<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-3461-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Growth responses of trees and understory plants to nitrogen fertilization in
a subtropical forest in China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Growth responses of trees and understory plants to nitrogen fertilization}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D. Tian et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Di</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Peng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Wenjing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Yongkai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>Zhengbing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Biao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9858-7943</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jingjing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Xiaoniu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Jingyun</given-names></name>
          <email>jyfang@urban.pku.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,
and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education,
Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Forestry, Anhui Agricultural University, 230036, Hefei, Anhui, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change,
Institute of Botany, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jingyun Fang (jyfang@urban.pku.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>21</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>3461</fpage><lpage>3469</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Reactive nitrogen (N) increase in the biosphere has been a
noteworthy aspect of global change, producing considerable ecological effects
on the functioning and dynamics of the terrestrial ecosystems. A number of
observational studies have explored responses of plants to experimentally
simulated N enrichment in boreal and temperate forests. Here we investigate how the
dominant trees and different understory plants respond to experimental N
enrichment in a subtropical forest in China. We conducted a 3.4-year N
fertilization experiment in an old-aged subtropical evergreen broad-leaved
forest in eastern China with three treatment levels applied to nine
20 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 m plots and replicated in three blocks. We divided the
plants into trees, saplings, shrubs (including tree seedlings), and
ground-cover plants (ferns) according to the growth forms, and then measured
the absolute and relative basal area increments of trees and saplings and the
aboveground biomass of understory shrubs and ferns. We further grouped
individuals of the dominant tree species, <italic>Castanopsis eyrei</italic>, into
three size classes to investigate their respective growth responses to the N
fertilization. Our results showed that the plot-averaged absolute and
relative growth rates of basal area and aboveground biomass of trees were not
affected by N fertilization. Across the individuals of <italic>C. eyrei</italic>, the
small trees with a DBH (diameter at breast height) of 5–10 cm  declined
by 66.4 and 59.5 %, respectively, in N50 (50 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and N100 fertilized plots (100 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the growth
of median and large trees with a DBH of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm did not significantly
change with the N fertilization. The growth rate of small trees, saplings,
and the aboveground biomass of understory shrubs and ground-cover ferns
decreased significantly in the N-fertilized plots. Our findings suggested
that N might not be a limiting nutrient in this mature subtropical forest,
and that the limitation of other nutrients in the forest ecosystem might be
aggravated by the enhanced N availability, potentially resulting in an
adverse effect on the development of natural subtropical forest.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Reactive nitrogen (N) increase in the biosphere, especially atmospheric N
deposition, is a globally prevalent phenomenon (Galloway et al., 2004). It
has become a serious environmental issue in China, especially in the
southeastern regions, with drastic increase of N entering terrestrial
ecosystems which produces considerable ecological effects on the functioning
and dynamics of the terrestrial ecosystems (Liu et al., 2013; Gu et al.,
2015). Since the 1990s, the simulated N-fertilization experiments have been
conducted in various forest ecosystems to explore the responses of plants
and other organisms to the potential high N enrichment and changes of soil N
availability (e.g. Wright and Tietema, 1995; Bobbink et al., 2010; Fowler
et al., 2015). Although a number of studies have reported a general positive
effect of N enrichment on plants in N-limited forests and a negative effect
of excess N (e.g. Aber et al., 1998; Högberg et al., 2006; Gilliam,
2006; Thomas et al., 2010), specific responses of plants appeared to be
highly growth form-dependent and ecosystem-dependent (LeBauer and Treseder,
2008; Bedison and McNeil, 2009; Dirnböck et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>Due to the widespread heavy N deposition in Europe and America, numerous
studies that focused on the growth responses of plants to N enrichment have
been carried out in boreal and temperate forests during the past several
decades (Magill, 2000; Högberg et al., 2006). These studies showed that
most trees have a positive growth response to N fertilization and therefore
have higher potential carbon sequestration because the status of N
limitation was largely alleviated by the increasing N inputs (e.g. Thomas
et al., 2010; BassiriRad et al., 2015). However, the understory plants in
these forest ecosystems inconsistently showed general negative responses to
N enrichment with declined biomass or shifted community structure (Rainey et
al., 1999; Du et al., 2014; Dirnböck et al., 2014). In addition to the
opposite responses of trees and understory plants to N enrichment,
differences remained in the effects of N enrichment on single plant growth
form in these forests. Generally, the limited light availability in these
ecosystems with high tree canopy cover was ascribed to the negative effects
of N fertilization (Strengbom and Nordin, 2008).</p>
      <p>Recently, the effects of N enrichment on tropical forests have raised
researchers' concern. Fertilization experiments in tropical forests showed
different growth responses of trees to nutrient addition among individual
size levels, understory shrubs, and tree seedlings (Wright et al., 2011;
Pasquini and Santiago, 2012; Santiago et al., 2012) which contrasted with
the ones found for trees in the previously described experiments. For
example, phosphorus (P) fertilization enhanced the growths of small trees
and seedlings but had no effect on median and large trees, while N addition
did not show any significant effect on plant growth in a lowland tropical
forest (Alvarez-Clare et al., 2013). In addition to the ubiquitous concept
that P was a critical element driving plant growth in tropical forests
(Vitousek et al., 1991), the heterogeneous nutrient limitation that the growths
of plants were co-limited by multiple nutrients was further proposed to
explain why diverse plants respond differently to N enrichment (Wright et
al., 2011; Alvarez-Clare et al., 2013; Wurzburger and Wright, 2015).
Nevertheless, the patterns of specific nutrient limitation and responses of
plants to N enrichments among diverse forest ecosystems need further
exploration.</p>
      <p>As most of the nutrient fertilization experiments have focused on boreal
forests, temperate forests, and lowland tropical forests, few studies have
investigated the effects of N enrichment on subtropical forests despite their
broad distribution throughout the world and great contribution to the global
carbon sink (Zhou et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2015). With
increasing N deposited in the subtropical ecosystems in southeastern China
(Du et al., 2014), it is important to diagnose the nutrient limitation and
evaluate the responses of different plant growth forms to N enrichment in
subtropical forests for the assessment of carbon sequestration and community
dynamics.</p>
      <p>To better predict the responses of subtropical forests and different plant
growth forms to N enrichment, we carried out a 3.4-year N fertilization
experiment with three treatment levels applied to nine 20 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 m
plots and replicated in three blocks in a subtropical forest in southeastern
China. We attempt to explore whether N is a limiting element in the old-aged
evergreen broad-leaved subtropical forest. We hypothesize a positive response
of trees to N fertilization, but a negative response of understory growth
forms to N fertilization due to the expansion of canopy crown and consequent
reduction of light availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study site and experimental design</title>
      <p>The N fertilization experiment site was located at 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">"</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> N
latitude and 117<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E longitude at an altitude of 375 m in
the natural conservation zone of Guniujiang in Anhui Province, eastern China.
