<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-4163-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Long-term response of oceanic carbon uptake to global warming via physical
and biological pumps</article-title><alt-title>Long-term response of oceanic carbon uptake to global warming</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Long-term response of oceanic carbon uptake to global warming}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Yamamoto~et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Yamamoto</surname><given-names>Akitomo</given-names></name>
          <email>akitomo@jamstec.go.jp</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-4854</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Abe-Ouchi</surname><given-names>Ayako</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1745-5952</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Yamanaka</surname><given-names>Yasuhiro</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-3248</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Atmospheric an Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo,
Kashiwa, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University,
Sapporo, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Akitomo Yamamoto (akitomo@jamstec.go.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>4163</fpage><lpage>4180</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>October</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e111">Global warming is expected to significantly decrease oceanic carbon uptake
and therefore increase atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and global warming. The
primary reasons given in previous studies for such changes in the oceanic
carbon uptake are the solubility reduction due to seawater warming and
changes in the ocean circulation and biological pump. However, the
quantitative contributions of different processes to the overall reduction in
ocean uptake are still unclear. In this study, we investigated
multi-millennium responses of oceanic carbon uptake to global warming and
quantified the contributions of the physical and biological pumps to these
responses using an atmosphere–ocean general circulation model and a
biogeochemical model. We found that global warming reduced oceanic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by 13 % (30 %) in the first 140 years (after
2000 model years), consistent with previous studies. Our sensitivity
experiments showed that this reduction is primarily driven by changes in the
organic matter cycle via ocean circulation change and solubility change due
to seawater warming. These results differ from most previous studies, in
which circulation changes and solubility change from seawater warming are the
dominant processes. The weakening of biological production and carbon export
induced by circulation change and lower nutrient supply, diminishes the
vertical DIC gradient and substantially reduces the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. The
weaker deep-ocean circulation decreases the downward transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the surface to the deep ocean, leading to a drop in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in high-latitude regions. Conversely, weaker equatorial
upwelling reduces the upward transport of natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and therefore
enhances the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in low-latitude regions. Because these
effects cancel each other out, circulation change plays only a small direct role
in the reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming but a large
indirect role through nutrient transport and biological processes.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e210">Since the beginning of the industrial era, global oceans have reduced the
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and mitigated climate change by
taking up approximately 25 % of anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
(Ciais et al., 2013). In contrast to terrestrial uptake, oceanic carbon
uptake operates on millennial timescales (Plattner et al., 2008; Archer et
al., 2009a; Zickfeld et al., 2013). Therefore, understanding changes in the
ocean carbon cycle is crucial for predicting the long-term evolution of
climate system components with a slow response time, such as ice sheets
(Charbit et al., 2008), permafrost (Lawrence and Slater, 2005), and methane
hydrate in continental margins (Archer et al., 2009b; Yamamoto et al., 2014)
as well as atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration.</p>
      <p id="d1e246">Climate warming tends to reduce the oceanic uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
atmosphere, thereby increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation in the atmosphere
and causing further warming, a well-known positive climate–carbon cycle
feedback (Cox et al., 2000; Dufresne et al., 2002; Friedlingstein et al.,
2006; Randerson et al., 2015). Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility due to
seawater warming, ocean circulation, and the biological pump alter oceanic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by affecting anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake and
altering the air–sea balance of the natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle. Most
previous studies have shown that solubility change from seawater warming and
circulation change<?pagebreak page4164?> are major contributors to the reduction in oceanic carbon
uptake (Sarmiento et al., 1998; Joos et al., 1999; Matear and Hirst, 1999;
Plattner et al., 2001; Matsumoto et al., 2010). In such previous studies,
changes in the biological pump associated with ocean circulation change were
regarded as a second-order process even though the biological pump plays a
crucial role in the natural carbon cycle.</p>
      <p id="d1e316">Conversely, changes in the biological pump can potentially contribute
significantly to a reduction in oceanic carbon uptake, considering that both
previous and current generations of Earth system models (ESMs) show a
consistent decrease in global mean export production between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 % by the year 2100 under strong climate warming (Steinacher et al.,
2010; Bopp et al., 2013). In the natural carbon cycle, the biological pump
maintains the surface-to-deep gradient in oceanic DIC, and therefore
regulates the exchange of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the atmosphere and the ocean.
Model simulations suggested that a complete die-off of ocean life would lead
to an atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase of more than 150 ppm (Maier-Reimer
et al., 1996; Sarmiento and Gruber, 2006). A significant reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake associated with the weakening of the biological pump was
found in Zickfeld et al. (2008) even though their investigation only focused
on the uptake change due to the weakening of the Atlantic meridional
overturning circulation (AMOC) by freshwater input.</p>
      <p id="d1e366">To our knowledge, the contributions of both physical and biological effects
to reductions in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake are not evaluated directly in
the recent generation of coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models
(AOGCMs) and ocean biogeochemical models. Moreover, previous studies using
Earth system Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs) show that global
warming decreases oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake continuously over 1000
years or more (Plattner et al., 2008; Schmittner et al., 2008; Archer et al.,
2009a). These millennial-scale simulations are now feasible with an AOGCM due
to increased computer power. Thus we examined multi-millennium changes in
oceanic carbon uptake due to global warming and the contribution of
individual mechanisms to these uptake changes using a series of global warming
simulations conducted with an AOGCM and an offline ocean biogeochemical
model. The methods applied here enable us to conduct multiple simulations of
the ocean carbon cycle according to AOGCM climate simulations with low
computational cost.</p>
      <p id="d1e392">An important difference among most previous studies (e.g., Sarmiento et
al., 1998; Joos et al., 1999; Matear and Hirst, 1999; Plattner et al., 2001;
Matsumoto et al., 2010) and that of Zickfeld et al. (2008) is the
experimental setup used to quantify the contribution of individual
mechanisms to changes in oceanic carbon uptake. In the typical former method
(Sarmiento et al., 1998; Matsumoto et al., 2010), abiotic experiments (i.e.,
without a biological pump) were conducted to isolate physical processes from
biological processes. Zickfeld et al. (2008) separated these two effects
more directly. In their sensitivity studies, the archived source and sink
terms for biological processes in preindustrial climate experiments were
replaced with those of global warming experiments. In our study, in order to
assess the different feedback mechanisms arising from different experimental
setups, we quantified the contributions of individual mechanisms to changes
in oceanic carbon uptake based on both abiotic experiments and the methods of
Zickfeld et al. (2008). We then compared these results to discuss which
experimental setup is more useful for quantification of feedback mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e395">The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the
models and experiment design. Section 3 describes the centennial- and
millennial-scale changes in the climate and ocean carbon cycle. Section 4
presents the results of three sets of sensitivity studies that quantify the
contributions of individual mechanisms to reductions in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake. Here we also discuss causes for differing results arising from the
different experimental setups before summarizing our research in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Climate model</title>
      <p id="d1e420">We used the global warming experiments conducted by Yamamoto et al. (2015)
with the MIROC 4 m AOGCM. This model is based on the MIROC 3.2 (K-1 Model
Developers, 2004) that contributed to the Coupled Model Intercomparison
Project phase 3 (Meehl et al., 2007), which was extensively cited in the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. In the
MIROC 4 m, the coefficient of the isopycnal layer thickness diffusivity is set
as 7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of the value of 3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> used in the original MIROC 3.2. The
atmospheric GCM has a horizontal resolution of T42 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 20 vertical levels. The oceanic GCM has a zonal
resolution of 1.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a spatially varying meridional resolution
that is approximately 0.56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at latitudes lower than 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at latitudes higher than 65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; the resolution
changes smoothly between these latitudes. The vertical coordinate is a hybrid
of sigma-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, resolving 44 levels in total: eight sigma-layers near the surface, 35
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> layers beneath, and one bottom boundary layer (Nakano and Suginohara,
2002). The sea ice component is based on a two-category thickness
representation, zero-layer thermodynamics (Semtner, 1976), and dynamics using
elastic–viscous–plastic rheology (Hunke and Dukowicz, 1997). A model spin-up
has been performed under preindustrial boundary conditions such as
insolation and an atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of 285 ppm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Offline ocean biogeochemical model</title>
      <p id="d1e598">The ocean carbon cycle was calculated by the MIROC-based offline
biogeochemical model (Yamamoto et al., 2015), which enables us to conduct
numerous sensitivity<?pagebreak page4165?> experiments of the ocean carbon cycle forced by outputs
from AOGCM climate simulations with low computational cost. The horizontal
and vertical resolutions are the same as in MIROC 3.2. For the tracer
calculation, the monthly output data of velocity, temperature, salinity,
sea surface height, sea surface wind speed, sea ice fraction, and
sea surface solar radiation from MIROC are applied to an offline tracer
scheme (Oka et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e601">This biogeochemical model is a modified version of the
nutrient–phytoplankton–zooplankton–detritus (NPZD) ecosystem model of
Keller et al. (2012). The model includes two phytoplankton classes (nitrogen
fixers and other phytoplankton), zooplankton, particulate detritus, nitrate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), phosphate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved
inorganic carbon (DIC), alkalinity (ALK), two carbon isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and an ideal age tracer. Constant stoichiometry relates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and P content of the biological variables and their exchanges to the
inorganic variables (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ALK, and DIC). Optimal
uptake kinetics, which assume a physiological trade-off between the
efficiency of nutrients encountered at the cell surface and the maximum
assimilation rate (Smith et al., 2009), are adopted for the nutrient
limitation of the growth rate of phytoplankton. The maximum phytoplankton
growth and microbial remineralization rates are assumed to increase with
seawater temperature according to Eppley (1972).</p>
      <p id="d1e711">The formulations of air–sea gas exchange and carbon chemistry follow the
protocols of the Ocean Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project – Phase 2
(OCMIP-2; <uri>http://ocmip5.ipsl.jussieu.fr/OCMIP/</uri>, last access: 6 July 2018) (Najjar and Orr, 1999). The
production rate of calcium carbonate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is assumed to be
proportional to that of particulate organic carbon (POC,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> POC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03) and the settling flux of particulate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the water column decreases with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding depth of 3500 m (Schmittner et al., 2008). Although iron cycling is not explicitly
calculated in our model, we adopted the iron limitation for the phytoplankton
growth rate using monthly dissolved iron concentration outputs from
preindustrial experiments conducted using the biogeochemical elemental
cycling model (AOU_06 case in Misumi et al., 2013). Thus, we
cannot consider changes in iron cycling and their impact on ecosystems in the
global warming experiment. This model does not include a marine-sediment
module because the reaction of the dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in deep-ocean sediments only plays an important role at
timescales of thousands of years or longer (Archer et al., 1998).</p>
      <p id="d1e794">As we forced the offline ocean biogeochemical model with monthly mean data
from the AOGCM, a certain amount of short-term variability was averaged
over. To confirm the validity of the offline calculations and their
sensitivity to the forcing frequency, we compared the passive salinity
distribution in the offline model to online salinity distribution in the
AOGCM. There were no significant differences in basin-scale distributions
between the two simulations, suggesting that short-term processes had
limited impact on our results.</p>
      <p id="d1e798">The biogeochemical model was initialized from the annual mean climatology
data based on the World Ocean Atlas 2005 (WOA2005: Garcia et al., 2006) for
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the GLobal Ocean Data Analysis
Project (GLODAP; Key et al., 2004) for DIC and ALK. For the spin-up, the last
50 years of data in the MIROC preindustrial experiment were cyclically
applied to the offline ocean biogeochemical model. A model spin-up of more
than 8000 years has been performed in order to eliminate the model drift in
the global inventory of all tracers. In the last century of the spin-up run,
the global net atmosphere–ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange is
3.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is smaller than the OCMIP2
threshold of 0.01 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Orr, 2002). The resultant initial storage
of ocean carbon (35 400 PgC), ocean net primary production
(49.6 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and export production (8.1 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
comparable to observations and other estimates (Antoine et al., 1996;
Schlitzer, 2000; Ciais et al., 2014). The simulated basin-scale distributions
of nutrients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), DIC, and ALK under
preindustrial conditions are generally in agreement with the modern
distributions in the WOA2005 and GLODAP datasets (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).
