<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-2891-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Frequency and intensity of nitrogen addition alter soil inorganic sulfur
fractions, but the effects vary with mowing management<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in a temperate steppe</article-title><alt-title>Frequency and intensity of nitrogen addition</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Frequency and intensity of nitrogen addition}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.~Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Tianpeng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Heyong</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Ruzhen</given-names></name>
          <email>ruzhenwang@iae.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8654-6677</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lü</surname><given-names>Xiao-Tao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-1895</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Junjie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Yunhai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Peng</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Zhirui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Xingguo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Yong</given-names></name>
          <email>jiangyong@iae.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang
110016, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University,
Shenyang 110866, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change,
Institute of Botany,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="econtrib"><p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ruzhen Wang (ruzhenwang@iae.ac.cn) and
Yong Jiang (jiangyong@iae.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>31</day><month>July</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>14</issue>
      <fpage>2891</fpage><lpage>2904</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>July</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Tianpeng Li et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e184">Sulfur (S) availability plays a vital role in driving functions of
terrestrial ecosystems, which can be largely affected by soil inorganic S
fractions and pool size. Enhanced nitrogen (N) input can significantly
affect soil S availability, but it still remains largely unknown if the N
effect varies with frequency of N addition and mowing management in
grasslands. To investigate changes in the soil S pool and inorganic S fractions
(soluble S, adsorbed S, available S, and insoluble S), we conducted a field
experiment with different frequencies (two times per year vs. monthly additions per year)
and intensities (i.e., 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 50 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition and mowing (unmown vs. mown) over
6 years in a temperate grassland of northern China. Generally, N addition
frequency, N intensity, and mowing significantly interacted with each other
to affect most of the inorganic S fractions. Specifically, a significant increase
in soluble S was only found at high N frequency with the increasing
intensity of N addition. Increasing N addition intensity enhanced adsorbed S
and available S concentrations at low N frequency in unmown plots; however,
both fractions were significantly increased with N intensity at both N
frequencies in mown plots. The high frequency of N addition increased the
concentrations of adsorbed S and available S in comparison to the low frequency of
N addition only in mown plots. Changes in soil S fractions were mainly
related to soil pH, N availability, soil organic carbon (SOC), and plant S uptake. Our results
suggested that N input could temporarily replenish soil-available S by
promoting dissolution of soil-insoluble S with decreasing soil pH and
mineralization of organic S due to increasing plant S uptake. However, the
significant decrease in organic S and total S concentrations with N addition
intensity in mown plots indicated that N addition together with biomass
removal would eventually cause soil S depletion in this temperate grassland
in the long term. Our results further indicated that using large and
infrequent N additions to simulate N deposition can overestimate the main
effects of N deposition and mowing management on soil S availability in
semiarid grasslands.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e236">Sulfur (S) is an essential nutrient for the metabolism of plants and soil
microorganisms by constituting amino acids of cysteine and methionine (Blum
et al., 2013). It also plays vital roles in increasing plant nitrogen (N)
use efficiency, enhancing crop yield and quality (De Bona and Monteiro,
2010), and reducing plant diseases and heavy metal toxicity (Chiang et al.,
2006; Feechan et al., 2005). Plant S deficiency is widely distributed in
global ecosystems (Kost et al., 2008; Scherer, 2009), with negative effects
on stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and consequently primary
productivity (Juszczuk and Ostaszewska, 2011;<?pagebreak page2892?> Wulff-Zottele et al., 2010).
As a macronutrient for plants, S occurs in soils in both organic and
inorganic forms. Soil organic S includes ester-bonded S, C-bonded S, and
residual S, with the first two forms constituting the potential S source
for plants. Inorganic S, accounting for approximately 5 % of total soil S
in mostly temperate soils (Tabatabai, 2005), generally occurs as bioavailable
S (including soluble <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and adsorbed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
insoluble S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coprecipitated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
co-crystallization with cations) (Fig. 1; Tisdale et al., 1993). Soluble S
is the most active fraction with high mobility in soil pore water and prone
to leaching loss (Fig. 1), while S adsorption helps to retain
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from hydrologic leaching (Riscassi et al., 2019).
Transformations of inorganic S fractions govern soil S availability which
are closely associated with plant–soil interactions (Kertesz and Mirleau,
2004; Juszczuk and Ostaszewska, 2011). For instance, the reversible
processes of both S adsorption and dissolution (Fig. 1) are pH
dependent (McGill and Cole, 1981; Tabatabai, 2005) and can be accelerated or decelerated by microbial S immobilization and plant S demand. Therefore,
changes in the soil inorganic S pool play a major role in S dynamics, which can
further impact the mineralization of organic S and plant growth (Kertesz and
Mirleau, 2004). A deeper understanding of transport and transformation of
soil inorganic S fractions is essential for better predicting S supply to
plants under global change scenarios.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e316">Conceptual scheme depicting the transformation of sulfur (S)
fractions in aerobic calcareous soils. Arrows indicate processes affecting
the concentration of one S fraction, with green and red colors representing
opposite transformation processes. Below each S fraction, characters in
blue indicate that the S fraction was directly measured from the
extraction or indirectly calculated from analyzed fractions. Specifically,
soluble S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), available S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
total inorganic S (HCl-S) were directly extracted by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and HCl, respectively. Adsorbed S was calculated
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, insoluble S by HCl-S
minus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and organic S by total S minus HCl-S.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e477">As they are mainly caused by increasing atmospheric N deposition and fertilization,
enhanced N inputs result in severe ecological problems in temperate
ecosystems worldwide (Bobbink et al., 2010), which are predicted to
deteriorate in the coming decades, especially in developing countries
(Dentener et al., 2006). Higher N input may increase plant S uptake and
affect soil S turnover by enhancing primary productivity, especially in
N-limited regions (De Bona and Monteiro, 2010; Harpole et al., 2007; Phoenix
et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015). Nitrogen input can promote S supply by
stimulating the mineralization of C-bonded S (into the form of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-S) (De Bona and Monteiro, 2010) and abiotic dissolution of
mineral-bound S under the N-induced soil acidification (Wang et al., 2016).
However, results from an 80-year fertilization experiment showed that N
addition did not change the concentrations of soil inorganic and organic S
(Yang et al., 2007). Nitrogen inputs may have negative effects on S cycling
rate due to the inhibition of arylsulfatase activity (Chen et al., 2016).
Therefore, soil S availability is mainly associated with soil pH and
mineralization of soil organic matter (SOM) under N enrichment, but it is
still poorly understood for its relationship with inorganic S fractions.</p>
      <p id="d1e497">Studies simulating N deposition commonly add N as an intensive and pulsed
input (Smith et al., 2009). However, natural N deposition occurs more
frequently and evenly in small events (Aneja et al., 2001). Low frequency of
N addition increases plant biomass (Barton et al., 2008; Bilbrough and
Caldwell, 1997) and ammonia volatilization (Zhang et al., 2014a) but
decreases soil pH (Wang et al., 2018) and plant N concentrations (Cheng et
al., 2009) in comparison to high-frequency N addition. Low frequency of N addition has
been reported to overestimate the effects of N deposition on plant species
diversity (Zhang et al., 2014b). Therefore, lower soil pH and enhanced plant
biomass could possibly promote inorganic S dissolution and plant S retention
under low frequency of N addition. Though these studies
demonstrated that N input frequencies alter factors associated with
transformation of soil S fractions (i.e., soil pH and plant uptake), how N input
frequency influences transformation of soil inorganic S fractions still
remains largely unknown.</p>
      <p id="d1e500">Mowing is a common management practice for hay harvesting in temperate
grasslands (Bremer and Ham, 2002; Zhang et al., 2017a), which greatly
reduces nutrient return from plant residues (Janzen and Ellert, 1998).
Persistent harvesting and mowing could reduce the incorporation of plant S into
soil, breaking the natural cycling of S and thus causing the depletion of soil inorganic
S (Solomon et al., 2001). Moreover, mowing can alter soil S mineralization
and immobilization by changing soil moisture, microbial activity, and plant
biomass allocation (Barrow, 1960). Under N-enriched conditions, mowing would
aggravate depletion of soil S pool by removing more plant biomass and plant
S out of the ecosystems in comparison to ambient N conditions. The effects of
biomass removal on soil inorganic S fractions remain poorly understood,
while, to our knowledge, the interactive N-mowing effect has not been explored
in temperate grassland ecosystems.</p>
      <p id="d1e503">Temperate grasslands, which account for 8 % of the earth's land surface
(White et al., 2000) with important ecological function and economic value,
play an important role in the global S cycle. Primary productivity of temperate
grasslands is mainly limited by N availability and typically sensitive to N
input (Niu et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2012). Low background N deposition in
temperate grasslands of Inner Mongolia (&lt; 1.5 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
makes this area an ideal place to investigate ecosystem responses to N
enrichment (Zhao et al., 2017). For a better understanding of soil S supply and
turnover under mowing and different intensities and frequencies of N addition, a
field experiment was conducted to investigate soil inorganic S fractions and
their transformations in a temperate steppe of Inner Mongolia. We
hypothesized that (1) a higher intensity of N addition would increase available
S (soluble S and adsorbed S) concentration by promoting insoluble S
dissolution with a drop in soil pH and enhancement of plant residue return and
organic S mineralization; (2) the increase in available S and decrease in
insoluble S would be more pronounced with a low frequency of N addition due to
lower soil pH conditions than the high frequency of N addition; (3) mowing would decrease
soil inorganic S fractions resulting from reduced plant residue return, and
such effects would be exacerbated with increasing N addition intensities due
to enhanced plant S retention.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2893?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description and experimental design</title>
      <p id="d1e545">The study site (43<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)
is a typical temperate semiarid steppe at the Inner Mongolia Grassland
Ecosystem Research Station (IMGERS) in the Xilin River watershed, Inner
Mongolia, China. The mean annual air temperature is 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
varying from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in January to 19.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in July.