As a commendable representative of the typical subtropical broad-leaved
evergreen forest, the Guniujiang experimental site is an important part of
the NEECF (Network of Nutrient Enrichment Experiments in China's Forests)
project (Du et al., 2013), because of its representativeness in both species
composition and landscape structure in the subtropical evergreen forest
region. The study area has a humid climate with strong summer monsoons with
an annual average precipitation of 1700 mm and an average annual temperature
of 14.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The amount of wet N deposition in this region was
5.9–7.3 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The soil in this area has been
classified as yellow-brown earth (Chinese Soil Taxonomic Classification), and
the pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value at 0–10 cm soil depth was 4.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE). The total N, P, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–N and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–N content in
the soil at 0–10 cm depth were 3.23 (0.37), 0.32 (0.02), 0.012 (0.001), and
0.002 (0.0006) mg g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Li et al., 2015).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Growth measurements for four plant growth forms in this study before
N fertilization. Numbers in the tables represent means (or
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of plants across all plots. TBA: total
basal area of trees; DBH: diameter at breast height (1.3 m); Basal diameter:
diameter at 10 cm above the ground.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Growth forms</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center">Growth variable </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TBA (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DBH (cm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Height (m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trees</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Castanopsis eyrei</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Saplings</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>C. eyrei</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Coverage (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Basal diameter (mm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Height (cm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shrubs and seedlings</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Cleyera japonica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">79.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Camellia cuspidata</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Rhododendron ovatum</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">167.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Eurya muricata</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">111.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Cinnamomum japonicum</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">51.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Cinnamomum subavenium</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Sarcandra glabra</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">35.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.69</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="left">Density (shoots m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ferns</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Woodwardia japonica</italic></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The study was conducted in a well-protected, mature subtropical evergreen
forest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300 year age) with a three-layered vertical structure: the
canopy tree layer (DBH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm and height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m); the understory
layer of saplings, shrubs, and seedlings (DBH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm and
height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m); and the ground-cover layer (ferns and herbs). The average
density and basal area of trees were 1219 trees ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
36.35 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; <italic>Castanopsis eyrei</italic> was the
dominant species (which was also an important species at some other sites in
subtropical forests) and accounted for 87 % of the total aboveground
biomass of trees. The understory saplings and shrubs contained several
species, including <italic>Cleyera japonica</italic>, <italic>Camellia cuspidata</italic>, <italic>Rhododendron ovatum</italic>, <italic>Eurya muricata</italic>, <italic>Cinnamomum japonicum</italic>, <italic>Cinnamomum subavenium</italic>,
<italic>Sarcandra glabra</italic>, and <italic>C. eyrei</italic>, and other native subtropical
evergreen species (Table 1). Two fern species (<italic>Woodwardia japonica</italic>
and <italic>Dryopteris hwangshanensis</italic>) and an orchid (<italic>Cymbidium tortisepalum</italic> var. <italic>longibracteatum</italic>) appeared on the floor layer,
while <italic>W. japonica</italic> exclusively dominated the floor layer with a
coverage of 10–20 %.</p>
      <p>We began N fertilization in March 2011. A randomized block design was used to
avoid spatial heterogeneity. We chose three blocks with similar stand growth,
species composition, and site condition to establish three N treatments in
each block: CK (0 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N50
(50 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and N100 (100 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In total, nine 20 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 m plots were established with a 5–10 m
buffer zone between each plot. The total NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was divided into 12
dosages and applied to the forest in each month at regular intervals.
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in dosages of 0.48 and 0.95 kg plot<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were dissolved
in 15 L of fresh water, respectively, and then sprayed uniformly in N50 and
N100 plots using a back-hatch sprayer. The unfertilized plots (controls) were
similarly treated with 15 L of fresh water without NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sampling and measurement</title>
      <p>In March 2011, the species of all trees higher than 2 m in each plot were
labelled and their initial DBH (1.3 m) was measured. Then, autonomous band
dendrometers made of aluminium tape and springs were installed on trees with
a DBH greater than 5 cm. After 1 month to allow the tapes and springs on
the trees to become stable, we began to measure the changes in the gaps on
the tapes using vernier callipers (measured in July 2014) and then calculated
tree DBH according to the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M71" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DBH</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DBH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where DBH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the initial DBH (cm) of trees measured in March
2011, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mm) represent the widths of gaps on the tapes
measured in July 2014 and at the beginning of the experiment, respectively.</p>
      <p>The basal area is a common indicator for weighing the biomass of trees.
