<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-3047-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>A novel isotope pool dilution approach to quantify gross rates of key
abiotic and biological processes in the soil phosphorus cycle</article-title><alt-title>Quantifying gross rates of key
abiotic and biological processes</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Quantifying gross rates of key
abiotic and biological processes}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W. Wanek et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Wanek</surname><given-names>Wolfgang</given-names></name>
          <email>wolfgang.wanek@univie.ac.at</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-8258</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Zezula</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-8803</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Wasner</surname><given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Mooshammer</surname><given-names>Maria</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-7321</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Prommer</surname><given-names>Judith</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and
Ecosystem Science, Center of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090 Vienna,
Austria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Wolfgang Wanek (wolfgang.wanek@univie.ac.at)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>3047</fpage><lpage>3068</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>July</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Wolfgang Wanek et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e114">Efforts to understand and model the current and future behavior of the global
phosphorus (P) cycle are limited by the availability of global data on rates of soil P processes, as well as their environmental controls. Here, we present a novel isotope pool dilution approach using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> labeling of live and sterile soils, which allows for high-quality data on gross fluxes of soil inorganic P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) sorption and desorption, as well as of gross fluxes of organic P mineralization and microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake to be obtained. At the same time, net immobilization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by soil microbes and abiotic
sorption can be easily derived and partitioned. Compared with other approaches, we used short incubation times (up to 48 h), avoiding tracer
remineralization, which was confirmed by the separation of organic P and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using isobutanol fractionation. This approach is also suitable for strongly weathered and P-impoverished soils, as the sensitivity is increased by the extraction of exchangeable bioavailable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Olsen <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement using the malachite green assay. Biotic
processes were corrected for desorption/sorption processes using adequate
sterile abiotic controls that exhibited negligible microbial and
extracellular phosphatase activities. Gross rates were calculated using
analytical solutions of tracer kinetics, which also allowed for the study of gross
soil P dynamics under non-steady-state conditions. Finally, we present major
environmental controls of gross P-cycle processes that were measured for
three P-poor tropical forest and three P-rich temperate grassland soils.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e233">Phosphorus (P) is a major limiting nutrient to terrestrial primary
production, particularly in highly weathered soils such as those found in the tropics. Globally, increasing imbalances between nitrogen (N) and P inputs
(i.e., increasing N : P stoichiometry of inputs) caused by human activities and
land-use changes through increased emissions of reactive N are suggested to
lead to progressive P limitation of terrestrial ecosystems, and the first signs thereof have already been identified (Penuelas et al., 2013). A decrease in the
relative P availability might have strong repercussions on future nutrient
limitations of natural ecosystems, on food production and on carbon (C)
sequestration (Penuelas et al., 2013; Penuelas et al., 2012; Yang et al.,
2013). Efforts to understand and model the current and future global P cycle
and its coupling to the global C and N cycles have been intensified, but are
strongly limited by the availability of global data on soil gross P processes
and their environmental controls (Reed et al., 2015). Therefore, large
investments in new projects, experiments and models have recently been
undertaken to advance our understanding of the terrestrial P cycle,
and to fill data gaps, e.g., IMBALANCE-P (<uri>http://imbalancep-erc.creaf.cat</uri>, last access: 2 August 2019) and
NGEE-Tropics (<uri>http://ngee-tropics.lbl.gov</uri>, last access: 2 August 2019).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e244">Schematic representation of <bold>(a)</bold> major fluxes of soil P processes
controlling the availability of inorganic P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in soils, and of <bold>(b)</bold> the isotope pool dilution principle showing influxes of unlabeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) into the available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool labeled by a spike in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and efflux of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as
present in the target pool. Biotic and abiotic processes of influx and efflux
are presented. <bold>(c)</bold> This causes a decline in the specific activity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> declines over time in sterile soils
(abiotic processes only) and live soils (biotic plus abiotic processes),
allowing for the biotic contributions to overall gross fluxes to be derived.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents total soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents total organic
P; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> includes occluded and fixed P as well as primary mineral P, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> includes occluded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in aggregates. Avail. refers to available.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption includes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolution from minerals, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
sorption includes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> precipitation.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e501">Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability is governed by transfers of
exchangeable P between pools (immobilized/fixed P and occluded P), by the slow release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from mineral P via the weathering of primary minerals and by the
mineralization of organic P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 1, this study; Bünemann, 2015;Turner
et al., 2007). In strongly weathered soils, primary mineral P pools are
depleted, and the largest fraction of P is found in occluded and fixed pools,
as well as in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Vitousek and Farrington, 1997;<?pagebreak page3048?> Yang and Post, 2011).
Phosphorus limitation in such soils is further aggravated by their high P
sorption potentials caused by high contents of Fe–Al (hydr)oxides
(Goldberg and Sposito, 1985). Most of the immediate P needs of
plants (and microbes) in natural and agricultural systems are supplied by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization, catalyzed by extracellular phosphatases that are
released by soil microbes and plant roots (Richardson and Simpson,
2011), as well as by abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption. Soil microbes and plant
roots can promote the release of P from primary and secondary minerals by
accelerating mineral dissolution and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption, via the exudation of (phyto)siderophores and organic acids (Mander et al., 2012; Ryan et al.,
2001).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e586">Comparison of traditional isotope exchange kinetic kinetic  (IEK) experiments
and the novel isotope pool dilution (IPD) approach to measure organic P
mineralization.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="199.169291pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="170.716535pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Factor and approach</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Isotope exchange (IEK)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Isotope pool dilution (IPD)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tracer addition and incubation period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>several time points across several days to weeks and months</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>two time points at 4 and 24 h</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Measured P pool</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Water-extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Bicarbonate-extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Abiotic controls</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Abiotic controls measured in batch experiment with live soil: 100 min <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange experiment in soil suspension 1 : 10 (soil : water), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or sodium azide; microbial contributions in short-term experiment often not accounted for</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Duplicate autoclaving for abiotic controls to kill microbial biomass and extracellular enzymes; treatment of abiotic controls similar to live soils in terms of tracer addition, incubation period and extraction</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Microbial processes in<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>abiotic controls</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Microbial biomass active in abiotic controls if no microbicide added, extracellular phosphatases fully active (causing organic P mineralization in abiotic controls)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Microbial biomass and phosphatases deactivated by autoclaving (no/almost no P mineralization occurring in abiotic controls)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Preincubation of soils<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>to equilibrate to moisture and temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Yes (to constant respiration – equilibrium conditions<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>necessary)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Yes (not necessary)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Change in soil structure and P availability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No (if no microbicide is added)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Potentially yes, as autoclaving might increase available P by death of microbial biomass and soil structure might change by autoclaving</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Numerical solution for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Isotopically exchangeable P within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> minutes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, derived as the inverse of the relative specific activity of phosphate in soil solution (water extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over time in live soils. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived for abiotic controls extrapolated from 100 min to length of full experiment, graphical solution of corrected data following Fardeau (1993). Differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Calculation of IPD influx rates based on mass/isotope balance equations derived by Kirkham and Bartholomew (1954) for tracer: tracee experiments. Gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization calculated as difference of IPD influx rates of live soils minus abiotic controls</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e941">Soil P cycling processes such as soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption/desorption fluxes and gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization rates, as well as the size of the exchangeable soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool have been measured by isotope exchange kinetic (IEK) techniques using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These techniques are based on recurrent measurements of radiotracer recovery and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in soil water extracts (Di et al., 1997; Frossard et al., 2011;Bünemann, 2015; Table 1, this study). A variety of IEK procedures and protocols are in use, and optimizations in methodology have been called for, particularly for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization
(Bünemann, 2015). Only over the last decade have common,
accepted protocols been adopted, and these protocols are currently used to measure soil
P processes following Oehl et al. (2001b). In this IEK
approach, abiotic sorption/desorption processes from
an isotopically exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool are measured over a short time
period in short-term batch experiments (100 min, 1 : 10 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) soil : water slurry, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> microbicides). This assumes that no microbial tracer uptake (blocked by
microbicides) and no organic P mineralization occurs, and that soils are in a
steady state, i.e., do not show changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Table 1). In such
short-term IEK experiments the decrease in radioactivity (radiotracer
recovery) in soil water is described by a power function:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the added radioactivity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radioactivity recovered at any time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in soil water extracts. The parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (slope of the
regression indicating speed of isotopic exchange) are derived from the
log–log regression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus time. This is based on steady-state
assumptions, i.e., that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in soil water extracts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is constant. In some soils an extended version of this equation needs to be
applied:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inf</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>inf</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum possible dilution of the added radiotracer,
approximated as the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to total inorganic P in soils. n and m
are derived from non-linear fitting procedures. Assuming that the tracer and
tracee behave similarly in the system, the specific activity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the soil solution should reflect the specific activity of isotopically
exchangeable P – termed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value (in mg P kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil).
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <?pagebreak page3049?><p id="d1e1365">Isotopic dilution, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is further measured over the full length of a moist soil incubation experiment lasting for several days to weeks,
constituting the total amount of exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or isotope dilution
caused by concurrent biological processes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization) and
physicochemical processes. Short-term exchange kinetics are then extrapolated
over the full time period of the moist soil incubation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fardeau et al., 1991). The difference between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
extrapolated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value then provides the measure of gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization.</p>
      <p id="d1e1472">The isotope pool dilution approach (IPD) of Kirkham and Bartholomew (1954) was developed as a general tracer approach to measure gross rates of
soil element cycle processes, but was most frequently applied to nitrogen
cycling processes such as organic N mineralization and nitrification
(Booth et al., 2005). However, the IPD approach can also be
transferred to measure gross rates of P cycle processes (Di et al., 2000).
It then also relies on the labeling of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and on subsequent time-resolved measurements of concentrations and specific activities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1, Fig. 1b). However, in contrast to IEK techniques, changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and specific activities are then solved by mass balance equations developed specifically for gross rate calculations based on tracer studies (Kirkham and Bartholomew, 1954). In the following we list the criteria that have to be met by the IPD method to correctly determine gross rates of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption/desorption (Di et al., 2000; Murphy et al., 2003; Kirkham and Bartholomew, 1954).
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1557">The tracer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and tracee (unlabeled
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) behave identically and are well mixed. This is given for the
different isotopes of P as long as radiotracer solution is homogeneously
distributed in the soil and sufficient time is provided for isotope
equilibration between added radiotracer and the native <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1617">The influx into the target (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) pool (i.e., the product of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization) has to be unlabeled (i.e., no tracer remineralization), in
order for it to dilute the tracer: tracee ratio over time (Fig. 1b, c).
Tracer remineralization via microbial tracer assimilation, mortality and
subsequent remineralization of labeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would result in an
underestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization, but can be avoided by short
incubation times (1–2 d).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page3050?><p id="d1e1665">Abiotic release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from a non-extractable pool (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption) causes an influx of unlabeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the target pool, resulting in an overestimation of the biotic process, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization, and has to be determined in parallel abiotic incubations of sterile soils. However, adequate abiotic controls with no contribution of biological processes have remained a major obstacle in measuring soil P dynamics with radiotracers,
both in IEK and IPD experiments. Procedures in earlier studies ranged from
short-term assays with no inhibitor addition as often performed in IEK assays
(Spohn et al., 2013; Oehl et al., 2001b), to amendments of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
sodium azide, toluene or chloroform, and gamma irradiation or repeated
autoclaving (Kellogg et al., 2006; Bünemann, 2015; Bünemann et al.,
2007; Oehl et al., 2001b; Achat et al., 2010).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1724">The soil extraction should target the bioavailable exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
pool. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in soil solution undergoes rapid equilibration with easily
adsorbed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An incomplete extraction of this pool causes an
underestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization rates, due to desorption from this pool, causing an influx of unlabeled tracer (and unlabeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) into the target pool, and thus violates assumption no. 2 of IPD assays. The
commonly used soil water extractions target only a small fraction of this
target pool, whereas standard soil P extractants, such as Olsen, Mehlich 3 or
Bray 1, extract a larger fraction (Kleinman et al.,
2001) and, therefore, are suggested to be better suited to extract the
rapidly exchanging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool (Kellogg et al., 2006).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1795">The efflux from the isotopically labeled pool (i.e., microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
immobilization and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption into a non-extractable pool) occurs at
the ratio of tracer: tracee as present in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool at any specific
time, with no discrimination between native <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and added radiotracer
(Fig. 1b). A short preincubation time is therefore needed to allow for
full mixing and isotopic equilibration of tracer and tracee (see point
no. 1).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1843">Changes in specific activity need to be measured specifically in the target
pool, i.e., in extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for measurements of gross rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption/desorption. However, most current
approaches do not separate extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but measure
radioactivity in unfractionated extracts, including radiolabeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
formed during the incubation, leading to an eventual overestimation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e1925">The rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization, abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux (biotic and abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization) need to be
constant over the duration of incubation: (i) the initial phase of fast
immobilization by sorption, microbial uptake and isotopic equilibration of
radiotracer is excluded from calculations of gross rates, and (ii) incubation
takes place within a suitable time frame to avoid microbial turnover and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remineralization (see point no. 2). The minimum two time
points necessary to measure concentration and specific activity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for the IPD calculations should therefore lie in between the initial phase
and the start of remineralization, but it is recommendable to test more time
points in the beginning to test the time linearity of IPD rates for specific soil
types.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2010">Mooshammer et al. (2012) adopted such a protocol for
measurements of gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization in decomposing plant litter,
following the knowledge of IPD processes based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> additions to study
gross rates of soil N cycling (Hart et al., 1994; Murphy et al., 2003; Wanek
et al., 2010; Braun et al., 2018). However, in plant litter P sorption and the
abiotic release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from sorbed P pools do not interfere.
