<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-4341-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Soil respiration across a permafrost transition zone: spatial structure and
environmental correlates</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Soil respiration across a~permafrost transition zone}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~C.~Stegen et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stegen</surname><given-names>James C.</given-names></name>
          <email>james.stegen@pnnl.gov</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>Carolyn G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bond-Lamberty</surname><given-names>Ben</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9525-4633</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Crump</surname><given-names>Alex R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2443-6146</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Xingyuan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1928-5555</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Hess</surname><given-names>Nancy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Sciences Division,
Richland, WA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research
Institute, College Park, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Atmospheric Sciences and Global
Change Division, Richland, WA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Environmental Molecular
Sciences Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">James C. Stegen (james.stegen@pnnl.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>18</issue>
      <fpage>4341</fpage><lpage>4354</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>29</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Soil respiration is a key ecosystem function whereby shifts in
respiration rates can shift systems from carbon sinks to sources.
Soil respiration in permafrost-associated systems is particularly
important given climate change driven permafrost thaw that leads to
significant uncertainty in resulting ecosystem carbon dynamics. Here
we characterize the spatial structure and environmental drivers of
soil respiration across a permafrost transition zone. We find that
soil respiration is characterized by a non-linear threshold that
occurs at active-layer depths greater than 140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We also
find that within each season, tree basal area is a dominant driver of
soil respiration regardless of spatial scale, but only in spatial
domains with significant spatial variability in basal area. Our
analyses further show that spatial variation (the coefficient of
variation) and mean-variance power-law scaling of soil respiration
in our boreal system are consistent with previous work in other
ecosystems (e.g., tropical forests) and in population ecology, respectively.
Comparing our results to those in other ecosystems
suggests that temporally stable features such as tree-stand
structure are often primary drivers of spatial variation in soil
respiration. If so, this provides an opportunity to better estimate
the magnitude and spatial variation in soil respiration through
remote sensing.  Combining such an approach with broader knowledge
of thresholding behavior – here related to active layer depth –
would provide empirical constraints on models aimed at predicting
ecosystem responses to ongoing permafrost thaw.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Given its central role in global carbon cycling (Raich and
Potter, 1995), the flux of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from soil to the
atmosphere – collectively referred to as soil respiration (SR)
– is heavily studied across a broad range of systems and
spatiotemporal scales using methods ranging from small footprint
flux chambers to large footprint flux towers (Bond-Lamberty and
Thomson, 2010; Wolf et al., 2016). Our understanding of SR
patterns is inherently linked to the scales at which measurements
are made and we often lack knowledge of how the variation in SR
changes as we move across scales. To rigorously and
mechanistically link SR measurements across scales, it is
essential to understand spatial heterogeneity in SR, how spatial
heterogeneity changes across scales, and the environmental
features that drive those SR patterns.</p>
      <p>Knowledge of SR spatial heterogeneity – and underlying drivers
of that heterogeneity – in permafrost associated ecosystems is
particularly important given the large carbon stocks in permafrost
(Tarnocai et al., 2009) and ongoing permafrost thaw (Grosse
et al., 2011; Schuur et al., 2013, 2015). Numerous studies have
investigated temporal dynamics of SR and most find strong
influences of temperature and moisture (e.g., Davidson et al.,
1998; Hanson et al., 1993), but much less is known about spatial
variation in SR, where temperature and moisture appear to have
weaker influences (Yim et al., 2003; Dore et al., 2014; Ohashi
et al., 2015; Song et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>Studies that examine spatial variation in SR often find rates to
be associated with tree-stand variables such as basal area,
species composition, and distance from SR measurement to tree
stems (Ohashi et al., 2015; Katayama et al., 2009; Soe and
Buchmann, 2005; Khomik et al., 2006), though such relationships
are not ubiquitous (Song et al., 2013; Saiz et al., 2006; Sotta
et al., 2004). Relatively little work on spatially resolved SR
has occurred in permafrost-associated systems, though higher SR in permafrost-free domains has been observed (Vogel
et al., 2005).  Importantly, no study has provided spatially
resolved SR estimates moving continuously across a permafrost
transition, where the depth of soil that is above permafrost
(referred to as active layer depth, ALD) increases along
a spatial gradient to the point that permafrost is lost. It is
critical that we fill this knowledge gap due to a combination of
ongoing permafrost thaw (Grosse et al., 2011; Schuur et al.,
2013, 2015), vast carbon stocks currently locked away in permafrost
(Tarnocai et al., 2009), and the heavy contribution of SR to
ecosystem carbon cycling (Raich and Potter, 1995; Longdoz et al.,
2000).</p>
      <p>Here we explore how the spatial structure and environmental
correlates of SR change as we move across spatial and temporal
scales. To do so, we generated spatially resolved SR rates – and
associated below/above ground data – across a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial domain within boreal Alaska. This
domain was selected to capture a spatially abrupt transition from
a permafrost-associated system to a permafrost-free system, and
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Landsat pixels, a scale relevant to potential future
work using remote sensing.</p>
      <p>Previous work in forests has revealed that SR spatial
autocorrelation occurs across a broad range of length scales
(referred to as the “range” in variogram models), from less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Foti et al., 2014; Russell and
Voroney, 1998; Song et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2008; Rayment and
Jarvis, 2000), but none of these estimates come from boreal
forests. In addition, among-study variation in the length scale
of spatial autocorrelation may be partially due to differences in
the spatial scale of sampling. It is therefore difficult to
generate quantitative a priori expectations for the parameters of
SR variograms (functions that describe spatial continuity or
variability) in our study system. Instead, we test the following
qualitative hypotheses: (i) given previous work showing that
spatial variability in SR is only weakly related to temperature
and soil moisture (e.g., Song et al., 2013; Yim et al., 2003), we
hypothesize that SR will be predominantly influenced by carbon
inputs such that variability in SR throughout the spatial domain
will be best explained by tree-stand variables (e.g., basal
area); (ii) within the drier, permafrost-free domain we
hypothesize that SR will again be best explained by tree-stand
variables, but within the wetter permafrost-associated domain SR
will be decoupled from carbon inputs and will therefore be poorly
explained by tree-stand variables; and (iii) cold
temperatures will fundamentally constrain SR such that we
hypothesize a smaller coefficient of variation and less well
defined spatial gradients (i.e., weaker spatial structure) in SR
under colder temperatures.</p>
      <p>Evaluation of the above-summarized hypotheses helps elucidate how
a mixture of control processes leads to aggregate SR rates. Such
knowledge is important for improving model predictions using
multi-scale approaches.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Overview of field site and spatial sampling design. The background
map shows the distribution of permafrost across Alaska and indicates the
approximate location of the field site. <bold>(a)</bold> Satellite image showing CPCRW
domain outlined in yellow;  the orange box shows the location of field
sampling. <bold>(b)</bold> Satellite image of the field site with orange lines indicating
transect locations. <bold>(c)</bold> Picture of the field site looking west (up-slope);
gradients in tree size and the transition from black spruce (green leaves)
to paper birch (yellow leaves) can be seen. <bold>(d)</bold> Spatial layout of soil
collars with red points denoting collars that were removed after Summer sampling due to soil
coring.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Interpolated environmental variables. Each panel has its
own color ramp, and units are noted. The vertical and horizontal axes in all
panels indicate the south-to-north and west-to-east dimensions,
respectively. Interpolations are based on fitted variograms. Active layer
depth of 150<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates that the probe had a maximum depth of 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
whereby permafrost occurring deeper than 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> could not be resolved.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p>The field site was within the Caribou-Poker Creeks Research
Watershed (CPCRW), which comprises a relatively pristine, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> watershed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> north of
Fairbanks, Alaska (Fig. 1a).  The CPCRW is part of the
Bonanza Creek Long-Term Ecological Research site. In July 2014, six