The long-term mean annual precipitation is 351.4 mm, about 72.8 % of which
is concentrated from May to August, according to the data from 1980 to 2013
(monitored and provided by IMGERS). The steppe is dominated by <italic>Leymus chinensis</italic>, <italic>Stipa grandis</italic>,
<italic>Agropyron cristatum</italic>, and <italic>Koeleria cristata</italic>. The soil was classified as a Haplic Calcisol by the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) soil classification
system, with a depth of 100–150 cm and a composition of 21 % clay, 60 %
sand, and 19 % silt on average (Hao et al., 2013). The site has experienced an
uncontrolled heavy sheep grazing since the 1980s and has been fenced since 1999.
No fertilizer was applied before the experiment was conducted.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2894?><p id="d1e632"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The experiment was set up in 2008 following a randomized block design. There
were nine N addition intensities (0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 50 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) crossed with two N addition frequencies (2 times per year
vs.12 times per year) and two mowing regimes (unmown and mown).
Currently, infrequent N addition (i.e., one or two times per year) is commonly
used in manipulative experiments to mimic N deposition, which is quite
different from natural N deposition occurring continuously throughout the
year (Smith et al., 2009). Therefore, a more frequent and even way of N
addition (i.e., 12 times per year) was set to simulate natural N
deposition (Aneja et al., 2001) and to compare whether the changing frequency of
N input affects the grassland ecosystem. Higher rates of N addition were
used to mimic accumulative N deposition in the long term and/or extreme N
inputs in the future of the grassland (Zhang et al., 2017b).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (&gt; 99.5 %) was added in wet and dry forms to
simulate the wet and dry N deposition, respectively. For the high-frequency
treatments, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was added monthly since 1 September 2008.
For the low-frequency treatments, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was added each year on 1 June and November since November 2008. During the growing season (from May
to October), N was added in wet form by mixing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
purified water (9.0 L water in total for each plot, either 9.0 L once in
June for low frequency or 1.5 L monthly from May to October for high
frequency) and then sprayed evenly with a sprayer. To simulate dry N
deposition in the nongrowing season, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was broadcast after being mixed with treated sand to ensure
even fertilization.
Specifically, 500 g of sand was used once in November for low-frequency
treatments, and 80 g of sand was used monthly from November to the next April for
high-frequency treatments and then broadcast evenly in every plot. The sand
used in this experiment was sieved through a 1 mm sieve, dipped in
hydrochloric acid, washed in purified water, and then oven dried at 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 48 h to remove acid-soluble S. Annual mowing was conducted
at the end of August using a hay mower at 10 cm height to simulate the local
hay-cutting management. The aboveground plant residue was taken away
immediately after mowing. We also set an unnamed control without any
treatment (N addition, mowing, water, or sand addition) to determine the
impacts of water and sand addition, which were also compared with mowing
treatment without any other treatments. Thus, there were 38 treatments with
10 replicate blocks for every treatment. Each plot is 8 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 m and
separated by a 1 m buffer zone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Plant and soil sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e765">We assessed aboveground biomass in each plot by clipping a 1 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 m quadrat above soil surface in late August 2014. All the living plants were
clipped and sorted by species, dried, and weighed. The plant samples were
washed using deionized water and then dried to constant weight at 65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 48 h.</p>
      <p id="d1e784">Soil samples were collected from each of the 380 plots at the beginning of
August 2014 (i.e., after 6 years of treatments). A mixed sample was taken
randomly from five cores of the topsoil (0 to 10 cm) within each plot. Then,
samples were passed through a 2 mm sieve immediately to remove the plant
residues and then air dried for further analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Measurement of soil chemical properties</title>
      <p id="d1e795">Soil pH was determined in a soil slurry at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) water / soil ratio by
a digital pH meter (Precision and Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) and the
data are given in Table 1 reported by Wang et al. (2018). The concentration
of soil organic carbon (SOC) in the topsoil was determined by oxidation
using a mixture of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution and sulfuric acid and
titration using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FeSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Nelson and Sommers, 1982). Soil total inorganic
nitrogen (TIN) concentration was calculated as the sum of ammonium and
nitrate, which was extracted with 2 M KCl and determined using a continuous
flowing analyzer (SAN<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> segmented flow analyzer, Skalar, the Netherlands).
Soil pH, SOC, and TIN were previously reported in Wang et al. (2018). Soil
total sulfur (TS) concentration was analyzed with an elemental analyzer
(Vario MACRO cube, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e869">Effects of N addition and mowing on soil pH, soil organic
carbon (SOC), and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN). Data shown are the mean
values, and the values in parentheses are standard errors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which
were previously reported in Wang et al. (2018).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">N intensity </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Unmown </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Mown </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">(g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">F2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">F12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">F2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">F12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">pH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.49 (0.13)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.34 (0.08)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.38 (0.12)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.47 (0.12)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.60 (0.18)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.34 (0.08)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.58 (0.13)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.28 (0.11)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.40 (0.17)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.51 (0.19)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.61 (0.18)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.64 (0.12)a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.48 (0.17)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.33 (0.14)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.36 (0.21)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.34 (0.14)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.78 (0.17)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.99 (0.18)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.97 (0.18)abc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.30 (0.14)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.47 (0.19)Bb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.08 (0.18)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.80 (0.16)bcd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.01 (0.17)b</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.24 (0.24)Bb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.08 (0.18)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.42(0.30)cd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.48 (0.18)c</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.56 (0.16)Bc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.22 (0.23)Ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.13 (0.31)de</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.08 (0.24)c</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.21 (0.26)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.13 (0.15)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.54 (0.32)e</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.41 (0.29)d</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TIN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.30 (0.61)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.13 (0.72)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.78 (0.65)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.20 (0.89)c</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(mg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.29 (1.02)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.24 (1.00)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.13 (0.53)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.74 (0.68)c</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.09 (1.00)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.64 (0.62)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.97 (0.63)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.88 (0.82)c</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.19 (1.13)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.61 (0.87)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.94 (0.80)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.75 (0.55)c</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.62 (1.34)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.19 (0.88)d</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.70 (1.22)Ad</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.29 (1.00)Bc</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.31 (3.38)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.51 (2.47)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.54 (2.92)cd</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.80 (2.31)bc</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30.69 (5.46)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31.04 (3.77)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.22 (4.41)bc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25.84 (4.44)b</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41.03 (5.77)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.48 (4.29)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">36.46 (7.05)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.05 (3.58)b</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">104.09(10.62)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">74.60 (6.22)Ba</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">111.94(15.14)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">71.93(10.32)Ba</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SOC (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.42 (0.06)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.17 (0.05)Bb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.60 (0.09)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.22 (0.11)Bab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.45 (0.08)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.24 (0.06)Bb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.45 (0.09)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.33 (0.15)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.17 (0.07)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.22 (0.06)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.36 (0.11)Aabc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.07 (0.08)Bb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.16 (0.07)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.36 (0.13)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.36 (0.11)abc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.27 (0.10)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.19 (0.06)Bb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.53 (0.09)Aa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.27 (0.08)bc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.35(0.08)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.26 (0.09)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.39 (0.10)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.25 (0.08)bc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.47 (0.09)a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.12 (0.08)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.21 (0.11)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.14 (0.11)bc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.35 (0.10)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.43 (0.09)a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.33(0.08)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.10 (0.09)c</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.27(0.11)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.31 (0.05)ab</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.18 (0.10)b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.28 (0.07)bc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.36 (0.07)ab</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e884">F2 and F12 represent low and high frequencies of N addition, respectively. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences between means of low and high frequency of N addition under each N intensity with or without mowing. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among  means of different N intensities under each N frequency with or without mowing.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1552"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>A schematic diagram is shown to illustrate the transformation processes and
extraction and calculation procedures of the S fractions (Fig. 1). Soluble S,
available S, and total inorganic S were extracted with 0.01 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.01 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 1 M HCl at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) water / soil ratio,
respectively (Roberts and Bettany, 1985). Briefly, 5.0 g of the air-dried
soil was mixed with 25 mL extractant and shaken at 400 rpm for 60 min at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The extracts were filtered and digested with 1 mL of 30 %
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 20 min to remove the color of soil organic matter. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in extractants of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
effectively depress the solubility of organic matter during the extraction.
