<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-941-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Manganese and iron reduction dominate organic carbon oxidation in surface
sediments of the deep Ulleung Basin, East Sea</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Manganese and iron reduction dominate organic carbon oxidation}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.-H. Hyun et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hyun</surname><given-names>Jung-Ho</given-names></name>
          <email>hyunjh@hanyang.ac.kr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Sung-Han</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mok</surname><given-names>Jin-Sook</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>Hyeyoun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Tongsup</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Vandieken</surname><given-names>Verona</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Thamdrup</surname><given-names>Bo</given-names></name>
          <email>bot@biology.sdu.dk</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Marine Science and Convergence Engineering, Hanyang
University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do 15588, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Oceanography, Pusan National University, 2
Busandaehak-ro, Busan, 46241, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment,
University of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 9–11, 26129 Oldenburg,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, Department of Biology, University
of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> 5230 Odense M, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jung-Ho Hyun (hyunjh@hanyang.ac.kr) and Bo Thamdrup (bot@biology.sdu.dk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>1</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>941</fpage><lpage>958</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Rates and pathways of benthic organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation were
investigated in surface sediments of the Ulleung Basin (UB) characterized by
high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 %, dry wt.) and very high contents
of Mn oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe oxides (up to
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The combination of geochemical analyses and
independently executed metabolic rate measurements revealed that Mn and Fe
reduction were the dominant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathways in the center
of the UB, comprising 45 and 20 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation,
respectively. By contrast, sulfate reduction was the dominant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation pathway, accounting for 50 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization in sediments of the continental slope. The relative
significance of each C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathway matched the depth
distribution of the respective electron acceptors. The relative importance of
Mn reduction for C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation displays saturation kinetics with
respect to Mn oxide content with a low half-saturation value of
8.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which further implies that Mn reduction can be
a dominant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation process even in sediments with lower
MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content as known from several other locations. This is the first
report of a high contribution of manganese reduction to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation in offshore sediments on the Asian margin. The high manganese oxide
content in the surface sediment in the central UB was maintained by an
extreme degree of recycling, with each Mn atom on average being reoxidized
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3800 times before permanent burial. This is the highest degree of
recycling so far reported for Mn-rich sediments, and it appears linked to the
high benthic mineralization rates resulting from the high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
content that indicate the UB as a biogeochemical hotspot for turnover of
organic matter and nutrient regeneration.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Although they cover only 15 % (47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
ocean surface area, sediments of continental margins (200–2000 m depth) are
characterized by enhanced organic matter flux generated either by vertical
transport from the highly productive overlying water column or by lateral
transport from adjacent shelves, and thus play an important role in
deposition and mineralization of organic matter (Romankevich, 1984; Jahnke et
al., 1990; Walsh, 1991; Jahnke and Jahnke, 2000). Organic particles that
reach the seafloor are quickly mineralized by hydrolysis, fermentation, and a
variety of respiratory processes using different electron acceptors such as
oxygen, nitrate, Mn oxides, Fe oxides, and sulfate (Froelich et al., 1979;
Jørgensen, 2006). The partitioning of organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation among the different electron-accepting pathways has a profound
influence on the distribution and the release and/or retention of Mn, Fe, S,
and nutrients (nitrogen and phosphate) (Canfield et al., 2005; Hansen et al.,
2006; Jørgensen, 2006; Slomp et al., 2013). Therefore, it is particularly
important to elucidate the contribution of each C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
pathway in order to better understand the role of sediments in biogeochemical
element cycles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Sampling stations in the East Sea and pictures showing contrasting
colors between surface sediments of the continental slope (M1) and center of
the basin (D3).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The relative significance of each carbon oxidation pathway is largely
controlled by the combination of organic matter supply and availability of
electron acceptors. In general, aerobic metabolism dominates the organic
matter mineralization in deep-sea sediments that are characterized by low
organic matter content (Jahnke et al., 1982; Glud, 2008), especially in
organic-carbon-starved deep-sea sediments with low sedimentation rates (Mewes
et al., 2014, 2016; D'Hondt et al., 2015; Mogollón et al., 2016). In
contrast, owing to high sulfate concentrations in marine sediment, sulfate
reduction might account for up to 50 % of total carbon oxidation in
continental margins with high organic matter flux (Jørgensen, 1982;
Jørgensen and Kasten, 2006; Bowles et al., 2014). However, in sediments
where manganese and iron oxides are abundant or rapidly recycled, microbial
reduction of manganese and iron can be the dominant electron-accepting
processes over sulfate reduction (Sørensen and Jørgensen, 1987; Aller,
1990; Canfield et al., 1993b). The significance of dissimilatory iron
reduction for C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation is well established in the sediments
of various continental margins and coastal wetlands (Thamdrup, 2000; Thamdrup
and Canfield, 1996; Jensen et al., 2003; Kostka et al., 2002a, b; Vandieken
et al., 2006; Hyun et al., 2007, 2009b). However, only a few locations such
as the Panama Basin (Aller, 1990), the coastal Norwegian trough in Skagerrak
and an adjacent fjord (Canfield et al., 1993a, b; Vandieken et al., 2014),
the Black Sea shelf (Thamdrup et al., 2000), and the continental shelf of the
northern Barents Sea (Vandieken et al., 2006; Nickel et al., 2008) are known
where microbial manganese reduction significantly contributes to carbon
mineralization.</p>
      <p>The East Sea (often referred to as Japan Sea), located in the far eastern
part of the Eurasian continental margin, consists of three major basins
deeper than 2000 m, the Japan Basin, the Yamato Basin, and the Ulleung Basin
(Fig. 1). Compared to the other two basins, the surface waters of the Ulleung
Basin (UB) are characterized by higher phytoplankton biomass and primary
production (Yamada et al., 2005; Yoo and Park, 2009), which is associated
with coastal upwelling (Hyun et al., 2009a). The enhanced biological
production in the euphotic zone of the UB is responsible for the high
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 % wt) in the sediment, and the highest
rates of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation compared to other deep-sea sediments with
similar depth range (Lee et al., 2008; Hyun et al., 2010). An intriguing
geochemical property of the UB surface sediment is the high content of Mn
oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe oxides (up to
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cha et al., 2007; Hyun et al., 2010). In
accordance with these geochemical findings, the suppression of sulfate
reduction (Hyun et al., 2010) and accumulation of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in anoxic
incubation of surface sediment (Vandieken et al., 2012) strongly implied that
the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in the surface sediment of the UB is dominated
by microbial manganese and iron reduction, but actual rates and partitioning
of each electron-accepting pathway in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation remain to be
determined in this deep marginal sediment underlying highly productive
surface waters.</p>
      <p>The primary objective of this paper was to characterize the sediment
biogeochemistry with regard to the rate of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and
partitioning of major terminal electron-accepting pathways at two contrasting
sites at the continental slope and rise in the UB. Here, for the first time
in sediments of the Asian marginal seas, we document that Mn reduction and Fe reduction
are the dominant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathways accounting for
respectively 45 and 20 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in the center
of the UB, and suggest that Mn and Fe reduction may be of greater importance
in deep-sea sediments than previously recognized.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Environmental settings and sediment characteristics<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Environmental parameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">M1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">D3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(continental slope)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(center of the basin)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Latitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">130<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">131<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water depth (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1453</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2154</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pore-water salinity (psu)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water content (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">85 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">77 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Porosity</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.95 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.86 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Density (g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.10 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.12 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total organic carbon (%, dry wt.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.96 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.27)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.66 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total nitrogen (%, dry wt.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.38 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.35 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Numbers in parentheses indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 SD of triplicate samples.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study site</title>
      <p>The East Sea is a marginal sea surrounded by the east Asian continent and
Japanese islands (Fig. 1; Kang et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2010). The UB
located in the southwestern part of the East Sea is a bowl-shaped deep basin
(2000–3000 m depth) (Fig. 1) delimited by continental slopes of Korean
Peninsula and the southwestern Japanese archipelago on the west and south,
respectively, and by the Korea Plateau and the Oki Bank on the north and
east, respectively (Chough et al., 2000).</p>
      <p>Shipboard experiments were conducted in June 2009 at two sites on the
continental slope (station M1, hereafter M1) and in the center (station D3,
hereafter D3) of the UB (Fig. 1, Table 1). Surface sediments consist of
fine-grained clay with a mean grain size less than 0.004 mm in diameter (Cha
et al., 2007). Two stations were characterized by two contrasting sediment
colors. The Mn oxide-enriched surface sediment at the basin site (D3) was
reddish-brown, whereas at the slope site (M1) it exhibited the typical
gray-brown color of muddy continental margin sediments (Fig. 1). Further
environmental properties are listed in Table 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sampling and handling</title>
      <p>Sediment samples were collected with a box corer. Onboard, duplicate or
mostly triplicate sub-samples for geochemical analyses were collected using
acrylic cores (6–9 cm in diameter and 30–40 cm in length). The sub-cores
for geochemical analyses were immediately sealed with butyl rubber stoppers
and transferred to a N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-filled glove bag for sectioning and loading into
polypropylene centrifuge tubes that were then tightly capped and centrifuged
for 15 min at 5000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. After reintroduction into the
N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-filled glove bag, pore waters were sampled and filtered through
0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m cellulose ester syringe filters (ADVANTEC, Toyo Rashi Kaisha,
Ltd). One to 2 mL of pore water to determine NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was fixed with
saturated HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and subsequently frozen. For determination of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2 mL of the pore water were acidified with
12 M HCl and stored at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Pore water for sulfide analysis was
preserved with Zn acetate (20 %). Sediments for solid-phase analysis were
frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for future analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Anoxic bag incubations</title>
      <p>Anaerobic carbon mineralization rates and dissimilatory Mn and Fe reduction
rates were determined in batch incubations based on the procedures of
Canfield et al. (1993b) and Thamdrup and Canfield (1996). Sediment cores were
transferred to a N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-filled glove bag and sliced in 2 cm intervals to a
depth of 10 cm. Sediment from parallel sections was pooled, mixed, and loaded
into gas-tight plastic bags (Hansen et al., 2000). The bags were sealed
without gas space and incubated in the dark at near in situ temperature (ca.
1–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in larger N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-filled bags to ensure anoxic conditions.
Over a period of 18 days of incubation, sub-samples to determine the
accumulation of total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and Mn in pore water
were withdrawn on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 9, and 18. Two 50 mL centrifuge tubes per
bag were filled completely with sediment in a N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-filled glove bag, and
pore water was extracted as described above. For DIC analysis, we collected
1.8 mL aliquots into glass vials without head space, fixed with
18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (125 mM), and stored at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until
analysis within 4 weeks. Samples for Mn analysis were acidified with 12 M
HCl and stored at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Sediment remaining after the collection of
pore water was frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for later analysis of oxalate-extractable solid Fe(II).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Pore-water analyses</title>
      <p>Total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured by flow
injection analysis with conductivity detection (Hall and Aller, 1992).
Nitrate was measured spectrophotometrically (Parsons et al., 1984). Dissolved
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined by colorimetric method with ferrozine (Stookey,
1970). Dissolved Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were analyzed in acidified pore
water by inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES,
Optima 3300DV, PerkinElmer Co.) and flame atomic absorption spectrometer
(SpectrAA 220/FS, Varian), respectively (Thamdrup and Canfield, 1996).
Dissolved sulfide was determined by the methylene blue method (Cline, 1969).
Sulfate concentrations were measured using ion chromatography (Metrohm 761).
