<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-4627-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>An evaluation of SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth (L-VOD)
data sets: high sensitivity of L-VOD to above-ground<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> biomass in Africa</article-title><alt-title>Sensitivity of SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth to biomass</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Sensitivity of SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth to biomass}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{N. J. Rodr\'{\i}guez-Fern\'{a}ndez et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rodríguez-Fernández</surname><given-names>Nemesio J.</given-names></name>
          <email>nemesio.rodriguez@cesbio.cnes.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3796-149X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mialon</surname><given-names>Arnaud</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7970-0701</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mermoz</surname><given-names>Stephane</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bouvet</surname><given-names>Alexandre</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7428-4339</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Richaume</surname><given-names>Philippe</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Al Bitar</surname><given-names>Ahmad</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-1096</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Al-Yaari</surname><given-names>Amen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7530-6088</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Brandt</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kaminski</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Le Toan</surname><given-names>Thuy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kerr</surname><given-names>Yann H.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wigneron</surname><given-names>Jean-Pierre</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère (CESBIO),
Université de Toulouse, Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES),
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Dévelopement (IRD),
Université Paul Sabatier, 18 av. Edouard Belin, bpi 2801, 31401 Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphére (ISPA), Unité Mixte de Recherche 1391, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), CS 20032,
33882 Villenave d'Ornon CEDEX, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geosciences and Natural Resources Management, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>The inversion Lab, Martinistr. 21, 20251 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nemesio J. Rodríguez-Fernández (nemesio.rodriguez@cesbio.cnes.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>30</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>4627</fpage><lpage>4645</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>February</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e203">The vegetation optical depth (VOD) measured at microwave frequencies is
related to the vegetation water content and provides information
complementary to visible/infrared vegetation indices. This study is devoted
to the characterization of a new VOD data set obtained from SMOS (Soil
Moisture and Ocean Salinity) satellite observations at L-band (1.4 GHz).
Three different SMOS L-band VOD (L-VOD) data sets (SMOS level 2, level 3 and
SMOS-IC) were compared with data sets on tree height, visible/infrared
indexes (NDVI, EVI), mean annual precipitation and above-ground biomass
(AGB) for the African continent. For all relationships, SMOS-IC showed the
lowest dispersion and highest correlation. Overall, we found a strong (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) correlation with no clear sign of saturation between L-VOD and four
AGB data sets. The relationships between L-VOD and the AGB data sets were
linear per land cover class but with a changing slope depending on the class
type, which makes it a global non-linear relationship. In contrast, the
relationship linking L-VOD to tree height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was close to linear.
For vegetation classes other than evergreen broadleaf forest, the annual
mean of L-VOD spans a range from 0 to 0.7 and it is linearly correlated with
the average annual precipitation. SMOS L-VOD showed higher
sensitivity to AGB compared to NDVI and K/X/C-VOD (VOD measured at 19, 10.7 and 6.9 GHz). The results showed that, although the
spatial resolution of L-VOD is coarse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km), the high temporal
frequency and sensitivity to AGB makes SMOS L-VOD a very promising
indicator for large-scale monitoring of the vegetation status, in
particular biomass.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e247">Large-scale monitoring of vegetation properties is crucial to understand
water, carbon and energy cycles. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">NDVI,</named-content></xref> computed from space-borne observations at
visible and infrared wavelengths has been widely used since the 1980s to
study vegetation changes and their implications on animal ecology
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.2"/>, global fire emissions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.3"/>, deforestation and urban development
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.4"/>, global patterns of land–atmosphere carbon fluxes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.5"/> and the vegetation response to climate
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.6"/> and extreme events such as droughts
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.7"/>. NDVI is sensitive to the abundance of
chlorophyll and therefore to the photosynthetically active biomass (which
includes herbaceous<?pagebreak page4628?> vegetation and the leaves of trees) but insensitive to
wood mass. NDVI is thus not considered as an accurate proxy of total above-ground biomass (AGB), except in areas of low vegetation density
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.8"/>. In contrast, being sensitive to both green and
non-green vegetation components, passive microwave observations can provide
important complementary information on the state and temporal changes of the
vegetation features, in particular regarding the AGB dynamics
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e280">The thermal emission arising from the Earth surface at microwave frequencies
depends on the soil characteristics such as soil temperature, soil roughness
and soil moisture content, which controls the soil emissivity
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.10"/>. In the presence of vegetation, part of the soil emission
is absorbed and scattered. These effects can be parameterized using radiative
transfer models such as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.11"/>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the optical depth and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the single-scattering albedo. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was shown to be linked to the vegetation water
content (VWC, kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.12"/> and to other vegetation properties such as the leaf area index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.13"/>.
Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is commonly known as vegetation optical depth (VOD). VOD is
also a function of the vegetation structure, which determines its dependence
on the incidence angle and on the polarization of the radiation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.14"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e351">Passive microwave radiometry is therefore a promising tool for monitoring
vegetation on a global scale. VOD samples the vegetation canopy, including woody
vegetation, which uses root zone soil moisture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.15"/>. VOD
was used to study deforestation in South America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.16"/>
and Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.17"/>. Using VOD, it has been possible to reveal
teleconnections linking the state of the vegetation in Australia and El Niño
Southern Oscillation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.18"/>. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.19"/>
showed the high potential of microwave VOD to monitor the AGB dynamics on a large scale. Using both VOD and NDVI contributes to a more robust
assessment of the vegetation characteristics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.20"/>. The VOD has
also been used to study the VWC and variations in ecosystem-scale
isohydricity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e376">The above-mentioned studies used VOD derived from different radiometers
operating at different frequencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.22"/>: SSM/I at 19 GHz
(K-band), TRMM-TMI at 10.7 GHz (X-band) and the Advanced Microwave Scanning
Radiometer – Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) at 10.7 and 6.9 GHz
(C-band). It is worth noting that VOD is intrinsically dependent on the
frequency of the electromagnetic radiation and VODs retrieved at different
frequencies provide complementary information. Therefore, in the following, a
specific VOD data set will be noted as <italic>B</italic>-VOD, where
<italic>B</italic>
stands for the microwave band (X-VOD, C-VOD, etc.). The lower the frequency,
the lower the VOD for a given level of VWC
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.23"/>. Consequently, L-band
(1.4 GHz, 21 cm) observations, which are less attenuated through the
vegetation canopy, are capable of sampling the vegetation layer up to higher
biomass values compared to higher-frequency observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e392">Currently, two missions are performing systematic L-band passive microwave
observations: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.24"/>, launched by ESA in November 2009, and the Soil Moisture
Active Passive (SMAP) satellite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.25"/>, launched by NASA
in January 2015. SMAP measures the brightness temperature for a single
incidence angle in two polarizations. A single-angle dual polarization
retrieval algorithm decreases the quality of the soil moisture retrievals
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.26"/> but using a multi-orbit approach, assuming that
the L-VOD does not vary significantly in a few days window, it is possible to
estimate soil moisture and L-VOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.27"/>. The
full-polarization and multi-angular capabilities of SMOS allow the simultaneous
retrieval of the soil moisture content and L-VOD.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="normal.28"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="normal.29"/> compared SMOS
L-VOD to X-VOD and C-VOD measured by AMSR-E and to visible/infrared
vegetation indices. In crop zones, such as the MODIS vegetation indices, L-VOD
increases during the growing season and decreases during senescence
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.30"/>. On a global scale, L-VOD is less correlated to
optical/visible vegetation indices than X<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C-VOD, suggesting that L-VOD can
add more complementary information with respect to optical/infrared indices
than X<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C-VOD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.31"/>. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="normal.32"/>
found a significant correlation between L-VOD and tree height estimates.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="normal.33"/> also discussed this relationship and compared it to
the one estimated with X<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C-VOD, which shows higher values for low tree-height
than SMOS L-VOD, as expected. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="normal.34"/> also showed a close to
linear relationship between L-VOD and AGB at 20 selected points over Peru,
Columbia and Panama. L-VOD has been recently used to study the evolution of
carbon stocks in African drylands by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="normal.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e454">In summary, L-VOD derived from the new SMOS L-band observations is a
promising tool for monitoring global vegetation characteristics. There is,
however, a lack of in-depth studies on how L-VOD relates to established
vegetation characteristics. The goal of the current study is to get further
insight into the sensitivity of L-VOD to vegetation properties (such as tree
height and AGB) and precipitation, which can drive the vegetation dynamics
for some biomes. Taking into account the novelty of these observations, three
distinct SMOS L-VOD data sets were evaluated against several data sets
independent of L-VOD: (i) optical/infrared indices (representing
the greenness of vegetation, also often used as a proxy for primary
productivity), (ii) AGB benchmark maps,<?pagebreak page4629?> (iii) lidar-derived
tree height and (iv) a precipitation data set. The area selected for
this study is Africa, as it is a continent with several climate regions and
biomes and with a large variability in the vegetation biomass, from sparse
shrubs to savannah and very dense rainforests. In addition,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="normal.36"/> have recently discussed the first biomass map of African
savannahs computed from L-band active microwave (synthetic aperture radar)
observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e460">In contrast to passive measurements, for which the goal is to study how the
thermal emission arising from the Earth is affected by the vegetation layer,
active measurements allow us to study how the radiation emitted by a human-made
radiation source is backscattered by the vegetation, which depends mainly on
the vegetation water content and the vegetation structure.</p>
      <p id="d1e463">Since this study is mainly devoted to AGB, long-term averages (typically
annual) will be used. Studying the evolution of VWC would require using much
shorter timescales. The document is organized as follows. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> presents the different SMOS L-VOD data sets as well as the
data sets used for the evaluation (tree height, cumulated precipitation,
NDVI, EVI and four AGB data sets). Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> deals with the
evaluation methods. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> presents the results, which
are discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>, in particular the potential
of L-VOD to estimate AGB on a large scale. Finally, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/> summarizes the results and presents the conclusions of
this study.
<?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>SMOS data</title>
      <p id="d1e488">The SMOS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.37"/> mission is an ESA-led mission with
contributions from CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, France) and CDTI
(Centro Para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial, Spain). The SMOS
radiometer measures the thermal emission from the Earth in the protected
frequency range around 1.4 GHz in full-polarization and for incidence angles
from 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Stokes 3 and 4 parameters are used to filter the data, for instance to detect radio frequency interference sources.
The footprint (full width at half maximum of the synthesized beam) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km on average <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.38"/>. The equator overpass time is 6:00 (18:00)
for ascending (descending) orbits. Data on ascending and descending orbits from
2011 and 2012 are used in this study. Taking into account the novelty of
L-VOD estimates, three different L-VOD data sets were evaluated in this
study: the ESA level 2 (L2) product, the CATDS multi-orbit level 3 (L3)
product and the new INRA-CESBIO (IC) data set (Table S1 in the Supplement gives a
summary of the main characteristics of those three products).</p>
      <p id="d1e534">The three SMOS soil moisture and L-VOD L2 retrieval algorithms discussed
below use the L-MEB (L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere) radiative
transfer model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.39"/>, which is based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
parameterization and takes into account the effect of vegetation. The soil
temperature profile is estimated from European Centre for Medium Range
Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) data. The
difference between forward-model estimates of the brightness temperatures at
antenna reference frame and actual satellite measurements is minimized by
varying the values of the soil moisture (SM) content and the L-VOD. The
contributions from the soil and vegetation layers can be distinguished thanks
to the multi-angular and dual-polarization measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e552">The differences between the three SMOS data sets are discussed in the
following.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>SMOS level 2 soil moisture and L-VOD</title>
      <p id="d1e560">The SMOS soil moisture and L-VOD L2 retrieval algorithm was described by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="normal.40"/>. The forward-model contributions are computed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km
resolution pixels and aggregated to the sensor resolution using the mean
synthetic antenna pattern. For footprints with mixed land cover, the L2
algorithm distinguishes the minor and the major land cover (low vegetation or
forest). The SMOS retrieval is performed only over the dominant land cover
class within the footprint, while the emission of the minor land cover is
estimated from ECMWF SM and MODIS leaf area index (LAI) data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.41"/>. The version of the data used in the current study is 620.
This data version uses auxiliary files including information on L-VOD
computed from previous retrievals, surface roughness and radio frequency
interference (RFI), which are used to constrain the new retrievals. Due to the
specificities of the SMOS geometry of observation, the profiles of brightness
temperatures observed in the middle part of the field of view (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km
centred on the satellite subtrack) have larger ranges of incidence angles
than the outer part of the field of view. For such observations, the
retrieval system has more information content that can be used to discriminate the vegetation
emission from the ground emission, leading to more accurate retrieved soil
moisture and VOD. The retrieved VODs and associated uncertainties for such
grid points are used as prior first guess and uncertainties for the L-VOD
retrieval of the next overpass of these grid points (3 days later at maximum)
that will be observed, this time, at the outer part of the field of view with
a reduced range of incidence angle. This avoids using auxiliary LAI data to
compute a first-guess L-VOD value <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.42"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4630?><p id="d1e592">The SMOS L2 data are provided by ESA in an Icosahedral Snyder Equal Area (ISEA) 4H9
grid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.43"/> in swath mode with a sampling resolution of 15 km.
