<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-2997-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ocean acidification and high irradiance stimulate the photo-physiological
fitness, growth and carbon production of the Antarctic cryptophyte
<italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic></article-title><alt-title>OA and HL promote growth of <italic>Geminigera</italic></alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{OA and HL promote growth of \textit{Geminigera}}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Trimborn et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Trimborn</surname><given-names>Scarlett</given-names></name>
          <email>scarlett.trimborn@awi.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1434-9927</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Thoms</surname><given-names>Silke</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Karitter</surname><given-names>Pascal</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bischof</surname><given-names>Kai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>EcoTrace, Biogeosciences section, Alfred Wegener Institute, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Marine Botany, Department 2 Biology/Chemistry, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Scarlett Trimborn (scarlett.trimborn@awi.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>2997</fpage><lpage>3008</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Scarlett Trimborn et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e117">Ecophysiological studies on Antarctic cryptophytes to assess whether
climatic changes such as ocean acidification and enhanced stratification
affect their growth in Antarctic coastal waters in the future are lacking so
far. This is the first study that investigates the combined effects of the increasing availability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (400 and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) and
irradiance (20, 200 and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) on growth,
elemental composition and photophysiology of the Antarctic cryptophyte
<italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic>. Under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this species was characterized by a pronounced
sensitivity to increasing irradiance with complete growth inhibition at the
highest light intensity. Interestingly, when grown under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> this
negative light effect vanished, and it reached the highest rates of growth and
particulate organic carbon production at the highest irradiance compared to
the other tested experimental conditions. Our results for <italic>G. cryophila</italic> reveal beneficial
effects of ocean acidification in conjunction with enhanced irradiance on
growth and photosynthesis. Hence, cryptophytes such as <italic>G. cryophila</italic> may be potential
winners of climate change, potentially thriving better in more stratified
and acidic coastal waters and contributing in higher abundance to future
phytoplankton assemblages of coastal Antarctic waters.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e220">Even though Antarctic coastal waters comprise a relatively small area
relative to the open ocean, these waters are highly productive due to the
constant supply of macronutrients and iron (Arrigo et al., 2008). Shelf
waters adjacent to the western Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) are currently
undergoing rapid physical changes, exhibiting more rapid warming rates
than anywhere in Antarctica over the last decades (Ducklow et al., 2007,
2013). Rising air temperature resulted in shorter sea ice seasons (Smith and
Stammerjohn, 2001) with contrasting effects on phytoplankton biomass,
composition and productivity between the northern and southern WAP. For the
latter, the earlier retreat of sea ice together with the observed increase
in surface water temperature led to shallow water column stratification,
which favored phytoplankton growth and productivity. In the northern part of
the WAP on the other hand, the earlier disappearance of sea ice was
associated with greater wind activities and more cloud formation. As a
consequence, a deepening of the upper mixed layer was found, providing less
favorable light conditions. Next to reduced chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation
(Montes-Hugo et al., 2009) and primary production (Moreau et al., 2015), a
decline in large phytoplankton such as diatoms relative to the whole
community was observed (Montes-Hugo et al., 2009; Rozema et al., 2017).
Accordingly, a recurrent shift from diatoms to cryptophytes and small
flagellates was reported for waters north of the WAP, with important
implications for food web dynamics (Moline et al., 2004; Ducklow et al.,
2007; Montes-Hugo et al., 2009; Mendes et al., 2017). The frequent
occurrence of cryptophytes was previously reported after<?pagebreak page2998?> diatom blooms
(Moline and Prézelin, 1996) and was related to surface meltwater
stratification (Moline et al., 2004). As a result of rising global air
temperatures, surface water freshening is expected to shallow the upper
water layer, exposing phytoplankton to higher light intensity (Moreau et
al., 2015). Relative to diatoms and the prymnesiophyte <italic>Phaeocystis antarctica</italic>, cryptophytes were
found to be the main contributors to biomass in stratified and warm WAP
coastal waters potentially resulting from their high tolerance to withstand
high irradiances (Mendes et al., 2017). Considering the lack in
ecophysiological studies carried out with Antarctic ecologically relevant
cryptophyte species it remains unclear as yet whether the projected climatic
changes could promote cryptophyte growth in Antarctic coastal waters in the
future. Hence, higher abundances of cryptophytes could have important
implications for the biogeochemistry of these waters, as they are considered
to be inefficient vectors of carbon and thus could reduce the efficiency of
the biological carbon pump.</p>
      <p id="d1e233">Light availability strongly influences the rate of growth and carbon
fixation of phytoplankton (Falkowski and Raven, 2007). With increasing
irradiance, Antarctic phytoplankton species exhibited increased growth and
carbon fixation, but only until photosynthesis was saturated (Fiala and
Oriol, 1990; Heiden et al., 2016). When exposed to excessive radiation,
phytoplankton cells can become photo-inhibited and even damaged (Falkowski and
Raven, 2007). Cryptophytes are exceptional among eukaryotic microalgae as,  similar to diatoms, they contain chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proteins, the carotenoid
alloxanthin and phycobiliproteins homologous to red algal phycobiliproteins
(Gould et al., 2008). This pigment composition allows cryptophytes to cope
well under limited irradiance. Unlike diatoms and prymnesiophytes,
cryptophytes have no photo-protective de-epoxidation–epoxidation cycling of
xanthophyll pigments (e.g., diadinoxanthin, diatoxanthin), instead they rely
on chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proteins, which dissipate excess light
energy, as another type of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ; Funk et al.,
2011; Kana et al., 2012). While laboratory studies so far have mainly concentrated on disentangling the physiological response of Southern Ocean key
species of diatom and prymnesiophytes to different environmental factors, almost nothing is known on Antarctic cryptophytes. Apart from field studies
(Moline et al., 2004; Ducklow et al., 2007; Montes-Hugo et al., 2009),
almost nothing is known on how climate change could influence the
ecophysiology of Antarctic cryptophytes. Due to the increased solubility of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cold water, ocean acidification (OA) is anticipated to strongly
affect polar waters (Orr et al., 2005; Pachauri et al., 2014). For various
Antarctic diatoms and the prymnesiophyte <italic>P. antarctica</italic>, growth and/or carbon fixation
remained unaltered by OA alone (Riebesell et al., 1993; Boelen et al., 2011;
Hoogstraten et al., 2012; Trimborn et al., 2013; Hoppe et al., 2015; Heiden
et al., 2016). Recent studies suggest that Southern Ocean diatoms are more
prone to OA especially in conjunction with high light than the
prymnesiophyte <italic>Phaeocystis antarctica</italic> (Feng et al., 2010; Trimborn et al., 2017a, b; Beszteri et
al., 2018; Heiden et al., 2018, 2019; Koch et al., 2018). The
response of cryptophytes to OA is hitherto almost unexplored. The few
studies on temperate phytoplankton communities suggest that cryptophytes
were not affected by OA (Schulz et al., 2017), even when exposed in
combination with increased ultraviolet radiation (Domingues et al., 2014) or
warming (Sommer et al., 2015). Similarly, no discernible OA effect on
cryptophyte abundance was found in subantarctic (Donahue et al., 2019) and
Antarctic (Young et al., 2015) natural phytoplankton communities composed of
diatoms, cryptophytes and <italic>Phaeocystis</italic> spp.</p>
      <p id="d1e281">Based on previous studies on the single effects of light or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone,
we hypothesize that cryptophytes are able to cope well with OA and high
light conditions. Due to the limited information available on Antarctic
cryptophyte physiology, this study assessed OA effects and their interaction
with increasing irradiance on the physiology of the Antarctic cryptophyte
<italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic>. To this end, <italic>G. cryophila</italic> was grown under two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels (400 and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) in combination with three irradiance levels (20, 200 and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and their interactive effects on growth,
elemental composition and photo-physiology were assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Culture conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e370">Triplicate semicontinuous cultures of the Antarctic cryptophyte <italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic> (CCMP
2564) were grown in exponential phase at 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in sterile-filtered
(0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) Antarctic seawater (salinity 30.03). This seawater was enriched with
phosphate (final concentration of 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrate (final
concentration of 6.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Redfield,
1958), and trace metals and vitamins according to F/2 medium (Guillard
and Ryther, 1962). <italic>G. cryophila</italic> cells were grown under a 16 h light and 8 h dark cycle at
three constant light intensities (LL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20, ML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 and HL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>: LL – low light; ML – medium light; HL – high light) using light-emitting diode (LED) lamps
(SolarStinger LED SunStrip Marine Daylight, Econlux). Light intensities were
adjusted using a LI-1400 data logger (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). The three light treatments were
further combined with two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial pressures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 400
(ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatment) or 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm (OA treatment, Table 1). All
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments and the respective dilution media were continuously and
gently bubbled through a frit with humidified air of the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels, which were generated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free air (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Dominick Hunter, Kaarst, Germany) and pure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Air Liquide
Deutschland ltd., Düsseldorf, Germany) with a gas flow<?pagebreak page2999?> controller (CGM
2000, MCZ Umwelttechnik, Bad Nauheim, Germany). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas mixtures
were regularly monitored with a nondispersive infrared analyzer system
(LI6252; Li-Cor Biosciences) calibrated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free air and purchased
gas mixtures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppmv <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Air
Liquide Deutschland). Dilutions with the corresponding acclimation media
ensured that the pH level remained constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> units, Table 1)
and that the cells stayed in the exponential growth phase. <italic>G. cryophila</italic> cells were
acclimated to the matrix of three light intensities (LL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20, ML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200
and HL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels
(ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 and OA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) for at least 2 weeks prior
to the start of the main experiment. Despite several attempts, <italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not grow
at ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in conjunction with HL. For the main experiments, cells
grew in exponential phase and final sampling took place between 7280 and
17 161 cells mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e836">Partial pressures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the ambient and ocean
acidification (OA) treatments were calculated from measured pH,
concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), silicate and phosphate,
temperature, and salinity using the CO2Sys program (Pierrot et al., 2006).
