<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-177-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title><?xmltex \hack{\vskip 3mm}?>Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes demonstrate retention of respired
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in tree stems from a range of tree species</article-title><alt-title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes demonstrate retention of respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in tree stems</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{{$\chem{CO_{2}/O_{2}}$} fluxes demonstrate retention of respired {$\chem{CO_{2}}$} in tree stems}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B. Hilman et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff10">
          <name><surname>Hilman</surname><given-names>Boaz</given-names></name>
          <email>boaz.hilman@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-1561</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Muhr</surname><given-names>Jan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Trumbore</surname><given-names>Susan E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-6202</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kunert</surname><given-names>Norbert</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-6221</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Carbone</surname><given-names>Mariah S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Yuval</surname><given-names>Päivi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>S. Joseph</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4260-5676</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Moreno</surname><given-names>Gerardo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8053-2696</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Pérez-Priego</surname><given-names>Oscar</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3138-3177</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Migliavacca</surname><given-names>Mirco</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3546-8407</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Carrara</surname><given-names>Arnaud</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Grünzweig</surname><given-names>José M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1654-2205</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Osem</surname><given-names>Yagil</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weiner</surname><given-names>Tal</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Angert</surname><given-names>Alon</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-4025</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>The Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, the Hebrew
University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91940, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck Institute for
Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University,
Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in
Agriculture, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Food and Environment,
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization,
Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Apartado 0843-03092,
Panama</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Institute for Dehesa Research, University of Extremadura, 10600 Plasencia, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for
Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Instituto Universitario Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales
del Mediterráneo (CEAM-UMH), 46980 Paterna, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>a</label><institution>current address: Department of Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck
Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Boaz Hilman (boaz.hilman@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>17</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>177</fpage><lpage>191</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e335">The ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx (ARQ,
apparent respiratory quotient) in tree stems is expected to be 1.0 for
carbohydrates, the main substrate supporting stem respiration. In previous
studies of stem fluxes, ARQ values below 1.0 were observed and hypothesized
to indicate retention of respired carbon within the stem. Here, we
demonstrate that stem ARQ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 values are common across 85
tropical, temperate, and Mediterranean forest trees from nine different
species. Mean ARQ values per species per site ranged from 0.39 to 0.78, with
an overall mean of 0.59. Assuming that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake provides a measure of
in situ stem respiration (due to the low solubility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the overall mean
indicates that on average 41 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respired in stems is not
emitted from the local stem surface. The instantaneous ARQ did not vary with
sap flow. ARQ values of incubated stem cores were similar to those measured
in stem chambers on intact trees. We therefore conclude that dissolution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the xylem sap and transport away from the site of respiration
cannot explain the low ARQ values. We suggest refixation of respired
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in biosynthesis reactions as possible mechanism for low ARQ values.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e432">The global annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from tree stems to the atmosphere is
estimated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pg C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yang et al.,
2016), but the drivers of stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux are not well understood
(Trumbore et al., 2013). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in tree stems originates
primarily from aerobic respiration, which consumes oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
respiratory quotient (RQ) is defined as the ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumed, and its value is derived from the stoichiometry of the
metabolized substrate. Carbohydrates are believed to be the main respiratory
substrate in tree stems  (Hoch et al., 2003; Plaxton and Podestá,
2006), and their metabolism results in an RQ of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Respiration that relies entirely on lipids predicts RQ values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but it is not clear to what extent lipids are stored
and used in trees as they are rarely measured  (Hartmann and
Trumbore, 2016). Current understanding suggests that significant storage of
lipids in stems is uncommon and limited to several tree genera, the
so-called “fat trees”  (Sinnott, 1918). RQ values greater than 1.0
are associated with organic acids catabolism, due to the greater O content
of the molecules being<?pagebreak page178?> oxidized. For these reasons, we expect principally
carbohydrate metabolism in tree stems and an RQ of approximately 1.0.</p>
      <p id="d1e546">Initial measurements of the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx from
the stem surface for six tree species found values mostly below 1.0
(Angert and Sherer, 2011; Angert et al., 2012). The flux ratio is
referred to in those studies, and here, as the “apparent” RQ (ARQ),
because it potentially includes additional sources or sinks of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the stem in addition to the respiration taking place in
tissue beneath a chamber placed on the stem surface. Processes that can
potentially reduce the emission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thereby decrease ARQ below
1.0 include (1) dissolution and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the xylem sap
(Teskey et al., 2008), and (2) carboxylating reactions during
biosynthesis of compounds more oxidized than carbohydrates that involve
refixation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC)
(Lambers et al., 2008). Alternatively, it may be hypothesized that
ARQ below 1.0 is the result of non-respiratory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, e.g., by
oxidases and hydroxylases that are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-consuming enzymes.</p>
      <p id="d1e649">Carbon dioxide is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> times more soluble in water than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with water to form bicarbonate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and carbonate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ions, further
increasing the amount of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). The rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is thus assumed to provide a better measure of stem
respiration than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, which can be complicated by
dissolution and transport within the xylem sap (Teskey et al., 2008),
potentially contributing to low ARQ values. There is evidence from studies
with an isotopically labeled stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool that a significant
portion of C is transported as DIC to photosynthetic tissues where it might
be refixed to organic C (Bloemen et al., 2013; McGuire et al., 2009; Powers
and Marshall, 2011). If transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the stem is
important, ARQ measured at the stem surface is expected to be inversely
related to sap velocity. As the difference in solubility between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases with increasing temperature
(Gevantman, 2018), ARQ also might be expected to increase with temperature if
all other factors remain constant. In addition, variations of ARQ with stem
height are to be expected. A model of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diffusion and advection
in the xylem sap by Hölttä and Kolari (2009) predicted that the
accumulation of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ascending xylem sap, together
with a reduction in stem diameter with height, induces faster <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
diffusive loss to the atmosphere in the upper parts of the stem. Thus, we
expect an increase in ARQ (higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> loss per mole of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake) with stem height if dissolution and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
xylem sap is important.</p>
      <p id="d1e847">The second possible explanation for low ARQ is local dark refixation in the
stem by PEPC (Angert et al., 2012). PEPC is present in tree stems (Berveiller
and Damesin, 2008; Höll, 1974; Ivanov et al., 2005), and its activity was
suggested to be sufficient to have a measurable impact on respired
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <italic>Ricinus communis</italic> (Gessler et al., 2009). Stem ARQ
values would remain below unity as long as the products of PEPC fixation
(e.g., malate and citrate) are not inhibiting further fixation. To date,
studies of these processes in large trees are scarce, and it is not clear
which processes are responsible for low ARQ. If ARQ values lower than unity
are prevalent and result from processes that retain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
stem, estimates of tree stem respiration based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux
measurements must be reconsidered. Thus, the first objective of this work is
to determine whether ARQ values lower than 1.0 are observed in a variety of
trees from different biomes and across seasons. A secondary objective of this
study is to test whether ARQ varies with xylem stream characteristics or with
tree height.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Methods for evaluating ARQ</title>
      <p id="d1e897">We report tree stem ARQ results based on measurement methods described in
Hilman and Angert (2016). These methods overcome the difficulty of measuring
small changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against the high atmospheric background by
using a static stem chamber, in which the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes are
considerably larger than in an open flow chamber.</p>
      <p id="d1e922">We used three different approaches to measuring ARQ: two are based on
discrete gas samples of headspace air, and one is based on direct measurement
of the headspace air using gas sensors (“continuous” sampling). Discrete
gas samples are either taken within 30 min to several hours after chamber
sealing (“instantaneous” sampling) or after the chamber has been sealed to
the stem for more than 24 h, once steady-state conditions have been achieved
(“steady state”). These methods and the time required for achieving steady
state were confirmed by comparing with continuous measurements (Hilman
and Angert, 2016). For each site and experiment described in Sect. 2.2, we
identify the method used to estimate ARQ as instantaneous, steady
state (for flask samples), or continuous (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e928">Study sites, tree species sampled at each site, stem chambers, stems
diameters, and experiments done in the site (A–G list in Sect. 2.2).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="105.275197pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="99.584646pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="51.214961pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="59.750787pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="156.490157pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site and coordinates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Chamber type, sealant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Stem diameter (cm, mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>))<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Experiments in the site (as listed in Sect. 2.2) – dates of samplings (stem chamber measurement method: steady state, s; instantaneous, i; and continuous, c).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Givat Ram campus,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Jerusalem, Israel (31.77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 35.20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Populus deltoids</italic> Bartr. Ex Marsh <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Platanus occidentalis</italic> L. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Pistacia atlantica</italic> Desf. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Quercus calliprinos</italic> Webb. <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Malus domestica</italic> Borkh.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Perspex<sup>®</sup><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, hot glue</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60.2 (1) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>43.4 (1) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>21.2 (1) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>24.3 (1) <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>16.3 (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Seasonal and phenological measurements (A) and vertical transects for <italic>P. occidentalis</italic> and <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> (F) – every 1–3 months between July 2011 and July 2014 (s, i). Day–night variation (C) – July 2012 and April 2013 (i). Day–night variation (C) and temperature effect on ARQ for the <italic>M. domestica</italic> (D) – April 2013 (c).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Quercus ilex</italic> L.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Perspex<sup>®</sup>, vacuum grease</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Comparison between stem chambers and incubated stem cores ARQ, and repeated incubations of stem cores and leaves (G) – July 2016 (s, i).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ramat Hanadiv Nature<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Park, Carmel Ridge, Israel<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(32.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 34.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Quercus calliprinos</italic> Webb.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Perspex<sup>®</sup>, hot glue</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Simultaneous measurements of ARQ and predawn shoot water potential (E) – April 2012, September 2012, and January 2013 (s).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bartlett Experimental Forest, NH, USA (44.06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 71.29<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Acer rubrum</italic> L.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Polypropylene<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, caulking</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Comparison to Harvard Forest based on different phenology (A) – September 2012.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Harvard Forest, MA, USA (42.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 72.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Acer rubrum</italic> L.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Polypropylene, caulking</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Comparison to Bartlett Experimental Forest based on different phenology (A) – September 2012.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Majadas de Tiétar, Cáceres, Spain (39<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>56<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Quercus ilex</italic> L.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Perspex<sup>®</sup>, vacuum grease</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (16)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Simultaneous measurements of ARQ and sap flux density (B) and comparison between stem chambers and incubated stem cores ARQ (G) – May 2015 (s, i).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gigante peninsula, Barro<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Colorado Nature Monument, Republic of Panama (9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>06<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Tetragastris panamensis</italic> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Engl.) Kuntze</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Perspex<sup>®</sup>, vacuum grease</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (42)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Comparison between stem chambers and incubated stem cores ARQ (G) – September–October 2013 (s). Additional stem chamber ARQ measurements – September 2012, September–October 2013, and March–April 2014 (s, i).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A station of the Brazilian National Institute for <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>Research in the Amazon<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(INPA), northwest of Manaus, Brazil (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>Scleronema micranthum</italic><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Ducke) Ducke</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Polypropylene<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Seasonal variability (A) – five campaigns between March 2012 and March 2014 (six trees) (i in the two first campaigns, s in the three later campaigns). Vertical transects including in-stem measurements (F) – March and October 2012 (i). Comparison between stem chambers and incubated stem cores ARQ (G) – March 2014 (s).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e931"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> All chambers were installed at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m above the ground, except for the <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> on
Carmel Ridge that were placed near to the ground due to the shrubby canopy,
the low branching of the trunk, and the constraint of the size of the chamber.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Chambers were made of a 10 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 cm
Perspex<sup>®</sup> plate with four connectors to
allow attachment of sampling flasks. The chamber on the <italic>M. domestica</italic>
was slightly larger, 12 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19 cm, with six flasks connectors.
