<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-1367-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>The influence of the ocean circulation state on ocean carbon storage and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown potential in an Earth system model</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Influence of ocean circulation on ocean carbon storage}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. \"{O}dalen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ödalen</surname><given-names>Malin</given-names></name>
          <email>malin.odalen@misu.su.se</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-7767</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nycander</surname><given-names>Jonas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-6859</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Oliver</surname><given-names>Kevin I. C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Brodeau</surname><given-names>Laurent</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Ridgwell</surname><given-names>Andy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Meteorology, Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton  SO14 3ZH, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Barcelona Supercomputer Center, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol University, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Malin Ödalen (malin.odalen@misu.su.se)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1367</fpage><lpage>1393</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e151">During the four most recent glacial cycles, atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during
glacial maxima has been lowered by about 90–100 ppm with respect to
interglacials. There is widespread consensus that most of this carbon was
partitioned in the ocean. It is, however, still debated which processes were
dominant in achieving this increased carbon storage. In this paper, we use an
Earth system model of intermediate complexity to explore the sensitivity of
ocean carbon storage to ocean circulation state. We carry out a set of
simulations in which we run the model to pre-industrial equilibrium, but in
which we achieve different states of ocean circulation by changing forcing
parameters such as wind stress, ocean diffusivity and atmospheric heat
diffusivity. As a consequence, the ensemble members also have different ocean
carbon reservoirs, global ocean average temperatures, biological pump
efficiencies and conditions for air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium. We analyse
changes in total ocean carbon storage and separate it into contributions by
the solubility pump, the biological pump and the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium
component. We also relate these contributions to differences in the strength
of the ocean overturning circulation. Depending on which ocean forcing
parameter is tuned, the origin of the change in carbon storage is different.
When wind stress or ocean diapycnal diffusivity is changed, the response of
the biological pump gives the most important effect on ocean carbon storage,
whereas when atmospheric heat diffusivity or ocean isopycnal diffusivity is
changed, the solubility pump and the disequilibrium component are also
important and sometimes dominant. Despite this complexity, we obtain a
negative linear relationship between total ocean carbon and the combined
strength of the northern and southern overturning cells. This relationship is
robust to different reservoirs dominating the response to different forcing
mechanisms. Finally, we conduct a drawdown experiment in which we investigate
the capacity for increased carbon storage by artificially maximising the
efficiency of the biological pump in our ensemble members. We conclude that
different initial states for an ocean model result in different capacities
for ocean carbon storage due to differences in the ocean circulation state
and the origin of the carbon in the initial ocean carbon reservoir. This
could explain why it is difficult to achieve comparable responses of the
ocean carbon pumps in model inter-comparison studies in which the initial
states vary between models. We show that this effect of the initial state is
quantifiable. The drawdown experiment highlights the importance of the
strength of the biological pump in the control state for model studies of
increased biological efficiency.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e188">The transition from interglacials to glacial maximums is associated with a
substantial reduction in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (henceforth,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). During the last four glacial cycles (since
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 000 years BP), the decrease has been about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at these glacial maxima (marine isotope stages 2, 6,
8 and 10) was approximately 180 ppm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references
therein</named-content></xref>. When CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolves in
water, most of the molecules react with the water to form bicarbonate and
carbonate ions. To achieve equilibrium between the atmospheric and surface
ocean partial pressures of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, further dissolution is then required
(cf. e.g. O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which does not react with water). As a consequence, the
ocean holds 50 times more carbon than the atmosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.2"/> and over 13 times that of the
terrestrial biosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.3"/>. Due to this size
difference between the carbon reservoirs, a larger fraction of the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
that was missing from the atmosphere during glacials is likely to have been
stored in the deep ocean than in the terrestrial biosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e308">That the oceanic carbon storage increased during glacials is a well-established idea, and there are numerous studies of how and why this may have
happened <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, the relative effects of different processes
contributing to this oceanic uptake have not yet been well constrained, and
so far there is a lack of consensus on which processes were dominant
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">reviewed in</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e321">To understand the controls on the oceanic storage of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the different
processes involved, it is helpful to think about the different pathways that
exist for carbon that is taken up in the surface layer to reach the deep
ocean. These pathways are often referred to as the solubility pump and the
biological pump (further described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>). In this work,
we focus on better constraining (1) the effects of changes in global ocean
mean temperature on the abiotic ocean–atmosphere CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> equilibrium and
hence on the solubility pump; (2) the effect of changed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
disequilibrium; and (3) the effects of increased efficiency of the biological
pump. By performing ensemble runs using the Earth system model cGENIE
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.7"/>, we examine the changes in the carbon
system that result from changes in ocean circulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e356">Changes in ocean circulation, which can be due to climate change or other
independent physical processes (e.g. tectonic and ocean gateway changes, such
as the opening of the Drake Passage; e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx66" id="altparen.8"/>), will lead to changes in global
ocean mean temperature through e.g. changes in the locus and strength of
deep water formation. Firstly, if surface ocean temperature changes, this
will have a direct effect on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility and hence on the
atmosphere–ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> equilibrium. Secondly, if the temperature and thus
the concentration of dissolved CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the deep water formation areas
changes, this will impact the deep ocean concentration of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.9"/>. Ocean circulation changes will also affect the ocean
carbon content by influencing nutrient distributions, biological efficiency
and timescales for the outgassing of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in upwelling areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e412">When studying glacial ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, the most common modelling
approach is to aim at reproducing a glacial climate by adjusting physical
parameters, such as orbital parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, bathymetry,
sea level, topography and/or ice sheets
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, in ways that they may have changed
during glacials. These changes influence the ocean circulation by affecting
e.g. climate (temperature), tidal dissipation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.11"/> and
wind stress <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.12"/>. Model studies of glacial climate are
generally based on a pre-industrial control state, in which
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is prescribed, while the circulation model is tuned in
order to achieve the target ocean fields of tracers such as salinity,
temperature and dissolved chemical compounds
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, the desired
tracer fields can be achieved through multiple different combinations of the
tuning parameters, which means that similar tracer fields can be achieved in
different model states despite differences in their circulation. In this
study, we investigate the consequences for the carbon storage of the initial
state circulation differences that result from this tuning: are there other
aspects of the climate system, such as the strengths of the ocean carbon
pumps, that become so significantly different that they can be crucial for
the outcome of e.g. model inter-comparison studies of glacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
drawdown? As discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.14"/>, overturning circulation
differences in an initial glacial state could similarly cause differences in
the results in model inter-comparison studies of deglacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise.</p>
      <p id="d1e501">Specifically, we aim to clarify how the initial equilibrium state, not only
in terms of ocean circulation, but also in terms of ocean carbon inventory and the
origin of the already stored carbon (e.g. biological or solubility pump), is
crucial for the outcome of a study investigating increased efficiency of the
biological pump. This will provide insight about why it is difficult to
compare results from different model studies that have attempted to simulate
and explain the glacial lowering of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. One example of a
model study in which this dependence on the initial state may have been key is
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.15"/>. They investigated the abiotic chemical
equilibrium in a few different models and showed that there was a consistent
difference between box models and general circulation models (GCMs). They
attributed this to differences in complexity, although <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.16"/>
found that the box vs. GCM differences could be explained by inappropriately
low ocean surface temperature assumptions in the original box model
descriptions. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.17"/> also found a significant
difference in behaviour between different GCMs, which they were unable to
explain. We show that such differences could instead be due to differences in
the initial state, whereby differences in circulation are causing the strengths
of the carbon pumps and thus model carbon inventories to be different. More
importantly, we highlight that this effect of the initial state is
quantifiable.</p>
      <p id="d1e532">In this study, we do not attempt to reproduce glacial climate. In the first
step of the modelling, we instead carry out a process study in which we change
physical parameters in the model one or two at a time, while restoring
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the pre-industrial value. The parameters we change
are common tuning parameters in climate models, such as wind stress intensity
and ocean diffusivity. This approach allows us to see how the ocean
circulation changes that follow from tuning each of these parameters affect
the ocean carbon storage. We are particularly interested in the relative
importance of the changes in the solubility pump, the biological pump and the
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium. Through the first step, we will show that the effect
of changes in ocean circulation on global ocean mean temperature, and thus on
the solubility pump, is non-negligible and in some cases of similar
importance as the effect on the biological pump. We will also show that the
relative contributions by the biological pump, the solubility pump and by
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium to the ocean carbon inventory in the initial
equilibrium state depends on the model tuning strategy, yet these combine in
a manner to give a response in total carbon that is more straightforwardly
related to the circulation than any of the individual components. This first
step will also allow us to discuss how specific changes to circulation
parameters will influence the total carbon uptake in model simulations of
e.g. glacial scenarios. In particular, we will focus on the influence of the
strength of the global and basin-scale overturning circulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e572">In the second step, we enforce 100 % nutrient utilisation efficiency (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>) in the different circulation patterns of the ensemble.
This allows us to measure the difference in drawdown potential for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
between different ocean circulation states. A new equilibrium in CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
between atmosphere and ocean will be established, and thus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will also be different depending on the ocean circulation.
This will illustrate how the initial state of a model can be important for
the outcome of a glacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown experiment and highlight the
importance of differences in the initial states of models in inter-comparison
studies. The effect of the solubility pump on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has
previously been studied by e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.18"/>. The effect of the
air–sea disequilibrium of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its connection with biological carbon
sequestration was studied by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.19"/> and in recent work by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.20"/>. Our theoretical approach is similar to those
taken by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.21"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.22"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.23"/>. However, these studies all focus mainly on the
contributions to ocean dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) by the biological
pump. In this study, we aim to determine a robust relationship between a
model's initial state and its drawdown potential that accounts for the
biological pump, the solubility pump and disequilibrium contributions. Such a
relationship, if it is sufficiently simple, will be useful in assessing the
effect of model biases on the sensitivity of the carbon cycle to climate
perturbations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Framework and general concepts</title>
      <p id="d1e677">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that is dissolved in the ocean surface layer is often described as
being able to reach the deep ocean via two pathways: the solubility pump
and the biological pump. These pathways are thoroughly described in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.24"/> and later in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.25"/>. More details
are given in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1"/>. Our separation of DIC into its different
sources of origin (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>), which is related to the two
carbon pumps, will largely follow the framework of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.26"/>.
This framework has been widely applied <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e708">Of the total ocean carbon reservoir, about 90 % is expected to be
preformed carbon, i.e. from the solubility pump, and the remaining 10 %
organic or regenerated carbon, i.e. from the biological pump
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.28"/>. If the net capacity of the carbon pumps increased,
this would act to decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For instance, increased
efficiency of the biological pump is a frequently proposed explanation for
the glacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. By
“increased efficiency” we mean that more of the available nutrients in the
surface layer are used for biological production before the water is
subducted into the deep ocean. When the nutrient utilisation efficiency (NUE)
is increased, the biological pump gets stronger and transfers more carbon to
the deep ocean. As a result, the air–sea equilibrium of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is shifted
and more CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is drawn from the atmosphere into the surface layer of the
ocean, reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e785">As described in the framework of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.30"/>, NUE can be described
in terms of the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the ratio between the
global averages of regenerated and total nutrients in the ocean (see
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2"/>). In Earth system models, how much CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be removed from the atmosphere by increasing the NUE depends on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can differ between models and between different
climate states achieved in the same model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.31"/>. The
difference between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the initial equilibrium state,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that can be
achieved by increasing NUE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (achieved when
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), will be referred to as the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>drawdown potential</italic> of a model, DP.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e974">When the biological pump is working at maximum efficiency (when
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a specific amount of carbon proportional to the
total amount of nutrients in the ocean will be trapped in the deep ocean at
all times, assuming fixed stoichiometric ratios (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1"/>). This
carbon will not participate in the chemical equilibrium between the
atmosphere and the ocean, which decides the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1018">An important component of the oceanic carbon cycle is alkalinity. It is
related to the buffer capacity of the ocean; hence, the ocean's capacity to
resist a change in pH despite the addition of an acid, such as CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Biological production affects the vertical distribution of ocean alkalinity
through the hard-tissue pump. When the CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> shells of micro-organisms
are exported to the deep ocean and dissolved, alkalinity is returned to
solution. Hence, some of the alkalinity in the deep ocean is of biological,
or regenerated, origin. This part of the alkalinity we will denote
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The rest of the alkalinity in the deep ocean was set at the
surface and then brought into the deep ocean by the circulation; this is
preformed alkalinity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Total alkalinity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        This partitioning of alkalinity will be useful for understanding the relative
importance of the hard-tissue biological pump in oceanic carbon storage.</p>
      <p id="d1e1100">It is likely that ocean alkalinity increased during glacials due to more
weathering of carbonates caused by lower sea levels
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.32"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This may have contributed to
the drawdown of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.33"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references
therein</named-content></xref>. In order to model the effect of alkalinity changes
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we would need an open ocean–atmosphere system with
river supply and sedimentation of alkalinity. This would require a different
type of modelling than we perform here. Our analysis is restricted to the
ocean–atmosphere system, excluding sediment feedbacks. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thus
has no external sources or sinks and is only affected by the biological pump.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Model</title>
      <p id="d1e1166">We use the model cGENIE, an Earth system model of intermediate complexity
(EMIC), which is a computationally efficient model developed for studying the
ocean carbon cycle on timescales of 100–100 000 years. cGENIE is higher in
complexity than box models, but is still efficient enough to allow for the running of a
large ensemble to equilibrium for the carbon system. In terms of ocean carbon
system tracers, the minimum required for this type of study is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, DIC,
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. cGENIE includes many additional tracers, out of
which only some are used in this study. For example, particulate (POC) and
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) are included in the calculations of model
carbon inventory (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>). Of particular importance for this
study is the possibility to run with preformed tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2"/>). Model characteristics are described in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.34"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.35"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.36"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1256">The physical ocean is modelled using a frictional geostrophic 3-D model on a
36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36 equal area grid in the horizontal and 16 depth levels. The
atmospheric model is an energy–moisture balance model (EMBM) with prescribed
climatological wind fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.37"/>. Ocean biogeochemistry and
atmospheric chemistry are treated by separate modules that are coupled to the
physical models and to each other <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.38"/>. The
biogeochemical module is based on a phosphate-only nutrient scheme. Hence,
phosphate (P) is the limiting nutrient. The model description of the export flux
of organic matter is based on available surface nutrients
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.39"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">Eqs. 1–4</named-content></xref>, and instead of having a “standing
plankton biomass” in the model, the export of particulate organic matter is
derived directly from the uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Remineralisation in cGENIE primarily
depends on oxygen availability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.40"/>. POC is modelled as
two fractions: one more easily degradable (labile) fraction, which undergoes
an exponential decay with depth, and one fraction that is more resistant to
degradation, which remineralises at the ocean floor. In the drawdown
experiment (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>), the length scale of the exponential decay is
adjusted. The remineralisation of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the water column is treated
in a similar manner to POC. The carbonate precipitation rate is
thermodynamically based and relates the export flux of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the flux of
POC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">Eq. 8</named-content></xref>. As an investigation of carbonate
system feedbacks is not the purpose of this study, interactive sediments are
not used, and in terms of carbon cycling, the atmosphere–ocean is studied as
a closed system.</p>
      <p id="d1e1317">As our control state, we use the pre-industrial equilibrium state described
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.42"/>. During the spin-up (10 000 years) to this
equilibrium state, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is restored to 278 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm), while the inventory of carbon in the model is allowed
to change. Henceforth, this pre-industrial equilibrium state will be referred
to as PIES278.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Stoichiometry</title>
      <p id="d1e1364">The stoichiometric relationships in cGENIE are based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.43"/>.
