<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-1863-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Carbon amendment stimulates benthic nitrogen cycling during the
bioremediation of particulate aquaculture waste</article-title><alt-title>Carbon amendment stimulates benthic nitrogen cycling</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningauthor{G. Robinson et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff7">
          <name><surname>Robinson</surname><given-names>Georgina</given-names></name>
          <email>georgina.robinson@sams.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>MacTavish</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Savage</surname><given-names>Candida</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Caldwell</surname><given-names>Gary S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>Clifford L. W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Probyn</surname><given-names>Trevor</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Eyre</surname><given-names>Bradley D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stead</surname><given-names>Selina M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University,
Newcastle, NE1 7RU, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown 6140, South Africa</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New
Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Biological Sciences and Marine Research Institute,
University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Cape Town, South Africa</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Marine and Coastal Management, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay 8012, Cape
Town, South Africa</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry, School of Environment, Science and
Engineering, Southern Cross University,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>a</label><institution>current address: The Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish
Marine Institute, Oban, PA37 1QA, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Georgina Robinson (georgina.robinson@sams.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>29</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>1863</fpage><lpage>1878</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>August</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e189">The treatment of organic wastes remains one of the key
sustainability challenges facing the growing global aquaculture industry.
Bioremediation systems based on coupled bioturbation–microbial processing
offer a promising route for waste management. We present, for the first time,
a combined biogeochemical–molecular analysis of the short-term performance
of one such system that is designed to receive nitrogen-rich particulate
aquaculture wastes. Using sea cucumbers (<italic>Holothuria scabra</italic>) as a
model bioturbator we provide evidence that adjusting the waste C : N from
5 : 1 to 20 : 1 promoted a shift in nitrogen cycling pathways towards the
dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), resulting in net
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from the sediment. The carbon amended treatment exhibited
an overall net N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, whereas the control receiving only aquaculture
waste exhibited net N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, suggesting that carbon
supplementation enhanced nitrogen fixation. The higher NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux
and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake was further supported by meta-genome predictions that
indicate that organic-carbon addition stimulated DNRA over denitrification.
These findings indicate that carbon addition may potentially result in
greater retention of nitrogen within the system; however, longer-term trials
are necessary to determine whether this nitrogen retention is translated into
improved sea cucumber biomass yields. Whether this truly constitutes a
remediation process is open for debate as there remains the risk that any
increased nitrogen retention may be temporary, with any subsequent release
potentially raising the eutrophication risk. Longer and larger-scale trials
are required before this approach may be validated with the complexities of
the in-system nitrogen cycle being fully understood.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e254">Intensive land-based aquaculture produces nitrogen-rich effluent that may
detrimentally impact water quality and other environmental parameters. In
conventional recirculating aquaculture systems (RASs), biological filtration
and water exchange are commonly practiced for nitrogen removal; however,
microbial nitrogen removal is limited by the supply of carbon as an electron
donor (Castine, 2013). Carbon supplementation is employed in a number of
treatment technologies to overcome this deficiency (Avnimelech, 1999; Hamlin
et al., 2008; Schneider et al., 2006). The addition of exogenous carbon is a
prerequisite for the successful operation of denitrifying filters that
permanently remove dissolved inorganic nitrogenous wastes by conversion<?pagebreak page1864?> to
dinitrogen gas (Roy et al., 2010). Alternatively, in zero exchange biofloc
systems, carbon-to-nitrogen ratios (C : N) are increased through the addition
of labile carbon sources to promote ammonia assimilation from the water
column by heterotrophic bacteria (Avnimelech, 1999; Crab et al., 2012). The
fundamental difference between these approaches is the ultimate fate of
nitrogen within the system, i.e. removal versus retention. Technological
advances are focused on the development of dissimilatory processes to
permanently remove nitrogen from the system as N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas, while
ecologically based systems, such as biofloc, aim to recycle and re-use
nitrogen within the culture system. This study aims to advance
ecologically based aquaculture bioremediation systems that may provide an
alternative to closing the nitrogen cycle through the promotion of
assimilatory processes (Robinson, 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e266">The stoichiometric approach taken in C : N amendment in biofloc systems
recognizes that carbon and nitrogen cycles are coupled; therefore, the
relative elemental abundances control the rate of nutrient cycling and
energy flow within the treatment system (Dodds et al., 2004; Ebeling et al.,
2006). The potential for C : N manipulation in sediment-based aquaculture
effluent treatment systems containing deposit feeders (sea cucumbers) was
previously demonstrated by Robinson et al. (2018), wherein the addition of
soluble starch to aquaculture waste significantly improved sea cucumber
growth rate and biomass density. Furthermore, redox-stratified sediments
that harboured predominately heterotrophic microbial communities also
supported higher sea cucumber yields, indicating that predominately reducing
conditions are more favourable for deposit feeder growth (Robinson et al.,
2015, 2016). Since reducing conditions favour anaerobic
respiratory and fermentative pathways, organic-carbon supplementation may
stimulate anaerobic bacterial metabolism by increasing the availability of
electron donors and/or substrates for fermentation, in addition to
increasing heterotrophic NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assimilation (Fenchel et al., 2012;
Oakes et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e281">The C : N ratio affects the quantity of nitrogen released during
mineralization, with a net release of nitrogen occurring below a threshold
of 20 : 1 (Cook et al., 2007; Blackburn, 1986). Robinson et al. (2018)
hypothesized that C : N manipulation may alter the nitrogen cycling pathways
within the sediment microbial community by mediating a shift from
ammonification (net release) to assimilation (net uptake) of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by heterotrophic bacteria; however, the effect of carbon supplementation on
nitrogen cycling was not clearly elucidated. An improved understanding of
how C : N manipulation influences benthic nitrogen cycling is necessary in
order to improve nitrogen assimilation and incorporation into secondary
biomass. In the current study, we applied a coupled biogeochemical–molecular
approach to further investigate the effect of carbon supplementation on
nitrogen cycling. Incubation experiments were conducted to quantify benthic
fluxes, while sediment microbial communities were examined using 16S rRNA
gene sequencing. The study aimed to test the hypothesis that increasing the
C : N of particulate aquaculture waste from 5 : 1 to 20 : 1 would promote the
assimilation of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by heterotrophic bacteria, drive shifts in
microbial community composition and result in nitrogen retention in the
culture system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study site and experimental animals</title>
      <p id="d1e319">The study was conducted in a purpose-built bio-secure heated conventional RAS described in Robinson et al. (2015).
The experiment was conducted over a 15-day period from 30 January (day
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1) to 14 February (day 14) 2014 using juvenile sea cucumbers
(<italic>Holothuria scabra</italic>) imported from a commercial hatchery (Research
Institute for Aquaculture III, Vietnam) on 5 September 2013 that were
quarantined and acclimated to the experimental system as described in
Robinson et al. (2018).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e335">Description of the experimental treatments. The presence
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">✓</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) or absence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) from day 0 of aquaculture waste,
added carbon source or sea cucumbers is indicated.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treatment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Treatment</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No. of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Aquaculture</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Sea</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">C : N</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">code</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">replicates</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">waste</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">cucumber</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">source</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Initial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">In</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n/a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No added carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">✓</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">✓</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5 : 1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Added carbon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">✓</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">✓</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">✓</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20 : 1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e352">n/a – not applicable</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Experimental design</title>
      <p id="d1e567">Three experimental treatments were randomly allocated to 15 incubation
chambers with five replicates per treatment. The “initial” (In) treatment
was included to ensure that there were no significant differences between
treatments prior to the start of the experiment and as an initial reference
point for evaluating the effect of the treatments. The “no added carbon”
treatment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) with a C : N of 5 : 1 received aquaculture waste only
(215.06 mg day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wet weight). The “added carbon” treatment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
received aquaculture waste (215.06 mg day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wet weight) and carbon in
the form of soluble starch (44.50 mg day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dry weight) daily to
increase the C : N to 20 : 1 (mass ratio) from day 0 (Table 1). The
carbon addition treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) were standardized at a concentration of
400 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Experimental system and rearing conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e658">Sediment incubation chambers were established by transferring unsieved
CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> builder's sand sourced from a commercial dune quarry (SSB Mining,
Macassar, South Africa) into Plexiglas<sup>®</sup>
tubes (25 cm long, 8.4 cm internal diameter) sealed with a polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) end cap to a depth of 7.5 cm. The incubation chambers were
connected via 4.0 mm air tubing and 4.0 mm variflow valves to a manifold
receiving seawater directly from a RAS biofilter (see Robinson et al., 2015, for further details). The water
flow rate was 50 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, equivalent to 16.34 exchanges h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The chamber outflows were routed into a main drainage channel and allowed to
flow to waste to prevent soluble carbon sources from entering the RAS.
Unsieved CaCO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was preconditioned for 4 weeks in flow-through tanks
prior to its transfer into the chambers. The sediment was allowed to
condition and stabilize into redox-stratified layers for 14 days prior to the
commencement of the experiment. No aeration was provided;<?pagebreak page1865?> however, water was
continuously mixed at 60 rpm using a magnetic stirring rod positioned 15 cm
above the sediment surface. Stirring rates were just below those causing
sediment re-suspension (Ferguson et al., 2004; Gongol and Savage, 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e706">The experimental area was fully shaded from direct sunlight. Light intensity
was measured during daylight incubations using a light meter (LX-107, Lutron
Electronic Enterprise Co. Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan) positioned 10 cm above each
chamber. Additionally, a temperature/light logger (Hobo, UA-002-64, Onset,
USA) was placed in an additional chamber positioned in the centre of the
experimental treatments. The mean (hours) natural photoperiod was
13.34 : 10.26 (L : D).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Aquaculture waste and carbon additions</title>
      <p id="d1e715">The aquaculture waste, used as feed for the sea cucumbers, comprised uneaten
abalone (<italic>Haliotis midae</italic>) feed and faeces. It was collected daily
from the backwash of a sand filter in a recirculating abalone grow-out
system. Samples were sent for organic-carbon and total nitrogen content
analysis (Robinson et al., 2018) and the mean C : N was 5.21 : 1. Soluble
starch (Merck Millipore, Pretoria, South Africa) was used as an additional
carbon source to increase the C : N to 20 : 1. Additions of waste with
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) or without (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) added carbon commenced on day 0. The aquaculture
waste was mixed into a wet slurry while the starch was dissolved in seawater
and added daily to the respective treatments at 16:00 local time (UTC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2) from day 0 to
day 14.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Experimental timeline</title>
      <p id="d1e749">Baseline data were collected at the start of the experiment (i.e.
day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1), with fluxes measured in all 15 chambers under light and dark
conditions. All replicates from the In treatment were sacrificed on day 0
and sub-cored for analysis of sediment characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Sea cucumber growth</title>
      <p id="d1e765">Animals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) previously acclimated in the RAS were suspended in mesh
containers for 24 h to evacuate their guts prior to weighing and
photo-identification (Robinson et al., 2015). Three juvenile <italic>H. scabra</italic> with a mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) weight of
1.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.36 g were added to each of 10 chambers (equivalent to a high
stocking density of 1034.00 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on day 0. They were removed at
the end of the experiment (day 14), gut-evacuated for 24 h and reweighed.