The single-scattering albedo and roughness values depend on the surface type
and are taken from literature and/or specific SMOS studies. For low
vegetation areas, the single-scattering albedo is set to 0 and roughness set
to 0.1. For forested areas the single-scattering albedo is set to 0.06 for
tropical and subtropical forest and 0.08 for boreal forest and roughness set
to 0.3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.44"/>.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>SMOS level 3 soil moisture and L-VOD</title>
      <p id="d1e609">The SMOS L3 soil moisture and L-VOD data set is provided by the CATDS (Centre
Aval de Traitement de Données SMOS) from CNES (Centre National D'Etudes
Spatiales) and IFREMER (Institut Français de Recherche pour
l'Exploitation de la Mer) in an Equal-Area Scalable Earth Grid (EASE-Grid) version
2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.45"/> with a sampling resolution of 25 km. The data version
used in this study is version 300. The data set and the retrieval algorithm
are described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="normal.46"/>. The L3 algorithm is based on the
same physics and modelling as the ESA L2 single-orbit algorithm (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1"/>). However, instead of using information on prior retrievals
to constrain the SM and L-VOD inversion, the level 3 algorithm uses a
multi-orbit approach with data from three different revisits over a 7-day
window. In contrast to soil moisture, L-VOD is not expected to change
strongly over a short period of time. Therefore a Gaussian correlation
function is used during the retrieval to penalize large L-VOD variations in
the cost function. The standard deviation of the Gaussian correlation
function is 21 days for forests and 7 days for low vegetation. The single-scattering albedo and roughness parameterizations use the same approach and
values of the L2 algorithm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>SMOS INRA-CESBIO (IC) soil moisture and L-VOD</title>
      <p id="d1e626">The SMOS INRA-CESBIO (SMOS-IC) algorithm was designed by INRA (Institut
National de la Recherche Agronomique) and is produced by CESBIO (Centre
d'Etudes Spatiales de la BIOsphère). A detailed description is given in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="normal.47"/>. One of the main goals of the SMOS-IC product is to
be as independent as possible from auxiliary data, which are often also used
for evaluation. In contrast to the L2 and L3 algorithms, the IC algorithm
considers the footprints to be homogeneous to avoid uncertainties and errors
linked to possible inconsistencies in the auxiliary data sets which are used
to characterize the footprint heterogeneity. In addition, SMOS-IC differs
from the SMOS L2 and L3 products in the initialization of the cost function
minimization and in the modelling of heterogeneous pixels: no LAI nor ECMWF
SM data are used.</p>
      <p id="d1e632">A first run was done with SM 0.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and L-VOD 0.5 as the initial guess
for the minimization. This allowed us to compute a mean L-VOD map per grid
point. The final inversion was done using this mean L-VOD map as a first guess
for L-VOD and a value of 0.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as a first guess for SM. The roughness
and single-scattering parameters are assigned per International
Geosphere-Biosphere Program <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">IGBP, </named-content></xref> land
cover classes, based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx41" id="normal.49"/>
and are averaged within a footprint according to the fraction of classes
present in the footprint. The data used in this study are version 103 and are provided in the 25 km EASE-Grid 2.0.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Evaluation data sets</title>
      <p id="d1e694">This study performs an evaluation of the SMOS L-VOD data sets by comparing it
with other vegetation-related evaluation data sets, which are described in the
following.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Precipitation</title>
      <p id="d1e702">The WorldClim data set <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.50"/> provides spatially
interpolated monthly climate data for global land areas at a very high
spatial resolution (approximately 1 km). It includes monthly temperature
(minimum, maximum and average), precipitation, solar radiation, vapour
pressure and wind speed, aggregated across a target temporal range of
1970–2000, using data from between 9000 and 60 000 weather stations. As
precipitation drives the vegetation dynamics for some biomes, mean annual
precipitation was used to evaluate the relationship with L-VOD.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>MODIS vegetation indices</title>
      <p id="d1e714">MODIS NDVI and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) from the product MYD13C1
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.51"/> collection 6 were compared to the
SMOS L-VOD data sets to test L-VOD's performance against green
photosynthetically active vegetation. Both NDVI and EVI are directly linked
to the essential climate variables FAPAR and LAI and they are widely used as
proxy for green vegetation cover. The NDVI product contains atmospherically
corrected bidirectional surface reflectances masked for water, clouds and
cloud shadows.</p>
      <p id="d1e720">EVI uses the blue band to remove residual atmospheric contaminations caused
by smoke and subpixel thin cirrus clouds, which also introduces
uncertainties over tropical areas. EVI was designed to have higher
sensitivity in high biomass regions than NDVI by allowing the
vegetation and the atmosphere contributions to be distinguished from the signal
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.52"/>. Whereas the NDVI is chlorophyll sensitive, the EVI
is more responsive to the canopy type and structure (including LAI) and, for
example, it has allowed the Amazon green-up season to be studied (where other
vegetation indexes such as NDVI do not show any particular pattern,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="altparen.53"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e729">Global MYD13C1 data are cloud-free spatial composites of the gridded 16-day 1 km
MYD13A2 and are provided as a level 3 product projected on a
0.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> geographic Climate Modeling Grid (CMG). Cloud-free global coverage is
achieved by replacing clouds with the historical MODIS time series
climatology record.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Lidar tree height</title>
      <?pagebreak page4631?><p id="d1e747">This study used global tree height data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="normal.54"/>. This
data set was produced using 2005 data from the Geoscience Laser Altimeter
System (GLAS) aboard ICESat (Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite). The
processing follows three steps. First, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="normal.55"/> developed a
procedure to select waveforms and correct slope-induced distortions and to
calibrate canopy height estimates using field measurements. In a second step,
GLAS canopy height estimations were found to be correlated to other ancillary
data such as annual mean precipitation, precipitation seasonality, annual
mean temperature, temperature seasonality, elevation, tree cover and classes
of protection status. In a third step, a machine-learning approach (random
forest) was trained using the ancillary variables as input and GLAS tree
height as reference data. Finally, the random forest algorithm was applied to
the ancillary data to produce a forest canopy height map at 1 km resolution
for areas not covered by GLAS waveforms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Above-ground biomass</title>
      <p id="d1e763">This study used four static AGB benchmark maps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.56"/> each with
specific strengths and limitations that assess L-VOD's ability to reflect
above-ground biomass in different biomes: whereas the maps produced by
Saatchi, Baccini and Avitabile aim to cover all pantropical regions with
a focus on dense forests, the Bouvet's map focuses on African savannahs with
lower biomass values. To take advantage of ALOS/PALSAR L-band observations,
in the current study the Bouvet data set has also been extended to rainforest
(see below).</p>
      <p id="d1e769">The first AGB map over Africa was extracted from the 1 km resolution
pantropical AGB data set produced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.57"/>. The
methodology used to produce this data set involves roughly two steps:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d1e777">In situ inventory plots are used to derive AGB estimates from
the Lorey's height (the basal area weighted height of all trees with a
diameter of more than 10 cm) calculated from the ICESat GLAS measurements.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d1e781">These punctual measurements are spatially extrapolated using
MODIS and Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) data through maximum entropy
(MaxEnt) modelling. All in situ AGB measurements were made from 1995 to
2005, and the MODIS and QuikSCAT data used for spatial extrapolation
were acquired in 2000–2001, so that the resulting biomass map is
representative of AGB circa 2000.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e784">This study also used data over Africa extracted from the pantropical AGB
data set produced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.58"/>. The methodology used to
produce this data set is very similar to that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.59"/>,
except that (i) only MODIS data are used for the spatial
extrapolation, (ii) random forest is used instead of MaxEnt,
(iii) the data set is representative of circa 2007–2008, and
(iv) the AGB map is produced at a resolution of 500 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e793">The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="normal.60"/> was also used in this study. This forest
biomass data set was obtained by merging the data sets by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.61"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.62"/> with machine-learning techniques to compute a pantropical AGB map at 1 km spatial
resolution. The merging method was trained using an independent reference
data set with field observations and locally calibrated high-resolution
biomass maps, harmonized and upscaled to be representative of 1 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. They
used a total of 14 477 AGB samples in Australia, southern Asia, Africa, South
America and Central America, spanning AGB values from 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and covering different biomes such as grasslands, shrublands, savannahs and
rainforests.</p>
      <p id="d1e838">The fourth biomass map used in this study is based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="normal.63"/>
map over savannahs and from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="normal.64"/> over dense forests. The
map from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="normal.65"/> at 25 m resolution is the first biomass map
for Africa with a focus on savannahs and was built from a L-band ALOS PALSAR
mosaic produced with observations made in year 2010 (when SMOS was already in
operation). A direct model was developed to relate the PALSAR backscatter to
AGB with the help of in situ and ancillary data. In a subsequent step, a
Bayesian inversion of the direct model was performed. Seasonal effects were
taken into account by stratification into wet and dry season areas. In
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="normal.66"/>, the method was originally applied to savannah and
woodlands with typical AGB values of less than 85 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the current study,
the Bouvet et al. data set was extended to regions with AGB values larger
than 85 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the methodology presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="normal.67"/>:
the ESA CCI (Climate Change Initiative) land cover map was used to separate
dense forest areas, over which AGB was estimated at 500 m resolution
using the results by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="normal.68"/>. The resulting data set will
be referred to as the Bouvet–Mermoz data set in the following.
<?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?></p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e893">The region selected for this study was the African continent because the
Bouvet–Mermoz data set, which is the only one that has been produced using
SAR observations made in the same frequency band (L-band) as SMOS, is limited
to Africa. The African continent contains arid, equatorial and temperate
regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.69"/> with deserts, shrublands, mediterranean
woodlands, grasslands, savannah and rainforests <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.70"/>.
Therefore, this study covers a wide range of climate regions and biomes and
allows the analysis of L-VOD data to be extended to monitor vegetation properties,
in particular biomass, on larger scales than in previous studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.71"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e905">Unlike SMOS-IC and SMOS L3 products, which are produced natively on the 25 km
EASE-Grid 2.0, the SMOS L2 L-VOD products are provided on the ISEA4H9 grid. A
spatial interpolation was required to align the SMOS L2 L-VOD to the 25 km EASE-Grid. In order to maintain the meaning of the opacity as much as possible,
e.g. close to the coastline<?pagebreak page4632?> or transitions between the two grid systems, this
interpolated level 2 (hereafter iL2) L-VOD is obtained using (i) a DeLaunay
triangulation linear interpolation whenever possible (three valid
L2 L-VOD), (ii) a linear interpolation (only two valid L2 L-VOD) or
(iii) the nearest L2 L-VOD (only one valid L2 L-VOD) to the 25 km EASE-Grid
grid point within a neighbour defined by the 25 km EASE-Grid square cell.</p>
      <p id="d1e908">AGB, precipitation, tree height and MODIS NDVI/EVI data were aggregated and
resampled to the EASE-Grid 2.0, which are common to the SMOS L3 and IC data sets using
the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library (GDAL) routine <monospace>gdalwarp</monospace> in
average mode. Regarding, the SMOS level 2 data, several SMOS level 2
retrievals are available for a given day for high northern and southern
latitudes. At these latitudes, the best retrievals (corresponding to lower
values of the cost function <monospace>Chi2</monospace>) were selected.</p>
      <p id="d1e917">In spite of observing in a protected band dedicated to research observations,
some radio frequency interferences (RFI) from human-built equipment affect
the quality of the SMOS observations. Several quality indicators are present
in the SMOS L2 and L3 products. The <monospace>DQX</monospace> parameter uses the inverse
linear tangent model (Jacobian) to translate the observation uncertainty
(radiometric accuracy) into the parameter space uncertainty. The forward
models are much more sensitive for lower values of the (SM, L-VOD) parameter
space (leading to low <monospace>DQX</monospace>) than for higher values (leading to high
<monospace>DQX</monospace>). Therefore, filtering to keep the lowest <monospace>DQX</monospace> implies a
risk of biasing our results toward the lowest retrieved values, particularly for
tropical forest where both SM and L-VOD are high. In addition, the
<monospace>DQX</monospace> parameter does not give information about the correctness of the
solution, which is based on a quality of a fit. Therefore, the <monospace>Chi2</monospace>
(goodness of the fit) was used to filter out the retrieved solutions. Several
tests were done and a value of 3, corresponding approximately to the peak of
the <monospace>Chi2</monospace> probability distribution was found to be a good threshold.
This is in agreement with the values used in other studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre">see for
instance,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e948">In the case of SMOS-IC, data with a root mean squared difference between
modelled and observed brightness temperatures larger than 10 K were filtered
out. In addition, the L-VOD time series of the three products were analysed
from grid point to grid point, and values with a deviation (in absolute value)
larger than 2.5 with respect to the grid point average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the standard deviation) were considered as outliers and also
filtered out.</p>
      <p id="d1e965">The main evaluation strategy used in this study is to compare L-VOD data to
the evaluation data sets presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>. These variables
such as above-ground biomass, tree height or long-term averages of mean
annual precipitation are not expected to change quickly over time. The
biomass data sets discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> were produced with
observations from years 1995 to 2010. The comparison of L-VOD with the
other data sets was done using L-VOD data from 2011 and 2012, as 2011 is the
first complete year after the SMOS commissioning phase, which ended in June
2010. The L-VOD data for 2011 and 2012 were averaged to avoid short-term
variations due to changes in the vegetation water content over short time
periods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e974">Average of L-VOD for the SMOS-IC, SMOS iL2 and SMOS L3 data sets from years 2011–2012 (panels <bold>a</bold>, <bold>d</bold> and <bold>g</bold>), corresponding standard
deviation (SD, panels <bold>b</bold>, <bold>e</bold> and <bold>h</bold>) and number of points (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, panels
<bold>c</bold>, <bold>f</bold> and <bold>i</bold>) after filtering (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>) of the local
L-VOD time series for the three products.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1024">To get a quantitative assessment of the correlation and the dispersion of
L-VOD versus the evaluation data sets, three correlation coefficients were
computed. The Pearson correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a measure of the linear
correlation between two variables. If the relationship linking these
variables is linear with no dispersion, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> equals 1 (both variables increase
together) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 (one variable increases when the other decreases). However,
the relationships between L-VOD and the evaluation data are not expected to
be linear in most of the cases. Therefore, the Spearman and Kendall rank
correlations (which can range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to 1) were also computed to quantify
monotonic relationships, whether linear or not (the exact definition of the
Spearman and Kendall rank correlations is given in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1057">AGB maps from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="normal.73"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.74"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.75"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="normal.76"/> (panels <bold>a, b, d, e</bold>). Mean annual
precipitation and tree height (panels <bold>c, f</bold>).
