<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-3275-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Organic carbon mass accumulation rate regulates the flux of reduced
substances from the sediments of deep lakes</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{TOC MAR regulates $F_{\mathrm{red}}$ from lake sediments}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.~Steinsberger et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Steinsberger</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schmid</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-5691</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Wüest</surname><given-names>Alfred</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Schwefel</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-4181</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Wehrli</surname><given-names>Bernhard</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7029-1972</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Beat</given-names></name>
          <email>beat.mueller@eawag.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-9035</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology,
6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich,
8092 Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Physics of Aquatic Systems Laboratory, Margaretha Kamprad Chair,
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Institute of
Environmental Engineering, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Beat Müller (beat.mueller@eawag.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>3275</fpage><lpage>3285</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3275/2017/bg-14-3275-2017.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3275/2017/bg-14-3275-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3275/2017/bg-14-3275-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3275/2017/bg-14-3275-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The flux of reduced substances, such as methane and ammonium, from
the sediment to the bottom water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is one of the major factors
contributing to the consumption of oxygen in the hypolimnia of lakes and thus
crucial for lake oxygen management. This study presents fluxes based on
sediment porewater measurements from different water depths of five deep
lakes of differing trophic states. In meso- to eutrophic lakes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
directly proportional to the total organic carbon mass accumulation rate
(TOC-MAR) of the sediments. TOC-MAR and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in eutrophic lakes
decreased systematically with increasing mean hypolimnion depth
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
suggesting that high oxygen concentrations in the deep waters of lakes were
essential for the extent of organic matter mineralization leaving a smaller
fraction for anaerobic degradation and thus formation of reduced compounds.
Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was low in the 310 m deep meso-eutrophic Lake
Geneva,
with high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the hypolimnion. By contrast, seasonal
anoxic conditions enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the deep basin of oligotrophic Lake
Aegeri. As TOC-MAR and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are based on more readily available data,
these relationships allow estimating the areal O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rate by
reduced compounds from the sediments where no direct flux measurements are
available.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Hypolimnetic oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion is a widespread phenomenon in
productive lakes and reservoirs. Considerable work has been done to identify
parameters responsible for hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption  (Livingstone
and Imboden, 1996; Hutchinson, 1938; Cornett and Rigler, 1980), yet the key
processes are still debated. Much to the irritation of lake managers,
decreasing phosphorus (P) loads to lakes has often not resulted in a decrease
in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption in the hypolimnion, and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption even
increased in artificially aerated lakes (Müller et al.,
2012a). An intuitive explanation for the lack of recovery of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
consumption is a delay caused by the mineralization of the large amount of
organic carbon (OC) deposited in the sediments during hypertrophy,
generating reduced species such as NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn(II), Fe(II)
and S(-II). By reacting with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and other electron acceptors (directly
or via microbial pathways), these reduced species contribute to the
hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption. As direct measurements of reduced
substances are rare, several modeling approaches have investigated the sediment
oxygen demand related to the formation of reduced substances  (Di Toro et
al., 1990; Soetaert et al., 1996). Further,  Matzinger et al. (2010) demonstrated
that sediment deposits older than 10 years contributed
only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 % to the areal hypolimnetic mineralization rate
(AHM), thus putting the magnitude and timescale of the “sediment memory
effect” into perspective.</p>
      <p>Müller et al. (2012a) proposed two key factors to be
responsible for the AHM: (i) the diffusion controlled O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption by
the mineralization of freshly settled OC at the sediment surface and (ii) the
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumed by the oxidation of reduced substances diffusing from
the sediment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The flux of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the bottom water to the
sediment surface is a first-order process with respect to the concentration
of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence lakes with a large hypolimnion volume can sustain a
larger O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux and increase the fraction of aerobically mineralized OC.
As a consequence, AHM systematically increases with mean hypolimnion depth
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of productive lakes. This relationship suggested a constant
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rate of the sediments, which agreed with the few
available estimations from direct sediment porewater measurements of reduced
compounds. The fluxes of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fe(II), and Mn(II) from
eutrophic lakes determined from porewater concentration profiles (summed up
and expressed in O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consuming equivalents) were in a surprisingly
narrow range of 0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Müller et al., 2012a). This can be a substantial
fraction of total AHM, especially in lakes with a small hypolimnion volume.
Matthews and Effler (2006) showed the importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for sediment O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> demand in Onondaga Lake. Further, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
responsible for up to 42  and 86 % of the total AHM in the Pfäffikersee
and Türlersee (Switzerland), respectively, where NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes represented up to 90 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while Fe(II) and
Mn(II) fluxes played only a minor role  (Matzinger et al.,
2010).</p>
      <p>Depending on the sedimentation regime and bottom-water O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expected to vary spatially.  Carignan and Lean (1991)
documented that porewater fluxes varied with lake depth and increased with
increasing sedimentation rate in a mesotrophic but seasonally anoxic lake.
They demonstrated the focusing of labile particulate OC as the cause for the
depth dependence. In lakes Baldegg and Sempach, increasing Fe(II) and Mn(II)
fluxes with lake depth were attributed to geochemical focusing (Urban et
al., 1997; Schaller et al., 1997). In consequence, extrapolating
measurements performed at the deepest sites of lakes to the entire
hypolimnion area can significantly overestimate the contribution of reduced
sediment compounds to AHM. Hence, the aim of this study is to systematically
extend the knowledge of sediment flux measurements of reduced compounds and
to identify a common driving factor of their creation. At least three
sampling depths were selected in each of the five lakes investigated to gain
information on the spatial distribution of fluxes of reduced substances. The
combination of porewater sampling and on-site analysis with two portable
capillary electrophoresis systems allowed a high sample throughput and the
acquisition of an unprecedented dataset of porewater concentration profiles.
