<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-2481-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Long-term carbon and nitrogen dynamics at SPRUCE revealed through
stable isotopes in peat profiles</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Long-term carbon and nitrogen dynamics at SPRUCE}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E.~A.~Hobbie et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hobbie</surname><given-names>Erik A.</given-names></name>
          <email>erik.hobbie@unh.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-6307</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Janet</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hanson</surname><given-names>Paul J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-3561</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Iversen</surname><given-names>Colleen M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>McFarlane</surname><given-names>Karis J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6390-7863</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Thorp</surname><given-names>Nathan R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Hofmockel</surname><given-names>Kirsten S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Earth Systems Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham,
New Hampshire, 03824, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Soil and Water Management  &amp;  Crop Nutrition Laboratory, FAO/IAEA
Agriculture  &amp;  Biotechnology<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Climate Change Science Institute and Environmental Sciences Division,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Livermore, California, 94551, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State
University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99354, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Erik A. Hobbie (erik.hobbie@unh.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>2481</fpage><lpage>2494</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Peatlands encode information about past vegetation dynamics,
climate, and microbial processes. Here, we used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C patterns from 16 peat profiles to deduce how the
biogeochemistry of the Marcell S1 forested bog in northern Minnesota
responded to environmental and vegetation change over the past
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 000 years. In multiple regression analyses, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C correlated strongly with depth, plot location, C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
 %N, and each other. Correlations with  %N,  %C, C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and
the other isotope accounted for 80 % of variance for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and
38 % of variance for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, reflecting N and C losses. In
contrast, correlations with depth and topography (hummock or hollow)
reflected peatland successional history and climate. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
in plots closer to uplands may reflect upland-derived DON inputs and
accompanying shifts in N dynamics in the lagg drainage area surrounding the
bog. The Suess effect (declining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> since the Industrial
Revolution) lowered <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in recent surficial samples. High
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55 cm probably indicated the depth of
ectomycorrhizal activity after tree colonization of the peatland over the
last 400 years, as confirmed by the occasional presence of wood down to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 cm depth. High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4000 years BP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>105 cm) could reflect a transition at that time to slower rates of peat
accumulation, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C discrimination during peat decomposition may
increase in importance. Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>213
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>225 cm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8500 years BP) corresponded to a warm period during a
sedge-dominated rich fen stage. The above processes appear to be the primary
drivers of the observed isotopic patterns, whereas there was no clear
evidence for methane dynamics influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C patterns.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling are tightly linked (Schlesinger et al.,
2011) and understanding the controls of C and N turnover in boreal peatlands
is fundamental to predicting whether this ecosystem will continue to function
as a strong C sink or switch to a source of carbon dioxide (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to environmental change. While 80–90 % of
C deposited in peatlands is lost via decomposition and microbial respiration
in the upper aerobic layers of the acrotelm (Belyea and Malmer, 2004), the
deeper anaerobic catotelm accumulates recalcitrant <italic>Sphagnum</italic> litter
and other organic matter due to low mineral nutrient availability and
waterlogged conditions. Carbon loss from the catotelm can be 50 % within
the first 1700 years with only an additional 15 % over the next
5800 years (Loisel et al., 2014), thus making peatlands an important
long-term C sink.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Conceptual diagram of movement of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N)
during peatland development from rich fen to bog. Major processes
influencing isotopic composition include methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) flux from surficial
and deeper layers (dotted upward arrow), methanotrophy and subsequent
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> recapture by <italic>Sphagnum</italic>, vascular plant transport of methane, N uptake by
vascular plants and mycorrhizal fungi, and the sequestration of C and N over
time in deeper peat. Assimilation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
Suess effect influences modern peat carbon (rightmost top box); N flux from
adjacent uplands influences productivity in the lagg region, peatland
topography of hummocks and hollows influences methanogenesis and
methanotrophy, and trees influence partitioning of nitrogen. Climate (not
shown) will influence the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of fixed carbon. By
rotating the figure 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> counterclockwise, the lower boxes
correspond stratigraphically to the peat profile.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Factors influencing C and N dynamics can be investigated using stable isotope
measurements because biochemical and physical reactions proceed faster with
lighter isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N) than with heavier isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N). Thus, different pools and fluxes can vary in their isotopic
signatures (expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N). Climate and
foliar  %N can also influence the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of plant photosynthate
by determining the relative rates of stomatal flux versus fixation of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Brooks et al., 1998; Ménot and Burns, 2001; Sparks and
Ehleringer, 1997). Radiocarbon measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) are also important in
biogeochemical research, as they allow dating of peat profiles and linking
stable isotope patterns to specific climatic periods or vegetational phases
of peatland succession. The dominant factors influencing organic C and N
turnover can be identified by characterizing isotopic signatures of specific
compounds or plant components through the peat profile (Nichols et al., 2009;
Gavazov et al., 2016), but interpreting bulk peat signatures remains
challenging. Deeper peats in the catotelm reflect both historic vegetation and accumulated effects of anaerobic fermentation occurring over
thousands of years. In contrast, aerobic decomposition in the acrotelm alters
biogeochemistry over shorter timescales.</p>
      <p>Analysis of C and N in peatland cores is a potential way to determine key
biogeochemical processes involved in organic matter burial and release.
Cores taken through the peat profile trace the trajectory of peatland
succession and contain the biogeochemical fingerprint of shifts in climate
and vegetation states. For example, fens and bogs differ in the chemical and
isotopic composition of the organic peat profile, reflecting differences in
their pH, redox state, hydrologic inputs, and relative abundance of vascular
plants compared to <italic>Sphagnum</italic> (Vitt and Weider, 2006). Warming, drying, and increased
N availability can also alter isotopic composition through changes in plant
community composition, with concomitant effects on C and N dynamics,
including enhanced production of greenhouse gases such as CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and nitrous oxide (N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) (Yavitt et al., 1987; Regina et al.,
1996; Bergman et al., 1999; Juutinen et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Our conceptual model of C and N dynamics during peatland succession is shown
in Fig. 1. Methanogenesis, methanotrophy, refixation of methane-derived
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and plant composition influence the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of surficial
layers (Ficken et al., 1998; Pancost et al., 2000), and the resulting
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signal is subsequently altered further during diagenesis of
these buried peat soils over time. Topography could also influence
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C because oxygen availability decreases with increasing water
depth, resulting in different levels of methanogenesis and methanotrophy in
hummocks versus hollows. Topography further influences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C because
hummock C is older than hollow C for equivalent depths below the mean bog
surface. The anthropogenic addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the
atmosphere via the burning of fossil fuels (the Suess effect; Ehleringer et
al., 2000) also increases the gradient between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted surficial
horizons and older, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched deeper horizons.</p>
      <p>How N dynamics will influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N patterns is also shown in
Fig. 1. In aerobic soils, uptake by mycorrhizal fungi and subsequent transfer
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted N to host plants increases the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N divergence
between deeper, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched horizons and surficial horizons (Hobbie and
Ouimette, 2009), with such processes presumably not operating in
<italic>Sphagnum</italic> and deep-rooted nonmycorrhizal plants (Kohzu et al., 2003),
but potentially operating in forested bogs. Nitrogen transport from uplands
can be considerable in the lagg drainage region surrounding a peatland (Verry
and Janssens, 2011), and depending on the drainage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, may
influence the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of the receiving peatland. For example, lagg
drainage could contribute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted nitrate or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched
dissolved organic N (DON) (Kalbitz and Geyer, 2002) that differ isotopically
from N fixation (0 ‰) or atmospheric N inputs (Stewart et al., 1995;
Högberg, 1997). In addition, biogeochemical hotspots are important for N
dynamics in peatlands (Hill et al., 2016). Microbial processing of organic
matter in soils commonly increases the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of
the residual material (Nadelhoffer and Fry, 1994), although a N loss
mechanism must also be present for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N to be affected. Such
processing decreases the C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N of organic matter, since respiratory C
losses are generally greater than N losses.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Peatland stages at SPRUCE based on stratigraphy at the S2 watershed
in the Marcell National Forest, USA (Verry and Janssens, 2011). MAT: mean annual temperature; MAP: mean annual precipitation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stage</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Years BP</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Climate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9300–7400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MAT 4–5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), MAP 700 mm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9200–6500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Warm and dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rich fen-sedge peat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8400–5500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7400–6100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, MAP 700–800 mm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6500–6000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cooling trend</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6100–3200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Stable climate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Transitional fen</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5600–3000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3200–2400</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cooled slightly</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Open poor fen</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2900–390</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2000–1800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Warmer and drier</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Little Ice Age</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">600–150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cooled 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, MAT 800 mm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Forested bog</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">384/130–now</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Here, we used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, %N, and %C patterns of
peat profiles, plant tissues, and fungal hyphae sampled from the Spruce and
Peatland Responses Under Climatic and Environmental Change (SPRUCE)
experimental site in northern Minnesota, USA, at the Marcell S1 bog to
investigate potential factors influencing C and N turnover in peatlands. In
addition to the continuous variables of elemental concentration, isotopic
signatures, and depth, nominal variables included plot location, topography
(hummock versus hollow), and vegetation (near trees or not). We used
concurrent radiocarbon measurements (Iversen et al., 2014) to link the stable
isotope measurements to the 11 000-year history of C and N dynamics at the
SPRUCE experimental site. With this combination of data, we studied how in
situ biogeochemistry and peatland succession may have influenced the
isotopic profiles. We inferred the path of peatland succession from a prior
study of the nearby S2 bog, as given in Table 1. Successional history at S1
should be similar, with the vegetation proceeding from a rich fen to a
transitional fen <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5500 years BP, transitioning to a poor fen
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2900 years BP, and then changing to a forested bog <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 years
BP.</p>
      <p>Isotopic patterns reflect numerous biogeochemical processes. Here, we
addressed four potential drivers of isotopic variation in a boreal peatland
profile:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p>microbial processing and biochemical composition (as inferred from
%N, %C, and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N) will influence peatland <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>proximity to uplands will increase N concentrations and peat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>peatland colonization by ectomycorrhizal trees will increase peat
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N enrichment between surficial and deeper peat.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>in upper peat layers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C depletion will reflect anthropogenic
declines in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Suess effect).</p></list-item></list>
In addition to these drivers, we will examine the covariation of peat
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N with climate or vegetation through the
Holocene.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Site description</title>
      <p>Soil and fungal samples were collected from the SPRUCE experimental site at
the 8 ha S1 bog in the USDA Forest Service Marcell Experimental Forest
in northern Minnesota, USA (47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30.476<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>27.162<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). The bog is dominated by the trees <italic>Picea mariana</italic> (Mill.) Britton, Sterns and Poggenb. and <italic>Larix laricina</italic> (Du
Roi) K. Koch; ericaceous shrubs (<italic>Ledum groenlandicum</italic> Oeder;
<italic>Chamaedaphne calyculata</italic> (L.) Moench.); and <italic>Sphagnum </italic>mosses. Various forbs and sedges are also present. The bog topography can be
separated into hummocks (protruding above the average water table) and
depressed hollows, and divided into areas with trees (<italic>Picea</italic> or
<italic>Larix</italic>) or without trees. Average annual air temperature from 1961 to
2005 was 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C with yearly mean extremes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>38 and
30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and average annual precipitation of 768 mm (Sebestyen et al.,
2011). Average pH of the peat is 4.1 and average gravimetric water content is
7.40 g H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dry peat (Iversen et al., 2014). The water table
fluctuates about 30 cm annually and water table depth can reach 1.4 m over
the course of a 50-year record (Sebestyen et al., 2011). The bog maintains a
perched water table with a hydraulic gradient about 1 m above the
surrounding aquifer, which is composed of outwash sand (Verry et al., 2011).