The cooled solutions were then mixed with 0.5 mL of HCl (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 1 mL of
gum acacia solution (to stabilize the suspension) successively and adjusted
to 25 mL. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all the extracts was quantified by
turbidimetry with 0.5 g of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> crystals at 440 nm using a UV–VIS
spectrophotometer (UV-1700, Shimadzu, Japan) (Tabatabai and Bremner, 1972).
Adsorbed S, total inorganic S, and organic S concentrations were calculated
as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M59" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">adsorbed</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">available</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soluble</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">insoluble</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorganic</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">available</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">organic</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">inorganic</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1869">We measured total S concentration in two dominant species of <italic>Leymus chinensis</italic> and <italic> Stipa grandis</italic> in N
addition plots of 0 and 15 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under low and high frequencies of N addition with and without mowing. Briefly, 0.3 g plant
samples were acid digested with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mixture of 65 % nitric acid
and 72 % perchloric acid at around 235 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Soon et al., 1996). The
S concentration of digestion solution was quantified by turbidimetry at 440 nm using a UV–VIS spectrophotometer (UV-1700, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Plant
S uptake of the dominant species was calculated as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">uptake</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represents S concentration in plant species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents
aboveground biomass of the corresponding species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2004">The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Levene's test were executed to determine the
normality of data and homogeneity of variances, respectively. The TIN concentration was
log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-transformed for homogeneity. We used three-way ANOVAs to determine
the effects of N addition intensity, N addition frequency, mowing, and their
interactions with the concentrations of soil inorganic S fractions and total
S. A Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test was performed to estimate the difference in plant
biomass and S uptake between two N frequencies within each N addition
intensity with or without mowing. Correlation analyses were conducted to
estimate the relationships<?pagebreak page2895?> between soil parameters and concentration of soil
S fractions. The proportion of S fractions relative to total S was
calculated and Duncan's multiple range test was employed to estimate
differences among treatments. All the analyses above were conducted using
SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and all statistical significance was
accepted at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Moreover, we calculated the response ratio of
available S concentration to mowing as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">response</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ratio</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mown</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">unmown</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mown</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">unmown</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> represent available S concentration in mown
and unmown plots, respectively. Weighted log-response ratio (log<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>RR) and
its 95 % confidence intervals for the effect of mowing were calculated
using the metafor package in R software, version 3.5.1 (Viechtbauer, 2010).
Confidence intervals not overlapping zero indicated significant mowing
effects on available S concentration.</p>
      <p id="d1e2093">Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to examine the direct and
indirect strengths of N addition intensities and frequencies on soil
inorganic S fractions through the changes in soil parameters with the AMOS
24.0 program (Amos Development Co., Greene, Maine, USA). Data from all the treatment
were pooled for the SEM analysis. An a priori model (Fig. S1a in the Supplement) was constructed by
assuming that soil S fractions could be directly affected by N addition
frequency, intensity, and mowing, or indirectly by altering soil pH, plant
biomass return, and organic S mineralization (see hypotheses in the
Introduction). Insignificant pathways and parameters that had no effect on
inorganic fractions were excluded from the model sequentially to obtain the
final model (Fig. S1b, c). Data were fitted to the model using the maximum
likelihood estimation method. We used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> test (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
Akaike information criteria (AIC) to evaluate the adequacy of the model.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2896?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Effects of N addition and mowing on soil characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e2145">Soil pH significantly decreased and the TIN concentration increased along the N gradient under
all treatments of addition frequencies and mowing regimes (Table 1). Soil pH
exhibited a sharper decrease in low N frequency compared with high N
frequency in unmown plots, especially at N addition intensities of 10 and 15 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Low frequency of N addition increased TIN concentration in both
unmown and mown plots at high N levels (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 50 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The SOC concentration decreased along the N gradient only under low N frequency
in mown plots.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2210">Effects of N addition intensity and frequency on concentrations of
soil-soluble S <bold>(a, b)</bold>, adsorbed S <bold>(c, d)</bold>, and insoluble S <bold>(e, f)</bold> in unmown
<bold>(a, c, e)</bold>) and mown plots <bold>(b, d, f)</bold>. Dashed and solid regression
lines represent 2 and 12 N additions per year, respectively. Error bars
indicate standard error.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Effects of N addition and mowing on soil inorganic S fractions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Soil-soluble S</title>
      <p id="d1e2251">Mowing significantly decreased soil-soluble S concentration by up to 47 %
among all N addition frequencies and intensities (Fig. 2a, b; Table 2). The high frequency of N
addition significantly increased soluble S concentration by up to 90 %
in both unmown and mown plots, resulting in a significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
effect (Fig. 2a, b; Table 2). With a high frequency of N addition, N addition
intensity increased soluble S for both unmown (Fig. 2a, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mown
plots (Fig. 2b, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), causing a significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect
(Table 2).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2305">Results of three-way ANOVAs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value) for the effects of mowing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), N addition frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) on soil sulfur
(S) fractions and total S concentration.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AdS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">AvS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">InS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">TIS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">OS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">TS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">74.46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60.40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">145.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">28.32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">449.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">120.82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">57.77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.08</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.36<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.98<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.59<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.62<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.91<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.39</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2336">Note: SS represents soluble S, AdS represents adsorbed S, AvS represents available S, InS represents insoluble S, TIS represents soil total inorganic S, OS represents organic S, and TS
represents soil total S. The symbols
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> represent significance levels at 0.05 and
0.01, respectively.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Soil adsorbed S</title>
      <p id="d1e2945">Soil adsorbed S concentration was significantly affected by mowing
treatments and intensity of N addition (Table 2). Mowing significantly
decreased soil adsorbed S concentration at low N addition frequency (Fig. 2c, d; Table 2). There was no effect of N addition frequency on adsorbed S
(Table 2). Compared to the control plot, N addition intensity increased soil
adsorbed S concentration at low frequency of N addition in unmown plots
(Fig. 2c, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and at both low and high frequencies of N addition
(Fig. 2d, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.01, respectively) in mown plots, causing significant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effects (Table 2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Soil-insoluble S</title>
      <p id="d1e3004">Mowing decreased soil-insoluble S concentration by up to 91 % across N
treatments (Fig. 2e, f). There was no significant effect of N addition
frequency on soil-insoluble S (Table 2). Intensity of N addition decreased
soil-insoluble S concentration at both low and high N frequency for unmown
plots (Fig. 2e; Table 2, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and &lt; 0.01, respectively) but only
at high N addition frequencies for mown plots (Fig. 2f, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
resulting in significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effects
on soil-insoluble S concentration (Table 2).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Effects of N addition and mowing on soil-available S</title>
      <p id="d1e3068">Mowing significantly decreased soil-available S concentration by up to
43 % and 40 % across N intensity at low and high N addition frequencies,
respectively (Fig. 3a, b; Table 2). For mown plots, high frequency of N
addition significantly increased soil-available S concentration by up to
57 % compared with low N frequency across N addition intensity (Fig. 3b;
Table 2). The high intensity of N addition increased soil-available S
concentration at the lower frequency of N addition for unmown plots from 15.9 to
24.0 mg per kilogram soil (Fig. 3a, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and at both low (from 10.7
to 15.6 mg per kilogram soil, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and high (from 12.0 to 23.0 mg per kilogram soil, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) frequencies of N<?pagebreak page2897?> addition for mown plots (Fig. 3b). This resulted in significant interactive effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on soil-available S (Table 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3150">Effects of N addition intensity and frequency on soil-available S
concentration in unmown <bold>(a)</bold> and mown plots <bold>(b)</bold>, and response ratio of soil-available S to mowing along the N addition rate <bold>(c)</bold>. Dashed and
solid regression lines represent 2 and 12 N additions per year,
respectively. Error bars indicate standard errors in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>,
and 95 % confidence intervals in <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3178">Nitrogen addition intensity enhanced the negative effect of mowing on soil-available S concentration at low N frequency (Fig. 3c, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
However, negative mowing effect on available S concentration decreased along
the increasing N addition intensity and even turned into positive at 15, 20,
and 50 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at high frequency of N addition (Fig. 3c,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The proportion of available S relative to total S increased
with increasing N intensity at low N frequency for unmown plots (Fig. S2a)
and at both low and high N frequencies for mown plots (Fig. S2c, d).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Effects of N addition and mowing on soil total inorganic S, total S,
plant biomass, and plant S uptake</title>
      <p id="d1e3237">Mowing significantly decreased total inorganic S at both low and high
frequencies of N addition by up to 38 % (Fig. 4a, b). The high frequency of N
addition significantly increased soil total inorganic S concentration by as
much as 15 % (unmown plots) and 26 % (mown plots) compared with low N
frequency (Fig. 4a, b). Soil total inorganic S concentration decreased with
increasing N intensity (except for 20 and 50 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
both N frequencies in unmown plots, while it showed no response in mown
plots. Soil organic S and total S concentrations were not affected by
the intensity of N addition, frequency of N addition, and mowing treatment as
suggested by three-way ANOVAs (Table 2). However, the mean values of soil
organic and total S concentration tended to decrease with increasing N
addition intensity as indicated by its linear correlation with N addition
intensity at both low and high N addition frequencies in mown plots (Fig. 4d,
f). Mowing significantly decreased the proportion of total inorganic S
relative to total S and increased organic S proportion (Figs. S2a vs. 2c and Figs. S2b
vs. 2d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3266">Effects of N addition intensity and frequency on concentrations of
soil total inorganic S <bold>(a, b)</bold>, organic S <bold>(c, d)</bold>, and total S <bold>(e, f)</bold> in unmown
<bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and mown <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> plots. Dashed and solid regression lines correspond
to 2 and 12 N additions per year, respectively. Error bars indicate
standard errors.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3290">The high intensity of N addition increased aboveground biomass regardless of N
addition frequency and mowing management (Fig. S3). The low frequency of N
addition increased aboveground biomass at 2 and 15 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with high frequency of N addition in unmown plots. Sulfur uptake
of <italic>Leymus chinensis</italic> and <italic>Stipa grandis</italic> showed no response to mowing management in plots without N
addition, but it increased with mowing under both frequencies of N addition.