Chambers were placed on top of a closed cell foam frame that allowed an
air-tight seal between the rigid chamber and the uneven surface of the tree
stem. We used nylon straps to compress the foam, while the sealant was
applied between the foam and stem for ensuring the seal (Hilman and Angert,
2016). Sealants were silicone-based vacuum grease
(Silicaid<sup>®</sup> 1010 manufactured by Aidchim
Ltd., Raanana, Israel) or hot glue applied by a hot-glue gun.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The chambers are described in Muhr et al. (2013) and Carbone et
al. (2013). Briefly, the chambers were made from an opaque plastic
polypropylene pipe T fitting with fittings for sampling flasks. Sealants were
caulking (Nautiflex; OASE GmbH, Oerel-Barchel, Germany) or hot glue applied
by a hot-glue gun. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Chambers were built from a 15 cm long piece
of polypropylene (PP) tubing (6.5 cm OD) that was welded shut on both sides
with a PP disc (6.7 cm diameter). By cutting off a segment (height 2 cm)
the tube was turned into an incubation chamber. Opposite the chamber opening,
three fittings (Sprint ESKV 20, Wiska, Germany) were installed and sealed
around the edges with liquid rubber (Dichtfix, Bindulin, Fürth, Germany).
For sampling, chambers were attached to the trees with four lashing straps. To
achieve a gas-tight seal, a frame (25 mm thick) made from closed-porous
cellular rubber (EPDM quality, REIFF Technische Produkte GmbH, Reutlingen,
Germany) was placed between the chamber and the stem.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>ARQ measurement from discrete samples</title>
      <?pagebreak page180?><p id="d1e1664">The evaluation of ARQ from discrete gas measurements is based on a one-box
model that describes gas dynamics in the headspace of a static chamber sealed
to the surface of a tree stem (Angert and Sherer, 2011; Angert et al., 2012;
Hilman and Angert, 2016). In the model, the gas in the chamber headspace has
initial mean atmospheric values (20.95 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
0.04 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ensured by flushing the chamber with ambient air
before measurement. Once the chamber is closed and the headspace above the
stem surface is isolated, metabolic reactions in the stem control the
chamber's air composition. For the first few hours, headspace concentrations
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease at rates that are roughly
linear with time (instantaneous incubation, Figs. 1 and S1 in the
Supplement). During this linear stage, ARQ is calculated by
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M105" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the changes in
[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] during the initial period after the
chamber was sealed, and for discrete samples can also be determined from the
difference in concentrations between the chamber air sampled at a specific
time and the initial atmosphere. Instantaneous fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported here are obtained either by monitoring
concentration change during the first hour following chamber closure with
sensors directly in the field or by sampling headspace air with glass flasks
within 30 min to a few hours of closing the chamber. The flasks were
transported to the laboratory for measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1860">Modeled changes in a tree stem chamber of the concentrations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the ratio between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are the changes in the gas concentrations from
their initial values and are also the difference in concentrations between
the chamber and the atmosphere. The gas dynamics are based on a one-box model
with arbitrary fluxes and ARQ (ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
tree stems) equal to 0.5. The two time frames in which ARQ can be measured from
the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicated in the figure.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=196.324016pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1964">After the first hours, the initially linear rates of change in headspace gas
concentration with time decline and concentrations eventually remain
constant (Figs. 1, S1). In this phase the gases in the chamber and the outer
part of the stem, where most of the metabolism takes place, are assumed to be
in equilibrium. This steady state occurs when the rates of addition of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the stem to the chamber headspace
are balanced by diffusive (assuming no strong wind) exchange of headspace air
with outside air through porous portions of the outer stem. For steady-state samples, the chamber is sealed to the surface of the stem and left
for a period longer than 24 h, after which the headspace air is sampled
using glass flasks. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations must be
corrected for differences in diffusivity between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as detailed in Angert and Sherer (2011), Angert et al. (2012),
and Hilman and Angert (2016) in order to estimate
the ratio of the gas fluxes from the concentrations in the static chamber:
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M126" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conductance values in the outer layer of the stem between the chamber and the
atmosphere. The structure of the path along which diffusion occurs is the
same for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence the conductance ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends solely on the ratio of diffusivities of the
gases in air, which is 0.76 (Massman, 1998). As a result, at steady state
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Assuming constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes over time, samples taken either
by instantaneous or steady-state methods will yield the same ARQ
values. Indeed, Hilman and Angert (2016) demonstrated excellent agreement
for direct comparisons of the instantaneous and steady-state
measurement methods, and the results are further compared here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Stem chambers and gas measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2228">All data reported here were collected by using chambers attached to the stem
surface to create a gas-tight incubation headspace. Chamber designs and
sampling details differed between sites (see Sect. 2.2 and Table 1), but
generally all chambers were equipped with sampling ports for attaching glass
flasks equipped with O-ring valves (LouwersHanique, Hapert, the Netherlands).
Outside incubations, permanently installed chambers were protected against
insect infestation using screens. Incubations were always started at ambient
concentration, and flasks were allowed to equilibrate with the headspace by
opening the flasks' valves during incubation. Incubation time varied from
between 30 min to a few hours for instantaneous ARQ samples to more than
24 h for steady-state samples. At the end of the incubation period, the
flask valve was closed and the gas sample was shipped to the laboratory for
analysis. Each reported ARQ measurement is the average of duplicate flasks
taken from the stem chamber, and the error is the standard deviation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2231">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios in the flasks were analyzed in the laboratory
at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in a closed system (the
Hampadah; Hilman and Angert, 2016). Two analyzers are included in
the Hampadah system; an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement (LI-840A LI-COR; Lincoln, NE, USA) and a
fuel-cell-based analyzer (FC-10; Sable Systems International, Las Vegas, NV, USA) for
measuring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The principle of operation of the Hampadah
is measurement of the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
in the system's air after the addition of the air from a given sample flask
of known volume and calculation of the concentration in the flask that would
yield that overall concentration change (Hilman and Angert, 2016).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page181?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Continuous ARQ measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2302">Sensitive detection of small changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is difficult in the
field, which is why we used the flask samples and long chamber closure times
(steady state) in most field sites. However, to measure diurnal changes
in stem ARQ values of <italic>Malus domestica</italic>, we were able to make
continuous measurements with a small IRGA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor (COZIR Wide
Range 0 %–20 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sensor, CO2Meter, Inc., Ormond Beach
FL, USA) and a quenching-based optode (Fibox 3, PreSens Precision Sensing,
Regensburg, Germany) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement (Hilman and Angert, 2016).
The sensors' reading was extracted every 30 s. A temperature sensor was
placed next to the optode sensor for temperature and water vapor corrections.
The inlet of a small diaphragm pump (KNF micro-pump) and a non-return valve
(SMC AKH 12 mm, RS, UK) were connected to the chamber headspace and used to
automatically vent the chamber headspace every 4 h. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux
and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx were calculated using a linear fit over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas concentration measurements during the first hour of incubation, the
chamber volume, and the stem surface area under the chamber. We used the data
from this experiment to examine the sensitivity of ARQ to temperature, which
affects the gas solubility constants. The strongest effects are expected
during the night, when daytime influences on stem fluxes associated with sap
flow and low turgor pressure (Salomón et al., 2018) are minimized.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Study sites and experimental design</title>
      <p id="d1e2392">For addressing the variation in stem ARQ values across a range of tree
species and environments, our study included trees located in tropical
forests (Panama and Brazil), in temperate forests (Bartlett and Harvard,
USA), and in a Mediterranean savanna (Spain) and a Mediterranean shrubland
(Carmel Ridge, Israel). We also included five trees located on the Hebrew
University campus in Jerusalem (Israel) and in the adjacent Jerusalem Botanical
Gardens. The trees in Panama were part of a fertilization and litter
manipulation project (Wright et al., 2011; Sayer and Tanner, 2010). No treatment effects were found (Fig. S2, this topic is
not in the scope of this paper). Details about the sites, tree species, stem
chambers, stem dimensions, and experiments conducted in each of the sites are
presented in Table 1 and Fig. 3. The list below summarizes what data were
available from the different sites and what questions in particular we
addressed with these data (the numbering of the experiments matches Table 1):
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>A.</label>
      <p id="d1e2397">Seasonal and/or phenological measurements of stem ARQ were performed in
Jerusalem, US, and Brazil sites. In Jerusalem, five individual trees from
five different species (first five species in Table 1) were measured. The
phenological state of deciduous trees (all except <italic>Quercus calliprinos</italic>) was separated into four classes (Fig. 4). In the US sites,
trees measured at the northern site (Bartlett Experimental Forest) had fall
color development, while leaves at Harvard Forest (southern site) were still
green. After analysis of flasks, we excluded results from three trees because
of suspected air leakage from the chamber (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % after
6 days of stem incubation). In Brazil, six trees were measured. After
analysis we excluded results from 4 out of 12 instantaneous
measurements because of a weak signal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 3 h of incubation).</p></list-item></list>
For our second objective, to explore the potential for low ARQ values to
reflect dissolution and transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the xylem sap, we
measured instantaneous ARQ at varying sap flow velocities and at different
times of a day. Transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was previously reported to be
correlated with sap flow (McGuire and Teskey, 2004; Bowman et al., 2005;
McGuire et al., 2007). Thus, anti-correlation of ARQ with sap flux, expressed
via maximal ARQ values during the night when transport is at a minimum, would
provide evidence that low ARQ can be explained by export of locally respired
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (as DIC) out of the stem region being measured (experiments B,
C, and E, below). If transport of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the main driver
of low ARQ values, we would also expect that (D) higher ARQ values will be
observed at higher temperatures (due to differential temperature dependences
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility coefficients), (F) ARQ values will increase
with stem height due to DIC accumulation and
stem tapering that induce stronger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diffusive loss, (F) ARQ
values will decrease with depth in the stem (due to the greater proximity to
the water conducting vessel elements), and (G) ARQ values in incubated stem
cores will be higher than measured values at the stem surface (due to the
detachment from the transport system).We performed a number of experiments to
test each of these predictions (additional details in Table 1):
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>B.</label>
      <p id="d1e2524">ARQ (instantaneous) was measured simultaneously with sap flux density
measurements in nine <italic>Quercus ilex</italic> trees with similar diameter (0.35
to 0.49 m at breast height) at the site in Spain.</p></list-item><list-item><label>C.</label>
      <p id="d1e2531">ARQ (instantaneous) was measured during daytime, at predawn when the
transpiration stream should reach its minimum, and again during the next day.