Consequently, the litter protocol cannot be directly transferred to soil
studies. In the present study we developed an IPD protocol to assess soil P
dynamics, based on the previous work for litter by
Mooshammer et al. (2012) and soils by Kellogg et al. (2006). The protocol is based on IPD
theory (Kirkham and Bartholomew, 1954; Di et al., 2000) applied to parallel
incubations of live and sterile soil with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer addition.
Gross rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption (abiotic immobilization) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
desorption are determined in sterile soils, and allow for the correction of gross
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization rates in live
soils. We used bicarbonate extractions to target the bioavailable
exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool. To avoid tracer remineralization, we used short
incubation periods (up to 2 d). To confirm that no significant amount of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was formed during incubation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also separated from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on isobutanol fractionation (Jayachandran
et al., 1992). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were measured based on the
phosphomolybdate blue protocol. At very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, e.g., in tropical soils, which are below the detection limit of the phosphomolybdate
blue method, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined by parallel measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
bicarbonate extracts using the more sensitive malachite green assay
(D'Angelo et al., 2001; Ohno and Zibilske, 1991). The protocol was tested
rigorously with two different soils, and then applied to six soils in total
(three tropical forest and three temperate grassland soils) to explore
environmental controls on gross soil P dynamics.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2204">Soil characterization of three temperate grassland soils (soil 2, 4
and 6) and three tropical lowland forest soils (soil 3, 5 and 7).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Temperate soils </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Tropical soils </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil pH (10 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Silt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">59.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">40.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">88.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">72.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">70.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">61.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">56.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total organic C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mg g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">126.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">28.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mg g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total P (TP)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mg g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total organic P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(mg g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.07</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of TP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">75.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">76.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil C : N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil C : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">121</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">507</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">548</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">293</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">237</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">406</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil N : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TP</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">32.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phosphatase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(nmol MUF g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">256</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">316</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">233</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1396</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1698</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2346</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Soil materials and basic characterization</title>
      <?pagebreak page3051?><p id="d1e2835">Soils (0–15 cm depth) were collected in summer 2015 from three temperate
grassland sites in Austria and in spring 2015 from three tropical lowland
forest sites in Costa Rica (Table 2). The grassland soils were extensively
managed meadows, collected in Lower Austria (48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>13–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12–17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in the vicinity of Vienna, at elevations between 170
and 320 m. The tropical forest soils were collected along a topographic
gradient (ridge–slope–valley bottom) in wet evergreen old-growth forests in
southwestern Costa Rica close to the Piedras Blancas National Park (8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 110–250 m a.s.l.). Soils were sieved to 2 mm and stored
in an air-dried state. Soil pH was measured in a 1 : 5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mixture of air-dried soil in water after 60 min of equilibration using an ISFET electrode
(Sentron SI600 pH meter). Soil texture was quantified using a miniaturized
pipette/sieving protocol for 2–4 g air-dried soils (Miller and Miller,
1987), using 4 % sodium metaphosphate as a dispersant. Soil total C and
total soil N content were determined after grinding oven-dried soil in a ball
mill, using an elemental analyzer (EA 1110, CE Instruments, Thermo
Scientific). Temperate grassland soils were treated with 2 M HCl to remove
carbonates, re-dried, ground and then analyzed using an elemental analyzer for soil organic C. Total soil P and total soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured after 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extraction of ignited soils (5 h at 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in a
muffle furnace; O'Halloran and Cade-Menun,
2008) and of untreated soils, respectively, using the malachite green method
(Ohno and Zibilske, 1991; D'Angelo et al., 2001). Total organic P was
estimated by calculating the difference between total soil P and total soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We must, however, submit that ignition methods tend to overestimate
soil organic P in highly weathered tropical soils (Condron
et al., 1990).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2973">Schematic overview of the final isotope pool dilution (IPD)
procedure. MG refers to the malachite green procedure, and MR refers to the Murphy–Riley procedure to measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations; LSC denotes liquid scintillation counting to measure radioactivity in extracts. Isobutanol fractionation separates dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thereby allows for highly specific measurements of concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, without interference from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Direct acidification of bicarbonate extracts measures dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using malachite green, but LSC quantifies the sum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, the formation of the latter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) turned out to be insignificant.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Soil pretreatment and assay of sterilization efficiency (abiotic controls)</title>
      <p id="d1e3118">Before starting the experiments, the soils were re-equilibrated from an
air-dried state by rewetting to 60 % water holding capacity for 6 d at
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Gravimetric soil water content and water holding capacity
were determined prior to the experiment. Soils were then either sterilized
twice, 48 and 2 h before the start of the IPD experiments, by autoclaving at 121 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 60 min (sterile soils), or were kept at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
(live soils, Fig. 2). Sterilization efficiency was checked based on soil
enzyme activity measurements. Fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis in soils
was measured as a proxy of viable, active microbial biomass (Green et al.,
2006; Schnurer and Rosswall, 1982), and the activity of acid
phosphomonoesterases, which are extracellular enzymes involved in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization, was determined using methylumbelliferyl (MUF) phosphate
(Sirova et al., 2013; Marx et al., 2001).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{{}^{{33}}P}$} IPD assay}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IPD assay</title>
      <p id="d1e3179">A schematic representation of the final IPD protocol can be found in Fig. 2. Duplicate soil aliquots (2 g fresh weight) of sterile and live soil were
each amended with 20 kBq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dilution of orthophosphoric acid
phosphorus-33 radionuclide, 5 m Ci mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., 185 MBq mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> HCl-free
water at a specified date, Perkin NEZ080002MC). Between 0.15 and 0.2 mL of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-label solution was added to each sample (Fig. 2); the volume added
was adjusted for each soil type to obtain an optimal water content in each
soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 % water holding capacity). Soils were extracted
with 30 mL (temperate soils) or 15 mL (tropical soils) of 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(pH 8.5) after 4 and 24 h of incubation for 30 min on a horizontal shaker and
filtered through ash-free cellulose filters. Lower extractant volumes in
tropical and other P-poor soils were used to reach higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in
the bicarbonate extracts for better quantification.</p>
      <p id="d1e3263">Following this, isobutanol fractionation of the bicarbonate extracts was
performed, separating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (into the organic phase) from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (into the acidic aqueous phase) allowing for the measurement of the kinetics and specific activity of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool without interference from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kellogg et al., 2006; Mooshammer et al., 2012). Isobutanol partitioning enables 100 % recovery of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with no hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Jayachandran et al., 1992). For isobutanol fractionation, each 1.5 mL of the soil extracts, standards and blanks was amended by sequential addition of 1.5 mL acidified molybdate, 3 mL deionized water and 3 mL isobutanol. The<?pagebreak page3052?> acidified molybdate reagent consists of 5 g ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mo</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) dissolved in 0.1 L 2.3 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (stable at room temperature for at least 3
months) and causes strong <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outgassing from the bicarbonate extracts. After the addition of all reagents the vials were shaken overhead for 1 min and then rested for 10 min for phase separation. For later photometric quantification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the isobutanol phase, standards ranging from 320 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (1 : 2 dilution series) and blanks, both of the same matrix as soil extracts (i.e., 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), were prepared and underwent isobutanol fractionation along with the samples. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery standards were also prepared and processed via the isobutanol fractionation protocol, consisting of the same volume of extractant (15 or 30 mL) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer activity as added to soils (Fig. 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3474">Response of soil enzyme activities to autoclaving: percentage
inhibition of <bold>(a)</bold> fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis as a proxy for the
inhibition of live, cell-bound microbial enzyme activity and of <bold>(b)</bold> MUF-phosphomonoesterase activity as a proxy for the inhibition of
extracellular enzyme activity. Temperate grassland soils (2, 4 and 6) and
tropical forest soils (3, 5 and 7) were tested. A two-way ANOVA was carried out to test for the factors soil, time (1, 24 and 48 h after second autoclaving
cycle, in open, gray and black bars, respectively) and their interaction. P
values are presented.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3053?><p id="d1e3490"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the isobutanol phase was quantified using the phosphomolybdate
blue color reaction according to Murphy and Riley (1962). Briefly,
each 1.5 mL of the upper organic phase was transferred to vials and amended
with 2.1 mL molybdate free reducing agent, consisting of 1.32 g ascorbic acid
dissolved in 250 mL antimony potassium tartrate (APT) solution (145.4 mg APT
in 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The APT solution is stable at room temperature for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 weeks, whereas the molybdate free reducing agent has to be
prepared fresh daily. Thereafter, samples were shaken overhead for 1 min and
rested for 20 min for phase separation and color development. A volume of 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of the blue isobutanol phase was then pipetted into a microtiter
plate, and the absorbance was read at 725 nm with a microplate photometer (Tecan
Infinite M200, Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria).</p>
      <p id="d1e3534">In parallel to the phosphomolybdate blue reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
isobutanol phase, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were also determined directly in
acidified bicarbonate extracts using the malachite green approach
(D'Angelo et al., 2001). This method is 4–10 times more
sensitive than the commonly used phosphomolybdate blue method and was chosen
to account for the expectedly low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of the tropical
soils. Standards for calibration of the malachite green method were prepared
in 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranging from 50 to 0.039 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Acidification of bicarbonate extracts and standards (blanks) was performed on
2.5 mL sample aliquots by adding 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L 2.75 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2). Of the acidified samples and standards, 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L was pipetted into
a microtiter plate, and 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of malachite green reagent A was added and
incubated for 10 min. Then, 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of reagent B was added, and the absorbance
was read after 45 min at 610 nm with a microplate reader. Reagent A was
prepared by pipetting 50 mL deionized water into an amber 0.1 L glass bottle,
adding 16.8 mL concentrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and stirring and dissolving 1.76 g
ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mo</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Reagent B was
prepared by heating 0.25 L of distilled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in an
amber 0.5 L glass bottle, dissolving 0.875 g PVA (polyvinyl alcohol, MW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 72 000 g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) whilst continuously stirring, cooling to room temperature and
finally dissolving 87 mg malachite green oxalate in this solution. Both
reagents are stable for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 months at room temperature.</p>
      <p id="d1e3754">Radioactivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity) was measured in 0.25 mL aliquots of
acidified bicarbonate extracts and in 0.4 mL aliquots of the isobutanol
phase, after the addition of each 4 mL scintillation cocktail (Ultima Gold,
Perkin Elmer), by liquid scintillation counting (Tri-Carb 1600 TR, Packard,
Perkin Elmer) (Fig. 2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e3777"><list list-type="custom">
            <list-item><label>i.</label>

      <p id="d1e3782">Time kinetics: high-resolution time kinetics of tracer and tracee dynamics
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were measured in two soils (temperate
grassland, soil 4; tropical forest, soil 3; Table 2). After tracer addition
to live and sterile soils in triplicates, IPD assays were stopped by
extraction with 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h. Time
point 0 was assessed by adding the tracer solution and immediately extracting
the soils with 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>ii.</label>

      <?pagebreak page3054?><p id="d1e3840">Microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization: the procedure outlined in Sect. 2.3 can
be combined with the direct determination of microbial P by extraction with
liquid chloroform-enriched salt solutions (Setia et al., 2012). Here, we
tested a sequential extraction–liquid chloroform extraction (sECE)
procedure. After 24 h of soil incubation in experiment (i), soil samples (2 g
fresh weight) were first extracted with 15 (soil 4) or 30 (soil 3) mL 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 30 min and centrifuged for 15 min at 10.000 g, before the
supernatant was decanted. The soil residue was then re-extracted with 15 (30) mL 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> containing 3 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) chloroform for 30 min and finally
filtered through ash-free cellulose filters. Volume corrections were applied
for extractant absorption by the soil pellet after centrifugation. Volume
corrections were calculated as soil wet weight after centrifugation minus
fresh weight weighed into each tube in grams, divided by the density of the
bicarbonate solution (in g mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), providing the carryover of extractant from
the first extraction (in mL).</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item><label>iii.</label>

      <p id="d1e3904">Soil effects on tracer dynamics: live and sterile soils (2 g aliquots) of all
six soils (Table 2) were measured in triplicates for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, and assays were stopped after 0, 4 and 24 h. Net
immobilization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gross process rates were calculated for the
time interval 4 to 24 h, and relationships between gross and net soil P
processes and soil physicochemical parameters were tested.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Calculations of abiotic and biotic net {$\protect\chem{{}^{{33}}P}$} immobilization}?><title>Calculations of abiotic and biotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization</title>
      <p id="d1e3969">In addition to the measurement of gross rates, abiotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
immobilization (net soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation) and biotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
immobilization (net soil microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization) were calculated
based on the determination of the recovery of added tracer in soil extracts
of live and autoclaved soils (see above) after 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h. Abiotic immobilization (in % added tracer) was estimated as 100 % minus the percent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery in autoclaved soils. Total
immobilization was estimated as 100 minus the percent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery in
live soils. Biotic immobilization was calculated as the difference between
total and abiotic immobilization. These data provide a rapid assessment of
the abiotic versus microbial sink strengths for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but do not represent
gross rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Calculations of gross rates of soil P dynamics</title>
      <p id="d1e4062">Calculation of gross IPD rates followed the mass balance equations of
Kirkham and Bartholomew (1954), as later applied by others for soil
gross P fluxes (Kellogg et al., 2006; Mooshammer et al., 2012). In these
gross P-flux studies abiotic processes were not corrected for; therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx
rates represent the sum of biotic (organic P mineralization) and
abiotic (desorption) processes, the latter of which do not play a significant
role in decomposing litter that is devoid of soil minerals
(Mooshammer et al., 2012). However, to calculate gross
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization for soils, gross rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption have to
be corrected for in live soils. In the present study, this abiotic correction
was performed by applying IPD calculations for influx (GI – gross influx;
Eq. 1) for sterile soils (abiotic influx by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption) and live
soils (total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx), and taking the difference as the biotic influx
(i.e., gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization). The same procedure was performed for
tracer efflux (GE – gross efflux; Eq. 2), calculating gross
immobilization fluxes for live soils (total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux) and sterile soils
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption), with the difference providing gross rates of microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
immobilization. Both abiotic corrections are based on the assumption that
abiotic sorption/desorption processes are not affected by autoclaving, i.e.,
that these processes act similarly in sterile and in live soils.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M266" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Gross influx is calculated as</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>and gross efflux is calculated as</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent incubation time (4 and 24 h; in days),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw), SA represents the specific activity (in Bq <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and LN is the natural logarithm. Thus, gross rates are in micrograms of soil inorganic phosphorus per gram soil dry weight per day (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Net organic P mineralization rates can
easily be derived by subtracting gross microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake from gross
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization rates.</p>
      <p id="d1e4577">Due to the relatively rapid decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity by radioactive
decay, all data were decay-corrected back to the start of each experiment,
i.e., the time point of tracer addition to the soil. This was done according
to Eq. (3):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M284" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the decay-corrected <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity in a sample (in Bq), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity at time of liquid scintillation counting, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is time (in days) elapsed between tracer addition and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity measurement, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.71828</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the decay constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.0273539).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Statistics</title>
      <p id="d1e4739">Regressions were performed in Sigmaplot 13.0 (Systat Software, Inc.) and
group differences were tested using one-way and two-way ANOVA tests followed by a Tukey HSD test in Statgraphics Centurion XVIII (Statpoint Technologies,
Inc.). Variance homogeneity was tested using a Levene test and if necessary data
were log, square root or rank transformed to meet assumptions of
homoscedasticity and normal distribution.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Soil characterization</title>
      <?pagebreak page3055?><p id="d1e4758">Temperate grassland soils had a pH between 6.3 and 6.8, with a silt loam to
sandy loam texture (Table 2). Soil organic C contents ranged between 48 and
127 mg C g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw, soil N from 2.3 to 5.0 mg N g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw and soil total P from 0.44 to 0.82 mg P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw. Tropical forest soils had a pH between 4.1
and 4.2, and soil texture varied between silt, silty loam and sandy loam. Soil
organic C contents were lower at 26 to 31 mg C g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw, soil N ranged from
2.2 to 2.6 mg N g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw, and soil total P ranged from 0.09 to 0.17 mg P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw.