Low frequency of N addition increased S uptake of the dominant species at 15 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in both mown and unmown plots (Fig. 5). Nitrogen
addition intensity increased plant S concentration of two dominant species
(Fig. S4) and relative biomass proportion of <italic>Stipa grandis</italic> (Fig. S5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3354">Effect of N addition intensity and frequency on plant S uptake by
the dominant species of <italic>Leymus chinensis</italic> and <italic>Stipa grandis</italic>, with and without mowing (only plant samples in 0 and
15 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured). F2 and F12 indicate low and high
frequencies of N addition, respectively. Error bars indicate the standard error.
Effects of N addition intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from three-way ANOVAs
were labeled with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and represent a significance level of 0.01. Different
letters above the bars represent the significant difference among means for the
N addition frequency (F2 vs. F12) at 15 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (N15) without
(lowercase letters) and with mowing (capital letters) separately. No
significant difference was detected (not labeled) between the two N
frequencies at 0 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for both mown and unmown treatments
(N0).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page2898?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Relationships between soil characteristics and S fractions</title>
      <p id="d1e3477">Soil pH was negatively correlated with adsorbed S and available S
concentrations under both low (Fig. 6a) and high frequencies of N addition
(Fig. 6b) (all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, insoluble S was positively correlated with pH
under both N frequencies. Soil TIN concentration was positively correlated with adsorbed S
and available S but negatively correlated with insoluble S concentration
under both low and high frequencies of N addition. Soil organic carbon was
positively correlated with soluble S under both N frequencies. Insoluble S
was negatively correlated with adsorbed and available S under both N
frequencies (all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 6a, b). Organic S concentration was
negatively correlated with adsorbed S and available S at high frequency of N
addition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 6b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3518">Correlations between soil parameters and S fractions with low <bold>(a)</bold>
and high <bold>(b)</bold> frequencies of N addition across differing N addition intensities and mowing
treatments. The color change from blue to red indicates correlations from
positive to negative as exhibited in bars at right side of each panel. The symbols * and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> represent significance levels of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3545">Results of SEM showed that N addition intensity affected soil inorganic S
fractions through altering soil pH, plant biomass, and SOC concentration (Fig. 7a, b).
Plant biomass, representing plant S uptake, showed a negative effect on
adsorbed S concentration. With increasing intensity of N addition, higher
plant biomass increased soil organic carbon, which elevated soil-soluble S
concentration (Fig. 7b). The frequency of N addition directly and positively
affected soil-soluble S (standardized total effect size: 0.26) but
indirectly influenced adsorbed S (effect size: 0.07) and inorganic S (effect
size: 0.05) concentrations by changing soil pH (Fig. 7c). Consistent with
the results of simple regressions, soil pH had a negative effect on soil
adsorbed S, which was positive for soil-insoluble S. Mowing decreased soluble
S, adsorbed S, and insoluble S concentrations (Fig. 7d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3551">Structural equation modeling (SEM) illustrating the pathways of
effects of N addition intensity, frequency, and mowing on soil parameters and
inorganic S fractions. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the original model, panel <bold>(b)</bold> depicts
the pathways related to effects of N intensity, panel <bold>(c)</bold> depicts the
pathways related to effects of N frequency, and panel <bold>(d)</bold> depicts the
depicts the pathways related to effects of mowing. Arrows indicate
significantly positive (black) and negative (red) effects with the effect
size proportional to arrow width. Numbers adjacent to arrows are
standardized path coefficients, and percentages next to the endogenous
variables indicate the variance explained by the model (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
numbers in the top-right corner denote the standardized total effects of N
intensity, frequency, and mowing on soluble S (SS), adsorbed S (AS), and
insoluble S (IS), respectively. The final SEM fitted the data well as
suggested by the fitting parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSEA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000, and AIC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85.06).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2891/2019/bg-16-2891-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Positive effects of N addition intensity on soil-available S resulted
from higher abiotic dissolution, adsorption, and potential organic S
mineralization</title>
      <p id="d1e3653">Consistent with the first hypothesis, increasing N addition intensity
enhanced soil-available S fractions, especially adsorbed S concentrations.
In this study, higher adsorbed S under N addition was due to the fact that the level of sulfate adsorption increased with the decrease in soil pH (Fig. 7b),
which was in line with Nodvin et al. (1986). Adsorption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is pH dependent as anionic groups from SOM compete with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
adsorption sites on iron and aluminum<?pagebreak page2899?> hydroxides (Johnson and Todd, 1983). Under
acidic conditions, soil matrix can provide adsorption sites with positive
charges to attract the negatively charged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Tabatabai, 2005).
Therefore, lower soil pH contributed to higher adsorbed S concentration via
enhancing adsorption strength and increasing electrostatic potential of the
adsorption sites under higher intensities of N addition (Scherer et al.,
2012). However, unaffected adsorbed S in unmown plots could be possibly due
to the fact that soil pH tended to be higher at high N frequency compared
with low N frequency at the same N addition level (significant at 10, 15, and
20 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Table 1). Moreover, soil pH decreased at a
much lower rate along with increasing N addition intensity (significant
decreases only detected at 20 and 50 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) under high N addition
frequency compared with low N addition frequency. This resulted in weaker S adsorption
strength, less <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release from insoluble S dissolution, and
consequently unchanged adsorbed S concentration with increasing N intensity
at high N frequency.</p>
      <p id="d1e3769">Increasing N addition intensity enhanced soil-available S fractions
partially due to the dissolution of soil-insoluble S as suggested by the
negative correlation between the two S fractions in our study (Fig. 6).
Without N deposition, free sulfate in soil could precipitate as calcium-,
magnesium-, or sodium sulfate and co-crystallize or co-precipitate with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Tisdale et al., 1993), especially in calcareous soil rich
in exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2018). Soil
acidification induced by N addition can reverse the precipitation process by
dissolving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–sulfate complexes (Chen et al., 1997; Zhang et al.,
2016). Therefore, insoluble S dissolution sequentially enhanced
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mobility due to soil acidification under excessive N
input. This postulation was further confirmed by the positive relationships
of soil pH and insoluble S at both N frequencies (Fig. 6a, b). For the insoluble
S fraction, cautions should be paid to the fact that a small part of organic
S might be oxidized into inorganic S during <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 mL) digestion
(Williams and Steinbergs, 1959). At low N frequency of N addition, the
non-significant effect of N intensity on soluble S concentration could
probably attribute to the balance between S adsorption and dissolution
processes under soil acidification thus keeping the concentration of soluble
S stable. Soluble S is the most active and mobile S fraction in topsoil for
it can be easily utilized by plants and leached along with soil pore water
(Tabatabai, 2005). The increase in soluble S with a high frequency of N
addition indicates that N deposition might increase the risk of S losses via
leaching and/or surface runoff.</p>
      <p id="d1e3866">Our results demonstrate that N input increased soil-available S potentially
by increasing organic S mineralization in mown plots as indicated by the
decreased organic S concentration (Fig. 4d). This was consistent with
previous observations that N addition enhanced mineralization of organic S
to increase S availability by elevating microbial activity (Ghani et al.,
1992). Soil N availability has considerable impacts on the mineralization of
organic S (Niknahad-Gharmakher et al., 2009). The increase in soil TIN concentration
following N input possibly accelerated organic S mineralization in this
study. Changes in SOC concentration also contributed to the increase in
soluble S (Fig. 7a) as biological mineralization of C-bonded S was
positively related to SOC concentration (Niknahad-Gharmakher et al., 2009).