Wet-weight data were used to calculate the growth rate (g d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Robinson et
al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Benthic flux incubations</title>
      <p id="d1e831">Benthic flux incubations were conducted on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 for all treatments (In,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and on alternate days from day 1 to day 13 for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatments, after sacrifice of the In treatment. Light incubations were
conducted during daylight hours, commencing after sunrise (08:00 local time),
and dark incubations were conducted after sunset (22:00 local time). When
data were collected, the flow from each chamber was interrupted, the stirrers
were paused (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 min) and the chambers were uncapped by removing the
rubber bung. A portable optical meter (YSI ProODO, YSI Pty Ltd, USA) was
inserted through the sampling port to measure temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The pH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01 pH units) was measured
electrochemically (Eutech Instruments pH 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> portable meter, Singapore).</p>
      <?pagebreak page1866?><p id="d1e930">Water alkalinity and nutrient concentration (ammonia, nitrate/nitrite,
nitrite and phosphate) were recorded at the start and end of each light–dark
incubation period. To do this, samples were withdrawn using a 50 mL acid-washed plastic syringe connected to the chamber outflow through 4.0 mm
tubing and filtered (Whatman<sup>®</sup> glass
microfibre filters grade GF/C, Sigma Aldrich, Johannesburg, South Africa)
into 15 mL screw-capped polycarbonate vials. All nutrient samples were
immediately frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and alkalinity samples were kept cold
at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were taken on three sampling occasions
(days 1, 7 and 13) during dark incubations, as during daylight hours
bubbles may form that interfere with the estimation of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : Ar and
thus lead to an overestimation of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production (Eyre et al., 2002). To minimize bubble
introduction, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were collected by allowing the water to flow by
gravity from the chamber outflow directly into 7 mL gas-tight glass vials
with glass stoppers filled to overflowing. The N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were poisoned
with 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of 5 % HgCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and stored submerged at
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were collected in duplicate or
triplicate; thus, the final values represent the mean value calculated for
each replicate (Eyre and Ferguson, 2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e1042">After withdrawal of all water samples, replacement water was gravity fed into
the chamber directly from the manifold and the chambers were recapped and
the stirrers restarted. All materials used for sample collection were acid
washed, rinsed three times with distilled water and air-dried prior to use.
Total oxygen exchange was measured in three randomly selected chambers during
incubations (one from each treatment) to ensure that the oxygen concentration
did not decrease by more than 20 %. Incubation times were kept short,
ranging from 68 to 146 min with an average duration of 104 min, to prevent
oxygen depletion and ensure that flux rates were linear (Burford and
Longmore, 2001; Glud, 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS8">
  <title>Nutrient analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e1051">Dissolved nitrate and nitrite (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) were determined
colourimetrically by flow injection analysis
(QuikChem<sup>®</sup> 8500 Automated Ion Analyzer,
Hach Company, USA) and a commercially available test kit
(QuikChem<sup>®</sup> method 31-107-04-1-E for the
determination of nitrate and nitrite in seawater). All other nutrient samples
were analysed manually. Ammonium (0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) and dissolved inorganic
phosphate (0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) were determined using the methods of
Grasshoff (1976) and Grasshoff et al. (1999) respectively, and nitrite
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) was determined according to Bendscheider and
Robinson (1952).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS9">
  <title>Gas analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e1116">Alkalinity (0.01 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and total dissolved CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M) concentrations were determined by potentiometric
titration according to Edmond (1970) using an automated titrator system (876
Dosimat plus, Metrohm, USA). Total alkalinity was calculated according to the
method of Snoeyink and Jenkins (1980). CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were
calculated from alkalinity and pH using the equations given in Almgren et
al. (1983). Changes in pH and alkalinity were used to calculate dissolved
inorganic carbon (DIC) fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d1e1159">Dinitrogen gas (N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined from N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : Ar using membrane
inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> removal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01 %).
Measurement of direct N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes using this technique represents the net
benthic flux of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting from a combination of processes that
produce N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as denitrification and anammox, and processes that
consume N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> such as nitrogen fixation (Ferguson and Eyre, 2007; Eyre et
al., 2013a).</p>
      <p id="d1e1236">Nutrient and gas fluxes across the sediment–water interface during light and
dark incubations were calculated using initial and final concentration data
according to Eq. (1). Net flux rates, representing the net result of 13.57 h
of dark fluxes and 10.43 h of light fluxes were calculated according to
Equation 2 (Veuger et al., 2007). Gross primary production was calculated
according to Eq. (3), where light O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes represent net primary
production and dark fluxes represent respiration. Remineralization ratios
were calculated according to Eq. (4) (Eyre et al., 2013b).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Flux</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where Flux is flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
concentration at time zero (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
concentration at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is incubation time
(h), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is area of sediment surface in chamber (cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is volume
of water in chamber (L).

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M103" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Net</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rates</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hourly</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dark</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rates</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hours</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">of</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">darkness</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hourly</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">light</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rates</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hours</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">of</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">daylight</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gross</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">primary</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">production</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">light</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ve</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dark</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ve</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Remineralization</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ratio</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dark</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS10">
  <title>Sediment sectioning</title>
      <p id="d1e1651">On days 0 and 14, three sub-cores (internal diameter 30 mm) were extracted
from the In and experimental (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) chambers. Each sub-core was
sectioned into the following five depth intervals: 0.0–0.5, 0.5–1.0,
1.0–2.0, 2.0–4.0 and 4.0–6.0 cm; this was done for the analysis of
sediment characteristics. One set of sub-cores was dried at 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 24 h for analysis of total organic carbon and total nitrogen; the second
set was frozen in sealed vials in black bags for spectrophotometric analysis
of total carbohydrates. Two sets of samples were prepared from the third
sub-core: sediment samples were frozen in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes for
subsequent deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction and sequencing. The
remaining sediment was added to 15 mL vials filled with 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
filtered, 1 % buffered paraformaldehyde and refrigerated for the
determination of bacterial abundance by flow cytometry.</p>
      <p id="d1e1684">The organic content measured as particulate organic carbon (OC) and total
nitrogen (TN) was determined on an elemental analyser after the removal of
carbonates by acid fumigation (Robinson et al., 2015). Total sediment
carbohydrates were measured on defrosted samples using the phenol-sulfuric
acid method (Underwood et al., 1995).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS11">
  <title>Flow cytometry</title>
      <p id="d1e1694">Aliquots of preserved samples were prepared in duplicate by staining with
4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 15 min at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in
darkness (Marie et al., 1999). Bacterial abundance was analysed with a
FACSCalibur flow cytometer<?pagebreak page1867?> (BD Biosciences, Singapore), fitted with a
488 nm, 15 mW laser, using the FL1 detector (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">530</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). TruCount
beads (BD Biosciences, Singapore) were used as an internal standard. All
cytometric data were logged and analysed using Cell Quest (Becton-Dickinson)
using <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> cells as a reference. Cell abundance was
converted to cells per gram of dry sediment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS12">
  <title>Deoxyribonucleic acid extraction and importation</title>
      <p id="d1e1736">Genomic DNA was extracted from approximately 250 mg of substrate samples
using a DNA isolation kit (ZR Soil Microbe DNA MiniPrep, Zymo Research, USA)
yielding purified genomic DNA for use in polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
amplification. Genomic DNA was stored in sealed, labelled Eppendorf tubes at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C prior to being couriered from the Republic of South Africa
to the United Kingdom. To comply with the Animal Health Act 1981, the samples
were accompanied by a general import license (IMP/GEN/2008/03) for the
importation of animal and poultry products, including DNA, from all non-EU
countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS13">
  <title>Polymerase chain reaction and 16S rRNA sequencing</title>
      <p id="d1e1761">Library preparation was performed using a modified version of the MiSeq
WetLab protocol (Kozich et al., 2013). One microlitre of template DNA was
arrayed into 96-well plate format with 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of Accuprime Pfx
Supermix (Thermofisher, UK), leaving two wells on each plate open for
controls. Two microlitres of reconstituted indexed primers at
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>M were added to the samples to barcode them for
identification. To identify any contaminating operational taxonomic units
(OTUs), two control samples were included in the sequencing run. The negative
control consisted of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of PCR grade dH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and the positive
control was 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>L of mock community (HM-278S, BEI Resources,
Manassas, USA) at a 1 : 3 dilution. The primer pair 515F/806R was used to
amplify the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. PCR was performed using the
following conditions: initial enzyme activation and DNA denaturation
proceeded at 95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 min followed by cycling parameters of
95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 20 s, 55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 15 s and 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 5 min for 30 cycles. A final extension was done at 72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 10 min. The amplification of the PCR products was checked on a subset of
12 samples using gel electrophoresis on a 1 % agarose gel prior to
library clean-up. Samples from all plates were pooled and libraries were
subjected to quality control including quantification using a KAPA Biosystems
Q-PCR kit, obtaining a bioanalyser trace using the Agilent Technologies HS
DNA kit and normalization using the Invitrogen SequalPrep Plate Normalization
Kit (Thermofisher, UK). Amplicons were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq
platform by NU-OMICS (Northumbria University, UK).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS14">
  <title>Processing of raw sequence data</title>
      <p id="d1e1854">The raw fastq files were processed using Mothur (version 1.37.0) based on the
Schloss MiSeq SOP with modifications. Raw forward and reverse sequence reads
were merged to create contigs prior to quality filtering. The sequence reads
were trimmed using a sliding window of five base pairs (bp) with an average
window quality threshold (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 22 or greater. Sequences containing an
ambiguous (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) base, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 homo-polymers or that had a sequence length
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 275 bp were discarded. Quality-filtered sequences were aligned using a
custom alignment created for the variable four (V4) region of the 16S rRNA
gene using the Silva database (version 123; July 2015 release). The reads
were screened to include only overlapping regions (based on alignment
positions), pre-clustered (number of differences: 1) and checked for
chimeras using the UCHIME algorithm (Edgar et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e1885">Taxons classified as “mitochondria”, “Eukaryota” or “unknown” were
specified during the remove.lineage command. The count.groups command was
used to determine the minimum number of reads per sample for normalization.
