean, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 39, L15610,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052980" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052980</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lindroth, P. and Mopper, K.: High performance liquid chromatographic
determination of subpicomole amounts of amino acids by precolumn fluorescence
derivatization with o-phthaldialdehyde, Anal. Chem., 51, 1667–1674, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Löscher, C. R., Bange, H. W., Schmitz, R. A., Callbeck, C. M., Engel, A.,
Hauss, H., Kanzow, T., Kiko, R., Lavik, G., Loginova, A., Melzner, F., Meyer,
J., Neulinger, S. C., Pahlow, M., Riebesell, U., Schunck, H., Thomsen, S.,
and Wagner, H.: Water column biogeochemistry of oxygen minimum zones in the
eastern tropical North Atlantic and eastern tropical South Pacific oceans,
Biogeosciences, 13, 3585–3606, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mari, X.: Carbon content and C : N ratio of transparent exopolymeric
particles (TEP) produced by bubbling exudates of diatoms, Mar. Ecol. Progr.
Ser., 183, 59–71, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Marsay, C. M., Sanders, R. J., Henson, S. S., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg, E.
P., and Lampitt, R. S.: Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon
flux through the mesopelagic ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 1089–1094,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1415311112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/ pnas.1415311112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, P., Lampitt, R. S., Perry, M. J. Sanders, R. Lee, C., and D'Asaro,
E.: Export and mesopelagic particle flux during a North Atlantic spring
diatom bloom, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 338–349, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: Vertex –
Carbon Cycling in the Northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. A, 34, 267–285,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mortlock, R. A. and Froelich, P. N.: A simple method for the rapid determina-
tion of biogenic opal in pelagic marine sediments, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. A, 36,
1415–1426, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Pantoja, S., Sepúlveda, J., and González, H. E.: Decomposition of
sinking proteinaceous material during fall in the oxygen minimum zone off
northern Chile, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 55–70, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U.: Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in aquatic environments,
Prog. Oceanogr., 55, 287–333, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U., Shipe, R. F., Pak, D. K., Brzezinski, M. A., and Alldredge, A.
L.: Origin of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) and their role in the
sedimentation of particulate matter, Cont. Shelf Res., 21, 327–346, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H. and Bergkvist, J.: Oxygen diffusion limitation and ammonium
production within sinking diatom aggregates under hypoxic and anoxic
conditions, Mar. Chem., 176, 142–149, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Kühl M., Buchholz-Cleven, B., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Anoxic
aggregates – an ephemeral phenomenon in the pelagic environment?, Aquat.
Microb. Ecol., 13, 285–294, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Schlitzer, R.: Ocean Data View, <uri>http://odv.awi.de</uri>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, B., Engel, A., and Schlitzer, R.: Effects of depth- and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent C : N ratios of particulate organic matter (POM) on the
marine carbon cycle, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB2015, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GB002184</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Soutar, A., Kling, S. A., Crill, P. A., Duffrin, E., and Bruland, K. W.:
Monitoring the marine environment through sedimentation, Nature, 266,
136–139, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Stief, P., Kamp, A., Thamdrup, B., and Glud, R. N.: Anaerobic Nitrogen
Turnover by Sinking Diatom Aggregates at Varying Ambient Oxygen Levels,
Front. Micriobiol., 7, 98,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00098</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Stramma, L., Johnson, G. C., Sprintall, J., and Mohrholz, V.: Expanding
Oxygen-Minimum Zones in the Tropical Oceans, Science, 320, 655–658, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Suess, E.: Particulate organic carbon flux in the oceans – surface
productivity and oxygen utilization, Nature, 288, 260–263, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Torres Valdez, S., Painter, C., Martin, A. P., Sanders, R., and Felden, J.:
Data compilation of fluxes of sedimenting material from sediment traps in the
Atlantic Ocean, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 123–145,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-123-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-6-123-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Van Mooy, B. A. S., Keil R. G., and Devol, A. H.: Impact of suboxia on
sinking particulate organic carbon: Enhanced carbon flux and preferential
degradation of amino acids via denitrification, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66,
457–465, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00787" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00787</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Visbeck M.: Oxygen in the Tropical Atlantic OSTRE Second Tracer Survey,
