<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-105-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Soil solution phosphorus turnover: derivation, interpretation, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>and insights
from a global compilation of isotope<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> exchange kinetic studies</article-title><alt-title>Soil solution phosphorus turnover</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Soil solution phosphorus turnover}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Helfenstein et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Helfenstein</surname><given-names>Julian</given-names></name>
          <email>julian.helfenstein@usys.ethz.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-2589</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Jegminat</surname><given-names>Jannes</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>McLaren</surname><given-names>Timothy I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Frossard</surname><given-names>Emmanuel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Lindau, 8315,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH
Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Julian Helfenstein (julian.helfenstein@usys.ethz.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>105</fpage><lpage>114</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e117">The exchange rate of inorganic phosphorus (P) between the
soil solution and solid phase, also known as soil solution P turnover, is
essential for describing the kinetics of bioavailable P. While soil solution
P turnover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be determined by tracing radioisotopes in a
soil–solution system, few studies have done so. We believe that this is due
to a lack of understanding on how to derive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from isotopic exchange
kinetic (IEK) experiments, a common form of radioisotope dilution study.
Here, we provide a derivation of calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using parameters
obtained from IEK experiments. We then calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 217 soils from
published IEK experiments in terrestrial ecosystems, and also that of 18
long-term P fertilizer field experiments. Analysis of the global compilation
data set revealed a negative relationship between concentrations of soil
solution P and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> buffered isotopically
exchangeable P in soils with low concentrations of soil solution P. This
finding was supported by an analysis of long-term P fertilizer field
experiments, which revealed a negative relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
phosphate-buffering capacity. Our study highlights the importance of
calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for understanding the kinetics of P between the soil
solid and solution phases where it is bioavailable. We argue that our
derivation can also be used to calculate soil solution turnover of other
environmentally relevant and strongly sorbing elements that can be traced
with radioisotopes, such as zinc, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, and uranium.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e218">As an essential but often limiting nutrient, phosphorus (P) plays a central
role in food production, and more efficient P management is key to improve
food security (Tilman et al., 2002; Syers et al., 2008). Phosphorus
limitation in agroecosystems is usually overcome by applying P fertilizers
to the soil surface. However, excessive applications of P fertilizer to soil
can cause ecological, societal, and economic problems. First, P fertilizer is
largely derived from rock phosphate, which is a non-renewable resource and
major deposits are located in only a few countries (Elser and
Bennett, 2011; Obersteiner et al., 2013). Second, applications of P
fertilizers to soils with a high P sorption capacity can be inefficient
because P largely accumulates in the soil in sparingly soluble forms
(Roy et al., 2016). Third, leaching or runoff of P fertilizer
from agricultural land to aquatic and marine ecosystems contributes to fish
die-off and declining water quality (Carpenter
et al., 1998). To improve food security while reducing ecosystem pollution,
it is essential that we improve our understanding of soil P dynamics,
particularly the mechanisms controlling P movement between the soil solid
phase and the soil solution where it is bioavailable.</p>
      <p id="d1e221">Plants take up P from the soil solution as ionic orthophosphate
(H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or HPO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via roots or mycorrhizal hyphae
(Pierzynski and McDowell, 2005). The soil solution typically
contains low concentrations of P (Achat et al., 2016), but the soil
solution can be replenished with P from the soil solid phase, which can
provide additional P for uptake by plants (Pierzynski and
McDowell, 2005). Therefore, P exchange kinetics, or the rate at which the
soil solution is replenished by<?pagebreak page106?> P from the soil solid phase, have important
implications for the P requirements of living organisms
(Menezes-Blackburn et al., 2016; Fardeau et al., 1991). In this study, we
investigate a potential link between two different concepts, phosphorus-buffering capacity and soil solution P turnover, by analyzing a data set of
global soils and P fertilizer experiments.</p>
      <p id="d1e262">Phosphorus-buffering capacity (PBC) is defined as the ability of soil to
moderate changes in the concentration of soil solution P (Pypers et al.,
2006; Olsen and Khasawneh, 1980; Beckett and White, 1964). Historically, PBC
has been calculated using Eq. (1).
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M12" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PBC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>conc.    of  P  in  soil  solution</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>conc.    of  P  in  the  soil</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The traditional approach of determining PBC in soil is to add various
amounts of P to a soil suspension, equilibrate, and then measure the
slope between adsorbed P and P in soil solution (Olsen
and Khasawneh, 1980). Alternatively, PBC can be measured by analyzing the
change in soil solution P concentration with regard to P budget in field P
fertilization experiments (Morel et al., 2000). These
approaches have revealed that PBC is influenced by ambient temperature, soil
solution pH, and concentrations of P in the soil solution, and is highly
variable among soil types (Barrow, 1983). One of the most
important factors among soil types is the specific surface area of Fe/Al
oxides and clay minerals, which are important sites of P sorption
(Gérard, 2016). Whilst the aforementioned approaches are a
useful and cost effective way to study soil P dynamics (Bolland and
Allen, 2003; Burkitt et al., 2002; Barrow and Debnath, 2014), they are not
able to directly determine the turnover of P in the solution.</p>
      <p id="d1e290">Soil solution P turnover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean rate of exchange between
phosphate ions in solution and inorganic phosphate in soil and can be
calculated from parameters determined in an isotopic exchange kinetic (IEK)
experiment (Fardeau, 1996). Isotopic exchange kinetic
experiments involve the use of P radioisotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>P or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>P) to
directly measure the exchange of P between the soil solid and solution
phases (Frossard et al., 2011). They are based on the assumption
that during the short-term experiments, usually lasting 100 min, there is
only physicochemical exchange but no biological exchange (Oehl et al.,
2001). Measurements of isotopically exchangeable P are a more accurate indicator
of P bioavailability than conventional soil tests based on chemical
extraction because the former involves a P radiotracer that can be directly
measured and distinguished from all other P ions in the soil (Demaria et
al., 2005; Hamon et al., 2002). Previous studies have shown that isotopically
exchangeable P is the predominant source of P for most crops (Frossard et
al., 1994; Morel and Plenchette, 1994). Though the IEK approach does not
consider root-induced pH alterations or secretion of organic acids,
increased P availability due to root exudates can be quantified by comparing
isotopically exchangeable P with radioisotope uptake in plants
(Hedley et al., 1982). Isotopic dilution in a
soil solution system is characterized by two statistically fitted
parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using Eq. (2)
(Fardeau, 1985; Fardeau et al., 1991).