Average of MODIS EVI <bold>(g)</bold> and NDVI <bold>(h)</bold>for 2011–2012.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1092">The AGB and L-VOD relationship was studied for different biomes using the
IGBP land cover classes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.77"/>. Table S2
summarizes the IGBP classes, and Fig. S1 in the Supplement shows their
spatial distribution using the Bouvet–Mermoz AGB map.
For a single biome, a linear function gives a good fit to the AGB and L-VOD relationships (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>).
In contrast, the global relationships linking the AGB data sets and L-VOD are significantly
non-linear; therefore fits were computed following the approach used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.78"/>.
The L-VOD data were binned in 0.05-width bins. For each L-VOD bin, the 5th
and 95th percentiles and the mean of the AGB distribution were computed,
providing three AGB curves as a function of L-VOD. The three curves were
fitted with the function used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.79"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M37" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>AGB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>vod</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        and with a logistic function,
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>AGB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VOD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        In Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), the parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are
varied to get the best fit to the curves. The fitted curves give AGB in Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
units as a function of L-VOD, which is a dimensionless quantity. Therefore
the units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are dimensionless
quantities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1321">Density scatter plots of SMOS-IC L-VOD respect to tree height <bold>(a)</bold>, EVI <bold>(c)</bold>, NDVI <bold>(e)</bold>,
cumulated precipitation <bold>(g)</bold>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.80"/> AGB <bold>(b)</bold>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="normal.81"/> AGB <bold>(d)</bold>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.82"/>
AGB <bold>(f)</bold> and Bouvet–Mermoz AGB data sets <bold>(h)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e1370">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows the average L-VOD computed over 2011
and 2012 using both ascending and descending orbits for the three SMOS L-VOD
products. In addition, it also shows the standard deviation (SD) and the
number of points of the local time series after applying the filters
discussed in Sect. 3. The three SMOS L-VOD products show a similar spatial
distribution but the SMOS-IC L-VOD shows a smoother spatial<?pagebreak page4633?> distribution than
the iL2 and L3 data sets. The highest values are found in equatorial forest
regions and L-VOD decreases monotonically with distance to the equatorial
forest in the tropical area and beyond. The SD of the L-VOD time series also
increases towards the equatorial forest, in particular for the iL2 and L3
data sets. The number of points in the time series is lower for the IC data set
due to the lower revisit frequency arising from the requirement of having
brightness temperature measurements spanning an incidence angle range of at
least 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.83"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1389">Scatter plots of MODIS NDVI and EVI with respect to
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.84"/> AGB.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1401">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the evaluation data after resampling to a 25 km
EASE-Grid 2.0: the 2011–2012 average of the MODIS NDVI and EVI indices, tree
height, mean annual precipitation and AGB data sets. EVI and NDVI also
decrease with increasing distance to the equator but more slowly than L-VOD.
The tree height map shows two main populations: the equatorial forest, with
heights larger than 20 m, and the rest of the continent, where most of
the vegetation is lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m. In contrast to the previous
quantities, AGB can vary by 2 orders of magnitude; therefore AGB maps are
shown in logarithmic units in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The Baccini, Saatchi
and Bouvet–Mermoz maps show a similar AGB distribution. In contrast, the
Avitabile map shows a much sharper decrease in AGB from the equatorial forest
region to the rest of the continent.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Comparison of the three L-VOD data sets</title>
      <p id="d1e1423">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the scatter plots
of SMOS IC L-VOD with respect to the evaluation data. The scatter plots
obtained with the iL2 and L3 data sets are shown in Figs. S2 and S3, respectively. A visual inspection shows that the
scatter plots obtained with IC L-VOD are significantly different than those
of iL2 and L3 L-VOD, as they show smoother relationships with lower
dispersion with respect to all the evaluation data sets than the equivalent
plots for iL2 and L3 L-VOD.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4634?><p id="d1e1428">A quantitative assessment of the correlation and the dispersion of the
different scatter plots can be found in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, where Pearson,
Spearman and Kendall correlation coefficients are given for the three L-VOD
data sets with respect to the evaluation data sets. The lowest Pearson
correlation coefficient values were obtained for L3 L-VOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.65–0.87).
The Pearson correlation coefficients obtained for iL2 L-VOD are similar (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67–0.87) to those obtained for L3 L-VOD but systematically higher by up to
4%, while the values obtained for IC L-VOD are the highest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.77–0.94)
with respect to all the evaluation data sets. The correlation increase is in
the range of 5 %–10 % with respect to iL2 L-VOD and up to 15 % with respect
to L3 L-VOD.
The rank correlation values with respect to all the evaluation data sets are also higher for
IC L-VOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78–0.91, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.61–0.75), followed by iL2 L-VOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.67–0.83,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.50–0.65) and L3 L-VOD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.66–0.80, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49–0.62). These results are in
agreement with those obtained with the Pearson correlation and imply that the lower Pearson
correlation values obtained for the L3 and iL2 data sets are not due to a correlation that
could be better but more non-linear than that of the IC data set. Therefore, using eight
vegetation-related evaluation data sets and three different metrics, the most consistent
SMOS L-VOD data set is SMOS-IC. This result implies that, currently,
the SMOS-IC data set is the best SMOS L-VOD product with which to perform vegetation studies, and the
rest of the current study will focus on SMOS-IC L-VOD.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1526">Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Spearman's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and Kendal's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation coefficients
of the three SMOS L-VOD data sets with respect to mean annual precipitation, tree
height, MODIS NDVI and EVI and AGB from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.85"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="normal.86"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.87"/> and Bouvet–Mermoz.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">IC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">iL2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">L3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">iL2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">L3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">iL2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">L3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Precipitation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tree height</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NDVI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EVI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.57</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Avitabile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.53</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Baccini</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Saatchi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bouvet–Mermoz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.62</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Comparison of SMOS IC L-VOD to other data sets</title>
      <p id="d1e1935">The relationship between tree height and IC L-VOD was found to be close to
linear with a high Pearson correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>), in agreement with previous findings using SMOS L2 data
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.88"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1955">With respect to visible/infrared indices such as EVI and NDVI, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows that both indices saturate even for moderate L-VOD
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in agreement with previous studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.89"/>. The correlation coefficients are
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.80–0.81 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.88 for NDVI and EVI. Regarding
precipitation, the scatter plots show more dispersion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than those obtained with NDVI and EVI but there is a saturation in
the mean annual precipitation values for L-VOD values higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.7.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4636?><p id="d1e2030">Regarding the different AGB data sets, most of the scatter plots show a clear
non-linear relationship between L-VOD and AGB. The relationship between
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.90"/> AGB versus IC L-VOD is the less non-linear one,
and the associated Pearson correlation coefficient is the highest found (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The relationship between
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="normal.91"/> AGB and L-VOD is the most non-linear one (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). It shows a low sensitivity to low L-VOD values and a
large dispersion for high L-VOD values with AGB ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 500 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relationship between L-VOD and the Bouvet–Mermoz AGB data
set (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) also shows a significant dispersion for high
L-VOD values, with AGB spanning a range from 200 to 400 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the
results obtained with the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.92"/> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.93"/> data sets show a single AGB peak for
the highest SMOS L-VOD values with values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">280</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. In summary, IC L-VOD shows high sensitivity to AGB,
with smooth relationships and without strong signs of saturation, in particular
with respect to the AGB data sets from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.94"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.95"/> and Bouvet–Mermoz.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2218">AGB vs. L-VOD scatter plots of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>
but plotted as point scatter plots. In addition, on the right-hand panels,
the 5th and 95th percentiles of the AGB
distribution in bins of L-VOD are displayed as blue circles, while the mean is
displayed as black circles. Solid blue and black lines are the fits obtained
using a logistic function (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) with the parameters given in
Table S3 for the 5th and 95th percentiles and the mean
curves.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2232">To compare the relationship linking L-VOD and AGB to the relationship between
other vegetation indices and AGB, scatter plots similar to those of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> were computed using Saatchi's AGB with respect to MODIS
NDVI and EVI (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). There is a close to linear
relationship for AGB lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and EVI and NDVI lower than 0.4
and 0.7, respectively. However, in contrast to L-VOD, the relationship
saturates for EVI and NDVI higher than 0.5–0.6 and 0.7–0.8, respectively, for
which AGB increases sharply from 90 to 300 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is expected as the
visible/infrared indices are sensible to the greenness of the canopy, which
is not closely related to the total AGB in densely vegetated regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2273">To get further insight into the global AGB versus L-VOD relationship, the
fitting method described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> was used. Fits of the
same quality were found using Liu's function (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) and the
logistic function (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows
the fits using a logistic function and Table S3 shows the
best-fit parameters. Even if the overall form of the scatter plots of L-VOD
and the four different AGB data sets are different, fits of the same quality
were obtained for the four relationships. The Pearson correlation
coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the fitted function with respect to the points to fit
are in the range from 0.990 to 0.999 (Table S3). Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>)
with the best-fit coefficients of Table S3 for
the “mean” curves can be used to transform SMOS IC L-VOD into AGB, while
the 5th and 95th quantile best fits can be used to provide an uncertainty
interval.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Comparison of IC L-VOD to other data sets per land cover class</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>AGB data sets</title>
      <?pagebreak page4637?><p id="d1e2309">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows
the relationship between L-VOD and the four AGB data sets (from left to right: Bouvet–Mermoz, Saatchi, Baccini, Avitabile)
for different IGBP land cover classes (from top to bottom: open shrublands,
croplands, grasslands, croplands and natural vegetation mosaics, savannah,
woody savannah, evergreen broadleaf). Each panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> shows the regression line and the corresponding
equation, as well as values of the Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Spearman <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and Kendall
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficients.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e2338">Maximum L-VOD values increase from grasslands, croplands, shrublands and
savannahs, where L-VOD reaches a maximum value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to croplands
and natural vegetation mosaics and woody savannahs, where L-VOD reaches a
maximum value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.7. L-VOD values higher than 0.7 were only
found in the evergreen broadleaf equatorial forest, where the L-VOD range is
0.5–1.2.</p>
      <p id="d1e2361">There are clear trends in the slope of the regression lines. For
Bouvet–Mermoz and Saatchi AGB data sets the trends are consistent. Slopes
increase from 75–86 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from shrublands and croplands to 110–150 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
grasslands, croplands and natural vegetation mosaics, savannahs and woody
savannahs. Finally the AGB versus L-VOD relationship slopes increase to
215–250 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for broadleaf evergreen forest. The general trends found with
the Baccini AGB data set are in overall agreement with those of Bouvet–Mermoz
and Saatchi but the slopes for shrublands and grasslands are significantly
lower (2–44 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), while those for croplands and natural vegetation mosaics,
savannahs and woody savannahs reach 160–210 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are values
significantly higher than the ones obtained with Bouvet–Mermoz and Saatchi
(122–156 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The slope obtained for the evergreen broadleaf equatorial
forest was in good agreement with the two other AGB data sets (265 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). On
the other hand, the slopes of the Avitabile AGB and L-VOD do not show the
same trends as the other three AGB data sets. Slopes for shrublands,
croplands, grasslands and savannahs are as low as 13–44 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The slope
increases for mosaics of croplands and natural vegetation up to
87 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are
still significantly lower than the range of 132–174 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> found with the other
three AGB data sets. The regression line for the scatter plot for Avitabile's
woody savannah AGB increases up to 175 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, an intermediate value with
respect to those found with Saatchi's (123 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Baccini's AGB (211 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and actually the scatter plot shows signs of bimodality for L-VOD
values of 0.5–0.7. In contrast, the slope obtained for evergreen broadleaf
forest using Avitabile's AGB is much higher (362 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than those obtained
with the other three AGB data sets (215–265 Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2546">Many of the relationships are close to linear with Pearson coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
up to 0.70–0.87 and similar Spearman <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. SMOS L-VOD is
well correlated to Bouvet–Mermoz and Saatchi's AGB for all IGBP classes with
Pearson correlation coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.6–0.85 (except with Saatchi AGB
in shrublands, which is lower, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). With respect to Baccini AGB, the
Pearson correlation is high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.87) for all IGBP classes but for
shrublands and grasslands, where it was found to be very low: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.39.