For all parameters, values are given for the abiotic control bottles
(abiotic, bubbled seawater without cells) and the culture bottles at the end
of the experiment (biotic). Different letters indicate
significant differences between treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Values
represent the means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Target <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">pH  </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">DIC </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">(NBS) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="center">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">abiotic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">biotic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">abiotic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">biotic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">abiotic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">biotic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 400</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">372</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">398</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2024</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2062</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA, 1000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">986</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">865</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2160</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2195</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Seawater carbonate chemistry</title>
      <p id="d1e1260">The pH of the different cultures and the culture medium was measured every
other day and on the final sampling day using a pH ion meter (pH meter 827,
Metrohm), calibrated (three-point calibration) with National Institute of
Standards and Technology-certified buffer systems. The pH remained constant
at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
OA treatments, respectively (Table 1). Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC)
samples were sterile-filtered (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and stored at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 5 mL
gastight borosilicate bottles without headspace until analysis. DIC was
measured colorimetrically in duplicates with a QuAAtro autoanalyzer (Seal
Analytical, Stoll et al., 2001). The carbonate system was
calculated based on DIC, pH, silicate (97 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), phosphate
(6.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), temperature (2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and salinity
(30.03) using the CO2Sys program (results shown in Table 1; Pierrot et al., 2006) choosing the equilibrium constant of
Mehrbach et al. (1973) refitted by Dickson
and Millero (1987).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Growth, elemental stoichiometry and composition</title>
      <p id="d1e1375">Cell count samples of every <italic>G. cryophila</italic> treatment were taken on a daily basis at the
same time of day and were determined immediately after sampling using a
Coulter Multisizer III (Beckmann-Coulter, Fullerton, USA). Cell-specific
growth rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, unit d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fin</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fin</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the cell concentrations at the beginning
and the end of the experiments, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
corresponding duration of incubation in days.</p>
      <p id="d1e1473">Particulate organic carbon (POC) and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) were
measured after filtration onto precombusted (12 h, 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
glass fiber filters (GF/F, pore size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, Whatman). Filters
were stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and dried for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h at 64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C prior to sample preparation. Analysis was performed using a Euro Vector CHNS-O elemental analyzer (Euro Elemental Analyzer 3000,
HEKAtech GmbH, Wegberg, Germany). Contents of POC and PON were corrected for
blank measurements and normalized to filtered volume and cell densities to
yield cellular quotas. Production rates of POC and PON were calculated by
multiplication of the cellular quota with the specific growth rate of the
respective treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Chlorophyll $a$ fluorescence}?><title>Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluorescence</title>
      <p id="d1e1558">The efficiency of photochemistry in photosystem II (PSII) was assessed in
all treatments using a fast repetition rate fluorometer (FRRf; FastOcean
PTX; Chelsea Technologies Group Ltd., West Molesey, United Kingdom) in
combination with a FastAct Laboratory system (Chelsea Technologies Group
Ltd., West Molesey, United Kingdom). Cells of the respective treatment were
dark-acclimated for 10 min, before minimum chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) fluorescence
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was recorded. Subsequently, a single turnover flashlet (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, wavelength 450 nm) was applied to
cumulatively saturate photosystem II (PSII), i.e., a single photochemical
turnover (Kolber et al., 1998). The single turnover saturation phase
comprised 100 flashlets on a 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>s pitch and was followed by a relaxation
phase comprising 40 flashlets on a 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>s pitch. This sequence was repeated 24
times within each acquisition. The saturation phase of the single turnover
acquisition was fitted according to Kolber et al. (1998). From this
measurement, the minimum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluorescence was
determined. Using these two parameters, the dark-adapted maximum PSII
quantum yield (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated according to the equation
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the fluorescence light curve (FLC),
cells were exposed for 5 min to eight actinic light levels ranging from 35
to 1324 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. From these measurements, the
light-adapted minimum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) fluorescence
of the single turnover acquisition was estimated. The effective PSII quantum
yield under ambient light (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was derived according to the
equation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Genty et al., 1989).
From this curve, absolute electron transport rates (ETRs, e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> PSII<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calculated following Suggett et al. (2004, 2009):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ETR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the functional absorption cross section of PSII
photochemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the applied instantaneous irradiance (photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Light-use characteristics were analyzed by fitting
irradiance-dependent ETRs according to Ralph and Gademann (2005), including
maximum ETR (ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), minimum saturating irradiance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
maximum light utilization efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Using the Stern–Volmer
equation, NPQ of chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluorescence was
calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. From the single turnover
measurement of dark-adapted cells, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the energy transfer
between PSII units (i.e., connectivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the re-oxidation of the electron
acceptor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the concentration of functional<?pagebreak page3000?> photosystem
II reaction centers ([RII]) were assessed from iterative algorithms for
induction (Kolber et al., 1998) and relaxation phase (Oxborough et al., 2012).
[RII] represents an estimator for the content of PSII in the sample and was
calculated according to the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M146" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RII</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LED</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an instrument-specific constant and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the photon
flux from the FRRf measuring LEDs. After the completion of the FLC, an
additional dark-adaptation period of 10 min was applied, followed by a
single turnover flashlet to check for recovery of PSII. Using the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured before and after the FLC, the yield recovery was
calculated and given as the percentage of the initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (before the
FLC). All measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were conducted at the growth
temperature of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Pigments</title>
      <p id="d1e2207">Samples for the determination of pigment concentration were filtered onto
GF/F filters and immediately frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until further
analysis. Pigments samples were homogenized and extracted in 90 % acetone
for 24 h at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the dark. After centrifugation (5 min, 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 13 000 rpm) and filtration through a 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m pore size
nylon syringe filter (Nalgene<sup>®</sup>, Nalge Nunc International,
Rochester, NY, USA), concentrations of chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and alloxanthin (Allo) were determined by reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The analysis was performed on a
LaChromElite<sup>®</sup> system equipped with a chilled autosampler
L-2200 and a DAD detector L-2450 (VWR-Hitachi International GmbH, Darmstadt,
Germany). A Spherisorb<sup>®</sup> ODS-2 column (25 cm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 mm, 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m particle size; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a LiChropher<sup>®</sup>
100-RP-18 guard cartridge was used for the separation of pigments, applying
a gradient according to Wright et al. (1991). Peaks were detected at 440 nm
and identified as well as quantified by co-chromatography with standards for
Allo, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DHI Lab Products, Hørsholm, Denmark) using the
software EZChrom Elite ver. 3.1.3. (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA,
USA). Pigment contents were normalized to filtered volume and cell densities
to yield cellular quotas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Statistics</title>
      <p id="d1e2346">Combined effects of the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ambient and OA) and light (LL, ML and HL) treatments on all experimental parameters were statistically
analyzed using two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with Bonferroni's
multiple comparison post tests. To test for significant differences between
light treatments of the OA-grown cells of <italic>G. cryophila</italic> cells one-way ANOVAs with
additional Bonferroni's multiple comparison post tests were applied. All
statistical analyses were performed using the program GraphPad Prism
(Version 5.00 for Windows, Graph Pad Software, San Diego California, USA), and the significance testing was done at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Seawater carbonate chemistry</title>
      <p id="d1e2393">The two target <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels of 400 and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>atm were
successfully achieved for abiotic control (abiotic, bubbled seawater without
cells) and culture bottles (biotic, one-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 1). As the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the abiotic control and culture bottles of the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatment were similar, this indicates that final cell numbers of <italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not
alter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the culture bottles relative to the culture medium.
