<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-4965-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Calibration of a simple and a complex model of global marine biogeochemistry</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Calibration of a simple and a complex global marine biogeochemical model}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{I. Kriest}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kriest</surname><given-names>Iris</given-names></name>
          <email>ikriest@geomar.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Iris Kriest (ikriest@geomar.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>4965</fpage><lpage>4984</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p>The assessment of the ocean biota's role in climate change is often carried
out with global biogeochemical ocean models that contain many components and
involve a high level of parametric uncertainty. Because many data that relate
to tracers included in a model are only sparsely observed, assessment of
model skill is often restricted to tracers that can be easily measured and
assembled. Examination of the models' fit to climatologies of inorganic
tracers, after the models have been spun up to steady state, is a common but
computationally expensive procedure to assess model performance and
reliability. Using new tools that have become available for global model
assessment and calibration in steady state, this paper examines two different
model types – a complex seven-component model (MOPS) and a very simple
four-component model (RetroMOPS) – for their fit to dissolved quantities.
Before comparing the models, a subset of their biogeochemical parameters has
been optimised against annual-mean nutrients and oxygen. Both model types fit
the observations almost equally well. The simple model contains only two
nutrients: oxygen and dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP). Its misfit and
large-scale tracer distributions are sensitive to the parameterisation of DOP
production and decay. The spatio-temporal decoupling of nitrogen and oxygen,
and processes involved in their uptake and release, renders oxygen and
nitrate valuable tracers for model calibration. In addition, the
non-conservative nature of these tracers (with respect to their upper
boundary condition) introduces the global bias (fixed nitrogen and oxygen
inventory) as a useful additional constraint on model parameters. Dissolved
organic phosphorus at the surface behaves antagonistically to phosphate, and
suggests that observations of this tracer – although difficult to measure –
may be an important asset for model calibration.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Global biogeochemical ocean models are now routinely used to assess the ocean
biota's role in climate change. Although these models have become ever more
complex with respect to the number of biogeochemical tracers they contain,
they are often calibrated only against a subset of their components, mostly
nutrients, oxygen and components of the carbon cycle
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>There has been an intensive discussion about the necessary level of marine
ecosystem model complexity, mostly on a theoretical basis, or in a local or
regional context
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
It remains an open question as to whether additional complexity is of advantage for
representing biogeochemical processes and tracers on a global scale (i.e. for
processes acting on rather long timescales and large space scales). For example,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="text.3"/> found no large differences when comparing
model skill with respect to oxygen and phosphate across a range of models of
different complexity, but quite large effects of parameter settings when
applying a coarse examination of the parameter space.</p>
      <p>However, a thorough and dense scan of the parameter space would be required
for a fair assessment of the virtues of models of different complexity. Such
a scan usually requires many model evaluations, which, given the long
equilibration timescales of coupled global models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.4"/>, is difficult to carry out. For
assessment of only surface properties and processes, a short model spin-up may
be sufficient; however, on a global scale, many centuries to millennia of
coupled model simulations are necessary in order to remove the drift in
biogeochemical tracer fields and fit to observed properties
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p>Only recently tools have become available that allow for a reduction in
simulation times, such as the Transport Matrix Method
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">TMM,</named-content></xref>, which replaces the ocean circulation model
with an efficient “offline” circulation, or methods that solve for steady-state tracer fields using Newton's method. The latter require either the
inversion of the Jacobian <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, or the application of matrix-free
Newton–Krylov <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">MFNK,</named-content></xref> to compute the
steady-state solution. Surrogate-based optimisation replaces the original and
computationally expensive model by a so-called surrogate, which is created
from a less accurate but computationally cheaper model. The latter is
corrected to reduce the misalignment between the two solutions.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.9"/> applied this method, together with the TMM, to recover
parameters of a simple global biogeochemical model; the surrogate in their
case consisted of shorter (decades) spin-ups.</p>
      <p>The gain in computational efficiency resulting from these methods can then be
used for a systematic calibration of global biogeochemical models. For
example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx42" id="text.10"/> used global climatological data sets of
phosphate, inorganic carbon and alkalinity to calibrate a simple global
biogeochemical model. The misfit between observed and simulated phosphate was
used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.11"/> to calibrate parameters related to particle
properties in a simple two-component, nutrient-restoring model. In a similar
approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.12"/> optimised parameters for opal production and
dissolution against observed silicate. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.13"/> switched between
a complex and a simple model of ocean biogeochemistry to estimate production
and decay rates of dissolved organic phosphorus on a global scale.</p>
      <p>All these biogeochemical models employed in global parameter estimates were
of a low level of biogeochemical complexity. One reason for this restriction
might be associated with the variety of timescales associated with more
complex models. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.14"/> used MFNK to evaluate the steady state
of simple and complex biogeochemical models. They noted that “[…] for more
complex models the Newton method requires more attention to solver parameter
settings […]” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.15"/>, which may be related to the highly
nonlinear structure of these models. The nonlinearity, and the large number
of parameters, also complicates their simultaneous optimisation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.16"/>. On a global scale, these problems are amplified by the
sparsity of observations of organism groups, particularly of higher trophic
levels. Observations of dissolved inorganic constituents, on the other hand,
are much more frequent and therefore provide more information on the
spatio-temporal variability of these tracers.</p>
      <p>Recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.17"/> combined the TMM with an estimation of a
distribution algorithm (covariance matrix adaption evolution strategy,
CMA-ES), to optimise six biogeochemical parameters of a seven-component model
against global climatologies of annual mean phosphate, nitrate and oxygen.
They showed that annual mean tracer concentrations did not provide much
information on parameters related to the dynamic biological processes taking
place in the euphotic zone, but that parameters related to long timescales and
large space scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. the remineralisation length scale or so-called
“Martin <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”; see also</named-content></xref> could be estimated from these
observations. The large uncertainty associated with surface parameter
estimates can be attributed to the relatively small volume of the surface
ocean, leading to a misfit that is dominated by deep-ocean observations.</p>
      <p>Replacing the misfit function by a metric that targets the surface ocean,
and/or contains additional observations that provide information on plankton,
could be one way to resolve this indeterminacy. Alternatively, one could omit these parameters from the optimisation and focus on parameters more tightly
connected to the meso- and bathypelagic ocean. A more drastic measure lies
in downscaling the biogeochemical model to a simpler system, that only
contains components with a counterpart in global, quasi-synoptic data sets.
The latter procedure may help to elucidate which level of complexity is
required to represent and investigate global distribution and patterns of
biogeochemical tracers.</p>
      <p>This paper examines the latter two potential solutions: firstly, I
investigate if parameters related to oxidant-dependent decay in the
mesopelagic zone are better constrained by this type of misfit function. This is
done by replacing four parameters of the optimisation carried out by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.19"/> by parameters related to oxidant affinity of
remineralisation, and – to account for the possible alterations in fixed
nitrogen turnover – by the maximum nitrogen fixation rate. Secondly, given
the successful parameter optimisation of simpler models noted above, and also
to acknowledge the fact that these models have been popular and quite
successful in global simulations of ocean biogeochemistry
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, this paper presents an optimised model, which has been
derived from downscaling the seven-component model MOPS
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.21"/> to a model that retains only three abiotic
dissolved tracers (phosphate, nitrate and oxygen) and one biotic tracer
(dissolved organic phosphorus, DOP). This new model, which I refer to as
“RetroMOPS”, includes the oxidant dependency of MOPS, but is otherwise very
similar to models applied earlier in global models. In contrast to some of
these models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.22"/> it assumes no relaxation to
observed tracer fields, but simulates fully prognostic changes in surface
production, as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.23"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.24"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.25"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.26"/>.</p>
      <p>After a brief presentation of model MOPS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.27"/>, the downscaled
model RetroMOPS is introduced, followed by an outline on circulation,
optimisation and experimental design (Sect. 2). In Sect. 3 results from
optimisation of both MOPS and RetroMOPS are presented and discussed. The
paper closes with conclusions drawn from these experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Models, experiments and optimisations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>The MOPS model</title>
      <p>The MOPS model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.28"/> is based on phosphorus and simulates seven
compartments. Phosphate, phytoplankton, zooplankton, DOP and detritus are calculated in units
of millimoles of phosphorus per cubic metre (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Oxygen is coupled to the P cycle with a constant
stoichiometry given by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerobic
remineralisation of organic matter follows a saturation curve, with
half-saturation constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerobic remineralisation ceases
when oxygen declines; at the same time, denitrification takes over, as long
as nitrate is available above a defined threshold,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Like the oxic process, suboxic remineralisation
follows a saturation curve for oxidant nitrate, with half-saturation constant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. MOPS does not explicitly resolve the different oxidation
states of inorganic nitrogen (nitrite, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ammonium), but assumes
immediate coupling of the different processes involved in nitrate reduction,
the end product being dinitrogen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">see
also</named-content></xref>. All organic components are characterised
by a constant N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P stoichiometry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Loss of fixed nitrogen is
balanced by a simple parameterisation of nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria,
which relaxes the nitrate-to-phosphate ratio to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a time constant,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NFix</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the long term, nitrogen fixation balances the
simulated loss of fixed nitrogen via denitrification, although they may occur
in distant areas (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="altparen.30"/>, for more details).</p>
      <p>Detritus sinks with a vertically increasing sinking speed: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming
a constant degradation rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in equilibrium this would result in
a particle flux curve given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For better
comparison with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from observations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.31"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and with the
simpler model RetroMOPS (see below), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is expressed in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(assuming constant, nominal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A fraction of detritus
deposited at the sea floor (at the bottom of the deepest vertical box) is
buried instantaneously in some hypothetical sediment. The fraction buried
depends on the deposition rate onto the sediment. Non-buried detritus is
resuspended into the last box of the water column, where it is treated as
regular detritus. The phosphorus budget is closed on an annual timescale
through resupply via river runoff. More details about the biogeochemical
model and parameters and their effects on model behaviour can be found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.32"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.33"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Model RetroMOPS</title>
      <p>MOPS' structure has been simplified by skipping the explicit simulation of
phytoplankton, zooplankton and detritus (see Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The
remaining equations of, and functional relationships between, phosphate,
nitrate, oxygen and DOP have been parameterised similar to MOPS. Because the
downscaled model resembles so many features of earlier biogeochemical models
simulated in a global context <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.34"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, but keeps the oxidant dependency of MOPS,
the model is named “RetroMOPS”.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Primary production</title>
      <p>Like MOPS, RetroMOPS calculates primary production only in the euphotic zone,
which, in the current configuration, is confined to the upper two numerical
layers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). As in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="text.35"/> phytoplankton is parameterised with
a constant concentration of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the
mean phytoplankton concentration in the upper 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of two optimised
model set-ups MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
below). Using this constant phytoplankton concentration, RetroMOPS calculates
light- and nutrient-dependent primary production <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in each layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M32" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable class="cases" columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> defines light-limitation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
temperature-dependent maximum growth rate of phytoplankton, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
determines the limiting nutrient: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.36"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for more details</named-content></xref>.
Note that, with the given parameters for nutrient and light affinity, the
resulting specific growth rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of optimised MOPS and
RetroMOPS are quite similar (0.127 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for MOPS and
0.102 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for RetroMOPS).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>The fate of primary production: export, DOP production and remineralisation</title>
      <p>Instead of resolving heterotrophic processes (zooplankton grazing, excretion
and egestion) at the sea surface explicitly, in RetroMOPS a fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of organic matter fixed photosynthetically is immediately released as
dissolved organic phosphorus. DOP then decays to phosphate and nitrate
with a constant rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. To allow for a potential fast recycling loop
at the surface, RetroMOPS parameterises an additional decay rate,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that affects DOP only in the first two layers. By
doing so, the model mimics multiple DOP fractions with different decay rates,
as observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.37"/>. The remaining fraction of production,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of each layer in the euphotic zone is exported to the layers
below, where it immediately remineralises to nutrients, following a power-law
of depth. The discretised form for flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into box <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from all (surface)
source layers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is then given by the following:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext> for </mml:mtext><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the thickness of a numerical (source) layer, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the depth of the upper boundary of layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The flux divergence,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for any box <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in discretised form is defined
by

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Neglecting oxidant dependency of decay, the entire flux divergence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
would be released as phosphate and nitrate, with equivalent oxidant
consumption. It is, however, possible that oxidants become depleted at some
location. Earlier models in this case continued the degradation of organic
matter, thereby implicitly assuming unspecified oxidants
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.38"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In contrast, RetroMOPS, like MOPS, accounts for suppression of
remineralisation (oxic or suboxic) in the absence of sufficient oxidants, by
assuming saturation curves for the limitation by either oxygen or nitrate.