Based on observations from 45 cores, this paper assesses the constraints of
fluxes of reduced compounds (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn(II), and Fe(II))
from the sediments of lakes with a range of trophic histories and discusses
their spatial variabilities and the consequences for hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
consumption.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study sites</title>
      <p>Five lakes of different trophic states and depths were selected for the
study (Table 1). Lake Baldegg (66 m depth) is located in an agricultural
area dominated by pig farms. After 34 years of artificial aeration and
mixing, it is still eutrophic with total phosphorus (TP) concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 mgP m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lake Hallwil is the shallowest of the investigated
lakes (48 m) and is presently recovering from its eutrophic past (TP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 mgP m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 30 years of artificial aeration. Lake Aegeri is
oligotrophic (TP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 mgP m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and located in a catchment dominated
by pastures and forests. Lake Geneva is the largest lake in central Europe
by volume. It is still meso-eutrophic (TP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 mgP m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
areal O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rate is among the highest measured in Swiss lakes
(Müller et al., 2012a; Schwefel et al., 2016). Lake Zug (197 m) is
eutrophic, permanently stratified below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m depth (meromictic), and
has a TP value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 mgP m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the productive epilimnion. In
Lake Zug, only one set of cores for porewater analysis, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis,
and bulk sediment parameters was collected from the permanently oxic part
(&gt; 4 mgO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the year) at 62 m water depth.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Lake characteristics, sampling depths, and dates. The mean
hypolimnion depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the hypolimnetic volume divided by
the hypolimnetic area below 15 m water depth.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropic status</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Hypolimnion</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hypolimnion</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Max.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Sampling</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Sampling time</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">surface area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">volume</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">depths</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake Baldegg</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">eutrophic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">125</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23, 40, 64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mar 2013, May 2013, Aug 2013, Oct 2013, Mar 2014,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake Aegeri</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">oligotrophic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">283</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">42.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34, 49, 79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mar 2013, May 2013, Aug 2013, Oct 2013, Mar 2014,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake Hallwil</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">mesotrophic   recovering</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">194</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25, 35, 46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Apr 2014, Aug 2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake Zug</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">eutrophic – meromictic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2660</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">197</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">May 2016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake Geneva</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">meso-eutrophic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">534</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">80 800</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">151</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">310</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 175<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Jul 2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Jul 2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">200<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 300<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 310<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sediment sampling and porewater analysis</title>
      <p>Sediment cores were retrieved with a Uwitec gravity corer equipped with a
PVC tube (6.5 cm inner diameter, 60 cm length). The PVC tube has pre-drilled
holes (diameter 2 mm) at 5 mm intervals. The holes were sealed with
adhesive tape prior to sampling. Sediment cores were taken along a depth
gradient (Table 1). Porewaters were sampled on site immediately after
retrieval. A total of 10–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of sediment porewater was retrieved by
punctuating the adhesive tape and horizontally inserting a MicroRhizon
filter tube (1 mm diameter, 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size; Rhizosphere Research
Products, Wageningen, Netherlands). The sampling resolution was 5 mm for the
first 5 cm of sediment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 cm between 5  and 10 cm of sediment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 cm between 10  and 20 cm of sediment, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 cm below 20 cm of
sediment. The porewater retrieval time was between 10 and 30 s and samples
were immediately analyzed to minimize oxidation. Each porewater sample was
analyzed once with two capillary electrophoresis devices each equipped with
a capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detector (CE-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>D)
(calibrated for anions and cations) directly at the lake shore. Full
separation of ions of interest (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn(II), Fe(II),
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was achieved within 6 min by applying a voltage of 15 kV and a current of 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>A. The
background electrolyte solution and all calibration standards were freshly
prepared before sampling with ultrapure water (Merck) and the corresponding
salts. All five-point calibrations were checked against a multi-ion standard
(Fluka), and standard deviations of all measurements were &lt; 5 %.
The procedure is described in detail by  Torres et al. (2013).</p>
      <p>Methane samples were collected from additional sediment cores retrieved on
the same day and location. Core liners had holes of 1.2 cm diameter
pre-drilled staggered at 1 cm vertical intervals and covered with adhesive
tape. Immediately after retrieval the cores were sampled in 1 cm steps from
top to bottom by cutting the tape and inserting a plastic syringe where the
tip was cut off. Two cubic centimeters of sediment was transferred into 125 mL serum
flasks containing 2 mL of 7 M NaOH and capped with a septum stopper. Each
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sample was analyzed three times in the headspace by gas
chromatography (Agilent) using a 1010 Supelco Carboxene column with a
standard deviation of 0.1   to 1.3 %.</p>
      <p>Additional sediment cores were extruded and sampled in 0.5  to 1 cm
sections. Water content was calculated from the weight difference before and
after freeze drying, and the porosity was estimated from the density and the
respective TOC content  (Och et al., 2012). Freeze-dried
sediments were ground in an agate mortar and further analyzed for
TOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TN
with a Euro EA 3000 elemental analyzer (Hekatech). Net sedimentation rates
were determined based on the assumption of constant rate of supply with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-ray measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs with a Canberra GeLi
borehole detector and/or by varve counting, which was possible in all cores
except the cores from Lake Hallwil. The net sedimentation rates were further
validated by the characteristic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">137</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Cs peaks of the Chernobyl fallout (1986)
and the bomb spike of 1963. As TOC content and net sedimentation
rates were not determined from our sediment cores in Lake Geneva, literature
data were used to calculate the total organic carbon mass accumulation rate
(TOC-MAR, gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By comparing our coring sites to sites
published by Span et al. (1990), Vernet et al. (1983) and  Loizeau et al. (2012) we estimated an average net sediment
accumulation rate of 1000 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a TOC content of
1.1 %,
resulting in TOC-MAR of 11 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the deep basin.
Although TOC content and net sedimentation can vary drastically due to
turbidites and the inflow of the Rhone River, we deem this estimate to be
representative of the deep undisturbed central basin of Lake Geneva.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Gross sedimentation</title>
      <p>Sediment traps were deployed in lakes Baldegg and Aegeri from March 2013
until the end of November 2014 to determine TOC gross sedimentation rates.
In Lake Hallwil, sediment traps were deployed from January 2014 to December
2014 (see Supplement Table S1). The sediment trap material was
collected every 2 weeks. The traps consisted of two cylindrical PVC tubes with an
inner diameter of 9.2 cm and were positioned at 15 m water depth and 1 m
above the sediment surface. For the calculation of the gross sedimentation,
only data from the lower trap were used. The collected material was weighed,
freeze-dried, and analyzed for TOC and TN with the same methods as the
sediment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Calculation of the flux of reduced compounds</title>
      <p>Porewater fluxes were calculated from vertical porewater concentration
gradients with a one-dimensional reaction-transport model
(Müller et al., 2003) that was adapted from Epping
and Helder (1997) and extended from O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to other parameters. The fluxes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of reduced compounds (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fe(II), and Mn(II)),
denoted in mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, were multiplied by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be
converted into equivalent O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based
on redox stoichiometry and summed up in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 1). S(-II) was
considered negligible as we detected dissolved Fe(II) in all cores.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M110" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents the total O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> required per area to oxidize all
reduced compounds released by the sediment (Matzinger et al.,
2010). As total phosphorus concentration and hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
consumption rate did not change during the past years, sediment diagenetic
processes are assumed to be in quasi-steady state. Although seasonally
varying deposition rates of OC and varying O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations may alter
Fe(II) and Mn(II) concentration gradients, the fluxes of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dominating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did not change systematically with the
seasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Estimation of total organic carbon mass accumulation rates</title>
      <p>Total organic carbon mass accumulation rate in the lake sediment (TOC-MAR,
in gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at each coring site was calculated from the
sedimentation rate (SR, in cm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, porosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, dry density
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and TOC (mg g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each 5 mm
interval (Och et al., 2012) (Eq. 4). Porosity and dry
density are calculated for each sampling interval individually (Eqs. 1 and
3):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M125" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the volumes of water and sediment, while the
sediment volume can be calculated from its weight (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the dry
density (Eq. 2):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M129" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The dry density is estimated according to the empirical relationship between
TOC content (in  %) and density of geogenic sediments (Och et al., 2012),
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M130" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">density</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0523</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The TOC-MAR values were then averaged from 2 to 10 cm sediment depth. The
first 2 cm were excluded to neglect freshly deposited matter as
this material still passes through intense and rapid degradation. The lower
TOC-MAR calculation depth of 10 cm was chosen to remain within the time frame
where steady-state conditions can be assumed  (Radbourne et al.,
2017).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M131" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Porewater concentration profiles and fluxes of reduced compounds</title>
      <p>The porewater concentration profiles of the reduced compounds CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fe(II), and Mn(II) measured at different depths in Lake
Baldegg, Lake Aegeri, Lake Hallwil, and Lake Geneva are presented in Fig. 1,
and for Lake Zug in Fig. S1 (see Supplement). The highest
overall porewater concentrations occurred in Lake Baldegg (Fig. 1a) and
the lowest in Lake Geneva (Fig. 1d) in spite of its high productivity. A
distinct pattern of increasing porewater concentrations with increasing
sampling depth was apparent in Lake Baldegg and to a lesser extent in Lake
Aegeri (Fig. 1a, b). Nitrate concentrations in the overlying water of the
sediment core were on average 101 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lake Baldegg,
23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lake Aegeri, 61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lake
Hallwil, 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lake Geneva, and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in Lake Zug and steeply declined to zero within the first centimeter of the
sediment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Porewater concentration profiles of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn(II), and Fe(II) from <bold>(a)</bold> Lake Baldegg, <bold>(b)</bold> Lake Aegeri, <bold>(c)</bold> Lake
Hallwil, and <bold>(d)</bold> Lake Geneva. Bold lines are averaged values of up to five
measurements, while the areas of corresponding colors show the range of
minimal and maximal values. Coring sites of Lake Geneva <bold>(d)</bold> were sampled
only once.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3275/2017/bg-14-3275-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The trend of increasing ion concentrations with lake depth observed in the
porewater was also reflected in the areal fluxes of the reduced compounds
from the sediment to the lake bottom waters (Table 2). The fluxes were
positive from the sediment to the bottom water in all lakes at all depths.