Organic P comprised a larger fraction of total P in tropical forest soils
(64 %–76 %) than in temperate grassland soils (22 %–57 %). Extractable soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher in temperate grasslands (4.2–13.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw) compared with tropical forest soils (0.07–0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw). Acid phosphomonoesterase activities of tropical
forest soils (1396–2346 nmol MUF released g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
markedly exceeded those in temperate grasslands (233–256 nmol MUF released g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Abiotic controls: soil sterilization efficiency</title>
      <p id="d1e4942">A separation of biotic and abiotic processes is based on the comparison of
gross rates using the IPD assay in live versus autoclaved soils, where the
latter should not exhibit any microbial activity (no FDA hydrolysis activity)
and no extracellular enzyme activities (no MUF-phosphatase activity), in
order to serve as abiotic controls. An incomplete inhibition of extracellular
phosphatase activities would lead to an underestimation of biological
processes and, therefore, of gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization. Our results show
that two consecutive treatments of the soils by autoclaving, with a 48 h
incubation in between, effectively reduced microbial metabolic activity as
shown by the reduction in soil FDA hydrolysis by 90 % in soil 4 and by
97 %–99 % in all other soils (Fig. 3). Autoclaved soils did not show any
increase in soil microbial activity during the 2 d of incubation. On the
contrary, the inhibition of FDA hydrolysis even increased from 1 h (all
soil average: 94 %) towards 24 and 48 h after sterilization (average:
97 %–99 %). The inhibition of extracellular acid phosphatase activity was
almost complete in tropical soils (95 %–97 %) and strongly reduced in
temperate soils (79 %–80 %). Similar to FDA hydrolysis, the extent of
inhibition of phosphatase activity increased from day 0 (average: 86 %) to
day 1 and 2 (average: 88 %–89 %, Fig. 3). However, autoclaving increased
available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fold (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 SD) in temperate
soils and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fold in the tropical soils (Fig. S1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5000">Relationship between <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recoveries as measured directly
in acidified bicarbonate extracts and after isobutanol fractionation,
relative to the added tracer amount, and between <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
measured using the malachite green method in acidified bicarbonate extracts and
after isobutanol fractionation following the phosphomolybdate blue approach.
<bold>(c)</bold> Comparison of specific activities (SA) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in acidified
bicarbonate extracts and after isobutanol fractionation. Regression in <bold>(c)</bold> is
only for temperate grassland soils (closed circles); for tropical forest
soils (open circles), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were close to the detection limit
of the phosphomolybdate method, impairing calculations of SA for isobutanol
fractionation. Linear regressions are given (slopes and intercepts <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 SD).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=179.252362pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of isobutanol fractionation and direct measurements of {$\protect\chem{P_{i}}$} and {$\protect\chem{{}^{{33}}P}$} activity}?><title>Comparison of isobutanol fractionation and direct measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity</title>
      <?pagebreak page3056?><p id="d1e5106">Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations measured using the malachite green method directly
in acidified bicarbonate extracts were compared to those measured after
isobutanol fractionation by phosphomolybdate blue reaction, including both
live and sterile soils. Both approaches yielded similar soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, and the relationship showed no bias (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.979</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.033</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 SE), with a coefficient of determination of 0.92 (Fig. 4b). The malachite green method is much more sensitive and therefore produced
more reliable results for the low-P soils from the three tropical forests.
Moreover, the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recoveries by isobutanol
fractionation and by direct measurements in acidified bicarbonate extracts
had a slope less than 1 (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.875</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4a), indicating no
significant formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during soil incubations. We also
found no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation in other soils using the same measurement
protocols, e.g., from the Jena biodiversity experiment (82 plots of temperate
grassland varying in soil texture and plant biodiversity,
slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.891</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.017</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and from French Guiana (24 soils from two primary
forest regions, with soils sampled across topographic gradients,
slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.043</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.020</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (same regression types as in Fig. 3a; data not
shown). The specific activities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were indistinguishable between
both approaches for temperate soils (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.977</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.064</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 4c) but varied strongly for the tropical
soils, where soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements in the isobutanol fraction were at or
below the limit of detection of the phosphomolybdate blue method. Specific
activities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were initially higher in live than in sterile soils
(Fig. 4c). This was caused by the addition of the same amount of radiotracer
to both, sterile and live soils, but autoclaving caused a flush of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from lysed soil microbes, which effectively lowered the specific activities
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in sterile soils.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Sensitivity of the IPD assay</title>
      <p id="d1e5343">The sensitivity of this assay is greatly improved relative to traditional
methods by using a combination of bicarbonate extractions and malachite green
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. The detection limit of the IPD approach was 0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on 3 times the standard
deviation of gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization, measured for the three tropical
soils (each measured in triplicate), and was, therefore, fully suitable across all
soil types tested so far. However, the precision suffers from IPD equations
that combine uncertainties from four measurements, two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
and two radioactivity measurements for the two time points in live as well
sterile soils. The coefficients of variation (CV) ranged between 1.0 % and
22.1 % (average 10.0 %) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration across temperate and
tropical soils, and between 1.5 % and 22.1 % (average 9.6 %) for SA, the
two major input variables into the IPD equation. CVs increased towards lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and higher SA values, i.e., closer to the detection
limit of the malachite green method. The CVs might be reduced by working with
larger soil aliquots (increase from 2 to 5 or 10 g soil fresh weight) and by
duplicate measurements of all samples. Purely methodological CVs were lower,
at about 2.5 % and 0.9 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements using malachite green in the
range from 3 to 12 and 12 to 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M, respectively, and 0.8 % for liquid
scintillation counting. Therefore, much of the shown variability derived from
differences between biological soil replicates. However, the variability
found here compares well with CVs published for soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
of 2 %–10 % (Bünemann et al., 2007) and 20 %–25 %
(Bünemann et al., 2012), and CVs for measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values that are calculated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
recoveries analogous to SA values ranging between 6 % and 16 %
(Bünemann et al., 2007), 8 % and 19 %
(Bünemann et al., 2012) and 9 % and 10 %
(Randriamanantsoa et al., 2015) across a range of cultivated
and non-cultivated soils from temperate to tropical regions. These variations
naturally propagate into higher errors in the measured rates of soil P
cycling and increase the limit of detection and the limit of quantification
of the various methods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5497">Test for linearity of change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recoveries <bold>(a, b)</bold> and in
specific activities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c, d)</bold> over time, for a temperate grassland
soil <bold>(a, c)</bold> and a tropical forest soil <bold>(b, d)</bold>. Data presented are for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured directly in bicarbonate extracts of live soils (closed
circles) and sterile soils (open circles), and are shown in a
logarithmic manner (LN) on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes. Regression lines follow exponential decay which in
this linear–LN plot appears as a straight line; dashed lines represent
sterile soils, and solid lines represent live soils. Regressions were calculated for the
time intervals from 2 to 24 h (tropical soil) and from 4 to 48 h (temperate
soil).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Time kinetics</title>
      <p id="d1e5570">During the first hour of the incubation, we found a rapid drop in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery and in the SA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4), while soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased slightly (Fig. S1). Thereafter, a dynamic equilibrium between added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer and the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool was reached and concentrations of extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained constant. A plot of ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery) versus time for both live and sterile soils showed that the consumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred linearly between 4 and 48 h in the temperate soil and between 2 and
24 h in the tropical soil (Fig. 5). Similarly, the plot of ln(SA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus time showed a linear relationship from 4 to 48 h in the temperate soil and for 2 to 48 h in the tropical soil, particularly in live soils (Fig. 5), with constant dilution of the isotopic signature of the pool over time. The regressions became insignificant in the sterile tropical soil, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery and SA declined more slowly. The data clearly show that abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> processes (i.e., decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery and SA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over time in sterile soils) occurred, particularly in the temperate soil, and that this occurred over a prolonged period of time. More importantly, the dynamics of the abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> processes changed over time: rapid abiotic immobilization during the initial 0–4 h was followed by a period of slower but linear tracer immobilization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Net {$\protect\chem{{}^{{33}}P}$} immobilization by abiotic and biotic processes}?><title>Net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization by abiotic and biotic processes</title>
      <p id="d1e5758">Abiotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization (net soil P fixation) increased markedly from 0 to 48 h in the grassland soil (17 % to 58 % of added tracer), while it reached 83 % almost instantaneously in tropical soil and further increased to 90 % after 48 h (Fig. 6a). Similar patterns were found across all six soils, with significantly higher abiotic net immobilization in tropical than in temperate soils, increasing in both with time from 0 to 4 and 24 h (Fig. 6c). Biotic (microbial) net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization ranged from 3 % to 8 % in the tropical soil and 8 to 17 % in the temperate soil in the time kinetics experiment, with a significant increase in the temperate but not in the tropical soil (Fig. 6b). Similarly, biotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization was
low but increased with time in all three tropical soils (3 % to 6 %), while
it was significantly higher in temperate soils but increased (soil 6) or
decreased (soil 2 and 4) with time (Fig. 6d). Microbial immobilization was
very fast, with almost instantaneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by microbes (sampling<?pagebreak page3057?> at
0 h), ranging between 3 % (tropical soils) and 15 %–38 % (temperate soils).
Given the strong changes in both abiotic and biotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
immobilization, we suggest that it is best to measure them after 24 h (up to
48 h).</p>
      <p id="d1e5821">Sequential extraction–liquid chloroform-extraction (sECE) was applied to
directly follow net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by microbes, whereas biotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization was estimated indirectly as the difference in net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization by live and sterile soils. In the two measured soils, sECE estimates of microbial net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake were higher than the microbial net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization estimates (temperate soil was 24.6 % versus 16.0 %, and tropical soil was 16.8 % versus 7.5 %, for direct and indirect estimates, respectively). This indicates incomplete extraction of exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to microbial lysis with chloroform and re-extraction.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5898">Net immobilization rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by abiotic processes
(sorption; <bold>a</bold>, <bold>c</bold>) measured in sterile soils and biotic processes (microbial
uptake; <bold>b</bold>, <bold>d</bold>) measured in live soils of a temperate grassland (soil 4) and a
tropical forest (soil 3) after 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h <bold>(a, b)</bold> and for
six soils measured after 0, 4 and 24 h <bold>(c, d)</bold>. Temperate grassland soils
(2, 4 and 6) and tropical forest soils (3, 5 and 7) were investigated in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>.
Curvilinear regressions following the function “exponential rise to
maximum” were performed on the data in <bold>(a, b)</bold>. Statistical analyses of data
in <bold>(c, d)</bold> were undertaken using a two-way ANOVA for the factors soil and time (0, 4 and
24 h after tracer addition), and the interaction between factors.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{{}^{{33}}P}$} pool dilution rates of abiotic and biotic processes}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool dilution rates of abiotic and biotic processes</title>
      <p id="d1e5973">We calculated gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx and efflux rates for live and sterile
soils. The calculated rates of sterile soils provide estimates of gross rates of
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption and desorption, and the difference between live and
sterile soils give the biotic influx (gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization) and
efflux (gross microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake). Gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization
significantly differed between soils, with two out of three temperate soils
(0.48 to 2.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibiting higher rates than
two out of three tropical soils (0.08 to 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 7a). Gross rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption in temperate soils (2.06
to 6.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were higher than in tropical soils (0.15 to 0.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and a similar trend was found for gross rates of microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (temperate soils: 0.44 to 1.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; tropical soils: 0.05 to 0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 7b). Gross rates of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption were significantly higher in temperate soils (1.44–3.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in tropical soils (0.04–0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 7a). The relative contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization to total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release into the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool ranged between 25.0 % and 73.8 %,
with two tropical P-poor soils showing the highest contributions (Fig. 7c).