Thus, when organic material is formed, the elements are taken up in the
proportions N : P : C : O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16 : 1 : 106 : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>138. For
example, 138 moles of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are released for every mole of phosphorus that
is taken up. The same relationship applies to the decomposition of organic
material, which releases N, P and C, but consumes O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The nitrogen (N)
cycle is not modelled, but the effect of N on alkalinity during the production
and remineralisation of organic matter is represented based on the fixed
stoichiometric relationship with P. Adjustments to the stoichiometric ratios
given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.44"/> have been proposed by e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.45"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.46"/>, but the
classic Redfield ratios are still widely accepted and used. The choice of
constants is not crucial for the outcome of the study, and we have hence
stayed with the default model set-up of the official release of cGENIE.</p>
      <p id="d1e1421">More recently, the stoichiometry of the production of new organic material
has been shown to be highly variable between species but also within the same
species while living under different conditions, such as nutrient
availability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.47"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. While this does not contradict the fact that
the ratios are on average similar to the results by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.48"/>,
this in situ variability in stoichiometric ratios could potentially be
important in a glacial scenario. However, evaluating the influence of such
variability is beyond the scope of the present study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Preformed tracers</title>
      <p id="d1e1439">In cGENIE, we also employ a set of preformed nutrients: carbon, oxygen and
alkalinity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>pre</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The initial concentrations of the preformed tracers are
set in the surface ocean, where they are set equal to the concentration of
the corresponding active tracers. After the surface water is submerged, they
are passively advected and mixed in the interior ocean. We use these tracers
to calculate e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2"/>) and apparent
oxygen utilisation (AOU; see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/>) and for
separating ocean DIC into categories of different origin (see
Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/> in
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1510">Preformed tracers are a recent addition to the model, which have only been
used to a limited extent in previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.49"/>. Studies
using other models have shown the usefulness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as explicit model tracers
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>,
but in this case we expand this by using as many as four preformed tracers
simultaneously. This eliminates errors that would result from using a linear
regression for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.51"/> or from the presence of
oxygen disequilibrium in the calculation of AOU (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E4"/>), as discussed
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.52"/>. Consequently, there is no need to make simulations
with infinitely fast gas exchange, which is a common approach to remove
errors due to O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.53"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
Concerns such as those raised by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.54"/> regarding the
“back-tracking” methods of the Ito and Follows framework are hence not an
issue here. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> allows for the direct determination of nutrient
utilisation efficiency, eliminating any sources of error that could be
associated with indirect methods of determination. Finally,
DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> allows us to estimate the errors associated with the
carbon species separation (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS4"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1615">List of sensitivity experiment equilibrium states SE1–SE12,
abbreviated ensemble member description and specification of which one or
two physical characteristics have been altered compared to the control
PIES278. The nature of the change is specified in parenthesis.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="42.679134pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="65.441339pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ensemble <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>member</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Abbreviated<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>description</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Adjusted parameter (adjustment)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wind stress intensity (doubled)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wind stress intensity (halved)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Atmospheric heat diffusivity (halved)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Atmospheric heat diffusivity (doubled)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ocean diapycnal diffusivity (doubled)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ocean diapycnal diffusivity (halved)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ocean isopycnal diffusivity (halved)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ocean isopycnal diffusivity (doubled)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wind stress intensity (halved) and ocean diapycnal diffusivity (halved)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Atmospheric heat diffusivity (doubled) and ocean diapycnal diffusivity (doubled)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ocean diapycnal and isopycnal diffusivity (doubled, doubled)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ocean diapycnal and isopycnal diffusivity (doubled, halved)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Theory and experimental set-up</title>
      <p id="d1e1916">The inventory of total carbon, TC [mol], in the equilibrium state can be
described by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M128" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2000">Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) sums the contributions to TC. Changes in e.g. land carbon
are not modelled and therefore not included in this equation. The atmospheric
carbon content is given by the partial pressure of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> times the number
of moles of gas in the atmosphere, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass
of the ocean (in kilograms). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration [mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] of
carbon an individual water parcel would have had if it were in equilibrium
with the atmosphere at the ambient temperature, salinity, alkalinity and
concentration of PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> originates from remineralisation
of the soft tissue of biogenic material that has entered the water parcel.
Carbon from biogenic hard tissue is denoted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the residual needed to get the actual carbon
concentration in the water parcel. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contains three
components: (1) the disequilibrium component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which we will
quantify in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS5"/>, (2) carbon in the form of particulate and
dissolved organic matter and (3) errors associated with any imperfect
assumptions in the theory used for calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The overbars represent global
averages. The concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the water parcel consists of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
gives regenerated carbon, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We calculate the contributions to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and any changes to this inventory (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>)
using the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.55"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.56"/>, when
necessary solving the carbon system equations using the solver of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.57"/>. More details about the calculations of the contributions to
TC are given in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2235">Initialising from our pre-industrial equilibrium state PIES278, we perform 12
different equilibrium experiments in which one or two physical tuning
parameters have been changed compared to the control (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).
The parameters and their ranges are further described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/> and listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The experiments
are run for 10 000 years, which is enough to reach a new equilibrium state.
These 12 sensitivity experiment equilibrium states (SE1–SE12) are given
descriptive notations listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. These modifications of
physical tuning parameters will cause the ocean circulation to change
relative to
PIES278; the circulation gets weaker or stronger and overturning cells change
their latitudinal extent, for example. During the spin-up phase,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is still restored to 278 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The ocean reservoir of nutrients (in this case,
PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the same as in PIES278, but the partitioning between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is changed and thereby the strength of
the biological pump. Likewise, the mean temperature of the ocean changes and
thereby the strength of the solubility pump. Hence, while the atmospheric
carbon inventory is the same in all ensemble members as in PIES278, the ocean
carbon inventory and the TC of these 12 ensemble members is
different. We aim at comparing the drawdown potential of models that have the
same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in their initial equilibrium state, but different
oceanic carbon distributions and inventories, which is usually the case in
model inter-comparison projects. For example, the instructions for the LGM
simulations within the framework of the current PMIP3–CMIP5 project specify
the LGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be set to 185 ppm, whereas there are no
specifications for the ocean carbon inventory (see
<uri>https://pmip3.lsce.ipsl.fr/</uri>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2348">The change in the total carbon inventory, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC [mol], between PIES278
and some equilibrium state SE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be
described by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M160" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2468">The contributions by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to this observed change in TC in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) are
then evaluated as described in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/> and
<xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. The change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will simply be the
residual between the observed change in TC and the sum of the contributions
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is restored and thus the atmospheric carbon reservoir
does not contribute to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC.</p>
      <p id="d1e2582">The changes in the inventories of TC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are translated into the equivalent
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that would occur if we were not restoring it
to pre-industrial levels, but instead kept TC constant in the ensemble
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="pre">cf. methods of</named-content></xref>. This
translation is performed as described in detail in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>.
This translation allows us to test the validity of the equation describing
the effect on global ocean mean temperature effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.59"/> (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2683">Flow chart showing the experimental set-up. Grey boxes are spin-ups
and transient stages of simulations (not analysed). Coloured boxes are
equilibrium states that are analysed in this study. Throughout the study, the
pre-industrial equilibrium state PIES278 (light blue box) is used as the
control state, with which we compare the sensitivity experiment equilibrium
states SE1–SE12 (yellow box). The change in physical characteristics for
each SE state compared to the control state PIES278 is described in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. The SEs are then used as a basis for the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
experiments in which biological efficiency is maximised. After running the
drawdown experiments for 10 000 model years, we achieve a new ensemble of
drawdown equilibrium states (DE1–DE12) which are compared to a control
drawdown equilibrium state (CDE).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2703">Finally, starting from each state SE1–SE12 and from PIES278, we run
experiments in which the NUE of biology is maximised (100 % efficiency; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) and again allow the model to run for 10 000 years to
new equilibrium states (DE1–DE12). This reveals the differences in drawdown
potential between ensemble members with different ocean circulation
characteristics. Note that in this step, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not
restored, and thus TC is held constant between SE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and carbon is
only redistributed between reservoirs (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>).
Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) is not applicable in this step because it assumes
constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Maximum NUE, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E1"/>), is achieved by changing the remineralisation length
scale in the model (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>). It is made deep enough (10 000 m)
for any carbon that is taken up in biogenic material to be highly efficiently
trapped in the deep ocean and not undergo any significant remineralisation.
The concentration of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (at the surface and as a global annual
mean) being reduced by 2 orders of magnitude in all DEs due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being
bound in organic material confirms that this effect is achieved. However,
due to convection, mixing and local remineralisation of dissolved organic
matter, the surface concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> does not go to zero. Note that the
contribution of biogenic material to the carbon inventory TC is substantial in
this step. Thus, quantifying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for this step is not useful unless the carbon contained in
biogenic material is also considered to contribute to these reservoirs.
However, the very deep remineralisation length scale is a highly hypothetical
case and we therefore choose not to separate the contributions by the
different carbon reservoirs to the drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Sensitivity experiment tuning parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e2872">The physical tuning parameters that we change are atmospheric heat
diffusivity, wind stress and ocean vertical and isopycnal diffusivity. They
are selected because they are common tuning parameters
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, which influence the ocean
circulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2880">For this study, our intention is for the ensemble to be representative of a
wide range of plausible ocean circulation states. The chosen parameter ranges
correspond to a halving and doubling of the values used in the control
simulation. Our chosen values are within the parameter space explored for a
predecessor to the GENIE model by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.61"/>, except the low
wind stress simulation (see below). Similar parameter ranges are also
explored for GENIE by e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.62"/>. For the most part, our
selected values are within the parameter ranges that generate the subset
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.63"/> refer to as low-error simulations. In the Bern3D
model, with physics based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.64"/> and thus similar to
GENIE, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.65"/> doubled the observed wind stress (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
get a more realistic gyre circulation.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46" id="text.66"/> used the Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics Laboratory Modular Ocean Model version 3, which has the same default
value for isopycnal diffusivity (1500 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as our model.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46" id="text.67"/> explore a range of
1000–2000 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (cf. our range of
750–3000 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2981">When comparing with models that have different available tuning parameters,
diagnostic variables such as temperature, salinity and AMOC volume transport
can indicate whether our achieved states are within the common tuning range
for ocean circulation. The IPCC AR5 WG1 report <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.68"/> shows
temperature and salinity ranges in two selected deep ocean grid points, in
the North and South Atlantic respectively, of the ensemble of pre-industrial
control states (PIC) of PMPI2 and CMIP5–PMIP3 (see grid point positions and
data in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). We compare those ranges to the corresponding
grid cell ranges of our equilibrium states SE1–SE12. In these selected grid
cells, we cover a similar span in salinity and an equally broad range in
temperatures as the PMIP ensemble, though the temperatures in our ensemble
are higher (range shifted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). According to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.69"/>, the PMIP3 PIC AMOC range is 12.6–23.0 Sv
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). If we exclude the combined simulation with halved wind
stress and halved diapycnal (vertical) diffusivity (WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2), which
has a very weak AMOC (2.0 Sv), the AMOC range for our equilibrium states is
8.3–18.0 Sv (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). Thus, there is a difference of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8–9 Sv between highest and lowest value, which is also the case for
the PMIP3 PICs, but our ensemble does not cover the two highest PMIP3 AMOC
values.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3037">Diagnostic variables of the pre-industrial control states (PICs) of
PMIP2 and CMIP5–PMIP3 (temperature and salinity as read from Fig. 9.18. of
WG1 in IPCC AR5 and AMOC as given in Table 1 in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="altparen.70"/>) compared to similar diagnostics for our
ensemble SE1–SE12 and control state PIES278.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variables</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PICs of PMIP2 and</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cGENIE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CMIP5–PMIP3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SE1–SE12 and PIES278</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), N. Atlantic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.9 to 6.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.6 to 8.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), S. Atlantic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6 to  2.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 to 3.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salinity, N. Atlantic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.8 to 35.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35.3 to 35.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Salinity, S. Atlantic AMOC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34.6 to 35.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.9 to 35.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(1 Sv <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.64 to 23.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0 to 18.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3043"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> North Atlantic PMIP grid point: 55.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
14.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2184 m of depth. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> North Atlantic cGENIE closest
corresponding grid cell: 51–56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 10–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W,
1738–2100 m of depth. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> South Atlantic PMIP grid point:
50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 3636 m of depth. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>d</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> South Atlantic
cGENIE closest corresponding grid cell: 46–51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
0–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 3008–3576 m of depth.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.71"/>, PMIP3 pre-industrial control
ensemble AMOC at 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, average with interval of 1 standard
deviation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>f</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cGENIE maximum Atlantic overturning. Ensemble member
WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) has a collapsed AMOC circulation
(2.0 Sv). The average of this variable for all other SEs is 13.8 Sv (range
8.3–18.0 Sv).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Overturning</title>
      <p id="d1e3455">In a coarse-resolution model like cGENIE, the overturning circulation, which
transports carbon to the deep ocean and back up to the surface again
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.72"/>, is one of the most sensitive circulation
components. We diagnose an overturning circulation strength (henceforth
denoted OVT) by taking the difference between the maximum and minimum of the
zonal average overturning stream function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, below 556 m of depth
(excluding the uppermost five grid boxes), as shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>). The
subscript gr in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) denotes the geographical region. OVT is
diagnosed for the Atlantic basin and the Pacific basin separately. A global
measure of OVT is calculated by taking the difference between the Northern
Hemisphere maximum and the Southern Hemisphere minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> below 556 m
of depth.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M243" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>OVT</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>gr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>gr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>gr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e3512">The OVT measures the amount of flushing of the deep water, which is important
for the carbon storage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.73"/>. Another important
factor influencing the carbon pools is which overturning cell is dominating
in terms of volume <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.74"/>: the northern cell
(producing North Atlantic Deep Water, NADW) or the southern cell (producing
Antarctic Bottom Water, AABW, and Circumpolar Deep Water, CPDW). Since these
water masses are of different origin, they will differ in properties, such as
water temperature and nutrients, and will therefore have different capacities
for holding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However,
the inter-member differences in this aspect are difficult to discern and we
have therefore chosen to focus on the impacts of OVT described above, which
are more clearly identifiable.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e3561">We use a two-step modelling approach, as explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>; in the
first step we change the ocean circulation by changing physical
parameters as listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, and in the second step we
force the biological pump to become 100 % efficient. The results from
this two-step approach are described in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/> and
<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3575">Diagnostic variables for observations (Obs.), the control PIES278
(Ctrl.) and the ensemble members SE1–SE12. The variables are global ocean
averages of temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and pH
(pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), surface ocean average pH, sea ice cover (%), the
global average of the nutrient utilisation efficiency (expressed in terms of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a measure of the strength of the global ocean
overturning circulation, OVT (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>). The observational
estimate for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been calculated using the World Ocean
Atlas 2013;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.75"/>) and the pre-industrial estimate for pH is given by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.76"/>. Modern day sea ice cover is given as an interval due
to seasonal variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.77"/>. The observational estimate for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.78"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ens.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Experiment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Sea ice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Global</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">mem.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">name</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(SWS)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(SWS)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">cover (%)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">OVT (Sv)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Obs.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3 to 6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ctrl.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PIES278</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.54</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">21.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">23.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.31</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.35</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">32.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.87</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.88</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">24.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.59</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SE12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.85</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4306">Correlation coefficients of the changes in OVT (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>) sorted by geographical regions and the anomaly in
each carbon species for the SE ensemble (relative to PIES278).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OVT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">in region</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Atlantic</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.64</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pacific</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Step 1 – The effects of ocean circulation changes</title>
      <p id="d1e4682">In this first step, we achieve a set of pre-industrial equilibrium states –
all with pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 278 ppm – in which, as a
result of ocean circulation differences, the ensemble members have different
carbon reservoirs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4706">In panel <bold>(a)</bold>, green bars show observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC inventory
for SE1–SE12 compared to the TC inventory of the control PIES278. Other
bars show relative contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC inventory by changes in the
solubility (due to temperature in red, due to preformed
alkalinity in pink; panels <bold>a, b</bold>), biological soft-tissue (dark
blue, panels <bold>a, c</bold>) and hard-tissue (light purple, panels <bold>a, c</bold>) pumps. The residual of the theoretical contributions by changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC
(calculations made using Eqs. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E3"/>–<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E2"/>) and the observed model
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC is denoted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (yellow bars). The horizontal axis
shows the magnitude of changes given in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pg C). The
lower panels <bold>(e–h)</bold> show approximate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
equivalent given in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm. Hence, this shows how big the difference
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be between ensemble members if we were not
restoring to 278 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm. Note that a positive (negative) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC
indicates a higher (lower) storage of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean, which would
cause a lower (higher) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4918">In PIES278 and SE1–SE12, global average salinity, total alkalinity and
PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are 34.90, 2363 and 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively.