Because of the high water table, root distribution is quite shallow compared
to upland sites (Iversen et al., 2017). In total, 93 % of fine roots were in the
0–10 cm depth, 6 % at 10–20 cm depth, and only 1 % at 20–30 cm
depth (A. Malhotra, personal communication, 2017).
The boundary between the acrotelm and catotelm at SPRUCE is around 30–40 cm
depth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Procedures </title>
      <p>Peat cores for this analysis were collected in mid-August of 2012 from
locations along three boardwalks extending out into the bog beyond the lagg
region (Fig. 2). Surface peat (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0–30 cm) was collected using a
modified hole saw, while deeper samples down to mineral soil
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30–250 cm) were collected using a Russian peat corer. Cores were
taken in both hummocks and hollows, with 0 cm defined as the surface of
hollows and hummock heights above that assigned positive depths. Cores were
bulked and homogenized every 10 cm over the 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 cm depth, every
25 cm from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 cm, and over the entire 50 cm increment from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>250 cm (in some cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>300 cm was reached before mineral
soil was observed). Cores were sampled at 17 locations (Fig. 2; the locations
of experimental plots distributed across the three boardwalks) and material
from 16 of these locations was used for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N,
and radiocarbon measurements reported here. At locations 4, 5, 6, and 7 along
the southern boardwalk, separate cores were taken within 150 cm of
<italic>Picea</italic> or <italic>Larix </italic> trees and in the open (no trees within
150 cm), and the distinction designated as “treed” or “untreed”.</p>
      <p>Peat cores were analyzed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N,
%C, %N, and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N by depth increment, with the depth increment
recorded as the average depth (for example, 0 to 10 cm in a hummock given as
5 cm). Peat cores were analyzed in hummocks to a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 cm and in
hollows to the bottom of the core (between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>300 cm). Live woody
plant foliage and fine roots to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 cm were collected in August 2012 and
live <italic>Sphagnum</italic> in 2013.</p>
      <p>To collect fungal hyphae, in-growth cores were constructed. Mesh
(40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) in-growth bags (10 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm) were filled with
sterile sand. Bags were incubated in the field in paired hummock and hollows
at six locations in the bog. In hummocks, bags were inserted at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 to
0 cm above the adjacent hollow and in both locations from 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 cm and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 cm below the hollow surface. Bags were installed on
5 June 2013 and recovered on 20 September 2013. Sand from in-growth bags was
combined with ultrapure water and mixed at 80 rpm for 20 min. Suspended
hyphae were removed with tweezers and the process was repeated until all
hyphae were collected. Hyphal biomass was dried in the oven at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 48 h. Of 30 in-growth samples, 20 generated enough hyphal mass for
analysis. All 20 samples were treated as independent replicates in
statistical analyses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Aerial photograph of the S1 bog showing the 16 experimental plots
(each 10.4 m in diameter to the outer edge of the visible perimeter
boardwalk). Plot numbers on the image represent the plot areas within which
peat was sampled. The lagg boundary is delineated with a dashed line, and
the inset indicates the location of the bog within Minnesota and the Marcell
Experimental Forest.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Isotopic and elemental analysis</title>
      <p>Radiocarbon content of homogenized bulk peat was measured on the Van de
Graaff FN accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS) at the Center for AMS at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Peat samples were not chemically
pretreated prior to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C measurement. Samples were prepared by
sealed-tube combustion to CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the presence of CuO and Ag and then
reduced onto Fe powder in the presence of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Vogel et al., 1984).
Radiocarbon isotopic values had an average AMS precision of 2.6 ‰
and were corrected for mass-dependent fractionation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values from analyses conducted at the Department of Geological Sciences
Stable Isotope Laboratory at the University of California, Davis, using a GVI
Optima stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Radiocarbon values are
reported here in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C notation corrected for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C decay since
1950 (Stuiver and Polach, 1977). Calibrated ages were determined using Calib
(<uri>http://calib.qub.ac.uk/calib/</uri>) or CaliBomb (Reimer et al., 2004) with
INTCAL13 (Reimer et al., 2013) and Northern Hemisphere Zone 1 bomb curve
extension (Hua et al., 2013) atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C calibration curves. Years
before present (BP) refer to years prior to 1950. For more recent samples,
calendar years AD may also be used.</p>
      <p>These same soil samples and additional samples of hyphae and foliage were
analyzed for %C, %N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at the
University of New Hampshire Stable Isotope Laboratory using a Costech 4010
elemental analyzer coupled to a Thermo Delta Plus XP IRMS. Standard
deviations of laboratory standards (tuna, NIST 1515, and NIST 1575a) for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C averaged less than 0.2 ‰. Fine
roots of the woody vascular plants were analyzed for their stable isotopic
composition at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory on an Integra CN mass
spectrometer (SerCon, Crewe, UK), using standards traceable to NIST
8547-ammonium sulfate or 8542-sucrose (NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Statistical tests</title>
      <p>The statistical program JMP (SAS Institute, Middleton, Massachusetts, USA)
was used for statistical analyses. Reported values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE, unless
otherwise specified. Regression models for soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N were tested. Factors included in the regression model included
nominal variables of vegetation type (treed or non-treed), topography (hollow
or hummock), and plot number. Depths with only a single measurement were
generally excluded, unless they were very similar in depth to another value.
Continuous variables included %N, %C, and isotopic values.</p>
      <p>To test whether plot location, proximity to trees, depth, topography, and
elemental concentrations influenced the carbon and N isotope patterns in peat
profiles, we used multiple regression analyses. Sample %C, %N,
C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N were included as
continuous variables. Because the effects of depth or plot location on N and
C dynamics are unlikely to change continuously (for example, methanogenesis
requires an anaerobic soil and plots at bog edges may have different
hydrology and N dynamics than plots in the middle of the bog; Urban and
Eisenreich, 1988), plot was treated as a nominal (categorical) variable in
our regression models. To avoid over-parameterizing the model, depth was
treated as a continuous variable with a cubic transformation (that is, the
regression model included model depth, the square of model depth, and the cube of model
depth as additional parameters). Stepwise regression was used and
model selection based on the lowest Akaike information criterion with a
correction for sample size (AICc). Within a given depth, values for
radiocarbon were tested for correlations against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and the slope of the regression estimated.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, %N, %C, and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N versus
depth. Values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SE) are averaged across hummock versus hollow cores and
across treed versus non-treed cores. Averages (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SE) are given for each
depth, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> given in parentheses following the depth: 25 (3), 22 (7), 15
(14), 5 (14), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 (19), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 (17), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 (17), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 (15), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 (17),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55 (17), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65 (17), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>85 (18), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>112 (17), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>162
(17), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>213  (3), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>225 cm (8).