The detection limit of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was 3,
1.8, 3, and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M, respectively. Reproducibility of DIC and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was better than 10 %. Precision of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
1–2 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Solid-phase analyses</title>
      <p>Total oxalate-extractable Fe [Fe(II) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III)] was extracted from
air-dried sediment in a 0.2 M oxic oxalate solution (pH 3) for 4 h
(Thamdrup and Canfield, 1996), and Fe(II) was extracted from frozen sediment
in anoxic oxalate (Phillips and Lovley, 1987). The total oxalate-extractable
Fe and Fe(II), hereafter total Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
were determined as described for the pore-water analysis of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Oxalate-extractable Fe(III), hereafter Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, was defined
as the difference between total Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This fraction represents poorly crystalline Fe(III)
oxides. Particulate Mn, hereafter Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was extracted with
dithionite–citrate–acetic acid (DCA; pH 4.8) for 4 h from air-dried
sediment and was determined by inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission
spectrometry (ICP-AES, Optima 3300DV, PerkinElmer Co). The DCA extraction
aims at dissolving free Mn oxides and authigenic Mn(II) phases. The
reproducibility of the measurements was better than 10 % and the
detection limits were 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M for Mn and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M for Fe. For the
determination of total reduced sulfur (TRS) that includes acid-volatile
sulfide (AVS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> FeS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S and small amounts of other metal
sulfides; see Rickard and Morse, 2005; Luther III, 2005) and chromium-reducible
sulfur (CRS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> FeS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sediment samples were fixed with
Zn acetate, and sulfide was determined according to the method of
Cline (1969) after a two-step distillation with cold 12 M HCl and boiling
0.5 M Cr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> solution (Fossing and Jørgensen, 1989). The contents of
total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrogen (TN) in the surface sediment were
analyzed using a CHN analyzer (CE Instruments, EA 1110) after removing
CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using 12 M HCl.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Oxygen micro-profiles</title>
      <p>Oxygen profiles were measured at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m resolution using Clark-type
microelectrodes (Unisense, OX-50) while stirring the overlying water.
Microelectrodes were calibrated between 100 % air-saturated in situ
bottom water and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-purged anoxic bottom water. Three profiles were
measured at each site. The diffusive boundary layer (DBL) and sediment–water
interface (SWI) were determined according to Jørgensen and
Revsbech (1985). To estimate the volume-specific oxygen consumption rate, we
used the PROFILE software (Berg et al., 1998).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Rate measurements</title>
      <p>The diffusive oxygen uptake (DOU) was calculated from the calibrated oxygen
micro-profiles.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M120" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>DOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at M1 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at D3) is the temperature-corrected
molecular diffusion coefficient estimated from Schulz (2006), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
oxygen concentration at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within the diffusive boundary layer (DBL)
(Jørgensen and Revsbech, 1985).</p>
      <p>The volume-specific O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rates exhibited a bimodal depth
distribution (see Sect. 3.2) with activity peaks near the SWI and the
oxic–anoxic interface, respectively. Thus, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rates by
aerobic organotrophic respiration were defined as the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rate
near the SWI, whereas the oxygen consumption at the oxic–anoxic interface was
assigned to re-oxidation of reduced inorganic compounds (Rasmussen and
Jørgensen, 1992; Canfield et al., 2005).</p>
      <p>Total anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization rates were determined by linear
regression of the accumulation of total DIC with time during the anoxic bag
incubations (Fig. 3) after correcting for CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation (Thamdrup
et al., 2000). Briefly, CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation was calculated from
decreasing dissolved Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration during the anoxic bag
incubation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M137" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sol</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the adsorption constant for Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Li and Gregory, 1974). Then the DIC production rate corrected for
CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation was calculated as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M142" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtext>DIC production</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC accumulation</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>precipitation</mml:mtext><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Fe(III) reduction rates were determined by linear regression of the increase
in solid-phase Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content with time during anoxic bag
incubations. The dissimilatory microbial Fe(III) reduction rate was derived
by subtracting abiotic Fe reduction coupled to the oxidation of sulfide
produced by sulfate reduction (Gribsholt et al., 2003):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M144" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>Dissimilatory microbial Fe(III) red.</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>total Fe(III) red.</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>abiotic Fe(III) red.</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            assuming that abiotic Fe reduction coupled to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S oxidation occurred at
a stoichiometry of 2 Fe(III) per 3 H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S (Pyzik and Sommer, 1981; Melton
et al., 2014):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M147" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeOOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">produced</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">by</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Finally, to estimate the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by microbial Fe reduction,
the 4 : 1 stoichiometry of iron reduction coupled to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation was used from the stoichiometric equation (Canfield et al., 1993a):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M150" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeOOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>Mn reduction rates were determined from linear regression of the production
of dissolved Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with time during the anoxic bag incubations. Similar
to previous studies (e.g., Canfield et al., 1993a, b; Thamdrup and Dalsgaard,
2000), we assumed that accumulating dissolved Mn was Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This ignores
a potential contribution from Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which in some cases can constitute a
substantial fraction of the dissolved Mn pool at the upper boundary of the
zone with soluble Mn accumulation in marine sediments (Madison et al., 2013).
Further studies of the dynamics of soluble Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are required to evaluate
its potential importance in anoxic incubations. Such studies pending, we find
justification for our assumption in the good agreement observed in the
previous studies between Mn reduction rates calculated based on the
assumption that soluble Mn is Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 7) and independent estimates of
rates of carbon mineralization through dissimilatory Mn reduction based on
DIC or NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation. Due to strong adsorption of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to Mn
oxide surfaces (Canfield et al., 1993b), the Mn reduction rates were
estimated after compensating for the adsorption effect of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
Mn oxides according to Thamdrup and Dalsgaard (2000):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M159" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>Mn reduction rate</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>accumulation rate</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is porosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is density of sediment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IV</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mL g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
[Mn(IV)] is the content of Mn(IV) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Concentrations of dissolved NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in pore water and contents of solid-phase Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, acid-volatile sulfur (AVS),
and chromium-reducible sulfur (CRS) in the sediment at M1 and D3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We here assume that extracted Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents Mn(IV) as observed
in surface sediments of another Mn-rich site (Canfield et al., 1993b;
Thamdrup and Dalsgaard, 2000). Small levels of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> remaining at
depth further suggest that little Mn(II) accumulates in the solid phase (see
Results). C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by dissimilatory Mn(IV) reduction was
calculated from the stoichiometric equation (Canfield et al., 1993a):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M176" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MnO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Sulfate reduction rates were determined using the radiotracer method of
Jørgensen (1978). Sediment cores (35 cm long with 2.9 cm i.d.) were
collected in triplicate, injected horizontally at 1 cm vertical interval
with 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L radiolabeled sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>S-SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
15 kBq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Amersham), diluted in sterilized NaCl solution
(3.0 %), and incubated for 12 h at in situ temperature. At the end of
the incubation, the sediment was sliced into sections, fixed in Zn acetate
(20 %), and frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until processed in the
laboratory. The reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>S was recovered using distillation with a
boiling acidic Cr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> solution according to Fossing and
Jørgensen (1989). Background radioactivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>S was
32.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.7 cpm cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at site D3 and 87.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38.7 cpm cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at site M1. Detection limits of the sulfate reduction rate (SRR),
estimated from the double standard deviation of the blank value (i.e., 7.4
and 77.4 cpm) according to Fossing et al. (2000), ranged from 0.79 to
2.62 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To elucidate the contribution of sulfate
reduction in anaerobic carbon oxidation, the SRRs (Fig. 5b, g) were converted
to carbon oxidation using a stoichiometric equation (Thamdrup and Canfield,
1996):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M195" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Pore-water and solid-phase constituents</title>
      <p>The depth distributions of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the pore water as well as solid-phase Mn, Fe, and S for the two
stations are shown in Fig. 2. NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at M1 increased
steadily with depth (Fig. 2a), whereas at D3 it decreased down to 3 cm depth
before it increased below (Fig. 2f). Highest concentrations of nitrate were
measured at 0 to 1 cm sediment depth at the two stations and concentrations
decreased below a background level (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) below 1 cm at both
M1 and D3 (Fig. 2a, f). Dissolved Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations differed widely
between the sites showing a maximum of 56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M between 0 and 3 cm
depth and not exceeding 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M below at M1 (Fig. 2b), whereas at D3
concentrations increased to a maximum of 286 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 10–12 cm depth
(Fig. 2g). Conversely, dissolved Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at M1 increased
from 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 0–0.5 cm to 32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 6–7 cm depth, and
stayed constant below (Fig. 2c), whereas at D3, concentrations were uniformly
low, showing a slight increase to 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M at 15 cm (Fig. 2h).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Oxygen penetration depth (OPD), diffusive oxygen utilization (DOU)
rate and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rate by aerobic respiration and re-oxidation of reduced inorganic compounds
(RIC) in the pore water. Values represent averages <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OPD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DOU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption (mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Aerobic respiration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Re-oxidation of RIC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.20)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.12 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.36)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.04 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.07 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.68)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.95 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.16)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.53 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.72)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.42 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.58)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Extractable Mn (Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents were low
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper 20 cm at the slope site (M1)
(Fig. 2b), but up to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper 4 cm depth
of the sediment at the center of the basin (D3), with a sharp decrease to
near depletion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below 10 cm (Fig. 2g).
At the slope site (M1), contents of Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased
slightly with increasing depth from 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> near the
surface to 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20 cm depth, mirroring an
increase in Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2d). At the center of the basin
(D3), Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased slightly from
67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0–0.5 cm to 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
4–6 cm depth, and it decreased steeply below to 4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 12–14 cm depth (Fig. 2i). Of total Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> comprised <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 98 % at 0–2 cm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 97 %
at 0–8 cm depth at M1 and D3, respectively. The fraction of
Fe(III)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> then decreased to 40 % at
10–12 cm depth at both sites. Acid-volatile sulfur (AVS) exhibited a slight
increase with depth at M1 from 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the surface
to 7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20 cm depth (Fig. 2e) but was not
detected at D3 (Fig. 2j). Chromium-reducible sulfur (CRS) contents at M1
increased rapidly with depth from 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0–0.5 cm
to 21.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20 cm depth (Fig. 2e), whereas the CRS
contents remained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at D3 (Fig. 2j).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{O${}_{{2}}$ micro-profiles and diffusive oxygen
uptake rate}?><title>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> micro-profiles and diffusive oxygen
uptake rate</title>
      <p>Oxygen penetrated less than 4 mm into the sediments (Fig. 3), and rates of
diffusive oxygen uptake (DOU) were 7.1 and
6.0 mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at M1 and D3, respectively (Table 2).
Oxygen consumption by aerobic respiration estimated from the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
micro-profiles (area I and II in Fig. 3) was higher at the M1 in the slope
site (4.0 mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than at the D3 in the center of
the basin (2.5 mmol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption by
re-oxidation of reduced inorganic compounds indicated by increased activity
at the oxic–anoxic interface (area III in Fig. 3) accounted for 43 and
57 % of the DOU at M1 and D3, respectively. From the profiles of
geochemical constituents (Fig. 2), O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption was mainly attributed
to the re-oxidation of sulfide and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at M1 and of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at D3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Vertical profiles of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The slashed area indicates the
diffusive boundary layer in the sediment–water interface (SWI). The shaded
areas indicate O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption by aerobic respiration (I and II)
and re-oxidation of reduced inorganic compounds (III).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Changes of concentrations of DIC, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in pore
water and contents of solid-phase Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during anoxic bag
incubations of sediments from 0–2, 2–4, 4–6, and 6–8 cm depth at M1 and D3.