Fluxes measured at the same locations on up to five different dates between
March and October varied by 34 % in Lake Baldegg and by 84 % in Lake
Aegeri for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as by 80 % in Lake Baldegg and by 65 % in Lake
Aegeri for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fluxes of Mn(II) (66  and 72 %) and
Fe(II) (46  and 88 %) also showed a high variability. This temporal
variation is likely due to local heterogeneity of the sediment and seasonal
variations of both the supply of OC, e.g., algae blooms, and the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration at the sediment–water interface. However, the relative
importance of these driving factors could not be determined, and no clear
seasonal pattern was detected.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Results from sediment and porewater analyses. Porewater
fluxes are averaged over all flux measurements of each individual species.
Standard deviations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) are based on all measurements. TOC was
averaged from 2 to 10 cm sediment depth. TOC and net sedimentation from Lake
Geneva were not determined (n.d). Lake Baldegg (BA), Lake Aegeri (AE), Lake
Hallwil (HA), Lake Zug (ZG), and Lake Geneva (LG).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Core</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">TOC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N  ratio</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">TOC-MAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">No. of</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">( %)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col9">(mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">cores</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BA 03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">22.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BA 02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">29.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BA 01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">45.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE 03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">16.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE 02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">16.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AE 01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">22.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HA 03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">28.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HA 02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">23.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HA 01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">22.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ZG</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">28.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">175</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">310</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LG 01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">310</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">n.d</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>A summary of all fluxes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given in Table 2. In Lake Baldegg
the highest fluxes of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Fe(II) of all lakes and
a clear increase with sampling depth were observed. Fluxes at the deepest
site agreed well with earlier measurements from dialysis samplers
(Urban et al., 1997). In the oligotrophic Lake Aegeri fluxes of
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were small at the shallow sites and similar to
those observed in other oligotrophic lakes (Frenzel et al., 1990;
Carignan et al., 1994), while at the deepest location considerably higher
fluxes were measured for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Fluxes in Lake Hallwil did not show an
overall increase with lake depth. In Lake Geneva, the smallest fluxes of
CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Fe(II) were observed in spite of its high
productivity, without systematic variations with lake depth. NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contributed 85  to 98 % to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consuming capacity,
while Fe(II) and Mn(II) played only a minor role.   Müller
et al. (2012a) estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a range of eutrophic lakes to be
0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on a relationship between
hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rates and mean hypolimnion depths.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed at 24 m (0.28 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 40 m
(0.34 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth in the eutrophic Lake Baldegg (see
Table 2) matched the modeled value. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the deepest site of Lake
Baldegg (0.49 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> agreed with a previous
observation of 0.55 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Likewise, in Lake Hallwil,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied between 0.18 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.25 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
matching earlier measurements of 0.28 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Müller et al., 2012a). In Lake Aegeri,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was clearly higher at the deepest sampling site than at the
shallower sites. At 34 and 49 m water depth, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.07 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and thus typical for a deep oligotrophic lake. At 79 m, a
markedly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.26 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed.
In eutrophic Lake Geneva, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied between 0.02 and 0.09 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is surprisingly low for a productive lake. In
summary, we did not observe a direct relationship between the trophic state
of the lake and the fluxes of reduced substances.</p>
      <p>Determination of sedimentation rates from core dating revealed increasing
sediment deposition with increasing lake depth in Lake Baldegg and at the
deepest site of Lake Aegeri. The sediment TOC content was around 3.4 %
and varied only little between the different coring sites and lakes (see
Table 2), except for Lake Geneva with an estimated 1.1 % TOC.
Consequently, mass accumulation rates varied substantially and increased
with depth in Lake Baldegg and to a lesser extent in Lake Aegeri. We
attribute this observation to sediment focusing, which has also been
documented by  Urban et al. (1997) for Lake Baldegg. Sediment
focusing transports fine, freshly settled organic-rich material from the
shallower to the deeper parts of a lake and consequently increases TOC-MAR
with lake depth  (Lehman, 1975).  Carignan and Lean (1991) documented
that porewater fluxes increased with lake depth caused by
the focusing of labile particulate OC into the deeper part of the lake. A
study at oligotrophic Little Rock Lake also showed elevated NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations at the deepest site due to a greater supply of fine-grained
organic particles caused by sediment focusing (Sherman et al.,
1994). In eutrophic Lake Zug,  Maerki et al. (2009) found that
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes increased proportionally with the sediment contents of
TOC and total nitrogen (TN), indicating a link between fluxes of reduced
substances and TOC-MAR. In lakes Baldegg and Hallwil, geochemical focusing,
caused by recurring redox-sensitive dissolution and precipitation of Mn and
Fe phases, is an additional process that increases Fe(II) and Mn(II)
concentrations with lake depth  (Urban et al., 1997; Schaller and Wehrli,
1996).</p>
      <p>Sediment focusing increased TOC-MAR by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 104 % in the
deepest part of Lake Baldegg and by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 % in Lake Aegeri.
Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the sedimentation regime and bottom-water O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
availability, this explains the spatial variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these
two lakes. No sediment focusing was observed in Lake Hallwil, which is in
agreement with a previous study by Bloesch and Uehlinger (1986).
In consequence, extrapolating measurements performed at the deepest sites of
lakes to the entire lake area can significantly overestimate the average
contribution of reduced sediment compounds to AHM if sediment focusing
is active.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{$F_{\mathrm{red}}$ controlled by sediment TOC mass accumulation
rate}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> controlled by sediment TOC mass accumulation
rate</title>
      <p>All lakes investigated have a predominance of autochthonous OC input,
implied by similar C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N ratios (7.0–9.9), a proxy for the origin of OC
(see Table 2), and a permanently oxic hypolimnion (see Fig. S2). As a consequence, the burial efficiency of OC, defined as the ratio
between TOC-MAR and OC gross sedimentation rate (deposition rate of OC onto
the sediment surface) by Sobek et al. (2009) should be rather
similar in these lakes. Based on gross TOC sedimentation data from sediment
traps (see Table S1) and TOC-MAR values (Table 2), burial
efficiencies at the deepest sampling locations were calculated from sediment
trap data of lakes Baldegg (50 %), Hallwil (41 %), and
Sempach (46 %). All values were close to the average value of 48 % determined from
27 sediment cores from 11 lakes by Sobek et al. (2009).