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M19" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The importance of parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as their relation to soil
properties was recently investigated (Achat et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e391">Despite several decades of using radioisotopes in P research and the
potential relevance of soil solution P turnover to understanding
agricultural and natural ecosystems, only six studies have published
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, and there has been no synthesis of these values (Frossard
et al., 2011; Fardeau et al., 1991; Fardeau, 1985, 1993; Oberson et al.,
1993; Xiong et al., 2002). We believe that this is because an intuitive
derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has never been published. Whilst information on soil
solution P turnover remains limited, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values can easily be calculated
using data from previously published IEK experiments.</p>
      <p id="d1e427">The first aim of our study was to provide a clear and intuitive derivation
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> term. Our second aim was to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from
previously published IEK studies, which resulted in a global data set of over
200 soils. We then tested specific hypotheses related to concentrations of
soil solution P and isotopically exchangeable P. Our third aim was to
understand the relationship between PBC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This involved an
additional data set based on long-term P fertilizer field experiments, which
reported IEK results and the P fertilizer budgets. Lastly, we carried
out a sensitivity analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to assist in interpretation of
future results.</p>
      <p id="d1e474">Our first hypothesis was that turnover of soil solution P would differ based
on soil group. More specifically, we hypothesized that soil groups known to
have higher concentrations of sorption sites (such as Andosols and
Ferralsols) would have faster turnover rates. Our second hypothesis was that
soils with higher concentrations of soil solution P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would have
lower values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to soil with lower concentrations of soil
solution P. This is because a high concentration of sorption sites leads to
fast adsorption and consequently low concentration of P in the solution.
Lastly, we hypothesized that the dependence of isotopically exchangeable P
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolves with time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Derivation of $K_{\mathrm{m}}$}?><title>Derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page107?><p id="d1e545">A given volume of soil can be described as containing inorganic P in one of
two states: the soil phase or the soil solution phase. In any given time
interval, physicochemical reactions transfer a fraction of P from the soil
solution phase into the solid phase. The rate constant of this reaction is
solution P turnover <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a critical role
in determining the time and amount of P that is potentially available to
plants. At low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, there is little exchange.</p>
      <p id="d1e593">At equilibrium, an underlying assumption of an IEK experiment, the net flux
between the phases is zero because of the balancing effect of the inverse
flux, i.e., the flux from the soil phase to the solution phase through
desorption and dissolution. In other words, the inverse flux prevents us
from measuring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly by fitting the temporal loss of P in soil
solution. If radioisotopes (for P, either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>P or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>P) are injected
into the soil solution, it becomes possible to experimentally eliminate the
inverse flux. Shortly after the injection, the radioisotope is not present
in the solid phase and, consequently, there is no inverse flux. Equation (3)
has been found to describe the resulting decline of radioisotope in solution
(Fardeau et al., 1991; Frossard et al., 2011).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radioactivity (Bq) measured at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (min), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
total amount of radioactivity added, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the model parameters that
describe the rapid and slow physicochemical processes, respectively. Since
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is equivalent to the decline rate of the radioisotope in the absence
of an inverse flux, we analyze Eq. (3) right after the injection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0)
and derive Eq. (2) (for details on the derivation, please see Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e756"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is thus calculated in three steps: first, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is measured, then
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are determined by nonlinear regression, and finally Eq. (2) is
applied. A limitation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is that it does not take into account an
indefinite number of P species each with their own exchange rate
(Andersson et al., 2016; Menezes-Blackburn et al., 2016; Gérard, 2016).
Also, the IEK method as described above does not consider microbial uptake
or mineralization of organic P (Oehl et al., 2001). Therefore, the
variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should be considered as the average P exchange rate of the
soil solution with an indefinite number of solid inorganic P pools.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Data set</title>
      <p id="d1e831">We carried out a literature search for IEK studies reporting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values based on the methodological approach of Fardeau et al. (1991).
Only values from topsoil layers (0–30 cm layer, if reported) were
compiled. The data set includes all papers cited by Achat et al. (2016) in
accordance with our aforementioned selection criteria, plus more recent
publications. In addition, data obtained from the published literature were
supplemented with unpublished data (seven soils), from studies carried out in
the Group of Plant Nutrition (ETH Zurich). This resulted in a final data set
of 217 soils taken from 41 references (see Supplement Table S1).
The soils represented 19 soil groups across the world reference base
(IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015), 26 countries, and all continents except Antarctica.
Eighty-five soils were from cropland, 64 from grassland, and 32 from forest,
while for 36 soils land use was not specified. Several studies (58 soils)
used a simplified version of Eq. (3). Since the simplified version leads to
only minor differences in parameter estimation, we assumed that this would
not affect calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fardeau et al., 1991). To avoid
overrepresentation, sample sizes of two articles reporting many samples of
similar soils were randomly reduced, from 30 to 10 (Compaoré
et al., 2003) and from 48 to 12 (Tran et al., 1988).</p>
      <p id="d1e870">In addition, we carried out a literature search for IEK studies on long-term
P fertilizer field experiments. We found published data across 18 long-term
experiment sites (Oberson et al., 1993, 1999; Fardeau et
al., 1991; Gallet et al., 2003; Morel et al., 1994). The soils represented the
following soil groups (IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015): Cambisols, Chernozems, Ferralsols,
Fluvisols, Gleysols, and Luvisols. In general, the field experiments involved
different types of mineral and organic P fertilizers applied at varying
rates. The difference in inputs minus outputs led to a range in P budgets
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>52 to 125 kg P ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e910">Isotopically exchangeable P (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the amount of P that can reach the soil solution within a given
time frame, is calculated using Eq. (4) (Hamon et al.,
2002; Fardeau, 1996).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          While IEK experiments only last several minutes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values can be
extrapolated beyond the IEK experiment based on Eqs. (3) and (4)
(Frossard et al., 1994; Morel and Plenchette, 1994; Buehler et al., 2003).
Extrapolated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are highly influenced by concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. One of the main challenges of the IEK experiment is the accurate and
precise determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly in high P-fixing soils
(Randriamanantsoa et al., 2013). Analysis involving
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could only be performed for studies that reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
addition to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1096">To examine the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and isotopically exchangeable P,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 to 129 600 min (equal to 3 months) using Eq. (4).  First, we calculated the difference between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We
then tested if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was a significant predictor of this difference using
linear regression. To determine the timespan over which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affected
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we performed linear regression between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 to 129 600 min. We also carried out linear regression with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as predictors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the aforementioned time points,
respectively. During data analysis, we noticed that different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels
were differently sensitive to predictor variables. Therefore, we used Jenks
natural breaks optimization to systematically partition the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data into
three clusters using R package “classInt” (Bivand et al., 2015).</p>
      <?pagebreak page108?><p id="d1e1354">To show sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we assumed relative standard deviations
(standard deviation/mean; %) of 10 % for each reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Uncertainty was then approximated using the partial derivatives approach for
error propagation (Eq. 5; Ku, 1966). By assuming independent errors
of the two fitted parameters, we obtain an upper bound on the error of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Weiss et al., 2006):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          We used R (R Core
Team, 2017) for all statistical analyses and to create the images. All model regressions were checked and the model fit determined
using significance of fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) and the regression coefficient
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Analysis of long-term field experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e1498">The P fertilizer budgets were calculated as the average annual input of
P fertilizer minus that of crop offtake (kg P ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each
site had three to four P treatments: usually one with a negative budget, one
with a balanced budget, and one with a positive budget. To determine the
effect of P budget on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we calculated the slope of linear
regressions between P budget and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The slope of the line relating
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to P budget can be taken as a field PBC, since the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
corresponds to the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the change in soil P concentration
(Eq. 1). Next, we investigated if there was a relationship between the
thus-determined PBC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Global analysis of P turnover in the soil solution ($K_{\mathrm{m}})$}?><title>Global analysis of P turnover in the soil solution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e1631">The turnover rate of P in the soil solution ranged 9 orders of magnitude
from 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across the 217 soils surveyed (Fig. 1). However, approximately half of the soils had a P turnover rate within
the range of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Clear differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
between different soil groups suggest that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is related to soil
properties governing kinetics of inorganic P in the soil solution system.