We conducted two day–night campaigns on the trees at the site in Jerusalem.
Additionally, during 4 days, ARQ (continuous) values were measured every
4 h from the <italic>M. domestica</italic> tree in Jerusalem.</p></list-item><list-item><label>D.</label>
      <p id="d1e2538">Nighttime results of the continuous ARQ measurements on the <italic>M. domestica</italic> enabled us
to examine the relationship between temperature and ARQ. During the night,
when sap flux is minimal, the temperature effect on the gases' solubility
should have its maximum effect on ARQ values.</p></list-item><list-item><label>E.</label>
      <p id="d1e2545">ARQ (steady state) was measured over spring, summer, and winter for
<italic>Quercus calliprinos</italic> trees on the Carmel<?pagebreak page182?> Ridge site, simultaneously with
predawn shoot water potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a
measure for available soil water and therefore is also a rough proxy for
seasonal differences in transpiration rates (Aranda et al., 2005; Bucci et
al., 2005).</p></list-item><list-item><label>F.</label>
      <p id="d1e2574">ARQ was measured at different heights on the same tree stems, while
simultaneously ARQ was determined from air sampled inside the stem. During
the seasonal measurements in Jerusalem, ARQ (steady state) was measured
at the stem base of the <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> and the <italic>Platanus occidentalis </italic>trees as well as at breast height. In Brazil, we measured ARQ
(instantaneous) from stem chambers and in-stem probes to sample in-stem
gases from the tree base up to 11 m above the ground on a single
<italic>Scleronema micranthum</italic> tree on two separate days.</p></list-item><list-item><label>G.</label>
      <p id="d1e2587">ARQ (steady state) measured from stem chambers was compared with ARQ
measurements through incubation of stem cores. Measurement of stem tissues
should provide better estimation for the stem outer layers' RQ by excluding
dissolution and advection in the xylem stream. Incubations were performed on
cores taken from four species in four different sites (Table 1). In
Jerusalem, we compared repeated stem incubation ARQ with that of leaf
incubation.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Sap flux density</title>
      <p id="d1e2596">Sap flux density was monitored in nine trees at the site in Spain using heat
ratio method (HRM) sensors (SFM1 Sap Flow Meter, ICT International). A
description of the installation and measurement is presented in Methods S1.
The detailed procedures for sap flux corrections and calculations are
described in Perez-Priego et al. (2017). We tested whether the daily maximum
sap flux density (i.e., average of measurements between 10:00 and
17:00 local time during the day of the ARQ
measurement), which correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution fluxes (Bowman
et al., 2005), could explain variability in ARQ (instantaneous).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Shoot water potential</title>
      <p id="d1e2616">Predawn shoot water potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on Carmel Ridge was
measured using a pressure chamber (PMS Instrument Company, Corvallis, Oregon,
USA). At each sampling time, we sampled 2–3 terminal twigs containing 5–10
leaves from each tree. The samples were wrapped in plastic, placed on ice, and
measured within an hour of sampling using the pressure chamber technique
(Scholander et al., 1965).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>In-stem measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2637">For sampling gas from inside the stem, stainless-steel tubes (1.3 cm
diameter) were installed 4, 8, and 12 cm deep into the stem, in various stem
heights on the same tree in Brazil where the vertical ARQ transects were
measured. Installation procedure was according to Muhr et al. (2013) and
tubes were sealed between sampling dates. Using rubber tubing we connected
the sampling flasks to the tubes for incubation of 4 days. The flasks were
then analyzed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Hampadah.
Assuming steady state, ARQ was calculated using Eq. (3) (Angert et al.,
2012).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Measuring ARQ of incubated tissues</title>
      <p id="d1e2668">Stem cores were extracted immediately after the chamber incubation experiment
in Panama, Spain, and Jerusalem using a 1.2 cm diameter cork borer. The
outer bark and green tissues, as well as sapwood sieves (with paler color
than the phloem tissues), were removed from the cores. The cores were cut
into longitudinal halves, wrapped with moist gauze cloth to avoid
desiccation, and placed in an air-tight incubation system to which glass flasks (two or
three) were connected by Swagelok Ultra-Torr fittings (Swagelok, Solon, OH,
USA, Fig. S4). At the end of the incubation period, the flasks were closed
and analyzed in the Hampadah. Since the incubations took place in a
closed system (no diffusive exchange with outside air), the changes with time
in [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] are assumed to be linear, and ARQ can
be calculated using Eq. (1).</p>
      <p id="d1e2693">In Panama and Spain the incubations were started immediately upon core
extraction, at ambient temperature, and lasted 8 and 3 h, respectively. In
Jerusalem the cores were kept on moist gauze cloth for 2 h before being
sealed in the incubation system and kept at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in an
environmental chamber. Repeated incubations were performed in series, with
the incubation systems flushed in between with ambient air. Simultaneously,
from each tree, four leaves from an understory branch were cut and inserted
into the same incubation systems, for the same incubation durations. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake rate (nmol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g FW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was
calculated as follows (adopted from Pruyn et al., 2002):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M170" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uptake</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rate</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FW</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the decrease in [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] during the
incubation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of headspace (mL), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the incubation
period (s), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fresh weight (g), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar
volume, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converts units to nmol. We dried the samples in an oven
at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 days for the dry weight.</p>
      <p id="d1e2907">In Brazil, stem cores were extracted by using a 5.15 mm diameter increment
corer. After bark was removed the cores were cut to a length of 6 cm each
and then allowed to equilibrate with the atmosphere for 6–8 h, while
continually being kept moist. After equilibration, each core was transferred
to an incubation chamber equipped with flasks. Prior to starting the
incubation, a few milliliters of water were added to keep the core tissue moist. In
this case, incubations were left at room temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
for 24 h before flasks were closed and removed.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page183?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2935">All statistical analysis was done using JMP
(JMP<sup>®</sup>, JMP Pro 13, SAS Institute Inc.,
Cary, NC, USA). Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate
how the interaction of tissue (stem core and leaves) with ARQ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake varies with time in the repeated incubations of the tissues from the
trees in Jerusalem. Mauchly's test indicated violation of sphericity in the
ARQ response in the repeated incubations experiment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.132</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.021</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); therefore, the Greenhouse–Geisser adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test was chosen.
One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer HSD (honestly significant difference) was used to
perform comparisons among time points in every tissue. A Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test was
used for comparisons between stem cores and leaves at each time point.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e3001">The ARQ values estimated from instantaneous and steady-state measurements
were in good agreement over a large range of ARQ values (Fig. 2). The mean
difference between the two assessments is 0.02, and RMSD is 0.15. The average
ARQ (steady state) value across all species and sites, including results
from Angert et al. (2012), was 0.59 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">229</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the average ARQ of
species in the different sites ranged between 0.39 and 0.78 (Fig. 3). For
individual measurements, a minimum ARQ value of 0.27 was recorded for
<italic>Q. ilex</italic> in Spain and for <italic>Tetragastris panamensis</italic> in Panama.
The highest value was 0.99 for <italic>M. domestica</italic> and <italic>Populus deltoids</italic> in Jerusalem.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e3030">Scatter plot of instantaneous ARQ (ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tree stems) measured in stem chambers
after incubation of 30 min to a few hours and steady-state ARQ measured
in the same experiment with typically 2 days of incubation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">139</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3077">Summary of steady-state ARQ (ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tree stems) for 12 species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> individuals).