These properties are conserved but redistributed, which gives some very
small differences in the global averages between ensemble members. Global
average temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is 3.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in PIES278, which is
close to the modern day observational estimate of 3.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.79"/>. In the SEs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges between
2.31 and 4.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Sea ice cover ranges from
0.0 to 10.6 % in the SEs,
with PIES278 in the centre of the interval (cf. observational estimates of
sea ice cover, which range between 3 and 6 % due to seasonal variability;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.80"/>). Diagnostic variables for all the individual SEs are
given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5007">The control PIES278 model total carbon inventory, TC, is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 Pg C). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC, and the contributions to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC by the biological and the solubility pump and by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) in the SEs, which are effects of the changes in ocean
circulation, are of the magnitude of a few percent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol;
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a–d). This corresponds to a range in
pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between 7.80 and 7.97 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), while
pH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>surf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stays close to the observational estimate
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.81"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2; see</named-content></xref>. For reference,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e–h show the approximate differences in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that would have occurred in the SEs if we were not
restoring it to 278 ppm (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> and
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>). In this ensemble, these differences in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stay at approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 ppm
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e) because of the cancellation between the effects
of the different carbon pumps. Note that the methods of
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/> (used in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e–h) are based
on the assumption that changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are small and are
therefore less reliable for SEs with large changes, e.g. WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and
WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2. Because the computed changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
approximate, the sum of the contributions from the different pumps do not
exactly equal the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Sensitivity of overturning stream function</title>
      <p id="d1e5267">The range of OVT (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) resulting from the differences in
zonal average overturning stream function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S1 in the
Supplement) is 10.1–32.6 Sv for the global measure
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The range of Atlantic OVT is 4.1–19.5 Sv
(see Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a). Note that Atlantic
OVT is not the same as AMOC strength, which ranges between 2.0 and 18.0 Sv
for the SEs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), though the AMOC is a large part of the OVT
in the Atlantic. The zonal average overturning stream function, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for a
typical weak (DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 with OVT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.4 Sv) and strong (DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 with
OVT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32.6 Sv) circulation SE in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a–b show that the
overturning circulation patterns in comparison to the control PIES278
(OVT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.4 Sv, Fig. 5c) are similar, with no major changes in the
extent of the overturning cells.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e5335">Strength of the overturning circulation in terms of OVT (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>) and the change in TC inventory for equilibrium
states SE1–SE12 relative to the control PIES278 (red dot). This is shown for the
Atlantic basin, Pacific basin and for the global measure based on hemispheric
differences on the horizontal axis of panels <bold>(a, b, c)</bold>
respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f03.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5349">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> suggests a linear relationship between OVT
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) and the total carbon inventory TC, in this case represented
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC, in the SEs. The relationship is clearer for the Atlantic and
the global measure (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and c) than for the Pacific
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b). The correlation coefficients indicate that as much
as 90 % of the variance in TC can be explained by changes in OVT
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). For the different carbon pumps, the correlation with
OVT is most clear for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), for
which
75–80 % of the variance can be explained by the OVT
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Note that since no biogeochemical manipulations have
been made in this step, the remaining variance (20–25 %) is also due to
physical perturbations. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
correlation is weak (40–57 and 25–30 % respectively;
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>), but statistically significant. If we add
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and correlate with the OVT, the
correlation gets stronger than it is for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone. In
experiments with stronger OVT (global and/or basin scale), the relative
importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (negative; see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (positive for total, negative for temperature
contribution and positive for alkalinity contribution) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (negative) will determine the sign of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC. In our
ensemble, stronger OVT (global and basin scale) leads to a decreased storage
of carbon in the ocean compared to PIES278 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e5507">Strength of the overturning circulation in terms of OVT (see Section
<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>) and the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for equilibrium states SE1–SE12 relative to the
control PIES278 (red dot). This is shown for the Atlantic basin, Pacific
basin and for the global measure based on hemispheric differences on the
horizontal axis of panels <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f04.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5554">Zonal average overturning stream function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured in
sverdrups (Sv) for <bold>(a)</bold> DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, with high diapycnal
diffusivity, <bold>(b)</bold> DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, with low diapycnal diffusivity, and
<bold>(c)</bold> the control PIES278. The upper panel in each subfigure shows the
global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the middle panel shows only the Atlantic sector and the lower
panel shows only the Pacific sector. The southernmost limit for the Atlantic
and Pacific sectors is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f05.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Sensitivity of total carbon inventory</title>
      <p id="d1e5623">Although the total carbon inventory is strongly correlated with OVT
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), the relative contributions of the carbon pumps to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC are very different depending on the modified physical
characteristics (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). They combine in a way to make
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC more closely correlated with OVT than any of the individual
components (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Altered wind stress (WS) intensity (SEs 1,
2 and 9) and diapycnal diffusivity (DD, SEs 5, 9, 10) have a large impact on
TC, dominated by changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In experiments with large
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. SEs 1, 2 9, 10), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
be as significant as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
whereas in most other experiments it plays a minor role. The overall impact
on TC from changing isopycnal diffusivity (ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2; SE7–8) is
small, with larger contributions by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
than from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For SEs 3, 4 and 10, in which the modified
atmospheric heat diffusivity (AD) is partly driving the circulation (and
temperature) changes, the contributions by changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are of similar magnitude and equally important for the
change in TC. This is also the case for some SEs with changes in ocean
diffusivity (ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2). Overall, no contributing
terms can be considered negligible relative to the other terms, though
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> caused by
changes in preformed alkalinity; Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E2"/>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
partly cancel each other (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS4"/>). The importance of a given
term for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC depends on the mechanism and the origin of the
circulation change (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e5861">In the following subsections, we analyse each of the contributing terms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Sensitivity of temperature and saturation carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e5870"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
changes in water temperature. The global average temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
of the equilibrium states has a range of 2.3–4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), resulting in an interval of change in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>), or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>96 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>72 GtC. Note
that this includes a restriction on the solubility constants that prevents
solubility from increasing with temperatures below 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which
weakens the close-to-linear relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). This corresponds to a range in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 ppm
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>f and S1 in the Supplement) when we solve the
carbon system equations (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>). The simplified equation
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E28"/>) suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.82"/> yields results for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that in general are 10–20 % lower compared to using
the carbon system equation solver (Fig. S1). Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> caused by changes in preformed alkalinity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) span <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b), which roughly corresponds to a
range in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 ppm
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>f).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e6226">Global ocean average temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the changes in
TC that are due to solubility changing with temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the ensemble members SE1–SE12 compared to
the control simulation PIES278 (red dot).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f06.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6266">Sections of temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) for <bold>(a)</bold> DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2,
with high diapycnal diffusivity, <bold>(b)</bold> DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, with low diapycnal
diffusivity, and <bold>(c)</bold> the control PIES278. The upper panel of each
subfigure shows a section through the Atlantic at 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and the
lower panel shows a section through the Pacific at 135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. Both
sections also cover latitudes that are in the Southern Ocean (south of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6343">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a–c stress that in some SEs the contribution by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC, and hence to changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is nearly as important as (e.g. AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2,
AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2) or even more
important than (ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2) the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further, the
temperature restriction on the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dissociation constants (see
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>) is likely to cause an underestimation of the
effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by on average 56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67 % in our
results.</p>
      <p id="d1e6485">In the ensemble, simulations with a weaker OVT than PIES278 tend to have a
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (thus larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a larger ocean
storage of TC (SEs 4, 6, 7, 9 and 12 in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> and in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OVT
(see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.63 globally. The temperature sections in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> show that when increased mixing is achieved by higher
diapycnal diffusivity (DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2), this causes the stratification to be
less sharp between warm surface water and cold deep water because the warmer
waters are mixed deeper, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, while
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases. The colder and more stratified simulation
(DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2) is also the simulation with the weaker OVT (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b,
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). Note that the Pacific Ocean deep water is warmer in DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2
than in DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, but the shallower thermocline has a compensating effect
and the net result is a decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS4">
  <title>Sensitivity of biogenic carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e6624"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> underestimates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared to the model tracer (DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by 1–3 %. Because this error is consistent,
the contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS5"/>) is
negligible. Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> always have
the same sign, but the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a smaller magnitude
(except ID<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c). The effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
of the same sign (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e and g). However, the change
caused by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of opposite sign and double magnitude. Thus, the net effect
of the biogenic hard-tissue pump (the carbonate counter pump) on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is of opposite sign compared to that of the
soft-tissue pump (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e and f), as expected due to the
effect of the carbonate pump on preformed alkalinity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.83"/>.
Globally, 75–80 % of the variance in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is explained by
the OVT (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). This correlation is
strongest over the Atlantic basin.</p>
      <p id="d1e6857"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SEs ranges between 0.32 and 0.59
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in PIES278.
For reference, the observational estimate for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
modern ocean is 0.36 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.84"/>. The tight, linear relationship
between the inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b) is expected from the definition of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eqs. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E1"/> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E4"/>), since it is a direct
measure of the efficiency of the biological pump. The relation between TC and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a) is also close to linear and
appears dominated by biogenic carbon (compare Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and
b). Deviations from a perfect straight line are caused by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Their
influence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC can be small compared to the influence of biogenic
carbon (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>; e.g. SEs 2, 6, 9) or large but partly
cancelling each other (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>; SEs 1, 3, 5, 10, 11),
thus resulting in biogenic carbon “passing on” its linear relationship with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is important for the
drawdown potential of a model (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c), which is examined
in the second step of the modelling (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e7069">Panels showing (whole) global ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
different ensemble members SE1–SE12 plotted versus <bold>(a)</bold> change in
total carbon inventory (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC, 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol), <bold>(b)</bold> the
inventory change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mol), and <bold>(c)</bold> the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown
potential (ppm) of each ensemble member, which is the lowering of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> achieved by maximising biological efficiency (making
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> equal 1); see Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). Ensemble member
characteristics are described in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7208">Example sections of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). The panels show
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for <bold>(a)</bold> WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, with
doubled wind stress, <bold>(b)</bold> AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, with halved atmospheric heat
diffusivity and <bold>(c)</bold> the control equilibrium PIES278. The upper panel
of each subfigure shows a section through the Atlantic at 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and
the lower panel shows a section through the Pacific at 135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. Both
sections also cover latitudes that are in the Southern Ocean (south of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1367/2018/bg-15-1367-2018-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS5">
  <title>Sensitivity of residual and disequilibrium carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e7337">The global inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SEs ranges between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cf. global TC inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol). The contribution from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d) is generally of the order <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SEs
changes relative to PIES278 by 0–30 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e7453">When looking at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d), we are
mainly interested in the contribution by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We have previously
confirmed that the contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by errors in
the calculations of biogenic carbon are negligible (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS4"/>), and we
find that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given by Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>),
(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E2"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E6"/>)–(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E7"/>) corresponds closely
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
in which DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is preformed carbon from the model. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is representative of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e7583">The processes influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be different in the deep water
formation areas in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.85"/>. In the
deep water formation areas in the North Atlantic, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly a
result of the temperature gradient. If a water parcel cools too fast before
it sinks, there is not enough time to equilibrate with the atmosphere and the
result will be a negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is seen as a negative signal
in the NADW in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a–c. In a warmer global ocean, the
temperature gradient between the Equator and the poles is smaller. This makes
it easier for a parcel travelling north in the Atlantic to reach equilibrium
with the atmosphere before deep water forms, since the parcel does not have to
cool as much as in a colder simulation. In a warmer ocean, there is also less
sea ice preventing exchange with the atmosphere. However, a warmer global
ocean is often associated with faster circulation (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1"/>), and
if the circulation becomes faster at the same time, the negative effect of
the shorter time available for equilibration will compete with the positive
effect of a smaller temperature gradient and less sea ice. In some cases, but
not all, the warmer high-latitude temperatures can compensate for the
acceleration
of the circulation. In the Southern Ocean there will also be less time for
the surface water to equilibrate its gas concentrations with the atmosphere.
Here, oversaturated deep water coming back to the surface in this area may not
have the time to release its carbon to the atmosphere before the water sinks
back into the deep, producing positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This appears as a
positive signal in the lower half of the sections in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c. In
a case with faster circulation, the contribution of positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
will be even larger. This effect dominates over the temperature gradient
effect in this area because the waters being brought back to the surface are
already very cold. However, in this model, the effect of sea ice on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can also be very pronounced in this area if it caps the
upwelling area and prevents outgassing. This effect is evident in AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2,
which has by far both the largest sea ice cover (10.6 %,
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) and the largest inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol). The competing effects described above result in
significant correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and similarly
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and global OVT (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
sea ice cover (%) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.30, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.65 and 0.50 respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e7748">Comparing panels (a) and (c) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, we see that the
differences are difficult to attribute to one single process. The overturning
circulation in WS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 is stronger than in PIES278. This makes the global
ocean warmer and reduces sea ice, but also shortens the time for
equilibration with the atmosphere in the North Atlantic branch. In this
particular case of stronger circulation, the shorter time for equilibration
dominates over the reduced temperature gradient and causes more negative
disequilibrium in the North Atlantic deep water formation area compared to
the control case in panel (c). In the Southern Ocean, there is less sea ice,
which allows more direct contact between the ocean and the atmosphere.