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C versus depth, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N versus
depth, <bold>(c)</bold>  %C versus depth, <bold>(d)</bold>  %N versus depth,
and
<bold>(e)</bold> C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{$\delta^{{{13}}}$C and $\delta^{{{15}}}$N in plants and fungal hyphae}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N in plants and fungal hyphae</title>
      <p>Of the six vascular plant taxa tested, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of foliage varied from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ in <italic>Larix</italic> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 ‰ in <italic>Picea</italic>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of plant foliage varied more widely than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.5 ‰ for <italic>Picea</italic> to 2.5 ‰ for
<italic>Eriophorum</italic>. Fine root <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ‰ for <italic>Larix</italic>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 ‰ for <italic>Picea</italic>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ‰ for shrubs. Fine root <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 ‰ for <italic>Larix</italic>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ‰ for <italic>Picea</italic>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 ‰ for shrubs, whereas coarse roots of shrubs
averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 ‰. If we assume plant productivity
patterns are similar aboveground and belowground, then the
productivity-weighted average in vascular plants for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.2 ‰ for foliage and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.3 ‰ for roots (Table 2).
Fungal hyphae from in-growth cores (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) averaged
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ‰ (se) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average foliar values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, %C,
%N, and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">%N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">%C flux<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Chamaedaphne</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">34.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>cd</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Eriophorum</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Larix</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>bc</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">65.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Ledum</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>bc</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">51.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">41.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.07<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Picea</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">79.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">38.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Smilacina</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ab</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.53 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Sphagnum</italic><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hollow<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hummock<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Weighted average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
inputs is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.2 ‰, based on carbon fixation measurements
of different taxa (R.J. Norby, personal communication). ANOVA comparing
means in vascular plants used a post hoc Tukey test, with log C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N tested in
place of C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Data from Tfaily et al. (2014). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Top 10 cm only,
primarily <italic>Sphagnum</italic>. Different superscripted letters after numbers within a column indicate a significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) Tukey post hoc ANOVA test.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{$\delta^{{{13}}}$C and $\delta^{{{15}}}$N in peat profiles}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N in peat profiles</title>
      <p>Carbon isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) values of peat in the profile increased from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29 ‰ in the top 10 cm of hummocks and hollows to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26 ‰ at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>112 cm and then decreased slightly at greater depths.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values changed most rapidly from 0 cm to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 cm depth
(Fig. 3a). Nitrogen isotope values in the peat profile increased from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3‰ in hummocks above the water level to around 1 ‰ at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 cm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N then decreased to 0 ‰ at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>85 cm before
increasing again to 1.5 ‰ at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 cm. Similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N changed most rapidly from 0 cm to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 cm depth (Fig. 3b).</p>
      <p>In a stepwise regression model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N,
C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, %N, %C, and depth as continuous variables and the vegetation
type, topography, and plot sampling location as nominal variables, all
factors were retained in our final model, including four terms for
partitioning the 16 plots. The model explained 85 % of the total variance
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in peat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The three depth terms
(depth, depth squared, and depth cubed) explained 45 %, %N explained
10 %, C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N 11 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N 15 %, %C explained
2 %, the four plot terms explained 7 %, and proximity to trees
explained 3 % of the variance (Table 3). Topography explained 10 % of
variance, with hollows lower than hummocks by 0.89 ‰ in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Results of the stepwise model testing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N are given in Table S1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Stepwise regression model for explaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N in peat profiles at SPRUCE. Plot, topography (hummock versus
hollow), and nearby presence of trees are treated as nominal variables.
Value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SE; Var <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  % variance explained;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 238. Depth in cm, depth-squared and depth-cubed terms are also
included in the model. Plots are sequentially separated into two groups to
maximize the variance explained. Plot groups are Group 1,
{19 &amp; 8 &amp; 11 &amp; 20 &amp; 10 &amp; 15 &amp; 5 vs.
9 &amp; 16 &amp; 21 &amp; 6 &amp; 14 &amp; 4 &amp; 7 &amp; 13 &amp; 17}; Group 2, {15 vs. 5};
Group 3, {9 &amp; 16 &amp; 921 &amp; 6 &amp; 14 &amp; 4 &amp; 7 vs. 13 &amp; 17}; Group 4,
{14 &amp; 4 vs. 7}; Group 5, {10 &amp; 6 &amp; 11 &amp; 13 &amp; 9 &amp; 15 vs.
17 &amp; 16 &amp; 5 &amp; 8 &amp; 14 &amp; 20 &amp; 7 &amp; 21 &amp; 19 &amp; 4}; Group 6, {13 vs.
9}; Group 7, {17 &amp; 16 &amp; 5 &amp; 8 &amp; 14 &amp; 20 &amp; 7 &amp; 21 vs. 19 &amp; 4}.
Within a group, the first plots listed have the given value, the second plots
listed (after vs.) have the negative of the given value.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C model, adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.846</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col8" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N model, adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">%Var</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">%Var</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Intercept</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.196 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.164 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.115</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">%N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.036 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.162</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">%N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.963 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.360</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">%C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.033 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.002</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">%C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.107 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.023</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.060 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hummock</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Hummock</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.023</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Treed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.63e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Depth<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.021</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.21e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Depth<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.27e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.032</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Group 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.121 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.031</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Group 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.305 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.070</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Group 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.151 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.081</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.062</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Group 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.280 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.188</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.137</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Group 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.111 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.047</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.018</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Group 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.308 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.090</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">&lt; 0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Group 4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.163 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.065</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Depth coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
calculated from the three depth terms in the regression models. The depth in
centimeters for specific points is indicated on the line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The stepwise regression model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of peat included <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and the same variables as in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C regression model.
This model explained 66 % of the total variance (adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with
proximity to trees and topography dropping out of the regression model. Of
the explained variance, the three depth terms accounted for 8 %, %N
22 %, %C 7 %, C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N 17 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C 34 %, and the
three plot terms 11 % (Table 3).</p>
      <p>The influence of depth and location in our regression models on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values is plotted in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively.
The influence of depth was negative above 0 cm (corresponding to the surface
of the hollows), increased regularly from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 cm, and then varied
little in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the deepest horizons while still increasing in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N. There was some spatial patterning of values across plots,
with two plots (4 and 19) near to the western upland high in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
(Figs. 2 and 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Plot coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C from
regression models in peat profiles, as calculated from Table 1. The plot
number is the symbol for the paired coefficient values. For clarity, plots
with identical or near-identical values are indicated with circles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlations between radiocarbon and stable isotopes by depth, and
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C for that depth. Hummock vs. hollow plots and treed vs.
non-treed plots were averaged together. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE columns reflect the shift in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
with a 1 ‰ shift in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N. Statistically significant correlations are bolded. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mean<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>SE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Age</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (‰)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(cal yr BP)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">adj. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(‰)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">adj. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(‰)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Modern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.881</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.157</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.943</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.892</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Modern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.325</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.106</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.195</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.889</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Modern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.219</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>13</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>6</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.039</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.221</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>7</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>3</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.038</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Modern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.682</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>74</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>13</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">&lt; <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.039</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.225</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Modern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.352</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>33</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>10</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.004</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.293</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>18</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>6</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.01</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">126 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Modern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.053</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.762</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.459</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Modern</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.018</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.261</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.414</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>62</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>16</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>102 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 180</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.228</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>246</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>100</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>0.026</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.053</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.704</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>182 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1730 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 260</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.041</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.575</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.570</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>58</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>12</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">&lt; <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>203 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">nd</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.447</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.512</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>52</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>12</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">&lt; <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>288 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 600</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.486</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>100</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>24</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">&lt; <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.34</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><bold>44</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>14</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><bold>0.006</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>359 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.362</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.049</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.651</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>113</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>392 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3950 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.081</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.134</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.276</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>163</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>486 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.713</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>68</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>11</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">&lt; <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><bold>0.537</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>31</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>7</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">&lt; <bold>0.001</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>213</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>587 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.811</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 136</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.801</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.912</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>225</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>567 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6775 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 260</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.089</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.677</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.101</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.784</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p>nd: not
determined.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C;
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/2481/2017/bg-14-2481-2017-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Although overall patterns of radiocarbon with depth were clear, radiocarbon
varied widely at any given depth, and correlated significantly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at several depths (Table 4). Radiocarbon correlated
positively with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>162, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5, 5, and 15 cm, and correlated
negatively with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65 cm. In contrast,
radiocarbon correlated positively with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5, and 15 cm, and correlated negatively with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>162 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 cm. Overall patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N are shown in Fig. 6a and b, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Potential causes of shifts in $\delta^{{{13}}}$C and $\delta^{{{15}}}$N in peat profiles}?><title>Potential causes of shifts in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N in peat profiles</title>
      <p>Isotopic ratios within the profile can shift if elemental fluxes in or out of
the system differ isotopically from profile material (Fig. 1). Loss of labile
C via respiration, methanogenesis, or leaching (Kolka et al., 1999) could
alter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of the residual material, as could inputs of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched material such as roots or mycorrhizal hyphae. Similarly,
changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can alter the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of photosynthetically fixed C, whereas changes in moisture,
temperature, or photosynthetic capacity can alter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C discrimination
between atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and fixed C. For N, loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted
material from the bulk peat via mycorrhizal transfer to fine roots, direct
root uptake, denitrification, or leaching of organic or inorganic N could
raise the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N of the remaining soil organic matter. Inputs of N
via atmospheric deposition, N fixation, or transport from surrounding uplands
could also influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N if these inputs differ isotopically from
peat profile values. These processes can be linked to past climate and
vegetation with profile radiocarbon measurements that are calibrated to
calendar years. Here, we used radiocarbon to indicate the potential timing of
shifts in some of the primary drivers that influenced C and N stable isotope
patterns within the peat profiles at SPRUCE, such as the Suess effect and the
transition to a forested bog, but also examined processes that were not tied
to a particular time period, such as differences in C and N stoichiometry or
proximity to uplands.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{{\%}N, \,{\%}C, and C\,:\,N stoichiometry influenced $\delta^{{{13}}}$C and $\delta^{{{15}}}$N patterns}?><title>%N,  %C, and C : N stoichiometry influenced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N patterns</title>
      <p>%N, %C, and C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N contributed a combined 47 and 23 % of
explained variance, respectively, to our regression models of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C. These factors reflected the biochemical and isotopic
composition of the original plant material, but also reflected how the
chemical structure and isotopic composition of plant material has altered
during its slow decomposition at S1.</p>
      <p>Microbially driven C loss raises soil organic matter %N, lowers C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
and enriches soil organic matter in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (resulting from loss of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ehleringer et al., 2000; Alewell et al., 2011).