Consequently, a similar proportion of gross OC sedimentation is buried and
contributes to the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TOC-MAR in all studied lakes.
An exception is Lake Aegeri, with a surprisingly high burial efficiency of
OC of 77 % calculated for the deepest site. However, this is caused by
the exceptional bathymetry. The deepest site is located in a small trough
with surrounding steep slopes predestined for sediment slides and
remobilization of settled particles. The locally high ratio of sediment area
to water volume presumably leads to the annual development of an anoxic deep
water layer which increases OC burial, but is not representative of the
whole lake.</p>
      <p>As primary production and hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations did not change
considerably during the last decade, the burial efficiency and thus TOC-MAR
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation likely remained unchanged. Furthermore, porewater
profiles do not capture the effects of rapid initial mineralization
occurring within the top few millimeters of the sediment, but mirror the
slower processes of anaerobic degradation of buried OC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence,
in Fig. 2 we related <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the corresponding TOC-MAR at each
sampling location. Additional datasets from earlier measurements in various
lakes were added to complement the relationship.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 11 different lakes plotted against the total
organic carbon mass accumulation rate (TOC-MAR). Values for lakes Baldegg
(BA), Hallwil (HA), and Aegeri (AE) were averaged from up to five
measurements (big circles); those for Lake Zug (ZG) were calculated from a
single core at 62 m water depth. Small circles show each individual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> result at the respective sampling location. The variations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lake Geneva show only the variations due to sampling depths as
all cores were collected in summer. Red marks were calculated from single-core literature data (Lake Baikal (LB):  Och et al., 2012;
Lake Sempach (SE):  Müller et al., 2012b; Rotsee (RO):
Naeher et al., 2012; Pfäffikersee (PF,
unpublished); and Türlersee (TU, unpublished)). TOC-MAR values from Lake Geneva
(LG) are based on sedimentation rate estimates from the literature
(Vernet et al., 1983; Loizeau et al., 2012; Span et al., 1990). TOC-MAR
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from Lake Erie (LE) were extracted from  Matisoff
et al. (1977), Adams et al. (1982), and  Smith and
Matisoff (2008). Values for Lake Superior (LS) were compiled from
Klump et al. (1989),  Remsen et al. (1989), Richardson and Nealson (1989),  Heinen and
McManus (2004), and Li et al. (2012).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3275/2017/bg-14-3275-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 2 reveals two characteristic facts concerning the release of reduced
compounds from lake sediments: (i) a distinct increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
observed when TOC-MAR exceeded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and (ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased proportionately with TOC-MAR between 10 and 45 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.50 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in all
seasonally mixed lakes investigated. The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was
measured at the deepest point of Lake Baldegg with 0.49 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at a TOC-MAR of 45 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, despite much
higher TOC-MAR in Rotsee. The mineralization of sediment OC appeared to be
the main driver of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> independent of the cause of TOC accumulation.
The areal accumulation of TOC per time is controlled by gross sedimentation
(which is related to primary production), O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the
bottom water, biological factors like grazing and bioturbation, and physical
parameters such as sediment focusing (Sobek et al., 2009). At
low TOC-MAR, the total flux of reduced substances was very low (e.g., lakes
Baikal, Erie, and Superior, Fig. 2), as only little carbon remained for
anaerobic degradation, and the reduced substances diffusing up from deeper
sediment strata were quantitatively oxidized in the upper sediment
layers</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Factors limiting $F_{\mathrm{red}}$ and TOC-MAR}?><title>Factors limiting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TOC-MAR</title>
      <p>Given that all investigated lakes are seasonally mixed and have a
permanently oxic hypolimnion, the likely driving factors for the positive
relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TOC-MAR are (i) hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, and (ii) the quality and quantity of OC. An influence of
temperature and benthic production can be ruled out as all sampling stations
were located in the cold hypolimnia well below the thermocline. Generally,
high O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations lead to a high fraction of aerobic OC
mineralization and hence decrease in TOC-MAR as OC is decomposed by
oxygenases and other reactive oxygen species  (Maerki et al., 2006; Sobek
et al., 2009; Stumm and Morgan, 1996). Furthermore, elevated hypolimnetic
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increase the oxidation of reduced compounds near or
within the top sediment layer and thus increase the regeneration of
alternative electron acceptors such as NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Urban et al., 1997). In contrast, low O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations or
even temporally anoxic conditions increase OC burial and thus TOC-MAR and
prompt the production of reduced compounds  (Sobek et al.,
2009).</p>
      <p>Low TOC-MAR occurred in lakes with low primary production and low
allochthonous input. In the <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>oligotrophic<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> lakes Superior and Baikal, TOC-MAR
was 4 and 7 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Table S2),
respectively, and the resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the sediment was close to
zero  (Och et al., 2012; Klump et al., 1989; Remsen et al., 1989;
Richardson and Nealson, 1989). In addition to low gross sedimentation of OC,
the high sediment O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> penetration depth (of around 1–3 cm) causes a long
exposure time to oxic conditions and thus oxic mineralization of a large
fraction of the deposit (Maerki et al., 2006; Martin et al., 1993; Li et
al., 2012). In consequence, the TOC buried in lakes like Superior and Baikal
is already highly mineralized and therefore does not generate significant
amounts of reduced substances. However, low TOC-MAR values were also observed in
Lake Geneva. Although Lake Geneva is highly productive, its hypolimnetic
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration remained high throughout the year (see
Fig. S2) (Schwefel et al., 2016).  Randlett et al. (2015) concluded that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 % of the OC in Lake Geneva
was mineralized aerobically at the sediment surface. Measurements performed
by  Schwefel et al. (2017) further confirmed that &gt; 96 % of
the OC in Lake Geneva is mineralized aerobically within the water column or
at the sediment surface. As the buried OC only generated low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
0.03 to 0.09 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Table 2), we concluded that the
material was already recalcitrant. In contrast to the other lakes
investigated, in Lake Geneva high porewater concentration and sediment
penetration of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enhanced the degradation of OC and actively
diminished <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by oxidation of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and formation of iron sulfides.