Data obtained at the 8–10 cm depth interval are not shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Anoxic bag incubations</title>
      <p>Changes in concentrations of DIC, Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and dissolved Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and solid
Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents over time during anoxic bag incubations from
sediment of 0–2, 2–4, 4–6, and 6–8 cm depth intervals are presented in
Fig. 4. The DIC concentrations increased linearly over time during
incubations of sediment in all bags from M1 and D3, except the bag from
6–8 cm at D3. The DIC accumulation rates were generally higher at the slope
site (M1) than at the basin site (D3) (Table 4). The concentrations of
Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased with time at all depth intervals of M1, whereas a
decrease in Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed only for the 2–4 cm depth interval at
D3. The decrease in Ca<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation, which
consequently underestimates DIC accumulation, especially at M1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Vertical distribution of terminal electron acceptors (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Mn, and Fe) and rates of sulfate reduction measured from
whole core analyses, and rates of anaerobic carbon oxidation (DIC production
rates), Mn reduction, and Fe reduction measured from anoxic bag incubations
in Fig. 4. C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by sulfate reduction in <bold>(c, h)</bold>  was calculated
from the stoichiometry of 2 : 1 of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidized to sulfate reduced.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Coinciding with high solid Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents (Fig. 2g), prominent
Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation appeared at 0–6 cm depth of D3, whereas no increase
in Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed at M1 except a slight accumulation at 0–2 cm
interval (Fig. 4). Solid Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> contents increased linearly
with time at 0–4 cm depth of M1, whereas highest Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
accumulation was observed at 4–6 cm depth at D3. An increase in
Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was not discernible in the Mn oxide-rich surface
sediment (0–2 cm) of D3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Depth-integrated rates (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of Mn reduction, Fe
reduction, and sulfate reduction and the partitioning of abiotic and
microbial Fe(III) reduction in total Fe(III) reduction with depth.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mn</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">Fe reduction by </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Fe red.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(microbial)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">interval (cm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Fe(III) red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Fe red.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(abiotic)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Abiotic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Microbial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fe red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Fe red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4–6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6–8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sum (0–10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>3.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.56</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4–6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">52.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6–8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sum (0–10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Stoichiometric equations were used to evaluate the
relative significance of abiotic and microbial Fe reduction: abiotic
reduction of Fe(III) by sulfide oxidation,
3H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2FeOOH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2FeS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O;
microbial Fe(III) reduction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> total Fe(III) reduction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> abiotic
Fe(III) reduction. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Back-calculated from the C oxidation by Mn
reduction in the 0–2 cm interval in Table 4 using the stoichiometric
equation,
2MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
“–” indicates that the process does not occur or is regarded as negligible
at the depth interval based on the OPD for aerobic respiration and
geochemical profiles or anoxic bag incubations for Mn(IV) and Fe(III)
reduction. “NA” indicates that data are not available.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Sulfate reduction rates (SRRs)</title>
      <p>At the slope site (M1), SRR increased from 18 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
the surface to 97–103 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 1.5–2 cm depth, and
decreased below to 12.5 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 20 cm depth (Fig. 5b).
In contrast, SRR at the manganese oxide-rich basin site (D3) ranged from 1.7
to 8.7 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and did not vary with depth (Fig. 5g).
Depth-integrated SRR down to 10 cm depth was 10 times higher at M1
(4.3 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than at D3 (0.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>DIC production rates</title>
      <p>Vertical profiles of the DIC production rate that were derived from the
linear regression of the DIC production measured in anoxic bag incubation
(Fig. 4) after correcting for CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation are presented in
Fig. 5c and h for M1 and D3, respectively. At M1, the DIC production rates
decreased with depth from 280 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0–2 cm depth) to
69 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (8–10 cm depth) (Fig. 5c), whereas the DIC
production rates at D3 were relatively similar across the upper 6 cm ranging
from 86 to 136 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and decreased to
8–15 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 6–10 cm (Fig. 5h). The integrated DIC
production rate within 10 cm depth of the sediment was twice as high at M1
(14.0 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as at the D3 (7.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table 4).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p>Organic carbon (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) oxidation
(mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by each C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathway, and
its partitioning in total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
(% total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ox) and anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
(% anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ox) at each depth interval within 10 cm of
the sediment. Mn red., Mn reduction; Fe red., Fe reduction; and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
red., sulfate reduction.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.92}[.92]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Total anaerobic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Total anaerobic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">interval</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">measured by </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">oxidation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">by dissimilatory </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation/</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(cm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(DOU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DIC)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(Mn red. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">anoxic DIC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> red.)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">production</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>DOU</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>DIC prod.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Mn red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d,e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Fe red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> red.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(aerobic respiration)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(anaerobic respiration)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">M1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.66</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4–6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6–8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sum (0–10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(% total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ox)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(18.1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(81.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(100)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(0.13)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(12.4)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(50.1)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(62.7)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(% anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ox)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(0.16)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(15.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(61.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.66</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>1.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2–4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.98</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.95</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4–6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6–8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8–10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sum (0–10)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.82</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.94</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(% total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ox)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(20.6)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(78.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(100)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(44.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(19.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(9.41)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(77.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(% anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ox)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(56.8)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(25.2)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(11.9)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption by
aerobic respiration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (106C/138O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) calculated using the
Redfield ratio; O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption by aerobic respiration rate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DOU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> re-oxidation rates) is calculated from Table 2 that is derived from the
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> micro-profiles in Fig. 2.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Independently measured from the DIC accumulation rate in anoxic bag
incubation experiment in Fig. 4.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> aerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by dissimilatory Mn(IV) reduction, Fe(III)
reduction, and sulfate reduction was calculated from the stoichiometric
equations: 2MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; 4Fe(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> HS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (total Fe(III) reduction in Fig. 5) –
(abiotic Fe(III) reduction coupled to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S oxidation;
3H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2FeOOH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2FeS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Back-calculated from DIC production rate – (C oxidation by
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> red. and Fe red.). See text for further discussion.
“–” indicates that the process does not occur or is regarded as
negligible based on the OPD for aerobic respiration and geochemical profiles
or anoxic bag incubations for Mn and Fe red.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Rates of Mn and Fe reduction</title>
      <p>The accumulation of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> presented evidence that manganese reduction was
occurring in the surface sediment (0–6 cm) of D3 (Fig. 4). The manganese
reduction rate (MnRR) derived from Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation with correction for
adsorption ranged from 7.5 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0–2 cm depth) to
198 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (2–4 cm depth) at D3 (Fig. 5i). In contrast,
MnRR at M1 was indiscernible except for low activity
(2.2 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0–2 cm depth (Fig. 5d). Depth-integrated MnRR at D3 (8.21 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 200 times higher
than the MnRR at M1 (0.04 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 3). The iron
reduction rate (FeRR), derived from Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation, at
M1 was highest in the 0–2 cm interval (237 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
then decreased with depth to 38 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 8–10 cm depth
(Fig. 5e). In contrast, Fe reduction was not detected in the surface sediment
at D3, but increased to its maximum rate of 240 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at
4–6 cm depth. The FeRR then decreased with depth to
12 nmol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 8–10 cm (Fig. 5j), where a few data points
were adopted to derive the line of best-fit regression. Depth-integrated
total FeRR was slightly higher at M1 (11.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than at
D3 (7.53 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 3). The ratio of microbial Fe
reduction, Fe red.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(microbial)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, to abiotic Fe reduction coupled to
sulfide oxidation, Fe red.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(abiotic)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranged from 1.14 (8–10 cm at
M1) to 52.3 (2–4 cm at D3), which indicated that the Fe reduction at Mn-
and Fe oxide-rich basin site was mostly a microbiologically mediated process
(Table 3).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Partitioning of C${}_{{\mathrm{org}}}$ oxidation in accordance
with the distribution of terminal electron acceptors}?><title>Partitioning of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in accordance
with the distribution of terminal electron acceptors</title>
      <p>One of the most prominent features revealed from the vertical distributions
of geochemical constituents at the basin site (D3) was that electron
acceptors such as O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrate, and Mn and Fe oxides were systematically
distributed with discrete zonation according to the order of decreasing
energy yield for C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation (Fig. 5f). Such biogeochemical
zones are not sharply separated in most aquatic sediments due to, for example,
sediment heterogeneity and mixing resulting from bioirrigation, bioturbation,
and bottom turbidity currents. The profiles of dissolved and solid-phase
geochemical constituents in the sediment provide indications as to specific
diagenetic reactions prevailing (Froelich et al., 1979). However, reoxidation
of reduced inorganic compounds often mask the primary reactions involved in
carbon oxidation (Sørensen and Jørgensen, 1987; Hines et al., 1991).
Together with the discrete geochemical zonation of the electron acceptors,
the independently executed metabolic rate measurements (Fig. 5) allowed us to
evaluate the relative contribution of each terminal electron-accepting
pathway with sediment depth.</p>
      <p>Previous experimental studies that have quantified pathways of anaerobic
carbon oxidation in subtidal marine sediments have generally determined the
contributions of Mn and Fe reduction indirectly from the difference between
rates of DIC production and sulfate reduction converted to carbon equivalents
(e.g., Canfield et al., 1993b; Thamdrup and Canfield, 1996; Vandieken et al.,
2006). The inferred rates of Mn and Fe reduction were further supported by
the depth distribution of metal oxides and patterns of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation in the pore water, but this could not be verified because
the accumulation of particulate Mn(II) and Fe(II) – which represents the
overwhelming fraction of the reduced pools – was not quantified. Here, we
combined the indirect approach with independent determination of Mn and Fe
reduction rates. Thus, we obtained two separate estimates of anaerobic carbon
oxidation rates: based on DIC production and on the sum of sulfate, Fe, and
Mn reduction converted to carbon equivalents, respectively (Table 4). At M1,
within the 0–10 cm depth interval, the average ratio between total
anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation rate (10.7 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation from DIC production
(14.0 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.77 (Table 4). Similarly, at D3, the
average ratio between total anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
(6.79 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and anaerobic DIC production
(7.22 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.94. There was a good agreement between
the two estimates with a ratio of total anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by
Mn <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate: DIC production for individual depth intervals of
0.8–1.2 (Table 4) with the exception at the 0–2 cm depth of the slope site
(M1), where the ratio was slightly lower, 0.66, possibly due to a contribution
from the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by nitrate reduction. The similarity of the
two estimates across all incubations spanning a range of redox conditions
provides confidence in our approach for calculating dissimilatory Mn and Fe
reduction rates. Specifically, the good agreement indicates that the
underlying assumptions concerning Mn adsorption and reactions of Fe(III) and
sulfide are valid as first-order approximations. The general agreement
further supports the validity of previous determinations of dissimilatory Mn
and Fe reduction rates based on the difference between DIC production and
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction (Canfield et al., 1993a, b; Thamdrup et al., 2000;
Vandieken et al., 2006, 2014).</p>
      <p>To elucidate the contribution of sulfate reduction in anaerobic carbon
oxidation, the SRRs (Fig. 5b, g) were converted to carbon oxidation (Thamdrup
and Canfield, 1996) and then compared to the DIC production rates from
anoxic bag incubation (Fig. 5c, h). At the slope site (M1), the fraction of
anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation coupled to sulfate reduction increased
with depth from 48 % at 0–2 cm to 80 % at 8–10 cm (Table 4).