However, due to the faster overturning, the deep waters that upwell here will
quickly sink again. This is particularly seen in the Atlantic sector, as a
band of positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extending from the surface and down,
whereas in the control, the positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more confined to
just below the sea ice area.</p>
      <p id="d1e7783">In AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b), we see a signal of positive
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> originating in the Southern Ocean that is much more
pronounced compared to the control PIES278 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c). AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 is
by far the coldest state and the global percentage of sea ice cover is
doubled compared to PIES278 (for reference, in the second coldest state the
sea ice cover has increased by less than 40 % compared to PIES278; see
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). It is likely that the extensive sea ice in
AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, to a larger extent than in the control, prevents the oversaturated
deep water from equilibrating with the atmosphere before sinking again. For
AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, the contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is large
enough to be critical for the sign of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC (see AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Step 2 – Drawdown potential</title>
      <p id="d1e7878">In this step, we use the set of equilibrium states (SEs and the control
PIES278) from step 1 as initial states for determining the drawdown
potential, DP (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). This reveals the dependence of the
resulting equilibrium state DE1–DE12 on differences in the initial states
SE1–SE12. The control drawdown equilibrium is denoted CDE. DP is computed as
the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 278 ppm and the drawdown
equilibrium states.</p>
      <p id="d1e7902">The DP varies strongly between the ensemble members and is close to linearly
related to the biological efficiency, in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, of the
initial equilibrium state (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c). The near-linear
relationship between DP and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of the initial SE is expected
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.86"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.</named-content></xref>. If the biological efficiency in the
SE is small, there is a larger pool of unused nutrients that can be used to
capture carbon when biological efficiency is increased to 100 %. In this
ensemble, an increase in biological efficiency manifested by an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.1 corresponds to a drawdown of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
atmosphere of about 20–30 ppm. This is similar to the theoretical
prediction by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.87"/> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 ppm. However, the
drawdown of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> achieved during the drawdown experiments is
not purely due to biology. There are also additional effects on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to changes in ocean temperature (caused by changes
in radiative balance), circulation and disequilibrium and due to the
climatic conditions of the initial state. Thus, the model results do not
correspond exactly to the theoretical prediction in this case. The most
prominent example is AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2, which has a low initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, but
still has a low DP. This is the coldest of all initial states, with very high
ocean sea ice cover (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>) compared to the other SEs,
and the cold conditions are likely to be affecting the conditions for
biological production and disequilibrium. Also note that the near-linear
relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and DP does not predict DP to be
exactly zero for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as would have to be the case. When
all climatic changes caused by the drawdown experiment itself are removed, DP
is reduced by 4–7 ppm. This shows that the biological component is highly
dominant in the total drawdown. However, the climatic differences between the
initial states will still not allow the theoretical prediction to be exact.</p>
      <p id="d1e8059">Those experiments that have a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and thus a larger inventory
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to PIES278 tend to have a smaller DP than
those with higher temperatures, which is due to circulation changes acting in
a predictable way. The circulation change that is causing a colder
temperature is also causing the OVT to be weaker
(Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), and at the same time causing a more efficient
biological pump (more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>), because
there is more time for biology to take up nutrients. Hence, there are fewer
preformed nutrients left at the surface, which means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is
higher and the DP is smaller.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Solubility pump and disequilibrium</title>
      <p id="d1e8127">The effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a change in the solubility pump is
approximately quantifiable from the change in global ocean average
temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, between two simulations, as described by
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E28"/>) and suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.88"/>. According to this
equation, the set of observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of our ensemble would
correspond to 5.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.0 ppm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1). Solving the
carbon system for the same set of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields
7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.0 ppm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S1). Here, the deviations from
the straight line are caused by the temperature restriction on the solubility
equation (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>). The error in using the simplified
equation seems to be on the order of 20 %. Depending on which process is
causing the change in ocean circulation, the impact of changes in the
solubility pump on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be almost as important as the
impact of changes in the biological CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efficiency of carbon uptake. For
changes in ocean isopycnal diffusivity, the solubility pump effect is even
the dominant response. Due to the temperature restriction on the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
solubility constants, the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is likely to
be underestimated by on average 56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 67 % in our results, further
emphasising its importance. In previous studies, this has to some extent been
disregarded when the response of the biological pump has been assumed to be
the dominant response to the applied changes in circulation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.89"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8321">The relationship between the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to linear (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Any deviation
from a perfect straight line is again caused by the temperature restriction
on the solubility equation (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>). The slope of
the line is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. If the global ocean is cooled by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, as expected in a glacial state
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.90"/>, the slope of the line suggests that the excursion in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol. Note that this
excursion is underestimated due to the restriction on the solubility
equation. For a 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C cooling, the carbon system equations (see
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>) yield a corresponding decrease of about 30 ppm in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, we cannot use the simplified
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E28"/>) because the buffered carbon inventory is unknown in
this hypothetical case.</p>
      <p id="d1e8496">In a set of idealised GCM simulations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.91"/> show
that CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium can be as important as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In our
ensemble, the effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appear to be particularly
important in simulations with a lot of sea ice (e.g. AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2; see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d, h). This leads us to the conclusion that it may
also be of importance in glacial simulations. A caveat to this finding is
cGENIE's coarse resolution at high latitudes and its simplified
representation of sea ice as a complete barrier to gas exchange. Assuming
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
circulation changes we impose correspond to a change in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 ppm due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is comparable to the results of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.92"/>, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.93"/> suggest as
much as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–70 ppm drawdown of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> due to increased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in glacial-like simulations. This emphasises the need for
further studies on the role of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in glacial and other
climate scenarios with changes in ocean circulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Implications of changes in OVT in relation to changes in carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e8677">In experiments with stronger OVT (global and basin scale) than in PIES278,
e.g. DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a), a water parcel
will, on average, stay near the ocean surface for a shorter time (e.g.
DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2; see Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). Hence, biology will have
less time to use the available nutrients and this will give less
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a strong negative
correlation with OVT (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>).
Changes in OVT explain 75–80 % of the variance in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the SE ensemble, while the rest of the variance is likely explained by e.g.
the redistribution of nutrients, light limitation regions or similar factors.
Meanwhile, with stronger OVT there will be more mixing, leading to a
deepening of the thermocline, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will increase
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>).
Thus, the correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will also be negative,
though weaker (43–64 %). The response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more
difficult to predict from the OVT due to competing changes in the temperature
gradient (especially important in the North Atlantic), sea ice and outgassing
(dominant in the Southern Ocean) resulting from a change in OVT.
Interestingly, the total carbon inventory TC shows a closer correlation with
the OVT than any of the individual ocean carbon components
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>). Thus,
the inventories of the individual DIC components are affected by the choice
of model tuning strategy, whereas the total carbon inventory is mainly a
result of the strength of the circulation, i.e. the ventilation of the deep
water. Similar results are found for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.94"/>, who describe the changes in ocean
ventilation using an ideal age tracer. Here, we show that the correlation
with ocean ventilation is even stronger for total carbon and is also present
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Implications for model validation</title>
      <p id="d1e8841">When comparing model studies, it is important to recognise differences in
biological efficiency in their control states. The pre-industrial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of a model will determine its pre-industrial inventory of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but also its drawdown potential. If the pre-industrial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is incorrect, the total carbon inventory in the model will
adjust to compensate for this error in order to achieve equilibrium with
pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, failing to tune the models for
pre-industrial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> will mean that they start from a
non-representative state of the carbon system. Thus, models with different
initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> will have different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in response
to similar circulation changes. This point was mentioned in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.95"/> and emphasised by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.96"/>, but does
not seem to have been recognised in the model inter-comparison community, and
models are still not tuned for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. The range of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> in our pre-industrial ensemble (SE1–SE12) is 0.32–0.59.
This range includes the current estimate for the global ocean, which
according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.97"/> is 0.36. Our range in initial-state
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a range in drawdown potential of 94–139
ppm. While using a different model but a similar approach, we confirm the
conclusion of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.98"/> and want to stress the importance of
a similar initial efficiency of the biological pump in model inter-comparison
studies in which CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown is diagnosed.</p>
      <p id="d1e9014">Few studies have simultaneously diagnosed the individual contributions by the
solubility and biological pumps and the effect of surface CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
disequilibrium. Studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.99"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.100"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.101"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.102"/> use a similar separation of the carbon storage
processes as we do. For increases in wind stress, the sign of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC (and
thus of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the individual contributions by
the carbon pumps and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> agree with those found by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.103"/>. In our ensemble, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC does not fully reveal
the magnitude of the differences in the individual carbon pumps between
ensemble members because the changes to the individual pumps tend to be
partially compensating for each other. We show that the differences in the
equilibrium-state efficiency of the biological pump between SEs manifest
themselves as differences in model sensitivity to the perturbation in
biological pump efficiency, as predicted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.104"/>. Our
result can be important for future model inter-comparison studies and in
explanations of results, but also in planning for common tuning strategies
and experimental design. Compared to the scenario-specific results of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.105"/>, our results could be used more generally as a way
of anticipating model behaviour based on the way in which the ocean
circulation changes in a model study. Depending on the way in which
we have
changed the ocean forcing and what the resulting effect on ocean circulation
is, the origin of the change in ocean carbon storage is different. When wind
stress (WS) or ocean diapycnal diffusivity (DD) is changed, the response of
the biological pump gives the most important effect on ocean carbon storage,
whereas when atmospheric heat diffusivity (AD) or ocean isopycnal diffusivity
(ID) is changed, the solubility pump and the disequilibrium component are
also important and sometimes dominant. Our results give a first approximation
of the effect of these ocean circulation changes on the ocean carbon storage,
but it is important to keep in mind that the results of changes in individual
parameters do not always combine linearly. For example, with doubled
atmospheric heat diffusivity (AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2) and doubled ocean diapycnal
diffusivity (DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2), the response of the solubility pump is very
similar in both simulations. In the combined simulation
(AD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2_DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2), the response of the solubility pump is larger,
but far from doubled, and the response of the soft-tissue pump is smaller
than in DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 alone. In this particular case, it is difficult to
discern which of these two parameters has the strongest impact on the system.</p>
      <p id="d1e9132">The four different preformed model tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>pre</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are shown to be
useful for accurate determination of the initial-state carbon partitioning
and nutrient utilisation efficiency, of which we demonstrate the importance
for model drawdown potential. They eliminate errors associated with indirect
methods used to determine AOU and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.106"><named-content content-type="pre">as described by
e.g.</named-content></xref> and
facilitate error estimates for the carbon partitioning methods. Some useful
applications of preformed tracers have previously been presented by e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.107"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.108"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.109"/>, but such extensive use of preformed tracers
is, to our knowledge, unprecedented in studies of the ocean carbon system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <title>Implications for glacial studies</title>
      <p id="d1e9210">We have shown that when comparing model simulations with the same
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but with differences in ocean circulation and
overturning circulation strength (OVT; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>), the
compared simulations will have different carbon inventories and different
strengths of the ocean carbon pumps. In the PMIP3 inter-comparison project,
in which glacial simulations with different models are compared, the models are
forced with glacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to achieve the LGM state
(<uri>https://pmip3.lsce.ipsl.fr/</uri>). The ocean circulation state is, however,
not specified. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.110"/> showed that model simulations in
the PMIP2 project developed very different LGM ocean circulation patterns and
specifically large differences in AMOC strength, despite displaying similar
ocean circulation patterns in pre-industrial simulations. Most models had
been initiated with pre-industrial circulation and LGM boundary conditions
according to the PMIP2 protocol. When run to quasi-equilibrium, some models
would develop an LGM-like circulation, with a shallower boundary between NADW
and AABW than today, as indicated by palaeo-nutrient tracers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.111"><named-content content-type="pre">see
e.g.</named-content></xref>, and some would keep a more pre-industrial-like circulation. Since the ocean circulation patterns differ, the ocean
carbon storage and thus the model carbon inventories of the compared
PMIP simulations also differ. This will be important when comparing e.g.
deglacial scenarios run with these different models
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.112"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9270">When attempting to simulate the glacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown, it is crucial to
critically evaluate the changes in forcing that need to be applied to achieve
a glacial state in the model. Do these changes agree with what we believe
actually happened in the climate system during a glacial? When applying PMIP3
boundary conditions for the LGM, the height of the ice sheet in the Northern
Hemisphere will tend to intensify both the wind stress over the North
Atlantic basin and as a result the AMOC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.113"/>. In a full glacial state, the
associated deepening of the AMOC is, however, counteracted by the decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.114"/>. Similar effects on the wind
fields due to the Laurentide ice sheet are seen in e.g.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.115"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.116"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.117"/>
suggest that Southern Hemisphere winds will also be stronger when applying
LGM boundary conditions, though they emphasise that results from different
palaeo-proxies and models disagree on this. In our simulation, we intensify
the wind stress in both hemispheres and this leads to decreased capacity of
both the biological and the solubility pump and effectively an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.118"/> showed similar results,
but for increased Southern Ocean winds. Hence, the changes in wind fields
achieved by the applied LGM boundary conditions in models may be contributing
to the difficulties in simulating the glacial decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9359">In our ensemble members for which ocean diapycnal (i.e. near vertical)
diffusivity is halved, we achieve some glacial-like ocean characteristics:
the circulation is weaker, the global ocean temperature is colder and the
biological pump is stronger. However, it has been shown by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.119"/> that open ocean mixing is likely to have been
intensified during glacials, when a lower sea level made shelf areas decrease
and tidal mixing was shifted to the deep ocean. In their model, global ocean
mean vertical diffusivity increased by more than a factor of 3, leading to an
intensification of ocean overturning. In our experiments, a doubling of
diapycnal diffusivity leads to a decrease in ocean carbon storage
corresponding to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of more than 20 ppm
(see DD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>e). Hence, in a full glacial
scenario, processes causing increased ocean carbon storage would have to
offset this effect before causing any net decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Other effects on glacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> linked to lower sea level
(reduced ocean volume) during glacials caused by higher salinity and a higher
concentration of DIC, alkalinity and nutrients have been constrained to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12
to 16 ppm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.120"/>. In
this process study we are not aiming to reproduce LGM conditions in the model
and such effects of changes in ocean volume are beyond the scope of our
investigations. Ocean volume and global averages of salinity, alkalinity and
phosphate have thus been kept constant in our simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e9442">Since numerous studies of proxy data indicate that the global ocean was in
fact less ventilated during glacials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.121"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, it
seems possible that the effect of increased mixing was indeed offset by some
other process. One such factor could be that the global ocean was saltier and
more stratified <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.122"/>. In our simulations, weaker
overturning circulation is also connected to colder temperatures. These cold
simulations show a tendency towards lower drawdown potentials. It is likely
that the more sluggish circulation is already allowing for a more efficient
biological pump, leading to a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus a smaller
drawdown potential. Another important mechanism for the global glacial deep
ocean circulation is surface buoyancy loss around Antarctica driven by the
brine rejection associated with sea ice formation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.123"/>. This effect is not explored in
our simulations.</p>
      <p id="d1e9471">According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.124"/>, the global average temperature of the
glacial ocean was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C colder than the modern day ocean.
Since the ensemble member with the coldest ocean is only 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
colder than PIES278, the variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the past
glacial cycles were likely larger than in our set of experiments, allowing
for a larger contribution by the solubility pump. Hence, the colder
temperatures could play an important role in offsetting the effect of
increased mixing. Figure 7 suggests that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a
change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C compared to pre-industrial would be
approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol (180 GtC), whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the coldest of our simulations is only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol (70 GtC). If we account for a likely underestimation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3"/> and
Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, a simulation as
cold as the LGM state suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.125"/> would have an
increase in strength of the solubility pump corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GtC.</p>
      <p id="d1e9666">In our ensemble of simulations, 100 % nutrient utilisation efficiency
(NUE) causes more drawdown than is necessary to reach glacial values. Future
efforts need to deduce how big an increase in NUE we could expect for a
glacial when using proxy data for e.g. iron fertilisation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.126"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and water mass properties
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.127"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> as a constraint. By understanding how
ocean circulation changes during the glacials may have contributed to
altering the ocean NUE, it will be easier to quantify how much it may have
increased due to e.g. fertilisation by the deposition of iron from dust. However,
ongoing studies indicate that there may have been more, not less, preformed
nutrients in the deep ocean during the last glacial <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.128"><named-content content-type="post">and
Arthur J. Spivack, personal communication, 2015</named-content></xref>, which implies less efficient
nutrient utilisation by biology. One aspect that could explain how more
carbon could still be trapped by biology in such a case is if the
stoichiometric ratios in a glacial scenario no longer follow the averages
described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.129"/>. In most climate models, this is currently
not taken into account. The implementation of variable stoichiometry in models
could bring interesting insights in the future.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e9694">In this paper, we have studied three mechanisms for ocean carbon
storage – the biological pump, the solubility pump and the contribution from
air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium – and quantified the response of these
mechanisms to differences in the equilibrium ocean circulation state. For a
given set of equilibrium states in the model cGENIE, we have constrained the
response of the carbon storage associated with the first two mechanisms
reasonably well and diagnosed their influence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We
have also seen some response related to ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> disequilibrium.</p>
      <p id="d1e9734">We have obtained different states of equilibrium ocean circulation by varying
forcings and model parameters (listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) in a model
ensemble, while keeping atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> constant. This was not done with
the aim to achieve a glacial-like circulation, but to study how the ocean
carbon storage responds to changes in a wide range of circulation processes
and relate the response of the three mechanisms for ocean carbon storage to
differences in ocean circulation strength. The contributions to the change in
carbon storage by the solubility pump, the biological pump or CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
disequilibrium are different depending on the origin of the ocean circulation
change, i.e. the model tuning strategy. When wind stress or ocean diapycnal
diffusivity is changed, the response of the biological pump has the strongest
impact on ocean carbon storage. In contrast, when atmospheric heat
diffusivity or ocean isopycnal diffusivity is changed, the solubility pump
and the disequilibrium component also give important and sometimes dominant
contributions to the change in ocean carbon storage. Despite this complexity,
we obtain a negative linear relationship between total ocean carbon and the
combined strength of the northern and southern overturning cells. This
relationship is robust to different reservoirs dominating the response to
different forcing mechanisms. We show that the individual carbon components
are all to some extent correlated with the strength of the circulation, but
they combine in a way that makes the response in total carbon inventory
nearly fully explained by changes in circulation strength.</p>
      <p id="d1e9757">Finally, to constrain the biological pump, we used the SE ensemble members
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) as initial states to see how their
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> responded when the model was forced into a state with
100 % efficient biology. We applied similar adjustments to circulation
parameters as those tested in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.130"/> in order to allow
some direct comparison of our results with their study. In agreement with
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.131"/>,<?xmltex \hack{\vadjust{\newpage}}?> we find that the
drawdown potential of an ensemble member is a direct result of its biological
efficiency, as measured by the ratio between global average regenerated
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) and total (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) phosphorus, denoted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, in its initial equilibrium state. We show that it is
possible to quantify, from theory, the effect of biases in the carbon
inventory of a model's control state on its sensitivity to changes in the
biological pump. We test a wide range of changes to the forcing in order to
demonstrate that the result is robust. This result should be of value in
understanding the biases of individual models, in model inter-comparison
studies and potentially for choosing tuning criteria. Often, a model with
stronger circulation will have a higher global ocean mean temperature (and
thus a weaker solubility pump) and lower biological efficiency (and thus also
a weaker biological pump). Such a model has a smaller ocean carbon inventory
in the control state, but a larger drawdown potential for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared
to a model with weaker circulation. Hence, when different models are used to
simulate a glacial scenario, it is likely that a significant part of the
difference in their CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown potentials results from differences
that are already present, but not directly visible, in their control states.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability">

      <p id="d1e9850">The source code for cGENIE is publicly available at
<uri>http://www.seao2.info/mycgenie.html</uri>. Data are available upon request
(by e-mail to the corresponding author).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>The ocean carbon system</title>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>The ocean carbon pumps</title>
      <p id="d1e9870">The abiotic, physical pathway, or <italic>the solubility pump</italic>, begins with
air–sea gas exchange, which acts to achieve a chemical equilibrium between
the atmosphere and the surface ocean. This equilibrium depends on
temperature. The ocean circulation then advects both the temperature and the
dissolved carbon into the deep ocean. This carbon is also referred to as
<italic>preformed</italic> carbon. Since the solubility of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger in
colder water, the sinking cold water is enriched in carbon compared to
surface waters in warmer regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e9888">The biological pathway, or <italic>the biological pump</italic>, begins with
biological production in the surface ocean. Carbon is incorporated into
soft-tissue organic compounds. Some of this material then reaches the deep
ocean, either by being advected in currents or by falling out of the surface
layer. When the organic material is decomposed, inorganic carbon (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
comes back into dissolution in the water. This fraction of DIC is referred to
as <italic>regenerated</italic> carbon. Carbon is also incorporated into hard tissue
(shells) in the form of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> which can be dissolved in the deep ocean.