The amount of organic matter available for oxidation is given by the decay of
dissolved organic matter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and by the flux
divergence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). The discretised flux
divergence, that can actually be remineralised with available oxidants
(oxygen and/or nitrate), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is then determined by

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the oxidant
limitation terms, expressed as saturation curves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for either oxygen (oxic remineralisation) or nitrate
(denitrification), with half-saturation constants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Denitrification is further inhibited by oxygen via
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.39"><named-content content-type="pre">see also Eqs. 15–27 of</named-content></xref>. In all models oxic
remineralisation only takes place down to a a lower threshold of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The lower threshold for denitrification
is determined by parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and subject to
optimisation.</p>
      <p>The flux divergence that cannot be remineralised under the given
concentrations of oxidants is added as additional flux divergence to the
layer below:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where again <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is evaluated. In the bottom layer the
remaining flux that has not been remineralised in the water column eventually
enters the sediment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Benthic exchanges</title>
      <p>Models that implicitly assume unspecified oxidants often prescribe a zero
boundary flux, i.e. all organic matter in the last bottom box is degraded
instantaneously <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx82" id="paren.40"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Both MOPS and RetroMOPS have to take “leftover” organic matter
flux into account, that arrives undegraded at the sea floor because of
incomplete remineralisation in the water column. The explicit detritus
compartment in MOPS allows for only partial burial at the sea floor, which
may result in detritus accumulation in the deepest model box
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>. Because there is no such detritus compartment in
RetroMOPS, all flux arriving at the sea floor is buried immediately.
Therefore, MOPS and RetroMOPS differ with respect to their lower boundary
condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Nitrogen fixation</title>
      <p>Both RetroMOPS and MOPS do not explicitly simulate cyanobacteria, but assume
zero net growth of these organisms, parameterised as an immediate release of
fixed nitrogen as nitrate:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnspacing="1em" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NFix</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EZ</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterises the temperature dependence of nitrogen fixation with
a second-order polynomial approximation of the function by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.42"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> regulates the relaxation of the
nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> phosphate ratio towards the global observed stoichiometric ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The maximum nitrogen fixation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NFix</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(mmol N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) parameterises an implicit cyanobacteria
population. As in MOPS, on long timescales nitrogen fixation balances the
simulated loss of fixed nitrogen via denitrification, although the regions of
nitrogen loss and gain can be spatially segregated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS5">
  <title>Source minus sinks</title>
      <p>Combining the above-mentioned processes and interactions, the time rate of
change in each layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for phosphate, nitrate, oxygen and DOP due to
biogeochemical processes are

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>production</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>surface decay</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>decay and flux divergence</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>release</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>surface decay</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>decay</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>production</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>surface decay</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>decay and flux divergence</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>production</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>N-fixation</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>surface decay</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>DOP</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mtext>decay and flux
divergence</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              To summarise, RetroMOPS is similar to model
“N-DOP” of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="text.44"/>, to the phosphorus component of
the model presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.45"/> or to the models presented by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.46"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.47"/>, the exception being
details of primary production at the sea surface, and the explicit
parameterisation of oxidant-dependent remineralisation. By assuming constant
cyanobacteria biomass, and a relaxation of the nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> phosphate ratio
via immediate release of fixed nitrogen, its parameterisation of nitrogen
fixation is similar to the one described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.48"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.49"/>. Because RetroMOPS lacks explicit phytoplankton,
zooplankton and detritus, it has eight fewer tunable parameters than MOPS.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Circulation and physical transport</title>
      <p>All model simulations apply the Transport Matrix Method
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="post"><uri>github.com/samarkhatiwala/tmm</uri></named-content></xref> for tracer
transport, with monthly mean transport matrices (TMs), wind, temperature and
salinity (for air–sea gas exchange) derived from a 2.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> global
configuration of the MIT ocean model, with 15 levels in the vertical, as
described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.51"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.52"/>. The
circulation model was forced with climatological annual cycles of wind, heat
and freshwater fluxes, and subject to a weak restoring of surface temperature
and salinity to observations. Its configuration is similar to that applied in
the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.53"/>, which has been assessed against observations of
temperature, salinity and mixed-layer depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.54"/>, CFCs
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.55"/>, and radiocarbon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.56"/>. Overall, its performance is comparable to other global models.</p>
      <p>Using this efficient offline approach, with a time step length of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> day for
tracer transport and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> day for biogeochemical interactions, a simulation
of 3000 years requires about 0.5–1.5 h on 4 nodes (24-core Intel Xeon
Ivybridge) at a high-performance computing centre (<uri>www.hlrn.de</uri>). After
3000 years most tracers have approached steady state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.57"><named-content content-type="pre">see also</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for
long time trends of MOPS simulated in a different circulation</named-content></xref>,
and the transient of the misfit function becomes very small (see Fig. S2).
The last year is used for model analysis and evaluation of the misfit
function.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Optimisation algorithm</title>
      <p>Optimisation of parameters is carried out using an estimation of distribution
algorithm, namely the covariance matrix adaption evolution strategy
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.58"/>. The application of this algorithm to the
coupled biogeochemistry–TMM framework has shown good performance with respect
to quality and efficiency (in terms of function evaluations) and is
described only briefly below. More details about the algorithm, its set-up and
coupling to the global biogeochemical model can be found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.59"/>.</p>
      <p>Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> be the number of biogeochemical parameters to be estimated. In each
iteration (“generation”) the algorithm defines a population of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
individuals (biogeochemical parameter vectors of length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">derived from the default parameter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</named-content></xref>. The candidate vectors are sampled from
a multi-variate normal distribution, which generalises the usual normal
distribution, also known as Gaussian distribution, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the
vector space <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Following the simulation of these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> individual model set-ups to steady
state (3000 years), the misfit function is evaluated, and information of
the current as well as previous generations is used to update the
probability distribution in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> such that the likelihood to sample
good solutions increases. Usually, the realisation of the probability
distribution update ensures that information of former solutions fades out
slowly, resisting for several iterations. Therefore, the population (the
number of model simulations per generation) in CMA-ES is smaller, and of less
computational demand, than in classical evolutionary algorithms.
Nevertheless, CMA-ES can still, to a certain degree, perform well with misfit
functions characterised by a rough topography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.61"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Experimental set-up of optimisation. Parameters that stay fixed are
highlighted. For parameters subject to optimisation we indicate the assigned
a priori lower and upper parameter boundary (parameter range,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for optimisation in square brackets;
n/a: not applicable for this model.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Unit</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.67</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[0.4–0.8]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[0.0–3.6]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.17</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>0.17</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.17</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.36</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[0.036–3.6]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>24</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[4–48]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>9.65</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>9.65</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>9.65</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.03125</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[0.001–0.5]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.5</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.5</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.5</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ZOO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>2</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[1–3]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>1.89</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ZOO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>3.2</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[1.6–4.8]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>4.55</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n/a</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.858</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[0.4–1.8]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[0.4–1.8]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.0725</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[0.4–1.8]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>170</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[150–200]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[150–200]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>171.7</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>171.7</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">mmol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : mmol P</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NFix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>2</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[1–3]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.19</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>1.19</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>4</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>4</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[1–16]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>15.80</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>15.80</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>2</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>2</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[1–16]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>1.0</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>1.0</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>8</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>8</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[2–32]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>31.97</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>31.97</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Note that from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the optimised parameter) in MOPS we
calculate the rate of vertical increase in sinking speed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> we assume nominal detrital
remineralisation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are
0.058275 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.858</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 0.0278 (lower boundary) and 0.125 (upper
boundary).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Misfit function</title>
      <p>As in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.62"/> the misfit to observations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the
root mean square error (RMSE) between simulated and observed annual mean
phosphate, nitrate and oxygen concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.63"/>, mapped onto the three-dimensional model geometry. Although
regridding the observations onto the coarser model geometry removes some of
the variability, this method is computationally more efficient in an
optimisation framework. Also, a sensitivity study with a similar coupled
model showed that accounting for the variance inherent in the observational
data and arising from regridding did not have a large influence on the
misfit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.64"/>.</p>
      <p>Deviations between model and observations are weighted by the volume of each
individual grid box, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, expressed as fraction of total ocean
volume, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting sum of weighted deviations is then
normalised by the global mean concentration of the respective observed
tracer:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the tracer type and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the model
locations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">749</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model grid boxes; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the global
average observed concentration of the respective tracer. The terms <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are model and observations, respectively. By weighting each
individual misfit with volume, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> serves more as a long-timescale
geochemical estimator, in contrast to a misfit function that, for example, focuses on
(rather fast) turnover in the surface layer, or resolves the seasonal cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Optimisation of MOPS</title>
      <p>Based on a “hand-tuned”, a priori set-up of MOPS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.65"/>, which
hereafter is referred to as MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.66"/>
presented an optimisation of mostly surface-related parameters (hereafter
referred to as MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). They chose a very wide range of
parameter types, across all trophic levels and acting on different time and
space scales. In that optimisation many of the surface parameters were
difficult to constrain, because of a misfit function that consists mostly of
observations in the deep ocean. Optimisation MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
presented here applies the same metric, but focuses on parameters in
subsurface waters. The selection of parameters to be optimised is motivated
by the large uncertainty regarding extent and expansion of oxygen minimum
zones in models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.67"/>, and because little knowledge
exists about their values, or even parameterisations.</p>
      <p>Parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determines the affinity of the aerobic
remineralisation to oxygen, and the gradual transition from this process to
denitrification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.68"><named-content content-type="pre">see Eqs. 15 and 20 of</named-content></xref>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determines the affinity of denitrification to nitrate.
Parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> defines the lower threshold for the
onset of denitrification. MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> also optimises the
maximum rate of nitrogen fixation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NFix</mml:mtext><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which balances
fixed nitrogen loss through denitrification. The fifth and sixth parameter to
be estimated are the oxygen requirement per mole of phosphorus remineralised,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the flux (or remineralisation) length scale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Upper and lower boundaries of parameters to be optimised have been set to
a rather wide range (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), to allow optimisation to explore
a wide range of potential parameters. The optimal parameters of
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for light and nutrient affinity of phytoplankton,
zooplankton grazing and its mortality are retained in
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Therefore optimisation
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> builds upon a previous tuning of surface
processes.</p>
      <p>Most of the processes affected by the parameters to be optimised take place
in suboxic waters, e.g. of the eastern equatorial Pacific (EEP). Given the
coarse model geometry, it is possible that circulation dynamics are not
represented well in the model. To investigate the influence of observations
within this region on misfit function and parameter estimates,
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is repeated with a reduced data set, that excludes
the EEP (here: east of 140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) from the misfit function. This optimisation is named
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Optimisation of RetroMOPS</title>
      <p>In the RetroMOPS model, processes such as grazing of phytoplankton, and its
subsequent release of organic or inorganic phosphorus are parameterised via
a single component, DOP. Because DOP production and decay regulate the
partitioning between sinking and dissolved organic matter, optimisation
RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> targets these parameters, namely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as the parameter that
regulates the export ratio, may be more or less well constrained,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> both include a variety of processes,
which may act on timescales of days to years. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.69"/> applied
a multi-G model to incubations of DOP sampled in surface waters of the middle
Atlantic Bight, and measured decay constants for the very labile fraction
(32 % of total DOP) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a range of
3–254 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Half of total DOP was in the labile fraction and
characterised by a decay constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging
from 0.8 to 43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, these observations may not be
directly transferable to globally simulated DOP, because most of the
simulated ocean is far off the productive shelf areas; further, DOP in
RetroMOPS is assumed to mimic a variety of biogeochemical components and
processes. In a three-step optimisation study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.70"/>, who
optimised a global model of semi-labile and refractory DOM against
observations estimated rates of 0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for semi-labile DOP at
the surface, and 0.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for semi-labile DOP in the mesopelagic zone,
i.e. much lower than suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.71"/>. Summarising, the
potential decay rate of the very labile to semi-labile fraction varies over
several orders of magnitude, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Optimisation of RetroMOPS focuses on the dominant labile to semi-labile
fraction, but allows for some potential fast turnover rates of DOP at the sea
surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre">towards the values observed by</named-content></xref>. To obtain
a first impression on model sensitivity towards these parameters, a set of
nine a priori experiments, that vary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.18 and
0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0 and
0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, has been carried out (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), which
provides
a guidance for upper and lower boundaries for optimisation of RetroMOPS. To
nevertheless explore the full range of potential decay rates, the maximum
possible rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for optimisation is set to
7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, towards the average decay rate of the labile DOP observed
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.73"/>. Optimised RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> will be compared to
the sensitivity experiment with the lowest misfit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is denoted as RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The explicit representation of detritus in MOPS may result in considerable
numerical diffusion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.74"><named-content content-type="pre">particularly on coarse vertical grids as used
here; see also</named-content></xref> and thus in a different estimate of optimal
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> than when applying a direct flux curve, such as in RetroMOPS. Therefore,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is included as the fourth parameter to be optimised. The effect of explicit
vs. implicit flux description on parameter estimate will be discussed in more
detail below.</p>
      <p>All other parameters (primary production, oxidant-dependent remineralisation,
stoichiometry) have been fixed to those obtained in optimisations
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). By doing so, optimisation RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> builds
upon previous optimisations of the more complex MOPS, and overlooks the faint
possibility that a parameter that is insensitive in one model, might not be
so in another. While it might be desirable to optimise all parameters of
RetroMOPS at once, this study rather aims at investigating to what extent
a simpler model can serve as a shortcut to the more complex one, given the
applied misfit function and observations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Parameter distribution of model simulations obtained during the
optimisation of MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whose misfit do not exceed
a threshold limit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10 %, red bars) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.01</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 %, open bars) of the minimum misfit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the
projection parameters of all model simulations in the optimisation trajectory
were grouped into 50 classes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Results (misfit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of sensitivity experiments with model
RetroMOPS, regarding parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for DOP
decay rate. The misfit of the reference scenario RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
indicated in bold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.502</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.480</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.480</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.466</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.476</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.493</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.503</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.522</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.539</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Optimal remineralisation parameters of MOPS</title>
      <p>Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are constrained very well by the
observations, as indicated by a well-defined minimum of the misfit function
(Fig. S3) and a narrow, almost Gaussian distribution of the best 10–1 %
of parameters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). On the other hand, parameters related to
the oxidant affinity of remineralisation or nitrogen fixation are determined
with lower accuracy. This is also reflected in the rather wide range of
candidate solutions within 1 ‰ of the best misfit, which vary
between 10 and 20 % of their assigned a priori range
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). Thus, in the presence of noise inherent in the
observations, some parameters could only be estimated within a quite wide
range of uncertainty, a feature that has already been addressed in
a one-dimensional model by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.75"/>. So far, the potential
consequences of this parametric uncertainty for other metrics (such as extent
of oxygen minimum zones, OMZs) and possibly transient scenarios (e.g. their
impact on simulated future evolution of OMZ volume) are not known.</p>
      <p>The good determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by dissolved inorganic tracers is in agreement
with earlier studies that applied the same model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.76"/>. Its optimal value is very close to that obtained in
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. higher than the value estimated by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.77"/>. Optimisation of maximum nitrogen fixation rate shows
a slightly skewed distribution, but suggests an overall good estimate of this
parameter. Optimal parameters for oxidant-dependent remineralisation also
show wide, skewed distributions, with their mode near the lower
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or upper (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
boundary.</p>
      <p>The high thresholds for the limitation of denitrification protect nitrate
from becoming depleted in the upwelling regions, particularly the eastern
equatorial Pacific, and resemble results obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.78"/>: To
prevent their model from reproducing unrealistically low nitrate values in
this region, they had to impose a threshold of
32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the occurrence of
denitrification. An explanation for this requirement of a high nitrate
threshold might be found in the representation of the equatorial intermediate
current system in coarse-resolution models, which can result in spurious
zonal oxygen gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.79"/>. It is possible
that the optimisation of biogeochemical parameters attempts to ameliorate
these effects, which are in fact caused by the parameterisation of physics.</p>
      <p>To further investigate the impact of this region on the parameter estimate,
an additional optimisation was carried out, that targets the same set of
parameters, but omits the eastern equatorial Pacific from the calculation of
the misfit function. This optimisation MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generates
a lower threshold of nitrate for the onset of denitrification, and a higher
maximum nitrogen fixation rate (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), resulting in slightly
enhanced fixed nitrogen turnover, particularly in the eastern equatorial
Pacific (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Compared to MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> the
estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> become more
uncertain with respect to the best 10 % to 1 ‰ individuals, and
even show a bimodal distribution (Fig. S4, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The
uncertainty in parameter estimates can be related to the missing data in
regions of simulated denitrification. Because the misfit function excludes
the EEP it is lower then when considering the entire ocean
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). A posteriori evaluation of misfit to the entire data
set results in a misfit of 0.439, the same as for MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The only moderate effect of the eastern equatorial Pacific on optimisation is
likely related to the small volume occupied by this region, compared to total
ocean volume.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Optimisation results: minimum misfit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, optimum parameters and
their uncertainties. To determine parameter uncertainty, we selected a group
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the 1 ‰ best individuals, i.e. individuals defined by
a misfit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The number of
these individuals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also denoted as fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all
individuals of the optimisation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number
of generations, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the population size. For each parameter
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the first column gives the optimal parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. the
average parameter of the last generation). The second and third column
present the parameter range of all individuals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, expressed as
absolute value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)), and normalised by the a priori range
of parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>):
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="16">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment:</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col12" align="center">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col14" nameend="col16" align="center">RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">[0.7–0.7]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 to 0.2]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">[0.4–0.5]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[8.9–10.3]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PHY</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[0.4–0.5]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ZOO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[1.6–2.0]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ZOO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[3.0–4.7]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">§</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.34</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[1.3–1.4]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[1.4–1.4]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">[1.4–1.4]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">[1.0–1.0]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">167.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[165–170]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">171.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[170–173]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">174.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">[174–176]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>NFix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[1.1–1.4]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.47</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">[1.4–1.6]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[13–16]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">[12–16]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[0.3–1.8]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">[0.5–1.4]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>DIN</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[30–34]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">31.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">[22–33]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.450</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.439</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.427</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">0.458</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1820</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1190</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">660</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">718</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">514</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1285</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">262</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><table-wrap-foot><p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{2mm}}?><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">§</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Note that from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the optimized parameter) in the model we calculate the rate
of vertical increase in sinking speed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, always assuming a
nominal detrital remineralization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Global annual fluxes of primary production (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), grazing (GRAZ),
fixed nitrogen loss through pelagic denitrification (NLOSS), export
production (F120, flux through 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), flux through 2250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(F2250) and benthic burial (BUR), in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the reference
experiment of MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RetroMOPS, for
which we show the fluxes of the (best) reference experiment,
RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the range of all sensitivity experiments, and the
optimised run, RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Also shown are some globally derived
observed estimates. Conversion between different elements was carried out via
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">122</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GRAZ</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NLOSS</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">F120</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">F2250</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">BUR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.098</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.918</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.107</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.051</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.117</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.102</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.056</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.018</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.068</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.080</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.055</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.022</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.083</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.081</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.053</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.021</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.078</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.194</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.043</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RetroMOPS (range)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.88–6.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.076–0.084</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.076–1.286</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.039–0.047</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.008–0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.071</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.052</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Observed<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.68–8.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.79–5.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05–0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.29–1.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03–0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Observed fluxes are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.80"><named-content content-type="post">primary
production</named-content></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.81"><named-content content-type="post">particle flux</named-content></xref>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.82"><named-content content-type="post">particle flux</named-content></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.83"><named-content content-type="post">particle flux</named-content></xref>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="text.84"><named-content content-type="post">primary production, zooplankton grazing excluding or including
mesozooplankton grazing</named-content></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.85"><named-content content-type="post">burial; without shelf
and slope region</named-content></xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.86"><named-content content-type="post">fixed nitrogen
loss</named-content></xref>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Global fixed nitrogen turnover depends on parameters for oxidant dependency
of remineralisation: in MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, both denitrification and
nitrogen fixation are very high (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), and outside the
observed range (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Because of the reduced affinity to
nitrate, in MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> pelagic fixed nitrogen loss is almost
halved and now agrees with observed global estimates (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>).
Further, as a result of lower denitrification, the nitrate deficit in the
eastern equatorial Pacific is smaller, but at the cost of a small
underestimate of observed oxygen in this region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The
latter is a consequence of the now very low half-saturation constant for
oxygen uptake (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). In MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
constraint on nitrate affinity is again relaxed, resulting in an enhancement
of fixed nitrogen turnover by about 20 %, towards the upper limit of
observed estimates (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Biogeochemical fluxes of MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Top: export production (here: sedimentation at
120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Second row from top: nitrogen fixation. Third row from top:
fixed nitrogen loss through pelagic denitrification. Bottom: sedimentation at
2250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. All fluxes in millimoles of nitrogen per squared metre per year (mmol N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Each
sub-panel also gives the global flux in teramoles of nitrate per year (Tmol N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Overall, optimising parameters related to the oxidant affinity of oxic and
suboxic remineralisation leads to a slightly improved fit to tracer
concentrations, to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of that of MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), and to a better agreement with observed estimates of
global biogeochemical fluxes (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Although the eastern
equatorial Pacific, and potential unresolved processes in simulated
circulation, has no effect on global misfit, its effect on some parameter
estimates results in an increase in global fixed nitrogen loss of
about 20 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>A shortcut for surface biology: RetroMOPS</title>
      <p>Given that parameters related to surface biology were difficult to constrain
in MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and, within a certain range, exert only
a small influence on the fit to global tracer distributions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.87"/>, this section examines if RetroMOPS, as a model that
parameterises surface biology in a much simpler way, suffices to represent
biogeochemical tracer fields. Starting from growth and decay parameters
optimised in MOPS, sensitivity experiments and optimisation search for
optimal parameters for DOP production and decay, that mimic the surface
nutrient turnover of MOPS.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Vertically averaged tracers of MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Top: phosphate. Second row from top: nitrate. Third row
from top: oxygen. Bottom: DOP. Phosphate (mmol P <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate
(mmol N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and oxygen (mmol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are
expressed as deviation from observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.88"/>,
and
DOP is given in absolute concentrations (mmol P <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Each sub-panel
also gives the global average tracer concentration (mmol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, but for three sensitivity experiments
with model RetroMOPS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Sensitivity to DOP production and decay</title>
      <p>In RetroMOPS fast DOP recycling results in higher primary production, export
production and deep organic particle flux, especially in the equatorial
upwelling regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). While this has only a small
effect on vertically or globally averaged phosphate concentrations
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), it causes
a large underestimate of nitrate in the ocean (Figs. S6 and
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The underestimate can be explained by the
tight coupling between production, export and denitrification, which leads to
higher denitrification and global fixed N loss
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), and thus a larger nitrate deficit (Fig. S6)
in the eastern equatorial Pacific, in agreement with effects hypothesised and
investigated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="normal.89"/>.</p>
      <p>In contrast, nitrogen fixation is not much affected by DOP turnover rates.