The positive correlation of %N with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C may therefore reflect
an underlying correlation between the accumulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched
microbial necromass (Wallander et al., 2004) and the increased N content of
the peatland organic matter. Fungal %N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C are positively
correlated (Hobbie et al., 2012) because of the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of
microbially synthesized protein relative to other microbial components such
as carbohydrates and lipids. In contrast, the positive correlation of
C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and negative correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
presumably reflect a legacy of buried wood, which, relative to other plant
material, should be high in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Trudell et al., 2004) and high in
C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N. This can be seen clearly in the few samples with C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N greater
than 70, which is higher than any plant tissue measured in this study.
Although some <italic>Sphagnum</italic> taxa under pristine conditions can be very
low in %N (0.22 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.6 ‰) and high in
C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 190) (Asada et al., 2005a), here, the presence of wood was
noted seven times during laboratory examination of the 238 samples at depths
from 15 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 cm, with those samples twice as high in C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N (average,
69) as other samples and also significantly higher in C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N in
multiple regression analysis (see Table S2).</p>
      <p>The negative correlation of %N with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N indicated that either
added or removed N is low in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N. One possibility for removal is
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted N has been transferred from mycorrhizal fungi to
plants. Alternatively, N could be added via fixation with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 ‰, which would lower overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values
deeper in the peat profile. However, we point out that only at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55 cm are %N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N significantly and negatively
correlated (Table S3). At these depths, %N is about
1.8 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N is about 1 ‰ (Fig. 3b, d). The value of
the coefficient for %N in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N regression,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.96 ‰ %N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, implied that the perturbing N has a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N value that is
1.8 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.96 ‰ %N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> less than that of
1 ‰, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.3 ‰, which is too low to be fixed N. The
apparent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N depletion of 5.3 ‰ against the source N is a
plausible value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N discrimination between mycorrhizal fungi and
host plants (Hobbie and Colpaert, 2003).</p>
      <p>Correlations of carbon concentration with stable isotopes provide information
about chemical composition or degree of processing. The negative correlation
of %C with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is expected based on the chemical composition of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted compound classes of lignin, aromatics, and lipids, which
are high in %C (Poorter et al., 1997; Hobbie et al., 2002). Initial
decomposition of <italic>Sphagnum</italic> commonly decreases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-enriched soluble components are leached (Asada et al., 2005b). In
contrast, aromatics and lipids do not generally contain N, so the positive
correlation of %C with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N in bulk peat cannot be explained in
the same manner. However, microbial processing generally enriches soils in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N (Billings and Richter 2006; Templer et al., 2007) while increasing
%C, which was also true at S1 (Tfaily et al., 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Proximity to uplands and trees increased peat $\delta^{{{15}}}$N}?><title>Proximity to uplands and trees increased peat <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N</title>
      <p>Plot-specific coefficients for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N may reflect
site-specific differences in the dominance of conditions favoring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-
or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted losses during peatland development. The positive
coefficients for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N are from two plots, 4 and 19, closest to the
lagg region adjacent to the western upland. This suggests that the different
hydrology in the lagg has enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N fractionation from N removal
mechanisms such as denitrification, nitrification, or leaching of DON.
Alternatively, dissolved N transported from the uplands during spring thaw
and melt may have provided an additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched N source for plots
4 and 19 located near the bog edges (Fig. 5). Peatland DON appears enriched
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C relative to bulk peat (Broder et al., 2012), and
this is presumably true for upland sources as well. In the adjacent Marcell
S2 kettle bog, large N fluxes from upland locations from both surface runoff
and interflow led to much larger N losses in streamflow from the lagg region
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 kg ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than from the bog itself
(2 kg ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Urban and Eisenreich, 1988). The uplands here
are dominated by ectomycorrhizal trees such as <italic>Populus</italic>,
<italic>Quercus</italic>, and <italic>Pinus</italic>, which produce vertically stratified
soil profiles with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values in lower organic and mineral
horizons (Hobbie and Ouimette, 2009). We therefore expect DON produced in
uplands to be high in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N, which will serve as a source of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched N to lagg regions of peatlands.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{$\delta^{{{15}}}$N patterns with depth
reflected climate and vegetation}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N patterns with depth
reflected climate and vegetation</title>
      <p>Peatland succession and climate have been established previously at the
nearby S2 bog and are summarized in Table 1. As the same climatological
factors affected the S2 and S1 (SPRUCE) bogs, plant stratigraphy and isotopic
patterns were probably similar, although accumulation rates are lower at S1
than at S2 (McFarlane, unpublished data).</p>
      <p>In the following paragraphs, we link shifts in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N through the
profile to radiocarbon ages and the corresponding patterns in vegetation and
climate at the S2 bog. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>213 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>225 cm
corresponded approximately to a warm period between 8000 and 9200 years BP, during
a sedge-rich fen stage (Verry and Janssens, 2011), with mean annual
temperatures of 4–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Given similar C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios during this period
to subsequent periods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20), nitrogen losses were probably more
depleted in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N than subsequent losses, that is, more losses via nitrate
leaching or denitrification rather than via DON leaching. Nitrification and
denitrification are higher in fens than in bogs and should change
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N patterns along the core profile as the core reflects peatland
succession and climatological changes (Regina et al., 1996; Bayley et al.,
2005; Wray and Bayley, 2007).</p>
      <p>The S2 bog shifted from a rich fen to a transitional fen by 5600 years BP,
while mean annual temperature (MAT) decreased to perhaps 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. At the S1 bog, the negative
correlation between radiocarbon and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>162 cm
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6000 years BP) suggested decreasing losses of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted N
during this transition. The depth increment from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>85 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>112 cm
corresponded to a transitional fen stage 3300–4800 years BP. The
accompanying trough in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>400‰ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (4220
calibrated years BP, Fig. 6b) suggested decreased sequestration of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched organic matter as nutrient availability declined during
this transition.</p>
      <p>The positive correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>65 cm (Table 4 and Fig. 6b) are linked to a parallel decline
in %N over these time periods, so that younger samples are lower in %N
and higher in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N than older samples, reflecting losses of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted N from the younger samples. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values peaked at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55 cm, and then declined above and below those depths. This
pattern suggested that those depths were affected by a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N enrichment
process that did not affect deeper depths (that is, further in the past). The
peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N accordingly reflected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N partitioning between
surficial and deeper horizons by a new mechanism.</p>
      <p>We suggest that ectomycorrhizal fungi are the most probable cause of this
unusual peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N at intermediate depths in the peat bog. At the
nearby S2 bog, poor fen transitioned to forested bog between AD 1610 and
1864, with a charcoal layer at S2 indicating that peat was consumed by
fire during this period, precluding a more specific date for this transition
(Verry and Janssens, 2011). This forested bog is dominated by ectomycorrhizal
<italic>Picea</italic> and <italic>Larix</italic>. Transfer to plants of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-depleted N
by ectomycorrhizal fungi leads to low plant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N
enrichment of the residual N not transferred (Hobbie and Hobbie, 2008; Hobbie
and Högberg, 2012). Here, the apparent influence of ectomycorrhizal
uptake can be traced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55 cm.</p>
      <p>The relatively low contribution of ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal
fungi to total plant uptake here compared to forest sites dominated by
ectomycorrhizal fungi accounted for the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N enrichment between
surficial layers and deeper layers here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 ‰) than in forest
soils, which averaged a 9.6 ‰ enrichment between surficial and
deeper soils for ectomycorrhizal forests (reviewed in Hobbie and Ouimette,
2009). Ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal trees and shrubs contributed
relatively little to total N uptake at the nearby Marcell S2 bog, where
mosses contributed 75 % of total plant uptake, herbaceous plants
13 %, and mycorrhizal trees and shrubs 13 % (Urban and Eisenreich,
1988). A few studies in peatlands have reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N values through
profiles, but those values have peaked at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to 0 ‰ and have been
in systems without ectomycorrhizal trees present (Krüger et al., 2015;
Esmeijer-Liu et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{$\delta^{{13}}$C patterns with depth reflected
climatic factors}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C patterns with depth reflected
climatic factors</title>
      <p>Once shifts in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C caused by compositional shifts are removed, the
remaining patterns can be explained by invoking climatic or vegetation
shifts. The relatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>213 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>225 cm
corresponded to a warm period between 8000 and 9200 years BP, during a
sedge-dominated rich fen stage (Verry and Janssens, 2011), with mean annual
temperatures of 4–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Higher temperatures in peatlands are
associated with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values (Skrzypek et al., 2005, 2008).</p>
      <p>Radiocarbon and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C correlated positively at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>162 cm,
corresponding to a 1 ‰ rise in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C which accompanied a
drop in MAT to perhaps 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C by 6000 years BP. This cooling trend was also
accompanied by a slight rise in precipitation, so the decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
discrimination could also be attributed to increased <italic>Sphagnum </italic>moisture (Rice and Giles, 1996), although it is difficult to distinguish
between these two possible causes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C differences (Ménot and
Burns, 2001). <italic>Sphagnum</italic> discrimination is less with increased
moisture because CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diffusion is limited under wet conditions. The