Norði et al. (2013) showed the efficiency of
anaerobic CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a reactive Fe(III) pool
which in turn reduced the flux of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> out of the sediment. Sediment
core measurements at 210  and 240 m but in proximity to the Rhone River
delta by  Randlett et al. (2015) showed that at even higher TOC-MARs
of 20 to 30 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (2 to 3 times the rate estimated for
the open lake), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values remained at similarly low values of 0.04
to 0.05 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This case highlights the importance of
OC quality, as refractory OC can be sequestered and offset TOC-MAR without a
noticeable increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, lakes with a higher input of
land-derived organic material should show a higher offset in TOC-MAR values
as more recalcitrant OC is buried without a direct effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>While TOC-MAR values were similar at all three stations in Lake Aegeri,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peaked at the deepest point. In addition to a likely sediment
focusing, a small anoxic bottom layer developed at the end of summer
stratification at the deepest location (see  Fig. S2) due
to the steep topography. This condition diminishes oxic mineralization of
settled OC and thus supports the formation of higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Under the assumptions that primary production even under ideal circumstances
can generate only a limited amount of OC of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 to
500 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wetzel, 2001) and that allochthonous, soil-
and land-plant-derived OC is comparatively less accessible for
mineralization, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expected to converge at an upper bound even at
high total TOC-MAR. As shallower lakes with a high primary production tend
to become anoxic during the stratification period and thereby start
accumulating reduced substances in the deepest part of the hypolimnion,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should not further increase as the concentration gradients between
sediment and water would flatten as the oxic–anoxic interface moves from the
sediment into the bottom water. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values encountered in
Lake Baldegg (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supposedly
represent an upper boundary of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as it is an example of a highly
eutrophic lake with an additional supply of OC to the deepest part by
sediment focusing while only retaining an oxic hypolimnion due to artificial
aeration. At the highest TOC-MAR value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured in the seasonally anoxic Rotsee (RO), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained at
0.46 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (measured after lake mixing in the oxic
hypolimnion), showing no further increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while
measurements performed at the end of summer stagnation and an anoxic
hypolimnion revealed a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.26 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, whether <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consistently levels off at high TOC-MAR remains
to be verified by measurements in additional eutrophic lakes with an oxic
hypolimnion and high TOC-MAR.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Average fluxes of reduced compounds from the sediments of
eight meso- to eutrophic lakes decrease systematically with mean hypolimnion
depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for sediments sampled at the deepest sites of lakes
with pronounced sediment focusing (BA, BA 01, open circles). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of Lake Baldegg (BA01 to 03) show a significant increase with
sampling depth due to strong sediment focusing. Blue circles indicate data
for Rotsee (RO), Türlersee (TU), Pfäffikersee (PF), Lake Murten
(MU), and Lake Sempach (SE), taken from  Müller et al. (2012a),
while red circles show data of the current study. Meromictic Lake
Zug is not shown. The blue line is used to guide the eye.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3275/2017/bg-14-3275-2017-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Relationship between $F_{\mathrm{red}}$ and mean hypolimnion depth}?><title>Relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mean hypolimnion depth</title>
      <p>The increasing fraction of aerobically mineralized OC with increasing
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> availability in eutrophic lakes is further supported by a systematic
decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing mean hypolimnion depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
productive lakes, shown in Fig. 3. During the stratified period, the
hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir in eutrophic lakes with a small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
quickly exhausted, enforcing a higher OC burial rate and increased anaerobic
mineralization and thus the formation of reduced substances, e.g. in Rotsee,
Türlersee, and Pfäffikersee. In these lakes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes the
dominant fraction of AHM with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40 gO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In the deep Lake Geneva, the hypolimnetic O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
inventory increases with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the lakes' resilience to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
depletion rises. Consequently, more O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is available for aerobic
remineralization of OC, and hence less or more degraded OC is buried. Hence,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diminishes with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Coherently, very deep
eutrophic lakes such as Lake Geneva are well protected from anoxia. Lake
Baldegg deviates from this general correlation in Fig. 3 due to the high
sediment focusing, which caused the sedimentation rate to increase by a
factor of 1.9 compared to the shallower sites. Likewise, sediment focusing
might increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in other lakes. However, it is unclear to what extent
sediment focusing increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TOC-MAR, for example in
Lake Sempach (Urban et al., 1997). These findings complement and
extend the observation presented in Müller et al. (2012a) that AHM of
fully productive lakes increased linearly with their mean hypolimnion depth
if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 m, with a similar contribution of reduced
compounds from the sediments of all lakes. A closer look at the fluxes of
reduced compounds produced by the deposited organic matter in the sediment,
however, revealed that they also depend on the concentration of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
that the material was exposed to.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>We demonstrate that the areal oxygen consumption in lakes caused by reduced
compounds diffusing from the sediment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is strongly related to the
local mass accumulation rate of OC (Fig. 2). In fully productive eutrophic
lakes, the flux of reduced compounds, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, declines with increasing
mean hypolimnion depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the higher O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bottom water
concentration and thus increasing exposition time of settled OC to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 3). Hence, in these lakes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can serve as a proxy for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These observations indicate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the sediment is
constrained mainly by the deposition rate and quality of OC, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
availability to the sediment surface, and lake bathymetry (i.e., the
occurrence of sediment focusing). The sediment O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> demand, a major sink
for O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the hypolimnion, can now be estimated for a broad range of
lakes with a permanently oxic hypolimnion without elaborate O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements at the sediment–water interface based on the relationships
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TOC-MAR and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are
more commonly available than porewater measurements.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data will be made available over
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5170687.v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6084/m9.figshare.5170687.v1</ext-link>.</p>
  </notes>
<sec id="Ch1.Sx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Information about the Supplement</title>
      <p>Table S1 summarizes
parameters used for OC burial efficiency rate calculations, e.g. TOC-MAR
values and benthic OC gross sedimentation. Table S2 sums up information about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and TOC-MAR values of lakes taken or calculated from literature.
Figure S1 shows the porewater concentrations of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Fe(II), and Mn(II) in the sediment of Lake Zug at 62 m water depth, while Fig. S2
depicts the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations throughout 1 year in five different
lakes at the core sampling depths.</p><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3275-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3275-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></supplementary-material>
</sec><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>MS, AW, BW, and BM designed the study. TS conducted porewater measurements
and analyzed the sediment cores and wrote the manuscript. RS performed
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> microprofiles. All authors contributed to the writing of the
manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Robert Lovas (Environment and Energy, Canton of Lucerne) for
providing data of lakes Sempach and Baldegg. Arno Stöckli (Dept. for the
Environment, Canton of Aargau) is acknowledged for providing monitoring data
of Lake Hallwil. Further, we acknowledge Peter Keller (Dept. for the
Environment, Canton of Zug) for providing monitoring data of Lake Aegeri.