Similar behaviour to that of Baccini AGB was found using Avitabile AGB,<?pagebreak page4638?> for
which Pearson correlation values were also found to be low for shrublands and
grasslands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.44), while they increase for savannahs and woody
savannahs to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.56 and to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for croplands, crops and
natural vegetation mosaics and evergreen broadleaf forest.</p>
      <p id="d1e2644">The best correlations of AGB and L-VOD were found with (i) Bouvet–Mermoz AGB for
shrublands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and savannahs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
(ii) Baccini AGB for croplands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and evergreen broadleaf
equatorial forest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and (iii) Saatchi AGB for grasslands
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Regarding croplands and natural vegetation mosaics, the highest
correlation values were obtained with Saatchi and Baccini, which gave very
similar results (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.87) and were somewhat higher than those obtained with
Bouvet–Mermoz (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Finally, for woody savannah, the highest
correlation values were also obtained with Saatchi and Baccini
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.70, respectively), while with Bouvet–Mermoz (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
Avitabile (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the correlation was lower. One should note that Pearson
correlation values obtained with Bouvet–Mermoz for woody savannah could be
degraded by the fact that, for the highest values of AGB found in this class
at the SMOS resolution, the AGB estimation is a mix of Bouvet and Mermoz
approaches. Actually, it is noteworthy that the highest rank correlations for
woody savannahs and mosaics of croplands and natural vegetation  were obtained
with the Bouvet–Mermoz data set (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). In summary, except for the Avitabile AGB data set, all the
other AGB data sets perform better than L-VOD for a few land
cover classes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2795">SMOS IC L-VOD relationships versus the four AGB data sets (from left
to right: Bouvet–Mermoz, Saatchi, Baccini, Avitabile) for different IGBP land
cover classes (from top to bottom: open shrublands, croplands, grasslands,
croplands and natural vegetation mosaics, savannah, woody savannah, evergreen
broadleaf). Each panel shows the regression line and equation, and values of
the Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Spearman <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and Kendall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficients.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Other auxiliary data sets</title>
      <p id="d1e2831">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> is similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> but it
shows the relationship between L-VOD and other auxiliary data sets (from left
to right: tree height, NDVI, EVI and mean annual precipitation) for
different IGBP land cover classes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2840">SMOS IC L-VOD relationships versus auxiliary data sets (from left
to right: tree height, NDVI, EVI and average annual precipitation)
for different IGBP land cover classes (from top to bottom: open shrublands, croplands,
grasslands,
croplands and natural vegetation mosaics, savannah, woody savannah, evergreen
broadleaf). Each panel shows the regression line and equation, and values of
the Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Spearman <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and Kendall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficients.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2870">Regarding tree height, the slope of the regression line is 17–27 m for all
IGBP classes except for shrublands, where it is 12 m. The Pearson correlation
is relatively low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) except for mosaics of croplands and natural
vegetation and for evergreen broadleaf forest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.61</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.73).</p>
      <p id="d1e2895">Regarding the L-VOD and NDVI relationship in different biomes, the slope of
the regression line increases from 0.05 in shrublands to 0.57 in grasslands
and 0.87 in mosaics of croplands and natural vegetation, before decreasing
again to 0.6 in savannahs, 0.36 in woody savannahs and 0.11 in evergreen
broadleaf forest as NDVI saturates. It is noteworthy that no significant
difference is seen in the behaviour of EVI and NDVI for high L-VOD values, in
spite of the “enhanced” performance of EVI with respect to NDVI, pointed out
in some studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.96"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2904"><bold>(a)</bold> Fits of the 5th and 95th percentile curves of the
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.97"/> AGB with respect to SMOS-IC L-VOD (green) and
NDVI (pink). To plot both distributions with the same scale, VOD and NDVI
were normalized from 0 to 1 using their respective maxima (0.83 for NDVI and
1.24 for L-VOD). <bold>(b)</bold> Fits of the 5th and 95th percentile curves of the
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.98"/> AGB with respect to SMOS-IC L-VOD (green)
overlaid in the K/X/C-VOD versus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.99"/> AGB curves of
Fig. S4 from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.100"/> (brown). No normalization is needed in this
case as both VODs span a similar range of values.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/15/4627/2018/bg-15-4627-2018-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2930">Regarding the relationship between L-VOD and the average amount of annual
precipitation, L-VOD increases from 0 up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for increasing
precipitation up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm (values found for croplands and natural
vegetation mosaics and woody savannah). In this range of L-VOD, all other
vegetation tracers increase as well. For instance, Bouvet–Mermoz and
Saatchi's AGB increase up to 85 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and
NDVI and EVI increase up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). The Pearson correlation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the slope of the regression line increase from 0.2–0.3 and 266–612 mm
for shrublands and grasslands to 0.4–0.65 and 1395–1914 mm for
croplands, mosaics of croplands and natural vegetation and savannahs. The
Pearson correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the slope decrease to 0.25 and 741 mm,
respectively, in woody savannahs. Finally, L-VOD values higher than 0.6–0.7,
found only in evergreen broadleaf forest, are uncorrelated with the mean
annual precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm). The mean annual
precipitation could be one of the drivers of vegetation growth in drylands.
In contrast, over that threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm of annual precipitation,
which occur basically in the evergreen broadleaf forest, L-VOD and the other
vegetation tracers are not coupled to the amount of precipitation.</p><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Sensitivity of L-VOD to AGB</title>
      <p id="d1e3062">As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, SMOS L2 and L3 products consider
heterogeneous land cover inside the SMOS footprints, while SMOS-IC does not
account for footprint heterogeneity. The better results obtained with the
SMOS-IC data set suggests that the approach used to account for heterogeneous
land cover introduces uncertainties in the level 2 and 3 products.
Nevertheless, independently of the choice of the SMOS L-VOD data set, the
results showed a generally high sensitivity of L-VOD with respect to the
vegetation-related variables and indices used for the evaluation, in particular
with respect to AGB (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.94).</p>
      <p id="d1e3079">The relationship between tree height and SMOS L-VOD was found to be close to
linear, confirming previous findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="normal.101"/> using SMOS L2
L-VOD. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="normal.102"/> estimated a correlation of L2 L-VOD and tree
height of 0.81, which is in good agreement with the value reported here
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). However, for IC L-VOD the relationship
shows even less dispersion and a higher correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3114">The SMOS-IC L-VOD relationships with respect to NDVI and EVI were found to be in
agreement with those discussed using SMOS L3 data by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="normal.103"/> as there is saturation in EVI and NDVI for high
L-VOD values. In contrast, the relationships found in this study using
SMOS-IC showed less dispersion than those found by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="normal.104"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4641?><p id="d1e3123">Regarding the comparison to AGB, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="normal.105"/> discussed the
relationship linking L2 L-VOD and biomass from the Carnegie Airborne
Observatory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.106"/> at 20 selected points over Peru, Columbia and
Panama, spanning AGBs from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">280</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relationship
was almost linear, in good agreement with the results discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> for SMOS IC L-VOD for evergreen broadleaf forest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Comparison of L-band sensitivity to AGB to other frequencies</title>
      <p id="d1e3173">This study is devoted to L-VOD as estimated from SMOS observations, but it is
interesting to discuss the scatter plots presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/> in comparison those obtained for other frequencies.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a shows the fits to the 5th and 95th curves
obtained by analysing the Saatchi AGB and L-VOD distributions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c). The area between the curves was shaded in
green. In addition, the figure also shows the fits to the 5th and 95th
curves obtained by analysing the MODIS NDVI and L-VOD distributions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).
The area between the curves was shaded in pink. Since the dynamic range of L-VOD and NDVI are significantly different,
both quantities were normalized from 0 to 1 by their maximum values being
divided (1.24 and 0.83 for L-VOD and NDVI) in order to better show the
sensitivity to AGB. As discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>, NDVI
shows some sensitivity to AGB only for low AGB values (with a low slope)
before showing strong saturation for AGB values higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3209">Regarding the VOD estimated with higher microwave frequencies,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.107"/> discussed fits of Saatchi's AGB as a function of K/X/C-VOD.
They used K/X/C-VOD data in the period 1998–2002 (as mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, the data used to compute the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.108"/>
maps were acquired from 1995 to 2005). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.109"/> computed the 5th
and 95th quantiles of the AGB distribution in VOD bins, obtaining two curves
and giving the “envelope” of the AGB versus and VOD distribution, which is the
same method that was used in the current study (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>).
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b shows the fits to the 5th and 95th curves shown
in Fig. S4 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.110"/>, which were reproduced using the function
and the parameters given in their Eq. (S2) and Table S1, respectively. The area
between the curves was shaded in brown. In addition, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b shows the fits to the 5th and 95th curves obtained
by analysing the Saatchi AGB and L-VOD distributions. The area between the
curves was shaded in green as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a. The
relationship between AGB and K/X/C-VOD shows a similar shape to that of AGB
versus L-VOD but it is somewhat shifted to higher VOD values. AGB increases
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for K/X/C-VOD values higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, the relationship between AGB and L-VOD shows a more steady
increase from low to high AGB and L-VOD values. In particular, it does not
show a threshold beyond which the relationship saturates and the slope
increases significantly.
One must bear in mind that the time periods of the data compared with
K/X/C-VOD are not the same, as the L-VOD period used in this study is
2011–2012 and more detailed comparisons of the sensitivity to AGB of VOD
at different frequencies would be interesting. However, the non-linearity of
the curve and the difference in sensitivity to high AGB from different
frequencies is driven by the high AGB values in the dense equatorial forest,
which is not supposed to vary strongly in a few years time at the SMOS
spatial resolution. In addition, it is worth noting that the different shapes
of the L-VOD and AGB relationships with respect to the K/X/C-VOD and AGB
relationships are in agreement with what it is expected from the radiation
transfer theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.111"/>
and previous results on L-VOD and X/C-VOD comparison by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="normal.112"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="normal.113"/> as
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b shows that, for a given AGB, L-VOD is lower than VOD at higher frequencies, as expected.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page4642?><sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Comparison of the different AGB data sets</title>
      <p id="d1e3295">Estimating the AGB from remote sensing measurements is complex and the errors
of different retrieval methods are not easy to characterize. Interpreting why
L-VOD compares better to a given AGB data set for a given IGBP class (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>) is not easy.</p>
      <p id="d1e3300">The Avitabile AGB data set shows that a sharp decrease from the equatorial region
with distance is not seen in any other AGB map nor in the L-VOD maps.
Avitabile AGB and L-VOD scatter plots are also significantly different to those computed
with the original Baccini and Saatchi maps. For instance, the low AGB versus
L-VOD slopes obtained for low shrublands, grasslands and croplands are much
lower than those found with the original Saatchi and Baccini data sets. The
scatter plot found with Avitabile for woody savannah resembles an overlay of
the scatter plot obtained from Baccini and the scatter plot obtained from
Saatchi. Finally, the slope of the AGB versus L-VOD in evergreen broadleaf
forest is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher than those found with the other data sets. The
singular behaviour of Avitabile AGB could arise from the fact that it is a
pure data-driven method and that it is therefore very sensitive to the data
used to train the method. In the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="normal.114"/> training
database, high AGB plots could be overrepresented.</p>
      <p id="d1e3318">On the other hand, as mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>, the
distribution of Baccini AGB for woody savannah is significantly different to
the other data sets, which have much higher values than those found for
Bouvet–Mermoz and Saatchi AGB. Actually, with Baccini AGB, the value of the
slope obtained for woody savannah is 80 % of that obtained for evergreen
broadleaf forest, while this ratio is only 55 % for Bouvet–Mermoz and
Saatchi AGB. This high slope for woody savannah is responsible for the lower
non-linearity of the global AGB and L-VOD relationship using the Baccini data
set. Woody savannah in the IGBP classification is defined as herbaceous
vegetation and a forest canopy cover between 30 % and 60 %. AGB could be
overestimated in this heterogeneous land cover class in the Baccini data set
due to the fact that no microwave data but only MODIS is used for the spatial
extrapolation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>). Figure S4 shows scatter
plots of the four AGB data sets as a function of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="normal.115"/>
tree height estimation. The relationship is almost linear for
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.116"/> AGB, which is not the expected behaviour from
allometric relations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.117"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3334">Radar observations in low vegetation regions such as shrublands and
grasslands are thought to be very sensitive to biomass variations, in spite
of a significant sensitivity to soil moisture. The high correlation of the
two AGB maps involving radar data, either as the main source of information
(Bouvet–Mermoz) or together with optical and elevation data (Saatchi), with
SMOS L-VOD in grasslands would confirm this fact, as the high correlation in
shrublands for Bouvet–Mermoz. The low slopes found for shrublands and
grasslands when being compared to Baccini AGB also support this interpretation.