stratigraphy at the S2 bog indicated a vegetational shift from a rich fen to
a transitional fen during this period.</p>
      <p>The depth increment from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>85 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>112 cm corresponded to a transitional
fen stage 3300–4800 years ago. In our regression model for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(Fig. 4), these two depths are about 0.5 ‰ higher in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
than at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>162 cm. The peak in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C may reflect a phase during
which sedges transported methane directly to the atmosphere, thereby
minimizing the refixation in <italic>Sphagnum</italic> cells of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted,
methanotrophic-derived carbon dioxide (Raghoebarsing et al., 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The Suess effect increased ${}^{{{13}}}$C depletion
in surficial peat}?><title>The Suess effect increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C depletion
in surficial peat</title>
      <p>The strong dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C on peat depth partially reflected the
1.7 ‰ decline in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> since
1850, with the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values above the water table, where C is
of recent origin. For example, the lowest estimated values of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C depth coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 ‰) in hummocks at
15, 22, and 25 cm above the mean hollow surface reflect C from the last
50 years (Fig. 4), as confirmed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C averages of 59, 29, and
52 ‰ for these three depths, where only C influenced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
created during thermonuclear testing should have positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values (Table 4). Although our sampling lacked sufficient vertical resolution
to explicitly include corrections for the Suess effect (e.g., as done in
Esmeijer-Liu et al., 2012), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 ‰ increase in the depth
coefficient of our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C regression model from the hummocks to
deeper in the profile correspond well to the long-term shift in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from preindustrial times to the present. An
additional factor contributing to the higher depth coefficient could be the
1–2‰ higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C in roots than in foliage and the
different input depths of foliage (surface only) and roots (distributed
throughout the acrotelm). The steady increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 cm depth (Fig. 4) presumably reflected the increasing dominance of
preindustrial C. Depths of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35 cm and below all had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values
less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 ‰ (Table 4), indicating primarily pre-bomb and
preindustrial C when the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.5 ‰ (versus the current value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.2 ‰). In
addition, modern production of organic matter averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29‰ in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Table 2), similar to values for surficial horizons, whereas
deeper horizons were between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26 ‰. The Suess effect of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 ‰ therefore accounted for at least half of this
difference.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Although the multiple potential interactions among climate, vegetation, and
soil processes made definitive conclusions difficult, we identified several
factors that influenced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N patterns in
peatland profiles, including the Suess effect, C and N stoichiometry,
microbial processing, proximity to uplands, and tree colonization. The
potential roles of methanogenesis versus respiration in influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C could not be addressed using bulk samples, since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C shifts were
relatively small. Future measurements of deuterium isotope ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D) would allow separation of effects of respiration (loss of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
versus methane flux on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C patterns, since methanogenesis
discriminates against deuterium. Our conceptual model as given in Fig. 1
included the Suess effect (influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C patterns) and N
transport from uplands (probably influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N patterns), but
missed several additional factors that appeared to be important in
controlling the isotopic patterns we reported. Buried wood appeared to
influence both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N directly, and the
ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with tree species here created a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-enriched horizon that may be specific to forested peatlands. The
model did not consider N loss mechanisms and associated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N effects, nor
did it consider the potential for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C differences between roots and
aboveground litter to influence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C profiles. One potential way
forward is to put these multiple processes into quantitative models of
peatland development that includes vegetation succession and climatic
drivers, such as the Holocene Peatland Model (Frolking et al., 2010), and to
adapt these models to make isotopic predictions that can be compared against
data. Such model–data comparisons should continue to improve our ability to
interpret isotopic patterns, as well as reveal areas where our model
formulations are currently inadequate.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data presented in this study are available in the
appendices and through the Iversen et al. (2014) publication.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2481-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/bg-14-2481-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Samples were collected by Colleen M. Iversen, Paul J. Hansen, and Kirsten S. Hofmockel and
analyzed by Janet Chen, Erik A. Hobbie, Colleen M. Iversen, and
Karis J. Mcfarlane. Erik A. Hobbie prepared the manuscript with contributions
from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors appreciate field sampling efforts of members of the SPRUCE
research group, in particular Jana Phillips, Deanne Brice, and Joanne Childs.
This material is based upon work supported by grant ER65430 to Iowa State
University from the US Department of Energy, and the SPRUCE experiment is
supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of
Biological and Environmental Research. This paper was authored by
UT-Battelle, LLC under contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the US Department
of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by
accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States
Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license
to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow
others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of
Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored
research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan
(<uri>http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan</uri>). The data
referenced in this paper are archived at and available from the SPRUCE
long-term repository (Iversen et al., 2014; <uri>http://mnspruce.ornl.gov</uri>).
The authors are grateful for comments on the manuscript by Tim Moore and
several anonymous reviewers. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:
P. Stoy<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: T. Moore and three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alewell, C., Giesler, R., Klaminder, J., Leifeld, J., and Rollog, M.: Stable
carbon isotopes as indicators for environmental change in palsa peats,
Biogeosciences, 8, 1769–1778, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1769-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-1769-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Asada, T., Warner, B. G., and Aravena, R.: Nitrogen isotope signature
variability in plant species from open peatland, Aquat. Bot., 82, 297–307,
2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Asada, T., Warner, B., and Aravena, R.: Effects of the early stage of
decomposition on change in carbon and nitrogen isotopes in <italic>Sphagnum</italic>
litter, J. Plant Interact., 1, 229–237, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bayley, S. E., Thormann, M. N., and Szumigalski, A. R.: Nitrogen
mineralization and decomposition in western boreal bog and fen peat,
Ecoscience, 12, 455–465, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Belyea, L. R. and Malmer, N.: Carbon sequestration in peatland: patterns and
mechanisms of response to climate change, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 1043–1052,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergman, I., Lundberg, P., and Nilsson, M.: Microbial carbon mineralisation
in an acid surface peat: effects of environmental factors in laboratory
incubations, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 1867–1877, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Billings, S. A. and Richter, D. D.: Changes in stable isotopic signatures of
soil nitrogen and carbon during 40 years of forest development, Oecologia,
148, 325–333, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Broder, T., Blodau, C., Biester, H., and Knorr, K. H.: Peat decomposition
records in three pristine ombrotrophic bogs in southern Patagonia,
Biogeosciences, 9, 1479–1491, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1479-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-1479-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brooks, J. R., Flanagan, L. B., and Ehleringer, J. R.: Responses of boreal
conifers to climate fluctuations: indications from tree-ring widths and
carbon isotope analyses, Can. For. Res., 28, 524–533, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Ehleringer, J. R., Buchmann, N., and Flanagan, L. B.: Carbon isotope ratios
in belowground carbon cycle processes, Ecol. Appl., 10, 412–422, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Esmeijer-Liu, A. J., Kürschner, W. M., Lotter, A. F., Verhoeven, J. T.,
and Goslar, T.: Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in a peat profile are
influenced by early stage diagenesis and changes in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
N deposition, Water Air Soil Pollut., 223, 2007–2022, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Ficken, K. J., Barber, K. E., and Eglinton, G.: Lipid biomarker, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and plant macrofossil stratigraphy of a Scottish montane peat bog
over the last two millennia, Org. Geochem., 28, 217–237, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Frolking, S., Roulet, N. T., Tuittila, E., Bubier, J. L., Quillet, A.,
Talbot, J., and Richard, P. J. H.: A new model of Holocene peatland net
primary production, decomposition, water balance, and peat accumulation,
Earth Syst. Dynam., 1, 1–21, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-1-1-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-1-1-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gavazov, K., Hagedorn, F., Buttler, A., Siegwolf R., and Bragazza L.:
Environmental drivers of carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures in peatland
vascular plants along an altitude gradient, Oecologia, 180, 257–264, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, B. H., Jicha, T. M., Lehto, L. L., Elonen C. M., Sebestyen, S. D., and
Kolka, R. K..: Comparisons of soil nitrogen mass balances for an ombrotrophic
bog and a minerotrophic fen in northern Minnesota, Sci. Total Environ., 550,
880–892, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A. and Colpaert, J. V.: Nitrogen availability and colonization by
mycorrhizal fungi correlate with nitrogen isotope patterns in plants, New
Phytol., 151, 115–126, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hobbie, E. A. and Hobbie, J. E.: Natural abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N in
nitrogen-limited forests and tundra can estimate nitrogen cycling through
mycorrhizal fungi: A review, Ecosystems, 11, 815–830, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A. and Högberg, P.: Nitrogen isotopes link mycorrhizal fungi
and plants to nitrogen dynamics, New Phytol., 196, 367–382, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A. and Ouimette, A. P.: Controls of nitrogen isotope patterns in
soil profiles, Biogeochemistry, 95, 355–371, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hobbie, E. A., Tingey, D. T., Rygiewicz, P. T., Johnson, M. G., and Olszyk,
D. M.: Contributions of current year photosynthate to fine roots estimated
using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-depleted CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source, Plant Soil, 247, 233–242, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A., Sánchez, F. S., and Rygiewicz, P. T.: Controls of isotopic
patterns in saprotrophic and ectomycorrhizal fungi, Soil Biol. Biochem., 48,
60–68, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hofmockel, K. S., Chen, J., and Hobbie, E. A.: SPRUCE S1 Bog Pretreatment
Fungal Hyphae Carbon and Nitrogen Concentrations and Stable Isotope
Composition from In-growth Cores, 2013–2014, Carbon Dioxide Information
Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.025</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Högberg, P.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N natural abundance in soil-plant systems, New
Phytol., 137, 179–203, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hua, Q., Barbetti, M., and Rakowski, A.: Atmospheric radiocarbon for the
period 1950–2010, Radiocarbon, 55, 2059–2072, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Iversen, C. M., Hanson, P. J., Brice, D. J., Phillips, J. R., McFarlane, K.