parallel transects – each running east to west – were
established (Fig. 1b); each was 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> long and covered
a permafrost-associated domain (eastern half of the sampling
region), a permafrost-free domain (western half of the sampling
region), and a transitional zone between these conditions (thin
strip in the center of the sampling region, running south to
north) (Fig. 2). In broad terms, the permafrost-associated domain
was characterized by black spruce (<italic>Picea mariana</italic>) and understory
mosses, while the permafrost-free domain was characterized by
paper birch (<italic>Betula papyrifera</italic>) and leaf litter (see Fig. 1c for
overview of vegetation transition).</p>
      <p>To enable SR measurements, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter PVC soil collars
were installed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth along each transect in
two phases. First, 12 collars were installed on each transect
following a cyclic sampling design aimed at efficient spatial
sampling (Burrows et al., 2002): spatial positions were 0, 4, 12,
20, 24, 32, 40, 44, 52, 60, 64, and 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the eastern
terminus. This arrangement deviates from regular spacing of
sampling locations to enable variogram analysis by providing good
sampling across all spatial lags (i.e., the distance between
sampling points). The design was determined by simulating a broad
range of cyclic sampling designs to find a configuration that
provided a relatively uniform distribution of sample numbers
across all spatial lags. Repeating this sampling design across the
6 transects resulted in 72 soil collars. SR rate measurements were
taken from each collar using an EGM-4 (PP Systems, <uri>http://ppsystems.com/</uri>) with a soil respiration chamber that
is designed to provide a well-mixed headspace within the chamber. These initial
measurements were used to identify a transition zone across which
SR increased rapidly moving from east to west. This transition
zone also coincided with the transition from permafrost to
permafrost-free conditions.  Higher density spatial sampling was
performed across this transition zone whereby collars were
installed every 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from positions 15 to 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(moving east to west) on each transect. The full design resulted
in 51 collars per transect and a total of 306 collars across the
field site (Fig. 1d).</p>
      <p>The full set of 306 soil collars was sampled twice from
3 to 13 August 2014 between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:30 LT (local time) and 22:00 LT; this
sampling period is referred to here as “Summer” because that
time of year is usually associated with some of the warmest
temperatures of the year. The minimum time between soil collar
installation and SR measurement was 2 days.  The strong
correlation between SR measurements taken from the same soil
collars in Summer and Fall (Fig. S1) indicates that the length of
time between installation and measurement did not fundamentally
change observed SR patterns. Co-located air and soil (5 and
15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depths) temperatures were collected at the time of
each measurement. For temperature measurements we used an analog
thermometer at the time of sampling for each soil collar.  For air
temperature, we shaded the thermometer to avoid elevating the
temperature due to solar inputs. For soil temperature, we placed
the thermometer's stem into the ground to the specified depth. Two
operators each used a separate EGM-4 and respiration chamber assembly;
each operator measured each soil collar once and the order of
sampling was randomized.  Following the SR measurements a subset
of collars were removed to enable soil coring for other purposes:
positions 25–33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (moving east to west) along the second
transect (from south), 31–39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along the third
transect, 37–45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along the fourth transect, and
21–29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along the sixth transect were removed
(Fig. 1d). No collars were removed from the first and fifth
transects. SR was measured twice again from 10 to 24 September 2014
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:30 LT and 17:30 LT in the remaining
collars, along with air and soil temperatures; this sampling
period is referred to here as “Fall” because that time of year
is usually associated with rapidly declining temperatures and
leaf-drop from deciduous trees. Indeed, air temperatures measured
during the Fall sampling period were significantly lower than
those measured during the Summer sampling period.</p>
      <p>It is important to note that analyses that directly compare
results between Summer and Fall were repeated on the SR data using
only locations that were sampled in both seasons. The purpose of
repeating the analyses was to evaluate whether observed seasonal
differences were due to differences (between seasons) in the
sampling scheme; this showed that seasonal differences in SR
patterns were not due to differences in the sampling scheme (see
Results section).</p>
      <p>For all SR measurements with the EGM-4 and respiration chamber
assembly, the maximum change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was set
to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the maximum time of data collection was
2 min. The manufacturer (PP Systems) set the measurement
interval, which was every 4.8 s. Raw <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
and timestamp data were collected and analyzed using custom R
scripts. Plotting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration against time commonly
showed a small degree of non-linearity. The most pronounced
non-linearity was usually between the first and second data points
such that removing the first data point provided linear fits in
nearly all cases. Other data excursions were noted, such as an
abrupt increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration with linear
trajectories on either side. To generalize the data analyses we
(1) dropped the first data point from each sample, (2) fit both
a linear regression and a segmented regression to the remaining
data to estimate the SR rate.  Segmented regressions were
estimated automatically using the function “segmented” in R
package “segmented” (version 0.5–1.4; Muggeo, 2003, 2008). For
each measurement, the rate was taken as either the slope of the
linear regression or the slope of the first segment in the
segmented regression, whichever had a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The only
exception was when the first segment contained fewer than 4 data
points; in those cases the slope from the full linear regression
was used whereby all regressions contained at least 4 data points
and had a maximum of 24 data points. The slope from the first
segment was used instead of the second segment due to noticeable
decreases in the SR rate with increasing sampling time, which was
likely due to increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the
recirculating system. This approach significantly improved model
fits, relative to using rates recorded directly from the EGM-4
instrument. For each collar in each season the duplicate SR
estimates were averaged.</p>
      <p>To facilitate comparisons to other studies investigating spatial
structure in SR, we quantified the coefficient of variation (CV)
within the whole spatial domain, within the permafrost-associated
domain, and within the permafrost-free domain; the CV was
estimated in these spatial domains within each season. As
a complementary approach, we estimated the slope of the power
function – on log axes – relating variance in SR to mean
SR. This is analogous to the classic “Taylor power law” that
relates variance in population density – of a given biological
species – to mean population density (Taylor, 1961; Taylor and
Taylor, 1977; Eisler et al., 2008).  Within each season, the 6
soil collars at a given east/west position were used to calculate
a mean and variance. In the Fall some positions did not have 6
soil collars due to soil coring (Fig. 1d); Fall-time SR from these
east/west positions were not used. To cover a broad range of mean
SR conditions, the two seasons were examined together. Spatial and
temporal structures were therefore examined simultaneously.</p>
      <p>To examine how SR spatial variation might respond to the spatial
advance of permafrost thaw, we iteratively quantified SR variance
across spatial domains that had an increasing contribution of
permafrost-free soils. Within each season, we began by quantifying
SR variance using all soil collars within the eastern-most
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the spatial domain, which represented 54 soil
collars (Fig. 1d). Preliminary analyses indicated that the number of
soil collars was sufficient for a reliable variance
estimate. After quantifying SR variance within the eastern-most
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we added the next most western set of soil collars
and recalculated SR variance. This procedure was repeated until
reaching the far western edge of the field domain. At each step we
also estimated mean ALD at the soil collars found at the western
edge of the domain used for variance estimation. This allowed us
to connect changes in SR spatial variation to changes in ALD.</p>
      <p>In addition to SR, we collected data on the following aboveground variables that
may influence SR. A 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> soil probe was used
to estimate active layer depth (ALD) to the nearest cm in
September 2014; ALD was measured every 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along all 6
transects. A clinometer was used to estimate % slope at
sampling locations (0, 4, 12, 20, 24, 32, 40, 44, 52, 60, 64, and
72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the eastern terminus) along each
transect. Percent cover of feather moss was visually estimated at
each soil collar within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
quadrat, with the collar at the center. Tree plots of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
radius were established every 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along each transect,
