<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-3841-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Utilizing the Drake Passage Time-series to understand variability and change in subpolar Southern Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></article-title><alt-title>Variability and change in the subpolar Southern Ocean</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Variability and change in the subpolar Southern Ocean}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~R.~Fay et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fay</surname><given-names>Amanda R.</given-names></name>
          <email>afay@ldeo.columbia.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3534-1932</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Lovenduski</surname><given-names>Nicole S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-1009</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>McKinley</surname><given-names>Galen A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-9221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Munro</surname><given-names>David R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-7402</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Sweeney</surname><given-names>Colm</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-0797</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Gray</surname><given-names>Alison R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1644-7654</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Landschützer</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Stephens</surname><given-names>Britton B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1966-6182</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Takahashi</surname><given-names>Taro</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>Nancy</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-9385</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Cooperative Institutes for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Amanda R. Fay (afay@ldeo.columbia.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>3841</fpage><lpage>3855</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e229">The Southern Ocean is highly under-sampled for the purpose of assessing total
carbon uptake and its variability. Since this region dominates the mean
global ocean sink for anthropogenic carbon, understanding temporal change is
critical. Underway measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collected as part of the
Drake Passage Time-series (DPT) program that began in 2002 inform our
understanding of seasonally changing air–sea gradients in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and by inference the carbon flux in this region. Here, we utilize available
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations to evaluate how the seasonal cycle, interannual
variability, and long-term trends in surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
Drake Passage region compare to that of the broader subpolar Southern Ocean.
Our results indicate that the Drake Passage is representative of the broader
region in both seasonality and long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, as evident
through the agreement of timing and amplitude of seasonal cycles as well as
trend magnitudes both seasonally and annually. The high temporal density of
sampling by the DPT is critical to constraining estimates of the seasonal
cycle of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this region, as winter data remain
sparse in areas outside of the Drake Passage. An increase in winter data
would aid in reduction of uncertainty levels. On average over the period
2002–2016, data show that carbon uptake has strengthened with annual surface
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in the Drake Passage and the broader subpolar
Southern Ocean less than the global atmospheric trend. Analysis of spatial
correlation shows Drake Passage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be representative of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its variability up to several hundred kilometers away
from the region. We also compare DPT data from 2016 and 2017 to
contemporaneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates from autonomous biogeochemical
floats deployed as part of the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations
and Modeling project (SOCCOM) so as to highlight the opportunity for
evaluating data collected on autonomous observational platforms. Though
SOCCOM floats sparsely sample the Drake Passage region for 2016–2017
compared to the Drake Passage Time-series, their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates
fall within the range of underway observations given the uncertainty on the
estimates. Going forward, continuation of the Drake Passage Time-series will
reduce uncertainties in Southern Ocean carbon uptake seasonality,
variability, and trends, and provide an invaluable independent dataset for
post-deployment assessment of sensors on autonomous floats. Together, these
datasets will vastly increase our ability to monitor change in the ocean
carbon sink.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e428">The Southern Ocean plays a disproportionately large role in the global carbon
cycle. Over the past few decades, the ocean has absorbed approximately
26 % of the carbon dioxide (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from fossil fuel burning
and land use change (Le Quéré et al., 2016, 2018), and since the
preindustrial era, the ocean has been the primary sink for anthropogenic
emissions (McKinley et al., 2017; Ciais et al., 2013). The Southern Ocean
(south of 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) accounts for almost half of the total oceanic sink
of anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Frölicher et al., 2015; Gruber et al.,
2009; Takahashi et al., 2009). Though the importance of this region is widely
understood, the relative scarcity of surface ocean carbon-related
observations in the Southern Ocean hampers our ability to understand how this
anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake occurs against the background of natural
variability.</p>
      <p id="d1e474">Observations and models suggest large variability in the strength of Southern
Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake on decadal timescales. Several studies have
reported a slow-down or reduction in the efficiency of Southern Ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake from the 1980s to the early 2000s (Le Quéré et
al., 2007; Lovenduski et al., 2008, 2015; Metzl 2009; Takahashi et al., 2012;
Fay and McKinley, 2013; Landschützer et al., 2014a, 2015a), followed by a
substantial strengthening of the Southern Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink since 2002
(Fay and McKinley, 2013; Fay et al., 2014; Landschützer et al., 2015a;
Munro et al., 2015a; Xue et al., 2015). Continued observational sampling
efforts and coordination are required for quantifying and understanding
decadal changes in this important <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink region.</p>
      <p id="d1e521">Initiated in 2002 and continuing to the present, the Drake Passage
Time-series is unique among Southern Ocean research programs in both its
spatial and temporal coverage. High-frequency underway observations of the
surface ocean partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are collected
on Antarctic Research and Supply Vessel <italic>Laurence M. Gould</italic> on up to
20 crossings per year from the southern tip of South America to the Antarctic
Peninsula, spanning the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) and its
associated Antarctic Polar Front (Munro et al., 2015a, b). The DPT is also
notable for sampling surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the austral winter
in all years from 2002 to the present, providing valuable information about
the full seasonal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the poorly sampled Southern
Ocean. Other ships have contributed observations in the Drake Passage region,
including the <italic>Polarstern</italic> and the <italic>Nathaniel B. Palmer</italic>;
however, none has the consistent temporal coverage as provided by the DPT.</p>
      <p id="d1e598">The surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations from the DPT have provided
the foundation for larger datasets, which
have been extensively used to examine variability and trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake in the broader Southern Ocean (Fay and McKinley, 2013; Fay et al.,
2014; Majkut et al., 2014; Landschützer et al., 2014b, 2015b;
Rödenbeck et al., 2015, Gregor et al., 2018). In many of these studies,
interpolated estimates of Southern Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used in
conjunction with measurements of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to estimate
variability and trends in the air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient and, when
combined with wind speed, air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d1e693">The physical oceanography of the Drake Passage region is unique in the
Southern Ocean. Here, the strong flow of the zonally unbounded ACC is
funneled through a narrow constriction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800 km), making it an ideal
location for sampling across the entire ACC system over a relatively short
distance (Sprintall et al., 2012). At the same time, the unique nature of
this circulation could potentially reduce the degree to which the Drake
Passage region is representative of the broader subpolar region. The DPT
program takes advantage of frequent <italic>Gould</italic> crossings to conduct
physical and biogeochemical sampling of the ACC system. Thus, before
conclusions can be drawn about large-scale Southern Ocean carbon uptake and
its variability using data from the DPT, it is important to document how
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this particular region compares with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured elsewhere in the subpolar Southern Ocean. In this study, we utilize
available ship-based surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations collected in
the subpolar Southern Ocean to evaluate how the seasonal cycle, interannual
variability, and long-term trends of surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
Drake Passage region compare to that of the broader subpolar Southern Ocean.
Further, we highlight the opportunity for post-deployment assessment of
autonomous observational platforms passing through the Drake Passage
utilizing the high-frequency, underway <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements from the
DPT.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data</title>
      <p id="d1e798">This study uses several observational datasets and data products of surface
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Southern Ocean: measurements from the Surface Ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT), which includes underway measurements from the DPT,
interpolated estimates of the SOCAT data using a self-organizing map
feed-forward neural network (SOM-FFN) approach, and calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimates from biogeochemical Argo floats. While the SOCAT database reports
the fugacity of carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), for our analysis we consider
datasets reporting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and f<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be interchangeable. This is an
acceptable assumption for surface ocean observations as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> behaves
closely to an ideal gas. Globally, the difference between these parameters
is less than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with f<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by no
more than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to temperature dependence. This is roughly the
reported uncertainty of shipboard observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and well
within the uncertainty of the observation-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates. Below,
we describe each of these data sources in turn.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>The Drake Passage Time-series (DPT)</title>
      <p id="d1e992">A unique dataset of ongoing year-round observations beginning in 2002 is
available from the Drake Passage Time-series. This dataset provides an
unprecedented opportunity to characterize the mean and time-varying state of
the Drake Passage and surrounding waters using direct observations. In
addition to high-frequency underway observations of surface ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, other physical and biogeochemical variables measured
onboard allow for a complete understanding of the carbonate system in the
Drake Passage. Analytical methods used to measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are described in detail by Munro et al. (2015a, b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Surface Ocean {$\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} Atlas (SOCAT)}?><title>Surface Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT)</title>
      <p id="d1e1067">SOCAT is a global surface ocean carbon dataset of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corrected for the non-ideal behavior of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sabine
et al., 2013; Pfeil et al., 2013). In this study, we utilize version 5 of
this product (SOCATv5) and include data with a reported WOCE flag of 2 and
cruise flags A–D, which results in a dataset of roughly 18.5 million
observations globally, spanning years 1957–2016, with uncertainties of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bakker et al., 2016). This dataset includes over
740 000 observations contributed from the DPT. Despite the large number of
observations available in the Southern Ocean, data are spatially and
temporally concentrated, with strong seasonal biases. Most data are collected
during reoccupations of supply routes to Antarctic bases or on repeat
hydrographic lines, which leaves large bands of the Southern Ocean completely
unsampled (Bakker et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Self-Organizing Map Feed-forward Network Product (SOM-FFN)</title>
      <p id="d1e1140">Landschützer et al. (2014b) use a two-step neural network approach to
extrapolate the monthly gridded SOCAT product in space and time. This
results in reconstructed, basin-wide monthly maps of the sea surface
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Landschützer et al., 2017). Air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux maps are then
computed using a standard gas exchange parameterization and high-resolution
wind speeds. The neural network estimate is described and substantially
validated in past publications (Landschützer et al., 2014a, 2015a, 2016)
and it was shown that the estimates fit observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in the
Southern Ocean with a root mean square error (RMSE) of about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and with almost no bias (Landschützer et al., 2015a, Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e1224">The SOM-FFN product used in this analysis was created from SOCATv5.
Additionally, we generated an alternative SOM-FFN product (SOM-FFN-noDP)
using the same methodological setup but excluding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data
collected in the Drake Passage region for years 2002–2016, which represents
the years of the DPT program.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>SOCCOM floats</title>
      <p id="d1e1251">The Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM)
project (<uri>http://soccom.princeton.edu</uri>, last access: 2 April 2018)
aims to deploy approximately 200 biogeochemical profiling
floats over a 5-year period (2015 to 2020) in an effort to fill observational
gaps in the Southern Ocean. In total, over 100 floats carrying some
combination of additional biogeochemical sensors (i.e., pH, nitrate, oxygen,
fluorescence, and backscattering) have been collecting data since April 2014
(Johnson et al., 2017). With the float's capability to measure pH and
utilization of existing algorithms for predicting total alkalinity,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be calculated from the collected observations and
compared to underway observations (Williams et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1274">The uncertainty range for these calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values is
estimated to be 2.7 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and takes into account multiple sources of uncertainty, including measurement
error, uncertainties introduced through the quality control procedures, and
uncertainties in seawater carbonate system thermodynamics (Williams et al.,
2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates from profiling floats have not been
included in the SOCAT database because they do not directly measure surface
water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For consistency, we maintain this separation in our
analysis and limit our study of SOCCOM floats to direct comparisons to DPT
values in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e1360">The SOCATv5 database from 2002 to 2016 is considered here to match the years
of overlap with DPT observations, which began in 2002. The SOCAT dataset is
then subsampled to include only observations with reported salinity values in
the 33.5–34.5 range and a distance-to-land value greater than or equal to
50 km. This step restricts our analysis to open-ocean observations, since
coastal observations report lower salinity values, which correspond to low
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values due to the influence of freshwater and ice melt.
