<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-2247-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonality of archaeal lipid flux and GDGT-based thermometry in sinking particles of high-latitude oceans: Fram Strait (79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and
Antarctic Polar Front (50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S)</article-title><alt-title>Archaeal lipid flux and GDGT-based thermometry</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Archaeal lipid flux and GDGT-based thermometry}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E. Park et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Eunmi</given-names></name>
          <email>eunmi.park@awi.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hefter</surname><given-names>Jens</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5823-1966</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>Gerhard</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-4741</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Iversen</surname><given-names>Morten Hvitfeldt</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5287-1110</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ramondenc</surname><given-names>Simon</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0275-2754</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nöthig</surname><given-names>Eva-Maria</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7527-7827</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Mollenhauer</surname><given-names>Gesine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-564X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine
Sciences, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, 28334 Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geosciences, University of Bremen, 28334 Bremen,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Eunmi Park (eunmi.park@awi.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>2247</fpage><lpage>2268</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e166">The relative abundance of individual archaeal membrane
lipids, namely of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) with
different numbers of cyclopentane rings, varies with temperature, which
enables their use as a paleotemperature proxy index. The first
GDGT-based index in marine sediments called <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is believed to reflect mean annual sea surface temperature (maSST). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an alternative temperature
proxy for “low-temperature” regions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), where the original <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy
calibration shows a larger scatter. However,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures still
display anomalous estimates in polar regions. In order to elucidate the
potential cause of the disagreement between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate and SST, we analyzed
GDGT fluxes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperatures in sinking particles collected with time-series sediment traps
in high-northern- and high-southern-latitude regions. At 1296 m depth in the
eastern Fram Strait (79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), a combination of various transporting
mechanisms for GDGTs might result in seasonally different sinking velocities
for particles carrying these lipids, resulting in strong variability in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal. The similarity of flux-weighted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures from
sinking particles and surface sediments implies an export of GDGTs without
alteration in the Fram Strait. The estimated temperatures correspond to
temperatures in water depths of 30–80 m, where nitrification might occur,
indicating the favorable depth habitat of Thaumarchaeota. In the Antarctic
Polar Front of the Atlantic sector (50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures displayed
warm and cold biases compared to satellite-derived SSTs at 614 m depth, and
its flux-weighted mean signal differs from the deep signal at 3196 m.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures at 3196 m
depth and the surface sediment showed up to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C warmer
temperatures relative to satellite-derived SST. Such a warm anomaly might be
caused by GDGT contributions from Euryarchaeota, which are known to dominate
archaeal communities in the circumpolar deep water of the Antarctic Polar
Front. The other reason might be that a linear calibration is not
appropriate for this frontal region. Of the newly suggested SST proxies
based on hydroxylated GDGTs (OH-GDGTs), only those with OH-GDGT–0 and
crenarchaeol or the ring index (RI) of OH-GDGTs yield realistic temperature
estimates in our study regions, suggesting that OH-GDGTs could be applied as
a potential temperature proxy in high-latitude oceans.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e352">The knowledge that Thaumarchaeota, one phylum of Archaea, regulate the
composition of their membrane lipids according to the surrounding water
temperatures enabled the development of the paleothermometer
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Kim
et al., 2010; Schouten et al., 2002). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
calculated based on the relative abundance of GDGT containing zero to three
cyclopentane (GDGT–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or four cyclopentane and one
cyclohexane (crenarchaeol) ring (Fig. 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e391">Chemical structures and molecular ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the isoprenoid
glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs), branched GDGTs, and
hydroxylated GDGTs.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e412">The ubiquity of Thaumarchaeota, even in the polar oceans where the widely
applied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy for
sea surface temperature (SST) reconstructions is often problematic, supports
the use of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in high-latitude regions
(Bendle and<?pagebreak page2248?> Rosell-Melé, 2004; Ho et al., 2014).
Nonetheless, the SST dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in warm
regions is stronger than in colder regions where SSTs are below 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Kim et al., 2010). Thus, a
logarithmic calibration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
excluding the crenarchaeol regio-isomer, was suggested for regions where
maSSTs are below 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (see Eq. 2;
Kim et al., 2010). The authors speculated
that the lack of correlation between the crenarchaeol regio-isomer and SST
at low temperatures might be caused by genetically different GDGT producers.
Moreover, all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibrations for
temperature include a rather large scatter, resulting in a calibration error
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration (Kim et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e531">It has been questioned whether temperature is the only factor influencing
the lipid composition (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly in
the regions where strong cold or warm biases were observed between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstructed and measured maSSTs. The biases
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibrations have been attributed to
enhanced production of GDGTs during seasons with favorable growth conditions
for Thaumarchaeota  (Pitcher et al., 2011; Wuchter
et al., 2006b), a contribution of GDGTs from deep-dwelling communities (Kim
et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2008; Taylor et al., 2013), terrestrial input
(Weijers et al., 2006), influences of different archaeal
communities (Lincoln et al., 2014;
Turich et al., 2007), and/or other environmental factors (Huguet et
al., 2006; Mollenhauer et al., 2015; Park et al., 2018; Turich et al.,
2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e569">To circumvent these problems, especially in cold regions, a handful of
studies have developed dedicated calibrations on regional scales
(Meyer et al., 2016; Seki et al.,
2014; Shevenell et al., 2011). For the temperature estimate in the Eocene
Arctic Ocean, a modified version of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
index termed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, was proposed
(Sluijs et al., 2006). It excludes GDGT–3 to eliminated
contribution from terrestrial input, leading to significantly higher
temperature estimates compared to the original
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 104 marine surface
sediments showed a good linear correlation with maSSTs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Sluijs et al., 2006). Following the addition of seven <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from surface sediments
collected at the continental margin of the western Antarctic Peninsula,
Shevenell et al. (2011) modified the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration of Kim et al. (2008) for this region
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0125</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">temp</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3038</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and estimated water temperatures for the Holocene.</p>
      <p id="d1e698">Ho et al. (2014) evaluated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the different calibrations in an extended
set of surface sediments from the polar regions of both hemispheres and
found that the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration is suitable
for subpolar regions (e.g., the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean and the
Subarctic Front in the North Pacific). Additionally, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields reasonable temperature
estimates if regional calibrations are developed for high-latitude regions.
Using a regression of water temperatures (at 20 m depth in August) versus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
Seki et al. (2014) obtained plausible
paleotemperature estimates for the Sea of Okhotsk and the subpolar North
Pacific region. Meyer et al. (2016) confirmed later that
this regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration can
also be applied to the subarctic northwest Pacific and the western Bering
Sea.</p>
      <p id="d1e762">More recently, hydroxylated GDGTs (OH-GDGTs), which contain an additional
hydroxyl group in one of the biphytanyl moieties of GDGT–0, GDGT–1, and
GDGT–2, have been recognized in marine sediments (Liu
et al., 2012; Fig. 1). Based on the finding that
the abundance of OH-GDGTs relative to the total isoprenoid GDGTs increases
towards cold regions (Huguet et al., 2013), OH-GDGT-based
SST calibrations have been proposed for high-latitude oceans
(Fietz et al., 2013; Huguet et al., 2013).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2249?><p id="d1e765">In addition to the biological, phylogenetic, and statistical studies of the
temperature proxy, sinking particles collected in specific regions can
provide new perspectives on the distribution of GDGTs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based temperature reconstructions. The study
using time-series sediment traps can give insights into the seasonal
variability of lipid flux and temperature signals, and allows the comparison of the
lipid signal to those in underlying sediments. Only one
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> study using a time-series sediment trap in
high-latitude regions has been conducted near Iceland
(Rodrigo-Gámiz et al., 2015), regardless of the
interest in polar regions, where temperature reconstructions with lipid
proxies are troublesome. Here, we examine the seasonal GDGT production and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures in
comparison to measured SSTs in order to better understand the drivers
influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in sinking
particles collected in two high-latitude oceans (eastern Fram Strait,
79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and Antarctic Polar Front of the Atlantic sector,
50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S). The temperatures derived from OH-GDGT proxies were also
calculated to evaluate the applicability of these novel proxies for high-latitude regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Study area</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Fram Strait</title>
      <p id="d1e850">The Fram Strait is located west of Spitsbergen, where the heat exchange
occurs between the Arctic Ocean and the North Atlantic
(Fig. 2). Relatively warm and nutrient-rich
Atlantic water (AW) is transported by the West Spitsbergen Current (WSC) to
the central Arctic Ocean, while colder and less saline Arctic water is
transported along the East Greenland Current (EGC) to the Nordic Seas
(Fig. 2). Part of the WSC is separated from the
northward flow and recirculated within the region
(Manley, 1995; Soltwedel et al., 2016). Eddies,
mixing, and recirculating Atlantic water contribute to the hydrographic
complexity observed in the Fram Strait (Walczowski, 2013). The
volume transport of the WSC and AW within the WSC displays strong
seasonality with maxima in March and minima in July for the WSC and maxima
in late autumn and winter and minima in June for the AW
(Beszczynska-Möller et al., 2012b). The occurrence of sea
ice and its variability has an effect on the particle fluxes as well as on
benthic ecosystems (Bauerfeind et al., 2009;
Hebbeln and Wefer, 1991; Soltwedel et al., 2016). Sinking particles in the
Fram Strait, including organic and terrigenous material, are well known to
originate not only from the photic zone in the upper water column, but also
from the Svalbard archipelago and Siberian shelf, from where they are
transported by sea ice (Hebbeln, 2000; Lalande et
al., 2016). Phytoplankton blooms enhance the vertical flux of biogenic
components (organic carbon, carbonate, and opal) in spring–summer, but the
downward flux of particles is likely affected by the environmental
conditions (e.g., hydrographic changes, sea ice extent, and atmospheric
low pressure) on an annual timescale (Wassmann et al., 2006).
Based on oceanographic measurements from mooring arrays at multiple depths
across the Fram Strait (from 7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to 9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,
78.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), Beszczynska-Möller et al. (2012a)
found two warm anomalies in the Atlantic water through the Fram Strait in
1999–2000 and 2005–2007. During the second warm anomaly, community
structures of phytoplankton and zooplankton were affected by the decreased
sea ice in this region  (Lalande et al., 2013;
Nöthig et al., 2015) and had a profound influence on biogenic sediment
fluxes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e882">Map of sediment trap locations in high northern latitudes (FEVI16)
and in Antarctic Polar Front (PF3). In the Fram Strait, the northward red arrow
represents the West Spitsbergen Current bringing warm and saline Atlantic
waters to the Arctic and the southward blue arrow displays the East
Greenland Current transporting cold and fresh water to the Norwegian Sea.
Around the Antarctic, the digitized blue shadow exhibits the location of the
Antarctic Polar Front for the years 2002–2014 at weekly resolution
(Freeman and Lovenduski, 2016). The blue arrow indicates the
clockwise Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Ocean Data View is used for mapping
(Schlitzer, 2017; available at <uri>https://odv.awi.de</uri>, last access: 3 May 2018).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Antarctic Polar Front</title>
      <p id="d1e902">The Antarctic Polar Front (APF) region is one of the major frontal zones
within the westerly wind-driven Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC)
(Fig. 2). Spatial and temporal variability of the
APF is strongly affected by seafloor topography. The APF has an average
width of 43 km (1987–1993), which moves southward during the austral
summer and reaches its northernmost position during the austral winter
(Moore et al., 1999). The ACC is well known for its
meandering jet flow and eddy formation (Moore et al., 1999; Orsi et al.,
1995), which likely stimulate phytoplankton blooms and primary production in
this region by supplying growth-limiting nutrients, and/or bringing deeper-dwelling phytoplankton into the photic zone
(Abbott et al., 2001; Moore and Abbott, 2000,
2002). Thus, the hydrographic structure is an important factor controlling
the distribution of phytoplankton and small zooplankton in this region
(Read et al., 2002). The highest chlorophyll-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels
of up to 3.5 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were recorded in the APF during the early austral
summer of 1990–1991, and it co-occurred with elevated silicate levels as well
as water column stratification (Laubscher et al., 1993). The
current speed close to the PF3 trap was recorded to be up to 8 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Walter et al., 2001). Read et al. (2002) reported the vertical profile of
currents measured between the surface and 400 m depth in the polar frontal
regions in December 1995. The currents recorded at the surface and
subsurface of the Polar Front were much stronger (30–50 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than
the ones measured at 700 m depth (1–8 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) by
Walter et al. (2001).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Sediment traps</title>
      <p id="d1e976">A time-series sediment trap system was moored to collect sinking particles
at the eastern Fram Strait (FEVI16) between July 2007 and July 2008 at 1296 m water depth (Table 1,
Fig. 2). Two traps (PF3) were deployed in the
permanent ice-free area of the APF in the Atlantic sector at 614 and 3196 m water depth from November 1989 to December 1990
(Table 1, Fig. 2). The
cone-shaped funnel of the Kiel trap systems had a 0.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> collection
area, and the collection periods of each individual sample cup were
programmed<?pagebreak page2250?> depending on the expected time of ice cover and/or the
seasonality of the production. The sampling cups were filled with filtered
seawater enriched in sodium chloride (NaCl) to achieve a salinity of 40 psu, and they were poisoned with mercury chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 0.14 %
final solution) for sample preservation. For FEVI16 samples, zooplankton
“large swimmers” were removed using forceps before splitting each sampling
cup into smaller subsamples (Lalande et al., 2016). For
PF3 samples, large swimmers were removed using forceps and a sieve (mesh
size: 1 mm mesh) in the laboratory (Fischer et al.,
2002). Afterwards, the samples were split for different purposes. A current
meter (RCM 9/11) was attached to both trap moorings, and the datasets are
available on PANGAEA (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.845610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.845610</ext-link>; FEVI16) and in
Walter et al. (2001; PF3).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1005">Information on FEVI16 and PF3 trap.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trap name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FEVI16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PF3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Eastern Fram Strait</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Antarctic Polar Front</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Latitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">79.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.83</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water depth (m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2580</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3785</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trap depth (m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1296</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">614</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3196</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Deployment period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Start</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23 Jul 2007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 Nov 1989</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">End</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 Jun 2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23 Dec 1990</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sampling interval (d)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10–31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21, 42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cruise reports</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ARK-XXII/1c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ANT-VIII/3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Klages and Participants, 2007)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Gersonde and Participants, 1990)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ARK-XXIII/2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ANT-IX/2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(Kattner and Participants, 2009)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Fahrbach and Cruise Participants, 1992)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1008"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The exact sampling interval of each sample at FEVI and PF3 can be found on PANGAEA (<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.897268</uri>).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Mass flux</title>
      <p id="d1e1266">Split FEVI16 samples were filtered onto GF/F filters (pre-combusted at 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 4 h) for organic carbon, organic nitrogen (PON), and
carbonate and onto cellulose acetate filters for biogenic opal
quantification. Organic carbon (POC) and organic nitrogen (PON) were
measured with a CHN elemental analyzer after 0.1 N HCl treatment. Carbonate
was calculated by subtracting the weight from total mass after 0.1 N HCl
treatments and recorrected according to the aragonite contents. The
detailed methods used for biogenic silica can be found in
Lalande et al. (2016). Split PF3 samples were
freeze-dried for further processing. Decalcified samples (6 N HCl) were
analyzed for POC using a CHN elemental analyzer. Total nitrogen (TN) was
also determined. Carbonate was calculated by subtracting POC from total
carbon (TC), which was directly measured without decalcification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carbonate</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.33</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The methodology for the quantification of
biogenic silica is described in Fischer et al. (2002).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>GDGT analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e1310">For GDGT analysis, total lipids were extracted with a solvent mixture (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dichloromethane (DCM) : methanol (MeOH)) using an ultrasonic bath for 10 min and a centrifuge for 5 min, after which the supernatant was decanted.