Surface soil horizons of Ferralsols had the highest values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
followed by Andosols and Cambisols (Fig. 1). High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
Ferralsols suggest that P in these soils is rapidly adsorbed, i.e., these
soils have a high P-buffering capacity. Three of the four
lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were found in Podzols, soils which are known to have
low P-sorbing capacity (Chen et al., 2003; Achat et al., 2009).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1755">Violin plots of P turnover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different world reference
base soil groups. Only soil groups with at least five observations were
plotted. The number of observations in each violin is written next to the
plot. Violin plots were made using the R package “vioplot” (Adler,
2005).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1777">Fardeau, Morel, and Boniface (Fardeau et al., 1991) showed that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is largest for small values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and becomes smaller as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
approaches 0.5, and as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches 1. Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> have often
been found to correlate with soil properties (pH, carbonate concentration,
oxalate-extractable Al/Fe, organic matter, etc.; Tran et al.,
1988; Demaria et al., 2013; Frossard et al., 1993; Achat et al., 2013). A
global compilation study showed that low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> occur for soils
with low concentrations of oxalate-extractable Al and Fe, which are
indicative of amorphous Al and Fe oxides (Achat et al., 2016). In
contrast, low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tend to occur for soils with a low ratio of organic
C to Al and Fe oxides (Achat et al., 2016). The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
Ferralsols are due to extremely low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.025, SD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.012, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 26), and are consistent with low ratios of organic C to Al and Fe oxides
typically reported in these soils (Randriamanantsoa et
al., 2013). The Podzols in the data set, on the other hand, have
distinguishably high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.50, SD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 14), consistent with the low Al and Fe oxide content of the upper horizon of
Podzols (Achat et al., 2009). However, small sample sizes per soil
group and large spans in soil properties even within soil groups mean that
group-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values should not be over-interpreted.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e1937">Simple linear regression between soil solution P turnover
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and soil solution P concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 217 soils. The
equation is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.960</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 127,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37. Dashed lines represent the 95 % confidence
interval.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page109?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Relationship between soil solution P turnover ($K_{\mathrm{m}})$ and concentration
of soil solution P ($P_{\mathrm{w}})$}?><title>Relationship between soil solution P turnover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and concentration
of soil solution P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e2088">There was a negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Fig. (2)
and described in Eq. (6):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M152" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.960</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 127, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37. The two
variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are important in governing plant-available P,
because the former describes the amount of P in solution and the latter
describes the rate at which it is exchanged. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 min, the highest
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred for soils with high values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the lowest values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred for soils with low
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The relationship was less clear at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 day (Fig. S1).
However, the trend that lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values occurred for soils
with a low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is still apparent at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 day.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2356">Soil solution P turnover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a driver of available P
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While there is a large range in P availability at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this variability becomes smaller and gradually uncoupled from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> class for longer time frames (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, 1440, 129 600 min <bold>a</bold>). The
growth in P availability between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 is dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>.
Simple linear regression between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the difference between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.170</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.357</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 615,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 170. Red, orange, and green colors
refer to classes of low, middle, and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as determined by Jenks
natural breaks optimization. In <bold>(b)</bold>, dashed lines represent the 95 %
confidence interval.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2650">The negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and P<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> confirms our second
hypothesis, that soils with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would have low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and is in
accordance with findings from other studies using different methodological
approaches. For example, it has been observed that sorption is less
pronounced on heavily fertilized soils, due to more negative surface charge
(Barrow and Debnath, 2014). In our study, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values imply the
presence of many potential binding sites, where P may adsorb or precipitate.
This leads to a rapid exchange between sorption sites and the soil solution,
as solution P quickly binds to a new site. Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low. On
the other hand, slower turnover rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the soil solution and high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occur when P-binding sites are few or saturated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Soil solution P turnover ($K_{\mathrm{m}})$ as a buffer of isotopically
exchangeable P ($E_{{(t)}})$}?><title>Soil solution P turnover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a buffer of isotopically
exchangeable P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e2773">We found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an important buffer of isotopically exchangeable P.
As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values diverge from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and eventually approach
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Interestingly, the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values decreased with time
(Fig. 3a). While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged almost 4 orders of magnitude,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values only ranged 3 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, differences
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values among soils of low, middle, and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased with time.
We found that the difference between log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was strongly correlated with log10(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 615,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79). Thus, soils with fast rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had large increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to soils with slow rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which showed little difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, soils with the largest increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had low
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but high values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3b).</p>
      <p id="d1e3124">While it is evident that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are related since both
variables are calculated from the same isotope exchange kinetic parameters,
the dependency reveals that many soils with low concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
attained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values comparable to other soils due to extremely high soil
solution P turnover rates (Fig. 3b). One can thus interpret that a soil with
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a higher PBC and that a majority of P applied as fertilizer will
be quickly adsorbed. On the other hand, high turnover means that there is a
large flux of P ions through the soil solution, and phosphate ions in
solution are quickly replaced through desorption when plants take up P. If
soils with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of over 5 mg P kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered highly
P fertile (Gallet et al., 2003), high P fertility can be found in
both soils with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or soils with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. S1). Soils with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as most Lixisols, also
have low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Thus, P fixing by soils is reversible and says little
about P availability.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3279"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of simple linear regressions between isotopically
exchangeable P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> explained by predictors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> as a function of time. Regressions were fit separately
for each class of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (low, middle, high), as determined by Jenks natural
breaks optimization. Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.008–0.16 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 46),
middle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16–1.9 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 94), and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9–42.5 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 77).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Time frame over which $K_{\mathrm{m}}$ buffers isotopically exchangeable P
($E_{{(t)}})$}?><title>Time frame over which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> buffers isotopically exchangeable P
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page110?><p id="d1e3511">On which time frame is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>? By performing linear
regressions among <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 min to 3 months, we found that the fits are strongly
dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> class (high, middle, low). Based on Jenks natural breaks
optimization, three clusters of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were determined: 0.008–0.16 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 46),
0.16–1.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 94), and 1.9–42.5 mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 77). Calculating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the regression as a function
of time showed that for the class of high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soils, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> explained
60 % of variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 1 min (Fig. 4a). However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lost
power as a predictor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rapidly, explaining only 20 % of
variability by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 min. In contrast, soils with low concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed no relationship between values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> even at
short time spans. Thus, the concentration of P in the soil solution has a
strong legacy on plant P availability for soils with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at short
time spans, but does not indicate P availability in soils with low
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In these soils, values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are primarily
driven by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4b). Eventually both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lose predictive
power, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inevitably approaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Eq. 4; Fig. 4c).