SOCCOM float files were downloaded on 2 April 2018 and reported
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are an average of all data collected in the top 20 m
of water, calculated using alkalinity derived from the LIAR algorithm (Carter
et al., 2016), to remain consistent with previous SOCCOM float analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e1397">The Southern Ocean region of interest is the Southern Ocean Subpolar
Seasonally Stratified (SPSS) biome as defined in Fay and McKinley (2014) as
the region of the Southern Hemisphere with climatological SST
&lt; 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C but excluding areas with a sea-ice fraction greater
than or equal to 50 % (Fig. 1). While the SPSS biome encompasses the
Drake Passage, we further define a Drake Passage region as the portion of the
Southern Ocean SPSS biome bounded by 55 and 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W lines of longitude
(Fig. 1, black box). This is similar to the region analyzed in Munro et
al. (2015a); however, it extends the region of interest to the northern and
southern extents of the SPSS biome.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1420">Map of the Subpolar Seasonally Stratified (SPSS) biome (Fay and
McKinley, 2014), defined at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. The red
line represents the mean location of the Antarctic Polar Front (Freeman and
Lovenduski, 2016), interpolated to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid. The
black box represents the Drake Passage region considered in this analysis.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1465">In order to compare the seasonal cycle and long-term trends in the Drake
Passage with the broader SPSS biome, we analyze surface ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from three subsets of the SOCAT database: SOCAT-all, which
includes all available SOCATv5 data from 2002 to 2016 in the SPSS biome,
SOCAT-DP, which includes SOCATv5 data within the longitudinally defined Drake
Passage region (Fig. 1, with 62 % of these data obtained by the
LDEO/Univ. Colorado group), and SOCAT-noDP, which excludes any data within
the longitudinally defined Drake Passage region of the SPSS biome. All
datasets are first averaged to monthly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution. Monthly means are then calculated for the SPSS biome by first
removing the background mean annual climatological value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> location (Landschützer et al.,
2014a) to aid in accounting for the potential of spatial aliasing in the
sparsely sampled Southern Ocean (Fay and McKinley, 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e1543">Alternate definitions of the larger Southern Ocean region of interest were
considered during our analysis, including a subdivision of the SPSS into a
Northern SPSS and Southern SPSS, with the boundary defined by the location of
the mean position in the Antarctic Polar Front (Freeman and Lovenduski, 2016;
Freeman et al., 2016; Munro et al., 2015b). As discussed in Munro et
al. (2015a), Drake Passage Time-series observations north of the front report
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than to the south, and they find a larger
trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the north for years 2002–2015. Additionally,
the seasonal cycle amplitude north of the front is much larger and well
defined than south of the front. We see these patterns in the SOCAT dataset
as well; however, given the goal of this research, we choose to consider the
entire north-to-south extent of the SPSS as a whole. Outside of the Drake
Passage region, available data are limited such that analysis over northern
and southern subregions would be impossible.</p>
      <p id="d1e1580">Additionally, we consider analysis over the Polar Antarctic Zone (PAZ),
defined as the area between the Subantarctic Front and the sea-ice zone
(Williams et al., 2017) (Supplement Fig. S1). While differences exist in
trends and seasonality when using the PAZ definition (Supplement
Figs. S2–3), the overall conclusions of the relationship between SOCAT-DP
and SOCAT-all remain largely unchanged when using this alternate regional
definition.</p>
      <p id="d1e1583">Biome-scale monthly means are compared and used to calculate seasonal cycles
and trends. Seasonal cycles are calculated by first removing a 1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
trend to account for increasing atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during
the 2002–2015 period (Dlugokencky et al., 2015). Seasonal uncertainties
(Fig. 2) are estimated as 1 standard error from the mean of all available
biome mean values for a given month. This is a conservative estimate of the
uncertainty in any given month because of inconsistent annual coverage and
spatial undersampling biases. Reported trends are calculated by fitting a
single harmonic and linear trend to the biome-scale monthly means as done in
Fay and McKinley (2013). Trends are not statistically different if the
calculated mean seasonal cycle is removed instead of the choice to fit a
harmonic to the data. Seasonal trends are calculated with a simple linear
fit to the seasonal monthly means.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e1621">Mean surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal cycle estimate for
years 2002–2016, for the SPSS biome from each dataset, shown on an 18-month
cycle, calculated from a time series corrected to year 2002 (atmospheric
trend of 1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> removed). Shading represents 1
standard error for biome-scale monthly means driven by interannual
variability; there is no error represented for SOM-FFN. Bar plot indicates
the number of years containing observations in a given month (maximum of
15 years) for the SOCAT-DP, SOCAT-noDP, and SOCAT-all datasets.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Seasonal cycle</title>
      <p id="d1e1680">The mean seasonal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (corrected to reference year
2002) in the Southern Ocean SPSS biome for the three SOCAT datasets and the
full SOM-FFN estimate indicates broad agreement (Fig. 2). Here, surface ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels reach a maximum in austral winter (June to August),
when deep mixing delivers carbon-rich water to the surface, and a minimum in
austral summer (December to February), when biological production draws down
the inorganic carbon from the surface (Takahashi et al., 2009). Temperature
also plays a role in modulating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal cycle in the
Southern Ocean. Winter cooling drives <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower at the same time
as deep winter mixing elevates surface carbon levels. During the summer,
warming temperatures raise <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while biological utilization of
carbon drives surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels lower (Munro et al., 2015b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1786">The average amplitude of the detrended seasonal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(max–min) is 23 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2), smaller than the high-latitude
oceans in the Northern Hemisphere (Takahashi et al., 2002, 2009;
Landschützer et al., 2015b). The small amplitude of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
seasonal cycle in this region is due to the similar magnitude and opposite
phasing of temperature and carbon supply/utilization effects (Munro et al.,
2015b). In all months, mean surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the
Southern Ocean SPSS are below atmospheric, which ranges from a global annual
mean of 372 ppmv in 2002 to 399 ppmv in 2015, indicating that this region
has been a persistent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink over the period of analysis
(Dlugokencky and Tans, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1862">Figure 2 also shows the uncertainty of the seasonal mean, with shading
representing 1 standard error from the monthly mean for each dataset, defined
as the standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size
(here, number of years with available data in that month). Uncertainty
estimates vary for each month of the seasonal cycle, with a minimum
uncertainty of 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (June, SOCAT-DP) to a maximum of
5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (July, SOCAT-DP). These estimates are of the same magnitude
as the measurement accuracy of underway <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in SOCAT
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2–5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1921">Data density of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations from the SOCATv5
dataset within each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cell. Data are restricted
to years 2002–2016. Salinity values outside of 33.5–34.5 psu and
observations within 50 km of land are omitted. <bold>(a)</bold> Data from all
months of the year; <bold>(b)</bold> data from only June, July, and August
(austral winter). Gray lines designate the boundary of the SPSS biome and the
Drake Passage region for reference.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1972">Figure 3 indicates how diverse Southern Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data density is in
space and time. Compared to the regular sampling of the DPT, there are many
fewer repeated occupations of SR03 south of Australia (Shadwick et al.,
2015), along the Prime Meridian (Hoppema et al., 2009; Van Heuven et al.,
2011), and in the southwestern Indian sector (Metzl et al., 1999; Lo Monaco
et al., 2005, 2010; Metzl, 2009). Specifically, during austral winter, data
availability outside of the Drake Passage region is extremely limited due to
the few ships operating in winter and the difficult conditions that the
wintertime Southern Ocean presents to data collection efforts (Fig. 3b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1992">Despite irregular sampling, average seasonal cycles of the three SOCAT
datasets are quite similar, with few statistically significant differences
given the uncertainty bounds. SOCAT data from the Drake Passage region
(SOCAT-DP, gray) exhibit relatively large estimated uncertainty (average for
all months <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), despite the frequent coverage and
smaller region considered. This indicates that large interannual variability
is inherent to the Drake Passage region, especially in the well-observed
austral summer months. Despite data being much more regularly collected in
this region than in the rest of the Southern Ocean (Fig. 3), there are still
months of quite limited observations, specifically July and August (Fig. 2).