Therefore, tree basal area increments were calculated to indicate the
responses of tree biomass to the N fertilization. First, to test
community-level responses of tree layer to N fertilization, we calculated the
sum of total basal area increase (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all trees
in a plot after 3.4 years of N fertilization and divided this value by the
period of N fertilization (3.4 years) to obtain the annual basal area
increase rate of the trees (dead trees were not included). Second, relative
annual basal area growth rate (RGR, m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to
eliminate the conceivable interferential effects resulting from the
differences in the number and size of original individuals among plots
according to the following equation, similar to the method of Alvarez-Clare et al. (2013):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RGR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2014</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2011</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BA</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where RGR represents the relative annual basal area growth rate
(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BA indicates the sum of basal area of all
trees in each plot, and 3.4 (years) is the N fertilization period.</p>
      <p>Because <italic>C. eyrei</italic> was the only dominant species in the tree layer, we
separated it from other tree species and grouped its individuals into three
classes based on their DBH values (i.e. 5–10, 10–30 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm) to
investigate the effects of N fertilization on the growth of trees after
removing the plant species and original size factors. During the monitoring
of tree growth, dead trees were recorded. Then, we calculated the aboveground
biomass increments of trees and the proportion of dead biomass using
allometric equations (see Table S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p>We examined the effects of N fertilization on understory tree saplings
distributed in the plots according to their sizes and characteristics. For
small trees with DBH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm and height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 m (defined as
“saplings”), DBH was measured at the beginning of N fertilization and in
July 2014. Then, annual basal area growth rate and RGR of saplings were
calculated based on DBH changes. For very small trees or shrubs with
DBH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm and height <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 m (defined as “shrubs/seedlings”), we
set two 5 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m subplots in each plot along a diagonal direction
and investigated the abundance, dominance, basal diameter (diameter at 10 cm
above the ground), height, and crown diameters of all shrubs/seedlings inside
the subplots at two specific times. The first time was at the beginning of N
fertilization (March 2011), and the second was in July 2014. The length,
width, and number of fern leaves were measured carefully in the
above-mentioned subplots, and the allometric equations for seven dominant
species were then obtained (Table S1). Because the average aboveground
biomass of shrubs/seedlings and ferns showed no significant differences
across three N treatments before N fertilization in March 2011, we regarded
the distribution of these understory shrubs/seedlings and ferns to be
homogeneous among the three treatments. Then we identified the effects of N
fertilization by comparing the aboveground biomass of shrubs/seedlings and
ferns in 2014 among the different treatments. Meanwhile, to investigate the
canopy cover and understory light availability, we used a digital camera
(Canon, Japan) with a fisheye lens (Sigma circular fisheye) to take
photographs of canopy. In each subplot, we put the camera at 1 m above ground
and took five photos upwards from understory.</p>
      <p>In addition, to further explore the influences of N fertilization on plants'
growth from the biogeochemical aspect, we measured soil N, P content and pH.
Specifically, we set three subplots randomly within each plot and collected
three subsamples of 0–10 cm soil for each subplot using a hand-held steel
soil borer (3 cm in diameter), during investigation of the understory
plants. Then, the three subsamples were mixed together to form one sample per
plot and transported to a laboratory and air-dried naturally. After
being air-dried, soil samples were ground with a ball mill (NM200, Retsch, Haan,
Germany) and screened through a 100-mesh sieve. The N concentration of soil
was measured using an elemental analyser (2400 Series2 CHNS/O elemental
analyser, Perkin-Elmer, USA). After acid digestion of the samples, soil P
concentrations were measured using a flow injection analysis instrument
(AutoAnanlyzer3, Bran <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Luebbe, Germany). Soil pH was measured by dry
soil in water suspension with a water : soil ratio of 1 : 2.5.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>The indicator of canopy cover (i.e. [1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fmv]) of the three
treatments in our experiments. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the number of replicates. SE
indicates the standard error.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treatment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Canopy cover </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CK</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">N100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p>We used an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the effects of N
fertilization on soil N and P content, soil pH, tree basal area increments,
RGR, aboveground biomass increments, proportion of dead trees, and
aboveground biomass of shrubs/seedlings and ferns. Block and N treatment were
both regarded as fixed factors in the statistical model. We excluded the
interactions between block and N treatment from the model because they do not
have ecological meaning. Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) tests
were used to conduct the multi-comparisons among the three N treatments. For
the estimation of canopy cover, we followed the detailed procedures of
weighted ellipsoidal method using the software of Hemisfer (version 2.16.6)
to obtain values of vertical total gap fraction (Fmv) which indicate the
proportion of projected light spots to the total projected area (Thimonier et
al., 2010). Then we obtained the values of [1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fmv] to indicate canopy
cover. All statistical analyses were performed in R.3.2 (R Development Core
Team, 2010), and all figures were drawn in SigmaPlot 12 (Systat, 2010).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Effects of N fertilization on canopy cover, soil N and P contents, and
pH</title>
      <p>The indicator of forest canopy (i.e. [1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fmv]) showed no significant
differences between unfertilized and fertilized plots with 3.4 years of N
fertilization (Table 2). Although the fish eye measurements did not provide
evidence for the changes in total forest cover with the effects of N
fertilization, there still may be a shift between the contribution of
overstory and understory trees to the total forest cover.</p>
      <p>The 3.4 years of N fertilization significantly increased the N content of
0–10 cm soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), especially in N100 plots (Fig. 1a), but showed no
significant effect on soil P content (Fig. 1b, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), thus leading to a
significant increase in soil N : P ratio (Fig. 1c, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additionally,
the N fertilization also decreased soil pH and aggravated soil acidification
(Fig. 1d, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Effects of N fertilization on soil nutrient content, N : P ratio,
and pH (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3) at the soil depth of 0–10 cm.
<bold>(a)</bold> Total N content per gram soil, <bold>(b)</bold> total P content per
gram soil, <bold>(c)</bold> N : P ratio and <bold>(d)</bold> soil pH. Numbers in
these figures indicate the results of ANOVA.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Effects of N fertilization on the growth and mortality of all trees
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE). <bold>(a)</bold> Absolute basal area increase of all trees,
<bold>(b)</bold> aboveground biomass increase of all trees, <bold>(c)</bold> relative
growth rate of total tree basal area, and <bold>(d)</bold> the proportion of all
dead trees. The proportion of dead trees was calculated using the aboveground
biomass of all dead trees during the experiment divided by the total
aboveground biomass of all trees in 2014. Numbers in these figures indicate
the results of ANOVA. The N treatment on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents three levels of N
fertilization: CK (0 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N50
(50 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and N100 (100 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Growth responses of trees to N fertilization</title>
      <p>The increments of absolute basal area, aboveground biomass, and RGR of all
trees at plot level showed no significant response to N fertilization during
3.4-year N fertilization (Fig. 2a–c). Compared with the unfertilized plots,
N50 and N100 fertilized plots showed a tendency toward higher averaged
proportions of dead trees' aboveground biomass despite no significant
difference between them (Fig. 2d).</p>
      <p>Individuals of the dominant species <italic>C. eyrei</italic> with different initial
DBH showed divergent responses of absolute basal area increments and RGR to N
fertilization (Fig. 3a–f). The small trees with a DBH of 5–10 cm growing
under unfertilized plots showed greater basal area increments than those
growing under N-fertilized plots (Fig. 3a, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Specifically, the N50
and N100 fertilization decreased the absolute basal area increments of small
individual trees at rates of 2.2 and 1.98 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> tree<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, which indicated that the decreasing degrees of the absolute
basal area of small trees reached 66.4 and 59.5 % in N50 and N100 plots.