Interestingly, the Bouvet–Mermoz AGB data set, which has been obtained from
L-band SAR data and is the only one developed with a particular focus on
savannahs, shows a linear relationship between L-VOD and AGB with a very low
dispersion.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3344">Three different SMOS-based L-VOD data
sets were evaluated and compared to precipitation, tree height, NDVI, EVI and
AGB data. Lower dispersion and smoother relationships were obtained by using
SMOS-IC L-VOD compared to the iL2 and L3 L-VOD data sets. Consistently, the
rank correlation values obtained with SMOS-IC were significantly higher by
5 %–15 % than those obtained with level 2 and level 3 L-VOD data sets.</p>
      <p id="d1e3347">The relationships between AGB estimates and L-VOD were strong (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.94) but differed among the products. For low vegetation classes
(grasslands to woody savannah), the best performance was achieved with the
Bouvet–Mermoz, Baccini and Saatchi biomass data sets. The biomass data by
Baccini and Saatchi showed the best agreement with L-VOD for dense forest
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.79). Avitabile's AGB data showed low correlation values with
L-VOD for low vegetation classes and a similar performance to Bouvet–Mermoz
for dense forest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.67). The AGB and L-VOD relationships can be
fitted over the entire range of both variables with a single law using a
sigmoid logistic function. However, an analysis per land cover class showed
that within the same land cover class, the L-VOD and AGB relationship is
close to linear. Therefore, the global non-linear relationship, found when
all the different land cover are considered together, arises from different
slopes in the L-VOD/AGB relationship obtained for different land cover
classes considered separately. For low vegetation classes, the annual mean of
L-VOD spans a range from 0 to 0.7 and could be related to the mean annual
precipitation.</p>
      <p id="d1e3386">The relationship between AGB versus L-VOD was compared to the ones between
AGB versus NDVI and AGB versus K/X/C-VOD from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.118"/>. As
expected, NDVI saturates strongly and it becomes weakly sensitive to AGB
changes from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Mg h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. With respect to K/X/C-VOD, the AGB
also increases slowly as VOD increases for most (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) of the
K/X/C-VOD dynamic range but it saturates for VOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, AGB
values show a steady increment as L-VOD increases over the whole L-VOD
dynamic range.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4643?><p id="d1e3445">The equations computed in this study can be used to estimate AGB from SMOS-IC
L-VOD. Of course, these equations depend on the data set used as reference to
fit the AGB and L-VOD relationship. Three of them (those determined with
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="normal.119"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="normal.120"/> and Bouvet–Mermoz)
gave very similar values when the 5th and 95th percentiles of the
distributions were taken into account.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e3456">The results obtained in this study showed that the L-VOD parameter estimated
from the SMOS passive microwave observations is an interesting index with which to
monitor AGB at coarse resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km). Despite its coarse spatial
resolution, the advantage of using SMOS L-VOD is that it is possible to
compute one AGB map per year, for instance, which allows temporal
estimations of the changes in the global carbon stocks on large scales
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.121"/>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e3476">SMOS level 3 and IC products are available from CATDS at
<uri>ftp://ext-catds-cpdc:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/GRIDDED/</uri> (CATDS, 2018a) and
<uri>ftp://ext-catds-cecsm:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/L3_SMOS_IC_Vegetation_Optical_Depth/</uri> (CATDS, 2018b), respectively.
SMOS Level 2 products are available from ESA (2018) at <uri>https://smos-diss.eo.esa.int</uri>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3488"><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4627-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4627-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e3494">NJRF, AM, YK and JPW planned the research discussed in this manuscript
and NJRF and AM performed most the computations. SM, AB and TLT provided the AGB data
sets and expertise on AGB estimations. AM, JPW and AAY provided the SMOS-IC data. PR
pre-processed the SMOS level 2 data. TK, AAB and MB reviewed the system design and the
results, in particular regarding the analysis per land cover classes. All authors
participated in the writing and provided comments and suggestions.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e3500">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3506">Nemesio J. Rodríguez-Fernández, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Thomas Kaminski, Arnaud Mialon and Yann H. Kerr acknowledge partial support from the
ESA contract no. 4000117645/16/NL/SW Support To Science Element
SMOS+Vegetation and by CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales) TOSCA
programme. They also acknowledge interesting discussions with other
colleagues involved in the SMOS+Vegetation project (Marko Scholze, Matthias
Drusch, Michael Vossbeck, Wolfgang Knorr, Cristina Vittucci and Paolo
Ferrazzoli). SMOS level 3 data were obtained from the “Centre Aval de
Traitement des Données SMOS” (CATDS), operated for CNES (France) by
IFREMER (Brest, France). Martin Brandt is supported by an AXA post-doctoral fellowship.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Peter van Bodegom<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Al Bitar et al.(2017)Al Bitar, Mialon, Kerr, Cabot, Richaume,
Jacquette, Quesney, Mahmoodi, Tarot, Parrens, Al-yaari, Pellarin,
Rodriguez-Fernandez, and Wigneron</label><mixed-citation>Al Bitar, A., Mialon, A., Kerr, Y. H., Cabot, F., Richaume, P., Jacquette,
E., Quesney, A., Mahmoodi, A., Tarot, S., Parrens, M., Al-Yaari, A.,
Pellarin, T., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N., and Wigneron, J.-P.: The global SMOS
Level 3 daily soil moisture and brightness temperature maps, Earth Syst. Sci.
Data, 9, 293–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-293-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-293-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Andela et al.(2013)Andela, Liu, Van Dijk, De Jeu, and
McVicar</label><mixed-citation>Andela, N., Liu, Y. Y., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Jeu, R. A. M., and McVicar,
T. R.: Global changes in dryland vegetation dynamics (1988–2008) assessed by
satellite remote sensing: comparing a new passive microwave vegetation
density record with reflective greenness data, Biogeosciences, 10, 6657–6676,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6657-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6657-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Asner et al.(2014)Asner, Knapp, Martin, Tupayachi, Anderson, Mascaro,
Sinca, Chadwick, Higgins, Farfan, Llactayo, and Silman</label><mixed-citation>Asner, G. P., Knapp, D. E., Martin, R. E., Tupayachi, R., Anderson, C. B.,
Mascaro, J., Sinca, F., Chadwick, K. D., Higgins, M., Farfan, W., Llactayo,
W., and Silman, M. R.: Targeted carbon conservation at national scales with
high-resolution monitoring, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, E5016–E5022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419550111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1419550111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Avitabile et al.(2016)Avitabile, Herold, Heuvelink, Lewis, Phillips,
Asner, Armston, Ashton, Banin, Bayol et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Avitabile, V., Herold, M., Heuvelink, G., Lewis, S. L., Phillips, O. L.,
Asner, G. P., Armston, J., Ashton, P. S., Banin, L., Bayol, N., and Berry, N. J.: An
integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets, Glob.
Change Biol., 22, 1406–1420, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Baccini et al.(2012)Baccini, Goetz, Walker, Laporte, Sun,
Sulla-Menashe, Hackler, Beck, Dubayah, Friedl et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Baccini, A., Goetz, S., Walker, W., Laporte, N., Sun, M., Sulla-Menashe, D.,
Hackler, J., Beck, P., Dubayah, R., Friedl, M., and Samanta, S.: Estimated carbon
dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density
maps, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 182–185, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bouvet et al.(2018)Bouvet, Mermoz, Toan, Villard, Mathieu, Naidoo,
and Asner</label><mixed-citation>Bouvet, A., Mermoz, S., Toan, T. L., Villard, L., Mathieu, R., Naidoo, L.,
and Asner, G. P.: An above-ground biomass map of African savannahs and woodlands
at 25 m resolution derived from ALOS PALSAR, Remote Sens.
Environ., 206, 156–173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.030</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Brandt et al.(2017)Brandt, Rasmussen, Peñuelas, Tian, Schurgers,
Verger, Mertz, Palmer, and Fensholt</label><mixed-citation>
Brandt, M., Rasmussen, K., Peñuelas, J., Tian, F., Schurgers, G., Verger,
A., Mertz, O., Palmer, J. R., and Fensholt, R.: Human population growth
offsets climate-driven increase in woody vegetation in sub-Saharan Africa,
Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 0081, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Brandt et al.(2018)Brandt, Wigneron, Chave, Tagesson, Penuelas,
Ciais, Rasmussen, Tian, Mbow, Al-Yaari et al.</label><mixed-citation>Brandt, M., Wigneron, J.-P., Chave, J., Tagesson, T., Penuelas, J., Ciais,
P.,Rasmussen, K. , Tian, F., Mbow, C., Al-Yaari, A., and Rodriguez-Fernandez, N.: Satellite passive
microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands,
Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2, 827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41559-017-0081</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Brodzik et al.(2012.)Brodzik, Billingsley, Haran, Raup, and
Savoie</label><mixed-citation>Brodzik, M. J., Billingsley, B., Haran, T., Raup, B., and Savoie, M. H.:
EASE-Grid 2.0: Incremental but Significant Improvements for Earth-Gridded
Data Sets., ISPRS Int. Geo-Inf., 1, 32–45,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1010032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ijgi1010032</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>CATDS: SMOS level 3 products,
available at:
<uri>ftp://ext-catds-cpdc:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/GRIDDED/</uri>,
last access: 27 July 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>CATDS: SMOS IC products,
available at:
<uri>ftp://ext-catds-cecsm:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/L3_SMOS_IC_Vegetation_Optical_Depth/</uri>,
last access: 27 July 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Chave et al.(2014)Chave, Réjou-Méchain, Búrquez,
Chidumayo, Colgan, Delitti, Duque, Eid, Fearnside, Goodman
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Chave, J., Réjou-Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan,
M. S., Delitti, W. B., Duque, A., Eid, T., Fearnside, P. M., Goodman, R. C.,
et al.: Improved allometric models to estimate<?pagebreak page4644?> the aboveground biomass of
tropical trees, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 3177–3190, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Entekhabi et al.(2010)Entekhabi, Njoku, O'Neill, Kellogg, Crow,
Edelstein, Entin, Goodman, Jackson, Johnson et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., O'Neill, P. E., Kellogg, K. H., Crow, W. T.,
Edelstein, W. N., Entin, J. K., Goodman, S. D., Jackson, T. J., Johnson, J.,
and Kimball, J.: The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission, Proceedings of the
IEEE, 98, 704–716, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>ESA: SMOS Level 2 products, available at: <uri>https://smos-diss.eo.esa.int</uri>,
last access: 26 July 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Esau et al.(2016)Esau, Miles, Davy, Miles, and
Kurchatova</label><mixed-citation>Esau, I., Miles, V. V., Davy, R., Miles, M. W., and Kurchatova, A.: Trends in
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) associated with urban
development in northern West Siberia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9563–9577,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9563-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-9563-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Fernandez-Moran et al.(2017)Fernandez-Moran, Al-Yaari, Mialon,
Mahmoodi, Al Bitar, De Lannoy, Rodriguez-Fernandez, Lopez-Baeza, Kerr, and
Wigneron</label><mixed-citation>Fernandez-Moran, R., Al-Yaari, A., Mialon, A., Mahmoodi, A., Al Bitar, A.,
De Lannoy, G., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N., Lopez-Baeza, E., Kerr, Y., and
Wigneron, J.-P.: SMOS-IC: An alternative SMOS soil moisture and vegetation
optical depth product, Remote Sensing, 9, 457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs9050457</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Ferrazzoli and Guerriero(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Ferrazzoli, P. and Guerriero, L.: Passive microwave remote sensing of
forests: A model investigation, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S.,
34, 433–443, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Fick and Hijmans(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Fick, S. E. and Hijmans, R. J.: WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution
climate surfaces for global land areas, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 4302–4315,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Grant et al.(2016)Grant, Wigneron, De Jeu, Lawrence, Mialon,
Richaume, Al Bitar, Drusch, van Marle, and Kerr</label><mixed-citation>
Grant, J., Wigneron, J.-P., De Jeu, R., Lawrence, H., Mialon, A., Richaume,
P., Al Bitar, A., Drusch, M., van Marle, M., and Kerr, Y.: Comparison of SMOS
and AMSR-E vegetation optical depth to four MODIS-based vegetation
indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 172, 87–100, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Herrmann et al.(2005)Herrmann, Anyamba, and
Tucker</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, S. M., Anyamba, A., and Tucker, C. J.: Recent trends in vegetation
dynamics in the African Sahel and their relationship to climate, Global
Environ. Chang., 15, 394–404, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hornbuckle et al.(2003)Hornbuckle, England, De Roo, Fischman, and
Boprie</label><mixed-citation>
Hornbuckle, B. K., England, A. W., De Roo, R. D., Fischman, M. A., and
Boprie, D. L.: Vegetation canopy anisotropy at 1.4 GHz, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 41, 2211–2223, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Huete et al.(2002)Huete, Didan, Miura, Rodriguez, Gao, and
Ferreira</label><mixed-citation>
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., and Ferreira,
L. G.: Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS
vegetation indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 195–213, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Huete et al.(2006)Huete, Didan, Shimabukuro, Ratana, Saleska, Hutyra,
Yang, Nemani, and Myneni</label><mixed-citation>Huete, A. R., Didan, K., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Ratana, P., Saleska, S. R.,
Hutyra, L. R., Yang, W., Nemani, R. R., and Myneni, R.: Amazon rainforests
green-up with sunlight in dry season, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025583</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Jackson and Schmugge(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, T. and Schmugge, T.: Vegetation effects on the microwave emission of
soils, Remote Sens. Environ., 36, 203–212, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Jung et al.(2011)Jung, Reichstein, Margolis, Cescatti, Richardson,
Arain, Arneth, Bernhofer, Bonal, Chen et al.</label><mixed-citation>Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Margolis, H. A., Cescatti, A., Richardson, A. D.,
Arain, M. A., Arneth, A., Bernhofer, C., Bonal, D., Chen, J., et al.: Global
patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and
sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001566" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jg001566</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Kerr et al.(2010)Kerr, Waldteufel, Wigneron, Delwart, Cabot, Boutin,
Escorihuela, Font, Reul, Gruhier, Juglea, Drinkwater, Hahne, Martin-Neira,
and Mecklenburg</label><mixed-citation>Kerr, Y., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J.-P., Delwart, S., Cabot, F., Boutin,
J., Escorihuela, M.-J., Font, J., Reul, N., Gruhier, C., Juglea, S., Drinkwater,
M., Hahne, A., Martin-Neira, M., and Mecklenburg, S.: The SMOS Mission: New
Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle, Proceedings of the
IEEE, 98, 666–687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043032</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Kerr et al.(2012)Kerr, Waldteufel, Richaume, Wigneron, Ferrazzoli,
Mahmoodi, Al Bitar, Cabot, Gruhier, Juglea, Leroux, Mialon, and
Delwart</label><mixed-citation>Kerr, Y., Waldteufel, P., Richaume, P., Wigneron, J., Ferrazzoli, P.,
Mahmoodi, A., Al Bitar, A., Cabot, F., Gruhier, C., Juglea, S., Leroux, D., Mialon, A.,
and Delwart, S.: The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 50, 1384–1403,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184548</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Kerr et al.(2001)Kerr, Waldteufel, Wigneron, Martinuzzi, Font, and
Berger</label><mixed-citation>Kerr, Y. H., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J. P., Martinuzzi, J., Font, J., and
Berger, M.: Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean
Salinity (SMOS) mission, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S.,
39, 1729–1735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.942551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/36.942551</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Kirdiashev et al.(1979)Kirdiashev, Chukhlantsev, and
Shutko</label><mixed-citation>
Kirdiashev, K., Chukhlantsev, A., and Shutko, A.: Microwave radiation of the
earth's surface in the presence of vegetation cover, Radiotekh.