SOCAT-all has monthly uncertainties averaging 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the
largest uncertainties in January and July (Fig. 2, blue). Data availability
for SOCAT-all is consistent for much of the year, with most months having
observations in at least 13 of the 15 years considered in this analysis
(Fig. 2). The exceptions are July and August, which have data from only 8 and
10 years, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e2022">The SOCAT-noDP seasonal cycle is similar to that of the other datasets, but
deviates in the austral fall/winter, specifically May and June. In winter,
SOCAT-noDP suggests higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than SOCAT-DP or SOCAT-all,
though the limited data in June and July must be considered when drawing
conclusions from this difference (Figs. 2, 3b). With June and July data
available for fewer than 5 of the 15 years covered in the analysis it is
possible that the peak shown here could be biased by the few years included,
specifically for the month of June. In contrast, SOCAT-DP has data for nearly
all of the years considered in these months. The data that are available
during May and June in SOCAT-noDP are from regions downstream of the Drake
Passage (Fig. 3b).</p>
      <p id="d1e2042">Seasonal cycles are consistent when analyzing the PAZ region (Supplement
Fig. S2); however, the SOCAT-DP seasonal cycle exhibits two maxima, possibly
due to the omission of the southern area of the Drake Passage (Supplement
Fig. S1), which would cause values for the PAZ region to be greater than
those shown for the DP region of the SPSS. The June peak in SOCAT-noDP also
remains when considering the PAZ region. Amplitudes are comparable given the
uncertainty; however, the seasonal amplitude for each dataset is slightly
larger over the SPSS biome than the PAZ, likely due to the more northern
expansion of the PAZ region downstream of the Drake Passage and the exclusion
of the southern Drake Passage region in the boundary of the PAZ.</p>
      <p id="d1e2045">Overall, given available data, the seasonal cycles are statistically
indistinguishable for data collected inside and outside of the Drake Passage
region, for all months with at least 5 years of observations (Fig. 2). This
analysis of SOCAT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data indicates that the Drake Passage
seasonal cycle is representative of the broader SPSS biome seasonality, based
on the available observations to date, but increased observations outside of
the Drake Passage during May and June are needed to provide a more robust
comparison. Additionally, the seasonal cycles from all three SOCAT datasets
closely resemble the smoothed seasonality of the interpolated SOM-FFN product
in the SPSS biome (Fig. 2). Sparse sampling outside of the Drake Passage
during winter months leads to this estimated seasonal cycle of SOCAT-all
being driven by Drake Passage data. Enhanced wintertime data collection,
especially in regions outside of the Drake Passage, is required to better
constrain the full seasonal cycle of surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
Southern Ocean SPSS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Interannual variability</title>
      <p id="d1e2088">The high resolution of the time-series data in the Drake Passage allows for
close examination of temporal variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with relatively low
uncertainty (Munro et al., 2015a). We investigate the interannual
variability in Drake Passage <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 4a, where deseasonalized and
detrended anomalies (Fay and McKinley, 2013) from the SOCAT-DP dataset are
shown in gray, with the black line representing these anomalies smoothed
with a 12-month running mean. Over the 2002–2016 period, the variance in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies is 66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Monthly anomalies are as large as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 12-month smoothed anomalies as large as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this dataset.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2203"><bold>(a)</bold> Temporal evolution of deseasonalized, detrended monthly
SOCAT-DP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies (gray bars) over 2002–2016, with 12-month
running averages (black line) overlain. <bold>(b)</bold> Correlation between
monthly SOCAT-DP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies
estimated from the SOM-FFN-noDP product (created without the inclusion of
Drake Passage data), for years 2002–2016 at each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
grid cell. Gray shading represents areas where the correlation does not pass
significance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-tests at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2306">A model-based study by Lovenduski et al. (2015) finds interannual variability
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be low in the Drake Passage compared to other Southern
Ocean regions for years 1981–2007. In contrast, we find that detrended and
deseasonalized anomalies from SOCAT-noDP and SOCAT-DP have comparable
variances (59 and 66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This result, however, is likely
strongly affected by the previously discussed seasonal data gaps outside of
the DP region or potentially by the different years considered in these two
analyses. Conducting a similar analysis of the reported SOCAT sea surface
temperature (SST) values does find the variance for SOCAT-DP to be
significantly lower than SOCAT-noDP (0.93 and 2.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). As the same sampling issues exist for SST as for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in SOCAT, an alternate method to address this issue is
needed to resolve these conflicting results.</p>
      <p id="d1e2383">The SOM-FFN data product offers complete seasonal and regional coverage, and
thus the comparison of variance in the Drake Passage to all of the Southern
Ocean can be made in this context. Results for SOM-FFN are different from
both the SOCAT findings above and the results of Lovenduski et al. (2015).
For the SPSS biome area of SOM-FFN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the variance of
detrended and deseasonalized anomalies is significantly higher within the
Drake Passage region than outside of the region (14.2 and 6.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). It should be noted that variances are
significantly lower for the SOM-FFN because of its interpolation. We are left
without a clear picture as to whether the Drake Passage is more or less
variable in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the rest of the Southern Ocean SPSS. This
conundrum is clearly due to the lack of data availability, particularly
outside the Drake Passage during winter months (Fig. 3b).</p>
      <p id="d1e2439">Given the lack of data, the degree to which the Drake Passage represents
interannual variability within the Southern Ocean SPSS can only be considered
in the context of the SOM-FFN data product. To produce independent estimates
of correlations between the Drake Passage and other points, we use a version
of the SOM-FFN product created without the inclusion of any observations in
our defined Drake Passage region (SOM-FFN-noDP, Fig. 4b), and assess
correlations with SOCAT data within the Drake Passage. Anomalies have been
detrended and deseasonalized, and grayed areas indicate that the correlation
is not significant at the 95 % confidence level (Fig. 4b). The strongest
positive correlations are within the Drake Passage, upstream of the Drake
Passage into the central Pacific SPSS, and in the Indian Ocean sector of the
SPSS biome (Fig. 4b). Weaker positive correlations are found in the western
Pacific SPSS, as well as a few areas in the Atlantic sector of the SPSS. No
regions of widespread strong negative correlations are observed in the SPSS
biome. This is consistent with the analysis of Munro et al. (2015b), who
estimate the footprint of the Drake Passage extending upstream into the
eastern Pacific sector of the ACC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Trends, 2002–2016</title>
      <p id="d1e2448">Trends for all data (annual), as well as summer (DJF) and winter (JJA), are
estimated from the three SOCAT datasets, the SOM-FFN data product, and the
SOM-FFN product subsampled as SOCAT-DP (SOM-FFN-sampled), in all cases
following the approach of Fay and McKinley (2013). Similar to the
climatological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal cycle, annual trends for the three
SOCAT datasets are indistinguishable given the 68 % confidence intervals
(Fig. 5, Supplement Table S1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e2470">Surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends in the SPSS biome for years
2002–2016 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): SOCATv5 data within the Drake Passage
box (gray); SOCATv5 data excluding data from the Drake Passage box (green);
SOCATv5 (blue); SOM-FFN product (magenta); SOM-FFN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product
sampled as SOCATv5 data in the Drake Passage box (light pink). The figure
includes annual trends (left), austral summer trends (center) and austral
winter trends (right). SOCAT-noDP winter trend omitted because it did not
contain a JJA value for every year of the time series. For reference, the
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend during the 2002–2015 period
(1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown as a horizontal black line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2575">All annual trends are less than the 2002–2016 atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
trend of 1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dlugokencky et al., 2015),
indicating that the Southern Ocean has been a growing sink for atmospheric
carbon over 2002–2016 (Fig. 5, far left). Comparing the different estimates,
SOCAT-DP (gray bar) and SOCAT-all (blue bar) have annual trends slightly
below that of the full SOM-FFN, however with greater uncertainty bounds. The
annual trend from the SOCAT-all dataset (blue) is nearly identical to the
SOCAT-DP trend in both mean and uncertainty. These are not statistically
different from the SOCAT-noDP, although the SOCAT-noDP dataset does yield a
slightly larger annual trend. While SOCAT-noDP yields the largest annual
trend of the three datasets, it still falls well below the atmospheric trend.
These trends are comparable to those reported in Munro et al. (2015b),
Takahashi et al. (2012), and Fay et al. (2014), despite these studies
utilizing different datasets, methods, and regional boundaries. Takahashi et
al. (2014), similar to Munro et al. (2015b), show that trends in the northern
portion of the Drake Passage are greater than those south of the front. Our
analysis of regions north and south of the front confirms this (not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e2617">Sampling the SOM-FFN data product as the SOCAT-DP dataset (SOM-FFN-sampled)
is one way to estimate the impact of the available data coverage in the
Drake Passage region as compared to the hypothetical situation of perfect
data coverage in the SPSS biome. Sampling lowers the trend, making it
significantly smaller than the full SOM-FFN trend. This reduction leads to
an annual trend very similar to that of SOCAT-DP and SOCAT-all. This
conclusion emphasizes the need for increased observations around the
Southern Ocean as it implies we are potentially not accurately capturing the
true trend in this region with the available data coverage.</p>
      <p id="d1e2621">Conclusions of these comparisons are largely maintained for summer and winter
trends (Fig. 5, center and right). Uncertainty increases when considering
seasonal trends due to reduced data quantity. All trends are statistically
indistinguishable for summer months; however, the SOCAT-DP trend shows the
largest change from the reported annual trends. For winter, SOCAT-noDP is not
shown, because unlike SOCAT-all and SOCAT-DP, not all years have available
data during this season (Fig. 2). Overall, winter trends are slightly higher
than summer trends. Even given the uncertainties, winter and summer trends
are clearly distinguishable for SOCAT-DP, SOCAT-all, and the full and sampled
SOM-FFN product. In each of these datasets, the winter trend is roughly
0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than the summer trend. While winter
trends have larger differences and larger uncertainties, consistent with
reduced data availability, this seasonal difference in trends is significant.
Further and more detailed consideration of this seasonal comparison is
warranted. Initial investigations indicate that 2016 had anomalously high
wintertime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (not shown). Specifically, when trends are
calculated with the same datasets for 2002–2015, winter trends are
significantly lower than the atmospheric trend (SOCAT-DP: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, SOCAT-all: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, SOM-FFN: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.70</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). It is
important to consider the impact of anomalous values at the end of selected
time series, specifically for time series less than 15 years (Fay and
McKinley, 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e2763">An investigation of trends from the full SOM-FFN product and that of the
SOM-FFN-noDP product for the entire Southern Ocean SPSS biome for years
2002–2016 indicates an increasing carbon uptake by the ocean with some
interannual variability (Fig. 6). If the Drake Passage data are omitted
during the creation of the product (SOM-FFN-noDP), carbon flux and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends are unchanged (Fig. 6). Both estimates illustrate
that for 2002–2016, the Southern Ocean SPSS biome was an important sink of
carbon dioxide.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e2785"><bold>(a)</bold> Sea–air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux and
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over the Southern Ocean SPSS biome,
from the SOM-FFN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product (blue) and that of the SOM-FFN-noDP
product created without the inclusion of Drake Passage data (red). Trends and
uncertainty values in corresponding colors.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2844">Trend analysis for the PAZ region (Supplement Fig. S3, Supplement Table S1)
produces comparable results. Annual trends are indistinguishable between the
three SOCAT datasets as well as between the SOM-FFN product, both full and
sampled. It could be that the greater extent of the PAZ northward yields
better agreement between the datasets and the SOM-FFN product. All annual
trends are also below the atmospheric trend. Summer and winter trends for the
PAZ are consistent with results for the SPSS biome, with winter trends being
larger than summer trends, most significantly for the SOCAT-DP and SOM-FFN
datasets. While actual trend values are different from those shown in Fig. 2,
the results show that the relationship between trends for the three SOCAT
datasets are indistinguishable for both seasons and annual analyses.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2849"><bold>(a)</bold> Trajectories of Drake Passage-transiting SOCCOM floats
included in this analysis. Colored diamonds represent the locations of
surface measurements for each float. Data from floats collected east of
55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and west of 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W are not included in this analysis.
Gray dots represent observations from the DPT. <bold>(b)</bold> Mean surface
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal cycle estimate for black: underway Drake
Passage Time-series data for years 2002–2016; purple: DPT for years
2016–2017 to match years covered by the floats; and orange: SOCCOM floats.
Seasonal cycles are shown on an 18-month cycle, calculated from a monthly
mean time series with the atmospheric correction to year 2017. Shading
represents 1 standard error accounting for the spatial and temporal
heterogeneity of the sample and the measurement error (2.7 % or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for floats;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for DPT data) combined using the square root of the
sum of squares.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{DPT as a $p${$\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} evaluation point for biogeochemical profiling
floats}?><title>DPT as a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evaluation point for biogeochemical profiling
floats</title>
      <p id="d1e2993">Starting in late 2014, autonomous biogeochemical profiling floats have been
deployed as part of the SOCCOM project, and as of December 2017, 10 floats
had traveled through or were approaching the Drake Passage region (Fig. 7a).
