<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-3801-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Variations in dissolved greenhouse gases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in the Congo River network overwhelmingly driven by fluvial-wetland
connectivity</article-title><alt-title>Dissolved greenhouse gases in the Congo River</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Dissolved greenhouse gases in the Congo River}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~V.~Borges et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Borges</surname><given-names>Alberto V.</given-names></name>
          <email>alberto.borges@uliege.be</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-2247</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff6">
          <name><surname>Darchambeau</surname><given-names>François</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff7">
          <name><surname>Lambert</surname><given-names>Thibault</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Morana</surname><given-names>Cédric</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>George H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8301-5301</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Tambwe</surname><given-names>Ernest</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Toengaho Sembaito</surname><given-names>Alfred</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Mambo</surname><given-names>Taylor</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Nlandu Wabakhangazi</surname><given-names>José</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Descy</surname><given-names>Jean-Pierre</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Teodoru</surname><given-names>Cristian R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bouillon</surname><given-names>Steven</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Chemical Oceanography Unit, University of Liège, Liège,
Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven,
Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geography, Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, Texas, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Université de Kisangani, Centre de Surveillance de la
Biodiversité, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of the Congo</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Congo Atomic Energy Commission, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>a</label><institution>present address: Direction Générale Opérationnelle
Agriculture, Ressources Naturelles et Environnement,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Service Publique de
Wallonie, Jambes, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>b</label><institution>present address: University of Lausanne, Institute of Earth Surface
Dynamics, Lausanne, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>c</label><institution>present address: Eidgenössische Technische
Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Alberto V. Borges (alberto.borges@uliege.be)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>19</issue>
      <fpage>3801</fpage><lpage>3834</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Alberto V. Borges et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <?pagebreak page3802?><p id="d1e268">We carried out 10 field expeditions between 2010 and 2015 in the lowland
part of the Congo River network in the eastern part of the basin (Democratic
Republic of the Congo), to describe the spatial variations in fluvial dissolved
carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
concentrations. We investigate the possible drivers of the spatial
variations in dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations by
analyzing covariations with several other biogeochemical variables, aquatic
metabolic processes (primary production and respiration), catchment
characteristics (land cover) and wetland spatial distributions. We test the
hypothesis that spatial patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
partly due to the connectivity with wetlands, in particular with a giant
wetland of flooded forest in the core of the Congo basin, the “Cuvette
Centrale Congolaise” (CCC). Two transects of 1650 km were carried out from
the city of Kisangani to the city of Kinshasa, along the longest possible
navigable section of the river and corresponding to 41 % of the total
length of the main stem. Additionally, three time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were obtained at fixed points in the main stem of the middle Congo
(2013–2018, biweekly sampling), in the main stem of the lower Kasaï
(2015–2017, monthly sampling) and in the main stem of the middle Oubangui
(2010–2012, biweekly sampling). The variations in dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations were modest, with values oscillating around the concentration
corresponding to saturation with the atmosphere, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation
level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where atmospheric equilibrium corresponds to 100 %)
ranging between 0 % and 561 % (average 142 %). The relatively narrow
range of %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations was consistent with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) levels in these near pristine rivers and streams, with
low agriculture pressure on the catchment (croplands correspond to 0.1 %
of catchment land cover of sampled rivers), dominated by forests
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of land cover). The covariations in %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dissolved oxygen saturation level
(%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removal by soil or sedimentary
denitrification in low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
environments (typically small and organic matter rich streams) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production by nitrification in high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (typical of larger rivers that are poor in organic matter).
Surface waters were very strongly oversaturated in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with respect to atmospheric equilibrium, with values of the partial pressure
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranging between 1087 and 22 899 ppm (equilibrium
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm) and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations ranging
between 22 and 71 428 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (equilibrium <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Spatial variations were overwhelmingly more important than
seasonal variations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as day–night variations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The wide range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations was consistent with the equally wide range of
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.3 %–122.8 %) and of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (1.8–67.8 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicative of generation of these two greenhouse gases from
intense processing of organic matter either in “terra firme” soils, wetlands or
in-stream. However, the emission rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere from
riverine surface waters was on average about 10 times higher than the flux
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced by aquatic net heterotrophy (as evaluated from
measurements of pelagic respiration and primary production). This indicates
that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the river network were sustained by lateral
inputs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (either from terra firme or from wetlands). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values decreased and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased with increasing Strahler
order, showing that stream size explains part of the spatial variability of
these quantities. In addition, several lines of evidence indicate that
lateral inputs of carbon from wetlands (flooded forest and aquatic
macrophytes) were of paramount importance in sustaining high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the Congo river network, as well as driving
spatial variations: the rivers draining the CCC were characterized by
significantly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and significantly lower
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than those not draining the CCC;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were correlated to the coverage of flooded
forest on the catchment. The flux of greenhouse gases (GHGs) between rivers and the atmosphere
averaged 2469 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (range 86 and 7110 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), 12 553 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (range
65 and 597 260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>52 and 319 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
estimate of integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the Congo River network
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TgC (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gC) yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to nearly half the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from tropical oceans globally (565 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and was
nearly 2 times the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the tropical Atlantic Ocean
(137 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover, the integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the
Congo River network is more than 3 times higher than the estimate of
terrestrial net ecosystem exchange (NEE) on the whole catchment (77 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This shows that it is unlikely that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from
the river network were sustained by the hydrological carbon export from
terra firme soils (typically very small compared to terrestrial NEE) but most likely,
to a large extent, they were sustained by wetlands (with a much higher
hydrological connectivity with rivers and streams).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e1442">Emissions to the atmosphere of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as carbon
dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from
inland waters (rivers, lakes and reservoirs) might be quantitatively
important for global budgets (Seitzinger and Kroeze, 1998; Cole et al., 2007;
Bastviken et al., 2011). Yet, there are very large uncertainties in the
estimates of GHGs emission to the atmosphere from rivers, as reflected in
the wide range of reported values, between 0.2 and 1.8 PgC (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gC) yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cole et al., 2007; Raymond et al., 2013), 2 and 27 TgCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bastviken et al., 2011; Stanley et al., 2016), and 32 and 2100 Gg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N) yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kroeze et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2016). This
uncertainty is mainly due to the scarcity of data in the tropics that
account for the majority of riverine GHG emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Raymond et al., 2013; Borges et al., 2015a, b; Lauerwald et al., 2015, 79 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Hu et al., 2016; 70 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sawakushi
et al., 2014) but also to scaling procedures of varying complexity that use
different input data (Raymond et al., 2013; Borges et al., 2015b; Lauerwald et
al., 2015), in addition to uncertainty in the estimate of surface area of
rivers (Downing et al., 2012; Raymond et al., 2013; Allen and Pavelsky, 2018)
and the parameterization of the gas transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Raymond et al., 2012; Huotari et al., 20013; Maurice et al., 2017; Kokic et al., 2018; McDowell
and Johnson, 2018; Ulseth et al., 2019). The exchange of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between
rivers and the atmosphere is in most cases computed from the air–water
gradient of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterized as a function of
stream morphology (e.g., slope or depth) and water flow (or discharge).
However, there can be large errors associated with the computation of the
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration from pH and total alkalinity (TA) for low alkalinity waters in
particular so that high-quality direct
measurements of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration are preferred (Abril et al., 2015), although scarce. In the tropics, research on GHGs in rivers has
mainly focussed on South American rivers and on the central
Amazon in particular (Richey et al., 1988, 2002; Melack et al., 2004; Abril et al., 2014;
Barbosa et al., 2016; Scofield et al., 2016), while until recently African
rivers were nearly uncharted with a few exceptions (Koné et al., 2009,
2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e1729">There is also a lack of understanding of the drivers of the fluvial
concentrations of GHGs, hence, ultimately of the drivers of their exchange
with the atmosphere. It is unclear to what extent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from
rivers are sustained by in situ net heterotrophy and/or by lateral inputs of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The global organic carbon degradation by net heterotrophy of
rivers and streams given by Battin et al. (2008) of 0.2 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is
insufficient to sustain global riverine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions given by the most
recent estimates of 0.7–1.8 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Raymond et al., 2013; Lauerwald et
al., 2015), suggesting an important role of lateral <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs in
sustaining emissions to the atmosphere from rivers. In a regional<?pagebreak page3803?> study in
the US, Hotchkiss et al. (2015) estimated that in-stream organic matter
degradation could only sustain 14 % and 39 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> riverine
emissions in small and large systems, respectively. It is also unclear to
what extent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from rivers are sustained by
carbon inputs either from the terrestrial biome (terra firme) or from wetlands (flooded
forests and macrophytes) (Abril and Borges, 2019). This difference has large
implications for our fundamental understanding of carbon cycling in rivers
and their connectivity with respective catchments but also, consequently,
for our capacity to predict how GHG emissions from rivers might be modified
in response to climate change (warming and modification of the hydrological
cycle), water diversion (damming, water abstraction) or land use change on
the catchment (e.g., Klaus et al., 2018). In upland areas, low-order stream
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are undoubtedly related to soil-water and ground-water
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs, although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> degassing takes place over very short
distances from point sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m), is highly variable in space and
seasonally, and mainly occurs during short-lived high-flow events that
promote shallow flow paths (e.g., Duvert et al., 2018). Low-order streams (1–3)
might account for about one-third of the global riverine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Marx
et al., 2017). Recently acquired datasets allowed us to show that inputs from
riparian wetlands seem to be of paramount importance in sustaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions to the atmosphere from large tropical lowland rivers
(Abril et al., 2014; Borges et al., 2015a, b). About half of the global surface
area of wetlands is located in the tropics and subtropics (33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), the rest are in the Northern Hemisphere (Fluet-Chouinard
et al., 2015), and more than half of river surface area is located in the
tropics and subtropics (Allen and Pavelsky, 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e1930">The Congo River (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km length, freshwater discharge
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) has a large drainage basin (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) covered by evergreen forest (dense and mosaic)
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and savannah (shrubland and grassland)
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), owing to the tropical climate (annual average
precipitation of 1530 mm and air temperature of 23.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The
Congo basin accounts for 89 % of African rainforests. These rainforests
are spread between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (54 %), Gabon
(11 %), Cameroon (10 %) and the Republic of the Congo (10 %), the
remaining 15 % being shared by several other countries. The mean
above-ground biomass of the rainforests in Central Africa (43 kg dry biomass
(db) m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is much higher than the mean in Amazonia (29 kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">db</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nearly equals the mean in the notorious high biomass forests
of Borneo (44 kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">db</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Malhi et al., 2013). Current estimates of
carbon transport from the Congo River close to the mouth rank it as the
Earth's second-largest supplier of organic carbon to the oceans (Coynel et
al., 2005). Despite its overwhelming importance, our knowledge of carbon and
nutrient cycling in the Congo river basin is limited to some transport flux
data from the 1980s, reviewed by Laraque et al. (2009) and a number of more
recent small-scale studies (Bouillon et al., 2012, 2014; Spencer et al., 2012;
Lambert et al., 2016), in sharp contrast to the extensive and sustained work
that has been done on the Amazon river basin (Alsdorf et al., 2016). The
Congo basin has a wide range of contrasting tributaries (differing in
lithology, soil characteristics, vegetation, rainfall patterns,
etc.) and extensive flooded forests in its central region, the
“Cuvette Centrale Congolaise” (CCC), with an estimated flooded cover of
360 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, for a total surface area of 1 760 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bwangoy et
al., 2010). Extensive peat deposits are present beneath the swamp forest of
the CCC that store below-ground 31 PgC of organic carbon, a quantity similar
to the above-ground carbon stock of the forests of the entire Congo basin
(Dargie et al., 2017). The tributaries partly drain semi-humid catchments
with alternating dry and wet seasons on both sides of the Equator, resulting
in a relatively constant discharge and water level for the main stem Congo
River (Runge, 2008). Hence, the CCC is an extended zone of year-round
inundation (Bwangoy et al., 2010), in sharp contrast with other large
tropical rivers such as the Amazon where floodplain inundation shows clear
seasonality (Hamilton et al., 2002).</p>
      <p id="d1e2104">Data of dissolved GHGs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been reported
in rivers in the western part of the Congo basin in four major river basins
in the Republic of the Congo (Alima, Lefini, Sangha, Likouala-Mossaka) (Mann et
al., 2014; Upstill-Goddard et al., 2017), and we previously reported GHGs data
collected in the eastern part of the basin in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo in the framework of a broad synthesis of riverine GHGs at the scale of
the African continent (Borges et al., 2015a) and a general comparison of
the Congo and the Amazon rivers (Borges et al., 2015b). Here, we describe in
more detail the variability of GHGs based on a dataset collected during 10
field expeditions from 2010 to 2015 (Figs. 1 and 2) (Borges and Bouillon, 2019), in particular with
regards to spatial and seasonal patterns, as well as with regards to the
origin of fluvial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by integrating metabolic measurements (primary
production and respiration), stable isotope ratios of dissolved inorganic
carbon (DIC) and characteristics of the catchments with regards to the
cover of wetlands. Comparison of data obtained in streams within and outside
the giant wetland area of the CCC allows a natural large-scale test of the
influence of the connectivity of wetlands on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics
in lowland tropical rivers.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2179">Freshwater discharge (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the Congo River at
Kinshasa from 2010 to 2015, with an indication of field expedition duration
(thick lines).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2211">Map showing the sampling stations of the 10 field expeditions in
the Congo River network.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Field expeditions and fixed monitoring</title>
      <p id="d1e2235">Samples were collected during a total of 10 field expeditions (Figs. 1 and
2). Three were done from a medium sized boat (22 m long) on which we
deployed the equipment for continuous measurements of the partial pressure
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">490</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as the field laboratory
for conditioning water samples. Sampling in the<?pagebreak page3804?> main stem and large
tributaries was made from the medium sized boat, while sampling in smaller
tributaries was made with a pirogue. These large-scale field expeditions
covered the Kisangani–Kinshasa transect twice (3–19 December 2013 and
10–30 June 2014) and the Kwa river up to Ilebo (16 April–6 May 2015).
During the other cruises, the field laboratory was installed in a base camp
(typically in a village along the river), and traveling and sampling was
made with small pirogues on which it was not possible to deploy the
apparatus for continuous measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Three cruises covered
the section from Kisangani to the mouth of the Lomami River
(20 November–8 December 2012; 17–26 September 2013; 13—21 March 2014), one cruise covered the
section from Kisangani to the mouth of the Itimbiri River
(8 May–6 June 2010) and three cruises (previously reported by Bouillon et
al., 2012, 2014) covered the Oubangui river network around the city of
Bangui (21–23 March 2010, 20–23 March 2011, and 20–24 November 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e2290">Fixed sampling was carried out in the Congo main stem in proximity of the
city of Kisangani (10 December 2012–16 April 2018), the Oubangui main stem
in
proximity of the city of Bangui (20 March 2010–31 March 2012) and the Kasaï
main stem in proximity of the village of Dima, close to the city of Bandundu
(14 April 2015–15 May 2017). Sampling was carried out at regular intervals,
every 15 d in the Congo and Oubangui main stems and every month in the
Kasaï main stem. Data from the Oubangui catchment were previously
reported by Bouillon et al. (2012, 2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Continuous measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2301">Continuous measurements (1 min interval) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were made with an
equilibrator designed for turbid waters (Frankignoulle et al., 2001) coupled
to a nondispersive infra-red gas analyzer (IRGA) (Li-Cor 840). The
equilibrator consisted of a Plexiglas cylinder (height of 70 cm and internal
diameter of 7 cm) filled with glass marbles; pumped water flowed from the
top to the bottom of the equilibrator at a rate of about 3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
water residence time within the equilibrator was about 10 s, while 99 %
of equilibration was achieved in less than 120 s (Frankignoulle et al., 2001). This type of equilibrator system was shown to be the fastest among
commonly used equilibration designs (Santos et al., 2012). In parallel to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, water temperature, specific conductivity, pH,
dissolved oxygen saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and turbidity were measured
with an YSI multiparameter probe (6600) and position was measured with a Garmin
geographical position system (Map 60S) portable probe. Water was pumped to
the equilibrator and the multiparameter probe (on deck) with a 12V powered
water pump (LVM105) attached on a wooden pole to the side of the boat at
about 1 m depth. We did not observe bubble entrainment in water circuit to
the equilibrator, as the sailing speed was low (maximum speed 12 km h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Instrumentation was powered by 12 V batteries that were recharged
in the evening with power generators.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Discrete sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e2373">In smaller streams, sampling was done from the side of a pirogue with a 1.7 L
Niskin bottle (General Oceanics) for gases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and a 5 L polyethylene water container for other variables. Water
temperature, specific conductivity, pH and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured
in situ with a YSI multiparameter probe (ProPlus). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured
with a Li-Cor Li-840 IRGA based on the headspace technique with four polypropylene syringes (Abril et al., 2015). During two cruises
(20 November–8 December 2012; 17–26 September 2013, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a PP Systems EGM-4 was used
as an IRGA instead of the Li-Cor Li-840. During one of the cruises
(13–21 March 2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the equilibrated headspace was stored in
pre-evacuated 12 mL Exetainer (Labco) vials and analyzed in our home
laboratory with a gas chromatograph (GC) (see below). Similarly, the
equilibrated headspace was stored in pre-evacuated 12 mL Exetainer (Labco)
vials for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis from the fixed sampling in Kisangani. This
approach was preferred to the analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the samples for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis, as the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to preserve
the water sample from biological alteration led to an artificial increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations most probably related to the precipitation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Supplement Fig. S1).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3805?><p id="d1e2544">Both YSI multiparameter probes were calibrated according to manufacturer's
specifications, in air for %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and with standard solutions for other
variables: commercial pH buffers (4.00 and 7.00), a 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
standard for conductivity and a 124 nephelometric turbidity unit (NTU)
standard for turbidity. The turbidity data from the YSI 6600 compared
satisfactorily with discrete total suspended matter (TSM) measurements (Fig. S2), so hereafter we will refer to TSM for both discrete samples and sensor
data. The Li-Cor 840 IRGAs were calibrated before and after each cruise with
ultrapure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a suite of gas standards (Air Liquide Belgium), with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios of 388, 813, 3788 and 8300 ppm. The overall precision
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Metabolism measurements </title>
      <p id="d1e2632">Primary production (PP) was measured during 2 h incubations along a gradient
of light intensity using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a tracer, as described
in detail by Descy et al. (2017). Data were integrated vertically with PAR
profiles made with a Li-Cor Li-193 underwater spherical sensor and at daily
scale with surface PAR data measured during the cruises with a Li-190R
quantum sensor. In order to extend the number of PP data points we developed
a very simple model as a function of chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and of
Secchi depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M206" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PP</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.166</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.751</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where PP is in mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cm and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2788">This approach is inspired from empirical models such as the one developed by
Cole and Cloern (1987) that accounts for phytoplankton biomass given by
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, light extinction given by the photic depth and daily surface
irradiance. We use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a proxy for photic depth and, in order to
simplify the computations, we did not include in the model daily surface
irradiance, since it is nearly constant year round in our study region close
to the Equator. The model satisfactorily predicts the PP (Fig. S3), except at
very low Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values at which the model overestimates PP (due to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> term). In order to overcome this, we assumed a zero PP value for
Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations &lt; 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2855">Pelagic community respiration (CR) was determined from the decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 60 mL biological oxygen demand bottles (Wheaton) over
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h incubation periods. The bottles were kept in the dark
and close to in situ temperature in a cooler filled with in situ water.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease was determined from triplicate measurements at the
start and the end of the incubation with an optical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> probe (YSI
ProODO). At the end of incubation the sealed samples were homogenized with a
magnetic bar prior to the measurement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Depth integration was made
by multiplying the CR in surface waters by the depth measured at the station
with a portable depth meter (Plastimo Echotest-II).</p>
      <p id="d1e2912">For methane oxidation measurements, seven 60 mL borosilicate serum bottles
(Wheaton) were filled sequentially from the Niskin bottle and immediately
sealed with butyl<?pagebreak page3806?> stoppers and crimped with aluminum caps. The butyl
stoppers were cleaned of leachable chemicals by boiling in deionized water
during 15 min in our home laboratory. The first and the last bottle to
be filled were then poisoned with a saturated solution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L) injected through the butyl stopper with a polypropylene syringe
and a steel needle, corresponding to the initial concentration of the
incubation (T0). The other bottles were stored in a cooler full of in situ
water (to keep samples close to in situ temperature and in the dark) and
were poisoned approximately 12 h after T0 (T1) and then approximately every
24 h after T0 (T2, T3, T4 and T5). The difference between the two T0 samples
was close to the typical precision of measurements showing that the water
was homogeneous within the Niskin bottle with regards to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, and no measurable loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred when filling the
seven vials. Methane oxidation was computed from the linear decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration with time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Sample conditioning and laboratory analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2976">Samples for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were collected from the Niskin bottle with
a silicone tube in 60 mL borosilicate serum bottles (Wheaton), poisoned with
200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of a saturated solution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sealed with a butyl
stopper and crimped with aluminum cap. Measurements were made with the
headspace technique (Weiss, 1981) and a GC (SRI 8610C) with a flame
ionization detector for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with a methanizer for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
electron capture detector for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calibrated with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gas mixtures (Air Liquide Belgium) with
mixing ratios of 1, 10, and 30 ppm for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 404, 1018, and 3961 ppm for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and 0.2, 2.0, and 6.0 ppm for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The precision of
measurements based on duplicate samples was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration is expressed as
partial pressure in parts per million (ppm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as dissolved
concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), in accordance with convention in existing
topical literature and because both quantities were systematically and
distinctly above saturation level (400 ppm and 2–3 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively). Variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were modest and concentrations
fluctuated around atmospheric equilibrium, so data are presented as percent
of saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where atmospheric equilibrium corresponds
to 100 %), computed from the global mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air mixing ratios given
by the Global Monitoring Division (GMD) of the Earth System Research
Laboratory (ESRL) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) (<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/hats/combined/N2O.html</uri>, last access: 15 August 2018) and using the
Henry's constant given by Weiss and Price (1980).</p>
      <p id="d1e3274">The flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between surface waters and the atmosphere was computed according
to Liss and Slater (1974):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M262" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas transfer velocity (cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
air–water gradient of a given gas.</p>
      <p id="d1e3408">Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from Mount Kenya station (NOAA ESRL GMD) and a
constant atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial pressure of 2 ppm were used.