starting with a plot centered at 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at the eastern
terminus of each transect. The tree plots were hemispherical with
sampling occurring to the south of each transect. This was done to
minimize disturbance to soil collars, which were placed on the
north side of each transect. Within each tree plot, all woody stems
with diameter at breast height (DBH) greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were
identified and their DBHs were measured. The tree plot data were
used to estimate the basal area and stem density.</p>
      <p>Relating the variance of SR to its mean suggested clustering of SR
in space and/or time (see Results section). In turn, we conducted formal
spatial analyses using the “AutoKrige” function in R package
“automap” (version 1.1–14) (Hiemstra et al., 2009), which uses
model selection to automatically fit a variogram model (Matheron,
1963) and, in turn, generates a spatial interpolation. This
package has been found to be robust via extensive use across
scientific and engineering disciplines, currently with greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>
citations in the peer reviewed literature. To enable quantitative
comparisons among SR variogram models, we used AutoKrige to fit
Matern models (Pardo-Iguzquiza and Chica-Olmo, 2008) and, in turn,
generate interpolations. We selected the Matern function because
it has been shown to be a robust and flexible model, in general
and for soil systems specifically (Stein, 1999; Minasny and
McBratney, 2005). For ALD, slope, feather moss cover, tree-stem
density, tree basal area, and Summer and Fall soil temperatures
the AutoKrige function was used to select the best model among
Matern, Gaussian, exponential and spherical structures. We allowed
different model structures for these additional variables because
we used the fitted variograms only to visualize the spatial
structure of these variables (Fig. 2), as opposed to making
quantitative comparisons of variogram parameter estimates. We also
examined parameter values of the models fit to the SR
variograms. These parameters included the nugget, range, and
sill. The variogram nugget represents processes that occur at
spatial scales smaller than the minimum distance between samples
as well as sampling error. The variogram range is an estimate of
the maximum spatial distance across which there is spatial
autocorrelation. The variogram sill is the variance at which the
variogram model levels off (Western et al., 1998). The Matern
model is a special case and also includes the kappa parameter,
which describes the smoothness of the fitted variogram (Minasny
and McBratney, 2005).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Soil respiration summary statistics, Matern
variogram parameters, and sample sizes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each season across the full,
permafrost-free, and permafrost-associated spatial domains.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="95pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Variance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CV (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Nugget</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Sill</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Kappa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer (full)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">306</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fall (full)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">49.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">270</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer (permafrost-free)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">133</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">156</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer (permafrost)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">46.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">150</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fall (permafrost-free)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">37.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">144</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fall (permafrost)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">126</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>We further aimed to explain variation in SR using the other
measured variables. Given significant spatial autocorrelation in
all data types, we used generalized least squares (GLS) regression
and compared models – using residual standard errors – with
Gaussian, exponential, or spherical spatial structure. Variogram
and GLS analyses were used to study SR data across the entire
spatial domain, within the permafrost-associated domain, and
within the permafrost-free domain. The SR analyses were repeated
separately within the Summer (August) and Fall (September). The SR
data from both seasons were also pooled and a GLS regression was
used without spatial structure to find the variable that best
explained this spatiotemporal set of SR rates; spatial structure
could not be used on the pooled set because measurements were made
in both seasons at the same spatial locations.</p>
      <p>Running GLS analyses required an estimate of each explanatory
variable at the spatial location of each soil collar. Some data
types – ALD, slope, stem density, and tree basal area – were
collected at a coarser spatial grain than the soil collars. These
variables were therefore linearly interpolated to provide an
estimate of each at each soil collar; we did not use kriging due
to some variables having poorly constrained variograms. Prior to
GLS analysis the data were log-transformed to improve normality;
feather moss percent coverage ranged from 0 to 100 such that
a value of 1 was added prior to log-transformation. To allow
direct comparisons of regression coefficients across explanatory
variables, log-transformed data were further normalized to have
a mean of 0 and variance of 1. Initial analyses indicated that
a spherical spatial structure generally lead to lower root square
errors in fitted models, relative to Gaussian and exponential
spatial structures. GLS models were thus fit using spherical
spatial structure and models with different explanatory variables
were competed against each other by comparing their root square
errors. All analyses were performed with R version 3.2.1 (R
Development Core Team, 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Mean-variance scaling of soil respiration. Each data point is
derived from six soil collars used to estimate the variance and mean of soil
respiration (see Methods section). The dashed line is the linear regression
and statistics are provided, including the slope of the line and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
for model significance.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>SR measured in a soil collar in Summer was strongly correlated to
SR measured in the same soil collar in the Fall (Fig. S1). There
was, however, a clear decline in both the mean and variance of SR
from Summer to Fall (Table 1; Fig. S1). Across the full domain the
two seasons had similar CVs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 %), but across the
two seasons the permafrost-associated domain CV was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–18 % higher than the permafrost-free domain
(Table 1). These results were maintained when Summer data were
analyzed using the same sampling scheme used in the Fall
(Table S1). The slope of the power function relating SR variance to
mean SR was 1.57, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.51 (Fig. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Relationships among soil respiration variance (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux variance), active
layer depth, and space. <bold>(a, b)</bold> Each soil respiration variance estimate (red
plot, left-side axis) is based on data from all soil collars within a spatial
domain that extends from the field site's eastern boundary to the indicated
western-most spatial position (horizontal axis). Each active layer depth
estimate (blue plot,  right-side axis) is the mean active layer at the
western-most spatial position. Lines are spline-fits. <bold>(c, d)</bold> Soil respiration
variance as a function of mean active layer depth – both from panels <bold>(a)</bold> and
<bold>(b)</bold>. The 140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold is indicated by the vertical dashed green line. The
black lines are spline-fits.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>We plotted SR variance within a given spatial domain against the
position of the western boundary of that sampled domain (see
Methods section). Doing so revealed a strong threshold at spatial positions
near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (moving east to west). At positions
beyond this threshold SR variance increased rapidly and then
stabilized at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a and b). ALD at the
western boundary of the sampled domain also showed threshold
behavior, increasing rapidly at spatial positions near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and then reached its limit
(150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at about 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a and b). These
patterns in SR variation and ALD were found in both seasons even
though the SR variance was much lower in the Fall
(cf. Fig. 4a and b; Table 1). Also in both seasons, SR variance
increased rapidly beyond an ALD threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 4c and d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Interpolated soil respiration across seasons and spatial
scales. Each panel has its own color ramp, and in all panels the values are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The vertical and horizontal axes
in all panels indicate the south-to-north and west-to-east dimensions,
respectively. The top panels show interpolations across the full spatial
domain and the bottom panels show interpolations within the permafrost-free
(P-f) and permafrost-associated (P-a) domains. Stronger spatial structure in
Summer is evident as is the non-linear decline in soil respiration near 36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
moving from west to east.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4341/2017/bg-14-4341-2017-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Generalized least squares model fits for Summer soil respiration.