These floats offer a new opportunity to complement our oceanographic
understanding that has been developed primarily with traditional shipboard
observations. Results above show that a lack of observations outside of the
Drake Passage region may contribute to the large uncertainties in both
seasonality and trends, which limits the conclusions we are able to make with
currently available shipboard data. As floats provide autonomous,
near-real-time observations covering existing spatial and temporal gaps
throughout the Southern Ocean and ship-based systems provide high density
observations at higher accuracy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % or 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for floats compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for ships), there is great potential for these two
platforms to work in concert to provide a whole Southern Ocean carbon
observing system. However, there are limitations of float observations,
notably the indirect estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from pH and the requirement
to adjust the sensor calibrations post-deployment by reference to deep (near
1500 m) pH values estimated from multiple linear regression equations fitted
to high-quality, spectrophotometric pH observations made on repeat
hydrography cruises (Williams et al., 2016, 2017; Johnson et al., 2016,
2017). Further comparisons between float-estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
shipboard observations are clearly warranted, and the complementary strengths
of the Drake Passage Time-series make it an ideal dataset to help address
these issues.</p>
      <p id="d1e3098">Here we utilize the underway Drake Passage Time-series <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data
to conduct comparisons to nearby SOCCOM floats, considering both seasonality
as well as fine-scale crossovers. Note that in this section of the analysis
we utilize data only from the Drake Passage Time-series (Takahashi et al.,
2017, available at <uri>https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/data/0160492.xml</uri>)
instead of the SOCATv5 dataset because SOCAT data are not available after
2016 at the time of writing.</p>
      <p id="d1e3121">A strong benefit of autonomous observation systems is their ability to sample
regions and times that are not often surveyed by ships. SOCCOM floats collect
data throughout the year, and especially important are the additional
observations in austral winter, a time when there are limited opportunities
for ship-based measurements. While currently only 2 full years of data are
available from floats within the Drake Passage (2016–2017), they span the
full width of the region (Fig. 7a) and are able to observe during each month
of the year. A seasonal comparison of monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
for the DPT data and float <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates within the defined
Drake Passage region show that both platforms capture the expected seasonal
cycle for the subpolar Southern Ocean with a wintertime peak and summertime
low (Fig. 7b). All datasets shown have been adjusted to 2017 using the mean
atmospheric trend (1.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dlugokencky et al.,
2015), and thus mean values are higher than shown in the seasonal curves of
Fig. 2. Standard error shading on the seasonal cycles (Fig. 7b) includes
considerations of measurement accuracy as this differs substantially between
these two platforms. Shading represents 1 standard error accounting for the
spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the sample and measurement error
(2.7 % or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for floats; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for DPT data),
combined using the square root of the sum of squares.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3255"><bold>(a)</bold> 2002–2017 underway DPT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations
(circles) and surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates from SOCCOM floats overlain
(diamonds; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), plotted versus latitude. <bold>(b)</bold> Same as
<bold>(a)</bold> but plotted as January 2016 to December 2017.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f08.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3317">The seasonal cycle derived from float-estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a larger
seasonal amplitude compared to the DPT data from 2002 to 2017, due to an
earlier and much lower observed summertime minimum. The difference in
summertime minima is smaller however when DPT data from only 2016 and 2017
are considered (Fig. 7b). The remaining difference between the floats and the
DPT 2016–2017 data might be an artifact of the specific locations sampled,
as floats and ships are not exactly synchronous, as well as the conditions
specific to 2016 and 2017. In summer 2016 for example, the floats appear to
have captured a strong phytoplankton bloom to the north and upstream of the
Drake Passage, not captured by the DPT, that resulted in strong inorganic
carbon uptake and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the floats did not sample in the
southern region where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is substantially higher in the early
spring (Fig. 8). However, there is no indication from the 2002–2017 seasonal
cycle that this low excursion of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> persists when looking
at the entire Drake Passage region (Fig. 7b). Since phytoplankton blooms
typically progress southward during spring (Carranza and Gille, 2015) this
difference in phasing likely results from the floats sampling preferentially
the earlier northern uptake.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3391"><bold>(a)</bold> Map of SOCCOM floats with DPT crossovers within 75 km,
3 days, and 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C SST from coincident surface observations.
<bold>(b)</bold> Calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the SOCCOM float (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis)
versus DPT underway <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis) for crossover
float locations, with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line. Colors correspond to the float number in
Fig. 7. Horizontal width of shading represents SOCCOM relative standard
uncertainty, which is estimated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; vertical
shading is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Black “x” and
squares indicated crossovers within a smaller window
(50 km/2 day/0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C SST and 25 km/1 day/0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C SST,
respectively).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/3841/2018/bg-15-3841-2018-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3534">Underway Drake Passage Time-series <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data in the SPSS biome
have a large range, often spanning over 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> each month as
shown in the time series in Fig. 8, largely related to the 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
temperature gradient and associated physical and biological dynamics that are
captured over the region. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from all floats east of 90 and
west of 55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W is also plotted on the time series (Fig. 8, diamonds),
with the reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value being an average for all depths
shallower than 20 m. Float-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface estimates largely
fall within the range of the direct underway <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations;
however, notable differences do exist when spatial and temporal differences
are taken into consideration. Float estimates from the central Drake Passage
in winter (JJA) 2017 (Fig. 8b) are higher than nearby DPT observations,
though cruise data do not precisely overlap in time. Overall, the range of
the DPT observations is far larger than the range of estimated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from floats inside the Drake Passage region because they
regularly span across the full width of the Drake Passage where meridional
decorrelation length scales are relatively short (Eveleth et al., 2017).
Conversely, floats tend to sample along the path of the ACC.</p>
      <p id="d1e3669">As floats offer autonomous, frequent observations and ships offer data of the
highest quality, it is ideal for these two platforms to work in partnership.
Analysis of direct comparisons between DPT data and SOCCOM floats at
crossover points indicates more precisely this potential (Fig. 9). As of
December 2017, there have been six occurrences of floats surfacing near DPT
observations within a window of 75 km, 3 days, and have a reported SST
within 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of each other (Fig. 9a). This window is consistent
with the crossover criteria used by the SOCAT community to quality control
shipboard data (Pfeil et al., 2013; Olsen et al., 2013). Figure 9a shows
locations of the floats and the nearby DPT observations that fit this
crossover window. As DPT offers high-frequency observations, all available
measurements over the 3-day window are shown (Fig. 9b). Also indicated are
DPT observations that cross over within a 50 km and 2-day window and 25 km
and 1-day window (Fig. 9b, black “x” and squares, respectively), both also
with the 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C SST criteria.</p>
      <p id="d1e3691">This comparison of the calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the floats and
observed DPT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reveals a broad correspondence (passing through
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line) in all six crossover instances within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
relative standard uncertainty of the SOCCOM float measurements and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DPT uncertainty (Fig. 9b shading). While all float
crossovers do intersect the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line given their stated uncertainties,
these comparisons reveal the large range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> captured by
high-frequency shipboard measurements in a relatively small region and
illustrate that this range cannot be fully captured by floats surfacing only
once every 10 days. Further investigation of crossovers in the entire
Southern Ocean region is needed; the DPT provides the most likely occurrence
for this, although other regions with frequent ship traffic and autonomous
platforms with biogeochemical capabilities should also be utilized when
feasible. Additional post-deployment data quality checks using the underway
surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from DPT and other ship-based programs should
be conducted, and more thorough assessments could be achieved if hydrocast
observations were planned to occur in the vicinity of a passing
biogeochemical float. Such coordinated efforts would significantly advance
monitoring of the carbon cycle in the Southern Ocean.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3823">The Drake Passage Time-series illustrates the large variability of surface
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and exemplifies the value of sustained observations
for understanding changing ocean carbon uptake in the Southern Ocean. This is
the only location where carbon measurements throughout the entire annual
cycle in the subpolar Southern Ocean have been made regularly over the past 2
decades. The available observations to date indicate that the Drake Passage
seasonal cycle is representative of the seasonality observed for the entire
SPSS biome, but increased observations outside of the Drake Passage,
specifically during austral winter, are needed to provide a more robust
comparison. Uncertainties in the seasonality for all datasets studied remain
considerable given the dynamic nature of this region and the short time
series considered. Specifically, a lack of winter data in all years limits
the direct conclusions for differences between the Drake Passage and the
larger SPSS biome where we see a discrepancy in the timing of the winter
maxima. These findings can direct specific goals for focus regions of future
observations. Specifically, insufficient wintertime data in regions outside
of the Drake Passage limit our assessment of how representative Drake Passage
data are of the larger subpolar region.</p>
      <p id="d1e3843">The magnitude of interannual variability is comparable for SOCAT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
data within and outside of the Drake Passage region of the SPSS biome, a
finding that conflicts with results from previous modeling and analysis of
the SOM-FFN product. A clear idea of whether the Drake Passage is more or
less variable in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will require increased data, particularly during
the austral winter, outside of the Drake Passage. Given these data
restrictions, the representativeness of the larger SPSS biome is also
investigated using the SOM-FFN product. Within this gap-filled data product,
monthly anomalies in the Drake Passage region are representative of broad
swaths of the Southern Ocean, specifically regions upstream of the Drake
Passage, but strong relationships are also evident in regions in the Indian
Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean. Consistent with this finding, estimates
of long-term trends do not change substantially if observations in the Drake
Passage are removed from the SOM-FFN analysis. Across approaches to data
analysis, trends in annual oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trends for 2002–2016 are less
than the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend, confirming previous findings that the
Southern Ocean has, on average, been a growing sink for atmospheric carbon
over this period.</p>
      <p id="d1e3915">Comparisons between underway DPT measurements and SOCCOM float estimates
taken within the Drake Passage show broad agreement, while a fine-scale
crossover investigation demonstrates their direct correspondence given
uncertainty ranges for SOCCOM float <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates. Continuation
of high-temporal measurements of the DPT, in addition to expanded programs to
target floats with both underway observations and frequent hydrocasts serving
as independent datasets for post-deployment, will provide high-value
comparisons, improving community confidence in float-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimates. Coordinated monitoring efforts that combine a well-calibrated
array of autonomous biogeochemical floats with a robust ship-based
observational network will improve and expand monitoring of the carbon cycle
in the Southern Ocean in the future.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3956">All data used in this study are publicly available. SOCAT
data are available via
<uri>https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/archive/arc0108/0163180/2.2/data/0-data/SOCATv5.tsv</uri>
(last access: 2 April 2018). Drake Passage data are available via
<uri>https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/data/0160492.xml</uri>
(<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)</ext-link>, Takahashi et al., 2017). SOCCOM float
data are available via <uri>https://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb3450604r</uri>