All physical and biogeochemical tracers, except salinity, have correlation
coefficients with observational data of more than 0.85 and normalized
standard deviation values between 0.7 and 1.1 (Fig. S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Global warming experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e936">After the spin-up, the prescribed atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for
the climate model was increased by 1 % per year from the preindustrial
value (285 ppm) until it reached 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (1140 ppm)
at year 140. This value was then held constant until reaching 2000 model
years. Using the output of the global warming experiment conducted by the
climate model, the offline biogeochemical model was integrated for 2000 years
(GW_bio in Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e971">Description of the model experiments and results for oceanic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.94}[.94]?><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Experiments</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Changing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cumulative</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Dilution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Circulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Sea ice</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mechanisms</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">500 years</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(Pg C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">matter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2000 years</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_bio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1629</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2888</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_bio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">all</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1227</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2028</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_abio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1819</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_abio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SST circulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1371</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_abio_SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">circulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1511</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_bio_SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1376</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_bio_fw</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">freshwater flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_bio_circ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">circulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1220</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CLT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_bio_om</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">organic matter cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1563</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_bio_ca</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1240</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_bio_si</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">sea ice</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1211</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GW_biotemp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">temperature for biology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_bio_SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1476</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_bio_fw</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">freshwater flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1627</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_bio_circ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">circulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1609</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_bio_om</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">organic matter cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1413</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_bio_ca</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1614</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">GW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_bio_si</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">sea ice</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1643</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">GW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CTL_biotemp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">temperature for biology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1583</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CTL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">CTL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CTL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.90}[.90]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e985"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Preindustrial seawater temperature is
used for calculating biological term in GW_biotemp. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Seawater
temperature of GW_bio is applied for calculating biological term in
CTL_biotemp. </p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1934">The prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during the first 140 years of our
experimental design are higher than the business-as-usual scenarios such as
SRES A2 and RCP8.5, so the response of climate and oceanic carbon cycle would
be somewhat different. After year 140, the influence of the initial
difference would weaken because of the similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
between the 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and business-as-usual scenarios.
Therefore, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differences between these scenarios would have a
limited impact on the long-term response of climate and ocean carbon cycle to
global warming. We compare our results with previous long-term simulations
under the business-as-usual scenario in Sect. 3.</p>
      <p id="d1e1988">In the real world, the climate and carbon cycle change in response to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions; our simulation with prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations is thus highly idealized. However, there is an advantage to
simulations with prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations as opposed to those
with prescribed emissions: the<?pagebreak page4166?> former allow for a more rigorous separation of
feedback processes since carbon sinks respond to the same atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in all simulations (Zickfeld et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Sensitivity experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e2041">We conducted additional experiments for the first 500 years using the offline
biogeochemical model (Table 1). In the constant-climate run
(CTL_bio), the same prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration as
used in GW_bio but with the climate conditions of the MIROC
preindustrial experiment were applied to the offline biogeochemical model.
This experiment relied on the same concept as the uncoupled simulation in
Friedlingstein et al. (2006), in which changing atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations did not affect the radiation balance and therefore the
climate. The total change in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global
warming is obtained from the difference between GW_bio and
CTL_bio (“Total” in Table 2). We conducted three sets of
experiments to isolate the sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake with respect
to changes in sea surface temperature (SST), ocean circulation, biology,
freshwater flux, and sea ice (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2091">The contributions of individual mechanisms to the reduction in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming in the first 500 years.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.85}[.85]?><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mechanisms</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Abiotic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">GW-base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CTL-base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Uptake</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Average of</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">change</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">change</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">change</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">GW-base and</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Pg C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(Pg C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(Pg C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CTL-base (Pg C)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>402</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>402</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>402</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>402</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(4) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>140</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>149</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(13) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>153</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>151</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Freshwater</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(14) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Circulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>308</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(15) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sea ice</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (11)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(18) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Total) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (SST) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Organic matter cycle)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>349</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(Organic matter cycle)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>231</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>290</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(biology)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (CaCO3 cycle)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (CaCO3 cycle)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Organic matter cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>336</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(16) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>216</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>276</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CaCO3 cycle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (10)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(17) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature for biology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(19) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>48.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nutrient supply</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Biology) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>298</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(Biology) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>185</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>241.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(temperature for biology)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(temperature for biology)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Residual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Abiotic experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e2975">The first set (3–5 in Table 1 and “Abiotic” in Table 2) are abiotic
experiments, a typical method used in previous studies (Sarmiento et al.,
1998; Matsumoto et al., 2010). Following established methodology, the
offline ocean biogeochemical model, which does not include a biological pump
(no production and remineralization of POC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), is used in this
first set. The abiotic offline biogeochemical model was spun up under the
climate conditions of the MIROC preindustrial experiment, as was the
original offline biogeochemical model. After the spin-up, the
surface-to-deep gradient of DIC decreased significantly (Fig. 1), as also
shown in Sarmiento and Gruber (2006). The influence of the reduced DIC
concentration in the ocean interior is discussed in Sect. 4.3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e2991">Vertical profile of the anomaly of salinity-normalized DIC from the
surface under the preindustrial condition. The black and red lines show the
abiotic and biotic models, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=156.490157pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f01.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3000">CTL_abio and GW_abio are identical to
CTL_bio and GW_bio, respectively, except that
they are calculated using the abiotic model. Experiment GW_abio_SST is the same as GW_abio, except that
the solubility is calculated using the preindustrial SST. The SST effect is
calculated from GW_abio minus GW_abio_SST, and the circulation effect is calculated from
GW_abio_SST minus CTL_abio
(“SST” and “Circulation”, respectively, in Table 2). The biological
effect is calculated as the residual (“Total” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> “SST” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> “Circulation”, as described in Table 2). In this set, the effects of
changes in freshwater flux and sea ice coverage on changes in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake are neglected, as in previous studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>GW-base and CTL-base experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e3034">The second set of sensitivity experiments (GW-base) are based on Zickfeld et al. (2008). The experiments are based on GW_bio; however, each
mechanism is replaced from GW_bio to CTL_bio
(6–12 in Table 1). The contributions of individual mechanisms to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake change are<?pagebreak page4167?> calculated from the difference between
GW_bio and each experiment (“GW-base” in Table 2).