Spherical spatial structure was used for all model fits. Models are sorted by
their residual standard error (RSE), used as a metric of model fit. Model
significance is reported as a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value and regression coefficients
associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are in bold. Models were fit after normalizing data
as standard normal deviates whereby regression coefficients can be directly
compared. Entries of “NA” indicate that no model could be fit.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="82pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spatial domain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Variable</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coefficient</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.178</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.128</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.252</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.036</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.264</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.003</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.264</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.009</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.266</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.246</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.147</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.069</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.155</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.054</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.170</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.058</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.184</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.003</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.202</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.041</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.209</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.174</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.104</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.181</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.081</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.191</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.063</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.329</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.010</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.870</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NA</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Generalized least squares model fits for Fall soil
respiration. All details as in Table 2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spatial domain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Variable</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coefficient</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.189</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.156</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.284</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.038</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.296</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.297</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.007</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.297</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.035</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.298</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.003</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.145</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.071</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.152</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.071</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.162</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.053</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.163</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.024</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.166</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.040</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.173</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.200</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.150</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.240</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.053</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.243</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.007</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.384</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.089</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.170</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.007</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.009</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Generalized least squares model fits for soil respiration
across both seasons. The same soil collars were sampled in both seasons so
spatial structure could not be introduced into the models. All other details
as in Table 2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="82pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spatial domain</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Variable</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RSE</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Coefficient</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.237</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.172</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.259</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.138</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.276</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.098</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.280</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.087</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.286</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.067</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Full</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.291</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.038</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.191</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.145</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.231</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.066</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.233</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>0.060</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.233</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.058</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.234</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.055</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost-free</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.239</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.88</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.026</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">soil temperature</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.238</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.182</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">basal area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.271</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.55</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.128</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">feather moss</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.276</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.117</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">stem density</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.290</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.078</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.298</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.031</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Permafrost</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">active layer depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.299</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.99</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.019</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The variogram fits to SR revealed consistently larger nuggets in the
Summer relative to the Fall and modest differences in the nuggets
between permafrost-associated and permafrost-free domains (Table 1,
Table S1). The range and sill were both larger in the Summer, with an
especially large range (133 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and sill (0.94) in the
permafrost-free domain during Summer (Table 1). Using the fitted
variograms to visualize the SR spatial structure showed elevated SR in
the Summer in the permafrost-free domain, and a similar – but less
pronounced – pattern in the Fall (Fig. 5). Visualization of the SR
spatial structure within the permafrost-associated and
permafrost-free domains – using variogram fits within those
domains (Table 1) – confirmed a peak in SR near the center of the
permafrost-free domain, an increase in SR from south to north in
the permafrost-associated domain, and weak spatial structure across
both domains in the Fall (Fig. 5). These patterns were maintained
when analyzing Summer data using the reduced sampling scheme used
for the Fall (Fig. S2).</p>
      <p>GLS regression revealed that Summer SR was significantly related only
to basal area when considering the full domain (Table 2). In the
permafrost-free and permafrost-associated domains, multiple
variables were significantly related to SR, with feather moss
percent cover and basal area having the strongest relationships,
respectively (Table 2). Similar patterns were observed when
analyzing Summer data using the reduced sampling scheme used for
the Fall (Table S1). Fall SR was also significantly related only to
basal area when considering the full domain, and was again best
explained by basal area in the permafrost-associated domain
(Table 3). In contrast to the Summer, Fall SR in the
permafrost-free domain was best explained by active layer depth
(Table 3). When considering both seasons together, SR in the full,
permafrost-associated, and permafrost-free spatial domains were best
explained by soil temperature, but multiple variables had
significant relationships with SR for all three domains (Table 4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Through intensive field sampling and geospatial analyses we have
revealed the spatial structure of SR across a boreal forest
permafrost transition, shifts in that spatial structure between
seasons and spatial scales, and the environmental variables that
potentially drive spatial variation in SR within and across
permafrost conditions. To the best of our knowledge this is the
first direct characterization of SR spatial structure across
a permafrost transition. A number of studies have characterized SR
spatial structure in other ecosystems, however, and patterns
revealed here show some commonality with previous work in terms of
the level of variation and environmental correlates of SR.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>The coefficient of variation (CV) of soil respiration</title>
      <p>A common approach for characterizing spatial heterogeneity in SR is
through estimation of the coefficient of variation (CV; e.g., Shi
et al., 2016; Song et al., 2013; Dore et al., 2014). Our CV
analyses suggest that at larger spatial scales – that traverse
shifts in tree species and permafrost conditions – SR spatial
heterogeneity is governed by temporally stable environmental
variables. The CV of the full (i.e., larger scale) domain was
similar between seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 %) despite declines in
the mean and variance of SR from Summer to Fall
(Table 1). Stability of the CV observed here is consistent with
a recent study in a monsoon-impacted mixed forest in China, where
the CV was 55 and 51 % in the Summer and Fall, respectively
(Shi et al., 2016). In the same study, the CV in the Spring was
lower (42 %), however, and their analyses pointed to important
influences of both dynamic (soil moisture) and temporally stable
(soil bulk density and tree size) environmental features. Here, we
do not have SR during Spring conditions, which in our study system
would correspond to snow melt and the initial stages of active
layer thaw. Characterizing the SR spatial heterogeneity under such
conditions may reveal more temporal dynamics in the
CV. Nonetheless, our data indicate that once the active layer has
thawed, larger-scale SR spatial heterogeneity is governed by
environmental conditions that have consistent spatial structure
between seasons (e.g., tree-stand structure).</p>
      <p>When looking across spatial and temporal scales, we found