(<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6075/J0PG1PX7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6075/J0PG1PX7</ext-link>, Johnson et al., 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3974"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3841-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3841-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e3980">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3986">We are grateful for funding from the NSF (PLR-1543457, OCE-1558225,
OCE-1155240), the NOAA (NA12OAR4310058), and NASA (NNX17AK19G). NCAR is
sponsored by the National Science Foundation. We acknowledge support from the
Space Science and Engineering Center of University of Wisconsin – Madison
and Columbia University. The authors are especially grateful for the efforts
of the marine and science support teams of the ARSV <italic>Laurence M. Gould</italic>, particularly Timothy Newberger, Kevin Pedigo, Bruce Felix, and Andy
Nunn. Underway DPT measurements presented in this paper are archived at the
NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information
(<uri>https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/VOS_Program/LM_gould.html</uri>, last
access: 2 April 2018). The Surface Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT) is an
international effort, supported by the International Ocean Carbon
Coordination Project (IOCCP), the Surface Ocean Lower Atmosphere Study
(SOLAS), and the Integrated Marine Biogeochemistry and Ecosystem Research
program (IMBER) to deliver a uniformly quality-controlled surface ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> database. The many researchers and funding agencies responsible
for the collection of data and quality control are thanked for their
contributions to SOCAT. Float data were collected and made freely available
by the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM)
Project funded by the National Science Foundation, Division of Polar Programs
(NSF PLR-1425989), supplemented by NASA, and by the International Argo
Program and the NOAA programs that contribute to it
(<uri>http://www.argo.ucsd.edu</uri>, <uri>http://argo.jcommops.org</uri>, last access:
2 April 2018). The Argo Program is part of the Global Ocean Observing
System.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Jack
Middelburg<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bakker, D. C. E., Pfeil, B., Landa, C. S., Metzl, N., O'Brien, K. M., Olsen,
A., Smith, K., Cosca, C., Harasawa, S., Jones, S. D., Nakaoka, S.-I., Nojiri,
Y., Schuster, U., Steinhoff, T., Sweeney, C., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook, B.,
Wada, C., Wanninkhof, R., Alin, S. R., Balestrini, C. F., Barbero, L., Bates,
N. R., Bianchi, A. A., Bonou, F., Boutin, J., Bozec, Y., Burger, E. F., Cai,
W.-J., Castle, R. D., Chen, L., Chierici, M., Currie, K., Evans, W.,
Featherstone, C., Feely, R. A., Fransson, A., Goyet, C., Greenwood, N.,
Gregor, L., Hankin, S., Hardman-Mountford, N. J., Harlay, J., Hauck, J.,
Hoppema, M., Humphreys, M. P., Hunt, C. W., Huss, B., Ibánhez, J. S. P.,
Johannessen, T., Keeling, R., Kitidis, V., Körtzinger, A., Kozyr, A.,
Krasakopoulou, E., Kuwata, A., Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K.,
Lefèvre, N., Lo Monaco, C., Manke, A., Mathis, J. T., Merlivat, L.,
Millero, F. J., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro, D. R., Murata, A., Newberger, T.,
Omar, A. M., Ono, T., Paterson, K., Pearce, D., Pierrot, D., Robbins, L. L.,
Saito, S., Salisbury, J., Schlitzer, R., Schneider, B., Schweitzer, R.,
Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Sullivan, K. F., Sutherland, S. C., Sutton, A. J.,
Tadokoro, K., Telszewski, M., Tuma, M., van Heuven, S. M. A. C., Vandemark,
D., Ward, B., Watson, A. J., and Xu, S.: A multi-decade record of
high-quality <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data in version 3 of the Surface Ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas
(SOCAT), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 383–413,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-383-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-383-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Carranza, M. M. and Gille S. T.: Southern Ocean wind-driven entrainment
enhances satellite chlorophyll-a through the summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
120, 304–323, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010203</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, B. R., Williams, N. L., Gray, A. R., and Feely, R. A.: Locally
interpolated alkalinity regression for global alkalinity estimation, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 14, 268–277, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le
Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and
Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Dlugokencky, E. and Tans, P.: NOAA/ESRL,
<uri>www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/</uri>, last access: 15 September 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Dlugokencky, E. J., Masarie, K. A., Lang, P. M., and Tans, P. P.: NOAA
Greenhouse Gas Reference from Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole
Fractions from the NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling
Network, Data Path:
<uri>ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/trace_gases/co2/flask/surface/</uri> (last
access: 1 September 2017), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Eveleth, R., Cassar, N., Doney, S. C., Munro, D. R., and Sweeney, C.:
Biological and physical controls on O2/Ar, Ar and pCO2 variability at the
Western Antarctic Peninsula and in the Drake Passage, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
139, 77–88, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Fay, A. R. and McKinley, G. A.: Global trends in surface ocean pCO2 from in
situ data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 541–557, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fay, A. R. and McKinley, G. A.: Global open-ocean biomes: mean and temporal
variability, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 273–284,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-273-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-6-273-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fay, A. R., McKinley, G. A., and Lovenduski, N. S.: Southern Ocean carbon
trends: Sensitivity to methods, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6833–6840,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Freeman, N. M. and Lovenduski, N. S.: Mapping the Antarctic Polar Front:
weekly realizations from 2002 to 2014, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 191–198,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-191-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-191-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Freeman, N. M., Lovenduski, N. S., and Gent, P. R.: Temporal variability in
the Antarctic Polar Front (2001–2014), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121,
7263–7276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC012145</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Frölicher, T. L., Sarmiento, J. L., Paynter, D. J., Dunne, J. P.,
Krasting, J. P., and Winton, M.: Dominance of the Southern Ocean in
anthropogenic carbon and heat uptake in CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 28,
862–886, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gregor, L., Kok, S., and Monteiro, P. M. S.: Interannual drivers of the
seasonal cycle of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Southern Ocean, Biogeosciences, 15,
2361–2378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2361-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-2361-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, N., Gloor, M., Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Doney, S. C., Dutkiewicz,
S., Follows, M. J., Gerber, M., Jacobson, A. R., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Menemenlis, D., Mouchet, A., Müller, S. A., Sarmiento, J. L., and
Takahashi, T.: Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB1005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003349</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Hoppema, M., Velo, A., van Heuven, S., Tanhua, T., Key, R. M., Lin, X.,
Bakker, D. C. E., Perez, F. F., Ríos, A. F., Lo Monaco, C., Sabine, C.
L., Álvarez, M., and Bellerby, R. G. J.: Consistency of cruise data of
the CARINA database in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean, Earth Syst.
Sci. Data, 1, 63–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-1-63-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-1-63-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, K. S., Jannasch, H. W., Coletti, L. J., Elrod, V. A., Martz, T. R.,
Takeshita, Y., Carlson, R. J., and Connery, J. G.: Deep-Sea DuraFET: A
pressure tolerant pH sensor designed for global sensor networks, Anal.
Chem., 88, 3249–3256, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Coletti, L. J., Jannasch, H. W., Sakamoto, C.
M., Riser, S. C., and Talley, L. D.: Biogeochemical sensor performance in the
SOCCOM profiling float array, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 6416–6436,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JC012838</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, K. S., Riser, S. C., Boss, E. S., Talley, L. D., Sarmiento, J. L.,
Swift, D. D., Plant, J. N., Maurer, T. L., Key, R. M., Williams, N. L.,
Wanninkhof, R. H., Dickson, A. G., Feely, R. A., and Russell, J. L.: SOCCOM
float data – Snapshot 2018-03-06, in: Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate
Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM) Float Data Archive, UC San Diego Library
Digital Collections, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6075/J0PG1PX7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6075/J0PG1PX7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D. C. E., and Schuster, U.: Recent
variability of the global ocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28,
927–949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB004853</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D. C. E., and Schuster, U.: An
observation-based global monthly gridded sea surface pCO2 product from 1998
through 2011 and its monthly climatology, available on:
<uri>http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/SPCO2_1998_2011_ETH_SOM_FFN.html</uri> (last
access: 22 November 2017), 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Haumann, F., Rödenbeck, C., Bakker, D.,
van Heuven, S., Hoppema, M., Metzl, N., Sweeney, C., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook,
B., and Wanninkhof, R.: The reinvigoration of the Southern Ocean carbon sink,
Science, 349, 1221–1224, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., and Bakker, D. C. E.: A 30 years
observation-based global monthly gridded sea surface pCO2 product from 1982
through 2011,
<uri>http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/oceans/SPCO2_1982_2011_ETH_SOM_FFN</uri>, Carbon
Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US
Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.SPCO2_1982_2011_ETH_SOMFFN">https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.SPCO2_1982_2011_
ETH_SOMFFN</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., and Bakker, D. C. E.: Decadal variations
and trends of the global ocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30,
1396–1417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GB005359</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., and Bakker, D. C. E.: An updated
observation-based global monthly gridded sea surface pCO2 and air-sea CO2
flux product from 1982 through 2015 and its monthly climatology (NCEI
Accession 0160558). Version 2.2. NOAA National Centers for Environmental
Information. Dataset. [2017-07-11]: available at:
<uri>https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/
SPCO2_1982_2015_ETH_SOM_FFN.html</uri>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Le Quéré, C., Rödenbeck, C., Buitenhuis, E. T., Conway, T. J.,
Langenfelds, R., Gomez, A., Labuschagne, C., Ramonet, M., Nakazawa, T.,
Metzl, N., Gillett, N., and Heimann, M.: Satuation of the Southern Ocean
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>sink due to recent climate change, Science, 316, 1735–1738,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1136188</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch, S., Korsbakken,
J. I., Peters, G. P., Manning, A. C., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Houghton, R.
A., Keeling, R. F., Alin, S., Andrews, O. D., Anthoni, P., Barbero, L., Bopp,
L., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Ciais, P., Currie, K., Delire, C., Doney,
S. C., Friedlingstein, P., Gkritzalis, T., Harris, I., Hauck, J., Haverd, V.,
Hoppema, M., Klein Goldewijk, K., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Körtzinger, A.,
Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi,
D., Melton, J. R., Metzl, N., Millero, F., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro, D. R.,
Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., O'Brien, K., Olsen, A., Omar, A. M., Ono,
T., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rödenbeck, C., Salisbury, J., Schuster, U.,
Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Skjelvan, I., Stocker, B. D., Sutton, A.
J., Takahashi, T., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van
der Werf, G. R., Viovy, N., Walker, A. P., Wiltshire, A. J., and Zaehle, S.:
Global Carbon Budget 2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 605–649,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-605-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz,
J., Manning, A. C., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G.,
Jackson, R. B., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Andrews, O. D., Arora, V. K.,
Bakker, D. C. E., Barbero, L., Becker, M., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L.,
Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Ciais, P., Cosca, C. E., Cross, J., Currie, K.,
Gasser, T., Harris, I., Hauck, J., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Hunt, C. W.,
Hurtt, G., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Kautz, M., Keeling, R. F.,
Klein Goldewijk, K., Körtzinger, A., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre,
N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Lima, I., Lombardozzi, D., Metzl, N., Millero,
F., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro, D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I.,
Nojiri, Y., Padin, X. A., Peregon, A., Pfeil, B., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B.,
Rehder, G., Reimer, J., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Séférian,
R., Skjelvan, I., Stocker, B. D., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tubiello, F. N.,
van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Werf, G. R., van Heuven, S., Viovy, N.,
Vuichard, N., Walker, A. P., Watson, A. J., Wiltshire, A. J., Zaehle, S., and
Zhu, D.: Global Carbon Budget 2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-405-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lo Monaco, C., Metzl, N., Poisson, A., Brunet, C., and Schauer, B.:
Anthropogenic CO2 in the Southern Ocean: Distribution and inventory at the
Indian-Atlantic boundary (World Ocean Circulation Experiment line I6), J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 110, C06010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JC002643</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Lo Monaco, C., Álvarez, M., Key, R. M., Lin, X., Tanhua, T., Tilbrook,
B., Bakker, D. C. E., van Heuven, S., Hoppema, M., Metzl, N., Ríos, A.