The small individual trees also showed a tendency toward lower averaged RGR
in N-fertilized plots although no significant difference was detected between
them (Fig. 3d, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As opposed to the negative responses of small
trees to N fertilization, the basal area increment and RGR of median
<italic>C. eyrei</italic> individuals (DBH of 10–30 cm) and large <italic>C. eyrei</italic>
individuals (DBH of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm) showed no significant response to N
fertilization, but the averaged growth rate of large <italic>C. eyrei</italic>
individuals in N50 plots almost doubled the value of the corresponding large
individuals in unfertilized plots (Fig. 3b, c, e and f, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all
cases).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Growth responses of understory saplings, shrubs/seedlings, and ferns to
N fertilization</title>
      <p>Responses of understory saplings to N fertilization were similar to those of
small dominant trees. Although the annual absolute increments of basal area
increments of saplings showed no significant response to N fertilization
(Fig. 4a, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the RGR of sapling growing in N50 and N100 plots showed
a substantial decrease at rates of 0.021 and
0.019 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, compared to sapling
growing in unfertilized plots (Fig. 4b, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, a general
negative effect of N fertilization also occurred on understory shrubs and
ground-cover ferns. The aboveground biomass of seven predominant
shrubs/seedlings was drastically decreased by 69.4 and 79.1 % in N50 and
N100 fertilized plots, respectively, compared with those in the unfertilized
plots (Fig. 5a, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Remarkably, the aboveground biomass of
ground-cover ferns significantly declined by 92.4 and 93.4 % in N50 and
N100 fertilized plots (Fig. 5b, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Effects of N fertilization on the growth (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE) of
<italic>C. eyrei</italic> by DBH classes (5–10, 10–30 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm).
<bold>(a–c)</bold> Absolute basal area increase and <bold>(d–f)</bold> relative
growth increase rate of basal area. Numbers in these figures indicate the
results of ANOVA. The N treatment on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents three levels of N
fertilization: CK (0 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N50
(50 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and N100
(100 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Growth responses of trees to N fertilization</title>
      <p>Nutrient limitation was generally determined through evaluating ecosystem
feedbacks to nutrient addition (Vitousek, 1991; Santiago et al., 2012;
Alvarez-Clare et al., 2013). When the forest ecosystems showed a positive
response to added nutrient, e.g. plant growth or rates of physiological
processes were promoted, the added nutrient then could be interpreted as
limiting to the ecosystem – and otherwise, as not limiting to the ecosystem
(Santiago, 2015). We initially expected positive growth responses of trees
exposed to N fertilization in this subtropical forest because N availability
in the soil would be enhanced by N fertilization and the potential N
limitation of plants in the forest ecosystem could be alleviated. However,
contrary to our expectation, we did not observe strong positive growth
responses of trees to N fertilization (Figs. 2 and 3). Across individual
trees of different sizes and plant growth forms, we only observed substantial
negative responses of small trees (5–10 cm DBH; Fig. 3a and d) and saplings
(Fig. 4a and b) and weak responses of median and large trees (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm
DBH) to N fertilization (Fig. 3b, c, e, f), which further demonstrated that
the growth of trees in this old-aged subtropical forest was not essentially
limited by N as hypothesized.</p>
      <p>Contrasted with previous positive responses of trees to N fertilization in
boreal and temperate forests which were considered as N limited ecosystems
(Högberg et al., 2006; Thomas et al., 2010; BassiriRad et al., 2015),
our finding of the unchanged responses of trees to N fertilization was
partly consistent with observations of trees from tropical forests (e.g.
Santiago et al., 2012; Alvarez-Clare et al., 2013). Studies from mature
tropical forests have revealed that P availability was a critical element
shaping tree species distribution and productivity (Santiago and Goldstein, 2016; Dalling
et al., 2016). Given the similar high-weathered soil properties, humid
climatic conditions, and dominant evergreen broadleaf trees in mature
subtropical forest as those in wet tropical forest, we speculated that P
limitation, rather than N limitation, might have played a key role in
influencing growth of plants in subtropical forest.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Effects of N fertilization on the growth of saplings
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE). <bold>(a)</bold> Absolute basal area increase and
<bold>(b)</bold> the relative growth rate of basal area. Numbers in these figures
indicate the results of ANOVA. The N treatment on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents three
levels of N fertilization: CK (0 kg N  ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N50
(50 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and N100 (100 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Effects of N fertilization on the aboveground biomass of shrubs,
seedlings and ferns. Bars show the aboveground biomass of
<bold>(a)</bold> shrubs/seedlings and <bold>(b)</bold> ferns (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE).
Numbers in these figures indicate the results of ANOVA. The N treatment on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents three levels of N fertilization: CK
(0 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N50 (50 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
N100 (100 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/3461/2017/bg-14-3461-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The N and P stoichiometry of soil might have objectively provided indicators
of P limitation with the effects of N fertilization in this subtropical
forest, because soil N contents and N : P ratio in N-fertilized plots were
remarkably higher than those in unfertilized plots (Fig. 1). Additionally,
limitation of other nutrients, such as K (potassium) which was highlighted in
tropical forests, and their combination as well as heterogeneous nutrient
limitation of specific species, plant growth forms, and individuals in
different sizes may warrant further consideration in subtropical forests
(Wright et al., 2011; Santiago et al., 2012; Alvarez-Clare et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Moreover, the high spatial heterogeneity in old-aged subtropical forest,
similar to tropical forests, could be a possible explanation for the lack of
significant responses of plot-averaged basal area growth, RGR, aboveground
biomass of trees with a DBH of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 cm, and the proportion of dead trees to
N fertilization. In eastern China, the distributions of subtropical forest
stands are quite topographically fragmented, while relatively flat stands are
required to avoid N losses and minimize spatial heterogeneity among
experimental treatments. The actual distribution and topography of the
subtropical forests limited the number of replications in the N fertilization
experiment. This limitation might reduce the statistic power of N treatment
on plot-averaged plant growth rate, as  has been pointed out in previous
studies (Wright et al., 2011; Alvarez-Clare et al., 2013). Furthermore, our
observation of large trees with DBH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 cm showed that the averaged
growth rate of large <italic>C. eyrei</italic> individuals in N50 plots almost
doubled the value of the corresponding large individuals in unfertilized
plots. Nevertheless, the results of ANOVA showed that the effect was not
significant. As the number of large trees in the experiment was relatively
less than the small trees, the low replication and high spatial site
heterogeneity might have reduced the statistical power of N fertilization on
the large trees. Thus, fertilization experiments with more homogeneous plots
and more replicates are warranted to further strengthen these findings.