Cruise, No. M105, 17 March–16 April 2014, Mindelo (Cape Verde), Mindelo
(Cape Verde), METEORBerichte, M105, DFG-Senatskommission für
Ozeanographie, 49 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/cr_m105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2312/cr_m105</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Volk, T. and Hoffert, M. I.: Ocean carbon pumps: Analysis of relative
strengths and efficiencies in ocean driven atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes, in:
The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
Natural Variations Archean to Present, edited by: Sundquist, E. T. and
Broecker, W. S., Geophysical Monograph Series, Washington, DC, American
Geophysical Union, 32, 99–110, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Weiner, S. and Erez, J.: Organic matrix of the shell of the foraminifer
<italic>Heterostegina depressa</italic>, J. Foramin. Res., 14, 206–212, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Welschmeyer, N. A.: Fluometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the resence of
chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and pheopigments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1985–1992, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Particle export fluxes to the oxygen minimum zone of the eastern tropical North Atlantic</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">In the ocean, sinking of particulate organic matter (POM) drives carbon
export from the euphotic zone and supplies nutrition to mesopelagic
communities, the feeding and degradation activities of which in turn lead to
export flux attenuation. Oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) minimum zones (OMZs) with suboxic
water layers (&lt; 5 µmol O<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup>) show a lower
carbon flux attenuation compared to well-oxygenated waters
(&gt; 100 µmol O<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup>), supposedly due to
reduced heterotrophic activity. This study focuses on sinking particle fluxes
through hypoxic mesopelagic waters
(&lt; 60 µmol O<sub>2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup>); these represent
 ∼  100 times more ocean volume globally compared to suboxic waters, but
they
have less been studied. Particle export fluxes and attenuation coefficients
were determined in the eastern tropical North Atlantic (ETNA) using two
surface-tethered drifting sediment trap arrays with seven trapping depths located
between 100 and 600 m. Data on particulate matter fluxes were fitted to the
normalized power function <i>F</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> =  <i>F</i><sub>100</sub> (<i>z</i>∕100)<sup>−<i>b</i></sup>, with <i>F</i><sub>100</sub>
being the flux at a depth (<i>z</i>) of 100 m and <i>b</i> being the attenuation
coefficient. Higher <i>b</i> values suggest stronger flux attenuation and are
influenced by factors such as faster degradation at higher temperatures. In
this study, <i>b</i> values of organic carbon fluxes varied between 0.74 and 0.80
and were in the intermediate range of previous reports, but lower than
expected from seawater temperatures within the upper 500 m. During this
study, highest <i>b</i> values were determined for fluxes of particulate
hydrolyzable amino acids (PHAA), followed by particulate organic phosphorus
(POP), nitrogen (PN), carbon (POC), chlorophyll <i>a</i> (Chl <i>a</i>) and transparent
exopolymer particles (TEP), pointing to a sequential degradation of organic
matter components during sinking. Our study suggests that in addition to
O<sub>2</sub> concentration, organic matter composition co-determines transfer
efficiency through the mesopelagic. The magnitude of future carbon export
fluxes may therefore also depend on how organic matter quality in the surface
ocean changes under influence of warming, acidification and enhanced
stratification.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abramson, L., Lee, C., Liu, Z. F., Wakeham, S. G., and Szlosek, J.: Exchange
between suspended and sinking particles in the northwest Mediterranean as
inferred from the organic composition of in situ pump and sediment trap
samples, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 725–739, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.55.2.0725" target="_blank">doi:10.4319/lo.2009.55.2.0725</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Cohen, Y.: Can microscale chemical patches persist in
the sea? Microelectrode study of marine snow, fecal pellets, Science, 235,
689–691, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Gotschalk, C. C.: Direct observation of the mass
flocculation of diatom blooms: characteristics, settling velocities and
formation of diatom aggregates, Deep-Sea Res., 36, 159–171, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Passow, U., and Logan, B. E.: The abundance and
significance of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean,
Deep-Sea Res., 40, 1131–1140, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arrigo, K. R.: Carbon cycle – Marine manipulations, Nature, 450, 491–492,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Azetsu-Scott, K. and Passow, U.: Ascending marine particles: Significance of
transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the upper ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
49, 741–748, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bar-Zeev, E. and Rahav, E.: Microbial metabolism of transparent exopolymer
particles during the summer months along a eutrophic estuary system, Front.