This process was repeated three times and the supernatants were combined.
Before the extraction process, a known amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-GDGT (internal
standard) was added to each sample for GDGT quantification.</p>
      <p id="d1e1348">Following saponification of total lipids with 1 mL of 0.1 M potassium
hydroxide (KOH) in a mixture of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeOH</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">purified</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 2 h, neutral lipids (NLs) were recovered with 1 mL
of hexane (three times). NLs were separated into F1 (apolar), F2 (ketone), and F3
(polar) polarity fractions eluted in 2 mL of hexane, 4 mL of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DCM</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hexane</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 4 mL of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DCM</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MeOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively, using deactivated
silica-gel chromatography (mesh size: 70–230 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m).</p>
      <p id="d1e1477">The F3 polar fraction containing GDGTs was redissolved in 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hexane</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">isopropanol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and filtered through a
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter (pore size: 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) into a
glass insert of a 2 mL vial according to Hopmans et al. (2000). The filtered polar
fraction was diluted with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hexane</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">isopropanol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to a concentration
of approximately 2 mg mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> before the instrumental analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e1581">GDGTs were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric
pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC/APCI-MS) according to
Chen et al. (2014). Molecular ions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1302, 1300,
1298, 1296, and 1292 for isoprenoid GDGTs and 1050, 1036, and 1022 for<?pagebreak page2251?> branched
GDGTs were determined and quantified in relation to the molecular ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 744
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-GDGT. The late eluting peaks of OH-GDGT–0, OH-GDGT–1, and OH-GDGT–2
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1318, 1316, and 1314 were also determined in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1300, 1298, and 1296
scan, as described by  Fietz et
al. (2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e1644">A lab-internal standard sediment was repeatedly analyzed along with the
samples to assess the analytical error. The standard deviation of replicate
analyses was 0.1 units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
6 % for isoprenoid GDGT concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>GDGT flux and indices</title>
      <p id="d1e1668"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were calculated according
to Kim et al. (2010).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.2}{9.2}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Log</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the numbers represent the number of cyclopentane moieties in the
isoprenoid GDGTs.</p>
      <p id="d1e1756"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were converted into
temperatures using the following equation  (Kim
et al., 2010):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M104" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SST</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">396</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>calibration error:</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            GDGT flux represents the sum of fluxes of individual GDGTs, which are used
for calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          OH-GDGT-based indices and estimated temperatures were calculated using the
following equations (Eq. 4 by Fietz et
al., 2013; Eqs. 5 and 6 by Lü et al., 2015):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M107" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0ex 2.845276pt 2.845276pt 0ex" displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH-GDGT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cren</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SST</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>calibration error:</mml:mtext><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.1}{8.1}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msup><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">RI-OH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH-GDGT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH-GDGT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH-GDGT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH-GDGT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OH-GDGT</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mtext>RI-OH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0382</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SST</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">107</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>calibration error:</mml:mtext><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            BIT, an index of relative contribution of terrestrial versus marine input,
was calculated according to Hopmans et al. (2004).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M108" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BIT</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cren</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The Roman numerals I, II, and III refer to the branched GDGTs with four, five, and
six methyl moieties, and Cren represents crenarchaeol containing four
cyclopentane moieties and one cyclohexane ring (Fig. 1). A terrestrial effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
significant when the BIT value is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Weijers et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e2281">MI, the methane index indicating the relative contribution of GDGTs derived
from methanotrophic Archaea to those from planktonic Thaumarchaeota, was
calculated as follows (Zhang et al., 2011):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M111" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{7.8}{7.8}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cren</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cren</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Cren<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the regio-isomer of crenarchaeol.
Contributions from methanotrophic Archaea are considered to be significant
when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MI</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2252?><p id="d1e2413">%GDGT–0, an indicator of a methanogenic source of GDGTs with a %GDGT
value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, was calculated as follows (Inglis
et al., 2015):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M115" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cren</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          RI, the ring index, is a tool for identifying a potential nonthermal
influence on GDGT distributions. A sample's ring index is
defined as follows (Zhang et al., 2016):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GDGT</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cren</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cren</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates the residual of a
sample's RI (RI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) from a calculated RI
(RI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calculated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) based on the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
regression. RI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calculated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are defined as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M123" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calculated</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">531</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calculated</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Potential nonthermal influences on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
recognized when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Zhang et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Environmental parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e2880"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures were compared
to satellite-derived SSTs obtained by the Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer (AVHRR), which has a spatial grid resolution of 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
and temporal resolution of 1 d  (Reynolds et al.,
2007). The satellite-derived SSTs were averaged over the collection period
of each sample cup. The depth profiles of mean annual water temperature and
nitrate concentration were obtained from the World Ocean Atlas 2013 (WOA13)
representing averaged values for the years 1955–2012 (Garcia et
al., 2013; Locarnini et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Eastern Fram Strait: FEVI16</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Mass and GDGT fluxes</title>
      <p id="d1e2927">The mass flux data of the FEVI16 trap have been published previously by
Lalande et al. (2016). In summary, the mass flux (opal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> POC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PON <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> lithogenic fluxes) measured at 1296 m water depth varied in between 18.5 and 652.9 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with minima in the winter
season (November 2007–February 2008; Fig. 3a).
Lithogenic flux is presented separately in Fig. 3a
due to its significantly higher contribution to total mass flux. The
composition of sinking particles changed between seasons. Lithogenic
material flux showed sudden pulses in spring (March and April–May 2008).
POC was predominant in mid-July 2007. Carbonate flux was elevated in March,
early May, and mid-June 2008. Opal was dominant in early September 2007 and
mid-May to June 2008.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2977">Changes in mass flux <bold>(a)</bold>, GDGT flux <bold>(b)</bold>, terrestrial biomarker
flux and diatom and coccolithophore abundances <bold>(c)</bold>, fecal pellet flux <bold>(d)</bold>,
sea ice concentration <bold>(e)</bold>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures and
satellite-derived SSTs obtained at 79.125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.375<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E
near the trap site <bold>(f)</bold> at 1296 m water depth at the eastern Fram Strait
site, FEVI16, during the deployment period July 2007–July 2008. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold>,
<bold>(d)</bold>, and <bold>(e)</bold> were previously reported by Lalande et al. (2016).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f03.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3049">GDGT fluxes varied between 7.2 and 85.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 3b). Peaks of GDGT flux occurred in
August–September 2007 and March and May–June 2008, while minima were
observed in the winter season (November 2007–February 2008). The GDGT flux
was strongly correlated with opal flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
when two GDGT maxima in late September 2007 and March 2008 were excluded
and with carbonate flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) except for the
last 2 months in May–June 2008 (Fig. 3a and b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{${\mathrm{TEX}}_{{\mathrm{86}}}^{{\mathrm{L}}}$ thermometry}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermometry</title>
      <p id="d1e3152"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values varied between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperatures (Kim et al., 2010, calibration) ranged between 0.6 and 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Fig. 3b and f). The flux-weighted
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature during the trap
deployment period was 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Two surface sediment
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at PS68-251/2,
79.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at PS68-271/2,
79.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) are available near the FEVI16 trap
(Ho et al., 2014). Most index values of BIT, MI,
%GDGT–0, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for samples from
FEVI16 were below the critical values of each index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
BIT and MI, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for %GDGT–0, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). One sample with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found, indicating a
nonthermal effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table A1 in the Appendix).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><title>Fractional abundance of OH-GDGTs</title>
      <p id="d1e3404">All OH-GDGTs were clearly present in FEVI16 samples. OH-GDGT–0 was
predominant in the OH-GDGT pool, accounting for 87 %–95 %
(Fig. 4a). The proportion of OH-GDGTs in the sum of
iso- and OH-GDGTs ranged between 7 % and 11 % during the trap deployment
period (Fig. 4a). Estimated temperatures calculated
using the calibrations as described in Eqs. (4) and (6)
(Fietz et al., 2013; Lü et
al., 2015) ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively. The last two data points for the trap time
series were unusually low when using Eq. (4) (Fig. 4b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3447">Changes in fractional abundance of OH-GDGTs <bold>(a)</bold> and estimated
temperatures based on OH-related calibrations <bold>(b)</bold> at site FEVI16. The purple
and orange lines indicate the calculated temperatures using the calibrations
by Fietz et al. (2013) (Eq. 4) and
Lü et al. (2015) (Eq. 6), respectively. The green
line indicates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperatures.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Antarctic Polar Front: PF3</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Mass and GDGT fluxes</title>
      <p id="d1e3491">The mass flux data of the PF3 trap have been published previously by
Fischer et al. (2002). The mass flux at the shallow
trap ranged between 19.7 and 592.1 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a distinct
seasonal variability (Fig. 5a). Flux maxima
occurred in November 1989 to early March 1990 and mid-October to November 1990, while it stayed relatively low<?pagebreak page2253?> from mid-March to mid-October 1990. At
the deep trap, the mass flux varied between 0 and 516.6 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 5d). The mass flux peaked in mid-December 1989 and January and March 1990 but stayed low for the remaining sampling
period except for mid-May 1990.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3544">Changes in mass flux <bold>(a, d)</bold>, GDGT flux <bold>(b, e)</bold>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures and
satellite-derived SSTs obtained at 50.125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 5.875<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E
near the trap site <bold>(c, f)</bold> at the 614 m <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> and 3196 m <bold>(d, e, f)</bold> water depths at the Antarctic Polar Front site (PF3) during the
deployment period (November 1989–December 1990).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3600">There was no clear correlation between organic material and GDGT fluxes at
either depth. The fluxes in GDGTs ranged from 10.5 to 73.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 614 m and from 0.5 to 153.9 ng m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 3196 m depth
(Fig. 5b and e). GDGT fluxes were mostly enhanced
during the low-mass-flux season at the shallow trap
(Fig. 5b). GDGT flux maxima occurred in November
and December 1989 and late May and early November 1990 at the deep trap
(Fig. 5e). GDGT analysis was not possible between
late July and October 1990 in the deep trap since very little material was
collected during this time period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{${\mathrm{TEX}}_{{\mathrm{86}}}^{{\mathrm{L}}}$ thermometry}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermometry</title>
      <?pagebreak page2254?><p id="d1e3672"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values varied between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the shallow and deep traps, respectively
(Fig. 5b and e). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures ranged
between 1.3 and 7.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the shallow trap and 7.4 and 9.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the deep trap (Fig. 5c and f).
The flux-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
temperatures were 4.6  and 8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at the shallow and
deep traps, respectively. In some samples, GDGT–3 was below the detection
limit. In these cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
and estimated temperatures were not included in the figures, but GDGT flux
was calculated. A surface sediment
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (CHN-115-4-34;
51.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 5.33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in the vicinity of the PF3 trap site
(50.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 5.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) can be found in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> global calibration dataset
(Kim et al., 2010), and its
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature estimate is
9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Most samples did not exceed the index values indicating
nonthermal impacts on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. 3.4). Two samples from the deep trap between early
November and late December 1989, however, showed MI values between 0.3 and
0.5 (Table A1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>4.2.3</label><title>Fractional abundance of OH-GDGTs</title>
      <p id="d1e3907">All OH-GDGTs were clearly present in samples from both depths. OH-GDGT–0
was predominant in the OH-GDGT pool (76 %–89 % for the shallow trap,
77 %–83 % for the deep trap; Fig. 6a and c). The
proportion of OH-GDGTs in the sum of iso- and OH-GDGTs ranged from 4 % to 7 % and 5 % to 6 % at the shallow and deep traps, respectively,
(Fig. 6a and c). Estimated temperatures calculated
according to Eqs. (4) and (6) ranged between 3.0–6.1 and
1.1–5.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the shallow trap (Fig. 6b). With the same calibrations, estimated temperatures varied between
3.6–5.8 and 2.8–5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the deep trap
(Fig. 6d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3930">Changes in fractional abundance of OH-GDGTs <bold>(a, c)</bold> and estimated
temperatures based on OH-related calibrations <bold>(b, d)</bold> at site PF3. The purple
and orange lines indicate the calculated temperatures using the calibrations
by Fietz et al. (2013) (Eq. 4) and
Lü et al. (2015) (Eq. 6), respectively. The green
lines indicate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperatures.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Eastern Fram Strait (79{${}^{{\circ}}$}\,N)}?><title>Eastern Fram Strait (79<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><title>GDGT flux and particle export</title>
      <p id="d1e3993">Organic matter (including GDGTs), formed in the upper ocean, is exported to
the bathypelagic mainly as zooplankton fecal pellets or marine snow
aggregates (Fischer and Karakaş, 2009; Wuchter et
al., 2006b). The velocities of the sinking aggregates vary depending on
their composition (Fischer and Karakaş, 2009; Iversen
and Ploug, 2010) and physical characteristics. For instance, aggregates
formed from coccolithophores are ballasted by carbonate and may sink faster
than opal-ballasted diatom aggregates (Iversen and Ploug,
2010). Still, fecal pellets formed from either coccolithophores or diatoms
sink faster than fecal pellets formed from non-ballasted flagellates (Ploug
et al., 2008a, b). GDGTs have been suggested to be preferentially
incorporated into opal-dominated particles
(Mollenhauer et al., 2015). This is in agreement
with observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures in
sediment trap samples off Cape Blanc being delayed relative to the SST
signal, and this time delay was longer than for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures
(Mollenhauer et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e4023">GDGT fluxes covaried with fluxes of biogenic and non-biogenic components
in the eastern Fram Strait (Fig. 3). GDGT fluxes
were enhanced in summer 2007 and spring 2008 with two clear maxima in late
September 2007 and March 2008 (Fig. 3b). Without
those two distinct GDGT flux maxima, GDGT flux showed a good correlation
with opal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) throughout the deployment
period. Those two episodic GDGT pulses occurred when carbonate,
coccolithophore, and terrestrial biomarker fluxes were enhanced, potentially
resulting in the enhanced GDGT flux  (Chen
et al., 2016; Yamamoto et al., 2012). GDGT fluxes also covaried with
carbonate from the beginning of the deployment until April 2008 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 3a and b). This
agrees with the concept that GDGTs are transported by particles mainly
containing opal and carbonate as previously shown in sediment trap studies (Chen
et al., 2016; Huguet et al., 2007; Mollenhauer et al., 2015; Park et al.,
2018; Yamamoto et al., 2012). This observation suggests that GDGTs are
exported together with diatoms (opal) and coccolithophores (carbonate).