Gases were sampled from chambers at breast height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m above soil
surface), except for the <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> in the Mediterranean
shrubland, in which chambers were placed near the stem base due to branching
stems. Vertical lines are mean values, error bars represent one standard
deviation, and colored bars represent the range of measured ARQ values. The
Peru data are from Angert et al. (2012). The horizontal bars were ordered
according to increasing mean ARQ.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e3137"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Phenology or seasonality had some effect on ARQ. In Jerusalem, the ARQ of
<italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> and <italic>Pistacia atlantica</italic> was lower during
spring and higher in fall and winter (Fig. 4). In Brazil, ARQ varied between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the wet season (March) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the dry
season (October, Fig. S3). The average ARQ of the <italic>Acer rubrum</italic> trees
at Harvard Forest, where all leaves were green, was significantly higher than
the average ARQ of the trees at Bartlett Experimental Forest, where the
leaves had autumn color development (0.69 vs. 0.57, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a Student's
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e3196">Seasonal dynamics of steady-state ARQ (ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tree stems) of five individual trees
from five different species. Phenology stage index determined according to
“defoliation” –  from beginning of autumn color development to the end of the
fall, “winter dormancy” – when the tree was bare from leaves, and “leaf
regeneration” – from bud burst to early leaf development stage. The
<italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> is evergreen. Markers are mean values and error bars
are SD of duplicate samples from the same stem chamber. Markers connected
with solid lines represent measurements with chambers at breast height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m above soil surface). Smaller markers connected with dashed lines
represent measurements with chambers positioned at the stem base. The trees
grew on the Hebrew University campus in Jerusalem, Israel.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>ARQ values under varying xylem stream flow and temperature</title>
      <p id="d1e3247">ARQ (instantaneous) values of nine <italic>Q. ilex</italic> trees in Spain were
invariable (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in comparison with the larger
variation in maximum daily sap flux density among these trees (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and no correlation was
found between the ARQ and sap flux density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9891</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3356">Mean ARQ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD values (steady state) of the trees at the Carmel
Ridge site were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
spring, summer, and winter, respectively. Repeated-measures analysis of
variance found no significant difference between seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied significantly with seasons (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">207.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0048</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). During summer, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MPa,
much lower than the spring and winter values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MPa,
respectively).</p>
      <p id="d1e3520">In the Jerusalem day–night campaigns, ARQ (instantaneous) values ranged
between 0.52 and 1.05, across all trees, seasons, and sampling times
(Fig. 5). Predawn ARQ values exceeding than daylight values (by amounts
larger than the differences between duplicates) were observed during the
summer in <italic>M. domestica</italic> and in the upper chamber on <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic>. No significant diurnal effect was found in repeated-measures
analysis of variance of the breast height chambers, neither when results of
all the trees were grouped by season nor when results were grouped by stem
chamber. In continuous measurements of <italic>M. domestica</italic>, with ARQ
values obtained every 4 h, ARQ during the night (0.70; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was not
significantly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) greater than in the day
(0.71; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 6). The variations among the nighttime values were best
explained using temperatures measured 235 min before the ARQ measurement
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">temperature</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). With the same time lag, the coefficient of
determination for the daytime values is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0266</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e3665">Instantaneous ARQ (ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tree
stems <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD of duplicates) values measured over a day–night–day
transition during July 2012 <bold>(a)</bold> and April 2013 <bold>(b)</bold> from
different trees growing on the Hebrew University campus in Jerusalem, Israel.
<italic>Quercus calliprinos</italic> was measured at two different heights on the
stem. The first sampling was taken during daylight (day 1), next sampling before
dawn (predawn), and last sampling during daylight of the successive day
(day 2).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Stem surface and in-stem ARQ vertical transects</title>
      <p id="d1e3720">In <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic>, measured over 3 years in Jerusalem, ARQ did
not differ significantly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test) between breast
height and stem base (ARQ of 0.56 vs. 0.59, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 4).
For <italic>P. occidentalis</italic> measured for<?pagebreak page184?> the same period the ARQ measured at
breast height was significantly higher than ARQ measured at the stem base
(0.74 vs. 0.64, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.003</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test,
Fig. 4). For a single <italic>S. micranthum</italic> tree in Brazil, ARQ values
measured at heights of 6.5 and 11 m above the ground were similar to ARQ
measured at breast height (Fig. 7), but also show differences with the stem
base. In this tree, ARQ measured in March (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; wet season) was
lower than in October (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; dry season). The in-stem ARQ values
ranged between 0.25 and 0.56, with average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
both seasons and at all stem positions and depths. The in-stem ARQ, as well
as [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] values, had no clear vertical trend (Figs. 7; S5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e3852">Diurnal patterns of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx to the stem and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from the stem, <bold>(b)</bold> chamber temperature, and
<bold>(c)</bold> instantaneous ARQ (ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
tree stems). Shaded areas indicate night periods. Error bars are 95 %
confidence bounds. All data were obtained from a single <italic>M. domestica</italic>
tree during 24–28 April 2013 on the Hebrew University campus in Jerusalem,
Israel.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p id="d1e3922">Instantaneous ARQ (ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
tree stems) measured from stem chambers installed at different heights above
the ground on a <italic>S. micranthum</italic> tree in Brazil. At the same heights
ARQ was measured from 4 cm in-stem probes. The measurements were conducted
during 30 March and 18 October 2012. Error bars represents SD of duplicate
samples from the same stem chamber.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Tissue incubations</title>
      <p id="d1e3964">The average ARQ values of the stem core incubations were similar to the stem
chamber ARQ for the four sites and trees where these comparisons were made
(Fig. 8). When incubations were repeated over time for <italic>Q. ilex</italic> stem
cores and leaves, significant effects of time, tissue (leaves, stem cores),
and their interactions (time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> tissue) on ARQ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake rates were observed. ARQ of the stem cores increased from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) after 3 h to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the end of
the experiment (32 h; Fig. 9). The ARQ of incubated leaves of the same trees
showed higher initial ARQ of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an increase over time to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e4058">Comparisons of stem chamber steady-state ARQ (ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">influx</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tree stems) to ARQ measured from
incubations of stem cores (ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">increase</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decrease</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), by
species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> individuals) in different sites. Values are means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>ARQ is lower than 1.0 for a wide range of tree species</title>
      <p id="d1e4144">The ARQ measured in stem chambers installed on 85 individual trees of nine
species including tropical, temperate, and Mediterranean forest trees was
considerably and almost universally lower than 1.0. ARQ values as low as 0.7
could indicate that lipids were used exclusively as substrates for
respiration, but current understanding suggests this scenario is implausible.
However, this understanding relies on low and constant lipid concentrations
over seasonal sampling (Hoch et al., 2003); daily changes in lipid
concentrations and RQ were measured in response to shading and drought
treatments, indicating this substrate might be more important than commonly
thought (Fischer et al., 2015; Hanf et al., 2015). Nevertheless, many of the
measured ARQ values were below 0.7, so substrate use alone cannot explain
them. Additionally, as ARQ values above 1.0 are expected when lipids are
produced (De Vries et al., 1974), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resulting from lipid
metabolism must be mirrored with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a different time
(assuming the lipids are produced locally). However, ARQ almost never
exceeded 1.0. The results demonstrate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx to the stems
usually exceeded the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, regardless of tree species, site,
season, and time of day. Assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake provides a measure of
in situ respiration (due to the low solubility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
carbohydrates are the main substrate, values of ARQ averaging 0.59 indicate
that on average 41 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced by respiration was<?pagebreak page185?> not
locally emitted to the atmosphere, but apparently retained in the stem.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e4229"><bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake rate (nmol g FW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and <bold>(b)</bold> ARQ (ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">increase</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">decrease</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
<italic>Q. ilex</italic> leaves and stem cores incubated in a closed system (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Values are means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD. Asterisks indicate significant difference
between tissues at each time step (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test). Different letters indicate
significant difference in Tukey–Kramer HSD analysis that followed one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) within tissue type, between time steps.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/177/2019/bg-16-177-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4404">For sites where we have time series data for the same individuals,
considerable variations in ARQ values were observed over 2 years in Brazil
(Fig. S3) and over 3 years in Jerusalem (Fig. 4). A decrease in ARQ
values was often observed during entrance to dormancy for the deciduous trees
in Jerusalem, as well as an apparent minimum in ARQ for <italic>P. atlantica</italic> and
<italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> in spring (Fig. 4). The autumn decrease seems to be
in agreement with the finding of significantly lower ARQ for Bartlett
Experimental Forest, where leaves were beginning to senesce, compared to the
more southerly Harvard Forest, where leaves were still green.</p>
      <p id="d1e4413">The possibility of measurement artifacts as the source for the low ARQ values
seems unlikely, as Hilman and Angert (2016) previously demonstrated the
validity of the measurement methods and the box-model approach. Further
support comes from the small mean difference (0.02) between the
instantaneous and steady-state ARQ measured for the same tree, which
reflects overall agreement between the measures. The considerable scatter
around perfect agreement (Fig. 2), expressed also in RMSD of 0.15, could be
taken as an indication that the measurement methods differ significantly.
However, since the model assumes constant ARQ with time, and temporal changes
in ARQ are obviously<?pagebreak page186?> present as shown in Figs. 5 and 6, the scatter could
also be attributed to temporal differences in the time integrated by the two
types of measurement: the instantaneous sampling was typically conducted
a few days before the steady-state sampling on the same tree. Additionally,
the precision for instantaneous ARQ was lower than for steady-state
values, due to smaller changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the shorter time periods.
This may also contribute to the scatter in Fig. 2 (Hilman and Angert, 2016).
We also found strong similarities between ARQ measured on intact stems using
chambers and ARQ determined by incubating stem cores (Fig. 8). This provides
another, indirect, confirmation that the low ARQ values obtained with the
stem chamber measurement approaches are measuring something that is occurring
in the stem tissues.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Dissolution and transport of respired {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$} in xylem
stream cannot explain the low ARQ values}?><title>Dissolution and transport of respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in xylem
stream cannot explain the low ARQ values</title>
      <?pagebreak page187?><p id="d1e4445">Given the low solubility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, stem flux ARQ values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or
potentially <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for “fat trees”) are the result of respired
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> either being exported from the site of respiration before it
can be emitted to the atmosphere or being refixed during biosynthesis
processes within the stem. As noted earlier, a second possibility is
non-respiratory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, e.g., by oxidases and hydroxylases that
are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-consuming enzymes, most notably used in lignin biosynthesis.