Elektron.+, 24, 256–264, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Konings and Gentine(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Konings, A. G. and Gentine, P.: Global variations in ecosystem-scale
isohydricity, Glob. Change Biol., 23, 891–905, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Konings et al.(2016)Konings, Piles, Rötzer, McColl, Chan, and
Entekhabi</label><mixed-citation>
Konings, A. G., Piles, M., Rötzer, K., McColl, K. A., Chan, S. K., and
Entekhabi, D.: Vegetation optical depth and scattering albedo retrieval using
time series of dual-polarized L-band radiometer observations, Remote Sens.
Environ., 172, 178–189, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Konings et al.(2017)Konings, Piles, Das, and
Entekhabi</label><mixed-citation>
Konings, A. G., Piles, M., Das, N., and Entekhabi, D.: L-band vegetation
optical depth and effective scattering albedo estimation from SMAP, Remote
Sens. Environ., 198, 460–470, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kottek et al.(2006)Kottek, Grieser, Beck, Rudolf, and
Rubel</label><mixed-citation>
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Rubel, F.: World map of
the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated, Meteorol.
Z., 15, 259–263, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Lawrence et al.(2014)Lawrence, Wigneron, Richaume, Novello, Grant,
Mialon, Bitar, Merlin, Guyon, Leroux, Bircher, and
Kerr</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence, H., Wigneron, J.-P., Richaume, P., Novello, N., Grant, J., Mialon,
A., Bitar, A. A., Merlin, O., Guyon, D., Leroux, D., Bircher, S., and Kerr,
Y.: Comparison between SMOS Vegetation Optical Depth products and MODIS
vegetation indices over crop zones of the USA, Remote Sens.
Environ., 140, 396–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.021</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Li et al.(2017)Li, Guan, Gentine, Konings, Meinzer, Kimball, Xu,
Anderegg, McDowell, Martinez-Vilalta et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Guan, K., Gentine, P., Konings, A. G., Meinzer, F. C., Kimball,
J. S., Xu, X., Anderegg, W. R., McDowell, N. G., Martinez-Vilalta, J., and Long, D. G.:
Estimating Global Ecosystem Isohydry/Anisohydry Using Active and Passive
Microwave Satellite Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo.,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, de Jeu, van Dijk, and Owe</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., de Jeu, R. A., van Dijk, A. I., and Owe, M.: TRMM-TMI satellite
observed soil moisture and vegetation density (1998–2005) show strong
connection with El Niño in eastern Australia, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL030311</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Liu et al.(2011)Liu, de Jeu, McCabe, Evans, and van
Dijk</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y. Y., de Jeu, R. A., McCabe, M. F., Evans, J. P., and van Dijk, A. I.:
Global long-term passive microwave satellite-based retrievals of vegetation
optical depth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048684" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048684</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Liu et al.(2015)Liu, van Dijk, de Jeu, Canadell, McCabe, Evans, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y. Y., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Jeu, R. a. M., Canadell, J. G., McCabe,
M. F., Evans, J. P., and Wang, G.: Recent reversal in loss of global
terrestrial biomass: supplementary information, Nat. Clim. Change, 5,
1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2581" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2581</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Loveland et al.(2000)Loveland, Reed, Brown, Ohlen, Zhu, Yang, and
Merchant</label><mixed-citation>
Loveland, T. R., Reed, B. C., Brown, J. F., Ohlen, D. O., Zhu, Z., Yang, L.,
and Merchant, J. W.: Development of a global land cover characteristics
database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data, Int. J.
Remote Sens., 21, 1303–1330, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Mermoz et al.(2014)Mermoz, Le Toan, Villard, Réjou-Méchain,
and Seifert-Granzin</label><mixed-citation>
Mermoz, S., Le Toan, T., Villard, L., Réjou-Méchain, M., and
Seifert-Granzin, J.: Biomass assessment in the Cameroon<?pagebreak page4645?> savanna using ALOS
PALSAR data, Remote Sens. Environ., 155, 109–119, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Mermoz et al.(2015)Mermoz, Réjou-Méchain, Villard, Le Toan,
Rossi, and Gourlet-Fleury</label><mixed-citation>
Mermoz, S., Réjou-Méchain, M., Villard, L., Le Toan, T., Rossi, V.,
and Gourlet-Fleury, S.: Decrease of L-band SAR backscatter with biomass of
dense forests, Remote Sens. Environ., 159, 307–317, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Mo et al.(1982)Mo, Choudhury, Schmugge, Wang, and
Jackson</label><mixed-citation>
Mo, T., Choudhury, B., Schmugge, T., Wang, J., and Jackson, T.: A model for
microwave emission from vegetation-covered fields, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 87, 11229–11237, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Olson et al.(2001)Olson, Dinerstein, Wikramanayake, Burgess, Powell,
Underwood, D'amico, Itoua, Strand, Morrison et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell,
G. V., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison,
J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., and Kassem, K. R.: Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on
Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool
for conserving biodiversity, BioScience, 51, 933–938, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Parrens et al.(2017a)Parrens, Al Bitar, Mialon,
Fernandez-Moran, Ferrazzoli, Kerr, and Wigneron</label><mixed-citation>
Parrens, M., Al Bitar, A., Mialon, A., Fernandez-Moran, R., Ferrazzoli, P.,
Kerr, Y., and Wigneron, J.-P.: Estimation of the L-band Effective Scattering
Albedo of Tropical Forests using SMOS observations, IEEE Geoscience and
Remote Sens. Lett., 14, 1223–1227, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Parrens et al.(2017b)Parrens, Wigneron, Richaume,
Al Bitar, Mialon, Fernandez-Moran, Al-Yaari, O'Neill, and
Kerr</label><mixed-citation>
Parrens, M., Wigneron, J.-P., Richaume, P., Al Bitar, A., Mialon, A.,
Fernandez-Moran, R., Al-Yaari, A., O'Neill, P., and Kerr, Y.: Considering
combined or separated roughness and vegetation effects in soil moisture
retrievals, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and
Geoinformation, 55, 73–86, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Pettorelli et al.(2005)Pettorelli, Vik, Mysterud, Gaillard, Tucker,
and Stenseth</label><mixed-citation>
Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C. J., and
Stenseth, N. C.: Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological
responses to environmental change, Trends Ecol. Evol., 20,
503–510, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Pettorelli et al.(2011)Pettorelli, Ryan, Mueller, Bunnefeld,
Jędrzejewska, Lima, and Kausrud</label><mixed-citation>
Pettorelli, N., Ryan, S., Mueller, T., Bunnefeld, N., Jędrzejewska, B.,
Lima, M., and Kausrud, K.: The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI):
unforeseen successes in animal ecology, Clim. Res., 46, 15–27, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Rahmoune et al.(2013)Rahmoune, Ferrazzoli, Kerr, and
Richaume</label><mixed-citation>Rahmoune, R., Ferrazzoli, P., Kerr, Y. H., and Richaume, P.: SMOS level 2
retrieval algorithm over forests: Description and generation of global maps,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl, 6, 1430–1439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2256339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2256339</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Rahmoune et al.(2014)Rahmoune, Ferrazzoli, Singh, Kerr, Richaume, and
Al Bitar</label><mixed-citation>Rahmoune, R., Ferrazzoli, P., Singh, Y., Kerr, Y., Richaume, P., and
Al Bitar,
A.: SMOS Retrieval Results Over Forests: Comparisons With Independent
Measurements, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl, 6-3, 1430–1439,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2321027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2321027</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Román-Cascón et al.(2017)Román-Cascón, Pellarin,
Gibon, Brocca, Cosme, Crow, Fernández-Prieto, Kerr, and
Massari</label><mixed-citation>
Román-Cascón, C., Pellarin, T., Gibon, F., Brocca, L., Cosme, E.,
Crow,
W., Fernández-Prieto, D., Kerr, Y. H., and Massari, C.: Correcting
satellite-based precipitation products through SMOS soil moisture data
assimilation in two land-surface models of different complexity: API and
SURFEX, Remote Sens. Environ., 200, 295–310, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Saatchi et al.(2011)Saatchi, Harris, Brown, Lefsky, Mitchard, Salas,
Zutta, Buermann, Lewis, Hagen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Saatchi, S. S., Harris, N. L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E. T., Salas,
W., Zutta, B. R., Buermann, W., Lewis, S. L., Hagen, S., Petrova, S., White, L., Silman, M., and Morel, A.: Benchmark
map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 9899–9904, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Sahr et al.(2003)Sahr, White, and Kimerling</label><mixed-citation>
Sahr, K., White, D., and Kimerling, A. J.: Geodesic discrete global grid
systems cartography, Cartogr. Geogr. Inform., 30, 121–134, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Schwank et al.(2005)Schwank, Matzler, Guglielmetti, and
Fluhler</label><mixed-citation>
Schwank, M., Matzler, C., Guglielmetti, M., and Fluhler, H.: L-band
radiometer
measurements of soil water under growing clover grass, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote S., 43, 2225–2237, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Simard et al.(2011)Simard, Pinto, Fisher, and
Baccini</label><mixed-citation>
Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B., and Baccini, A.: Mapping forest canopy
height globally with spaceborne lidar, J. Geophys.Res.-Biogeo., 116, 9899–9904, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Todd et al.(1998)Todd, Hoffer, and Milchunas</label><mixed-citation>
Todd, S., Hoffer, R., and Milchunas, D.: Biomass estimation on grazed and
ungrazed rangelands using spectral indices, Int. J. Remote
Sens., 19, 427–438, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Tucker(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Tucker, C. J.: Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for
monitoring
vegetation, Remote Sens. Environ., 8, 127–150, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Ulaby(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F.: Passive microwave remote sensing of the Earth's surface,
Antennas and Propagation, IEEE T. Antenn. Propag., 24, 112–115, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Ulaby and Wilson(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F. T. and Wilson, E. A.: Microwave attenuation properties of
vegetation canopies, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 5, 746–753,
1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Van de Griend and Wigneron(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Van de Griend, A. A. and Wigneron, J.-P.: The b-factor as a function of
frequency and canopy type at H-polarization, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote Sens., 42, 786–794, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>van der Werf et al.(2010)Van der Werf, Randerson, Giglio, Collatz,
Mu, Kasibhatla, Morton, DeFries, Jin, and van Leeuwen</label><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M.,
Kasibhatla, P. S., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Jin, Y., and van Leeuwen,
T. T.: Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna,
forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
11707–11735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>van Marle et al.(2016)Van Marle, Van Der Werf, de Jeu, and
Liu</label><mixed-citation>van Marle, M. J. E., van der Werf, G. R., de Jeu, R. A. M., and Liu, Y. Y.:
Annual South American forest loss estimates based on passive microwave remote
sensing (1990–2010), Biogeosciences, 13, 609–624,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-609-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-609-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Vicente-Serrano et al.(2013)Vicente-Serrano, Gouveia, Camarero,
Beguería, Trigo, López-Moreno, Azorín-Molina, Pasho,
Lorenzo-Lacruz, Revuelto et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Gouveia, C., Camarero, J. J., Beguería, S.,
Trigo,
R., López-Moreno, J. I., Azorín-Molina, C., Pasho, E.,
Lorenzo-Lacruz, J., Revuelto, J., and Morán-Tejeda, E.,: Response of vegetation to drought
time-scales across global land biomes, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA,, 110, 52–57, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Vittucci et al.(2016)Vittucci, Ferrazzoli, Kerr, Richaume, Guerriero,
Rahmoune, and Laurin</label><mixed-citation>Vittucci, C., Ferrazzoli, P., Kerr, Y., Richaume, P., Guerriero, L.,
Rahmoune, R., and Laurin, G. V.: SMOS retrieval over forests: Exploitation of optical
depth and tests of soil moisture estimates, Remote Sens. Environ.,
180, 115–127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.004</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Wigneron et al.(1995)Wigneron, Chanzy, Calvet, and
Bruguier</label><mixed-citation>
Wigneron, J.-P., Chanzy, A., Calvet, J.-C., and Bruguier, N.: A simple
algorithm to retrieve soil moisture and vegetation biomass using passive
microwave measurements over crop fields, Remote Sens. Environ., 51,
331–341, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Wigneron et al.(2004)Wigneron, Pardé, Waldteufel, Chanzy, Kerr,
Schmidl, and Skou</label><mixed-citation>
Wigneron, J.-P., Pardé, M., Waldteufel, P., Chanzy, A., Kerr, Y.,
Schmidl, S., and Skou, N.: Characterizing the dependence of vegetation model
parameters on crop structure, incidence angle, and polarization at L-band, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 42, 416–425, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Wigneron et al.(2007)Wigneron, Kerr, Waldteufel, Saleh, Escorihuela,
Richaume, Ferrazzoli, de Rosnay, Gurney, Calvet, Grant, Guglielmetti,
Hornbuckle, Mätzler, Pellarin, and Schwank</label><mixed-citation>Wigneron, J.-P., Kerr, Y., Waldteufel, P., Saleh, K., Escorihuela, M.-J.,
Richaume, P., Ferrazzoli, P., de Rosnay, P., Gurney, R., Calvet, J.-C.,
Grant, J., Guglielmetti, M., Hornbuckle, B., Mätzler, C., Pellarin, T., and
Schwank, M.: L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB) Model:
Description and calibration against experimental data sets over crop fields,
Remote Sens. Environ., 107, 639–655,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.014</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>An evaluation of SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth (L-VOD) data sets: high sensitivity of L-VOD to above-ground biomass in Africa</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The vegetation optical depth (VOD) measured at microwave frequencies is
related to the vegetation water content and provides information
complementary to visible/infrared vegetation indices. This study is devoted
to the characterization of a new VOD data set obtained from SMOS (Soil
Moisture and Ocean Salinity) satellite observations at L-band (1.4&thinsp;GHz).