The imbalance between nitrogen losses and gains suggests that the models, even
after 3000 years of simulation, are not yet in equilibrium, which might be
explained by the large spatial scales between regions of fixed nitrogen loss
and gain. The divergence increases with higher DOP recycling rates (and thus
larger denitrification), indicating that there is no unique equilibration
timescale for one and the same model, but that it depends on biogeochemical
parameters associated with sinking and remineralisation of organic matter, as
observed earlier <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.90"/>. The resulting requirement for long
spin-up times for a complete model adjustment, their dependence on
biogeochemical parameters and the model's nonlinearity during spin-up
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.91"/> complicate model calibration and assessment, in addition
to those factors already investigated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.92"/>. It emphasises
the need for a thorough assessment of trade-offs between model complexity and
computational demand, and the possibility to examine the parameter space in
sufficient detail.</p>
      <p>The effect of DOP recycling on oxygen concentrations differs from its effect
on nitrate. With fast recycling DOP is remineralised mostly at its place of
production, and does not contribute much to oxygen consumption in deep waters
(see also Fig. S5). As a consequence, deep oxygen concentrations are high,
particularly in the northern North Pacific (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>), and
global average oxygen is overestimated by more than 10 %
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Slow DOP recycling, in contrast, leads
to less organic matter remineralisation in well-ventilated waters, but more
remineralisation in deep waters. This in turn results in an underestimate of
global mean oxygen of almost 10 % (for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is somewhat surprising, given
that production and export in this scenario are the lowest of all simulations
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Overall, the best fit to observed inorganic
tracer concentrations is achieved with moderate DOP recycling
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>).</p>
      <p>Most likely because of its fixed inventory, phosphate contributes to less
than one-third of the misfit function and is quite insensitive to changes in DOP
recycling rate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Nitrate and oxygen play
a larger role for model fit, because their inventory can adapt to changing
biogeochemistry. The misfit to nitrate and oxygen increases more or less in
concert with their bias (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Therefore, these
tracers with their flexible inventory provide some very useful constraints on
DOP recycling rates.</p>
      <p>Slow DOP recycling increases DOP concentrations at the surface, particularly
in the ACC and in the northern North Atlantic (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>)
towards concentrations that exceed the observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.93"/>. Only the simulation with
quite fast DOP recycling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results in reasonable
concentrations of DOP – but at the cost of too-high phosphate concentrations
along these sections, and a too-high global misfit (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>),
a too-low nitrate and too-high oxygen inventory (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>
and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Therefore, it should be noted that despite
the relatively good fit of RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, it nevertheless suffers
from a potential mismatch to DOP, which so far is not included in misfit
evaluation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, but for three sensitivity experiments with
model RetroMOPS.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Components of the misfit function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>; upper
panels) and model bias (lower panels), projected onto <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Bias is expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the global average model tracer, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> the average observed tracer, for the three tracers phosphate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; left panels), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; mid panels) and oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; right
panels). An open star indicates the respective lowest misfit or bias.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Optimal parameters for DOP cycling in RetroMOPS</title>
      <p>All four parameters of RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are well constrained by the
observations, as indicated by the narrow, almost Gaussian distribution around
the optimal parameter (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, S7, and
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). Optimisation reduces the decay rate for surface DOP,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to almost zero, i.e. in RetroMOPS there seems to be
no requirement for fast DOP turnover at the surface, similar to the results
obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.94"/>. The optimal total remineralisation rate of
DOP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is about 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, more than
twice as high as the recycling rate estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.95"/>, but
lower than the rates observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.96"/>. The optimal fraction
of primary production released as DOP, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is 73 % and agrees very
well with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.97"/>; however, their optimal
DOP decay rate was twice as high (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, but for optimisation RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>When optimising a simple biogeochemical model similar to RetroMOPS against
observed phosphate, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.98"/> noted a correlation between DOP
production fraction and decay rate, impeding the simultaneous estimation of
these parameters. On the contrary, in optimisation RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> both
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the DOP decay rates seem to be rather well constrained. An
analysis of the different components of the misfit function, similar to
Fig. 4 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.99"/>, helps to resolve this apparent contradiction.
For this, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> the total misfit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and its
components <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>), as well as the bias of the best
5 % of all individuals are mapped against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and DOP decay
timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Model misfit and relative bias <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
plotted for parameter combinations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and DOP decay timescale
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Relative bias is
evaluated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the global mean model concentration of tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> the observed mean. Model misfit is shown as total misfit
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>; upper left) and separated into its components,
normalised by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>; lower panels).
The analysis is restricted to all individuals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> whose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> differs less than
5 % from optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For better visibility
some model solutions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that are outside the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been omitted from the plot.
Open squares denote optimal estimates by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.100"><named-content content-type="post">total phosphate
constraint</named-content></xref>, open circles the optimal parameter from this
study.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/4965/2017/bg-14-4965-2017-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Note that the analysis depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> differs from
that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.101"/> in several aspects: firstly, their global
biogeochemical model was fully equilibrated (due to their direct evaluation
of steady state via Newton's method), whereas simulations of RetroMOPS may
still exhibit some drift in nitrogen inventory (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/> and Supplement). Second, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.102"/>
evaluated model sensitivity at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>
displays a region <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % around optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thirdly,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> maps only the misfit of solutions realised by
the optimisation routine, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.103"/> analysed the entire
parameter space at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most important, the misfit function applied here is
based on three components, with very different properties and associated timescales (see above), which can be advantageous for parameter estimation.</p>
      <p>The misfit to phosphate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, lower left panel)
indicates an elongated valley in the two-dimensional projection on DOP decay
timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (years) and DOP production fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and resembles
Fig. 4 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.104"/>. Indeed, one of the lowest misfits to phosphate
is achieved with about the same set of parameters as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.105"/>,
namely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, nitrate and oxygen
show a different and, partly, antagonistic pattern: the best fit to
observed nitrate is achieved with rather high values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between about 1 and 2 years, while the best fit to oxygen is obtained
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years. The superposition of
the different components of the misfit function leads to a unique optimum at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). Thus, oxygen and nitrate can provide some useful
independent information on these parameters.</p>
      <p>This can partly be explained by their non-conservative nature. As noted in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/> the inventory of these tracers may change
freely according to model parameterisation. The resulting bias to
observations thus adds two important components to the misfit function, both
of which are independent: while high DOP turnover (as simulated by low
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) biases nitrate low (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, upper mid panel),
the same value leads to an overestimate of oxygen
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, upper right panel; see also
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). This behaviour can be explained with the
different processes and boundary conditions for the two tracers already noted
in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>: a high DOP turnover leads to higher
fluxes and a tighter coupling of production and denitrification in upwelling
waters, causing a nitrate deficit in the model (see above, and Fig. S6). On
the other hand, it reduces preformed DOP in subducted waters, e.g. the
Southern Ocean, thereby decreasing aerobic remineralisation and oxygen
consumption in these waters on their passage towards, for example, the northern North
Pacific. The latter process increases oxygen particularly in deep waters
(Fig. S5).</p>
      <p>To summarise, including nitrate and oxygen as non-conservative tracers in the
misfit function helps to resolve parameters related to DOP production and
decay on long timescales. This can be explained by the different pathways of
DOP originating from upwelling regions or subducted water masses in the high
latitudes, and is confirmed by the analysis of sensitivity experiments
presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>. However, a better fit to
observed phosphate seems to come at the expense of a mismatch to observed DOP
concentration. It remains to be seen if a simultaneous fit to
observed inorganic and organic phosphorus is possible.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Comparison of MOPS and RetroMOPS</title>
      <p>The optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower than that of
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This may be
partially explained by the absence of numerical diffusion of detritus in
RetroMOPS. As shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.106"/>, in models that explicitly
simulate detritus sinking with an upstream scheme the assumption of
homogenous detritus distribution in each vertical grid box causes an
additional, usually downward transport of detritus. This results in an
effective <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> which is about 10–20 % smaller (corresponding to faster
sinking) than the nominally prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Optimisation of MOPS accounts for
this additional numerical transport by increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> reducing sinking
velocity) by some amount. Therefore, optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of MOPS without any
influence from numerical diffusion would likely be around 1.1–1.2, i.e. closer
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering this effect, the optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and, in particular, RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> agrees with
the optimal value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.107"/>.</p>
      <p>Despite its generally lower fluxes, fixed nitrogen loss in the eastern
equatorial Pacific is higher in RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> than in
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), resulting in a nitrate
deficit in this region. Likely, the instantaneous remineralisation of sinking
material inherent in the direct flux parameterisation of RetroMOPS causes
a tighter spatial coupling between production, sinking, remineralisation and
upwelling (see also Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>). It has been suggested
earlier that the production of slowly degradable organic matter above
upwelling regions and/or oxygen minimum zones may help to decouple these
processes and avoid a runaway effect of nitrate loss <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.108"/>. The very low optimal value for surface DOP turnover
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> found in this study, and also in the study by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.109"/>, supports this finding.</p>
      <p>Simulated biogeochemical fluxes of RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally lower
than those of MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and their horizontal pattern is
less pronounced (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). This likely arises from the
prescribed, constant phytoplankton concentration of RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
mutes biogeochemical dynamics in productive regions of the high latitudes and
upwelling areas. Because RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> applies the same parameters as
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for oxidant-dependent processes, its global fixed
nitrogen loss and gain is comparable to that of the more complex model.</p>
      <p>The total misfit to observed dissolved tracer concentrations of
RetroMOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is only about 4 % higher than that of
MOPS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that even the simple RetroMOPS can
perform almost as well as MOPS with respect to annual mean phosphate,
nitrate and oxygen. As for MOPS, optimisation of RetroMOPS against dissolved
tracer concentrations results in a good fit to global estimates of
biogeochemical fluxes (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>), and indicates that these tracers
can provide means to calibrate biogeochemical model fluxes on a global scale,
even – or especially – for a model as simple as RetroMOPS.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>How much complexity is needed?</title>
      <p>Current, state-of-the-art biogeochemical models address questions such as the
future evolution of oxygen minimum zones, or uptake of anthropogenic carbon
by the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.110"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
Compared to these models, MOPS and RetroMOPS, presented here, are of a rather
low structural complexity. RetroMOPS is quite similar to early models
addressing these tasks, among them the pioneering work of Ernst Maier-Reimer
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.111"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, while MOPS
resembles models of intermediate complexity such as HAMOCC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.112"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> or HadOCC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.113"/>. However, very simple models such as RetroMOPS are
still being used, e.g. for inverse methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.114"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> or to investigate specific processes, where their computational
efficiency and structural simplicity facilitates model analysis
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.115"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In contrast to these
very simple model are models that simulate different plankton groups and size
classes of detritus, e.g. PISCES <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.116"/>, MEDUSA
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.117"/> or PlankTOM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.118"/>.</p>
      <p>Despite this large range of structural complexity, there have been only few
studies which evaluate these models against a common data set, and with
a common circulation. One example is the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.119"/>,
who compared the output of six different global biogeochemical models,
coupled to a common circulation model, and simulated over 118 years,
against data sets of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, DIC, alkalinity, DIN,
Chl <italic>a</italic> and primary production. The models varied in complexity from
7 to 57 compartments, and thus also in their computational demand by
almost a factor of 5. To assess model skill <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.120"/>
ranked the models with respect to spatial correlation between, and variance
of, model and observations. In general, the more complex models performed
better with respect to simulated variance, but the simpler models performed better with
respect to spatial correlation. Although no model was superior across all
metrics, they concluded that “Results suggest little evidence that higher
biological complexity implies better model performance in reproducing
observed global-scale bulk properties of ocean biogeochemistry”
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.121"/>.</p>
      <p>The lack of distinction between models and their ability to represent
biogeochemical tracers is corroborated by the study by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.122"/>, who evaluated three different biogeochemical ocean
models within a common framework for the Earth system. The models varied in
complexity between 1 and 30 components. Following a spin-up over
100 years, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.123"/> analysed both a transient and
pre-industrial scenario with respect to the model's representation of
macronutrients, oxygen, DIC and export. All three models performed quite
similarly with respect to the observed tracer fields, as well as with the
transient evolution of carbon uptake and oxygen concentrations. Therefore, in
the presence of noise inherent in observations, and given the sparsity of
biological data sets, the question of whether more complexity is indeed beneficial seems unresolved so far – at least if the model is supposed to represent mostly
biogeochemical processes, instead of biological interactions, and is compared
against bulk biogeochemical properties.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Based on a global metric for biogeochemical tracers, this study
assessed the skill of two optimised global biogeochemical ocean models, as
well as the metric's capability to constrain the often uncertain model
parameters.</p>
      <p>Similar to an earlier study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.124"/> that targeted parameters
relevant for biogeochemical processes at the sea surface, parameters for
oxidant-dependent processes in the mesopelagic zone could only be determined with
a wide range of uncertainty. The reason for this lack of resolution can be
found in the small volume occupied by either surface or oxygen minimum zones
(where oxidant dependency is of relevance). Omission of the eastern
equatorial Pacific from the misfit function increases uncertainty in
parameter estimates, but does not fundamentally alter the outcome of
optimisation, likely because of the small volume of this region.</p>
      <p>In contrast, parameters relevant for large-scale, global distributions of
oxygen, such as remineralisation length scale or stoichiometry, could be
determined well; these parameters were very similar in all experiments, and
point towards a shorter remineralisation length scale of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
compared to the canonical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.858</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.125"/>.</p>
      <p>Despite the uncertainty in estimates of some parameters, and very small
differences between models in the residual misfit, optimisation of parameters
for oxidant-dependent processes results in a much better fit to observed
estimates of global fixed nitrogen turnover. The remaining mismatch to
observations can partly be attributed to circulation. Model optimisations
with different parameterisations of circulation and the equatorial
intermediate current system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.126"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. using TMs extracted from the UVic
model;</named-content></xref> will help to examine, if a different parameterisation
alters the current requirement for a very high nitrate threshold of
denitrification, that currently helps to prevent nitrate from depletion.</p>
      <p>Oxygen and nitrate add important additional constraints on the estimation of
biogeochemical parameters. Of particular importance is that, in addition to
the spatial information they provide, their flexible inventory introduces the
bias as additional information for model calibration. The different timescales and
space scales of processes relevant for their inventory may help to constrain
parameters that govern dissolved organic matter production and decay. The
effect of these tracers on parameter estimates is of particular importance
for models such as RetroMOPS and MOPS, that aim at conserving all oxidants.