Thus, the excess C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in the upper layers should be
coupled to other electron-accepting processes. Indeed, the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation by Fe reduction (0.96 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accounted for most
of the remaining anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation (12–18 % of DIC
production) at 0–8 cm depth, consistent with the distribution of Fe(III)
decreasing from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> near the surface (Fig. 6,
Table 4). Mn reduction was of minor importance at M1 because of the low
content of Mn oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Carbon oxidation
coupled to aerobic respiration was estimated to
3.1 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to 18 % of the total aerobic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> anaerobic oxidation,
while the contributions of Fe and sulfate reduction to this total were 12 and
50 %, respectively (Table 4). As mentioned above, nitrate
reduction/denitrification may contribute part of the unexplained 19 % of
carbon oxidation, but most of this imbalance likely reflects the combined
uncertainties in the estimates of the individual pathways. Additionally, our
partitioning of carbon oxidation pathways could be biased towards the
anaerobic electron acceptors due to the use of the diffusive oxygen uptake
(DOU) rather than total oxygen uptake (TOU), which will exceed DOU if
bioirrigation is active (Glud, 2008). Bioirrigation was not determined at our
sites, but the pore water profiles show no indication of strong irrigation
(Fig. 2). An average DOU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> TOU ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 has been reported for
sediments at 1.5–2.5 km depth (Glud, 2008). Using this ratio, and assuming
that TOU is partitioned similarly as DOU between aerobic carbon oxidation and
reoxidation, aerobic carbon oxidation would account for 25 %, while Fe
and sulfate reduction would account for 11 and 46 % of carbon
oxidation, respectively. Thus, the potential bias from using DOU is not
expected to affect the ranking of electron acceptors by quantitative
importance (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe(III)), and, as discussed
further below, the partitioning of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation at M1 falls
within the range previously reported for continental margin sediments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Depth variations in partitioning of each carbon oxidation pathway in
total carbon oxidation at M1 and D3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In contrast to M1, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by sulfate reduction at the basin
site (D3) accounted for only a small fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11 %) of anaerobic
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation at 0–6 cm interval and it only dominated carbon
oxidation at 8–10 cm (Fig. 5h, Table 4). Oxygen and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
depleted within 3.6 mm and 1 cm depth of the sediment surface, respectively
(Fig. 5f), while Mn and Fe(III) oxides were abundant at 0–4 and 0–6 cm,
respectively. Consistent with the abundance of electron acceptors, high rates
of Mn and Fe reduction (Fig. 5i and j) implied Mn and Fe reduction as the
most significant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathways to 6 cm depth. At
0–2 cm depth, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by aerobic respiration and Mn
reduction accounted for 53 and 43 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation,
respectively (Fig. 6). At 2–4 cm, Mn reduction accounted for 73 % of
total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and 92 % of anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation (Table 4, Fig. 6). Its importance decreased to 22 % at 4–6 cm
due to lower Mn contents, while microbial Fe(III) reduction here contributed
51 %, and the partitioning of sulfate reduction increased to 11 %
(Fig. 6). Consequently, the relative distribution of each C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation pathway with depth at D3 (Fig. 6) matched well with the depth
distribution of the respective electron acceptors (Fig. 5f). Overall, within
the 10 cm depth sediment interval, Mn reduction and Fe reduction were the dominant
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathways comprising 45 and 20 % of total carbon
oxidation, respectively, at the Mn and Fe oxide-rich site in the center of
the UB (Table 4). Correction for a potential underestimation of TOU, as
discussed for M1, would reduce the contributions of Mn and Fe reduction
slightly to 41 and 18 %, respectively.</p>
      <p>Despite the high Fe oxide content at 0–4 cm at D3 (Fig. 5f), no solid
Fe(II)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(oxal)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation was observed at this depth range
(Fig. 4). This indicates that Fe(III) reduction may not occur under these
Mn oxide-rich conditions. Indeed, using acombination of 16S rRNA-stable
isotope probing and geochemical analysis in three manganese oxide-rich
sediments including the UB, Vandieken et al. (2012) identified bacteria
related to <italic>Colwellia</italic>, <italic>Oceanospillaceae</italic> and
<italic>Arcobacter</italic> as acetate-oxidizing bacteria that potentially reduce
manganese, whereas no known iron reducers were detected in the Mn-rich
sediment. Similarly, Thamdrup et al. (2000) found, in Mn oxide-rich Black Sea
sediment, that the abundance of viable Fe-reducing bacteria in most
probable number counts was low in comparison to Mn reducers and the addition
of ferrihydrite did not stimulate Fe reduction, which implied that Fe
reduction should be outcompeted by the Mn reduction process.</p>
      <p>As manganese reduction is thermodynamically more favorable than iron and
sulfate reduction, the Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> liberation (Fig. 4) likely resulted from
dissimilatory Mn reduction. Nonetheless, Mn reduction estimated from the
increase in Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0–4 cm interval at D3 (Fig. 4) could be due to
oxidation of Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or sulfide. Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> may readily react with Mn oxides
(Meyers and Nealson, 1988; Lovley and Phillips, 1988) by the reaction
2Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2Fe(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, in
the Mn oxide-rich sediment of the Skagerrak, Canfield et al. (1993b) revealed
that the addition of Ferrozine, a strong complexation agent for Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
had no inhibitory effect on the Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> liberation, indicating that the
chemical reaction of MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> generated by Fe reduction was
not responsible for the accumulation of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Despite the anoxic conditions and nitrate depletion during the bag
incubation, Mn reduction rates at 0–2 cm depth (Fig. 5i) based on Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
accumulation were substantially lower than the rates inferred from DIC
accumulation (Fig. 5h). A similar discrepancy was previously observed for the
uppermost part of the Mn reduction zone (Thamdrup et al., 2000) and is
likely explained by particularly strong sorption of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to fresh Mn
oxide surfaces, which is not included in the adsorption coefficient used
here. Low Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> together with the rapid decrease in nitrate at 0–2 cm
depth at D3 (Fig. 2f, g) also suggested that dissolved reduced manganese
might act as a reducing agent for nitrate, as was suggested by Aller et
al. (1998) in the Panama Basin and Mogollón et al. (2016) in the deep-sea
sediment of the Clarion–Clipperton fracture zone in the northeast equatorial
Pacific.</p>
      <p>Previous estimation of denitrification in 0–2 cm depth of the UB ranged
from 0.01 to 0.17 mmol N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lee, 2009), which is
equivalent to a C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of
0.013–0.213 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the stoichiometric equation
of 4H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Based on the average, the contribution of
carbon oxidation by denitrification (0.11 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
should be minor at the basin site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation at 0–2 cm; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 % of integrated C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation). This is consistent with the general consensus that C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation by denitrification is of little importance in most marine sediments
(Sørensen et al., 1979; Canfield et al., 1993a; Trimmer and Engström,
2011). Denitrification may be even further suppressed in Mn-rich sediments
due to competitive inhibition from Mn reduction (Trimmer et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{C${}_{{\mathrm{org}}}$ oxidation dominated by manganese\hack{\break}
reduction in the UB}?><title>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">org</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation dominated by manganese<?xmltex \hack{\break}?>
reduction in the UB</title>
      <p>Microbial Fe reduction has been quantified directly in sediments of various
coastal oceans (Gribsholt et al., 2003; Kostka et al., 2002a, b; Hyun et al.,
2007, 2009b) and indirectly in deeper continental margins (Thamdrup and
Canfield, 1996; Jensen et al., 2003; Kostka et al., 1999). Earlier estimation
from 16 different continental margin sediments indicated that Fe(III)
reduction contributed 22 % on average to anaerobic carbon oxidation
(Thamdrup, 2000). Thus, the contributions from Fe(III) reduction of 12 and
20 % of anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation on the slope (M1) and in the
basin (D3) of the UB (Table 4) fall in the range of the previous indirect
estimates.</p>
      <p>Unlike Fe reduction, direct estimation of manganese reduction rates is not
easy, mainly because of the restriction of the process to a thin surface
layer (Sundby and Silverberg, 1985), the rapid reduction of manganese oxides
with H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S and Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Postma, 1985; Burdige and Nealson, 1986; Kostka
et al., 1995; Lovley and Phillips, 1988), and the adsorption of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
Mn oxide surface (Canfield et al., 1993b). For that reason, only two studies,
from the Skagerrak and Black Sea, are available for direct comparison on the
partitioning of Mn reduction. The process has also been indicated to be of
importance in the Panama Basin based on diagenetic modeling (Aller, 1990) and
at some Arctic shelf sites where it was, however, not quantified separately from
Fe reduction (Vandieken et al., 2006; Nickel et al., 2008). Mn reduction was
responsible for over 90 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation at 600 m
depth in the Skagerrak (Canfield et al., 1993b), and accounted for
13–45 % of anaerobic C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation in the Black Sea shelf
sites at 60–130 m of water depth (Thamdrup et al., 2000). To our knowledge,
this report of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation dominated by Mn reduction comprising
45 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and 57 % of anaerobic
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> respiration in the center of the UB (Table 4) represents the
first from deep-offshore basin of the eastern Asian marginal seas.</p>
      <p>The difference in partitioning of Mn reduction in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
between the UB, Black Sea, and Skagerrak reflects the close relationship
between Mn oxide content in the sediment and Mn reduction (Thamdrup et al.,
2000). From the vertical distribution of electron acceptors (Fig. 5f) and
contribution of each C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathway with depth (Fig. 6), it
is apparent that the availability of Mn(IV) largely controls the relative
contribution to C oxidation. In the Skagerrak, the Mn oxides are abundant in
high content down to 10 cm depth (Canfield et al., 1993b), whereas Mn oxides
in the Black Sea and the Ulleung Basin were enriched only down to 2 and
4 cm, respectively (Thamdrup et al., 2000; Fig. 2g). Using the available
data set for the three marine sediments, we further plotted the relative
contribution of manganese reduction to anaerobic carbon oxidation as a
function of Mn oxide content to expand data from Thamdrup (2000) (Fig. 7).
The plot indicates saturation kinetics with a close correlation between Mn
oxide content and the importance of Mn reduction at low contents.
Curve fitting yields a content of MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 % of contribution of
manganese reduction to total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
8.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> similar to the approximately
10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> suggested before (Thamdrup et al., 2000). This
indicates that Mn reduction can be a dominant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
process even at low contents of Mn oxides compared to those found at UB.
Manganese enrichments of this magnitude have been reported for several
locations on the continental margins and in deep basins (Murray et al., 1984;
Gingele and Kasten, 1994; Gobeil et al., 1997; Haese et al., 2000; Mouret et
al., 2009; Magen et al., 2011; Macdonald and Gobeil, 2012; Mewes et al.,
2014) in addition to the relatively few places where dissimilatory Mn
reduction was already indicated to be of importance, as discussed above.