J., Hobbie, E. A., and Kolka, R. K.: SPRUCE peat physical and chemical
characteristics from experimental plot cores, 2012, Carbon Dioxide
Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of
Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Iversen, C. M., Childs, J., Norby, R. J., Ontl, T. A., Kolka, R. K., Brice,
D. J., McFarlane, K. J., and Hanson, P. J.: Fine-root growth in a forested
bog is seasonally dynamic, but shallowly distributed in nutrient-poor peat,
Plant Soil, 1–21,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3231-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-017-3231-z</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Juutinen, S., Bubier, J. L., and Moore, T. R.: Responses of vegetation and
ecosystem CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange to 9 years of nutrient addition at Mer Bleue bog,
Ecosystems, 13, 874–887, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kalbitz, K. and Geyer, S.: Different effects of peat degradation on dissolved
organic carbon and nitrogen, Org. Geochem., 33, 319–326, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kohzu, A., Matsui, K., Yamada, T., Sugimoto, A., and Fujita, N.: Significance
of rooting depth in mire plants: Evidence from natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N abundance,
Ecol. Res., 18, 257–266, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kolka, R. K., Grigal, D. F., Verry, E. S., and Nater, E. A.: Mercury and
organic carbon relationships in streams draining forested upland/peatland
watersheds, J. Environ. Qual., 28, 766–775, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Krüger, J. P., Leifeld, J., Glatzel, S., Szidat, S., and Alewell, C.:
Biogeochemical indicators of peatland degradation – a case study of a
temperate bog in northern Germany, Biogeosciences, 12, 2861–2871,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2861-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-2861-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Loisel, J., Yu, Z., Beilman, D. W., Camill, P., Alm, J., Amesbury, M. J.,
Anderson, D., Andersson, S., Bochicchio, C., and Barber, K.: A database and
synthesis of northern peatland soil properties and Holocene carbon and
nitrogen accumulation, The Holocene, 24, 1028–1042, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ménot, G. and Burns, S. J.: Carbon isotopes in ombrogenic peat bog plants
as climatic indicators: calibration from an altitudinal transect in
Switzerland, Org. Geochem., 32, 233–245, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Nadelhoffer, K. and Fry, B.: N isotope studies in forests, Stable Isotopes in
Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Oxford, Blackwell, 22–62, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Nichols, J. E., Walcott, M., Bradley, R., Pilcher, J., and Huang, Y.:
Quantitative assessment of precipitation seasonality and summer surface
wetness using ombrotrophic sediments from an Arctic Norwegian peatland, Quat.
Res., 72, 443–45, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Pancost, R. D., van Geel, B., Baas, M., and Damste, J. S. S.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values and radiocarbon dates of microbial biomarkers as tracers for carbon
recycling in peat deposits, Geology, 28, 663–666, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Poorter, H., Berkel, Y., Baxter, R., Hertog. J. D., Dijkstra, P., Gifford,
R., Griffin, K., Roumet, C., Roy, J., and Wong, S.: The effect of elevated
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on the chemical composition and construction costs of leaves of 27
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species, Plant Cell Environ., 20, 472–482, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Raghoebarsing, A. A., Smolders, A. J., Schmid, M. C., Rijpstra, W. I. C.,
Wolters-Arts, M., Derksen, J., Jetten, M. S., Schouten, S., Damsté, J. S.
S., and Lamers, L. P.: Methanotrophic symbionts provide carbon for
photosynthesis in peat bogs, Nature, 436, 1153–1156, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Regina, K., Nykänen, H., Silvola, J., and Martikainen, P. J.: Fluxes of
nitrous oxide from boreal peatlands as affected by peatland type, water table
level and nitrification capacity, Biogeochemistry, 35, 401–418, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Reimer, P. J., Brown T. A., and Reimer, R. W.: Discussion: Reporting and
Calibration of Post-Bomb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C Data. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Bronk,
R. C., Buck, C. E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L, Friedrich, M., Grootes, P. M.,
Guilderson, T. P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T. J.,
Hoffmann, D. L., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Kaiser, K. F., Kromer, B.,
Manning, S. W., Niu, M., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D. A., Scott, E. M.,
Southon, J. R., Staff, R. A., Turney, C. S. M., and van der Plicht, J.:
IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50 000 years cal
BP, Radiocarbon, 55, 1869–1887, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Rice, S. and Giles, L.: The influence of water content and leaf anatomy on
carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis in <italic>Sphagnum</italic>, Plant
Cell Environ., 19, 118–124, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Schlesinger, W. H., Cole, J. J., Finzi, A. C., and Holland, E. A.:
Introduction to coupled biogeochemical cycles, Front. Ecol. Environ., 9,
5–8, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sebestyen, S. D., Dorrance, C., Olson, D. M., Verry, E. S., Kolka, R. K.,
Elling, A. E., and Kyllander, R.: Long-term monitoring sites and trends at
the Marcell Experimental Forest, in: Peatland biogeochemistry and watershed
hydrology at the Marcell Experimental Forest, edited by: Kolka, R. K.,
Sebestyen, S. D., Verry, E. S., and Brooks, K. N., Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press,
15–71, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Skrzypek, G., Jędrysek, M., and Keller-Sikora A.: Calibration of
temperature carbon isotopic effect (peat bogs Hala Izerska, Izerskie Mts. and
Szrenica, Karkonosze Mts.), Pol. Geological Inst. Spec. Papers, 16, 123–126,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Skrzypek, G., Paul, D., and Wojtun, B.: Stable isotope composition of plants
and peat from Arctic mire and geothermal area in Iceland, Pol. Polar Res.,
29, 365–376, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sparks, J. and Ehleringer, J. R.: Leaf carbon isotope discrimination and
nitrogen content for riparian trees along elevational transects, Oecologia,
109, 362–367, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, G. R., Schmidt, S., Handley, L. L., Turnbull, M. H., Erskine, P. D.,
and Joly, C. A.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N natural abundance of vascular rainforest epiphytes:
implications for nitrogen source and acquisition, Plant Cell Environ., 18,
85–90, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A.: Discussion; reporting of C-14 data,
Radiocarbon, 19, 355–363, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Templer, P. H., Arthur, M. A., Lovett, G. M., and Weathers, K. C.: Plant and
soil natural abundance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N: indicators of relative rates of
nitrogen cycling in temperate forest ecosystems, Oecologia, 153, 399–406,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Tfaily, M. M., Cooper, W. T., Kostka, J., Chanton, P. R., Schadt, C. W.,
Hanson, P. J., Iversen, C. M., and Chanton, J. P.: Organic matter
transformation in the peat column at Marcell Experimental Forest:
humification and vertical stratification, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 119,
661–675, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Trudell, S. A, Rygiewicz, P. T., and Edmonds, R. L.: Patterns of nitrogen and
carbon stable isotope ratios in macrofungi, plants and soils in two
old-growth conifer forests, New Phytol., 164, 317–335, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Urban N. R. and Eisenreich, S. J.: Nitrogen cycling in a forested Minnesota
bog, Can. J. Bot., 66, 435–449, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b88-069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/b88-069</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Verry, E. S. and Janssens, J.: Geology, vegetation, and hydrology of the S2
bog at the MEF: 12,000 years in northern Minnesota, in: Peatland
biogeochemistry and watershed hydrology at the Marcell Experimental Forest,
edited by: Kolka, R. K., Sebestyen, S. D., Verry, E. S., and Brooks, K. N.,
Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 93–134, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Verry, E. S., Brooks, K. N., Nichols, D. S., Ferris, D. R., and Sebestyen, S.