Atmospheric mixing ratios given in dry air were converted to water-vapor-saturated air, using the water vapor formulation of Weiss and Price (1982)
as a function of salinity and water temperature. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> normalized to a Schmidt
number of 600 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were derived from the
parameterization as a function slope and stream water velocity given by
Eq. 5 of Raymond et al. (2012):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M271" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11838</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is stream velocity (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is slope (unitless).</p>
      <p id="d1e3519">We chose this parameterization because it is based on the most
exhaustive compilation to date of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in streams derived from tracer experiments
and was used in the global riverine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> efflux estimates of Raymond et
al. (2013) and Lauerwald et al. (2015). Values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were derived from a
geographical information system (GIS), as described in Sect. 2.6.</p>
      <p id="d1e3555">During the June 2014 field expedition, samples for the stable isotope
composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were collected and
preserved similarly to those described above for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined with a custom developed interface,
whereby a 20 mL He headspace was first created and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was flushed out
through a double-hole needle, non-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volatile organic compounds were
trapped in liquid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was removed with a soda lime trap,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was removed with a magnesium perchlorate trap, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
quantitatively oxidized to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in an online combustion column similar
to that of an elemental analyzer. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was subsequently
pre-concentrated by immersion of a stainless steel loop in liquid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
passed through a micropacked GC column (Restek HayeSep Q 2 m length, 0.75 mm
internal diameter) and finally measured on a Thermo DeltaV Advantage
isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). Calibration was performed with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generated from certified reference standards (IAEA-CO-1 or NBS-19
and LSVEC) and injected in the line after the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trap. Reproducibility
of measurements based on duplicate injections of samples was typically better
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰.</p>
      <p id="d1e3764">The fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removed by methane oxidation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated
with a closed-system Rayleigh fractionation model (Liptay et al., 1998)
according to
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M299" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">initial</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">initial</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the signature of
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as produced by methanogenesis in sediments, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the signature of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in situ and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the fractionation factor.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3807?><p id="d1e3974">We used a value of 1.02 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on field measurements in a
tropical lake (Morana et al., 2015). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">initial</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we used a value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60.2 ‰, which we measured in bubbles from the sediment
trapped with a funnel on one occasion in a river dominated by <italic>Vossia cuspidata</italic> wetlands
(16 April–6 May 2015). The model we used to compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> applies for closed
systems, implying that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed not to be exchanged with
surroundings in contrast to open-system models. Running river water
corresponds to a system that is intermediate between closed and open
chemical systems, since it is open to the atmosphere and the sediments, but,
on the other hand, the water parcel can be partly viewed as a closed system
being transported downstream with the flow. As such, the water parcel
receives a certain amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from sediments and then is transported
downstream away from the initial input of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We also applied two
common open-system models to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given by Happel et al. (1994) and
by Tyler et al. (1997) that have also been applied in lake systems
(Bastviken et al., 2002). However, both open-system models gave <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
&gt; 1 in many cases (data not shown) since the difference between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source and measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was often much higher than expected from the assumed
isotopic fractionation (1.02). The same observation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 1) was
also reported with open-system models in the lakes studied by Bastviken et
al. (2002). Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values &gt; 1 are not conceptually possible, we
preferred to use the results from the closed-system model instead, although
we acknowledge that flowing waters are in fact intermediary systems between
closed and open and that, consequently, the computed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ox</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are likely
underestimated.</p>
      <p id="d1e4173">Samples for the stable isotope composition of DIC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC)
were collected from the Niskin bottle with a silicone tube in 12 mL
Exetainer vials (Labco) and poisoned with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of a saturated
solution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Prior to the analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC, a 2 mL helium headspace was created and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of phosphoric acid
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 99 %) was added in the vial in order to convert
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After overnight
equilibration, up to 1 mL of the headspace was injected with a gastight
syringe into a coupled elemental analyzer – IRMS (EA-IRMS, Thermo FlashHT or
Carlo Erba EA1110 with DeltaV Advantage). The obtained data were corrected
for isotopic equilibration between dissolved and gaseous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as
described by Gillikin and Bouillon (2007). Calibration was performed with
certified standards (NBS-19 or IAEA-CO-1 and LSVEC). Reproducibility of
measurements based on duplicate injections of samples was typically better
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰.</p>
      <p id="d1e4307">Water was filtered on Whatman glass fiber filters (GF/F grade, 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m
porosity) for TSM (47 mm diameter), particulate organic carbon (POC) and
particulate nitrogen (PN) (25 mm diameter) (precombusted at 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
for 5 h) and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (47 mm diameter). Filters for TSM and POC were stored dry
and filters for Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were stored frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Filters for POC
analysis were decarbonated with HCl fumes for 4 h and dried before
encapsulation into silver cups; POC and PN concentration and carbon stable
isotope composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-POC) were analyzed on an EA-IRMS
(Thermo FlashHT with DeltaV Advantage), with a reproducibility better than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for stable isotopic composition and better
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for bulk concentration of POC and PN. Data were
calibrated with certified (IAEA-600: caffeine) and in-house standards
(leucine and muscle tissue of Pacific tuna) that were previously calibrated
versus certified standards. The Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography according to Descy et al. (2005), with a
reproducibility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and a detection limit of 0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Part of the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data were previously reported by Descy et al. (2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e4436">The water filtered through GF/F Whatman glass microfiber filters was collected
and further filtered through polyethersulfone syringe encapsulated filters
(0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity) for stable isotope composition of O of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), TA, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), major
elements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dissolved silicate,
Si), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), nitrite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and ammonium
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Samples for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were stored at
ambient temperature in polypropylene 8 mL vials and measurements were
carried out at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA, Vienna), where
water samples were pipetted into 2 mL vials and measured twice on different
laser water isotope analyzers (Los Gatos Research or Picarro). Isotopic
values were determined by averaging isotopic values from the last four out
of nine injections, along with memory and drift corrections, with final
normalization to the VSMOW/SLAP scales by using two-point lab standard
calibrations, as fully described in Wassenaar et al. (2014) and Coplen and
Wassenaar (2015). The long-term uncertainty for standard <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. Samples for TA were stored at
ambient temperature in polyethylene 55 mL vials and measurements were
carried out by open-cell titration with HCl 0.1 mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> according to
Gran (1952), and data quality was checked with certified reference material
obtained from Andrew Dickson (Scripps Institution of Oceanography,
University of California, San Diego, USA), with a typical reproducibility
better than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. DIC was computed from TA and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements using the carbonic acid dissociation constants for
freshwater of Millero (1979) using the “CO2sys” package. Samples to determine
DOC were stored at ambient temperature and in the dark in 40 mL brown
borosilicate vials with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated septa and
poisoned with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (85 %), and DOC
concentration was determined with a wet oxidation total organic carbon
analyzer (IO Analytical Aurora 1030W), with a typical reproducibility better
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Part of the DOC data were previously reported by Lambert
et al. (2016). Samples for major elements were stored in 20 mL scintillation
vials and preserved with 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>L of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (65 %). Major elements
were measured with inductively coupled plasma MS (ICP-MS; Agilent 7700x)
calibrated with the following standards: SRM1640a from National Institute of
Standards and Technology, TM-27.3 (lot 0412) and TMRain-04 (lot 0913)<?pagebreak page3808?> from
Environment Canada, and SPS-SW2 Batch 130 from Spectrapure Standard. Limit
of quantification was 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for Si. Samples were collected during four cruises (8 May–6 June 2010,
20 November–8 December 2012, 3–19 December 2013, and 16 April–6 May 2015) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and were stored frozen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
in 50 mL polypropylene vials. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
determined with the sulfanilamide, colorimetric was determined with the vanadium reduction
method (APHA, 1998) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined with the
dichloroisocyanurate-salicylate-nitroprussiate colorimetric method (SCA,
1981). Detection limits were 0.3, 0.01 and 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Precisions
were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>GIS</title>
      <p id="d1e5101">The limits of the river catchments and Strahler order of rivers and streams
were determined from the geospatial HydroSHEDS dataset
(<uri>https://hydrosheds.cr.usgs.gov/</uri>, last access: 27 September 2018) using ArcGIS<sup>®</sup> (10.3.1). Land
cover data were extracted from the global land cover (GLC) 2009 dataset
(<uri>http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php</uri>, last access: 11 January 2019) from the
European Space Agency GlobCover 2009 project for the following classes:
croplands, mosaic cropland/vegetation, dense forest, flooded dense forest,
open forest/woodland, shrublands, mosaic forest or shrubland/grassland,
grasslands, flooded grassland, and water bodies. Shrubland and grassland classes
were aggregated for the estimate of savannah. Theoretical contribution of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation were extracted based on the vegetation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
isoscape for Africa from Still and Powell (2010) but corrected for
agro-ecosystems according to the method of Powell et al. (2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e5135">The geospatial and statistical methods to compute river width, length,
Strahler stream order, surface area, slope, flow velocity and discharge
throughout the Congo River network are described in detail in the
Supplement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e5146">Statistical tests were carried out using GraphPad Prism<sup>®</sup>
software at 0.05 level, and the normality of the distribution was tested with
the D'Agostino–Pearson omnibus normality test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e5161">This section starts with the description of the
spatial variations in general limnological variables as well as GHGs along
the two main transects (Kinsangani–Kinshasa and Kwa) and as a function of
stream order and the presence of the CCC. The following parts of this section deal with
the seasonal variability and the drivers of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics, based on one
hand on the metabolic measurements and on the other hand on stable isotopic
composition of DIC. The final part of this section deals with fluxes of GHGs between the
river and the atmosphere that are presented and discussed firstly as areal
fluxes and finally as integrated fluxes at the scale of the basin and at
global scale.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Spatial variations along the Kisangani–Kinshasa transect of general
limnological variables and dissolved GHGs</title>
      <p id="d1e5182">Figures 3 and 4 show the spatial distribution of variables in surface waters
of the main stem
Congo River and confluence with tributaries along the
Kisangani–Kinshasa transect during high water (HW, December 2013) and
falling water (FW, June 2014) periods (Figs. 1 and 2). Numerous variables
show a regular pattern in the main stem (increase or decrease) due to the
gradual inputs from tributaries with a different (higher or lower) value
than the main stem. Specific conductivity, TA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC, pH,
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, TSM, pH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreased, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DOC increased in the main stem along the
Kisangani–Kinshasa transect. Numerous tributaries had black-water
characteristics (low conductivity, TA, pH, %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, TSM and high DOC)
while the main stem had generally white-water characteristics. The
black-water tributaries were mainly found in the region of the CCC, while
tributaries upstream or downstream of the CCC had in general more
white-water characteristics. The differences between black-waters and
white-waters were apparent in the patterns of continuous measurements of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, showing a negative relationship with %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, TSM, pH and
specific conductivity (Fig. S4).</p>
      <p id="d1e5297">Specific conductivity in the main stem Congo River decreased from 48.3 (HW) and 78.9 (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kisangani to 26.5 (HW) and 32.7 (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kinshasa (Figs. 3 and 4). This decreasing pattern was related
to a gradual dilution with tributary water with lower conductivities, on
average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The lowest specific conductivity was measured in the Lefini River that is
part of the Téké Plateau, where rainwater infiltrates into deep
aquifers across thick sandy horizons leading to water with a low
mineralization (Laraque et al., 1998). TA in the main stem decreased from 344
(HW) and 697 (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kisangani to 195 (HW) and 269 (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kinshasa, with an average in tributaries of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">141</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">136</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">141</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC roughly followed the patterns of TA, decreasing in the
main stem from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.9 (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.8 (FW) ‰ in Kisangani to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.8 (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.8 (FW) ‰ in Kinshasa, with an average
in tributaries of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) ‰. TSM in the main stem decreased from 92.9 (HW) and 23.2
(FW) mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kisangani to 45.4 (HW) and 18.2 (FW) mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Kinshasa, with an average in tributaries of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The highest TSM values were recorded in the
Kwa (44.4 (HW) and 15.8 (FW) mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in the Nsele, a small<?pagebreak page3809?> stream-draining savannah and flowing into pool Malebo (71.4 [HW] and 34.8 [FW] mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). pH in the main stem decreased from 6.73 (HW) and 7.38 (FW) in
Kisangani to 6.11 (HW) and 6.29 (FW) in Kinshasa, with an average in
tributaries of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.91</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW). %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values in the main stem
decreased from 89.2 (HW) and 92.6 (FW) % in
Kisangani to 57.8 (HW) and 79.7 (FW) % in Kinshasa, with an average in
tributaries of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (LW) %. DOC
increased from 5.9 (HW) and 5.1 (FW) mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kisangani to 11.9 (HW) and 9.4 (FW) mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kinshasa, with an average in tributaries of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Extremely low pH
values were recorded in rivers draining the CCC, with values as low as 3.6,
coinciding with nearly anoxic conditions (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> down to 0.3 %) in
surface waters and very high DOC content (up to 67.8 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the main stem decreased from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2 (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6 (FW) ‰ in Kisangani to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.9 (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2 (FW) ‰ in Kinshasa, with an average in the tributaries of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (FW). Temperature
increased in the main stem from 26.0 (HW) and 27.1 (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in
Kisangani to 27.8 (HW) and 27.3 (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in Kinshasa, due to
exposure in the uncovered main stem to solar radiation, as temperature was
lower in tributaries with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C due to more shaded conditions (forest cover).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5907">Variation in surface waters of the specific conductivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), oxygen stable isotope
composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ‰), total suspended matter (TSM in mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), total alkalinity (TA in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved organic carbon (DOC in mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
carbon stable isotope composition of dissolved inorganic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC in ‰), pH, partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
%), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) as a function of the distance
upstream of Kinshasa along a transect along the Congo River from Kisangani
(3–19 December 2013, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">505</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Grey and black symbols indicate samples
from the main stem and green samples from tributaries.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e6157">Variation in surface waters of the specific conductivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), oxygen stable isotope
composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ‰), total suspended matter (TSM in mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), total alkalinity (TA in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved organic carbon (DOC in mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
carbon stable isotope composition of dissolved inorganic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC in ‰), pH, partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
%), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) as a function of the distance
upstream of Kinshasa along a transect along the Congo River from Kisangani
(10–30 June 2014, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">968</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Grey and black symbols indicate samples from
the main stem and green samples from tributaries.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6404">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the main stem increased from 2424 (HW) and 1670 (FW) ppm in Kisangani to 5343 (HW) and 2896 (FW) ppm in Kinshasa, with an average
in tributaries of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8306</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4089</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8039</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5311</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) ppm.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in tributaries was in general higher than in the main stem with a
few exceptions, namely in rivers close to Kinshasa (1582 to 1903 [HW] and
1087 to 2483 [FW] ppm), due to degassing at waterfalls upstream of the
sampling stations, as the terrain is more mountainous in this area than in
more gently sloping catchments upstream and also possibly due to a larger
contribution of savannah to the catchment cover. The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values (up to 16 942 ppm) were observed in streams draining the CCC.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the main stem decreased from 85 (HW) and 63 (FW) nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Kisangani to 24 (HW) and 22 (FW) nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> just before Kinshasa and then
increased again in the Malebo pool (82 [HW] and 78 [FW] nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
possibly related to the shallowness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in Malebo pool
versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m depth at station just upstream). The general
decreasing pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the main stem resulted from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
oxidation, as indicated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched values in the main stem (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>38.1 ‰
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>49.4 ‰) with regards to sediment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60.2 ‰) and the increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment along the
transect (Fig. 5). The calculated fraction of oxidized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged
between 0.43 and 0.68 in the main stem and also increased downstream along
the transect (Fig. S5). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tributaries showed a very large
range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (68 to 51 839 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and 102 to
56 236 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW)). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tributaries showed a variable
degree of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment compared to sediment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.3 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>56.3 ‰, Fig. 5),
and the calculated fraction of oxidized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged between 0.18 and
0.88 (Fig. S5). Unlike the large rivers of the Amazon where a loose negative
relation has been reported (Sawakuchi et al., 2016), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the Congo River were unrelated to dissolved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, and a relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.3 ‰) was observed even at
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (correspondingly 3118 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 5).
This lack of correlation between concentration and isotope composition of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was probably related to spatial heterogeneity of sedimentary (and
corresponding water column) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content over a very large and
heterogeneous sampling area. The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were
observed at the mouths of small rivers in the CCC. At the confluence with
the Congo main stem, the flow is slowed down, leading to the development of
shallow delta-type systems with very dense coverage of aquatic macrophytes
(in majority <italic>Vossia cuspidata</italic> with a variable contribution of <italic>Eichhornia crassipes</italic> but also other species, Fig. S6). Such sites are favorable for intense sediment methanogenesis but, due
to the stable environment related to near stagnant waters, also very
favorable for the establishment of a stable methanotrophic bacterial
community in the water column and associated with the root system of floating
macrophytes that sustain intense methane oxidation (Yoshida et al., 2014;
Kosten et al., 2016). Indeed, we found a very strong relation between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration on a limited number of
incubations carried out in the Kwa river network in April 2015 (Fig. S7).
Such conditions can explain the apparently paradoxical combination of high
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in some cases associated with a high degree of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation. Microbial oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might also explain the
occurrence of samples with extremely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depleted POC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-POC down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39.0 ‰) observed in low
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> environments (Fig. 6) located in small streams
of the CCC that were also characterized by low POC and TSM values (not
shown) and high POC : Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (excluding the possibility that in situ PP would
be at the basis of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion). This suggests that in these
environments poor in particles (typical of black-water streams) but with
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, methanotrophic bacteria that are able to
incorporate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into their biomass contribute
substantially to POC. While such patterns have been reported at the
oxic–anoxic transition zone of lakes with high hypolimnetic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations such as Lake Kivu (Morana et al., 2015), this has never been
reported in surface waters of rivers.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e7080">Carbon stable isotope composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ‰) in surface waters of the Congo
River main stem (black symbols) and tributaries (green symbols) as a
function of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and as a function
of the distance upstream of Kinshasa, obtained along a longitudinal transect
along the Congo River from Kisangani (10–30 June 2014). The dotted line
indicates linear regression.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e7149">Carbon stable isotope composition of particulate organic carbon
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-POC in ‰) in surface waters of the
Congo River network as a function of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level
(%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Grey lines indicate average (full line) and standard deviation (dotted
lines) of average soil organic carbon stable isotope composition with a
dominance of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
plants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Bird and Pousai, 1997).
Data with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-POC &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ were
associated with significantly lower %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than data
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-POC &gt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰
(Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both tests).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3812?><p id="d1e7338">%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased from 198 (HW) and 139 (FW) % in Kisangani to 168
(HW) and 153 (FW) % in Kinshasa, and in most cases %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower
in tributaries, on average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">114</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (HW) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (FW) %. The
undersaturation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in streams with high DOC, low
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and relatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and is most probably
related to denitrification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as also reported in the Amazon river
(Richey et al., 1988) and in temperate rivers (Baulch et al., 2011).
Denitrification could have occurred in river sediments or soils, although
the lowest %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) occurred in the CCC dominated by
flooded soils in the flooded forest. Indeed, there was a general negative
relationship between %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7), with an average
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 25 % and an
average %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">155.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 25 % (Mann–Whitney <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The decreasing pattern of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : DIN and increasing pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : DIN with
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicated the occurrence of nitrification in oxygenated (typical
of high Strahler stream order) rivers and prevalence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the more reducing and lower oxygenated (typical of low Strahler order)
streams draining the CCC in particular, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was probably
also removed from the water by sedimentary or soil denitrification (Fig. 7).