However, stoichiometric analysis of this pathway shows that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
produced from the sucrose that is the lignin's substrate usually exceeds the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption, so that the net effect of lignin biosynthesis
should be a local increase in ARQ (Amthor, 2003). To the best of our knowledge, there are no other
significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-consuming processes in tree stems that might affect
the ARQ value.</p>
      <p id="d1e4546">We conclude that the low stem ARQ must be the result of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being
locally fixed or transported away from the site of respiration. If
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution and DIC transport is the main export mechanism, we
would expect ARQ to increase with temperature (i.e., according to solubility
changes with temperature), be anti-correlated with sap flow (McGuire and
Teskey, 2004; McGuire et al., 2007; Bowman et al., 2005), and to increase
with height in the stem (Hölttä and Kolari, 2009). Three observations
support the idea that this export mechanism controls some of the variability
in ARQ. First, nighttime ARQ in <italic>M. domestica</italic> was indeed correlated
with temperature, an expected trend given the greater temperature sensitivity
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility in comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gevantman,
2018). Second, <italic>P. occidentalis</italic> had higher ARQ values in the
upper stem position, especially during the growing season (Fig. 4). Third,
relatively high ARQ values were observed at 0.2 m above the ground in the
<italic>S. micranthum</italic> tree (Fig. 7), which may reflect a burst of in-stem
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that originated from belowground respiration (McGuire and
Teskey, 2004; Levy et al., 1999). However, in most of our observations ARQ
did not vary as expected if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution and transport were the
main <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> export mechanism.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4639">Comparison between the calculated PEPC fixation rates required to
explain measured ARQ in stem core incubations and reported PEPC fixation
rates for young stems.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ARQ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PEPC fixation rate required</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PEPC fixation rate<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">efflux</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uptake</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(nmol g DW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">to explain the observed ARQ<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(nmol C g DW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(nmol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g DW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Quercus ilex</italic> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.15</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Tetragastris panamensis</italic> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.40</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> L.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> L.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.74</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e4642"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Values are mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Dry weight (DW) was determined after drying in an oven at
60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 days. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is an estimation of the flux of
respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that did not diffuse out from the core, based on the
assumption that carbohydrates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the respiratory
substrate. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> We calculated PEPC fixation rate of <italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> L. with data from Berveiller and Damesin (2008) as follows: PEPC
activity (nmol C mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> chl s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> total chl
(mg g DW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">12.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol C g DW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The chosen PEPC activity was
the lowest among seasonal measurements. We calculated PEPC fixation rate of
<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> L. with data from Ivanov et al. (2005) as follows:
PEPC activity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol C mg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> chl min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> total
chl
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>g g FW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> g FW g DW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (using assumed water content of
0.5) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion to seconds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">483.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">16.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol C g DW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. PEPC activity
was measured during winter.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e5373">When sap flux density was measured directly, it did not explain the variation
in ARQ among <italic>Q. ilex</italic> trees in Spain. Mean ARQ values were fairly
stable over spring, summer, and winter (0.62–0.69) for <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> in the Carmel Ridge site, while the transpiration stream
probably varied greatly between seasons if related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Additionally, during dormancy when no leaves were in place to force the
transpiration stream, we found ARQ values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in four deciduous trees
(black markers in Fig. 4). Sap flow rates are assumed to decline during the
night, but ARQ values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during nighttime were measured in five species,
and in most cases no nocturnal increase in ARQ in comparison to daytime
values was observed (Figs. 5, 6). Thus, the temperature dependency observed
for the <italic>M. domestica</italic> tree during the night, which explained
variability in ARQ values between 0.65 and 0.75, must be a second-order control
on ARQ variability and cannot explain the big deviation from unity (according
to the linear fit, an ARQ of 1.0 is expected at the unreasonable temperature
of 63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). Also, the vertical transects of ARQ for <italic>Q. calliprinos</italic> and <italic>S. micranthum</italic>, including in-stem ARQ for the later
(Figs. 4, 7, S5), showed no consistent pattern of ARQ increasing with stem
height, unlike the ARQ increase with height measured in the <italic>P. occidentalis</italic> (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p id="d1e5435">ARQ values measured in the stem core incubations, where tissues are isolated
from the influence of transport in the xylem stream, were well below 1.0 and
similar to the chambers' values (Figs. 8, 9). The in-stem ARQ measured in the
<italic>S. micranthum</italic> was likewise <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but although the proximity to
the xylem was greater, the values were not necessarily lower than the surface
ARQ (Fig. 7). It is likely that in-stem ARQ values are influenced by
dissolution in the xylem water, but the question is the following: what is the contribution
of in-stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from the stem surface?
There are contradicting assessments, and the influence likely is related to
wood anatomy. For example, studies of ring- and diffuse-porous species
observed tight covariations of in-stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and surface efflux and
have interpreted this as evidence of strong influence of in-stem
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (Teskey and McGuire, 2002, 2007; Steppe et al.,
2007), while other studies conducted on conifers with tracheid anatomy
inferred only marginal influence of in-stem processes on surface efflux
(Ubierna et al., 2009; Maier and Clinton, 2006). Nevertheless, observations
of covariation in in-stem [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux do not
necessarily represent cause-and-effect relationships (Maier and Clinton,
2006). Muhr et al. (2013) utilized the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signature
of in-stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5 cm deep) and surface efflux to estimate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of total emitted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> originates from the inner stem in
three tropical non-coniferous tree species. Small contribution of in-stem
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the surface efflux can be easily explained by the<?pagebreak page188?> slow
diffusion through wood of all three anatomical groups (Sorz and Hietz, 2006).
The woody diffusional barrier can explain the apparent decoupling between
ARQ, sap flux density, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> presented above. A major
contribution from respiratory activity concentrated in the outer stem tissues
to overall stem respiration would further reduce sap flow effects on surface
fluxes (Hölttä and Kolari, 2009; Maier and Clinton, 2006; Ubierna et
al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e5585">An alternative explanation for low ARQ values could be the fixation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by biosynthesis with engagement of the enzyme PEPC, which is
able to fix respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indirect evidence for PEPC activity can
be found in the increase in the ARQ values with time in our repeated
incubations, while cellular activity was retained as reflected in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake rates (Fig. 9). Such a pattern may reflect a biochemical
process, e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation by the enzyme PEPC, which decreases with
time due to self-inhibition by the accumulation of the products (Kai et al.,
1999; Huber and Edwards, 1975). PEPC fixation rates can easily explain the
retained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, according to mass balance calculation for the stem
core incubations and published PEPC fixation rates in young tree stems
(Table 2). Assuming refixation is important, the fact that ARQ measured from
intact stems is almost always lower than unity indicates that the fixation
products, organic acids like malate and citrate or amino acids, are not
inhibiting the fixation or being oxidized locally and are further
metabolized or allocated elsewhere in the stem. The malate can be transported
in the xylem stream as indicated by an upwards concentration increase in
<italic>Acer platanoides</italic> stems (Schill et al., 1996). A possible fate of the
malate might be similar to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-like photosynthesis observed in tobacco,
where xylem-transported malate contributes C to photosynthesis in leaves
(Hibberd and Quick, 2002). Alternatively, the fixation products might be
exported via the phloem. One possible sink is excretion of organic acids to
the rhizosphere as root exudates, which can account for ample fraction of
overall gross primary productivity (GPP) in forests (Abramoff and Finzi, 2016; Finzi et al., 2015).
Indications for the transport of organic acids from upper parts of the plant
to the roots have already been reported (Hoffland et al., 1992; Shane et al.,
2004).</p>
      <p id="d1e5656">Overall, our results suggest that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution and removal in
the xylem stream are not the main cause of the low ARQ values that are common
to the trees we measured. We speculate the observed ARQ values resulted by
PEPC refixation, with possible cumulative effects of some dissolution and
transport, partial lipid metabolism, and some non-respiratory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
consumption. Corticular photosynthesis may theoretically influence ARQ, but
in a complex manner; with an assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange ratio of 1.0 and
given that all other processes yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the photosynthesis will
reduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration gradients between
stem and atmosphere in the same absolute numbers, which will cause a further ARQ
decrease. However, in our measurements photosynthesis was prevented by
shading the measured stem surface. Additionally, most evidence for
significant corticular photosynthesis comes from twigs and young stems (Pfanz
et al., 2002; Ávila et al., 2014), while stems in the current study were
mature. Wood anatomy may further impact ARQ by modifying the contribution of
internal stem processes on surface fluxes. The numerous mechanisms
potentially responsible for ARQ probably varied with the broad range of
species and wood anatomies we investigated. Further research to pursue the
potential role of PEPC, including direct measurement of PEPC activity, would
be needed to assess whether PEPC plays a role in lowering ARQ values to the
levels observed. To complete the stem C balance, additional evaluation of the
relations between the in-stem and the stem surface fluxes is also needed, as
well as analysis of how organic and amino acids vary in the stem.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Implications of low ARQ</title>
      <?pagebreak page189?><p id="d1e5740">From a whole ecosystem perspective, if respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the stem
returns to the atmosphere elsewhere (e.g., in the soil, canopy), the overall
ecosystem–atmosphere C fluxes will not be affected, and high ARQ associated
with the release of the transported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will balance the low ARQ in
the stem. Such <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ARQ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are expected in the rhizosphere
where organic acids are decomposed. In the canopy, greater refixation of
internal C is expected to increase the photosynthetically oxidative ratio
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">produced</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">consumed</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as the internally transported C
replaces the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when assimilation is measured.