F., Sabine, C. L., and Velo, A.: Assessing the internal consistency of the
CARINA database in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, Earth Syst. Sci.
Data, 2, 51–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2-51-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-2-51-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Lovenduski, N. S., Gruber, N., and Doney, S. C.: Toward a mechanistic
understanding of the decadal trends in the Southern Ocean carbon sink,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB3016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003139</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Lovenduski, N. S., Fay, A. R., and McKinley, G. A.: Observing multidecadal
trends in Southern Ocean CO2 uptake: What can we learn from an ocean model?,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 416–426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004933" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB004933</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Majkut, J. D., Carter, B. R., Frölicher, T. L., Dufour, C. O., Rodgers,
K. B., and Sarmiento, J. L.: An observing system simulation for Southern
Ocean carbon dioxide uptake, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 372, 2019, 20130046,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
McKinley, G. A., Fay, A. R., Lovenduski, N. S., and Pilcher, D. J.: Natural
variability and anthropogenic trends in the ocean carbon sink, Annu. Rev.
Mar. Sci., 9, 125–150, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Metzl, N.: Decadal increase of oceanic carbon dioxide in Southern Indian
Ocean surface waters (1991–2007), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 607–619,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Metzl, N., Tilbrook, B., and Poisson, A.: The annual f<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle and the
air'sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in the sub-Antarctic Ocean, Tellus B, 51, 849–861,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Munro, D. R., Lovenduski, N. S., Takahashi, T., Stephens, B. B., Newberger,
T., and Sweeney, C.: Recent evidence for a strengthening <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink in the
Southern Ocean from carbonate system measurements in the Drake Passage
(2002–2015), Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7623–7630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL065194</ext-link>,
2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Munro, D. R., Lovenduski, N. S., Stephens, B. B., Newberger, T., Arrigo, K.
R., Takahashi, T., Quay, P. D., Sprintall, J., Freeman, N. M., and Sweeney,
C.: Estimates of net community production in the Southern Ocean determined
from time-series observations (2002–2011) of nutrients, dissolved inorganic
carbon, and surface ocean p<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Drake Passage, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
114, 49–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.12.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.12.014</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Olsen, A., Metzl, N., Bakker, D., and O'Brien, K.: SOCAT QC cookbook for
SOCAT participants; available at:
<uri>https://www.socat.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2015_SOCAT_QC_Cookbook_v3.pdf</uri>
(last access: 1 November 2017), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Pfeil, B., Olsen, A., Bakker, D. C. E., Hankin, S., Koyuk, H., Kozyr, A.,
Malczyk, J., Manke, A., Metzl, N., Sabine, C. L., Akl, J., Alin, S. R.,
Bates, N., Bellerby, R. G. J., Borges, A., Boutin, J., Brown, P. J., Cai,
W.-J., Chavez, F. P., Chen, A., Cosca, C., Fassbender, A. J., Feely, R. A.,
González-Dávila, M., Goyet, C., Hales, B., Hardman-Mountford, N.,
Heinze, C., Hood, M., Hoppema, M., Hunt, C. W., Hydes, D., Ishii, M.,
Johannessen, T., Jones, S. D., Key, R. M., Körtzinger, A.,
Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lourantou,
A., Merlivat, L., Midorikawa, T., Mintrop, L., Miyazaki, C., Murata, A.,
Nakadate, A., Nakano, Y., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., Omar, A. M., Padin, X. A.,
Park, G.-H., Paterson, K., Perez, F. F., Pierrot, D., Poisson, A., Ríos,
A. F., Santana-Casiano, J. M., Salisbury, J., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Schlitzer,
R., Schneider, B., Schuster, U., Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T.,
Suzuki, T., Takahashi, T., Tedesco, K., Telszewski, M., Thomas, H., Tilbrook,
B., Tjiputra, J., Vandemark, D., Veness, T., Wanninkhof, R., Watson, A. J.,
Weiss, R., Wong, C. S., and Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: A uniform, quality
controlled Surface Ocean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5,
125–143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-125-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-125-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Rödenbeck, C., Bakker, D. C. E., Gruber, N., Iida, Y., Jacobson, A. R.,
Jones, S., Landschützer, P., Metzl, N., Nakaoka, S., Olsen, A., Park,
G.-H., Peylin, P., Rodgers, K. B., Sasse, T. P., Schuster, U., Shutler, J.
D., Valsala, V., Wanninkhof, R., and Zeng, J.: Data-based estimates of the
ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM), Biogeosciences, 12, 7251–7278,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7251-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-7251-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Sabine, C. L., Hankin, S., Koyuk, H., Bakker, D. C. E., Pfeil, B., Olsen, A.,
Metzl, N., Kozyr, A., Fassbender, A., Manke, A., Malczyk, J., Akl, J., Alin,
S. R., Bellerby, R. G. J., Borges, A., Boutin, J., Brown, P. J., Cai, W.-J.,
Chavez, F. P., Chen, A., Cosca, C., Feely, R. A., González-Dávila,
M., Goyet, C., Hardman-Mountford, N., Heinze, C., Hoppema, M., Hunt, C. W.,
Hydes, D., Ishii, M., Johannessen, T., Key, R. M., Körtzinger, A.,
Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lourantou,
A., Merlivat, L., Midorikawa, T., Mintrop, L., Miyazaki, C., Murata, A.,
Nakadate, A., Nakano, Y., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., Omar, A. M., Padin, X. A.,
Park, G.-H., Paterson, K., Perez, F. F., Pierrot, D., Poisson, A., Ríos,
A. F., Salisbury, J., Santana-Casiano, J. M., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Schlitzer,
R., Schneider, B., Schuster, U., Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T.,
Suzuki, T., Takahashi, T., Tedesco, K., Telszewski, M., Thomas, H., Tilbrook,
B., Vandemark, D., Veness, T., Watson, A. J., Weiss, R., Wong, C. S., and
Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: Surface Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Atlas (SOCAT) gridded data
products, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 145–153,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-145-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-5-145-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Shadwick, E. H., Trull, T. W., Tilbrook, B., Sutton, A. J., Schulz, E., and
Sabine, C. L.: Seasonality of biological and physical controls on surface
ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from hourly observations at the Southern Ocean Time Series
site south of Australia, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 223–238, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sprintall, J., Chereskin, T. K., and Sweeney, C.: High-resolution underway
upper ocean and surface atmospheric observations in Drake Passage:
Synergistic measurements for climate science., Oceanography, 25, 70–81,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Sweeney, C., Poisson, A., Metzl, N.,
Tilbrook, B., Bates, N., Wanninkhof, R., Feely, R. F., Sabine, C., Olafsson,
J., and Nojiri, Y.: Global sea-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux based on climatological
surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and seasonal biological and temperature effects,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 1601–1622, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S., Wanninkhof, R., Sweeney, C., Feely, R.,
Chipman, D., Hales, B., Friederich, G., Chavez, F., Sabine, C., Watson, A.,
Bakker, D., Schuster, U., Metzl, N., Yoshikawa-Inoue, H., Ishii, M.,
Midorikawa, T., Nojiri, Y., Körtzinger, A., Steinhoff, T., Hoppema, M.,
Olafson, J., Arnarson, T., Tilbrook, B., Johannessen, T., Olsen, A.,
Bellerby, R., Wong, C., Delille, B., Bates, N., and de Baar, H.:
Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and net
sea-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux over the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56,
554–577, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Sweeney, C., Hales, B., Chipman, D. W., Newberger, T.,
Goddard, J. G., Iannuzzi, R. A., and Sutherland, S. C.: The changing carbon
cycle in the Southern Ocean, Oceanography, 25, 26–37, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Chipman, D. W., Goddard, J. G., Ho, C.,
Newberger, T., Sweeney, C., and Munro, D. R.: Climatoogical Distributions of
pH, pCO2, Total CO2, Alkalinity, and CaCO3 Saturation in the Global Surface
Ocean, and Temporal Changes at Selected Locations, Mar. Chem., 164,
95–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7916/D8G73D37" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7916/D8G73D37</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., and Kozyr, A.: Global Ocean Surface Water
Partial Pressure of CO2 Database: Measurements Performed During 1957–2017
(LDEO Database Version 2017) (NCEI Accession 0160492). Version 6.6. NOAA
National Centers for Environmental Information, Dataset,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)</ext-link> (last access: 2 April 2018), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>van Heuven, S. M., Hoppema, M., Huhn, O., Slagter, H. A., and de Baar, H. J.:
Direct observation of increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Weddell Gyre along the Prime
Meridian during 1973–2008, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58, 2613–2635, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, N. L., Juranek, L. W., Johnson, K. S., Feely, R. A., Riser, S. C.,
Talley, L. D., Russell, J. L., Sarmiento, J. L., and Wanninkhof, R.:
Empirical algorithms to estimate water column pH in the Southern Ocean,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3415–3422, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Williams, N. L., Juranek, L. W., Feely, R. A., Johnson, K. S., Sarmiento, J.
L., Talley, L. D., and Riser, S. C.: Calculating surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from biogeochemical Argo floats equipped with pH: an uncertainty analysis,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 591–604, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Xue, L., Gao, L., Cai, W. J., Yu, W., and Wei, M.: Response of sea surface
fugacity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the SAM shift south of Tasmania: Regional
differences, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3973–3979, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Utilizing the Drake Passage Time-series to understand variability and change in subpolar Southern Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub></article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The Southern Ocean is highly under-sampled for the purpose of assessing total
carbon uptake and its variability. Since this region dominates the mean
global ocean sink for anthropogenic carbon, understanding temporal change is
critical. Underway measurements of <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> collected as part of the
Drake Passage Time-series (DPT) program that began in 2002 inform our
understanding of seasonally changing air–sea gradients in <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>,
and by inference the carbon flux in this region. Here, we utilize available
<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> observations to evaluate how the seasonal cycle, interannual
variability, and long-term trends in surface ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> in the
Drake Passage region compare to that of the broader subpolar Southern Ocean.