Experiment GW_bio_SST is identical to
GW_bio, except that preindustrial SST is used to calculate
the solubility. This experiment evaluates the influence of the solubility
changes due to the SST increases on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.</p>
      <p id="d1e3059">Experiment GW_bio_circ is based on
GW_bio; however, it uses the preindustrial ocean's vertical
and horizontal velocities, sea surface height, and vertical diffusivity. Note
that the archived monthly mean data of the source and sink of DIC and
alkalinity due to the biological pump (the organic matter cycle and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle) in GW_bio are applied to the offline
biogeochemical model. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake sensitivity to ocean
circulation change is isolated in this experiment.</p>
      <p id="d1e3084">Experiments GW_bio_om and GW_bio_ca are similar to GW_bio, except that the
archived monthly mean data of the source and sink of DIC and alkalinity due
to the organic matter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles in CTL_bio,
respectively, are applied to the offline biogeochemical model. These two
sensitivity studies have the same ocean circulation as GW_bio. Comparing GW_bio to the GW_bio_om (“Organic matter cycle” of GW-base in Table 2),
reduced export production decreases carbon uptake but reduced
remineralization decreases upward transport of remineralized carbon, leading
to enhanced carbon uptake. These experiments evaluate the contributions of
changes in the organic matter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles. The biological effect
is obtained from the sum of these two effects. Note that changes in
productivity due to stratification and circulation changes are included in
these biological sensitivity experiments rather than in circulation
sensitivity experiments.</p>
      <p id="d1e3109">GW_bio_si is similar to GW_bio,
except that the preindustrial sea ice fractions in both hemispheres are
used. Note that the preindustrial sea ice fractions are used only in the
gas exchange calculations. The effects of biological and circulation changes
due to the sea ice fractions are not included in this experiment.</p>
      <p id="d1e3113">GW_bio_fw is identical to GW_bio, except that the freshwater flux of the preindustrial experiment is
applied to the offline biogeochemical model. This experiment evaluates the
influence of changes in salinity, DIC, and alkalinity due to the hydrological
cycle change on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.</p>
      <p id="d1e3127">The contributions of individual mechanisms to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake change
are also estimated from sensitivity experiments under preindustrial climate
conditions. In the third set (CTL-base), following GW-base, sensitivity
experiments are based on CTL_bio; however, each mechanism is
replaced from CTL_bio to GW_bio (13–19 in
Table 1). The contributions of individual mechanisms are obtained from<?pagebreak page4168?> the
differences between each experiment and CTL_bio (“CTL-base”
in Table 2). The differences in the estimated contributions between GW-base
and CTL-base reflect the nonlinearity of each mechanism to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake change.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Multi-millennium responses to global warming</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Climate and ocean biogeochemical cycles</title>
      <p id="d1e3165">In this section, we briefly describe the regional changes in climate and
ocean biogeochemical variables; a full summary of global mean changes was
reported in Yamamoto et al. (2015). At the end of the global warming
simulation, the global mean surface air and ocean temperature increase by 8.4 and 6.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively. The AMOC decreases from
16.5 to 3.8 Sv in the first 500 years and does not recover by the end of
the simulation. The strength of the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) formation
decreases from 6.2 to 2.4 Sv in the first 500 years. Thereafter, the
strength of the AABW formation recovers and overshoots the preindustrial
condition after year 1000. These global mean changes are comparable to
previous long-term simulations with EMIC and AOGCM (see Yamamoto et al., 2015, for a more detailed discussion).</p>
      <p id="d1e3177">At the time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quadrupling (year 140), polar amplification
occurs only in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 2a). The surface temperature
over the Southern Ocean and Antarctica gradually increases, and polar
amplification in both hemispheres is observed at approximately year 1000.
This slow southern polar warming is related to deep-ocean heat uptake in the
Southern Ocean. According to the slow deep-ocean heat uptake, the ocean
interior is still warming up at the end of the simulations (Fig. 2b). Slow
southern polar warming and ocean heat uptake have also been reported in
previous multi-millennial simulations conducted by ECHAM5–MPIOM (Li et al.,
2013). In the ocean, greater warming of the upper ocean (above 2000 m) occur
in the Southern Hemisphere (Fig. 2c). This is because the drastically
weakened AMOC and enhanced AABW formations cause the heat transport to be
larger in the Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 2d).
Weakening in AMOC reduces the heat transport from 1.8 to 0.8 PW across
30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. By contrast, the enhanced AABW increases heat transport by
0.7 PW in the Southern Hemisphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3202">Changes in the physical and biological variables in the global
warming experiment. Hovmöller diagrams of <bold>(a)</bold> the zonally
averaged anomaly of the surface temperature and <bold>(b)</bold> the horizontally
averaged anomaly of the seawater temperature. <bold>(c)</bold> Zonal mean changes
in the seawater temperature between the control run and the end of the global
warming experiment (year 2000). <bold>(d)</bold> Northward ocean heat transport
for the control (black) and the end of the global warming runs (red).
<bold>(e)</bold> Zonal mean wind stress for the control run (black) and at the
time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quadrupling (years 140 and 2000: red dashed and solid lines,
respectively). Changes in <bold>(f)</bold> the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (averaged
over the top 50 m) and <bold>(g)</bold> the export production at the end of the
global warming run. <bold>(h)</bold> Vertical profile of the alkalinity (solid
lines) and salinity-normalized alkalinity (dashed lines) for the control
(black) and global warming (red) runs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3258">Strengthening and poleward shifting of the subpolar westerlies occurs in the
Southern Hemisphere (Fig. 2e), which is consistent with the observations and
a robust feature of climate projections in global warming experiments (Fyfe
and Saenko, 2006; Meijers, 2014). A 12 % strengthening and a
2.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> poleward shift of the maximum annual mean zonal wind stress
occur at the time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quadrupling. Subsequently, the subpolar
westerlies in the Southern Hemisphere are gradually weakened but are still
slightly stronger than the preindustrial conditions. This weakening occurs
because the slow southern polar warming weakens the thermal gradient between
the tropical and polar areas. The contributions of ocean circulation change
caused by strengthened westerlies to the ocean carbon cycle are discussed in
Sect. 4.2.</p>
      <p id="d1e3282">Global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the surface decreases by about
25 and 20 %, respectively. These decreases are attributed to
reduced nutrient supply into the euphotic zone due to enhanced stratification
and slower deep-ocean circulation. As a result, the global export production
decreases by 22 % (see Fig. 1d in Yamamoto et al., 2015), which is
comparable with CMIP5 models (7–18 % reduction in export
production from the 1990s to 2090s for RCP8.5) (Bopp et al., 2013).
Remarkable reductions in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration occurs in the
tropical ocean and the North Atlantic (Fig. 2f). Consistent with this
reduction, the largest declines in export production are also located around
the Equator and in the North Atlantic (Fig. 2g). The increases in export
production are primarily observed in the Southern and Arctic oceans. These
increases are related to reductions in light limitation and/or increased
growth rates due to rising temperatures as shown by Steinacher et al. (2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e3318">The efficiency of the oceanic biological pump is calculated following Ito and
Follows (2005) as the biologically sequestered fraction of the total
phosphate inventory, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total
phosphate inventory and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is remineralized phosphate concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AOU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where AOU is the apparent oxygen
utilization (AOU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dissolved
oxygen concentration, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant phosphorous-to-oxygen
ratio. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases from its preindustrial value of 0.47
to 0.51 in the first 200 years. This increased efficiency of the biological
pump is consistent with CMIP5 models (calculated in terms of AOU) (Schwinger
et al., 2014). After 500 model years, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remi</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases to 0.34
by the end of the simulation. Preformed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is accumulated in AABW
(Fig. S3). This reduced efficiency of the biological pump is associated with
enhanced AABW formation after 500 model years (Yamamoto et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e3560">Global primary production increases by 2.5 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the
preindustrial value, which is consistent with previous studies (Schmittner
et al., 2008; Taucher and Oschlies, 2011). Both diazotrophs and other
phytoplankton increase slightly. Taucher and Oschlies (2011) showed that
increases in primary production are caused by temperature effects on
biological processes such as remineralization and the microbial loop.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4170?><p id="d1e3575">Due to the constant production ratio of POC to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model
formulation and the increase in the global primary production, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production is increased by 6 %. The export of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also increases
in spite of a reduction in the POC export, resulting in the rain ratio
increasing from 0.09 to 0.13. Two distinct export responses are caused by
faster and shallower remineralization of POC in a warmer ocean; however, the
remineralization rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is independent of the seawater
temperature in our model. The enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production decreases
(increases) alkalinity in the surface (deep) oceans as shown by changes in
the salinity-normalized alkalinity (dashed lines in Fig. 2h). Reduced surface
alkalinity is also caused by the longer residence time of surface waters,
allowing a more efficient biological utilization of the carbonate ions. The
enhanced surface-to-deep gradient of the salinity-normalized alkalinity and
the alkalinity associated with changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycling and ocean
circulation have been reported in previous long-term simulations (Plattner et
al., 2001; Schmittner et al., 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e3645">Changes in the freshwater flux also alter the alkalinity. At low latitudes,
enhanced evaporation concentrates the surface alkalinity. Dilution of the
surface alkalinity by enhanced precipitation at high latitudes reduces the
alkalinity in the deep ocean. As a result, changes in the freshwater flux
cause weaker surface-to-deep alkalinity gradients. The effects of changes in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycling and freshwater flux cancel each other out, resulting
in apparently slight changes in the surface-to-deep alkalinity gradient in
our model (solid lines in Fig. 2h). The effects of changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycle and freshwater flux to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake change are
quantitatively discussed in Sect. 4.1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Ocean carbon cycle</title>
      <p id="d1e3687">We first show the cumulative oceanic uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
reduction of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming. At the time
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quadrupling (year 140), the cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
is 567 PgC in the global warming run (GW_bio) and 654 PgC in
the constant climate run (CTL_bio), a projected reduction due
to global warming of 13 %. These values are close to those of
corresponding simulations in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5
(CMIP5; Taylor et al., 2012) in which the modeled mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
is 613 PgC and the uptake reduction is 11 % (Arora et al., 2013). Even
though oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is decreased during constant atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after year 140, a new equilibrium is not yet reached by the end
of the simulation. In the last decade of the experiments, the ocean still
takes up approximately 0.31 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the millennial
timescale of the deep-ocean ventilation (Key et al., 2004). At the end of the
simulation, the cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is 2028 PgC and the uptake
reduction due to global warming increases to 30 % (Fig. 3a and Table 1).
These values and the increasing trend in the uptake reduction are also
comparable to the results of previous long-term EMIC simulations (Plattner et
al., 2001; Schmittner et al., 2008).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e3793"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of the cumulative oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake for CTL (dashed line) and GW (solid line). <bold>(b)</bold> Time series of
the annual mean values of the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake for the global
ocean (black) and different ocean basins (colors) in GW.
<bold>(c)</bold> Reduction in the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global
warming for the global ocean and three ocean basins at 500 years (GW–CTL).
The contributions of the global ocean and individual ocean basins are
separated into three regions (South: south of 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S; Tropics:
32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; North: north of 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). The
positive and negative values represent uptake reductions and uptake
increases, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page4171?><p id="d1e3880">The time evolutions of oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in each basin are shown
in Fig. 3b. During the first few decades, the Pacific Ocean is the dominant
sink of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because it possesses the largest area.
After atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stops increasing, the surface Pacific waters
are close to saturation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake rapidly decreases because
the deep Pacific waters are slowly ventilated. Conversely, the decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the Southern Ocean is slower than that in the
Pacific Ocean. Carbon transport from the surface to deep ocean via these
well-ventilated waters causes continuous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake there. In the
preindustrial condition, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Southern Ocean is kept
higher than the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> owing to the upwelling of
carbon-rich deep waters, resulting in a source of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The Southern Ocean alters from a source to a sink of atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immediately after the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase. This
phenomenon is consistent with observation-based reconstructions of
present-day and preindustrial air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (Gruber et al.,
2009). After excess <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mixed throughout the deep ocean, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Southern Ocean again exceeds the atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The Southern Ocean returns to being a source of atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at approximately year 1400. At the end of the global warming
experiment, the Atlantic and Southern oceans are the major sink and source
basins of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, as in the preindustrial
condition.</p>
      <p id="d1e4097">We also investigate the regional differences in uptake reduction due to
global warming. In the first 500 years, approximately half of the total
uptake reduction occurs in tropical and subtropical regions between
32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (Figs. 3c, and S4). The contributions
of the high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere have similar
magnitudes. At a basin scale, the contributions of the Atlantic and Pacific
oceans have similar magnitudes and that of the Indian Ocean is approximately
half those contributions. These regional differences have also been found in
similar long-term simulations by Plattner et al. (2001).</p>
      <p id="d1e4119">Figure 4 shows the zonal mean distribution of the salinity-normalized DIC
(sDIC) in the global warming run. In the first 500 years, changes in sDIC
from the preindustrial condition decrease from the surface to the deep
oceans. Significant sDIC changes in the deep water are observed in the North
Atlantic. The shallower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> invasion into the North Atlantic
compared to the constant climate run (Fig. S4) is caused by the weaker and
shallower AMOC. After year 1000, due to the enhanced AABW formation, AABW
with a relatively high sDIC concentration intrudes into the deep North
Atlantic below 2000 m. As a result, the largest sDIC change in the deep water
occurs in the North Atlantic at the end of the simulations. The smallest sDIC
change is found in the deep North Pacific in accordance with the millennial
ventilation timescale.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Effects of individual mechanisms on the reduction in oceanic {$\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} uptake
associated with global warming}?><title>Effects of individual mechanisms on the reduction in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
associated with global warming</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4154">Zonal mean distribution of changes in
the salinity-normalized DIC (colors) and meridional overturning stream
function (contours) for <bold>(a)</bold> 500 years and <bold>(b)</bold> 2000 years in
the global warming run (GW). The left and right panels show the Atlantic and
Indo-Pacific oceans, respectively; contour interval is 2 Sv (sverdrups).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e4169">The decrease in cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming
projected by our model is consistent with previous centennial and millennial
simulations using ESMs and EMICs. In this section, we disentangle the
contributions of individual mechanisms to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake reduction
using three sets of sensitivity experiments (Abiotic, GW-base, and CTL-base;
Tables 1 and 2). To compare our results with previous studies, we focus on
changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the first 500 years. The total
reduction in the cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake until year 500 is 402 PgC
(“Total” in Table 2).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Abiotic experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e4222">In the abiotic experiments, the reduction in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
associated with global warming is caused by changes in the ocean circulation
and increases in the SST that reduce the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by 308 and 140 PgC, respectively (Table 2). Weaker AMOC and AABW formations
decrease the downward transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the surface to the deep
ocean, leading to a significant drop in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake at high
latitudes (Fig. 5a) and thus a reduction in sDIC in the deep ocean (Fig. 6a).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4271">Contributions of the primary mechanisms to the reduction in the
oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming at 500 years for
<bold>(a)</bold> the abiotic experiments and <bold>(b)</bold> the CTL-base and GW-base
experiments. Total change and effects of SST, circulation, and biology are
calculated as summarized in Table 2. The biological effect in the abiotic
experiments is calculated as the residual. The biological effect in
CTL-base and GW-base represents the effect of the organic matter cycle.
Contributions of the individual mechanisms are separated into three regions
(South: south of 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S; Tropics: 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to
32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; North: north of 32.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). In panel <bold>(b)</bold>,
bars refer to the averages of CTL-base and GW-base.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4339">Zonal mean changes in the salinity-normalized DIC induced by
circulation changes for <bold>(a)</bold> the abiotic experiments and <bold>(b)</bold>
the CTL-base and GW-base experiments at 500 years. The left and right panels show
the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific oceans, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4355">An increase in sDIC also occurs in the Antarctic intermediate water. As
previously mentioned, the intensification of the Southern Hemisphere westerly
winds enhances the mixing and overturning circulation of the Southern Ocean
(Fig. 6a), increasing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake and sDIC (Fig. 5a). An
enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to intensified westerly winds in the
Southern Ocean has also been observed in previous studies using simple box
models and coupled general-circulation models (Zickfeld et al., 2007; Matear
and Lenton, 2008). A similar redistribution of carbon due to
wind-stress-induced circulation changes is found in Swart et al. (2012), in
which the Agulhas leakage and overturning circulation are linked.</p>
      <p id="d1e4380">The contribution of the SST increase to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake diminishes
continuously from south to north. Biological changes calculated as the
residual enhance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake at high latitudes and reduce it at low
latitudes; the resulting global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake increases by 46 PgC due
to biological changes. These global and regional contributions of individual
mechanisms are consistent with previous estimations using abiotic experiments
and other methods (Sarmiento et al., 1998; Matsumoto et al., 2010).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>GW-base and CTL-base experiments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Global change</title>
      <p id="d1e4428">The contributions of individual mechanisms to the uptake change estimated
from the combination of the GW-base and CTL-base experiments are summarized
in Table 2 and Fig. 5b; averages of these experiments are used below.
Changes in the organic matter cycle and in the solubility due to the SST
increase are the dominant mechanisms for the global reduction in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming (Fig. 5b). By year 500, these
changes decrease the global carbon uptake by 276 and 151 PgC (Table 2). A significant nonlinearity in the uptake change (from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>216 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>336 PgC) is found for the organic matter cycle. The ocean
circulation change decreases the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by 6.5 PgC. The
large differences relative to the abiotic simulation are discussed below
(Sect. 4.3).</p>
      <p id="d1e4467">Enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production reduces the surface alkalinity and therefore
leads to an increase in the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Changes in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle reduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by 14 PgC. The reduced sea
ice cover allows air–sea gas<?pagebreak page4172?> exchange over a larger area and leads to a 15 PgC increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. Dilution of the surface salinity by
1 psu leads to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction of approximately 4 %
(Takahashi et al., 1993) and an increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.
Enhanced evaporation at low latitudes increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in
an uptake reduction, whereas enhanced precipitation at high latitudes
increases uptake. The global contribution of freshwater-flux changes is an
uptake reduction of 2.5 PgC.</p>
      <p id="d1e4577">These significant contributions of changes in the organic matter cycle to the
uptake reduction due to global warming and the indirect importance of
circulation changes through nutrient transport and biological processes are
consistent with Zickfield et al. (2008), who investigated the reduction in
the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to freshwater hosing and AMOC weakening.
However, these results are different from most previous studies (Sarmiento et
al., 1998; Joos et al., 1999; Matear and Hirst, 1999; Plattner et al., 2001;
Matsumoto et al., 2010), in which ocean circulation was the dominant
mechanism for reductions in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. Below, we
investigate what causes these greater biological effects and smaller
circulation effects in our global warming simulations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Effects of circulation change</title>
      <?pagebreak page4173?><p id="d1e4608">The effects of circulation change display large regional variations (Fig. 5b). Similar to the abiotic experiments, reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
and sDIC in the deep ocean (induced by weaker deep-ocean circulation) occur
at high latitudes, and sDIC is enhanced by increased westerly winds in the
Southern Ocean. Conversely, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake at low latitudes is
enhanced by ocean circulation. We attribute this increase to weaker
upper-ocean overturning and tropical upwelling (Fig. 7a). The tropical
upwelling across 200 m decreases from 38 to 22.5 Sv in the first 200 years
and continues to the end of the simulation (Fig. 7b). Weakening the
equatorial upwelling reduces the upward transport of natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the ocean interior to the surface. The resulting enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake at low latitudes increases sDIC in the subsurface water, especially in
the Pacific Ocean (Fig. 6b). The importance of enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
associated with weaker upper-ocean overturning is also suggested in decadal
variability in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (DeVries et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4680">Global upper-ocean overturning circulation. <bold>(a)</bold> Meridional
overturning stream function at year 500 (colors). The positive numbers
represent clockwise circulation, and the negative numbers represent
counterclockwise circulation. The contours show the differences between the
meridional overturning stream function in year 500 and the preindustrial
condition. The contour interval is 4 Sv. <bold>(b)</bold> Time series of global
equatorial upwelling (through 200 m, between 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4713">Enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake induced by weaker equatorial upwelling and
increased westerly winds cancel out the reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
associated with stratification and the weaker deep-ocean circulation.
Therefore, the effects of circulation changes are responsible for only a
small fraction of the total reduction in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in our
simulations. In the first 200 years, increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake caused
by weaker equatorial upwelling and strengthened westerly winds are the
dominant processes in the effect of circulation change (Fig. 8).
Subsequently, the effects of weaker AMOC and AABW formations are enhanced and
overcome those of the strengthened westerly winds and weaker equatorial
upwelling. As a result, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is reduced by the
circulation changes after year 450.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e4774">Time series of the contributions of primary mechanisms to the
reduction in the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the CTL-base and GW-base
experiments. The positive and negative values represent uptake increases and
decreases, respectively. The contributions of circulation (red), biology
(green), and SST (blue) and the temperature dependences of production and
remineralization (black dashed line) are illustrated. The quantification
methods for each mechanism are summarized in Table 2.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f08.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Effects of changes in the biological pump</title>
      <p id="d1e4800">Reduced nutrient supply into the euphotic zone due to circulation change and
faster remineralization from seawater warming decrease the POC flux by
22 % at a depth of 100 m and 70 % at a depth of 1000 m (Fig. 9a). The
weaker carbon transport by the biological pump cannot maintain the vertical
gradient of DIC between the surface and deep oceans. Excess DIC stored in the
deep ocean by the biological pump is transported to the surface, therefore
increasing surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.
Reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake occurs at the low latitudes and the high
latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 5) according to changes in export
production (Fig. 2g). Similarly, significant sDIC decreases occur in the
North Atlantic, equatorial Indo-Pacific Ocean, and North Pacific (Fig. 9b).
Reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake induced by a weaker biological pump are
consistent with previous model simulations in which a significant atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase is caused by a complete die-off of ocean life
(Maier-Reimer et al., 1996; Sarmiento and Gruber, 2006).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4866">Contribution of the reorganization of the organic matter cycle.
<bold>(a)</bold> Vertical distribution of the POC flux for the control (black)
and global warming runs (red). <bold>(b)</bold> Zonal mean changes in the
salinity-normalized DIC induced by changes in the organic matter cycle in the
CTL-base and GW-base experiments at 500 years. The top and bottom panels show the
Atlantic and Indo-Pacific oceans, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4163/2018/bg-15-4163-2018-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4881">Subsequently, the effect of the reorganization of the biological pump on the
reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is decomposed into the effects of the
temperature dependence of production and remineralization and the change in
nutrient supply via the circulation change. In our model, the production and
remineralization rate doubles for every 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C increase in the
seawater temperature (Eppley, 1972). The warming-induced increase in
production reduces the partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, therefore enhancing
the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. Enhanced remineralization of organic matter
reduces the carbon transport into the deep ocean, leading to a lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. The lower nutrient supply due to stratification and
slower thermohaline circulation decreases export production and therefore
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. The effect of the temperature dependence of the
biological pump is calculated in GW-base and CTL-base (“Temperature for
biology” in Table 2). The effect of the change in the nutrient supply is
calculated as the residual (“Biology” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> “Temperature for biology” as
summarized in Table 2).</p>
      <?pagebreak page4175?><p id="d1e4956">In the first 100 years, a warming-induced increase in production occurs more
rapidly than an increase in remineralization because the surface waters are
warming more rapidly than the subsurface. Therefore, the temperature
dependence slightly increases the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (Fig. 8).
Subsequently, the effect of the enhanced remineralization overcomes that of
the enhanced production; therefore the temperature dependence decreases the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, consistent with the findings of Matsumoto (2007). By
year 500, lower nutrient supply and temperature dependence decreases the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by 241.5 and 48.5 PgC, respectively (Table 2). Our
results indicate that the reduction in the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake from
biological change is mainly caused by reductions in nutrient supply via the
circulation change, and that temperature effects on production and
remineralization are not negligible.</p>
      <p id="d1e5004">The contribution of changes in the biological pump depends considerably on
the base state (GW-base or CTL-base; 118 PgC difference while the total is
402 PgC) and mainly causes the nonlinearity of feedback mechanisms. This
nonlinearity would be caused by difference in ocean circulation between
GW-base and CTL-base. The enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake associated with
reduced upward transport of remineralized carbon partly cancels out the
reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to lower export production. This process is
larger in CTL-base than in GW-base because of slower deep-ocean circulation
in the latter. As a result, the contribution of changes in the biological
pump is smaller in CTL-base than in GW-base. These nonlinearities need to be
properly accounted for when separating the contribution of individual
feedback mechanisms to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake change.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Assessment of differences between the abiotic and CTL-base and GW-base
experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e5047">The contributions of changes in the ocean circulation and the biological pump
to the reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake differ between the abiotic and
CTL-base and GW-base experiments even when using the same model and scenario, as
suggested in previous studies (Sarmiento et al., 1998; Zickfeld et al., 2008;
Matsumoto et al., 2010). Our results show that these different results are
caused by the estimation methods used.</p>
      <p id="d1e5061">We attribute these different results to the vertical gradient of DIC under
the preindustrial conditions of the abiotic and biotic experiments (i.e.,
CTL-base and GW-base) (Fig. 1). With regards to the circulation effect of the
abiotic experiments, the enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake associated with
reduced upward transport of natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the deep ocean to the
upper ocean is underestimated because the vertical DIC gradient in the
abiotic experiments is much smaller than in the biotic experiments. The
effect of circulation change in the abiotic experiments primarily represents
reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to reduced downward transport of
anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the surface to deep ocean. In the
CTL-base and GW-base experiments with a realistic vertical DIC gradient,<?pagebreak page4176?> the
effect of the circulation change represents both a reduced upward transport
of natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a reduced downward transport of anthropogenic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to weaker
deep-ocean circulation is larger in the abiotic experiments than in the
CTL-base and GW-base experiments. An increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake associated
with weaker equatorial upwelling is found only in the CTL-base and GW-base
experiments.</p>
      <p id="d1e5153">In the abiotic experiments, the biological contribution is calculated as the
residual. The enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake owing to the reduced upward
transport of natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is included in the biological effect. This
effect overcomes the reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to the weakening of the
biological pump, leading to an enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to the
biological change. Therefore, the CTL-base and GW-base experiments are more
useful for quantifying the contributions of circulation and biological
change. We conclude that changes in the organic matter cycle and increases in
the SST are the primary contributors to the reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake
due to global warming in our model. Although our experimental design differs
from that used in some previous studies (e.g., Joos et al., 1999; Plattner et
al., 2001), the identification of differences in feedback mechanism among
all experimental designs is beyond the scope of this work and should be the
subject of future research.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d1e5219">In this study, we investigated multi-millennium changes in the ocean carbon
cycle under a quadrupling of atmospheric carbon dioxide using an AOGCM
and an offline biogeochemical model. At the end of the simulation, the
cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is 2028 PgC and global warming reduces the
uptake by 30 %; this primarily occurs in the tropical and subtropical
regions. These projected global and regional changes in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake are similar to those in previous long-term simulations using EMIC
(Plattner et al., 2001; Schmittner et al., 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e5244">To isolate and quantify the individual mechanisms responsible for the
reduction in the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming, we
conducted three sets of sensitivity experiments based on previous studies.
Our results are consistent with those previous studies: in abiotic
experiments, the primary contributors are changes in the ocean circulation
and reduced solubility due to sea surface warming (Sarmiento et al., 1998;
Matsumoto et al., 2010), while in the CTL-base and GW-base experiments, the
primary contributors are changes in the organic matter cycle via ocean
circulation change and sea surface warming (Zickfeld et al., 2008). It is
conceivable that the differences in results among these sensitivity studies
are caused by the vertical gradient of DIC under preindustrial conditions,
i.e., smaller DIC gradients in abiotic experiments and realistic DIC
gradients in CTL-base and GW-base<?pagebreak page4177?> experiments (Fig. 1). In the abiotic
experiments, the circulation effects are underestimated with respect to
enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake associated with reduced upward transport of
natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the deep ocean to the upper ocean. Conversely, in the CTL-base and GW-base experiments, the effects of the circulation
changes include both reduced upward transport of natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a
reduced downward transport of anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the
CTL-base and GW-base experiments are more useful for quantifying the individual
feedback mechanisms.</p>
      <p id="d1e5302">The reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake associated with weaker deep-ocean
circulation and stratification is counteracted by the enhanced uptake due to
weaker equatorial upwelling and strengthened subpolar westerly winds in the
Southern Hemisphere. The weakening of the biological carbon export resulting
from circulation change and the enhanced remineralization owing to seawater
warming diminish the DIC gradient between the surface and deep ocean,
leading to a significant reduction in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. Our
results suggest that changes in the biological pump and solubility are the
primary drivers of reductions in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake associated with
global warming.</p>
      <p id="d1e5338">Circulation plays a small direct role in changes in oceanic carbon uptake due
to global warming but a large indirect role through nutrient transport and
the biological pump. On a centennial timescale, the weakening of AMOC and
AABW formation in our simulation is consistent with the results of CMIP5
models (Weaver et al., 2012; Heuzé et al., 2015). Changes in oceanic
carbon uptake and reductions in export production due to global warming are
in close agreement with current simulations using ESMs, as mentioned in
Sect. 3. Therefore, we speculate that similar contributions to the
reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake from changes in ocean circulation and
biological processes will be found in other models. Conversely, the
longer-term responses of AMOC and AABW are very uncertain. The recovery and
overshoot of the AABW formation that occurred after 1000 years in our
simulation have not been reported in the previous multi-millennium
simulations (Schmittner et al., 2008, Li et al., 2013). To fully assess the
robustness of millennial-scale reductions in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due
to global warming, simulations using other recent GCMs and ocean
biogeochemical models are required.</p>
      <p id="d1e5364">Although our results show that changes in the biological pump are crucial for
reductions in oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake due to global warming, several
biological processes were not considered in our model. A reduction in the
saturation levels of calcium carbonate in seawater associated with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> invasion into the ocean can have adverse effects on marine
calcifying organisms. The subsequent reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production would
increase the surface ocean alkalinity and therefore enhance oceanic carbon
uptake (Riebesell et al., 2000), but its modeled impact has been very
different in previous studies (Heinze, 2004; Gehlen et al., 2007; Ridgwell et
al., 2007; Matsumoto et al., 2010). In addition, an increase in biotic
carbon-to-nitrogen drawdown in response to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes can
enhance oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (Oschlies et al., 2008). Reduced
seawater viscosity in a warmer ocean accelerates particle sinking speed,
therefore increasing the efficiency of the biological pump and enhancing
oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (Bach et al., 2012; Taucher et al., 2014). These
effects remain poorly understood but could potentially have a large impact on
oceanic carbon uptake and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration on a
multi-centennial to millennial timescale. The inclusion of these processes in
models may be required for a more comprehensive understanding of the response
of the ocean carbon cycle to global warming.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e5455">Data are freely available from the corresponding author
(akitomo@jamstec.go.jp) upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5458"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4163-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4163-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e5464">AY designed the research and experiments and wrote the manuscript in conjunction with YY and AA-O. AY performed
the offline experiments and analyzed the results. AA-O provided the results
of MIROC. All authors discussed the results and gave their inputs on the
manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e5470">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5476">We would like to thank Akira Oka for stimulating discussions. Helpful comments
from Neil Swart and the two anonymous reviewers are acknowledged. This research was supported by
the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-10) of the
Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and was also supported by the
“Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU program)”
from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
(MEXT), Japan. AOGCM simulations were carried out on the JAMSTEC Earth
Simulator. The simulations with the offline biogeochemical model were
performed using the Fujitsu PRIMEHPC FX10 system in the Information
Technology Center, University of Tokyo.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited
by: Laurent Bopp<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: Neil Swart and two anonymous
referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Antoine, D., André, J.-M., and Morel, A.: Oceanic primary production: 2.