To standardize sequencing effort, all samples were subsampled to 550 using
the sub.sample command, to ensure that all replicate samples from the
experimental treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) were retained. The subsampled OTU
table (shared file) and assigned consensus taxonomy (cons.taxonomy.file) were
used in downstream analyses, including alpha and beta diversity, taxonomic
composition and meta-genome predictions of the microbial communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS15">
  <title>Statistical analyses and bioinformatics</title>
      <p id="d1e1908">Environmental (light, temperature, salinity) and flux rate data for nutrients
(NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gases (DO, DIC
and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> – night only) collected on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 during light and dark
incubations were averaged to provide a mean value per replicate chamber for
each diurnal period. The data were tested for homogeneity of
variance and for the normal distribution of the residuals using Levene and
Shapiro–Wilk tests. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tested for
differences in the environmental, nutrient and gas flux data between the In,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatments on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1868?><p id="d1e1999">The light, water quality and flux rate data (days 1–13) for nutrients and
gases were averaged to provide a mean value for each replicate incubation
chamber. It was not possible to conduct daytime incubations on day 9 due
to lowered O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the chambers; therefore, light incubation
data represent a mean of six values (days 1, 3, 5, 7, 11 and
13), while the mean dark incubation data were calculated from the full set of
seven incubations. The mean temperature, salinity and mean light, dark and
net fluxes of nutrients and gas fluxes, mean remineralization ratios, and mean
gross primary production measured during the experimental period (days 1–13)
were analysed using a Student <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test at alpha <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05. Sediment
characteristics, including organic carbon, total nitrogen, C : N and
bacterial cell abundance, were compared using mixed-model ANOVA with treatment
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and sediment depth as fixed factors. When a significant
effect was observed, post hoc comparisons of means were conducted with a
Tukey's honest significant difference test. Differences in <italic>H. scabra</italic>
growth rate and biomass density were analysed by a Student <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test at
alpha <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05. Data are presented as mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error unless
otherwise stated. All statistical analyses were performed in Statistica v.13.</p>
      <p id="d1e2064">Alpha (within-sample) diversity metrics for the number of OTUs (observed),
richness (Chao 1), abundance-coverage estimator (ACE) and diversity (Shannon,
Simpson and Inverse Simpson) were calculated and visualized in the phyloseq
package in R (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013). The diversity metrics were
generated by the summary.single command by subsampling to the lowest number
of reads per sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and compared across treatments and sediment
depths using mixed-model ANOVA.</p>
      <p id="d1e2079">Patterns in bacterial community structure between treatments and sediment
depths were visualized using principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on a
Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix calculated from the OTU table in R. In
addition, a non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was
performed on the community distance matrix based on the Bray–Curtis
dissimilarity index to test the null hypothesis that there was no difference
in the structure of microbial communities between treatments (In vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C vs.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and sediment depth using the “adonis” function of the vegan package in
R (Oksanen et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e2097">Mantel correlation tests were performed on dissimilarity matrices of the
community and environmental data to provide an indication of how well
microbial community data corresponded to the environmental data. The
environmental distance matrix was calculated as Euclidean distances computed
from a metadata table containing all of the data describing light, water
quality, sediment characteristics and net flux rates for gases and nutrients.
The significance of correlation coefficients was assessed using a permutation
procedure. In addition, the correlation between environmental data and the
sediment microbial communities was determined using the “envfit” function
of the “vegan” package in R (Oksanen et al., 2016). Since none of the
environmental characteristics were significantly correlated with the
microbial community data, the environmental data were not plotted as vectors
on the PCoA ordination.</p>
      <p id="d1e2100">The Tax4Fun package in R was used to predict the metabolic capacities of the
microbial communities from the 16S rRNA sequences. The fctProfiling option
was set to TRUE (default) to predict the metabolic capacities of the
meta-genomes based on pre-computed Kyoto Encyclopedia for Genes and Genomes
(KEGG) ortholog reference profiles (Aßhauer et al., 2015). Only KEGG
pathways within “nitrogen metabolism” were retained for analysis. The KEGG
pathway map 00910 for nitrogen metabolism and associated information was used
to extract the KEGG ortholog reference numbers involved in the six fully
characterized reactions listed under “nitrogen metabolism” (Table S2 in the
Supplement). Anaerobic oxidation of ammonia (anammox) was not included, as
although this process is recognized in the KEGG database, it has yet to be
assigned to a module or reference profile.</p>
      <p id="d1e2103">The relative abundance of functional genes predicted from the 16S rRNA
sequences within each ortholog reference profile were summed to provide a
mean value for each pathway module for each replicate sample from all
sediment depths sampled in all treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The relative abundance
of functional genes in the In and experiment treatments was illustrated by
graphically plotting vertical depth profiles and analysed statistically using
a mixed-model ANOVA.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Sea cucumber growth and survival</title>
      <p id="d1e2130">Survival of sea cucumbers was 100 % in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment; however, one
replicate chamber from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment was terminated on day 9
following a period of water column hypoxia, caused by one animal preventing
water exchange by blocking the outflow valve. This resulted in the mortality
of all sea cucumbers in this chamber, reducing the overall survival to
80 %. There was no significant difference between the mean sea cucumber
wet weight on day 0 or day 14 between treatments; however, despite the
short duration of the experiment the sea cucumbers in both treatments lost
mass (decreasing from 1.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 to 1.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 g; an overall
mean growth rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00 g day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The biomass density
decreased from 1,034.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.73 to
874.97 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.31 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, although the initial stocking density was
comparable to the final densities (1011.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75.58 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
achieved in previous carbon amended cultures standardized at
200 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Robinson et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Gas and nutrient fluxes</title>
      <p id="d1e2270">Benthic fluxes of dissolved oxygen and DIC can provide an indication of
overall benthic metabolism in response to organic enrichment (Eyre et al.,
2011). There were no significant differences in the light, dark or net fluxes
of DO, DIC or N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between treatments on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 (N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dark only;
Fig. S1 in the Supplement). Sediment oxygen consumption was significantly
higher in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C incubations throughout the experiment in both light and
dark incubations (Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) resulting in
a higher net consumption of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2905.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 99.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2511.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 116.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment (Fig. 1a). Oxygen and DIC fluxes clearly show that the
sediment metabolism was net heterotrophic. During the day, DIC<?pagebreak page1869?> release from
organic-matter degradation exceeded DIC consumption from primary production
(Fig. 1b). There was sediment oxygen consumption during light and dark
incubations, indicating that respiration dominated over photosynthesis,
supported by the lower gross primary production in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment
(Fig. 1d). There were no significant differences in the light, dark or net
fluxes of DIC with a mean net efflux of
12 732.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2031.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> across the
treatments (Fig. 1b). The assumed low rates of photosynthesis may have been
due to shading and from turnover of the micro-phytobenthos standing stock due
to grazing by sea cucumbers (Glud et al., 2008; MacTavish et al., 2012). In
addition, DIC fluxes were 4-fold higher than oxygen fluxes, indicating that
the majority of the organic carbon was oxidized by anaerobic pathways
(Burford and Longmore, 2001; Eyre et al., 2011).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e2504">Mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error) net fluxes (in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <bold>(a)</bold> dissolved oxygen
(DO), <bold>(b)</bold> DIC, <bold>(c)</bold> dinitrogen gas (N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<bold>(d)</bold> gross primary production (GPP) in incubation chambers containing
sea cucumbers and aquaculture waste with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) or without (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) carbon
addition, incubated under light and dark conditions between day 1 and
day 13.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1863/2018/bg-15-1863-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2603">The mean dark N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux on days 7 and 13 was not significantly
different between treatments (Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. 1c). Carbon supplementation resulted in a net N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>142.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating
that atmospheric nitrogen fixation dominated over denitrification and anammox
during dark incubations. In contrast, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment had a small but
positive net N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux
(17.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 36.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that
nitrogen removal pathways, such as denitrification or anaerobic ammonium
oxidation (anammox), were slightly greater than nitrogen fixation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2764">Ambient environmental conditions recorded in the incubation chambers at the
start of the experiment on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1, during light and dark periods, are
presented in Table S1. There were no significant differences in the dark or
net fluxes of any of the nutrients between treatments on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1, except the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes during light incubations, which were significantly
different (one-way ANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.002</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S2). The
In chambers had a significantly higher NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux of
115.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with an
uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment had intermediary values with a mean
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux of
56.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had the
highest flux rate throughout the experiment (Fig. 2b) with mean efflux
significantly higher in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C chambers during light incubations compared
with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment (182.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120.77 vs.