Similar trends as for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were also apparent for the measured pH
values, which yielded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the culture
bottles of the ambient and OA treatments, respectively (Table 1). While DIC
concentrations were significantly enhanced for OA relative to the ambient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments (one-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), they also significantly
differed between abiotic control (abiotic, bubbled seawater without cells)
and culture bottles (biotic, Table 1).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3001?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Growth, elemental stoichiometry and composition</title>
      <p id="d1e2544">Growth rates were significantly affected by light (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but
not by OA or the interaction of both factors (Fig. 1a). In response to
increasing irradiance, growth rates of cells grown under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained unchanged between LL and ML but were negatively influenced by HL
as they were unable to grow. Under OA, however, growth rates significantly
increased between LL and ML by 89 % (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and between
ML and HL by 32 % (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Irrespective
of changes in irradiance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or their combination, cellular POC
contents did not change (Fig. 1b). Daily POC production rates, were,
however, significantly altered by increasing irradiance (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but not by OA or the interaction of both factors (Fig. 1c). While increasing
light intensity did not affect POC production rates of the ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
treatments, there was a significant OA-dependent enhancement of 69 %
between LL and ML (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of 39 % between ML and
HL (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Molar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were only
significantly influenced by the interaction of both factors together (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 1d). From LL to ML <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios did not change for both
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments, whereas from ML to HL the ratio declined by 12 % for
the OA treatment (one-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In response to increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased by 10 % when grown under LL (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but
remained unaltered at ML.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2760">Growth rate <bold>(a)</bold>, cellular content <bold>(b)</bold>, and production rate <bold>(c)</bold> of
particulate organic carbon (POC) and the molar ratio of carbon to nitrogen
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>d</bold>) for <italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic> acclimated to ambient (black bars) or high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (gray bars)
conditions combined with low (LL), medium (ML) or high light (HL). <italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not
grow under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HL as indicated by ng. Values represent the
means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Different letters indicate significant
differences between treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Pigments</title>
      <p id="d1e2864">For all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments, cellular concentrations of the measured
pigments (Allo, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) showed a strong and significant decline
between LL and ML (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 2). Between ML and HL,
however, different effects were seen, with a significant enhancement for Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Allo (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and no
effect for Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had generally no effect on
cellular pigment quotas (Allo, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) except for the Allo quotas
of the LL treatments, which displayed a significant OA-dependent decline of
26 % (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A significant interaction between light
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was only found for Allo quotas (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3023">Cellular concentrations of chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as alloxanthin (Allo) were determined for <italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic> acclimated to
ambient or high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions combined with low (LL), medium (ML) or
high light (HL). <italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not grow under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HL as indicated by
ng. Photosynthetic parameters were derived from at least three independent
measurements. Different letters indicate significant differences between
treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Values represent the means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD. Here, “fg” denotes femtogram.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treatment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Allo</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(fg cell<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(fg cell<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(fg cell<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> LL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2358</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">277</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">172</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA LL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2300</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">131</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ML</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">871</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA ML</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">662</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ng</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ng</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ng</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA HL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">772</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Chlorophyll $a$ fluorescence}?><title>Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluorescence</title>
      <p id="d1e3554">The dark-adapted maximum quantum yield of PSII (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was strongly
influenced by irradiance (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and their interaction (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 2a). With increasing
irradiance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally declined, whereas OA increased it
at LL (17 %, post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or did not change it at ML.
Noticeably, the interaction of HL and OA resulted in the lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value. Comparing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured before and after the
FLC, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery was calculated and given as the percentage of the
initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Neither high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nor the interaction of light
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery, whereas the increase in
irradiance had a significant effect (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 2b), being
increased by 11 % between LL and ML under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3807">The dark-adapted maximum PSII quantum yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and
the yield recovery after short-term light stress (% of initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(b)</bold> for
<italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic> acclimated to ambient (black bars) or high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (gray bars) conditions
combined with low (LL), medium (ML) or high light (HL). <italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not grow under
ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HL as indicated by ng. Values represent the means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Different letters indicate significant differences
between treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3920">The increase in  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or light alone had no effect on cellular
concentrations of functional photosystem II reaction centers<?pagebreak page3002?> ([RCII]), while
the interaction of both factors strongly altered [RCII] (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3a). From LL to ML [RCII] decreased under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(39 %, post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) while the combination of ML with OA
synergistically increased it (44 %, post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 3).
[RCII] was reduced by OA at LL (37 % post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the
combined effect of OA and ML led to an increase (49 %, post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the interaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and light together did
not change the energy transfer between PSII units (i.e., connectivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
only the increase in irradiance had a significant effect (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by 22 % between LL and ML under OA (post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 3b). While the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or light did not alter the
functional absorption cross sections of PSII (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the
interaction of both factors, however, had an effect (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. 3c). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were similar under LL and ML at
ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The interaction of OA and ML, however, lowered them
(post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 3). On the other hand, when grown under OA
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was larger under HL than under ML (one-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Re-oxidation times of the primary electron acceptor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
significantly changed with increasing irradiance (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but
not with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or the interaction of both factors together (Fig. 3d). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of OA-acclimated cells was much shorter at HL than at ML
(one-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4244">Maximum absolute electron transport rates (ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), minimum
saturating irradiances (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and maximum light utilization efficiencies
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) were determined for <italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic> acclimated to ambient or high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions combined with low (LL), medium (ML) or high light (HL). <italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not
grow under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HL as indicated by ng. Photosynthetic
parameters were derived from at least three independent measurements.
Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Values represent the means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Treatment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(e<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> PS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(rel. unit)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> LL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">126</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA LL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">279</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">142</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ML</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">265</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">102</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA ML</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">138</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ng</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ng</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ng</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OA HL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">379</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">156</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4787">Cellular concentrations of functional photosystem II reaction
centers [RCII] <bold>(a)</bold>, energy transfers between PSII units (i.e., connectivity,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(b)</bold>, functional absorption cross sections of PSII photochemistry (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(c)</bold> and re-oxidation times of the primary electron acceptor
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(d)</bold> were determined for <italic>Geminigera cryophila </italic>acclimated to ambient or
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions combined with low (LL), medium (ML) or high light
(HL). <italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not grow under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HL as indicated by ng.
Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4896">Absolute ETRs differed in amplitude and shape in response to the applied
changes in irradiance and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4a–c). Both maximum absolute
electron transport rates (ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and minimum saturating irradiances
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) followed the same trend and were significantly changed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but not by light or the interaction of both factors
(Table 3). OA significantly enhanced both parameters under LL (ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: post hoc: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but not under
ML. The maximum light utilization efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was significantly
affected by light (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the interaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
light (two-way ANOVA: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) but not by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone (Table 3). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
significantly increased from LL to ML at ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (53 %, post hoc:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) while such an effect was absent under ML and OA. Between ML
and HL, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> did not differ when grown under OA.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5096">Absolute electron transport rates (ETR, <bold>a</bold>–<bold>c</bold>) and non-photochemical
quenching (NPQ, <bold>d</bold>–<bold>f</bold>) were measured in response to increasing irradiance in
<italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic> acclimated to ambient (black circles) or high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (white circles)
conditions combined with <bold>(a)</bold> low (LL), <bold>(b)</bold> medium (ML) or <bold>(c)</bold> high light (HL).
<italic>G. cryophila</italic> did not grow under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HL. ETRs were obtained in three
individual measurements. Values represent the means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/2997/2019/bg-16-2997-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5177">NPQ generally went up with increasing actinic
irradiance during the FLC (Fig. 4d–f). Compared with the LL treatments, NPQ
values of the ML and HL treatments were as twice as high. There were no
differences in the NPQ pattern between the ML and HL treatments observed. Much
higher NPQ values were determined in the ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the
OA treatment under LL while such a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect was absent under ML.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e5216">Ecophysiological studies on Antarctic cryptophytes to assess whether
climatic changes such as ocean acidification and enhanced stratification
affect their growth in Antarctic coastal waters in the future are lacking so
far. This study can show that the Antarctic cryptophyte <italic>G. cryophila</italic> may be a potential
winner of such climatic conditions as it reached the<?pagebreak page3003?> highest rates of growth and
POC production when grown under HL and OA.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{\textit{Geminigera cryophila} is sensitive to increasing irradiance under ambient {$\protect\chem{\mathit{p}CO_{2}}$}}?><title><italic>Geminigera cryophila</italic> is sensitive to increasing irradiance under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e5244">The cryptophyte <italic>G. cryophila</italic> was well adapted to grow under LL and ML at ambient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, yielding similar growth, POC quotas and production rates as well
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (Fig. 1). In line with this, the exposure of the cryptophyte
<italic>Rhodomonas salina</italic> to 30 up to 150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> did not lead to any changes
in growth rate at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Hammer et al., 2002). Even though growth
and biomass remained unchanged in <italic>G. cryophila</italic> between LL and ML, acclimation to the
even higher light intensity of 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was
indicated by the reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and [RCII] (Figs. 2a, 3a). Such a decline in the number of photosystems is a typical photo-acclimation response
of most microalgae to increasing light and is usually accompanied by a
decrease in cellular concentrations of light-harvesting pigments (MacIntyre
et al., 2002), as seen here for cellular Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quotas (Table 2).