It may be weaker for models that continue remineralisation even under suboxic
and/or low nitrate conditions, thereby implicitly assuming some “hidden”
oxidants. In these models it could be useful to track and examine potential
oxidant deficits for model evaluation.</p>
      <p>DOP recycling rate affects surface DOP and phosphate concentrations conversely. If the model performs well with respect to DOP, it overestimates phosphate concentrations. If the
model performs well with respect to phosphate, it overestimates surface DOP.
Observations of DOP as an additional constraint on model parameters will help us to
find out if there is a model solution that fits all tracers equally well.</p>
      <p>With respect to annual mean tracer concentrations the simple model RetroMOPS
can perform almost as well as the more complex model MOPS, the residual
misfit being only 5 % larger. Spatial patterns of fluxes in RetroMOPS are
less pronounced, but global tracer concentrations, inventories and fluxes are
comparable to that of MOPS, and in agreement with observed estimates.</p>
      <p>Although it is obvious that low- to intermediate-complexity models such as the
models presented here cannot represent the level of detail embedded in models
with, for example, several plankton size classes, so far evaluation with respect to
the bulk biogeochemical observations does not seem to indicate any
superiority of more complex models on a global scale. This of course may
change if our scientific interest and model purpose is directed towards
shorter timescales, or surface patterns, for which the misfit function
applied provides little information. In this case more complex data sets,
such as different plankton groups, or particle size distribution, may provide
further insight about the level of model complexity required. If focusing on
large scales, however, a simple model such as RetroMOPS or similarly simple
models may suffice to represent and analyse much of the biogeochemical
dynamics in the ocean.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>Model and optimization output and code are
available at <uri>http://data.geomar.de/thredds/catalog/open_access/kriest_2017_bg/catalog.html</uri>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4965-2017-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4965-2017-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declares that she has no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p>This article is part of the special issue“Progress in
quantifying ocean biogeochemistry – in honour of Ernst Maier-Reimer”. This paper is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I am very thankful for having met Ernst Maier-Reimer, who pioneered global
biogeochemical modelling. In his thoughtful and kind way he taught me to view
global ocean biogeochemistry before the background of long timescales and large
space scales.</p><p>This work is a contribution to the DFG-supported project SFB754 and to the BMBF
joint project PalMod (FKZ 01LP1512A). Parallel supercomputing resources have
been provided by the North-German Supercomputing Alliance (HLRN). The author
wishes to acknowledge use of the Ferret program of NOAA's Pacific Marine
Environmental Laboratory for analysis and graphics in this paper. I thank
three anonymous reviewers and Friederike Hoffmann for their constructive and
helpful comments.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Christoph Heinze <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Friederike Hoffmann and three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Anderson(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can
walk?, J. Plankton
Res., 27, 1073–1081, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Anderson(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, T. R.: Confronting complexity: reply to Le Quere and Flynn, J. Plankton Res.,
28, 877–878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/fbl016</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Aumont et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp,
L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bacastow and Maier-Reimer(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Bacastow, R. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Ocean-circulation model of the carbon
cycle, Clim. Dynam., 4, 95–125, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bacastow and Maier-Reimer(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Bacastow, R. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Dissolved organic carbon in modeling
oceanic new production, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 5, 71–85, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Breitbarth et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Breitbarth, E., Oschlies, A., and LaRoche, J.:
Physiological constraints on the global distribution of <italic>Trichodesmium</italic> – effect of temperature on diazotrophy,
Biogeosciences, 4, 53–61, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-53-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-53-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Buesseler et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K., Lamborg, C., Boyd, P., Lam, P., Trull, T., Bidigare, R.,
Bishop, J., Casciotti, K., Dehairs, F., Elskens, M., Honda, M., Karl, D.,
Siegel, D., Silver, M., Steinberg, D., Valdes, J., Mooy, B. V., and
Wilson, S.: Revisiting carbon flux through the ocean's twilight zone,
Science, 316, 567–570, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Cabre et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Cabré, A., Marinov, I., Bernardello, R., and Bianchi, D.: Oxygen minimum
zones in the tropical Pacific across CMIP5 models: mean state differences and
climate change trends,
Biogeosciences, 12, 5429–5454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5429-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-5429-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Carr et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Carr, M.-E.,
Friedrichs, M., Schmeltz, M., Aitac, M., Antoine, D., Arrigo, K.,
Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Barber, R., Behrenfeld, M., Bidigare, R.,
Buitenhuis, E., Campbell, J., Ciotti, A., Dierssen, H., Dowell, M.,
Dunne, J., Esaias, W., Gentili, B., Gregg, W.,, Groom, S., Hoepffner, N.,
Ishizaka, J., Kameda, T., Quere, C. L., Lohrenz, S., Marra, J., lino, F. M.,
Moore, K., Morel, A., Reddy, T., J.Ryan, Scardi, M., T.Smyth, Turpie, K.,
Tilstone, G., Waters, K., and Yamanaka, Y.: A comparison of global estimates
of marine primary production from ocean color, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53,
741–770, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Cocco et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Cocco, V., Joos, F., Steinacher, M., Frölicher, T. L., Bopp, L., Dunne,
J., Gehlen, M., Heinze, C., Orr, J., Oschlies, A., Schneider, B.,
Segschneider, J., and Tjiputra, J.: Oxygen and indicators of stress for
marine life in multi-model global warming projections, Biogeosciences, 10,
1849–1868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>DeVries et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>DeVries, T., Liang, J.-H., and Deutsch, C.: A mechanistic
particle flux model applied to the oceanic phosphorus cycle, Biogeosciences, 11, 5381–5398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Dietze and Loeptien(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Dietze, H. and Loeptien, U.: Revisiting “nutrient trapping” in global coupled
biogeochemical ocean circulation models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 265–284, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Doney et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Doney, S., Lindsay, K., Caldeira, K., Campin, J., Drange, H., Dutay, J., Follows, M., Gao, Y.,
Gnanadesikan, A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Madec, G., Maier-Reimer, E., Marshall, J., Matear, R., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Najjar, R., Orr, J., Plattner, G., Sarmiento, J., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R., Totterdell, I., Weirig, M., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.:
Evaluating global ocean carbon models: the importance of realistic physics,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB3017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GB002150</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Dunne et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L., and Gnanadesikan, A.: A synthesis of global
particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through the ocean interior
and on the seafloor, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4006,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002907</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Dutay et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Dutay, J., Bullister, J. L., Doney, S. C., Orr, J. C., Najjar, R.,
Caldeira, K., Campin, J., Drange, H., Follows, M., Gao, Y., Gruber, N.,
Hecht, M. W., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Lindsay, K., Madec, G.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Marshall, J. C., Matear, R. J., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Plattner, G., Sarmiento, J., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R., Totterdell, I. J.,
Weirig, M., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Evaluation of ocean model ventilation
with CFC-11: comparison of 13 global ocean models,
Ocean Model., 4, 89–120, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Dutkiewicz et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Dutkiewicz, S., Follows, M., and Parekh, P.: Interactions of the iron and
phosphorous cycles: a three-dimensional model study, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
19, GB1021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002342</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Dutkiewicz et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Dutkiewicz, S., Follows, M., Heimbach, P., and Marshall, J.: Controls on
ocean productivity and air–sea carbon flux: an adjoint model sensitivity
study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024987" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL024987</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Flynn(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Flynn, K. J.: Reply to Horizons Article “Plankton functional type modelling:
running before we can walk” Anderson (2005): II. Putting trophic
functionality into plankton functional types, J. Plankton Res., 28,
873–875, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/fbl015</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Galbraith et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Galbraith, E. D., Dunne, J. P., Gnanadesikan, A., Slater, R. D.,
Sarmiento, J. L., Dufour, C. O., de Souza, G. F., Bianchi, D., Claret, M.,
Rodgers, K. B., and Marvasti, S. S.: Complex functionality with minimal
computation: promise and pitfalls of reduced-tracer ocean biogeochemistry
models, J. Adv. Model. Earth. Sy., 7, 2012–2028,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015MS000463</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Garcia et al.(2006a)</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A.,
Boyer, T. P., and Antonov, J. I.: World Ocean Atlas 2005, Vol. 4: Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), in: NOAA Atlas
NESDIS 64, edited by: Levitus, S., US Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC, 2006a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Garcia et al.(2006b)</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., and Antonov, J. I.: World
Ocean Atlas 2005, Vol. 3: Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and
Oxygen Saturation, in: NOAA Atlas NESDIS 63, edited by: Levitus, S., US
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Getzlaff and Dietze(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Getzlaff, J. and Dietze, H.: Effects of increased isopycnal diffusivity
mimicking the unresolved equatorial intermediate current system in an earth
system climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2166–2170, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Graven et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Graven, H., Gruber, N., Key, R., Khatiwala, S., and Gireaud, X.: Changing
controls on oceanic radiocarbon: New insights on shallow-to-deep ocean
exchange and anthropogenic CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C10005,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008074</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Hansen(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, N.: The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review, in: Towards a New Evolutionary
Computation. Advances on Estimation of Distribution Algorithms, edited by: Lozano, J. A., Larranaga, P., Inza, I., Bengoetxea, E.,
Springer, 75–102, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hansen and Ostermeier(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, N. and Ostermeier, A.: Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution
strategies, Evol. Comput., 9, 159–195, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Holzer et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Holzer, M., Primeau, F., DeVries, T., and Matear, R.: The Southern Ocean
silicon trap: Data-constrained estimates of regenerated silicic acid,
trapping efficiencies, and global transport paths, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean.,
119, 313–331, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009356" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JC009356</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Honjo et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S., Manganini, S. J., Krishfield, R. A., and Francois, R.: Particulate
organic carbon fluxes to the ocean interior and factors controlling the
biological pump: A synthesis of global sediment trap programs since 1983,
Prog. Oceanogr., 76, 217–285, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Hopkinson et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkinson, C., Vallino, J., and Nolin, A.: Decomposition of dissolved organic
matter from the continental margin, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 4461–4478,
f2c, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Ilyina et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Ilyina, T., Six, K., Segschneider, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Li, H., and nez
Riboni, I. N.: Global ocean biogeochemistry model HAMOCC: model