Additionally, such internal transport can (i) cause a discrepancy between the
measured aboveground and belowground <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effluxes and the
locations where respiration is actually occurring (Aubrey and Teskey, 2009)
and (ii) lead to false attribution of respiration responses to environmental
conditions. Moreover, the different long-term temperature sensitivity of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx is of interest and might
explain part of the gap between modeled and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of tree
respiration (Griffin and Prager, 2017). For example, decrease in ARQ with
rising temperature (due to higher PEPC activity for example) might result in
a slow increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, whereas the respiration rate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake) is actually increasing sharply, together with the
internal C flux. Future studies should determine how temperature and
nutrients control long-term changes in ARQ and aim to identify the
biochemical process that control the low ARQ reported by the current study.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e5884">Data used in this study can be found in figures, tables, and
in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5887">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-177-2019-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-177-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e5896">BH and AA planned and designed the research. BH performed most of the ARQ
sampling and analysis and led the writing of the manuscript. JM, NK, and SET
carried out the field work in Brazil, and MSC carried out the field work in
the USA. PY measured shoot water potential. SJW designed the long-term experiment
in the Republic of Panama. GM, OPP, MM, and AC contributed to the campaign in
Spain. OPP measured the sap flux density. JMG and YO contributed to the
campaigns in Carmel Ridge. TW contributed to the campaigns in Spain and
Jerusalem. JM, SET, SJW, GM, OPP, MM, JMG, and AA contributed to the
discussion and writing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e5902">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5908">This research was funded by the German–Israeli Foundation for Scientific and
Development (no. 1334 /2016), and by a Ring Foundation grant. Boaz Hilman was
partly funded by the Advanced School for Environmental Studies and by the
Canadian Friends of the Hebrew University. Mirco Migliavacca and
Oscar Pérez-Priego acknowledge the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for
supporting the research activities of the MANIP project with the Max Planck
Prize to Markus Reichstein. We thank Avihay Berry for assistance with field
work at Jerusalem, Itsik Simchayov for technical support, the Ramat Hanadiv
Nature Park for logistic assistance, the Jerusalem Botanical Gardens in
Givat Ram and especially Ori Fragman-Sapir and Ofri Bar for facilitating this
research, and Rufino Gonzales and Omar Hernandez for assistance with field
work at the Barro Colorado Nature Monument.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> The
article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication
were covered by the Max Planck Society.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited
by: Paul Stoy<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abramoff, R. Z. and Finzi, A. C.: Seasonality and partitioning of root
allocation to rhizosphere soils in a midlatitude forest, Ecosphere, 7,
e01547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ecs2.1547</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Amthor, J. S.: Efficiency of lignin biosynthesis: a quantitative analysis, Ann. Bot.-London, 91, 673–695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/aob/mcg073</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Angert, A. and Sherer, Y.: Determining the relationship between tree-stem
respiration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements,
Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 25, 1752–1756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/Rcm.5042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/Rcm.5042</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Angert, A., Muhr, J., Negron Juarez, R., Alegria Muñoz, W., Kraemer, G.,
Ramirez Santillan, J., Barkan, E., Mazeh, S., Chambers, J. Q., and Trumbore,
S. E.: Internal respiration of Amazon tree stems greatly exceeds external
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, Biogeosciences, 9, 4979–4991,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4979-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-4979-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Aranda, I., Gil, L., and Pardos, J. A.: Seasonal changes in apparent
hydraulic conductance and their implications for water use of European beech
(<italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> L.) and sessile oak [<italic>Quercus petraea</italic>
(Matt.) Liebl] in South Europe, Plant Ecol., 179, 155–167,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-004-7007-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11258-004-7007-1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Aubrey, D. P. and Teskey, R. O.: Root-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux via xylem
stream rivals soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux, New Phytol., 184, 35–40,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02971.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02971.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Ávila, E., Herrera, A., and Tezara, W.: Contribution of stem
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation to whole-plant carbon balance in nonsucculent species,
Photosynthetica, 52, 3–15, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Berveiller, D. and Damesin, C.: Carbon assimilation by tree stems: potential
involvement of phospho<italic>enol</italic>pyruvate carboxylase, Trees-Struct.
Funct., 22, 149–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0193-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00468-007-0193-4</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Bloemen, J., McGuire, M. A., Aubrey, D. P., Teskey, R. O., and Steppe, K.:
Transport of root-respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via the transpiration stream affects
aboveground carbon assimilation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in trees, New
Phytol., 197, 555–565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04366.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04366.x</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bowman, W. P., Barbour, M. M., Turnbull, M. H., Tissue, D. T., Whitehead, D.,
and Griffin, K. L.: Sap flow rates and sapwood density are critical factors
in within- and between-tree variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux from stems of
mature <italic>Dacrydium cupressinum</italic> trees, New Phytol., 167, 815–828,
<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>doi10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01478.x, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bucci, S. J., Goldstein, G., Meinzer, F. C., Franco, A. C., Campanello, P.,
and Scholz, F. G.: Mechanisms<?pagebreak page190?> contributing to seasonal homeostasis of minimum
leaf water potential and predawn disequilibrium between soil and plant water
potential in Neotropical savanna trees, Trees, 19, 296–304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0391-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00468-004-0391-2</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Carbone, M. S., Czimczik, C. I., Keenan, T. F., Murakami, P. F., Pederson,
N., Schaberg, P. G., Xu, X., and Richardson, A. D.: Age, allocation and
availability of nonstructural carbon in mature red maple trees, New Phytol.,
200, 1145–1155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.12448</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>De Vries, F. W. T. P., Brunsting, A. H. M., and Van Laar, H. H.: Products,
requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis a quantitative approach, J.
Theor. Biol., 45, 339–377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Finzi, A. C., Abramoff, R. Z., Spiller, K. S., Brzostek, E. R., Darby, B. A.,
Kramer, M. A., and Phillips, R. P.: Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively
important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles, Glob. Change
Biol., 21, 2082–2094, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12816</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, S., Hanf, S., Frosch, T., Gleixner, G., Popp, J., Trumbore, S., and
Hartmann, H.: Pinus sylvestris switches respiration substrates under shading
but not during drought, New Phytol., 207, 542–550, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.13452</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gessler, A., Tcherkez, G., Karyanto, O., Keitel, C., Ferrio, J. P.,
Ghashghaie, J., Kreuzwieser, J., and Farquhar, G. D.: On the metabolic origin
of the carbon isotope composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolved from darkened
light-acclimated leaves in Ricinus communis, New Phytol., 181, 374–386,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02672.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02672.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gevantman, L. H.: Solubility of Selected Gases in Water, in: CRC Handbook of
Cemistry and Physics, edited by: Rumble, J. R., CRC press/Taylor and Francis,
Boca Raton, FL, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Griffin, K. L. and Prager, C. M.: Where does the carbon go? Thermal
acclimation of respiration and increased photosynthesis in trees at the
temperate-boreal ecotone, Tree Physiol., 37, 281–284,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpw133</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hanf, S., Fischer, S., Hartmann, H., Keiner, R., Trumbore, S., Popp, J., and
Frosch, T.: Online investigation of respiratory quotients in Pinus sylvestris
and Picea abies during drought and shading by means of cavity-enhanced Raman
multi-gas spectrometry, Analyst, 140, 4473–4481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an00402k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c5an00402k</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hartmann, H. and Trumbore, S.: Understanding the roles of nonstructural
carbohydrates in forest trees – from what we can measure to what we want to
know, New Phytol., 211, 386–403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.13955</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hibberd, J. M. and Quick, W. P.: Characteristics of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photosynthesis in
stems and petioles of C3 flowering plants, Nature, 415, 451–454,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/415451a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/415451a</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hilman, B. and Angert, A.: Measuring the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx in tree stem respiration, Tree Physiol., 36, 1422,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpw057</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hoch, G., Richter, A., and Körner, C.: Non-structural carbon compounds in
temperate forest trees, Plant Cell Environ., 26, 1067–1081,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01032.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01032.x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Hoffland, E., Van Den Boogaard, R., Nelemans, J., and Findenegg, G.:
Biosynthesis and root exudation of citric and malic acids in
phosphate-starved rape plants, New Phytol., 122, 675–680,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00096.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00096.x</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Höll, W.: Dark <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation by cell-free preparations of the
wood of Robinia pseudoacacia, Can. J. Bot., 52, 727–734,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/b74-094" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/b74-094</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hölttä, T. and Kolari, P.: Interpretation of stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
efflux measurements, Tree Physiol., 29, 1447–1456,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpp073</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Huber, S. C. and Edwards, G. E.: Inhibition of phosphoenolpyruvate
carboxylase from C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants by malate and aspartate, Can. J. Bot., 53,
1925–1933, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/b75-216</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Ivanov, A. G., Krol, M., Sveshnikov, D., Malmberg, G., Gardeström, P.,
Hurry, V., Öquist, G., and Huner, N. P. A.: Characterization of the
photosynthetic apparatus in cortical bark chlorenchyma of Scots pine, Planta,
223, 1165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0164-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00425-005-0164-1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kai, Y., Matsumura, H., Inoue, T., Terada, K., Nagara, Y., Yoshinaga, T.,
Kihara, A., Tsumura, K., and Izui, K.: Three-dimensional structure of
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase: a proposed mechanism for allosteric
inhibition, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 823–828, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lambers, H., Chapin III, F. S., and Pons, T. L.: Plant Physiological Ecology,
2nd Edn., Springer, New York, NY, 610 pp., 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Levy, P. E., Meir, P., Allen, S. J., and Jarvis, P. G.: The effect of aqueous
transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in xylem sap on gas exchange in woody plants, Tree
Physiol., 19, 53–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.1.53" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/19.1.53</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Maier, C. A. and Clinton, B. D.: Relationship between stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
efflux, stem sap velocity and xylem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in young
loblolly pine trees, Plant Cell Environ., 29, 1471–1483,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01511.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01511.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Massman, W. J.: A review of the molecular diffusivities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in air, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
near STP, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1111–1127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00391-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00391-9</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>McGuire, M. A. and Teskey, R. O.: Estimating stem respiration in trees by a