Even though most studies on temperate cryptophytes report a photo-protective
function of Allo, with higher amounts of this carotenoid toward high
irradiance (Funk et al., 2011; Laviale and Neveux, 2011), the reduction in
cellular Allo quotas from LL to ML in our<?pagebreak page3004?> tested species (Table 2) rather
suggests its role in light absorption. Similarly, cellular Allo contents
also declined between 40 and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
temperate cryptophyte <italic>Rhodomonas marina</italic> (Henriksen et al., 2002). In this study, various
photo-physiological parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 3)
did not change between LL and ML in <italic>G. cryophila</italic> while other photo-acclimation processes
such as higher ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> took place (Table 3). Such a light-dependent, apparent higher electron flow was accompanied by similar
high POC quotas and production rates between LL and ML (Fig. 1b, c) and
suggests saturation of the Calvin cycle and therewith the requirement for
alternative electron cycling to dissipate the excessive light energy. In the
temperate <italic>R. salina</italic>, the onset of NPQ was induced after saturation of the Calvin
cycle and was found to be located in the chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proteins and not in the
phycobiliproteins (Kana et al., 2012). In fact, NPQ was strongly enhanced in
<italic>G. cryophila</italic> between LL and ML at ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4). As ML-acclimated cells relative to
LL-acclimated ones also exhibited a higher potential of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
recovery after the FLC (Fig. 2b), it appears that all these
adjustments allowed a reduction in the excitation pressure on the
photosynthetic apparatus and protected <italic>G. cryophila</italic> well against short-term high light
exposure. Unexpectedly, <italic>G. cryophila</italic> was, however, unable to grow at the highest
light intensity of 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol photons m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under ambient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pointing towards its vulnerability of coping with HL under present-day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, long-term field observations have shown
that cryptophytes mainly occur under stratified conditions along the WAP
(e.g., Moline and Prézelin, 1996; Moline et al., 2004; Mendes et al.,
2013). A connection of this group with highly illuminated conditions was first
suggested by Mendes et al. (2017), but this data set lacks information on which cryptophyte
species were present and their photosynthetic responses. The reason for this
difference could be related to species- or strain-specific differences. On
the basis of our results, the <italic>G. cryophila</italic> strain tested here was indeed able to cope
well with medium, but not high irradiances. More tests with other
cryptophytes are certainly required to be able to better evaluate
cryptophytes' abilities to cope with high irradiances.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{OA alters the physiological response of \textit{G. cryophila} to high irradiance}?><title>OA alters the physiological response of <italic>G. cryophila</italic> to high irradiance</title>
      <p id="d1e5622">In line with previous studies on Antarctic diatoms and <italic>P. antarctica</italic> (Hoogstraten et al.,
2012; Heiden et al., 2016; Trimborn et al., 2017b), OA in conjunction with
low irradiance did not alter growth, cellular contents or production rates
of POC in <italic>G. cryophila</italic> (Fig. 1a–c). There was, however, an OA-dependent decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
under LL (Fig. 1d), resulting from a significant enhancement of PON quotas
between ambient and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pg N cell<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively). Hence, <italic>G. cryophila</italic> cells most probably benefitted from
lower energy investments to acquire inorganic carbon under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Whereas the two temperate cryptophytes <italic>Rhodomonas</italic> sp. and <italic>Chroomonas</italic> sp. (Burns and Beardall,
1987; Camiro-Vargas et al., 2005), similar to other Antarctic phytoplankton
taxa (Trimborn et al., 2013), were able to actively take up <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the operation of a carbon concentrating mechanism in <italic>G. cryophila</italic> has
not been tested so far. As typically observed for temperate phytoplankton
(Hopkinson et al., 2011; McCarthy et al., 2012; Yang and Gao, 2012), the
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was not used to fix more POC per cell by <italic>G. cryophila</italic> at LL (Fig. 1b,
c) but instead fueled protein buildup through conversion of carbohydrate
skeletons to proteins. N assimilation is energetically costly due to the
reduction steps involved (Sanz-Luque et al., 2015); therefore, the finding of
elevated PON buildup under OA and LL is surprising. In line with this,
ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> per PSII increased by 121 % from ambient to high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Table 3), likely used to reduce nitrite to ammonium. Calculating overall
maximum ETRs per cell (cETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [RCII], given in
amol cell<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), there was also an OA-dependent increase in
cETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 41 % (mean value of 76 and 107 amol cell<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under ambient and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively), but this increase was
comparably lower relative to ETR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> per PSII. The reason for this comes
from the strong reduction in [RCII] between ambient and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at LL
(Fig. 3). Next to the positive OA effect on N metabolism, the
photochemical efficiency  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <italic>G. cryophila</italic> was also significantly increased by
17 % by OA under LL (Fig. 2a). Unexpectedly, this effect was not the
result of reduced cellular quotas of the light-harvesting pigments (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as they remained the same under these conditions. Instead a
significant OA-dependent decrease of 26 % in the carotenoid Allo was found
(Table 2), which could explain the positive OA effect on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is in line with the OA-dependent reduction in NPQ observed
in LL-acclimated <italic>G. cryophila</italic> cells (Fig. 4), pointing towards a reduced need to
dissipate excess light energy following short-term high light exposure.
Overall, OA in conjunction with LL was beneficial for <italic>G. cryophila</italic>, with positive effects
in particular on N metabolism.</p>
      <p id="d1e5972">The beneficial OA effect on N assimilation under LL, however, vanished at ML
(Fig. 1d; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pg N cell<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), probably as a result of the higher N metabolism cost to
maintain photosynthesis under these conditions (Li et al., 2015). Based on
our results, the physiology of the cryptophyte <italic>G. cryophila</italic> remained more or less
unchanged between ambient and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at ML (Figs. 1, 2, 4; Tables 2
and 3). At the highest irradiance (HL), <italic>G. cryophila</italic> could not grow under ambient
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but surprisingly grew well under the same light intensity in
conjunction with OA, displaying the highest growth rates compared to all other
treatments (Fig. 1a). Similarly, this species also showed the highest production
rates of POC and PON (Fig. 1). Compared with the Antarctic diatoms
and <italic>P. antarctica</italic> tested so far, which exhibited either negative or neutral effects in response
to OA and high irradiance on growth and/or<?pagebreak page3005?> photosynthesis (Feng et al.,
2010; Heiden et al., 2016, 2019; Trimborn et al., 2017a, b;  Koch
et al., 2019), growth and photosynthesis of the cryptophyte benefitted
synergistically from OA and HL. Looking at the significantly higher amounts
of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and Allo per cell and its larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSII</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between ML and
HL under OA (Table 2, Fig. 3c), this species even reinforced its
capacity to absorb light. Faster electron drainage into downstream processes
was evident by the shorter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> re-oxidation time between ML and HL under OA
(Fig. 3d), supporting the idea that this species indeed managed to cope well with
these conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Implications for the ecology of \textit{G. cryophila }in future coastal Antarctic waters}?><title>Implications for the ecology of <italic>G. cryophila </italic>in future coastal Antarctic waters</title>
      <p id="d1e6088">Along the coast of the WAP, diatoms, prymnesiophytes
and cryptophytes represent the main phytoplankton groups, which form
prominent blooms and therefore strongly contribute to carbon biomass
buildup (Garibotti et al., 2005; Trimborn et al., 2015). The occurrence of
cryptophytes in this region was associated with low salinity and warm
stratified surface waters (Moline and Prézelin, 1996; Moline et al.,
2004; Mendes et al., 2013, 2017). Only recently, it was
suggested by Mendes et al. (2017) that a high tolerance of cryptophytes to withstand high
irradiances could potentially explain their occurrence in well-illuminated
surface waters. Our results from a short-term
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> light experiment point towards a high ability of <italic>G. cryophila</italic> to acclimate to
such conditions and to cope well with medium, but not high irradiances; whether this applies to other Antarctic cryptophyte species as well needs
further testing. Also, it remains unclear whether similar responses would be
found when exposed in the longer term. In general, with respect to the
projected climatic changes little is known about the potential <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
sensitivity of cryptophytes. Previous studies mainly assessed the response
to OA of cryptophytes at the community level, and this showed no discernible
effects on their abundance (Domingues et al., 2014; Sommer et al., 2015;
Young et al., 2015; Schulz et al., 2017; Donahue et al., 2019). This study
is the first at the species level to show that the combination of OA and
high irradiance promoted growth and biomass production in the Antarctic
cryptophyte <italic>G. cryophila</italic>. In fact, while HL conditions inhibited growth of this species
under ambient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the combination of OA and HL, on the other hand,
enabled it to grow and to cope even better with the applied environmental
conditions, reaching highest growth and POC production rates (Fig. 1). This
was also accompanied with a high photo-physiological capacity of this species
when exposed in the short term to increasing irradiances. The beneficial
effect of OA and HL for <italic>G. cryophila</italic> is contrary to previous observations, where growth
and/or photosynthesis were inhibited in several diatoms, but without any effect on the prymnesiophytes <italic>P. antarctica</italic> (Feng et al., 2010; Trimborn et al., 2017a, b; Beszteri
et al., 2018; Heiden et al., 2018, 2019; Koch et al., 2018).