Three different SMOS L-band VOD (L-VOD) data sets (SMOS level 2, level 3 and
SMOS-IC) were compared with data sets on tree height, visible/infrared
indexes (NDVI, EVI), mean annual precipitation and above-ground biomass
(AGB) for the African continent. For all relationships, SMOS-IC showed the
lowest dispersion and highest correlation. Overall, we found a strong (<i>R</i> &gt; 0.85) correlation with no clear sign of saturation between L-VOD and four
AGB data sets. The relationships between L-VOD and the AGB data sets were
linear per land cover class but with a changing slope depending on the class
type, which makes it a global non-linear relationship. In contrast, the
relationship linking L-VOD to tree height (<i>R</i> = 0.87) was close to linear.
For vegetation classes other than evergreen broadleaf forest, the annual
mean of L-VOD spans a range from 0 to 0.7 and it is linearly correlated with
the average annual precipitation. SMOS L-VOD showed higher
sensitivity to AGB compared to NDVI and K/X/C-VOD (VOD measured at 19, 10.7 and 6.9&thinsp;GHz). The results showed that, although the
spatial resolution of L-VOD is coarse ( ∼ 40&thinsp;km), the high temporal
frequency and sensitivity to AGB makes SMOS L-VOD a very promising
indicator for large-scale monitoring of the vegetation status, in
particular biomass.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Al Bitar et al.(2017)Al Bitar, Mialon, Kerr, Cabot, Richaume,
Jacquette, Quesney, Mahmoodi, Tarot, Parrens, Al-yaari, Pellarin,
Rodriguez-Fernandez, and Wigneron</label><mixed-citation>
Al Bitar, A., Mialon, A., Kerr, Y. H., Cabot, F., Richaume, P., Jacquette,
E., Quesney, A., Mahmoodi, A., Tarot, S., Parrens, M., Al-Yaari, A.,
Pellarin, T., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N., and Wigneron, J.-P.: The global SMOS
Level 3 daily soil moisture and brightness temperature maps, Earth Syst. Sci.
Data, 9, 293–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-293-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-293-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Andela et al.(2013)Andela, Liu, Van Dijk, De Jeu, and
McVicar</label><mixed-citation>
Andela, N., Liu, Y. Y., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Jeu, R. A. M., and McVicar,
T. R.: Global changes in dryland vegetation dynamics (1988–2008) assessed by
satellite remote sensing: comparing a new passive microwave vegetation
density record with reflective greenness data, Biogeosciences, 10, 6657–6676,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6657-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6657-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Asner et al.(2014)Asner, Knapp, Martin, Tupayachi, Anderson, Mascaro,
Sinca, Chadwick, Higgins, Farfan, Llactayo, and Silman</label><mixed-citation>
Asner, G. P., Knapp, D. E., Martin, R. E., Tupayachi, R., Anderson, C. B.,
Mascaro, J., Sinca, F., Chadwick, K. D., Higgins, M., Farfan, W., Llactayo,
W., and Silman, M. R.: Targeted carbon conservation at national scales with
high-resolution monitoring, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
111, E5016–E5022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419550111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419550111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Avitabile et al.(2016)Avitabile, Herold, Heuvelink, Lewis, Phillips,
Asner, Armston, Ashton, Banin, Bayol et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Avitabile, V., Herold, M., Heuvelink, G., Lewis, S. L., Phillips, O. L.,
Asner, G. P., Armston, J., Ashton, P. S., Banin, L., Bayol, N., and Berry, N. J.: An
integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets, Glob.
Change Biol., 22, 1406–1420, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Baccini et al.(2012)Baccini, Goetz, Walker, Laporte, Sun,
Sulla-Menashe, Hackler, Beck, Dubayah, Friedl et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Baccini, A., Goetz, S., Walker, W., Laporte, N., Sun, M., Sulla-Menashe, D.,
Hackler, J., Beck, P., Dubayah, R., Friedl, M., and Samanta, S.: Estimated carbon
dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density
maps, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 182–185, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bouvet et al.(2018)Bouvet, Mermoz, Toan, Villard, Mathieu, Naidoo,
and Asner</label><mixed-citation>
Bouvet, A., Mermoz, S., Toan, T. L., Villard, L., Mathieu, R., Naidoo, L.,
and Asner, G. P.: An above-ground biomass map of African savannahs and woodlands
at 25&thinsp;m resolution derived from ALOS PALSAR, Remote Sens.
Environ., 206, 156–173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.030</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Brandt et al.(2017)Brandt, Rasmussen, Peñuelas, Tian, Schurgers,
Verger, Mertz, Palmer, and Fensholt</label><mixed-citation>
Brandt, M., Rasmussen, K., Peñuelas, J., Tian, F., Schurgers, G., Verger,
A., Mertz, O., Palmer, J. R., and Fensholt, R.: Human population growth
offsets climate-driven increase in woody vegetation in sub-Saharan Africa,
Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 0081, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Brandt et al.(2018)Brandt, Wigneron, Chave, Tagesson, Penuelas,
Ciais, Rasmussen, Tian, Mbow, Al-Yaari et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Brandt, M., Wigneron, J.-P., Chave, J., Tagesson, T., Penuelas, J., Ciais,
P.,Rasmussen, K. , Tian, F., Mbow, C., Al-Yaari, A., and Rodriguez-Fernandez, N.: Satellite passive
microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands,
Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2, 827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0081</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Brodzik et al.(2012.)Brodzik, Billingsley, Haran, Raup, and
Savoie</label><mixed-citation>
Brodzik, M. J., Billingsley, B., Haran, T., Raup, B., and Savoie, M. H.:
EASE-Grid 2.0: Incremental but Significant Improvements for Earth-Gridded
Data Sets., ISPRS Int. Geo-Inf., 1, 32–45,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1010032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi1010032</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
CATDS: SMOS level 3 products,
available at:
<a href="ftp://ext-catds-cpdc:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/GRIDDED/" target="_blank">ftp://ext-catds-cpdc:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/GRIDDED/</a>,
last access: 27 July 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
CATDS: SMOS IC products,
available at:
<a href="ftp://ext-catds-cecsm:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/L3_SMOS_IC_Vegetation_Optical_Depth/" target="_blank">ftp://ext-catds-cecsm:catds2010@ftp.ifremer.fr/Land_products/L3_SMOS_IC_Vegetation_Optical_Depth/</a>,
last access: 27 July 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Chave et al.(2014)Chave, Réjou-Méchain, Búrquez,
Chidumayo, Colgan, Delitti, Duque, Eid, Fearnside, Goodman
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Chave, J., Réjou-Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan,
M. S., Delitti, W. B., Duque, A., Eid, T., Fearnside, P. M., Goodman, R. C.,
et al.: Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of
tropical trees, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 3177–3190, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Entekhabi et al.(2010)Entekhabi, Njoku, O'Neill, Kellogg, Crow,
Edelstein, Entin, Goodman, Jackson, Johnson et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., O'Neill, P. E., Kellogg, K. H., Crow, W. T.,
Edelstein, W. N., Entin, J. K., Goodman, S. D., Jackson, T. J., Johnson, J.,
and Kimball, J.: The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission, Proceedings of the
IEEE, 98, 704–716, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
ESA: SMOS Level 2 products, available at: <a href="https://smos-diss.eo.esa.int" target="_blank">https://smos-diss.eo.esa.int</a>,
last access: 26 July 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Esau et al.(2016)Esau, Miles, Davy, Miles, and
Kurchatova</label><mixed-citation>
Esau, I., Miles, V. V., Davy, R., Miles, M. W., and Kurchatova, A.: Trends in
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) associated with urban
development in northern West Siberia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9563–9577,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9563-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9563-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Fernandez-Moran et al.(2017)Fernandez-Moran, Al-Yaari, Mialon,
Mahmoodi, Al Bitar, De Lannoy, Rodriguez-Fernandez, Lopez-Baeza, Kerr, and
Wigneron</label><mixed-citation>
Fernandez-Moran, R., Al-Yaari, A., Mialon, A., Mahmoodi, A., Al Bitar, A.,
De Lannoy, G., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N., Lopez-Baeza, E., Kerr, Y., and
Wigneron, J.-P.: SMOS-IC: An alternative SMOS soil moisture and vegetation
optical depth product, Remote Sensing, 9, 457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050457" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050457</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Ferrazzoli and Guerriero(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Ferrazzoli, P. and Guerriero, L.: Passive microwave remote sensing of
forests: A model investigation, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S.,
34, 433–443, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fick and Hijmans(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Fick, S. E. and Hijmans, R. J.: WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution
climate surfaces for global land areas, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 4302–4315,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Grant et al.(2016)Grant, Wigneron, De Jeu, Lawrence, Mialon,
Richaume, Al Bitar, Drusch, van Marle, and Kerr</label><mixed-citation>
Grant, J., Wigneron, J.-P., De Jeu, R., Lawrence, H., Mialon, A., Richaume,
P., Al Bitar, A., Drusch, M., van Marle, M., and Kerr, Y.: Comparison of SMOS
and AMSR-E vegetation optical depth to four MODIS-based vegetation
indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 172, 87–100, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Herrmann et al.(2005)Herrmann, Anyamba, and
Tucker</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, S. M., Anyamba, A., and Tucker, C. J.: Recent trends in vegetation
dynamics in the African Sahel and their relationship to climate, Global
Environ. Chang., 15, 394–404, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hornbuckle et al.(2003)Hornbuckle, England, De Roo, Fischman, and
Boprie</label><mixed-citation>
Hornbuckle, B. K., England, A. W., De Roo, R. D., Fischman, M. A., and
Boprie, D. L.: Vegetation canopy anisotropy at 1.4 GHz, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 41, 2211–2223, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Huete et al.(2002)Huete, Didan, Miura, Rodriguez, Gao, and
Ferreira</label><mixed-citation>
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., and Ferreira,
L. G.: Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS
vegetation indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 195–213, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Huete et al.(2006)Huete, Didan, Shimabukuro, Ratana, Saleska, Hutyra,
Yang, Nemani, and Myneni</label><mixed-citation>
Huete, A. R., Didan, K., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Ratana, P., Saleska, S. R.,
Hutyra, L. R., Yang, W., Nemani, R. R., and Myneni, R.: Amazon rainforests
green-up with sunlight in dry season, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025583</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Jackson and Schmugge(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, T. and Schmugge, T.: Vegetation effects on the microwave emission of
soils, Remote Sens. Environ., 36, 203–212, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Jung et al.(2011)Jung, Reichstein, Margolis, Cescatti, Richardson,
Arain, Arneth, Bernhofer, Bonal, Chen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Margolis, H. A., Cescatti, A., Richardson, A. D.,
Arain, M. A., Arneth, A., Bernhofer, C., Bonal, D., Chen, J., et al.: Global
patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and
sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001566" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001566</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Kerr et al.(2010)Kerr, Waldteufel, Wigneron, Delwart, Cabot, Boutin,
Escorihuela, Font, Reul, Gruhier, Juglea, Drinkwater, Hahne, Martin-Neira,
and Mecklenburg</label><mixed-citation>
Kerr, Y., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J.-P., Delwart, S., Cabot, F., Boutin,
J., Escorihuela, M.-J., Font, J., Reul, N., Gruhier, C., Juglea, S., Drinkwater,
M., Hahne, A., Martin-Neira, M., and Mecklenburg, S.: The SMOS Mission: New
Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle, Proceedings of the
IEEE, 98, 666–687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043032</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kerr et al.(2012)Kerr, Waldteufel, Richaume, Wigneron, Ferrazzoli,
Mahmoodi, Al Bitar, Cabot, Gruhier, Juglea, Leroux, Mialon, and
Delwart</label><mixed-citation>
Kerr, Y., Waldteufel, P., Richaume, P., Wigneron, J., Ferrazzoli, P.,
Mahmoodi, A., Al Bitar, A., Cabot, F., Gruhier, C., Juglea, S., Leroux, D., Mialon, A.,
and Delwart, S.: The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 50, 1384–1403,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184548" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184548</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Kerr et al.(2001)Kerr, Waldteufel, Wigneron, Martinuzzi, Font, and
Berger</label><mixed-citation>
Kerr, Y. H., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J. P., Martinuzzi, J., Font, J., and
Berger, M.: Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean
Salinity (SMOS) mission, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S.,
39, 1729–1735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/36.942551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/36.942551</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kirdiashev et al.(1979)Kirdiashev, Chukhlantsev, and
Shutko</label><mixed-citation>
Kirdiashev, K., Chukhlantsev, A., and Shutko, A.: Microwave radiation of the
earth's surface in the presence of vegetation cover, Radiotekh.