83.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 26.70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 2b). Sediment–water exchange of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were unaffected by carbon addition. Mean fluxes of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were positive irrespective of
diel cycle, indicating net release from the sediment (Fig. 2a–c); however,
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were variable with opposing trends in light, dark and net
fluxes between treatments (Fig. 2d). As both dissolved oxygen consumption and
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production were higher in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C chambers, this indicates an
overall increase in benthic metabolism during daylight.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e3204">Mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error) benthic light, dark and net fluxes (in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <bold>(a)</bold> phosphate
(PO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> ammonium (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> nitrite
(NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> nitrate and nitrite (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in incubation
chambers containing sea cucumbers and aquaculture waste with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) or
without (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C) carbon addition, incubated under light and dark conditions
between day 1 and day 13.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1863/2018/bg-15-1863-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3348">Vertical depth profiles of sediment characteristics:
<bold>(a)</bold> organic carbon, <bold>(b)</bold> total nitrogen, <bold>(c)</bold> carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C : N), <bold>(d)</bold> total carbohydrate and <bold>(e)</bold> bacterial abundance. Cores were sectioned on day 0 prior to
the addition of aquaculture waste (initial; In) and after waste addition,
both with and without carbon supplementation (carbon and no carbon
respectively) on day 14.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1863/2018/bg-15-1863-2018-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Sediment characteristics and\hack{\break} remineralization ratios}?><title>Sediment characteristics and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> remineralization ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e3381">The sediment OC content decreased in the experimental
treatments after 14 days compared to the initial treatment (Fig. 3a). The
largest decrease was observed at the 1.0–2.0 and 2.0–4.0 cm depth
intervals spanning the approximate depth of the oxic–anoxic interface, one of
the most active zones of organic-matter mineralization by<?pagebreak page1870?> heterotrophic
microorganisms (Reimers et al., 2013). Vertical profiles of TN and the C : N on days 0 and 14 followed a similar trend with the
most marked changes occurring at the 1.0–2.0 and 2.0–4.0 cm depth
intervals. Carbon addition did not affect the OC or TN, but
sediment depth significantly influenced the OC (mixed-model ANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.024</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3a) and TN content (mixed-model ANOVA;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.029</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3b), being significantly lower at
the 1.0–2.0 cm depth interval with mean values of 0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 %
(OC) and 0.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00 % (TN). This confirms that the
oxic–anoxic interface supported the highest rates of organic-matter
mineralization. In contrast, the deepest sectioned interval (4.0–6.0 cm)
had significantly higher OC (0.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 %) and TN content
(0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 %) than the shallower intervals. Carbon addition did
not significantly increase the sediment C : N in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment
(7.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27) compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment (7.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24; mixed-model ANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.054</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3c). However, carbon
supplementation resulted in mean remineralization ratios (after the exclusion of
outliers) of 15.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.43 that were approximately 3-fold higher than
chambers receiving aquaculture waste only (5.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.50), although the
difference was not significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Remineralization ratios were higher than the sediment C : N in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C
treatment; a trend that is consistent with nitrogen assimilation by
heterotrophic bacteria, including nitrogen fixation (Eyre et al., 2013b).
Conversely, in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment receiving raw aquaculture waste at a
C : N of 5 : 1, the remineralization ratios were lower than the sediment
C : N, indicating net release of nitrogen.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3615">Alpha diversity metrics calculated on subsampled data.
Observed: the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs);
ACE: abundance-coverage estimator; InvSimpson: Inverse Simpson
diversity metric.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1863/2018/bg-15-1863-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page1871?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Microbial community analysis and nitrogen metabolism functional
gene prediction</title>
      <p id="d1e3630">A total of 781 701 16S rRNA reads were generated. Four samples from one
replicate of the In treatment were removed during subsampling due to a low
abundance of reads and therefore excluded from further analysis. A total of
780 612 sequences in the 41 samples remained subsequent to quality control,
primer trimming, size exclusion and the removal of unassigned taxons,
mitochondria and Eukaryota.</p>
      <p id="d1e3633">Neither carbon addition, sediment depth nor the interaction between the
factors (treatment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sediment depth) significantly affected the
number of sequences, OTUs (observed species), community richness (Chao and
ACE), or diversity measured as Simpson and Inverse Simpson indices (mixed-model ANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4). Sediment depth significantly influenced
Shannon diversity, with the highest diversity of 2.85 recorded in the
sediment surface layer (0–0.5 cm) and the lowest (1.54) in the 4–6 cm
layer (mixed-model ANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.031</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3691"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Flow cytometry data compared relatively well with the 16S rRNA amplicon
sequencing data. Bacterial abundance (cells per gram; Fig. 3e), the number
of sequences and OTUs were higher in the In chambers than the experimental
chambers sampled on day 14, presumably in response to grazing by the sea
cucumbers. The number of OTUs decreased from 286.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 128.13 in the In
chambers to 176 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65.15 and 181.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45.90 in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C
treatments respectively. Overall, the community diversity was low: Shannon
diversity: 2.31 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13; Inverse Simpson: 5.79 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.51.
There was a marked increase in community richness at the 1–2 cm depth
interval, coinciding with the oxic–anoxic interface. In the In chambers the
number of OTUs was 778.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 731.00, compared with 343.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 199.25
and 322.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 307.25 in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatments respectively. The
Chao 1 richness indicator also followed this trend (Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3783">The mean proportion (%) and the difference in the mean proportion
of taxa at <bold>(a)</bold> family and <bold>(b)</bold> genus level between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatments with 95 % confidence intervals. Significant differences
in mean proportions were determined using two-sided Welch's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> tests
(alpha <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1863/2018/bg-15-1863-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3831">Results of a PERMANOVA testing the differences in microbial
community structure at the five sediment depths prior to the addition of
aquaculture waste (In) and after waste addition, both with and without carbon
supplementation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sum of squares</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">squares</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treatment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.797</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.399</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.195</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.058</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.115</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sediment depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.705</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.426</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.278</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.123</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.011</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.656</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.332</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.996</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.192</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.494</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Residuals</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.672</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.334</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.627</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.830</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4073">The majority of sequences (99.8 %) were assigned to the Bacteria, with
only 0.12 % assigned to Archaea. Taxa from three archaeal phyla were
present, including Euryarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota and Woesearchaeota.
<italic>Natronorubrum</italic> (Euryarchaeota), a halophilic aerobic chemoorganotroph
(Xu et<?pagebreak page1872?> al., 1999), was the most abundant genus, representing 14 of the 27
archaeal reads.</p>
      <p id="d1e4079">The bacterial community contained a total of 18 phyla, 4 candidate phyla
and the candidate division WPS-2. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the two
dominant phyla, accounting for 47.64 and 34.71 % of the total sequences
respectively, with Cyanobacteria accounting for 7.42 %. Planctomycetes
(2.45 %), Actinobacteria (2.34 %), unclassified Bacteria (2.12 %)
and Bacteroidetes (1.33 %) were minor components. The remainder of the
phyla, candidate phyla and the candidate division WPS-2 each represented less
than 1 % of the community. Candidate phyla included Hydrogenedentes
(formerly NKB19), Latesbacteria (formerly WS3), Parcubacteria (formerly OD1)
and Poribacteria.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4084">Principal component analysis ordination of the microbial community
structure between the initial (In), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatments at the five
sediment depth intervals performed on a Bray–Curtis community dissimilarity
matrix.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1863/2018/bg-15-1863-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4107">Taxa within the Oxalobacteraceae and the genus <italic>Herbaspirillum</italic> were
significantly more abundant in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment (Welch's two-sided <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
test; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 5). In comparison, the genera
<italic>Blastopirellula</italic> and <italic>Litorilinea</italic> were significantly enriched in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment. There were no significant differences in the mean
proportion of taxa between experimental treatments at phylum, class or order
levels, underscoring the high degree of similarity among the microbial
communities between treatments (Fig. 6). Further, there was no correlation
between the microbial community and environmental data (Mantel test; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The first axis in the PCoA ordination explained
53.4 % of the variation and appeared to be associated with sediment
depth, while the second axis (4.7 % of the variation) appeared to be
associated with experimental treatment. Treatment did not significantly
influence microbial community structure (PERMANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 2),
which may be a function of the relatively short duration of the experiment.
By contrast, there was a significant effect of sediment depth on the
microbial community (PERMANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.011</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e4202">There were no significant differences in the predicted relative abundance of
genes involved in the six nitrogen transformation pathways (mixed-model
ANOVA; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 7). The relative abundance of predicted nitrification
genes peaked at the 0.5–1.0 cm depth interval in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment,
coinciding with the oxic zone. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment, the relative abundance
of predicted denitrification and DNRA genes were higher in the sediment
layers sectioned at 1.0–2.0, 2.0–4.0 and 4.0–6.0 cm. Overall, DNRA was
the dominant pathway (20.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 %) predicted to occur in all
treatments and sediment depths, with the exception of the surface layer
(0.0–0.5 cm) in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment, where there was a higher predicted
relative abundance of denitrification genes (Fig. 7). Denitrification was the
second most abundant predicted pathway (18.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 %), followed
by complete nitrification (8.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43 %), indicating that the
potential for coupled nitrification–denitrification was present in all
treatments. Genes predicted to be involved in nitrogen fixation represented
2.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.32 %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e4269">Vertical depth profiles of the predicted relative abundance of genes
involved in the six nitrogen transformation pathways: <bold>(a)</bold> nitrogen
fixation, <bold>(b)</bold> dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA),
<bold>(c)</bold> assimilatory nitrate reduction, <bold>(d)</bold> denitrification,
<bold>(e)</bold> complete nitrification and <bold>(f)</bold> nitrification, under
the pathway module of nitrogen metabolism in the KEGG database.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/1863/2018/bg-15-1863-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1873?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e4304">Effluent (especially particulates) discharged from intensive land-based
aquaculture can impact the marine benthos through the organic enrichment of
the underlying sediment. In this study, the comparison of vertical sediment
profiles before and after the experiment indicated that the addition of
particulate aquaculture waste to treatments with sea cucumbers stocked at
densities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> did not increase the organic-carbon
content, total nitrogen or C : N. Overall, the values were generally lower
after 14 days of daily waste addition than at the start. This is consistent
with previous studies that concluded that sea cucumbers are efficient
bioturbators that stimulate benthic microbial metabolism and organic-matter
remineralization and may partly ameliorate the effects of organic-matter
enrichment from aquaculture effluent (MacTavish et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e4326"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>It was hypothesized that increasing the C : N would mediate a shift from
ammonification (net release) to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assimilation (net uptake),
leading to an overall decrease in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux; however, net
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production was higher in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment. In addition to sea
cucumber excretion, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can originate from four nitrogen
transformation pathways: ammonification (degradation of organic nitrogenous
waste), nitrogen fixation, assimilatory reduction of nitrate to ammonia
(ARNA) and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA). ARNA and
nitrogen fixation are both assimilatory pathways that occur within organisms
and therefore do not contribute to an increase in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
at the sediment–water interface (Gardner et al., 2006). Ammonification and