Our results indicate that the Drake Passage is representative of the broader
region in both seasonality and long-term <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> trends, as evident
through the agreement of timing and amplitude of seasonal cycles as well as
trend magnitudes both seasonally and annually. The high temporal density of
sampling by the DPT is critical to constraining estimates of the seasonal
cycle of surface <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> in this region, as winter data remain
sparse in areas outside of the Drake Passage. An increase in winter data
would aid in reduction of uncertainty levels. On average over the period
2002–2016, data show that carbon uptake has strengthened with annual surface
ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> trends in the Drake Passage and the broader subpolar
Southern Ocean less than the global atmospheric trend. Analysis of spatial
correlation shows Drake Passage <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> to be representative of
<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and its variability up to several hundred kilometers away
from the region. We also compare DPT data from 2016 and 2017 to
contemporaneous <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> estimates from autonomous biogeochemical
floats deployed as part of the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations
and Modeling project (SOCCOM) so as to highlight the opportunity for
evaluating data collected on autonomous observational platforms. Though
SOCCOM floats sparsely sample the Drake Passage region for 2016–2017
compared to the Drake Passage Time-series, their <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> estimates
fall within the range of underway observations given the uncertainty on the
estimates. Going forward, continuation of the Drake Passage Time-series will
reduce uncertainties in Southern Ocean carbon uptake seasonality,
variability, and trends, and provide an invaluable independent dataset for
post-deployment assessment of sensors on autonomous floats. Together, these
datasets will vastly increase our ability to monitor change in the ocean
carbon sink.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bakker, D. C. E., Pfeil, B., Landa, C. S., Metzl, N., O'Brien, K. M., Olsen,
A., Smith, K., Cosca, C., Harasawa, S., Jones, S. D., Nakaoka, S.-I., Nojiri,
Y., Schuster, U., Steinhoff, T., Sweeney, C., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook, B.,
Wada, C., Wanninkhof, R., Alin, S. R., Balestrini, C. F., Barbero, L., Bates,
N. R., Bianchi, A. A., Bonou, F., Boutin, J., Bozec, Y., Burger, E. F., Cai,
W.-J., Castle, R. D., Chen, L., Chierici, M., Currie, K., Evans, W.,
Featherstone, C., Feely, R. A., Fransson, A., Goyet, C., Greenwood, N.,
Gregor, L., Hankin, S., Hardman-Mountford, N. J., Harlay, J., Hauck, J.,
Hoppema, M., Humphreys, M. P., Hunt, C. W., Huss, B., Ibánhez, J. S. P.,
Johannessen, T., Keeling, R., Kitidis, V., Körtzinger, A., Kozyr, A.,
Krasakopoulou, E., Kuwata, A., Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K.,
Lefèvre, N., Lo Monaco, C., Manke, A., Mathis, J. T., Merlivat, L.,
Millero, F. J., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro, D. R., Murata, A., Newberger, T.,
Omar, A. M., Ono, T., Paterson, K., Pearce, D., Pierrot, D., Robbins, L. L.,
Saito, S., Salisbury, J., Schlitzer, R., Schneider, B., Schweitzer, R.,
Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Sullivan, K. F., Sutherland, S. C., Sutton, A. J.,
Tadokoro, K., Telszewski, M., Tuma, M., van Heuven, S. M. A. C., Vandemark,
D., Ward, B., Watson, A. J., and Xu, S.: A multi-decade record of
high-quality <i>f</i>CO<sub>2</sub> data in version 3 of the Surface Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> Atlas
(SOCAT), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 383–413,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-383-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-383-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Carranza, M. M. and Gille S. T.: Southern Ocean wind-driven entrainment
enhances satellite chlorophyll-a through the summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
120, 304–323, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010203</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, B. R., Williams, N. L., Gray, A. R., and Feely, R. A.: Locally
interpolated alkalinity regression for global alkalinity estimation, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 14, 268–277, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le
Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and
Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Dlugokencky, E. and Tans, P.: NOAA/ESRL,
<a href="www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/" target="_blank">www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/</a>, last access: 15 September 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Dlugokencky, E. J., Masarie, K. A., Lang, P. M., and Tans, P. P.: NOAA
Greenhouse Gas Reference from Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole
Fractions from the NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling
Network, Data Path:
<a href="ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/trace_gases/co2/flask/surface/" target="_blank">ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/trace_gases/co2/flask/surface/</a> (last
access: 1 September 2017), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Eveleth, R., Cassar, N., Doney, S. C., Munro, D. R., and Sweeney, C.:
Biological and physical controls on O2/Ar, Ar and pCO2 variability at the
Western Antarctic Peninsula and in the Drake Passage, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
139, 77–88, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Fay, A. R. and McKinley, G. A.: Global trends in surface ocean pCO2 from in
situ data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 541–557, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fay, A. R. and McKinley, G. A.: Global open-ocean biomes: mean and temporal
variability, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 273–284,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-273-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-273-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fay, A. R., McKinley, G. A., and Lovenduski, N. S.: Southern Ocean carbon
trends: Sensitivity to methods, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6833–6840,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Freeman, N. M. and Lovenduski, N. S.: Mapping the Antarctic Polar Front:
weekly realizations from 2002 to 2014, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 191–198,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-191-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-191-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Freeman, N. M., Lovenduski, N. S., and Gent, P. R.: Temporal variability in
the Antarctic Polar Front (2001–2014), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121,
7263–7276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012145</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Frölicher, T. L., Sarmiento, J. L., Paynter, D. J., Dunne, J. P.,
Krasting, J. P., and Winton, M.: Dominance of the Southern Ocean in
anthropogenic carbon and heat uptake in CMIP5 models, J. Climate, 28,
862–886, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gregor, L., Kok, S., and Monteiro, P. M. S.: Interannual drivers of the
seasonal cycle of CO<sub>2</sub> in the Southern Ocean, Biogeosciences, 15,
2361–2378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2361-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2361-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N., Gloor, M., Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Doney, S. C., Dutkiewicz,
S., Follows, M. J., Gerber, M., Jacobson, A. R., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Menemenlis, D., Mouchet, A., Müller, S. A., Sarmiento, J. L., and
Takahashi, T.: Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB1005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003349</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hoppema, M., Velo, A., van Heuven, S., Tanhua, T., Key, R. M., Lin, X.,
Bakker, D. C. E., Perez, F. F., Ríos, A. F., Lo Monaco, C., Sabine, C.
L., Álvarez, M., and Bellerby, R. G. J.: Consistency of cruise data of
the CARINA database in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean, Earth Syst.
Sci. Data, 1, 63–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-1-63-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-1-63-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, K. S., Jannasch, H. W., Coletti, L. J., Elrod, V. A., Martz, T. R.,
Takeshita, Y., Carlson, R. J., and Connery, J. G.: Deep-Sea DuraFET: A
pressure tolerant pH sensor designed for global sensor networks, Anal.
Chem., 88, 3249–3256, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, K. S., Plant, J. N., Coletti, L. J., Jannasch, H. W., Sakamoto, C.
M., Riser, S. C., and Talley, L. D.: Biogeochemical sensor performance in the
SOCCOM profiling float array, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 6416–6436,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012838</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, K. S., Riser, S. C., Boss, E. S., Talley, L. D., Sarmiento, J. L.,
Swift, D. D., Plant, J. N., Maurer, T. L., Key, R. M., Williams, N. L.,
Wanninkhof, R. H., Dickson, A. G., Feely, R. A., and Russell, J. L.: SOCCOM
float data – Snapshot 2018-03-06, in: Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate
Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM) Float Data Archive, UC San Diego Library
Digital Collections, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6075/J0PG1PX7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6075/J0PG1PX7</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D. C. E., and Schuster, U.: Recent
variability of the global ocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 28,
927–949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004853</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D. C. E., and Schuster, U.: An
observation-based global monthly gridded sea surface pCO2 product from 1998
through 2011 and its monthly climatology, available on:
<a href="http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/SPCO2_1998_2011_ETH_SOM_FFN.html" target="_blank">http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/SPCO2_1998_2011_ETH_SOM_FFN.html</a> (last
access: 22 November 2017), 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Haumann, F., Rödenbeck, C., Bakker, D.,
van Heuven, S., Hoppema, M., Metzl, N., Sweeney, C., Takahashi, T., Tilbrook,
B., and Wanninkhof, R.: The reinvigoration of the Southern Ocean carbon sink,
Science, 349, 1221–1224, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., and Bakker, D. C. E.: A 30 years
observation-based global monthly gridded sea surface pCO2 product from 1982
through 2011,
<a href="http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/oceans/SPCO2_1982_2011_ETH_SOM_FFN" target="_blank">http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/oceans/SPCO2_1982_2011_ETH_SOM_FFN</a>, Carbon
Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US
Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.SPCO2_1982_2011_ETH_SOMFFN" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.SPCO2_1982_2011_
ETH_SOMFFN</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., and Bakker, D. C. E.: Decadal variations
and trends of the global ocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30,
1396–1417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005359</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., and Bakker, D. C. E.: An updated
observation-based global monthly gridded sea surface pCO2 and air-sea CO2
flux product from 1982 through 2015 and its monthly climatology (NCEI
Accession 0160558). Version 2.2. NOAA National Centers for Environmental
Information. Dataset. [2017-07-11]: available at:
<a href="https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/&#xA;SPCO2_1982_2015_ETH_SOM_FFN.html" target="_blank">https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/ocads/oceans/
SPCO2_1982_2015_ETH_SOM_FFN.html</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C., Rödenbeck, C., Buitenhuis, E. T., Conway, T. J.,
Langenfelds, R., Gomez, A., Labuschagne, C., Ramonet, M., Nakazawa, T.,
Metzl, N., Gillett, N., and Heimann, M.: Satuation of the Southern Ocean
CO<sub>2 </sub>sink due to recent climate change, Science, 316, 1735–1738,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136188</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch, S., Korsbakken,
J. I., Peters, G. P., Manning, A. C., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Houghton, R.
A., Keeling, R. F., Alin, S., Andrews, O. D., Anthoni, P., Barbero, L., Bopp,
L., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Ciais, P., Currie, K., Delire, C., Doney,
S. C., Friedlingstein, P., Gkritzalis, T., Harris, I., Hauck, J., Haverd, V.,
Hoppema, M., Klein Goldewijk, K., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Körtzinger, A.,
Landschützer, P., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi,
D., Melton, J. R., Metzl, N., Millero, F., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro, D. R.,
Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I., O'Brien, K., Olsen, A., Omar, A. M., Ono,
T., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B., Rödenbeck, C., Salisbury, J., Schuster, U.,
Schwinger, J., Séférian, R., Skjelvan, I., Stocker, B. D., Sutton, A.