Supporting this, diatom and coccolithophore fluxes both, previously reported
by  Lalande et al. (2016), showed good correlations
with GDGT fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for diatoms and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for coccolithophores) when excluding two GDGT
flux maxima in the correlations with opal fluxes. The flux of terrestrial
biomarkers (campesterol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sitosterol), previously analyzed by
Lalande et al. (2016), also showed a positive
correlation with GDGT flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The sterols
(campesterol and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sitosterol), used frequently to assess the
plant-derived organic matter input to aquatic systems
(Moreau et al., 2002), reflect the input of terrestrial
matter transported by sea ice in the Fram Strait (Lalande
et al., 2016). We thus assume that terrestrial material is aggregated into
particles which carry GDGTs. However, the lithogenic flux, also representing
terrestrial input, displayed a different trend with maxima only in
mid-April–mid-May 2008, when the sea ice concentration abruptly increased
(Fig. 3e). The lithogenic material seems to be
mainly supplied by downslope export from the nearby Svalbard archipelago
(Lalande et al., 2016), with a significant input when the
sea ice is present (Fig. 3e).</p>
      <p id="d1e4184">GDGTs might also be exported with fecal pellets after grazing of Archaea by
zooplankton. Indeed, GDGTs have been found in decapod guts and intestines,
and their<?pagebreak page2255?> abundance ratios appear to be unaltered during gut passage
(Huguet et al., 2006). The fecal pellet carbon (FPC) flux
from appendicularians contributed more to the total carbon flux than copepod
FPC flux. Both appendicularian and copepod FPC fluxes were higher during
spring 2008 than during summer 2007 (Fig. 3d;
Lalande et al., 2016). The correlation of GDGT fluxes
with appendicularian FPC fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
mid-July to mid-October 2007) implies grazing of Archaea by the
appendicularians. Appendicularians are well known to ingest micro-size
particles like Archaea (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) efficiently through a fine
mucus filter (Conley and Sutherland, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4232">Overall, it is reasonable to assume that seasonal changes in the relative
proportion of materials that GDGTs can be aggregated with may result in
variable export velocities of particles carrying GDGTs to deeper waters in
the eastern Fram Strait.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Variability of ${\mathrm{TEX}}_{{\mathrm{86}}}^{{\mathrm{L}}}$-derived
temperature}?><title>Variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperature</title>
      <p id="d1e4257"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures varied (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) within a similar range as the satellite-derived SSTs
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) during the trap deployment period in the eastern
Fram Strait. Although it did not display a clear seasonality, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal is most likely to reflect
the surface water environments without nonthermal effects influencing the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3e). First of all, when the error of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is considered, the SST estimates are identical to the
satellite-derived SSTs. Secondly, the index values (e.g., BIT, MI,
%GDGT–0, RI), which could indicate potential nonthermal factors
influencing the distribution of GDGTs, suggest that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures should reflect the
upper water column temperature (Table A1). The BIT
index defined by  Hopmans et al. (2004) as a tracer
for the terrestrial organic matter input was very low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
showing that negligible amounts of soil-derived GDGTs are entrained in
sinking particles.<?pagebreak page2256?> MI (Zhang et al., 2011) and
%GDGT–0 (Inglis et al., 2015) have been suggested as
indicators for the impact of methanotrophic Archaea even though it was
questioned if the latter index can be applied in marine settings
(Inglis et al., 2015). Both index values were consistently
lower than the respective critical values of 0.3 for MI and 67 % for
%GDGT–0. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was suggested by
Zhang et al. (2016) as an indicator for the integrated
nonthermal factors on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were lower than a value of 0.3, and only
three samples collected in late September 2007 and June 2008 satisfied the
criteria of being influenced by nonthermal factors. Lastly, although
significant portions of particles transported to the mid-depth and deep
water in the eastern Fram Strait originated off Svalbard and the Barents Sea
(Lalande et al., 2016), it is known that GDGTs are most
likely to reflect the local conditions rather than being affected by lateral
transport (Kim et al., 2009; Mollenhauer
et al., 2008). Therefore, we conclude that GDGTs are mainly transported from
upper waters and non-regional sources of particles do not play a significant
role in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate of sinking
particles of the eastern Fram Strait.</p>
      <p id="d1e4445"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>temperatures varied
strongly between mid-July and October 2007, with the minimum estimated
temperature (0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) when the GDGT and terrestrial biomarker
fluxes were highest (Fig. 3b, c, and f). This is
the most productive period in the Fram Strait and also the period with the
highest export fluxes (e.g., Lalande et al., 2016). The
material collected by deep-ocean sediment traps is a mixture of many types
of aggregates with different composition and settling velocities. Therefore,
fluctuating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures might
be due to an average of signals from previous (before mid-July, i.e., slowly
sinking particles) and current seasons (mid-July to October, i.e., fast
settling aggregates), which were exported via different aggregation and
sinking mechanisms with different horizontal displacements during particle
descent. Due to the collection of aggregates sinking with different
velocities, one sample cup in a sediment trap may collect GDGTs of different
ages.</p>
      <p id="d1e4483">During the low flux period between November 2007 and February 2008,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures were constantly
lower than the satellite-derived SSTs (Fig. 3a, b,
and f). These signals might be derived from GDGTs synthesized in mid-August
to October, which was a late-bloom period dominated by protists that do not
produce biominerals, such as <italic>Phaeocystis</italic> sp., dinoflagellates, and nanoflagellates (Nöthig et al., 2015). Aggregates formed without
biominerals have low sinking velocities (Iversen
and Ploug, 2010; Ploug et al., 2008a, b), which may explain why the
satellite-derived SSTs from mid-August to October 2007 were similar to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures in sinking
particles collected during November 2007 and February 2008. In spring 2008,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures stayed relatively
warm until mid-April and suddenly dropped in May and June
(Fig. 3f). The relatively warm
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures in particles
collected in March and April 2008 probably reflect the signal transported by
GDGTs produced in November–December 2007. Warm and cold biases of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures varied
within the calibration error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) throughout the trap
deployment period. It shows that the bias of the calibration occurs neither
in one direction only nor to the same extent even at a given location;
instead the temperature estimate is more affected by other processes
discussed above. Like previous seasons, the lack of transporting materials
for GDGTs delayed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal.
The sudden drop in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperatures in mid-May to June 2008 was matched with the season of the
enhanced flux of biogenic materials, GDGTs, phytoplankton, zooplankton fecal
pellets, and terrestrial biomarkers at the trap when the sea ice
concentration was enhanced (Fig. 3). Eddies around
the ice edge create upwelling and downwelling, which breaks the stratified
surface water and supplies nutrients to the upper water column, fostering
phytoplankton blooms  (Lalande et al., 2013). The sea
ice-edge bloom probably enhanced the GDGT production followed by zooplankton
grazing. Additionally, the terrestrial materials as ballast were more
available, and were derived from sea ice as it melted during spring 2008.
This process caused the fast export of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal from the surface waters
in mid-May to June 2008. Overall, the particles containing GDGTs captured at
1296 m depth in the eastern Fram Strait were likely delivered by a
combination of packaging mechanisms involving biological and nonbiological
transport materials with different delay times over the season. Moreover,
most GDGTs are exported vertically from the upper waters and reflect a
regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal in the eastern
Fram Strait (Fig. 3f), while significant particle
supply from the south via lateral advection has been reported previously
(Lalande et al., 2016). The reflection of SSTs based on
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration and the good
correlation of GDGTs with opal and Appendicularian fecal pellet fluxes
agrees with the finding that diatom and fecal pellet fluxes can be traced as
the export of local production regardless of the lateral particle supply in
the Fram Strait (Lalande et al., 2016).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2257?><p id="d1e4641">The average export velocity of particles containing GDGTs can be calculated
by dividing the travel distance of particles (i.e., the depth of the
sediment trap) by the temporal offset between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature and the
corresponding satellite-derived SST, greatly simplifying the complexity of
sinking mechanisms and range of settling velocities throughout the season
(Mollenhauer et al., 2015). When the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures are shifted
by 82 d, we found the best fit to the satellite-derived SSTs
(Fig. 7b). Therefore, we see that GDGTs synthesized
in the eastern Fram Strait likely travel to the trap (1296 m) approximately
within 82 d. This translates into an average minimum export velocity of
GDGT-containing particles of approximately 15 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when assuming
export from 30 to 80 m water depth (see Sect. 5.1.3). We have assumed that the export velocity
includes the time of GDGT synthesis and transport time to the trap. The
estimated sinking velocity of 15 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is within the range (9–17 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) estimated at a similar water depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) in the
filamentous upwelling zone off northwest Africa
(Mollenhauer et al., 2015) and only slightly lower
than settling velocities found previously for aggregates from the Fram
Strait (Wekerle et al., 2018). Based on the seasonal
succession of peaks in appendicularian fecal pellets in the same mooring
system, their sinking velocity was estimated to be 5- to 11-fold higher
(15–35 d to 2400 m depth; Lalande et al., 2016)
compared to GDGTs. This is a realistic scenario because of the fast sinking
velocity of a fecal pellet, being rather big and dense, and generally faster
average export velocities to deeper ocean depths
(Fischer and Karakaş, 2009; Iversen et al.,
2017). Moreover, the average export velocity of GDGTs includes the time it
takes to be incorporated into aggregates. A more rapid export of GDGTs to
depth resulting in smaller temporal offsets of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature to water
temperature changes occurred in mid-May–June 2008 when the FPC flux of
appendicularians was enhanced (Fig. 3d). It has to
be noted that the export velocity we calculated here may represent an
averaged velocity of all the aggregates collected in the trap, as the export
velocity of GDGTs can vary depending on the type of sinking materials GDGTs
are incorporated into.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4732">Changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperatures and satellite-derived SSTs <bold>(a)</bold>, time-delayed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures <bold>(b)</bold>, and sensor-measured temperatures <bold>(c)</bold> at approximately 68 m water depth at site FEVI16.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4776">The flux-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
temperature over the mooring period was 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In the vicinity
of the site FEVI16 (79.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), two
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from surface sediments
are available in the dataset published by  Ho et al. (2014). The estimated temperatures based on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 2.8 and 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in PS68-251/2 (79.30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and
PS68-271/2 (79.10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), respectively.
Considering the error of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
calibration (Kim et al., 2010),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates are almost identical
between sinking particles and surface sediments. This suggests that GDGTs
synthesized in the upper waters are propagated through the water column into
the sediment without significant alteration even though the sinking process
of GDGTs in the eastern Fram Strait seems quite complicated as discussed
above. Iversen et al. (2010) and Jackson and Checkley Jr. (2011) also suggested that most
biological activities resulting in aggregate alteration and degradation
occur around the base of the photic zone. Our observations agree with
previous studies, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> displays consistent
values at multiple depths and/or in the underlying surface sediments in
various environmental regimes such as in the Arabian Sea
(Wuchter et al., 2006b), in the northwestern Pacific
(Yamamoto et al., 2012), off Cape Blanc
(Mollenhauer et al., 2015), near Iceland
(Rodrigo-Gámiz et al., 2015), off southern Java
(Chen et al., 2016), and in the northern Gulf of
Mexico (Richey and Tierney, 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e4929">In the eastern Fram Strait, the changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature are largely
controlled by the depth and time of GDGT production and temporally variable
sinking materials aggregated with GDGTs. Additionally, the absolute
estimated temperatures varied within the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). In this case, the temperature error inherited from the
calibration is less important than other relative changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>5.1.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Potential depth of ${\mathrm{TEX}}_{{\mathrm{86}}}^{{\mathrm{L}}}$ signal origin}?><title>Potential depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal origin</title>
      <?pagebreak page2258?><p id="d1e4999">To determine the water depth where the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal originated, the
flux-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature
(2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) was compared to the depth profile of nutrient
concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured in late June to early
July 2010, 2011, and 2013 and water temperature extracted from WOA13
(79.125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.375<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in the eastern Fram Strait
(Fig. 8). Unfortunately, ammonia data are
unavailable in 2007 and 2008. The mean estimated temperature (2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in sinking particles corresponds to the surface water in
July–September or of 30–80 m subsurface waters in April–June
(Fig. 8). Major production of GDGTs in both seasons
is a possible scenario because GDGT flux peaked in both seasons
(Fig. 3b). However, the latter period
(April–June) is the more plausible season dominantly supplying GDGTs to
the sediment if we consider the delay time of the GDGT signal (approximately
82 d; see Sect. 5.1.2), which illustrates the
initial time of GDGT production (Fig. 3b).
Furthermore, Thaumarchaeota, the primary synthesizers of GDGTs in the ocean,
are aerobic ammonia oxidizers  (Könneke et al.,
2005) and maximum GDGT concentrations have been found near the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum, where maximum rates of
ammonia oxidation and nitrification occur (Beman et al., 2008; Hurley et al.,
2016). The depths of consumption of ammonia and production of nitrite as
well as nitrate accumulation as a result of the nitrification process in the
subsurface can be deduced from the nutrient profile
(Fig. 8). Assuming that maximum thaumarchaeotal
abundance occurs at the depth of highest substrate availability, we,
therefore, infer that Thaumarchaeota mainly record the subsurface water
temperature (30–80 m) during the warm season when the spring bloom may
occur (April–June) in the eastern Fram Strait. Similar observations were
made in the Sea of Okhotsk and the northwest Pacific
(Seki et al., 2014) and in the western Bering Sea
(Meyer et al., 2016), where the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature is
attributable to the regional season and water depth of GDGT production. The
temperatures measured by a temperature sensor attached to the mooring array
at approximately 68 m depth (Beszczynska-Möller et al.,
2012a), which is approximately in the middle of the depth interval (30–80 m) corresponding to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
temperature (Fig. 8), support our interpretation.
The flux-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
temperature is within the range of measured temperatures at this depth
and it reflects well the temperatures in March<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>June as deduced from the
nutrient depth profile well (Fig. 7c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e5166">Depth profiles of nutrient concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
temperature in the Fram Strait. The navy, green, and gray lines represent
the central station of the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) observatory
HAUSGARTEN (HG-IV), close to the FEVI16 trap location. The purple and brown
lines represent the southern and northern stations of HG-IV. Black dotted
lines for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
temperature and blue and orange lines for temperature represent the datasets extracted from WOA13. Only two seasonal profiles (April to June and
July to September) from WOA13 are available at the same location
(79.125<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 4.375<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) near the site FEVI16. Measured
nutrient concentrations are reported on PANGAEA (Bauerfeind
et al., 2014).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Antarctic Polar Front (50{${}^{{\circ}}$}\,S)}?><title>Antarctic Polar Front (50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S)</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>5.2.1</label><title>GDGT flux</title>
      <p id="d1e5272">At the shallow trap (614 m water depth) of site PF3, there was no clear
correlation between fluxes of organic matter and GDGTs, which displayed
their respective maxima in different seasons (Fig. 5a and b). Peaks of mass flux occurred in November 1989–early March 1990
and mid-October–December 1990, while GDGT fluxes were highest in
mid-May–June and late July–August 1990 (late austral autumn and winter)
(Fig. 5a and b). Similar observations were made in
the North Sea, where the abundance of Thaumarchaeota (previously known as
marine group I Crenarchaeota) and GDGT concentrations were high in wintertime, supported by the seasonality of Thaumarchaeotal 16S rRNA and amoA gene
abundances in that region (Herfort
et al., 2007; Pitcher et al., 2011; Wuchter et al., 2006a). An austral
“winter bloom” of planktonic Archaea was also found near the Antarctic
Peninsula  (Church et al., 2003;
Murray et al., 1999; Tolar et al., 2016). Photoautotrophic phytoplankton,
which use ammonium as a N source, would outcompete Archaea for ammonia in
spring and summer. In contrast, in wintertime when phytoplankton
productivity is limited due to the lack of light, ammonia availability for
Archaea is higher  (Pitcher et al., 2011; Wuchter
et al., 2006b). This explains the winter bloom of ammonia-oxidizing Archaea.