DNRA are therefore the only pathways with the potential to contribute to
increased NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment. The increased
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration may have originated from an increase in<?pagebreak page1874?>
ammonification consistent with the increase in metabolism observed in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment.</p>
      <p id="d1e4436">An increasing number of studies have demonstrated the importance and indeed
dominance of DNRA in nearshore shallow water coastal environments,
particularly in tropical ecosystems (Decleyre et al., 2015; Fernandes et al.,
2012; Gardner et al., 2006; Song et al., 2014; Erler et al., 2013). For
example, Fernandes et al. (2012) showed that DNRA can account for 99 % of
nitrate removal in nitrogen-limited mangrove ecosystems. In marine sediments,
DNRA and denitrification compete for nitrate; however, denitrification
results in the permanent removal of nitrogen from the system, whereas DNRA
retains bioavailable nitrogen in sediments by reducing nitrate to
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gardner et al., 2006). Since these nitrogen transformation
processes are reductive pathways, mediated by heterotrophic bacteria in the
anaerobic zone of redox-stratified sediments, carbon addition can stimulate
both denitrification and DNRA (Hardison et al., 2015). In some aquaculture
systems the availability of organic carbon is known to limit N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
production via denitrification (Castine et al., 2012); therefore, carbon
supplementation is employed to successfully operate denitrifying filters
(Castine, 2013; Roy et al., 2010). However, Castine (2013) found no
significant differences in N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production when aquaculture slurries were
amended with particulate organic matter or methanol as carbon sources. Other
studies have found that high organic loading rates and/or the addition of
exogenous carbon sources stimulated DNRA and concluded that high organic-carbon loading is a prerequisite for DNRA to be favoured over
denitrification (Hardison et al., 2015; Capone, 2000). In the present study,
the higher NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment, supported by the
meta-genome predictions and the uptake of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas, would suggest that
organic-carbon addition stimulates DNRA over denitrification.</p>
      <p id="d1e4498">Increasing the organic-carbon availability can potentially stimulate all four
nitrogen reduction pathways (Fig. S2). These pathways, with the exception of
denitrification, result in ammonia production and therefore contribute to
nitrogen retention within the system (Hardison et al., 2015). The factors
regulating the balance between the different nitrogen processes are not well
understood. For example, the quality and quantity of organic carbon may
influence the balance between denitrification and nitrogen fixation
(Fulweiler et al., 2013). Historically, denitrification has been considered
to be the main pathway of nitrogen loss, based on mass balance calculations
(Seitzinger, 1988). However, in sediment-based systems enriched with
particulate organic waste (such as settlement ponds in aquaculture systems),
the processes of permanent nitrogen removal account for a very small fraction
of the total nitrogen that is permanently removed from the system. For
example, Castine et al. (2012) found that denitrification and anammox only
removed 2.5 % of total nitrogen inputs (by N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production) to
settlement ponds in intensive shrimp and barramundi farms. In this case
denitrification was not carbon limited; rather, the authors argue that
inhibition of microbial metabolism by increased H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S and NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production limited the performance of the system.</p>
      <p id="d1e4532">Sediment nitrogen fixation can equal or exceed N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loss in estuarine
systems (Newell et al., 2016a). The genetic potential for nitrogen fixation
is widespread within the Bacteria and Archaea (Newell et al., 2016b; Zehr and
Paerl, 2008). Heterotrophic nitrogen fixation has not been widely
demonstrated in sediments beyond the observation of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (Gardner
et al., 2006); however, recent studies provide direct evidence by measuring
in situ N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production combined with molecular and genomic tools to
quantify the presence of the nitrogenase reductase (<italic>nifH</italic>) gene
(Newell et al., 2016b; Baker et al., 2015). Indirect evidence of nitrogen
fixation is provided in the present study by the presence of <italic>nifH</italic>
(K02588) in all samples and the taxonomic composition of the microbial
communities.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1875?><p id="d1e4568">Nitrogen fixation can be mediated by photoautotrophic and heterotrophic
diazotrophs. Heterotrophic diazotrophs, including Gammaproteobacteria and
Group A cyanobacteria, are the dominant nitrogen-fixing organisms in oceanic
and estuarine systems (Halm et al., 2012; Bentzon-Tilia et al., 2015). In
this study, Cyanobacteria was the third most abundant phylum. In the
rhizosphere of seagrass beds most nitrogen fixation is mediated by
sulfate-reducing bacteria (Welsh et al., 1996). The Deltaproteobacteria,
which contain most of the sulfate-reducing bacteria, represented a very
small proportion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 %) of the community; however, Firmicutes were
the second most abundant phylum, demonstrating that taxa capable of nitrogen
fixation were present (Zehr and Paerl, 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e4578">The addition of exogenous carbon sources, including glucose, sucrose and
lactose, has been found to stimulate heterotrophic nitrogen fixation in
cyanobacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria (Welsh et al., 1997; Newell et
al., 2016a). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C treatment exhibited an overall net N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, whereas the control receiving waste only exhibited net N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production,
indicating that carbon supplementation enhanced nitrogen fixation. Similar
to DNRA and denitrification, the rates of heterotrophic nitrogen fixation in
coastal marine sediments are frequently limited by organic-carbon
availability (Welsh et al., 1997; Newell et al., 2016a).</p>
      <p id="d1e4606">Benthic incubation chambers integrate the exchange of gases and nutrients
across the sediment–water interface; thus, while many reactions may be
occurring within the sediments, the net outcome of sediment reactions are
translated into benthic fluxes. It was anticipated that combining this
traditional approach with next-generation sequencing would elucidate the
response of sediment microbial communities to carbon addition by highlighting
shifts in taxonomy and functional potential. Benthic flux incubations
detected a significant enhancement of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production during light
incubations in response to carbon supplementation; however, no statistically
significant differences in the microbial community or predicted nitrogen
transformation pathways were observed. Robinson et al. (2016) showed that
increasing the availability of rate-limiting electron acceptors (oxygen) had
a marked effect on the sediment microbial taxonomic composition, structure,
metabolic capacity and functional potential. In contrast, increasing the
availability of potential electron donors through carbon supplementation did
not significantly affect the microbial community structure. Significant
variations at different sediment depths were likely due to the partitioning of
processes within the oxic and anoxic layers. None of the environmental
parameters, sediment characteristics, and gas or nutrient fluxes were
significantly correlated with microbial community structure, and no
significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of predicted
genes involved in the major nitrogen transformation pathways.</p>
      <p id="d1e4621">The benthic nitrogen cycle is one of the most complex biogeochemical cycles,
characterized by a diverse set of dissimilatory microbial processes
(Thamdrup and Dalsgaard, 2008). The lack of significant changes in microbial
community structure and functioning may indicate that processes that
contribute NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the sediment were operating concurrently with
transformations that removed NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the system, such as anammox
and coupled nitrification–denitrification. Furthermore, organic carbon can
fulfil many functions under reducing conditions: it can be an electron donor in
redox reactions, a substrate for fermentation or as organic substrate
assimilated by heterotrophic bacteria coupled with NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.
The dual biogeochemical–molecular approach holds promise to further our
understanding of nitrogen cycling; the challenge remains to resolve net
biogeochemical fluxes with molecular tools that define microbial
communities.</p>
      <p id="d1e4660">Our findings indicate that carbon addition may partly bioremediate
nitrogen-rich effluent by retaining nitrogen within the system; however, longer-term trials are necessary to determine whether this translates into
improved sea cucumber biomass yields. In the current study, the sea cucumbers
decreased in mass with growth rates of 0.02 g day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, there was
no significant difference in mean wet weight of the sea cucumbers at the
start or end of the experiment. Two key factors are likely to have accounted
for the differences in growth performance of <italic>Holothuria scabra</italic> in
the present study and the previous study of Robinson et al. (2018). Firstly,
chambers were shaded from direct sunlight in this experiment to mitigate
against water temperature spikes that would likely have caused hypoxia in the
small sealed chambers. However, because high light levels may be important
for <italic>Holothuria scabra</italic> growth (Battaglene et al., 1999), this may
have resulted in the lower growth performance. Secondly, the duration over
which the sediment microbial community was allowed to develop differed
between the studies. In Robinson et al. (2018) the trials lasted 112 days
compared with the current 28-day study (14-day preconditioning and 14-day
experimental).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <?pagebreak page1876?><p id="d1e4688">Pathways that support the retention of nitrogen in sediments can dominate over
pathways for permanent removal (Newell et al., 2016a), particularly in
tropical ecosystems such as seagrass and mangrove systems (the natural
habitat of <italic>H. scabra</italic>). This imbalance between denitrification and
nitrogen fixation is partially responsible for nitrogen limitation in these
systems (Fulweiler et al., 2013; Newell et al., 2016b). Thus, DNRA and
heterotrophic nitrogen fixation are important processes for retaining
nitrogen and sustaining ecosystem productivity (Fernandes et al., 2012;
Enrich-Prast et al., 2016; Decleyre et al., 2015). In shallow euphotic
sediments, these processes are likely important for overcoming nitrogen
limitation and competition with benthic microalgae and cyanobacteria, by
recycling and retaining NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sediment. The increase in
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux combined with net uptake of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> into the sediment in
response to carbon addition indicates that under nutrient loading rates
consistent with hypereutrophic estuaries (400 mmol C m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 240 N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eyre and Ferguson, 2009), pathways that
retained nitrogen could dominate over pathways of permanent removal.</p>
      <p id="d1e4776">The coupled biogeochemical–molecular approach was useful in providing an
overview of the functional potential for different nitrogen cycling pathways;
however, given the complexity of nitrogen cycling in marine sediments, future
studies should include more disparate C/N treatments of longer duration and
measure all individual processes including denitrification, anammox, DNRA and
nitrogen fixation. Furthermore, the use of more targeted molecular
approaches, such as meta-genomic shotgun sequencing or quantitative polymerase
chain reaction (qPCR) in conjunction with stable isotope labelling studies
(e.g. Eyre et al., 2016) are recommended to fully elucidate the pathways of
nitrogen cycling in response to C : N manipulation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4783">Access to the original data can be requested from the corresponding author (Georgina Robinson).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4786"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1863-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1863-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4792">The work was conceptualized and funding was secured by GR,
CLWJ, SMS, CS and BDE. Experiments were performed by GR and TM with equipment
provided by CS, TP and BDE, and data were analysed by GR. The manuscript was
written by GR and GSC and edited by and BDE, CLWJ, CS, TM, TP and SMS. All
authors have approved the final article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4798">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4804">This research was funded by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
Council (BBSRC) Industrial CASE Studentship to Georgina Robinson (grant code
BB/J01141X/1) with HIK Abalone Farm Pty Ltd as the CASE partner, with
additional contributions from the ARC Grant DP160100248. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Clare Woulds<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two
anonymous referees</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Almgren, T., Dryssen, D., and Fonselius, S.: Determination of alkalinity and
total carbonate, in: Methods of seawater analysis, 2nd Edn., edited by:
Grasshoff, K., Ehrhardt, M., and Kremling, K., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, West
Germany, 99–123, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R., and Meinicke, P.: Tax4Fun:
predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data,
Bioinformatics, 31, 2882–2884, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv287" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/bioinformatics/btv287</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Avnimelech, Y.: Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture
systems, Aquaculture, 176, 227–235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00085-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00085-x</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Baker, B. J., Lazar, C. S., Teske, A. P., and Dick, G. J.: Genomic resolution
of linkages in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling among widespread estuary
sediment bacteria, Microbiome, 3, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0077-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40168-015-0077-6</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Battaglene, S. C., Seymour, J. E., and Ramofafia, C.: Survival and growth of cultured
juvenile sea cucumbers, Holothuria scabra, Aquaculture, 178, 293–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00130-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00130-1</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bendscheider, K. and Robinson, R. J.: A new spectrophotometric method for the
determination of nitrite in sea water, J. Mar. Res., 11, 87–96, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bentzon-Tilia, M., Traving, S. J., Mantikci, M., Knudsen-Leerbeck, H.,
Hansen, J. L. S., Markager, S., and Riemann, L.: Significant N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation
by heterotrophs, photoheterotrophs and heterocystous cyanobacteria in two
temperate estuaries, ISME J., 9, 273–285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2014.119</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Blackburn, T. H.: Nitrogen cycle in marine sediments, Ophelia, 26, 65–76,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1986.10421979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00785326.1986.10421979</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Burford, M. A. and Longmore, A. R.: High ammonium production from sediments
in hypereutrophic shrimp ponds, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 224, 187–195, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: The marine nitrogen cycle, in: Microbial Ecology of the
Oceans, 1st Edn., edited by: Kirchman, D. L., Wiley-Liss, 455–493, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Castine, S. A.: Nitrogen removal and reuse in land-based intensive
aquaculture, PhD thesis, James Cook University, 173 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Castine, S. A., Erler, D. V., Trott, L. A., Paul, N. A., de Nys, R., and
Eyre, B. D.: Denitrification and anammox in tropical aquaculture settlement
ponds: an isotope tracer approach for evaluating N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, PLoS ONE,
7, e4281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0042810</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cook, P. L. M., Veuger, B., Boer, S., and Middelburg, J. J.: Effect of
nutrient availability on carbon and nitrogen incorporation and flows through
benthic algae and bacteria in near-shore sandy sediment, Aquat. Microb.