significant shifts in the CV, and the range of CV values was
similar to that found in previous work from a broad range of
ecosystems; across temperate forests, tropical forests, and
agricultural systems the SR CV generally ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 60 % (Shi et al., 2016; Song et al., 2013; Dore et al.,
2014). In both seasons the permafrost-associated domain had
a higher CV (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) than the permafrost-free domain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). We therefore infer that temporally stable conditions
are the primary control over SR spatial heterogeneity in both the
permafrost-free and permafrost-dominated domains. This is
consistent with work in other systems showing important influences
of tree-stand structure, and in particular the distance from large
trees (Ohashi et al., 2015; Katayama et al., 2009; Soe and
Buchmann, 2005; Khomik et al., 2006). In the permafrost-dominated
domain there may, however, be a small influence of environmental
variables characterized by temporally shifting spatial
structure. One possibility is small – but spatially heterogeneous
– increases in ALD from Summer to Fall.</p>
      <p>Our results further indicate that the 10–20 % higher SR CV in
the permafrost-dominated domain, relative to the permafrost-free
domain, was due to higher spatial variability in the tree basal area in
the permafrost-dominated domain. This inference is supported by two
observations. First, SR in the permafrost-dominated domain was best
explained by tree basal area in both seasons, while variables
explaining SR in the permafrost-free domain changed across seasons
and were more diffuse (i.e., there were more significant variables)
(Tables 2 and 3). Second, the CV of basal area was much higher in the
permafrost-dominated domain; examining the linearly interpolated
basal area estimates that align with SR measurements revealed 45
and 80 % CV for basal area in the permafrost-free and
permafrost-dominated domains, respectively. These results suggest
that in the permafrost-dominated domain, basal area in the vicinity
of a collar-scale measurement impacts the SR rate and spatial
variability of basal area on the plot-scale is a primary driver of
the SR CV. These results – combined with previous work in other
systems (e.g., Ohashi et al., 2015) – further support an important
role of tree-stand structure for SR spatial variability across
biomes. It would, however, be useful to study SR CV in
permafrost-free domains characterized by higher basal area CV than
observed here. Doing so would help determine if there is a general
threshold of basal area spatial variation above which that
variation becomes an important driver of the SR CV. If a general
threshold exists, it could be incorporated into ecosystem
simulation models aimed at predicting carbon-cycling responses to
environmental change. Furthermore, if spatial variation in SR is
broadly influenced by tree-stand structure, it suggests an
opportunity to use remote sensing techniques to characterize this
structure (van Leeuwen and Nieuwenhuis, 2010) and, in turn, the
spatial structure of SR in boreal and other high-latitude
ecosystems (Kushida et al., 2004).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>The Taylor power law of soil respiration</title>
      <p>Taylor power law analysis has been broadly used in population
ecology to relate variance to mean, and extending this approach
to spatial and temporal variation in SR revealed consistency
between the scaling of SR and the scaling of population
density. More specifically, we found a slope of the power
function relating SR variance to mean SR of 1.57, which is
consistent with slopes found in population ecology (Taylor, 1961;
Reed and Hobbs, 2004). Slopes greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> have been interpreted as
indicating aggregation or clustering (Taylor, 1984), whereby
a slope of 1.57 in our dataset indicates that SR was clustered in
space and/or time.</p>
      <p>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the power function was only 0.51, lower than many
population ecology studies. This was likely due to the small
number of soil collars (6) used in each variance/mean
estimate. Using more soil collars for each variance/mean estimate
would generate more accurate estimates, but the number of
independent estimates would drop considerably. The approach we
implemented strikes a balance between accuracy and number of
independent estimates (Rodeghiero and Cescatti, 2008), and our
results should be interpreted as a preliminary characterization
of variance-mean scaling of SR. Nonetheless, empirically linking
mean and variance may provide an opportunity to predict mean SR
through process-based models and, in turn, generate appropriate
spatial projections of variation in SR. For ecosystem-scale
models that encapsulate non-linear or threshold-based processes,
appropriately capturing spatial variation in SR could
significantly improve model predictions under conditions of
environmental change.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Variance in SR related to active layer depth (ALD)</title>
      <p>Relating SR variance to ALD revealed strong thresholding behavior
whereby the variance of SR increased sharply above an ALD of
140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This threshold was observed in both seasons
suggesting underlying mechanisms that are stable through time. One
potential explanation is that SR associated with thinner ALDs is
constrained by relatively high soil moisture – likely due to
facilitation of anaerobic conditions (Drew and Lynch, 1980) –
associated with thin ALD; a small number of soil cores in the
permafrost-free and permafrost-dominated domains showed higher soil
moisture in the permafrost-dominated domain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. 0.82
gravimetric moisture content on a wet mass basis, respectively; see also Bonan and Shugart, 1989). This is consistent with our
observation that SR variance (not CV) was lower in the
permafrost-dominated region (Table 1). As ALD increases and soil
moisture decreases, the spatially homogeneous constraint placed on
SR by high moisture should diminish, thereby allowing other – more
spatially heterogeneous – mechanisms to govern SR rates. As
a consequence, SR spatial variance would increase. If true, it
appears that in our system this release from
high-moisture limitation occurred abruptly at an ALD of
140 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This threshold behavior and conceptual
interpretation is consistent with the representation of moisture
impacts on SR in ecosystem models such as the Community Land Model
(Lawrence et al., 2011), and highlights the critical need of
accurately modeling changes in system hydrology as permafrost thaws
(Elberling et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>It should be recognized, however, that we were not able to
characterize moisture patterns through space and time such that our
interpretations of moisture impacts are speculative. In addition,
field observations alone are insufficient to resolve underlying
mechanisms leading to the observed thresholding behavior,
especially because multiple environmental variables co-varied in
space. In particular, multiple variables changed across the
permafrost-to-permafrost-free transition such that multiple factors
likely contributed simultaneously to the observed thresholding
behavior. We strongly encourage future manipulative experiments
designed to resolve the governing mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>SR variograms and spatial interpolations</title>
      <p>Variogram analyses of SR revealed shifts in the degree of
small-scale heterogeneity and in the range of spatial
autocorrelation across seasons and spatial scales. The variogram
nugget reflects measurement error and spatial variation at
distances shorter than sampled. Assuming consistent measurement
error – the same instruments, operators, and protocols were used
throughout – the decrease in the nugget from Summer to Fall
indicates a decline in small-scale heterogeneity. A potential
explanation is that lower temperatures in the Fall broadly
constrained SR (Bond-Lamberty and Thomson, 2010; Davidson et al.,
1998) and, in turn, limited the impact of small-scale variation in
other influential environmental variables. The scale of spatial
autocorrelation – as measured by the variogram range – was also
much lower in the Fall and in the permafrost-associated domain
during the Summer. These patterns indicate that SR has much weaker
spatial structure during colder periods and across
permafrost-associated spatial domains. There are a number of
mechanisms potentially contributing to these observed patterns. For
example in the Fall, colder temperatures may place an upper
constraint on microbial and root respiration (Lloyd and Taylor,
1994) and senescence of deciduous leaves – which occurred during
our Fall sampling – may indicate decreases in root respiration in
the deciduous-dominated permafrost-free spatial domain (Lee et al.,
2003; Tomotsune et al., 2013; Noh et al., 2016). Both mechanisms
could lead to weaker spatial structure and we look forward to
future studies that parse their relative contributions, potentially
using root-excluding soil collars.  The spatial structure of SR in
the permafrost-associated domain may be further influenced by high
soil moisture placing an upper constraint on microbial respiration
in soils with a thin ALD (Elberling et al., 2013).  Climate change
driven increases in temperature, shifts in forest phenology, and
decreases in permafrost may therefore increase both small-scale
heterogeneity and larger-scale spatial autocorrelation in SR.</p>
      <p>Visualizing the spatial structure of SR – based on fitted
variograms – revealed a sharp boundary in the middle of the field
domain across which SR increased non-linearly moving from east to
west. This pattern was most apparent in the Summer (Fig. 5),
consistent with our interpretation of a weaker spatial structure in
Fall. This east-to-west boundary in SR was co-located with rapid
thickening of the active layer, which further supports our
inference that non-linear thresholds in SR should be expected as
ALD thickens due to ongoing permafrost thaw. In our system this
threshold occurs at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see above); knowledge of
among-system variation in the presence and magnitude of such
a threshold would help constrain ecosystem models that attempt to
predict elemental cycling in permafrost-associated systems under
future climate scenarios. In addition, improved understanding of
the mechanisms leading to threshold behavior is needed for improved
process representation in such models. For example, the highest
tree stem density, soil temperatures, and feather moss cover were
found along the east-to-west SR and ALD boundary (Fig. 2).
Understanding how these biotic and abiotic features feed back on
each other is critical for robust predictions of ecosystem
responses to permafrost thaw.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Characterizing the spatial structure of SR – not just spatial
variation – provides a number of unique opportunities to improve
our basic understanding of processes that control the carbon
balance in ecosystems and to reveal key thresholds in ecosystem
function that are likely to arise in response to environmental
change. While such efforts are relatively rare due (presumably) to
logistic challenges, they provide insights that other approaches
cannot. Here, for example, we revealed thresholding behavior both
in terms of average SR rates (i.e., spatial discontinuities shown
in Fig. 5) and spatial variation in SR (i.e., the steep increases
shown in Fig. 4).  These patterns provide powerful constraints on
simulation models that attempt to predict carbon cycling fluxes
across spatial environmental gradients and/or through time as
environmental conditions change. A future challenge is therefore
to couple highly resolved spatially explicit SR measurements –
like those shown here – with dynamic ecosystem models. Doing so
has significant potential to reveal important model limitations
that, if overcome, may facilitate improved predictions of
ecosystem function under environmental change.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>Data are available from the corresponding author, and will be associated with the corresponding author's name via the Bonanza Creek LTER website (<uri>http://www.lter.uaf.edu/</uri>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4341-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4341-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>All authors contributed to components of the study design. JCS, CGA, BBL, and ARC collected field data.