Estimation at global scale from satellite (coastal zone color scanner)
chlorophyll, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 57–69, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Archer, D., Kheshi, H., and Maier-Reimer, E.: Dynamics of fossil fuel
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutralization by marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
12, 259–276, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D., Eby, M., Brovken, V., Ridgwell, A., Cao, L., Mikolajewicz, U.,
Caldeira, K., Matsumoto, K., Munhoven, G., Montenegro, A., and Tokos, K.:
Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 37, 117–134, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Archer, D., Buffett, B., and Brovkin, V.: Ocean methane hydrates as a slow
tipping point in the global carbon cycle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106,
20596–20601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800885105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0800885105</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Arora, V. K., Boer, G. J., Friedlingstein, P., Eby, M., Jones, C. D.,
Christian, J. R., Bonan, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Hajima, T.,
Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K., Tjiputra, J. F., and Wu, T.: Carbon-concentration
and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth system models, J. Climate, 26,
5289–5314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00494.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-12-00494.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bach, L. T., Riebesell, U., Sett, S., Febiri, S., Rzepka, P., and Schulz, K.
G.: An approach for particle sinking velocity measurements in the 3–400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m size range and considerations on the effect of temperature on
sinking rates, Mar. Biol., 159, 1853–1864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1945-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00227-012-1945-2</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M.,
Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and
Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century:
projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Charbit, S., Paillard, D., and Ramstein, G.: Amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions irreversibly leading to the total melting of Greenland, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 35, L12503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033472" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033472</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le
Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and
Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 465–570, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A., and Totterdell, I. J.:
Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled
climate model, Nature, 408, 184–187, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>DeVries, T., Holzer, M., and Primeau, F.: Recent increase in oceanic carbon
uptake driven by weaker upper-ocean overturning, Nature, 542, 215–218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature21068</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Dufresne, J. L., Friedlingstein, P., Berthelot, M., Bopp, L., Ciais, P.,
Fairhead, L., Treut, H. L., and Monfray, P.: On the magnitude of positive
feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 1405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013777" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013777</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Eppley, R. W.: Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea, Fish. Bull.,
70, 1063–1085, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V.,
Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., Bala, G., John, J., Jones, C.,
Joos, F., Kato, T., Kawamiya, M., Knorr, W., Lindsay, K., Matthews, H. D.,
Raddatz, T., Rayner, P., Reick, C., Roeckner, E., Schnitzler, K.-G.,
Schnur, R., Strassmann, K., Weaver, A. J., Yoshikawa, C., and Zeng, N.:
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Inter-
comparison, J. Climate, 19, 3337–3353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3800.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3800.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fyfe, J. C. and Saenko, O. A.: Simulated changes in the extratropical
Southern Hemisphere winds and currents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06701,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025332</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., and Antonov, J. I.: World
Ocean Atlas 2005, vol. 4, Nutrients (Phosphate, Nitrate, Silicate), NOAA
Atlas NESDIS, vol. 64, edited by: Levitus, S., 396 pp., U.S. Gov. Print.
Off., Washington, D.C., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gehlen, M., Gangstø, R., Schneider, B., Bopp, L., Aumont, O., and Ethe,
C.: The fate of pelagic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in a high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ocean:
a model study, Biogeosciences, 4, 505–519,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-505-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-505-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, N., Gloor, M., Fletcher, S. E. M., Doney, S. C., Dutkiewicz, S.,
Follows, M. J., Gerber, M., Jacobson, A. R., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Menemenlis, D., Mouchet, A., Muller, S. A., Sarmiento, J. L., and Takahashi,
T.: Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB1005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008gb003349</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Heinze, C.: Simulating oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> export production in the
greenhouse, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16308,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020613" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020613</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Heuzé, C., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P., and Ridley, J. K.: Changes in
global ocean bottom properties and volume transports in CMIP5 models under
climate change scenarios, J. Climate, 28, 2917–2944,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00381.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00381.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hunke, E. C. and Dukowicz, J. K.: An elastic-viscous-plastic model for sea
ice dynamics, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1849–1867,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027&lt;1849:AEVPMF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027&lt;1849:AEVPMF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Ito, T. and Follows, M.: Preformed phosphate, soft tissue pump and
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Mar. Res., 63, 813–839, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Joos, F., Plattner, G. K., Stocker, T. F., Marchal, O., and Schmittner, A.:
Global warming and marine carbon cycle feedbacks on future atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Science, 284, 464–467, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
K-1Model Developers: K-1 Coupled GCM (MIROC) description, edited by: Hasumi,
H. and Emori, S., K-1 Tech. Rep. 1, 34 pp., Univ. of Tokyo, Tokyo, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Keller, D. P., Oschlies, A., and Eby, M.: A new marine ecosystem model for
the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5,
1195–1220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1195-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1195-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Key, R. M., Kozyr, A., Sabine, C. L., Lee, K., Wanninkhof, R., Bullister, J.
L., Feely, R. A., Millero, F. J., Mordy, C., and Peng, T.-H.: A global ocean
carbon climatology: Results from Global Data Analysis Project (GLODAP),
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4031, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002247</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, D. M. and Slater, A. G.: A projection of severe near-surface
permafrost degradation during the 21st century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,
L24401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025080" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025080</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Li, C., von Storch, J.-S., and Marotzke, J.: Deep-ocean heat uptake and
equilibrium climate response, Clim. Dynam., 40, 1071–1086,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1350-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-012-1350-z</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4179?><ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., and Winguth, A.: Future ocean uptake of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: Interaction between ocean circulation and biology, Clim.
Dynam., 12, 711–721, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Matear, R. and Hirst, A.: Climate change feedback on the future oceanic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, Tellus, 51B, 722–733, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Matear, R. J. and Lenton, A.: Impact of historical climate change on the
Southern Ocean carbon cycle, J. Climate, 21, 5820–5834, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Matsumoto, K.: Biology-mediated temperature control on atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ocean biogeochemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L20605,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031301</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K., Tokos, K., Chikamoto, M. O., and Ridgwell, A.: Characterizing
post-industrial changes in the ocean carbon cycle in an Earth system model,
Tellus B, 62, 296–313, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Stocker, T. F., Collins, W. D., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A.
T., Gregory, J. M., Kitoh, A., Knutti, R., Murphy, J. M., Noda, A., Raper, S.
C. B., Watterson, I. G., Weaver, A. J., and Zhao, Z.-C.: Climate Change 2007:
The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, chap.
Global Climate Projections, 747–846, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Meijers, A.: The Southern Ocean in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
phase 5, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 372, 20130296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0296" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2013.0296</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Misumi, K., Lindsay, K., Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., Tsumune, D., and
Yoshida, Y.: Humic substances may control dissolved iron distributions in the
global ocean: Implications from numerical simulations, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 450–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/gbc.20039</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Najjar, R. G. and Orr, J.: Biotic-HOWTO, internal OCMIP report, 15 pp., Lab.
des Sci. du Clim. et l'Environ., CEA, Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Nakano, H. and Suginohara, N.: Effects of bottom boundary layer
parameterization on reproducing deep and bottom waters in a world ocean
model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 1209–1227, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Oka, A., Abe-Ouchi, A., Chikamoto, M. O., and Ide, T.: Mechanisms controlling
export production at the LGM: Effects of changes in oceanic physical field
and atmospheric dust deposition, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB2009,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003628</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Orr, J. C.: Global Ocean Storage of Anthropogenic Carbon (GOSAC), final
report, 117 pp., EC Environ. and Clim. Programme, Inst. Pierre Simon Laplace,
Paris, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Oschlies, A., Schulz, K. G., Riebesell, U., and Schmittner, A.: Simulated
21st century's increase in oceanic suboxia by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-enhanced biotic
carbon export, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB4008,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003147" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003147</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Plattner, G. K., Joos, F., Stocker, T. F., and Marchal, O.: Feedback
mechanisms and sensitivities of ocean carbon uptake under global warming,
Tellus Ser. B-Chem. Phys. Meteorol., 53, 564–592, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Plattner, G., Knutti, R., Joos, F., Stocker, T., Von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V.,
Cameron, D., Driesschaert, E., Dutkiewicz, S., and Eby, M.: Long-term
climate commitments projected with climate – carbon cycle models, J.
Climate, 21, 2721–2751, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Randerson, J. T., Lindsay, K., Munoz, E., Fu, W., Moore, J. K., Hoffman, F.