Overall, given the negative and potential positive effects of N fertilization
on small and large trees, it is of urgent necessity to conduct long-term
monitoring of the trees which would provide alternatives for accurately
evaluating the forest dynamics under the enhanced global N deposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Growth responses of small trees, understory saplings, shrubs/seedlings,
and ferns to N fertilization</title>
      <p>Although the positive response of small or juvenile trees to nutrient
fertilization has been reported in boreal, temperate, and tropical forest
(e.g. Högberg et al., 2006; Bedison and McNeil, 2009; Alvarez-Clare et
al., 2013), our results showed a remarkable negative effect of N
fertilization on small-sized plants including trees, understory saplings,
shrubs/seedlings, and ferns. During our field investigation, we also found
that the average proportion of dead trees (Fig. 2d) tended to increase in N-fertilized plots although the result was not statistically significant
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additionally, the ground-cover ferns in N100 plots almost
disappeared after 3.4-year N fertilization (personal observation). Given the
high stand density in this mature subtropical forest, we suggest that N
fertilization might potentially lead to increased self- and alien thinning of
individuals through decreasing understory light availability.</p>
      <p>The pivotal role of light availability in the eco-physiological processes of
understory growth forms has been widely recognized (Santiago, 2015). Due to
the limited light availability, understory plants may not be able to
incorporate the added nutrient and promote their photosynthetic rates
(Alvarez-Clare et al., 2013). However, a study conducted in tropical forest
with thick canopy showed that photosynthetic process could be enhanced by
nutrient addition even under low light availability (Pasquini and Santiago,
2012). In  sharp contrast, the study conducted in an Australian rainforest
revealed that understory seedlings increased growth when the light
availability was high, but showed no significant response to nutrient
fertilization in low lights (Thompson et al., 1988). These studies, together
with our field observations, suggest that the growth of understory plants is
largely co-limited by nutrient and light availability in the local
environment. Further, our results of forest canopy cover estimated by
photographic fisheye showed no significant differences between unfertilized
and N-fertilized plots, which was consistent with the findings of Lu et al.
(2010). Although the understory light irradiance fluctuated widely during a
day and was very hard to detect precisely, our measurements of forest canopy
cover provided a rough evaluation for light availability and a potential
shift between the contribution of overstory and understory trees to the
total forest cover which could partly explain the differences in the
responses of trees with different sizes (i.e. different DBH classes). The
results might indicate that other factors in addition to the low light
availability in this old-aged forest had also played a crucial role in
influencing understory plants during 3.4 years of N fertilization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Potential N saturation and plant growth</title>
      <p>The striking biomass reduction of the understory plants, especially ferns, in
response to N fertilization in our study well corroborated the similar
findings in an old-aged tropical forest at Mt Dinghushan in China (Lu et
al., 2010). Also, consistent with previous studies obtained from boreal,
temperate, and tropical forests (Rainey et al., 1999; Alvarez-Clare et al.,
2013; Dirnböck et al., 2014), our experiment revealed that understory
small-sized plants responded sensitively to nutrient fertilization, which
might indicate a possibility of N saturation in the subtropical forest.
According to the definition of N saturation addressed by Aber et al. (1998)
(i.e. N availability in the forest ecosystem exceeded the demand of plants
and microbes), the drastic decrease of understory ferns, shifted composition
of understory plant community, and cation imbalances of understory species
after 7 years of chronic N fertilization at Harvard Forest, USA, could be
interpreted as useful indicators of N saturation (Rainey et al., 1999).
Moreover, a 6-year N fertilization experiment in an old-aged tropical forest
at Mt Dinghushan also showed signs of N saturation, such as significant
increases in nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-) leaching, inorganic N concentration, and
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O emissions of soils, and soil acidification (Lu et al., 2014; Chen et
al., 2015). In our experiment, the soil acidification and increased soil N
concentration in high-N-fertilized plots (Fig. 1) combined with the negative
responses of understory plants suggest that the 3.4-year N fertilization in
this mature subtropical forest site has potentially caused N saturation.
Nevertheless, further observations are still required to explore the
mechanisms underlying the changes of different growth forms with the effects
of N enhancement in the subtropical forests.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Contrasting growth responses among plant growth forms to N fertilization were
present in the mature subtropical evergreen forest in this study. Overall
growth of trees at the plot level showed no significant response to the N
fertilization; however, if the dominant tree species, <italic>C. eyrei</italic>, was
grouped into three DBH classes, the basal area increment of small trees with
a DBH of 5–10 cm declined 66.4 and 59.5 % in N50 and N100 fertilized
plots, respectively, while the growth of median and large trees with a DBH of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm showed weak responses to N fertilization. The growths of
understory saplings, shrubs/seedlings, and ground-cover ferns showed a
negative response to N fertilization. Our results indicated that N might not
be a limited nutrient in this subtropical forest and that other nutrient and
light availability may potentially co-limit growth of plants with different
growth forms. Our data also suggested that even short-term N fertilization
might have caused N saturation in this mature subtropical forest and the
limitation of other nutrients might be amplified with increasing N addition.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>All of the original data used in this study can be found in
the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3461-2017-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3461-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>JF and XX designed the experiment. DT and PL
conducted the N fertilization experiment. DT, PL, WF, JX, and JW
collected data during the experiment. YL
contributed the allometric equations for shrubs. DT, ZY, and
JF wrote the paper. All authors shared discussion and
revisions of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(31321061 and 31330012).We wish to thank Bernhard Schmid, Gianalberto Losapio, Lilian Dutoit,
Peter Schmid and Jessica Baby for their helpful
suggestions on the manuscript, and the editor and two anonymous reviewers for
their insightful comments that greatly improved the manuscript. We also
thank the Sino-German Center for Research Promotion for the participation in
a summer school in Jingdezhen (GZ1146).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Sönke Zaehle<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aber, J., McDowell, W., Nadelhoffer, K., Magill, A., Berntson, G., Kamakea,
M., McNulty, S., Currie, W., Rustad, L., and Fernandez, I.: Nitrogen
saturation in temperate forest ecosystems: hypotheses revisited, BioScience,
48, 921–934, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alvarez-Clare, S., Mack, M. C., and Brooks, M.: A direct test of nitrogen and
phosphorus limitation to net primary productivity in a lowland tropical wet
forest, Ecology, 94, 1540–1551, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
BassiriRad, H., Lussenhop, J. F., Sehtiya, H. L., and Borden, K. K.: Nitrogen
deposition potentially contributes to oak regeneration failure in the
Midwestern temperate forests of the USA, Oecologia, 177, 1–11, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bedison, J. E. and McNeil, B. E.: Is the growth of temperate forest trees
enhanced along an ambient nitrogen deposition gradient?, Ecology, 90,
1736–1742, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bobbink, R., Hicks, K., Galloway, J., Spranger, T., Alkemade, R., Ashmore,
M., Bustamante, M., Cinderby, S., Davidson, E., and Dentener, F.: Global
assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a
synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 20, 30–59, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H., Gurmesa, G. A., Zhang, W., Zhu, X. M., Zheng, M. H., Mao, Q. G.,
Zhang, T., and Mo, J. M.: Nitrogen saturation in humid tropical forests after
6 years of nitrogen and phosphorus addition: Hypothesis testing, Funct.