JCS and CGA analyzed the data. JCS drafted the manuscript and all authors
contributed to the writing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Jamie Hollingsworth and Jay Jones for technical support at the
Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed, part of the Bonanza Creek Long-Term
Ecological Research site. We also thank Vanessa Bailey for assistance in the
field. The research was conducted under the Laboratory Directed Research and
Development (LDRD) program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,
a multiprogram national laboratory operated by Battelle for the US Department
of Energy under contract DE-AC05-76RL01 830.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Edzo Veldkamp <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: Alfred Stein and one
anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bonan, G. B. and Shugart, H. H.: Environmental-factors and ecological processes in boreal forests, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20, 1–28,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.000245" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.000245</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bond-Lamberty, B. and Thomson, A.: Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record, Nature, 464, 579–582,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08930" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08930</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Burrows, S. N., Gower, S. T., Clayton, M. K., Mackay, D. S., Ahl, D. E., Norman, J. M., and Diak, G.: Application of geostatistics to characterize leaf area index (LAI) from flux tower to landscape scales using a cyclic sampling design, Ecosystems, 5, 667–679,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0110-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-002-0110-z</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Davidson, E. A., Belk, E., and Boone, R. D.: Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest, Glob. Change Biol., 4, 217–227,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00128.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00128.x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Dore, S., Fry, D. L., and Stephens, S. L.: Spatial heterogeneity of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux after harvest and prescribed fire in a California mixed conifer forest, Forest Ecol. Manag., 319, 150–160,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.012</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Drew, M. C. and Lynch, J. M.: Soil anaerobiosis, microorganisms, and root function, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 18, 37–66,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.18.090180.000345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.py.18.090180.000345</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Eisler, Z., Bartos, I., and Kertesz, J.: Fluctuation scaling in complex systems: Taylor's law and beyond, Adv. Phys., 57, 89–142,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730801893043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00018730801893043</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Elberling, B., Michelsen, A., Schadel, C., Schuur, E. A. G.,
Christiansen, H. H., Berg, L., Tamstorf, M. P., and Sigsgaard, C.: Long-term
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production following permafrost thaw, Nat. Clim. Change, 3,
890–894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Nclimate1955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/Nclimate1955</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Foti, S., Balogh, J., Nagy, Z., Herbst, M., Pinter, K., Peli, E., Koncz, P., and Bartha, S.: Soil moisture induced changes on fine-scale spatial pattern of soil respiration in a semi-arid sandy grassland, Geoderma, 213, 245–254,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Grosse, G., Harden, J., Turetsky, M., McGuire, A. D., Camill, P., Tarnocai, C., Frolking, S., Schuur, E. A. G., Jorgenson, T., Marchenko, S., Romanovsky, V., Wickland, K. P., French, N., Waldrop, M., Bourgeau-Chavez, L., and Striegl, R. G.: Vulnerability of high-latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, G00k06,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jg001507</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Hanson, P. J., Wullschleger, S. D., Bohlman, S. A., and Todd, D. E.: Seasonal and topographic patterns of forest floor CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from an upland oak forest, Tree Physiol., 13, 1–15,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/13.1.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/13.1.1</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Hiemstra, P. H., Pebesma, E. J., Twenhofel, C. J. W., and Heuvelink, G. B. M.: Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network, Comput. Geosci.-Uk, 35, 1711–1721,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Katayama, A., Kume, T., Komatsu, H., Ohashi, M., Nakagawa, M., Yamashita, M., Otsuki, K., Suzuki, M., and Kumagai, T.: Effect of forest structure on the spatial variation in soil respiration in a Bornean tropical rainforest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1666–1673,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.007</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Khomik, M., Arain, M. A., and McCaughey, J. H.: Temporal and spatial variability of soil respiration in a boreal mixedwood forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 140, 244–256,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Kushida, K., Kim, Y., Tanaka, N., and Fukuda, M.: Remote sensing of net ecosystem productivity based on component spectrum and soil respiration observation in a boreal forest, interior Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D06108,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003858" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003858</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E.,
Swenson, S. C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X. B., Yang, Z. L., Levis, S.,
Sakaguchi, K., Bonan, G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization
improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of
the community land model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M03001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011MS00045</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lee, M. S., Nakane, K., Nakatsubo, T., and Koizumi, H.: Seasonal changes in the contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a cool-temperate deciduous forest, Plant Soil, 255, 311–318,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026192607512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1026192607512</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Lloyd, J. and Taylor, J. A.: On the temperature-dependence of soil respiration, Funct. Ecol., 8, 315–323,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2389824" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/2389824</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Longdoz, B., Yernaux, M., and Aubinet, M.: Soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances, spatial variability and seasonal evolution, Glob. Change Biol., 6, 907–917,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00369.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00369.x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Matheron, G.: Principles of geostatistics, Econ. Geol., 58, 1246–1266,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Minasny, B. and McBratney, A. B.: The Matern function as a general model for soil variograms, Geoderma, 128, 192–207,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.003</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Muggeo, V. M. R.: Estimating regression models with unknown break-points, Stat. Med., 22, 3055–3071,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/sim.1545</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Muggeo, V. M. R.: Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with
broken-line relationships, R News, 8/1, 20–25, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Noh, N. J., Kuribayashi, M., Saitoh, T. M., Nakaji, T., Nakamura, M., Hiura, T., and Muraoka, H.: Responses of soil, heterotrophic, and autotrophic respiration to experimental open-field soil warming in a cool-temperate deciduous forest, Ecosystems, 19, 504–520,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9948-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-015-9948-8</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ohashi, M., Kume, T., Yoshifuji, N., Kho, L. K., Nakagawa, M., and Nakashizuka, T.: The effects of an induced short-term drought period on the spatial variations in soil respiration measured around emergent trees in a typical bornean tropical forest, Malaysia, Plant Soil, 387, 337–349,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2303-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-014-2303-6</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Pardo-Iguzquiza, E. and Chica-Olmo, M.: Geostatistics with the Matern semivariogram model: A library of computer programs for inference, kriging and simulation, Comput. Geosci.-UK, 34, 1073–1079,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.020</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical
computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <uri>http://www.R-project.org/</uri>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Raich, J. W. and Potter, C. S.: Global patterns of carbon-dioxide emissions from soils, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 9, 23–36,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94gb02723" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94gb02723</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Rayment, M. B. and Jarvis, P. G.: Temporal and spatial variation of soil CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in a Canadian boreal forest, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 35–45,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00110-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00110-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Reed, D. H. and Hobbs, G. R.: The relationship between population size and temporal variability in population size, Anim. Conserv., 7, 1–8,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004003476" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S1367943004003476</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Rodeghiero, M. and Cescatti, A.: Spatial variability and optimal sampling strategy of soil respiration, Forest Ecol. Manag., 255, 106–112,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.025</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Russell, C. A. and Voroney, R. P.: Carbon dioxide efflux from the floor of a boreal aspen forest. I. Relationship to environmental variables and estimates of C respired, Can. J. Soil Sci., 78, 301–310,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4141/S97-054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4141/S97-054</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Saiz, G., Green, C., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Kiese, R., Avitabile, V., and Farrell, E. P.: Seasonal and spatial variability of soil respiration in four Sitka spruce stands, Plant Soil, 287, 161–176,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9052-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-006-9052-0</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A. G., Abbott, B. W., Bowden, W. B., Brovkin, V., Camill, P., Canadell, J. G., Chanton, J. P., Chapin, F. S., Christensen, T. R., Ciais, P., Crosby, B. T., Czimczik, C. I., Grosse, G., Harden, J., Hayes, D. J., Hugelius, G., Jastrow, J. D., Jones, J. B., Kleinen, T., Koven, C. D., Krinner, G., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D. M., McGuire, A. D., Natali, S. M., O'Donnell, J. A., Ping, C. L., Riley, W. J., Rinke, A., Romanovsky, V. E., Sannel, A. B. K., Schadel, C., Schaefer, K., Sky, J., Subin, Z. M., Tarnocai, C., Turetsky, M. R., Waldrop, M. P., Anthony, K. M. W., Wickland, K. P., Wilson, C. J., and Zimov, S. A.: Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change, Climatic Change, 119, 359–374,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0730-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-013-0730-7</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Schuur, E. A. G., McGuire, A. D., Schadel, C., Grosse, G., Harden, J. W., Hayes, D. J., Hugelius, G., Koven, C. D., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D. M., Natali, S. M., Olefeldt, D., Romanovsky, V. E., Schaefer, K., Turetsky, M. R., Treat, C. C., and