However, predictive power of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is again dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> class.</p>
      <p id="d1e3913"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over time spans between 1 min and 3 months were differently related
to predictors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is thus strongly dependent on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In P-depleted soils the kinetic component is crucial in predicting a
soil's P availability. An underestimation of the kinetic components of P
availability will lead to over-fertilization of P-fixing soils. In more
P-rich soils, however, P availability can be relatively accurately assessed
with static measures, i.e., the concentration of P in the solution and the
total inorganic P in the soil.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e4016">Simple linear regression between phosphorus-buffering capacity
(PBC) and soil solution P turnover (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 18 long-term P fertilizer
experiments. PBC was calculated as the slope of the regression between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and P budget. PBC was found to correlate with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as given by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PBC</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.481</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.482</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.40 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.8, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0047). Dashed lines represent 95 % confidence interval.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{$K_{\mathrm{m}}$ buffers fertilizer application in long-term fertilizer
experiments}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> buffers fertilizer application in long-term fertilizer
experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e4150">There was a positive relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and P budget across all 18
long-term P fertilizer experimental sites, which is consistent with the
study of Morel et al. (2000). However, the slopes spanned 3 orders of
magnitude, from 0.007
(mg P kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(kg P ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Ferralsol, Colombia; Oberson et al., 1999) to
3.9 (mg P kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(kg P ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Chernozem, Canada; Morel et al., 1994). This shows that soil solution P is
more<?pagebreak page111?> strongly buffered in some soils than others. Results from the
fertilizer experiments thus confirm that in high P-sorbing soils, such as
Ferralsols, additions of P fertilizers may lead to only incremental
increases in solution P concentration (Roy et al., 2016).
However, this does not necessarily translate to P availability
(Pypers et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e4251">PBC on the field experiments, taken as the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase with
increasing P budget, was negatively dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.8, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0047, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40; Fig. 5). In other words, soils with higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were characterized by slower increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at similar
yearly P input–output budgets, and vice versa. Both PBC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
measures which describe the exchange of P between the soil solution and solid
phases (Olsen and Khasawneh, 1980; Fardeau et al., 1991). However, the two
have never been directly related. Data from long-term field experiments
enabled us to compare <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to field-scale PBC. The fact that the two are
correlated in fertilizer field experiments thus underlines our findings from
the global soil investigation that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PBC provide information on the
same underlying processes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e4367">Relative standard deviations (RSDs) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after error
propagation assuming 10 % uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> input parameters. The plot shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the 217 soils included in
this global compilation study. Uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximated using
the partial derivatives approach. Bubble size and color relates to the RSD
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the plotted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> combination.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2018/bg-15-105-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Implications for using $K_{\mathrm{m}}$}?><title>Implications for using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4469">Most previous studies involving isotopic exchange kinetics have focused on
analyzing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Frossard et al., 1993; Achat et al., 2016; Tran
et al., 1988; Brédoire et al., 2016). However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are simply
statistical parameters, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be readily interpreted in terms
of soil processes (Fardeau et al., 1991). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mechanism behind
PBC and is useful in explaining P availability. However, when using
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is important to be aware of its limitations (as described in the
methods section) and its sensitivity to the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. (Fig. 6)
Depending on the study, a relatively large uncertainty for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be
acceptable because differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between soils or treatments often
vary on orders of magnitude (Frossard et al., 2011; Fardeau et
al., 1991). However, for low values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation becomes
very sensitive to uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and relative errors may be much
higher than 100 % (Fig. 6). Future studies should take this into account
and conduct appropriate error propagation, or consult Fig. 6 to get an
overview of sensitive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges.</p>
      <p id="d1e4632">While we focused our analysis on P studies, the derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well
as the finding that there is extremely rapid exchange between solid and
liquid phases is equally relevant for other nutrients and/or pollutants with
strongly sorbing ion species. The isotope exchange kinetic approach has also
been successfully applied to study availability of Zn (Sinaj et
al., 1999), Cd (Gray et al., 2004; Gérard et al., 2000), Ni
(Echevarria et al., 1998), As
(Rahman et al., 2017), and U
(Clark et al., 2011), and applications are also plausible
for other elements with radioisotopes. Isotope exchange kinetic studies with
Zn, Cd, and Ni have used the same method as studies on P analyzed here, also
modeling the decline in radioactivity using Eq. (3; Gray et al.,
2004; Sinaj et al., 1999; Echevarria et al., 1998). For such studies, the
derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as it is presented here is directly transferable and
might provide additional useful information for understanding soil–solution
exchange.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>Environmental implications</title>
      <?pagebreak page112?><p id="d1e4663">Our study provides new insight into the diffusion-based mechanisms of P
buffering across a large range of soil types. Prior to this study, little
was known about soil solution P turnover rate, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had previously been
calculated by only a handful of studies. Our analysis of 217 soils showed
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is inversely proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is an important
determinant of plant-available P. Biological adaptations to P availability
have received a lot of attention, as it has been shown that plant
communities have different strategies for P nutrition depending on P
availability (Lambers et al., 2008). Indeed, biological
activity acts as an important buffer of P availability in many ecosystems,
with higher fluxes of biological P often occurring when there are lower
fluxes of physicochemical P (Bünemann et al., 2016, 2012). Our global compilation of 217 samples demonstrated there is
another buffer of soil solution P, which is independent of biological
activity and exclusively diffusion-based. Soils with a low concentration of
P in the soil solution tend to have a high P turnover rate, thus buffering
isotopically exchangeable P values. This does not mean that negative
balances of P will improve the availability of soil P for plant uptake,
rather it explains why changes in P availability are not as large as
suggested by more drastic changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4710">Our findings complement the notion that there are two categories of soils in
regard to P dynamics. In many low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soils, sorption is extremely high
and the soil solution is buffered from P inputs or outputs (Barrow and
Debnath, 2014). For these soils, the prevalence of sites with fast exchange
rates is crucial to assure a steady flux of P to the soil solution (Fig. 3b). In terms of agricultural management, in such a soil, P fertilization
has to be higher than P output via crop removal to account for the buffering
effect (Roy et al., 2016). However, once a soil reaches a
certain P level and binding sites are saturated by phosphate and other
anions, P exchange is less important and fertilizer inputs can be lowered to
equal crop offtake (Syers et al., 2008). For these soils, additional P
inputs will be directly reflected by an increase in P in the soil solution, and P
availability is largely driven by the amount of P in the soil solution (Fig. 4a). A better understanding of P kinetics in soil will allow more effective
nutrient management to meet the dual goals of improving agricultural
production while reducing fertilizer use and pollution.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4729">The global soil and fertilizer field experiment data sets used in
this study are available in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes>
<sec id="Ch1.Sx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Information about the Supplement</title>
      <p id="d1e4739">The derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a table presenting isotope exchange kinetic
properties of soils used in the study, and figures relating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are available in the Supplement.</p><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4781">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-105-2018-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-105-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
</sec><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4791">The project was conceived and carried out by JH with support
from EF, TM, and JJ. JJ provided the derivation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. JH prepared the
manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4808">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4814">We thank Astrid Oberson for her helpful comments. The project was funded
by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project no.