M., Mahowald, N. M., and Doney, S. C.: Multicentury changes in ocean and land
contributions to the climatecarbon feedback, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29,
744–759, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Ridgwell, A., Zondervan, I., Hargreaves, J. C., Bijma, J., and Lenton, T. M.:
Assessing the potential long-term increase of oceanic fossil fuel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-calcification feedback, Biogeosciences, 4,
481–492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-481-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-481-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Riebesell, U., Zondervan, I., Rost, B., Tortell, P. D., Zeebe, R. E., and
Morel, F. M. M.: Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to
increased atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 407, 364–367, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. L. and Gruber, N.: Ocean Biogeochemical Dynamics, chap. 8,
Carbon cycle, 318–358, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. L., Hughes, T., Stouffer, R., and Manabe, S.: Simulated
response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming, Nature,
393, 245–248, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Schlitzer, R.: Applying the adjoint method for global biogeochemical
modeling, in: Inverse Methods in Biogeochemical Cycles, edited by:
Kasibhatla, P., Heimann, M., Rayner, P., Mahowald, N., Prinn, R. G., and Hartley, D, E., 107–124, AGU, Washington, D.C., 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Schmittner, A., Oschlies, A., Matthews, D., and Galbraith, E. D.: Future
changes in climate, ocean circulation, ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling
simulated for a business-as-usual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission scenario until year
4000 AD, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB1013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002953" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB002953</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J. F., Heinze, C., Bopp, L., Christian, J. R.,
Gehlen, M., Ilyina, T., Jones, C. D., Salas-Mélia, D., Segschneider, J.,
Séférian, R., and Totterdell, I.: Nonlinearity of Ocean Carbon Cycle
Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models, J. Climate, 27, 3869–3888,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00452.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00452.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Semtner Jr., A. J.: A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in
numerical investigations of climate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 379–389, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, S. L., Yamanaka, Y., Pahlow, M., and Oschlies, A.: Optimal uptake
kinetics: Physiological acclimation explains the pattern of nitrate uptake by
phytoplankton in the ocean, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 384, 1–12, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Steinacher, M., Joos, F., Frölicher, T. L., Bopp, L., Cadule, P., Cocco,
V., Doney, S. C., Gehlen, M., Lindsay, K., Moore, J. K., Schneider, B., and
Segschneider, J.: Projected 21st century decrease in marine productivity: a
multi-model analysis, Biogeosciences, 7, 979–1005,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-979-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-979-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Swart, N. C. and Fyfe, J. C.: Ocean carbon uptake and storage influenced by wind bias in global climate models, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 47–52, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Olafsson, J., Goddard, J. G., Chipman, D. W., and Sutherland,
S. C.: Seasonal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nutrients in the high-latitude
surface oceans: a comparative study, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 7, 843–878,
1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An overview of CMIP5 and
the experiment design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 485–498, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4180?><ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Taucher, J. and Oschlies, A.: Can we predict the direction of marine primary
production change under global warming?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L02603,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL045934</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Taucher, J., Bach, L. T., Riebesell, U., and Oschlies, A.: The viscosity
effect on marine particle flux: A climate relevant feedback mechanism, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 415–422, doi10.1002/2013/GB004728, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Weaver, A. J. Sedláček, J., Eby, M., Alexander, K., Crespin, E.,
Fichefet, T., Philippon-Berthier, G., Joos, F., Kawamiya, M., Matsumoto, K.,
Steinacher, M., Tachiiri, K., Tokos, K., Yoshimori, M., and Zickfeld, K.:
Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: a model
intercomparison, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20709, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053763</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Yamamoto, A., Yamanaka, Y., Oka, A., and Abe-Ouchi, A.: Ocean oxygen
depletion due to decomposition of submarine methane hydrate, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 5075–5083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060483" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL060483</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Yamamoto, A., Abe-Ouchi, A., Shigemitsu, M., Oka, A., Takahashi, K., Ohgaito,
R., and Yamanaka, Y.: Global deep ocean oxygenation by enhanced ventilation
in the Southern Ocean under long-term global warming, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
29, 1801–1815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GB005181</ext-link>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zickfeld, K., Fyfe, J. C., Saenko, O. A., Eby, M., and Weaver, A. J.:
Response of the global carbon cycle to human-induced changes in Southern
Hemisphere winds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL028797</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., and Weaver, A. J.: Carbon-cycle feedbacks of changes
in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation under future atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, Gb3024,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003118</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Matthews, H. D., Schmittner, A., and Weaver, A. J.:
Nonlinearity of Carbon Cycle Feedbacks, J. Climate, 24, 4255–4275, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Weaver, A., Alexander, K., Crespin, E., Edwards, N.,
Eliseev, A., Feulner, G., Fichefet, T., Forest, C., Friedlingstein, P.,
Goosse, H., Holden, P., Joos, F., Kawamiya, M., Kicklighter, D., Kienert, H.,
Matsumoto, K., Mokhov, I., Monier, E., Olsen, S., Pedersen, J., Perrette, M.,
Philippon- Berthier, G., Ridgwell, A., Schlosser, A., Schneider von Deim-
ling, T., Shaffer, G., Sokolov, A., Spahni, R., Steinacher, M., Tachiiri, K.,
Tokos, K., Yoshimori, M., Zeng, N., and Zhao, F.: Long-term climate change
commitment and reversibility: An EMIC intercomparison, J. Climate, 26,
5782–5809, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00584.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00584.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Long-term response of oceanic carbon uptake to global warming via physical and biological pumps</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Global warming is expected to significantly decrease oceanic carbon uptake
and therefore increase atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and global warming. The
primary reasons given in previous studies for such changes in the oceanic
carbon uptake are the solubility reduction due to seawater warming and
changes in the ocean circulation and biological pump. However, the
quantitative contributions of different processes to the overall reduction in
ocean uptake are still unclear. In this study, we investigated
multi-millennium responses of oceanic carbon uptake to global warming and
quantified the contributions of the physical and biological pumps to these
responses using an atmosphere–ocean general circulation model and a
biogeochemical model. We found that global warming reduced oceanic
CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by 13 % (30 %) in the first 140 years (after
2000 model years), consistent with previous studies. Our sensitivity
experiments showed that this reduction is primarily driven by changes in the
organic matter cycle via ocean circulation change and solubility change due
to seawater warming. These results differ from most previous studies, in
which circulation changes and solubility change from seawater warming are the
dominant processes. The weakening of biological production and carbon export
induced by circulation change and lower nutrient supply, diminishes the
vertical DIC gradient and substantially reduces the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. The
weaker deep-ocean circulation decreases the downward transport of
CO<sub>2</sub> from the surface to the deep ocean, leading to a drop in
CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in high-latitude regions. Conversely, weaker equatorial
upwelling reduces the upward transport of natural CO<sub>2</sub> and therefore
enhances the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in low-latitude regions. Because these
effects cancel each other out, circulation change plays only a small direct role
in the reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> uptake due to global warming but a large
indirect role through nutrient transport and biological processes.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Antoine, D., André, J.-M., and Morel, A.: Oceanic primary production: 2.
Estimation at global scale from satellite (coastal zone color scanner)
chlorophyll, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 57–69, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D., Kheshi, H., and Maier-Reimer, E.: Dynamics of fossil fuel
CO<sub>2</sub> neutralization by marine CaCO<sub>3</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
12, 259–276, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D., Eby, M., Brovken, V., Ridgwell, A., Cao, L., Mikolajewicz, U.,
Caldeira, K., Matsumoto, K., Munhoven, G., Montenegro, A., and Tokos, K.:
Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 37, 117–134, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D., Buffett, B., and Brovkin, V.: Ocean methane hydrates as a slow
tipping point in the global carbon cycle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106,
20596–20601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800885105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800885105</a>, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arora, V. K., Boer, G. J., Friedlingstein, P., Eby, M., Jones, C. D.,
Christian, J. R., Bonan, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Hajima, T.,
Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K., Tjiputra, J. F., and Wu, T.: Carbon-concentration
and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth system models, J. Climate, 26,
5289–5314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00494.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00494.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bach, L. T., Riebesell, U., Sett, S., Febiri, S., Rzepka, P., and Schulz, K.
G.: An approach for particle sinking velocity measurements in the 3–400 µm size range and considerations on the effect of temperature on
sinking rates, Mar. Biol., 159, 1853–1864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1945-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1945-2</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M.,
Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and
Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century:
projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Charbit, S., Paillard, D., and Ramstein, G.: Amount of CO<sub>2</sub>
emissions irreversibly leading to the total melting of Greenland, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 35, L12503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033472" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033472</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J.,
Chhabra, A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le
Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and
Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin,
D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia,
Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 465–570, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A., and Totterdell, I. J.:
Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled
climate model, Nature, 408, 184–187, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
DeVries, T., Holzer, M., and Primeau, F.: Recent increase in oceanic carbon
uptake driven by weaker upper-ocean overturning, Nature, 542, 215–218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21068</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dufresne, J. L., Friedlingstein, P., Berthelot, M., Bopp, L., Ciais, P.,
Fairhead, L., Treut, H. L., and Monfray, P.: On the magnitude of positive
feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 1405, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013777" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013777</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Eppley, R. W.: Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea, Fish. Bull.,
70, 1063–1085, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V.,
Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., Bala, G., John, J., Jones, C.,
Joos, F., Kato, T., Kawamiya, M., Knorr, W., Lindsay, K., Matthews, H. D.,
Raddatz, T., Rayner, P., Reick, C., Roeckner, E., Schnitzler, K.-G.,
Schnur, R., Strassmann, K., Weaver, A. J., Yoshikawa, C., and Zeng, N.:
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Inter-
comparison, J. Climate, 19, 3337–3353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3800.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3800.1</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fyfe, J. C. and Saenko, O. A.: Simulated changes in the extratropical
Southern Hemisphere winds and currents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06701,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025332" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025332</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., and Antonov, J. I.: World
Ocean Atlas 2005, vol. 4, Nutrients (Phosphate, Nitrate, Silicate), NOAA
Atlas NESDIS, vol. 64, edited by: Levitus, S., 396 pp., U.S. Gov. Print.
Off., Washington, D.C., 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gehlen, M., Gangstø, R., Schneider, B., Bopp, L., Aumont, O., and Ethe,
C.: The fate of pelagic CaCO<sub>3</sub> production in a high CO<sub>2</sub> ocean:
a model study, Biogeosciences, 4, 505–519,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-505-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-505-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N., Gloor, M., Fletcher, S. E. M., Doney, S. C., Dutkiewicz, S.,
Follows, M. J., Gerber, M., Jacobson, A. R., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Menemenlis, D., Mouchet, A., Muller, S. A., Sarmiento, J. L., and Takahashi,
T.: Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 23, GB1005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gb003349</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Heinze, C.: Simulating oceanic CaCO<sub>3</sub> export production in the
greenhouse, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020613" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020613</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Heuzé, C., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P., and Ridley, J. K.: Changes in
global ocean bottom properties and volume transports in CMIP5 models under
climate change scenarios, J. Climate, 28, 2917–2944,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00381.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00381.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hunke, E. C. and Dukowicz, J. K.: An elastic-viscous-plastic model for sea
ice dynamics, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1849–1867,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027&lt;1849:AEVPMF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1997)027&lt;1849:AEVPMF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T. and Follows, M.: Preformed phosphate, soft tissue pump and
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, J. Mar. Res., 63, 813–839, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Joos, F., Plattner, G. K., Stocker, T. F., Marchal, O., and Schmittner, A.:
Global warming and marine carbon cycle feedbacks on future atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub>, Science, 284, 464–467, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
K-1Model Developers: K-1 Coupled GCM (MIROC) description, edited by: Hasumi,
H. and Emori, S., K-1 Tech. Rep. 1, 34 pp., Univ. of Tokyo, Tokyo, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Keller, D. P., Oschlies, A., and Eby, M.: A new marine ecosystem model for
the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model, Geosci. Model Dev., 5,
1195–1220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1195-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1195-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Key, R. M., Kozyr, A., Sabine, C. L., Lee, K., Wanninkhof, R., Bullister, J.