Contributions of biological processes to gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization did not differ between soils (ranged from 11.5 % to 34.9 %).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6372">Gross influx rates into the available soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool <bold>(a)</bold> and
gross efflux rates from this pool <bold>(b)</bold> measured by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope pool
dilution for six soils over the time period from 4 to 24 h and assessed in
sterile and live soils. Abiotic and biotic process rates are indicated by
open and closed bars, respectively. Temperate grassland soils (2, 4 and 6) and
tropical forest soils (3, 5 and 7) were studied. Presented are means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 SD
of triplicate live and sterile soils per time point and soil type. A one-way
ANOVA was performed on transformed data, as indicated in parentheses. Different
lowercase letters indicate significant differences between soils for abiotic
processes (open bars), uppercase letters indicate significant differences between soils for biological processes (black
bars).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e6420">Relationship between selected soil physicochemical parameters, net
abiotic and microbial immobilization fluxes, gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influx rates by
biological processes (gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization) and abiotic processes
(gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption), and gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux rates by biological
processes (gross microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake) and abiotic processes (gross
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption). Regression lines are for linear or power function fits,
and P and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for these are shown. Open circles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>)
depict tropical forest soils, and closed circles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">•</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) depict temperate grassland
soils. Units are provided in Table 2 for soil physicochemical parameters and
phosphomonoesterase, and are the percentage (%) of added tracer for net processes, and micrograms of phosphorus per gram soil dry weight per day (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for gross process rates.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3047/2019/bg-16-3047-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page3058?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS8">
  <label>3.8</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Physicochemical and biological controls on soil {$\protect\chem{P_{i}}$} processes}?><title>Physicochemical and biological controls on soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> processes</title>
      <p id="d1e6574">Gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization was strongly positively correlated with total
soil P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8a) and with total as well as
extractable soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8b), but not with soil organic P or its contribution to soil total P, nor with soil organic C, soil texture or soil acid phosphatase activity (Table S1). Gross abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release rates via desorption and dissolution were strongly positively related to total soil P and bicarbonate soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.98, respectively, both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8c and Table S1), but not to other parameters such as soil pH, soil texture and soil organic C content. Gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption rates exceeded gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption rates approximately 2-fold, but both were strongly related (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8e). Gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption rates were strongly positively related to soil total P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Fig. 8d), soil total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S1) and
bicarbonate soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S1), but
not to soil pH, soil organic C, nor clay content or soil texture.
Abiotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization was most strongly, negatively related to soil pH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8l) and weakly, negatively related to soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.073</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8j). Gross
microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake rates were directly proportional to microbial
biomass P measured by sECE (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8g), and
positively related to net microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8i). We found a negative curvilinear relationship
between net immobilization rates by sorption and microbes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 8f).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3059?><sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e7060">About a decade ago, Kellogg et al. (2006) compared two
IEK techniques with an IPD approach, identifying several biases of the
different approaches and making recommendations for further development. The
authors recommended the IPD approach with soil extraction using 0.5 M sodium
bicarbonate, as it is best suited for any potential soil type. However, this
approach is currently underused and has had issues with abiotic controls. IPD
methods are state-of-the-art to measure gross processes of soil N cycling
(Murphy et al., 2003), but have rarely been applied to
soil P cycling processes (Mooshammer et al., 2012; Di et al., 2000; Kellogg
et al., 2006). Here, we present a novel and versatile approach to derive
quantitative estimates of soil P-cycling processes that drive soil P
availability in low- to high-P soils. The approach quantifies gross rates of
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and the abiotic release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
non-extractable soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pools (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption and dissolution), both of which cause a gross influx of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the soil available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool. Furthermore, gross rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization by soil sorption and precipitation and by microbial uptake processes are derived from the same data by calculating the efflux from the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool in sterile soils (abiotic) and in live minus sterile soils (biotic processes), respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e7152">In contrast to many earlier IEK assays, the IPD approach presented here is
based on real isotope pool dilution theory (Kirkham and
Bartholomew, 1954), and not on curvilinear extrapolation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Table 1). Moreover, IEK assays of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization necessitate steady-state conditions (constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and microbial biomass P pools, and constant rates of isotope exchange and respiration) to allow for the extrapolation of short-term exchange processes to the full length of the moist soil incubation experiments. IPD approaches can accommodate non-steady-state conditions as caused by flush effects and disturbances
(Mooshammer et al., 2017) or as induced by the addition of organic matter. The equations to estimate IPD rates can easily be solved for soils where target pool concentrations increase (net mineralization) or decrease (net immobilization) over time and where microbial biomass P changes (Kirkham and Bartholomew, 1954), and do not necessitate constant pool sizes as has been incorrectly suggested in previous studies (Di et al., 2000; Randhawa et al., 2005).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Soil sterilization</title>
      <p id="d1e7191"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IPD experiments in soils differ from the more common <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IPD variants for gross N processes (Murphy et al., 2003),
as the persistence of abiotic P processes over time (Figs. 5, 6) needs
to be accounted for via the use of sterile soils. Our data clearly show that
the dynamics of abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> processes change over time. Therefore, the IPD rates in the sterile soils need to be measured over the same time period and under similar environmental conditions as in the live soils. It is<?pagebreak page3060?> likely insufficient to extrapolate from short-term (100 min) batch incubations run under very different conditions to correct for abiotic processes in the respective live moist soil incubations over weeks.
Bünemann et al. (2007) indicated that batch
incubations (1 : 10 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) soil : water suspensions) have higher water-soluble and isotopically exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (measured as extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) and tend to have higher tracer recoveries (measured as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., water-soluble <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovered relative to total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> added) compared with moist soil incubations. Therefore, incubation conditions should also match between live and sterile soils.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3061?><p id="d1e7313">We chose autoclaving as the sterilization procedure as other procedures only
reduce or eliminate microbial activity (gamma irradiation, azide, mercuric
chloride, toluene or chloroform treatment) but do not curtail extracellular
enzyme activities (Blankinship et al., 2014; Wolf et al., 1989; Tiwari et
al., 1988; Oehl et al., 2001b). Given that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization is mediated by extracellular phosphatases, previous isotope experiments using short-term batch experiments with or without microbicides or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiation did not inhibit phosphatases and, therefore, did not allow for the separation of abiotic and biotic processes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release in soils. While the application of phosphatase inhibitors might be another viable option, we are only aware of one study testing this; the application of silver nanoparticles to soils showed a general inhibitory effect on soil enzymes (Shin et al., 2012). Previous tests in our laboratory with two commercial phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma-Aldrich) at 10-fold the recommended final concentration did not significantly decrease IPD rates in two soils (data not shown), indicating an insufficient inhibition of extracellular phosphatases. However, more rigorous tests of soil enzyme activities with synthetic substrates (e.g., MUF-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of P mineralization based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IPD using increasing concentrations and different types of commercial phosphatase
inhibitor cocktails might clarify whether this approach is viable or not.
In contrast, autoclaving soils twice was highly efficient in suppressing
biological activities, and those soils had no or very low extracellular
enzyme activity and no residual microbial metabolic activity. Previous
studies have shown (almost) total inhibition of hydrolytic enzyme activities
(including phosphomonoesterases) by autoclaving, in a wide range of arable,
grassland and forest soils (Serrasolsas et al., 2008; Kedi et al.,
2013; Blankinship et al., 2014; Tiwari et al., 1988). Other studies have
demonstrated successful killing of bacterial and fungal cells in soils by
autoclaving (Carter et al., 2007; Blankinship et al., 2014; Serrasolsas and
Khanna, 1995b; Alphei and Scheu, 1993). Most importantly, the final step in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization is catalyzed by phosphomonoesterases, which were fully inactivated by autoclaving in all soils tested so far.</p>
      <p id="d1e7380">It must be noted that autoclaving could potentially alter the physicochemical
properties of soils, thereby affecting abiotic sorption/desorption kinetics.
Despite this, in previous studies autoclaving up to two times and steam
sterilization did not affect the cation exchange capacity, nor did it impact base saturation, soil surface area, contents of total organic carbon and total
nitrogen, and it only slightly affected soil pH (Wolf et al., 1989; Tanaka et al.,
2003; Serrasolsas and Khanna, 1995b). Autoclaving might, however, weaken soil
aggregates and therefore increase the number of sites accessible for
sorption/desorption processes that were previously hidden in aggregates.
However, we did not find clear support for or against this in the literature
as autoclaving only weakly affected soil aggregate size distribution, causing
a 0.5 % to 1 % increase in clay-sized aggregates compared with silt-sized aggregates (Berns et al., 2008). In contrast, aggregate
stability and aggregation increased upon autoclaving in two other studies
(Lotrario et al., 1995; Salonius et al., 1967). The effects of autoclaving on
soil aggregation and soil P dynamics could be tested by measuring P-process
rates on intact aggregates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 mm and after destroying them by
ultrasonication or grinding. In our study autoclaving caused a pulse of
labile P into the available soil P pool due to the lysis of microbial biomass
(Fig. S1), as has also been demonstrated for P and N by Serrasolsas and
Khanna (1995a, b). Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased significantly in the autoclaved soils studied here, but only by an average of 1.86-fold in the
three temperate soils and 1.65-fold in the three tropical forest soils,
which was in the range found by others, e.g., 1.3- to 1.6-fold
(Skipper and Westermann, 1973) and 1.5- to 1.6-fold
(Anderson and Magdoff, 2005), but lower than reported
elsewhere, e.g., 2.6- to 11-fold (Serrasolsas and Khanna, 1995a).
Autoclaving was also demonstrated to increase the tracer recovery (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
decrease the velocity of its decline over time, as expected due to loss of
microbial biomass (Bünemann et al., 2007). Therefore, autoclaving slightly affects the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool and most likely has minor effects on its abiotic sorption/desorption dynamics, whereas it inhibits biological reactions. Nonetheless, the effects of microbial lysis on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption/desorption could be tested in sterile soils by adding increasing concentrations of non-labeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alongside the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer and then could be corrected for in future <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-IPD experiments. As stated earlier, changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration caused by autoclaving can easily be accounted for in IPD approaches, as long as abiotic process rates remain unaffected by the treatment. However, the estimation of the contribution of abiotic and biotic processes is based on calculating the difference in P fluxes between sterile and non-sterile soils. This assumes that biotic and abiotic fluxes are additive while there is potential that both processes compete for available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this case we would overestimate abiotic process rates in autoclaved soils, due to lack of competition by biotic processes. This could effectively cause an underestimation of biotic processes, i.e., organic P mineralization and microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake. To date we have no approach at hand to cope with this potential bias. Thus, overall, there is the potential for method improvement, particularly in terms of using abiotic controls circumventing autoclaving (e.g., bactericide combined with phosphomonoesterase inhibitors) or correcting for autoclave-induced changes in aggregation and in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Soil {$\protect\chem{P_{i}}$} extraction using bicarbonate}?><title>Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extraction using bicarbonate</title>
      <?pagebreak page3062?><p id="d1e7539">Similar to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IPD assays, where salt extractions are employed to target
the available inorganic or organic N pool (Murphy et al., 2003; Wanek et
al., 2010; Hu et al., 2017), we focused on the potentially bioavailable,
salt-extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool that more suitably reflects the plant- (and microbial)
accessible amount of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fardeau et al., 1988; Olsen et
al., 1954; Horta and Torrent, 2007) than the water extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool, which is mostly assessed with soil IEK methods. The applied 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extraction (pH 8.5, Olsen P) promotes the displacement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and the extraction of labile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particularly from Al–Fe (hydr)oxides and soil
organic matter, by competition of bicarbonate anions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
underlying process is an increase of the negative charge on surfaces and a
decrease of the concentration and activity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
thereby increasing P solubility in acid to alkaline soils (Horta and
Torrent, 2007; Schoenau and O'Halloran, 2008; Demaria et al., 2005). Several
studies compared soil P tests such as Bray III, resin P and Olsen P to soil
water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and plant P uptake in order to assess how well they reflect the available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool. These studies demonstrated that soil tests like bicarbonate extractions (Olsen P), resin P and DGT (diffusive gradients in thin films technique) closely resembled the SA values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extracted by water or 10 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or from plants (Six et al., 2012; Fardeau et al., 1988; Demaria et al., 2005). Others further showed that isotopically exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in soil water extracts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) and those extracted by plant roots in plant growth experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values) were also strongly related (Bühler et al., 2003; Frossard et al., 1994). Bicarbonate extracted 8- to 22-fold greater amounts of exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared with water, and SA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in bicarbonate extracts reached 66 %–90 % of the SA values measured in soil water extracts (Demaria et al., 2005). IPD approaches require fast extractions to quickly terminate the assay after 4 and 24 h, which renders water extractions (generally 16 h), resin P (16 h) and DGT (up to 48 h in low P soils; Six et al., 2012) impossible.
Bicarbonate extractions only take 30–60 min and therefore represent a viable alternative. Moreover, it makes the IPD assay 8-fold more
sensitive on average, as a greater amount of exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is extracted by
bicarbonate than with water (Kleinman et al., 2001).