200021_162422), which is gratefully acknowledged.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Sönke Zaehle<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., Saur, E., Dousseron, L., and
Morel, C.: Evaluation of the phosphorus status of P-deficient podzols in
temperate pine stands: combining isotopic dilution and extraction methods,
Biogeochemistry, 92, 183–200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9283-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-008-9283-7</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., Derrien, D., Gallegos, N., Lashchinskiy, N., Milin, S., Nikitich, P., Raudina, T.,
Rusalimova, O., Zeller, B., and Barsukov, P.: Phosphorus status of soils from contrasting forested ecosystems in southwestern
Siberia: effects of microbiological and physicochemical properties, Biogeosciences, 10, 733–752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-733-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-733-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Pousse, N., Nicolas, M., Brédoire, F., and Augusto, L.:
Soil properties controlling inorganic phosphorus availability: general
results from a national forest network and a global compilation of the
literature, Biogeochemistry, 127, 255–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, D.: vioplot: Violin plot, R Package version 0.2. 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Andersson, K. O., Tighe, M. K., Guppy, C. N., Milham, P. J., McLaren, T. I.,
Schefe, C. R., and Lombi, E.: XANES Demonstrates the Release of Calcium
Phosphates from Alkaline Vertisols to Moderately Acidified Solution,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 4229–4237,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04814" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b04814</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Barrow, N. J.: A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and
desorption of phosphate by soil, J. Soil Sci., 34, 733–750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1983.tb01068.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1983.tb01068.x</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Barrow, N. J. and Debnath, A.: Effect of phosphate status on the sorption
and desorption properties of some soils of northern India, Plant Soil,
378, 383–395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2042-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-014-2042-8</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Beckett, P. H. T. and White, R. E.: Studies on the phosphate potentials of
soils, Plant Soil, 21, 253–282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01377744" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf01377744</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bivand, R., Ono, H., Dunlap, R., and Stigler, M.: classInt: Choose
Univariate Class Intervals, R package version 0.1-24., 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bolland, M. D. A. and Allen, D. G.: Phosphorus sorption by sandy soils from
Western Australia: effect of previously sorbed P on P<?pagebreak page113?> buffer capacity and
single-point P sorption indices, Soil Res., 41, 1369–1388,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/SR02098</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Brédoire, F., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., Barsukov, P. A., Derrien, D., Nikitich, P., Rusalimova, O.,
Zeller, B., and Achat, D. L.: What is the P value of Siberian soils? Soil phosphorus status in south-western
Siberia and comparison with a global data set, Biogeosciences, 13, 2493–2509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2493-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-2493-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Buehler, S., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., Friesen, D. K., and Frossard, E.:
Isotope methods for assessing plant available phosphorus in acid tropical
soils, European J. Soil Sci., 54, 605–616,
10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00542.x, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Bünemann, E. K., Oberson, A., Liebisch, F., Keller, F., Annaheim, K. E.,
Huguenin-Elie, O., and Frossard, E.: Rapid microbial phosphorus
immobilization dominates gross phosphorus fluxes in a grassland soil with
low inorganic phosphorus availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 51,
84–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Bünemann, E. K., Augstburger, S., and Frossard, E.: Dominance of either
physicochemical or biological phosphorus cycling processes in temperate
forest soils of contrasting phosphate availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 101, 85–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Burkitt, L. L., Moody, P. W., Gourley, C. J. P., and Hannah, M. C.: A simple
phosphorus buffering index for Australian soils, Soil Res., 40, 497–513,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR01050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/SR01050</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley,
A. N., and Smith, V. H.: Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with
phosphorus and nitrogen, Ecol. Appl., 8, 559–568,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C. R., Condron, L. M., Sinaj, S., Davis, M. R., Sherlock, R. R., and
Frossard, E.: Effects of plant species on phosphorus availability in a range
of grassland soils, Plant Soil, 256, 115–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026273529177" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1026273529177</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Clark, M. W., Harrison, J. J., and Payne, T. E.: The pH-dependence and
reversibility of uranium and thorium binding on a modified bauxite refinery
residue using isotopic exchange techniques, J. Colloid  Interf. Sci., 356, 699–705,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.068</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Compaoré, E., Frossard, E., Sinaj, S., Fardeau, J. C., and Morel, J. L.:
Influence of land-use management on isotopically exchangeable phosphate in
soils from Burkina Faso, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan.,
34, 201–223, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1081/css-120017426" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1081/css-120017426</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Demaria, P., Flisch, R., Frossard, E., and Sinaj, S.: Exchangeability of
phosphate extracted by four chemical methods, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 168, 89–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200421463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jpln.200421463</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Demaria, P., Sinaj, S., Flisch, R., and Frossard, E.: Soil properties and
phosphorus isotopic exchangeability in cropped temperate soils,
Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 44, 287–300,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.741896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00103624.2013.741896</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Echevarria, G., Morel, J. L., Fardeau, J. C., and Leclerc-Cessac, E.:
Assessment of Phytoavailability of Nickel in Soils, J. Environ. Qual., 27, 1064–1070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700050011x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700050011x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Elser, J. and Bennett, E.: Phosphorus cycle: A broken biogeochemical cycle,
Nature, 478, 29–31, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C.: Cinètique d'èchange des ions phosphate dans les systèmes
sol-solution. Vèrification expèrimentale de l'èquation thèorique, C.R.