This dissolution influences deep ocean alkalinity (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e9917">Due to the difference in the chemical role of soft-tissue and hard-tissue
carbon, the biological pump is more correctly referred to as being two
separate pumps: the soft-tissue pump and the carbonate (hard-tissue) pump
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.132"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The soft-tissue
pump acts to increase deep ocean DIC. The carbonate pump has a counter
effect because the uptake of CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for shell formation reduces alkalinity
and the capacity to dissolve CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface ocean. The soft-tissue
pump is stronger than the carbonate pump. Therefore, the net effect of the
biological pump is to enhance the deep ocean concentration of DIC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Nutrient utilisation efficiency and $P^{{*}}$}?><title>Nutrient utilisation efficiency and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e9960">Biology in the surface ocean uses a fraction of the available nutrients to
produce new organic material and binds CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the process. The
remaining unused (or preformed) nutrients, denoted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are
brought with the circulation (the physical pathway) into the deep ocean,
where no new production is possible. The nutrients transported to the deep
ocean via the biological pump are called regenerated nutrients,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If the biology becomes more efficient at using the
nutrients in the surface ocean, the fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the deep
ocean increases and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases.</p>
      <p id="d1e10016">As described in the framework introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.133"/>, the
global average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the overall global average
concentration of inorganic nutrients (denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a measure of
nutrient utilisation efficiency, NUE. This can be described using the
parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M724" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e10085">Here, the overbars indicate that we are using the global average of a quantity.
If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1, all available nutrients in the deep ocean were
brought there by the biological pump. In other words, the deep ocean is
ventilated by surface waters that have had all nutrients removed, and hence (at
steady state) the ocean interior will have no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10113">To calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E1"/>), we need to know
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, the concentration of dissolved phosphate in the
deep ocean that is of regenerated origin. We get <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by
removing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the concentration of total phosphate, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Separation of carbon species</title>
      <p id="d1e10183">In this section, the calculations of the total carbon inventory described by
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) are described in detail.</p>
      <p id="d1e10188">The atmospheric carbon content, which in this model is limited to its content
of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is given by the partial pressure of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> times the number of
moles of gas in the atmosphere, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming an atmospheric
thickness of 7777 m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7692</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol.
In this case 1 ppm of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to 2.123 PgC, which is
consistent with the OCMIP recommendation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass of the
ocean, which in our ensemble of simulations is kept constant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg. Implications of changes in volume are further discussed
in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS4"/>. Calculations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are described in
Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>–<xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
residual between the sum of the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the actual carbon concentration
in the water parcel, which includes DIC and organic matter (POC and DOC).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contains three components. (1) The first, and most
interesting, contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the disequilibrium component
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is the part of the carbon concentration which results
from the water parcel not being in perfect equilibrium with the atmosphere at
the time when it left the surface. Hence, the concentration of carbon of
abiotic origin (preformed carbon) in the water parcel consists of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We can therefore use the relation
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to estimate this component
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, though we need to keep in mind that if there are
calculation errors associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this will affect the
estimate (see point 3 below). (2) The second contribution to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the presence of carbon in the form of particulate and dissolved organic
matter. At any one model time step, the concentration of such carbon is very
small compared to the other terms in the equation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol) and this is therefore not considered separately. It is,
however, included when model TC is quantified. (3) The third contribution to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consists of the errors associated with any imperfect
assumptions in the theory used for calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These are further discussed in
Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>–<xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Contribution by the solubility pump</title>
      <p id="d1e10568">For one individual water parcel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the
concentration [mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] of carbon the water parcel would have had if
it had been in equilibrium with the atmosphere, taking into account
its temperature, salinity, alkalinity and also the minor effect of the
concentration of PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the absence of biology. We calculate the global
average of grid cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SE</mml:mtext><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIES</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by solving the carbon system equations using
the solver CO2SYS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.134"/>. The constants used in the scheme do not
exactly match those used in the model, but the differences are minor.</p>
      <p id="d1e10649">The dissociation constants used in the cGENIE calculations of solubility for
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in seawater follow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.135"/>, which are only defined
for waters between 2 and 35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Hence, the expression for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
solubility in the model is restricted so that all water below 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
has the same CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility (similarly for all water above
35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). In the calculations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we use CO2SYS with
this temperature restriction to accurately represent the model behaviour. In
order to estimate the error introduced by this restriction, we need to assume
that the same dissociation constants can be used outside the given
temperature interval. The validity of this assumption is supported by the
results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.136"/>, who find similar dissociation constants
for the interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in a study
on artificial seawater. When CO2SYS is run using model ocean temperatures
without the temperature restriction, we find that the calculated inventory of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SEs is 0.06–0.5 % larger than with the
restriction. For PIES278 the inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.25 %
larger. In terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the unrestricted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories indicate that the contribution by temperature
changes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC is on average underestimated by approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % when the restriction is active. Since the restriction is used
consistently, the error caused by the restriction being present in the model
should not constitute a significant problem for our analysis. Nonetheless,
the underestimation of the effect of temperature changes should be heeded in
the discussion of our results.</p>
      <p id="d1e10814">Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constant and the global ocean mean salinity
is similar in all ensemble members SE1–SE12, any changes in global average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between PIES278 and the SEs will be due to changes in ocean
temperature or alkalinity.
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M786" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Note that salinity is conserved, but redistributed. Hence, when using
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E2"/>) on the local scale, the term dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must
be included. It only disappears after global integration, assuming that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">constant</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
is done here.</p>
      <p id="d1e11001">We calculate the first term on the right-hand side in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E2"/>) on the
local scale by solving the carbon system equations using CO2SYS and taking
the global average of the grid cell difference
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SE</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIES</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for each ensemble member, while keeping salinity and alkalinity constant
using the PIES278 grid cell salinity and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly, the
second term on the right-hand side is calculated as the global average of
grid cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SE</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIES</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each ensemble
member using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of PIES278.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Contribution by the biological pumps</title>
      <p id="d1e11134">The calculations in this section largely follow the Appendix in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.137"/>, who studied the correlation between wind-driven
changes of the residual circulation in the Southern Ocean and changes in
ocean carbon reservoirs and atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.138"/>, our model computes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which reduces the sources of error in
Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E3"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E5"/>). All stoichiometric ratios for organic
material are based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.139"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11184"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the carbon that has been added to the water
parcel through the remineralisation of the soft tissue of biogenic material
that has entered the water parcel. The global ocean average of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M799" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the stoichiometric ratio of carbon to
oxygen of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">138</mml:mn><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.768</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and AOU is the apparent oxygen
utilisation. As seen in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E4"/>), we calculate AOU as the difference
between the preformed concentration of oxygen, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
the concentration that the water had at the surface before it was subducted,
and the actual concentration of oxygen, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, that is registered in the
water. This difference is due to the decomposition of organic soft-tissue
material, which consumes oxygen. Therefore, AOU can be used to “back-track”
the amount of nutrients or carbon that was brought into the deep ocean
trapped in organic material, which has then been remineralised. When
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not an available quantity, it is commonly assumed that
oxygen is at equilibrium at the ocean surface. AOU is then calculated by
replacing O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the saturation concentration for oxygen at
the ambient temperature and salinity. In the real ocean, oxygen
disequilibrium is negative and though it is small, it is not negligible.
Hence, using O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gives a more reliable result for AOU.</p>
      <p id="d1e11392">The biogenic material also carries hard tissue, and the carbon dissolved from
this tissue is denoted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We calculate the grid cell
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M809" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot </mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AOU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the grid cell alkalinity and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the stoichiometric ratio of nitrogen to
oxygen of 16 : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>138 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.116</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We can then calculate the
volume-weighted global average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11541">Finally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
SE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are given by the difference between
the global average concentration in the SE and in PIES278 as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M819" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SE</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIES</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SE</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIES</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Contribution by residual and disequilibrium carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e11738">Residual carbon, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is TC minus the contributions from the
computed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
residual will mainly consist of disequilibrium carbon, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined at the surface before water sinks, by
definition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming the
methods described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/> give a good approximation
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where
DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the model concentration of preformed carbon gives a
good approximation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Corresponding changes in $p$CO${}_{{2}}{}^{\text{atm}}$}?><title>Corresponding changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e11910">To achieve the equilibrium states of our ensemble (SE1–SE12), we have been
restoring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 278 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>atm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm). This means that the changes in carbon
cycling caused by the imposed circulation changes are only seen as changes in
ocean carbon storage. In the real world, we would also get an effect on the
air–sea equilibrium and on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11973">In this section, we translate the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that would
have been seen if it had not been restored. The fact that we are indeed
changing the total carbon inventory of the system means that these
translations are approximate, since they assume the inventory to be constant.
However, the changes in inventory are small compared to the size of the total
inventory and therefore these calculations are still reasonably correct.</p>
      <p id="d1e12055">First, we need to know the Revelle buffer factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the
control equilibrium, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M849" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">/</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">/</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">/</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and where [CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [DIC] are the concentrations of dissolved CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
DIC in the surface ocean. Assuming thermodynamic equilibrium between the
atmosphere and the sea surface carbonate system, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in our simulations, but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and thus the
approximation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reasonable.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated by using the carbon system equation solver CO2SYS
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.140"/>, which also assumes thermodynamic equilibrium. As input, we
use the control equilibrium global averages of temperature, salinity and
concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are 3.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
34.90, 2296 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given as standard output from
CO2SYS. Given the control
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 278 ppm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 12.4, which we then use
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the rest of our calculations. From the equation solver, we
also get the global average ocean concentration of DIC that corresponds to
the given conditions. We call this concentration DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and it is
2100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e12526">DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is used as input when we next prepare to calculate the
alkalinity factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of the system. This factor is used to
calculate the effect of a change in alkalinity on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M878" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">/</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e12647">Again, we use CO2SYS, with the same control-state equilibrium parameters as
before, but now fixing DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This time we get a value for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as output. We will denote this output
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>alk</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. We also let CO2SYS calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for a 1 % increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>alk</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
is 278 ppm in the case with all control values and 248 ppm in the case with
increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We take the average of these two calculations,
263 ppm, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">alk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>alk</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">248</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm. With these values,
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E9"/>) gives <inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e12840">In the following derivation, keep in mind that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and note that
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M895" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e12914">We conduct our equilibrium-state simulation PIES278 and an ensemble of
equilibrium simulations with modified circulation. According to
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) and with the separation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</p>
      <p id="d1e12971"><disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M899" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M900" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e13090">We first study the case in which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is held constant. The
observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TC in an ensemble member is
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M904" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which is based on observed changes (marked by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in each carbon
component.</p>
      <p id="d1e13179">For the hypothetical case in which we keep TC constant and allow
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to vary, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E11"/>) becomes
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M908" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Note that we henceforth neglect any changes in circulation that would occur
in the ensemble member due to this change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus we
assume
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M911" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is water temperature) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We know that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Consequently, any
differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are due to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e13509">We seek to compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the result
in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E13"/>). We linearise around the ensemble member equilibrium
state in the case with constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M927" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e13640">Using Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E15"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E16"/>) in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E14"/>) gives
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M928" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.1}{9.1}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which together with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E13"/>) yields
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M929" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        if we use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and neglect terms that are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus,
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E19" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M932" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        or, using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E8"/>),

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M933" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E20"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          This equation gives us the total change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that would
occur when going from the control equilibrium state PIES278 to one of the SE
ensemble member equilibrium states while allowing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
vary. Here, we use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm. Note again that we make
use of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ensemble member
simulation in which we kept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constant.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be replaced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>o</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the above equation to give each of
their contributions to the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example,
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E21" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M948" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e14306">Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are separated into contributions by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is due to changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> caused by the biological hard- and soft-tissue pumps
respectively, and thus
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E22" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M954" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hard</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        and from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E9"/>) we have
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E23" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M955" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e14485"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> originates from biogenic hard tissue. The formation of such
hard tissue in the surface ocean is associated with an uptake of DIC
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which acts to decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and with
an uptake of alkalinity, which is twice as large and acts to decrease
the solubility of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.141"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.</named-content></xref>. Thus
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E24" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M962" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hard</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e14587">Similarly, the remineralisation of organic nitrogen decreases alkalinity. This
effect is associated with the soft-tissue pump and changes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M964" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mtext>AOU</mml:mtext><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E25"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          and thus we get
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E26" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M965" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e14785">If we use Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E26"/>) in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E23"/>), we see that
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E27" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M966" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.2}{9.2}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The simplifications we make here, assuming that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can replace
[DIC] in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E8"/>) and that, to leading order approximation, the
sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to changes in carbon species is
independent of the size of the carbon reservoirs in the atmosphere and ocean
respectively, are similar to those made by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.142"/>. In contrast
to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.143"/>, we treat the effect of the biological pump on
alkalinity, and hence on CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility, separately by specifying
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.144"/> estimate
that the excursion in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is overestimated by about 10–15 % due to the
assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is insensitive to the size of the
carbon reservoirs.</p>
      <p id="d1e15005">The only remaining carbon species is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We calculate the
effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to our observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly by solving the carbon system equations using
CO2SYS. As input data we use the observed salinity, global average
concentration of DIC and surface PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the control equilibrium, as well
as the restored value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm. We run CO2SYS
with the PIES278 global average temperature and the SE ensemble member global
average temperature. As output, we then get the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
these two temperatures. Thus, we can compute the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M986" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that we would get as a result of solely changing the
temperature and keeping everything else but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M987" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M988" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constant.</p>
      <p id="d1e15151">Instead of solving the carbon system equations to get the change in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M989" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M990" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>atm</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.145"/> suggest using a simplified
equation in which the fractional change, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M991" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is described as proportional to a function of global
average ocean temperature:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M992" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E28"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.E29"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>
(mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M994" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M995" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M996" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the change in the saturation
concentration of DIC per unit change of seawater temperature, in this case
global ocean average temperature. We use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M997" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M998" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> known
from Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M999" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is<?xmltex \hack{\vadjust{\newpage}}?> determined
individually for each ensemble member. Also note that we calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1000" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sat</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the temperature restriction on the gas
solubility. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1001" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ocean volume (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1002" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1003" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
buffered amount of carbon in the system, or in other words the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1004" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that
is “available for redistribution between the atmosphere and ocean”
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.146"/>. As described by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E29"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1005" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
based on the atmospheric carbon inventory, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1006" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the ocean
inventory of DIC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1007" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, scaled by the global value for the Revelle
buffer factor. In this case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1008" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>global</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.E8"/>).</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e15582"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1367-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1367-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e15590">MÖ, JN and KICO designed the model experiments.