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data for Lake Geneva were provided by the Commission International
pour la Protection des Eaux du Léman (CIPEL) and the Information System
of the SOERE OLA (<uri>http://si-ola.inra.fr</uri>), INRA
Thonon-les-Bains. We thank Patrick Kathriner for the great help in the
laboratory and on field campaigns. The valuable comments and suggestion by
the reviewers greatly helped to clarify and improve this paper. This work
was financially supported by the SNF grants 200021_146234 and 200021_146652.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by:  Jack Middelburg<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adams, D. D., Matisoff, G., and Snodgrass, W. J.: Flux of reduced chemical
constituents (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
sediment oxygen demand in Lake Erie, Hydrobiologia, 91, 405–414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00940130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00940130</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bloesch, J. and Uehlinger, U.: Horizontal sedimentation differences in a
eutrophic Swiss lake, Limnol. Oceanogr., 31, 1094–1109,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1986.31.5.1094" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1986.31.5.1094</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Carignan, R. and Lean, D.: Regeneration of dissolved substances in a
seasonally anoxic lake: The relative importance of processes occurring in
the water column and in the sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr, 36, 683–707,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.4.0683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1991.36.4.0683</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Carignan, R., St-Pierre, S., and Gächter, R.: Use of diffusion samplers
in oligotrophic lake sediments: Effects of free oxygen in sampler material,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 468–474,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.2.0468" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1994.39.2.0468</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cornett, R. J. and Rigler, F. H.: Hypolimnetic oxygen deficits: their
prediction and interpretation, Science, 209, 722–723,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.209.4457.722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.209.4457.722</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Di Toro, D. M., Paquin, P. R., Subburamu, K., and Gruber, D. A.: Sediment
oxygen demand model: methane and ammonia oxidation, J. Environ. Eng., 116,
945–986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1990)116:5(945)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1990)116:5(945)</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Epping, E. H. and Helder, W.: Oxygen budgets calculated from in situ oxygen
microprofiles for Northern Adriatic sediments, Cont. Shelf Res., 17,
1737–1764, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(97)00039-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0278-4343(97)00039-3</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Frenzel, P., Thebrath, B., and Conrad, R.: Oxidation of methane in the oxic
surface layer of a deep lake sediment (Lake Constance), FEMS Microbiol.
Lett., 73, 149–158,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(90)90661-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0378-1097(90)90661-9</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Heinen, E. A. and McManus, J.: Carbon and nutrient cycling at the
sediment-water boundary in western Lake Superior, J. Great Lakes Res., 30,
113–132,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(04)70381-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0380-1330(04)70381-0</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Hutchinson, G. E.: On the relation between the oxygen deficit and the
productivity and typology of lakes, Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., 36, 336–355,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19380360205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/iroh.19380360205</ext-link>, 1938.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Klump, J. V., Paddock, R., Remsen, C. C., Fitzgerald, S., Boraas, M., and
Anderson, P.: Variations in sediment accumulation rates and the flux of
labile organic matter in eastern Lake Superior basins, J. Great Lakes Res.,
15, 104–122,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71465-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71465-9</ext-link>,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Lehman, J. T.: Reconstructing the rate of accumulation of lake sediment: The
effect of sediment focusing, Quaternary Res., 5, 541–550,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(75)90015-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0033-5894(75)90015-0</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Crowe, S. A., Miklesh, D., Kistner, M., Canfield, D. E., and Katsev,
S.: Carbon mineralization and oxygen dynamics in sediments with deep oxygen
penetration, Lake Superior, Limnol. Oceanogr., 57, 1634–1650,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.6.1634" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2012.57.6.1634</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Livingstone, D. M. and Imboden, D. M.: The prediction of hypolimnetic
oxygen profiles: a plea for a deductive approach, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.,
53, 924–932,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f95-230" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/f95-230</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Loizeau, J.-L., Girardclos, S., and Dominik, J.: Taux d'accumulation de
sédiments récents et bilan de la matière particulaire dans le
Léman (Suisse-France), Arch. Sci, 65, 81–92, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Maerki, M., Müller, B., and Wehrli, B.: Microscale mineralization
pathways in surface sediments: A chemical sensor study in Lake Baikal,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 1342–1354,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.3.1342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2006.51.3.1342</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Maerki, M., Müller, B., Dinkel, C., and Wehrli, B.: Mineralization
pathways in lake sediments with different oxygen and organic carbon supply,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 428–438,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.2.0428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2009.54.2.0428</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Martin, P., Goddeeris, B., and Martens, K.: Oxygen concentration profiles in
soft sediment of Lake Baikal (Russia) near the Selenga delta, Freshwater
Biol., 29, 343–349,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00768.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00768.x</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Matisoff, G., Lick, W., and Fisher, J. B.: Early diagenesis and chemical
mass transfer in Lake Erie sediments, EPA Contract no. R805716020, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Matthews, D. A. and Effler, S. W.: Long-term changes in the areal
hypolimnetic oxygen deficit (AHOD) of Onondaga Lake: Evidence of sediment
feedback, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 702–714,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0702" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0702</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Matzinger, A., Müller, B., Niederhauser, P., Schmid, M., and Wüest,
A.: Hypolimnetic oxygen consumption by sediment-based reduced substances in
former eutrophic lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2073–2084,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.2073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.2073</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Müller, B., Wang, Y., Dittrich, M., and Wehrli, B.: Influence of organic
carbon decomposition on calcite dissolution in surficial sediments of a
freshwater lake, Water Res., 37, 4524–4532,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00381-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00381-6</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Müller, B., Bryant, L. D., Matzinger, A., and Wüest, A.:
Hypolimnetic oxygen depletion in eutrophic lakes, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 9964–9971,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301422r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es301422r</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Müller, B., Och, L., and Wüest, A.: Entwicklung des
Phosphorhaushalts und der Sauerstoffzehrung im Sempacher-und Baldeggersee.
In: Eawag-REPORT-15562, Eawag Kastanienbaum,
<uri>https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/187331</uri> (last access: 3 July 2017), 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Naeher, S., Smittenberg, R. H., Gilli, A., Kirilova, E. P., Lotter, A. F.,
and Schubert, C. J.: Impact of recent lake eutrophication on microbial
community changes as revealed by high resolution lipid biomarkers in Rotsee
(Switzerland), Org. Geochem., 49, 86–95,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.05.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.05.014</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Norði, K. À., Thamdrup, B., and Schubert, C. J.: Anaerobic oxidation
of methane in an iron-rich Danish freshwater lake sediment, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 58, 546–554,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0546</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Och, L. M., Müller, B., Voegelin, A., Ulrich, A., Göttlicher, J.,
Steiniger, R., Mangold, S., Vologina, E. G., and Sturm, M.: New insights
into the formation and burial of Fe <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Mn accumulations in Lake Baikal
sediments, Chem. Geol., 330–331, 244–259,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.09.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.09.011</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Radbourne, A. D., Ryves, D. B., Anderson, N. J., and Scott, D. R.: The
historical dependency of organic carbon burial efficiency, Limnol.
Oceanogr.,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10512</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Randlett, M.-E., Sollberger, S., Del Sontro, T., Müller, B., Corella, J.
P., Wehrli, B., and Schubert, C. J.: Mineralization pathways of organic
matter deposited in a river–lake transition of the Rhone River Delta, Lake
Geneva, Environmental Science: Processes &amp; Impacts, 17, 370–380,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00470A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C4EM00470A</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Remsen, C. C., Minnich, E. C., Stephens, R. S., Buchholz, L., and Lidstrom,
M. E.: Methane oxidation in Lake Superior sediments, J. Great Lakes Res.,
15, 141–146,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71468-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71468-4</ext-link>,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Richardson, L. L. and Nealson, K. H.: Distributions of manganese, iron, and
manganese-oxidizing bacteria in Lake Superior sediments of different organic
carbon content, J. Great Lakes Res., 15, 123–132,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71466-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71466-0</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Schaller, T. and Wehrli, B.: Geochemical-focusing of manganese in lake
sediments – An indicator of deep-water oxygen conditions, Aquat.