Thus, the process may be of more widespread significance, particularly in
deep basin settings such as UB that allow geochemical focusing of manganese.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>The relative contribution of Mn reduction to anaerobic carbon
oxidation as a function of the content of Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at three different
sites:
BS, Black Sea (Thamdrup et al., 2000); UB, Ulleung Basin (This study); Sk,
Skagerrak (Canfield et al., 1993b).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=219.08622pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/14/941/2017/bg-14-941-2017-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Source of high Mn oxide content</title>
      <p>The strong enrichment of Mn in the UB surface sediment is primarily of
diagenetic origin as indicated by just slightly higher Mn contents at depth
in the sediment at D3 (mean 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 10–20 cm
depth) compared to M1 (0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2) combined with
higher sediment accumulation rates at the slope (0.15–0.3 cm year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
than in the basin (0.07 cm year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Cha et al., 2005). Thus, the burial
flux of Mn, and thereby the net input assuming steady-state deposition, is
similar or higher at M1 compared to D3. Furthermore, Mn is likely subject to
geochemical focusing in the basin as Mn depositing at shallower depths is
reductively mobilized and incompletely oxidized in the thin oxic surface
layer, resulting in release to the water column and net down-slope transport,
as inferred in other ventilated basins (Sundby and Silverberg, 1985; Canfield
at al., 1993b; Schaller and Wehrli, 1997). A diagenetic source of Mn
enrichment was also concluded in previous studies (Yin et al., 1989; Cha et
al., 2007; Choi et al., 2009). The Mn remaining and being buried at M1 likely
represents unreactive detrital forms to a larger extent than at D3 (Cha et
al., 2007). Adopting the sediment accumulation rate of 0.07 cm year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the UB determined at a station 50 km from D3 (Cha et al., 2005), the average
Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content of 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 10–20 cm
depth (Fig. 2g) corresponds to a flux for permanent burial of
0.002 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or just 0.03 % of the Mn reduction rate
(Table 3) – i.e., an Mn atom is recycled 3800 times before it finally gets
buried, first by stripping from the particles that settle to the seafloor
and subsequently, over and over, by reductive dissolution of the Mn oxides
that from by reoxidation in the oxic surface layer (or, potentially, in the
nitrate zone; Aller et al., 1998; Mogollón et al., 2016). This is a much
more extensive recycling than found in the Mn sediment of Skagerrak
(130–260 times; Canfield et al., 1993b). The difference results mainly from
a much higher burial flux of Mn (as authigenic Mn[II]) in the Skagerrak
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Canfield et al., 1993b). The reason
that little, if any, authigenic Mn(II) is buried in the UB is not clear.</p>
      <p>As noted in previous studies (Aller, 1990; Canfield et al., 1993b), high
contributions of Mn and Fe reduction to carbon oxidation in offshore
sediments require physical mixing, which typically occurs through
bioturbation. This is also the case for the UB, where the burial flux from
the oxic surface layer into the Mn reduction zone corresponded to
0.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> or 5 % of the Mn reduction rate
(213 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 cm year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Bioturbation
has previously been inferred, but not quantified, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pb profiles in
the UB (Cha, 2002), and thin polychaete worms were observed during our
sampling. Assuming bioturbation to be a diffusive process, we estimate, in a
similar manner as in the previous studies and based on the average gradient
in Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>(DCA)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0.5–1 to 7–8 cm, that the Mn reduction rate
would be supported at a biodiffusion coefficient of 9.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This value is 3.6 times lower than the coefficient estimated for the
Skagerrak (Canfield et al., 1993b) and consistent with estimates for other
sediments with similar deposition rates (Boudreau, 1994). The estimated
biodiffusion coefficient (Db) of 9.5 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Site
D3 corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 % of the molecular diffusion coefficient of
oxygen (388 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Judging from the absence of major fauna in
the UB sediments, the mixing is brought about by small organisms with each
individual affecting only a small area relative to the size of our cores, and
the Db averaging many of these small and local but frequent events. Under
such conditions, bioturbation can drive Mn cycling in the UB without
substantial smearing of the redox zonation. Similarly, Hyacinthe et
al. (2001) found that well-defined profiles can be observed in both sediments
with low and high bioactivity in the Bay of Biscay.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>The UB as a biogeochemical hotspot</title>
      <p>The SRRs measured in this study (0.43–4.29 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
higher than those measured in productive systems such as the Benguela
upwelling system in the southeastern Atlantic
(0.14–1.39 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Ferdelman et al., 1999), and even
comparable to those reported at the Chilean
(2.7–4.8 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Thamdrup and Canfield, 1996) and
Peruvian upwelling system (5.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fossing, 1990) at a
similar depth range of 1000–2500 m. The total anaerobic DIC production
rates at the slope (14.0 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and basin site
(7.2 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were also comparable to those measured at the
same depth range of a Chilean upwelling site
(9.2–11.6 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thamdrup and Canfield, 1996). Since
rates of benthic carbon oxidation are largely controlled by the supply of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Canfield et al., 2005), a high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux reflected
in the high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 %, dry wt.) in the sediment
of the UB (Table 1) is likely to explain the high metabolic activities. A
similar high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content as in the UB is rarely found in deep-sea
sediment underlying oxic bottom water at depths exceeding 2000 m, except for
a Chilean upwelling site (Lee et al., 2008). This high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content
in the UB is mainly associated with the combination of enhanced biological
production resulting from the formation of coastal upwelling (Hyun et al.,
2009a), enhanced new production in summer (Kwak et al., 2013), occurrence of
an intrathermocline eddy resulting in the extraordinary subsurface
chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum (Kim et al., 2012), high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation
rates exceeding 2 g C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lee et al., 2008), and high
export production (Kim et al., 2009). Consequently, high benthic
mineralization resulting from the high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sediment implied
that the UB is a biogeochemical hotspot where significant turnover of organic
matter and nutrient regeneration occur.</p>
      <p>Recent oceanographic observations revealed that the gradual deoxygenation and
warming of the bottom water of the East Sea over the last 30 years have
resulted in an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % decrease in dissolved oxygen and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C increase in potential temperature (Kim et al., 2001;
Gamo, 2011; Gamo et al., 2014). Benthic metabolism and respiratory C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation
coupled to various terminal electron-accepting processes in the sediments are
largely controlled by the combination of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content, temperature, and
biological production overlying the water column (Canfield et al., 2005). It is
thus important to monitor any changes in the rates and partitioning of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation to better understand and predict the variations in
biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nutrients, and metals potentially associated
with long-term climatic changes in the UB, the biogeochemical hotspot of the
East Sea.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Surface sediments of the Ulleung Basin (UB) in the East Sea are characterized
by a high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 %, dry wt.), high contents of
Fe oxides (up to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and very high contents of Mn
oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We show that microbial Mn and Fe
reduction are the dominant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathways, comprising 45
and 20 % of total C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, respectively. The high Mn
content results from highly efficient recycling through reoxidation with very
low permanent burial of authigenic Mn(II) phases. The basin topography may
ensure that any Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> escaping to the overlying water returns to the
sediment after reprecipitation. The relative importance of Mn reduction to
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation displays saturation kinetics with respect to Mn
oxide content with a low half-saturation value
(8.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which further implies that Mn reduction can
be a dominant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation process in sediments with lower
MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content, and thereby that the process might be more important in
continental margin and deep basin sediments than previously thought. Vertical
distributions of the major terminal electron acceptors such as O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
nitrate, and Mn and Fe oxides were systematically zonated with discrete
sequential depletion according to the order of decreasing energy yield for
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, which are not sharply separated in most aquatic
sediments due to, for example, sediment heterogeneity and mixing resulting from
bioirrigation, bioturbation, and bottom turbidity currents. High benthic
mineralization resulting from the high C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>org</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content in the sediment
implied that the UB is a biogeochemical hotspot where significant turnover of
organic matter and nutrient regeneration occur.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Jung-Ho Hyun, as the first author and leader of the Korean research group, designed
the original experiments and conducted most writing; Sung-Han Kim,
Jin-Sook Mok, and Hyeyoun Cho participated in onboard research activities and
analytical processes; Verona Vandieken participated in onboard research and
was actively involved in the discussion of the manuscript; Tongsup Lee, as
project manager of the EAST-1 program,
participated in discussion of the results; Bo Thamdrup, as leader of the
Danish research group, collaborated with Jung-Ho Hyun in designing the
experiments and writing and discussing the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was a part of the projects titled Korean Long-term Marine
Ecological Researches (K-LTMER) and Deep Water Circulation and Material
Cycling in the East Sea (EAST-II) funded by the Korean Ministry of Oceans and
Fisheries, and was also supported by the National Research Foundation of
Korea (NRF-2012-013-2012S1A2A1A01030760) in collaboration with the Danish
Council for Independent Research and the Danish National Research Foundation
(DNRF53). The authors thank S. Pantoja (handling editor), S. Kasten and the two
anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved the earlier version of
the manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: S.
Pantoja<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: S. Kasten and two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C.: Bioturbation and manganese cycling in hemipelagic sediments,
Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond. A, 331, 51–68, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C., Hall, P. O. J., Rude, P. D., and Aller, J. Y.: Biogeochemical
heterogeneity and suboxic diagenesis in hemipelagic sediments of the Panama
Basin, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 45, 133–165, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Berg, P., Risgaard-Petersen, N., and Rysgaard, S.: Interpretation shelf and
slope: A comparison of in situ microelectrode and chamber flux measurements,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 614–629, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Boudreau, B. P.: Is burial velocity a master parameter for bioturbation?,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1243–1249, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bowles, M. W., Mogollón, J. M., Kasten, S., Zabel, M., and Hinrichs, K.
U.: Global rates of marine sulfate reduction and implications for
sub-sea-floor metabolic activities, Science, 344, 889–891, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Burdige, D. J. and Nealson, K. H.: Chemical and microbiological studies of
sulfide-mediated manganese reduction, Geomicrobiol. J., 4, 361–387, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Jørgensen, B. B., Fossing, H., Glud, R., Gundersen, J.,
Rasing, N. B., Thamdrup, B., Hansen, J. W., Nielsen, L. P., and Hall, P. O.
J.: Pathways of organic carbon oxidation in three continental margin
sediments, Mar. Geol., 113, 27–40, 1993a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Hansen, J. W.: The anaerobic degradation
of organic matter in Danish coastal sediments: iron reduction, manganese
reduction, and sulfate reduction, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 57, 3867–3883,
1993b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Kristensen, E. (Eds.): Aquatic
geomicrobiology, Elsevier, San Diego, 640 pp., 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cha, H. J.: Geochemistry of surface sediments and diagenetic redistribution
of phosphorus in the southwestern East Sea, PhD thesis, Seoul National Univ.,
Seoul, Korea, 190 pp., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cha, H. J., Lee, C. B., Kim, B. S., Choi, M. S., and Ruttenberg, K. C.: Early
diagenetic redistribution and burial of phosphorus in the sediments of the
southwestern East Sea (Japan Sea), Mar. Geol., 216, 127–143, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cha, H. J., Choi, M. S., Lee, C.-B., and Shin, D.-H.: Geochemistry of surface
sediments in the southwestern East/Japan Sea, J. Asian Earth Sci., 29,
685–697, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, Y. J., Kim, D. S., Lee, T. H., and Lee, C. B.: Estimate of manganese
and iron oxide reduction rates in slope and basin sediments of Ulleung Basin,
East Sea, J. Korean Soc. Oceanogr., 14, 127–133, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chough, S. K., Lee, H. J., and Yoon, S. H. (Eds.): Marine Geology of Korean
Seas, 2nd Edn., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cline, J. D.: Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural
waters, Limnol. Oceanogr., 14, 454–458, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
D'Hondt, S., Inagaki, F., Zarikian, C. A., Abrams, L. J., Dubois, N.,
Engelhardt, T., Evans, H., Ferdelman, T., Gribsholt, B., Harris, R. N.,
Hoppie, B. W., Hyun, J.-H., Kallmeyer, j., Kim, J., Lynch, J. E., McKinley,
C. C., Mitsunobu, S., Morono Y., Murray, R. W., Pockalny, R., Sauvage, J.,
Shimono, T., Shiraishi, F., Smith, D. C., Smith-Duque, C. E., Spivack, A. J.,
Steinsbu, B. O., Suzuki, Y., Szpak, M., Toffin, L., Uramoto, G., Yamaguchi,
Y. T., Zhang, G.-I., Zhang, X.-H., and Ziebis, W.: Presence of oxygen and
aerobic communities from sea floor to basement in deep-sea sediments, Nat.
Geosci., 8, 299–304, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Ferdelman, T. G., Fossing, H., Neumann, K., and Schulz, H. D.: Sulfate
reduction in surface sediments of the southeast Atlantic continental margin
between 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (Angola and Namibia),
Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 650–661, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H.: Sulfate reduction in shelf sediments in the upwelling
region off Central Peru, Cont. Shelf Res., 10, 355–367, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Measurement of bacterial sulfate
reduction in sediments: evaluation of a single-step chromium reduction
method, Biogeochemistry, 8, 205–222, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H., Ferdelman, T. G., and Berg, P.: Sulfate reduction and methane
oxidation in continental margin sediments influenced by irrigation
(South-East Atlantic off Namibia), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 897–910,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Froelich, P. N., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N. A., Heath,
G.R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., and Maynard, V.:
Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern
equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 43,
1075–1090, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gamo, T.: Dissolved oxygen in the bottom water of the Sea of Japan as a
sensitive alarm for global climatic change, Trend Anal. Chem., 30,
1308–1319, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gamo, T., Nakayama, N., Takahata, N., Sano, Y., Zhang, J., Yamazaki, E.,
Taniyasu, S., and Yamashita, N.: The Sea of Japan and its unique chemistry
revealed by time-series observations over the last 30 Year, Monogr. Environ.