Microbiol., 6, 403, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00403" target="_blank">doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00403</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Belcher, A., Iversen, M., Manno, C., Henson, S. A., Tarling, G. A., and
Sanders, R.: The role of particle associated microbes in remineralization of
fecal pellets in the upper mesopelagic of the Scotia Sea, Antarctica, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 61, 1049–1064, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lno.10269" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/lno.10269</a>, 2016
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bishop, J. K. B., Ketten, D. K., and Edmon, J. M.: The chemistry, biology and
vertical flux of particulate organic matter from the upper 400 m of the Cape
Basin in the southeast Atlantic Ocean, Deep-Sea Res., 25, 1121–1161, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O.: The decoupling of production and particulate export in the
surface ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 297–310, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O. and Boyd, P. W.: Shedding light on processes that control
particle export and flux attenuation in the twilight zone, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
54, 1210–1232, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O., Lamborg, C. H., Boyd, P. W., Lam, P. J., Trull, T. W.,
Bidigare, R. R., Bishop, J. K. B., Casciotti, K. L., Dehairs, F., Elskens,
M., Honda, M., Karl, D. M., Siegel, D. A., Silver, M. W., Steinberg, D. K.,
Valdes, J., Van Mooy, B., and Wilson, S.: Revisiting carbon flux through the
ocean's twilight zone, Science, 316, 567–570, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O., Antia, A., Chen, M., Fowler, S. W., Gardner, W.D.,
Gustafsson, O., Harada, K., Michaels, A. F., van der Loeff, M. R., Sarin, M.,
Steinberg, D. K., and Trull, T.: An assessment of the use of sediment traps
for estimating upper ocean particle fluxes, J. Mar. Res., 65, 345–416,
2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cavan, E. L., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Poulton, A. J., Tarling, G. A., Ward, P.,
Daniels, C. J., Fragoso, G. M., and Sanders, R. J.: Attenuation of
particulate organic carbon flux in the Scotia Sea, Southern Ocean, is
controlled by zooplankton fecal pellets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 821–830,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062744" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2014GL062744</a>, 2015
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. S., Lee, C., and Engel, A.: The influence of extracellular
polysaccharides, growth rate, and free coccoliths on the coagulation
efficiency of <i>Emiliania huxleyi</i>, Mar. Chem., 175, 5–17,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B. and Middelburg, J. J.: Amino acids and hexosamines as indicators of
organic matter degradation state in North Sea sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
43, 782–798, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dauwe, B., Middelburg, J. J., Herman, P. M. J., and Heip, C. H. R.: Linking
diagenetic alteration of amino acids and bulk organic matter reactivity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 1809–1814, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Devol, A. H. and Hartnett, H. E.: Role of the oxygen minimum zone in transfer
of organic carbon to the deep ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 25, 1684–1690, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dittmar, T., Cherrier, J., and Ludwichowski, K.-U.: The Analysis of Amino
Acids in Seawater, in: Practical Guidelines for the Analysis of Seawater, CRC
Press, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ebersbach, F., Assmy, P., and Martin, P., Schulz, I, Wolzenburg, S., and Nöthig, E. M.: Particle flux characterisation and sedimentation patterns of
protistan plankton during the iron fertilisation experiment LOHAFEX in the
Southern Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 89, 94–103, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: The role of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the increase
in apparent particle stickiness (alpha) during the decline of a diatom bloom,
J. Plankton Res., 22, 485–497, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: Distribution of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the
northeast Atlantic Ocean and their potential significance for aggregation
processes, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 83–92, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A.: Determination of Marine Gel Particles, in: Practical Guidelines
for the Analysis of Seawater, edited, CRC Press, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Thoms, S., Riebesell, U., Rochelle-Newall, E., and Zondervan, I.:
Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic
carbon, Nature, 428, 929–932, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Abramson, L., Szlosek, J., Liu, Z., Stewart, G., Hirschberg, D.,
and Lee, C.: Investigating the effect of ballasting by CaCO<sub>3</sub> in
<i>Emiliania huxleyi</i>, II: Decomposition of particulate organic matter,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 1408–1419, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Piontek, J., Grossart, H. P., Riebesell, U., Schulz, K. G., and
Sperling, M.: Impact of CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment on organic matter dynamics during
nutrient induced coastal phytoplankton blooms, J. Plankton Res., 36,
641–657, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt125" target="_blank">doi:10.1093/plankt/fbt125</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Giering, S. L. C., Sanders, R., Lampitt, R. S.,, Anderson, T. A.,Tamburini,