Ecol., 30, 305–313, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dalling, J. W., Heineman, K., Lopez, O. R., Wright, S. J., and Turner, B. L.:
The Paradigm of Phosphorus Limitation, Tropical tree physiology, edited by:
Goldstein, G. and Santiago, L. S., Springer International Publishing,
Switzerland, 261–274, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dirnböck, T., Grandin, U., Bernhardt-Römermann, M., Beudert, B.,
Canullo, R., Forsius, M., Grabner, M. T., Holmberg, M., Kleemola, S., and
Lundin, L.: Forest floor vegetation response to nitrogen deposition in
Europe, Global Change Biol., 20, 429–440, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Du, E. Z., Zhou, Z., Li, P., Hu, X. Y., Ma, Y. C., Wang, W., Zheng, C. Y.,
Zhu, J. X., He, J. S., and Fang, J. Y.: NEECF: a project of nutrient
enrichment experiments in China's forests, J. Plant Ecol., 6, 428–435, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Du, E. Z., Liu, X. Y., and Fang, J. Y.: Effects of nitrogen additions on
biomass, stoichiometry and nutrient pools of moss <italic>Rhytidium rugosum</italic>
in a boreal forest in Northeast China, Environ. Poll., 188, 166–171, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, Z. K., Adams, M. B., and Peterjohn, W. T.: Will more nitrogen enhance
carbon storage in young forest stands in central Appalachia?, Forest Ecol.
Manag., 337, 144–152, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C., Green, P., and Holland,
E.: Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future, Biogeochemistry, 70,
153–226, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gilliam, F. S.: Response of the herbaceous layer of forest ecosystems to
excess nitrogen deposition, J. Ecool., 94, 1176–1191, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, F. X., Zhang, Y. D., Huang, M., Tao, B., Yan, H. M., Guo, R., and Li, J.:
Nitrogen deposition and its effect on carbon storage in Chinese forests
during 1981–2010, Atmos. Environ., 123, 171–179, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y. M., Kang, R., Mulder, J., Zhang, T., and Duan, L.: Nitrogen
saturation, soil acidification, and ecological effects in a subtropical pine
forest on acid soil in southwest China, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2457–2472,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Högberg, P., Fan, H. B., Quist, M., Binkley, D., and Tamm, C. O.: Tree
growth and soil acidification in response to 30 years of experimental
nitrogen loading on boreal forest, Global Change Biol., 12, 489–499, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
LeBauer, D. S. and Treseder, K. K.: Nitrogen limitation of net primary
productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed, Ecology, 89,
371–379, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Li, P., Han, W. X., Zhang, C., Tian, D., Xu, X. X., and Fang, J. Y.: Nutrient
resorption of Castanopsis eyrei varies at the defoliation peaks in spring and
autumn in a subtropical forest, Anhui, China, Ecol. Res., 30, 111–118, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. J., Zhang, Y., Han, W. X., Tang, A. H., Shen, J. L., Cui, Z. L.,
Vitousek, P., Erisman, J. W., Goulding, K., and Christie, P.: Enhanced
nitrogen deposition over China, Nature, 494, 459–462, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X. K., Mo, J. M., Gilliam, F. S., Zhou, G. Y., and Fang, Y. T.: Effects
of experimental nitrogen additions on plant diversity in an old-growth
tropical forest, Global Change Biol., 16, 2688–2700, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X. K., Mao, Q. G., Gilliam, F. S., Luo, Y. Q., and Mo, J. M.: Nitrogen
deposition contributes to soil acidification in tropical ecosystems, Global
Change Biol., 20, 3790–3801, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Magill, A. H., Aber, J. D., Berntson, G. M., McDowell, W. H., Nadelhoffer, K.
J., Melillo, J. M., and Steudler, P.: Long-term nitrogen additions and
nitrogen saturation in two temperate forests, Ecosystems, 3, 238–253, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Pasquini, S. and Santiago, L.: Nutrients limit photosynthesis in seedlings of
a lowland tropical forest tree species, Oecologia, 168, 311–319, 2012.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Rainey, S. M., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Silver, W. L., and Downs, M. R.: Effects
of chronic nitrogen additions on understory species in a red pine plantation,
Ecol. Appl., 9, 949–957, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Computing, R Foundation for Statistic Computing, Vienna, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Santiago, L. S.: Nutrient limitation of eco-physiological processes in
tropical trees, Trees, 29, 1291–1300, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Santiago, L. S. and Goldstein, G.: Is Photosynthesis Nutrient Limited in
Tropical Trees? Tropical tree physiology, Springer International Publishing, 299–318, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Santiago, L. S., Wright, S. J., Harms, K. E., Yavitt, J. B., Korine, C.,
Garcia, M. N., and Turner, B. L.: Tropical tree seedling growth responses to
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium addition, J. Ecolol., 100, 309–316, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Strengbom, J. and Nordin, A.: Commercial forest fertilization causes
long-term residual effects in ground vegetation of boreal forests, Forest
Ecol. Manag., 256, 2175–2181, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Thimonier, A., Sedivy, I., and Schleppi, P.: Estimating leaf area index in
different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of
methods, Eur. J. Forest Res., 129, 543–562, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, R. Q., Canham, C. D., Weathers, K. C., and Goodale, C. L.: Increased
tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US, Nat.