Ecol., 49, 165–180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/ame01142</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P., and Verstraete, W.: Biofloc technology
in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges, Aquaculture,
356–357, 351–356, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Decleyre, H., Heylen, K., Van Colen, C., and Willems, A.: Dissimilatory
nitrogen reduction in intertidal sediments of a temperate estuary: small
scale heterogeneity and novel nitrate-to-ammonium reducers, Front.
Microbiol., 6, 1124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2015.01124</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Dodds, W. K., Marti, E., Tank, J. L., Pontius, J., Hamilton, S. K., Grimm, N.
B., Bowden, W. B., McDowell, W. H., Peterson, B. J.,<?pagebreak page1877?> Valett, H. M., Webster,
J. R., and Gregory, S.: Carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry and nitrogen
cycling rates in streams, Oecologia, 140, 458–467,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1599-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00442-004-1599-y</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Ebeling, J. M., Timmons, M. B., and Bisogni, J. J.: Engineering analysis of
the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal
of ammonia–nitrogen in aquaculture systems, Aquaculture, 257, 346–358,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., and Knight, R.:
UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection, Bioinformatics,
27, 2194–2200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Edmond, J. M.: High precision determination of titration alkalinity and total
carbon dioxide content of sea water by potentiometric titration, Deep Sea
Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 17, 737–750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(70)90038-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0011-7471(70)90038-0</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Enrich-Prast, A., Figueiredo, V., De Esteves, F. A., and Nielsen, L. P.:
Controls of sediment nitrogen dynamics in tropical coastal lagoons, PLoS ONE,
11, e0155586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0155586</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Erler, D. V., Trott, L. A., Alongi, D. M., and Eyre, B. D.: Denitrification,
anammox and nitrate reduction in sediments of the southern Great Barrier Reef
lagoon, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 478, 57–70, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D. and Ferguson, A. J. P.: Benthic metabolism and nitrogen cycling
in a sub-tropical east Australian estuary (Brunswick) – temporal variability
and controlling factors, Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 81–96, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Eyre, B. D. and Ferguson, A. J. P.: Denitrification efficiency for defining
critical loads of carbon in shallow coastal ecosystems, Hydrobiologia, 629,
137–146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9765-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-009-9765-1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Eyre, B. D., Rysgaard, S., Dalsgaard, T., and Christensen, P. B.: Comparison
of isotope pairing and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : Ar methods for measuring sediment
denitrification- assumption, modifications, and implications, Estuaries, 25,
1077–1087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF02692205</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D., Ferguson, A. J., Webb, A., Maher, D., and Oakes, J. M.:
Metabolism of different benthic habitats and their contribution to the carbon
budget of a shallow oligotrophic sub-tropical coastal system (southern
Moreton Bay, Australia), Biogeochemistry, 102, 87–110, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Eyre, B. D., Maher, D. T., and Squire, P.: Quantity and quality of organic
matter (detritus) drives N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> effluxes (net denitrification) across seasons,
benthic habitats, and estuaries, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1083–1095,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004631" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GB004631</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Eyre, B. D., Santos, I. R., and Maher, D. T.: Seasonal, daily and diel N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
effluxes in permeable carbonate sediments, Biogeosciences, 10, 2601–2615,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2601-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-2601-2013</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Eyre, B. D., Oakes, J. M., and Middelburg, J.: Fate of microphytobenthos
nitrogen in subtropical subtidal sediments: a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N pulse-chase study,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 61, 2108–2121, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Fenchel, T., King, G. M., and Blackburn, T. H.: Bacterial Biogeochemistry.
The Ecophysiology of Mineral Cycling, 3rd Edn., Academic Press, 307 pp., San
Diego, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ferguson, A. J. P. and Eyre, B. D.: Seasonal discrepancies in denitrification
measured by isotope pairing and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> : Ar techniques, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 350, 19–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps07152</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ferguson, A. J. P., Eyre, B. D., and Gay, M.: Benthic nutrient fluxes in
euphotic sediments along shallow sub-tropical estuaries, northern New South
Wales, Australia, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 37, 219–235, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Fernandes, S. O., Bonin, P. C., Michotey, V. D., Garcia, N., and
LokaBharathi, P. A.: Nitrogen-limited mangrove ecosystems conserve N through
dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, Scientific Reports, 2, 419,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep00419</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R. W., Brown, S. M., Nixon, S. W., and Jenkins, B. D.: Evidence
and a conceptual model for the co-occurrence of nitrogen fixation and
denitrification in heterotrophic marine sediments, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
482, 57-68, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Gardner, W. S., McCarthy, M. J., An, S., Sobolev, D., Sell, K. S., and Brock,
D.: Nitrogen fixation and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA)
support nitrogen dynamics in Texas estuaries, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51,
558–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0558" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0558</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Glud, R. N.: Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4,
243–289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000801888726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17451000801888726</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Glud, R. N., Eyre, B. D., and Patten, N.: Biogeochemical responses to mass
coral spawning at the Great Barrier Reef: Effects on respiration and primary
production, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1014–1024, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Gongol, C. and Savage, C.: Spatial variation in rates of benthic
denitrification and environmental controls in four New Zealand estuaries,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 556, 59–77, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K.: The automated determination of ammonia, in: Methods of
Seawater Analysis, edited by: Grasshoff, K., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim,
276–278, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Ehrhardt, M., and Kremling, K.: Methods of seawater analysis,
3rd Edn., Wiley-VCH, 600 pp, Weinheim, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Halm, H., Lam, P., Ferdelman, T. G., Lavik, G., Dittmar, T., LaRoche, J.,
D'Hondt, S., and Kuypers, M. M.: Heterotrophic organisms dominate nitrogen
fixation in the South Pacific Gyre, ISME J., 6, 1238–1249,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.182" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2011.182</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Hamlin, H. J., Michaels, J. T., Beaulaton, C. M., Graham, W. F., Dutt, W.,
Steinbach, P., Losordo, T. M., Schrader, K. K., and Main, K. L.: Comparing
denitrification rates and carbon sources in commercial scale upflow
denitrification biological filters in aquaculture, Aquacult. Eng., 38,
79–92, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.11.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Hardison, A. K., Algar, C. K., Giblin, A. E., and Rich, J. J.: Influence of
organic carbon and nitrate loading on partitioning between dissimilatory
nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> production, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 146–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.049</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Kozich, J. J., Westcott, S. L., Baxter, N. T., Highlander, S. K., and
Schloss, P. D.: Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation
pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina
sequencing platform, Appl. Environ. Microb., 79, 5112–5120,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01043-13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1128/aem.01043-13</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>MacTavish, T., Stenton-Dozey, J., Vopel, K., and Savage, C.: Deposit-feeding
sea cucumbers enhance mineralization and nutrient cycling in organically-enriched
coastal sediments, PLoS ONE, 7, e50031, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0050031</ext-link>,<?pagebreak page1878?> 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Marie, D., Brussaard, C. P. D., Thyrhaug, R., Bratbak, G., and Vaulot, D.:
Enumeration of marine viruses in culture and natural samples by flow
cytometry, Appl. Environ. Microb., 65, 45–52, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>McMurdie, P. J. and Holmes, S.: phyloseq: an R package for reproducible
interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data, PLoS One, 8,
e61217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0061217</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Newell, S. E., McCarthy, M. J., Gardner, W. S., and Fulweiler, R. W.:
Sediment nitrogen fixation: a call for re-evaluating coastal N budgets,
Estuar. Coast., 39, 1626–1638, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0116-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12237-016-0116-y</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Newell, S. E., Pritchard, K. R., Foster, S. Q., and Fulweiler, R. W.:
Molecular evidence for sediment nitrogen fixation in a temperate New England
estuary, PeerJ, 4, e1615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7717/peerj.1615</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Oakes, J. M., Eyre, B. D., and Ross, D. J.: Short-Term Enhancement and
Long-Term Suppression of Denitrification in Estuarine Sediments Receiving
Primary- and Secondary-Treated Paper and Pulp Mill Discharge, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 3400–3406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103636d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es103636d</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Oksanen, J., Guillaume Blanchet, F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R.,
O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., and Wagner,
H.: vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package version 2.3-4, available at:
<uri>http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan</uri> (last access: 25 June 2016), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Reimers, C. E., Alleau, Y., Bauer, J. E., Delaney, J., Girguis, P. R.,
Schrader, P. S., and Stecher, H. A.: Redox effects on the microbial
degradation of refractory organic matter in marine sediments, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 121, 582–598, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, G.: Shifting paradigms and closing the nitrogen loop, Aquacult.