Hence, <italic>G. cryophila</italic> could be a potential winner of climate change, with higher
abundances and an increased contribution to the productivity of future
stratified, acidified and well-illuminated coastal Antarctic waters. This
study further confirms previous results (Moline et al., 2004; Ducklow et
al., 2007; Montes-Hugo et al., 2009; Mendes et al., 2017), which point
to a stronger importance of flagellates in the future. A functional
shift away from efficient carbon sinkers such as diatoms to less efficient
carbon vectors such as flagellates including cryptophytes and
prymnesiophytes could, however, diminish the strength of the biological
carbon pump of future Antarctic coastal waters.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6147">The raw data of this study are available
in the PANGAEA data repository (<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.904010</uri>,
Trimborn, 2019).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6156">ScT designed the study. PK conducted the experiment. ScT, SiT and PK
analyzed the data. ScT prepared the paper with contributions from SiT, PK
and KB.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6162">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6168">Helen Soares de Souza, Jasmin P. Heiden, Tina Brenneis and Britta Meyer are
thanked for the support in the laboratory. Scarlett Trimborn and Pascal Karitter were funded by the
Helmholtz association (Young Investigator Group <italic>EcoTrace</italic>, VH-NG-901).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6176">This research has been supported by the Helmholtz Association (grant no. VH-NG-901).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication  were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6189">This paper was edited by Emilio Marañón and reviewed by John Beardall and Marco J. Cabrerizo.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G., and Long, M.: Coastal Southern Ocean: A
strong anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 1–6,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035624" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035624</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beszteri, S., Thoms, S., Benes, V., Harms, L., and Trimborn, S.: Acclimation
to ocean acidification and high light in three Southern Ocean phytoplankton
species: A transcriptomic study, Protist, 169, 958–975, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2018.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.protis.2018.08.003</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boelen, P., van de Poll, W. H., van der Strate, H. J., Neven, I. A.,
Beardall, J., and Buma, A. G. J.: Neither elevated nor reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
affects the photophysiological performance of the marine Antarctic diatom
<italic>Chaetoceros brevis</italic>, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 406, 38–45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.012</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Burns, B. D. and Beardall, J.: Utilization of inorganic carbon by marine
microalgae, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 107, 75–86, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Camiro-Vargas, T. K., Hernandez-Ayon, J. M., Valenzuela-Espinoza, E.,
Delgadillo-Hinojosa, F., and Cajal-Medrano, R.: Dissolved inorganic carbon
uptake by <italic>Rhodomonas</italic> sp. and <italic>Isochrysis aff. galbana</italic> determined by a potentiometric technique, Aquacult.
Eng., 33, 83–95, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dickson, A. G.  and Millero, F. J.: A comparison of the equilibrium
constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media, Deep-Sea
Res., 34, 1733–1743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90021-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(87)90021-5</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Domingues, R. B., Guerra, C. C., Barbosa, A. B., Brotas, V., Galvao, H. M.,
and Notes, A.: Effects of ultraviolet radiation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase on
winter phytoplankton assemblages in a temperate coastal lagoon,  J. Plankton
Res.,  36, 672–684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/fbt135</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donahue, K., Klaas, C., Dillingham, P. W., and Hoffmann, L. J.: Combined
effects of ocean acidification and increased light intensity on natural
phytoplankton communities from two Southern Ocean water masses, J. Plankton
Res., 41, 30–45, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fby048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/plankt/fby048</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ducklow, H. W., Baker, K., Martinson, D. G., Quetin, L. B., Ross, R. M.,
Smith, R. C., Stammerjohn, R. C., Vernet, M., and Fraser, W.: Marine pelagic
ecosystems: the West Antarctic Peninsula, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 362, 67–94, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ducklow, H. W., Fraser, W. R., Meredith, M. P., Stammerjohn, S. E., Doney, S. C.,
Martinson, D. G., Sailley, S. F., Schofield, O. M., Steinberg, D. K., Venables,
H. J., and Amsler, C. D.: West Antarctic Peninsula: An ice-dependent coastal
marine ecosystem in transition, Oceanography, 26, 190–203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.62" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2013.62</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P. G.  and Raven, J. A.: Aquatic Photosynthesis, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 501 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Feng, Y., Hare, C. E., Rose, J. M., Handy, S. M., DiTullio, G. R., Lee, P.
A., Smith, W. O., Peloquin, J., Tozzi, S., Sun, J., Zhang, Y.,
Dunbar, R. B., Long, M. C., Sohst, B., Lohan, M., and Hutchins, D. A.:
Interactive effects of iron, irradiance and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on Ross Sea
phytoplankton, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 57, 368–383,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fiala, M. and Oriol, L.: Light-temperature interactions on the growth of Antarctic diatoms, Polar Biol., 10, 629–36, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Funk, C., Alami, M., Tibiletti, T., and Green, B. R.: High light stress and
the onehelix LHC-like proteins of the cryptophyte <italic>Guillardia theta</italic>, BBA-Bioenergetics, 1807, 841–846, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Garibotti, I. A., Vernet, M., and Ferrario, M. E.: Annually recurrent phytoplanktonic assemblages during summer in the seasonal ice zone west of the Antarctic Peninsula (Southern Ocean), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 52, 1823–1841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2005.05.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2005.05.003</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Genty, B., Briantais, J.-M., and Baker, N. R.: The relationship between the
quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of
chlorophyll fluorescence, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 990, 87–92,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Gould, S. B., Waller, R. F., and McFadden, G. I.: Plastid evolution, Annu.
Rev. Plant Biol., 59, 491–517, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guillard, R. R. L. and Ryther, J. H.: Studies of marine planktonic diatoms:
I. <italic>Cyclotella nana</italic> Hustedt, and <italic>Detonula confervacea</italic> (Cleve), Gran., Can. J. Microbiol., 8, 229–239,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/m62-029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/m62-029</ext-link>, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hammer, A., Schumann, R., and Schubert, H.: Light and temperature
acclimation of <italic>Rhodomonas</italic> <italic>salina</italic> (Cryptophyceae): Photosynthetic performance, Aquat. Microb.
Ecol., 29, 287–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame029287" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/ame029287</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heiden, J. P., Bischof, K., and Trimborn, S.: Light intensity modulates the
response of two Antarctic diatom species to ocean acidification, Front. Mar.
Sci.,  3, 260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2016.00260</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heiden, J. P., Thoms, S., Bischof, K., and Trimborn, S.: Ocean acidification
stimulates particulate organic carbon accumulation in two Antarctic diatom
species under moderate and high solar radiation, J. Phycol.,  54, 505–517, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12753" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/jpy.12753</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heiden, J. P., Völkner, C., Jones, E., Van de Poll, W. H., Buma A. G.
J., Meredith, M. P., De Baar, H., Bischof, K., Wolf-Gladrow, D., and Trimborn,
S.: Impact of ocean acidification and high solar radiation on productivity
and species composition of a late summer phytoplankton community of the
coastal Western Antarctic Peninsula, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11147" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11147</ext-link>, online first, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Henriksen, P., Riemann, B., Sorensen, H. M., and Sorensen, H. L.: Effects of
nutrient-limitation and irradiance on marine phytoplankton pigments, J.