Vonk, J. E.: Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback, Nature, 520, 171–179,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14338" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14338</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Shi, B. K., Gao, W. F., Cai, H. Y., and Jin, G. Z.: Spatial variation of soil respiration is linked to the forest structure and soil parameters in an old-growth mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in northeastern China, Plant Soil, 400, 263–274,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2730-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-015-2730-z</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Singh, S., Amiro, B. D., and Quideau, S. A.: Effects of forest floor organic layer and root biomass on soil respiration following boreal forest fire, Can. J. Forest Res., 38, 647–655,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/X07-200</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Soe, A. R. B. and Buchmann, N.: Spatial and temporal variations in soil respiration in relation to stand structure and soil parameters in an unmanaged beech forest, Tree Physiol., 25, 1427–1436,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.11.1427" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/25.11.1427</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Song, Q. H., Tan, Z. H., Zhang, Y. P., Cao, M., Sha, L. Q., Tang, Y., Liang, N. S., Schaefer, D., Zhao, J. F., Zhao, J. B., Zhang, X., Yu, L., and Deng, X. B.: Spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration in a seasonal rainforest with complex terrain, Iforest, 6, 65–72,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0681-006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3832/ifor0681-006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Sotta, E. D., Meir, P., Malhi, Y., Nobre, A. D., Hodnett, M., and Grace, J.: Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in a tropical forest in the central Amazon, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 601–617,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00761.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00761.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, M. L.: Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G., and Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23,  Gb2023,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gb003327</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, L. R.: Aggregation, variance and the mean, Nature, 189, 732–735,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/189732a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/189732a0</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, L. R.: Assessing and interpreting the spatial distributions of insect populations, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 29, 321–357,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001541</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, L. R. and Taylor, R. A. J.: Aggregation, migration and population mechanics, Nature, 265, 415–421,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/265415a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/265415a0</ext-link>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Tomotsune, M., Yoshitake, S., Watanabe, S., and Koizumi, H.: Separation of root and heterotrophic respiration within soil respiration by trenching, root biomass regression, and root excising methods in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in Japan, Ecol. Res., 28, 259–269,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-1013-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11284-012-1013-x</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>van Leeuwen, M. and Nieuwenhuis, M.: Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing, Eur. J. Forest Res., 129, 749–770,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, J. G., Valentine, D. W., and Ruess, R. W.: Soil and root respiration in mature Alaskan black spruce forests that vary in soil organic matter decomposition rates, Can. J. Forest Res., 35, 161–174,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/X04-159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/X04-159</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Western, A. W., Bloschl, G., and Grayson, R. B.: Geostatistical characterisation of soil moisture patterns in the Tarrawarra a catchment, J. Hydrol., 205, 20–37,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00142-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00142-X</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wolf, S., Keenan, T. F., Fisher, J. B., Baldocchi, D. D., Desai, A. R., Richardson, A. D., Scott, R. L., Law, B. E., Litvak, M. E., Brunsell, N. A., Peters, W., and van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T.: Warm spring reduced carbon cycle impact of the 2012 US summer drought, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5880–5885,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519620113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1519620113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Yim, M. H., Joo, S. J., Shutou, K., and Nakane, K.: Spatial variability of soil respiration in a larch plantation: estimation of the number of sampling points required, Forest Ecol. Manag., 175, 585–588,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00222-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00222-0</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Soil respiration across a permafrost transition zone: spatial structure and environmental correlates</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Soil respiration is a key ecosystem function whereby shifts in
respiration rates can shift systems from carbon sinks to sources.
Soil respiration in permafrost-associated systems is particularly
important given climate change driven permafrost thaw that leads to
significant uncertainty in resulting ecosystem carbon dynamics. Here
we characterize the spatial structure and environmental drivers of
soil respiration across a permafrost transition zone. We find that
soil respiration is characterized by a non-linear threshold that
occurs at active-layer depths greater than 140 cm. We also
find that within each season, tree basal area is a dominant driver of
soil respiration regardless of spatial scale, but only in spatial
domains with significant spatial variability in basal area. Our
analyses further show that spatial variation (the coefficient of
variation) and mean-variance power-law scaling of soil respiration
in our boreal system are consistent with previous work in other
ecosystems (e.g., tropical forests) and in population ecology, respectively.
Comparing our results to those in other ecosystems
suggests that temporally stable features such as tree-stand
structure are often primary drivers of spatial variation in soil
respiration. If so, this provides an opportunity to better estimate
the magnitude and spatial variation in soil respiration through
remote sensing.  Combining such an approach with broader knowledge
of thresholding behavior – here related to active layer depth –
would provide empirical constraints on models aimed at predicting
ecosystem responses to ongoing permafrost thaw.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bonan, G. B. and Shugart, H. H.: Environmental-factors and ecological processes in boreal forests, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20, 1–28,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.000245" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.000245</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bond-Lamberty, B. and Thomson, A.: Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record, Nature, 464, 579–582,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08930" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08930</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Burrows, S. N., Gower, S. T., Clayton, M. K., Mackay, D. S., Ahl, D. E., Norman, J. M., and Diak, G.: Application of geostatistics to characterize leaf area index (LAI) from flux tower to landscape scales using a cyclic sampling design, Ecosystems, 5, 667–679,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0110-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0110-z</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Davidson, E. A., Belk, E., and Boone, R. D.: Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest, Glob. Change Biol., 4, 217–227,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00128.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00128.x</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Dore, S., Fry, D. L., and Stephens, S. L.: Spatial heterogeneity of soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux after harvest and prescribed fire in a California mixed conifer forest, Forest Ecol. Manag., 319, 150–160,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.012</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Drew, M. C. and Lynch, J. M.: Soil anaerobiosis, microorganisms, and root function, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 18, 37–66,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.18.090180.000345" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.18.090180.000345</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Eisler, Z., Bartos, I., and Kertesz, J.: Fluctuation scaling in complex systems: Taylor's law and beyond, Adv. Phys., 57, 89–142,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730801893043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730801893043</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Elberling, B., Michelsen, A., Schadel, C., Schuur, E. A. G.,
Christiansen, H. H., Berg, L., Tamstorf, M. P., and Sigsgaard, C.: Long-term
CO<sub>2</sub> production following permafrost thaw, Nat. Clim. Change, 3,
890–894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/Nclimate1955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/Nclimate1955</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Foti, S., Balogh, J., Nagy, Z., Herbst, M., Pinter, K., Peli, E., Koncz, P., and Bartha, S.: Soil moisture induced changes on fine-scale spatial pattern of soil respiration in a semi-arid sandy grassland, Geoderma, 213, 245–254,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.009</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Grosse, G., Harden, J., Turetsky, M., McGuire, A. D., Camill, P., Tarnocai, C., Frolking, S., Schuur, E. A. G., Jorgenson, T., Marchenko, S., Romanovsky, V., Wickland, K. P., French, N., Waldrop, M., Bourgeau-Chavez, L., and Striegl, R. G.: Vulnerability of high-latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, G00k06,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001507</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, P. J., Wullschleger, S. D., Bohlman, S. A., and Todd, D. E.: Seasonal and topographic patterns of forest floor CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from an upland oak forest, Tree Physiol., 13, 1–15,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/13.1.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/13.1.1</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Hiemstra, P. H., Pebesma, E. J., Twenhofel, C. J. W., and Heuvelink, G. B. M.: Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network, Comput. Geosci.-Uk, 35, 1711–1721,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.011</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Katayama, A., Kume, T., Komatsu, H., Ohashi, M., Nakagawa, M., Yamashita, M., Otsuki, K., Suzuki, M., and Kumagai, T.: Effect of forest structure on the spatial variation in soil respiration in a Bornean tropical rainforest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1666–1673,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.007</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Khomik, M., Arain, M. A., and McCaughey, J. H.: Temporal and spatial variability of soil respiration in a boreal mixedwood forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 140, 244–256,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kushida, K., Kim, Y., Tanaka, N., and Fukuda, M.: Remote sensing of net ecosystem productivity based on component spectrum and soil respiration observation in a boreal forest, interior Alaska, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D06108,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003858" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003858</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, D. M., Oleson, K. W., Flanner, M. G., Thornton, P. E.,