Env. Interac., in review, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, G., Caldwell, G. S., Jones, C. L. W., Slater, M. J., and Stead, S.
M.: Redox stratification drives enhanced growth in a deposit-feeding
invertebrate: implications for aquaculture bioremediation, Aquacult. Env.
Interac., 8, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/aei00158</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, G., Caldwell, G. S., Wade, M. J., Free, A., Jones, C. L. W., and
Stead, S. M.: Profiling bacterial communities associated with sediment-based
aquaculture bioremediation systems under contrasting redox regimes,
Scientific Reports, 6, 38850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep38850</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, G., Caldwell, G. S., Jones, C. L. W., and Stead, S. M.: The effect
of resource quality on the growth of <italic>Holothuria scabra</italic> during
aquaculture waste bioremediation, Aquaculture, in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Roy, D., Hassan, K., and Boopathy, R.: Effect of carbon to nitrogen (C : N)
ratio on nitrogen removal from shrimp production waste water using sequencing
batch reactor, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot., 37, 1105–1110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0869-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10295-010-0869-4</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, O., Sereti, V., Eding, E. H., and Verreth, J. A. J.: Molasses as C
source for heterotrophic bacteria production on solid fish waste,
Aquaculture, 261, 1239–1248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.053</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. P.: Denitrification in freshwater and coastal marine
ecosystems: ecological and geochemical significance, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33,
702–724, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Snoeyink, V. L. and Jenkins, D.: Water Chemistry, John Wiley &amp; Sons,
220 pp., New York, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Song, B., Lisa, J. A., and Tobias, C. R.: Linking DNRA community structure
and activity in a shallow lagoonal estuarine system, Front. Microbiol., 5,
460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2014.00460</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Dalsgaard, T.: Nitrogen cycling in sediments, in: Microbial
Ecology of the Oceans, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 527–568, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Underwood, G. J. C., Paterson, D. A., and Parkes, R. J.: The measurement of
microbial carbohydrate exopolymers from intertidal sediments, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 40, 1243–1253, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Veuger, B., Eyre, B. D., Maher, D., and Middelburg, J. J.: Nitrogen
incorporation and retention by bacteria, algae, and fauna in a subtropical
intertidal sediment: an in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N-labeling study, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
52, 1930–1942, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Welsh, D. T., Bourgués, S., de Wit, R., and Herbert, R. A.: Seasonal
variations in nitrogen-fixation (acetylene reduction) and sulphate-reduction
rates in the rhizosphere of <italic>Zostera noltii:</italic> nitrogen fixation by
sulphate-reducing bacteria, Mar. Biol., 125, 619–628,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00349243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf00349243</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Welsh, D. T., Bourguès, S., De Wit, R., and Auby, I.: Effect of plant
photosynthesis, carbon sources and ammonium availability on nitrogen fixation
rates in the rhizosphere of <italic>Zostera noltii</italic>, Aquat. Microb. Ecol.,
12, 285–290, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Y., Zhou, P., and Tian, X.: Characterization of two novel
haloalkaliphilic archaea <italic>Natronorubrum bangense</italic> gen. nov., sp. nov.
and <italic>Natronorubrum tibetense</italic> gen. nov., sp. nov, Int. J. Syst.
Bacteriol., 49, 261–266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-1-261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1099/00207713-49-1-261</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zehr, J. P. and Paerl, H. W.: Molecular ecological aspects of nitrogen
fixation in the marine environment, in: Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, 2nd
Edn., edited by: Kirchman, D. L., Wiley-Liss, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 481–525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470281840.ch13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9780470281840.ch13</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Carbon amendment stimulates benthic nitrogen cycling during the bioremediation of particulate aquaculture waste</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The treatment of organic wastes remains one of the key
sustainability challenges facing the growing global aquaculture industry.
Bioremediation systems based on coupled bioturbation–microbial processing
offer a promising route for waste management. We present, for the first time,
a combined biogeochemical–molecular analysis of the short-term performance
of one such system that is designed to receive nitrogen-rich particulate
aquaculture wastes. Using sea cucumbers (<i>Holothuria scabra</i>) as a
model bioturbator we provide evidence that adjusting the waste C : N from
5 : 1 to 20 : 1 promoted a shift in nitrogen cycling pathways towards the
dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), resulting in net
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> efflux from the sediment. The carbon amended treatment exhibited
an overall net N<sub>2</sub> uptake, whereas the control receiving only aquaculture
waste exhibited net N<sub>2</sub> production, suggesting that carbon
supplementation enhanced nitrogen fixation. The higher NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> efflux
and N<sub>2</sub> uptake was further supported by meta-genome predictions that
indicate that organic-carbon addition stimulated DNRA over denitrification.
These findings indicate that carbon addition may potentially result in
greater retention of nitrogen within the system; however, longer-term trials
are necessary to determine whether this nitrogen retention is translated into
improved sea cucumber biomass yields. Whether this truly constitutes a
remediation process is open for debate as there remains the risk that any
increased nitrogen retention may be temporary, with any subsequent release
potentially raising the eutrophication risk. Longer and larger-scale trials
are required before this approach may be validated with the complexities of
the in-system nitrogen cycle being fully understood.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Almgren, T., Dryssen, D., and Fonselius, S.: Determination of alkalinity and
total carbonate, in: Methods of seawater analysis, 2nd Edn., edited by:
Grasshoff, K., Ehrhardt, M., and Kremling, K., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, West
Germany, 99–123, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R., and Meinicke, P.: Tax4Fun:
predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data,
Bioinformatics, 31, 2882–2884, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv287" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv287</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Avnimelech, Y.: Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture
systems, Aquaculture, 176, 227–235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00085-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00085-x</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, B. J., Lazar, C. S., Teske, A. P., and Dick, G. J.: Genomic resolution
of linkages in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling among widespread estuary
sediment bacteria, Microbiome, 3, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0077-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0077-6</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Battaglene, S. C., Seymour, J. E., and Ramofafia, C.: Survival and growth of cultured
juvenile sea cucumbers, Holothuria scabra, Aquaculture, 178, 293–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00130-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00130-1</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bendscheider, K. and Robinson, R. J.: A new spectrophotometric method for the
determination of nitrite in sea water, J. Mar. Res., 11, 87–96, 1952.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bentzon-Tilia, M., Traving, S. J., Mantikci, M., Knudsen-Leerbeck, H.,
Hansen, J. L. S., Markager, S., and Riemann, L.: Significant N<sub>2</sub> fixation
by heterotrophs, photoheterotrophs and heterocystous cyanobacteria in two
temperate estuaries, ISME J., 9, 273–285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.119</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Blackburn, T. H.: Nitrogen cycle in marine sediments, Ophelia, 26, 65–76,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1986.10421979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1986.10421979</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Burford, M. A. and Longmore, A. R.: High ammonium production from sediments
in hypereutrophic shrimp ponds, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 224, 187–195, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Capone, D. G.: The marine nitrogen cycle, in: Microbial Ecology of the
Oceans, 1st Edn., edited by: Kirchman, D. L., Wiley-Liss, 455–493, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Castine, S. A.: Nitrogen removal and reuse in land-based intensive
aquaculture, PhD thesis, James Cook University, 173 pp., 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Castine, S. A., Erler, D. V., Trott, L. A., Paul, N. A., de Nys, R., and
Eyre, B. D.: Denitrification and anammox in tropical aquaculture settlement
ponds: an isotope tracer approach for evaluating N<sub>2</sub> production, PLoS ONE,
7, e4281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042810" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042810</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. L. M., Veuger, B., Boer, S., and Middelburg, J. J.: Effect of
nutrient availability on carbon and nitrogen incorporation and flows through
benthic algae and bacteria in near-shore sandy sediment, Aquat. Microb.
Ecol., 49, 165–180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01142</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P., and Verstraete, W.: Biofloc technology
in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges, Aquaculture,
356–357, 351–356, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Decleyre, H., Heylen, K., Van Colen, C., and Willems, A.: Dissimilatory
nitrogen reduction in intertidal sediments of a temperate estuary: small
scale heterogeneity and novel nitrate-to-ammonium reducers, Front.
Microbiol., 6, 1124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01124</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dodds, W. K., Marti, E., Tank, J. L., Pontius, J., Hamilton, S. K., Grimm, N.