Moreover, decrease in soil pH and higher plant S uptake under N input (Fig. 5) could promote biochemical mineralization of organic S via the enhancement of arylsulfatase secretion by<?pagebreak page2900?> soil microorganisms (McGill and Cole, 1981).
This was further confirmed by Niknahad-Gharmakher et al. (2009), who reported
the upregulation of soil organic S mineralization by the decrease in soil pH.
Elevation of soil S availability via the two pathways of insoluble S
dissolution and organic S mineralization implies that N deposition would
substantially promote transportation of soil S into plant biomass in the
semiarid grassland. This finding is relevant to understand the fates of S
under ecosystem N enrichment with the presence of other disturbances such as
mowing and livestock grazing of grasslands.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Effects of N addition frequency on soil inorganic S fractions</title>
      <p id="d1e3877">Partially contrary to our second hypothesis, low frequency of N addition
decreased soluble S, adsorbed S, available S, and total inorganic S
concentrations compared with high-frequency addition. A change in soil-available S
concentration was mainly determined by the input from dissolution of
insoluble S and output to plant uptake and leaching. A sharper decrease in
soil pH with low N frequency relative to high N frequency would result in
higher soil-available S concentration via the enhancement of insoluble S dissolution.
On the contrary, lower available S concentration was found under low N frequency compared with high N frequency (Fig. 3), which could be possibly driven by
higher plant S uptake (Fig. 5), surpassing the amount of S dissolution.
Leaching loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was evident with infrequent and extreme
rainfall pulses in sandy soils (Eriksen and Askegaard, 2000). Therefore,
another potential explanation could be that large-pulse water input at low N
frequency resulted in higher leaching loss of available S than the high N
frequency of adding a small amount of water each time. The results in the<?pagebreak page2901?> control
plots supported this explanation, with lower concentrations of adsorbed S,
available S, and total inorganic S under low N frequency compared with high-frequency (especially in unmown plots). With the increasing N intensity,
leaching loss of available S was exacerbated due to enhanced insoluble S
dissolution (Fig. 2e, f). Compared with high N frequency, organic S
mineralization did not contribute to lower total inorganic S and available S
concentrations at low N frequency for the same N intensity as no difference
was detected for organic S concentration between the two N frequencies. These
results suggest that using low frequency of N addition to mimic N deposition
may overestimate insoluble S dissolution (especially in unmown plots) and
plant S uptake in temperate grasslands. However, some of the S fractions
responded differently to both N intensity and frequency with or without
mowing treatment, suggesting that the effects of N addition strongly
depended on mowing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Mowing effect and its interaction with N addition</title>
      <p id="d1e3904">Mowing decreased inorganic S fractions in all treatments, which supports
our third hypothesis. Mowing could alter plant community composition (Lü
et al., 2012) and ecosystem nutrient cycling (Koncz et al., 2015). Decreased
soil nutrient availability was found with mowing in a similar
grassland ecosystem resulting from reduced plant residue return (Lü et
al., 2012). Similarly, mowing resulted in significant decreases in inorganic
S fractions and the proportion of total inorganic S relative to soil total S
(Figs. 4a, b, S2). In contrast, relative organic S proportion increased
with mowing treatment (Fig. S2), which indicates that mowing management
removes soil S out of the ecosystem and has a larger impact on inorganic S
transformation than on the organic S mineralization (Fig. 4a, b vs. Fig. 4c,
d). This is contrary to the findings of Li et al. (2001), which suggested
that over 70 % of S removal by harvests was derived from organic S
mineralization in an agroecosystem. The difference could probably  be attributed
to the relatively lower intensity of plant S uptake and fertility of soil of the
grassland ecosystem than the cropland.</p>
      <p id="d1e3907">The negative mowing effect on the soil-available S was suggested to be exacerbated
due to enhanced plant S uptake coincident with higher plant biomass
(Jackson, 2000). We found that combined mowing and N addition treatments
tended to increase S uptake of the dominant species (Fig. 5). This was probably
due to higher S concentration in <italic>Stipa grandis</italic> (Fig. S4) and increases in its biomass
proportion after mowing (Fig. S5). However, the exacerbation of the negative
mowing effect on available S was only detected at low frequency of N
addition in this study, and high N frequency alleviated the negative mowing
effect and even turned it into a positive effect (&gt; 15 g N m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the increasing N addition intensity (Fig. 3c). The discrepancy might be recognized as the tradeoff between the available S output and input processes, which are regulated by differential responses of soil pH, plant biomass, and S uptake in the two N addition frequencies. Therefore, it was reasonable to detect the decrease in soil
total S but the increase in soluble S and adsorbed S concentrations under N
addition with mowing. Our results suggest that the increase in S
removal from the grassland ecosystem could temporally stimulate available S
formation via abiotic dissolution of insoluble S and mineralization of
organic S. In the long term, however, N enrichment together with continuous
mowing would cause depletion of the S pool.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3947">Increasing the intensity of N input enhanced soil-available S fractions
by affecting soil pH, plant S uptake, SOC concentration, and insoluble S
concentration. Dissolution of insoluble S and mineralization of organic S
contributed to the increases in soil S availability. Mowing significantly
decreased soil inorganic S fractions by reducing S replenishment via plant
residue return, and such an effect was exacerbated with increasing intensity of
N addition by enhancing plant S uptake. Frequency of N addition also
interacted with mowing to decrease soil adsorbed and available S with a higher response ratio with the low frequency of N addition. Our results indicated that
simulating N deposition using large and infrequent pulses of N could
overestimate changes in adsorbed S, and available S under unmown conditions,
but underestimate responses of soluble S, adsorbed S and available S
concentrations under mown conditions. Mowing could regulate the effects of
N addition intensity and frequency on soil S dynamics in semiarid grassland
ecosystems. Our results provide insights for sustainable grassland
management from a perspective of S cycling.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3954">The datasets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable
request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3957">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2891-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2891-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3966">XH and YJ designed the study. YZ and JY set up the field experiment and applied fertilizer every year. HL, RW, and PH performed samplings of soils and plants. TL, HL, and ZW completed laboratory analyses. RW and X-T L contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the results. TL prepared the manuscript with suggestions from all the co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3972">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3978">The authors would like to thank the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station for the great assistance during the sampling and in situ measurements. We are grateful
to the two referees for their helpful and constructive comments on the previous
version of this paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3983">This research has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31870441, 31770525, and 31430016) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2016YFC0500707).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3989">This paper was edited by Nobuhito Ohte and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Aneja, V. P., Roelle, P. A., Murray, G. C., Southerland, J., Erisman, J. W.,
Fowler, D., Asman, W. A. H., and Patni, N.: Atmospheric nitrogen compounds
II: emissions, transport, transformation, deposition and assessment, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 1903–1911, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00543-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00543-4</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Barrow, N. J.: A comparison of the mineralization of nitrogen and of sulphur
from decomposing organic materials, Aust. J. Agr. Res., 11, 960–969,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9600960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/AR9600960</ext-link>, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Barton, L., Wan, G. G. Y., Buck, R. P., and Colmer, T. D.: Does N fertiliser
regime influence N leaching and quality of different-aged turfgrass
(<italic>Pennisetum clandestinum</italic>) stands?, Plant Soil, 316, 81–96,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9761-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-008-9761-7</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bilbrough, C. J. and Caldwell, M. M.: Exploitation of springtime ephemeral N
pulses by six great basin plant species, Ecology, 78, 231–243,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2265992" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/2265992</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Blum, S. C., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Caires, E. F., and Alleoni, L. R. F.:
Sulfur forms in organic substrates affecting S mineralization in soil,
Geoderma, 200, 156–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.02.003</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bobbink, R., Hicks, K., Galloway, J., Spranger, T., Alkemade, R., Ashmore,
M., Bustamante, M., Cinderby, S., Davidson, E., Dentener, F., Emmett, B.,
Erisman, J. W., Fenn, M., Gilliam, F., Nordin, A., Pardo, L., and De Vries,
W.: Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant
diversity: a synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 20, 30–59,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1140.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/08-1140.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bremer, D. J. and Ham, J. M.: Measurement and modeling of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
flux in a temperate grassland under mowed and burned regimes, Ecol. Appl.,
12, 1318–1328, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chen, B., Shan, X., Shen, D., and Mou, S.: Nature of the HCl-soluble sulfate
in the sequential extraction for sulfur speciation in soils, Fresen. J.
Anal. Chem., 357, 941–945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s002160050278</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, H., Yang, L., Wen, L., Luo, P., Liu, L., Yang, Y., Wang, K., and Li,
D.: Effects of nitrogen deposition on soil sulfur cycling, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1568–1577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gb005423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016gb005423</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, X., Luo, Y., Su, B., Verburg, P. S. J., Hui, D., Obrist, D., Arnone,
J. A., Johnson, D. W., and Evans, R. D.: Responses of net ecosystem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
exchange to nitrogen fertilization in experimentally manipulated grassland
ecosystems, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1956–1963,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chiang, H. C., Lo, J. C., and Yeh, K. C.: Genes associated with heavy metal
tolerance and accumulation in Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri: a
genomic survey with cDNA microarray, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6792–6798,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061432y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es061432y</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>De Bona, F. D. and Monteiro, F. A.: Nitrogen and sulfur fertilization and
dynamics in a Brazilian Entisol under pasture, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 74,
1248–1258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0228" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2009.0228</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Dentener, F., Drevet, J., Lamarque, J. F., Bey, I., Eickhout, B., Fiore, A.