architecture and performance as component of the MPI-Earth system model in
different CMIP5 experimental realizations, J. Adv. Model. Earth. Sy., 5,
1–29, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Khatiwala(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Khatiwala, S.: A computational framework for simulation of biogeochemical
tracers in the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB3001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB002923</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Khatiwala(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Khatiwala, S.: Fast spin up of ocean biogeochemical models using matrix-free
Newton–Krylov, Ocean Model., 23, 121–129, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Khatiwala et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Khatiwala, S., Visbeck, M., and Cane, M. A.: Accelerated
simulation of passive tracers in ocean circulation models, Ocean Model., 9, 51–69, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: Numerical effects on organic matter sedimentation and
remineralization in biogeochemical ocean models, Ocean Model., 39, 275–283, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: Swept under the carpet: organic matter burial decreases
global ocean biogeochemical model sensitivity to remineralization length scale, Biogeosciences, 10, 8401–8422,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8401-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-8401-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: MOPS-1.0: towards a model for the regulation of the
global oceanic nitrogen budget by marine biogeochemical processes, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2929–2957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2929-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2929-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Kriest et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I., Khatiwala, S., and Oschlies, A.: Towards an assessment of simple
global marine biogeochemical models of different complexity, Prog. Oceanogr.,
86, 337–360, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kriest et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Kriest, I., Oschlies, A., and Khatiwala, S.: Sensitivity analysis of simple
global marine biogeochemical models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2029,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004072" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004072</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Kriest et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Kriest, I., Sauerland, V., Khatiwala, S., Srivastav, A., and Oschlies, A.:
Calibrating a global three-dimensional biogeochemical ocean model (MOPS-1.0),
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 127–154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Kvale et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Kvale, K. F., Khatiwala, S., Dietze, H., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.:
Evaluation of the transport matrix method for simulation of ocean
biogeochemical tracers, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2425–2445,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2425-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-2425-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Kwiatkowski et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Kwiatkowski, L., Yool, A., Allen, J. I., Anderson, T. R., Barciela, R.,
Buitenhuis, E. T., Butenschön, M., Enright, C., Halloran, P. R., Le
Quéré, C., de Mora, L., Racault, M.-F., Sinha, B., Totterdell, I. J.,
and Cox, P. M.: iMarNet: an ocean biogeochemistry model intercomparison
project within a common physical ocean modelling framework, Biogeosciences,
11, 7291–7304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Kwon and Primeau(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Kwon, E. Y. and Primeau, F.: Optimization and sensitivity study of
a biogeochemistry ocean model using an implicit solver and in situ phosphate
data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002631" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GB002631</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Kwon and Primeau(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Kwon, E. Y. and Primeau, F.: Optimization and sensitivity of a global
biogeochemistry ocean model using combined in situ DIC, alkalinity, and
phosphate data, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C08011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004520</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Kwon et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento, J.: The impact of remineralization
depth on the air–sea carbon balance, Nat. Geosci., 2, 630–635, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Landolfi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Landolfi, A., Dietze, H., Koeve, W., and Oschlies, A.: Overlooked runaway
feedback in the marine nitrogen cycle: the vicious cycle, Biogeosciences, 10,
1351–1363,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1351-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-1351-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Leles et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Leles, S., Valentin, J., and Figueiredo, G.: Evaluation of the complexity and
performance of marine planktonic trophic models, Anais da Academia Brasileira
de Ciências, 88, 1971–1991, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1590/0001-3765201620150588</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Le Quere(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Le Quere, C.: Reply to Horizons Article “Plankton functional type
modelling: running before we can walk” Anderson (2005): I. Abrupt changes in
marine ecosystems?, J. Plankton Res., 28, 871–872,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/fbl014</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Le Quere et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Le Quere, C., Harrison, S., Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E., Aumont, O.,
Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud, X., Klaas, C.,
Kohfeld, K., Legendre, L., Manizza, M., Platt, T., Rivkin, R.,
Sathyendranath, S., Uitz, J., Watson, A., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Ecosystem
dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry
models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2016–2040,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Letscher and Moore(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Letscher, R. and Moore, J. K.: Preferential remineralization of dissolved
organic phosphorus and non-Redfield DOM dynamics in the global ocean: Impacts
on marine productivity, nitrogen fixation, and carbon export, Global.
Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 325–340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004904" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB004904</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Letscher et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Letscher, R. T., Moore, J. K., Teng, Y.-C., and Primeau, F.: Variable C : N : P
stoichiometry of dissolved organic matter cycling in the Community Earth
System Model, Biogeosciences,
12, 209–221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-209-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-209-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Li and Primeau(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. and Primeau, F.: A fast Newton–Krylov solver for seasonally varying global ocean
biogeochemistry models, Ocean Model., 23, 13–20, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Löptien and Dietze(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Löptien, U. and Dietze, H.: Constraining parameters in marine pelagic
ecosystem models – is it actually feasible with typical observations of
standing stocks?, Ocean Sci., 11, 573–590,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-573-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-11-573-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Lutz et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Lutz, M., Caldeira, K., Dunbar, R., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Seasonal rhythms
of net primary production and particulate organic carbon flux to depth
describe biological pump efficiency in the global ocean, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, C10011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003706" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JC003706</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Maier-Reimer(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Maier-Reimer, E.: Geochemical cycles in an ocean general circulation
model. Preindustrial tracer distributions, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 7, 645–677, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Maier-Reimer et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Maier-Reimer, E., Kriest, I., Segschneider, J., and Wetzel, P.: The HAMburg
Ocean Carbon Cycle Model HAMOCC 5.1 – Technical Description Release 1.1,
Reports on Earth System Science 14, Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology,
Hamburg, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Marchal et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchal, O., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A latitude-depth,
circulation-biogeochemical ocean model for paleoclimate studies. Development
and sensitivities, Tellus B, 50, 290–316, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Marshall et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, J., Adcroft, A., Hill, C., Perelman, L., and Heisey, C.:
A finite-volume, incompressible Navier–Stokes model for studies of the
ocean on parallel computers, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 5733–5752, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Martin et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: VERTEX:
carbon cycling in the Northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 34, 267–285, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Matear and Hirst(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Matear, R. J., and Hirst, A. C.: Long-term changes in dissolved oxygen
concentrations in the ocean caused by protracted global warming, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001997" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GB001997</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Matsumoto, K., Sarmiento, J. L., Key, R. M., Aumont, O., Bullister, J. L.,
Caldeira, K., Campin, J., Doney, S. C., Drange, H., Dutay, J., Follows, M.,
Gao, Y., Gnanadesikan, A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Marshall, J. C., Matear, R. J., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Najjar, R., Plattner, G., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R., Swathi, P. S.,
Totterdell, I. J., Weirig, M., Yamanaka, Y., Yool, A., and Orr, J. C.:
Evaluation of ocean carbon cycle models with data-based metrics, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 31, L07303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018970</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Moore and Doney(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Moore, J. K. and Doney, S. C.: Iron availability limits the ocean nitrogen
inventory stabilizing feedbacks between marine denitrification and nitrogen
fixation, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB2001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002762</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Najjar et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Najjar, R. G., Jin, X., Louanchi, F., Aumont, O., Caldeira, K., Doney, S. C.,
Dutay, J.-C., Follows, M., Gruber, N., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Matear, R., Matsumoto, K., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Orr, J. C., Plattner, G.-K., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R. D.,
Weirig, M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Impact of circulation on export
production, dissolved organic matter and dissolved oxygen in the ocean:
results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison Project
(OCMIP-2), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB3007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002857</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Orr et al.(2000)Orr, Najjar, Sabine, and Joos</label><mixed-citation>Orr, J., Najjar, R., Sabine, C. L., and Joos, F.: Abiotic – HOWTO. Internal
OCMIP Report, Tech. Rep. revision: 1.16, 25 pp., LSCE/CEA, Saclay,
Gif-sur-Yvette, France, available at:
<uri>ocmip5.ipsl.jussieu.fr/OCMIP/phase2/simulations/Abiotic/HOWTO-Abiotic.html</uri>
(last access: 28 November 2013), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Palmer and Totterdell(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Palmer, J. and Totterdell, I.: Production and export in a global ocean
ecosystem model, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 48, 1169–1198,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00080-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00080-7</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Parekh et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Parekh, P., Follows, M. J., and Boyle, E. A.: Decoupling of iron and
phosphate in the global ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB2020,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002280</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Paulmier et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Paulmier, A., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.: Stoichiometries of
remineralisation and denitrification in global biogeochemical ocean models,
Biogeosciences, 6, 923–935,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-923-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Piwonski and Slawig(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Piwonski, J. and Slawig, T.: Metos3D: the Marine Ecosystem Toolkit for
Optimization and Simulation in 3-D – Part 1: Simulation Package v0.3.2,
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3729–3750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3729-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-3729-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Priess et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Priess, M., Koziel, S., and Slawig, T.: Marine ecosystem model calibration
with real data using enhanced surrogate-based optimization, J. Comput.