B., Bowden, W. B., McDowell, W. H., Peterson, B. J., Valett, H. M., Webster,
J. R., and Gregory, S.: Carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry and nitrogen
cycling rates in streams, Oecologia, 140, 458–467,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1599-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1599-y</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Ebeling, J. M., Timmons, M. B., and Bisogni, J. J.: Engineering analysis of
the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal
of ammonia–nitrogen in aquaculture systems, Aquaculture, 257, 346–358,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., and Knight, R.:
UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection, Bioinformatics,
27, 2194–2200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Edmond, J. M.: High precision determination of titration alkalinity and total
carbon dioxide content of sea water by potentiometric titration, Deep Sea
Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 17, 737–750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(70)90038-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(70)90038-0</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Enrich-Prast, A., Figueiredo, V., De Esteves, F. A., and Nielsen, L. P.:
Controls of sediment nitrogen dynamics in tropical coastal lagoons, PLoS ONE,
11, e0155586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155586</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Erler, D. V., Trott, L. A., Alongi, D. M., and Eyre, B. D.: Denitrification,
anammox and nitrate reduction in sediments of the southern Great Barrier Reef
lagoon, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 478, 57–70, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D. and Ferguson, A. J. P.: Benthic metabolism and nitrogen cycling
in a sub-tropical east Australian estuary (Brunswick) – temporal variability
and controlling factors, Limnol. Oceanogr., 50, 81–96, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D. and Ferguson, A. J. P.: Denitrification efficiency for defining
critical loads of carbon in shallow coastal ecosystems, Hydrobiologia, 629,
137–146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9765-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9765-1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D., Rysgaard, S., Dalsgaard, T., and Christensen, P. B.: Comparison
of isotope pairing and N<sub>2</sub> : Ar methods for measuring sediment
denitrification- assumption, modifications, and implications, Estuaries, 25,
1077–1087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692205</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D., Ferguson, A. J., Webb, A., Maher, D., and Oakes, J. M.:
Metabolism of different benthic habitats and their contribution to the carbon
budget of a shallow oligotrophic sub-tropical coastal system (southern
Moreton Bay, Australia), Biogeochemistry, 102, 87–110, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D., Maher, D. T., and Squire, P.: Quantity and quality of organic
matter (detritus) drives N<sub>2</sub> effluxes (net denitrification) across seasons,
benthic habitats, and estuaries, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1083–1095,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004631" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004631</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D., Santos, I. R., and Maher, D. T.: Seasonal, daily and diel N<sub>2</sub>
effluxes in permeable carbonate sediments, Biogeosciences, 10, 2601–2615,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2601-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2601-2013</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Eyre, B. D., Oakes, J. M., and Middelburg, J.: Fate of microphytobenthos
nitrogen in subtropical subtidal sediments: a <sup>15</sup>N pulse-chase study,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 61, 2108–2121, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Fenchel, T., King, G. M., and Blackburn, T. H.: Bacterial Biogeochemistry.
The Ecophysiology of Mineral Cycling, 3rd Edn., Academic Press, 307 pp., San
Diego, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ferguson, A. J. P. and Eyre, B. D.: Seasonal discrepancies in denitrification
measured by isotope pairing and N<sub>2</sub> : Ar techniques, Mar. Ecol.-Prog.
Ser., 350, 19–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07152</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ferguson, A. J. P., Eyre, B. D., and Gay, M.: Benthic nutrient fluxes in
euphotic sediments along shallow sub-tropical estuaries, northern New South
Wales, Australia, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 37, 219–235, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Fernandes, S. O., Bonin, P. C., Michotey, V. D., Garcia, N., and
LokaBharathi, P. A.: Nitrogen-limited mangrove ecosystems conserve N through
dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, Scientific Reports, 2, 419,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00419</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Fulweiler, R. W., Brown, S. M., Nixon, S. W., and Jenkins, B. D.: Evidence
and a conceptual model for the co-occurrence of nitrogen fixation and
denitrification in heterotrophic marine sediments, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser.,
482, 57-68, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, W. S., McCarthy, M. J., An, S., Sobolev, D., Sell, K. S., and Brock,
D.: Nitrogen fixation and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA)
support nitrogen dynamics in Texas estuaries, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51,
558–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0558" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0558</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Glud, R. N.: Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments, Mar. Biol. Res., 4,
243–289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000801888726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000801888726</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Glud, R. N., Eyre, B. D., and Patten, N.: Biogeochemical responses to mass
coral spawning at the Great Barrier Reef: Effects on respiration and primary
production, Limnol. Oceanogr., 53, 1014–1024, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Gongol, C. and Savage, C.: Spatial variation in rates of benthic
denitrification and environmental controls in four New Zealand estuaries,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 556, 59–77, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K.: The automated determination of ammonia, in: Methods of
Seawater Analysis, edited by: Grasshoff, K., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim,
276–278, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Grasshoff, K., Ehrhardt, M., and Kremling, K.: Methods of seawater analysis,
3rd Edn., Wiley-VCH, 600 pp, Weinheim, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Halm, H., Lam, P., Ferdelman, T. G., Lavik, G., Dittmar, T., LaRoche, J.,
D'Hondt, S., and Kuypers, M. M.: Heterotrophic organisms dominate nitrogen
fixation in the South Pacific Gyre, ISME J., 6, 1238–1249,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.182" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.182</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlin, H. J., Michaels, J. T., Beaulaton, C. M., Graham, W. F., Dutt, W.,
Steinbach, P., Losordo, T. M., Schrader, K. K., and Main, K. L.: Comparing
denitrification rates and carbon sources in commercial scale upflow
denitrification biological filters in aquaculture, Aquacult. Eng., 38,
79–92, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.11.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2007.11.003</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hardison, A. K., Algar, C. K., Giblin, A. E., and Rich, J. J.: Influence of
organic carbon and nitrate loading on partitioning between dissimilatory
nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and N<sub>2</sub> production, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 146–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.049</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kozich, J. J., Westcott, S. L., Baxter, N. T., Highlander, S. K., and
Schloss, P. D.: Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation
pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina
sequencing platform, Appl. Environ. Microb., 79, 5112–5120,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01043-13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01043-13</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
MacTavish, T., Stenton-Dozey, J., Vopel, K., and Savage, C.: Deposit-feeding
sea cucumbers enhance mineralization and nutrient cycling in organically-enriched
coastal sediments, PLoS ONE, 7, e50031, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050031</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Marie, D., Brussaard, C. P. D., Thyrhaug, R., Bratbak, G., and Vaulot, D.:
Enumeration of marine viruses in culture and natural samples by flow
cytometry, Appl. Environ. Microb., 65, 45–52, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
McMurdie, P. J. and Holmes, S.: phyloseq: an R package for reproducible
interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data, PLoS One, 8,
e61217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Newell, S. E., McCarthy, M. J., Gardner, W. S., and Fulweiler, R. W.:
Sediment nitrogen fixation: a call for re-evaluating coastal N budgets,
Estuar. Coast., 39, 1626–1638, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0116-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0116-y</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Newell, S. E., Pritchard, K. R., Foster, S. Q., and Fulweiler, R. W.:
Molecular evidence for sediment nitrogen fixation in a temperate New England
estuary, PeerJ, 4, e1615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1615</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Oakes, J. M., Eyre, B. D., and Ross, D. J.: Short-Term Enhancement and
Long-Term Suppression of Denitrification in Estuarine Sediments Receiving
Primary- and Secondary-Treated Paper and Pulp Mill Discharge, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 3400–3406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103636d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es103636d</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Oksanen, J., Guillaume Blanchet, F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R.,
O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., and Wagner,
H.: vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package version 2.3-4, available at:
<a href="http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan" target="_blank">http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan</a> (last access: 25 June 2016), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Reimers, C. E., Alleau, Y., Bauer, J. E., Delaney, J., Girguis, P. R.,
Schrader, P. S., and Stecher, H. A.: Redox effects on the microbial
degradation of refractory organic matter in marine sediments, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 121, 582–598, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, G.: Shifting paradigms and closing the nitrogen loop, Aquacult.
Env. Interac., in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, G., Caldwell, G. S., Jones, C. L. W., Slater, M. J., and Stead, S.
M.: Redox stratification drives enhanced growth in a deposit-feeding
invertebrate: implications for aquaculture bioremediation, Aquacult. Env.
Interac., 8, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00158</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, G., Caldwell, G. S., Wade, M. J., Free, A., Jones, C. L. W., and
Stead, S. M.: Profiling bacterial communities associated with sediment-based
aquaculture bioremediation systems under contrasting redox regimes,
Scientific Reports, 6, 38850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38850</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, G., Caldwell, G. S., Jones, C. L. W., and Stead, S. M.: The effect
of resource quality on the growth of <i>Holothuria scabra</i> during
aquaculture waste bioremediation, Aquaculture, in review, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Roy, D., Hassan, K., and Boopathy, R.: Effect of carbon to nitrogen (C : N)
ratio on nitrogen removal from shrimp production waste water using sequencing
batch reactor, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot., 37, 1105–1110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0869-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0869-4</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, O., Sereti, V., Eding, E. H., and Verreth, J. A. J.: Molasses as C
source for heterotrophic bacteria production on solid fish waste,
Aquaculture, 261, 1239–1248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.053</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. P.: Denitrification in freshwater and coastal marine
ecosystems: ecological and geochemical significance, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33,
702–724, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Snoeyink, V. L. and Jenkins, D.: Water Chemistry, John Wiley &amp; Sons,
220 pp., New York, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Song, B., Lisa, J. A., and Tobias, C. R.: Linking DNRA community structure
and activity in a shallow lagoonal estuarine system, Front. Microbiol., 5,
460, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00460</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Thamdrup, B. and Dalsgaard, T.: Nitrogen cycling in sediments, in: Microbial
Ecology of the Oceans, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., 527–568, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Underwood, G. J. C., Paterson, D. A., and Parkes, R. J.: The measurement of
microbial carbohydrate exopolymers from intertidal sediments, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 40, 1243–1253, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Veuger, B., Eyre, B. D., Maher, D., and Middelburg, J. J.: Nitrogen
incorporation and retention by bacteria, algae, and fauna in a subtropical
intertidal sediment: an in situ <sup>15</sup>N-labeling study, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
52, 1930–1942, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Welsh, D. T., Bourgués, S., de Wit, R., and Herbert, R. A.: Seasonal
variations in nitrogen-fixation (acetylene reduction) and sulphate-reduction
rates in the rhizosphere of <i>Zostera noltii:</i> nitrogen fixation by
sulphate-reducing bacteria, Mar. Biol., 125, 619–628,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00349243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00349243</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Welsh, D. T., Bourguès, S., De Wit, R., and Auby, I.: Effect of plant
photosynthesis, carbon sources and ammonium availability on nitrogen fixation
rates in the rhizosphere of <i>Zostera noltii</i>, Aquat. Microb. Ecol.,
12, 285–290, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, Y., Zhou, P., and Tian, X.: Characterization of two novel
haloalkaliphilic archaea <i>Natronorubrum bangense</i> gen. nov., sp. nov.
and <i>Natronorubrum tibetense</i> gen. nov., sp. nov, Int. J. Syst.
Bacteriol., 49, 261–266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-1-261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-1-261</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zehr, J. P. and Paerl, H. W.: Molecular ecological aspects of nitrogen
fixation in the marine environment, in: Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, 2nd
Edn., edited by: Kirchman, D. L., Wiley-Liss, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 481–525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470281840.ch13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470281840.ch13</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