D.: Watershed hydrology, in: Peatland biogeochemistry and watershed hydrology
at the Marcell Experimental Forest, edited by: Kolka, R. K., Sebestyen, S.
D., Verry, E. S., and Brooks, K. N., Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 193–212,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Vitt, D. H. and Wieder, R. K..: Boreal peatland ecosystems: our carbon
heritage, Boreal Peatland and Ecosystems, Springer, Berlin, 425–429, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, J. S., Southon, J. R., Nelson, D., and Brown, T. A.: Performance of
catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry,
Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. B, 5, 289–293, 1984.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Wallander, H., Göransson, H., and Rosengren, U.: Production, standing
biomass and natural abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in ectomycorrhizal
mycelia collected at different soil depths in two forest types, Oecologia,
139, 89–97, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wray, H. E. and Bayley, S. E.: Denitrification rates in marsh fringes and
fens in two boreal peatlands in Alberta, Canada, Wetlands, 27, 1036–1045,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Yavitt, J. B., Lang, G. E., and Wieder, R. K.: Control of carbon
mineralization to CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in anaerobic,
<italic>Sphagnum</italic>-derived peat from Big Run Bog, West Virginia,
Biogeochemistry, 4, 141–157, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Long-term carbon and nitrogen dynamics at SPRUCE revealed through stable isotopes in peat profiles</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Peatlands encode information about past vegetation dynamics,
climate, and microbial processes. Here, we used <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N and
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C patterns from 16 peat profiles to deduce how the
biogeochemistry of the Marcell S1 forested bog in northern Minnesota
responded to environmental and vegetation change over the past
 ∼  10 000 years. In multiple regression analyses, <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N and
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C correlated strongly with depth, plot location, C ∕ N,
 %N, and each other. Correlations with  %N,  %C, C ∕ N, and
the other isotope accounted for 80 % of variance for <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N and
38 % of variance for <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C, reflecting N and C losses. In
contrast, correlations with depth and topography (hummock or hollow)
reflected peatland successional history and climate. Higher <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N
in plots closer to uplands may reflect upland-derived DON inputs and
accompanying shifts in N dynamics in the lagg drainage area surrounding the
bog. The Suess effect (declining <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>CO<sub>2</sub> since the Industrial
Revolution) lowered <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C in recent surficial samples. High
<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N from −35 to −55 cm probably indicated the depth of
ectomycorrhizal activity after tree colonization of the peatland over the
last 400 years, as confirmed by the occasional presence of wood down to
−35 cm depth. High <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C at  ∼  4000 years BP (−65 to
−105 cm) could reflect a transition at that time to slower rates of peat
accumulation, when <sup>13</sup>C discrimination during peat decomposition may
increase in importance. Low <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and high <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N at −213
and −225 cm ( ∼  8500 years BP) corresponded to a warm period during a
sedge-dominated rich fen stage. The above processes appear to be the primary
drivers of the observed isotopic patterns, whereas there was no clear
evidence for methane dynamics influencing <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C patterns.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alewell, C., Giesler, R., Klaminder, J., Leifeld, J., and Rollog, M.: Stable
carbon isotopes as indicators for environmental change in palsa peats,
Biogeosciences, 8, 1769–1778, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1769-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-8-1769-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Asada, T., Warner, B. G., and Aravena, R.: Nitrogen isotope signature
variability in plant species from open peatland, Aquat. Bot., 82, 297–307,
2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Asada, T., Warner, B., and Aravena, R.: Effects of the early stage of
decomposition on change in carbon and nitrogen isotopes in <i>Sphagnum</i>
litter, J. Plant Interact., 1, 229–237, 2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bayley, S. E., Thormann, M. N., and Szumigalski, A. R.: Nitrogen
mineralization and decomposition in western boreal bog and fen peat,
Ecoscience, 12, 455–465, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Belyea, L. R. and Malmer, N.: Carbon sequestration in peatland: patterns and
mechanisms of response to climate change, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 1043–1052,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergman, I., Lundberg, P., and Nilsson, M.: Microbial carbon mineralisation
in an acid surface peat: effects of environmental factors in laboratory
incubations, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 1867–1877, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Billings, S. A. and Richter, D. D.: Changes in stable isotopic signatures of
soil nitrogen and carbon during 40 years of forest development, Oecologia,
148, 325–333, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Broder, T., Blodau, C., Biester, H., and Knorr, K. H.: Peat decomposition
records in three pristine ombrotrophic bogs in southern Patagonia,
Biogeosciences, 9, 1479–1491, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1479-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-1479-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brooks, J. R., Flanagan, L. B., and Ehleringer, J. R.: Responses of boreal
conifers to climate fluctuations: indications from tree-ring widths and
carbon isotope analyses, Can. For. Res., 28, 524–533, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Ehleringer, J. R., Buchmann, N., and Flanagan, L. B.: Carbon isotope ratios
in belowground carbon cycle processes, Ecol. Appl., 10, 412–422, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Esmeijer-Liu, A. J., Kürschner, W. M., Lotter, A. F., Verhoeven, J. T.,
and Goslar, T.: Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in a peat profile are
influenced by early stage diagenesis and changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and
N deposition, Water Air Soil Pollut., 223, 2007–2022, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Ficken, K. J., Barber, K. E., and Eglinton, G.: Lipid biomarker, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and plant macrofossil stratigraphy of a Scottish montane peat bog
over the last two millennia, Org. Geochem., 28, 217–237, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Frolking, S., Roulet, N. T., Tuittila, E., Bubier, J. L., Quillet, A.,
Talbot, J., and Richard, P. J. H.: A new model of Holocene peatland net
primary production, decomposition, water balance, and peat accumulation,
Earth Syst. Dynam., 1, 1–21, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-1-1-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/esd-1-1-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gavazov, K., Hagedorn, F., Buttler, A., Siegwolf R., and Bragazza L.:
Environmental drivers of carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures in peatland
vascular plants along an altitude gradient, Oecologia, 180, 257–264, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, B. H., Jicha, T. M., Lehto, L. L., Elonen C. M., Sebestyen, S. D., and
Kolka, R. K..: Comparisons of soil nitrogen mass balances for an ombrotrophic
bog and a minerotrophic fen in northern Minnesota, Sci. Total Environ., 550,
880–892, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A. and Colpaert, J. V.: Nitrogen availability and colonization by
mycorrhizal fungi correlate with nitrogen isotope patterns in plants, New
Phytol., 151, 115–126, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A. and Hobbie, J. E.: Natural abundance of <sup>15</sup>N in
nitrogen-limited forests and tundra can estimate nitrogen cycling through
mycorrhizal fungi: A review, Ecosystems, 11, 815–830, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A. and Högberg, P.: Nitrogen isotopes link mycorrhizal fungi
and plants to nitrogen dynamics, New Phytol., 196, 367–382, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A. and Ouimette, A. P.: Controls of nitrogen isotope patterns in
soil profiles, Biogeochemistry, 95, 355–371, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A., Tingey, D. T., Rygiewicz, P. T., Johnson, M. G., and Olszyk,
D. M.: Contributions of current year photosynthate to fine roots estimated
using a <sup>13</sup>C-depleted CO<sub>2</sub> source, Plant Soil, 247, 233–242, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbie, E. A., Sánchez, F. S., and Rygiewicz, P. T.: Controls of isotopic
patterns in saprotrophic and ectomycorrhizal fungi, Soil Biol. Biochem., 48,
60–68, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hofmockel, K. S., Chen, J., and Hobbie, E. A.: SPRUCE S1 Bog Pretreatment
Fungal Hyphae Carbon and Nitrogen Concentrations and Stable Isotope
Composition from In-growth Cores, 2013–2014, Carbon Dioxide Information
Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.025" target="_blank">doi:10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.025</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Högberg, P.: <sup>15</sup>N natural abundance in soil-plant systems, New
Phytol., 137, 179–203, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hua, Q., Barbetti, M., and Rakowski, A.: Atmospheric radiocarbon for the
period 1950–2010, Radiocarbon, 55, 2059–2072, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, C. M., Hanson, P. J., Brice, D. J., Phillips, J. R., McFarlane, K.