Geosci., 3, 13–17, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, W., Stocker, G. C., and Kriedemann, P. E.: Growth and
photosynthetic response to light and nutrients of <italic>flindersia brayleyana</italic> F. Muell., a rainforest tree with broad tolerance to sun and
shade, Funct. Plant Boil., 15, 299–315, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Vitousek, P. M. and Howarth, R. W.: Nitrogen limitation on land and in the
sea: how can it occur?, Biogeochemistry, 13, 87–115, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, R. F. and Tietema, A.: Ecosystem response to 9 years of nitrogen
addition at Sogndal, Norway, Forest Ecol. Manag., 71, 133–142, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, S. J., Yavitt, J. B., Wurzburger, N., Turner, B. L., Tanner, E. V.,
Sayer, E. J., Santiago, L. S., Kaspari, M., Hedin, L. O., and Harms, K. E.:
Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or
litter production in a lowland tropical forest, Ecology, 92, 1616–1625,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Wurzburger, N. and Wright, S. J.: Fine-root responses to fertilization reveal
multiple nutrient limitation in a lowland tropical forest, Ecology, 96,
2137–2146, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G. R., Chen, Z., Piao, S. L., Peng, C. H., Ciais, P., Wang, Q. F., Li, X.
R., and Zhu, X. J.: High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest
ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
4910–4915, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, G. Y., Peng, C. H., Li, Y. L., Liu, S. Z., Zhang, Q. M., Tang, X. L.,
Liu, J. X., Yan, J. H., Zhang, D. Q., and Chu G. W.: A climate change-induced threat to the ecological
resilience of a subtropical monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Southern
China, Global Change Biol., 19, 1197–1210, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Growth responses of trees and understory plants to nitrogen fertilization in a subtropical forest in China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Reactive nitrogen (N) increase in the biosphere has been a
noteworthy aspect of global change, producing considerable ecological effects
on the functioning and dynamics of the terrestrial ecosystems. A number of
observational studies have explored responses of plants to experimentally
simulated N enrichment in boreal and temperate forests. Here we investigate how the
dominant trees and different understory plants respond to experimental N
enrichment in a subtropical forest in China. We conducted a 3.4-year N
fertilization experiment in an old-aged subtropical evergreen broad-leaved
forest in eastern China with three treatment levels applied to nine
20 m  ×  20 m plots and replicated in three blocks. We divided the
plants into trees, saplings, shrubs (including tree seedlings), and
ground-cover plants (ferns) according to the growth forms, and then measured
the absolute and relative basal area increments of trees and saplings and the
aboveground biomass of understory shrubs and ferns. We further grouped
individuals of the dominant tree species, <i>Castanopsis eyrei</i>, into
three size classes to investigate their respective growth responses to the N
fertilization. Our results showed that the plot-averaged absolute and
relative growth rates of basal area and aboveground biomass of trees were not
affected by N fertilization. Across the individuals of <i>C. eyrei</i>, the
small trees with a DBH (diameter at breast height) of 5–10 cm  declined
by 66.4 and 59.5 %, respectively, in N50 (50 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)
and N100 fertilized plots (100 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), while the growth
of median and large trees with a DBH of  &gt;  10 cm did not significantly
change with the N fertilization. The growth rate of small trees, saplings,
and the aboveground biomass of understory shrubs and ground-cover ferns
decreased significantly in the N-fertilized plots. Our findings suggested
that N might not be a limiting nutrient in this mature subtropical forest,
and that the limitation of other nutrients in the forest ecosystem might be
aggravated by the enhanced N availability, potentially resulting in an
adverse effect on the development of natural subtropical forest.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aber, J., McDowell, W., Nadelhoffer, K., Magill, A., Berntson, G., Kamakea,
M., McNulty, S., Currie, W., Rustad, L., and Fernandez, I.: Nitrogen
saturation in temperate forest ecosystems: hypotheses revisited, BioScience,
48, 921–934, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alvarez-Clare, S., Mack, M. C., and Brooks, M.: A direct test of nitrogen and
phosphorus limitation to net primary productivity in a lowland tropical wet
forest, Ecology, 94, 1540–1551, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
BassiriRad, H., Lussenhop, J. F., Sehtiya, H. L., and Borden, K. K.: Nitrogen
deposition potentially contributes to oak regeneration failure in the
Midwestern temperate forests of the USA, Oecologia, 177, 1–11, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bedison, J. E. and McNeil, B. E.: Is the growth of temperate forest trees
enhanced along an ambient nitrogen deposition gradient?, Ecology, 90,
1736–1742, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bobbink, R., Hicks, K., Galloway, J., Spranger, T., Alkemade, R., Ashmore,
M., Bustamante, M., Cinderby, S., Davidson, E., and Dentener, F.: Global
assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a
synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 20, 30–59, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H., Gurmesa, G. A., Zhang, W., Zhu, X. M., Zheng, M. H., Mao, Q. G.,
Zhang, T., and Mo, J. M.: Nitrogen saturation in humid tropical forests after
6 years of nitrogen and phosphorus addition: Hypothesis testing, Funct.