AR developed the cGENIE model code with the addition of new tracers. MÖ
adapted the code for the experimental design, performed the model simulations
and produced the figures. LB provided technical expertise for the model
set-up. MÖ prepared the paper with contributions from all
co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e15596">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e15602">The simulations were performed on resources provided by the Swedish National
Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the National Supercomputer Centre,
Linköping University. Malin Ödalen and Jonas Nycander would like to
acknowledge the Bolin Centre for Climate Research for financial support.
Kevin Oliver would like to acknowledge support from UK NERC grant
NE/K002546/1, and he is grateful to the International Meteorological Institute
for generous support during several visits to Stockholm. Andy Ridgwell was
supported by EU grant ERC 2013-CoG-617313. This work benefited from helpful
discussions with Johan Nilsson.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:
Victor Brovkin<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Anderson and Sarmiento(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, L. A. and Sarmiento, J. L.: Redfield ratios of remineralization
determined by nutrient data analysis, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8,
65–80, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Archer et al.(2000a)Archer, Winguth, Lea, and
Mahowald</label><mixed-citation>Archer, D., Winguth, A., Lea, D., and Mahowald, N.: What caused the
glacial/interglacial atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1009" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1010" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles?, Rev. Geophys.,
38, 159–189, 2000a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Archer et al.(2000b)Archer, Eshel, Winguth, Broecker,
Pierrehumbert, Tobis, and Jacob</label><mixed-citation>Archer, D. E., Eshel, G., Winguth, A., Broecker, W., Pierrehumbert, R.,
Tobis,
M., and Jacob, R.: Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1011" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1012" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity to the biological pump
in the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 1219–1230,
2000b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Ballarotta et al.(2014)Ballarotta, Falahat, Brodeau, and
Döös</label><mixed-citation>Ballarotta, M., Falahat, S., Brodeau, L., and Döös, K.: On the
glacial and interglacial thermohaline circulation and the associated
transports of heat and freshwater, Ocean Sci., 10, 907–921,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-907-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-10-907-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bernardello et al.(2014)Bernardello, Marinov, Palter, Sarmiento,
Galbraith, and Slater</label><mixed-citation>
Bernardello, R., Marinov, I., Palter, J. B., Sarmiento, J. L., Galbraith,
E. D., and Slater, R. D.: Response of the ocean natural carbon storage to
projected twenty-first-century climate change, J. Climate, 27,
2033–2053, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Broecker(1982)</label><mixed-citation>Broecker, W. S.: Glacial to interglacial changes in ocean chemistry, Prog.
Oceanogr., 11, 151–197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Broecker et al.(1990)Broecker, Peng, Trumbore, Bonani, and
Wolfli</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S., Peng, T.-H., Trumbore, S., Bonani, G., and Wolfli, W.: The
distribution of radiocarbon in the glacial ocean, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 4, 103–117, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Brovkin et al.(2007)Brovkin, Ganopolski, Archer, and
Rahmstorf</label><mixed-citation>Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.: Lowering of
glacial
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1013" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to changes in oceanic circulation and marine
biogeochemistry, Paleoceanography, 22, PA4202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006PA001380</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Brovkin et al.(2012)Brovkin, Ganopolski, Archer, and
Munhoven</label><mixed-citation>Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Munhoven, G.: Glacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1014" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycle as a succession of key physical and biogeochemical processes, Clim.
Past, 8, 251–264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-251-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-251-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Cao et al.(2009)Cao, Eby, Ridgwell, Caldeira, Archer, Ishida, Joos,
Matsumoto, Mikolajewicz, Mouchet et al.</label><mixed-citation>Cao, L., Eby, M., Ridgwell, A., Caldeira, K., Archer, D., Ishida, A., Joos,
F., Matsumoto, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Mouchet, A., Orr, J. C., Plattner,
G.-K., Schlitzer, R., Tokos, K., Totterdell, I., Tschumi, T., Yamanaka, Y.,
and Yool, A.: The role of ocean transport in the uptake of anthropogenic
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1015" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Biogeosciences, 6, 375–390, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-375-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-375-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Comiso(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Comiso, J. C.: Variability and trends of the global sea ice cover, in: Sea
ice:
an introduction to its physics, chemistry, biology and geology, edited by:
Thomas, D. N. and Dieckmann, G. S., 205–246, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>DeVries and Primeau(2009)</label><mixed-citation>DeVries, T. and Primeau, F.: Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1016" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1017" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity to the
solubility pump: Role of the low-latitude ocean, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 23, GB4020, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003537</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Duteil et al.(2012)Duteil, Koeve, Oschlies, Aumont, Bianchi, Bopp,
Galbraith, Matear, Moore, Sarmiento et al.</label><mixed-citation>Duteil, O., Koeve, W., Oschlies, A., Aumont, O., Bianchi, D., Bopp, L.,
Galbraith, E., Matear, R., Moore, J. K., Sarmiento, J. L., and Segschneider,
J.: Preformed and regenerated phosphate in ocean general circulation models:
can right total concentrations be wrong?, Biogeosciences, 9, 1797–1807,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1797-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-1797-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Edwards and Marsh(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, N. R. and Marsh, R.: Uncertainties due to transport-parameter
sensitivity in an efficient 3-D ocean-climate model, Clim. Dynam., 24,
415–433, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Eggleston and Galbraith(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Eggleston, S. and Galbraith, E. D.: The devil's in the disequilibrium:
sensitivity of ocean carbon storage to climate state and iron fertilization
in a general circulation model, Biogeosciences Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2017-328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2017-328</ext-link>, in review, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Elderfield and Rickaby(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Elderfield, H. and Rickaby, R.: Oceanic Cd <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1018" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> P ratio and nutrient
utilization in the glacial Southern Ocean, Nature, 405, 305–310, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Eriksson and Welander(1956)</label><mixed-citation>Eriksson, E. and Welander, P.: On a Mathematical Model of the Carbon Cycle in
Nature, Tellus, 8, 155–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01207.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01207.x</ext-link>,  1956.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Falkowski et al.(2000)Falkowski, Scholes, Boyle, Canadell, Canfield,
Elser, Gruber, Hibbard, Högberg, Linder, Mackenzie, Moore III, Pedersen,
Rosenthal, Seitzinger, Smetacek, and Steffen</label><mixed-citation>Falkowski, P., Scholes, R. J., Boyle, E., Canadell, J., Canfield, D., Elser,
J., Gruber, N., Hibbard, K., Högberg, P., Linder, S., Mackenzie, F. T.,
Moore III, B., Pedersen, T., Rosenthal, Y., Seitzinger, S., Smetacek, V., and
Steffen, W.: The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a
System, Science, 290, 291–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5490.291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.290.5490.291</ext-link>,  2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Galbraith and Martiny(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. D. and Martiny, A. C.: A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism
for
predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 8199–8204, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Ganopolski et al.(2010)Ganopolski, Calov, and
Claussen</label><mixed-citation>Ganopolski, A., Calov, R., and Claussen, M.: Simulation of the last glacial
cycle with a coupled climate ice-sheet model of intermediate complexity,
Clim. Past, 6, 229–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-229-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-6-229-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Goodwin et al.(2007)Goodwin, Williams, Follows, and
Dutkiewicz</label><mixed-citation>Goodwin, P., Williams, R. G., Follows, M. J., and Dutkiewicz, S.:
Ocean-atmosphere partitioning of anthropogenic carbon dioxide on centennial
timescales, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1014, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002810</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Goodwin et al.(2008)Goodwin, Follows, and Williams</label><mixed-citation>Goodwin, P., Follows, M. J., and Williams, R. G.: Analytical relationships
between atmospheric carbon dioxide, carbon emissions, and ocean processes,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB3030, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003184</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Goodwin et al.(2011)Goodwin, Oliver, and Lenton</label><mixed-citation>Goodwin, P., Oliver, K. I. C., and Lenton, T. M.: Observational constraints
on
the causes of Holocene CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1019" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> change, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25,
GB3011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003888" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003888</ext-link>,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Goodwin et al.(2015)Goodwin, Williams, and
Ridgwell</label><mixed-citation>
Goodwin, P., Williams, R. G., and Ridgwell, A.: Sensitivity of climate to
cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon
uptake, Nat. Geosci., 8, 29–34, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Goyet and Poisson(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Goyet, C. and Poisson, A.: New determination of carbonic acid dissociation
constants in seawater as a function of temperature and salinity, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. A, 36, 1635–1654, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hain et al.(2010)Hain, Sigman, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>Hain, M. P., Sigman, D. M., and Haug, G. H.: Carbon dioxide effects of
Antarctic stratification, North Atlantic Intermediate Water formation, and
subantarctic nutrient drawdown during the last ice age: Diagnosis and
synthesis in a geochemical box model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB4023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003790" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003790</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Headly and Severinghaus(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Headly, M. A. and Severinghaus, J. P.: A method to measure Kr <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1020" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1021" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios in air
bubbles trapped in ice cores and its application in reconstructing past mean
ocean temperature, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
D19105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008317</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Heinze et al.(1991)Heinze, Maier-Reimer, and Winn</label><mixed-citation>Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., and Winn, K.: Glacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1022" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1023" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction by
the
world ocean: Experiments with the Hamburg carbon cycle model,
Paleoceanography, 6, 395–430, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Homola et al.(2015)Homola, Spivack, D'Hondt, Estes,
Insua, McKinley, Murray, Pockalny, Robinson, and
Sauvage</label><mixed-citation>
Homola, K., Spivack, A. J., D'Hondt, S., Estes, E. R., Insua,
T. L.,
McKinley, C. C., Murray, R. W., Pockalny, R. A., Robinson, R. S., and
Sauvage, J.: Preformed Nitrate in the Glacial North Atlantic, AGU Fall
Meeting Abstracts, PP43A-2254, San Francisco, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Ito and Follows(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Ito, T. and Follows, M. J.: Preformed phosphate, soft tissue pump and
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1024" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Mar. Res., 63, 813–839, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Ito and Follows(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T. and Follows, M. J.: Air-sea disequilibrium of carbon dioxide enhances
the biological carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1129–1138, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Ito et al.(2004)Ito, Follows, and Boyle</label><mixed-citation>Ito, T., Follows, M., and Boyle, E.: Is AOU a good measure of respiration in
the oceans?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L17305, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020900" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020900</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Keigwin and Schlegel(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Keigwin, L. and Schlegel, M.: Ocean ventilation and sedimentation since the
glacial maximum at 3 km in the western North Atlantic, Geochem.
Geophy. Geosy., 3, 1–14, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Klockmann et al.(2016)Klockmann, Mikolajewicz, and
Marotzke</label><mixed-citation>Klockmann, M., Mikolajewicz, U., and Marotzke, J.: The effect of greenhouse
gas concentrations and ice sheets on the glacial AMOC in a coupled climate
model, Clim. Past, 12, 1829–1846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1829-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-1829-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kohfeld and Ridgwell(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Kohfeld, K. E. and Ridgwell, A.: Glacial-Interglacial Variability in
Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1025" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, in: Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere Processes, edited
by:
Le Quéré, C. and Saltzman, E. S., 251–286, American Geophysical Union,
Washington D.C., 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Köhler and Fischer(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Köhler, P. and Fischer, H.: Simulating low frequency changes in
atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1026" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the last 740 000 years, Clim. Past, 2, 57–78,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2-57-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-2-57-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kwon et al.(2011)Kwon, Sarmiento, Toggweiler, and
DeVries</label><mixed-citation>Kwon, E. Y., Sarmiento, J. L., Toggweiler, J., and DeVries, T.: The control
of
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1027" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1028" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by ocean ventilation change: The effect of the oceanic
storage of biogenic carbon, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004059</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lauderdale et al.(2013)Lauderdale, Garabato, Oliver, Follows, and
Williams</label><mixed-citation>Lauderdale, J. M., Garabato, A. C. N., Oliver, K. I. C., Follows, M. J., and
Williams, R. G.: Wind-driven changes in Southern Ocean residual circulation,
ocean carbon reservoirs and atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1029" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Clim. Dynam., 41,
2145–2164, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Le Quéré et al.(2005)Quere, Harrison, Colin Prentice, Buitenhuis,
Aumont, Bopp, Claustre, Cotrim Da Cunha, Geider, Giraud
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E.
T., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R.,
Giraud, X., Klaas, C., Kohfeld, K. E., Legendre, L., Manizza, M., Platt, T.,
Rivkin, R. B., Sathyendranath, S., Uitz, J., Watson, A. J., and Wolf-Gladrow,
D.: Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean
biogeochemistry models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2016–2040, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Lewis et al.(1998)Lewis, Wallace, and Allison</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, E., Wallace, D., and Allison, L. J.: Program developed for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1030" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
system calculations, ORNL/CDIAC-105, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis
Center, managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation for the US
Department of Energy Tennessee, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Locarnini et al.(2013)Locarnini, Mishonov, Antonov, Boyer, Garcia,
Baranova, Zweng, Paver, Reagan, Johnson, Hamilton, and Seidov</label><mixed-citation>
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Garcia,
H. E., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Johnson,
D. R., Hamilton, M., and Seidov, D.: World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume 1:
Temperature,
Tech. Rep. 73, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 40 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Löfverström et al.(2014)Löfverström, Caballero,
Nilsson, and Kleman</label><mixed-citation>Löfverström, M., Caballero, R., Nilsson, J., and Kleman, J.:
Evolution of the large-scale atmospheric circulation in response to changing
ice sheets over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 10, 1453–1471,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Luthi et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Luthi, D., Le Floch, M., Bereiter, B., Blunier, T., Barnola, J.-M.,
Siegenthaler, U., Raynaud, D., Jouzel, J., Fischer, H., Kawamura, K.,
and  Stocker, T. F.:
High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000
years before present.