mass balance approach that accounts for internal and external fluxes of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Tree Physiol., 24, 571–578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.5.571" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/24.5.571</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>McGuire, M. A., Cerasoli, S., and Teskey, R. O.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and
respiration of branch segments of sycamore (<italic>Platanus occidentalis</italic>
L.) examined at different sap velocities, branch diameters, and temperatures,
J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2159–2168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jxb/erm069</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>McGuire, M. A., Marshall, J. D., and Teskey, R. O.: Assimilation of
xylem-transported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-labelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in leaves and branches
of sycamore (<italic>Platanus occidentalis</italic> L.), J. Exp. Bot., 60,
3809–3817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jxb/erp222</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Muhr, J., Angert, A., Negrón-Juárez, R. I., Muñoz, W. A.,
Kraemer, G., Chambers, J. Q., and Trumbore, S. E.: Carbon dioxide emitted
from live stems of tropical trees is several years old, Tree Physiol.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpt049</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Perez-Priego, O., El-Madany, T. S., Migliavacca, M., Kowalski, A. S., Jung,
M., Carrara, A., Kolle, O., Martín, M. P., Pacheco-Labrador, J., Moreno,
G., and Reichstein, M.: Evaluation of eddy covariance latent heat fluxes with
independent lysimeter and sapflow estimates in a Mediterranean savannah
ecosystem, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 236, 87–99,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.01.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.01.009</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Pfanz, H., Aschan, G., Langenfeld-Heyser, R., Wittmann, C., and Loose, M.:
Ecology and ecophysiology of tree stems:<?pagebreak page191?> corticular and wood photosynthesis,
Naturwissenschaften, 89, 147–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-002-0309-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00114-002-0309-z</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Plaxton, W. C. and Podestá, F. E.: The Functional Organization and
Control of Plant Respiration, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 25, 159–198,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600563876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07352680600563876</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Powers, E. M. and Marshall, J. D.: Pulse labeling of dissolved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-carbonate into tree xylem: developing a new method to determine
the fate of recently fixed photosynthate, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 25, 33–40,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4829" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.4829</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Pruyn, M. L., Gartner, B. L., and Harmon, M. E.: Respiratory potential in
sapwood of old versus young ponderosa pine trees in the Pacific Northwest,
Tree Physiol., 22, 105–116, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Salomón, R. L., De Schepper, V., Valbuena-Carabaña, M., Gil, L., and
Steppe, K.: Daytime depression in temperature-normalised stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
efflux in young poplar trees is dominated by low turgor pressure rather than
by internal transport of respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, New Phytol., 217, 586–598,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14831" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.14831</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Sayer, E. J.  and Tanner, E. V.: Experimental investigation of the importance
of litterfall in lowland semi-evergreen tropical forest nutrient cycling,
J. Ecol., 98, 1052–1062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01680.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01680.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Schill, V., Hartung, W., Orthen, B., and Weisenseel, M. H.: The xylem sap of
maple (<italic>Acer platanoides</italic>) trees – sap obtained by a novel method
shows changes with season and height, J. Exp. Bot., 47, 123–133,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.1.123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jxb/47.1.123</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Scholander, P. F., Bradstreet, E. D., Hemmingsen, E. A., and Hammel, H. T.:
Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be
measured in plants, Science, 148, 339–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3668.339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.148.3668.339</ext-link>,
1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Shane, M. W., Cramer, M. D., Funayama-Noguchi, S., Cawthray, G. R., Millar,
A. H., Day, D. A., and Lambers, H.: Developmental Physiology of Cluster-Root
Carboxylate Synthesis and Exudation in <italic>Harsh Hakea</italic>. Expression of
Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase and the Alternative Oxidase, Plant Physiol.,
135, 549–560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.035659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1104/pp.103.035659</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Sinnott, E. W.: Factors Determining Character and Distribution of Food
Reserve in Woody Plants, Bot. Gaz., 66, 162–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/332321" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/332321</ext-link>,
1918.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Sorz, J. and Hietz, P.: Gas diffusion through wood: implications for oxygen
supply, Trees-Struct. Funct., 20, 34–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0010-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00468-005-0010-x</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Steppe, K., Saveyn, A., McGuire, M. A., Lemeur, R., and Teskey, R. O.:
Resistance to radial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diffusion contributes to between-tree
variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux of Populus deltoides stems, Funct. Plant
Biol., 34, 785–792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/FP07077" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/FP07077</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Teskey, R. and McGuire, M.: Measurement of stem respiration of sycamore
(<italic>Platanus occidentalis</italic> L.) trees involves internal and external
fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and possible transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from roots,
Plant Cell Environ., 30, 570–579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01649.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01649.x</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Teskey, R. O. and McGuire, M. A.: Carbon dioxide transport in xylem causes
errors in estimation of rates of respiration in stems and branches of trees,
Plant Cell Environ., 25, 1571–1577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00961.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00961.x</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Teskey, R. O., Saveyn, A., Steppe, K., and McGuire, M. A.: Origin, fate and
significance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in tree stems, New Phytol., 177, 17–32,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02286.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02286.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Trumbore, S. E., Angert, A., Kunert, N., Muhr, J., and Chambers, J. Q.:
What's the flux? Unraveling how <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from trees reflect
underlying physiological processes, New Phytol., 197, 353–355,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.12065</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Ubierna, N., Kumar, A. S., Cernusak, L. A., Pangle, R. E., Gag, P. J., and
Marshall, J. D.: Storage and transpiration have negligible effects on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in large conifer trees, Tree
Physiol., 29, 1563–1574, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Wright, S. J., Yavitt, J. B., Wurzburger, N., Turner, B. L., Tanner, E. V. J.,
Sayer, E. J., Santiago, L. S., Kaspari, M., Hedin, L. O., Harms, K. E., Garcia,
M. N., and Corre, M. D.: Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation,
tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest, Ecology, 92, 1616–1625, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1558.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/10-1558.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Yang, J., He, Y., Aubrey, D. P., Zhuang, Q., and Teskey, R. O.: Global
patterns and predictors of stem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux in forest ecosystems,
Glob. Change Biol., 22, 1433–1444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13188</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Comparison of CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> fluxes demonstrate retention of respired CO<sub>2</sub> in tree stems from a range of tree species</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The ratio of CO<sub>2</sub> efflux to O<sub>2</sub> influx (ARQ,
apparent respiratory quotient) in tree stems is expected to be 1.0 for
carbohydrates, the main substrate supporting stem respiration. In previous
studies of stem fluxes, ARQ values below 1.0 were observed and hypothesized
to indicate retention of respired carbon within the stem. Here, we
demonstrate that stem ARQ&thinsp; &lt; &thinsp;1.0 values are common across 85
tropical, temperate, and Mediterranean forest trees from nine different
species. Mean ARQ values per species per site ranged from 0.39 to 0.78, with
an overall mean of 0.59. Assuming that O<sub>2</sub> uptake provides a measure of
in situ stem respiration (due to the low solubility of O<sub>2</sub>), the overall mean
indicates that on average 41&thinsp;% of CO<sub>2</sub> respired in stems is not
emitted from the local stem surface. The instantaneous ARQ did not vary with
sap flow. ARQ values of incubated stem cores were similar to those measured
in stem chambers on intact trees. We therefore conclude that dissolution of
CO<sub>2</sub> in the xylem sap and transport away from the site of respiration
cannot explain the low ARQ values. We suggest refixation of respired
CO<sub>2</sub> in biosynthesis reactions as possible mechanism for low ARQ values.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abramoff, R. Z. and Finzi, A. C.: Seasonality and partitioning of root
allocation to rhizosphere soils in a midlatitude forest, Ecosphere, 7,
e01547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1547</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Amthor, J. S.: Efficiency of lignin biosynthesis: a quantitative analysis, Ann. Bot.-London, 91, 673–695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg073</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Angert, A. and Sherer, Y.: Determining the relationship between tree-stem
respiration and CO<sub>2</sub> efflux by <i>δ</i>O<sub>2</sub>∕Ar measurements,
Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 25, 1752–1756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/Rcm.5042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/Rcm.5042</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Angert, A., Muhr, J., Negron Juarez, R., Alegria Muñoz, W., Kraemer, G.,
Ramirez Santillan, J., Barkan, E., Mazeh, S., Chambers, J. Q., and Trumbore,
S. E.: Internal respiration of Amazon tree stems greatly exceeds external
CO<sub>2</sub> efflux, Biogeosciences, 9, 4979–4991,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4979-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4979-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aranda, I., Gil, L., and Pardos, J. A.: Seasonal changes in apparent
hydraulic conductance and their implications for water use of European beech
(<i>Fagus sylvatica</i> L.) and sessile oak [<i>Quercus petraea</i>
(Matt.) Liebl] in South Europe, Plant Ecol., 179, 155–167,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-004-7007-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-004-7007-1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Aubrey, D. P. and Teskey, R. O.: Root-derived CO<sub>2</sub> efflux via xylem
stream rivals soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux, New Phytol., 184, 35–40,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02971.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02971.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Ávila, E., Herrera, A., and Tezara, W.: Contribution of stem
CO<sub>2</sub> fixation to whole-plant carbon balance in nonsucculent species,
Photosynthetica, 52, 3–15, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Berveiller, D. and Damesin, C.: Carbon assimilation by tree stems: potential
involvement of phospho<i>enol</i>pyruvate carboxylase, Trees-Struct.
Funct., 22, 149–157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0193-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0193-4</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bloemen, J., McGuire, M. A., Aubrey, D. P., Teskey, R. O., and Steppe, K.:
Transport of root-respired CO<sub>2</sub> via the transpiration stream affects
aboveground carbon assimilation and CO<sub>2</sub> efflux in trees, New
Phytol., 197, 555–565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04366.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04366.x</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bowman, W. P., Barbour, M. M., Turnbull, M. H., Tissue, D. T., Whitehead, D.,
and Griffin, K. L.: Sap flow rates and sapwood density are critical factors
in within- and between-tree variation in CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from stems of
mature <i>Dacrydium cupressinum</i> trees, New Phytol., 167, 815–828,
<br/>doi10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01478.x, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bucci, S. J., Goldstein, G., Meinzer, F. C., Franco, A. C., Campanello, P.,
and Scholz, F. G.: Mechanisms contributing to seasonal homeostasis of minimum
leaf water potential and predawn disequilibrium between soil and plant water
potential in Neotropical savanna trees, Trees, 19, 296–304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0391-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0391-2</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Carbone, M. S., Czimczik, C. I., Keenan, T. F., Murakami, P. F., Pederson,
N., Schaberg, P. G., Xu, X., and Richardson, A. D.: Age, allocation and
availability of nonstructural carbon in mature red maple trees, New Phytol.,
200, 1145–1155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12448</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
De Vries, F. W. T. P., Brunsting, A. H. M., and Van Laar, H. H.: Products,
requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis a quantitative approach, J.