M., Hauglustaine, D., Horowitz, L. W., Krol, M., Kulshrestha, U. C.,
Lawrence, M., Galy-Lacaux, C., Rast, S., Shindell, D., Stevenson, D., Van
Noije, T., Atherton, C., Bell, N., Bergman, D., Butler, T., Cofala, J.,
Collins, B., Doherty, R., Ellingsen, K., Galloway, J., Gauss, M., Montanaro,
V., Müller, J. F., Pitari, G., Rodriguez, J., Sanderson, M., Solmon, F.,
Strahan, S., Schultz, M., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Wild, O.: Nitrogen and
sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4003,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GB002672</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Eriksen, J. and Askegaard, M.: Sulphate leaching in an organic crop rotation
on sandy soil in Denmark, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 78, 107–114,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00117-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00117-6</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Feechan, A., Kwon, E., Yun, B. W., Wang, Y., Pallas, J. A., and Loake, G.
J.: A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant disease resistance, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 8054–8059,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501456102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0501456102</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Ghani, A., McLaren, R., and Swift, R.: Sulphur mineralisation and
transformations in soils as influenced by additions of carbon, nitrogen and
sulphur, Soil Biol. Biochem., 24, 331–341,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90193-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(92)90193-2</ext-link>,1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hao, Y., Kang, X., Wu, X., Cui, X., Liu, W., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Wang, Y.,
Xu, Z., and Zhao, H.: Is frequency or amount of precipitation more important
in controlling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in the 30-year-old fenced and the moderately
grazed temperate steppe?, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 17, 63–71,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.03.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agee.2013.03.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Harpole, W. S., Potts, D. L., and Suding, K. N.: Ecosystem responses to
water and nitrogen amendment in a California grassland, Glob. Change Boil.,
13, 2341–2348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01447.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01447.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Jackson, G. D.: Effects of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient
uptake, Agron. J., 92, 644–649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924644x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/agronj2000.924644x</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Janzen, H. H. and Ellert, B. H.: Sulfur dynamics in cultivated temperate
agroecosystems, in: Sulphur in the Environment, edited by: Maynard, D. G., Marcel
Dekker, New York, 11–43, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, D. W. and Todd, D.: Relationships among iron, aluminum, carbon, and
sulfate in a variety of forest soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47, 792–800,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700040035x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700040035x</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2903?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Juszczuk, I. M. and Ostaszewska, M.: Respiratory activity, energy and redox
status in sulphur-deficient bean plants, Environ. Exp. Bot., 74, 245–254,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.06.006</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Kertesz, M. A. and Mirleau, P.: The role of soil microbes in plant sulphur
nutrition, J. Exp. Bot., 55, 1939–1945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jxb/erh176</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Koncz, P., Balogh, J., Papp, M., Hidy, D., Pintér, K., Fóti, S.,
Klumpp, K., and Nagy, Z.: Higher soil respiration under mowing than under
grazing explained by biomass differences, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 103,
201–215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9732-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10705-015-9732-3</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kost, D., Chen, L., and Dick, W. A.: Predicting plant sulfur deficiency in
soils: results from Ohio, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 44, 1091–1098,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0298-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-008-0298-y</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Li, S., Lin, B., and Zhou, W.: Soil organic sulfur mineralization in the
presence of growing plants under aerobic or waterlogged conditions, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 33, 721–727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00205-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00205-4</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Lü, X., Lü, F., Zhou, L., Han, X., and Han, X.: Stoichiometric
response of dominant grasses to fire and mowing in a semi-arid grassland, J.
Arid Environ., 78, 154–160, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.008</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>McGill, W. B. and Cole, C. V.: Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C,
N, S and P through soil organic matter, Geoderma, 26, 267–286,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(81)90024-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7061(81)90024-0</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L.: Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic
Matter, in: Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 – Chemical and Microbiological
Properties, 2nd Edn., edited by: Miller, A. L., Keeney, R. H., and Soil, D. R.,
Science Society of America, Madison, 539–579, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Niknahad-Gharmakher, H., Machet, J. M., Beaudoin, N., and Recous, S.:
Estimation of sulfur mineralization and relationships with nitrogen and
carbon in soils, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 45, 297–304,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0332-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-008-0332-0</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Niu, S., Wu, M., Han, Y. I., Xia, J., Zhang, Z. H. E., Yang, H., and Wan,
S.: Nitrogen effects on net ecosystem carbon exchange in a temperate steppe,
Glob. Change Boil., 16, 144–155,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01894.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01894.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Nodvin, S. C., Driscoll, C. T., and Likens, G. E.: The effect of pH on
sulfate adsorption by a forest soil, Soil Sci., 142, 69–75,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198608000-00002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1097/00010694-198608000-00002</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Phoenix, G. K., Emmett, B. A., Britton, A. J., Caporn, S. J. M., Dise, N.
B., Helliwell, R., Jones, L., Leake, J. R., Leith, I. D., Sheppard, L. J.,
Sowerby, A., Pilkington, M. G., Rowe, E. C., Ashmore, M. R., and Power, S.
A.: Impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: responses of multiple plant
and soil parameters across contrasting ecosystems in long-term field
experiments, Glob. Change Boil., 18, 1197–1215,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02590.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02590.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Riscassi, A., Scanlon, T., and Galloway, J.: Stream geochemical response to
reductions in acid deposition in headwater streams: Chronic versus episodic
acidification recovery, Hydrol. Proc., 33, 512–526,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.13349</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, T. L. and Bettany, J. R.: The influence of topography on the nature
and distribution of soil sulfur across a narrow environmental gradient, Can.
J. Soil Sci., 65, 419–434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss85-046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4141/cjss85-046</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Scherer, H. W., Welp, G., and Förster, S.: Sulfur fractions in
particle-size separates as influenced by long-term application of mineral
and organic fertilizers, Plant, Soil Environ., 58, 242–248,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17221/78/2012-PSE" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17221/78/2012-PSE</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Scherer, H. W.: Sulfur in soils, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 172, 326–335,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jpln.200900037</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K., and Collins, S. L.: A framework for assessing
ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by
global change, Ecology, 90, 3279–3289,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, D., Lehmann, J., Tekalign, M., Fritzsche, F., and Zech, W.: Sulfur
fractions in particle-size separates of the sub-humid Ethiopian highlands as
influenced by land use changes, Geoderma, 102, 41–59,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(00)00103-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0016-7061(00)00103-8</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Soon, Y. K., Kalra, Y. P., and Abboud, S. A.: Comparison of some methods for
the determination of total sulfur in plant tissues, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant
Anal., 27, 809–818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629609369598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00103629609369598</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Tabatabai, M. A.: Chemistry of Sulfur in Soils, in: Chemical Processes in
Soils, edited by: Tabatabai, M. A. and Sparks, D. L., SSSA Book Series, Soil
Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 203–218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser8.c3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssabookser8.c3</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Tabatabai, M. A. and Bremner, J. M.: Forms of sulfur, carbon, nitrogen and
sulfur relationships in Iowa soils, Soil Sci., 114, 380–386,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197211000-00009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1097/00010694-197211000-00009</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Tisdale, S., Nelson, W., Beaton, J., and Havlin, J.: Soil Fertility and
Fertilizers, Prentice Hall, New Jersey,  251–254, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Viechtbauer, W.: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package, J.