Swenson, S. C., Lawrence, P. J., Zeng, X. B., Yang, Z. L., Levis, S.,
Sakaguchi, K., Bonan, G. B., and Slater, A. G.: Parameterization
improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of
the community land model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M03001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, M. S., Nakane, K., Nakatsubo, T., and Koizumi, H.: Seasonal changes in the contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a cool-temperate deciduous forest, Plant Soil, 255, 311–318,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026192607512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026192607512</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Lloyd, J. and Taylor, J. A.: On the temperature-dependence of soil respiration, Funct. Ecol., 8, 315–323,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2389824" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/2389824</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Longdoz, B., Yernaux, M., and Aubinet, M.: Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances, spatial variability and seasonal evolution, Glob. Change Biol., 6, 907–917,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00369.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00369.x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Matheron, G.: Principles of geostatistics, Econ. Geol., 58, 1246–1266,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246</a>, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Minasny, B. and McBratney, A. B.: The Matern function as a general model for soil variograms, Geoderma, 128, 192–207,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.003</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Muggeo, V. M. R.: Estimating regression models with unknown break-points, Stat. Med., 22, 3055–3071,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1545</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Muggeo, V. M. R.: Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with
broken-line relationships, R News, 8/1, 20–25, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Noh, N. J., Kuribayashi, M., Saitoh, T. M., Nakaji, T., Nakamura, M., Hiura, T., and Muraoka, H.: Responses of soil, heterotrophic, and autotrophic respiration to experimental open-field soil warming in a cool-temperate deciduous forest, Ecosystems, 19, 504–520,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9948-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9948-8</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Ohashi, M., Kume, T., Yoshifuji, N., Kho, L. K., Nakagawa, M., and Nakashizuka, T.: The effects of an induced short-term drought period on the spatial variations in soil respiration measured around emergent trees in a typical bornean tropical forest, Malaysia, Plant Soil, 387, 337–349,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2303-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2303-6</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Pardo-Iguzquiza, E. and Chica-Olmo, M.: Geostatistics with the Matern semivariogram model: A library of computer programs for inference, kriging and simulation, Comput. Geosci.-UK, 34, 1073–1079,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.020</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical
computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <a href="http://www.R-project.org/" target="_blank">http://www.R-project.org/</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Raich, J. W. and Potter, C. S.: Global patterns of carbon-dioxide emissions from soils, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 9, 23–36,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94gb02723" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94gb02723</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Rayment, M. B. and Jarvis, P. G.: Temporal and spatial variation of soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux in a Canadian boreal forest, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 35–45,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00110-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00110-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Reed, D. H. and Hobbs, G. R.: The relationship between population size and temporal variability in population size, Anim. Conserv., 7, 1–8,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004003476" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943004003476</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Rodeghiero, M. and Cescatti, A.: Spatial variability and optimal sampling strategy of soil respiration, Forest Ecol. Manag., 255, 106–112,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.025</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, C. A. and Voroney, R. P.: Carbon dioxide efflux from the floor of a boreal aspen forest. I. Relationship to environmental variables and estimates of C respired, Can. J. Soil Sci., 78, 301–310,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.4141/S97-054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4141/S97-054</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G., Green, C., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Kiese, R., Avitabile, V., and Farrell, E. P.: Seasonal and spatial variability of soil respiration in four Sitka spruce stands, Plant Soil, 287, 161–176,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9052-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9052-0</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Schuur, E. A. G., Abbott, B. W., Bowden, W. B., Brovkin, V., Camill, P., Canadell, J. G., Chanton, J. P., Chapin, F. S., Christensen, T. R., Ciais, P., Crosby, B. T., Czimczik, C. I., Grosse, G., Harden, J., Hayes, D. J., Hugelius, G., Jastrow, J. D., Jones, J. B., Kleinen, T., Koven, C. D., Krinner, G., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D. M., McGuire, A. D., Natali, S. M., O'Donnell, J. A., Ping, C. L., Riley, W. J., Rinke, A., Romanovsky, V. E., Sannel, A. B. K., Schadel, C., Schaefer, K., Sky, J., Subin, Z. M., Tarnocai, C., Turetsky, M. R., Waldrop, M. P., Anthony, K. M. W., Wickland, K. P., Wilson, C. J., and Zimov, S. A.: Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change, Climatic Change, 119, 359–374,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0730-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0730-7</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Schuur, E. A. G., McGuire, A. D., Schadel, C., Grosse, G., Harden, J. W., Hayes, D. J., Hugelius, G., Koven, C. D., Kuhry, P., Lawrence, D. M., Natali, S. M., Olefeldt, D., Romanovsky, V. E., Schaefer, K., Turetsky, M. R., Treat, C. C., and Vonk, J. E.: Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback, Nature, 520, 171–179,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14338" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14338</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, B. K., Gao, W. F., Cai, H. Y., and Jin, G. Z.: Spatial variation of soil respiration is linked to the forest structure and soil parameters in an old-growth mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in northeastern China, Plant Soil, 400, 263–274,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2730-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2730-z</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Singh, S., Amiro, B. D., and Quideau, S. A.: Effects of forest floor organic layer and root biomass on soil respiration following boreal forest fire, Can. J. Forest Res., 38, 647–655,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-200" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-200</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Soe, A. R. B. and Buchmann, N.: Spatial and temporal variations in soil respiration in relation to stand structure and soil parameters in an unmanaged beech forest, Tree Physiol., 25, 1427–1436,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.11.1427" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.11.1427</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Song, Q. H., Tan, Z. H., Zhang, Y. P., Cao, M., Sha, L. Q., Tang, Y., Liang, N. S., Schaefer, D., Zhao, J. F., Zhao, J. B., Zhang, X., Yu, L., and Deng, X. B.: Spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration in a seasonal rainforest with complex terrain, Iforest, 6, 65–72,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0681-006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0681-006</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Sotta, E. D., Meir, P., Malhi, Y., Nobre, A. D., Hodnett, M., and Grace, J.: Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux in a tropical forest in the central Amazon, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 601–617,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00761.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00761.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stein, M. L.: Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Tarnocai, C., Canadell, J. G., Schuur, E. A. G., Kuhry, P., Mazhitova, G., and Zimov, S.: Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23,  Gb2023,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003327</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, L. R.: Aggregation, variance and the mean, Nature, 189, 732–735,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/189732a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/189732a0</a>, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, L. R.: Assessing and interpreting the spatial distributions of insect populations, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 29, 321–357,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001541</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, L. R. and Taylor, R. A. J.: Aggregation, migration and population mechanics, Nature, 265, 415–421,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/265415a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/265415a0</a>, 1977.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Tomotsune, M., Yoshitake, S., Watanabe, S., and Koizumi, H.: Separation of root and heterotrophic respiration within soil respiration by trenching, root biomass regression, and root excising methods in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in Japan, Ecol. Res., 28, 259–269,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-1013-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-1013-x</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
van Leeuwen, M. and Nieuwenhuis, M.: Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing, Eur. J. Forest Res., 129, 749–770,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0381-4</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, J. G., Valentine, D. W., and Ruess, R. W.: Soil and root respiration in mature Alaskan black spruce forests that vary in soil organic matter decomposition rates, Can. J. Forest Res., 35, 161–174,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/X04-159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/X04-159</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Western, A. W., Bloschl, G., and Grayson, R. B.: Geostatistical characterisation of soil moisture patterns in the Tarrawarra a catchment, J. Hydrol., 205, 20–37,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00142-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00142-X</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Wolf, S., Keenan, T. F., Fisher, J. B., Baldocchi, D. D., Desai, A. R., Richardson, A. D., Scott, R. L., Law, B. E., Litvak, M. E., Brunsell, N. A., Peters, W., and van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T.: Warm spring reduced carbon cycle impact of the 2012 US summer drought, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5880–5885,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519620113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519620113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Yim, M. H., Joo, S. J., Shutou, K., and Nakane, K.: Spatial variability of soil respiration in a larch plantation: estimation of the number of sampling points required, Forest Ecol. Manag., 175, 585–588,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00222-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00222-0</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