Underestimation of this labile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool – even if specific activities
thereof are correctly measured – also causes underestimation of IPD rates,
given that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations linearly affect IPD rates according to IPD Eqs. (1) and (2) above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Microbial P dynamics</title>
      <p id="d1e7795">We observed very fast microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization in live soils (within minutes; extraction started directly after tracer addition), causing net immobilization of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 3 %–38 %. Similar results were reported within 1.5 to 4 h by others, ranging from 6 % to 37 % (Bünemann et al., 2012; Kellogg et al., 2006). This has two major repercussions. (i) Rapid uptake might cause microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assimilation and efflux or exudation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> metabolites without microbial death and turnover. However, the comparison between specific activities and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recoveries of the direct measurement and after isobutanol fractionation (see below, and Fig. 3) showed that no significant release of microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred during the 24 and 48 h incubations. The short extraction times used in this study also decrease the likelihood of significant hydrolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds. (ii) Rapid microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake clearly rules out the use of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization assays that measure abiotic IEK in short-term batch
experiments (100 min) without the addition of a microbicide or without prior
sterilization and then extrapolate these “abiotic” process rates to the
full experimental duration.</p>
      <p id="d1e7912">Microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake can be derived indirectly as the difference in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery between live and sterile soils (Fig. 5, this study), more directly by sECE (this study), or by parallel water or bicarbonate extraction with and without the addition of liquid chloroform or hexane (measuring resin strip or extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), or by chloroform fumigation extraction (Bünemann et al., 2012; Oberson et al., 2001; Oehl et al., 2001a; Spohn and Kuzyakov, 2013). Microbial net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization measured by direct sECE was higher relative to the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilized in live minus sterile soils, pointing towards (i) overestimation of microbial net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization by sECE due to incomplete extraction of nonmicrobial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by one-time bicarbonate extraction prior to sECE, or (ii) overestimation of abiotic sorption processes by autoclaving. In favor of (i),
repeated extractions of soils with Bray 1 showed that soils
continued to release P at lower rates in subsequent extractions after readily
extractable P was removed by the first extraction (Serrasolsas et al.,
2008; Messiga et al., 2014). Repeated extractions with bicarbonate also showed that the first extraction only removed 67 %–78 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that was extractable with three consecutive extractions (D. Wasner, unpublished data, 2017). In favor of (ii), Kellogg et al. (2006) found
higher net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization or sorption in sterile than in live soils. This was interpreted as a lack of microbial competition for P in
sterile soils. However, we found a weak positive relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.749</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.087</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S1) between gross microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake and gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption. This opposes the idea of strong competition between sorption and microbial uptake on the basis of gross process measurements. Another possible mechanism underlying (ii) could be changes in soil structure and reactive surfaces enhancing soil P sorption. Delineation of the causes could be performed by a comparison of sECE with liquid chloroform–fumigation
extraction (CFE), i.e., parallel assessments of microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake,
using a comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in bicarbonate versus bicarbonate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> liquid chloroform or bicarbonate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> liquid hexane extracts. Given the continued extraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pools in serial extraction tests, parallel determination of microbial P and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by CFE is recommended compared with sequential extractions by sECE.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of isobutanol fractionation with direct measurements of {$\protect\chem{P_{i}}$} and {$\protect\chem{{}^{{33}}P}$} activity}?><title>Comparison of isobutanol fractionation with direct measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity</title>
      <p id="d1e8180">We showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> IPD assays can be performed specifically on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool using isobutanol fractionation in high-P soils. However, due to low production or persistence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, results closely conformed with measurements run without <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractionation by malachite green and direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates. This was ascertained for forest soils from French Guiana and Costa Rica, and for grassland soils from Austria and Germany (data not shown for French Guiana and Germany). Isobutanol fractionation has previously been applied in radiotracer studies on P dynamics in soils (Kellogg et al., 2006) and
litter (Mooshammer et al., 2012) to ascertain the separation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from any possible radiolabeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contaminant,
although without comparison to SA in unfractionated bicarbonate extracts.
Oehl et al. (2001a) also applied isobutanol fractionation to
water extracts of fumigated and control soils, demonstrating that with long
extraction times (16 h) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities in water extracts with and without isobutanol fractionation were comparable. It was suggested that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> possibly released during fumigation was cleaved by soil
phosphatases during extraction. This may not apply for short-term extractions
(e.g., 0.5 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 30 min, as used in this study) where hydrolysis by phosphatases would not necessarily occur due to short contact times. Measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope pool dilution in soils based on bicarbonate extracts can therefore be interchangeably be performed by (i) direct
measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in acidified bicarbonate
extracts and after (ii) isobutanol fractionation on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this needs to be validated for other types of soil,<?pagebreak page3063?> and may change significantly after longer incubation periods (weeks), when microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, assimilation and turnover causes the release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the soil. The shortcut of performing direct measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in acidified bicarbonate extracts comes along with a 4- to 10-fold greater sensitivity of the malachite green assay relative to phosphomolybdate blue measurements of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Another option to increase the measurement sensitivity for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and possibly also for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for strongly sorbing low-P soils has been adopted by Randriamanantsoa et al. (2013), and is based on the concentration of the phosphomolybdate blue complex from a large volume of extract into a smaller volume of hexane, with subsequent phase separation (Murphy and Riley, 1962). This allows for the quantification limits of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be decreased 66-fold compared with the classical Murphy–Riley protocol, and 14-fold compared with the malachite green procedure (Randriamanantsoa et al.,
2013), but involves the handling of large volumes of radiolabeled extracts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Time kinetics</title>
      <p id="d1e8493">During the first few minutes, equilibration between the tracer and tracee was not
achieved, which was indicated by the enhanced extractability of the added tracer
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) relative to more strongly bonded native tracee (soil
exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The fast process of equilibration caused very rapid
declines in the SA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the first few minutes. Thereafter, microbial uptake and soil P fixation caused a rapid drawdown of extractable
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a further decrease in the SA of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations did not change after the initial phase of tracer–tracee equilibration (Fig. 4). These processes slowed down within the first 1–2 h but did not cease, and declines in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recoveries and in the SA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred throughout the incubation period, in sterile as well as in live soils. Thereafter, time kinetics of IPD were relatively constant between 4 and 24 h for both temperate and tropical soils, as shown by the linearity of the relationship in a plot of ln(SA of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus time. This linear relationship is conceptually different from the plot of log(recovery, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus log(time) in short-term IEK batch experiments, which provides the parameter “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”, i.e., the slope or the rate of decline in tracer recovery due to sorption over time (Bünemann, 2015). Based on constant IPD rates in the abovementioned time interval we advise running <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool dilution experiments for an incubation period of 4 to 24 h. This time frame is well within the linear range, as it lies after the rapid abiotic equilibration, and is long enough to allow significant pool dilution to occur for sensitive measurements of organic P mineralization. Longer incubation times are not recommended due to the risk of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
release from dying microbes, potentially causing a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflux
via remineralization, violating a major assumption of IPD theory.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of {$\protect\chem{P_{o}}$} mineralization rates with published values}?><title>Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization rates with published values</title>
      <p id="d1e8688">The detection limit of the IPD approach was 0.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In comparison, the detection limits for gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization by the IEK approach were 0.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the modified protocol including the hexane concentration of
phosphomolybdate blue for tropical soils (Randriamanantsoa et
al., 2015) and 0.6–2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> using the traditional IEK approach on temperate soils (Bünemann et al.,
2007). Values of gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization measured via IPD in this study ranged between 0.08 and 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in tropical
forest soils and 0.48–2.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in temperate grassland soils and were, therefore, well within the range of those compiled for
IEK measurements by Bünemann (2015) for 14 different
soils, including temperate arable, grassland and forest soils (0.1–12.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and one tropical arable soil (0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). To date, the highest gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization rates have been reported for decomposing beech litter, i.e.,
22.5–86.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g P g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> soil litter dw d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Mooshammer et al., 2012). A direct comparison of the
present IPD and the IEK approaches on the same soils might help to clarify
how far the approaches really deviate or converge in their gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization rate estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS7">
  <label>4.7</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Physicochemical and biological controls on soil {$\protect\chem{P_{i}}$} processes}?><title>Physicochemical and biological controls on soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> processes</title>
      <p id="d1e9015">We found that gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization was strongly positively correlated with total soil P but not to soil organic P, soil organic C, soil texture or soil acid phosphatase activity. This indicates that gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization might be driven by total P rather than by soil enzyme activity, and that total soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not represent the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction accessible to soil phosphatases well. A few studies have demonstrated positive correlations between gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Lopez-Hernandez et al., 1998) or litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or its
inverse C : P; Mooshammer et al., 2012). However,
Wyngaard et al. (2016) did not find this relationship
between gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and total soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, they did note a relation with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content of the coarse soil fraction, which points in a similar direction to our results. Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization might rather be controlled by soil phosphodiesterases targeting DNA, RNA, teichoic
acids and phospholipids, than by phosphomonoesterases that are responsible
for the final extracellular dephosphorylation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast to our results, positive relationships were found between gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
mineralization and phosphomonoesterase activities in two studies (Spohn et
al., 2013; Oehl et al., 2004), although not across studies
(Bünemann, 2015). Thus, a larger set of soils varying in soil
pH, texture and mineralogy might provide better insights into the
controls of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization, such as effects by extracellular
phosphatase activity (phosphomonoesterases and phosphodiesterases), and<?pagebreak page3064?> the
availability, stabilization and accessibility of organic P in soils, among
others. Moreover, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability (i.e., bicarbonate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
strongly suppressed phosphomonoesterase activity in soils, causing a negative
correlation between the enzyme activity and extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was positively related to gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization, indicating that high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions suppressed phosphatase production but not <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization across these soils. This was also found as a positive correlation between gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and water-extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by others (Schneider et
al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e9274">The contribution of gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization to total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption from exchangeable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pools and dissolution ranged between 25 % and 74 %, with a trend towards larger contributions in low-P tropical soils (35 %–74 %) compared with temperate soils (25 %–51 %). This clearly demonstrates that biological processes contribute importantly to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply in soils, particularly in low-P soils, as also pointed out
by Bünemann (2015). In low-P forest soils biological
processes were shown to dominate over physicochemical processes, while in
P-rich forest soils abiotic processes controlled gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply rates (Bünemann et al., 2016). It was also found that the
contributions of microbial processes decreased with soil depth, whereas in deep soils diffusive fluxes (i.e., gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption) dominated the soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply due to low total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contents relative to total P
(Achat et al., 2012, 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e9377">Gross abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> release rates via desorption and dissolution were strongly positively related to total soil P and bicarbonate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but not to other parameters such as soil pH, soil texture and soil organic C
content. In contrast to the weak effects of soil pH and texture on gross soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> supply, soil mineralogy and particularly oxalate-extractable Fe and Al as proxies for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hydr)oxides play a major role in controlling abiotic dynamics of phosphate ions in soils, across the full range from acidic to alkaline soils (Achat et al., 2016). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hydr)oxides provide large positively-charged surface areas in weathered soils that are highly reactive to phosphate ions, more so than clay minerals such as kaolinite, illite and others (Hinsinger, 2001; Regelink et al., 2015). Therefore, soil mineralogy might provide further interesting insights into the controls of abiotic processes as demonstrated by (Achat et al., 2011, 2016), but can also affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization via strong effects on the sorption strength of organic matter and of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds. Moreover, the positive relations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption with soil organic C contents reported elsewhere has been explained by competitive sorption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOC or DOC to reactive surfaces such as positively charged
metal (hydr)oxides (Regelink et al., 2015; Achat et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e9494">Gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption rates exceeded gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> desorption rates
approximately 2-fold but both were strongly related, indicating close and
rapid cycling of available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through sorption/desorption processes. The
observed rates indicate that soils immobilized more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> then they
mobilized by abiotic processes, causing an intermediate drawdown of
available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pools. Two processes work against this drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in soils, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization and microbial P release via turnover and lysis. Moreover, plants (and microbes) might also desorb this sorbed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by the release of phytosiderophores and organic acids and thereby replenish <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and reinject it into the organic P cycle. Similar to the soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle, we might also expect an active “bank mechanism” regulating nutrient and C sequestration in soils (Fontaine et
al., 2011). At high nutrient availability priming effects are low, allowing
the sequestration of nutrients and SOC buildup. At low nutrient availability
microbes (and plants) release nutrients from SOM and from mineral surfaces
stimulated by root exudates, effectively mining inorganic and organic P
stored in soils.</p>
      <p id="d1e9609">The strong positive relationship between gross <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption rates and
soil total P, soil total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and bicarbonate soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the lack of a relationship with soil pH, soil organic C, clay content and soil texture highlights again that specific soil minerals, particularly metal (hydr)oxides and to a lesser extent clay minerals such kaolinite, which are factors not fully captured by soil pH and soil texture alone, are responsible for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorption in soils (Regelink et al., 2015). In the IEK
experiments it was found that the rate of abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion from soil solution via sorption was positively related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hydr)oxide content and negatively related to soil organic C divided by the Al and Fe oxide content (Achat et al., 2016; Tran et al., 1988). The strong negative relation between abiotic net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization and soil pH reconfirms that strongly weathered, acid tropical soils have a higher P sorption and fixation capacity than temperate soils.</p>
      <p id="d1e9691">Finally, gross microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake rates were directly proportional to microbial biomass P measured by sECE. We also found greater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
immobilization potentials through sorptive reactions (28 %–92 %) than through biological sinks (5 %–37 %) in the soils studied here. The importance of the rapid net uptake of tracer by soil microbes has also been demonstrated by other studies (e.g., Bünemann et al., 2012).