Stat. Softw., 36, 1–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18637/jss.v036.i03</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., Butterbach-Bahl, K., He, N., Wang, Q., Xing, X., and Han, X.:
Nitrogen addition and mowing affect microbial nitrogen transformations in a
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> grassland in northern China, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 485–495,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ejss.12231</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Creamer, C. A., Wang, X., He, P., Xu, Z. W., and Jiang, Y.: The
effects of a 9-year nitrogen and water addition on soil aggregate phosphorus
and sulfur availability in a semi-arid grassland, Ecol. Indic., 61, 806–814,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.033</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Zhang, Y., He, P., Yin, J., Yang, J., Liu, H., Cai, J., Shi, Z.,
Feng, X., Dijkstra, F. A., Han, X., and Jiang, Y.: Intensity and frequency
of nitrogen addition alter soil chemical properties depending on mowing
management in a temperate steppe, J. Environ. Manage., 224, 77–86,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.036</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
White, R. P., Murray, S., and Rohweder, M.: Pilot analysis of global
ecosystems: grassland ecosystems, World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 12–13,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Williams, C. H. and Steinbergs, A.: Soil sulphur fractions as chemical
indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils, Aust. J. Agr. Res.,
10, 340–352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9590340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/AR9590340</ext-link>, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wulff-Zottele, C., Gatzke, N., Kopka, J., Orellana, A., Hoefgen, R., Fisahn,
J., and Hesse, H.: Photosynthesis and metabolism interact during acclimation
of Arabidopsis thaliana to high irradiance and sulphur depletion, Plant,
Cell Environ., 33, 1974–1988,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02199.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02199.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Yang, H., Jiang, L., Li, L., Li, A., Wu, M., and Wan, S.:
Diversity-dependent stability under mowing and nutrient addition:<?pagebreak page2904?> evidence
from a 7-year grassland experiment, Ecol. Lett., 15, 619–626,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01778.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01778.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Z., Singh, B. R., Hansen, S., Hu, Z., and Riley, H.: Aggregate
associated sulfur fractions in long-term (&gt; 80 Years) fertilized
soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 71, 163–170,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0242" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2006.0242</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Han, X., He, N., Long, M., Huang, J., Zhang, G., Wang, Q., and
Han, X.: Increase in ammonia volatilization from soil in response to N
deposition in Inner Mongolia grasslands, Atmos. Environ., 84, 156–162,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.052</ext-link>, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Isbell, F., Stevens, C., Han, X., He, N., Zhang, G., Yu,
Q., Huang, J., and Han, X.: Rapid plant species loss at high rates and at
low frequency of N addition in temperate steppe, Glob. Change Boil., 20,
3520–3529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12611</ext-link>, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, R., Cai, J., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Huang, S., and
Jiang, Y.: Impacts of fertilization practices on pH and the pH buffering
capacity of calcareous soil, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 62, 432–439,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1226685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00380768.2016.1226685</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Loreau, M., He, N., Zhang, G., and Han, X.: Mowing exacerbates
the loss of ecosystem stability under nitrogen enrichment in a temperate
grassland, Funct. Ecol., 31, 1637–1646,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1365-2435.12850</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Stevens, C. J., Lü, X., He, N., Wang, C., and Han,
X.: Effects of the frequency and the rate of N enrichment on community
structure in a temperate grassland, J. Plant Ecol., 11, 685–695,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtx041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jpe/rtx041</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, Y., Liu, X., Xu, W., Pan, Y., and Duan, L.:
Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to China: A model analysis on nitrogen
budget and critical load exceedance, Atmos. Environ., 153, 32–40,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.018</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Frequency and intensity of nitrogen addition alter soil inorganic sulfur fractions, but the effects vary with mowing management in a temperate steppe</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Sulfur (S) availability plays a vital role in driving functions of
terrestrial ecosystems, which can be largely affected by soil inorganic S
fractions and pool size. Enhanced nitrogen (N) input can significantly
affect soil S availability, but it still remains largely unknown if the N
effect varies with frequency of N addition and mowing management in
grasslands. To investigate changes in the soil S pool and inorganic S fractions
(soluble S, adsorbed S, available S, and insoluble S), we conducted a field
experiment with different frequencies (two times per year vs. monthly additions per year)
and intensities (i.e., 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 50&thinsp;g&thinsp;N&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>) of NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> addition and mowing (unmown vs. mown) over
6 years in a temperate grassland of northern China. Generally, N addition
frequency, N intensity, and mowing significantly interacted with each other
to affect most of the inorganic S fractions. Specifically, a significant increase
in soluble S was only found at high N frequency with the increasing
intensity of N addition. Increasing N addition intensity enhanced adsorbed S
and available S concentrations at low N frequency in unmown plots; however,
both fractions were significantly increased with N intensity at both N
frequencies in mown plots. The high frequency of N addition increased the
concentrations of adsorbed S and available S in comparison to the low frequency of
N addition only in mown plots. Changes in soil S fractions were mainly
related to soil pH, N availability, soil organic carbon (SOC), and plant S uptake. Our results
suggested that N input could temporarily replenish soil-available S by
promoting dissolution of soil-insoluble S with decreasing soil pH and
mineralization of organic S due to increasing plant S uptake. However, the
significant decrease in organic S and total S concentrations with N addition
intensity in mown plots indicated that N addition together with biomass
removal would eventually cause soil S depletion in this temperate grassland
in the long term. Our results further indicated that using large and
infrequent N additions to simulate N deposition can overestimate the main
effects of N deposition and mowing management on soil S availability in
semiarid grasslands.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aneja, V. P., Roelle, P. A., Murray, G. C., Southerland, J., Erisman, J. W.,
Fowler, D., Asman, W. A. H., and Patni, N.: Atmospheric nitrogen compounds
II: emissions, transport, transformation, deposition and assessment, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 1903–1911, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00543-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00543-4</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Barrow, N. J.: A comparison of the mineralization of nitrogen and of sulphur
from decomposing organic materials, Aust. J. Agr. Res., 11, 960–969,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9600960" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9600960</a>, 1960.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barton, L., Wan, G. G. Y., Buck, R. P., and Colmer, T. D.: Does N fertiliser
regime influence N leaching and quality of different-aged turfgrass
(<i>Pennisetum clandestinum</i>) stands?, Plant Soil, 316, 81–96,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9761-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9761-7</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bilbrough, C. J. and Caldwell, M. M.: Exploitation of springtime ephemeral N
pulses by six great basin plant species, Ecology, 78, 231–243,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2265992" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/2265992</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Blum, S. C., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Caires, E. F., and Alleoni, L. R. F.:
Sulfur forms in organic substrates affecting S mineralization in soil,
Geoderma, 200, 156–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.02.003</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bobbink, R., Hicks, K., Galloway, J., Spranger, T., Alkemade, R., Ashmore,
M., Bustamante, M., Cinderby, S., Davidson, E., Dentener, F., Emmett, B.,
Erisman, J. W., Fenn, M., Gilliam, F., Nordin, A., Pardo, L., and De Vries,
W.: Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant
diversity: a synthesis, Ecol. Appl., 20, 30–59,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1140.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1140.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bremer, D. J. and Ham, J. M.: Measurement and modeling of soil CO<sub>2</sub>
flux in a temperate grassland under mowed and burned regimes, Ecol. Appl.,
12, 1318–1328, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, B., Shan, X., Shen, D., and Mou, S.: Nature of the HCl-soluble sulfate
in the sequential extraction for sulfur speciation in soils, Fresen. J.
Anal. Chem., 357, 941–945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050278</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, H., Yang, L., Wen, L., Luo, P., Liu, L., Yang, Y., Wang, K., and Li,
D.: Effects of nitrogen deposition on soil sulfur cycling, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1568–1577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gb005423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gb005423</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, X., Luo, Y., Su, B., Verburg, P. S. J., Hui, D., Obrist, D., Arnone,
J. A., Johnson, D. W., and Evans, R. D.: Responses of net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub>
exchange to nitrogen fertilization in experimentally manipulated grassland
ecosystems, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1956–1963,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.001</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chiang, H. C., Lo, J. C., and Yeh, K. C.: Genes associated with heavy metal
tolerance and accumulation in Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri: a
genomic survey with cDNA microarray, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6792–6798,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es061432y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es061432y</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
De Bona, F. D. and Monteiro, F. A.: Nitrogen and sulfur fertilization and
dynamics in a Brazilian Entisol under pasture, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 74,
1248–1258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0228" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0228</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dentener, F., Drevet, J., Lamarque, J. F., Bey, I., Eickhout, B., Fiore, A.
M., Hauglustaine, D., Horowitz, L. W., Krol, M., Kulshrestha, U. C.,
Lawrence, M., Galy-Lacaux, C., Rast, S., Shindell, D., Stevenson, D., Van
Noije, T., Atherton, C., Bell, N., Bergman, D., Butler, T., Cofala, J.,
Collins, B., Doherty, R., Ellingsen, K., Galloway, J., Gauss, M., Montanaro,
V., Müller, J. F., Pitari, G., Rodriguez, J., Sanderson, M., Solmon, F.,
Strahan, S., Schultz, M., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Wild, O.: Nitrogen and
sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4003,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002672</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Eriksen, J. and Askegaard, M.: Sulphate leaching in an organic crop rotation
on sandy soil in Denmark, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 78, 107–114,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00117-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00117-6</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Feechan, A., Kwon, E., Yun, B. W., Wang, Y., Pallas, J. A., and Loake, G.