C., Boutrif, M., Zubkov, M. V., Marsay, C. M., Henson, S. A., Saw, K., Cook,
K., and Mayor, D. J.: Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean's
twilight zone, Nature, 507, 480–483, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Haake, B., Ittekkot, V., Ramaswamy, V., Nair, R. R., and Honjo, S. Fluxes of
amino acids and hexosamines to the deep Arabian Sea, Mar. Chem., 40,
291–314, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, H. P. and Koroleff, F.: Determination of nutrients, in: Methods of
seawater analysis, edited by: Grasshof, K., 159–228, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hecky, R. E., Mopper, K., Kilham, P., and Degens, E. T.: Amino acid and sugar
composition of diatom cell-walls, Mar. Biol., 19, 323–331,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00348902" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/BF00348902</a>, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Heinze, C., Meyer, S., Goris, N., Anderson, L., Steinfeldt, R., Chang, N., Le
Quere, C., and Bakker, D. C. E.: The ocean carbon sink – impacts,
vulnerabilities and challenges, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 327–358,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-327-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/esd-6-327-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H., Nowald, N., Ploug, H., Jackson, G. A., and Fischer, G.: High
resolution profiles of vertical particulate organic matter export off Cape
Blanc, Mauritania: Degradation processes and ballasting effects, Deep-Sea
Res., 57, 771–784, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Keil, R. G., Neibauer, J. A., Biladeau, C., van der Elst, K., and Devol, A.
H.: A multiproxy approach to understanding the “enhanced” flux of organic
matter through the oxygen-deficient waters of the Arabian Sea,
Biogeosciences, 13, 2077–2092, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2077-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-13-2077-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.: Association of sinking organic matter with
various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: Implications for the rain
ratio, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1116, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GB001765</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Knauer, G. A., Martin, J. H., and Bruland, K. W.: Fluxes of particulate
carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the upper water column of the northeast
Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 26, 97–108, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kohlfeld, K. E. and Ridgewell, A. Glacial-Interglacial Variability in
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, in: Surface Ocean–Lower Atmosphere Processes Geophysical
Research Series, American Geophysical Union, 187, 251–286, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GM000845" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008GM000845</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento J. L.: The impact of remineralization
on the air-sea carbon balance, Nat. Geosci., 2, 630–635, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo612" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/ngeo612</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Lam, P. J, Doney, S. C., and Bishop J. K. B.: The dynamic ocean biological
pump: Insights from a global compilation of particulate organic carbon,
CaCO<sub>3</sub> and opal concentrations profiles from the mesopelagic, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3009, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003868" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GB003868</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lampitt, R. S., Noji, T., and Von Bodungen, B.: What happens to zooplankton
fecal pellets-implications for material flux, Mar. Biol., 104, 15–23,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01313152" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/BF01313152</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, C. and Cronin, C.: The vertical flux of particulate nitrogen in the sea:
Decomposition of amino acids in the Peru upwelling area and the equatorial
Atlantic, J. Mar. Res., 40, 227–251, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, C. and Cronin, C., Particulate amino acids in the sea: Effects of
primary productivity and biological decomposition, J. Mar. Res., 42,
1075–1097, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Le Moigne F., Sanders, R., Villa, M., Martin,  A., Pabortsava, K.,
Planquette, H., Morris, P. J., and Thomalla, S.: On the proportion of ballast
vs. non-ballast associated sinking POC in the surface ocean, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 39, L15610,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052980" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012GL052980</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Lindroth, P. and Mopper, K.: High performance liquid chromatographic
determination of subpicomole amounts of amino acids by precolumn fluorescence
derivatization with o-phthaldialdehyde, Anal. Chem., 51, 1667–1674, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Löscher, C. R., Bange, H. W., Schmitz, R. A., Callbeck, C. M., Engel, A.,
Hauss, H., Kanzow, T., Kiko, R., Lavik, G., Loginova, A., Melzner, F., Meyer,
J., Neulinger, S. C., Pahlow, M., Riebesell, U., Schunck, H., Thomsen, S.,
and Wagner, H.: Water column biogeochemistry of oxygen minimum zones in the
eastern tropical North Atlantic and eastern tropical South Pacific oceans,
Biogeosciences, 13, 3585–3606, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mari, X.: Carbon content and C : N ratio of transparent exopolymeric
particles (TEP) produced by bubbling exudates of diatoms, Mar. Ecol. Progr.