However, the presented IPD approach allowed for the estimation of
gross rates of microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in addition to net microbial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immobilization for the first time. Gross rates of microbial uptake were calculated from the IPD approach, not necessitating the application of any extraction factor to calculate microbial biomass P from chloroform-labile P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-factor). The
use of extraction factors becomes necessary when studying net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake over prolonged time periods in tracer experiments and for the correction of net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralization rates (Bünemann, 2015; Bünemann et al., 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS8">
  <label>4.8</label><title>Conclusion and outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e9780">The combination of this IPD assay with advanced numerical modeling
approaches, as applied by Müller and Bünemann (2014), might further enhance the precision of estimates of simultaneously
occurring soil P-cycle processes and thereby advance the knowledge of major
controls of<?pagebreak page3065?> the transformations and fluxes of this important nutrient in
terrestrial ecosystems. There is an ever-increasing need for high-quality data
on soil P processes, even more so to calibrate terrestrial biogeochemical
models and incorporate nutrient controls on plant productivity in global
models. This IPD approach may provide highly important quantitative data to
implement soil P-cycling processes into global biogeochemical models. This
will further enhance our current understanding of nutrient controls on the
global terrestrial C cycle and improve our capabilities to predict future
changes by increasing discrepancies in N and P inputs into the terrestrial
biosphere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e9788">The data of the different experiments are freely available
upon request from the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e9791">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3047-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3047-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e9800">The project was conceived and supervised by WW. DZ, JP
and DW performed the measurements and data evaluation. WW wrote the
paper with contributions from all coauthors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e9806">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e9812">We are indebted to the Isotope Laboratory managers for
access and training (Virginie Canoine, Markus Schmid).</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e9817">This paper was edited by Sébastien Fontaine and reviewed
by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Saur, E., Pellerin, S., Augusto, L., and Morel,
C.: Quantifying gross mineralisation of P in dead soil organic matter:
Testing an isotopic dilution method, Geoderma, 158, 163–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.027</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Augusto, L., Morel, C., and Bakker, M. R.: Predicting available
phosphate ions from physical-chemical soil properties in acidic sandy soils
under pine forests, J. Soils Sediments, 11, 452–466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0329-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11368-010-0329-9</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Augusto, L., Bakker, M. R., Gallet-Budynek, A., and Morel, C.:
Microbial processes controlling P availability in forest spodosols as
affected by soil depth and soil properties, Soil Biol. Biochem., 44, 39–48, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.007</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., and Morel, C.: Contributions of
microbial and physical-chemical processes to phosphorus availability in
Podzols and Arenosols under a temperate forest, Geoderma, 211, 18–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.003</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Achat, D. L., Pousse, N., Nicolas, M., Bredoire, F., and Augusto, L.: Soil
properties controlling inorganic phosphorus availability: general results
from a national forest network and a global compilation of the literature,
Biogeochemistry, 127, 255–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alphei, J. and Scheu, S.: Effects of biocidal treatments on biological and
nutritional properties of a mull-structured woodland soil, Geoderma, 56,
435–448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90125-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7061(93)90125-5</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, B. H. and Magdoff, F. R.: Autoclaving soil samples affects
algal-available phosphorus, J. Environ. Qual., 34, 1958–1963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq2005.0024</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berns, A. E., Philipp, H., Narres, H. D., Burauel, P., Vereecken, H., and
Tappe, W.: Effect of gamma-sterilization and autoclaving on soil organic
matter structure as studied by solid state NMR, UV and fluorescence
spectroscopy, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 540–550, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blankinship, J. C., Becerra, C. A., Schaeffer, S. M., and Schimel, J. P.:
Separating cellular metabolism from exoenzyme activity in soil organic matter
decomposition, Soil Biol. Biochem., 71, 68–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Booth, M. S., Stark, J. M., and Rastetter, E.: Controls on nitrogen cycling
in terrestrial ecosystems: A synthetic analysis of literature data,
Ecol. Monogr., 75, 139–157, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Braun, J., Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Prommer, J., Walker, T. W. N., Rutting,
T., and Richter, A.: Full N-15 tracer accounting to revisit major assumptions
of N-15 isotope pool dilution approaches for gross nitrogen mineralization,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 117, 16–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.005</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bühler, S., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., Friesen, D. K., and Frossard, E.:
Isotope methods for assessing plant available phosphorus in acid tropical
soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 54, 605–616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00542.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00542.x</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bünemann, E. K., Marschner, P., McNeill, A. M., and McLaughlin, M. J.:
Measuring rates of gross and net mineralisation of organic phosphorus in
soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 900–913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.10.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.10.009</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bünemann, E. K., Oberson, A., Liebisch, F., Keller, F., Annaheim, K. E.,
Huguenin-Elie, O., and Frossard, E.: Rapid microbial phosphorus
immobilization dominates gross phosphorus fluxes in a grassland soil with low
inorganic phosphorus availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 51, 84–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bünemann, E. K.: Assessment of gross and net mineralization rates of soil
organic phosphorus – A review, Soil Biol. Biochem., 89, 82–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.026</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bünemann, E. K., Augstburger, S., and Frossard, E.: Dominance of either
physicochemical or biological phosphorus cycling processes in temperate
forest soils of contrasting phosphate availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 101,
85–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carter, D. O., Yellowlees, D., and Tibbett, M.: Autoclaving kills soil
microbes yet soil enzymes remain active, Pedobiologia, 51, 295–299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.05.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.05.002</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3066?><ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Condron, L. M., Moir, J. O., Tiessen, H., and Stewart, J. W. B.:
Critical-Evaluation Of Methods For Determining Total Organic Phosphorus In
Tropical Soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54, 1261–1266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400050010x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400050010x</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
D'Angelo, E., Crutchfield, J., and Vandiviere, M.: Rapid, sensitive,
microscale determination of phosphate in water and soil, J. Environ. Qual.,
30, 2206–2209, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Demaria, P., Flisch, R., Frossard, E., and Sinaj, S.: Exchangeability of
phosphate extracted by four chemical methods, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 168, 89–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpin.200421463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jpin.200421463</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Di, H. J., Condron, L. M., and Frossard, E.: Isotope techniques to study
phosphorus cycling in agricultural and forest soils: A review, Biol. Fertil.
Soils, 24, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01420213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf01420213</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Di, H. J., Cameron, K. C., and McLaren, R. G.: Isotopic dilution methods to
determine the gross transformation rates of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur
in soil: a review of the theory, methodologies, and limitations, Aust. J.
Soil Res., 38, 213–230, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fardeau, J. C., Morel, C., and Boniface, R.: Why the Olsen method should be
used to estimate available soil phosphorus?, Agronomie, 8, 577–584, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19880702" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/agro:19880702</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fardeau, J. C., Morel, C., and Boniface, R.: Phosphate Ion Transfer From Soil
To Soil Solution – Kinetic-Parameters, Agronomie, 11, 787–797, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19910909" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/agro:19910909</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C.: Le phosphore assimilable des sols : sa représentation par
un modèle fonctionnel à plusieurs compartiments Agronomie, 13,
317–331, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fontaine, S., Henault, C., Aamor, A., Bdioui, N., Bloor, J. M. G., Maire, V.,
Mary, B., Revaillot, S., and Maron, P. A.: Fungi mediate long term
sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 86–96, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Fardeau, J. C., Brossard, M., and Morel, J. L.: Soil
isotopically exchangeable phosphorus – a comparison between E and L-values,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 846–851, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Achat, D. L., Bernasconi, S. M., Bünemann, E. K., Fardeau,
J. C., Jansa, J., Morel, C., Rabeharisoa, L., Randriamanantsoa, L., Sinaj,
S., Tamburini, F., and Oberson, A.: The Use of Tracers to Investigate
Phosphate Cycling in Soil-Plant Systems, in: Phosphorus in Action: Biological
Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling, edited by: Bunemann, E. K., Oberson,
A., and Frossard, E., Soil Biology, 59–91, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goldberg, S. and Sposito, G.: On the mechanism of specific
phosphate-adsorption by hydroxylated mineral surfaces – a review, Commun.
Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 16, 801–821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628509367646" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00103628509367646</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Green, V. S., Stott, D. E., and Diack, M.: Assay for fluorescein diacetate
hydrolytic activity: Optimization for soil samples, Soil Biol. Biochem., 38,
693–701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.020</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hart, S. C., Nason, G. E., Myrold, D. D., and Perry, D. A.: Dynamics of gross
nitrogen transformations in an old-growth forest: the carbon connection,
Ecology, 75, 880–891, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hinsinger, P.: Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as
affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review, Plant Soil, 237,
173–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013351617532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1013351617532</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Horta, M. D. and Torrent, J.: The Olsen P method as an agronomic and
environmental test for predicting phosphate release from acid soils, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 77, 283–292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9066-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10705-006-9066-2</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, Y. T., Zheng, Q., and Wanek, W.: Flux Analysis of Free Amino Sugars and
Amino Acids in Soils by Isotope Tracing with a Novel Liquid
Chromatography/High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Platform, Anal.
Chem., 89, 9192–9200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01938" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01938</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Jayachandran, K., Schwab, A. P., and Hetrick, B. A. D.: Partitioning
dissolved inorganic and organic phosphorus using acidified molybdate and
isobutanol, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 762–765, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kedi, B., Sei, J., Quiquampoix, H., and Staunton, S.: Persistence of
catalytic activity of fungal phosphatases incubated in tropical soils, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 56, 69–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.005</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kellogg, L. E., Bridgham, S. D., and Lopez-Hernandez, D.: A comparison of
four methods of measuring gross phosphorus mineralization, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 70, 1349–1358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2135/sssaj2005.0300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2135/sssaj2005.0300</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kirkham, D. and Bartholomew, W. V.: Equations for following nutrient
transformations in soil, utilizing tracer data, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Pro., 18, 33–34, 1954.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kleinman, P. J. A., Sharpley, A. N., Gartley, K., Jarrell, W. M., Kuo, S.,
Menon, R. G., Myers, R., Reddy, K. R., and Skogley, E. O.: Interlaboratory
comparison of soil phosphorus extracted by various soil test methods,
Commun. Soil Sci. Plan, 32, 2325–2345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1081/css-120000376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1081/css-120000376</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lopez-Hernandez, D., Brossard, M., and Frossard, E.: P-isotopic exchange
values in relation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mineralisation in soils with very low P-sorbing
capacities, Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 1663–1670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00255-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00255-1</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lotrario, J. B., Stuart, B. J., Lam, T., Arands, R. R., Oconnor, O. A., and
Kosson, D. S.: Effects Of Sterilization Methods On The Physical
Characteristics Of Soil – Implications For Sorption Isotherm Analyses, B. Environ. Contam. Tox., 54, 668–675, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mander, C., Wakelin, S., Young, S., Condron, L., and O'Callaghan, M.:
Incidence and diversity of phosphate-solubilising bacteria are linked to
phosphorus status in grassland soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 44, 93–101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.009</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Marx, M. C., Wood, M., and Jarvis, S. C.: A microplate fluorimetric assay for
the study of enzyme diversity in soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 33, 1633–1640,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Messiga, A. J., Ba, Y. X., Ziadi, N., Belanger, G., and Lafond, J.: Assessing
the depletion of soil P following sequential extractions with Mehlich-3 and
Olsen solutions, Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 60, 1445–1458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.884709" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/03650340.2014.884709</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Miller, W. and Miller, D.: A micropipette method for soil mechanical
analysis, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan, 18, 1–15, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Schnecker, J., Wild, B., Leitner, S., Hofhansl,
F., Blochl, A., Hammerle, I., Frank, A. H., Fuchslueger, L., Keiblinger, K.
M., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Richter, A.: Stoichiometric controls of
nitrogen and phosphoru<?pagebreak page3067?>s cycling in decomposing beech leaf litter, Ecology,
93, 770–782, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mooshammer, M., Hofhansl, F., Frank, A. H., Wanek, W., Hammerle, I., Leitner,
S., Schnecker, J., Wild, B., Watzka, M., Keiblinger, K. M.,
Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Richter, A.: Decoupling of microbial carbon,
nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling in response to extreme temperature events,
Sci. Adv., 3, e1602781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1602781</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Müller, C. and Bünemann, E. K.: A P-33 tracing model for quantifying
gross P transformation rates in soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 76, 218–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.013</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. V., Recous, S., Stockdale, E. A., Fillery, I. R. P., Jensen, L.
S., Hatch, D. J., and Goulding, K. W. T.: Gross nitrogen fluxes in soil:
Theory, measurement and application of 15N pool dilution techniques, Adv. Agron., 79, 69–118, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murphy, J. and Riley, J. P.: A modified single solution method for
determination of phosphate in natural waters, Anal. Chim. Acta, 26,
31–36, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
O'Halloran, I. P., and Cade-Menun, B. J.: Total
and Organic Phosphorus, chap. 24, in: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edn., edited by: Carter, M. R. and Gregorich, E. G., CRC Press, Taylor
&amp; Francis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 265–291, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oberson, A., Friesen, D. K., Rao, I. M., Buhler, S., and Frossard, E.:
Phosphorus Transformations in an Oxisol under contrasting land-use systems:
The role of the soil microbial biomass, Plant Soil, 237, 197–210, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013301716913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/a:1013301716913</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Oehl, F., Oberson, A., Probst, M., Fliessbach, A., Roth, H. R., and Frossard,
E.: Kinetics of microbial phosphorus uptake in cultivated soils, Biol.
Fertil. Soils, 34, 31–41, 2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Oehl, F., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., and Frossard, E.: Organic phosphorus
mineralization studies using isotopic dilution techniques, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 65, 780–787, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oehl, F., Frossard, E., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., and Oberson, A.: Basal
organic phosphorus mineralization in soils under different farming systems,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 36, 667–675, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.12.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.12.010</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ohno, T. and Zibilske, L. M.: Determination of low concentrations of
phosphorus in soil extracts using malachite green, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55,
892–895, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., and Dean, L. A.: Estimation of
Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate, USDA
Circ. 939, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1954.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Penuelas, J., Sardans, J., Rivas-Ubach, A., and Janssens, I. A.: The
human-induced imbalance between C, N and P in Earth's life system, Glob.