Plankton Res., 24,  835–858, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoogstraten, A., Timmermans, K. R., and de Baar, H. J. W.: Morphological and
physiological effects in <italic>Proboscia Alata</italic> (Bacillariophyceae) grown under different light
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions of the modern Southern Ocean, J. Phycol., 48,
559–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01148.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01148.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hopkinson, B. M., Dupont, C. L., Allen, A. E., and Morel, F. M. M.: Efficiency
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-concentrating mechanism of diatoms, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 108, 3830–3837, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hoppe, C. J. M., Holtz, L., Trimborn, S., and Rost, B.: Ocean acidification
decreases the light-use efficiency in an Antarctic diatom under dynamic but
not constant light, New Phytol., 207, 159–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13334" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.13334</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kana, R., Kotabova, E., Sobotka, R., and Prasil, O.: Non-photochemical quenching
in cryptophyte alga <italic>Rhodomonas salina</italic> is located in chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> antennae, PLoS ONE, 7,
e29700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029700" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0029700</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koch, F., Beszteri, S., Harms, L., and Trimborn, S.: The impacts of iron
limitation and ocean acidification on the cellular stoichiometry,
photophysiology and transcriptome of <italic>Phaeocystis antarctica</italic>, Limnol. Oceanogr., 64, 357–375,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11045</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kolber, Z. S., Prášil, O., and Falkowski, P. G.: Measurements of
variable chlorophyll fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques:
Defining methodology and experimental protocols, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
1367, 88–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00135-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00135-2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laviale, M. and Neveux, J.: Relationships between pigment ratios and growth
irradiance in 11 marine phytoplankton species, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 425,
63–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps09013</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3007?><ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, G., Brown, C. M., Jeans, J. A., Donaher, N. A., McCarthy, A., and
Campbell, D. A.: The nitrogen costs of photosynthesis in a diatom under
current and future <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, New Phytol., 205, 533–543, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.13037</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>MacIntyre, H. L., Kana, T. M., Anning, T., and Geider, R. J.:
Photoacclimation of photosynthesis irradiance response curves and
photosynthetic pigments in microalgae and cyanobacteria, J. Phycol., 38,
17–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.00094.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.00094.x</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McCarthy, A., Rogers, S. P., Duffy, S. J., and Campbell, D. A.: Elevated
carbon dioxide differentially alters the photophysiology of <italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> (Bacillariophyceae)
and <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic> (Haptophyta), J. Phycol., 48, 635–646, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C. H., Hawley, J. E., and Pytkowicz, R. M.:
Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in
seawater at atmospheric pressure, Limnol. Oceanogr., 18, 897–907,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1973.18.6.0897" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1973.18.6.0897</ext-link>, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mendes, C. R. B., Tavano, V. M., Leal, M. C., de Souza, M. S., Brotas, V.,
and Garcia, C. A. E.: Shifts in the dominance between diatoms and
cryptophytes during three late summers in the Bransfield Strait (Antarctic
Peninsula), Polar Biol., 36, 537–547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1282-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00300-012-1282-4</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mendes, C. R. B., Tavano, V. M., Dotto, T. S., Kerr, R., De Souza, M. S.,
Garcia, C. A. E., and Secchi, E. R.: New insights on the dominance of
cryptophytes in Antarctic coastal waters: A case study in Gerlache Strait,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 149, 161–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.02.010</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moline, M. A. and Prézelin, B. B.: Long-term monitoring and analyses of
physical factors regulating variability in coastal Antarctic phytoplankton
biomass, <italic>in situ</italic> productivity and taxonomic composition over seasonal and
interannual timescales, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 145, 143–160,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/Meps145143" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/Meps145143</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moline, M. A., Claustre, H., Frazer, T. K., Schofield, O., and Vernet, M.:
Alteration of the food web along the Antarctic Peninsula in response to a
regional warming trend, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 1973–1980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00825.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00825.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Montes-Hugo, M., Doney, S. C., Ducklow, H. W., Fraser, W. R., Martinson, D. G.,
Stammerjohn, S. E., and Schofield, O.: Recent changes in phytoplankton
communities associated with rapid regional climate change along the western
Antarctic Peninsula, Science, 323, 1470–1473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1164533</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moreau, S., Mostajir, B., Bélanger, S., Schloss, I. R., Vancoppenolle,
M., Demers, S., and Ferreyra, G. A.: Climate change enhances primary
production in the western Antarctic Peninsula, Glob. Change Biol.,  21,
2191–2205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12878</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Orr, J. C., Fabry, V. J., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Doney, S. C., Feely, R. A.,
Gnanadesikan, A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Key, R. M., Lindsay, K.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Matear, R., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Najjar, R. G.,
Plattner, G.-K., Rodgers, K. B., Sabine, C. L., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer,
R., Slater, R. D., Totterdell, I. J., Weirig, M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool,
A.: Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its
impact on calcifying organisms, Nature, 437, 681–686, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oxborough, K., Moore, C. M., Suggett, D. J., Lawson, T., Chan, H. G., and
Geider, R. J.: Direct estimation of functional PSII reaction center
concentration and PSII electron flux on a volume basis: a new approach to
the analysis of Fast Repetition Rate fluorometry (FRRf) data, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 10, 142–154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2012.10.142</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A. (Eds.): Climate Change 2014: Synthesis
Report., ed. Contribution of workinggroups I, II and III to the fifth
assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Geneva,
Switzerland, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pierrot, D., Lewis,  E., and Wallace, D. W. R.: MS Excel Program Developed for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> System Calculations, ORNL/CDIAC-105a, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/otg.CO2SYS_XLS_CDIAC105a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3334/CDIAC/otg.CO2SYS_XLS_CDIAC105a</ext-link>,  2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ralph, P. J.  and Gademann, R.: Rapid light curves: A powerful tool to
assess photosynthetic activity, Aquat. Bot., 82, 222–237,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.02.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.02.006</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The biological control of chemical factors in the
environment, Am. Sci., 64, 205–221, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Riebesell, U., Wolf-Gladrow, D. A., and Smetacek, V.: Carbon dioxide
limitation of marine phytoplankton growth rates, Nature, 361, 249–251, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rozema, P. D., Venables, H. J., van de Poll, W. H., Clarke, A., Meredith, M.
P., and Buma, A. G. J.: Interannual variability in phytoplankton biomass and
species composition in northern Marguerite Bay (West Antarctic Peninsula) is
governed by both winter sea ice cover and summer stratification, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 62, 235–252, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sanz-Luque, E., Chamizo-Ampudia, A., Llamas, A., Galvan, A., and Fernandez,
E.: Understanding nitrate assimilation and its regulation in microalgae,
Front. Plant Sci., 6, 899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fpls.2015.00899</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schulz, K. G., Bach, L. T., Bellerby, R. G. J., Bermúdez, R.,
Büdenbender, J., Boxhammer, T., Czerny, J., Engel, A., Ludwig, A.,
Meyerhöfer, M., Larsen, A., Paul, A. J., Sswat, M., and Riebesell, U.:
Phytoplankton blooms at increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide:
Experimental evidence for negative effects on prymnesiophytes and positive
on small picoeukaryotes, Front. Mar. Sci., 4, 64,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2017.00064</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, R. C.  and Stammerjohn,  S. E.: Variations of surface air temperature
and sea-ice extent in the western Antarctic Peninsula region,  Ann. Glaciol., 33,
493–500, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781818662" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/172756401781818662</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sommer, U., Paul, C., and Moustaka-Gouni, M.: Warming and ocean acidification
effects on phytoplankton – From species shifts to size shifts within species
in a mesocosm experiment, PLoS ONE, 10, e0125239,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0125239</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stoll, M. H. C., Bakker, K., Nobbe, G. H., and Haese, R. R. Continous-flow
analysis of dissolved inorganic carbon content in seawater, Anal.
Chem., 73, 4111–4116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010303r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac010303r</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Suggett, D. J., MacIntyre, H. L., and Geider, R. J.: Evaluation of
biophysical and optical determinations of light absorption b<?pagebreak page3008?>y photosystem II
in phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 2, 316–332,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2004.2.316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2004.2.316</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Suggett, D. J., Moore, C. M., Hickman, A. E., and Geider, R. J.:
Interpretation of fast repetition rate (FRR) fluorescence: Signatures of
phytoplankton community structure versus physiological state, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 376, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07830" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps07830</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trimborn, S.: Ocean acidification and high irradiance stimulate the photo-physiological fitness, growth and carbon production of the Antarctic cryptophyte Geminigera cryophila, PANGAEA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.904010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.904010</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, S., Brenneis, T., Sweet, E., and Rost, B.: Sensitivity of Antarctic
phytoplankton species to ocean acidification: growth, carbon acquisition and
species interaction, Limnol. Oceanogr., 58, 997–1007, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, S., Hoppe, C. J. M., Taylor, B., Bracher, A., and Hassler, C.:
Physiological characteristics of phytoplankton communities of Western
Antarctic Peninsula and Drake Passage waters, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 98,
115–124, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trimborn, S., Brenneis, T., Hoppe, C. J. M., Norman, L., Santos, J.,
Laglera, L., Völkner, C., Wolf-Gladrow, D., and Hassler, C.: Iron sources
alter the response of Southern Ocean phytoplankton to ocean acidification,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 578, 35–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps12250</ext-link>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trimborn, S., Thoms, S., Brenneis, T., Heiden, J. P., Beszteri, S., and Bischof,
K.: Two Southern Ocean diatoms are more sensitive to ocean acidification and
changes in irradiance than the prymnesiophyte <italic>Phaeocystis antarctica</italic>, Physiol. Plant., 160,
155–170,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ppl.12539</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wright, S. W., Jeffrey, S. W., Mantoura, R. F. C., Llewellyn, C. A.,
Bjornland, T., Repeta, D., and Welschmeyer, N.: Improved HPLC method for the
analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 77, 183–196, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps077183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps077183</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, G. and Gao, K.: Physiological responses of the marine diatom
<italic>Thalassiosira pseudonana</italic> to increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and seawater acidity, Mar. Environ. Res., 79,
142–151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.06.002</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Young, J. N., Kranz, S. A., Goldman, J. A. L., Tortell, P. D., and Morel, F.