Acad. Sci. Paris,  300, 371–376, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C.: Le phosphore assimilable des sols : sa représentation
par un modèle fonctionnel à plusieurs compartiments, Agronomie, 13,
317–331, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Fardeau, J. C.: Dynamics of phosphate in soils, An isotopic outlook,
Fert. Res., 45, 91–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00790658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00790658</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J.-C., Morel, C., and Boniface, R.: Phosphate ion transfer from
soil to soil solution: kinetic parameters, Agronomie, 11, 787–797, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Frossard, E., Feller, C., Tiessen, H., Stewart, J. W. B., Fardeau, J. C.,
and Morel, J. L.: Can an isotopic method allow for the determination of the
phosphate-fixing capacity of soils?, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 24, 367–377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629309368807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00103629309368807</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Frossard, E., Morel, J. L., Fardeau, J. C., and Brossard, M.: Soil
isotopically exchangeable phosphorus: A comparison between E and L values,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 846–851,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800030031x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800030031x</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Achat, D. L., Bernasconi, S. M., Fardeau, J.-C., Jansa, J.,
Morel, C., Randriamanantsoa, L., Sinaj, S., and Oberson, A.: The use of
tracers to investigate phosphate cycling in soil–plant systems,  edited
by: Bünemann, E. K., Springer, Heidelberg, 59–91, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Gallet, A., Flisch, R., Ryser, J.-P., Frossard, E., and Sinaj, S.: Effect of
phosphate fertilization on crop yield and soil phosphorus status, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 166, 568–578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200321081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jpln.200321081</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Gérard, E., Echevarria, G., Sterckeman, T., and Morel, J. L.: Cadmium
Availability to Three Plant Species Varying in Cadmium Accumulation Pattern,
J. Environ. Qual., 29, 1117–1123,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040012x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040012x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Gérard, F.: Clay minerals, iron/aluminum oxides, and their contribution
to phosphate sorption in soils – A myth revisited, Geoderma, 262, 213–226,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.036</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gray, C. W., McLaren, R. G., Günther, D., and Sinaj, S.: An assessment
of cadmium availability in cadmium-contaminated soils using isotope exchange
kinetics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 1210–1217,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2004.1210</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Hamon, R. E., Bertrand, I., and McLaughlin, M. J.: Use and abuse of isotopic
exchange data in soil chemistry, Soil Res., 40, 1371–1381,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/SR02046</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hedley, M. J., White, R. E., and Nye, P. H.: Plant-induced changes in the
rhizosphere of rape (Brassica-napus var – Emerald) seedlings 3. Changes in L
value, soil phosphate fractions and phosphatase-activity, New Phytol.,
91, 45–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03291.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03291.x</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
IUSS Working Group WRB:  World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015: International soil classification
system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome,
FAO, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page114?><ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ku, H.: Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas, Journal of
Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section C: Engineering and
Instrumentation, 70, 263, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Lambers, H., Raven, J. A., Shaver, G. R., and Smith, S. E.: Plant
nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age, Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 95–103,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Menezes-Blackburn, D., Zhang, H., Stutter, M., Giles, C. D., Darch, T.,
George, T. S., Shand, C., Lumsdon, D., Blackwell, M., Wearing, C., Cooper,
P., Wendler, R., Brown, L., and Haygarth, P. M.: A holistic approach to
understanding the desorption of phosphorus in soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 3371–3381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b05395</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Morel, C. and Plenchette, C.: Is the isotopically exchangeable phosphate of
a loamy soil the plant-available P?, Plant Soil, 158, 287–297,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00009502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00009502</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Morel, C., Tiessen, H., Moir, J. O., and Stewart, J. W. B.: Phosphorus
transformations and availability under cropping and fertilization assessed
by isotopic exchange, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58,
1439–1445, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050023x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050023x</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Morel, C., Tunney, H., Plénet, D., and Pellerin, S.: Transfer of
phosphate ions between soil and solution: Perspectives in soil testing,
J. Environ. Qual., 29, 50–59,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010007x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010007x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Oberson, A., Fardeau, J. C., Besson, J. M., and Sticher, H.: Soil phosphorus
dynamics in cropping systems managed according to conventional and
biological agricultural methods, Biol. Fert. Soils, 16,
111–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00369411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00369411</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Oberson, A., Friesen, D. K., Tiessen, H., Morel, C., and Stahel, W.:
Phosphorus status and cycling in native savanna and improved pastures on an
acid low-P Colombian Oxisol, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 55, 77–88,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009813008445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1009813008445</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Obersteiner, M., Peñuelas, J., Ciais, P., van der Velde, M., and
Janssens, I. A.: The phosphorus trilemma, Nat. Geosci., 6, 897–898,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1990" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1990</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Oehl, F., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., and Frossard, E.: Organic phosphorus
mineralization studies using isotopic dilution techniques, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am., 65, 780–787, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Olsen, S. R. and Khasawneh, F. E.: Use and limitations of physical-chemical
criteria for assessing the status of phosphorus in soils, in: The Role of
Phosphorus in Agriculture, edited by: Khasawneh, F. E., Sample, E. C., and
Kamprath, E. J., American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of
America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 361–410, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Pierzynski, G. M. and McDowell, R. W.: Chemistry, Cycling, and Potential
Movement of Inorganic Phosphorus in Soils, in: Phosphorus: Agriculture and
the Environment, edited by: Sims, J. T. and Sharpley, A. N., Agronomy
Monograph, 46, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of
America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 53–86, 2005.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Pypers, P., Delrue, J., Diels, J., Smolders, E., and Merckx, R.: Phosphorus
intensity determines short-term P uptake by pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)
grown in soils with differing P buffering capacity, Plant Soil, 284,
217–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-0051-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-006-0051-y</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Rahman, M. S., Clark, M. W., Yee, L. H., Comarmond, M. J., Payne, T. E.,
Kappen, P., and Mokhber-Shahin, L.: Arsenic solid-phase speciation and
reversible binding in long-term contaminated soils, Chemosphere, 168,
1324–1336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.130</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Randriamanantsoa, L., Morel, C., Rabeharisoa, L., Douzet, J. M., Jansa, J.,
and Frossard, E.: Can the isotopic exchange kinetic method be used in soils
with a very low water extractable phosphate content and a high sorbing
capacity for phosphate ions?, Geoderma, 200–201, 120–129,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Roy, E. D., Richards, P. D., Martinelli, L. A., Coletta, L. D., Lins, S. R.
M., Vazquez, F. F., Willig, E., Spera, S. A., VanWey, L. K., and Porder, S.:
The phosphorus cost of agricultural intensification in the tropics, Nat. Plants, 2,  16043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.43" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nplants.2016.43</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sinaj, S., Mächler, F., and Frossard, E.: Assessment of isotopically
exchangeable zinc in polluted and nonpolluted soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 1618–1625, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361618x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1999.6361618x</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Syers, J. K., Johnston, A., and Curtin, D.: Efficiency of soil and
fertilizer phosphorus use: Reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus
behaviour with agronomic information, Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations, Rome, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., and Polasky, S.:
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices, Nature, 418,
671–677, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature01014</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Tran, T. S., Giroux, M., and Fardeau, J. C.: Effects of soil properties on
plant-available phosphorus determined by the isotopic dilution phosphorus-32
method, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1383–1390,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050033x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050033x</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss, N. A., Holmes, P. T., and Hardy, M.: A Course in Probability, Pearson
Addison Wesley, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Xiong, L. M., Zhou, Z. G., Fardeau, J. C., Feng, G. L., and Lu, R. K.:
Isotopic assessment of soil phosphorus fertility and evaluation of rock
phosphates as phosphorus sources for plants in subtropical China, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 63, 91–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020501007558" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1020501007558</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Soil solution phosphorus turnover: derivation, interpretation, and insights from a global compilation of isotope exchange kinetic studies</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The exchange rate of inorganic phosphorus (P) between the
soil solution and solid phase, also known as soil solution P turnover, is
essential for describing the kinetics of bioavailable P. While soil solution
P turnover (<i>K</i><sub>m</sub>) can be determined by tracing radioisotopes in a
soil–solution system, few studies have done so. We believe that this is due
to a lack of understanding on how to derive <i>K</i><sub>m</sub> from isotopic exchange
kinetic (IEK) experiments, a common form of radioisotope dilution study.