Change Biol., 18, 3–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02568.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02568.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Penuelas, J., Poulter, B., Sardans, J., Ciais, P., van der Velde, M., Bopp,
L., Boucher, O., Godderis, Y., Hinsinger, P., Llusia, J., Nardin, E., Vicca,
S., Obersteiner, M., and Janssens, I. A.: Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus
imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe, Nat.
Commun., 4, 2934, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms3934</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randhawa, P. S., Condron, L. M., Di, H. J., Sinaj, S., and McLenaghen, R. D.:
Effect of green manure addition on soil organic phosphorus mineralisation,
Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 73, 181–189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-005-0593-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10705-005-0593-z</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randriamanantsoa, L., Morel, C., Rabeharisoa, L., Douzet, J. M., Jansa, J.,
and Frossard, E.: Can the isotopic exchange kinetic method be used in soils
with a very low water extractable phosphate content and a high sorbing
capacity for phosphate ions?, Geoderma, 200, 120–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randriamanantsoa, L., Frossard, E., Oberson, A., and Bünemann, E. K.:
Gross organic phosphorus mineralization rates can be assessed in a Ferralsol
using an isotopic dilution method, Geoderma, 257, 86–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reed, S. C., Yang, X. J., and Thornton, P. E.: Incorporating phosphorus
cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor, New
Phytol., 208, 324–329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.13521</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Regelink, I. C., Weng, L., Lair, G. J., and Comans, R. N. J.: Adsorption of
phosphate and organic matter on metal (hydr)oxides in arable and forest soil:
a mechanistic modelling study, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 867–875, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ejss.12285</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richardson, A. E. and Simpson, R. J.: Soil Microorganisms Mediating
Phosphorus Availability, Plant Physiol., 156, 989–996, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1104/pp.111.175448</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ryan, P. R., Delhaize, E., and Jones, D. L.: Function and mechanism of
organic anion exudation from plant roots, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant
Molec. Biol., 52, 527–560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Salonius, P. O., Robinson, J. B., and Chase, F. E.: A Comparison Of
Autoclaved And Gamma-Irradiated Soils As Media For Microbial Colonization
Experiments, Plant Soil, 27, 239–248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01373392" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/bf01373392</ext-link>, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schneider, K. D., Voroney, R. P., Lynch, D. H., Oberson, A., Frossard, E.,
and Bünemann, E. K.: Microbially-mediated P fluxes in calcareous soils as
a function of water-extractable phosphate, Soil Biol. Biochem., 106, 51–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.016</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schnurer, J. and Rosswall, T.: Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure
of total microbial activity in soil and litter, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,
43, 1256–1261, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Schoenau, J. J. and O'Halloran, I. P.: Sodium Bicarbonate-Extractable
Phosphorus, in: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, edited by: Carter, M.
R. and Gregorich, E. G., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 89–94, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Serrasolsas, I. and Khanna, P. K.: Changes in heated and autoclaved forest
soils of SE Australia, 2. Phosphorus and phosphatase activity,
Biogeochemistry, 29, 25–41, 1995a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Serrasolsas, I. and Khanna, P. K.: Changes in heated and autoclaved forest
soils of SE Australia, 1. Carbon and nitrogen, Biogeochemistry, 29, 3–24,
1995b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Serrasolsas, I., Romanya, J., and Khanna, P. K.: Effects of heating and
autoclaving on sorption and desorption of phosphorus in some forest soils,
Biol. Fertil. Soils, 44, 1063–1072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0301-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00374-008-0301-7</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Setia, R., Verma, S. L., and Marschner, P.: Measuring microbial biomass
carbon by direct extraction – Comparison with chloroform
fumigation-extraction, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 53, 103–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.09.005</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shin, Y.-J., Kwak, J. I., and An, Y.-J.: Evidence for the inhibitory effects
of silver nanoparticles on the activities of soil exoenzymes, Chemosphere,
88, 524–529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.010</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3068?><ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sirova, D., Rejmankova, E., Carlson, E., and Vrba, J.: Current standard
assays using artificial substrates overestimate phosphodiesterase activity,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 56, 75–79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Six, L., Pypers, P., Degryse, F., Smolders, E., and Merckx, R.: The
performance of DGT versus conventional soil phosphorus tests in tropical
soils – An isotope dilution study, Plant Soil, 359, 267–279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1192-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-012-1192-9</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Skipper, H. D. and Westermann, D. T.: Comparative effects of propylene
oxide, sodium azide, and autoclaving on selected soil properties, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 5, 409–414, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Spohn, M., Ermak, A., and Kuzyakov, Y.: Microbial gross organic phosphorus
mineralization can be stimulated by root exudates – A P-33 isotopic dilution
study, Soil Biol. Biochem., 65, 254–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.028</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Spohn, M. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by
microbial need for carbon, Soil Biol. Biochem., 61, 69–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, S., Kobayashi, T., Iwasaki, K., Yamane, S., Maeda, K., and Sakurai,
K.: Properties and metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils
treated with steam sterilization compared with methyl bromide and
chloropicrin fumigations, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 49, 603–610, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tiwari, S. C., Tiwari, B. K., and Mishra, R. R.: Enzyme activities in soils –
effects of leaching, ignition, autoclaving and fumigation, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 20, 583–585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90079-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(88)90079-x</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tran, T. S., Fardeau, J. C., and Giroux, M.: Effects of soil properties on
plant-available phosphorus determined by the isotopic dilution phosphorus-32
method, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1383–1390, 1988.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Turner, B. L., Condron, L. M., Richardson, S. J., Peltzer, D. A., and
Allison, V. J.: Soil organic phosphorus transformations during pedogenesis,
Ecosystems, 10, 1166–1181, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vitousek, P. M. and Farrington, H.: Nutrient limitation and soil
development: Experimental test of a biogeochemical theory, Biogeochemistry,
37, 63–75, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wanek, W., Mooshammer, M., Blöchl, A., Hanreich, A., and Richter, A.:
Determination of gross rates of amino acid production and immobilization
in decomposing leaf litter by a novel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N isotope pool dilution technique,
Soil Bio. Biochem., 42, 1293–1302, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wolf, D. C., Dao, T. H., Scott, H. D., and Lavy, T. L.: Influence of
sterilization methods on selected soil microbiological, physical, and
chemical properties, J. Environ. Qual., 18, 39–44, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wyngaard, N., Cabrera, M. L., Jarosch, K. A., and Bünemann, E. K.:
Phosphorus in the coarse soil fraction is related to soil organic phosphorus
mineralization measured by isotopic dilution, Soil Biol. Biochem., 96,
107–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, X. and Post, W. M.: Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: A synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method, Biogeosciences, 8, 2907–2916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Post, W. M., Thornton, P. E., and Jain, A.: The distribution of soil phosphorus for global biogeochemical modeling, Biogeosciences, 10, 2525–2537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2525-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-2525-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>A novel isotope pool dilution approach to quantify gross rates of key abiotic and biological processes in the soil phosphorus cycle</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Efforts to understand and model the current and future behavior of the global
phosphorus (P) cycle are limited by the availability of global data on rates of soil P processes, as well as their environmental controls. Here, we present a novel isotope pool dilution approach using <sup>33</sup>P labeling of live and sterile soils, which allows for high-quality data on gross fluxes of soil inorganic P (P<sub>i</sub>) sorption and desorption, as well as of gross fluxes of organic P mineralization and microbial P<sub>i</sub> uptake to be obtained. At the same time, net immobilization of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> by soil microbes and abiotic
sorption can be easily derived and partitioned. Compared with other approaches, we used short incubation times (up to 48&thinsp;h), avoiding tracer
remineralization, which was confirmed by the separation of organic P and P<sub>i</sub> using isobutanol fractionation. This approach is also suitable for strongly weathered and P-impoverished soils, as the sensitivity is increased by the extraction of exchangeable bioavailable P<sub>i</sub> (Olsen P<sub>i</sub>; 0.5&thinsp;M&thinsp;NaHCO<sub>3</sub>)
followed by P<sub>i</sub> measurement using the malachite green assay. Biotic
processes were corrected for desorption/sorption processes using adequate
sterile abiotic controls that exhibited negligible microbial and
extracellular phosphatase activities. Gross rates were calculated using
analytical solutions of tracer kinetics, which also allowed for the study of gross
soil P dynamics under non-steady-state conditions. Finally, we present major
environmental controls of gross P-cycle processes that were measured for
three P-poor tropical forest and three P-rich temperate grassland soils.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Saur, E., Pellerin, S., Augusto, L., and Morel,
C.: Quantifying gross mineralisation of P in dead soil organic matter:
Testing an isotopic dilution method, Geoderma, 158, 163–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.027</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Augusto, L., Morel, C., and Bakker, M. R.: Predicting available
phosphate ions from physical-chemical soil properties in acidic sandy soils
under pine forests, J. Soils Sediments, 11, 452–466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0329-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0329-9</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Augusto, L., Bakker, M. R., Gallet-Budynek, A., and Morel, C.:
Microbial processes controlling P availability in forest spodosols as
affected by soil depth and soil properties, Soil Biol. Biochem., 44, 39–48, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.007</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Bakker, M. R., Augusto, L., and Morel, C.: Contributions of
microbial and physical-chemical processes to phosphorus availability in
Podzols and Arenosols under a temperate forest, Geoderma, 211, 18–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.003</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Achat, D. L., Pousse, N., Nicolas, M., Bredoire, F., and Augusto, L.: Soil
properties controlling inorganic phosphorus availability: general results
from a national forest network and a global compilation of the literature,
Biogeochemistry, 127, 255–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0178-0</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Alphei, J. and Scheu, S.: Effects of biocidal treatments on biological and
nutritional properties of a mull-structured woodland soil, Geoderma, 56,
435–448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90125-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90125-5</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, B. H. and Magdoff, F. R.: Autoclaving soil samples affects
algal-available phosphorus, J. Environ. Qual., 34, 1958–1963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0024</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Berns, A. E., Philipp, H., Narres, H. D., Burauel, P., Vereecken, H., and
Tappe, W.: Effect of gamma-sterilization and autoclaving on soil organic
matter structure as studied by solid state NMR, UV and fluorescence
spectroscopy, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 540–550, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blankinship, J. C., Becerra, C. A., Schaeffer, S. M., and Schimel, J. P.:
Separating cellular metabolism from exoenzyme activity in soil organic matter
decomposition, Soil Biol. Biochem., 71, 68–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Booth, M. S., Stark, J. M., and Rastetter, E.: Controls on nitrogen cycling
in terrestrial ecosystems: A synthetic analysis of literature data,
Ecol. Monogr., 75, 139–157, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Braun, J., Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Prommer, J., Walker, T. W. N., Rutting,
T., and Richter, A.: Full N-15 tracer accounting to revisit major assumptions
of N-15 isotope pool dilution approaches for gross nitrogen mineralization,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 117, 16–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.005</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bühler, S., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., Friesen, D. K., and Frossard, E.:
Isotope methods for assessing plant available phosphorus in acid tropical
soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 54, 605–616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00542.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00542.x</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bünemann, E. K., Marschner, P., McNeill, A. M., and McLaughlin, M. J.:
Measuring rates of gross and net mineralisation of organic phosphorus in
soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 39, 900–913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.10.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.10.009</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Bünemann, E. K., Oberson, A., Liebisch, F., Keller, F., Annaheim, K. E.,
Huguenin-Elie, O., and Frossard, E.: Rapid microbial phosphorus
immobilization dominates gross phosphorus fluxes in a grassland soil with low
inorganic phosphorus availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 51, 84–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bünemann, E. K.: Assessment of gross and net mineralization rates of soil
organic phosphorus – A review, Soil Biol. Biochem., 89, 82–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.026</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bünemann, E. K., Augstburger, S., and Frossard, E.: Dominance of either
physicochemical or biological phosphorus cycling processes in temperate
forest soils of contrasting phosphate availability, Soil Biol. Biochem., 101,
85–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.005</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, D. O., Yellowlees, D., and Tibbett, M.: Autoclaving kills soil
microbes yet soil enzymes remain active, Pedobiologia, 51, 295–299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.05.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.05.002</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Condron, L. M., Moir, J. O., Tiessen, H., and Stewart, J. W. B.:
Critical-Evaluation Of Methods For Determining Total Organic Phosphorus In
Tropical Soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54, 1261–1266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400050010x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400050010x</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
D'Angelo, E., Crutchfield, J., and Vandiviere, M.: Rapid, sensitive,
microscale determination of phosphate in water and soil, J. Environ. Qual.,
30, 2206–2209, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Demaria, P., Flisch, R., Frossard, E., and Sinaj, S.: Exchangeability of
phosphate extracted by four chemical methods, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 168, 89–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpin.200421463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jpin.200421463</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Di, H. J., Condron, L. M., and Frossard, E.: Isotope techniques to study
phosphorus cycling in agricultural and forest soils: A review, Biol. Fertil.
Soils, 24, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01420213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01420213</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Di, H. J., Cameron, K. C., and McLaren, R. G.: Isotopic dilution methods to
determine the gross transformation rates of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur
in soil: a review of the theory, methodologies, and limitations, Aust. J.