Earth Planets, 2, 1–22, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gingele, F. X. and Kasten, S.: Solid-phase manganese in Southeast Atlantic
sediments Implications for the paleoenvironment, Mar. Geol., 121, 317–332,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Glud, R. N.: Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4,
243–289, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gobeil, C., Macdonald, R. W., and Sundby, B.: Diageneticseparation of cadmium
and manganese in suboxiccontinental margin sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 61, 4647–4654, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gribsholt, B., Kostka, J. E., and Kristensen, E.: Impact of fiddler crabs and
plant roots on sediment biogeochemistry in a Georgia saltmarsh, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 259, 237–251, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Haese, R. R., Schramm, J., Rutgers Van Der Loeff, M. M., and Schulz, H. D.: A comparative
study of iron and manganese diagenesis in continental slope and deep sea
basin sediments off Uruguay (SW Atlantic), Int. J. Earth Sci., 88, 619–629,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hall, P. O. and Aller, R. C.: Rapid small-volume, flow injection analysis for
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in marine and freshwaters, Limnol. Oceanogr., 37,
113–119, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, C., Zabel, M., and Schulz, H. N.: Benthic cycling of oxygen,
nitrogen, and phosphorus, in: Marine Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D.
and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 207–240, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J. W., Thamdrup, B., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Anoxic incubation of
sediment in gas-tight plastic bags: a method for biochemical process studies,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 208, 273–282, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hines, M. E., Bzylinski, D. A., Tugel, J. B., and Lyons, W. B.: Anaerobic
microbial biogeochemistry in sediments from two basins in the Gulf of Maine:
evidence for iron and manganese reduction, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 32,
313–324, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hyacinthe, C., Anschutz, P., Carbonel, P., Jouanneau, J.-M., Jorissen, F. J.:
Early diagenetic processes in the muddy sediments of the Bay of Biscay, Mar.
Geol., 177, 111–128, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Smith, A. C., and Kostka, J. E.: Relative contributions of
sulfate- and iron(III) reduction to organic matter mineralization and process
controls in contrasting habitats of the Georgia saltmarsh, Appl. Geochem.,
22, 2637–2651, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Kim, D., Shin, C.-W., Noh, J.-H., Yang, E.-J., Mok, J.-S., Kim,
S.-H., Kim, H.-C., and Yoo, S.: Enhanced phytoplankton and bacterioplankton
production coupled to coastal upwelling and an anticyclonic eddy in the
Ulleung basin, East Sea, Aquat. Microbiol. Ecol., 54, 45–54, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Mok, J.-S., Cho, H.-Y., Kim, S.-H., and Kostka, J. E.: Rapid
organic matter mineralization coupled to iron cycling in intertidal mud flats
of the Han River estuary, Yellow Sea, Biogeochemistry, 92, 231–245, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Mok, J.-S., You, O.-R., Kim, D., and Choi, D. L.: Variations and
controls of sulfate reduction in the continental slope and rise of the
Ulleung basin off the southeast Korean upwelling system in the East Sea,
Geomicrobiol. J., 27, 1–11, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A. and Jahnke, D. B.: Rates of C, N, P and Si recycling and
denitrification at the US mid-Atlantic continental slope depocenter, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 47, 1405–1428, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A., Emerson, S. R., and Murray, J. W.: A model of oxygen
reduction, denitrification, and organic matter mineralization in marine
sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 610–623, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A., Reimers, C. E., and Craven, D. B.: Intensification of
recycling of organic matter at the sea floor near ocean margins, Nature, 348,
50–54, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, M. M., Thamdrup, B., Rysgaard, S., Holmer, M., and Fossing, H.: Rates
and regulation of microbial iron reduction in sediments of the Baltic–North
Sea transition, Biogeochemistry, 65, 295–317, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: A comparison of methods for the quantification of
bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments, 1. Measurement with
radiotracer techniques, Geomicrobiol. J., 1, 11–28, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the
role of sulphate reduction, Nature, 296, 643–645, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: Bacteria and marine biogeochemistry,in:Marine
Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D. and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 169–206, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B. and Kasten, S.: Sulfur cycling and methane oxidation, in:
Marine Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D. and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 271–309, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B. and Revsbech, N. P.: Diffusive boundary layers and the
oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus, Limnol. Oceanogr., 30, 111–122,
1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, D. J., Lee, D. S., and Kim, K.-R.: The East Sea (Sea of Japan), in:
Carbon and nutriet fuxes in continental margins, edited by: Liu, K.-K.,
Atkinson, L., Quiñones, R. A., and Talaue-MaManus, L., Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 383–394, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Kim, D., Choi, M.-S., Oh, H.-Y., Kim, K. H., and Noh, J.-H.: Estimate of
particulate organic carbon export flux using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">238</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>U
disequilibrium in the southwestern East Sea during summer, (The Sea) J.
Korean Soc. Oceanogr., 14, 1–9, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, D., Yang, E. J., Kim, K. H., Shin, C.-W., Park, J., Yoo, S. J., and Hyun,
J.-H.: Impact of an anticyclonic eddy on the summer nutrient and chlorophyll
a distributions in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea (Japan Sea), ICES J. Mar.
Sci., 69, 23–29, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, K., Kim, K.-R., Min, D. H., Volkov, Y., Yoon, J.-H., and Takematsu, M.:
Warming and structural changes in the East Sea (Japan) Sea: a clue to future
changes in the global oceans?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3293–3296, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Luther, G. W., and Nealson, K. H.: Chemical and biological
reduction of Mn(III)-pyrophosphate complexes – potential importance of
dissolved Mn(III) as an environmental oxidant, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 59,
885–894, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Thamdrup, B., Glud, R. N., and Canfield, D. E.: Rates and
pathways of carbon oxidation in permanently cold Arctic sediments, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 180, 7–21, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Gribsholt, B., Petrie, E., Dalton, D., Skelton, H., and
Kristensen, E.: The rates and pathways of carbon oxidation in bioturbated
saltmarsh sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 230–240, 2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Roychoudhury, A., and Van Cappellen, P.: Rates and controls of
anaerobic microbial respiration across spatial and temporal gradients in
saltmarsh sediments, Biogeochemistry, 60, 49–76, 2002b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Kwak, J. H., Hwang, J., Choy, E. J., Park, H. J., Kang, D.-J., Lee, T.,
Chang, K.-I., Kim, K.-R., and Kang, C.-K.: High primary productivity and
f-ratio in summer in the Ulleung Basin of the East/Japan Sea, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. I, 79, 74–85, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J.: Importance of nitrate reduction in coastal and deep-sea sediments,
MS thesis, Department of Marine Science Graduate School, Pusan National
University, Korea, 86 pp., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, T., Hyun, J.-H., Mok, J. S., and Kim, D.: Organic carbon accumulation
and sulfate reduction rates in slope and basin sediments of the Ulleung
basin, East/Japan Sea, Geo.-Mar. Lett., 28, 153–159, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. H. and Gregory, S.: Diffusion of ions in sea water and deep sea
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 38, 703–714, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, K.-K., Atkinson, L., Quiñones, R. A., and Talaue-MaManus, L.:
Biogeochemistry of the continental margins, in: Carbon and nutriet fuxes in
continental margins, edited by: Liu, K.-K., Atkinson, L., Quiñones, R.
A., and Talaue-MaManus, L., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–24, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Lovley, D. R. and Phillips, E. J. P.: Manganese inhibition of microbial iron
reduction in anaerobic sediments, Geomicrobiol. J., 6, 145–155, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Luther III, G. W.: Acid volatile sulfide – A comment, Mar. Chem., 97,
198–205, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Macdonald, R. W. and Gobeil, C.: Manganese sources andsinks in the Arctic
Oceanwith reference to periodicenrichments in basin sediments, Aquat.
Geochem., 18, 565–591, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Madison, S., Tebo, B. M., Mucci, A., Sundby, B., and Luther III, G. W.:
Abundant porewater Mn(III) is a major component of the sedimentary redox
system, Science, 341, 875–878, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Magen, C., Mucci, A., and Sundby, B.: Reduction rates of sedimentary Mn and
Fe oxides: an incubation experiment with Arctic Ocean sediments, Aquat.
Biogeochem., 17, 629–643, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Melton, E. D., Swanner, E. D., Behrens, S., Schmidt, C., and Kappler, A.: The
interplay of microbially mediated and abiotic reactions in the biogeochemical
Fe cycle, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 12, 797–808, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Mewes, K., Mogollón, J. M., Picard, A., Rühlemann, C., Kuhn, T.,
Nöthen, K., and Kasten, S.: Impact of depositional and biogeochemical
processes on small scale variations in nodule abundance in the
Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 91, 125–141, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Mewes, K., Mogollón, J. M., Picard, A., Rühlemann, C., Eisenhauer,
A., Kuhn, T., Ziebis, W., and Kasten, S.: Diffusive transfer of oxygen from
seamount basaltic crust into overlying sediments: an example from the
Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 433, 215–225,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Meyers, C. and Nealson, K. H.: Microbial reduction of manganese oxides:
Interactions with iron and sulfur, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 52, 2727–2732,
1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Mogollón, J. M., Mewes, K., and Kasten, S.: Quantifying manganese and
nitrogen cycle coupling in manganese-rich, organic carbon-starved marine
sediments: examples from the Clarion-Clipperton fracture zone, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 43, 7114–7123, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069117</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Mouret, A., Anschutz, P., Lecroart, P., Chaillou, G., Hyacinthe, C., Deborde,
J., Jorissen, F., Deflandre, B., Schmidt, S., and Jouanneau, J.-M.: Benthic
geochemistry of manganese inthe Bayof Biscay, and sediment mass accumulation
rate, Geo.-Mar. Lett. 29, 133–149, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, J. W., Balistrieri, L. S., and Paul, B.: The oxidation stateof
manganese in marinesediments and ferromanganesenodules, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 48, 1237–1247, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Nickel, M., Vandieken, V., Brüchert, V., and Jørgensen, B. B.:
Microbial Mn(IV) and Fe(III) reduction in northern Barents Sea sediments
under different conditions of ice cover and organic carbon deposition,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55, 2390–2398, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Parsons, T. R., Maita, Y., and Lalli, C. M. (Eds.): A manual of chemical and
biological methods for seawater analysis, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 173 pp.,
1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, E. J. P. and Lovley, D. R.: Determination of Fe(III) and Fe(II) in
oxalate extracts of sediment, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 938–941, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Postma, D.: Concentration of Mn and separation from Fe in sediments – I.
Kinetics and stoichiometry of the reaction between birnessite and dissolved
Fe(II) at 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 49, 1023–1033, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Pyzik, A. E. and Sommer, S. E.: Sedimentary iron monosulfide: kinetics and
mechanisms of formation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 45, 687–698, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmussen, H. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Microelectrode studies of seasonal
oxygen uptake in a coastal sediment: role of molecular diffusion, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 81, 289–303, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Rickard, D. and Morse, J. W.: Acid volatile sulfur (AVS), Mar. Chem., 97,
141–107, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Romankevich, E. A.: Geochemistry of organicmatter in the ocean,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, Tokyo, 334 pp., 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Schaller, T. and Wehrli, B.: Geochemical-focusing of manganese in lake
sediments – An indicator of deep-water oxygen conditions, Aquat. Geochem.,
2, 359–378, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, H. D.: Qunatification of early diagenesis: dissolved constituents in marine
pore water, in: Marine Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D. and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 169–206, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Slomp, C. P., Mort, H. P., Jilbert, T., Reed, D. C., and Gustafsson, B. G.:
Coupled dynamics of iron and phosphorus in sediments of an oligotrophic
coastal bsin and the impact of anaerobic oxidation of methane, PLoS ONE, 8,
e62386, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0062386</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Sørensen, J. W. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Early diagenesis in sediments
from Danish coastal waters: Microbial activity and Mn-Fe-S geochemistry,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 51, 1583–1590, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Sørensen, J. W., Jørgensen, B. B., and Revsbech, N. P.: A comparison of
oxygen, nitrate and sulfate respiration in a coastal marine sediment,
Microbiol. Ecol., 5, 105–115, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Stookey, L. L.: Ferrozine – a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron, Anal.