Nature, 453,  379–382,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06949</ext-link>,  2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Marchitto and Broecker(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Marchitto, T. M. and Broecker, W. S.: Deep water mass geometry in the glacial
Atlantic Ocean: A review of constraints from the paleonutrient proxy Cd <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1031" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ca,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q12003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001323" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GC001323</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Marinov et al.(2008a)Marinov, Follows, Gnanadesikan,
Sarmiento, and Slater</label><mixed-citation>Marinov, I., Follows, M., Gnanadesikan, A., Sarmiento, J. L., and Slater,
R. D.: How does ocean biology affect atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1032" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1033" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>? Theory and
models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C07032, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004598</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Marinov et al.(2008b)Marinov, Gnanadesikan, Sarmiento,
Toggweiler, Follows, and Mignone</label><mixed-citation>Marinov, I., Gnanadesikan, A., Sarmiento, J. L., Toggweiler, J. R., Follows,
M., and Mignone, B. K.: Impact of oceanic circulation on biological carbon
storage in the ocean and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1034" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1035" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22, GB3007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB002958</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Marsh et al.(2013)Marsh, Sobester, Hart, Oliver, Edwards, and
Cox</label><mixed-citation>Marsh, R., Sóbester, A., Hart, E. E., Oliver, K. I. C., Edwards, N. R.,
and Cox, S. J.: An optimally tuned ensemble of the “eb_go_gs”
configuration of GENIE: parameter sensitivity and bifurcations in the
Atlantic overturning circulation, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1729–1744,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1729-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-1729-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Martin(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1036" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> change: The iron hypothesis,
Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Marzocchi and Jansen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Marzocchi, A. and Jansen, M. F.: Connecting Antarctic sea ice to deep-ocean
circulation in modern and glacial climate simulations, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 44, 6286–6295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073936" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL073936</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Mehrbach et al.(1973)Mehrbach, Culberson, Hawley, and
Pytkowicx</label><mixed-citation>
Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C., Hawley, J., and Pytkowicx, R.: Measurement of
the
apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric
pressure, Limnol. Oceanogr., 18, 897–907, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Muglia and Schmittner(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Muglia, J. and Schmittner, A.: Glacial Atlantic overturning increased by wind
stress in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9862–9868, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Müller et al.(2006)Müller, Joos, Edwards, and
Stocker</label><mixed-citation>Müller, S. A., Joos, F., Edwards, N. R., and Stocker, T. F.: Water Mass
Distribution and Ventilation Time Scales in a Cost-Efficient,
Three-Dimensional Ocean Model, J. Climate, 19, 5479–5499,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3911.1</ext-link>,  2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Munhoven(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Munhoven, G.: Glacial–interglacial changes of continental weathering:
estimates of the related CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1037" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1038" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> flux variations and their
uncertainties, Global  Planet. Change, 33, 155–176, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2007)Otto-Bliesner, Hewitt, Marchitto, Brady,
Abe-Ouchi, Crucifix, Murakami, and Weber</label><mixed-citation>Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Hewitt, C. D., Marchitto, T. M., Brady, E., Abe-Ouchi,
A., Crucifix, M., Murakami, S., and Weber, S. L.: Last Glacial Maximum ocean
thermohaline circulation: PMIP2 model intercomparisons and data constraints,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12706, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029475</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Petit et al.(1999)Petit, Jouzel, Raynaud, Barkov, Barnola, Basile,
Bender, Chappellaz, Davis, Delaygue et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile,
I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M.,
Kotlyakov, V. M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C., Pépin, L.,
Ritz, C., Saltzman, E., and Stievenard, M.: Climate and
atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core,
Antarctica, Nature, 399, 429–436, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>PMIP3(2018)</label><mixed-citation>PMIP3: Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase III,
avaiable at: <uri>https://pmip3.lsce.ipsl.fr/</uri>, last access: 31 January 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Raven et al.(2005)Raven, Caldeira, Elderfield, Hoegh-Guldberg, Liss,
Riebesell, Shepherd, Turley, and Watson</label><mixed-citation>
Raven, J., Caldeira, K., Elderfield, H., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Liss, P.,
Riebesell, U., Shepherd, J., Turley, C., and Watson, A.: Ocean acidification
due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide, The Royal Society,  Clyvedon Press Ltd, Cardiff,
UK,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Redfield(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water,
The Sea, 2, 26–77, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Ridgwell et al.(2007)Ridgwell, Hargreaves, Edwards, Annan, Lenton,
Marsh, Yool, and Watson</label><mixed-citation>Ridgwell, A., Hargreaves, J. C., Edwards, N. R., Annan, J. D., Lenton, T. M.,
Marsh, R., Yool, A., and Watson, A.: Marine geochemical data assimilation in
an efficient Earth System Model of global biogeochemical cycling,
Biogeosciences, 4, 87–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-87-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-87-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Ridgwell(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A. J.: Glacial-interglacial perturbations in the global carbon
cycle, PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Sarmiento and Toggweiler(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Sarmiento, J. and Toggweiler, J.: A new model for the role of the oceans in
determining atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1039" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1040" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 308, 621–624, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Sarmiento and Gruber(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. L. and Gruber, N.: Ocean biogeochemical dynamics, Princeton
University Press, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Schmittner et al.(2015)Schmittner, Green, and
Wilmes</label><mixed-citation>
Schmittner, A., Green, J. A. M., and Wilmes, S.-B.: Glacial ocean overturning
intensified by tidal mixing in a global circulation model, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 42, 4014–4022, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Sigman and Boyle(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Sigman, D. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Glacial/interglacial variations in
atmospheric
carbon dioxide, Nature, 407, 859–869, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Sigman et al.(2010)Sigman, Hain, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>Sigman, D. M., Hain, M. P., and Haug, G. H.: The polar ocean and glacial
cycles
in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1041" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, Nature, 466, 47–55, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Sijp et al.(2014)Sijp, von der Heydt, Dijkstra, Flögel, Douglas,
and Bijl</label><mixed-citation>Sijp, W. P., von der Heydt, A. S., Dijkstra, H. A., Flögel, S., Douglas,
P. M., and Bijl, P. K.: The role of ocean gateways on cooling climate on long
time scales, Global Planet. Change, 119, 1–22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.04.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.04.004</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Sikes et al.(2000)Sikes, Samson, Guilderson, and
Howard</label><mixed-citation>
Sikes, E. L., Samson, C. R., Guilderson, T. P., and Howard, W. R.: Old
radiocarbon ages in the southwest Pacific Ocean during the last glacial
period and deglaciation, Nature, 405, 555–559, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Sime et al.(2013)Sime, Kohfeld, Le Quéré, Wolff, de Boer,
Graham, and Bopp</label><mixed-citation>
Sime, L. C., Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., Wolff, E. W., de Boer,
A. M., Graham, R. M., and Bopp, L.: Southern Hemisphere westerly wind changes
during the Last Glacial Maximum: model-data comparison, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 64, 104–120, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Sime et al.(2016)Sime, Hodgson, Bracegirdle, Allen, Perren, Roberts,
and de Boer</label><mixed-citation>Sime, L. C., Hodgson, D., Bracegirdle, T. J., Allen, C., Perren, B., Roberts,
S., and de Boer, A. M.: Sea ice led to poleward-shifted winds at the Last
Glacial Maximum: the influence of state dependency on CMIP5 and PMIP3 models,
Clim. Past, 12, 2241–2253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Skinner et al.(2010)Skinner, Fallon, Waelbroeck, Michel, and
Barker</label><mixed-citation>Skinner, L., Fallon, S., Waelbroeck, C., Michel, E., and Barker, S.:
Ventilation of the deep Southern Ocean and deglacial CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1042" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rise, Science,
328, 1147–1151, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Skinner et al.(2015)Skinner, McCave, Carter, Fallon, Scrivner, and
Primeau</label><mixed-citation>
Skinner, L., McCave, I., Carter, L., Fallon, S., Scrivner, A., and Primeau,
F.:
Reduced ventilation and enhanced magnitude of the deep Pacific carbon pool
during the last glacial period, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 411,
45–52, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Solomon et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M.,
and Miller, H. L.: Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Stocker(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T.: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I
contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Takahashi et al.(1985)Takahashi, Broecker, and
Langer</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., and Langer, S.: Redfield ratio based on
chemical data from isopycnal surfaces, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 90, 6907–6924, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Toggweiler et al.(2003)Toggweiler, Gnanadesikan, Carson, Murnane, and
Sarmiento</label><mixed-citation>Toggweiler, J. R., Gnanadesikan, A., Carson, S., Murnane, R., and Sarmiento,
J. L.: Representation of the carbon cycle in box models and GCMs: 1.
Solubility pump, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1026,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001401</ext-link>,  2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Volk and Hoffert(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Volk, T. and Hoffert, M. I.: Ocean Carbon Pumps: Analysis of Relative
Strengths
and Efficiencies in Ocean-Driven Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1043" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Changes, in: The Carbon
Cycle and Atmospheric CO: Natural Variations Archean to Present, edited by:
Sundquist, E. T. and Broecker, W. S.,  99–110, American Geophysical
Union, Washington D.C., 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>von der Heydt and Dijkstra(2006)</label><mixed-citation>von der Heydt, A. and Dijkstra, H. A.: Effect of ocean gateways on the global
ocean circulation in the late Oligocene and early Miocene, Paleoceanography,
21, PA1011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005PA001149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005PA001149</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Williams and Follows(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, R. G. and Follows, M. J.: Ocean Dynamics and the Carbon Cycle:
Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)Zhang, Lohmann, Knorr, and Xu</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Lohmann, G., Knorr, G., and Xu, X.: Different ocean states and
transient characteristics in Last Glacial Maximum simulations and
implications for deglaciation, Clim. Past, 9, 2319–2333,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2319-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-9-2319-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The influence of the ocean circulation state on ocean carbon storage and CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown potential in an Earth system model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">During the four most recent glacial cycles, atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during
glacial maxima has been lowered by about 90–100 ppm with respect to
interglacials. There is widespread consensus that most of this carbon was
partitioned in the ocean. It is, however, still debated which processes were
dominant in achieving this increased carbon storage. In this paper, we use an
Earth system model of intermediate complexity to explore the sensitivity of
ocean carbon storage to ocean circulation state. We carry out a set of
simulations in which we run the model to pre-industrial equilibrium, but in
which we achieve different states of ocean circulation by changing forcing
parameters such as wind stress, ocean diffusivity and atmospheric heat
diffusivity. As a consequence, the ensemble members also have different ocean
carbon reservoirs, global ocean average temperatures, biological pump
efficiencies and conditions for air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> disequilibrium. We analyse
changes in total ocean carbon storage and separate it into contributions by
the solubility pump, the biological pump and the CO<sub>2</sub> disequilibrium
component. We also relate these contributions to differences in the strength
of the ocean overturning circulation. Depending on which ocean forcing
parameter is tuned, the origin of the change in carbon storage is different.
When wind stress or ocean diapycnal diffusivity is changed, the response of
the biological pump gives the most important effect on ocean carbon storage,
whereas when atmospheric heat diffusivity or ocean isopycnal diffusivity is
changed, the solubility pump and the disequilibrium component are also
important and sometimes dominant. Despite this complexity, we obtain a
negative linear relationship between total ocean carbon and the combined
strength of the northern and southern overturning cells. This relationship is
robust to different reservoirs dominating the response to different forcing
mechanisms. Finally, we conduct a drawdown experiment in which we investigate
the capacity for increased carbon storage by artificially maximising the
efficiency of the biological pump in our ensemble members. We conclude that
different initial states for an ocean model result in different capacities
for ocean carbon storage due to differences in the ocean circulation state
and the origin of the carbon in the initial ocean carbon reservoir. This
could explain why it is difficult to achieve comparable responses of the
ocean carbon pumps in model inter-comparison studies in which the initial
states vary between models. We show that this effect of the initial state is
quantifiable. The drawdown experiment highlights the importance of the
strength of the biological pump in the control state for model studies of
increased biological efficiency.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Anderson and Sarmiento(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, L. A. and Sarmiento, J. L.: Redfield ratios of remineralization
determined by nutrient data analysis, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8,
65–80, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Archer et al.(2000a)Archer, Winguth, Lea, and
Mahowald</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D., Winguth, A., Lea, D., and Mahowald, N.: What caused the
glacial/interglacial atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> cycles?, Rev. Geophys.,
38, 159–189, 2000a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Archer et al.(2000b)Archer, Eshel, Winguth, Broecker,
Pierrehumbert, Tobis, and Jacob</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D. E., Eshel, G., Winguth, A., Broecker, W., Pierrehumbert, R.,
Tobis,
M., and Jacob, R.: Atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> sensitivity to the biological pump
in the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 1219–1230,
2000b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Ballarotta et al.(2014)Ballarotta, Falahat, Brodeau, and
Döös</label><mixed-citation>
Ballarotta, M., Falahat, S., Brodeau, L., and Döös, K.: On the
glacial and interglacial thermohaline circulation and the associated
transports of heat and freshwater, Ocean Sci., 10, 907–921,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-907-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-907-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bernardello et al.(2014)Bernardello, Marinov, Palter, Sarmiento,
Galbraith, and Slater</label><mixed-citation>
Bernardello, R., Marinov, I., Palter, J. B., Sarmiento, J. L., Galbraith,
E. D., and Slater, R. D.: Response of the ocean natural carbon storage to
projected twenty-first-century climate change, J. Climate, 27,
2033–2053, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Broecker(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S.: Glacial to interglacial changes in ocean chemistry, Prog.
Oceanogr., 11, 151–197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Broecker et al.(1990)Broecker, Peng, Trumbore, Bonani, and
Wolfli</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S., Peng, T.-H., Trumbore, S., Bonani, G., and Wolfli, W.: The
distribution of radiocarbon in the glacial ocean, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 4, 103–117, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Brovkin et al.(2007)Brovkin, Ganopolski, Archer, and
Rahmstorf</label><mixed-citation>
Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.: Lowering of
glacial
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in response to changes in oceanic circulation and marine
biogeochemistry, Paleoceanography, 22, PA4202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Brovkin et al.(2012)Brovkin, Ganopolski, Archer, and
Munhoven</label><mixed-citation>
Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Munhoven, G.: Glacial CO<sub>2</sub>
cycle as a succession of key physical and biogeochemical processes, Clim.
Past, 8, 251–264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-251-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-251-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Cao et al.(2009)Cao, Eby, Ridgwell, Caldeira, Archer, Ishida, Joos,
Matsumoto, Mikolajewicz, Mouchet et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, L., Eby, M., Ridgwell, A., Caldeira, K., Archer, D., Ishida, A., Joos,
F., Matsumoto, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Mouchet, A., Orr, J. C., Plattner,
G.-K., Schlitzer, R., Tokos, K., Totterdell, I., Tschumi, T., Yamanaka, Y.,
and Yool, A.: The role of ocean transport in the uptake of anthropogenic
CO<sub>2</sub>, Biogeosciences, 6, 375–390, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-375-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-375-2009</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Comiso(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Comiso, J. C.: Variability and trends of the global sea ice cover, in: Sea
ice:
an introduction to its physics, chemistry, biology and geology, edited by:
Thomas, D. N. and Dieckmann, G. S., 205–246, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>DeVries and Primeau(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
DeVries, T. and Primeau, F.: Atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> sensitivity to the
solubility pump: Role of the low-latitude ocean, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 23, GB4020, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003537</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Duteil et al.(2012)Duteil, Koeve, Oschlies, Aumont, Bianchi, Bopp,
Galbraith, Matear, Moore, Sarmiento et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Duteil, O., Koeve, W., Oschlies, A., Aumont, O., Bianchi, D., Bopp, L.,
Galbraith, E., Matear, R., Moore, J. K., Sarmiento, J. L., and Segschneider,
J.: Preformed and regenerated phosphate in ocean general circulation models:
can right total concentrations be wrong?, Biogeosciences, 9, 1797–1807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1797-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-1797-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Edwards and Marsh(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Edwards, N. R. and Marsh, R.: Uncertainties due to transport-parameter
sensitivity in an efficient 3-D ocean-climate model, Clim. Dynam., 24,
415–433, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Eggleston and Galbraith(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Eggleston, S. and Galbraith, E. D.: The devil's in the disequilibrium:
sensitivity of ocean carbon storage to climate state and iron fertilization
in a general circulation model, Biogeosciences Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2017-328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2017-328</a>, in review, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Elderfield and Rickaby(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Elderfield, H. and Rickaby, R.: Oceanic Cd ∕ P ratio and nutrient
utilization in the glacial Southern Ocean, Nature, 405, 305–310, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Eriksson and Welander(1956)</label><mixed-citation>
Eriksson, E. and Welander, P.: On a Mathematical Model of the Carbon Cycle in
Nature, Tellus, 8, 155–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01207.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01207.x</a>,  1956.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Falkowski et al.(2000)Falkowski, Scholes, Boyle, Canadell, Canfield,
Elser, Gruber, Hibbard, Högberg, Linder, Mackenzie, Moore III, Pedersen,
Rosenthal, Seitzinger, Smetacek, and Steffen</label><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P., Scholes, R. J., Boyle, E., Canadell, J., Canfield, D., Elser,
J., Gruber, N., Hibbard, K., Högberg, P., Linder, S., Mackenzie, F. T.,
Moore III, B., Pedersen, T., Rosenthal, Y., Seitzinger, S., Smetacek, V., and
Steffen, W.: The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a
System, Science, 290, 291–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5490.291" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5490.291</a>,  2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Galbraith and Martiny(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. D. and Martiny, A. C.: A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism
for
predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 8199–8204, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Ganopolski et al.(2010)Ganopolski, Calov, and
Claussen</label><mixed-citation>
Ganopolski, A., Calov, R., and Claussen, M.: Simulation of the last glacial
cycle with a coupled climate ice-sheet model of intermediate complexity,
Clim. Past, 6, 229–244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-229-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-229-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Goodwin et al.(2007)Goodwin, Williams, Follows, and
Dutkiewicz</label><mixed-citation>
Goodwin, P., Williams, R. G., Follows, M. J., and Dutkiewicz, S.:
Ocean-atmosphere partitioning of anthropogenic carbon dioxide on centennial
timescales, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1014, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002810</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Goodwin et al.(2008)Goodwin, Follows, and Williams</label><mixed-citation>
Goodwin, P., Follows, M. J., and Williams, R. G.: Analytical relationships
between atmospheric carbon dioxide, carbon emissions, and ocean processes,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB3030, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003184" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003184</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Goodwin et al.(2011)Goodwin, Oliver, and Lenton</label><mixed-citation>
Goodwin, P., Oliver, K. I. C., and Lenton, T. M.: Observational constraints
on
the causes of Holocene CO<sub>2</sub> change, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25,
GB3011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003888" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003888</a>,  2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Goodwin et al.(2015)Goodwin, Williams, and
Ridgwell</label><mixed-citation>
Goodwin, P., Williams, R. G., and Ridgwell, A.: Sensitivity of climate to
cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon
uptake, Nat. Geosci., 8, 29–34, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Goyet and Poisson(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Goyet, C. and Poisson, A.: New determination of carbonic acid dissociation
constants in seawater as a function of temperature and salinity, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. A, 36, 1635–1654, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hain et al.(2010)Hain, Sigman, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>
Hain, M. P., Sigman, D. M., and Haug, G. H.: Carbon dioxide effects of
Antarctic stratification, North Atlantic Intermediate Water formation, and
subantarctic nutrient drawdown during the last ice age: Diagnosis and
synthesis in a geochemical box model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB4023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003790" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003790</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Headly and Severinghaus(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Headly, M. A. and Severinghaus, J. P.: A method to measure Kr ∕ N<sub>2</sub>
ratios in air
bubbles trapped in ice cores and its application in reconstructing past mean
ocean temperature, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
D19105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008317</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Heinze et al.(1991)Heinze, Maier-Reimer, and Winn</label><mixed-citation>
Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., and Winn, K.: Glacial <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> reduction by
the
world ocean: Experiments with the Hamburg carbon cycle model,
Paleoceanography, 6, 395–430, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Homola et al.(2015)Homola, Spivack, D'Hondt, Estes,
Insua, McKinley, Murray, Pockalny, Robinson, and
Sauvage</label><mixed-citation>
Homola, K., Spivack, A. J., D'Hondt, S., Estes, E. R., Insua,
T. L.,
McKinley, C. C., Murray, R. W., Pockalny, R. A., Robinson, R. S., and
Sauvage, J.: Preformed Nitrate in the Glacial North Atlantic, AGU Fall
Meeting Abstracts, PP43A-2254, San Francisco, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Ito and Follows(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T. and Follows, M. J.: Preformed phosphate, soft tissue pump and
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, J. Mar. Res., 63, 813–839, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Ito and Follows(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T. and Follows, M. J.: Air-sea disequilibrium of carbon dioxide enhances
the biological carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1129–1138, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Ito et al.(2004)Ito, Follows, and Boyle</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T., Follows, M., and Boyle, E.: Is AOU a good measure of respiration in
the oceans?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L17305, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020900" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020900</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Keigwin and Schlegel(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Keigwin, L. and Schlegel, M.: Ocean ventilation and sedimentation since the
glacial maximum at 3 km in the western North Atlantic, Geochem.