J.: A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant disease resistance, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 8054–8059,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501456102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501456102</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Ghani, A., McLaren, R., and Swift, R.: Sulphur mineralisation and
transformations in soils as influenced by additions of carbon, nitrogen and
sulphur, Soil Biol. Biochem., 24, 331–341,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90193-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(92)90193-2</a>,1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hao, Y., Kang, X., Wu, X., Cui, X., Liu, W., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Wang, Y.,
Xu, Z., and Zhao, H.: Is frequency or amount of precipitation more important
in controlling CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes in the 30-year-old fenced and the moderately
grazed temperate steppe?, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 17, 63–71,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.03.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.03.011</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Harpole, W. S., Potts, D. L., and Suding, K. N.: Ecosystem responses to
water and nitrogen amendment in a California grassland, Glob. Change Boil.,
13, 2341–2348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01447.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01447.x</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. D.: Effects of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient
uptake, Agron. J., 92, 644–649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924644x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924644x</a>,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Janzen, H. H. and Ellert, B. H.: Sulfur dynamics in cultivated temperate
agroecosystems, in: Sulphur in the Environment, edited by: Maynard, D. G., Marcel
Dekker, New York, 11–43, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, D. W. and Todd, D.: Relationships among iron, aluminum, carbon, and
sulfate in a variety of forest soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47, 792–800,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700040035x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700040035x</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Juszczuk, I. M. and Ostaszewska, M.: Respiratory activity, energy and redox
status in sulphur-deficient bean plants, Environ. Exp. Bot., 74, 245–254,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.06.006</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Kertesz, M. A. and Mirleau, P.: The role of soil microbes in plant sulphur
nutrition, J. Exp. Bot., 55, 1939–1945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh176</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Koncz, P., Balogh, J., Papp, M., Hidy, D., Pintér, K., Fóti, S.,
Klumpp, K., and Nagy, Z.: Higher soil respiration under mowing than under
grazing explained by biomass differences, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 103,
201–215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9732-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9732-3</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kost, D., Chen, L., and Dick, W. A.: Predicting plant sulfur deficiency in
soils: results from Ohio, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 44, 1091–1098,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0298-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0298-y</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Li, S., Lin, B., and Zhou, W.: Soil organic sulfur mineralization in the
presence of growing plants under aerobic or waterlogged conditions, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 33, 721–727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00205-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00205-4</a>,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lü, X.,&thinsp;Lü, F., Zhou, L., Han, X., and Han, X.: Stoichiometric
response of dominant grasses to fire and mowing in a semi-arid grassland, J.
Arid Environ., 78, 154–160, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.008</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
McGill, W. B. and Cole, C. V.: Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C,
N, S and P through soil organic matter, Geoderma, 26, 267–286,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(81)90024-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(81)90024-0</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L.: Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic
Matter, in: Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 – Chemical and Microbiological
Properties, 2nd Edn., edited by: Miller, A. L., Keeney, R. H., and Soil, D. R.,
Science Society of America, Madison, 539–579, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Niknahad-Gharmakher, H., Machet, J. M., Beaudoin, N., and Recous, S.:
Estimation of sulfur mineralization and relationships with nitrogen and
carbon in soils, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 45, 297–304,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0332-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0332-0</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Niu, S., Wu, M., Han, Y. I., Xia, J., Zhang, Z. H. E., Yang, H., and Wan,
S.: Nitrogen effects on net ecosystem carbon exchange in a temperate steppe,
Glob. Change Boil., 16, 144–155,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01894.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01894.x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Nodvin, S. C., Driscoll, C. T., and Likens, G. E.: The effect of pH on
sulfate adsorption by a forest soil, Soil Sci., 142, 69–75,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198608000-00002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198608000-00002</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Phoenix, G. K., Emmett, B. A., Britton, A. J., Caporn, S. J. M., Dise, N.
B., Helliwell, R., Jones, L., Leake, J. R., Leith, I. D., Sheppard, L. J.,
Sowerby, A., Pilkington, M. G., Rowe, E. C., Ashmore, M. R., and Power, S.
A.: Impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: responses of multiple plant
and soil parameters across contrasting ecosystems in long-term field
experiments, Glob. Change Boil., 18, 1197–1215,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02590.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02590.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Riscassi, A., Scanlon, T., and Galloway, J.: Stream geochemical response to
reductions in acid deposition in headwater streams: Chronic versus episodic
acidification recovery, Hydrol. Proc., 33, 512–526,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13349</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Roberts, T. L. and Bettany, J. R.: The influence of topography on the nature
and distribution of soil sulfur across a narrow environmental gradient, Can.
J. Soil Sci., 65, 419–434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss85-046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss85-046</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Scherer, H. W., Welp, G., and Förster, S.: Sulfur fractions in
particle-size separates as influenced by long-term application of mineral
and organic fertilizers, Plant, Soil Environ., 58, 242–248,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.17221/78/2012-PSE" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17221/78/2012-PSE</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Scherer, H. W.: Sulfur in soils, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 172, 326–335,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900037</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K., and Collins, S. L.: A framework for assessing
ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by
global change, Ecology, 90, 3279–3289,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, D., Lehmann, J., Tekalign, M., Fritzsche, F., and Zech, W.: Sulfur
fractions in particle-size separates of the sub-humid Ethiopian highlands as
influenced by land use changes, Geoderma, 102, 41–59,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(00)00103-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(00)00103-8</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Soon, Y. K., Kalra, Y. P., and Abboud, S. A.: Comparison of some methods for
the determination of total sulfur in plant tissues, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant
Anal., 27, 809–818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629609369598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629609369598</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Tabatabai, M. A.: Chemistry of Sulfur in Soils, in: Chemical Processes in
Soils, edited by: Tabatabai, M. A. and Sparks, D. L., SSSA Book Series, Soil
Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 203–218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser8.c3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser8.c3</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Tabatabai, M. A. and Bremner, J. M.: Forms of sulfur, carbon, nitrogen and
sulfur relationships in Iowa soils, Soil Sci., 114, 380–386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197211000-00009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197211000-00009</a>, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Tisdale, S., Nelson, W., Beaton, J., and Havlin, J.: Soil Fertility and
Fertilizers, Prentice Hall, New Jersey,  251–254, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Viechtbauer, W.: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package, J.
Stat. Softw., 36, 1–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C., Butterbach-Bahl, K., He, N., Wang, Q., Xing, X., and Han, X.:
Nitrogen addition and mowing affect microbial nitrogen transformations in a
C<sub>4</sub> grassland in northern China, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 485–495,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12231</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, R., Creamer, C. A., Wang, X., He, P., Xu, Z. W., and Jiang, Y.: The
effects of a 9-year nitrogen and water addition on soil aggregate phosphorus
and sulfur availability in a semi-arid grassland, Ecol. Indic., 61, 806–814,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.033</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, R., Zhang, Y., He, P., Yin, J., Yang, J., Liu, H., Cai, J., Shi, Z.,
Feng, X., Dijkstra, F. A., Han, X., and Jiang, Y.: Intensity and frequency
of nitrogen addition alter soil chemical properties depending on mowing
management in a temperate steppe, J. Environ. Manage., 224, 77–86,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.036</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
White, R. P., Murray, S., and Rohweder, M.: Pilot analysis of global
ecosystems: grassland ecosystems, World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 12–13,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, C. H. and Steinbergs, A.: Soil sulphur fractions as chemical
indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils, Aust. J. Agr. Res.,
10, 340–352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9590340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9590340</a>, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Wulff-Zottele, C., Gatzke, N., Kopka, J., Orellana, A., Hoefgen, R., Fisahn,
J., and Hesse, H.: Photosynthesis and metabolism interact during acclimation
of Arabidopsis thaliana to high irradiance and sulphur depletion, Plant,
Cell Environ., 33, 1974–1988,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02199.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02199.x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, H., Jiang, L., Li, L., Li, A., Wu, M., and Wan, S.:
Diversity-dependent stability under mowing and nutrient addition: evidence
from a 7-year grassland experiment, Ecol. Lett., 15, 619–626,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01778.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01778.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Z., Singh, B. R., Hansen, S., Hu, Z., and Riley, H.: Aggregate
associated sulfur fractions in long-term (&gt;&thinsp;80 Years) fertilized
soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 71, 163–170,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0242" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0242</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Han, X., He, N., Long, M., Huang, J., Zhang, G., Wang, Q., and
Han, X.: Increase in ammonia volatilization from soil in response to N
deposition in Inner Mongolia grasslands, Atmos. Environ., 84, 156–162,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.11.052</a>, 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Isbell, F., Stevens, C., Han, X., He, N., Zhang, G., Yu,
Q., Huang, J., and Han, X.: Rapid plant species loss at high rates and at
low frequency of N addition in temperate steppe, Glob. Change Boil., 20,
3520–3529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12611</a>, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, R., Cai, J., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Huang, S., and
Jiang, Y.: Impacts of fertilization practices on pH and the pH buffering
capacity of calcareous soil, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 62, 432–439,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1226685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1226685</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Loreau, M., He, N., Zhang, G., and Han, X.: Mowing exacerbates
the loss of ecosystem stability under nitrogen enrichment in a temperate
grassland, Funct. Ecol., 31, 1637–1646,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12850</a>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Stevens, C. J.,&thinsp;Lü, X., He, N., Wang, C., and Han,
X.: Effects of the frequency and the rate of N enrichment on community
structure in a temperate grassland, J. Plant Ecol., 11, 685–695,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtx041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtx041</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, Y., Liu, X., Xu, W., Pan, Y., and Duan, L.:
Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to China: A model analysis on nitrogen
budget and critical load exceedance, Atmos. Environ., 153, 32–40,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.018</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