Chem., 42, 779–781, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Sundby, B. and Silverberg, N.: Manganese fluxes in the benthic boundary layer,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 30, 372–381, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B.: Bacterial manganese and iron reduction in aquatic sediments,
Adv. Microb. Ecol., 16, 41–84, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Canfield, D. E.: Pathways of carbon oxidation in continental
margin sediments off central Chile, Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 1629–1650, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Dalsgaard, T.: The fate of ammonium in anoxic manganese
oxide-rich marine sediment, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 4157–4164, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B., Rosselló-Mora, R., and Amann, R.: Microbial manganese and
sulfate reduction in Black Sea shelf sediments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,
66, 2888–2897, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M. and Engström, P.: Distribution, activity, and ecology of
anammox bacteria in aquatic environments, in: Nitrification, edited by: Ward,
B. B., Arp, D. J., and Klotz, M. G., ASM Press, Washington, DC, 201–235,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M., Engström, P., and Thamdrup, B.: Stark contrast in
denitrification and anammox across the deep Norwegian Trench in the
Skagerrak, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79, 7381–7389, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Vandieken, V., Nickel, M., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Carbon mineralization in
Arctic sediments northeast of Svalbard: Mn(IV) and Fe(III) reduction as
principal anaerobic respiratory pathways, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 322, 15–27,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Vandieken, V., Pester, M., Finke, N., Hyun, J.-H., Friedrich, M. W., Loy, A.,
and Thamdrup, B.: Identification of acetate-oxidizing manganese-reducing
bacteria in three manganese oxide-rich marine sediments by stable isotope
probing, ISME J., 6, 2078–2090, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Vandieken, V., Finke, N., and Thamdrup, B.: Hydrogen, acetate, and lactate as
electron donors for microbial manganese reduction in a manganese-rich coastal
marine sediment, FEMS Micribiol Ecol., 87, 733–745, 2014.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Walsh, J. J.: Importance of continental margins in the marine biogeochemical
cycling of carbon and nitrogen, Nature, 350, 53–55, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Yamada, K., Ishizaka, J., and Nagata, H.: Spatial and temporal variability of
satellite primary production in the Japan Sea from 1998 to 2002, J.
Oceanogr., 61, 857–869, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, J. H., Kajiwara, Y., and Fujii, T.: Distribution of transition elements
in surface sediments of the southwestern margin of Japan Sea, Geochem. J.,
23, 161–180, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Yoo, S. and Park, J. S.: Why is the southwest the most productive region of
the East Sea/Sea of Japan?, J. Marine Syst., 78, 301–315, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Manganese and iron reduction dominate organic carbon oxidation in surface sediments of the deep Ulleung Basin, East Sea</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Rates and pathways of benthic organic carbon (C<sub>org</sub>) oxidation were
investigated in surface sediments of the Ulleung Basin (UB) characterized by
high C<sub>org</sub> contents ( &gt;  2.5 %, dry wt.) and very high contents
of Mn oxides ( &gt;  200 µmol cm<sup>−3</sup>) and Fe oxides (up to
100 µmol cm<sup>−3</sup>). The combination of geochemical analyses and
independently executed metabolic rate measurements revealed that Mn and Fe
reduction were the dominant C<sub>org</sub> oxidation pathways in the center
of the UB, comprising 45 and 20 % of total C<sub>org</sub> oxidation,
respectively. By contrast, sulfate reduction was the dominant C<sub>org</sub>
oxidation pathway, accounting for 50 % of total C<sub>org</sub>
mineralization in sediments of the continental slope. The relative
significance of each C<sub>org</sub> oxidation pathway matched the depth
distribution of the respective electron acceptors. The relative importance of
Mn reduction for C<sub>org</sub> oxidation displays saturation kinetics with
respect to Mn oxide content with a low half-saturation value of
8.6 µmol cm<sup>−3</sup>, which further implies that Mn reduction can be
a dominant C<sub>org</sub> oxidation process even in sediments with lower
MnO<sub>2</sub> content as known from several other locations. This is the first
report of a high contribution of manganese reduction to C<sub>org</sub>
oxidation in offshore sediments on the Asian margin. The high manganese oxide
content in the surface sediment in the central UB was maintained by an
extreme degree of recycling, with each Mn atom on average being reoxidized
 ∼  3800 times before permanent burial. This is the highest degree of
recycling so far reported for Mn-rich sediments, and it appears linked to the
high benthic mineralization rates resulting from the high C<sub>org</sub>
content that indicate the UB as a biogeochemical hotspot for turnover of
organic matter and nutrient regeneration.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C.: Bioturbation and manganese cycling in hemipelagic sediments,
Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond. A, 331, 51–68, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aller, R. C., Hall, P. O. J., Rude, P. D., and Aller, J. Y.: Biogeochemical
heterogeneity and suboxic diagenesis in hemipelagic sediments of the Panama
Basin, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 45, 133–165, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Berg, P., Risgaard-Petersen, N., and Rysgaard, S.: Interpretation shelf and
slope: A comparison of in situ microelectrode and chamber flux measurements,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 614–629, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Boudreau, B. P.: Is burial velocity a master parameter for bioturbation?,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 1243–1249, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bowles, M. W., Mogollón, J. M., Kasten, S., Zabel, M., and Hinrichs, K.
U.: Global rates of marine sulfate reduction and implications for
sub-sea-floor metabolic activities, Science, 344, 889–891, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Burdige, D. J. and Nealson, K. H.: Chemical and microbiological studies of
sulfide-mediated manganese reduction, Geomicrobiol. J., 4, 361–387, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Jørgensen, B. B., Fossing, H., Glud, R., Gundersen, J.,
Rasing, N. B., Thamdrup, B., Hansen, J. W., Nielsen, L. P., and Hall, P. O.
J.: Pathways of organic carbon oxidation in three continental margin
sediments, Mar. Geol., 113, 27–40, 1993a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Hansen, J. W.: The anaerobic degradation
of organic matter in Danish coastal sediments: iron reduction, manganese
reduction, and sulfate reduction, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 57, 3867–3883,
1993b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Canfield, D. E., Thamdrup, B., and Kristensen, E. (Eds.): Aquatic
geomicrobiology, Elsevier, San Diego, 640 pp., 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cha, H. J.: Geochemistry of surface sediments and diagenetic redistribution
of phosphorus in the southwestern East Sea, PhD thesis, Seoul National Univ.,
Seoul, Korea, 190 pp., 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cha, H. J., Lee, C. B., Kim, B. S., Choi, M. S., and Ruttenberg, K. C.: Early
diagenetic redistribution and burial of phosphorus in the sediments of the
southwestern East Sea (Japan Sea), Mar. Geol., 216, 127–143, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cha, H. J., Choi, M. S., Lee, C.-B., and Shin, D.-H.: Geochemistry of surface
sediments in the southwestern East/Japan Sea, J. Asian Earth Sci., 29,
685–697, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, Y. J., Kim, D. S., Lee, T. H., and Lee, C. B.: Estimate of manganese
and iron oxide reduction rates in slope and basin sediments of Ulleung Basin,
East Sea, J. Korean Soc. Oceanogr., 14, 127–133, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chough, S. K., Lee, H. J., and Yoon, S. H. (Eds.): Marine Geology of Korean
Seas, 2nd Edn., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cline, J. D.: Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural
waters, Limnol. Oceanogr., 14, 454–458, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
D'Hondt, S., Inagaki, F., Zarikian, C. A., Abrams, L. J., Dubois, N.,
Engelhardt, T., Evans, H., Ferdelman, T., Gribsholt, B., Harris, R. N.,
Hoppie, B. W., Hyun, J.-H., Kallmeyer, j., Kim, J., Lynch, J. E., McKinley,
C. C., Mitsunobu, S., Morono Y., Murray, R. W., Pockalny, R., Sauvage, J.,
Shimono, T., Shiraishi, F., Smith, D. C., Smith-Duque, C. E., Spivack, A. J.,
Steinsbu, B. O., Suzuki, Y., Szpak, M., Toffin, L., Uramoto, G., Yamaguchi,
Y. T., Zhang, G.-I., Zhang, X.-H., and Ziebis, W.: Presence of oxygen and
aerobic communities from sea floor to basement in deep-sea sediments, Nat.
Geosci., 8, 299–304, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Ferdelman, T. G., Fossing, H., Neumann, K., and Schulz, H. D.: Sulfate
reduction in surface sediments of the southeast Atlantic continental margin
between 15°38′ S and 27°57′ S (Angola and Namibia),
Limnol. Oceanogr., 44, 650–661, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H.: Sulfate reduction in shelf sediments in the upwelling
region off Central Peru, Cont. Shelf Res., 10, 355–367, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Measurement of bacterial sulfate
reduction in sediments: evaluation of a single-step chromium reduction
method, Biogeochemistry, 8, 205–222, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fossing, H., Ferdelman, T. G., and Berg, P.: Sulfate reduction and methane
oxidation in continental margin sediments influenced by irrigation
(South-East Atlantic off Namibia), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 897–910,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Froelich, P. N., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N. A., Heath,
G.R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., and Maynard, V.:
Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern
equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 43,
1075–1090, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Gamo, T.: Dissolved oxygen in the bottom water of the Sea of Japan as a
sensitive alarm for global climatic change, Trend Anal. Chem., 30,
1308–1319, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gamo, T., Nakayama, N., Takahata, N., Sano, Y., Zhang, J., Yamazaki, E.,
Taniyasu, S., and Yamashita, N.: The Sea of Japan and its unique chemistry
revealed by time-series observations over the last 30 Year, Monogr. Environ.
Earth Planets, 2, 1–22, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gingele, F. X. and Kasten, S.: Solid-phase manganese in Southeast Atlantic
sediments Implications for the paleoenvironment, Mar. Geol., 121, 317–332,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Glud, R. N.: Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4,
243–289, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gobeil, C., Macdonald, R. W., and Sundby, B.: Diageneticseparation of cadmium
and manganese in suboxiccontinental margin sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 61, 4647–4654, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gribsholt, B., Kostka, J. E., and Kristensen, E.: Impact of fiddler crabs and
plant roots on sediment biogeochemistry in a Georgia saltmarsh, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 259, 237–251, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Haese, R. R., Schramm, J., Rutgers Van Der Loeff, M. M., and Schulz, H. D.: A comparative
study of iron and manganese diagenesis in continental slope and deep sea
basin sediments off Uruguay (SW Atlantic), Int. J. Earth Sci., 88, 619–629,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, P. O. and Aller, R. C.: Rapid small-volume, flow injection analysis for
CO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in marine and freshwaters, Limnol. Oceanogr., 37,
113–119, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, C., Zabel, M., and Schulz, H. N.: Benthic cycling of oxygen,
nitrogen, and phosphorus, in: Marine Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D.
and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 207–240, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J. W., Thamdrup, B., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Anoxic incubation of
sediment in gas-tight plastic bags: a method for biochemical process studies,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 208, 273–282, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hines, M. E., Bzylinski, D. A., Tugel, J. B., and Lyons, W. B.: Anaerobic
microbial biogeochemistry in sediments from two basins in the Gulf of Maine:
evidence for iron and manganese reduction, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 32,
313–324, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hyacinthe, C., Anschutz, P., Carbonel, P., Jouanneau, J.-M., Jorissen, F. J.:
Early diagenetic processes in the muddy sediments of the Bay of Biscay, Mar.