In addition, in black-water rivers and streams, low pH (down to 4) might have
led to the inhibition of nitrification (Le et al., 2019) and also
contributed higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:DIN values. Furthermore, the positive
relation between %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : DIN and the negative
relation between %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : DIN (Fig. 8) support the
hypothesis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removal by denitrification in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted
environments (either in stream sediments or soils), while in more oxygenated
rivers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was produced by nitrification. In the main stem of the
Congo, there might, in addition, be a loop of nitrogen recycling
(ammonification-nitrification) sustained by phytoplankton growth and decay
that contributed to maintain oversaturation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
atmospheric equilibrium, as phytoplankton growth was only observed in the
main stem (Descy et al., 2017). The generally low %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the
Congo River network were probably due to the near pristine nature of these
systems with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) levels, typical of
rivers and streams draining a large fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) of
forests. Croplands only represented at most 17 %, on average, of the land
cover of the studied river catchments where traditional agriculture is
practised with little use of artificial fertilizers. This corresponds to an
upper bound of cropland surface area since it was estimated aggregating the
“cropland” and “mosaic cropland/vegetation” GLC 2009 categories, the
latter corresponding to mixed surfaces with &lt; 50 % of cropland.
The “cropland” GLC 2009 category only accounts for 0.1 %, on average, of
the land cover of the studied river catchments. Nitrogen inputs from waste
water can also sustain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in impacted rivers and streams
(Marwick et al., 2014), but the largest cities along the Congo River main stem
are of relatively modest size such as Kisangani (1 600 000 habitants) and
Mbandaka (350 000 habitants), especially considering the large dilution due
to the massive discharge of the main stem (sampling was done upstream of the
influence of the megacity of Kinshasa with 11 900 000 habitants).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e7887">Dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %), ratio
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to dissolved inorganic nitrogen
(DIN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol) and ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to DIN (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol) in surface waters of the Congo River network as a function of dissolved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %). Outliers (red dots) were
identified with a Cook's distance procedure and removed prior to linear
regression analysis (solid line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=156.490157pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e8045">Dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %), as a
function of the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to dissolved inorganic nitrogen
(DIN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol) and of the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to DIN (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol) in surface waters of the Congo River network. Outliers (red
dots) were identified with a Cook's distance procedure and removed prior
to linear regression analysis (solid line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e8178">The input of the Kwa led to distinct changes of TA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (decrease) and TSM (increase) of main stem values
(comparing values upstream and downstream of the Kwa mouth) (Figs. 3–4). In
the main stem, continuous measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH, %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
conductivity showed more variability compared to discrete samples acquired
in the middle of channel, in particular in the region of CCC (Figs. 3–4).
These patterns were related to gradients across the section of channel, as
the boat sailed either along the mid-channel or closer to shore. The water
from the tributaries flowed along the riverbanks and did not mix with
main stem middle channel waters, as visible in natural color remotely sensed
images (Fig. S8), leading to strong gradients across the section of main stem
channel. During the June 2014 field expedition, this was investigated in
more detail by a series of six transects perpendicular to the river main stem
channel (Fig. 9). In the upper part (1590 km from Kinshasa), the variables
showed little cross section gradients except for a decrease in conductivity
towards the right bank due to inputs from the Lindi River that had
distinctly lower specific conductivities (27.2 [HW] and 35.1 [FW] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than the main stem (48.3 [HW] and 78.9 [FW] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
At 795 km from Kinshasa, marked gradients appeared in all variables, with the
presence of black-water characteristics close to the right bank (higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lower %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH, specific conductivity, temperature, and
TSM values). This feature was related to inputs from large right-bank
tributaries such as the Aruwimi and the Itimbiri (Supplement Table S1). Upstream of
this section the only major left-bank tributary is the Lomami, which had
white-water characteristics, relatively similar to those of the main stem
(Figs. 3–4). The presence of black-water characteristics became apparent
also on the left bank, from cross sections at 307 and 254 km upstream of
Kinshasa, where the river is particularly wide (&gt; 6 km wide) and
received the inputs from the Ruki, the second-largest left-bank tributary
(Table S1) with black-water characteristics. The cross section gradients
became less marked at 203 km upstream from Kinshasa, as in this region the
river becomes more narrow (2 km wide) leading to increased currents and more
lateral<?pagebreak page3813?> mixing. The cross section gradients nearly disappeared at 158 km
upstream of Kinshasa (and 30 km downstream of the Kwa mouth) due to
homogenization by the large Kwa inputs (nearly 20 % of total freshwater
discharge from the Congo River, Table S1) into a relatively narrow river section
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e8308">Variations in surface water of the partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm), dissolved oxygen saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %),
pH, specific conductivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), water temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and total suspended matter (TSM in mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) along
perpendicular transects to the main stem Congo River as a function of distance
from the left bank (m) and at a variable distance from Kinshasa
(10–30 June 2014).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Spatial variations along the Kwa transect</title>
      <p id="d1e8402">Spatial features of biogeochemical variables along the transect in the Kwa
River network (Fig. 10) showed some similarities with two Kisangani–Kinshasa
transects along the Congo main stem (Figs. 3–4). The main stem Kwa had a higher
specific conductivity than the tributaries (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), higher TA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">281</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">119</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">118</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), higher temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), higher TSM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), higher pH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), higher %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %),
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and lower DOC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Unlike the Kisangani–Kinshasa transects along the Congo
main stem, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower in the main stem Kwa
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) than in the tributaries
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Note that both the main upstream
branches of the Kwa (Kasai and Sankuru) had low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the upper Kasai and Sankuru
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.4 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, respectively) were lower than those
of the Lualaba (Congo at Kisangani) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2 [HW] and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6 [FW] ‰). This difference can be in part explained by the
spatial patterns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in rainwater, as the annual
averages over of river catchments are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.1 ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2 ‰, for the Lualaba and the Kasai, respectively, based on
the global grids of the O isotope composition of precipitation given by
Bowen et al. (2005). The river <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was close to
those of rain for the Kasai but less depleted in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Lualaba.
This was probably related to the lower evapotranspiration over the
catchments of the upper Kasai and Sankuru than those of Lualaba (Bultot,
1972), leading to more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted water (e.g., Simpson and Herczeg,
1991). Additionally, the catchment of Kwa has a high fraction of
unconsolidated sedimentary (41.4 %) and siliciclastic sedimentary
(44.3 %) rocks than the catchment of the Lualaba that is dominated by
metamorphic rocks (68.4 %). Unconsolidated sedimentary and siliciclastic
sedimentary rocks are more favorable to the infiltration of water and
development of aquifers that will minimize evaporation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
enrichment, unlike catchments dominated by metamorphic rocks. Note that the
tributaries with the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were situated
downstream of the Kwa and upstream of Kinshasa<?pagebreak page3814?> (Figs. 3–4) and are part of
the Téké Plateau. These rivers are fed by deep aquifers derived from
infiltration of rain through sandy soils (Laraque et al., 1998).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e8973">Variation in surface waters of the specific conductivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), oxygen stable isotope
composition of H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ‰), total suspended matter (TSM in mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), total alkalinity (TA in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved organic carbon (DOC in mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
carbon stable isotope composition of dissolved inorganic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC in ‰), pH, partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
%), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) as a function of the distance
upstream of the Kwa mouth along a transect along the Kwa River
(16 April–6 May 2015, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7017</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Grey and black symbols indicate samples from
the main stem and green samples from tributaries.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9213">Another difference with the Kisangani–Kinshasa transects along the Congo
main stem relates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that were closer to saturation in the
Kwa main stem (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), while surface waters oscillated from
undersaturation to oversaturation in the tributaries (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">122.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). This difference could be due to variations in biogeochemical cycling
or in physical settings leading to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter seems more likely
due to the strong flow in the Kwa that probably led to high gas transfer
velocities and strong degassing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere. In the Kwa
main stem, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3473</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">974</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">255</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) values were lower than in tributaries (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8804</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5108</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6783</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">479</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of the entire dataset in the Congo River network were observed in a
tributary of the Fimi (22 899 ppm and 71 428 nmol<?pagebreak page3815?> L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) that is bordered
by very extensive meadows of the aquatic macrophyte <italic>Vossia cuspidata</italic> and unrelated to
inputs from the shallow Lake Mai Ndombé that showed lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (3,143 ppm and 250 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3816?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Spatial variations as a function of stream order and as a function of
the influence of the CCC</title>
      <p id="d1e9458">The large differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Figs. 3, 4, 10) among the various sampled tributaries of the Congo River can
be analyzed in terms of size classes as given by Strahler order (Fig. 11).
There were distinct patterns in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus Strahler
order, with a decrease in the central value (median and average) for both
quantities as a function of Strahler order in streams draining and not
draining the CCC (Fig. 11). For nearly all the stream orders, the streams
draining the CCC had significantly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than
streams not draining the CCC (Fig. 11). The %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values per Strahler
order did not show any distinct pattern (increase or decrease) in the
streams not draining the CCC, but the streams draining the CCC showed an
increasing pattern as a function of Strahler order. The %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
were significantly lower in the streams draining the CCC than those not
draining the CCC (Fig. 11). For %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the tendency of the central
value (median and average) as a function of Strahler order did not show a
clear pattern for streams not draining the CCC; however, there was a clear
increasing pattern with Strahler order for streams draining the CCC. In
addition, the %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were significantly lower for half of the
cases, in streams draining the CCC compared to those not draining it (Fig. 11).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e9609">Box plot as a function of Strahler stream order of the partial
pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
(nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %),
and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level ( %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) for rivers and
streams of the Congo River network draining and not draining the Cuvette
Centrale Congolaise. The box represents the first and third quartile,
the horizontal line corresponds to the median, the cross corresponds to the average, the error
bars correspond to the maximum and minimum, and the symbols show all data points. A
Mann–Whitney test was used to test statistical differences: ns represents not
significant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9843">In US rivers, a decreasing pattern as a function of Strahler order has
previously been reported for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Butman and Raymond, 2001; Liu and
Raymond, 2018). This has been interpreted as reflecting inputs of soil-water
enriched in terrestrial respired <inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that have a stronger impact in
smaller and lower Strahler order systems, in particular headwater streams,
followed by degassing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in higher Strahler order rivers (Hotchkiss
et al., 2015), although soil-water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs in headwater streams are
seasonally variable and spatially heterogeneous (Duvert et al., 2018).
Nevertheless, all of the low-Strahler-order streams we sampled were in
lowlands, so the decreasing pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of Strahler
order could alternatively reflect the stronger influence of riparian
wetlands on smaller streams, rather than larger systems. The mechanism
remains the same, a high ratio of lateral inputs to water volume in small
streams that is related to soil-water in temperate streams such as in the
US but related in addition to riparian wetlands in tropical systems such as
those sampled in the Congo River network.</p>
      <p id="d1e9906">The influence of riparian wetlands on stream <inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be also highlighted when data were separated into rivers
draining or not draining the CCC but aggregating into systems smaller or
larger than Strahler order 5 to account simultaneously for the effect of
stream size (Fig. 12). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were statistically higher in
rivers draining the CCC than those not draining it, with median values more
than 2-fold higher in both small and large rivers. Conversely, %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels were statistically lower in rivers draining the CCC than those not
draining it, with median values 11-fold and 2-fold lower in small and large
rivers, respectively. Additional evidence on the influence of the
connectivity of wetlands with rivers in sustaining high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values was provided by the positive relationship between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and flooded dense forest cover and the converse negative
relationship between %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and flooded dense forest cover (Fig. 13).
These patterns were also consistent with the positive relation between DOC
concentration and flooded dense forest reported by Lambert et al. (2016).
Note that aquatic macrophytes (<italic>Vossia cuspidata</italic>) also most probably strongly contributed, in
addition to flooded forest, to high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels,
based on visual observations of dense coverage (Fig. S9), although macrophytes have
not been systematically mapped and GIS data are unavailable (as for flooded
dense forest).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e10049">Box plot of the partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm),
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level
(%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) in surface waters of rivers and streams of the Congo
river network draining and not draining the Cuvette Centrale Congolaise for
small and large systems (Strahler stream order <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and &gt; 5,
respectively) (3–19 December 2013; 10–30 June 2014). The box represents
the first and third quartile, the horizontal line corresponds to the median, the
cross corresponds to the average, the error bars correspond to the maximum and minimum, and the
symbols show all data points. A Mann–Whitney test was used to test
statistical differences: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e10267">Partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm) and dissolved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) in surface waters of rivers
and streams of the Congo River network as a function of the flooded dense
forest over the respective catchment (GLC, 2009). Grey open
dots are individual data points, and black full dots are binned averages
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) by intervals of 20 %.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e10329">Wetlands coverage had also a major importance on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution, as
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were statistically higher in rivers draining the CCC
than those not draining it (Fig. 12), with median values 10-fold and 2-fold
higher in small and large rivers, respectively. %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also
statistically lower in rivers draining the CCC than those not draining it,
with median values 2.7-fold lower in small rivers but 1.4-fold higher in
large rivers. The pattern of %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed the one of %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the very low to null <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed in the systems
draining the CCC where the lowest %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (close to 0) were also
observed due to sedimentary or soil organic matter degradation, leading to a
decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in surface waters (consumption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by denitrification).</p>
      <p id="d1e10453">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molar ratio ranged between 0.0001 and 0.1215, with a
mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0097</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Such ratios were distinctly higher than those
typically observed in marine waters (0.0005) and in the atmosphere (0.005).
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molar ratio strongly increased with the decrease in
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and was significantly higher in small rivers draining the CCC
(Fig. 14). These patterns were probably related to inputs of organic matter
from wetlands and in particular aquatic macrophytes that lead to important
organic matter transfer to sediments and high sedimentary degradation of
organic matter. This led to %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease in surface waters and a
large fraction of organic matter degradation by anaerobic processes compared
to aerobic degradation, leading to an increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio. The decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the water in
presence of floating macrophytes was probably in part also related to
autotrophic root respiration and not fully related to microbial
heterotrophic respiration.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e10582">Ratio of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol:<inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol) plotted as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level
(%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) and plotted in box plots draining and not draining the
Cuvette Centrale Congolaise for small and large systems (Strahler stream
order <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and &gt; 5, respectively) (3–19 December 2013;
10–30 June 2014). The box represents the first and third quartile,
the horizontal line corresponds to the median, the cross corresponds to the average, the error
bars correspond to the maximum and minimum, and the symbols show all data points. A
Mann–Whitney test was used to test statistical differences: ns<inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>not
significant; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e10706">Primary production (measured and modeled) (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of community respiration (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and air–water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a
function of community respiration (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and net community
production (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in surface waters of rivers and streams
of the Congo River network. Insets show the data on a linear scale (instead
of a log–log scale).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Drivers of {$\protect\chem{CO_{{{2}}}}$} dynamics -- metabolic
measurements and daily variations in {$\protect\chem{CO_{{{2}}}}$}}?><title>Drivers of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics – metabolic
measurements and daily variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page3817?><p id="d1e10892">We compared the balance of depth-integrated planktonic PP to water column CR
and compared it to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to test if in situ net heterotrophy was sufficient to
sustain the emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere (Fig. 15), or if
alternatively fluvial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had a lateral origin (soils or wetlands). A
detailed description of spatial and seasonal variations in PP as well as
main phytoplankton communities is given by Descy et al. (2017). In brief,
phytoplankton biomass was mainly confined to the main stem and was low in
most tributaries. The PP values in the Congo River ranged between 0.0 and
57.5 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and were higher than previously reported in
tropical river channels, whereas in other tropical rivers phytoplankton
production mainly occurred in the floodplain lakes. This is due to generally
lower TSM values in the Congo and to its relative shallowness that allows
net phytoplankton growth in the mainstream unlike other deeper and more
turbid tropical rivers such as the Amazon. Measured CR was lower than PP 3 out of 49 times, and on average the PP : CR ratio was 0.28. Volumetric rates of
CR ranged between 0.7 and 46.6 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while integrated
rates of CR ranged between 3.1 and 790.4 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. CR was
unrelated to TSM, POC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> but showed a positive
relation with DOC after binning the data (Fig. S10). The same pattern
emerged when using modeled PP, to extend the number of data points, with PP higher than CR
2 out of 169 times and a PP : CR ratio of 0.15 on average. This
indicates that a generalized and strongly net heterotrophic metabolism was
encountered in the sampled sites. Yet, in 174 out of 187 cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
higher than CR, and in 162 out of 169 cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher than net
community production (NCP). CR averaged 81 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, NCP
averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>75 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
was 740 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : CR ratio was higher in lower-order streams than in higher-order streams, with median values ranging between
21 and 139 in stream orders 2–5 and between 3 and 17 in stream orders 6–10
(Fig. 16). This indicates a prevalence of lateral <inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs either
from soil-water or riparian wetlands in sustaining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in lower-order
streams over higher-order streams where in-stream <inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production from
net heterotrophy is more important. These patterns are in general agreement
with the conceptual framework developed by Hotchkiss et al. (2015), although
lateral <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs were exclusively attributed by these authors to
soil-water or ground-water inputs and riparian wetlands were not considered.
These patterns are also in agreement with the results reported by Ward et
al. (2018), who show that in large high-order rivers of the lower Amazon,
in-stream production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from respiration is sufficient to sustain
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions to the atmosphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e11227">Ratio of air–water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and community respiration (mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function
of Strahler stream order for rivers and streams of the Congo River network.
The box represents the first and third quartile, the horizontal line corresponds
to the median, the cross corresponds to the average, the error bars correspond to the
maximum and minimum, and the symbols show all data points. Inset shows on a log
scale the median of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : CR and an exponential fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3818?><p id="d1e11337">CR was estimated from measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration decrease in
bottles that were not rotated, and this has been shown to lead to an
underestimation of CR up to a factor of 2 (Richardson et al., 2013; Ward
et al., 2018). The underestimation of our CR measurements due to the absence
of rotation is most likely not as severe as in the Richardson et al. (2013)
and Ward et al. (2018) studies, as the organic matter in our samples was
mostly in dissolved form (median DOC of 8.6 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a low
particulate load (median TSM of 14 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and POC of 1.3 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
while the median of TSM at the sites studied by Ward et al. (2018) in the
Amazon was higher (28.5 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> based on data reported by Ward et al., 2015). We acknowledge that our CR measurements might be underestimated due
to bottle effects and lack of rotation up to a factor of 2 based on the
studies of Richardson et al. (2013) and Ward et al. (2018); nevertheless, it
seems unrealistic to envisage an underestimation of CR by a factor of 10 that
would allow reconciling the CR (and NCP) estimates with those of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although we did not measure sediment respiration, the average
value reported by Cardoso et al. (2014) of 21 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
tropical rivers and streams does not allow accounting for the imbalance
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NCP. This then suggests that the emission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the Congo lowland river network is to a large extent sustained by
lateral inputs rather than by in-stream production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by net
heterotrophy. It remains to be determined to what extent this lateral input
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is sustained by riparian wetlands or soil-groundwater from
terra firme.</p>
      <p id="d1e11485">The low PP : CR ratio of 0.15 to 0.28 on average, and generally low PP values
(on average 12 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) were also reflected in the low
diurnal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We did not carry out dedicated 24 h cycles
to look at the day–night variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to lack of
opportunity given the important navigation time to cover large distances,
but we compared the data acquired at the anchoring site on shore (typically
around 17:00 universal time, UT, just before dusk) with the data on the
same spot the next day (typically around 04:30 UT, just after dawn) (Fig. S11). Unsurprisingly, water temperature measured just before dusk was
significantly higher than just after dawn (on average 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
higher), while specific conductivity was not significantly different,
indicating that the same water mass was sampled at dusk and dawn (Fig. S11).
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration measured just before dusk were not
significantly different than just after dawn, showing that daily variability
in these variables was low (Fig. S11). The difference between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
dusk and dawn ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2307 and 1186 ppm and averaged 39 ppm
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The wide range of values of the difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at dusk
and at dawn might reflect occasional small-scale variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
as the boat anchored for the night close to shore, frequently in
close proximity to riparian<?pagebreak page3819?> vegetation. Nevertheless, the average difference is
not of the expected sign (in the case of a strong diurnal change of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to PP and CR, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should have been lower at dusk than
dawn, so the difference should have been negative). This difference was also
very small compared to the overall range of spatial variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(1087 to 22 899 ppm). Day–night variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been reported
in temperate headwater and low-order streams and in one lowland river with
an amplitude from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm (Lynch et
al., 2010; Dinsmore et al., 2013; Peter et al., 2014; Crawford et al., 2017;
Reiman and Xu, 2019), although daily signals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were not
systematically observed and were absent for instance in streams covered by
forest canopy (Crawford et al., 2017). In a low turbidity and very shallow
low-order stream of the Tana River network, Tamooh et al. (2013) reported on
one occasion day–night variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an amplitude of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, and in the Zambezi river, during the dry season,
corresponding to very low TSM values (&lt; 10 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), Teodoru et
al. (2015) reported day–night <inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation in the range of 475 ppm.