M. M.: Antarctic phytoplankton down-regulate their carbon-concentrating
mechanisms under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with no change in growth rates, Mar. Ecol.-Progr. Ser., 532, 13–28, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Ocean acidification and high irradiance stimulate the photo-physiological fitness, growth and carbon production of the Antarctic cryptophyte <i>Geminigera cryophila</i></article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Ecophysiological studies on Antarctic cryptophytes to assess whether
climatic changes such as ocean acidification and enhanced stratification
affect their growth in Antarctic coastal waters in the future are lacking so
far. This is the first study that investigates the combined effects of the increasing availability of <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> (400 and 1000&thinsp;µatm) and
irradiance (20, 200 and 500&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;photons&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;s<sup>−1</sup>) on growth,
elemental composition and photophysiology of the Antarctic cryptophyte
<i>Geminigera cryophila</i>. Under ambient <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, this species was characterized by a pronounced
sensitivity to increasing irradiance with complete growth inhibition at the
highest light intensity. Interestingly, when grown under high <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> this
negative light effect vanished, and it reached the highest rates of growth and
particulate organic carbon production at the highest irradiance compared to
the other tested experimental conditions. Our results for <i>G. cryophila</i> reveal beneficial
effects of ocean acidification in conjunction with enhanced irradiance on
growth and photosynthesis. Hence, cryptophytes such as <i>G. cryophila</i> may be potential
winners of climate change, potentially thriving better in more stratified
and acidic coastal waters and contributing in higher abundance to future
phytoplankton assemblages of coastal Antarctic waters.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G., and Long, M.: Coastal Southern Ocean: A
strong anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> sink, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 1–6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035624" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035624</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Beszteri, S., Thoms, S., Benes, V., Harms, L., and Trimborn, S.: Acclimation
to ocean acidification and high light in three Southern Ocean phytoplankton
species: A transcriptomic study, Protist, 169, 958–975, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2018.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2018.08.003</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Boelen, P., van de Poll, W. H., van der Strate, H. J., Neven, I. A.,
Beardall, J., and Buma, A. G. J.: Neither elevated nor reduced CO<sub>2</sub>
affects the photophysiological performance of the marine Antarctic diatom
<i>Chaetoceros brevis</i>, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 406, 38–45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.012</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Burns, B. D. and Beardall, J.: Utilization of inorganic carbon by marine
microalgae, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 107, 75–86, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Camiro-Vargas, T. K., Hernandez-Ayon, J. M., Valenzuela-Espinoza, E.,
Delgadillo-Hinojosa, F., and Cajal-Medrano, R.: Dissolved inorganic carbon
uptake by <i>Rhodomonas</i> sp. and <i>Isochrysis aff. galbana</i> determined by a potentiometric technique, Aquacult.
Eng., 33, 83–95, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Dickson, A. G.  and Millero, F. J.: A comparison of the equilibrium
constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media, Deep-Sea
Res., 34, 1733–1743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90021-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(87)90021-5</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Domingues, R. B., Guerra, C. C., Barbosa, A. B., Brotas, V., Galvao, H. M.,
and Notes, A.: Effects of ultraviolet radiation and CO<sub>2</sub> increase on
winter phytoplankton assemblages in a temperate coastal lagoon,  J. Plankton
Res.,  36, 672–684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt135</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Donahue, K., Klaas, C., Dillingham, P. W., and Hoffmann, L. J.: Combined
effects of ocean acidification and increased light intensity on natural
phytoplankton communities from two Southern Ocean water masses, J. Plankton
Res., 41, 30–45, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fby048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fby048</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ducklow, H. W., Baker, K., Martinson, D. G., Quetin, L. B., Ross, R. M.,
Smith, R. C., Stammerjohn, R. C., Vernet, M., and Fraser, W.: Marine pelagic
ecosystems: the West Antarctic Peninsula, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 362, 67–94, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Ducklow, H. W., Fraser, W. R., Meredith, M. P., Stammerjohn, S. E., Doney, S. C.,
Martinson, D. G., Sailley, S. F., Schofield, O. M., Steinberg, D. K., Venables,
H. J., and Amsler, C. D.: West Antarctic Peninsula: An ice-dependent coastal
marine ecosystem in transition, Oceanography, 26, 190–203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.62" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.62</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P. G.  and Raven, J. A.: Aquatic Photosynthesis, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 501 pp., 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Feng, Y., Hare, C. E., Rose, J. M., Handy, S. M., DiTullio, G. R., Lee, P.
A., Smith, W. O., Peloquin, J., Tozzi, S., Sun, J., Zhang, Y.,
Dunbar, R. B., Long, M. C., Sohst, B., Lohan, M., and Hutchins, D. A.:
Interactive effects of iron, irradiance and CO<sub>2</sub> on Ross Sea
phytoplankton, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 57, 368–383,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.013</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fiala, M. and Oriol, L.: Light-temperature interactions on the growth of Antarctic diatoms, Polar Biol., 10, 629–36, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Funk, C., Alami, M., Tibiletti, T., and Green, B. R.: High light stress and
the onehelix LHC-like proteins of the cryptophyte <i>Guillardia theta</i>, BBA-Bioenergetics, 1807, 841–846, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Garibotti, I. A., Vernet, M., and Ferrario, M. E.: Annually recurrent phytoplanktonic assemblages during summer in the seasonal ice zone west of the Antarctic Peninsula (Southern Ocean), Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 52, 1823–1841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2005.05.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2005.05.003</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Genty, B., Briantais, J.-M., and Baker, N. R.: The relationship between the
quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of
chlorophyll fluorescence, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 990, 87–92,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gould, S. B., Waller, R. F., and McFadden, G. I.: Plastid evolution, Annu.
Rev. Plant Biol., 59, 491–517, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Guillard, R. R. L. and Ryther, J. H.: Studies of marine planktonic diatoms:
I. <i>Cyclotella nana</i> Hustedt, and <i>Detonula confervacea</i> (Cleve), Gran., Can. J. Microbiol., 8, 229–239,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/m62-029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/m62-029</a>, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hammer, A., Schumann, R., and Schubert, H.: Light and temperature
acclimation of <i>Rhodomonas</i> <i>salina</i> (Cryptophyceae): Photosynthetic performance, Aquat. Microb.
Ecol., 29, 287–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/ame029287" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/ame029287</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Heiden, J. P., Bischof, K., and Trimborn, S.: Light intensity modulates the
response of two Antarctic diatom species to ocean acidification, Front. Mar.
Sci.,  3, 260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00260</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Heiden, J. P., Thoms, S., Bischof, K., and Trimborn, S.: Ocean acidification
stimulates particulate organic carbon accumulation in two Antarctic diatom
species under moderate and high solar radiation, J. Phycol.,  54, 505–517, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12753" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12753</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Heiden, J. P., Völkner, C., Jones, E., Van de Poll, W. H., Buma A. G.
J., Meredith, M. P., De Baar, H., Bischof, K., Wolf-Gladrow, D., and Trimborn,
S.: Impact of ocean acidification and high solar radiation on productivity
and species composition of a late summer phytoplankton community of the
coastal Western Antarctic Peninsula, Limnol. Oceanogr.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11147" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11147</a>, online first, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Henriksen, P., Riemann, B., Sorensen, H. M., and Sorensen, H. L.: Effects of
nutrient-limitation and irradiance on marine phytoplankton pigments, J.