Ser., 183, 59–71, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Marsay, C. M., Sanders, R. J., Henson, S. S., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg, E.
P., and Lampitt, R. S.: Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon
flux through the mesopelagic ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 1089–1094,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1415311112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/ pnas.1415311112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, P., Lampitt, R. S., Perry, M. J. Sanders, R. Lee, C., and D'Asaro,
E.: Export and mesopelagic particle flux during a North Atlantic spring
diatom bloom, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 338–349, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: Vertex –
Carbon Cycling in the Northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. A, 34, 267–285,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mortlock, R. A. and Froelich, P. N.: A simple method for the rapid determina-
tion of biogenic opal in pelagic marine sediments, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. A, 36,
1415–1426, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Pantoja, S., Sepúlveda, J., and González, H. E.: Decomposition of
sinking proteinaceous material during fall in the oxygen minimum zone off
northern Chile, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 55–70, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U.: Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in aquatic environments,
Prog. Oceanogr., 55, 287–333, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U., Shipe, R. F., Pak, D. K., Brzezinski, M. A., and Alldredge, A.
L.: Origin of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) and their role in the
sedimentation of particulate matter, Cont. Shelf Res., 21, 327–346, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H. and Bergkvist, J.: Oxygen diffusion limitation and ammonium
production within sinking diatom aggregates under hypoxic and anoxic
conditions, Mar. Chem., 176, 142–149, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Kühl M., Buchholz-Cleven, B., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Anoxic
aggregates – an ephemeral phenomenon in the pelagic environment?, Aquat.
Microb. Ecol., 13, 285–294, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Schlitzer, R.: Ocean Data View, <a href="http://odv.awi.de" target="_blank">http://odv.awi.de</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, B., Engel, A., and Schlitzer, R.: Effects of depth- and
CO<sub>2</sub>-dependent C : N ratios of particulate organic matter (POM) on the
marine carbon cycle, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB2015, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002184" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003GB002184</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Soutar, A., Kling, S. A., Crill, P. A., Duffrin, E., and Bruland, K. W.:
Monitoring the marine environment through sedimentation, Nature, 266,
136–139, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Stief, P., Kamp, A., Thamdrup, B., and Glud, R. N.: Anaerobic Nitrogen
Turnover by Sinking Diatom Aggregates at Varying Ambient Oxygen Levels,
Front. Micriobiol., 7, 98,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00098" target="_blank">doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00098</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Stramma, L., Johnson, G. C., Sprintall, J., and Mohrholz, V.: Expanding
Oxygen-Minimum Zones in the Tropical Oceans, Science, 320, 655–658, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Suess, E.: Particulate organic carbon flux in the oceans – surface
productivity and oxygen utilization, Nature, 288, 260–263, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Torres Valdez, S., Painter, C., Martin, A. P., Sanders, R., and Felden, J.:
Data compilation of fluxes of sedimenting material from sediment traps in the
Atlantic Ocean, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 123–145,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-123-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/essd-6-123-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Van Mooy, B. A. S., Keil R. G., and Devol, A. H.: Impact of suboxia on
sinking particulate organic carbon: Enhanced carbon flux and preferential
degradation of amino acids via denitrification, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66,
457–465, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00787" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00787</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Visbeck M.: Oxygen in the Tropical Atlantic OSTRE Second Tracer Survey,
Cruise, No. M105, 17 March–16 April 2014, Mindelo (Cape Verde), Mindelo
(Cape Verde), METEORBerichte, M105, DFG-Senatskommission für
Ozeanographie, 49 pp., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/cr_m105" target="_blank">doi:10.2312/cr_m105</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Volk, T. and Hoffert, M. I.: Ocean carbon pumps: Analysis of relative
strengths and efficiencies in ocean driven atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> changes, in:
The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>:
Natural Variations Archean to Present, edited by: Sundquist, E. T. and
Broecker, W. S., Geophysical Monograph Series, Washington, DC, American
Geophysical Union, 32, 99–110, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Weiner, S. and Erez, J.: Organic matrix of the shell of the foraminifer
<i>Heterostegina depressa</i>, J. Foramin. Res., 14, 206–212, 1984.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Welschmeyer, N. A.: Fluometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the resence of
chlorophyll <i>b</i> and pheopigments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1985–1992, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