Here, we provide a derivation of calculating <i>K</i><sub>m</sub> using parameters
obtained from IEK experiments. We then calculated <i>K</i><sub>m</sub> for 217 soils from
published IEK experiments in terrestrial ecosystems, and also that of 18
long-term P fertilizer field experiments. Analysis of the global compilation
data set revealed a negative relationship between concentrations of soil
solution P and <i>K</i><sub>m</sub>. Furthermore, <i>K</i><sub>m</sub> buffered isotopically
exchangeable P in soils with low concentrations of soil solution P. This
finding was supported by an analysis of long-term P fertilizer field
experiments, which revealed a negative relationship between <i>K</i><sub>m</sub> and
phosphate-buffering capacity. Our study highlights the importance of
calculating <i>K</i><sub>m</sub> for understanding the kinetics of P between the soil
solid and solution phases where it is bioavailable. We argue that our
derivation can also be used to calculate soil solution turnover of other
environmentally relevant and strongly sorbing elements that can be traced
with radioisotopes, such as zinc, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, and uranium.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., Saur, E., Dousseron, L., and
Morel, C.: Evaluation of the phosphorus status of P-deficient podzols in
temperate pine stands: combining isotopic dilution and extraction methods,
Biogeochemistry, 92, 183–200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9283-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9283-7</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., Derrien, D., Gallegos, N., Lashchinskiy, N., Milin, S., Nikitich, P., Raudina, T.,
Rusalimova, O., Zeller, B., and Barsukov, P.: Phosphorus status of soils from contrasting forested ecosystems in southwestern
Siberia: effects of microbiological and physicochemical properties, Biogeosciences, 10, 733–752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-733-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-733-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Pousse, N., Nicolas, M., Brédoire, F., and Augusto, L.:
Soil properties controlling inorganic phosphorus availability: general
results from a national forest network and a global compilation of the
literature, Biogeochemistry, 127, 255–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, D.: vioplot: Violin plot, R Package version 0.2. 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, K. O., Tighe, M. K., Guppy, C. N., Milham, P. J., McLaren, T. I.,
Schefe, C. R., and Lombi, E.: XANES Demonstrates the Release of Calcium
Phosphates from Alkaline Vertisols to Moderately Acidified Solution,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 4229–4237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04814" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04814</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barrow, N. J.: A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and
desorption of phosphate by soil, J. Soil Sci., 34, 733–750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1983.tb01068.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1983.tb01068.x</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Barrow, N. J. and Debnath, A.: Effect of phosphate status on the sorption
and desorption properties of some soils of northern India, Plant Soil,
378, 383–395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2042-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2042-8</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Beckett, P. H. T. and White, R. E.: Studies on the phosphate potentials of
soils, Plant Soil, 21, 253–282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01377744" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01377744</a>, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bivand, R., Ono, H., Dunlap, R., and Stigler, M.: classInt: Choose
Univariate Class Intervals, R package version 0.1-24., 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bolland, M. D. A. and Allen, D. G.: Phosphorus sorption by sandy soils from
Western Australia: effect of previously sorbed P on P buffer capacity and
single-point P sorption indices, Soil Res., 41, 1369–1388,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02098</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Brédoire, F., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., Barsukov, P. A., Derrien, D., Nikitich, P., Rusalimova, O.,
Zeller, B., and Achat, D. L.: What is the P value of Siberian soils? Soil phosphorus status in south-western
Siberia and comparison with a global data set, Biogeosciences, 13, 2493–2509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2493-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2493-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Buehler, S., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., Friesen, D. K., and Frossard, E.:
Isotope methods for assessing plant available phosphorus in acid tropical
soils, European J. Soil Sci., 54, 605–616,
10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00542.x, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bünemann, E. K., Oberson, A., Liebisch, F., Keller, F., Annaheim, K. E.,
Huguenin-Elie, O., and Frossard, E.: Rapid microbial phosphorus
immobilization dominates gross phosphorus fluxes in a grassland soil with
low inorganic phosphorus availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 51,
84–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bünemann, E. K., Augstburger, S., and Frossard, E.: Dominance of either
physicochemical or biological phosphorus cycling processes in temperate
forest soils of contrasting phosphate availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 101, 85–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Burkitt, L. L., Moody, P. W., Gourley, C. J. P., and Hannah, M. C.: A simple
phosphorus buffering index for Australian soils, Soil Res., 40, 497–513,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR01050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/SR01050</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley,
A. N., and Smith, V. H.: Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with
phosphorus and nitrogen, Ecol. Appl., 8, 559–568,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C. R., Condron, L. M., Sinaj, S., Davis, M. R., Sherlock, R. R., and
Frossard, E.: Effects of plant species on phosphorus availability in a range
of grassland soils, Plant Soil, 256, 115–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026273529177" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026273529177</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, M. W., Harrison, J. J., and Payne, T. E.: The pH-dependence and
reversibility of uranium and thorium binding on a modified bauxite refinery
residue using isotopic exchange techniques, J. Colloid  Interf. Sci., 356, 699–705,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.068</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Compaoré, E., Frossard, E., Sinaj, S., Fardeau, J. C., and Morel, J. L.:
Influence of land-use management on isotopically exchangeable phosphate in
soils from Burkina Faso, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan.,
34, 201–223, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1081/css-120017426" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1081/css-120017426</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Demaria, P., Flisch, R., Frossard, E., and Sinaj, S.: Exchangeability of
phosphate extracted by four chemical methods, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 168, 89–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200421463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200421463</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Demaria, P., Sinaj, S., Flisch, R., and Frossard, E.: Soil properties and
phosphorus isotopic exchangeability in cropped temperate soils,
Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 44, 287–300,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.741896" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.741896</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Echevarria, G., Morel, J. L., Fardeau, J. C., and Leclerc-Cessac, E.:
Assessment of Phytoavailability of Nickel in Soils, J. Environ. Qual., 27, 1064–1070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700050011x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700050011x</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Elser, J. and Bennett, E.: Phosphorus cycle: A broken biogeochemical cycle,
Nature, 478, 29–31, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C.: Cinètique d'èchange des ions phosphate dans les systèmes
sol-solution. Vèrification expèrimentale de l'èquation thèorique, C.R.