Theor. Biol., 45, 339–377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Finzi, A. C., Abramoff, R. Z., Spiller, K. S., Brzostek, E. R., Darby, B. A.,
Kramer, M. A., and Phillips, R. P.: Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively
important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles, Glob. Change
Biol., 21, 2082–2094, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12816</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, S., Hanf, S., Frosch, T., Gleixner, G., Popp, J., Trumbore, S., and
Hartmann, H.: Pinus sylvestris switches respiration substrates under shading
but not during drought, New Phytol., 207, 542–550, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13452</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gessler, A., Tcherkez, G., Karyanto, O., Keitel, C., Ferrio, J. P.,
Ghashghaie, J., Kreuzwieser, J., and Farquhar, G. D.: On the metabolic origin
of the carbon isotope composition of CO<sub>2</sub> evolved from darkened
light-acclimated leaves in Ricinus communis, New Phytol., 181, 374–386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02672.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02672.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gevantman, L. H.: Solubility of Selected Gases in Water, in: CRC Handbook of
Cemistry and Physics, edited by: Rumble, J. R., CRC press/Taylor and Francis,
Boca Raton, FL, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Griffin, K. L. and Prager, C. M.: Where does the carbon go? Thermal
acclimation of respiration and increased photosynthesis in trees at the
temperate-boreal ecotone, Tree Physiol., 37, 281–284,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw133" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw133</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hanf, S., Fischer, S., Hartmann, H., Keiner, R., Trumbore, S., Popp, J., and
Frosch, T.: Online investigation of respiratory quotients in Pinus sylvestris
and Picea abies during drought and shading by means of cavity-enhanced Raman
multi-gas spectrometry, Analyst, 140, 4473–4481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an00402k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an00402k</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, H. and Trumbore, S.: Understanding the roles of nonstructural
carbohydrates in forest trees – from what we can measure to what we want to
know, New Phytol., 211, 386–403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13955</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hibberd, J. M. and Quick, W. P.: Characteristics of C<sub>4</sub> photosynthesis in
stems and petioles of C3 flowering plants, Nature, 415, 451–454,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/415451a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/415451a</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hilman, B. and Angert, A.: Measuring the ratio of CO<sub>2</sub> efflux to
O<sub>2</sub> influx in tree stem respiration, Tree Physiol., 36, 1422,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpw057</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hoch, G., Richter, A., and Körner, C.: Non-structural carbon compounds in
temperate forest trees, Plant Cell Environ., 26, 1067–1081,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01032.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01032.x</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffland, E., Van Den Boogaard, R., Nelemans, J., and Findenegg, G.:
Biosynthesis and root exudation of citric and malic acids in
phosphate-starved rape plants, New Phytol., 122, 675–680,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00096.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00096.x</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Höll, W.: Dark CO<sub>2</sub> fixation by cell-free preparations of the
wood of Robinia pseudoacacia, Can. J. Bot., 52, 727–734,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/b74-094" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/b74-094</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hölttä, T. and Kolari, P.: Interpretation of stem CO<sub>2</sub>
efflux measurements, Tree Physiol., 29, 1447–1456,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp073</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Huber, S. C. and Edwards, G. E.: Inhibition of phosphoenolpyruvate
carboxylase from C<sub>4</sub> plants by malate and aspartate, Can. J. Bot., 53,
1925–1933, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-216" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-216</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Ivanov, A. G., Krol, M., Sveshnikov, D., Malmberg, G., Gardeström, P.,
Hurry, V., Öquist, G., and Huner, N. P. A.: Characterization of the
photosynthetic apparatus in cortical bark chlorenchyma of Scots pine, Planta,
223, 1165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0164-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0164-1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kai, Y., Matsumura, H., Inoue, T., Terada, K., Nagara, Y., Yoshinaga, T.,
Kihara, A., Tsumura, K., and Izui, K.: Three-dimensional structure of
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase: a proposed mechanism for allosteric
inhibition, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 823–828, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lambers, H., Chapin III, F. S., and Pons, T. L.: Plant Physiological Ecology,
2nd Edn., Springer, New York, NY, 610 pp., 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Levy, P. E., Meir, P., Allen, S. J., and Jarvis, P. G.: The effect of aqueous
transport of CO<sub>2</sub> in xylem sap on gas exchange in woody plants, Tree
Physiol., 19, 53–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.1.53" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.1.53</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Maier, C. A. and Clinton, B. D.: Relationship between stem CO<sub>2</sub>
efflux, stem sap velocity and xylem CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in young
loblolly pine trees, Plant Cell Environ., 29, 1471–1483,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01511.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01511.x</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Massman, W. J.: A review of the molecular diffusivities of H<sub>2</sub>O,
CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO, O<sub>3</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>,
N<sub>2</sub>O, NO, and NO<sub>2</sub> in air, O<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>
near STP, Atmos. Environ., 32, 1111–1127, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00391-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00391-9</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
McGuire, M. A. and Teskey, R. O.: Estimating stem respiration in trees by a
mass balance approach that accounts for internal and external fluxes of
CO<sub>2</sub>, Tree Physiol., 24, 571–578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.5.571" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.5.571</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
McGuire, M. A., Cerasoli, S., and Teskey, R. O.: CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and
respiration of branch segments of sycamore (<i>Platanus occidentalis</i>
L.) examined at different sap velocities, branch diameters, and temperatures,
J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2159–2168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm069</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
McGuire, M. A., Marshall, J. D., and Teskey, R. O.: Assimilation of
xylem-transported <sup>13</sup>C-labelled CO<sub>2</sub> in leaves and branches
of sycamore (<i>Platanus occidentalis</i> L.), J. Exp. Bot., 60,
3809–3817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp222" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp222</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Muhr, J., Angert, A., Negrón-Juárez, R. I., Muñoz, W. A.,
Kraemer, G., Chambers, J. Q., and Trumbore, S. E.: Carbon dioxide emitted
from live stems of tropical trees is several years old, Tree Physiol.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt049</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Perez-Priego, O., El-Madany, T. S., Migliavacca, M., Kowalski, A. S., Jung,
M., Carrara, A., Kolle, O., Martín, M. P., Pacheco-Labrador, J., Moreno,
G., and Reichstein, M.: Evaluation of eddy covariance latent heat fluxes with
independent lysimeter and sapflow estimates in a Mediterranean savannah
ecosystem, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 236, 87–99,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.01.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.01.009</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Pfanz, H., Aschan, G., Langenfeld-Heyser, R., Wittmann, C., and Loose, M.:
Ecology and ecophysiology of tree stems: corticular and wood photosynthesis,
Naturwissenschaften, 89, 147–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-002-0309-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-002-0309-z</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Plaxton, W. C. and Podestá, F. E.: The Functional Organization and
Control of Plant Respiration, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 25, 159–198,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600563876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600563876</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Powers, E. M. and Marshall, J. D.: Pulse labeling of dissolved
<sup>13</sup>C-carbonate into tree xylem: developing a new method to determine
the fate of recently fixed photosynthate, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 25, 33–40,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4829" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4829</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Pruyn, M. L., Gartner, B. L., and Harmon, M. E.: Respiratory potential in
sapwood of old versus young ponderosa pine trees in the Pacific Northwest,
Tree Physiol., 22, 105–116, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Salomón, R. L., De Schepper, V., Valbuena-Carabaña, M., Gil, L., and
Steppe, K.: Daytime depression in temperature-normalised stem CO<sub>2</sub>
efflux in young poplar trees is dominated by low turgor pressure rather than
by internal transport of respired CO<sub>2</sub>, New Phytol., 217, 586–598,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14831" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14831</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Sayer, E. J.  and Tanner, E. V.: Experimental investigation of the importance
of litterfall in lowland semi-evergreen tropical forest nutrient cycling,
J. Ecol., 98, 1052–1062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01680.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01680.x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Schill, V., Hartung, W., Orthen, B., and Weisenseel, M. H.: The xylem sap of
maple (<i>Acer platanoides</i>) trees – sap obtained by a novel method
shows changes with season and height, J. Exp. Bot., 47, 123–133,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.1.123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.1.123</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Scholander, P. F., Bradstreet, E. D., Hemmingsen, E. A., and Hammel, H. T.:
Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be
measured in plants, Science, 148, 339–346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3668.339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3668.339</a>,
1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Shane, M. W., Cramer, M. D., Funayama-Noguchi, S., Cawthray, G. R., Millar,
A. H., Day, D. A., and Lambers, H.: Developmental Physiology of Cluster-Root
Carboxylate Synthesis and Exudation in <i>Harsh Hakea</i>. Expression of
Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase and the Alternative Oxidase, Plant Physiol.,
135, 549–560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.035659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.035659</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Sinnott, E. W.: Factors Determining Character and Distribution of Food
Reserve in Woody Plants, Bot. Gaz., 66, 162–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/332321" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1086/332321</a>,
1918.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sorz, J. and Hietz, P.: Gas diffusion through wood: implications for oxygen
supply, Trees-Struct. Funct., 20, 34–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0010-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0010-x</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Steppe, K., Saveyn, A., McGuire, M. A., Lemeur, R., and Teskey, R. O.:
Resistance to radial CO<sub>2</sub> diffusion contributes to between-tree
variation in CO<sub>2</sub> efflux of Populus deltoides stems, Funct. Plant
Biol., 34, 785–792, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/FP07077" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/FP07077</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Teskey, R. and McGuire, M.: Measurement of stem respiration of sycamore
(<i>Platanus occidentalis</i> L.) trees involves internal and external
fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> and possible transport of CO<sub>2</sub> from roots,
Plant Cell Environ., 30, 570–579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01649.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01649.x</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Teskey, R. O. and McGuire, M. A.: Carbon dioxide transport in xylem causes
errors in estimation of rates of respiration in stems and branches of trees,
Plant Cell Environ., 25, 1571–1577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00961.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00961.x</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Teskey, R. O., Saveyn, A., Steppe, K., and McGuire, M. A.: Origin, fate and
significance of CO<sub>2</sub> in tree stems, New Phytol., 177, 17–32,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02286.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02286.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Trumbore, S. E., Angert, A., Kunert, N., Muhr, J., and Chambers, J. Q.:
What's the flux? Unraveling how CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes from trees reflect
underlying physiological processes, New Phytol., 197, 353–355,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12065</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Ubierna, N., Kumar, A. S., Cernusak, L. A., Pangle, R. E., Gag, P. J., and
Marshall, J. D.: Storage and transpiration have negligible effects on
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of stem CO<sub>2</sub> efflux in large conifer trees, Tree
Physiol., 29, 1563–1574, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, S. J., Yavitt, J. B., Wurzburger, N., Turner, B. L., Tanner, E. V. J.,
Sayer, E. J., Santiago, L. S., Kaspari, M., Hedin, L. O., Harms, K. E., Garcia,
M. N., and Corre, M. D.: Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation,
tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest, Ecology, 92, 1616–1625, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1558.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1558.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, J., He, Y., Aubrey, D. P., Zhuang, Q., and Teskey, R. O.: Global
patterns and predictors of stem CO<sub>2</sub> efflux in forest ecosystems,
Glob. Change Biol., 22, 1433–1444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13188</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