Ecol., 30, 305–313, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dalling, J. W., Heineman, K., Lopez, O. R., Wright, S. J., and Turner, B. L.:
The Paradigm of Phosphorus Limitation, Tropical tree physiology, edited by:
Goldstein, G. and Santiago, L. S., Springer International Publishing,
Switzerland, 261–274, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dirnböck, T., Grandin, U., Bernhardt-Römermann, M., Beudert, B.,
Canullo, R., Forsius, M., Grabner, M. T., Holmberg, M., Kleemola, S., and
Lundin, L.: Forest floor vegetation response to nitrogen deposition in
Europe, Global Change Biol., 20, 429–440, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Du, E. Z., Zhou, Z., Li, P., Hu, X. Y., Ma, Y. C., Wang, W., Zheng, C. Y.,
Zhu, J. X., He, J. S., and Fang, J. Y.: NEECF: a project of nutrient
enrichment experiments in China's forests, J. Plant Ecol., 6, 428–435, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Du, E. Z., Liu, X. Y., and Fang, J. Y.: Effects of nitrogen additions on
biomass, stoichiometry and nutrient pools of moss <i>Rhytidium rugosum</i>
in a boreal forest in Northeast China, Environ. Poll., 188, 166–171, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, Z. K., Adams, M. B., and Peterjohn, W. T.: Will more nitrogen enhance
carbon storage in young forest stands in central Appalachia?, Forest Ecol.
Manag., 337, 144–152, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C., Green, P., and Holland,
E.: Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future, Biogeochemistry, 70,
153–226, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Gilliam, F. S.: Response of the herbaceous layer of forest ecosystems to
excess nitrogen deposition, J. Ecool., 94, 1176–1191, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, F. X., Zhang, Y. D., Huang, M., Tao, B., Yan, H. M., Guo, R., and Li, J.:
Nitrogen deposition and its effect on carbon storage in Chinese forests
during 1981–2010, Atmos. Environ., 123, 171–179, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y. M., Kang, R., Mulder, J., Zhang, T., and Duan, L.: Nitrogen
saturation, soil acidification, and ecological effects in a subtropical pine
forest on acid soil in southwest China, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2457–2472,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Högberg, P., Fan, H. B., Quist, M., Binkley, D., and Tamm, C. O.: Tree
growth and soil acidification in response to 30 years of experimental
nitrogen loading on boreal forest, Global Change Biol., 12, 489–499, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
LeBauer, D. S. and Treseder, K. K.: Nitrogen limitation of net primary
productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed, Ecology, 89,
371–379, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Li, P., Han, W. X., Zhang, C., Tian, D., Xu, X. X., and Fang, J. Y.: Nutrient
resorption of Castanopsis eyrei varies at the defoliation peaks in spring and
autumn in a subtropical forest, Anhui, China, Ecol. Res., 30, 111–118, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. J., Zhang, Y., Han, W. X., Tang, A. H., Shen, J. L., Cui, Z. L.,
Vitousek, P., Erisman, J. W., Goulding, K., and Christie, P.: Enhanced
nitrogen deposition over China, Nature, 494, 459–462, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X. K., Mo, J. M., Gilliam, F. S., Zhou, G. Y., and Fang, Y. T.: Effects
of experimental nitrogen additions on plant diversity in an old-growth
tropical forest, Global Change Biol., 16, 2688–2700, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X. K., Mao, Q. G., Gilliam, F. S., Luo, Y. Q., and Mo, J. M.: Nitrogen
deposition contributes to soil acidification in tropical ecosystems, Global
Change Biol., 20, 3790–3801, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Magill, A. H., Aber, J. D., Berntson, G. M., McDowell, W. H., Nadelhoffer, K.
J., Melillo, J. M., and Steudler, P.: Long-term nitrogen additions and
nitrogen saturation in two temperate forests, Ecosystems, 3, 238–253, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Pasquini, S. and Santiago, L.: Nutrients limit photosynthesis in seedlings of
a lowland tropical forest tree species, Oecologia, 168, 311–319, 2012.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Rainey, S. M., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Silver, W. L., and Downs, M. R.: Effects
of chronic nitrogen additions on understory species in a red pine plantation,
Ecol. Appl., 9, 949–957, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Computing, R Foundation for Statistic Computing, Vienna, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Santiago, L. S.: Nutrient limitation of eco-physiological processes in
tropical trees, Trees, 29, 1291–1300, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Santiago, L. S. and Goldstein, G.: Is Photosynthesis Nutrient Limited in
Tropical Trees? Tropical tree physiology, Springer International Publishing, 299–318, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Santiago, L. S., Wright, S. J., Harms, K. E., Yavitt, J. B., Korine, C.,
Garcia, M. N., and Turner, B. L.: Tropical tree seedling growth responses to
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium addition, J. Ecolol., 100, 309–316, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Strengbom, J. and Nordin, A.: Commercial forest fertilization causes
long-term residual effects in ground vegetation of boreal forests, Forest
Ecol. Manag., 256, 2175–2181, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Thimonier, A., Sedivy, I., and Schleppi, P.: Estimating leaf area index in
different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of
methods, Eur. J. Forest Res., 129, 543–562, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, R. Q., Canham, C. D., Weathers, K. C., and Goodale, C. L.: Increased
tree carbon storage in response to nitrogen deposition in the US, Nat.
Geosci., 3, 13–17, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, W., Stocker, G. C., and Kriedemann, P. E.: Growth and
photosynthetic response to light and nutrients of <i>flindersia
brayleyana</i> F. Muell., a rainforest tree with broad tolerance to sun and
shade, Funct. Plant Boil., 15, 299–315, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Vitousek, P. M. and Howarth, R. W.: Nitrogen limitation on land and in the
sea: how can it occur?, Biogeochemistry, 13, 87–115, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, R. F. and Tietema, A.: Ecosystem response to 9 years of nitrogen
addition at Sogndal, Norway, Forest Ecol. Manag., 71, 133–142, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, S. J., Yavitt, J. B., Wurzburger, N., Turner, B. L., Tanner, E. V.,
Sayer, E. J., Santiago, L. S., Kaspari, M., Hedin, L. O., and Harms, K. E.:
Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or
litter production in a lowland tropical forest, Ecology, 92, 1616–1625,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Wurzburger, N. and Wright, S. J.: Fine-root responses to fertilization reveal
multiple nutrient limitation in a lowland tropical forest, Ecology, 96,
2137–2146, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, G. R., Chen, Z., Piao, S. L., Peng, C. H., Ciais, P., Wang, Q. F., Li, X.
R., and Zhu, X. J.: High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest
ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
4910–4915, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, G. Y., Peng, C. H., Li, Y. L., Liu, S. Z., Zhang, Q. M., Tang, X. L.,
Liu, J. X., Yan, J. H., Zhang, D. Q., and Chu G. W.: A climate change-induced threat to the ecological
resilience of a subtropical monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Southern
China, Global Change Biol., 19, 1197–1210, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