Elektron.+, 24, 256–264, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Konings and Gentine(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Konings, A. G. and Gentine, P.: Global variations in ecosystem-scale
isohydricity, Glob. Change Biol., 23, 891–905, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Konings et al.(2016)Konings, Piles, Rötzer, McColl, Chan, and
Entekhabi</label><mixed-citation>
Konings, A. G., Piles, M., Rötzer, K., McColl, K. A., Chan, S. K., and
Entekhabi, D.: Vegetation optical depth and scattering albedo retrieval using
time series of dual-polarized L-band radiometer observations, Remote Sens.
Environ., 172, 178–189, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Konings et al.(2017)Konings, Piles, Das, and
Entekhabi</label><mixed-citation>
Konings, A. G., Piles, M., Das, N., and Entekhabi, D.: L-band vegetation
optical depth and effective scattering albedo estimation from SMAP, Remote
Sens. Environ., 198, 460–470, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kottek et al.(2006)Kottek, Grieser, Beck, Rudolf, and
Rubel</label><mixed-citation>
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., and Rubel, F.: World map of
the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated, Meteorol.
Z., 15, 259–263, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Lawrence et al.(2014)Lawrence, Wigneron, Richaume, Novello, Grant,
Mialon, Bitar, Merlin, Guyon, Leroux, Bircher, and
Kerr</label><mixed-citation>
Lawrence, H., Wigneron, J.-P., Richaume, P., Novello, N., Grant, J., Mialon,
A., Bitar, A. A., Merlin, O., Guyon, D., Leroux, D., Bircher, S., and Kerr,
Y.: Comparison between SMOS Vegetation Optical Depth products and MODIS
vegetation indices over crop zones of the USA, Remote Sens.
Environ., 140, 396–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.021</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Li et al.(2017)Li, Guan, Gentine, Konings, Meinzer, Kimball, Xu,
Anderegg, McDowell, Martinez-Vilalta et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Guan, K., Gentine, P., Konings, A. G., Meinzer, F. C., Kimball,
J. S., Xu, X., Anderegg, W. R., McDowell, N. G., Martinez-Vilalta, J., and Long, D. G.:
Estimating Global Ecosystem Isohydry/Anisohydry Using Active and Passive
Microwave Satellite Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo.,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Liu et al.(2007)Liu, de Jeu, van Dijk, and Owe</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y., de Jeu, R. A., van Dijk, A. I., and Owe, M.: TRMM-TMI satellite
observed soil moisture and vegetation density (1998–2005) show strong
connection with El Niño in eastern Australia, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 34, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030311" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030311</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Liu et al.(2011)Liu, de Jeu, McCabe, Evans, and van
Dijk</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y. Y., de Jeu, R. A., McCabe, M. F., Evans, J. P., and van Dijk, A. I.:
Global long-term passive microwave satellite-based retrievals of vegetation
optical depth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048684" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048684</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Liu et al.(2015)Liu, van Dijk, de Jeu, Canadell, McCabe, Evans, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Y. Y., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Jeu, R. a. M., Canadell, J. G., McCabe,
M. F., Evans, J. P., and Wang, G.: Recent reversal in loss of global
terrestrial biomass: supplementary information, Nat. Clim. Change, 5,
1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2581" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2581</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Loveland et al.(2000)Loveland, Reed, Brown, Ohlen, Zhu, Yang, and
Merchant</label><mixed-citation>
Loveland, T. R., Reed, B. C., Brown, J. F., Ohlen, D. O., Zhu, Z., Yang, L.,
and Merchant, J. W.: Development of a global land cover characteristics
database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data, Int. J.
Remote Sens., 21, 1303–1330, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Mermoz et al.(2014)Mermoz, Le Toan, Villard, Réjou-Méchain,
and Seifert-Granzin</label><mixed-citation>
Mermoz, S., Le Toan, T., Villard, L., Réjou-Méchain, M., and
Seifert-Granzin, J.: Biomass assessment in the Cameroon savanna using ALOS
PALSAR data, Remote Sens. Environ., 155, 109–119, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mermoz et al.(2015)Mermoz, Réjou-Méchain, Villard, Le Toan,
Rossi, and Gourlet-Fleury</label><mixed-citation>
Mermoz, S., Réjou-Méchain, M., Villard, L., Le Toan, T., Rossi, V.,
and Gourlet-Fleury, S.: Decrease of L-band SAR backscatter with biomass of
dense forests, Remote Sens. Environ., 159, 307–317, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Mo et al.(1982)Mo, Choudhury, Schmugge, Wang, and
Jackson</label><mixed-citation>
Mo, T., Choudhury, B., Schmugge, T., Wang, J., and Jackson, T.: A model for
microwave emission from vegetation-covered fields, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 87, 11229–11237, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Olson et al.(2001)Olson, Dinerstein, Wikramanayake, Burgess, Powell,
Underwood, D'amico, Itoua, Strand, Morrison et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell,
G. V., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison,
J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., and Kassem, K. R.: Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on
Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool
for conserving biodiversity, BioScience, 51, 933–938, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Parrens et al.(2017a)Parrens, Al Bitar, Mialon,
Fernandez-Moran, Ferrazzoli, Kerr, and Wigneron</label><mixed-citation>
Parrens, M., Al Bitar, A., Mialon, A., Fernandez-Moran, R., Ferrazzoli, P.,
Kerr, Y., and Wigneron, J.-P.: Estimation of the L-band Effective Scattering
Albedo of Tropical Forests using SMOS observations, IEEE Geoscience and
Remote Sens. Lett., 14, 1223–1227, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Parrens et al.(2017b)Parrens, Wigneron, Richaume,
Al Bitar, Mialon, Fernandez-Moran, Al-Yaari, O'Neill, and
Kerr</label><mixed-citation>
Parrens, M., Wigneron, J.-P., Richaume, P., Al Bitar, A., Mialon, A.,
Fernandez-Moran, R., Al-Yaari, A., O'Neill, P., and Kerr, Y.: Considering
combined or separated roughness and vegetation effects in soil moisture
retrievals, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and
Geoinformation, 55, 73–86, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Pettorelli et al.(2005)Pettorelli, Vik, Mysterud, Gaillard, Tucker,
and Stenseth</label><mixed-citation>
Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C. J., and
Stenseth, N. C.: Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological
responses to environmental change, Trends Ecol. Evol., 20,
503–510, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Pettorelli et al.(2011)Pettorelli, Ryan, Mueller, Bunnefeld,
Jędrzejewska, Lima, and Kausrud</label><mixed-citation>
Pettorelli, N., Ryan, S., Mueller, T., Bunnefeld, N., Jędrzejewska, B.,
Lima, M., and Kausrud, K.: The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI):
unforeseen successes in animal ecology, Clim. Res., 46, 15–27, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Rahmoune et al.(2013)Rahmoune, Ferrazzoli, Kerr, and
Richaume</label><mixed-citation>
Rahmoune, R., Ferrazzoli, P., Kerr, Y. H., and Richaume, P.: SMOS level 2
retrieval algorithm over forests: Description and generation of global maps,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl, 6, 1430–1439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2256339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2256339</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Rahmoune et al.(2014)Rahmoune, Ferrazzoli, Singh, Kerr, Richaume, and
Al Bitar</label><mixed-citation>
Rahmoune, R., Ferrazzoli, P., Singh, Y., Kerr, Y., Richaume, P., and
Al Bitar,
A.: SMOS Retrieval Results Over Forests: Comparisons With Independent
Measurements, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl, 6-3, 1430–1439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2321027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2321027</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Román-Cascón et al.(2017)Román-Cascón, Pellarin,
Gibon, Brocca, Cosme, Crow, Fernández-Prieto, Kerr, and
Massari</label><mixed-citation>
Román-Cascón, C., Pellarin, T., Gibon, F., Brocca, L., Cosme, E.,
Crow,
W., Fernández-Prieto, D., Kerr, Y. H., and Massari, C.: Correcting
satellite-based precipitation products through SMOS soil moisture data
assimilation in two land-surface models of different complexity: API and
SURFEX, Remote Sens. Environ., 200, 295–310, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Saatchi et al.(2011)Saatchi, Harris, Brown, Lefsky, Mitchard, Salas,
Zutta, Buermann, Lewis, Hagen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Saatchi, S. S., Harris, N. L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E. T., Salas,
W., Zutta, B. R., Buermann, W., Lewis, S. L., Hagen, S., Petrova, S., White, L., Silman, M., and Morel, A.: Benchmark
map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 9899–9904, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Sahr et al.(2003)Sahr, White, and Kimerling</label><mixed-citation>
Sahr, K., White, D., and Kimerling, A. J.: Geodesic discrete global grid
systems cartography, Cartogr. Geogr. Inform., 30, 121–134, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Schwank et al.(2005)Schwank, Matzler, Guglielmetti, and
Fluhler</label><mixed-citation>
Schwank, M., Matzler, C., Guglielmetti, M., and Fluhler, H.: L-band
radiometer
measurements of soil water under growing clover grass, IEEE T.
Geosci. Remote S., 43, 2225–2237, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Simard et al.(2011)Simard, Pinto, Fisher, and
Baccini</label><mixed-citation>
Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B., and Baccini, A.: Mapping forest canopy
height globally with spaceborne lidar, J. Geophys.Res.-Biogeo., 116, 9899–9904, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Todd et al.(1998)Todd, Hoffer, and Milchunas</label><mixed-citation>
Todd, S., Hoffer, R., and Milchunas, D.: Biomass estimation on grazed and
ungrazed rangelands using spectral indices, Int. J. Remote
Sens., 19, 427–438, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Tucker(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Tucker, C. J.: Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for
monitoring
vegetation, Remote Sens. Environ., 8, 127–150, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Ulaby(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F.: Passive microwave remote sensing of the Earth's surface,
Antennas and Propagation, IEEE T. Antenn. Propag., 24, 112–115, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Ulaby and Wilson(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Ulaby, F. T. and Wilson, E. A.: Microwave attenuation properties of
vegetation canopies, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 5, 746–753,
1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Van de Griend and Wigneron(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Van de Griend, A. A. and Wigneron, J.-P.: The b-factor as a function of
frequency and canopy type at H-polarization, IEEE T. Geosci.
Remote Sens., 42, 786–794, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>van der Werf et al.(2010)Van der Werf, Randerson, Giglio, Collatz,
Mu, Kasibhatla, Morton, DeFries, Jin, and van Leeuwen</label><mixed-citation>
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M.,
Kasibhatla, P. S., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Jin, Y., and van Leeuwen,
T. T.: Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna,
forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
11707–11735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>van Marle et al.(2016)Van Marle, Van Der Werf, de Jeu, and
Liu</label><mixed-citation>
van Marle, M. J. E., van der Werf, G. R., de Jeu, R. A. M., and Liu, Y. Y.:
Annual South American forest loss estimates based on passive microwave remote
sensing (1990–2010), Biogeosciences, 13, 609–624,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-609-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-609-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Vicente-Serrano et al.(2013)Vicente-Serrano, Gouveia, Camarero,
Beguería, Trigo, López-Moreno, Azorín-Molina, Pasho,
Lorenzo-Lacruz, Revuelto et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Gouveia, C., Camarero, J. J., Beguería, S.,
Trigo,
R., López-Moreno, J. I., Azorín-Molina, C., Pasho, E.,
Lorenzo-Lacruz, J., Revuelto, J., and Morán-Tejeda, E.,: Response of vegetation to drought
time-scales across global land biomes, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA,, 110, 52–57, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Vittucci et al.(2016)Vittucci, Ferrazzoli, Kerr, Richaume, Guerriero,
Rahmoune, and Laurin</label><mixed-citation>
Vittucci, C., Ferrazzoli, P., Kerr, Y., Richaume, P., Guerriero, L.,
Rahmoune, R., and Laurin, G. V.: SMOS retrieval over forests: Exploitation of optical
depth and tests of soil moisture estimates, Remote Sens. Environ.,
180, 115–127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.004</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Wigneron et al.(1995)Wigneron, Chanzy, Calvet, and
Bruguier</label><mixed-citation>
Wigneron, J.-P., Chanzy, A., Calvet, J.-C., and Bruguier, N.: A simple
algorithm to retrieve soil moisture and vegetation biomass using passive
microwave measurements over crop fields, Remote Sens. Environ., 51,
331–341, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Wigneron et al.(2004)Wigneron, Pardé, Waldteufel, Chanzy, Kerr,
Schmidl, and Skou</label><mixed-citation>
Wigneron, J.-P., Pardé, M., Waldteufel, P., Chanzy, A., Kerr, Y.,
Schmidl, S., and Skou, N.: Characterizing the dependence of vegetation model
parameters on crop structure, incidence angle, and polarization at L-band, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote S., 42, 416–425, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Wigneron et al.(2007)Wigneron, Kerr, Waldteufel, Saleh, Escorihuela,
Richaume, Ferrazzoli, de Rosnay, Gurney, Calvet, Grant, Guglielmetti,
Hornbuckle, Mätzler, Pellarin, and Schwank</label><mixed-citation>
Wigneron, J.-P., Kerr, Y., Waldteufel, P., Saleh, K., Escorihuela, M.-J.,
Richaume, P., Ferrazzoli, P., de Rosnay, P., Gurney, R., Calvet, J.-C.,
Grant, J., Guglielmetti, M., Hornbuckle, B., Mätzler, C., Pellarin, T., and
Schwank, M.: L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB) Model:
Description and calibration against experimental data sets over crop fields,
Remote Sens. Environ., 107, 639–655,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.014</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