Laubscher et al. (1993) found that ammonia was highly
depleted at the chlorophyll-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum across the Antarctic Polar Front in
early austral summer, which might create less favorable conditions for
ammonia-oxidizing planktonic Archaea. Additionally, Thaumarchaeota are known
to be sensitive to photoinhibition  (Horak et al.,
2017). Therefore, the austral winter maxima in GDGT flux at the shallow trap
of PF3 might be a consequence of the higher production of planktonic Archaea
in surface waters of the APF during the time when ammonia is more available
and photoautotrophs cannot compete due to light limitation.</p>
      <p id="d1e5282">At the deep trap (3196 m water depth) of site PF3, GDGT flux peaked in
November 1989 while mass flux was most pronounced in March 1990
(Fig. 5d and e). Due to the lack of sinking
particles captured in the deep trap in June–November 1990, it is unclear
if a potential winter bloom of GDGTs was also exported to deeper waters.
The trapping efficiency of PF3 was found to be below 50 % at the deep
trap using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as flux proxy (Walter et al.,
2001). The negligible mass flux could thus be caused by low trapping
efficiency. However,  Fischer et al. (2002) observed a
similar seasonal flux pattern in the following years measured almost at the
same depths and at the same location as site PF3. At site BO
(54.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 3.33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), which was located further south
than site PF3, the authors also found a period of almost no flux in
July–December for 4 years approximately at 2200 m depth. Thus, it is
assumed that a low trapping efficiency or a failure of the trap system did
not account for the lack of particle samples at the deep trap of PF3.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>5.2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Variability of ${\mathrm{TEX}}_{{\mathrm{86}}}^{{\mathrm{L}}}$-derived
temperature}?><title>Variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperature</title>
      <p id="d1e5337"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures at the
shallow trap did not display a clear seasonal variability. Only one-third of the
data points were similar to the SSTs, while the remaining samples showed
warm- or cold-biased temperatures relative to the satellite-derived SSTs
during the sampling period (Fig. 5c). All samples
in the deep trap displayed warmer
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures by up to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C relative to the satellite-derived SSTs
(Fig. 5f). As discussed above, the mismatch between
lipid proxy-based temperature estimates and satellite-derived temperature
could be explained by the delay time of the proxy signal, due to the time
needed between lipid synthesis and incorporation into sinking aggregates
plus the sinking time  (Mollenhauer
et al., 2015; Müller and Fischer, 2003; Park et al., 2018). However,
without a marked seasonality of the estimated temperature, it is difficult
to determine a delay time of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal. The
other explanation for the absence of covariance between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal and the satellite-derived SST is that
we observe a mixed signal of Thaumarchaeotal GDGTs derived from surface and
deep ocean. The warm biases have a tendency to occur during periods of lower
GDGT flux and thus may include higher proportions of material from different
sources (early December, mid-June–July, September–November), which may
be more dominant in the deep trap (see discussion below).</p>
      <p id="d1e5396">Temperature residuals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) in the deep trap,
which are larger than the calibration error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C),
suggest significant nonthermal effects on GDGT compositions or the
unreliability of the global calibration in this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e5437">Warm-biased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures
have been attributed to the contribution of different archaeal communities
or GDGT input from terrestrial sources, which may alter the composition of
pelagic GDGTs, leading to unusual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature estimates
(Hopmans et al., 2004; Inglis et
al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2011, 2016). For example, several studies showed
that anomalous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based temperature estimates
can be caused by isoprenoid GDGTs produced by Group II Euryarchaeota as
significant contributors to the archaeal tetraether lipid pool and, thus,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lincoln et
al., 2014; Schouten et al., 2008, 2014; Turich et al., 2007), a suggestion
that is controversial. A prevalence of<?pagebreak page2259?> marine Group II Euryarchaeota has
been reported in Circumpolar Deep Water (Alonso-Sáez
et al., 2011) and in deep waters of the Antarctic Polar Front
(López-García et al.,
2001; Martin-Cuadrado et al., 2008; Moreira et al., 2004; Murray et al.,
1999). Therefore, we would assume that GDGTs produced by deep-dwelling
Euryarchaeota might have caused the warm-biased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal at depth in the region.
Alternatively, advection of particles from warmer ocean regions could
potentially lead to warm biases. However, it is known that the impact of
lateral transport of GDGTs on the local signal is insignificant
(Kim et al., 2009; Mollenhauer et al.,
2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e5502">BIT, MI, %GDGT–0, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
examined to evaluate nonthermal factors on GDGT composition and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at both PF3 traps. However, none of
the values for BIT, %GDGT–0, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
exceeded the defined critical values (Table A1). MI
values were higher at the deep trap than at the shallow one. The first two
samples at the deep trap reached values of 0.3–0.5 MI, suggesting that
GDGTs are derived from a mixture of non-methanotrophic and methanotrophic
communities  (Zhang et al., 2011). However, these two
samples alone cannot fully explain the episodic and continuous warm-biased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates at the shallow and
deep traps. Therefore, those indices cannot explain the warm anomaly of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in the APF. Like in
the Gulf of Mexico  (Richey and Tierney, 2016), a longer time
series of samples would be helpful to investigate inter-annual variability,
paired with a direct assessment of the archaeal community in the region.</p>
      <p id="d1e5570">The flux-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
temperatures averaged over the trap deployment period were 4.6 and 8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at the shallow and deep traps, respectively. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature in surface sediment
(CHN 115-4-34; 51.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 5.33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) from the vicinity of
the PF3 trap was 9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, which is 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C warmer than
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate temperature in the
shallow trap (4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) but is similar to the one in the deep trap
(8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). This situation is different from the Fram Strait and
other time-series trap studies which showed that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in different depths are almost
identical (Chen et al., 2016;
Mollenhauer et al., 2015; Wuchter et al., 2006b). This implies that there is
a clearly different origin of GDGTs in particles collected in the upper
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) and deeper ocean, yet the main explanation
of the warm-biased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is still
speculative.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Re-evaluation of ${\mathrm{TEX}}_{{\mathrm{86}}}^{{\mathrm{L}}}$ calibration in polar oceans}?><title>Re-evaluation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration in polar oceans</title>
      <p id="d1e5736">In the two previous sections, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration developed by
Kim et al. (2010) for regions where maSSTs
are below 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was applied. This calibration is based on data
from 396 surface sediments in the global ocean. Several studies have
expanded the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface sediment dataset. We
revisited the latest global surface sediment dataset containing 1095 surface
sediment measurements (Tierney and Tingley, 2015, and
references therein) to recalculate the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration and to examine the
agreement of our results with the new calibration. From the dataset, the
data points for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
cannot be calculated or which were pointed out as problematic by
Ho et al. (2014) (see <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BIT</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and GDGT concentration below detection limit) were
excluded to avoid potential biases. With approximately 2 times more data
points for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration than
the original one (Kim et al., 2010; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">396</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the new calibration again shows a linear correlation with maSSTs even
though the correlation coefficient is slightly lower
(Fig. 9;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.013</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SST</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.657</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">744</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the residual standard error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) is higher than those of the calibration of
Kim et al. (2010) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). It should be noted that our new linear
calibration has SST on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis as the control variable and
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis as the
dependent variable because the composition of GDGTs and membrane lipids of
Thaumarchaeota (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value) is affected by water
temperature. This different regression might explain parts of the
discrepancy between our and the original<?pagebreak page2260?> calibrations of Kim et al. (2010).
Larger scatter towards colder temperatures appears in the new calibration as
shown in previous studies  (Ho et
al., 2014; Kim et al., 2010) (Fig. 9).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e6015">Correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
with mean annual SSTs in the global ocean (gray symbols;
Tierney and Tingley (2015) and reference therein). Blue
and black round symbols represent the high-latitude regions higher than
50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, respectively. In the southern regions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values have a polynomial correlation with maSSTs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Red and orange diamonds represent the flux-weighted mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the two traps at the site PF3
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the surface sediment
(CHN-115-4-34), respectively. Yellow and green round symbols represent the
flux-weighted mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the site
FEVI16 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the surface
sediments (PS68-251/2 and PS68-271/2), respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2247/2019/bg-16-2247-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6166">It is obvious that the relationship of maSSTs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in high-latitude northern
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and southern (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S)
oceans is significantly different when both regions are plotted separately
(Fig. 9). The data from the north (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) are scattered on both the right- and left-hand sides of the
regression line, resulting in potential warm and cold anomalies,
respectively (Fig. 9). This may reflect various
sources of GDGTs in the high-latitude northern oceans, which have direct
geographical connections to Eurasia and North America. Warm-biased
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in these regions might
be caused by input of soil-derived GDGTs, which are picked up by the sea ice
in the Arctic marginal seas (Laptev Sea, Kara Sea, eastern Greenland),
and released while the sea ice melts. Alternatively,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures might
reflect warmer subsurface temperatures in the warm season as shown in the
subarctic North Pacific region with the regional calibration by
Seki et al. (2014) and Meyer et
al. (2016). Cold-biased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimates are mainly found in the Barents Sea, North Sea, and the Norwegian
Sea. In the North Sea, a significantly enhanced abundance of planktonic
Archaeal cells and high GDGT concentration in the wintertime could account
for colder <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature
compared to SST (Herfort et al.,
2007; Pitcher et al., 2011; Wuchter et al., 2006a). Hence, regional
calibrations in the high-latitude northern oceans seem to be a valid
approach.</p>
      <p id="d1e6290">By contrast, most of the data from the south (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S)
show higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than
predicted by the regression line (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This explains the observed warm
anomalies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperature
when using the original linear regression calibration. Instead of the global
linear calibration, a polynomial one seems to be a better option in these
regions (Fig. 9). When excluding one data point in
the winter sea-ice-covered Southern Ocean, the correlation coefficient of
the polynomial correlation is encouraging (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e6367">Summary of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermometry
in FEVI16 and PF3 site.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trap name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">FEVI16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PF3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oceanographic setting</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seasonal ice cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter ice edge</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Main GDGTs producer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Thaumarchaeota</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Thaumarchaeota <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Euryarchaeota</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface ocean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Satellite SST: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Satellite-SST: 1.8 to 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ave. SST: 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Ave. SST: 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Shallow trap</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (30–80 m depth signal)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Thaumarchaeota <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Euryarchaeota)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Deep trap</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 8.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(dominant Euryarchaeota)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface sediment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 2.3/2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 2400 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 3800 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relevant processes for GDGTs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Export of upper ocean signal by fast</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">– Contribution of Euryarchaeota in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>CDW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">settling particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">causing warm biases</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Highly ballasted with opal and carbonate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>s.v.: 15 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Conclusions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Linear calibration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> applicable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">– Linear calibration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> unreliable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Temporal offset due to changing ballast</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">– Nonlinear relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">materials and s.v.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">and SST (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– OH-GDGT-based calibrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">– OH-GDGT-based calibrations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">applicable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">applicable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e6383"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Satellite-derived sea surface temperature. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Averaged surface temperature over the trap deployment period. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Flux-weighted average temperature over the trap deployment period. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s.v.: sinking velocity. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> CDW: Circumpolar Deep Water.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6996">The data points of the flux-weighted mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the FEVI16 trap and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the underlying surface
sediment against maSSTs are both closely located to the linear regression
line. It illustrates the applicability of the linear
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration in the eastern Fram
Strait (Fig. 9). At the site PF3, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures based on
the polynomial calibration yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1.9, and
2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at the shallow and deep traps and in the underlying
surface sediment, respectively (Fig. 9), which are
colder than the estimates based on the linear calibration. The polynomial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures at the deep trap
and on the sediment are slightly colder than maSST (2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; the
data can be found in Tierney and Tingley, 2015), but
less biased compared to the reconstructed temperatures based on the linear
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration (see Sect. 5.2.2). To test this polynomial calibration in the
Southern Ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), a further assessment needs
to be made with down-core sediments in similar regions, where the original
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate displays a warm bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Applicability of OH-GDGT-related calibrations for SST estimates in the high-latitude Atlantic Ocean</title>
      <p id="d1e7146">OH-GDGTs were determined in sinking particles of the eastern Fram Strait and
of the APF. The proportions of OH-GDGTs to total GDGTs (sum of OH- and
iso-GDGTs) ranged between 7 % and 14 % in the eastern Fram Strait and 4 % and 7 % in the APF (Figs. 4a,
6a, and c). This is a relatively smaller portion
than in the Nordic Seas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %;
Fietz et al., 2013).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2261?><p id="d1e7159">Several OH-GDGT-based calibrations for SST have been suggested for the
global ocean and the Nordic Seas  (Fietz
et al., 2013; Huguet et al., 2013; Lü et al., 2015). We applied those
calibrations suggested by Fietz et al. (2013) and
Lü et al. (2015). Only two calibrations (Eqs. 4
and 6) yield realistic temperature estimates, which varied within a similar
range as satellite-derived SSTs or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures
(Figs. 4b, 6b and d). The
former calibration considers relative abundances of OH-GDGT–0 and
crenarchaeol (Eq. 4). The latter is based on the RI-OH-GDGTs (Eqs. 5 and 6).