J., Takahashi, T., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van
der Werf, G. R., Viovy, N., Walker, A. P., Wiltshire, A. J., and Zaehle, S.:
Global Carbon Budget 2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 605–649,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-605-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz,
J., Manning, A. C., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G.,
Jackson, R. B., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Andrews, O. D., Arora, V. K.,
Bakker, D. C. E., Barbero, L., Becker, M., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L.,
Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Ciais, P., Cosca, C. E., Cross, J., Currie, K.,
Gasser, T., Harris, I., Hauck, J., Haverd, V., Houghton, R. A., Hunt, C. W.,
Hurtt, G., Ilyina, T., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Kautz, M., Keeling, R. F.,
Klein Goldewijk, K., Körtzinger, A., Landschützer, P., Lefèvre,
N., Lenton, A., Lienert, S., Lima, I., Lombardozzi, D., Metzl, N., Millero,
F., Monteiro, P. M. S., Munro, D. R., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nakaoka, S.-I.,
Nojiri, Y., Padin, X. A., Peregon, A., Pfeil, B., Pierrot, D., Poulter, B.,
Rehder, G., Reimer, J., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Séférian,
R., Skjelvan, I., Stocker, B. D., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Tubiello, F. N.,
van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T., van der Werf, G. R., van Heuven, S., Viovy, N.,
Vuichard, N., Walker, A. P., Watson, A. J., Wiltshire, A. J., Zaehle, S., and
Zhu, D.: Global Carbon Budget 2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 405–448,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lo Monaco, C., Metzl, N., Poisson, A., Brunet, C., and Schauer, B.:
Anthropogenic CO2 in the Southern Ocean: Distribution and inventory at the
Indian-Atlantic boundary (World Ocean Circulation Experiment line I6), J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 110, C06010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002643</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lo Monaco, C., Álvarez, M., Key, R. M., Lin, X., Tanhua, T., Tilbrook,
B., Bakker, D. C. E., van Heuven, S., Hoppema, M., Metzl, N., Ríos, A.
F., Sabine, C. L., and Velo, A.: Assessing the internal consistency of the
CARINA database in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, Earth Syst. Sci.
Data, 2, 51–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2-51-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2-51-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lovenduski, N. S., Gruber, N., and Doney, S. C.: Toward a mechanistic
understanding of the decadal trends in the Southern Ocean carbon sink,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB3016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003139</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lovenduski, N. S., Fay, A. R., and McKinley, G. A.: Observing multidecadal
trends in Southern Ocean CO2 uptake: What can we learn from an ocean model?,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 416–426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004933" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004933</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Majkut, J. D., Carter, B. R., Frölicher, T. L., Dufour, C. O., Rodgers,
K. B., and Sarmiento, J. L.: An observing system simulation for Southern
Ocean carbon dioxide uptake, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 372, 2019, 20130046,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
McKinley, G. A., Fay, A. R., Lovenduski, N. S., and Pilcher, D. J.: Natural
variability and anthropogenic trends in the ocean carbon sink, Annu. Rev.
Mar. Sci., 9, 125–150, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Metzl, N.: Decadal increase of oceanic carbon dioxide in Southern Indian
Ocean surface waters (1991–2007), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 607–619,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Metzl, N., Tilbrook, B., and Poisson, A.: The annual fCO<sub>2</sub> cycle and the
air'sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux in the sub-Antarctic Ocean, Tellus B, 51, 849–861,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Munro, D. R., Lovenduski, N. S., Takahashi, T., Stephens, B. B., Newberger,
T., and Sweeney, C.: Recent evidence for a strengthening CO<sub>2</sub> sink in the
Southern Ocean from carbonate system measurements in the Drake Passage
(2002–2015), Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7623–7630, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065194</a>,
2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Munro, D. R., Lovenduski, N. S., Stephens, B. B., Newberger, T., Arrigo, K.
R., Takahashi, T., Quay, P. D., Sprintall, J., Freeman, N. M., and Sweeney,
C.: Estimates of net community production in the Southern Ocean determined
from time-series observations (2002–2011) of nutrients, dissolved inorganic
carbon, and surface ocean pCO<sub>2</sub> in Drake Passage, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II,
114, 49–63, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.12.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.12.014</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Olsen, A., Metzl, N., Bakker, D., and O'Brien, K.: SOCAT QC cookbook for
SOCAT participants; available at:
<a href="https://www.socat.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2015_SOCAT_QC_Cookbook_v3.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.socat.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2015_SOCAT_QC_Cookbook_v3.pdf</a>
(last access: 1 November 2017), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Pfeil, B., Olsen, A., Bakker, D. C. E., Hankin, S., Koyuk, H., Kozyr, A.,
Malczyk, J., Manke, A., Metzl, N., Sabine, C. L., Akl, J., Alin, S. R.,
Bates, N., Bellerby, R. G. J., Borges, A., Boutin, J., Brown, P. J., Cai,
W.-J., Chavez, F. P., Chen, A., Cosca, C., Fassbender, A. J., Feely, R. A.,
González-Dávila, M., Goyet, C., Hales, B., Hardman-Mountford, N.,
Heinze, C., Hood, M., Hoppema, M., Hunt, C. W., Hydes, D., Ishii, M.,
Johannessen, T., Jones, S. D., Key, R. M., Körtzinger, A.,
Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lourantou,
A., Merlivat, L., Midorikawa, T., Mintrop, L., Miyazaki, C., Murata, A.,
Nakadate, A., Nakano, Y., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., Omar, A. M., Padin, X. A.,
Park, G.-H., Paterson, K., Perez, F. F., Pierrot, D., Poisson, A., Ríos,
A. F., Santana-Casiano, J. M., Salisbury, J., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Schlitzer,
R., Schneider, B., Schuster, U., Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T.,
Suzuki, T., Takahashi, T., Tedesco, K., Telszewski, M., Thomas, H., Tilbrook,
B., Tjiputra, J., Vandemark, D., Veness, T., Wanninkhof, R., Watson, A. J.,
Weiss, R., Wong, C. S., and Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: A uniform, quality
controlled Surface Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> Atlas (SOCAT), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5,
125–143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-125-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-125-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Rödenbeck, C., Bakker, D. C. E., Gruber, N., Iida, Y., Jacobson, A. R.,
Jones, S., Landschützer, P., Metzl, N., Nakaoka, S., Olsen, A., Park,
G.-H., Peylin, P., Rodgers, K. B., Sasse, T. P., Schuster, U., Shutler, J.
D., Valsala, V., Wanninkhof, R., and Zeng, J.: Data-based estimates of the
ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>
Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM), Biogeosciences, 12, 7251–7278,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7251-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-7251-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Sabine, C. L., Hankin, S., Koyuk, H., Bakker, D. C. E., Pfeil, B., Olsen, A.,
Metzl, N., Kozyr, A., Fassbender, A., Manke, A., Malczyk, J., Akl, J., Alin,
S. R., Bellerby, R. G. J., Borges, A., Boutin, J., Brown, P. J., Cai, W.-J.,
Chavez, F. P., Chen, A., Cosca, C., Feely, R. A., González-Dávila,
M., Goyet, C., Hardman-Mountford, N., Heinze, C., Hoppema, M., Hunt, C. W.,
Hydes, D., Ishii, M., Johannessen, T., Key, R. M., Körtzinger, A.,
Landschützer, P., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Lenton, A., Lourantou,
A., Merlivat, L., Midorikawa, T., Mintrop, L., Miyazaki, C., Murata, A.,
Nakadate, A., Nakano, Y., Nakaoka, S., Nojiri, Y., Omar, A. M., Padin, X. A.,
Park, G.-H., Paterson, K., Perez, F. F., Pierrot, D., Poisson, A., Ríos,
A. F., Salisbury, J., Santana-Casiano, J. M., Sarma, V. V. S. S., Schlitzer,
R., Schneider, B., Schuster, U., Sieger, R., Skjelvan, I., Steinhoff, T.,
Suzuki, T., Takahashi, T., Tedesco, K., Telszewski, M., Thomas, H., Tilbrook,
B., Vandemark, D., Veness, T., Watson, A. J., Weiss, R., Wong, C. S., and
Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: Surface Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> Atlas (SOCAT) gridded data
products, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 145–153,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-145-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-145-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Shadwick, E. H., Trull, T. W., Tilbrook, B., Sutton, A. J., Schulz, E., and
Sabine, C. L.: Seasonality of biological and physical controls on surface
ocean CO<sub>2</sub> from hourly observations at the Southern Ocean Time Series
site south of Australia, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 223–238, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sprintall, J., Chereskin, T. K., and Sweeney, C.: High-resolution underway
upper ocean and surface atmospheric observations in Drake Passage:
Synergistic measurements for climate science., Oceanography, 25, 70–81,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Sweeney, C., Poisson, A., Metzl, N.,
Tilbrook, B., Bates, N., Wanninkhof, R., Feely, R. F., Sabine, C., Olafsson,
J., and Nojiri, Y.: Global sea-air CO<sub>2</sub> flux based on climatological
surface ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and seasonal biological and temperature effects,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49, 1601–1622, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S., Wanninkhof, R., Sweeney, C., Feely, R.,
Chipman, D., Hales, B., Friederich, G., Chavez, F., Sabine, C., Watson, A.,
Bakker, D., Schuster, U., Metzl, N., Yoshikawa-Inoue, H., Ishii, M.,
Midorikawa, T., Nojiri, Y., Körtzinger, A., Steinhoff, T., Hoppema, M.,
Olafson, J., Arnarson, T., Tilbrook, B., Johannessen, T., Olsen, A.,
Bellerby, R., Wong, C., Delille, B., Bates, N., and de Baar, H.:
Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, and net
sea-air CO<sub>2</sub> flux over the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56,
554–577, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Sweeney, C., Hales, B., Chipman, D. W., Newberger, T.,
Goddard, J. G., Iannuzzi, R. A., and Sutherland, S. C.: The changing carbon
cycle in the Southern Ocean, Oceanography, 25, 26–37, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Chipman, D. W., Goddard, J. G., Ho, C.,
Newberger, T., Sweeney, C., and Munro, D. R.: Climatoogical Distributions of
pH, pCO2, Total CO2, Alkalinity, and CaCO3 Saturation in the Global Surface
Ocean, and Temporal Changes at Selected Locations, Mar. Chem., 164,
95–125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7916/D8G73D37" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7916/D8G73D37</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., and Kozyr, A.: Global Ocean Surface Water
Partial Pressure of CO2 Database: Measurements Performed During 1957–2017
(LDEO Database Version 2017) (NCEI Accession 0160492). Version 6.6. NOAA
National Centers for Environmental Information, Dataset,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP088(V2015)</a> (last access: 2 April 2018), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
van Heuven, S. M., Hoppema, M., Huhn, O., Slagter, H. A., and de Baar, H. J.:
Direct observation of increasing CO<sub>2</sub> in the Weddell Gyre along the Prime
Meridian during 1973–2008, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58, 2613–2635, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, N. L., Juranek, L. W., Johnson, K. S., Feely, R. A., Riser, S. C.,
Talley, L. D., Russell, J. L., Sarmiento, J. L., and Wanninkhof, R.:
Empirical algorithms to estimate water column pH in the Southern Ocean,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 3415–3422, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, N. L., Juranek, L. W., Feely, R. A., Johnson, K. S., Sarmiento, J.
L., Talley, L. D., and Riser, S. C.: Calculating surface ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>
from biogeochemical Argo floats equipped with pH: an uncertainty analysis,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 591–604, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Xue, L., Gao, L., Cai, W. J., Yu, W., and Wei, M.: Response of sea surface
fugacity of CO<sub>2</sub> to the SAM shift south of Tasmania: Regional
differences, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3973–3979, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