Geochem., 2, 359–378,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115977" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00115977</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Schaller, T., Moor, H. C., and Wehrli, B.: Sedimentary profiles of Fe, Mn,
V, Cr, As and Mo as indicators of benthic redox conditions in Baldeggersee,
Aquat. Sci., 59, 345–361,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02522363</ext-link>,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Schwefel, R., Gaudard, A., Wüest, A., and Bouffard, D.: Effects of
climate change on deepwater oxygen and winter mixing in a deep lake (Lake
Geneva): Comparing observational findings and modeling, Water Resour. Res.,
52, 8811–8826,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR019194</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Schwefel, R., Steinsberger, T., Bouffard, D., Bryant, L., Müller, B.,
and Wüest, A.: Using small-scale measurements to estimate hypolimnetic
oxygen depletion in a deep lake,  Limnol. Oceanogr., submitted,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Sherman, L. A., Baker, L. A., Weir, E. P., and Brezonik, P. L.: Sediment
pore-water dynamics of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin: geochemical processes
and seasonal and spatial variability, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1155–1171,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.5.1155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1994.39.5.1155</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Smith, D. A. and Matisoff, G.: Sediment oxygen demand in the central basin
of Lake Erie, J. Great Lakes Res., 34, 731–744,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(08)71614-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0380-1330(08)71614-9</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Sobek, S., Durisch-Kaiser, E., Zurbrügg, R., Wongfun, N., Wessels, M.,
Pasche, N., and Wehrli, B.: Organic carbon burial efficiency in lake
sediments controlled by oxygen exposure time and sediment source, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 54, 2243–2254,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.2243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.2243</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Middelburg, J. J.: A model of early
diagenetic processes from the shelf to abyssal depths, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 60, 1019–1040,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Span, D., Arbouille, D., Howa, H., and Vernet, J.-P.: Variation of nutrient
stocks in the superficial sediments of Lake Geneva from 1978 to 1988,
Hydrobiologia, 207, 161–166,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00041453</ext-link>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J.: Chemical equilibria and rates in natural
waters, Wiley, New York, Aquatic Chemistry, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Torres, N. T., Hauser, P. C., Furrer, G., Brandl, H., and Müller, B.:
Sediment porewater extraction and analysis combining filter tube samplers
and capillary electrophoresis, Environmental Science: Processes &amp;
Impacts, 15, 715–720,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00068k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3em00068k</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Urban, N. R., Dinkel, C., and Wehrli, B.: Solute transfer across the
sediment surface of a eutrophic lake: I. Porewater profiles from dialysis
samplers, Aquat. Sci., 59, 1–25,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522546" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02522546</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Vernet, J. P., Dominik, J., and Favarger, P. Y.: Texture and sedimentation
rates in Lake Geneva, Environ. Geol., 5, 143–149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02381272</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Wetzel, R.: Limnology, Academic Press, San Diego, California,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Organic carbon mass accumulation rate regulates the flux of reduced substances from the sediments of deep lakes</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The flux of reduced substances, such as methane and ammonium, from
the sediment to the bottom water (<i>F</i><sub>red</sub>) is one of the major factors
contributing to the consumption of oxygen in the hypolimnia of lakes and thus
crucial for lake oxygen management. This study presents fluxes based on
sediment porewater measurements from different water depths of five deep
lakes of differing trophic states. In meso- to eutrophic lakes <i>F</i><sub>red</sub> was
directly proportional to the total organic carbon mass accumulation rate
(TOC-MAR) of the sediments. TOC-MAR and thus <i>F</i><sub>red</sub> in eutrophic lakes
decreased systematically with increasing mean hypolimnion depth
(<i>z</i><sub>H</sub>),
suggesting that high oxygen concentrations in the deep waters of lakes were
essential for the extent of organic matter mineralization leaving a smaller
fraction for anaerobic degradation and thus formation of reduced compounds.
Consequently, <i>F</i><sub>red</sub> was low in the 310 m deep meso-eutrophic Lake
Geneva,
with high O<sub>2</sub> concentrations in the hypolimnion. By contrast, seasonal
anoxic conditions enhanced <i>F</i><sub>red</sub> in the deep basin of oligotrophic Lake
Aegeri. As TOC-MAR and <i>z</i><sub>H</sub> are based on more readily available data,
these relationships allow estimating the areal O<sub>2</sub> consumption rate by
reduced compounds from the sediments where no direct flux measurements are
available.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adams, D. D., Matisoff, G., and Snodgrass, W. J.: Flux of reduced chemical
constituents (Fe<sup>2+</sup>, Mn<sup>2+</sup>, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and CH<sub>4)</sub> and
sediment oxygen demand in Lake Erie, Hydrobiologia, 91, 405–414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00940130" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00940130</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bloesch, J. and Uehlinger, U.: Horizontal sedimentation differences in a
eutrophic Swiss lake, Limnol. Oceanogr., 31, 1094–1109,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1986.31.5.1094" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1986.31.5.1094</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carignan, R. and Lean, D.: Regeneration of dissolved substances in a
seasonally anoxic lake: The relative importance of processes occurring in
the water column and in the sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr, 36, 683–707,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.4.0683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.4.0683</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Carignan, R., St-Pierre, S., and Gächter, R.: Use of diffusion samplers
in oligotrophic lake sediments: Effects of free oxygen in sampler material,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 468–474,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.2.0468" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.2.0468</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cornett, R. J. and Rigler, F. H.: Hypolimnetic oxygen deficits: their
prediction and interpretation, Science, 209, 722–723,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.209.4457.722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.209.4457.722</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Di Toro, D. M., Paquin, P. R., Subburamu, K., and Gruber, D. A.: Sediment
oxygen demand model: methane and ammonia oxidation, J. Environ. Eng., 116,
945–986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1990)116:5(945)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1990)116:5(945)</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Epping, E. H. and Helder, W.: Oxygen budgets calculated from in situ oxygen
microprofiles for Northern Adriatic sediments, Cont. Shelf Res., 17,
1737–1764, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(97)00039-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4343(97)00039-3</a>,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Frenzel, P., Thebrath, B., and Conrad, R.: Oxidation of methane in the oxic
surface layer of a deep lake sediment (Lake Constance), FEMS Microbiol.