In both cases, the day–night variations were also small compared to spatial
variations of 300 to 5204 ppm in the Tana and 300 to 14 004 ppm in the
Zambezi. In floodplain lakes of the Amazon, daily variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
can be intense (with an amplitude up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm) during
cyanobacterial blooms (Abril et al., 2013; Amaral et al., 2018) but have not
been documented in the river channels of the Amazon. Our data show that in
nutrient-poor and light-limited lowland tropical rivers such as the Congo
River, where pelagic PP is low, day–night variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
negligible compared to spatial variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We conclude that
accounting for day–night variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should not lead to a
dramatic revision of global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, unlike the recent claim
based on data from a lowland temperate river by Reiman and Xu (2019), given
that tropical rivers account for 80 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Raymond et
al., 2013; Borges et al., 2015a, b; Lauerwald et al., 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Drivers of {$\protect\chem{CO_{{{2}}}}$} dynamics -- stable isotope
composition of DIC}?><title>Drivers of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics – stable isotope
composition of DIC</title>
      <p id="d1e11871">The stable isotope composition of DIC can provide information on the origin
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although the signal depends on the combination of the
biological processes that remove or add <inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the water column (CR and
PP), rock weathering that adds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and outgassing, which removes
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The variable
contribution to DIC in time and in space of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> complicates the interpretation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC
data. The stable isotope composition of DIC due to rock weathering will
depend on the type of rock (silicate or carbonate) and on the origin of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> involved in rock dissolution (either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the atmosphere
or from respiration of soil organic matter). The stable isotopic composition
of DIC due to the degradation of organic matter will depend in part on
whether the organic matter is derived from terrestrial vegetation following
the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photosynthetic pathway (woody plants and trees, temperate
grasses; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰)
compared to the less fractionating C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photosynthetic pathway (largely
tropical and subtropical grasses; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Hedges et al., 1986; Bird et al., 1994). Spatial
and temporal changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are related to the change of the
relative abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The degassing of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere and the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from rock
weathering lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC values becoming dominated by those
related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is isotopically depleted relative
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> degassing leads to a gradual enrichment of the
remaining DIC pool (e.g., Doctor et al., 2008; Deirmendjian and Abril, 2018).
The combination of these processes can lead to spatial changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M986" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC that covary with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M987" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M988" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.
For instance, in the Tana River network, an altitudinal gradient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M989" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC was attributed to a downstream accumulation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M990" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
due to rock weathering combined to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M991" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> degassing (Bouillon et al., 2009;
Tamooh et al., 2003). Figure 17 shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M992" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC as a function of
the TA : DIC ratio in the rivers and streams of the Congo, with a general
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC from TA : DIC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M994" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0 (all of the DIC is in the
form of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M995" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) towards TA : DIC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M996" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 (nearly all of the DIC is in the form
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M997" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This pattern reflects the mixing of two distinct types
of rivers and streams: the lowland systems draining the CCC with low rock
weathering due to dominance of deep organic soils (low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M998" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M999" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from respiration leading to TA : DIC close to 0 with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1000" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC and<?pagebreak page3820?> the systems draining highland regions (Lualaba and
Kasaï) with high rock weathering and lower generation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1001" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
respiration and/or higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1002" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> degassing leading to TA : DIC close to 1
with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1003" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC. The plots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1004" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TA</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1005" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1006" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 18) showed aggregation of
data close to what would be expected for silicate rock weathering based on
the average values proposed by Gaillardet et al. (1999). This is in
agreement with the dominance of silicate rocks over carbonate rocks in the
Congo basin (Nkounkou and Probst, 1987). Note that TA values from the Congo
are generally very low compared to other large rivers globally (Meybeck,
1987), due to the large proportion of relatively insoluble rocks on the
catchment (70 % of metamorphic rocks) and a small proportion of low
soluble rocks such as siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (10 % mainly as sand
stone), unconsolidated sediments (17 % as sand and clays) and a very
small proportion of highly soluble volcanic rocks (1 %). The high TA values
in the Lualaba are due to a larger proportion of volcanic rocks in high-altitude areas, such as the Virunga region, which is rich in volcanic rocks
(including basalts) and has been shown to be a hotspot of chemical
weathering (Balagizi et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{17}?><label>Figure 17</label><caption><p id="d1e12471">Carbon stable isotope composition of dissolved inorganic carbon
(DIC) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1007" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC in ‰) as a function of the
total alkalinity (TA) to DIC ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1008" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1009" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol) and as a function
of the partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1010" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1011" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm) for a TA:DIC ratio
equal to zero in surface waters of rivers and streams of the Congo River
network. Open dots indicate individual data points, full dots indicate
binned averages (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1012" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> stand deviation) (bins &lt; 5000,
5000–10 000 and &gt; 10 000 ppm). Horizontal dotted lines indicate
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1013" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1014" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and of average soil
organic carbon stable isotope composition with a dominance of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1015" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1016" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1017" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1018" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Bird and Pousai, 1997). Dotted red line provides
polynomial fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1019" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1020" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1021" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TA : DIC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1022" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (TA : DIC)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1023" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1024" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f17.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{18}?><label>Figure 18</label><caption><p id="d1e12688">Total alkalinity (TA) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1025" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1026" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
the surface waters of rivers and streams of the Congo River network, in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1027" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> normalized plots (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1028" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol : <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1029" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol) showing the composition
fields for rivers draining different lithologies from a global compilation
of the 60 largest rivers in the world (Gaillardet et al., 1999).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f18.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e12752">At TA : DIC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1030" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1031" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC values are exclusively related to
those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1032" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and might be indicative of the source of mineralized
organic matter. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1033" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC values ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1034" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.2 ‰ and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1035" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.9 ‰ and averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1036" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24.1 ‰ (Fig. 17) indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1037" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was produced from the degradation of mixture of
organic matter from C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1038" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1039" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> origin. Furthermore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1040" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC was positively related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1041" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 17), indicating that
in the streams with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1042" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1043" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was generated from
the degradation organic matter with a higher contribution from C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1044" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
plants. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1045" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC values were unrelated to the contribution
of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1046" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation on the catchment (terra firme), as modeled by Still and Powell (2010), and the cover by savannah on the catchment given by GLC2009 (Fig. S12). Further, the most enriched <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1047" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC values (&gt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1048" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 ‰), corresponded on average to a low contribution
of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1049" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation on the catchment (7.4 %) and low contribution of
savannah cover on the catchment (0.8 %). These patterns are inconsistent
with an origin from terra firme of the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1050" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> material that led to high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1051" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
streams (Fig. 17) but is rather more consistent with a larger contribution
of degradation of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1052" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aquatic macrophyte material in high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1053" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
streams.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Seasonal variations</title>
      <?pagebreak page3821?><p id="d1e13013">The difference between the HW and FW in the main stem along the
Kisangani–Kinshasa transects (Figs. 3 and 4) were relatively modest with
higher specific conductivity, TA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1054" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-DIC, and TSM (at
Kisangani); biogeochemical signatures of higher surface run-off during the
HW sampling (December 2013); and water flows from deeper soil horizons (or
ground-water) during the FW sampling (June 2014). The comparison of
tributaries that were sampled during both HW and FW periods along the
Kisangani–Kinshasa transects shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1055" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly higher
(Wilcoxon match-pairs signed rank test <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1056" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.078</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during HW for large
systems (freshwater discharge <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1057" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1058" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1059" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table S1) but not
significantly different for small systems (freshwater discharge &lt; 300 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1060" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1061" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), irrespective of whether it was from the left or right bank (Fig. 19).
However, no significant differences among the HW and FW periods occurred in
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1062" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1063" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1064" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for either small of large systems,
irrespective of whether they were taken from the left or right bank (Fig. 19). This indicates that
across the basin, spatial differences among tributaries are more important
than seasonal variations within a given tributary. The average difference
for large rivers between HW and FW was on average only 1745 ppm for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1065" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when the respective range of variation for the whole dataset was
from 1087 to 22 899 ppm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F19" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{19}?><label>Figure 19</label><caption><p id="d1e13158">Comparison of the partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1066" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1067" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
ppm), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1068" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1069" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1070" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1071" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %), and dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1072" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level
(%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1073" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %) in surface waters of the Congo River tributaries
sampled during both high water (3–19 December 2013) and falling water
periods (10–30 June 2014). Tributaries were separated into left and right
bank, as well as into large and small systems, with a freshwater discharge
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1074" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) &lt;and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1075" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1076" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1077" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f19.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e13302">Yearly cycles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1078" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1079" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were established on the Lualaba (6 years), the Oubangui (2 years) and the Kasaï (2 years) (Figs. 20 and 21),
while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1080" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is only available during 2 years in the Lualaba. In the
Oubangui and the Kasaï, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1081" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration peaked with the onset of
rising water and decreased as water level continued to increase. The
decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1082" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as discharge peaked in the Oubangui and the Kasaï
is most probably related to dilution by surface runoff, as also testified by
the decrease in specific conductivity and TA (not shown). The increase at
the onset of rising water could be related to initial flushing of soil
atmosphere enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1083" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as rain penetrates superficial layers of
soils. In the Lualaba the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1084" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal variations seem to follow more
closely those of freshwater discharge (for instance in 2014). Unlike the
Kasaï and the Oubangui, the Lualaba has very extensive permanent
marshes and swamps such as the Upemba wetland system (inundated area of
18 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1085" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the Luama swamps (inundated area of 6000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1086" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
(Hughes and Hughes, 1992). Yet, it remains to be determined if the
seasonality of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1087" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in Lualaba can be attributed to higher
inputs during high water from these major wetlands located, respectively,
1000 and 600 km upstream of Kisangani. Even so, there are numerous more
modest marshes and swamps that border upstream tributaries of the Lualaba
closer to Kisangani (Hughes and Hughes, 1992). The seasonal amplitude of
dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1088" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Oubangui was about 10 times higher than in the
Kasaï and the Oubangui, and the seasonal amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1089" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these
three rivers seemed to be related to the relative seasonal amplitude of
freshwater discharge, as indicated by the positive relation with the ratio of
maximum and minimum of freshwater discharge (Fig. 22).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F20" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{20}?><label>Figure 20</label><caption><p id="d1e13442">Time series of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1090" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1091" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in surface waters and freshwater discharge (grey line) in the Congo
(at Kisangani, 2013–2018), the Oubangui (at Bangui, 2010–2012) and the
Kasaï (at Dima, 2015–2017) rivers. The black line shows a five sample running
average. Time series of the partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1092" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1093" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm)
in surface waters was also obtained in the Congo River (at Kisangani,
2017–2018). Data in the Oubangui were previously reported by Bouillon et al. (2012, 2013).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f20.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3822?><p id="d1e13498">The seasonal cycles of %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1094" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show patterns that were consistent with
those <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1095" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a loose parallelism of %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1096" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and discharge in
the Lualaba, an inverse relation in the Kasaï, and peak of %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1097" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during rising waters (although delayed with respect to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1098" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak) in
the Oubangui. In addition to the seasonal cycle there seemed to be a longer-term decrease in the annual average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1099" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Lualaba (Fig. S13).
There were no significant long-term changes of the annual average of other
variables such as POC and PN (not shown). So the observed decrease in annual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is probably unrelated to changes in terrestrial productivity (Zhou
et al., 2014) or nitrogen content of terrestrial vegetation (Craine et al., 2018) that act at longer timescales (several decades) and seem to be
related to long-term changes in climate (precipitation). Freshwater
discharge showed an increasing pattern during the time period (Fig. S13). An
increasing discharge could lead to increased gas transfer velocities and a
loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere. Water temperature in the Congo River is
already close to the optimum of denitrification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, Canion et al., 2014), so an enhancement of denitrification
with increase in temperature is unlikely. Water temperature did not show a
clear pattern, but freshwater discharge increased during the 2013–2018
period, excluding the year 2017. It is likely that the decreasing trend in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the 2013–2018 period is a transient feature in response to
inter-annual fluctuations in hydrology that led to a period of sustained
increase in freshwater discharge.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F21" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{21}?><label>Figure 21</label><caption><p id="d1e13636">Time series of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level (%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in %) in surface waters and freshwater discharge (grey line) in the Congo
(at Kisangani, 2013–2018), the Oubangui (at Bangui, 2010–2012) and
the Kasaï (at Dima, 2015–2017) rivers. The black line shows a five sample
running average. Data in the Oubangui were previously reported by Bouillon
et al. (2012, 2013).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f21.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F22"><?xmltex \currentcnt{22}?><label>Figure 22</label><caption><p id="d1e13673">Seasonal amplitude of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in surface waters as a function of the ratio of
seasonal maximum and minimum of freshwater discharge (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
Congo (at Kisangani, 2013–2018), the Oubangui (at Bangui, 2010–2012)
and the Kasaï (at Dima, 2015–2017) rivers (Fig. 20).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/3801/2019/bg-16-3801-2019-f22.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e13736">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series in the Lualaba at Kisangani is shorter than for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but a general positive relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
discharge was observed (Fig. S14). A similar positive relationship between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and discharge was also observed in the Oubangui (Bouillon et al., 2012) and the Madeira River (Almeida et al., 2017), as well in several rivers
in the Amazon (Richey et al., 2002) based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated from pH and
TA. Such <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> discharge patterns were interpreted as resulting from
higher connectivity during high water between the river main stem and the
floodplains and wetlands. In large temperate rivers, a negative relationship
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and discharge was observed in the Meuse (Borges et al., 2018) and in more than half of the US rivers analyzed by Liu and Raymond (2018). The difference in the relationship of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus discharge
between tropical and temperate large rivers might be related to lower
interactions between river and floodplains in temperate rivers, particularly
in highly human-impacted and channelized rivers such as the Meuse. This is
in agreement with the analysis of Aho and Raymond (2019), who reported, in
the Salmon River network, positive relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and flow
in water watersheds with a high presence of wetlands and negative
relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and flow in watersheds with low presence of
wetlands. Also, in temperate rivers, temperature covaries strongly with
discharge in temperate rivers, so that the warmer months that promote
biological production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are also characterized by lower discharge
(Borges et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e13880">The seasonal amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
Kasaï and the Congo, versus 200–400 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Oubangui) and
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 %–90 % in the 3 rivers) was overall much lower than the
spatial gradients across the basin of 22 and 71 428 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0 and 561 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><title>Variability of GHG fluxes in the Congo river network</title>
      <p id="d1e13986">Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations followed distinct
patterns as a function of Strahler stream order (Fig. 11) we used
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and stream surface area as a function of Strahler stream order
(Fig. S15) to compute the air–water GHG fluxes and to integrate them at
basin scale. This was done separating data for streams draining and not
draining the CCC since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns were
very different (Figs. 11 and 12). The stream surface area decreased
regularly with increasing Strahler stream order but showed a large increase
for Strahler stream order 9 (Fig. S15). The latter mainly corresponds to the
Congo main stem that downstream of Kisangani is characterized by anastomosing
river channels with extended sand bars and numerous islands (Runge, 2008;
O'Loughlin et al., 2013). In particular along the about 500 km
long section between the Mbandaka and Kwa mouths, the main stem river channel undergoes a
general expansion and width increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. This corresponds to the area of CCC<?pagebreak page3823?> depression with a
corresponding decrease in the slope from 6 to 3 cm km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (O'Loughlin et
al., 2013). The calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased regularly with increasing
Strahler stream order, as previously reported (Butman and Raymond, 2011;
Raymond et al., 2012; Deirmendjian and Abril, 2018; Liu and Raymond, 2018), due
to higher turbulence in low-order streams associated with higher stream flow
due to steeper slopes. HydroSHEDS stream order classification is missing at
least 1 stream order because small streams are not correctly represented
(Benstead and Leigh, 2012; Raymond et al., 2013). Hence, to correct this bias,
we added 1 to stream orders determined by HydroSHEDS, meaning that the
lowest stream order to which GHG were attributed was 2. We then extrapolated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations to stream order 1,
separating streams draining and not draining the CCC, using a linear
regression with higher orders or by using the same value as for order 2
(Fig. S16).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3824?><p id="d1e14156">An error analysis on the GHG flux computation and upscaling was carried out
by error propagation of the GHG concentration measurements, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1144" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
estimates and the estimate of surface areas of river channels to scale the
areal fluxes, using a Monte Carlo simulation with 1000 iterations. The
uncertainty in the GHG concentrations led to an uncertainty of areal fluxes
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1151" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from tracer
experiments is typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Ulseth et al., 2019). This leads
to a cumulated uncertainty of areal fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively. The uncertainty of the river and stream surface areas based on GIS
analysis of Allen and Pavelsky (2018) is estimated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
leading to an overall uncertainty of integrated fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e14391">The calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged between 86 and 7110 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
averaging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2469</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">435</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1170" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (weighted by surface area
of Strahler stream order), encompassing the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Mann
et al. (2014) (312 to 1429 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in 25 sites during a
single period (November 2010) from four major river basins in the Republic
of the Congo (Alima, Lefini, Sangha, Likouala-Mossaka). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
ranged between 1087 and 22 899 ppm, also encompassing the values reported
by Mann et al. (2014) (2600 to 15 802 ppm) that were not measured directly
but computed from pH and DIC measurements, although pH measurements in
black-water rivers can be biased by the presence of humic-dissolved organic
matter (Abril et al., 2015) and the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seems to alter
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content of samples (Fig. S1). The calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged
between 65 and 597 260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1181" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaging
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">553</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2247</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (weighted by surface area
of Strahler order), encompassing the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by
Upstill-Goddard et al. (2017) (33 to 48 705 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1188" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in 41 sites draining the Congo basin in the Republic of the Congo (November 2010
and August 2011) in the same four river basins sampled by Mann et al. (2014). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged between 22 and 71 428 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, also
encompassing the values reported by Upstill-Goddard et al. (2017) (11 to
9553 nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1194" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>52 and 319 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, averaging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1201" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (weighted by surface area of Strahler order), encompassing the
range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Upstill-Goddard et al. (2017) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1203" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 to 67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The %<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values ranged between 0 % and 561 %, also encompassing the values reported by Upstill-Goddard et al. (2017)
(6 % to 266 %). The wider ranges of GHGs and respective fluxes we report
compared to those of Mann et al. (2014) and Upstill-Goddard et al. (2017)
reflect the larger number of river systems sampled over a wider geographical
area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">278</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">367</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
hence,<?pagebreak page3825?> representing a wider range of river types, morphologies, catchment
characteristics and wetland densities.</p>
      <p id="d1e14969">Information on the seasonal variability of concurrent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values was only available in the Lualaba (at Kisangani), where the
three GHGs were measured simultaneously (Fig. S17). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were loosely positively correlated with freshwater discharge, as
the seasonal variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were small (ranging between 23.4 and
30.3 cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was correlated to freshwater
discharge (Fig. S14) this was not the case for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (Figs. 20 and 21). The range of seasonal variations at
Kisangani of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (234 and 948 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (116
and 876 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1234" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 and 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was small compared to the range of spatial variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (86 and 7,110 mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (65 and 597 260 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1246" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>52 and 319 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS8">
  <label>3.8</label><title>Significance of integrated GHG fluxes at basin and global scales</title>
      <p id="d1e15399">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased with increasing Strahler order, as given
by surface area, and also when integrated by surface area of the streams
(Table 1). Strahler orders 1-2 accounted for nearly 80 % of the integrated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (79.6 %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (77.0 %), while Strahler orders 1–4
accounted for &gt; 90 % of the integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (90.7 %) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (91.9 %). Strahler orders 5–10 only accounted for 9.3 % of
integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 8.1 % of integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The rivers draining
the CCC contributed to 6 % of the basin-wide emissions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
22 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, although the contribution in stream surface area was
only 11 %. The low contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the CCC to the basin-wide
emissions was due to the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
were higher than the rest of the basin (Table 1). In the case of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the much higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the CCC overcome the
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per surface area in rivers and streams
outside the CCC were relatively similar for Strahler orders 10 to 3 and
increased for Strahler orders 1 and 2 (Table 1). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per surface area
in rivers and streams draining the CCC steadily<?pagebreak page3826?> decreased from Strahler
order 8 to 1, with rivers of orders 5, 3, 2 and 1 acting as sinks for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, the relative contribution per Strahler order of
integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was less skewed than for integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Strahler orders 1–4 contributed 69.9 % of integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared to &gt; 90 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e15732">Partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ppm); dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration (nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> saturation level
(%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in %); gas transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>);
air–water fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and in TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and in
TgCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and in Gg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); stream surface area (S.A. in
km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); and as a function of Strahler stream order (S.O.) in the Congo River
network for rivers and streams draining and not draining the Cuvette
Centrale Congolaise. Values in italic were extrapolated to stream order 1, using a linear regression with higher orders or by using the same value as for stream order 2 (Fig. S16).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="14">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S.O.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Temp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">S.A.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">nmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1317" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1321" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1324" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">TgCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">Gg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Draining the Cuvette Centrale Congolaise </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>12 304</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>8349</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>0.5</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>7.3</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>27.0</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2892</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">61 732</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1332" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">350</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.126</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1333" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.154</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 304</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8,349</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">44.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1766</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">37 747</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1334" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">335</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.074</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1335" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.054</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 923</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7411</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">77.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">26.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1376</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">25 765</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1336" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">324</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.049</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1337" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 065</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9409</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">104.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">26.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1323</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">33 431</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.057</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.003</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13 705</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9533</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1525</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">33 255</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1338" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.054</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1339" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.042</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7830</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">214.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">834</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1855</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">24.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">480</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.121</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6643</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">503</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">188.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">670</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1582</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">18.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">163</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.030</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6977</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">401</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">219.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">824</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1581</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">366</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.107</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col14">Not draining the Cuvette Centrale Congolaise </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>10 719</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>1584</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>9.4</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>136.6</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">161.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><italic>24.1</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15 417</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">66 695</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">107.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2235</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">150.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.871</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2.449</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8921</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1275</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">135.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4450</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">19 171</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">36.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2143</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">41.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.240</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.798</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7225</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1185</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">133.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1972</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9554</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">18.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1883</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.105</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.364</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5766</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">726</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">126.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1065</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4098</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1752</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.042</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.181</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">538</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">131.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">589</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2452</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1688</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.165</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1929</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">299</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">143.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">239</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1328</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1772</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.233</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2667</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">220</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">153.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">343</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1030</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">15.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2168</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.340</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">226</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">109.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">310</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">837</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1696</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.036</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2521</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">170</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">145.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">217</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">533</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4639</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">4.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.419</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3445</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">153.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">574</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">178</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">19.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">646</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">0.127</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">251</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">5.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page3828?><p id="d1e17456">The rivers and streams draining the CCC were a very small sink of
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1341" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01 Gg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) while the rivers and
streams outside the CCC were a source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5.1 Gg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Congo River network was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponded to 14 %–17 % of total
riverine emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Hu et al. (2016). Note that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> riverine emissions computed by Hu et al. (2016) were indirectly
computed from data on global nitrogen deposition on catchments and on
emission factors rather than derived from direct measurements of dissolved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. The estimates given by Hu et al. (2016) are more
conservative than older estimates (e.g., Kroeze et al., 2010) because they are
based on revised emission factors and converge with a similar more recent
study by Maavara et al. (2018). Our estimate of the integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
consistent with the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions of 3.8 to 4.3 Gg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1357" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> given by Maavara et al. (2018) for the Congo river network, also
based on an indirect calculation based on nitrogen deposition and emission
factors.</p>
      <p id="d1e17690">The integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Congo River network of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TgCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1360" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1361" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is nearly 2 times higher than the estimate given by
Bastviken et al. (2011) for all tropical rivers and corresponds to 6 % of
the global emission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from rivers given by Stanley et al. (2016),
while the surface area of the Congo River network corresponds to a lower
proportion (3 %) of the global riverine surface area (773 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Allen and Pavelsky). Note that the meta-analysis of Stanley et al. (2016)
includes part of our dataset from the Congo River, as published by Borges et
al. (2015a). The integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we report for the Congo River network
is also more than 3 times higher than the estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
for Amazonian large rivers reported by Sawakuchi et al. (2014) (0.49 TgCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we report for the Congo River
network corresponds to 7 % of the emission from the Congo wetlands
inferred from remotely sensed atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data (Bloom et al., 2010)
(25.7 TgCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1370" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, the top-down estimate given by Bloom
et al. (2011) includes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from all ecosystems over the
Congo basin and should also include the fluvial emissions. Note that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions we report for the Congo River basin only include the
diffusive flux component, when the ebullitive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission component
represents the majority of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from inland waters (Bastviken
et al., 2011), which would be consistent with the gap between our emission
estimates and those from atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inventories. Finally, note
that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions were only calculated and integrated for the
rivers and streams draining the CCC but not for the actual wetland flooded
area of the CCC. The emission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from actual wetland flooded area
of the CCC can be estimated to a massive 51 TgCH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by
extrapolating the area averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the streams (24 468 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table 1) to the flooded extent (360 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1385" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Bwangoy et al., 2010). This corresponds to about 29 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions from natural wetlands (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Tg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Saunois et al., 2010) and would in this case be higher than the estimate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the Congo wetlands inferred from remotely sensed
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data (Bloom et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e18072">The integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Congo River network is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1394" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and is equivalent to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission value for rivers
globally given by Cole et al. (2007) and to 14 % and 39 % of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission value for rivers globally given by Raymond et al. (2013)
(18 000 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Lauerwald et al. (2015) (650 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
respectively. The integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the Congo River network
corresponds to 44 % of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from tropical (24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1401" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) oceans globally (565 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 183 % of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the tropical Atlantic Ocean (137 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
based on the Takahashi et al. (2002) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology. The terrestrial
net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of the watershed of the Congo River can be
estimated based on the NEE estimate of 23 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1407" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for savannahs
given by Ciais et al. (2011) and of 20 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for forests
given by Fisher et al. (2013) and based on the respective land cover from
GLC2009 (30 % savannah and 70 % forest). The corresponding terrestrial
NEE of 77 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is more than 3 times lower than the riverine
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the Congo River. This is extremely surprising since
the hydrological export from terra firme forests of DOC and DIC that are assumed to
sustain fluvial emissions are typically 2 %–3 % compared to terrestrial NEE
(Kindler et al., 2011; Deirmendjian et al., 2018). Hydrological carbon export
is higher compared to NEE in European grasslands (on average 22 %)
(Kindler et al., 2011). We ignore if this is transposable to tropical
grasslands, such as savannahs, although they only occupy 30 % of the Congo
catchment surface. Accordingly, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the Congo River
network should have been an order of magnitude lower than the estimates of
terrestrial NEE from terra firme biomes rather than more than 3 times higher.