Geophy. Geosy., 3, 1–14, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Klockmann et al.(2016)Klockmann, Mikolajewicz, and
Marotzke</label><mixed-citation>
Klockmann, M., Mikolajewicz, U., and Marotzke, J.: The effect of greenhouse
gas concentrations and ice sheets on the glacial AMOC in a coupled climate
model, Clim. Past, 12, 1829–1846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1829-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1829-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kohfeld and Ridgwell(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kohfeld, K. E. and Ridgwell, A.: Glacial-Interglacial Variability in
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, in: Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere Processes, edited
by:
Le Quéré, C. and Saltzman, E. S., 251–286, American Geophysical Union,
Washington D.C., 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Köhler and Fischer(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Köhler, P. and Fischer, H.: Simulating low frequency changes in
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the last 740 000 years, Clim. Past, 2, 57–78,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2-57-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2-57-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kwon et al.(2011)Kwon, Sarmiento, Toggweiler, and
DeVries</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Sarmiento, J. L., Toggweiler, J., and DeVries, T.: The control
of
atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> by ocean ventilation change: The effect of the oceanic
storage of biogenic carbon, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004059</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Lauderdale et al.(2013)Lauderdale, Garabato, Oliver, Follows, and
Williams</label><mixed-citation>
Lauderdale, J. M., Garabato, A. C. N., Oliver, K. I. C., Follows, M. J., and
Williams, R. G.: Wind-driven changes in Southern Ocean residual circulation,
ocean carbon reservoirs and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Clim. Dynam., 41,
2145–2164, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Le Quéré et al.(2005)Quere, Harrison, Colin Prentice, Buitenhuis,
Aumont, Bopp, Claustre, Cotrim Da Cunha, Geider, Giraud
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E.
T., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R.,
Giraud, X., Klaas, C., Kohfeld, K. E., Legendre, L., Manizza, M., Platt, T.,
Rivkin, R. B., Sathyendranath, S., Uitz, J., Watson, A. J., and Wolf-Gladrow,
D.: Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean
biogeochemistry models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2016–2040, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Lewis et al.(1998)Lewis, Wallace, and Allison</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, E., Wallace, D., and Allison, L. J.: Program developed for CO<sub>2</sub>
system calculations, ORNL/CDIAC-105, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis
Center, managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation for the US
Department of Energy Tennessee, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Locarnini et al.(2013)Locarnini, Mishonov, Antonov, Boyer, Garcia,
Baranova, Zweng, Paver, Reagan, Johnson, Hamilton, and Seidov</label><mixed-citation>
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Garcia,
H. E., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Johnson,
D. R., Hamilton, M., and Seidov, D.: World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume 1:
Temperature,
Tech. Rep. 73, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 40 pp., 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Löfverström et al.(2014)Löfverström, Caballero,
Nilsson, and Kleman</label><mixed-citation>
Löfverström, M., Caballero, R., Nilsson, J., and Kleman, J.:
Evolution of the large-scale atmospheric circulation in response to changing
ice sheets over the last glacial cycle, Clim. Past, 10, 1453–1471,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-1453-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Luthi et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Luthi, D., Le Floch, M., Bereiter, B., Blunier, T., Barnola, J.-M.,
Siegenthaler, U., Raynaud, D., Jouzel, J., Fischer, H., Kawamura, K.,
and  Stocker, T. F.:
High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000
years before present.
Nature, 453,  379–382,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949</a>,  2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Marchitto and Broecker(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchitto, T. M. and Broecker, W. S.: Deep water mass geometry in the glacial
Atlantic Ocean: A review of constraints from the paleonutrient proxy Cd ∕ Ca,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q12003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001323" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001323</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Marinov et al.(2008a)Marinov, Follows, Gnanadesikan,
Sarmiento, and Slater</label><mixed-citation>
Marinov, I., Follows, M., Gnanadesikan, A., Sarmiento, J. L., and Slater,
R. D.: How does ocean biology affect atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>? Theory and
models, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C07032, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004598</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Marinov et al.(2008b)Marinov, Gnanadesikan, Sarmiento,
Toggweiler, Follows, and Mignone</label><mixed-citation>
Marinov, I., Gnanadesikan, A., Sarmiento, J. L., Toggweiler, J. R., Follows,
M., and Mignone, B. K.: Impact of oceanic circulation on biological carbon
storage in the ocean and atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22, GB3007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002958</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Marsh et al.(2013)Marsh, Sobester, Hart, Oliver, Edwards, and
Cox</label><mixed-citation>
Marsh, R., Sóbester, A., Hart, E. E., Oliver, K. I. C., Edwards, N. R.,
and Cox, S. J.: An optimally tuned ensemble of the “eb_go_gs”
configuration of GENIE: parameter sensitivity and bifurcations in the
Atlantic overturning circulation, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1729–1744,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1729-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1729-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Martin(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> change: The iron hypothesis,
Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Marzocchi and Jansen(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Marzocchi, A. and Jansen, M. F.: Connecting Antarctic sea ice to deep-ocean
circulation in modern and glacial climate simulations, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 44, 6286–6295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073936" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073936</a>,  2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Mehrbach et al.(1973)Mehrbach, Culberson, Hawley, and
Pytkowicx</label><mixed-citation>
Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C., Hawley, J., and Pytkowicx, R.: Measurement of
the
apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric
pressure, Limnol. Oceanogr., 18, 897–907, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Muglia and Schmittner(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Muglia, J. and Schmittner, A.: Glacial Atlantic overturning increased by wind
stress in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9862–9868, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Müller et al.(2006)Müller, Joos, Edwards, and
Stocker</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, S. A., Joos, F., Edwards, N. R., and Stocker, T. F.: Water Mass
Distribution and Ventilation Time Scales in a Cost-Efficient,
Three-Dimensional Ocean Model, J. Climate, 19, 5479–5499,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3911.1</a>,  2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Munhoven(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Munhoven, G.: Glacial–interglacial changes of continental weathering:
estimates of the related CO<sub>2</sub> and HCO<sup>3−</sup> flux variations and their
uncertainties, Global  Planet. Change, 33, 155–176, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Otto-Bliesner et al.(2007)Otto-Bliesner, Hewitt, Marchitto, Brady,
Abe-Ouchi, Crucifix, Murakami, and Weber</label><mixed-citation>
Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Hewitt, C. D., Marchitto, T. M., Brady, E., Abe-Ouchi,
A., Crucifix, M., Murakami, S., and Weber, S. L.: Last Glacial Maximum ocean
thermohaline circulation: PMIP2 model intercomparisons and data constraints,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12706, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029475</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Petit et al.(1999)Petit, Jouzel, Raynaud, Barkov, Barnola, Basile,
Bender, Chappellaz, Davis, Delaygue et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile,
I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M.,
Kotlyakov, V. M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C., Pépin, L.,
Ritz, C., Saltzman, E., and Stievenard, M.: Climate and
atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core,
Antarctica, Nature, 399, 429–436, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>PMIP3(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
PMIP3: Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project Phase III,
avaiable at: <a href="https://pmip3.lsce.ipsl.fr/" target="_blank">https://pmip3.lsce.ipsl.fr/</a>, last access: 31 January 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Raven et al.(2005)Raven, Caldeira, Elderfield, Hoegh-Guldberg, Liss,
Riebesell, Shepherd, Turley, and Watson</label><mixed-citation>
Raven, J., Caldeira, K., Elderfield, H., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Liss, P.,
Riebesell, U., Shepherd, J., Turley, C., and Watson, A.: Ocean acidification
due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide, The Royal Society,  Clyvedon Press Ltd, Cardiff,
UK,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Redfield(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water,
The Sea, 2, 26–77, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Ridgwell et al.(2007)Ridgwell, Hargreaves, Edwards, Annan, Lenton,
Marsh, Yool, and Watson</label><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A., Hargreaves, J. C., Edwards, N. R., Annan, J. D., Lenton, T. M.,
Marsh, R., Yool, A., and Watson, A.: Marine geochemical data assimilation in
an efficient Earth System Model of global biogeochemical cycling,
Biogeosciences, 4, 87–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-87-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-87-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Ridgwell(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A. J.: Glacial-interglacial perturbations in the global carbon
cycle, PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Sarmiento and Toggweiler(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. and Toggweiler, J.: A new model for the role of the oceans in
determining atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 308, 621–624, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Sarmiento and Gruber(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. L. and Gruber, N.: Ocean biogeochemical dynamics, Princeton
University Press, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Schmittner et al.(2015)Schmittner, Green, and
Wilmes</label><mixed-citation>
Schmittner, A., Green, J. A. M., and Wilmes, S.-B.: Glacial ocean overturning
intensified by tidal mixing in a global circulation model, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 42, 4014–4022, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Sigman and Boyle(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Sigman, D. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Glacial/interglacial variations in
atmospheric
carbon dioxide, Nature, 407, 859–869, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Sigman et al.(2010)Sigman, Hain, and Haug</label><mixed-citation>
Sigman, D. M., Hain, M. P., and Haug, G. H.: The polar ocean and glacial
cycles
in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, Nature, 466, 47–55, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Sijp et al.(2014)Sijp, von der Heydt, Dijkstra, Flögel, Douglas,
and Bijl</label><mixed-citation>
Sijp, W. P., von der Heydt, A. S., Dijkstra, H. A., Flögel, S., Douglas,
P. M., and Bijl, P. K.: The role of ocean gateways on cooling climate on long
time scales, Global Planet. Change, 119, 1–22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.04.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.04.004</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Sikes et al.(2000)Sikes, Samson, Guilderson, and
Howard</label><mixed-citation>
Sikes, E. L., Samson, C. R., Guilderson, T. P., and Howard, W. R.: Old
radiocarbon ages in the southwest Pacific Ocean during the last glacial
period and deglaciation, Nature, 405, 555–559, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Sime et al.(2013)Sime, Kohfeld, Le Quéré, Wolff, de Boer,
Graham, and Bopp</label><mixed-citation>
Sime, L. C., Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., Wolff, E. W., de Boer,
A. M., Graham, R. M., and Bopp, L.: Southern Hemisphere westerly wind changes
during the Last Glacial Maximum: model-data comparison, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 64, 104–120, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Sime et al.(2016)Sime, Hodgson, Bracegirdle, Allen, Perren, Roberts,
and de Boer</label><mixed-citation>
Sime, L. C., Hodgson, D., Bracegirdle, T. J., Allen, C., Perren, B., Roberts,
S., and de Boer, A. M.: Sea ice led to poleward-shifted winds at the Last
Glacial Maximum: the influence of state dependency on CMIP5 and PMIP3 models,
Clim. Past, 12, 2241–2253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Skinner et al.(2010)Skinner, Fallon, Waelbroeck, Michel, and
Barker</label><mixed-citation>
Skinner, L., Fallon, S., Waelbroeck, C., Michel, E., and Barker, S.:
Ventilation of the deep Southern Ocean and deglacial CO<sub>2</sub> rise, Science,
328, 1147–1151, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Skinner et al.(2015)Skinner, McCave, Carter, Fallon, Scrivner, and
Primeau</label><mixed-citation>
Skinner, L., McCave, I., Carter, L., Fallon, S., Scrivner, A., and Primeau,
F.:
Reduced ventilation and enhanced magnitude of the deep Pacific carbon pool
during the last glacial period, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 411,
45–52, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Solomon et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M.,
and Miller, H. L.: Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Stocker(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T.: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I
contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Takahashi et al.(1985)Takahashi, Broecker, and
Langer</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., and Langer, S.: Redfield ratio based on
chemical data from isopycnal surfaces, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 90, 6907–6924, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Toggweiler et al.(2003)Toggweiler, Gnanadesikan, Carson, Murnane, and
Sarmiento</label><mixed-citation>
Toggweiler, J. R., Gnanadesikan, A., Carson, S., Murnane, R., and Sarmiento,
J. L.: Representation of the carbon cycle in box models and GCMs: 1.
Solubility pump, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1026,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001401</a>,  2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Volk and Hoffert(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Volk, T. and Hoffert, M. I.: Ocean Carbon Pumps: Analysis of Relative
Strengths
and Efficiencies in Ocean-Driven Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Changes, in: The Carbon
Cycle and Atmospheric CO: Natural Variations Archean to Present, edited by:
Sundquist, E. T. and Broecker, W. S.,  99–110, American Geophysical
Union, Washington D.C., 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>von der Heydt and Dijkstra(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
von der Heydt, A. and Dijkstra, H. A.: Effect of ocean gateways on the global
ocean circulation in the late Oligocene and early Miocene, Paleoceanography,
21, PA1011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005PA001149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005PA001149</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Williams and Follows(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, R. G. and Follows, M. J.: Ocean Dynamics and the Carbon Cycle:
Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Zhang et al.(2013)Zhang, Lohmann, Knorr, and Xu</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Lohmann, G., Knorr, G., and Xu, X.: Different ocean states and
transient characteristics in Last Glacial Maximum simulations and
implications for deglaciation, Clim. Past, 9, 2319–2333,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2319-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2319-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