In the eastern Fram Strait, both OH-GDGT-based temperatures showed similar
changes with an increasing trend until late April 2008 and decreasing
temperatures in May 2008 except for the last two samples
(Fig. 4b). In the APF, both OH-GDGT-based
temperatures were also close to the satellite-derived SSTs and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived temperatures at the
shallow trap (Fig. 6b). Warm biases such as the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration did not occur with
those OH-GDGT calibrations at the deep trap (Fig. 6d). We speculated in Sect. 5.2.2 that the
warm-biased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures
relative to SSTs may be caused by GDGTs synthesized by Euryarchaeota
dwelling in deep waters of the APF. The methanogenic Euryarchaeota are known
to produce GDGT–1, GDGT–2, and GDGT–3 and may alter the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal derived from pelagic Thaumarchaeota
(Weijers et al., 2011). This might explain why only
calibrations (OH-GDGT/Cren and RI-OH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which do not contain
GDGTs potentially originating from Euryarchaeota, show a correspondence to
regional SSTs. At this stage, however, this has to be considered
speculative. Moreover, it is not clear yet if OH-GDGTs are exclusively
produced by Thaumarchaeota since OH-GDGTs were also detected in a culture of
Euryarchaeota (<italic>Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus</italic>) (Liu et al., 2012). Therefore, further
research is needed to clarify various aspects of distribution, production,
and modification of OH-GDGTs in response to physicochemical changes in the
global ocean. Nonetheless, OH-GDGTs appear to be a potential temperature
proxy in our two high-latitude regions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e7247">Sinking particles collected using time-series sediment traps allowed us to
determine the variability of the downward GDGT export and the environmental
influence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermometry in
northern and southern high-latitude regions of the Atlantic Ocean. We
observed fundamentally different patterns between the eastern Fram Strait
and the Antarctic Polar Front (Table 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e7263">In the eastern Fram Strait, the seasonally different composition of sinking
materials resulted in different sinking velocities of GDGTs, and thus the
temporal offsets between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived
temperatures and SSTs may vary by season. Although increased flux of
terrestrial matter transported by sea ice in intermediate and deep waters is
well known in the region (Lalande et al., 2016),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermometry does not seem to be
affected by lateral advection of particles. The flux-weighted mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature in sinking particles
was similar to the one in the underlying surface sediment, indicating that
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal did not experience
substantial changes while sinking. The flux-weighted mean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature corresponded to
temperatures in water depths ranging between 30 and 80 m, where nutrient
profiles suggest favorable conditions for Thaumarchaeota.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2262?><p id="d1e7331">In the Antarctic Polar Front, changes in GDGT fluxes and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperatures are different
between the two traps moored at different depths. At the shallow trap,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates do not covary with
satellite-derived SSTs, and its flux-weighted mean temperature is 4.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The warm-biased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
at the deep trap and in the underlying surface sediment may be caused by
GDGT contributions from Euryarchaeota, which is dominant in the deeper part
of the water column of CDW at the Antarctic Polar Front. Alternatively, a
systematic warm bias of the linear calibration in the high-latitude Southern
Ocean could explain the discrepancy between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reconstructed and observed
temperatures. The discrepancies can be reduced by using a nonlinear
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration developed for high-latitude samples from the Southern Hemisphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e7409">Our findings offer insights into the potential factors governing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermometry such as nutrient
availability or archaeal community composition in high-latitude regions. In
the high-latitude North Atlantic, regional
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibrations can be an
additional option next to the global calibration, while in the high-latitude
Southern Ocean, the benefit of a polynomial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration needs to be further
tested. Our studies suggest that OH-GDGT-based calibrations are also worth further investigation in the polar oceans. Accordingly, our study
highlights that multiple approaches to global versus regional calibrations,
polynomial relationships, or OH-GDGT-based calibrations are beneficial to
overcome the limitations of a single global
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibration in high-latitude
ocean regions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e7469">The data presented here are available in the PANGAEA database
(<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.897268</uri>; Park et al., 2019).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page2263?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S1.T3"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d1e7489">Index values for assessing the terrestrial and/or methanogen GDGT
inputs at FEVI16 and PF3 sediment traps. The exact sampling interval of each
sample number at FEVI16 and PF3 can be found in PANGAEA
(<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.897268</uri>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cup  no.</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">FEVI16 </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col13" align="center">PF3 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">(1296 m) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col9" align="center" colsep="1">(614 m) </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col13" align="center">(3196 m) </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BIT<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">MI<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%GDGT–0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BIT</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">MI</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">%GDGT–0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">BIT</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">MI</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">%GDGT–0</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.34</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.23</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.17</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.24</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.09</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.06</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.05</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">65</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.24</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.08</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">0.09</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">0.08</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10" morerows="1">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11" morerows="1">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12" morerows="1">56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col13" morerows="1">0.01</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">0.13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">0.14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">0.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">59</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.06</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="1">0.13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4" morerows="1">59</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5" morerows="1">0.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">0.19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.15</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.04</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.00</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">63</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.01</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.31</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Total 20 samples </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col13" align="center">Total 17 samples </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e7495"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> BIT (Hopmans et al., 2004; Weijers et al., 2006) for terrestrial input when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> MI (Zhang et al., 2011) for methanotrophic archaeal input when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and normal oceanic signal when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> %GDGT–0  (Blaga et al., 2009; Inglis et al., 2015) for methanogenic archaeal input when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RI</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhang et al., 2016) for both methanotrophic archaeal and terrestrial input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e8593">EP and GM designed the study. EP measured the samples with the help of JH,
analyzed the data, prepared figures and tables, and wrote the paper.
All the authors provided feedback on the paper and GM reviewed the
paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e8599">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e8605">We acknowledge the captain, crew, and scientists who participated in the expeditions for collecting sediment trap samples used in this study. This project is supported by GLOMAR – Bremen International Graduate School for Marine Sciences and the MARUM Centre of Marine Environmental Research at the University of Bremen. The trap samples were supplied by Bremen (PF3) by the MARUM and Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research (FEVI16).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e8610">This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft – Clusters of Excellence “The Ocean in the Earth System” at MARUM (grant no. EXC309). Morten Hvitfeldt Iversen received funding for the joint Helmholtz Young Investigators Group SEAPUMP “Seasonal and regional food web interactions with the biological pump” (VH-NG-1000) at the Alfred Wegener Institute.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication  were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e8624">This paper was edited by Markus Kienast and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abbott, M. R., Richman, J. G., Nahorniak, J. S., and Barksdale, B. S.:
Meanders in the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone and their impact on
phytoplankton, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 3891–3912,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00073-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00073-X</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alonso-Sáez, L., Andersson, A., Heinrich, F., and Bertilsson, S.: High
archaeal diversity in Antarctic circumpolar deep waters, Env. Microbiol.
Rep., 3, 689–697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00282.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00282.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bauerfeind, E., Nöthig, E. M., Beszczynska, A., Fahl, K., Kaleschke, L.,
Kreker, K., Klages, M., Soltwedel, T., Lorenzen, C., and Wegner, J.: Particle
sedimentation patterns in the eastern Fram Strait during 2000–2005: Results
from the Arctic long-term observatory HAUSGARTEN, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 56, 1471–1487, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.011</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bauerfeind, E., Kattner, G., Ludwichowski, K.-U., Nöthig, E.-M., and
Sandhop, N.: Inorganic nutrients measured on water bottle samples at AWI
HAUSGARTEN during POLARSTERN cruise MSM29, PANGAEA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.834685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.834685</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Beman, J. M., Popp, B. N., and Francis, C. A.: Molecular and biogeochemical
evidence for ammonia oxidation by marine Crenarchaeota in the Gulf of
California, ISME J., 2, 429–441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.33" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2008.33</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bendle, J. and Rosell-Melé, A.: Distributions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface
waters and sediments of the Nordic Seas: Implications for paleoceanography,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000741" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GC000741</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Beszczynska-Möller, A., Fahrbach, E., Rohardt, G., and Schauer, U.:
Physical oceanography and current meter data from mooring F7-8, PANGAEA,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.800396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.800396</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Beszczynska-Möller, A., Fahrbach, E., Schauer, U., and Hansen, E.:
Variability in Atlantic water temperature and transport at the entrance to
the Arctic Ocean, 1997–2010, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 69, 852–863,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fss056</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Blaga, C. I., Reichart, G. J., Heiri, O., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Tetraether membrane lipid distributions in water-column particulate matter
and sediments: A study of 47 European lakes along a north-south transect, J.
Paleolimnol., 41, 523–540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-008-9242-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10933-008-9242-2</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, W., Mohtadi, M., Schefuß, E., and Mollenhauer, G.:
Organic-geochemical proxies of sea surface temperature in surface sediments
of the tropical eastern Indian Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
88, 17–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.03.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2014.03.005</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chen, W., Mohtadi, M., Schefuß, E., and Mollenhauer, G.: Concentrations
and abundance ratios of long-chain alkenones and glycerol dialkyl glycerol
tetraethers in sinking particles south of Java, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 112, 14–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2016.02.010</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Church, M. J., DeLong, E. F., Ducklow, H. W., Karner, M. B., Preston, C. M.,
and Karl, D. M.: Abundance and distribution of planktonic Archaea and
Bacteria in the waters west of the Antarctic Peninsula, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
48, 1893–1902, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1893" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1893</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Conley, K. R. and Sutherland, K. R.: Particle shape impacts export and fate
in the ocean through interactions with the globally abundant appendicularian
Oikopleura dioica, PLoS One, 12, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0183105</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Fahrbach, E. and Cruise Participants: Report and preliminary results of the
Expeditions ANTARKTIS IX/2 of the Research Vessel Polarstern in 1990/91,
Punta Arenas-Cape Town, 16 November–30 December 1990, Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Fietz, S., Huguet, C., Rueda, G., Hambach, B., and Rosell-Melé, A.:
Hydroxylated isoprenoidal GDGTs in the Nordic Seas, Mar. Chem., 152, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2013.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2013.02.007</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, G. and Karakaş, G.: Sinking rates and ballast composition of particles in the Atlantic Ocean: implications for the organic carbon fluxes to the deep ocean, Biogeosciences, 6, 85–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-85-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-85-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, G., Gersonde, R., and Wefer, G.: Organic carbon, biogenic silica and
diatom fluxes in the marginal winter sea-ice zone and in the Polar Front
Region: Interannual variations and differences in composition, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. II, 49, 1721–1745,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00009-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00009-7</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2265?><ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Freeman, N. M. and Lovenduski, N. S.: Mapping the Antarctic Polar Front: weekly realizations from 2002 to 2014, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 191–198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-191-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-191-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O.
K., Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2013,
Volume 4?: Dissolved Inorganic Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate),
NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 76, 25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gersonde, R. and Participants, C.: Report and preliminary results of the
Expeditions ANTARKTIS VIII/3 of the Research Vessel Polarstern in 1989/90,
Cape Town-Punta Arenas, 1 November–1 December 1989, available at:
<uri>http://epic.awi.de/29793/1/PE_17.pdf</uri> (last access: 7 August 2018), 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hebbeln, D.: Flux of ice-rafted detritus from sea ice in the Fram Strait,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 1773–1790,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00006-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00006-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hebbeln, D. and Wefer, G.: Effects of ice coverage and ice-rafted material
on sedimentation in the Fram Strait, Nature, 350, 409–411,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/350409a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/350409a0</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Herfort, L., Schouten, S., Abbas, B., Veldhuis, M. J. W., Coolen, M. J. L.,
Wuchter, C., Boon, J. P., Herndl, G. J., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Variations in spatial and temporal distribution of Archaea in the North Sea
in relation to environmental variables, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 62,
242–257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00397.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00397.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ho, S. L., Mollenhauer, G., Fietz, S., Martínez-Garcia, A., Lamy, F.,
Rueda, G., Schipper, K., Méheust, M., Rosell-Melé, A., Stein, R., and
Tiedemann, R.: Appraisal of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thermometries in subpolar and
polar regions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 131, 213–226,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.001</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hopmans, E. C., Schouten, S., Pancost, R. D., Van Der Meer, M. T. J., and
Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Analysis of intact tetraether lipids in
archaeal cell material and sediments by high performance liquid
chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry,
Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 14, 585–589,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(20000415)14:7&lt;585::AID-RCM913&gt;3.0.CO;2-N" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(20000415)14:7&lt;585::AID-RCM913&gt;3.0.CO;2-N</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hopmans, E. C., Weijers, J. W. H., Schefuß, E., Herfort, L., Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.: A novel proxy for terrestrial organic
matter in sediments based on branched and isoprenoid tetraether lipids,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 224, 107–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.012</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Horak, R. E. A., Qin, W., Bertagnolli, A. D., Nelson, A., Heal, K. R., Han,
H., Heller, M., Schauer, A. J., Jeffrey, W. H., Armbrust, E. V., Moffett, J.
W., Ingalls, A. E., Stahl, D. A., and Devol, A. H.: Relative impacts of
light, temperature, and reactive oxygen on thaumarchaeal ammonia oxidation
in the North Pacific Ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 63, 1–16,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10665</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Huguet, C., Cartes, J. E., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.:
Marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids in decapods: Implications for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paleothermometer, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 7, Q11010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GC001305</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Huguet, C., Schimmelmann, A., Thunell, R., Lourens, L. J., Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.: A study of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paleothermometer in the water column and
sediments of the Santa Barbara Basin, California, Paleoceanography, 22,
PA3203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001310" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006PA001310</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Huguet, C., Fietz, S., and Rosell-Melé, A.: Global distribution patterns
of hydroxy glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers, Org. Geochem., 57,
107–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2013.01.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2013.01.010</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hurley, S. J., Elling, F. J., Könneke, M., Buchwald, C., Wankel, S. D.,
Santoro, A. E., Lipp, J. S., Hinrichs, K.-U., and Pearson, A.: Influence of
ammonia oxidation rate on thaumarchaeal lipid composition and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature proxy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 113, 7762–7767, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518534113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1518534113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Inglis, G. N., Farnsworth, A., Lunt, D., Foster, G. L., Hollis, C. J.,
Pagani, M., Jardine, P. E., Pearson, P. N., Markwick, P., and Galsworthy, A.