Lett., 73, 149–158,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(90)90661-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(90)90661-9</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Heinen, E. A. and McManus, J.: Carbon and nutrient cycling at the
sediment-water boundary in western Lake Superior, J. Great Lakes Res., 30,
113–132,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(04)70381-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(04)70381-0</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Hutchinson, G. E.: On the relation between the oxygen deficit and the
productivity and typology of lakes, Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., 36, 336–355,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19380360205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19380360205</a>, 1938.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Klump, J. V., Paddock, R., Remsen, C. C., Fitzgerald, S., Boraas, M., and
Anderson, P.: Variations in sediment accumulation rates and the flux of
labile organic matter in eastern Lake Superior basins, J. Great Lakes Res.,
15, 104–122,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71465-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71465-9</a>,
1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Lehman, J. T.: Reconstructing the rate of accumulation of lake sediment: The
effect of sediment focusing, Quaternary Res., 5, 541–550,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(75)90015-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(75)90015-0</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Crowe, S. A., Miklesh, D., Kistner, M., Canfield, D. E., and Katsev,
S.: Carbon mineralization and oxygen dynamics in sediments with deep oxygen
penetration, Lake Superior, Limnol. Oceanogr., 57, 1634–1650,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.6.1634" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.6.1634</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Livingstone, D. M. and Imboden, D. M.: The prediction of hypolimnetic
oxygen profiles: a plea for a deductive approach, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.,
53, 924–932,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f95-230" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/f95-230</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Loizeau, J.-L., Girardclos, S., and Dominik, J.: Taux d'accumulation de
sédiments récents et bilan de la matière particulaire dans le
Léman (Suisse-France), Arch. Sci, 65, 81–92, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Maerki, M., Müller, B., and Wehrli, B.: Microscale mineralization
pathways in surface sediments: A chemical sensor study in Lake Baikal,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 1342–1354,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.3.1342" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.3.1342</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Maerki, M., Müller, B., Dinkel, C., and Wehrli, B.: Mineralization
pathways in lake sediments with different oxygen and organic carbon supply,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 428–438,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.2.0428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.2.0428</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, P., Goddeeris, B., and Martens, K.: Oxygen concentration profiles in
soft sediment of Lake Baikal (Russia) near the Selenga delta, Freshwater
Biol., 29, 343–349,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00768.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00768.x</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Matisoff, G., Lick, W., and Fisher, J. B.: Early diagenesis and chemical
mass transfer in Lake Erie sediments, EPA Contract no. R805716020, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Matthews, D. A. and Effler, S. W.: Long-term changes in the areal
hypolimnetic oxygen deficit (AHOD) of Onondaga Lake: Evidence of sediment
feedback, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 702–714,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0702" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0702</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Matzinger, A., Müller, B., Niederhauser, P., Schmid, M., and Wüest,
A.: Hypolimnetic oxygen consumption by sediment-based reduced substances in
former eutrophic lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2073–2084,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.2073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.2073</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, B., Wang, Y., Dittrich, M., and Wehrli, B.: Influence of organic
carbon decomposition on calcite dissolution in surficial sediments of a
freshwater lake, Water Res., 37, 4524–4532,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00381-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00381-6</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, B., Bryant, L. D., Matzinger, A., and Wüest, A.:
Hypolimnetic oxygen depletion in eutrophic lakes, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 9964–9971,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301422r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es301422r</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, B., Och, L., and Wüest, A.: Entwicklung des
Phosphorhaushalts und der Sauerstoffzehrung im Sempacher-und Baldeggersee.
In: Eawag-REPORT-15562, Eawag Kastanienbaum,
<a href="https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/187331" target="_blank">https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/187331</a> (last access: 3 July 2017), 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Naeher, S., Smittenberg, R. H., Gilli, A., Kirilova, E. P., Lotter, A. F.,
and Schubert, C. J.: Impact of recent lake eutrophication on microbial
community changes as revealed by high resolution lipid biomarkers in Rotsee
(Switzerland), Org. Geochem., 49, 86–95,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.05.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.05.014</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Norði, K. À., Thamdrup, B., and Schubert, C. J.: Anaerobic oxidation
of methane in an iron-rich Danish freshwater lake sediment, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 58, 546–554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0546</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Och, L. M., Müller, B., Voegelin, A., Ulrich, A., Göttlicher, J.,
Steiniger, R., Mangold, S., Vologina, E. G., and Sturm, M.: New insights
into the formation and burial of Fe ∕ Mn accumulations in Lake Baikal
sediments, Chem. Geol., 330–331, 244–259,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.09.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.09.011</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Radbourne, A. D., Ryves, D. B., Anderson, N. J., and Scott, D. R.: The
historical dependency of organic carbon burial efficiency, Limnol.
Oceanogr.,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10512</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Randlett, M.-E., Sollberger, S., Del Sontro, T., Müller, B., Corella, J.
P., Wehrli, B., and Schubert, C. J.: Mineralization pathways of organic
matter deposited in a river–lake transition of the Rhone River Delta, Lake
Geneva, Environmental Science: Processes &amp; Impacts, 17, 370–380,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00470A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00470A</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Remsen, C. C., Minnich, E. C., Stephens, R. S., Buchholz, L., and Lidstrom,
M. E.: Methane oxidation in Lake Superior sediments, J. Great Lakes Res.,
15, 141–146,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71468-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71468-4</a>,
1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, L. L. and Nealson, K. H.: Distributions of manganese, iron, and
manganese-oxidizing bacteria in Lake Superior sediments of different organic
carbon content, J. Great Lakes Res., 15, 123–132,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71466-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71466-0</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Schaller, T. and Wehrli, B.: Geochemical-focusing of manganese in lake
sediments – An indicator of deep-water oxygen conditions, Aquat.
Geochem., 2, 359–378,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115977" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00115977</a>,
1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Schaller, T., Moor, H. C., and Wehrli, B.: Sedimentary profiles of Fe, Mn,
V, Cr, As and Mo as indicators of benthic redox conditions in Baldeggersee,
Aquat. Sci., 59, 345–361,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522363" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522363</a>,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Schwefel, R., Gaudard, A., Wüest, A., and Bouffard, D.: Effects of
climate change on deepwater oxygen and winter mixing in a deep lake (Lake
Geneva): Comparing observational findings and modeling, Water Resour. Res.,
52, 8811–8826,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019194</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Schwefel, R., Steinsberger, T., Bouffard, D., Bryant, L., Müller, B.,
and Wüest, A.: Using small-scale measurements to estimate hypolimnetic
oxygen depletion in a deep lake,  Limnol. Oceanogr., submitted,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Sherman, L. A., Baker, L. A., Weir, E. P., and Brezonik, P. L.: Sediment
pore-water dynamics of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin: geochemical processes
and seasonal and spatial variability, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1155–1171,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.5.1155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.5.1155</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, D. A. and Matisoff, G.: Sediment oxygen demand in the central basin
of Lake Erie, J. Great Lakes Res., 34, 731–744,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(08)71614-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(08)71614-9</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Sobek, S., Durisch-Kaiser, E., Zurbrügg, R., Wongfun, N., Wessels, M.,
Pasche, N., and Wehrli, B.: Organic carbon burial efficiency in lake
sediments controlled by oxygen exposure time and sediment source, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 54, 2243–2254,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.2243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6.2243</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Soetaert, K., Herman, P. M. J., and Middelburg, J. J.: A model of early
diagenetic processes from the shelf to abyssal depths, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 60, 1019–1040,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00013-0</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Span, D., Arbouille, D., Howa, H., and Vernet, J.-P.: Variation of nutrient
stocks in the superficial sediments of Lake Geneva from 1978 to 1988,
Hydrobiologia, 207, 161–166,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041453</a>, 1990.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J.: Chemical equilibria and rates in natural
waters, Wiley, New York, Aquatic Chemistry, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, N. T., Hauser, P. C., Furrer, G., Brandl, H., and Müller, B.:
Sediment porewater extraction and analysis combining filter tube samplers
and capillary electrophoresis, Environmental Science: Processes &amp;
Impacts, 15, 715–720,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00068k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00068k</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Urban, N. R., Dinkel, C., and Wehrli, B.: Solute transfer across the
sediment surface of a eutrophic lake: I. Porewater profiles from dialysis
samplers, Aquat. Sci., 59, 1–25,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522546" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522546</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Vernet, J. P., Dominik, J., and Favarger, P. Y.: Texture and sedimentation
rates in Lake Geneva, Environ. Geol., 5, 143–149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381272</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Wetzel, R.: Limnology, Academic Press, San Diego, California,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