Sci.-Neth., 4, 423–437, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Primeau and Deleersnijder(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Primeau, F. and Deleersnijder, E.: On the time to tracer equilibrium in the
global ocean, Ocean Sci., 5, 13–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-5-13-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-5-13-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Primeau et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Primeau, F., Holzer, M., and DeVries, T.: Southern Ocean nutrient trapping
and the efficiency of the biological pump, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118,
2547–2564, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Raimbault et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Raimbault, P., Garcia, N., and Cerutti, F.: Distribution of inorganic and
organic nutrients in the South Pacific Ocean – evidence for long-term
accumulation of organic matter in nitrogen-depleted waters, Biogeosciences,
5, 281–298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-281-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-281-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Schartau et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Schartau, M., Wallhead, P., Hemmings, J., Löptien, U., Kriest, I.,
Krishna, S., Ward, B. A., Slawig, T., and Oschlies, A.: Reviews and
syntheses: parameter identification in marine planktonic ecosystem modelling,
Biogeosciences, 14, 1647–1701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Schmoker et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmoker, C., Hernandez-Leon, S., and Calbet, A.: Microzooplankton grazing in
the oceans: impacts, data variability, knowledge gaps and future directions,
J. Plankton Res., 35, 691–706, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Séférian et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Séférian, R., Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Marti,
O., Dunne, J. P., Christian, J. R., Doney, S. C., Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K.,
Halloran, P. R., Heinze, C., Segschneider, J., Tjiputra, J., Aumont, O., and
Romanou, A.: Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications
for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
1827–1851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Shimoda and Arhonditsis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Shimoda, Y. and Arhonditsis, G.: Phytoplankton functional type modelling:
Running before we can walk? A critical evaluation of the current state of
knowledge, Ecol. Model., 320, 29–43,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.029</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Siberlin and Wunsch(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Siberlin, C. and Wunsch, C.: Oceanic tracer and proxy time scales revisited,
Clim. Past, 7, 27–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-27-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-7-27-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Six and Maier-Reimer(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Six, K. D. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Effects of plankton dynamics on seasonal
carbon fluxes in an ocean general circulation model, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
10, 559–583, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Torres-Valdes et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Torres-Valdes, S., Roussenov, V., Sanders, R., Reynolds, S., Pan, X.,
Mather, R., Landolfi, A., Wolff, G., Achterberg, E., and Williams, R.:
Distribution of dissolved organic nutrients and their effect on export
production over the Atlantic Ocean Distribution of dissolved organic
nutrients and their effect on export production over the Atlantic Ocean,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB4019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003389</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Van Mooy et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Mooy, B., Keil, R., and Devol, A.: Impact of suboxia on sinking
particulate organic carbon: Enhanced carbon flux and preferential degradation
of amino acids via denitrificiation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66, 457–465,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Wallmann(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Wallmann, K.: Phosphorus imbalance in the global ocean?, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 24, GB4030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003643</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Ward et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, B., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Anderson, T., and Oschlies, A.: Parameter
optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine
biogeochemical models, J. Marine. Syst., 81, 34–43, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Wunsch and Heimbach(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Wunsch, C. and Heimbach, P.: How long to oceanic tracer and proxy
equilibrium?, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 27, 637–651, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Yool et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: Medusa-1.0: a new intermediate
complexity plankton ecosystem model for the global domain, Geosci. Model
Dev., 4, 381–417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-381-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-381-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Yool et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate
complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change
and ocean acidification studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1767–1811,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Yoshimura et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Yoshimura, T., Nishioka, J., Saito, H., Takeda, S., Tsuda, A., and
Wells, M. L.: Distributions of particulate and dissolved organic and
inorganic phosphorus in North Pacific surface waters, Mar. Chem., 103,
112–121, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Calibration of a simple and a complex model of global marine biogeochemistry</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The assessment of the ocean biota's role in climate change is often carried
out with global biogeochemical ocean models that contain many components and
involve a high level of parametric uncertainty. Because many data that relate
to tracers included in a model are only sparsely observed, assessment of
model skill is often restricted to tracers that can be easily measured and
assembled. Examination of the models' fit to climatologies of inorganic
tracers, after the models have been spun up to steady state, is a common but
computationally expensive procedure to assess model performance and
reliability. Using new tools that have become available for global model
assessment and calibration in steady state, this paper examines two different
model types – a complex seven-component model (MOPS) and a very simple
four-component model (RetroMOPS) – for their fit to dissolved quantities.
Before comparing the models, a subset of their biogeochemical parameters has
been optimised against annual-mean nutrients and oxygen. Both model types fit
the observations almost equally well. The simple model contains only two
nutrients: oxygen and dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP). Its misfit and
large-scale tracer distributions are sensitive to the parameterisation of DOP
production and decay. The spatio-temporal decoupling of nitrogen and oxygen,
and processes involved in their uptake and release, renders oxygen and
nitrate valuable tracers for model calibration. In addition, the
non-conservative nature of these tracers (with respect to their upper
boundary condition) introduces the global bias (fixed nitrogen and oxygen
inventory) as a useful additional constraint on model parameters. Dissolved
organic phosphorus at the surface behaves antagonistically to phosphate, and
suggests that observations of this tracer – although difficult to measure –
may be an important asset for model calibration.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Anderson(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can
walk?, J. Plankton
Res., 27, 1073–1081, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Anderson(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, T. R.: Confronting complexity: reply to Le Quere and Flynn, J. Plankton Res.,
28, 877–878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl016</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Aumont et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp,
L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bacastow and Maier-Reimer(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Bacastow, R. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Ocean-circulation model of the carbon
cycle, Clim. Dynam., 4, 95–125, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bacastow and Maier-Reimer(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Bacastow, R. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Dissolved organic carbon in modeling
oceanic new production, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 5, 71–85, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Breitbarth et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Breitbarth, E., Oschlies, A., and LaRoche, J.:
Physiological constraints on the global distribution of <i>Trichodesmium</i> – effect of temperature on diazotrophy,
Biogeosciences, 4, 53–61, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-53-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-53-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Buesseler et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K., Lamborg, C., Boyd, P., Lam, P., Trull, T., Bidigare, R.,
Bishop, J., Casciotti, K., Dehairs, F., Elskens, M., Honda, M., Karl, D.,
Siegel, D., Silver, M., Steinberg, D., Valdes, J., Mooy, B. V., and
Wilson, S.: Revisiting carbon flux through the ocean's twilight zone,
Science, 316, 567–570, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cabre et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Cabré, A., Marinov, I., Bernardello, R., and Bianchi, D.: Oxygen minimum
zones in the tropical Pacific across CMIP5 models: mean state differences and
climate change trends,
Biogeosciences, 12, 5429–5454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5429-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5429-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Carr et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Carr, M.-E.,
Friedrichs, M., Schmeltz, M., Aitac, M., Antoine, D., Arrigo, K.,
Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Barber, R., Behrenfeld, M., Bidigare, R.,
Buitenhuis, E., Campbell, J., Ciotti, A., Dierssen, H., Dowell, M.,
Dunne, J., Esaias, W., Gentili, B., Gregg, W.,, Groom, S., Hoepffner, N.,
Ishizaka, J., Kameda, T., Quere, C. L., Lohrenz, S., Marra, J., lino, F. M.,
Moore, K., Morel, A., Reddy, T., J.Ryan, Scardi, M., T.Smyth, Turpie, K.,
Tilstone, G., Waters, K., and Yamanaka, Y.: A comparison of global estimates
of marine primary production from ocean color, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 53,
741–770, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Cocco et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Cocco, V., Joos, F., Steinacher, M., Frölicher, T. L., Bopp, L., Dunne,
J., Gehlen, M., Heinze, C., Orr, J., Oschlies, A., Schneider, B.,
Segschneider, J., and Tjiputra, J.: Oxygen and indicators of stress for
marine life in multi-model global warming projections, Biogeosciences, 10,
1849–1868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1849-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>DeVries et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
DeVries, T., Liang, J.-H., and Deutsch, C.: A mechanistic
particle flux model applied to the oceanic phosphorus cycle, Biogeosciences, 11, 5381–5398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Dietze and Loeptien(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Dietze, H. and Loeptien, U.: Revisiting “nutrient trapping” in global coupled
biogeochemical ocean circulation models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 265–284, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Doney et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Doney, S., Lindsay, K., Caldeira, K., Campin, J., Drange, H., Dutay, J., Follows, M., Gao, Y.,
Gnanadesikan, A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Madec, G., Maier-Reimer, E., Marshall, J., Matear, R., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Najjar, R., Orr, J., Plattner, G., Sarmiento, J., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R., Totterdell, I., Weirig, M., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.:
Evaluating global ocean carbon models: the importance of realistic physics,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB3017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002150</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Dunne et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L., and Gnanadesikan, A.: A synthesis of global
particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through the ocean interior
and on the seafloor, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB4006,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002907</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Dutay et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Dutay, J., Bullister, J. L., Doney, S. C., Orr, J. C., Najjar, R.,
Caldeira, K., Campin, J., Drange, H., Follows, M., Gao, Y., Gruber, N.,
Hecht, M. W., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Lindsay, K., Madec, G.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Marshall, J. C., Matear, R. J., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Plattner, G., Sarmiento, J., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R., Totterdell, I. J.,
Weirig, M., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Evaluation of ocean model ventilation
with CFC-11: comparison of 13 global ocean models,
Ocean Model., 4, 89–120, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Dutkiewicz et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Dutkiewicz, S., Follows, M., and Parekh, P.: Interactions of the iron and
phosphorous cycles: a three-dimensional model study, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
19, GB1021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002342" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002342</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Dutkiewicz et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Dutkiewicz, S., Follows, M., Heimbach, P., and Marshall, J.: Controls on
ocean productivity and air–sea carbon flux: an adjoint model sensitivity
study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024987</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Flynn(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Flynn, K. J.: Reply to Horizons Article “Plankton functional type modelling:
running before we can walk” Anderson (2005): II. Putting trophic
functionality into plankton functional types, J. Plankton Res., 28,
873–875, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl015</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Galbraith et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. D., Dunne, J. P., Gnanadesikan, A., Slater, R. D.,
Sarmiento, J. L., Dufour, C. O., de Souza, G. F., Bianchi, D., Claret, M.,
Rodgers, K. B., and Marvasti, S. S.: Complex functionality with minimal
computation: promise and pitfalls of reduced-tracer ocean biogeochemistry
models, J. Adv. Model. Earth. Sy., 7, 2012–2028,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000463</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Garcia et al.(2006a)</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A.,
Boyer, T. P., and Antonov, J. I.: World Ocean Atlas 2005, Vol. 4: Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), in: NOAA Atlas
NESDIS 64, edited by: Levitus, S., US Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC, 2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Garcia et al.(2006b)</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., and Antonov, J. I.: World
Ocean Atlas 2005, Vol. 3: Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and
Oxygen Saturation, in: NOAA Atlas NESDIS 63, edited by: Levitus, S., US
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Getzlaff and Dietze(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Getzlaff, J. and Dietze, H.: Effects of increased isopycnal diffusivity
mimicking the unresolved equatorial intermediate current system in an earth
system climate model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2166–2170, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Graven et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Graven, H., Gruber, N., Key, R., Khatiwala, S., and Gireaud, X.: Changing
controls on oceanic radiocarbon: New insights on shallow-to-deep ocean
exchange and anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C10005,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008074</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hansen(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, N.: The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review, in: Towards a New Evolutionary
Computation. Advances on Estimation of Distribution Algorithms, edited by: Lozano, J. A., Larranaga, P., Inza, I., Bengoetxea, E.,
Springer, 75–102, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hansen and Ostermeier(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, N. and Ostermeier, A.: Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution
strategies, Evol. Comput., 9, 159–195, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Holzer et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Holzer, M., Primeau, F., DeVries, T., and Matear, R.: The Southern Ocean
silicon trap: Data-constrained estimates of regenerated silicic acid,
trapping efficiencies, and global transport paths, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean.,
119, 313–331, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009356" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009356</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Honjo et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S., Manganini, S. J., Krishfield, R. A., and Francois, R.: Particulate
organic carbon fluxes to the ocean interior and factors controlling the
biological pump: A synthesis of global sediment trap programs since 1983,
Prog. Oceanogr., 76, 217–285, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hopkinson et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkinson, C., Vallino, J., and Nolin, A.: Decomposition of dissolved organic
matter from the continental margin, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 4461–4478,
f2c, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Ilyina et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Ilyina, T., Six, K., Segschneider, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Li, H., and nez
Riboni, I. N.: Global ocean biogeochemistry model HAMOCC: model
architecture and performance as component of the MPI-Earth system model in
different CMIP5 experimental realizations, J. Adv. Model. Earth. Sy., 5,
1–29, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Khatiwala(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Khatiwala, S.: A computational framework for simulation of biogeochemical
tracers in the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB3001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002923" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002923</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Khatiwala(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Khatiwala, S.: Fast spin up of ocean biogeochemical models using matrix-free
Newton–Krylov, Ocean Model., 23, 121–129, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Khatiwala et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Khatiwala, S., Visbeck, M., and Cane, M. A.: Accelerated
simulation of passive tracers in ocean circulation models, Ocean Model., 9, 51–69, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: Numerical effects on organic matter sedimentation and
remineralization in biogeochemical ocean models, Ocean Model., 39, 275–283, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: Swept under the carpet: organic matter burial decreases
global ocean biogeochemical model sensitivity to remineralization length scale, Biogeosciences, 10, 8401–8422,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8401-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8401-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: MOPS-1.0: towards a model for the regulation of the
global oceanic nitrogen budget by marine biogeochemical processes, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2929–2957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2929-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2929-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Kriest et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I., Khatiwala, S., and Oschlies, A.: Towards an assessment of simple
global marine biogeochemical models of different complexity, Prog. Oceanogr.,
86, 337–360, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kriest et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I., Oschlies, A., and Khatiwala, S.: Sensitivity analysis of simple
global marine biogeochemical models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB2029,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004072" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004072</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Kriest et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I., Sauerland, V., Khatiwala, S., Srivastav, A., and Oschlies, A.:
Calibrating a global three-dimensional biogeochemical ocean model (MOPS-1.0),
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 127–154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-127-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Kvale et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Kvale, K. F., Khatiwala, S., Dietze, H., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.:
Evaluation of the transport matrix method for simulation of ocean
biogeochemical tracers, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2425–2445,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2425-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2425-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kwiatkowski et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwiatkowski, L., Yool, A., Allen, J. I., Anderson, T. R., Barciela, R.,
Buitenhuis, E. T., Butenschön, M., Enright, C., Halloran, P. R., Le
Quéré, C., de Mora, L., Racault, M.-F., Sinha, B., Totterdell, I. J.,
and Cox, P. M.: iMarNet: an ocean biogeochemistry model intercomparison
project within a common physical ocean modelling framework, Biogeosciences,
11, 7291–7304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7291-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Kwon and Primeau(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y. and Primeau, F.: Optimization and sensitivity study of
a biogeochemistry ocean model using an implicit solver and in situ phosphate
data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002631" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002631</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Kwon and Primeau(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y. and Primeau, F.: Optimization and sensitivity of a global
biogeochemistry ocean model using combined in situ DIC, alkalinity, and
phosphate data, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C08011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004520</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Kwon et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento, J.: The impact of remineralization
depth on the air–sea carbon balance, Nat. Geosci., 2, 630–635, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Landolfi et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Landolfi, A., Dietze, H., Koeve, W., and Oschlies, A.: Overlooked runaway
feedback in the marine nitrogen cycle: the vicious cycle, Biogeosciences, 10,
1351–1363,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1351-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-1351-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Leles et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Leles, S., Valentin, J., and Figueiredo, G.: Evaluation of the complexity and
performance of marine planktonic trophic models, Anais da Academia Brasileira
de Ciências, 88, 1971–1991, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150588" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150588</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Le Quere(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quere, C.: Reply to Horizons Article “Plankton functional type
modelling: running before we can walk” Anderson (2005): I. Abrupt changes in
marine ecosystems?, J. Plankton Res., 28, 871–872,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbl014</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Le Quere et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quere, C., Harrison, S., Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E., Aumont, O.,
Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud, X., Klaas, C.,
Kohfeld, K., Legendre, L., Manizza, M., Platt, T., Rivkin, R.,
Sathyendranath, S., Uitz, J., Watson, A., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Ecosystem
dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry
models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2016–2040,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Letscher and Moore(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Letscher, R. and Moore, J. K.: Preferential remineralization of dissolved
organic phosphorus and non-Redfield DOM dynamics in the global ocean: Impacts
on marine productivity, nitrogen fixation, and carbon export, Global.
Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 325–340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004904" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004904</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Letscher et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Letscher, R. T., Moore, J. K., Teng, Y.-C., and Primeau, F.: Variable C : N : P
stoichiometry of dissolved organic matter cycling in the Community Earth
System Model, Biogeosciences,
12, 209–221, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-209-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-209-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Li and Primeau(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. and Primeau, F.: A fast Newton–Krylov solver for seasonally varying global ocean
biogeochemistry models, Ocean Model., 23, 13–20, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Löptien and Dietze(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Löptien, U. and Dietze, H.: Constraining parameters in marine pelagic
ecosystem models – is it actually feasible with typical observations of
standing stocks?, Ocean Sci., 11, 573–590,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-573-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-573-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Lutz et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Lutz, M., Caldeira, K., Dunbar, R., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Seasonal rhythms
of net primary production and particulate organic carbon flux to depth
describe biological pump efficiency in the global ocean, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, C10011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003706" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003706</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Maier-Reimer(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Maier-Reimer, E.: Geochemical cycles in an ocean general circulation
model. Preindustrial tracer distributions, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 7, 645–677, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Maier-Reimer et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Maier-Reimer, E., Kriest, I., Segschneider, J., and Wetzel, P.: The HAMburg
Ocean Carbon Cycle Model HAMOCC 5.1 – Technical Description Release 1.1,
Reports on Earth System Science 14, Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology,
Hamburg, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Marchal et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchal, O., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A latitude-depth,
circulation-biogeochemical ocean model for paleoclimate studies. Development
and sensitivities, Tellus B, 50, 290–316, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Marshall et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Marshall, J., Adcroft, A., Hill, C., Perelman, L., and Heisey, C.:
A finite-volume, incompressible Navier–Stokes model for studies of the
ocean on parallel computers, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 5733–5752, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Martin et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: VERTEX:
carbon cycling in the Northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 34, 267–285, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Matear and Hirst(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Matear, R. J., and Hirst, A. C.: Long-term changes in dissolved oxygen
concentrations in the ocean caused by protracted global warming, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001997" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001997</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K., Sarmiento, J. L., Key, R. M., Aumont, O., Bullister, J. L.,
Caldeira, K., Campin, J., Doney, S. C., Drange, H., Dutay, J., Follows, M.,
Gao, Y., Gnanadesikan, A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Marshall, J. C., Matear, R. J., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Najjar, R., Plattner, G., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R., Swathi, P. S.,
Totterdell, I. J., Weirig, M., Yamanaka, Y., Yool, A., and Orr, J. C.:
Evaluation of ocean carbon cycle models with data-based metrics, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 31, L07303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018970</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Moore and Doney(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, J. K. and Doney, S. C.: Iron availability limits the ocean nitrogen
inventory stabilizing feedbacks between marine denitrification and nitrogen
fixation, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB2001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002762</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Najjar et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Najjar, R. G., Jin, X., Louanchi, F., Aumont, O., Caldeira, K., Doney, S. C.,
Dutay, J.-C., Follows, M., Gruber, N., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Matear, R., Matsumoto, K., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A.,
Orr, J. C., Plattner, G.-K., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R. D.,
Weirig, M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Impact of circulation on export
production, dissolved organic matter and dissolved oxygen in the ocean:
results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model Intercomparison Project
(OCMIP-2), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB3007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Orr et al.(2000)Orr, Najjar, Sabine, and Joos</label><mixed-citation>
Orr, J., Najjar, R., Sabine, C. L., and Joos, F.: Abiotic – HOWTO. Internal
OCMIP Report, Tech. Rep. revision: 1.16, 25 pp., LSCE/CEA, Saclay,
Gif-sur-Yvette, France, available at:
<a href="ocmip5.ipsl.jussieu.fr/OCMIP/phase2/simulations/Abiotic/HOWTO-Abiotic.html" target="_blank">ocmip5.ipsl.jussieu.fr/OCMIP/phase2/simulations/Abiotic/HOWTO-Abiotic.html</a>
(last access: 28 November 2013), 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Palmer and Totterdell(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, J. and Totterdell, I.: Production and export in a global ocean
ecosystem model, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 48, 1169–1198,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00080-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00080-7</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Parekh et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Parekh, P., Follows, M. J., and Boyle, E. A.: Decoupling of iron and
phosphate in the global ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB2020,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002280</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Paulmier et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulmier, A., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.: Stoichiometries of
remineralisation and denitrification in global biogeochemical ocean models,
Biogeosciences, 6, 923–935,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Piwonski and Slawig(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Piwonski, J. and Slawig, T.: Metos3D: the Marine Ecosystem Toolkit for
Optimization and Simulation in 3-D – Part 1: Simulation Package v0.3.2,
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3729–3750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3729-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3729-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Priess et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Priess, M., Koziel, S., and Slawig, T.: Marine ecosystem model calibration
with real data using enhanced surrogate-based optimization, J. Comput.
Sci.-Neth., 4, 423–437, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Primeau and Deleersnijder(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Primeau, F. and Deleersnijder, E.: On the time to tracer equilibrium in the
global ocean, Ocean Sci., 5, 13–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-5-13-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-5-13-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Primeau et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Primeau, F., Holzer, M., and DeVries, T.: Southern Ocean nutrient trapping
and the efficiency of the biological pump, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118,
2547–2564, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Raimbault et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Raimbault, P., Garcia, N., and Cerutti, F.: Distribution of inorganic and
organic nutrients in the South Pacific Ocean – evidence for long-term
accumulation of organic matter in nitrogen-depleted waters, Biogeosciences,
5, 281–298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-281-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-281-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Schartau et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Schartau, M., Wallhead, P., Hemmings, J., Löptien, U., Kriest, I.,
Krishna, S., Ward, B. A., Slawig, T., and Oschlies, A.: Reviews and
syntheses: parameter identification in marine planktonic ecosystem modelling,
Biogeosciences, 14, 1647–1701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1647-2017</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Schmoker et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmoker, C., Hernandez-Leon, S., and Calbet, A.: Microzooplankton grazing in
the oceans: impacts, data variability, knowledge gaps and future directions,
J. Plankton Res., 35, 691–706, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Séférian et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Séférian, R., Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Marti,
O., Dunne, J. P., Christian, J. R., Doney, S. C., Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K.,
Halloran, P. R., Heinze, C., Segschneider, J., Tjiputra, J., Aumont, O., and
Romanou, A.: Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications
for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment, Geosci. Model Dev., 9,
1827–1851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1827-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Shimoda and Arhonditsis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Shimoda, Y. and Arhonditsis, G.: Phytoplankton functional type modelling:
Running before we can walk? A critical evaluation of the current state of
knowledge, Ecol. Model., 320, 29–43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.029</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Siberlin and Wunsch(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Siberlin, C. and Wunsch, C.: Oceanic tracer and proxy time scales revisited,
Clim. Past, 7, 27–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-27-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-7-27-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Six and Maier-Reimer(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Six, K. D. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Effects of plankton dynamics on seasonal
carbon fluxes in an ocean general circulation model, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
10, 559–583, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Torres-Valdes et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Torres-Valdes, S., Roussenov, V., Sanders, R., Reynolds, S., Pan, X.,
Mather, R., Landolfi, A., Wolff, G., Achterberg, E., and Williams, R.:
Distribution of dissolved organic nutrients and their effect on export
production over the Atlantic Ocean Distribution of dissolved organic
nutrients and their effect on export production over the Atlantic Ocean,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB4019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003389" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003389</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Van Mooy et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Van Mooy, B., Keil, R., and Devol, A.: Impact of suboxia on sinking
particulate organic carbon: Enhanced carbon flux and preferential degradation
of amino acids via denitrificiation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 66, 457–465,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wallmann(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Wallmann, K.: Phosphorus imbalance in the global ocean?, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 24, GB4030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003643</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Ward et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, B., Friedrichs, M. A. M., Anderson, T., and Oschlies, A.: Parameter
optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine
biogeochemical models, J. Marine. Syst., 81, 34–43, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Wunsch and Heimbach(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Wunsch, C. and Heimbach, P.: How long to oceanic tracer and proxy
equilibrium?, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 27, 637–651, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Yool et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: Medusa-1.0: a new intermediate
complexity plankton ecosystem model for the global domain, Geosci. Model
Dev., 4, 381–417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-381-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-381-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Yool et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Yool, A., Popova, E. E., and Anderson, T. R.: MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate
complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change
and ocean acidification studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1767–1811,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1767-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Yoshimura et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Yoshimura, T., Nishioka, J., Saito, H., Takeda, S., Tsuda, A., and
Wells, M. L.: Distributions of particulate and dissolved organic and
inorganic phosphorus in North Pacific surface waters, Mar. Chem., 103,
112–121, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