Plankton Res., 24,  835–858, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Hoogstraten, A., Timmermans, K. R., and de Baar, H. J. W.: Morphological and
physiological effects in <i>Proboscia Alata</i> (Bacillariophyceae) grown under different light
and CO<sub>2</sub> conditions of the modern Southern Ocean, J. Phycol., 48,
559–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01148.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01148.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hopkinson, B. M., Dupont, C. L., Allen, A. E., and Morel, F. M. M.: Efficiency
of the CO<sub>2</sub>-concentrating mechanism of diatoms, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 108, 3830–3837, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hoppe, C. J. M., Holtz, L., Trimborn, S., and Rost, B.: Ocean acidification
decreases the light-use efficiency in an Antarctic diatom under dynamic but
not constant light, New Phytol., 207, 159–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13334" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13334</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kana, R., Kotabova, E., Sobotka, R., and Prasil, O.: Non-photochemical quenching
in cryptophyte alga <i>Rhodomonas salina</i> is located in chlorophyll <i>a</i>∕<i>c</i> antennae, PLoS ONE, 7,
e29700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029700" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029700</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Koch, F., Beszteri, S., Harms, L., and Trimborn, S.: The impacts of iron
limitation and ocean acidification on the cellular stoichiometry,
photophysiology and transcriptome of <i>Phaeocystis antarctica</i>, Limnol. Oceanogr., 64, 357–375,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11045</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kolber, Z. S., Prášil, O., and Falkowski, P. G.: Measurements of
variable chlorophyll fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques:
Defining methodology and experimental protocols, Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
1367, 88–106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00135-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00135-2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Laviale, M. and Neveux, J.: Relationships between pigment ratios and growth
irradiance in 11 marine phytoplankton species, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 425,
63–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09013</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Li, G., Brown, C. M., Jeans, J. A., Donaher, N. A., McCarthy, A., and
Campbell, D. A.: The nitrogen costs of photosynthesis in a diatom under
current and future <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, New Phytol., 205, 533–543, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13037</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
MacIntyre, H. L., Kana, T. M., Anning, T., and Geider, R. J.:
Photoacclimation of photosynthesis irradiance response curves and
photosynthetic pigments in microalgae and cyanobacteria, J. Phycol., 38,
17–38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.00094.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.00094.x</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
McCarthy, A., Rogers, S. P., Duffy, S. J., and Campbell, D. A.: Elevated
carbon dioxide differentially alters the photophysiology of <i>Thalassiosira pseudonana</i> (Bacillariophyceae)
and <i>Emiliania huxleyi</i> (Haptophyta), J. Phycol., 48, 635–646, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C. H., Hawley, J. E., and Pytkowicz, R. M.:
Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in
seawater at atmospheric pressure, Limnol. Oceanogr., 18, 897–907,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1973.18.6.0897" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1973.18.6.0897</a>, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Mendes, C. R. B., Tavano, V. M., Leal, M. C., de Souza, M. S., Brotas, V.,
and Garcia, C. A. E.: Shifts in the dominance between diatoms and
cryptophytes during three late summers in the Bransfield Strait (Antarctic
Peninsula), Polar Biol., 36, 537–547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1282-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1282-4</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mendes, C. R. B., Tavano, V. M., Dotto, T. S., Kerr, R., De Souza, M. S.,
Garcia, C. A. E., and Secchi, E. R.: New insights on the dominance of
cryptophytes in Antarctic coastal waters: A case study in Gerlache Strait,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 149, 161–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.02.010</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Moline, M. A. and Prézelin, B. B.: Long-term monitoring and analyses of
physical factors regulating variability in coastal Antarctic phytoplankton
biomass, <i>in situ</i> productivity and taxonomic composition over seasonal and
interannual timescales, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 145, 143–160,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/Meps145143" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/Meps145143</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Moline, M. A., Claustre, H., Frazer, T. K., Schofield, O., and Vernet, M.:
Alteration of the food web along the Antarctic Peninsula in response to a
regional warming trend, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 1973–1980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00825.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00825.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Montes-Hugo, M., Doney, S. C., Ducklow, H. W., Fraser, W. R., Martinson, D. G.,
Stammerjohn, S. E., and Schofield, O.: Recent changes in phytoplankton
communities associated with rapid regional climate change along the western
Antarctic Peninsula, Science, 323, 1470–1473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164533" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164533</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Moreau, S., Mostajir, B., Bélanger, S., Schloss, I. R., Vancoppenolle,
M., Demers, S., and Ferreyra, G. A.: Climate change enhances primary
production in the western Antarctic Peninsula, Glob. Change Biol.,  21,
2191–2205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12878" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12878</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Orr, J. C., Fabry, V. J., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Doney, S. C., Feely, R. A.,
Gnanadesikan, A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., Key, R. M., Lindsay, K.,
Maier-Reimer, E., Matear, R., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Najjar, R. G.,
Plattner, G.-K., Rodgers, K. B., Sabine, C. L., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer,
R., Slater, R. D., Totterdell, I. J., Weirig, M.-F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool,
A.: Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its
impact on calcifying organisms, Nature, 437, 681–686, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Oxborough, K., Moore, C. M., Suggett, D. J., Lawson, T., Chan, H. G., and
Geider, R. J.: Direct estimation of functional PSII reaction center
concentration and PSII electron flux on a volume basis: a new approach to
the analysis of Fast Repetition Rate fluorometry (FRRf) data, Limnol.
Oceanogr.-Meth., 10, 142–154, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.142</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A. (Eds.): Climate Change 2014: Synthesis
Report., ed. Contribution of workinggroups I, II and III to the fifth
assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Geneva,
Switzerland, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Pierrot, D., Lewis,  E., and Wallace, D. W. R.: MS Excel Program Developed for CO<sub>2</sub> System Calculations, ORNL/CDIAC-105a, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/otg.CO2SYS_XLS_CDIAC105a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/otg.CO2SYS_XLS_CDIAC105a</a>,  2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ralph, P. J.  and Gademann, R.: Rapid light curves: A powerful tool to
assess photosynthetic activity, Aquat. Bot., 82, 222–237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.02.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.02.006</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The biological control of chemical factors in the
environment, Am. Sci., 64, 205–221, 1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Riebesell, U., Wolf-Gladrow, D. A., and Smetacek, V.: Carbon dioxide
limitation of marine phytoplankton growth rates, Nature, 361, 249–251, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rozema, P. D., Venables, H. J., van de Poll, W. H., Clarke, A., Meredith, M.
P., and Buma, A. G. J.: Interannual variability in phytoplankton biomass and
species composition in northern Marguerite Bay (West Antarctic Peninsula) is
governed by both winter sea ice cover and summer stratification, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 62, 235–252, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Sanz-Luque, E., Chamizo-Ampudia, A., Llamas, A., Galvan, A., and Fernandez,
E.: Understanding nitrate assimilation and its regulation in microalgae,
Front. Plant Sci., 6, 899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00899</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, K. G., Bach, L. T., Bellerby, R. G. J., Bermúdez, R.,
Büdenbender, J., Boxhammer, T., Czerny, J., Engel, A., Ludwig, A.,
Meyerhöfer, M., Larsen, A., Paul, A. J., Sswat, M., and Riebesell, U.:
Phytoplankton blooms at increasing levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide:
Experimental evidence for negative effects on prymnesiophytes and positive
on small picoeukaryotes, Front. Mar. Sci., 4, 64,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00064</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, R. C.  and Stammerjohn,  S. E.: Variations of surface air temperature
and sea-ice extent in the western Antarctic Peninsula region,  Ann. Glaciol., 33,
493–500, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781818662" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/172756401781818662</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Sommer, U., Paul, C., and Moustaka-Gouni, M.: Warming and ocean acidification
effects on phytoplankton – From species shifts to size shifts within species
in a mesocosm experiment, PLoS ONE, 10, e0125239,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125239" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125239</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Stoll, M. H. C., Bakker, K., Nobbe, G. H., and Haese, R. R. Continous-flow
analysis of dissolved inorganic carbon content in seawater, Anal.
Chem., 73, 4111–4116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010303r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010303r</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Suggett, D. J., MacIntyre, H. L., and Geider, R. J.: Evaluation of
biophysical and optical determinations of light absorption by photosystem II
in phytoplankton, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 2, 316–332,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2004.2.316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2004.2.316</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Suggett, D. J., Moore, C. M., Hickman, A. E., and Geider, R. J.:
Interpretation of fast repetition rate (FRR) fluorescence: Signatures of
phytoplankton community structure versus physiological state, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 376, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07830" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07830</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, S.: Ocean acidification and high irradiance stimulate the photo-physiological fitness, growth and carbon production of the Antarctic cryptophyte Geminigera cryophila, PANGAEA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.904010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.904010</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, S., Brenneis, T., Sweet, E., and Rost, B.: Sensitivity of Antarctic
phytoplankton species to ocean acidification: growth, carbon acquisition and
species interaction, Limnol. Oceanogr., 58, 997–1007, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, S., Hoppe, C. J. M., Taylor, B., Bracher, A., and Hassler, C.:
Physiological characteristics of phytoplankton communities of Western
Antarctic Peninsula and Drake Passage waters, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 98,
115–124, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, S., Brenneis, T., Hoppe, C. J. M., Norman, L., Santos, J.,
Laglera, L., Völkner, C., Wolf-Gladrow, D., and Hassler, C.: Iron sources
alter the response of Southern Ocean phytoplankton to ocean acidification,
Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 578, 35–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12250</a>, 2017a.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, S., Thoms, S., Brenneis, T., Heiden, J. P., Beszteri, S., and Bischof,
K.: Two Southern Ocean diatoms are more sensitive to ocean acidification and
changes in irradiance than the prymnesiophyte <i>Phaeocystis antarctica</i>, Physiol. Plant., 160,
155–170,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12539</a>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, S. W., Jeffrey, S. W., Mantoura, R. F. C., Llewellyn, C. A.,
Bjornland, T., Repeta, D., and Welschmeyer, N.: Improved HPLC method for the
analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton, Mar.
Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 77, 183–196, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps077183" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps077183</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, G. and Gao, K.: Physiological responses of the marine diatom
<i>Thalassiosira pseudonana</i> to increased <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and seawater acidity, Mar. Environ. Res., 79,
142–151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.06.002</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Young, J. N., Kranz, S. A., Goldman, J. A. L., Tortell, P. D., and Morel, F.
M. M.: Antarctic phytoplankton down-regulate their carbon-concentrating
mechanisms under high CO<sub>2</sub> with no change in growth rates, Mar. Ecol.-Progr. Ser., 532, 13–28, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