Soil Res., 38, 213–230, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C., Morel, C., and Boniface, R.: Why the Olsen method should be
used to estimate available soil phosphorus?, Agronomie, 8, 577–584, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19880702" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19880702</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C., Morel, C., and Boniface, R.: Phosphate Ion Transfer From Soil
To Soil Solution – Kinetic-Parameters, Agronomie, 11, 787–797, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19910909" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19910909</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Fardeau, J. C.: Le phosphore assimilable des sols : sa représentation par
un modèle fonctionnel à plusieurs compartiments Agronomie, 13,
317–331, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Fontaine, S., Henault, C., Aamor, A., Bdioui, N., Bloor, J. M. G., Maire, V.,
Mary, B., Revaillot, S., and Maron, P. A.: Fungi mediate long term
sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 86–96, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Fardeau, J. C., Brossard, M., and Morel, J. L.: Soil
isotopically exchangeable phosphorus – a comparison between E and L-values,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 846–851, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Frossard, E., Achat, D. L., Bernasconi, S. M., Bünemann, E. K., Fardeau,
J. C., Jansa, J., Morel, C., Rabeharisoa, L., Randriamanantsoa, L., Sinaj,
S., Tamburini, F., and Oberson, A.: The Use of Tracers to Investigate
Phosphate Cycling in Soil-Plant Systems, in: Phosphorus in Action: Biological
Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling, edited by: Bunemann, E. K., Oberson,
A., and Frossard, E., Soil Biology, 59–91, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Goldberg, S. and Sposito, G.: On the mechanism of specific
phosphate-adsorption by hydroxylated mineral surfaces – a review, Commun.
Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 16, 801–821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628509367646" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628509367646</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Green, V. S., Stott, D. E., and Diack, M.: Assay for fluorescein diacetate
hydrolytic activity: Optimization for soil samples, Soil Biol. Biochem., 38,
693–701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.020</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hart, S. C., Nason, G. E., Myrold, D. D., and Perry, D. A.: Dynamics of gross
nitrogen transformations in an old-growth forest: the carbon connection,
Ecology, 75, 880–891, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hinsinger, P.: Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as
affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review, Plant Soil, 237,
173–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013351617532" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013351617532</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Horta, M. D. and Torrent, J.: The Olsen P method as an agronomic and
environmental test for predicting phosphate release from acid soils, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys., 77, 283–292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9066-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9066-2</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, Y. T., Zheng, Q., and Wanek, W.: Flux Analysis of Free Amino Sugars and
Amino Acids in Soils by Isotope Tracing with a Novel Liquid
Chromatography/High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Platform, Anal.
Chem., 89, 9192–9200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01938" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01938</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jayachandran, K., Schwab, A. P., and Hetrick, B. A. D.: Partitioning
dissolved inorganic and organic phosphorus using acidified molybdate and
isobutanol, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 762–765, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kedi, B., Sei, J., Quiquampoix, H., and Staunton, S.: Persistence of
catalytic activity of fungal phosphatases incubated in tropical soils, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 56, 69–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.005</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kellogg, L. E., Bridgham, S. D., and Lopez-Hernandez, D.: A comparison of
four methods of measuring gross phosphorus mineralization, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 70, 1349–1358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2135/sssaj2005.0300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2135/sssaj2005.0300</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kirkham, D. and Bartholomew, W. V.: Equations for following nutrient
transformations in soil, utilizing tracer data, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Pro., 18, 33–34, 1954.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kleinman, P. J. A., Sharpley, A. N., Gartley, K., Jarrell, W. M., Kuo, S.,
Menon, R. G., Myers, R., Reddy, K. R., and Skogley, E. O.: Interlaboratory
comparison of soil phosphorus extracted by various soil test methods,
Commun. Soil Sci. Plan, 32, 2325–2345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1081/css-120000376" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1081/css-120000376</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lopez-Hernandez, D., Brossard, M., and Frossard, E.: P-isotopic exchange
values in relation to P<sub>o</sub> mineralisation in soils with very low P-sorbing
capacities, Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 1663–1670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00255-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00255-1</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Lotrario, J. B., Stuart, B. J., Lam, T., Arands, R. R., Oconnor, O. A., and
Kosson, D. S.: Effects Of Sterilization Methods On The Physical
Characteristics Of Soil – Implications For Sorption Isotherm Analyses, B. Environ. Contam. Tox., 54, 668–675, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mander, C., Wakelin, S., Young, S., Condron, L., and O'Callaghan, M.:
Incidence and diversity of phosphate-solubilising bacteria are linked to
phosphorus status in grassland soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 44, 93–101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.009</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Marx, M. C., Wood, M., and Jarvis, S. C.: A microplate fluorimetric assay for
the study of enzyme diversity in soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 33, 1633–1640,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Messiga, A. J., Ba, Y. X., Ziadi, N., Belanger, G., and Lafond, J.: Assessing
the depletion of soil P following sequential extractions with Mehlich-3 and
Olsen solutions, Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 60, 1445–1458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.884709" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.884709</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, W. and Miller, D.: A micropipette method for soil mechanical
analysis, Commun. Soil Sci. Plan, 18, 1–15, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Schnecker, J., Wild, B., Leitner, S., Hofhansl,
F., Blochl, A., Hammerle, I., Frank, A. H., Fuchslueger, L., Keiblinger, K.
M., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Richter, A.: Stoichiometric controls of
nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in decomposing beech leaf litter, Ecology,
93, 770–782, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Mooshammer, M., Hofhansl, F., Frank, A. H., Wanek, W., Hammerle, I., Leitner,
S., Schnecker, J., Wild, B., Watzka, M., Keiblinger, K. M.,
Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., and Richter, A.: Decoupling of microbial carbon,
nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling in response to extreme temperature events,
Sci. Adv., 3, e1602781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602781</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, C. and Bünemann, E. K.: A P-33 tracing model for quantifying
gross P transformation rates in soil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 76, 218–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.013</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. V., Recous, S., Stockdale, E. A., Fillery, I. R. P., Jensen, L.
S., Hatch, D. J., and Goulding, K. W. T.: Gross nitrogen fluxes in soil:
Theory, measurement and application of 15N pool dilution techniques, Adv. Agron., 79, 69–118, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, J. and Riley, J. P.: A modified single solution method for
determination of phosphate in natural waters, Anal. Chim. Acta, 26,
31–36, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
O'Halloran, I. P., and Cade-Menun, B. J.: Total
and Organic Phosphorus, chap. 24, in: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edn., edited by: Carter, M. R. and Gregorich, E. G., CRC Press, Taylor
&amp; Francis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 265–291, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Oberson, A., Friesen, D. K., Rao, I. M., Buhler, S., and Frossard, E.:
Phosphorus Transformations in an Oxisol under contrasting land-use systems:
The role of the soil microbial biomass, Plant Soil, 237, 197–210, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013301716913" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013301716913</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Oehl, F., Oberson, A., Probst, M., Fliessbach, A., Roth, H. R., and Frossard,
E.: Kinetics of microbial phosphorus uptake in cultivated soils, Biol.
Fertil. Soils, 34, 31–41, 2001a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Oehl, F., Oberson, A., Sinaj, S., and Frossard, E.: Organic phosphorus
mineralization studies using isotopic dilution techniques, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 65, 780–787, 2001b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Oehl, F., Frossard, E., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., and Oberson, A.: Basal
organic phosphorus mineralization in soils under different farming systems,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 36, 667–675, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.12.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.12.010</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ohno, T. and Zibilske, L. M.: Determination of low concentrations of
phosphorus in soil extracts using malachite green, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55,
892–895, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., and Dean, L. A.: Estimation of
Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate, USDA
Circ. 939, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1954.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Penuelas, J., Sardans, J., Rivas-Ubach, A., and Janssens, I. A.: The
human-induced imbalance between C, N and P in Earth's life system, Glob.
Change Biol., 18, 3–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02568.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02568.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Penuelas, J., Poulter, B., Sardans, J., Ciais, P., van der Velde, M., Bopp,
L., Boucher, O., Godderis, Y., Hinsinger, P., Llusia, J., Nardin, E., Vicca,
S., Obersteiner, M., and Janssens, I. A.: Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus
imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe, Nat.
Commun., 4, 2934, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3934</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Randhawa, P. S., Condron, L. M., Di, H. J., Sinaj, S., and McLenaghen, R. D.:
Effect of green manure addition on soil organic phosphorus mineralisation,
Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 73, 181–189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-005-0593-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-005-0593-z</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Randriamanantsoa, L., Morel, C., Rabeharisoa, L., Douzet, J. M., Jansa, J.,
and Frossard, E.: Can the isotopic exchange kinetic method be used in soils
with a very low water extractable phosphate content and a high sorbing
capacity for phosphate ions?, Geoderma, 200, 120–129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.019</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Randriamanantsoa, L., Frossard, E., Oberson, A., and Bünemann, E. K.:
Gross organic phosphorus mineralization rates can be assessed in a Ferralsol
using an isotopic dilution method, Geoderma, 257, 86–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.01.003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Reed, S. C., Yang, X. J., and Thornton, P. E.: Incorporating phosphorus
cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor, New
Phytol., 208, 324–329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13521</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Regelink, I. C., Weng, L., Lair, G. J., and Comans, R. N. J.: Adsorption of
phosphate and organic matter on metal (hydr)oxides in arable and forest soil:
a mechanistic modelling study, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 66, 867–875, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12285</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, A. E. and Simpson, R. J.: Soil Microorganisms Mediating
Phosphorus Availability, Plant Physiol., 156, 989–996, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175448</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Ryan, P. R., Delhaize, E., and Jones, D. L.: Function and mechanism of
organic anion exudation from plant roots, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant
Molec. Biol., 52, 527–560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Salonius, P. O., Robinson, J. B., and Chase, F. E.: A Comparison Of
Autoclaved And Gamma-Irradiated Soils As Media For Microbial Colonization
Experiments, Plant Soil, 27, 239–248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01373392" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01373392</a>, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Schneider, K. D., Voroney, R. P., Lynch, D. H., Oberson, A., Frossard, E.,
and Bünemann, E. K.: Microbially-mediated P fluxes in calcareous soils as
a function of water-extractable phosphate, Soil Biol. Biochem., 106, 51–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.016</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Schnurer, J. and Rosswall, T.: Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure
of total microbial activity in soil and litter, Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,
43, 1256–1261, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Schoenau, J. J. and O'Halloran, I. P.: Sodium Bicarbonate-Extractable
Phosphorus, in: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, edited by: Carter, M.
R. and Gregorich, E. G., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 89–94, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Serrasolsas, I. and Khanna, P. K.: Changes in heated and autoclaved forest
soils of SE Australia, 2. Phosphorus and phosphatase activity,
Biogeochemistry, 29, 25–41, 1995a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Serrasolsas, I. and Khanna, P. K.: Changes in heated and autoclaved forest
soils of SE Australia, 1. Carbon and nitrogen, Biogeochemistry, 29, 3–24,
1995b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Serrasolsas, I., Romanya, J., and Khanna, P. K.: Effects of heating and
autoclaving on sorption and desorption of phosphorus in some forest soils,
Biol. Fertil. Soils, 44, 1063–1072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0301-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0301-7</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Setia, R., Verma, S. L., and Marschner, P.: Measuring microbial biomass
carbon by direct extraction – Comparison with chloroform
fumigation-extraction, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 53, 103–106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.09.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.09.005</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Shin, Y.-J., Kwak, J. I., and An, Y.-J.: Evidence for the inhibitory effects
of silver nanoparticles on the activities of soil exoenzymes, Chemosphere,
88, 524–529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.010</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Sirova, D., Rejmankova, E., Carlson, E., and Vrba, J.: Current standard
assays using artificial substrates overestimate phosphodiesterase activity,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 56, 75–79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.008</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Six, L., Pypers, P., Degryse, F., Smolders, E., and Merckx, R.: The
performance of DGT versus conventional soil phosphorus tests in tropical
soils – An isotope dilution study, Plant Soil, 359, 267–279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1192-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1192-9</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Skipper, H. D. and Westermann, D. T.: Comparative effects of propylene
oxide, sodium azide, and autoclaving on selected soil properties, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 5, 409–414, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Spohn, M., Ermak, A., and Kuzyakov, Y.: Microbial gross organic phosphorus
mineralization can be stimulated by root exudates – A P-33 isotopic dilution
study, Soil Biol. Biochem., 65, 254–263, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.028</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Spohn, M. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by
microbial need for carbon, Soil Biol. Biochem., 61, 69–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, S., Kobayashi, T., Iwasaki, K., Yamane, S., Maeda, K., and Sakurai,
K.: Properties and metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils
treated with steam sterilization compared with methyl bromide and
chloropicrin fumigations, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 49, 603–610, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, S. C., Tiwari, B. K., and Mishra, R. R.: Enzyme activities in soils –
effects of leaching, ignition, autoclaving and fumigation, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 20, 583–585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90079-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90079-x</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Tran, T. S., Fardeau, J. C., and Giroux, M.: Effects of soil properties on
plant-available phosphorus determined by the isotopic dilution phosphorus-32
method, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 1383–1390, 1988.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, B. L., Condron, L. M., Richardson, S. J., Peltzer, D. A., and
Allison, V. J.: Soil organic phosphorus transformations during pedogenesis,
Ecosystems, 10, 1166–1181, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Vitousek, P. M. and Farrington, H.: Nutrient limitation and soil
development: Experimental test of a biogeochemical theory, Biogeochemistry,
37, 63–75, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wanek, W., Mooshammer, M., Blöchl, A., Hanreich, A., and Richter, A.:
Determination of gross rates of amino acid production and immobilization
in decomposing leaf litter by a novel <sup>15</sup>N isotope pool dilution technique,
Soil Bio. Biochem., 42, 1293–1302, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wolf, D. C., Dao, T. H., Scott, H. D., and Lavy, T. L.: Influence of
sterilization methods on selected soil microbiological, physical, and
chemical properties, J. Environ. Qual., 18, 39–44, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wyngaard, N., Cabrera, M. L., Jarosch, K. A., and Bünemann, E. K.:
Phosphorus in the coarse soil fraction is related to soil organic phosphorus
mineralization measured by isotopic dilution, Soil Biol. Biochem., 96,
107–118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.022</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X. and Post, W. M.: Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: A synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method, Biogeosciences, 8, 2907–2916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, X., Post, W. M., Thornton, P. E., and Jain, A.: The distribution of soil phosphorus for global biogeochemical modeling, Biogeosciences, 10, 2525–2537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2525-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2525-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