J., Hobbie, E. A., and Kolka, R. K.: SPRUCE peat physical and chemical
characteristics from experimental plot cores, 2012, Carbon Dioxide
Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of
Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005" target="_blank">doi:10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, C. M., Childs, J., Norby, R. J., Ontl, T. A., Kolka, R. K., Brice,
D. J., McFarlane, K. J., and Hanson, P. J.: Fine-root growth in a forested
bog is seasonally dynamic, but shallowly distributed in nutrient-poor peat,
Plant Soil, 1–21,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3231-z" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3231-z</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Juutinen, S., Bubier, J. L., and Moore, T. R.: Responses of vegetation and
ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange to 9 years of nutrient addition at Mer Bleue bog,
Ecosystems, 13, 874–887, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kalbitz, K. and Geyer, S.: Different effects of peat degradation on dissolved
organic carbon and nitrogen, Org. Geochem., 33, 319–326, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kohzu, A., Matsui, K., Yamada, T., Sugimoto, A., and Fujita, N.: Significance
of rooting depth in mire plants: Evidence from natural <sup>15</sup>N abundance,
Ecol. Res., 18, 257–266, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kolka, R. K., Grigal, D. F., Verry, E. S., and Nater, E. A.: Mercury and
organic carbon relationships in streams draining forested upland/peatland
watersheds, J. Environ. Qual., 28, 766–775, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Krüger, J. P., Leifeld, J., Glatzel, S., Szidat, S., and Alewell, C.:
Biogeochemical indicators of peatland degradation – a case study of a
temperate bog in northern Germany, Biogeosciences, 12, 2861–2871,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2861-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-12-2861-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Loisel, J., Yu, Z., Beilman, D. W., Camill, P., Alm, J., Amesbury, M. J.,
Anderson, D., Andersson, S., Bochicchio, C., and Barber, K.: A database and
synthesis of northern peatland soil properties and Holocene carbon and
nitrogen accumulation, The Holocene, 24, 1028–1042, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ménot, G. and Burns, S. J.: Carbon isotopes in ombrogenic peat bog plants
as climatic indicators: calibration from an altitudinal transect in
Switzerland, Org. Geochem., 32, 233–245, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Nadelhoffer, K. and Fry, B.: N isotope studies in forests, Stable Isotopes in
Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Oxford, Blackwell, 22–62, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Nichols, J. E., Walcott, M., Bradley, R., Pilcher, J., and Huang, Y.:
Quantitative assessment of precipitation seasonality and summer surface
wetness using ombrotrophic sediments from an Arctic Norwegian peatland, Quat.
Res., 72, 443–45, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Pancost, R. D., van Geel, B., Baas, M., and Damste, J. S. S.: <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C
values and radiocarbon dates of microbial biomarkers as tracers for carbon
recycling in peat deposits, Geology, 28, 663–666, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Poorter, H., Berkel, Y., Baxter, R., Hertog. J. D., Dijkstra, P., Gifford,
R., Griffin, K., Roumet, C., Roy, J., and Wong, S.: The effect of elevated
CO<sub>2</sub> on the chemical composition and construction costs of leaves of 27
C<sub>3</sub> species, Plant Cell Environ., 20, 472–482, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Raghoebarsing, A. A., Smolders, A. J., Schmid, M. C., Rijpstra, W. I. C.,
Wolters-Arts, M., Derksen, J., Jetten, M. S., Schouten, S., Damsté, J. S.
S., and Lamers, L. P.: Methanotrophic symbionts provide carbon for
photosynthesis in peat bogs, Nature, 436, 1153–1156, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Regina, K., Nykänen, H., Silvola, J., and Martikainen, P. J.: Fluxes of
nitrous oxide from boreal peatlands as affected by peatland type, water table
level and nitrification capacity, Biogeochemistry, 35, 401–418, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Reimer, P. J., Brown T. A., and Reimer, R. W.: Discussion: Reporting and
Calibration of Post-Bomb <sup>14</sup>C Data. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005" target="_blank">doi:10.3334/CDIAC/spruce.005</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Bronk,
R. C., Buck, C. E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L, Friedrich, M., Grootes, P. M.,
Guilderson, T. P., Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T. J.,
Hoffmann, D. L., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Kaiser, K. F., Kromer, B.,
Manning, S. W., Niu, M., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D. A., Scott, E. M.,
Southon, J. R., Staff, R. A., Turney, C. S. M., and van der Plicht, J.:
IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50 000 years cal
BP, Radiocarbon, 55, 1869–1887, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Rice, S. and Giles, L.: The influence of water content and leaf anatomy on
carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis in <i>Sphagnum</i>, Plant
Cell Environ., 19, 118–124, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Schlesinger, W. H., Cole, J. J., Finzi, A. C., and Holland, E. A.:
Introduction to coupled biogeochemical cycles, Front. Ecol. Environ., 9,
5–8, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sebestyen, S. D., Dorrance, C., Olson, D. M., Verry, E. S., Kolka, R. K.,
Elling, A. E., and Kyllander, R.: Long-term monitoring sites and trends at
the Marcell Experimental Forest, in: Peatland biogeochemistry and watershed
hydrology at the Marcell Experimental Forest, edited by: Kolka, R. K.,
Sebestyen, S. D., Verry, E. S., and Brooks, K. N., Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press,
15–71, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Skrzypek, G., Jędrysek, M., and Keller-Sikora A.: Calibration of
temperature carbon isotopic effect (peat bogs Hala Izerska, Izerskie Mts. and
Szrenica, Karkonosze Mts.), Pol. Geological Inst. Spec. Papers, 16, 123–126,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Skrzypek, G., Paul, D., and Wojtun, B.: Stable isotope composition of plants
and peat from Arctic mire and geothermal area in Iceland, Pol. Polar Res.,
29, 365–376, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sparks, J. and Ehleringer, J. R.: Leaf carbon isotope discrimination and
nitrogen content for riparian trees along elevational transects, Oecologia,
109, 362–367, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, G. R., Schmidt, S., Handley, L. L., Turnbull, M. H., Erskine, P. D.,
and Joly, C. A.: <sup>15</sup>N natural abundance of vascular rainforest epiphytes:
implications for nitrogen source and acquisition, Plant Cell Environ., 18,
85–90, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A.: Discussion; reporting of C-14 data,
Radiocarbon, 19, 355–363, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Templer, P. H., Arthur, M. A., Lovett, G. M., and Weathers, K. C.: Plant and
soil natural abundance <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N: indicators of relative rates of
nitrogen cycling in temperate forest ecosystems, Oecologia, 153, 399–406,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Tfaily, M. M., Cooper, W. T., Kostka, J., Chanton, P. R., Schadt, C. W.,
Hanson, P. J., Iversen, C. M., and Chanton, J. P.: Organic matter
transformation in the peat column at Marcell Experimental Forest:
humification and vertical stratification, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 119,
661–675, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Trudell, S. A, Rygiewicz, P. T., and Edmonds, R. L.: Patterns of nitrogen and
carbon stable isotope ratios in macrofungi, plants and soils in two
old-growth conifer forests, New Phytol., 164, 317–335, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Urban N. R. and Eisenreich, S. J.: Nitrogen cycling in a forested Minnesota
bog, Can. J. Bot., 66, 435–449, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b88-069" target="_blank">doi:10.1139/b88-069</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Verry, E. S. and Janssens, J.: Geology, vegetation, and hydrology of the S2
bog at the MEF: 12,000 years in northern Minnesota, in: Peatland
biogeochemistry and watershed hydrology at the Marcell Experimental Forest,
edited by: Kolka, R. K., Sebestyen, S. D., Verry, E. S., and Brooks, K. N.,
Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 93–134, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Verry, E. S., Brooks, K. N., Nichols, D. S., Ferris, D. R., and Sebestyen, S.
D.: Watershed hydrology, in: Peatland biogeochemistry and watershed hydrology
at the Marcell Experimental Forest, edited by: Kolka, R. K., Sebestyen, S.
D., Verry, E. S., and Brooks, K. N., Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 193–212,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Vitt, D. H. and Wieder, R. K..: Boreal peatland ecosystems: our carbon
heritage, Boreal Peatland and Ecosystems, Springer, Berlin, 425–429, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, J. S., Southon, J. R., Nelson, D., and Brown, T. A.: Performance of
catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry,
Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. B, 5, 289–293, 1984.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wallander, H., Göransson, H., and Rosengren, U.: Production, standing
biomass and natural abundance of <sup>15</sup>N and <sup>13</sup>C in ectomycorrhizal
mycelia collected at different soil depths in two forest types, Oecologia,
139, 89–97, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wray, H. E. and Bayley, S. E.: Denitrification rates in marsh fringes and
fens in two boreal peatlands in Alberta, Canada, Wetlands, 27, 1036–1045,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Yavitt, J. B., Lang, G. E., and Wieder, R. K.: Control of carbon
mineralization to CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> in anaerobic,
<i>Sphagnum</i>-derived peat from Big Run Bog, West Virginia,
Biogeochemistry, 4, 141–157, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