M. J.: Descent toward the Icehouse: Eocene sea surface cooling inferred from
GDGT distributions, Paleoceanography, 30, 1000–1020,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002723" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014PA002723</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Iversen, M. H. and Ploug, H.: Ballast minerals and the sinking carbon flux in the ocean: carbon-specific respiration rates and sinking velocity of marine snow aggregates, Biogeosciences, 7, 2613–2624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Iversen, M. H., Nowald, N., Ploug, H., Jackson, G. A., and Fischer, G.: High
resolution profiles of vertical particulate organic matter export off Cape
Blanc, Mauritania: Degradation processes and ballasting effects, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. I, 57, 771–784, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Iversen, M. H., Pakhomov, E. A., Hunt, B. P. V., van der Jagt, H.,
Wolf-Gladrow, D., and Klaas, C.: Sinkers or floaters? Contribution from salp
pellets to the export flux during a large bloom event in the Southern Ocean,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 138, 116–125,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.004</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Jackson, G. A. and Checkley Jr., D. M.: Particle size distribution in the
upper 100 m water column and their implications for animal feeding in the
plankton, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 283–297,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.12.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2010.12.008</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kattner, G. and Participants, C.: Reports on Polar and Marine Research. The
Expedition of the Research Vessel Polarstern to the Arctic in 2008
(ARK-XXIII/2), Longyearbyen-Reykjavik, 6 July–10 August 2008, available
at: <uri>http://epic.awi.de/28933/1/Kat2009b.pdf</uri> (last access: 7 August 2018), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J. H., Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Donner, B. and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Global sediment core-top calibration of the TEX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  paleothermometer in the ocean, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 72, 1154–1173, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.010</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J. H., Crosta, X., Michel, E., Schouten, S., Duprat, J., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Impact of lateral transport on organic proxies in the
Southern Ocean, Quaternary Res., 71, 246–250,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2008.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.yqres.2008.10.005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J.-H., van der Meer, J., Schouten, S., Helmke, P., Willmott, V.,
Sangiorgi, F., Koç, N., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
New indices and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarchaeal
isoprenoid tetraether lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature
reconstructions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 4639–4654,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.05.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2010.05.027</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2266?><ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J.-H., Schouten, S., Rodrigo-Gámiz, M., Rampen, S., Marino, G.,
Huguet, C., Helmke, P., Buscail, R., Hopmans, E. C., Pross, J., Sangiorgi,
F., Middelburg, J. B. M., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Influence of
deep-water derived isoprenoid tetraether lipids on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paleothermometer in the
Mediterranean Sea, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 150, 125–141,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.11.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2014.11.017</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Klages, M. and Participants, C.: Reports on Polar and Marine Research, The
Expedition of the Research Vessel Polarstern to the Arctic in 2007
(ARK-XXII/1a-c, Bremerhaven-Tromso-Longyarbyen-Tromso, 29 May–25 July 2007,
Alfred-Wegener Institute, available at:
<uri>http://epic.awi.de/29744/1/Kla2011a.pdf</uri> (last access: 7 August 2018), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Könneke, M., Bernhard, A. E., de la Torre, J. R., Walker, C. B.,
Waterbury, J. B., and Stahl, D. A.: Isolation of an autotrophic
ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon, Nature, 437, 543–546,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature03911</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lalande, C., Bauerfeind, E., Nöthig, E. M., and Beszczynska-Möller,
A.: Impact of a warm anomaly on export fluxes of biogenic matter in the
eastern Fram Strait, Prog. Oceanogr., 109, 70–77,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.09.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2012.09.006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Lalande, C., Nöthig, E. M., Bauerfeind, E., Hardge, K.,
Beszczynska-Möller, A., and Fahl, K.: Lateral supply and downward export
of particulate matter from upper waters to the seafloor in the deep eastern
Fram Strait, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 114, 78–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.04.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2016.04.014</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Laubscher, R. K., Prissinotto, R., and McQuaid, C. D.: Phytoplankton
production and biomass at frontal zones in the Atlantic sector of the
Southern Ocean, Polar Biol., 13, 471–481, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lee, K. E., Kim, J.-H., Wilke, I., Helmke, P., and Schouten, S.: A study of
the alkenone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and planktonic foraminifera in
the Benguela Upwelling System: Implications for past sea surface temperature
estimates, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 9, 1–19,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GC002056</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Lincoln, S. A., Wai, B., Eppley, J. M., Church, M. J., Summons, R. E., and
DeLong, E. F.: Planktonic Euryarchaeota are a significant source of archaeal
tetraether lipids in the ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
9858–9863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409439111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1409439111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X. L., Lipp, J. S., Simpson, J. H., Lin, Y. S., Summons, R. E., and
Hinrichs, K. U.: Mono- and dihydroxyl glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol
tetraethers in marine sediments: Identification of both core and intact
polar lipid forms, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 89, 102–115,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.04.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2012.04.053</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Garcia, H.
E., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Johnson, D.
R., Hamilton, M., and Seidov, D.: World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume 1:
Temperature, edited by: Levitus, S. and Mishonov, A., NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 73,
40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>López-García, P., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Pedrós-Alió, C., and
Moreira, D.: Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic
plankton, Nature, 409, 603–607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35054537" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/35054537</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Lü, X., Liu, X. L., Elling, F. J., Yang, H., Xie, S., Song, J., Li, X.,
Yuan, H., Li, N., and Hinrichs, K. U.: Hydroxylated isoprenoid GDGTs in
Chinese coastal seas and their potential as a paleotemperature proxy for
mid-to-low latitude marginal seas, Org. Geochem., 89–90, 31–43,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.10.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.10.004</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Manley, T. O.: Branching of Atlantic Water within the Greenland-Spitsbergen
Passage: An estimate of recirculation, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 20627–20634,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC01251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JC01251</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Martin-Cuadrado, A.-B., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Moreira, D., Alba, J. C.,
Ivars-Martínez, E., Henn, M. R., Talla, E., and López-García,
P.: Hindsight in the relative abundance, metabolic potential and genome
dynamics of uncultivated marine archaea from comparative metagenomic
analyses of bathypelagic plankton of different oceanic regions, ISME J., 2,
865–886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.40" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2008.40</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Meyer, V. D., Max, L., Hefter, J., Tiedemann, R., and Mollenhauer, G.:
Glacial-to-Holocene evolution of sea surface temperature and surface
circulation in the subarctic northwest Pacific and the Western Bering Sea,
Paleoceanography, 31, 916–927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015PA002877</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Mollenhauer, G., Eglinton, T. I., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S.: A radiocarbon-based assessment of the preservation characteristics of
crenarchaeol and alkenones from continental margin sediments, Org. Geochem.,
39, 1039–1045, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.02.006</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Mollenhauer, G., Basse, A., Kim, J.-H., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and
Fischer, G.: A four-year record of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>- and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived sea surface temperature estimates
from sinking particles in the filamentous upwelling region off Cape Blanc,
Mauritania, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 97, 67–79,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.11.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2014.11.015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Moore, J. K. and Abbott, M. R.: Phytoplankton chlorophyll distributions and
primary production in the Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 105,
28709–28722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JC000043</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Moore, J. K. and Abbott, M. R.: Surface chlorophyll concentrations in
relation to the Antarctic Polar Front: seasonal and spatial patterns from
satellite observations, J. Marine Syst., 37, 69–86,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00196-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00196-3</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Moore, J. K., Abbott, M. R., and Richman, J. G.: Location and dynamics of the
Antarctic Polar Front from satellite sea surface temperature data, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 3059–3074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JC01705</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Moreau, R. A., Whitaker, B. D., and Hicks, K. B.: Phytosterols, phytostanols,
and their conjugates in foods: structural diversity, quantitative analysis,
and health-promoting uses, Prog. Lipid Res., 41, 457–500,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00006-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00006-1</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Moreira, D., Rodríguez-Valera, F., and López-García, P.:
Analysis of a genome fragment of a deep-sea uncultivated Group II
euryarchaeote containing 16S rDNA, a spectinomycin-like operon and several
energy metabolism genes, Environ. Microbiol., 6, 959–969,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00644.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00644.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Müller, P. J. and Fischer, G.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-Alkenones as Paleotemperature
Tool: Fundamentals Based on Sediment Traps and Surface Sediments from the
South Atlantic Ocean, in: The South Atlantic in the Late Quaternary, edited
by: Wefer, G., Mulitza, S., and Ratmeyer, V.,  167–193, Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, A. E., Wul, K. Y., Moyer, C. L., Karl, D. M., and Delong, E. F.:
Evidence for Circumpolar Distribution of Planktonic Archaea in the Southern
Ocean, Aquat. Microbiol. Ecol., 18, 263–273, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Nöthig, E.-M., Bracher, A., Engel, A., Metfies, K., Niehoff, B., Peeken,
I., Bauerfeind, E., Cherkasheva, A., Gäbler-Schwarz, S., Hardge, K.,
Kilias, E., Kraft, A., Kidane, Y. M., Lalande, C., Piontek, J., Thomisch, K.,
and Wurst, M.:<?pagebreak page2267?> Summertime plankton ecology in Fram Strait-a compilation of
long-and short-term observations, Polar Res., 34, 1–18,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/polar.v34.23349</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Orsi, A. H., Whitworth III, T., and Nowlin Jr., W. D.: On the meridional
extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 42, 641–673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Park, E., Hefter, J., Fischer, G., and Mollenhauer, G.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in sinking particles in three eastern
Atlantic upwelling regimes, Org. Geochem., 124, 151–163,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.07.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.07.015</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Park, E., Hefter, J., Fischer, G., Iversen, M. H., Ramondenc, S., Nöthig, E.-M., and Mollenhauer, G.: Fractional abundances and concentrations of GDGT collected by sediment trap moored in two latitude regions of the Atlantic Ocean: in the eastern Fram Strait (FEVI16) and in the Antarctic Polar Front (PF3), PANGAEA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.897268" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.897268</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Pitcher, A., Wuchter, C., Siedenberg, K., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Crenarchaeol tracks winter blooms of ammonia-oxidizing
Thaumarchaeota in the coastal North Sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 2308–2318,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.2308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.2308</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., and Fischer, G.: Ballast, sinking velocity, and
apparent diffusivity within marine snow and zooplankton fecal pellets:
Implications for substrate turnover by attached bacteria, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
53, 1878–1886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1878</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., Koski, M., and Buitenhuis, E. T.: Production,
oxygen respiration rates, and sinking velocity of copepod fecal pellets:
Direct measurements of ballasting by opal and calcite, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
53, 469–476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0469" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0469</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Read, J. F., Pollard, R. T., and Bathmann, U.: Physical and biological
patchiness of an upper ocean transect from South Africa to the ice edge near
the Greenwich Meridian, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49,
3713–3733, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00108-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00108-X</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S., and
Schlax, M. G.: Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface
temperature, J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Richey, J. N. and Tierney, J. E.: GDGT and alkenone flux in the northern
Gulf of Mexico: Implications for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paleothermometers,
Paleoceanography, 31, 1547–1561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016PA003032</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Rodrigo-Gámiz, M., Rampen, S. W., de Haas, H., Baas, M., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Constraints on the applicability of the organic temperature proxies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and LDI in the subpolar region around Iceland, Biogeosciences, 12, 6573–6590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6573-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-6573-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Schlitzer, R.: Ocean Data View, available at:
<uri>http://odv.awi.de</uri> (last access: 3 May 2018), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Schefuß, E., and Damsté, J. S. S.:
Distributional variations in marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids: a new
tool for reconstructing ancient sea water temperatures?, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 204, 265–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00979-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00979-2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Schouten, S., van der Meer, M. T. J., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Comment on “Lipids of marine Archaea: Patterns and
provenance in the water column and sediments” by Turich et al. (2007),
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 5342–5346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.03.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2008.03.028</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Schouten, S., Villanueva, L., Hopmans, E. C., van der Meer, M. T. J., and
Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Are Marine Group II Euryarchaeota significant
contributors to tetraether lipids in the ocean?, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, E4285, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416176111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1416176111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Seki, O., Bendle, J. A., Harada, N., Kobayashi, M., Sawada, K., Moossen, H.,
Inglis, G. N., Nagao, S., and Sakamoto, T.: Assessment and calibration of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paleothermometry in the Sea of Okhotsk and
sub-polar North Pacific region: Implications for paleoceanography, Prog.
Oceanogr., 126, 254–266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.04.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2014.04.013</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Shevenell, A. E., Ingalls, A. E., Domack, E. W., and Kelly, C.: Holocene
Southern Ocean surface temperature variability west of the Antarctic
Peninsula, Nature, 470, 250–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09751</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Pagani, M., Woltering, M., Brinkhuis, H.,
Damsté, J. S. S., Dickens, G. R., Huber, M., Reichart, G.-J., Stein, R.,
Matthiessen, J., Lourens, L. J., Pedentchouk, N., Backman, J., Moran, K., and
the Expedition 302 Scientists: Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during
the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum, Nature, 441, 610–613,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04668" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04668</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Soltwedel, T., Bauerfeind, E., Bergmann, M., Bracher, A., Budaeva, N.,
Busch, K., Cherkasheva, A., Fahl, K., Grzelak, K., Hasemann, C., Jacob, M.,
Kraft, A., Lalande, C., Metfies, K., Nöthig, E. M., Meyer, K.,
Quéric, N. V., Schewe, I., Włodarska-Kowalczuk, M., and Klages, M.:
Natural variability or anthropogenically-induced variation? Insights from 15
years of multidisciplinary observations at the arctic marine LTER site
HAUSGARTEN, Ecol. Indic., 65, 89–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.001</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, K. W. R., Huber, M., Hollis, C. J., Hernandez-Sanchez, M. T., and
Pancost, R. D.: Re-evaluating modern and Palaeogene GDGT distributions:
Implications for SST reconstructions, Global Planet. Change, 108, 158–174,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.06.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.06.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Tierney, J. E. and Tingley, M. P.: A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface
sediment database and extended Bayesian calibration, Sci. Data, 2, 150029,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.29" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/sdata.2015.29</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Tolar, B. B., Ross, M. J., Wallsgrove, N. J., Liu, Q., Aluwihare, L. I.,
Popp, B. N., and Hollibaugh, J. T.: Contribution of ammonia oxidation to
chemoautotrophy in Antarctic coastal waters, ISME J., 10, 2605–2619,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.61" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ismej.2016.61</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Turich, C., Freeman, K. H., Bruns, M. A., Conte, M., Jones, A. D., and
Wakeham, S. G.: Lipids of marine Archaea: Patterns and provenance in the
water-column and sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 71, 3272–3291,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.04.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2007.04.013</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Walczowski, W.: Frontal structures in the West Spitsbergen Current margins, Ocean Sci., 9, 957–975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-957-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-9-957-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Walter, H. J., Geibert, W., Rutgers Van Der Loeff, M. M., Fischer, G., and
Bathmann, U.: Shallow vs. deep-water scavenging of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">231</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in radionuclide enriched waters of the Atlantic sector of the Southern
Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 48, 471–493,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00046-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00046-7</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2268?><ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Wassmann, P., Reigstad, M., Haug, T., Rudels, B., Carroll, M. L., Hop, H.,
Gabrielsen, G. W., Falk-Petersen, S., Denisenko, S. G., Arashkevich, E.,
Slagstad, D., and Pavlova, O.: Food webs and carbon flux in the Barents Sea,
Prog. Oceanogr., 71, 232–287, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.003</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Weijers, J. W. H., Schouten, S., Spaargaren, O. C., and Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S.: Occurrence and distribution of tetraether membrane lipids in soils:
Implications for the use of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proxy and the
BIT index, Org. Geochem., 37, 1680–1693,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.07.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.07.018</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Weijers, J. W. H., Lim, K. L. H., Aquilina, A., Damsté, J. S. S., and
Pancost, R. D.: Biogeochemical controls on glycerol dialkyl glycerol
tetraether lipid distributions in sediments characterized by diffusive
methane flux, Geochem. Geophys. Geosy., 12, 1–15,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003724" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GC003724</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Wekerle, C., Krumpen, T., Dinter, T., von Appen, W.-J., Iversen, M. H., and
Salter, I.: Properties of Sediment Trap Catchment Areas in Fram Strait:
Results From Lagrangian Modeling and Remote Sensing, Front. Mar. Sci.,
5, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2018.00407</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Wuchter, C., Abbas, B., Coolen, M. J. L., Herfort, L., van Bleijswijk, J.,
Timmers, P., Strous, M., Teira, E., Herndl, G. J., Middelburg, J. J.,
Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Archaeal nitrification in the
ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 12317–12322,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701630104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0701630104</ext-link>, 2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Wuchter, C., Schouten, S., Wakeham, S. G., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Archaeal tetraether membrane lipid fluxes in the northeastern Pacific and
the Arabian Sea: Implications for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
paleothermometry, Paleoceanography, 21, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001279" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006PA001279</ext-link>,
2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Yamamoto, M., Shimamoto, A., Fukuhara, T., Tanaka, Y., and Ishizaka, J.:
Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
index in sinking particles in the western North Pacific, Org. Geochem., 53,
52–62, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.04.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.04.010</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. G., Zhang, C. L., Liu, X.-L., Li, L., Hinrichs, K.-U., and Noakes,
J. E.: Methane Index: A tetraether archaeal lipid biomarker indicator for
detecting the instability of marine gas hydrates, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
307, 525–534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.031</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. G., Pagani, M., and Wang, Z.: Ring Index: A new strategy to
evaluate the integrity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEX</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> paleothermometry,
Paleoceanography, 31, 220–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015PA002848</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Seasonality of archaeal lipid flux and GDGT-based thermometry in sinking particles of high-latitude oceans: Fram Strait (79°&thinsp;N) and Antarctic Polar Front (50°&thinsp;S)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The relative abundance of individual archaeal membrane
lipids, namely of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) with
different numbers of cyclopentane rings, varies with temperature, which
enables their use as a paleotemperature proxy index. The first
GDGT-based index in marine sediments called TEX<sub>86</sub>
is believed to reflect mean annual sea surface temperature (maSST). The
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup> is an alternative temperature
proxy for <q>low-temperature</q> regions ( &lt; 15&thinsp;°C), where the original TEX<sub>86</sub> proxy
calibration shows a larger scatter. However,
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup>-derived temperatures still
display anomalous estimates in polar regions. In order to elucidate the
potential cause of the disagreement between the
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup> estimate and SST, we analyzed
GDGT fluxes and TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup>-derived
temperatures in sinking particles collected with time-series sediment traps
in high-northern- and high-southern-latitude regions. At 1296&thinsp;m depth in the
eastern Fram Strait (79°&thinsp;N), a combination of various transporting
mechanisms for GDGTs might result in seasonally different sinking velocities
for particles carrying these lipids, resulting in strong variability in the
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup> signal. The similarity of flux-weighted TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup> temperatures from
sinking particles and surface sediments implies an export of GDGTs without
alteration in the Fram Strait. The estimated temperatures correspond to
temperatures in water depths of 30–80&thinsp;m, where nitrification might occur,
indicating the favorable depth habitat of Thaumarchaeota. In the Antarctic
Polar Front of the Atlantic sector (50°&thinsp;S),
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup>-derived temperatures displayed
warm and cold biases compared to satellite-derived SSTs at 614&thinsp;m depth, and
its flux-weighted mean signal differs from the deep signal at 3196&thinsp;m.