However, in wetlands such as peatlands in Europe, the hydrological export of
DOC and DIC represent 109 % of NEE and is enough to sustain the riverine
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission that represents 17 % of NEE (Billett et al., 2004).
Indeed, the carbon export from flooded forests to riverine waters of the
Congo basin can be roughly estimated to 396 TgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1415" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and is in excess
of the integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (calculated from the export per surface area of
flooded forest of 1100 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1417" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1418" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Abril et al., 2014, for the central Amazon and surface area of flooded forest of the
CCC, 360 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1419" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Bwangoy et al., 2010). Altogether, this would then
strongly suggest that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the lowland Congo River
network is to a large extent sustained by another source of carbon than from
the terrestrial terra firme biome. The most likely alternative source would be wetlands
(flooded forest and aquatic macrophytes), in agreement with the analysis in
the central Amazon River by Abril et al. (2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e18425">Net heterotrophy in rivers and lakes sustained by inputs of organic matter
from the terrestrial vegetation on the catchments is the prevailing paradigm
to explain oversaturation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in inland surface waters and
corresponding emissions to the atmosphere, based on process studies, the
earliest in the Amazon (Wissmar et al., 1981) and boreal systems (Del Giorgio
et al., 1999; Prairie et al., 2002), and then generalized at global scales for
lakes (Cole et al., 1994) and rivers (Cole and Caraco, 2001). Yet, the
comparison of 169 measurements of aquatic NCP and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in the
central Congo River network covering a wide range of size and type of rivers
and streams shows that the aquatic NCP cannot account for fluvial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This implies that lateral inputs of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sustain a large part
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from rivers and streams in the Congo River
network.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3829?><p id="d1e18487">The comparison of the integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from the Congo River
network with terrestrial terra firme NEE shows that it unlikely that fluvial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions are sustained by lateral hydrological transfer of carbon from
terra firme. Indeed, integrated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the river network was more than 3 times higher than terrestrial NEE, when forests typically only export a very
small fraction of NEE as carbon to rivers that can sustain fluvial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emissions. It is then likely that the fluvial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the
central Congo River are sustained by organic matter inputs as well as direct
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs from extensive riparian wetlands (flooded forest and aquatic
floating macrophytes). This is consistent with the stable isotopic signature
of DIC, the differences in the spatial distribution of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
%<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between rivers and streams draining or not
draining the CCC, a large wetland region in the core of the basin, and based
on the correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels and the cover of flooded forest
in the catchment. Indeed, the calculated export of carbon from the CCC to
the riverine network is sufficient to sustain the fluvial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
emission from the Congo.</p>
      <p id="d1e18616">The fact that fluvial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in lowland rivers are to a large
extent sustained by carbon inputs from wetlands in addition to those from
terra firme has consequences for the conceptualization of statistical and mechanistic
models of carbon cycling in river networks. While progress has been made in
integrating wetland connectivity in mechanistic regional models (Lauerwald
et al., 2017), this has not been the case so far for statistical global
models that rely on terrestrial (terra firme) productivity (Lauerwald et al., 2015). The
comparison of the output of such a statistical model for the Congo River
with observational data (Fig. S18) shows that the model fails to represent
spatial gradients and the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of streams
and rivers draining the CCC in particular. This illustrates how ignoring the river–wetland
connectivity can lead to the misrepresentation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in
river networks, in particular tropical ones that account for the vast
majority (80 %) of global riverine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e18671">Full dataset is available at <uri>https://zenodo.org/record/3413449</uri> (Borges and Bouillon, 2019).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e18677">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3801-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3801-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e18686">AVB and SB conceived the study. AVB, FD, TL,
ET, ATS, TB, JB, CRT and SB collected field samples. AVB, FD, TL, CM, CRT,
JPD and SB made laboratory analysis. GHA and TL carried out GIS analysis. AVB
drafted the manuscript with substantial inputs from SB. All authors
contributed to the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e18692">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e18698">We thank the Isotope
Hydrology Laboratory of IAEA for analyses of water stable isotope ratios,
which contribute to the Coordinated Research Project CRPF33021 (Application
and development of isotope techniques to evaluate human impacts on water
balance and nutrient dynamics of large river basins) implemented by the
IAEA, Jonathan Richir (University of Liège) for advice about the
statistical analysis, Sandro Petrovic and Marc-Vincent Commarieu (University
of Liège), Bruno Leporcq (UNamur) and Zita Kelemen (KU Leuven) for
analytical assistance, the Régie des Voies Fluviales (RVF, Kinshasa) for
providing water height data, and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the
previous version of the paper. Publication costs were partly covered by
European Geosciences Union as part of the 2018 Outstanding Reviewer Award to
Alberto V. Borges. Alberto V. Borges is a senior research associate at the FNRS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e18703">This research has been supported by the European Research
Council (grant no. 240002), the Fonds National de la Recherche
Scientifique (grant no. 14711103), the Belgian Federal Science
Policy (BELSPO, grant no. COBAFISH SD/AR/05A), the Research Foundation Flanders
(FWO-Vlaanderen), the Research Council of the KU Leuven and the Fonds
Leopold-III pour l'Exploration et Conservation de la Nature. The
Boyekoli-Ebale-Congo 2010 Expedition was funded by the Belgian Development
Cooperation, BELSPO and Belgian National Lottery.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e18709">This paper was edited by Ji-Hyung Park and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abril, G. and Borges, A. V.: Carbon leaks from flooded land: do we need to
re-plumb the inland water active pipe?, Biogeosciences, 16, 769–784,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-769-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-16-769-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abril, G., Martinez, J.-M., Artigas, L. F., Moreira-Turcq, P., Benedetti,
M. F., Vidal, L., Meziane, T., Kim, J.-H., Bernardes, M. C., Savoye, N.,
Deborde, J., Albéric, P., Souza, M. F. L., Souza, E. L., and Roland, F.:
Amazon river carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by wetlands, Nature, 505,
395–398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12797</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abril, G., Bouillon, S., Darchambeau, F., Teodoru, C. R., Marwick, T. R.,
Tamooh, F., Omengo, F. O., Geeraert, N., Deirmendjian, L., Polsenaere, P.,
and Borges A. V.: Technical note: Large overestimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
calculated from pH and alkalinity in acidic, organic-rich freshwaters,
Biogeosciences, 12, 67–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-67-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-67-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aho, K. S. and Raymond, P. A.: Differential response of greenhouse gas evasion to storms in forested and wetland streams, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 649–662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004750" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JG004750</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3830?><ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allen, G. H. and Pavelsky, T. M.: Global extent of rivers and streams,
Science, 28, eaat0636, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0636" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aat0636</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Almeida, R. M., Pacheco, F. S., Barros, N., Rosi, E., and Roland, F.:
Extreme floods increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outgassing from a large Amazonian river,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 62, 989–999, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10480" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10480</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alsdorf, D., Beighley, E., Laraque, A., Lee, H., Tshimanga, R., O'Loughlin,
F., Mahé, G., Dinga, B., Moukandi, G., and Spencer, R. G. M.:
Opportunities for hydrologic research in the Congo Basin, Rev. Geophys., 54,
378–409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000517</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Amaral, J. H. F., Borges, A. V., Melack, J. M., Sarmento, H., Barbosa, P.
M., Kasper, D., Melo, M. L., de Fex Wolf, D., da Silva, J. S., and Forsberg,
B. R.: Influence of plankton metabolism and mixing depth on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
dynamics in an Amazon floodplain lake, Sci. Total Environ., 630, 1381–1393,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.331" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.331</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
APHA: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American
Public Health Association, 1325 pp., 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Balagizi, C. M., Darchambeau, F., Bouillon, S., Yalire, M. M., Lambert, T.,
and Borges, A. V.: River geochemistry, chemical weathering and atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rates in the Virunga Volcanic Province (East Africa),
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 16, 2637–2660, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GC005999</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Barbosa, P. M., Melack, J. M., Farjalla, V. F., Amaral, J. H. F., Scofield,
V., and Forsberg, B. R.: Diffusive methane fluxes from Negro, Solimões
and Madeira rivers and fringing lakes in the Amazon basin, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 61, S221–S237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.10358</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bastviken, D., Ejlertsson, J., and Tranvik, L.: Measurement of methane
oxidation in lakes: A comparison of methods, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
3354–3361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es010311p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es010311p</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Crill, P. M., and
Enrich-Prast, A. :, Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental
carbon sink, Science, 331, p. 50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196808" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1196808</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Battin, T. J., Kaplan, L. A., Findlay, S., Hopkinson, C. S., Marti, E.,
Packman, A. I., Newbold, J. D., and Sabater, F.: Biophysical controls on
organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks, Nat. Geosci., 1, 95–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo101</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baulch, H. M., Schiff, S. L., Maranger, R., and Dillon, P. J.: Nitrogen
enrichment and the emission of nitrous oxide from streams, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB4013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004047</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Benstead, J. P. and Leigh, D. S.: An expanded role for river networks,
Nat. Geosci., 5, 678–679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1593</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Billett, M. F., Palmer, S. M., Hope, D., Deacon, C., Storeton-West, R.,
Hargreaves, K. J., Flechard, C., and Fowler, D.: Linking
land-atmosphere-stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB1024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GB002058</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bird, M. I. and Pousai, P.: Variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface
soil organic carbon pool, Global Biogeoch. Cy., 11, 313–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GB01197</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bird, M. I., Giresse, P., and Chivas, A. R.: Effect of forest and savanna
vegetation on the carbon-isotope composition from the Sanaga River,
Cameroon, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1845–1854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.8.1845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1994.39.8.1845</ext-link>,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bowen, G. J., Wassenaar, L. I., and Hobson, K. A.: Global application of stable
hydrogen and oxygen isotopes to wildlife forensics, Oecologia, 143, 337–348,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1813-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00442-004-1813-y</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bloom, A. A., Palmer, P. I., Fraser, A., Reay, D. S., and Frankenberg, C.:
Large-scale controls of methanogenesis inferred from methane and gravity
spaceborne data, Science, 327, 322–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1175176</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borges, A. V., Darchambeau, F., Teodoru, C. R., Marwick, T. R., Tamooh, F.,
Geeraert, N., Omengo, F. O., Guérin, F., Lambert, T., Morana, C., Okuku,
E., and Bouillon, S.: Globally significant greenhouse gas emissions from
African inland waters, Nat. Geosci., 8, 637–642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2486" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO2486</ext-link>,
2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borges, A. V., Abril, G., Darchambeau, F., Teodoru, C. R., Deborde, J.,
Vidal, L. O., Lambert, T., and Bouillon, S.: Divergent biophysical controls
of aquatic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the World's two largest rivers, Sci. Rep., 5,
15614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15614" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep15614</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borges, A. V., Darchambeau, F., Lambert, T., Bouillon, S., Morana, C.,
Brouyère, S., Hakoun, V., Jurado, A., Tseng, H.-C., Descy, J.-P.,
and Roland, F. A. E.: Effects of agricultural land use on fluvial carbon
dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide concentrations in a large European river,
the Meuse (Belgium), Sci. Total Environ., 610/611, 342–355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.047</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borges, A. V. and Bouillon, S.: Data-base of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ancillary data in the Congo River, available at: <uri>https://zenodo.org/record/3413449#.XYm2eUYzaUk</uri>, last access: 24 September 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouillon, S., Abril, G., Borges, A. V., Dehairs, F., Govers, G., Hughes, H.
J., Merckx, R., Meysman, F. J. R., Nyunja, J., Osburn, C., and Middelburg,
J. J.: Distribution, origin and cycling of carbon in the Tana River (Kenya):
a dry season basin-scale survey from headwaters to the delta,
Biogeosciences, 6, 2475–2493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2475-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-2475-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouillon, S., Yambélé, A., Spencer, R. G. M., Gillikin, D. P., Hernes, P. J., Six, J., Merckx, R., and Borges, A. V.: Organic matter sources, fluxes and greenhouse gas exchange in the Oubangui River (Congo River basin), Biogeosciences, 9, 2045–2062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2045-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-2045-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouillon, S., Yambélé, A., Gillikin, D. P., Teodoru, C.,
Darchambeau, F., Lambert, T., and Borges, A. V.: Contrasting biogeochemical
characteristics of right-bank tributaries and a comparison with the mainstem
Oubangui River, Central African Republic (Congo River basin), Sci. Rep., 4,
5402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep05402</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bultot, F.: Atlas Climatique du Bassin Congolais Publications de L'Institut
National pour L'Etude Agronomique du Congo (I.N.E.A.C.), Troisieme Partie,
Temperature et Humidite de L'Air, Rosee, Temperature du Sol, 253 pp., 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Butman, D. and Raymond, P. A.: Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from
streams and rivers in the United States, Nat. Geosci., 4, 839–842, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1294</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bwangoy, J.-R. B., Hansen, M. C., Roy, D. P., De Grandi, G., and Justice, C.
O.: Wetland mapping in the Congo Basin using optical and radar remotely
sensed data and derive<?pagebreak page3831?>d topographical indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 114,
73–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canion, A., Overholt, W. A., Kostka, J. E., Huettel, M., Lavik, G., and
Kuypers, M. M. M.: Temperature response of denitrification and anaerobic
ammonium oxidation rates and microbial community structure in Arctic fjord
sediments, Environ. Microbiol., 16, 3331–3344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/1462-2920.12593</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cardoso, S. J., Enrich-Prast, A., Pace, M. L., and Roland, F.: Do models of
organic carbon mineralization extrapolate to warmer tropical sediments?
Limnol. Oceanogr., 59, 48–54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0048</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ciais, P., Bombelli, A., Williams, M., Piao, S. L., Chave, J., Ryan, C. M.,
Henry, M., Brender, P., and Valentini, R.: The carbon balance of Africa:
synthesis of recent research studies, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 369,
2038–2057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2010.0328</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coplen, T. B. and Wassenaar, L. I.: LIMS for Lasers 2015 for achieving
long-term accuracy and precision of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of waters using laser absorption spectrometry, Rapid Commun.
Mass Spectr., 29, 2122–2130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.7372</ext-link>,2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cole, B. E. and Cloern, J. E.: An empirical model for estimating
phytoplankton productivity in estuaries, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 36, 299–305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps036299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/meps036299</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cole, J. J. and Caraco, N. F.: Carbon in catchments: connecting terrestrial
carbon losses with aquatic metabolism, Mar. Fresh. Res., 52, 101–110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF00084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/MF00084</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., Kling, G. W., and Kratz, T. K.: Carbon dioxide
supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes, Science, 265, 1568–1570,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5178.1568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.265.5178.1568</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G. , Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the global carbon cycle: Integrating inland
waters into the terrestrial carbon budget, Ecosystems, 10, 171–184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coynel, A., Seyler, P., Etcheber, H., Meybeck, M., and Orange, D.: Spatial
and seasonal dynamics of total suspended sediment and organic carbon species
in the Congo River, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4019,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002335</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Craine J. M., Elmore, A. J., Wang, L., Aranibar, J., Bauters, M., Boeckx,
P., Crowley, B. E., Dawes, M. A., Delzon, S., Fajardo, A., Fang, Y.,
Fujiyoshi, L., Gray, A., Guerrieri, R., Gundale, M. J., Hawke, D.J., Hietz,
P., Jonard, M., Kearsley, E., Kenzo, T., Makarov, M.,
Marañón-Jiménez, S., McGlynn, T. P., McNeil, B. E., Mosher, S.