L., Feely, R. A., Millero, F. J., Mordy, C., and Peng, T.-H.: A global ocean
carbon climatology: Results from Global Data Analysis Project (GLODAP),
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4031, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002247</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, D. M. and Slater, A. G.: A projection of severe near-surface
permafrost degradation during the 21st century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,
L24401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025080" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025080</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C., von Storch, J.-S., and Marotzke, J.: Deep-ocean heat uptake and
equilibrium climate response, Clim. Dynam., 40, 1071–1086,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1350-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1350-z</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., and Winguth, A.: Future ocean uptake of
CO<sub>2</sub>: Interaction between ocean circulation and biology, Clim.
Dynam., 12, 711–721, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Matear, R. and Hirst, A.: Climate change feedback on the future oceanic
CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, Tellus, 51B, 722–733, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Matear, R. J. and Lenton, A.: Impact of historical climate change on the
Southern Ocean carbon cycle, J. Climate, 21, 5820–5834, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K.: Biology-mediated temperature control on atmospheric
<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and ocean biogeochemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L20605,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031301</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K., Tokos, K., Chikamoto, M. O., and Ridgwell, A.: Characterizing
post-industrial changes in the ocean carbon cycle in an Earth system model,
Tellus B, 62, 296–313, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Meehl, G. A., Stocker, T. F., Collins, W. D., Friedlingstein, P., Gaye, A.
T., Gregory, J. M., Kitoh, A., Knutti, R., Murphy, J. M., Noda, A., Raper, S.
C. B., Watterson, I. G., Weaver, A. J., and Zhao, Z.-C.: Climate Change 2007:
The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, chap.
Global Climate Projections, 747–846, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Meijers, A.: The Southern Ocean in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project
phase 5, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 372, 20130296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0296" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0296</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Misumi, K., Lindsay, K., Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., Tsumune, D., and
Yoshida, Y.: Humic substances may control dissolved iron distributions in the
global ocean: Implications from numerical simulations, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 450–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20039</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Najjar, R. G. and Orr, J.: Biotic-HOWTO, internal OCMIP report, 15 pp., Lab.
des Sci. du Clim. et l'Environ., CEA, Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Nakano, H. and Suginohara, N.: Effects of bottom boundary layer
parameterization on reproducing deep and bottom waters in a world ocean
model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 1209–1227, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Oka, A., Abe-Ouchi, A., Chikamoto, M. O., and Ide, T.: Mechanisms controlling
export production at the LGM: Effects of changes in oceanic physical field
and atmospheric dust deposition, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB2009,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003628" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003628</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Orr, J. C.: Global Ocean Storage of Anthropogenic Carbon (GOSAC), final
report, 117 pp., EC Environ. and Clim. Programme, Inst. Pierre Simon Laplace,
Paris, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Oschlies, A., Schulz, K. G., Riebesell, U., and Schmittner, A.: Simulated
21st century's increase in oceanic suboxia by CO<sub>2</sub>-enhanced biotic
carbon export, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB4008,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003147" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003147</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Plattner, G. K., Joos, F., Stocker, T. F., and Marchal, O.: Feedback
mechanisms and sensitivities of ocean carbon uptake under global warming,
Tellus Ser. B-Chem. Phys. Meteorol., 53, 564–592, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Plattner, G., Knutti, R., Joos, F., Stocker, T., Von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V.,
Cameron, D., Driesschaert, E., Dutkiewicz, S., and Eby, M.: Long-term
climate commitments projected with climate – carbon cycle models, J.
Climate, 21, 2721–2751, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Randerson, J. T., Lindsay, K., Munoz, E., Fu, W., Moore, J. K., Hoffman, F.
M., Mahowald, N. M., and Doney, S. C.: Multicentury changes in ocean and land
contributions to the climatecarbon feedback, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29,
744–759, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A., Zondervan, I., Hargreaves, J. C., Bijma, J., and Lenton, T. M.:
Assessing the potential long-term increase of oceanic fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub>
uptake due to CO<sub>2</sub>-calcification feedback, Biogeosciences, 4,
481–492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-481-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-481-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Riebesell, U., Zondervan, I., Rost, B., Tortell, P. D., Zeebe, R. E., and
Morel, F. M. M.: Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to
increased atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 407, 364–367, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. L. and Gruber, N.: Ocean Biogeochemical Dynamics, chap. 8,
Carbon cycle, 318–358, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. L., Hughes, T., Stouffer, R., and Manabe, S.: Simulated
response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming, Nature,
393, 245–248, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Schlitzer, R.: Applying the adjoint method for global biogeochemical
modeling, in: Inverse Methods in Biogeochemical Cycles, edited by:
Kasibhatla, P., Heimann, M., Rayner, P., Mahowald, N., Prinn, R. G., and Hartley, D, E., 107–124, AGU, Washington, D.C., 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Schmittner, A., Oschlies, A., Matthews, D., and Galbraith, E. D.: Future
changes in climate, ocean circulation, ecosystems and biogeochemical cycling
simulated for a business-as-usual CO<sub>2</sub> emission scenario until year
4000 AD, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB1013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002953" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002953</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Schwinger, J., Tjiputra, J. F., Heinze, C., Bopp, L., Christian, J. R.,
Gehlen, M., Ilyina, T., Jones, C. D., Salas-Mélia, D., Segschneider, J.,
Séférian, R., and Totterdell, I.: Nonlinearity of Ocean Carbon Cycle
Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models, J. Climate, 27, 3869–3888,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00452.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00452.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Semtner Jr., A. J.: A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in
numerical investigations of climate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 379–389, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, S. L., Yamanaka, Y., Pahlow, M., and Oschlies, A.: Optimal uptake
kinetics: Physiological acclimation explains the pattern of nitrate uptake by
phytoplankton in the ocean, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 384, 1–12, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Steinacher, M., Joos, F., Frölicher, T. L., Bopp, L., Cadule, P., Cocco,
V., Doney, S. C., Gehlen, M., Lindsay, K., Moore, J. K., Schneider, B., and
Segschneider, J.: Projected 21st century decrease in marine productivity: a
multi-model analysis, Biogeosciences, 7, 979–1005,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-979-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-979-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Swart, N. C. and Fyfe, J. C.: Ocean carbon uptake and storage influenced by wind bias in global climate models, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 47–52, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Olafsson, J., Goddard, J. G., Chipman, D. W., and Sutherland,
S. C.: Seasonal variation of CO<sub>2</sub> and nutrients in the high-latitude
surface oceans: a comparative study, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 7, 843–878,
1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An overview of CMIP5 and
the experiment design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 485–498, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Taucher, J. and Oschlies, A.: Can we predict the direction of marine primary
production change under global warming?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L02603,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045934</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Taucher, J., Bach, L. T., Riebesell, U., and Oschlies, A.: The viscosity
effect on marine particle flux: A climate relevant feedback mechanism, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 28, 415–422, doi10.1002/2013/GB004728, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Weaver, A. J. Sedláček, J., Eby, M., Alexander, K., Crespin, E.,
Fichefet, T., Philippon-Berthier, G., Joos, F., Kawamiya, M., Matsumoto, K.,
Steinacher, M., Tachiiri, K., Tokos, K., Yoshimori, M., and Zickfeld, K.:
Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: a model
intercomparison, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20709, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053763</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Yamamoto, A., Yamanaka, Y., Oka, A., and Abe-Ouchi, A.: Ocean oxygen
depletion due to decomposition of submarine methane hydrate, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 5075–5083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060483" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060483</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Yamamoto, A., Abe-Ouchi, A., Shigemitsu, M., Oka, A., Takahashi, K., Ohgaito,
R., and Yamanaka, Y.: Global deep ocean oxygenation by enhanced ventilation
in the Southern Ocean under long-term global warming, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
29, 1801–1815, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005181" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005181</a>, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Zickfeld, K., Fyfe, J. C., Saenko, O. A., Eby, M., and Weaver, A. J.:
Response of the global carbon cycle to human-induced changes in Southern
Hemisphere winds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L12712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028797</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., and Weaver, A. J.: Carbon-cycle feedbacks of changes
in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation under future atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, Gb3024,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003118</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Matthews, H. D., Schmittner, A., and Weaver, A. J.:
Nonlinearity of Carbon Cycle Feedbacks, J. Climate, 24, 4255–4275, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Weaver, A., Alexander, K., Crespin, E., Edwards, N.,
Eliseev, A., Feulner, G., Fichefet, T., Forest, C., Friedlingstein, P.,
Goosse, H., Holden, P., Joos, F., Kawamiya, M., Kicklighter, D., Kienert, H.,
Matsumoto, K., Mokhov, I., Monier, E., Olsen, S., Pedersen, J., Perrette, M.,
Philippon- Berthier, G., Ridgwell, A., Schlosser, A., Schneider von Deim-
ling, T., Shaffer, G., Sokolov, A., Spahni, R., Steinacher, M., Tachiiri, K.,
Tokos, K., Yoshimori, M., Zeng, N., and Zhao, F.: Long-term climate change
commitment and reversibility: An EMIC intercomparison, J. Climate, 26,
5782–5809, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00584.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00584.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