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup>-derived temperatures at 3196&thinsp;m
depth and the surface sediment showed up to 7&thinsp;°C warmer
temperatures relative to satellite-derived SST. Such a warm anomaly might be
caused by GDGT contributions from Euryarchaeota, which are known to dominate
archaeal communities in the circumpolar deep water of the Antarctic Polar
Front. The other reason might be that a linear calibration is not
appropriate for this frontal region. Of the newly suggested SST proxies
based on hydroxylated GDGTs (OH-GDGTs), only those with OH-GDGT–0 and
crenarchaeol or the ring index (RI) of OH-GDGTs yield realistic temperature
estimates in our study regions, suggesting that OH-GDGTs could be applied as
a potential temperature proxy in high-latitude oceans.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abbott, M. R., Richman, J. G., Nahorniak, J. S., and Barksdale, B. S.:
Meanders in the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone and their impact on
phytoplankton, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 48, 3891–3912,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00073-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00073-X</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alonso-Sáez, L., Andersson, A., Heinrich, F., and Bertilsson, S.: High
archaeal diversity in Antarctic circumpolar deep waters, Env. Microbiol.
Rep., 3, 689–697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00282.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00282.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bauerfeind, E., Nöthig, E. M., Beszczynska, A., Fahl, K., Kaleschke, L.,
Kreker, K., Klages, M., Soltwedel, T., Lorenzen, C., and Wegner, J.: Particle
sedimentation patterns in the eastern Fram Strait during 2000–2005: Results
from the Arctic long-term observatory HAUSGARTEN, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 56, 1471–1487, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.04.011</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bauerfeind, E., Kattner, G., Ludwichowski, K.-U., Nöthig, E.-M., and
Sandhop, N.: Inorganic nutrients measured on water bottle samples at AWI
HAUSGARTEN during POLARSTERN cruise MSM29, PANGAEA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.834685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.834685</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Beman, J. M., Popp, B. N., and Francis, C. A.: Molecular and biogeochemical
evidence for ammonia oxidation by marine Crenarchaeota in the Gulf of
California, ISME J., 2, 429–441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.33" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.33</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bendle, J. and Rosell-Melé, A.: Distributions of
U<sub>37</sub><sup>k</sup> and
U<sub>37</sub><sup>k</sup>′ in the surface
waters and sediments of the Nordic Seas: Implications for paleoceanography,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000741" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000741</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Beszczynska-Möller, A., Fahrbach, E., Rohardt, G., and Schauer, U.:
Physical oceanography and current meter data from mooring F7-8, PANGAEA,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.800396" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.800396</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Beszczynska-Möller, A., Fahrbach, E., Schauer, U., and Hansen, E.:
Variability in Atlantic water temperature and transport at the entrance to
the Arctic Ocean, 1997–2010, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 69, 852–863,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss056</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blaga, C. I., Reichart, G. J., Heiri, O., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Tetraether membrane lipid distributions in water-column particulate matter
and sediments: A study of 47 European lakes along a north-south transect, J.
Paleolimnol., 41, 523–540, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-008-9242-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-008-9242-2</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, W., Mohtadi, M., Schefuß, E., and Mollenhauer, G.:
Organic-geochemical proxies of sea surface temperature in surface sediments
of the tropical eastern Indian Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
88, 17–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.03.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.03.005</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, W., Mohtadi, M., Schefuß, E., and Mollenhauer, G.: Concentrations
and abundance ratios of long-chain alkenones and glycerol dialkyl glycerol
tetraethers in sinking particles south of Java, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 112, 14–24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.02.010</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Church, M. J., DeLong, E. F., Ducklow, H. W., Karner, M. B., Preston, C. M.,
and Karl, D. M.: Abundance and distribution of planktonic Archaea and
Bacteria in the waters west of the Antarctic Peninsula, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
48, 1893–1902, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1893" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1893</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Conley, K. R. and Sutherland, K. R.: Particle shape impacts export and fate
in the ocean through interactions with the globally abundant appendicularian
Oikopleura dioica, PLoS One, 12, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183105" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183105</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Fahrbach, E. and Cruise Participants: Report and preliminary results of the
Expeditions ANTARKTIS IX/2 of the Research Vessel Polarstern in 1990/91,
Punta Arenas-Cape Town, 16 November–30 December 1990, Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Fietz, S., Huguet, C., Rueda, G., Hambach, B., and Rosell-Melé, A.:
Hydroxylated isoprenoidal GDGTs in the Nordic Seas, Mar. Chem., 152, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2013.02.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2013.02.007</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, G. and Karakaş, G.: Sinking rates and ballast composition of particles in the Atlantic Ocean: implications for the organic carbon fluxes to the deep ocean, Biogeosciences, 6, 85–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-85-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-85-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, G., Gersonde, R., and Wefer, G.: Organic carbon, biogenic silica and
diatom fluxes in the marginal winter sea-ice zone and in the Polar Front
Region: Interannual variations and differences in composition, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. II, 49, 1721–1745,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00009-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00009-7</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Freeman, N. M. and Lovenduski, N. S.: Mapping the Antarctic Polar Front: weekly realizations from 2002 to 2014, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 191–198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-191-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-191-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O.
K., Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2013,
Volume 4?: Dissolved Inorganic Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate),
NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 76, 25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gersonde, R. and Participants, C.: Report and preliminary results of the
Expeditions ANTARKTIS VIII/3 of the Research Vessel Polarstern in 1989/90,
Cape Town-Punta Arenas, 1 November–1 December 1989, available at:
<a href="http://epic.awi.de/29793/1/PE_17.pdf" target="_blank">http://epic.awi.de/29793/1/PE_17.pdf</a> (last access: 7 August 2018), 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hebbeln, D.: Flux of ice-rafted detritus from sea ice in the Fram Strait,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 1773–1790,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00006-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00006-0</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hebbeln, D. and Wefer, G.: Effects of ice coverage and ice-rafted material
on sedimentation in the Fram Strait, Nature, 350, 409–411,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/350409a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/350409a0</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Herfort, L., Schouten, S., Abbas, B., Veldhuis, M. J. W., Coolen, M. J. L.,
Wuchter, C., Boon, J. P., Herndl, G. J., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Variations in spatial and temporal distribution of Archaea in the North Sea
in relation to environmental variables, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 62,
242–257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00397.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00397.x</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Ho, S. L., Mollenhauer, G., Fietz, S., Martínez-Garcia, A., Lamy, F.,
Rueda, G., Schipper, K., Méheust, M., Rosell-Melé, A., Stein, R., and
Tiedemann, R.: Appraisal of TEX<sub>86</sub> and
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>L</sup> thermometries in subpolar and
polar regions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 131, 213–226,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.001</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hopmans, E. C., Schouten, S., Pancost, R. D., Van Der Meer, M. T. J., and
Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Analysis of intact tetraether lipids in
archaeal cell material and sediments by high performance liquid
chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry,
Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 14, 585–589,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(20000415)14:7&lt;585::AID-RCM913&gt;3.0.CO;2-N" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(20000415)14:7&lt;585::AID-RCM913&gt;3.0.CO;2-N</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hopmans, E. C., Weijers, J. W. H., Schefuß, E., Herfort, L., Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.: A novel proxy for terrestrial organic
matter in sediments based on branched and isoprenoid tetraether lipids,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 224, 107–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.012</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Horak, R. E. A., Qin, W., Bertagnolli, A. D., Nelson, A., Heal, K. R., Han,
H., Heller, M., Schauer, A. J., Jeffrey, W. H., Armbrust, E. V., Moffett, J.
W., Ingalls, A. E., Stahl, D. A., and Devol, A. H.: Relative impacts of
light, temperature, and reactive oxygen on thaumarchaeal ammonia oxidation
in the North Pacific Ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 63, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10665" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10665</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Huguet, C., Cartes, J. E., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.:
Marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids in decapods: Implications for the
TEX<sub>86</sub> paleothermometer, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 7, Q11010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001305</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Huguet, C., Schimmelmann, A., Thunell, R., Lourens, L. J., Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S., and Schouten, S.: A study of the
TEX<sub>86</sub> paleothermometer in the water column and
sediments of the Santa Barbara Basin, California, Paleoceanography, 22,
PA3203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001310" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001310</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Huguet, C., Fietz, S., and Rosell-Melé, A.: Global distribution patterns
of hydroxy glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers, Org. Geochem., 57,
107–118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2013.01.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2013.01.010</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hurley, S. J., Elling, F. J., Könneke, M., Buchwald, C., Wankel, S. D.,
Santoro, A. E., Lipp, J. S., Hinrichs, K.-U., and Pearson, A.: Influence of
ammonia oxidation rate on thaumarchaeal lipid composition and the
TEX<sub>86</sub> temperature proxy, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 113, 7762–7767, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518534113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518534113</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Inglis, G. N., Farnsworth, A., Lunt, D., Foster, G. L., Hollis, C. J.,
Pagani, M., Jardine, P. E., Pearson, P. N., Markwick, P., and Galsworthy, A.
M. J.: Descent toward the Icehouse: Eocene sea surface cooling inferred from
GDGT distributions, Paleoceanography, 30, 1000–1020,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002723" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014PA002723</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H. and Ploug, H.: Ballast minerals and the sinking carbon flux in the ocean: carbon-specific respiration rates and sinking velocity of marine snow aggregates, Biogeosciences, 7, 2613–2624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H., Nowald, N., Ploug, H., Jackson, G. A., and Fischer, G.: High
resolution profiles of vertical particulate organic matter export off Cape
Blanc, Mauritania: Degradation processes and ballasting effects, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. I, 57, 771–784, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.03.007</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H., Pakhomov, E. A., Hunt, B. P. V., van der Jagt, H.,
Wolf-Gladrow, D., and Klaas, C.: Sinkers or floaters? Contribution from salp
pellets to the export flux during a large bloom event in the Southern Ocean,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 138, 116–125,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.12.004</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A. and Checkley Jr., D. M.: Particle size distribution in the
upper 100&thinsp;m water column and their implications for animal feeding in the
plankton, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 283–297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.12.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.12.008</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kattner, G. and Participants, C.: Reports on Polar and Marine Research. The
Expedition of the Research Vessel Polarstern to the Arctic in 2008
(ARK-XXIII/2), Longyearbyen-Reykjavik, 6 July–10 August 2008, available
at: <a href="http://epic.awi.de/28933/1/Kat2009b.pdf" target="_blank">http://epic.awi.de/28933/1/Kat2009b.pdf</a> (last access: 7 August 2018), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J. H., Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Donner, B. and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Global sediment core-top calibration of the TEX<sub>86</sub>  paleothermometer in the ocean, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 72, 1154–1173, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.010</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J. H., Crosta, X., Michel, E., Schouten, S., Duprat, J., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Impact of lateral transport on organic proxies in the
Southern Ocean, Quaternary Res., 71, 246–250,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2008.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2008.10.005</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J.-H., van der Meer, J., Schouten, S., Helmke, P., Willmott, V.,
Sangiorgi, F., Koç, N., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
New indices and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarchaeal
isoprenoid tetraether lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature
reconstructions, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 4639–4654,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.05.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.05.027</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J.-H., Schouten, S., Rodrigo-Gámiz, M., Rampen, S., Marino, G.,
Huguet, C., Helmke, P., Buscail, R., Hopmans, E. C., Pross, J., Sangiorgi,
F., Middelburg, J. B. M., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Influence of
deep-water derived isoprenoid tetraether lipids on the
TEX<sub>86</sub><sup>H</sup> paleothermometer in the
Mediterranean Sea, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 150, 125–141,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.11.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.11.017</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Klages, M. and Participants, C.: Reports on Polar and Marine Research, The
Expedition of the Research Vessel Polarstern to the Arctic in 2007
(ARK-XXII/1a-c, Bremerhaven-Tromso-Longyarbyen-Tromso, 29 May–25 July 2007,
Alfred-Wegener Institute, available at:
<a href="http://epic.awi.de/29744/1/Kla2011a.pdf" target="_blank">http://epic.awi.de/29744/1/Kla2011a.pdf</a> (last access: 7 August 2018), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Könneke, M., Bernhard, A. E., de la Torre, J. R., Walker, C. B.,
Waterbury, J. B., and Stahl, D. A.: Isolation of an autotrophic
ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon, Nature, 437, 543–546,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03911" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03911</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Lalande, C., Bauerfeind, E., Nöthig, E. M., and Beszczynska-Möller,
A.: Impact of a warm anomaly on export fluxes of biogenic matter in the
eastern Fram Strait, Prog. Oceanogr., 109, 70–77,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.09.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.09.006</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Lalande, C., Nöthig, E. M., Bauerfeind, E., Hardge, K.,
Beszczynska-Möller, A., and Fahl, K.: Lateral supply and downward export
of particulate matter from upper waters to the seafloor in the deep eastern
Fram Strait, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 114, 78–89,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.04.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.04.014</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Laubscher, R. K., Prissinotto, R., and McQuaid, C. D.: Phytoplankton
production and biomass at frontal zones in the Atlantic sector of the
Southern Ocean, Polar Biol., 13, 471–481, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, K. E., Kim, J.-H., Wilke, I., Helmke, P., and Schouten, S.: A study of
the alkenone, TEX<sub>86</sub>, and planktonic foraminifera in
the Benguela Upwelling System: Implications for past sea surface temperature
estimates, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 9, 1–19,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002056</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lincoln, S. A., Wai, B., Eppley, J. M., Church, M. J., Summons, R. E., and
DeLong, E. F.: Planktonic Euryarchaeota are a significant source of archaeal
tetraether lipids in the ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111,
9858–9863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409439111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409439111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, X. L., Lipp, J. S., Simpson, J. H., Lin, Y. S., Summons, R. E., and
Hinrichs, K. U.: Mono- and dihydroxyl glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol
tetraethers in marine sediments: Identification of both core and intact
polar lipid forms, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 89, 102–115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.04.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.04.053</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Garcia, H.
E., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Johnson, D.
R., Hamilton, M., and Seidov, D.: World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume 1:
Temperature, edited by: Levitus, S. and Mishonov, A., NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 73,
40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
López-García, P., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Pedrós-Alió, C., and
Moreira, D.: Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic
plankton, Nature, 409, 603–607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35054537" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/35054537</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Lü, X., Liu, X. L., Elling, F. J., Yang, H., Xie, S., Song, J., Li, X.,
Yuan, H., Li, N., and Hinrichs, K. U.: Hydroxylated isoprenoid GDGTs in
Chinese coastal seas and their potential as a paleotemperature proxy for
mid-to-low latitude marginal seas, Org. Geochem., 89–90, 31–43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.10.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.10.004</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Manley, T. O.: Branching of Atlantic Water within the Greenland-Spitsbergen
Passage: An estimate of recirculation, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 20627–20634,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC01251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC01251</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Martin-Cuadrado, A.-B., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Moreira, D., Alba, J. C.,
Ivars-Martínez, E., Henn, M. R., Talla, E., and López-García,
P.: Hindsight in the relative abundance, metabolic potential and genome
dynamics of uncultivated marine archaea from comparative metagenomic
analyses of bathypelagic plankton of different oceanic regions, ISME J., 2,
865–886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.40" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.40</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Meyer, V. D., Max, L., Hefter, J., Tiedemann, R., and Mollenhauer, G.:
Glacial-to-Holocene evolution of sea surface temperature and surface
circulation in the subarctic northwest Pacific and the Western Bering Sea,
Paleoceanography, 31, 916–927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002877" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002877</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Mollenhauer, G., Eglinton, T. I., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S.: A radiocarbon-based assessment of the preservation characteristics of
crenarchaeol and alkenones from continental margin sediments, Org. Geochem.,
39, 1039–1045, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2008.02.006</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Mollenhauer, G., Basse, A., Kim, J.-H., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., and
Fischer, G.: A four-year record of
U<sub>37</sub><sup>k</sup>′- and
TEX<sub>86</sub>-derived sea surface temperature estimates
from sinking particles in the filamentous upwelling region off Cape Blanc,
Mauritania, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 97, 67–79,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.11.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.11.015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, J. K. and Abbott, M. R.: Phytoplankton chlorophyll distributions and
primary production in the Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 105,
28709–28722, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000043</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, J. K. and Abbott, M. R.: Surface chlorophyll concentrations in
relation to the Antarctic Polar Front: seasonal and spatial patterns from
satellite observations, J. Marine Syst., 37, 69–86,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00196-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00196-3</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, J. K., Abbott, M. R., and Richman, J. G.: Location and dynamics of the
Antarctic Polar Front from satellite sea surface temperature data, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 3059–3074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01705</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Moreau, R. A., Whitaker, B. D., and Hicks, K. B.: Phytosterols, phytostanols,
and their conjugates in foods: structural diversity, quantitative analysis,
and health-promoting uses, Prog. Lipid Res., 41, 457–500,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00006-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00006-1</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Moreira, D., Rodríguez-Valera, F., and López-García, P.:
Analysis of a genome fragment of a deep-sea uncultivated Group II
euryarchaeote containing 16S rDNA, a spectinomycin-like operon and several
energy metabolism genes, Environ. Microbiol., 6, 959–969,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00644.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00644.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, P. J. and Fischer, G.: C<sub>37</sub>-Alkenones as Paleotemperature
Tool: Fundamentals Based on Sediment Traps and Surface Sediments from the
South Atlantic Ocean, in: The South Atlantic in the Late Quaternary, edited
by: Wefer, G., Mulitza, S., and Ratmeyer, V.,  167–193, Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, A. E., Wul, K. Y., Moyer, C. L., Karl, D. M., and Delong, E. F.:
Evidence for Circumpolar Distribution of Planktonic Archaea in the Southern
Ocean, Aquat. Microbiol. Ecol., 18, 263–273, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Nöthig, E.-M., Bracher, A., Engel, A., Metfies, K., Niehoff, B., Peeken,
I., Bauerfeind, E., Cherkasheva, A., Gäbler-Schwarz, S., Hardge, K.,
Kilias, E., Kraft, A., Kidane, Y. M., Lalande, C., Piontek, J., Thomisch, K.,
and Wurst, M.: Summertime plankton ecology in Fram Strait-a compilation of
long-and short-term observations, Polar Res., 34, 1–18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v34.23349</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Orsi, A. H., Whitworth III, T., and Nowlin Jr., W. D.: On the meridional
extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 42, 641–673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Park, E., Hefter, J., Fischer, G., and Mollenhauer, G.:
TEX<sub>86</sub> in sinking particles in three eastern
Atlantic upwelling regimes, Org. Geochem., 124, 151–163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.07.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.07.015</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Park, E., Hefter, J., Fischer, G., Iversen, M. H., Ramondenc, S., Nöthig, E.-M., and Mollenhauer, G.: Fractional abundances and concentrations of GDGT collected by sediment trap moored in two latitude regions of the Atlantic Ocean: in the eastern Fram Strait (FEVI16) and in the Antarctic Polar Front (PF3), PANGAEA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.897268" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.897268</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Pitcher, A., Wuchter, C., Siedenberg, K., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Crenarchaeol tracks winter blooms of ammonia-oxidizing
Thaumarchaeota in the coastal North Sea, Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 2308–2318,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.2308" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.2308</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., and Fischer, G.: Ballast, sinking velocity, and
apparent diffusivity within marine snow and zooplankton fecal pellets:
Implications for substrate turnover by attached bacteria, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
53, 1878–1886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1878" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1878</a>, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., Koski, M., and Buitenhuis, E. T.: Production,
oxygen respiration rates, and sinking velocity of copepod fecal pellets:
Direct measurements of ballasting by opal and calcite, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
53, 469–476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0469" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0469</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Read, J. F., Pollard, R. T., and Bathmann, U.: Physical and biological
patchiness of an upper ocean transect from South Africa to the ice edge near
the Greenwich Meridian, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 49,
3713–3733, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00108-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00108-X</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S., and
Schlax, M. G.: Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface
temperature, J. Climate, 20, 5473–5496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Richey, J. N. and Tierney, J. E.: GDGT and alkenone flux in the northern
Gulf of Mexico: Implications for the TEX<sub>86</sub> and
U<sub>37</sub><sup>k</sup>′ paleothermometers,
Paleoceanography, 31, 1547–1561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016PA003032</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Rodrigo-Gámiz, M., Rampen, S. W., de Haas, H., Baas, M., Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Constraints on the applicability of the organic temperature proxies U<sub>37</sub><sup>k</sup>′, TEX<sub>86</sub> and LDI in the subpolar region around Iceland, Biogeosciences, 12, 6573–6590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6573-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6573-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Schlitzer, R.: Ocean Data View, available at:
<a href="http://odv.awi.de" target="_blank">http://odv.awi.de</a> (last access: 3 May 2018), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Schefuß, E., and Damsté, J. S. S.:
Distributional variations in marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids: a new
tool for reconstructing ancient sea water temperatures?, Earth Planet. Sc.
Lett., 204, 265–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00979-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00979-2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Schouten, S., van der Meer, M. T. J., Hopmans, E. C., and Sinninghe
Damsté, J. S.: Comment on “Lipids of marine Archaea: Patterns and
provenance in the water column and sediments” by Turich et al. (2007),
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 72, 5342–5346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.03.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.03.028</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Schouten, S., Villanueva, L., Hopmans, E. C., van der Meer, M. T. J., and
Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Are Marine Group II Euryarchaeota significant
contributors to tetraether lipids in the ocean?, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, E4285, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416176111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416176111</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Seki, O., Bendle, J. A., Harada, N., Kobayashi, M., Sawada, K., Moossen, H.,
Inglis, G. N., Nagao, S., and Sakamoto, T.: Assessment and calibration of
TEX<sub>86</sub> paleothermometry in the Sea of Okhotsk and
sub-polar North Pacific region: Implications for paleoceanography, Prog.
Oceanogr., 126, 254–266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.04.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.04.013</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Shevenell, A. E., Ingalls, A. E., Domack, E. W., and Kelly, C.: Holocene
Southern Ocean surface temperature variability west of the Antarctic
Peninsula, Nature, 470, 250–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09751</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Sluijs, A., Schouten, S., Pagani, M., Woltering, M., Brinkhuis, H.,
Damsté, J. S. S., Dickens, G. R., Huber, M., Reichart, G.-J., Stein, R.,
Matthiessen, J., Lourens, L. J., Pedentchouk, N., Backman, J., Moran, K., and
the Expedition 302 Scientists: Subtropical Arctic Ocean temperatures during
the Palaeocene/Eocene thermal maximum, Nature, 441, 610–613,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04668" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04668</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Soltwedel, T., Bauerfeind, E., Bergmann, M., Bracher, A., Budaeva, N.,
Busch, K., Cherkasheva, A., Fahl, K., Grzelak, K., Hasemann, C., Jacob, M.,
Kraft, A., Lalande, C., Metfies, K., Nöthig, E. M., Meyer, K.,
Quéric, N. V., Schewe, I., Włodarska-Kowalczuk, M., and Klages, M.:
Natural variability or anthropogenically-induced variation? Insights from 15
years of multidisciplinary observations at the arctic marine LTER site
HAUSGARTEN, Ecol. Indic., 65, 89–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.001</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K. W. R., Huber, M., Hollis, C. J., Hernandez-Sanchez, M. T., and
Pancost, R. D.: Re-evaluating modern and Palaeogene GDGT distributions:
Implications for SST reconstructions, Global Planet. Change, 108, 158–174,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.06.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.06.011</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Tierney, J. E. and Tingley, M. P.: A TEX<sub>86</sub> surface
sediment database and extended Bayesian calibration, Sci. Data, 2, 150029,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.29" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.29</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Tolar, B. B., Ross, M. J., Wallsgrove, N. J., Liu, Q., Aluwihare, L. I.,
Popp, B. N., and Hollibaugh, J. T.: Contribution of ammonia oxidation to
chemoautotrophy in Antarctic coastal waters, ISME J., 10, 2605–2619,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.61" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2016.61</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Turich, C., Freeman, K. H., Bruns, M. A., Conte, M., Jones, A. D., and
Wakeham, S. G.: Lipids of marine Archaea: Patterns and provenance in the
water-column and sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 71, 3272–3291,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.04.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.04.013</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Walczowski, W.: Frontal structures in the West Spitsbergen Current margins, Ocean Sci., 9, 957–975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-957-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-957-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Walter, H. J., Geibert, W., Rutgers Van Der Loeff, M. M., Fischer, G., and
Bathmann, U.: Shallow vs. deep-water scavenging of <sup>231</sup>Pa and <sup>230</sup>Th
in radionuclide enriched waters of the Atlantic sector of the Southern
Ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 48, 471–493,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00046-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00046-7</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Wassmann, P., Reigstad, M., Haug, T., Rudels, B., Carroll, M. L., Hop, H.,
Gabrielsen, G. W., Falk-Petersen, S., Denisenko, S. G., Arashkevich, E.,
Slagstad, D., and Pavlova, O.: Food webs and carbon flux in the Barents Sea,
Prog. Oceanogr., 71, 232–287, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.003</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Weijers, J. W. H., Schouten, S., Spaargaren, O. C., and Sinninghe Damsté,
J. S.: Occurrence and distribution of tetraether membrane lipids in soils:
Implications for the use of the TEX<sub>86</sub> proxy and the
BIT index, Org. Geochem., 37, 1680–1693,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.07.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.07.018</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Weijers, J. W. H., Lim, K. L. H., Aquilina, A., Damsté, J. S. S., and
Pancost, R. D.: Biogeochemical controls on glycerol dialkyl glycerol
tetraether lipid distributions in sediments characterized by diffusive
methane flux, Geochem. Geophys. Geosy., 12, 1–15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003724" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003724</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Wekerle, C., Krumpen, T., Dinter, T., von Appen, W.-J., Iversen, M. H., and
Salter, I.: Properties of Sediment Trap Catchment Areas in Fram Strait:
Results From Lagrangian Modeling and Remote Sensing, Front. Mar. Sci.,
5, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00407" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00407</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Wuchter, C., Abbas, B., Coolen, M. J. L., Herfort, L., van Bleijswijk, J.,
Timmers, P., Strous, M., Teira, E., Herndl, G. J., Middelburg, J. J.,
Schouten, S., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.: Archaeal nitrification in the
ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 12317–12322,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701630104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701630104</a>, 2006a.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
Wuchter, C., Schouten, S., Wakeham, S. G., and Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.:
Archaeal tetraether membrane lipid fluxes in the northeastern Pacific and
the Arabian Sea: Implications for TEX<sub>86</sub>
paleothermometry, Paleoceanography, 21, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001279" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001279</a>,
2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Yamamoto, M., Shimamoto, A., Fukuhara, T., Tanaka, Y., and Ishizaka, J.:
Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers and TEX<sub>86</sub>
index in sinking particles in the western North Pacific, Org. Geochem., 53,
52–62, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.04.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.04.010</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. G., Zhang, C. L., Liu, X.-L., Li, L., Hinrichs, K.-U., and Noakes,
J. E.: Methane Index: A tetraether archaeal lipid biomarker indicator for
detecting the instability of marine gas hydrates, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett.,
307, 525–534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.031</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y. G., Pagani, M., and Wang, Z.: Ring Index: A new strategy to
evaluate the integrity of TEX<sub>86</sub> paleothermometry,
Paleoceanography, 31, 220–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015PA002848</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