G., Nelson, D. M., Peri, P. L., Roggy, J. C., Sanders-DeMott, R., Song, M.,
Szpak, P., Templer, P. H., Van der Colff, D., Werner, C., Xu, X., Yang, Y.,
Yu, G., and Zmudczyńska-Skarbek, K.: Isotopic evidence for
oligotrophication of terrestrial ecosystems, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2, 1735–1744,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crawford J. T., Stanley, E. H., Dornblaser, M., and Striegl, R. G.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
time series patterns in contrasting headwater streams of North America,
Aquat. Sci., 79, 473–486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0511-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00027-016-0511-2</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dargie, G. C., Lewis, S. L., Lawson, I. T., Mitchard, E. T. A., Page, S. E.,
Bocko, Y. E., and Ifo, S. A.: Age, extent and carbon storage of the central
Congo Basin peatland complex, Nature, 542, 86–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature21048</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Deirmendjian, L. and Abril, G.: Carbon dioxide degassing at the
groundwater-stream-atmosphere interface: isotopic equilibration and
hydrological mass balance in a sandy watershed, J. Hydrol., 558, 129–143,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Deirmendjian, L., Loustau, D., Augusto, L., Lafont, S., Chipeaux, C.,
Poirier, D., and Abril, G.: Hydro-ecological controls on dissolved carbon
dynamics in groundwater and export to streams in a temperate pine forest,
Biogeosciences, 15, 669–691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-669-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-669-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dinsmore, K. J., Wallin, M. B., Johnson, M. S., Billett, M. F., Bishop, K.,
Pumpanen, J., and Ojala, A.: Contrasting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1455" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration discharge
dynamics in headwater streams: a multi-catchment comparison, J. Geophys.
Res., 118, 445–461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrg.20047</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Del Giorgio, P. A., Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., and Peters, R. H.: Linking
planktonic biomass and metabolism to net gas fluxes in northern temperate
lakes, Ecology, 80, 1422–1431, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1422:LPBAMT]2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1422:LPBAMT]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Descy, J.-P., Hardy, M.-A., Sténuite, S., Pirlot, S., Leporcq, B.,
Kimirei, I., Sekadende, B., Mwaitega, S. R., and Sinyenza, D.: Phytoplankton
pigments and community composition in Lake Tanganyika, Freshwater Biol.,
50, 668–684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Descy, J.-P., Darchambeau, F., Lambert, T., Stoyneva, M. P., Bouillon, S.,
and Borges, A. V.: Phytoplankton dynamics in the Congo River, Freshwater Biol.,
62, 87–101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12851" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/fwb.12851</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Doctor, D. H., Kendall, C., Sebestyen, S. D., Shanley, J. B., Ohte, N., and
Boyer, E. W.: Carbon isotope fractionation of dissolved inorganic carbon
(DIC) due to outgassing of carbon dioxide from a headwater stream, Hydrol.
Process., 22, 2410–2423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6833" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6833</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Downing, J. A., Cole, J. J., Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J., Melack, J.
M., Prairie, Y. T., Kortelainen, P., Striegl, R. G., McDowell, W. H., and
Tranvik, L. J.: Global abundance and size distribution of streams and
rivers, Inland Waters, 2, 229–236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-2.4.502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5268/IW-2.4.502</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duvert, C., Butman, D. E., Marx, A., Ribolzi, O., and Hutley, L. B.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
evasion along streams driven by groundwater inputs and geomorphic controls,
Nat. Geosci., 11, 813–818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0245-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0245-y</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fisher, J. B., Sikka, M., Sitch, S., Ciais, P., Poulter, B., Galbraith, D.,
Lee, J.-E., Huntingford, C., Viovy, N., Zeng, N., Ahlström, A., Lomas,
M. R., Levy, P. E., Frankenberg, C., Saatchi, S., and Malhi, Y.: African
tropical rainforest net carbon dioxide fluxes in the twentieth century,
Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20120376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2012.0376</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fluet-Chouinard, E., Lehner, B., Rebelo, L.-M., Papa, F., and Hamilton,
S. K.: Development of a global inundation map at high spatial resolution from
topographic downscaling of coarse-scale remote sensing data, Remote Sens.
Environ., 158, 348–361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frankignoulle, M., Borges, A., and Biondo R.: A new design of equilibrator
to monitor carbon dioxide in highly dynamic and turbid environments, Water
Res., 35, 1344–1347, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00369-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00369-9</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3832?><ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gaillardet, J., Dupré, B., Louvat, P., and Allègre C. J.: Global
silicate weathering and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rates deduced from the
chemistry of large rivers, Chem. Geol., 159, 3–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00031-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00031-5</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gillikin, D. P. and Bouillon, S.: Determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of
water and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of dissolved inorganic carbon using a simple
modification of an elemental analyzer – isotope ratio mass spectrometer
(EA-IRMS): an evaluation, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectr., 21, 1475–1478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2968" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.2968</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gran, G.: Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric
titrations Part II, The Analyst, 77, 661–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9527700661" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/AN9527700661</ext-link>,
1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hamilton, S. K., Sippel, S. J., and Melack J. M.: Comparison of inundation
patterns among major South American floodplains, J. Geophys. Res., 107, LBA
5-1-LBA 5-14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000306</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Happell, J., Chanton, J. P., and Showers, W.: The influence of methane
oxidation on the stable isotopic composition of methane emitted from Florida
Swamp forests, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 4377–4388,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90341-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(94)90341-7</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hedges, J. I., Clark, W. A., Quay, P. D., Richey, J. E., Devol, A. H., and
de M. Santos, U.: Compositions and fluxes of particulate organic material in
the Amazon River, Limnol Oceanogr., 31, 717–738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0717" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0717</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hotchkiss, E. R., Hall Jr, R. O., Sponseller, R. A., Butman, D., Klaminder,
J., Laudon, H., Rosvall, M., and Karlsson, J.: Sources of and processes
controlling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions change with the size of streams and rivers, Nat.
Geosci., 8, 696–699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2507" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2507</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, M., Chen, D., and Dahlgren, R. A.: Modeling nitrous oxide emission from
rivers: a global Assessment, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 3566–3582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13351</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hughes, R. H. and Hughes, J. S.: A directory of African wetlands, IUCN,
ISBN 2-88032-949-3, 820 pp., 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huotari, J., Haapanala, S., Pumpanen, J., Vesala, T., and Ojala, A.:
Efficient gas exchange between a boreal river and the atmosphere, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 40, 5683–5686, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL057705</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kindler, R., Siemens, J., Kaiser, K., Walmsley, D. C., Bernhofer, C.,
Buchmann, N., Cellier, P., Eugster, W., Gleixner, G., Grunwald, T., Heim,
A., Ibrom, A., Jones, S. K., Jones, M., Klumpp, K., Kutsch, W., Steenberg
Larsen, K., Lehuger, S., Loubet, B., McKenzie, R., Moors, E., Osborne, B.,
Pilegaard, K., Rebmann, C., Saunders, M., Schmidt, M. W. I., Schrumpf, M.,
Seyfferth, J., Skiba, U., Soussana, J.-F., Sutton, M. A.; Tefs, C.,
Vowinckel, B., Zeeman, M. J., and Kaupenjohann, M.: Dissolved carbon
leaching from soil is a crucial component of net ecosystem carbon balance,
Glob. Change Biol., 17, 1167–1185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02282.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02282.x</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Klaus, M., Geibrink, E., Jonsson, A., Bergström, A.-K., Bastviken, D.,
Laudon, H., Klaminder, J., and Karlsson, J.: Greenhouse gas emissions from
boreal inland waters unchanged after forest harvesting, Biogeosciences, 15,
5575–5594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5575-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-5575-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kokic, J., Sahlée, E., Sobek, S., Vachon, D., and Wallin, M. B.: High
spatial variability of gas transfer velocity in streams revealed by
turbulence measurements, Inland Waters, 8, 461–473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2018.1500228" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/20442041.2018.1500228</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koné, Y. J. M., Abril, G., Kouadio, K. N., Delille, B., and Borges, A. V.:
Seasonal variability of carbon dioxide in the rivers and lagoons of Ivory
Coast (West Africa), Estuar. Coast., 32, 246–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-008-9121-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12237-008-9121-0</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Koné, Y. J. M., Abril, G., Delille, B., and Borges, A. V.: Seasonal
variability of methane in the rivers and lagoons of Ivory Coast (West
Africa), Biogeochemistry, 100, 21–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9402-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-009-9402-0</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kosten, S., Piñeiro, M., de Goede, E., de Klein, J., Lamers, L. P. M., and
Ettwig, K.: Fate of methane in aquatic systems dominated by free-floating
plants, Water Res., 104, 200–207,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kroeze, C., Dumont, E., and Seitzinger, S. P.: Future trends in emissions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from rivers and estuaries, J. Integr. Environ. Sc., 7, 71–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2010.496789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/1943815X.2010.496789</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lambert, T., Bouillon, S., Darchambeau, F., Massicotte, P., and Borges,
A.V.: Shift in the chemical composition of dissolved organic matter in the
Congo River network, Biogeosciences, 13, 5405–5420,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5405-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-5405-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Laraque, A., Mietton, M. Olivry, J. C., and Pandi, A.: Impact of lithological
and vegetal covers on flow discharge and water quality of Congolese
tributaries from the Congo river, Rev. Sci. Eau., 11, 209–224,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laraque, A., Bricquet, J. P., Pandi, A., and Olivry, J. C.: A review of
material transport by the Congo River and its tributaries, Hydrol. Process.,
23, 3216–3224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7395</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G. G., Hartmann, J., Ciais, P., and Regnier, P. A.
G.: Spatial patterns in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evasion from the global river network,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 534–554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GB004941</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lauerwald, R., Regnier, P., Camino-Serrano, M., Guenet, B., Guimberteau, M.,
Ducharne, A., Polcher, J., and Ciais, P.: ORCHILEAK (revision 3875): a new
model branch to simulate carbon transfers along the terrestrial–aquatic
continuum of the Amazon basin, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3821–3859,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3821-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-3821-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Le, T. T. H., Fettig, J., and Meon, G.: Kinetics and simulation of
nitrification at various pH values of a polluted river in the tropics,
Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 19, 54–65, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liptay, K., Chanton, J., Czepiel, P., and Mosher, B.: Use of stable isotopes
to determine methane oxidation in landfill cover soils, J. Geophys. Res.,
103, 8243–8250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02630" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD02630</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liss, P. S. and Slater, P. G.: Flux of gases across the air sea interface,
Nature, 247, 181–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/247181a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/247181a0</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, S. and Raymond, P. A.: Hydrologic controls on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
efflux in US streams and rivers, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 3, 428–435, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lol2.10095</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lynch, J. K., Beatty, C. M., Seidel, M. P., Jungst, L. J., and DeGrandpre, M.
D.: Controls of riverine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over an annual cycle determined using
direct, high temporal resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, J. Geophys. Res.,
115, G03016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JG001132</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maavara, T., Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G.G., Akbarzadeh, Z., Bouskill, N. J.,
Van Cappellen, P., and Regnier, P.: Nitrous oxide emissions from inland
waters: Are IPCC estimates too high?, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 473–488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14504" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14504</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3833?><ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Malhi, Y., Adu-Bredu, S., Asare, R. A., Lewis, S. L., and Mayaux, P.:
African rainforests: past, present and future, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368,
20120312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2012.0312</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mann, P. J., Spencer, R. G. M., Dinga, B. J., Poulsen, J. R., Hernes, P. J.,
Fiske, G., Salter, M. E., Wang, Z. A., Hoering, K. A., Six, J., and Holmes
R. M.: The biogeochemistry of carbon across a gradient of streams and rivers
within the Congo Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 687–702,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JG002442</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maurice, L., Rawlins, B. G., Farr, G., Bell, R., and Gooddy, D. C.: The
influence of flow and bed slope on gas transfer in steep streams and their
implications for evasion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1467" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122,
2862–2875, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JG004045</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marwick, T. R., Tamooh, F., Ogwoka, B., Teodoru, C., Borges, A. V.,
Darchambeau, F., and Bouillon, S.: Dynamic seasonal nitrogen cycling in
response to anthropogenic N loading in a tropical catchment,
Athi–Galana–Sabaki River, Kenya, Biogeosciences, 11, 1–18,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-1-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marx, A., Dusek, J., Jankovec, J., Sanda, M., Vogel, T., van Geldern, R.,
Hartmann, J., and Barth, J. A. C.: A review of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and associated
carbon dynamics in headwater streams: A global perspective, Rev. Geophys.,
55, 560–585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016RG000547</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McDowell, M. J. and Johnson, M. S.: Gas transfer velocities evaluated using
carbon dioxide as a tracer show high streamflow to be a major driver of
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evasion flux for a headwater stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 123, 2183–2197, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JG004388</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Melack, J. M., Hess, L. L., Gastil, M., Forsberg, B. R., Hamilton, S. K.,
Lima, I. B. T., and Novo, E. M. L. M.: Regionalization of methane emissions in
the Amazon Basin with microwave remote sensing, Glob. Change Biol., 10,
530–544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00763.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00763.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meybeck, M.: Global chemical weathering of surficial rocks estimated from
river dissolved loads, Am. J. Sci., 287, 401–428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.287.5.401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2475/ajs.287.5.401</ext-link>,
1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Millero, F. J.: The thermodynamics of the carbonate system in seawater,
Geochem. Cosmochem. Ac., 43, 1651–1661, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90184-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(79)90184-4</ext-link>,1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morana, C., Borges, A. V., Roland, F. A. E., Darchambeau, F., Descy, J.-P.,
and Bouillon, S.: Methanotrophy within the water column of a large
meromictic, tropical lake (Lake Kivu, East Africa), Biogeosciences, 12,
2077–2088, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2077-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-2077-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nkounkou, R. R. and Probst, J. L.: Hydrology and geochemistry of the Congo
river system, Mitt. Geol–Palaont. Inst. Univ. Hamburg, SCOPE/UNEP, 64,
483–508, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Loughlin, F., Trigg, M. A., Schumann, G. J.-P., and Bates, P. D.:
Hydraulic characterization of the middle reach of the Congo River, Water
Resour. Res., 49, 5059–5070, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wrcr.20398</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peter, H., Singer, G. A., Preiler, C., Chifflard, P., Steniczka, G., and Battin,
T. J.: Scales and drivers of temporal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics in an Alpine
stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 1078–1091,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JG002552</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Powell, R. L., Yoo, E.-H., and Still, C. J.: Vegetation and soil carbon-13
isoscapes for South America: integrating remote sensing and ecosystem
isotope measurements, Ecosphere, 3, 1–25, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00162.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/ES12-00162.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prairie, Y. T., Bird, D. F., and Cole, J. J.: The summer metabolic balance in
the epilimnion of southeastern Quebec lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 316–321,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.1.0316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2002.47.1.0316</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Raymond, P. A., Zappa, C. J., Butman, D., Bott, T. L., Potter, C.,
Mulholland, P., Laursen, A. E., McDowell, W. H., and Newbold, D.: Scaling
the gas transfer velocity and hydraulic geometry in streams and small
rivers, Limnol. Oceanogr. Fluids Environ., 2, 41–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1215/21573689-1597669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1215/21573689-1597669</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Raymond, P. A., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Sobek, S., McDonald, C.,
Hoover, M., Butman, D., Striegl, R., Mayorga, E., Humborg, C., Kortelainen,
P., Dürr, H., Meybeck, M., Ciais, P., and Guth, P.: Global carbon
dioxide emissions from inland waters, Nature, 503, 355–359,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12760" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12760</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reiman, J. H. and Xu, J. Y.: Diel variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
outgassing from the Lower Mississippi River: Implications for riverine
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outgassing estimation, Water, 11,  1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w11010043</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richardson, D. C., Newbold, J. D., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Taylor, P. G., and
Kaplan, L. A.: Measuring heterotrophic respiration rates of suspended
particulate organic carbon from stream ecosystems, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Method., 11, 247–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2013.11.247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2013.11.247</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richey, J. E., Devol, A. H., Wofy, S. C., Victoria, R., and Riberio, M. N.
G.: Biogenic gases and the oxidation and reduction of carbon in Amazon River
and floodplain waters, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33, 551–561,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4.0551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1988.33.4.0551</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Richey, J. E., Melack, J. M., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Ballester, V. M., and Hess,
L.: Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source
of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 416, 617–620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/416617a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/416617a</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Runge, J.:   Large Rivers: Geomorpholgy and Management, edited by:  Gupta, A.,
John Wiley &amp; Sons., 293–309, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Santos, I. R., Maher, D. T., and, Eyre B. D.: Coupling automated radon and
carbon dioxide measurements in coastal waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
7685–7691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301961b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es301961b</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J.
G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S.,
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe,
M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R.,
Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P.,
Kovey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L.,
Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S.,
McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V.,
O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S.,
Peters, G., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J.,
Saito, M., Sanyini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele,
P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N.,
Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C.,
Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D. B., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y.,
Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget, Earth Syst.
Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3834?><ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sawakuchi, H. O., Bastviken, D., Sawakuchi, A. O., Krusche, A. V.,
Ballester, M. V. R., and Richey, J. E.: Methane emissions from Amazonian
Rivers and their contribution to the global methane budget, Glob. Change
Biol., 20, 2829–2840, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12646" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12646</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sawakuchi, H. O., Bastviken, D., Sawakuchi, A. O., Ward, N. D., Borges, C. D.,
Tsai, S. M., Richey, J. E., Ballester, M. V. R. and Krusche, A. V.: Oxidative
mitigation of aquatic methane emissions in large Amazonian rivers, Glob.
Change Biol., 22, 1075–1085, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13169" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13169</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scofield, V., Melack, J. M., Barbosa, P. M., Amaral, J. H. F., Forsberg, B.
R., and Farjalla, V. F.: Carbon dioxide outgassing from Amazonian aquatic
ecosystems in the Negro River basin, Biogeochemistry, 129, 77–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0220-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-016-0220-x</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seitzinger, S. P. and Kroeze, C.: Global distribution of nitrous oxide
production and N inputs in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 93–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB03657" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GB03657</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Simpson, H. and Herczeg, A.: Stable isotopes as an indicator of evaporation
in the River Murray, Australia, Water Resour. Res., 27, 1925–1935,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR00941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91WR00941</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Spencer, R. G. M., Hernes, P. J., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Baker, A., Gulliver,
P., Stubbins, A., Aiken, G. R., Dyda, R. Y., Butler, K. D., Mwamba, V. L.,
Mangangu, A. M., Wabakanghanzi, J. N., and Six, J.: An initial investigation
into the organic matter biogeochemistry of the Congo River, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 84, 614–627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.013</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
SCA (Standing committee of Analysts): Ammonia in waters. Methods for the
examination of waters and associated materials, 16 pp., 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stanley, E. H., Casson, N. J., Christel, S. T., Crawford, J. T., Loken, L.
C., and Oliver, S. K.: The ecology of methane in streams and rivers: patterns,
controls, and global significance, Ecol. Monogr., 86, 146–171,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/15-1027</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Still, C. J. and Powell, R. L.: Continental-scale distributions of
vegetation stable carbon isotope ratios, edited by: West, J. B., Bowen, G. J., Dawson, T. E., Tu,
K. P.,  Isoscapes, the Netherlands, Springer Netherlands,  179–193, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Wanninkhof, R., Sweeney, C., Feely, R. A.,
Chipman, D. W., Hales, B., Friederich, G., Chavez, F., Sabine, C., Watson,
A., Bakker, D. C. E., Schuster, U., Metzl, N., Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.I., Ishii,
M., Midorikawa, T., Nojiri, Y., Körtzinger, A., Steinhoff, T., Hoppema,
M., Olafsson, J., Arnarson, T. S., Tilbrook, B., Johannessen, T., Olsen, A.,
Bellerby, R., Wong, C. S., Delille, B., Bates, N. R., and de Baar, H. J. W.:
Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1475" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and net
sea-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux over the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 554–577,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tamooh, F., Borges, A. V., Meysman, F. J. R., Van Den Meersche, K., Dehairs,
F., Merckx, R., and Bouillon, S.:Dynamics of dissolved inorganic carbon and
aquatic metabolism in the Tana River basin, Kenya, Biogeosciences, 10,
6911–6928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6911-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6911-2013</ext-link>, 2013</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Teodoru, C. R., Nyoni, F. C., Borges, A. V., Darachambeau, F., Nyambe, I.,
and Bouillon, S.: Spatial variability and temporal dynamics of greenhouse
gas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations and fluxes along the
Zambezi River mainstem and major tributaries, Biogeosciences, 12, 2431–2453,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2431-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-2431-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tyler, S. C., Bilek, R. S., Sass, R. L., and Fisher, F. M.: Methane oxidation
and pathways of production in a Texas paddy field deduced from measurements
of flux, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1481" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 11, 323–348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01624" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GB01624</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ulseth, A. J., Hall Jr, R. O., Canadell, M. B., Madinger, H. L., Niayifar,
A., and Battin, T. J.: Distinct air–water gas exchange regimes in low- and
high-energy streams, Nat. Geosci., 12, 259–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0324-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-019-0324-8</ext-link>, 2019</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Salter, M. E., Mann, P. J., Barnes, J., Poulsen, J.,
Dinga, B., Fiske, G. J., and Holmes, R. M.: The riverine source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Republic of Congo, western Congo Basin,
Biogeosciences, 14, 2267–2281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2267-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-14-2267-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ward, N. D., Krusche, A. V., Sawakuchi, H. O., Brito, D. C., Cunha, A. C.,
Sousa Moura, J. M., da Silva, R., Yager, P. L., Keil, R. G., and Richey, J.