Acad. Sci. Paris,  300, 371–376, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C.: Le phosphore assimilable des sols : sa représentation
par un modèle fonctionnel à plusieurs compartiments, Agronomie, 13,
317–331, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C.: Dynamics of phosphate in soils, An isotopic outlook,
Fert. Res., 45, 91–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00790658" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00790658</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J.-C., Morel, C., and Boniface, R.: Phosphate ion transfer from
soil to soil solution: kinetic parameters, Agronomie, 11, 787–797, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Feller, C., Tiessen, H., Stewart, J. W. B., Fardeau, J. C.,
and Morel, J. L.: Can an isotopic method allow for the determination of the
phosphate-fixing capacity of soils?, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 24, 367–377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629309368807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629309368807</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Morel, J. L., Fardeau, J. C., and Brossard, M.: Soil
isotopically exchangeable phosphorus: A comparison between E and L values,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 846–851,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800030031x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800030031x</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Achat, D. L., Bernasconi, S. M., Fardeau, J.-C., Jansa, J.,
Morel, C., Randriamanantsoa, L., Sinaj, S., and Oberson, A.: The use of
tracers to investigate phosphate cycling in soil–plant systems,  edited
by: Bünemann, E. K., Springer, Heidelberg, 59–91, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gallet, A., Flisch, R., Ryser, J.-P., Frossard, E., and Sinaj, S.: Effect of
phosphate fertilization on crop yield and soil phosphorus status, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 166, 568–578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200321081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200321081</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gérard, E., Echevarria, G., Sterckeman, T., and Morel, J. L.: Cadmium
Availability to Three Plant Species Varying in Cadmium Accumulation Pattern,
J. Environ. Qual., 29, 1117–1123,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040012x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040012x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gérard, F.: Clay minerals, iron/aluminum oxides, and their contribution
to phosphate sorption in soils – A myth revisited, Geoderma, 262, 213–226,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.036</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Gray, C. W., McLaren, R. G., Günther, D., and Sinaj, S.: An assessment
of cadmium availability in cadmium-contaminated soils using isotope exchange
kinetics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 1210–1217,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1210</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hamon, R. E., Bertrand, I., and McLaughlin, M. J.: Use and abuse of isotopic
exchange data in soil chemistry, Soil Res., 40, 1371–1381,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02046</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hedley, M. J., White, R. E., and Nye, P. H.: Plant-induced changes in the
rhizosphere of rape (Brassica-napus var – Emerald) seedlings 3. Changes in L
value, soil phosphate fractions and phosphatase-activity, New Phytol.,
91, 45–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03291.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03291.x</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
IUSS Working Group WRB:  World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015: International soil classification
system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome,
FAO, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ku, H.: Notes on the use of propagation of error formulas, Journal of
Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section C: Engineering and
Instrumentation, 70, 263, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lambers, H., Raven, J. A., Shaver, G. R., and Smith, S. E.: Plant
nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age, Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 95–103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Menezes-Blackburn, D., Zhang, H., Stutter, M., Giles, C. D., Darch, T.,
George, T. S., Shand, C., Lumsdon, D., Blackwell, M., Wearing, C., Cooper,
P., Wendler, R., Brown, L., and Haygarth, P. M.: A holistic approach to
understanding the desorption of phosphorus in soils, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 3371–3381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05395</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Morel, C. and Plenchette, C.: Is the isotopically exchangeable phosphate of
a loamy soil the plant-available P?, Plant Soil, 158, 287–297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00009502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00009502</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Morel, C., Tiessen, H., Moir, J. O., and Stewart, J. W. B.: Phosphorus
transformations and availability under cropping and fertilization assessed
by isotopic exchange, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58,
1439–1445, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050023x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050023x</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Morel, C., Tunney, H., Plénet, D., and Pellerin, S.: Transfer of
phosphate ions between soil and solution: Perspectives in soil testing,
J. Environ. Qual., 29, 50–59,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010007x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010007x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Oberson, A., Fardeau, J. C., Besson, J. M., and Sticher, H.: Soil phosphorus
dynamics in cropping systems managed according to conventional and
biological agricultural methods, Biol. Fert. Soils, 16,
111–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00369411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00369411</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Oberson, A., Friesen, D. K., Tiessen, H., Morel, C., and Stahel, W.:
Phosphorus status and cycling in native savanna and improved pastures on an
acid low-P Colombian Oxisol, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 55, 77–88,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009813008445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009813008445</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Obersteiner, M., Peñuelas, J., Ciais, P., van der Velde, M., and
Janssens, I. A.: The phosphorus trilemma, Nat. Geosci., 6, 897–898,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1990" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1990</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Oehl, F., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., and Frossard, E.: Organic phosphorus
mineralization studies using isotopic dilution techniques, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am., 65, 780–787, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Olsen, S. R. and Khasawneh, F. E.: Use and limitations of physical-chemical
criteria for assessing the status of phosphorus in soils, in: The Role of
Phosphorus in Agriculture, edited by: Khasawneh, F. E., Sample, E. C., and
Kamprath, E. J., American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of
America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 361–410, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Pierzynski, G. M. and McDowell, R. W.: Chemistry, Cycling, and Potential
Movement of Inorganic Phosphorus in Soils, in: Phosphorus: Agriculture and
the Environment, edited by: Sims, J. T. and Sharpley, A. N., Agronomy
Monograph, 46, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of
America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 53–86, 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Pypers, P., Delrue, J., Diels, J., Smolders, E., and Merckx, R.: Phosphorus
intensity determines short-term P uptake by pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)
grown in soils with differing P buffering capacity, Plant Soil, 284,
217–227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-0051-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-0051-y</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Rahman, M. S., Clark, M. W., Yee, L. H., Comarmond, M. J., Payne, T. E.,
Kappen, P., and Mokhber-Shahin, L.: Arsenic solid-phase speciation and
reversible binding in long-term contaminated soils, Chemosphere, 168,
1324–1336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.130" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.130</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Randriamanantsoa, L., Morel, C., Rabeharisoa, L., Douzet, J. M., Jansa, J.,
and Frossard, E.: Can the isotopic exchange kinetic method be used in soils
with a very low water extractable phosphate content and a high sorbing
capacity for phosphate ions?, Geoderma, 200–201, 120–129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Roy, E. D., Richards, P. D., Martinelli, L. A., Coletta, L. D., Lins, S. R.
M., Vazquez, F. F., Willig, E., Spera, S. A., VanWey, L. K., and Porder, S.:
The phosphorus cost of agricultural intensification in the tropics, Nat. Plants, 2,  16043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.43" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.43</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Sinaj, S., Mächler, F., and Frossard, E.: Assessment of isotopically
exchangeable zinc in polluted and nonpolluted soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 1618–1625, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361618x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6361618x</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Syers, J. K., Johnston, A., and Curtin, D.: Efficiency of soil and
fertilizer phosphorus use: Reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus
behaviour with agronomic information, Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations, Rome, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., and Polasky, S.:
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices, Nature, 418,
671–677, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Tran, T. S., Giroux, M., and Fardeau, J. C.: Effects of soil properties on
plant-available phosphorus determined by the isotopic dilution phosphorus-32
method, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1383–1390,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050033x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200050033x</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss, N. A., Holmes, P. T., and Hardy, M.: A Course in Probability, Pearson
Addison Wesley, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Xiong, L. M., Zhou, Z. G., Fardeau, J. C., Feng, G. L., and Lu, R. K.:
Isotopic assessment of soil phosphorus fertility and evaluation of rock
phosphates as phosphorus sources for plants in subtropical China, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 63, 91–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020501007558" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020501007558</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