Geol., 177, 111–128, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Smith, A. C., and Kostka, J. E.: Relative contributions of
sulfate- and iron(III) reduction to organic matter mineralization and process
controls in contrasting habitats of the Georgia saltmarsh, Appl. Geochem.,
22, 2637–2651, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Kim, D., Shin, C.-W., Noh, J.-H., Yang, E.-J., Mok, J.-S., Kim,
S.-H., Kim, H.-C., and Yoo, S.: Enhanced phytoplankton and bacterioplankton
production coupled to coastal upwelling and an anticyclonic eddy in the
Ulleung basin, East Sea, Aquat. Microbiol. Ecol., 54, 45–54, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Mok, J.-S., Cho, H.-Y., Kim, S.-H., and Kostka, J. E.: Rapid
organic matter mineralization coupled to iron cycling in intertidal mud flats
of the Han River estuary, Yellow Sea, Biogeochemistry, 92, 231–245, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hyun, J.-H., Mok, J.-S., You, O.-R., Kim, D., and Choi, D. L.: Variations and
controls of sulfate reduction in the continental slope and rise of the
Ulleung basin off the southeast Korean upwelling system in the East Sea,
Geomicrobiol. J., 27, 1–11, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A. and Jahnke, D. B.: Rates of C, N, P and Si recycling and
denitrification at the US mid-Atlantic continental slope depocenter, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 47, 1405–1428, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A., Emerson, S. R., and Murray, J. W.: A model of oxygen
reduction, denitrification, and organic matter mineralization in marine
sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 610–623, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Jahnke, R. A., Reimers, C. E., and Craven, D. B.: Intensification of
recycling of organic matter at the sea floor near ocean margins, Nature, 348,
50–54, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Jensen, M. M., Thamdrup, B., Rysgaard, S., Holmer, M., and Fossing, H.: Rates
and regulation of microbial iron reduction in sediments of the Baltic–North
Sea transition, Biogeochemistry, 65, 295–317, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: A comparison of methods for the quantification of
bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments, 1. Measurement with
radiotracer techniques, Geomicrobiol. J., 1, 11–28, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed – the
role of sulphate reduction, Nature, 296, 643–645, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B.: Bacteria and marine biogeochemistry,in:Marine
Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D. and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 169–206, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B. and Kasten, S.: Sulfur cycling and methane oxidation, in:
Marine Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D. and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 271–309, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jørgensen, B. B. and Revsbech, N. P.: Diffusive boundary layers and the
oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus, Limnol. Oceanogr., 30, 111–122,
1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, D. J., Lee, D. S., and Kim, K.-R.: The East Sea (Sea of Japan), in:
Carbon and nutriet fuxes in continental margins, edited by: Liu, K.-K.,
Atkinson, L., Quiñones, R. A., and Talaue-MaManus, L., Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 383–394, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, D., Choi, M.-S., Oh, H.-Y., Kim, K. H., and Noh, J.-H.: Estimate of
particulate organic carbon export flux using <sup>234</sup>Th ∕ <sup>238</sup>U
disequilibrium in the southwestern East Sea during summer, (The Sea) J.
Korean Soc. Oceanogr., 14, 1–9, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, D., Yang, E. J., Kim, K. H., Shin, C.-W., Park, J., Yoo, S. J., and Hyun,
J.-H.: Impact of an anticyclonic eddy on the summer nutrient and chlorophyll
a distributions in the Ulleung Basin, East Sea (Japan Sea), ICES J. Mar.
Sci., 69, 23–29, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, K., Kim, K.-R., Min, D. H., Volkov, Y., Yoon, J.-H., and Takematsu, M.:
Warming and structural changes in the East Sea (Japan) Sea: a clue to future
changes in the global oceans?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3293–3296, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Luther, G. W., and Nealson, K. H.: Chemical and biological
reduction of Mn(III)-pyrophosphate complexes – potential importance of
dissolved Mn(III) as an environmental oxidant, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 59,
885–894, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Thamdrup, B., Glud, R. N., and Canfield, D. E.: Rates and
pathways of carbon oxidation in permanently cold Arctic sediments, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 180, 7–21, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Gribsholt, B., Petrie, E., Dalton, D., Skelton, H., and
Kristensen, E.: The rates and pathways of carbon oxidation in bioturbated
saltmarsh sediments, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 230–240, 2002a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Kostka, J. E., Roychoudhury, A., and Van Cappellen, P.: Rates and controls of
anaerobic microbial respiration across spatial and temporal gradients in
saltmarsh sediments, Biogeochemistry, 60, 49–76, 2002b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Kwak, J. H., Hwang, J., Choy, E. J., Park, H. J., Kang, D.-J., Lee, T.,
Chang, K.-I., Kim, K.-R., and Kang, C.-K.: High primary productivity and
f-ratio in summer in the Ulleung Basin of the East/Japan Sea, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. I, 79, 74–85, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J.: Importance of nitrate reduction in coastal and deep-sea sediments,
MS thesis, Department of Marine Science Graduate School, Pusan National
University, Korea, 86 pp., 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, T., Hyun, J.-H., Mok, J. S., and Kim, D.: Organic carbon accumulation
and sulfate reduction rates in slope and basin sediments of the Ulleung
basin, East/Japan Sea, Geo.-Mar. Lett., 28, 153–159, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y. H. and Gregory, S.: Diffusion of ions in sea water and deep sea
sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 38, 703–714, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, K.-K., Atkinson, L., Quiñones, R. A., and Talaue-MaManus, L.:
Biogeochemistry of the continental margins, in: Carbon and nutriet fuxes in
continental margins, edited by: Liu, K.-K., Atkinson, L., Quiñones, R.
A., and Talaue-MaManus, L., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–24, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Lovley, D. R. and Phillips, E. J. P.: Manganese inhibition of microbial iron
reduction in anaerobic sediments, Geomicrobiol. J., 6, 145–155, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Luther III, G. W.: Acid volatile sulfide – A comment, Mar. Chem., 97,
198–205, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Macdonald, R. W. and Gobeil, C.: Manganese sources andsinks in the Arctic
Oceanwith reference to periodicenrichments in basin sediments, Aquat.
Geochem., 18, 565–591, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Madison, S., Tebo, B. M., Mucci, A., Sundby, B., and Luther III, G. W.:
Abundant porewater Mn(III) is a major component of the sedimentary redox
system, Science, 341, 875–878, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Magen, C., Mucci, A., and Sundby, B.: Reduction rates of sedimentary Mn and
Fe oxides: an incubation experiment with Arctic Ocean sediments, Aquat.
Biogeochem., 17, 629–643, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Melton, E. D., Swanner, E. D., Behrens, S., Schmidt, C., and Kappler, A.: The
interplay of microbially mediated and abiotic reactions in the biogeochemical
Fe cycle, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 12, 797–808, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Mewes, K., Mogollón, J. M., Picard, A., Rühlemann, C., Kuhn, T.,
Nöthen, K., and Kasten, S.: Impact of depositional and biogeochemical
processes on small scale variations in nodule abundance in the
Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 91, 125–141, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Mewes, K., Mogollón, J. M., Picard, A., Rühlemann, C., Eisenhauer,
A., Kuhn, T., Ziebis, W., and Kasten, S.: Diffusive transfer of oxygen from
seamount basaltic crust into overlying sediments: an example from the
Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 433, 215–225,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Meyers, C. and Nealson, K. H.: Microbial reduction of manganese oxides:
Interactions with iron and sulfur, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 52, 2727–2732,
1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Mogollón, J. M., Mewes, K., and Kasten, S.: Quantifying manganese and
nitrogen cycle coupling in manganese-rich, organic carbon-starved marine
sediments: examples from the Clarion-Clipperton fracture zone, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 43, 7114–7123, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069117" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2016GL069117</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Mouret, A., Anschutz, P., Lecroart, P., Chaillou, G., Hyacinthe, C., Deborde,
J., Jorissen, F., Deflandre, B., Schmidt, S., and Jouanneau, J.-M.: Benthic
geochemistry of manganese inthe Bayof Biscay, and sediment mass accumulation
rate, Geo.-Mar. Lett. 29, 133–149, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, J. W., Balistrieri, L. S., and Paul, B.: The oxidation stateof
manganese in marinesediments and ferromanganesenodules, Geochim. Cosmochim.
Ac., 48, 1237–1247, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Nickel, M., Vandieken, V., Brüchert, V., and Jørgensen, B. B.:
Microbial Mn(IV) and Fe(III) reduction in northern Barents Sea sediments
under different conditions of ice cover and organic carbon deposition,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55, 2390–2398, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Parsons, T. R., Maita, Y., and Lalli, C. M. (Eds.): A manual of chemical and
biological methods for seawater analysis, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 173 pp.,
1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Phillips, E. J. P. and Lovley, D. R.: Determination of Fe(III) and Fe(II) in
oxalate extracts of sediment, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51, 938–941, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Postma, D.: Concentration of Mn and separation from Fe in sediments – I.
Kinetics and stoichiometry of the reaction between birnessite and dissolved
Fe(II) at 10 °C, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 49, 1023–1033, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Pyzik, A. E. and Sommer, S. E.: Sedimentary iron monosulfide: kinetics and
mechanisms of formation, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 45, 687–698, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Rasmussen, H. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Microelectrode studies of seasonal
oxygen uptake in a coastal sediment: role of molecular diffusion, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 81, 289–303, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Rickard, D. and Morse, J. W.: Acid volatile sulfur (AVS), Mar. Chem., 97,
141–107, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Romankevich, E. A.: Geochemistry of organicmatter in the ocean,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, Tokyo, 334 pp., 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Schaller, T. and Wehrli, B.: Geochemical-focusing of manganese in lake
sediments – An indicator of deep-water oxygen conditions, Aquat. Geochem.,
2, 359–378, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, H. D.: Qunatification of early diagenesis: dissolved constituents in marine
pore water, in: Marine Geochemistry, edited by: Schulz, H. D. and Zabel, M., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 169–206, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Slomp, C. P., Mort, H. P., Jilbert, T., Reed, D. C., and Gustafsson, B. G.:
Coupled dynamics of iron and phosphorus in sediments of an oligotrophic
coastal bsin and the impact of anaerobic oxidation of methane, PLoS ONE, 8,
e62386, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062386" target="_blank">doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062386</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Sørensen, J. W. and Jørgensen, B. B.: Early diagenesis in sediments
from Danish coastal waters: Microbial activity and Mn-Fe-S geochemistry,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 51, 1583–1590, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Sørensen, J. W., Jørgensen, B. B., and Revsbech, N. P.: A comparison of
oxygen, nitrate and sulfate respiration in a coastal marine sediment,
Microbiol. Ecol., 5, 105–115, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Stookey, L. L.: Ferrozine – a new spectrophotometric reagent for iron, Anal.
Chem., 42, 779–781, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Sundby, B. and Silverberg, N.: Manganese fluxes in the benthic boundary layer,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 30, 372–381, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B.: Bacterial manganese and iron reduction in aquatic sediments,
Adv. Microb. Ecol., 16, 41–84, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Canfield, D. E.: Pathways of carbon oxidation in continental
margin sediments off central Chile, Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 1629–1650, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Dalsgaard, T.: The fate of ammonium in anoxic manganese
oxide-rich marine sediment, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 4157–4164, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B., Rosselló-Mora, R., and Amann, R.: Microbial manganese and
sulfate reduction in Black Sea shelf sediments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,
66, 2888–2897, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M. and Engström, P.: Distribution, activity, and ecology of
anammox bacteria in aquatic environments, in: Nitrification, edited by: Ward,
B. B., Arp, D. J., and Klotz, M. G., ASM Press, Washington, DC, 201–235,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Trimmer, M., Engström, P., and Thamdrup, B.: Stark contrast in
denitrification and anammox across the deep Norwegian Trench in the
Skagerrak, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79, 7381–7389, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Vandieken, V., Nickel, M., and Jørgensen, B. B.: Carbon mineralization in
Arctic sediments northeast of Svalbard: Mn(IV) and Fe(III) reduction as
principal anaerobic respiratory pathways, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 322, 15–27,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Vandieken, V., Pester, M., Finke, N., Hyun, J.-H., Friedrich, M. W., Loy, A.,
and Thamdrup, B.: Identification of acetate-oxidizing manganese-reducing
bacteria in three manganese oxide-rich marine sediments by stable isotope
probing, ISME J., 6, 2078–2090, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Vandieken, V., Finke, N., and Thamdrup, B.: Hydrogen, acetate, and lactate as
electron donors for microbial manganese reduction in a manganese-rich coastal
marine sediment, FEMS Micribiol Ecol., 87, 733–745, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Walsh, J. J.: Importance of continental margins in the marine biogeochemical
cycling of carbon and nitrogen, Nature, 350, 53–55, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Yamada, K., Ishizaka, J., and Nagata, H.: Spatial and temporal variability of
satellite primary production in the Japan Sea from 1998 to 2002, J.
Oceanogr., 61, 857–869, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Yin, J. H., Kajiwara, Y., and Fujii, T.: Distribution of transition elements
in surface sediments of the southwestern margin of Japan Sea, Geochem. J.,
23, 161–180, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Yoo, S. and Park, J. S.: Why is the southwest the most productive region of
the East Sea/Sea of Japan?, J. Marine Syst., 78, 301–315, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