E.: The compositional evolution of dissolved and particulate organic matter
along the lower Amazon River–Óbidos to the ocean, Mar. Chem., 177,
244–256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.013</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ward N. D., Sawakuchi, H. O., Neu, V., Less, D. F. S., Valerio, A. M., Cunha, A. C., Kampel, M., Bianchi, T. S., Krusche, A. V., Richey, J. E., and Keil, R.
G.: Velocity-amplified microbial respiration rates in the lower Amazon
River, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 3,   265–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lol2.10062</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wassenaar, L. I., Coplen, T. B., and Aggarwal, P. K.: Approaches for
achieving long-term accuracy and precision of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for waters analyzed using laser absorption spectrometers, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 48, 1123–1131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es403354n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es403354n</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weiss, R. F.: Determinations of carbon dioxide and methane by dual catalyst
flame ionization chromatography and nitrous oxide by electron capture
chromatography, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 19, 611–616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/19.12.611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/chromsci/19.12.611</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weiss, R. F. and Price, B. A.: Nitrous oxide solubility in water and seawater,
Mar. Chem., 8, 347–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(80)90024-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(80)90024-9</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wissmar, R. C., Richey, J. E., Stallard, R. F., and Edmond, J. M.: Plankton
metabolism and carbon processes in the Amazon river, its tributaries, and
floodplain waters, Peru-Brazil, May–June 1977, Ecology, 62, 1622–1633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1941517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1941517</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yoshida, N., Iguchi, H., Yurimoto, H., Murakami, A., and Sakai, Y.: Aquatic
plant surface as a niche for methanotrophs, Front. Microbiol., 30, 1–9,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmicb.2014.00030</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, L., Tian, Y., Myneni, R. B., Ciais, P., Saatchi, S. L., Yi Y.,
Shilong, P., Chen, H., Vermote, E. F., Song, C., and Hwang, T.: Widespread
decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade, Nature, 509,
86–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13265" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature13265</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Variations in dissolved greenhouse gases (CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O) in the Congo River network overwhelmingly driven by fluvial-wetland connectivity</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>We carried out 10 field expeditions between 2010 and 2015 in the lowland
part of the Congo River network in the eastern part of the basin (Democratic
Republic of the Congo), to describe the spatial variations in fluvial dissolved
carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O)
concentrations. We investigate the possible drivers of the spatial
variations in dissolved CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations by
analyzing covariations with several other biogeochemical variables, aquatic
metabolic processes (primary production and respiration), catchment
characteristics (land cover) and wetland spatial distributions. We test the
hypothesis that spatial patterns of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O are
partly due to the connectivity with wetlands, in particular with a giant
wetland of flooded forest in the core of the Congo basin, the <q>Cuvette
Centrale Congolaise</q> (CCC). Two transects of 1650&thinsp;km were carried out from
the city of Kisangani to the city of Kinshasa, along the longest possible
navigable section of the river and corresponding to 41&thinsp;% of the total
length of the main stem. Additionally, three time series of CH<sub>4</sub> and
N<sub>2</sub>O were obtained at fixed points in the main stem of the middle Congo
(2013–2018, biweekly sampling), in the main stem of the lower Kasaï
(2015–2017, monthly sampling) and in the main stem of the middle Oubangui
(2010–2012, biweekly sampling). The variations in dissolved N<sub>2</sub>O
concentrations were modest, with values oscillating around the concentration
corresponding to saturation with the atmosphere, with N<sub>2</sub>O saturation
level (%N<sub>2</sub>O, where atmospheric equilibrium corresponds to 100&thinsp;%)
ranging between 0&thinsp;% and 561&thinsp;% (average 142&thinsp;%). The relatively narrow
range of %N<sub>2</sub>O variations was consistent with low NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>
(2.3±1.3&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup>) and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> (5.6±5.1&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup>) levels in these near pristine rivers and streams, with
low agriculture pressure on the catchment (croplands correspond to 0.1&thinsp;%
of catchment land cover of sampled rivers), dominated by forests
( ∼ 70&thinsp;% of land cover). The covariations in %N<sub>2</sub>O,
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> and dissolved oxygen saturation level
(%O<sub>2</sub>) indicate N<sub>2</sub>O removal by soil or sedimentary
denitrification in low O<sub>2</sub>, high NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and low NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>
environments (typically small and organic matter rich streams) and N<sub>2</sub>O
production by nitrification in high O<sub>2</sub>, low NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and high
NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> (typical of larger rivers that are poor in organic matter).
Surface waters were very strongly oversaturated in CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub>
with respect to atmospheric equilibrium, with values of the partial pressure
of CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>) ranging between 1087 and 22&thinsp;899&thinsp;ppm (equilibrium
 ∼ 400&thinsp;ppm) and dissolved CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations ranging
between 22 and 71&thinsp;428&thinsp;nmol&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup> (equilibrium  ∼ 2&thinsp;nmol&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup>). Spatial variations were overwhelmingly more important than
seasonal variations for <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and %N<sub>2</sub>O as well as day–night variations for <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>. The wide range of <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>
and CH<sub>4</sub> variations was consistent with the equally wide range of
%O<sub>2</sub> (0.3&thinsp;%–122.8&thinsp;%) and of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (1.8–67.8&thinsp;mg&thinsp;L<sup>−1</sup>), indicative of generation of these two greenhouse gases from
intense processing of organic matter either in <q>terra firme</q> soils, wetlands or
in-stream. However, the emission rate of CO<sub>2</sub> to the atmosphere from
riverine surface waters was on average about 10 times higher than the flux
of CO<sub>2</sub> produced by aquatic net heterotrophy (as evaluated from
measurements of pelagic respiration and primary production). This indicates
that the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the river network were sustained by lateral
inputs of CO<sub>2</sub> (either from terra firme or from wetlands). The <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and
CH<sub>4</sub> values decreased and %O<sub>2</sub> increased with increasing Strahler
order, showing that stream size explains part of the spatial variability of
these quantities. In addition, several lines of evidence indicate that
lateral inputs of carbon from wetlands (flooded forest and aquatic
macrophytes) were of paramount importance in sustaining high CO<sub>2</sub> and
CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations in the Congo river network, as well as driving
spatial variations: the rivers draining the CCC were characterized by
significantly higher <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> and significantly lower
%O<sub>2</sub> and %N<sub>2</sub>O values than those not draining the CCC;
<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and %O<sub>2</sub> values were correlated to the coverage of flooded
forest on the catchment. The flux of greenhouse gases (GHGs) between rivers and the atmosphere
averaged 2469&thinsp;mmol&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup> for CO<sub>2</sub> (range 86 and 7110&thinsp;mmol&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup>), 12&thinsp;553&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup> for CH<sub>4</sub> (range
65 and 597&thinsp;260&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup>) and 22&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup> for N<sub>2</sub>O (range −52 and 319&thinsp;µmol&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;d<sup>−1</sup>). The
estimate of integrated CO<sub>2</sub> emission from the Congo River network
(251±46&thinsp;TgC (10<sup>12</sup>&thinsp;gC)&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>), corresponding to nearly half the
CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from tropical oceans globally (565&thinsp;TgC&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>) and was
nearly 2 times the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the tropical Atlantic Ocean
(137&thinsp;TgC&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>). Moreover, the integrated CO<sub>2</sub> emission from the
Congo River network is more than 3 times higher than the estimate of
terrestrial net ecosystem exchange (NEE) on the whole catchment (77&thinsp;TgC&thinsp;yr<sup>−1</sup>). This shows that it is unlikely that the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from
the river network were sustained by the hydrological carbon export from
terra firme soils (typically very small compared to terrestrial NEE) but most likely,
to a large extent, they were sustained by wetlands (with a much higher
hydrological connectivity with rivers and streams).</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abril, G. and Borges, A. V.: Carbon leaks from flooded land: do we need to
re-plumb the inland water active pipe?, Biogeosciences, 16, 769–784,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-769-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-769-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Abril, G., Martinez, J.-M., Artigas, L. F., Moreira-Turcq, P., Benedetti,
M. F., Vidal, L., Meziane, T., Kim, J.-H., Bernardes, M. C., Savoye, N.,
Deborde, J., Albéric, P., Souza, M. F. L., Souza, E. L., and Roland, F.:
Amazon river carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by wetlands, Nature, 505,
395–398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12797</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Abril, G., Bouillon, S., Darchambeau, F., Teodoru, C. R., Marwick, T. R.,
Tamooh, F., Omengo, F. O., Geeraert, N., Deirmendjian, L., Polsenaere, P.,
and Borges A. V.: Technical note: Large overestimation of <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>
calculated from pH and alkalinity in acidic, organic-rich freshwaters,
Biogeosciences, 12, 67–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-67-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-67-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Aho, K. S. and Raymond, P. A.: Differential response of greenhouse gas evasion to storms in forested and wetland streams, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 649–662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004750" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004750</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, G. H. and Pavelsky, T. M.: Global extent of rivers and streams,
Science, 28, eaat0636, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0636" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0636</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Almeida, R. M., Pacheco, F. S., Barros, N., Rosi, E., and Roland, F.:
Extreme floods increase CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing from a large Amazonian river,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 62, 989–999, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10480" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10480</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Alsdorf, D., Beighley, E., Laraque, A., Lee, H., Tshimanga, R., O'Loughlin,
F., Mahé, G., Dinga, B., Moukandi, G., and Spencer, R. G. M.:
Opportunities for hydrologic research in the Congo Basin, Rev. Geophys., 54,
378–409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000517</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Amaral, J. H. F., Borges, A. V., Melack, J. M., Sarmento, H., Barbosa, P.
M., Kasper, D., Melo, M. L., de Fex Wolf, D., da Silva, J. S., and Forsberg,
B. R.: Influence of plankton metabolism and mixing depth on CO<sub>2</sub>
dynamics in an Amazon floodplain lake, Sci. Total Environ., 630, 1381–1393,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.331" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.331</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
APHA: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American
Public Health Association, 1325 pp., 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Balagizi, C. M., Darchambeau, F., Bouillon, S., Yalire, M. M., Lambert, T.,
and Borges, A. V.: River geochemistry, chemical weathering and atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> consumption rates in the Virunga Volcanic Province (East Africa),
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 16, 2637–2660, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005999</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Barbosa, P. M., Melack, J. M., Farjalla, V. F., Amaral, J. H. F., Scofield,
V., and Forsberg, B. R.: Diffusive methane fluxes from Negro, Solimões
and Madeira rivers and fringing lakes in the Amazon basin, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 61, S221–S237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10358</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bastviken, D., Ejlertsson, J., and Tranvik, L.: Measurement of methane
oxidation in lakes: A comparison of methods, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
3354–3361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es010311p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es010311p</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Crill, P. M., and
Enrich-Prast, A. :, Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental
carbon sink, Science, 331, p. 50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196808" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196808</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Battin, T. J., Kaplan, L. A., Findlay, S., Hopkinson, C. S., Marti, E.,
Packman, A. I., Newbold, J. D., and Sabater, F.: Biophysical controls on
organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks, Nat. Geosci., 1, 95–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo101</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Baulch, H. M., Schiff, S. L., Maranger, R., and Dillon, P. J.: Nitrogen
enrichment and the emission of nitrous oxide from streams, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB4013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004047</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Benstead, J. P. and Leigh, D. S.: An expanded role for river networks,
Nat. Geosci., 5, 678–679, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1593" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1593</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Billett, M. F., Palmer, S. M., Hope, D., Deacon, C., Storeton-West, R.,
Hargreaves, K. J., Flechard, C., and Fowler, D.: Linking
land-atmosphere-stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB1024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002058</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Bird, M. I. and Pousai, P.: Variations of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C in the surface
soil organic carbon pool, Global Biogeoch. Cy., 11, 313–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01197" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01197</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Bird, M. I., Giresse, P., and Chivas, A. R.: Effect of forest and savanna
vegetation on the carbon-isotope composition from the Sanaga River,
Cameroon, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 1845–1854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.8.1845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1994.39.8.1845</a>,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Bowen, G. J., Wassenaar, L. I., and Hobson, K. A.: Global application of stable
hydrogen and oxygen isotopes to wildlife forensics, Oecologia, 143, 337–348,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1813-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1813-y</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Bloom, A. A., Palmer, P. I., Fraser, A., Reay, D. S., and Frankenberg, C.:
Large-scale controls of methanogenesis inferred from methane and gravity
spaceborne data, Science, 327, 322–325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175176" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175176</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Borges, A. V., Darchambeau, F., Teodoru, C. R., Marwick, T. R., Tamooh, F.,
Geeraert, N., Omengo, F. O., Guérin, F., Lambert, T., Morana, C., Okuku,
E., and Bouillon, S.: Globally significant greenhouse gas emissions from
African inland waters, Nat. Geosci., 8, 637–642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2486" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2486</a>,
2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Borges, A. V., Abril, G., Darchambeau, F., Teodoru, C. R., Deborde, J.,
Vidal, L. O., Lambert, T., and Bouillon, S.: Divergent biophysical controls
of aquatic CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> in the World's two largest rivers, Sci. Rep., 5,
15614, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15614" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15614</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Borges, A. V., Darchambeau, F., Lambert, T., Bouillon, S., Morana, C.,
Brouyère, S., Hakoun, V., Jurado, A., Tseng, H.-C., Descy, J.-P.,
and Roland, F. A. E.: Effects of agricultural land use on fluvial carbon
dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide concentrations in a large European river,
the Meuse (Belgium), Sci. Total Environ., 610/611, 342–355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.047</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Borges, A. V. and Bouillon, S.: Data-base of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and ancillary data in the Congo River, available at: <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/3413449#.XYm2eUYzaUk" target="_blank">https://zenodo.org/record/3413449#.XYm2eUYzaUk</a>, last access: 24 September 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Bouillon, S., Abril, G., Borges, A. V., Dehairs, F., Govers, G., Hughes, H.
J., Merckx, R., Meysman, F. J. R., Nyunja, J., Osburn, C., and Middelburg,
J. J.: Distribution, origin and cycling of carbon in the Tana River (Kenya):
a dry season basin-scale survey from headwaters to the delta,
Biogeosciences, 6, 2475–2493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2475-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2475-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Bouillon, S., Yambélé, A., Spencer, R. G. M., Gillikin, D. P., Hernes, P. J., Six, J., Merckx, R., and Borges, A. V.: Organic matter sources, fluxes and greenhouse gas exchange in the Oubangui River (Congo River basin), Biogeosciences, 9, 2045–2062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2045-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2045-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Bouillon, S., Yambélé, A., Gillikin, D. P., Teodoru, C.,
Darchambeau, F., Lambert, T., and Borges, A. V.: Contrasting biogeochemical
characteristics of right-bank tributaries and a comparison with the mainstem
Oubangui River, Central African Republic (Congo River basin), Sci. Rep., 4,
5402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05402" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05402</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Bultot, F.: Atlas Climatique du Bassin Congolais Publications de&thinsp;L'Institut
National pour&thinsp;L'Etude Agronomique du Congo (I.N.E.A.C.), Troisieme Partie,
Temperature et Humidite de&thinsp;L'Air, Rosee, Temperature du Sol, 253 pp., 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Butman, D. and Raymond, P. A.: Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from
streams and rivers in the United States, Nat. Geosci., 4, 839–842, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1294</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Bwangoy, J.-R. B., Hansen, M. C., Roy, D. P., De Grandi, G., and Justice, C.
O.: Wetland mapping in the Congo Basin using optical and radar remotely
sensed data and derived topographical indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 114,
73–86, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.004</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Canion, A., Overholt, W. A., Kostka, J. E., Huettel, M., Lavik, G., and
Kuypers, M. M. M.: Temperature response of denitrification and anaerobic
ammonium oxidation rates and microbial community structure in Arctic fjord
sediments, Environ. Microbiol., 16, 3331–3344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12593" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12593</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Cardoso, S. J., Enrich-Prast, A., Pace, M. L., and Roland, F.: Do models of
organic carbon mineralization extrapolate to warmer tropical sediments?
Limnol. Oceanogr., 59, 48–54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0048</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Bombelli, A., Williams, M., Piao, S. L., Chave, J., Ryan, C. M.,
Henry, M., Brender, P., and Valentini, R.: The carbon balance of Africa:
synthesis of recent research studies, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 369,
2038–2057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0328</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Coplen, T. B. and Wassenaar, L. I.: LIMS for Lasers 2015 for achieving
long-term accuracy and precision of <i>δ</i><sup>2</sup>H, <i>δ</i><sup>17</sup>O, and
<i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O of waters using laser absorption spectrometry, Rapid Commun.
Mass Spectr., 29, 2122–2130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7372</a>,2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, B. E. and Cloern, J. E.: An empirical model for estimating
phytoplankton productivity in estuaries, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 36, 299–305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps036299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps036299</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J. and Caraco, N. F.: Carbon in catchments: connecting terrestrial
carbon losses with aquatic metabolism, Mar. Fresh. Res., 52, 101–110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF00084" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/MF00084</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., Kling, G. W., and Kratz, T. K.: Carbon dioxide
supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes, Science, 265, 1568–1570,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5178.1568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.265.5178.1568</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, J. J., Prairie, Y. T., Caraco, N. F., McDowell, W. H., Tranvik, L. J.,
Striegl, R. G. , Duarte, C. M., Kortelainen, P., Downing, J. A., Middelburg,
J. J., and Melack, J.: Plumbing the global carbon cycle: Integrating inland
waters into the terrestrial carbon budget, Ecosystems, 10, 171–184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Coynel, A., Seyler, P., Etcheber, H., Meybeck, M., and Orange, D.: Spatial
and seasonal dynamics of total suspended sediment and organic carbon species
in the Congo River, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4019,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002335" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002335</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Craine J. M., Elmore, A. J., Wang, L., Aranibar, J., Bauters, M., Boeckx,
P., Crowley, B. E., Dawes, M. A., Delzon, S., Fajardo, A., Fang, Y.,
Fujiyoshi, L., Gray, A., Guerrieri, R., Gundale, M. J., Hawke, D.J., Hietz,
P., Jonard, M., Kearsley, E., Kenzo, T., Makarov, M.,
Marañón-Jiménez, S., McGlynn, T. P., McNeil, B. E., Mosher, S.
G., Nelson, D. M., Peri, P. L., Roggy, J. C., Sanders-DeMott, R., Song, M.,
Szpak, P., Templer, P. H., Van der Colff, D., Werner, C., Xu, X., Yang, Y.,
Yu, G., and Zmudczyńska-Skarbek, K.: Isotopic evidence for
oligotrophication of terrestrial ecosystems, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2, 1735–1744,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0694-0</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Crawford J. T., Stanley, E. H., Dornblaser, M., and Striegl, R. G.: CO<sub>2</sub>
time series patterns in contrasting headwater streams of North America,
Aquat. Sci., 79, 473–486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0511-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0511-2</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Dargie, G. C., Lewis, S. L., Lawson, I. T., Mitchard, E. T. A., Page, S. E.,
Bocko, Y. E., and Ifo, S. A.: Age, extent and carbon storage of the central
Congo Basin peatland complex, Nature, 542, 86–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21048</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Deirmendjian, L. and Abril, G.: Carbon dioxide degassing at the
groundwater-stream-atmosphere interface: isotopic equilibration and
hydrological mass balance in a sandy watershed, J. Hydrol., 558, 129–143,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Deirmendjian, L., Loustau, D., Augusto, L., Lafont, S., Chipeaux, C.,
Poirier, D., and Abril, G.: Hydro-ecological controls on dissolved carbon
dynamics in groundwater and export to streams in a temperate pine forest,
Biogeosciences, 15, 669–691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-669-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-669-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Dinsmore, K. J., Wallin, M. B., Johnson, M. S., Billett, M. F., Bishop, K.,
Pumpanen, J., and Ojala, A.: Contrasting CO<sub>2</sub> concentration discharge
dynamics in headwater streams: a multi-catchment comparison, J. Geophys.
Res., 118, 445–461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20047</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Del Giorgio, P. A., Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., and Peters, R. H.: Linking
planktonic biomass and metabolism to net gas fluxes in northern temperate
lakes, Ecology, 80, 1422–1431, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1422:LPBAMT]2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1422:LPBAMT]2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Descy, J.-P., Hardy, M.-A., Sténuite, S., Pirlot, S., Leporcq, B.,
Kimirei, I., Sekadende, B., Mwaitega, S. R., and Sinyenza, D.: Phytoplankton
pigments and community composition in Lake Tanganyika, Freshwater Biol.,
50, 668–684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Descy, J.-P., Darchambeau, F., Lambert, T., Stoyneva, M. P., Bouillon, S.,
and Borges, A. V.: Phytoplankton dynamics in the Congo River, Freshwater Biol.,
62, 87–101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12851" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12851</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Doctor, D. H., Kendall, C., Sebestyen, S. D., Shanley, J. B., Ohte, N., and
Boyer, E. W.: Carbon isotope fractionation of dissolved inorganic carbon
(DIC) due to outgassing of carbon dioxide from a headwater stream, Hydrol.
Process., 22, 2410–2423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6833" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6833</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Downing, J. A., Cole, J. J., Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J., Melack, J.
M., Prairie, Y. T., Kortelainen, P., Striegl, R. G., McDowell, W. H., and
Tranvik, L. J.: Global abundance and size distribution of streams and
rivers, Inland Waters, 2, 229–236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-2.4.502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-2.4.502</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Duvert, C., Butman, D. E., Marx, A., Ribolzi, O., and Hutley, L. B.: CO<sub>2</sub>
evasion along streams driven by groundwater inputs and geomorphic controls,
Nat. Geosci., 11, 813–818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0245-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0245-y</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Fisher, J. B., Sikka, M., Sitch, S., Ciais, P., Poulter, B., Galbraith, D.,
Lee, J.-E., Huntingford, C., Viovy, N., Zeng, N., Ahlström, A., Lomas,
M. R., Levy, P. E., Frankenberg, C., Saatchi, S., and Malhi, Y.: African
tropical rainforest net carbon dioxide fluxes in the twentieth century,
Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20120376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0376" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0376</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Fluet-Chouinard, E., Lehner, B., Rebelo, L.-M., Papa, F., and Hamilton,
S. K.: Development of a global inundation map at high spatial resolution from
topographic downscaling of coarse-scale remote sensing data, Remote Sens.
Environ., 158, 348–361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Frankignoulle, M., Borges, A., and Biondo R.: A new design of equilibrator
to monitor carbon dioxide in highly dynamic and turbid environments, Water
Res., 35, 1344–1347, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00369-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00369-9</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Gaillardet, J., Dupré, B., Louvat, P., and Allègre C. J.: Global
silicate weathering and CO<sub>2</sub> consumption rates deduced from the
chemistry of large rivers, Chem. Geol., 159, 3–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00031-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00031-5</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Gillikin, D. P. and Bouillon, S.: Determination of <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O of
water and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of dissolved inorganic carbon using a simple
modification of an elemental analyzer – isotope ratio mass spectrometer
(EA-IRMS): an evaluation, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectr., 21, 1475–1478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2968" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2968</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Gran, G.: Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric
titrations Part II, The Analyst, 77, 661–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9527700661" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9527700661</a>,
1952.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Hamilton, S. K., Sippel, S. J., and Melack J. M.: Comparison of inundation
patterns among major South American floodplains, J. Geophys. Res., 107, LBA
5-1-LBA 5-14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000306</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Happell, J., Chanton, J. P., and Showers, W.: The influence of methane
oxidation on the stable isotopic composition of methane emitted from Florida
Swamp forests, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 58, 4377–4388,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90341-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90341-7</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. I., Clark, W. A., Quay, P. D., Richey, J. E., Devol, A. H., and
de M. Santos, U.: Compositions and fluxes of particulate organic material in
the Amazon River, Limnol Oceanogr., 31, 717–738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0717" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0717</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Hotchkiss, E. R., Hall Jr, R. O., Sponseller, R. A., Butman, D., Klaminder,
J., Laudon, H., Rosvall, M., and Karlsson, J.: Sources of and processes
controlling CO<sub>2</sub> emissions change with the size of streams and rivers, Nat.
Geosci., 8, 696–699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2507" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2507</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, M., Chen, D., and Dahlgren, R. A.: Modeling nitrous oxide emission from
rivers: a global Assessment, Glob. Change Biol., 22, 3566–3582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13351</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, R. H. and Hughes, J. S.: A directory of African wetlands, IUCN,
ISBN 2-88032-949-3, 820 pp., 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Huotari, J., Haapanala, S., Pumpanen, J., Vesala, T., and Ojala, A.:
Efficient gas exchange between a boreal river and the atmosphere, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 40, 5683–5686, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057705</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Kindler, R., Siemens, J., Kaiser, K., Walmsley, D. C., Bernhofer, C.,
Buchmann, N., Cellier, P., Eugster, W., Gleixner, G., Grunwald, T., Heim,
A., Ibrom, A., Jones, S. K., Jones, M., Klumpp, K., Kutsch, W., Steenberg
Larsen, K., Lehuger, S., Loubet, B., McKenzie, R., Moors, E., Osborne, B.,
Pilegaard, K., Rebmann, C., Saunders, M., Schmidt, M. W. I., Schrumpf, M.,
Seyfferth, J., Skiba, U., Soussana, J.-F., Sutton, M. A.; Tefs, C.,
Vowinckel, B., Zeeman, M. J., and Kaupenjohann, M.: Dissolved carbon
leaching from soil is a crucial component of net ecosystem carbon balance,
Glob. Change Biol., 17, 1167–1185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02282.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02282.x</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Klaus, M., Geibrink, E., Jonsson, A., Bergström, A.-K., Bastviken, D.,
Laudon, H., Klaminder, J., and Karlsson, J.: Greenhouse gas emissions from
boreal inland waters unchanged after forest harvesting, Biogeosciences, 15,
5575–5594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5575-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5575-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Kokic, J., Sahlée, E., Sobek, S., Vachon, D., and Wallin, M. B.: High
spatial variability of gas transfer velocity in streams revealed by
turbulence measurements, Inland Waters, 8, 461–473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2018.1500228" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2018.1500228</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Koné, Y. J. M., Abril, G., Kouadio, K. N., Delille, B., and Borges, A. V.:
Seasonal variability of carbon dioxide in the rivers and lagoons of Ivory
Coast (West Africa), Estuar. Coast., 32, 246–260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-008-9121-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-008-9121-0</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Koné, Y. J. M., Abril, G., Delille, B., and Borges, A. V.: Seasonal
variability of methane in the rivers and lagoons of Ivory Coast (West
Africa), Biogeochemistry, 100, 21–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9402-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9402-0</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Kosten, S., Piñeiro, M., de Goede, E., de Klein, J., Lamers, L. P. M., and
Ettwig, K.: Fate of methane in aquatic systems dominated by free-floating
plants, Water Res., 104, 200–207,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Kroeze, C., Dumont, E., and Seitzinger, S. P.: Future trends in emissions of
N<sub>2</sub>O from rivers and estuaries, J. Integr. Environ. Sc., 7, 71–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2010.496789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2010.496789</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Lambert, T., Bouillon, S., Darchambeau, F., Massicotte, P., and Borges,
A.V.: Shift in the chemical composition of dissolved organic matter in the
Congo River network, Biogeosciences, 13, 5405–5420,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5405-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5405-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Laraque, A., Mietton, M. Olivry, J. C., and Pandi, A.: Impact of lithological
and vegetal covers on flow discharge and water quality of Congolese
tributaries from the Congo river, Rev. Sci. Eau., 11, 209–224,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Laraque, A., Bricquet, J. P., Pandi, A., and Olivry, J. C.: A review of
material transport by the Congo River and its tributaries, Hydrol. Process.,
23, 3216–3224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7395</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G. G., Hartmann, J., Ciais, P., and Regnier, P. A.
G.: Spatial patterns in CO<sub>2</sub> evasion from the global river network,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 534–554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004941</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Lauerwald, R., Regnier, P., Camino-Serrano, M., Guenet, B., Guimberteau, M.,
Ducharne, A., Polcher, J., and Ciais, P.: ORCHILEAK (revision 3875): a new
model branch to simulate carbon transfers along the terrestrial–aquatic
continuum of the Amazon basin, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3821–3859,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3821-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3821-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Le, T. T. H., Fettig, J., and Meon, G.: Kinetics and simulation of
nitrification at various pH values of a polluted river in the tropics,
Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol., 19, 54–65, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Liptay, K., Chanton, J., Czepiel, P., and Mosher, B.: Use of stable isotopes
to determine methane oxidation in landfill cover soils, J. Geophys. Res.,
103, 8243–8250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02630" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02630</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Liss, P. S. and Slater, P. G.: Flux of gases across the air sea interface,
Nature, 247, 181–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/247181a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/247181a0</a>, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, S. and Raymond, P. A.: Hydrologic controls on <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>
efflux in US streams and rivers, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 3, 428–435, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10095</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Lynch, J. K., Beatty, C. M., Seidel, M. P., Jungst, L. J., and DeGrandpre, M.
D.: Controls of riverine CO<sub>2</sub> over an annual cycle determined using
direct, high temporal resolution <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> measurements, J. Geophys. Res.,
115, G03016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001132</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Maavara, T., Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G.G., Akbarzadeh, Z., Bouskill, N. J.,
Van Cappellen, P., and Regnier, P.: Nitrous oxide emissions from inland
waters: Are IPCC estimates too high?, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 473–488, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14504" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14504</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Malhi, Y., Adu-Bredu, S., Asare, R. A., Lewis, S. L., and Mayaux, P.:
African rainforests: past, present and future, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368,
20120312, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0312" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0312</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Mann, P. J., Spencer, R. G. M., Dinga, B. J., Poulsen, J. R., Hernes, P. J.,
Fiske, G., Salter, M. E., Wang, Z. A., Hoering, K. A., Six, J., and Holmes
R. M.: The biogeochemistry of carbon across a gradient of streams and rivers
within the Congo Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 687–702,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002442</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Maurice, L., Rawlins, B. G., Farr, G., Bell, R., and Gooddy, D. C.: The
influence of flow and bed slope on gas transfer in steep streams and their
implications for evasion of CO<sub>2</sub>, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 122,
2862–2875, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG004045</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Marwick, T. R., Tamooh, F., Ogwoka, B., Teodoru, C., Borges, A. V.,
Darchambeau, F., and Bouillon, S.: Dynamic seasonal nitrogen cycling in
response to anthropogenic N loading in a tropical catchment,
Athi–Galana–Sabaki River, Kenya, Biogeosciences, 11, 1–18,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Marx, A., Dusek, J., Jankovec, J., Sanda, M., Vogel, T., van Geldern, R.,
Hartmann, J., and Barth, J. A. C.: A review of CO<sub>2</sub> and associated
carbon dynamics in headwater streams: A global perspective, Rev. Geophys.,
55, 560–585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000547</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
McDowell, M. J. and Johnson, M. S.: Gas transfer velocities evaluated using
carbon dioxide as a tracer show high streamflow to be a major driver of
total CO<sub>2</sub> evasion flux for a headwater stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 123, 2183–2197, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004388</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Melack, J. M., Hess, L. L., Gastil, M., Forsberg, B. R., Hamilton, S. K.,
Lima, I. B. T., and Novo, E. M. L. M.: Regionalization of methane emissions in
the Amazon Basin with microwave remote sensing, Glob. Change Biol., 10,
530–544, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00763.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00763.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Meybeck, M.: Global chemical weathering of surficial rocks estimated from
river dissolved loads, Am. J. Sci., 287, 401–428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.287.5.401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.287.5.401</a>,
1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Millero, F. J.: The thermodynamics of the carbonate system in seawater,
Geochem. Cosmochem. Ac., 43, 1651–1661, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90184-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90184-4</a>,1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Morana, C., Borges, A. V., Roland, F. A. E., Darchambeau, F., Descy, J.-P.,
and Bouillon, S.: Methanotrophy within the water column of a large
meromictic, tropical lake (Lake Kivu, East Africa), Biogeosciences, 12,
2077–2088, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2077-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2077-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Nkounkou, R. R. and Probst, J. L.: Hydrology and geochemistry of the Congo
river system, Mitt. Geol–Palaont. Inst. Univ. Hamburg, SCOPE/UNEP, 64,
483–508, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
O'Loughlin, F., Trigg, M. A., Schumann, G. J.-P., and Bates, P. D.:
Hydraulic characterization of the middle reach of the Congo River, Water
Resour. Res., 49, 5059–5070, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20398</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
Peter, H., Singer, G. A., Preiler, C., Chifflard, P., Steniczka, G., and Battin,
T. J.: Scales and drivers of temporal <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> dynamics in an Alpine
stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 1078–1091,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002552</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
Powell, R. L., Yoo, E.-H., and Still, C. J.: Vegetation and soil carbon-13
isoscapes for South America: integrating remote sensing and ecosystem
isotope measurements, Ecosphere, 3, 1–25, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00162.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00162.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Prairie, Y. T., Bird, D. F., and Cole, J. J.: The summer metabolic balance in
the epilimnion of southeastern Quebec lakes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 316–321,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.1.0316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.1.0316</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Raymond, P. A., Zappa, C. J., Butman, D., Bott, T. L., Potter, C.,
Mulholland, P., Laursen, A. E., McDowell, W. H., and Newbold, D.: Scaling
the gas transfer velocity and hydraulic geometry in streams and small
rivers, Limnol. Oceanogr. Fluids Environ., 2, 41–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/21573689-1597669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1215/21573689-1597669</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Raymond, P. A., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Sobek, S., McDonald, C.,
Hoover, M., Butman, D., Striegl, R., Mayorga, E., Humborg, C., Kortelainen,
P., Dürr, H., Meybeck, M., Ciais, P., and Guth, P.: Global carbon
dioxide emissions from inland waters, Nature, 503, 355–359,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12760" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12760</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Reiman, J. H. and Xu, J. Y.: Diel variability of <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>
outgassing from the Lower Mississippi River: Implications for riverine
CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing estimation, Water, 11,  1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010043</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, D. C., Newbold, J. D., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Taylor, P. G., and
Kaplan, L. A.: Measuring heterotrophic respiration rates of suspended
particulate organic carbon from stream ecosystems, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Method., 11, 247–261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2013.11.247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2013.11.247</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Richey, J. E., Devol, A. H., Wofy, S. C., Victoria, R., and Riberio, M. N.
G.: Biogenic gases and the oxidation and reduction of carbon in Amazon River
and floodplain waters, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33, 551–561,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4.0551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4.0551</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Richey, J. E., Melack, J. M., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Ballester, V. M., and Hess,
L.: Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source
of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 416, 617–620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/416617a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/416617a</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Runge, J.:   Large Rivers: Geomorpholgy and Management, edited by:  Gupta, A.,
John Wiley &amp; Sons., 293–309, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Santos, I. R., Maher, D. T., and, Eyre B. D.: Coupling automated radon and
carbon dioxide measurements in coastal waters, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46,
7685–7691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es301961b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es301961b</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J.
G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S.,
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe,
M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R.,
Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P.,
Kovey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L.,
Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S.,
McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V.,
O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S.,
Peters, G., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J.,
Saito, M., Sanyini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele,
P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N.,
Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C.,
Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D. B., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y.,
Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget, Earth Syst.
Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Sawakuchi, H. O., Bastviken, D., Sawakuchi, A. O., Krusche, A. V.,
Ballester, M. V. R., and Richey, J. E.: Methane emissions from Amazonian
Rivers and their contribution to the global methane budget, Glob. Change
Biol., 20, 2829–2840, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12646" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12646</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation>
Sawakuchi, H. O., Bastviken, D., Sawakuchi, A. O., Ward, N. D., Borges, C. D.,
Tsai, S. M., Richey, J. E., Ballester, M. V. R. and Krusche, A. V.: Oxidative
mitigation of aquatic methane emissions in large Amazonian rivers, Glob.
Change Biol., 22, 1075–1085, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13169" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13169</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation>
Scofield, V., Melack, J. M., Barbosa, P. M., Amaral, J. H. F., Forsberg, B.
R., and Farjalla, V. F.: Carbon dioxide outgassing from Amazonian aquatic
ecosystems in the Negro River basin, Biogeochemistry, 129, 77–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0220-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0220-x</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation>
Seitzinger, S. P. and Kroeze, C.: Global distribution of nitrous oxide
production and N inputs in freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 93–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB03657" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB03657</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation>
Simpson, H. and Herczeg, A.: Stable isotopes as an indicator of evaporation
in the River Murray, Australia, Water Resour. Res., 27, 1925–1935,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR00941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR00941</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation>
Spencer, R. G. M., Hernes, P. J., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Baker, A., Gulliver,
P., Stubbins, A., Aiken, G. R., Dyda, R. Y., Butler, K. D., Mwamba, V. L.,
Mangangu, A. M., Wabakanghanzi, J. N., and Six, J.: An initial investigation
into the organic matter biogeochemistry of the Congo River, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 84, 614–627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.01.013</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation>
SCA (Standing committee of Analysts): Ammonia in waters. Methods for the
examination of waters and associated materials, 16 pp., 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation>
Stanley, E. H., Casson, N. J., Christel, S. T., Crawford, J. T., Loken, L.
C., and Oliver, S. K.: The ecology of methane in streams and rivers: patterns,
controls, and global significance, Ecol. Monogr., 86, 146–171,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1027</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation>
Still, C. J. and Powell, R. L.: Continental-scale distributions of
vegetation stable carbon isotope ratios, edited by: West, J. B., Bowen, G. J., Dawson, T. E., Tu,
K. P.,  Isoscapes, the Netherlands, Springer Netherlands,  179–193, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Wanninkhof, R., Sweeney, C., Feely, R. A.,
Chipman, D. W., Hales, B., Friederich, G., Chavez, F., Sabine, C., Watson,
A., Bakker, D. C. E., Schuster, U., Metzl, N., Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.I., Ishii,
M., Midorikawa, T., Nojiri, Y., Körtzinger, A., Steinhoff, T., Hoppema,
M., Olafsson, J., Arnarson, T. S., Tilbrook, B., Johannessen, T., Olsen, A.,
Bellerby, R., Wong, C. S., Delille, B., Bates, N. R., and de Baar, H. J. W.:
Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, and net
sea-air CO<sub>2</sub> flux over the global oceans, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 554–577,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation>
Tamooh, F., Borges, A. V., Meysman, F. J. R., Van Den Meersche, K., Dehairs,
F., Merckx, R., and Bouillon, S.:Dynamics of dissolved inorganic carbon and
aquatic metabolism in the Tana River basin, Kenya, Biogeosciences, 10,
6911–6928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6911-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6911-2013</a>, 2013
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation>
Teodoru, C. R., Nyoni, F. C., Borges, A. V., Darachambeau, F., Nyambe, I.,
and Bouillon, S.: Spatial variability and temporal dynamics of greenhouse
gas (CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O) concentrations and fluxes along the
Zambezi River mainstem and major tributaries, Biogeosciences, 12, 2431–2453,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2431-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2431-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation>
Tyler, S. C., Bilek, R. S., Sass, R. L., and Fisher, F. M.: Methane oxidation
and pathways of production in a Texas paddy field deduced from measurements
of flux, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C, and <i>δ</i>D of CH<sub>4</sub>, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 11, 323–348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01624" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01624</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation>
Ulseth, A. J., Hall Jr, R. O., Canadell, M. B., Madinger, H. L., Niayifar,
A., and Battin, T. J.: Distinct air–water gas exchange regimes in low- and
high-energy streams, Nat. Geosci., 12, 259–263, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0324-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0324-8</a>, 2019
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation>
Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Salter, M. E., Mann, P. J., Barnes, J., Poulsen, J.,
Dinga, B., Fiske, G. J., and Holmes, R. M.: The riverine source of CH<sub>4</sub>
and N<sub>2</sub>O from the Republic of Congo, western Congo Basin,
Biogeosciences, 14, 2267–2281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2267-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2267-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, N. D., Krusche, A. V., Sawakuchi, H. O., Brito, D. C., Cunha, A. C.,
Sousa Moura, J. M., da Silva, R., Yager, P. L., Keil, R. G., and Richey, J.
E.: The compositional evolution of dissolved and particulate organic matter
along the lower Amazon River–Óbidos to the ocean, Mar. Chem., 177,
244–256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.013</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation>
Ward N. D., Sawakuchi, H. O., Neu, V., Less, D. F. S., Valerio, A. M., Cunha, A. C., Kampel, M., Bianchi, T. S., Krusche, A. V., Richey, J. E., and Keil, R.
G.: Velocity-amplified microbial respiration rates in the lower Amazon
River, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett., 3,   265–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10062</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation>
Wassenaar, L. I., Coplen, T. B., and Aggarwal, P. K.: Approaches for
achieving long-term accuracy and precision of <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O and <i>δ</i><sup>2</sup>H for waters analyzed using laser absorption spectrometers, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 48, 1123–1131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es403354n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es403354n</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss, R. F.: Determinations of carbon dioxide and methane by dual catalyst
flame ionization chromatography and nitrous oxide by electron capture
chromatography, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 19, 611–616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/19.12.611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/19.12.611</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation>
Weiss, R. F. and Price, B. A.: Nitrous oxide solubility in water and seawater,
Mar. Chem., 8, 347–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(80)90024-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(80)90024-9</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation>
Wissmar, R. C., Richey, J. E., Stallard, R. F., and Edmond, J. M.: Plankton
metabolism and carbon processes in the Amazon river, its tributaries, and
floodplain waters, Peru-Brazil, May–June 1977, Ecology, 62, 1622–1633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1941517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1941517</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation>
Yoshida, N., Iguchi, H., Yurimoto, H., Murakami, A., and Sakai, Y.: Aquatic
plant surface as a niche for methanotrophs, Front. Microbiol., 30, 1–9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00030</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L., Tian, Y., Myneni, R. B., Ciais, P., Saatchi, S. L., Yi Y.,
Shilong, P., Chen, H., Vermote, E. F., Song, C., and Hwang, T.: Widespread
decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade, Nature, 509,
86–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13265" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13265</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
