<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-409-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of leaves, litter, and soils
of various ecosystems along an elevational and land-use gradient at Mount
Kilimanjaro, Tanzania</article-title><alt-title>Stable isotopes of C and N at Mount Kilimanjaro</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Stable isotopes of C and N at Mount Kilimanjaro}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F. Gerschlauer et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Gerschlauer</surname><given-names>Friederike</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff1">
          <name><surname>Saiz</surname><given-names>Gustavo</given-names></name>
          <email>gsaiz@ucsc.cl</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7794-4403</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Schellenberger Costa</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Kleyer</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dannenmann</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kiese</surname><given-names>Ralf</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences,
Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción,
Concepción, Chile</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of
Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Gustavo Saiz (gsaiz@ucsc.cl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>409</fpage><lpage>424</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>14</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e139">Variations in the stable isotopic composition of carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of fresh leaves, litter, and topsoils were
used to characterize soil organic matter dynamics of 12 tropical
ecosystems in the Mount Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania. We studied a total of
60 sites distributed along five individual elevational transects
(860–4550 m a.s.l.), which define a strong climatic and land-use gradient
encompassing semi-natural and managed ecosystems. The combined effects of
contrasting environmental conditions, vegetation, soil, and management
practices had a strong impact on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed in the different ecosystems. The relative
abundance of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants greatly determined the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a given ecosystem. In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values were largely controlled by land-use intensification and climatic
conditions.</p>
    <p id="d1e239">The large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment factors
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">litter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and low soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios observed
in managed and disturbed systems agree well with the notion of altered SOM
dynamics. Besides the systematic removal of the plant biomass characteristic of
agricultural systems, annual litterfall patterns may also explain the
comparatively lower contents of C and N observed in the topsoils of these
intensively managed sites. Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and calculated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment factors
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">litter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggest the tightest nitrogen cycling at
high-elevation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.s.l.) ecosystems and more open
nitrogen cycling both in grass-dominated and intensively managed cropping
systems. However, claims about the nature of the N cycle (i.e. open or closed)
should not be made solely on the basis of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as other
processes that barely discriminate against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. soil nitrate
leaching) have been shown to be quite significant in Mount Kilimanjaro's forest
ecosystems. The negative correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values with soil
nitrogen content and the positive correlation with mean annual temperature
suggest reduced mineralization rates and thus limited nitrogen availability,
at least in high-elevation ecosystems. By contrast, intensively managed
systems are characterized by lower soil nitrogen contents and warmer
conditions, leading together with nitrogen fertilizer inputs to lower
nitrogen retention and thus significantly higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values. A simple function driven by soil nitrogen content and mean annual
temperature explained 68 % of the variability in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values across all sites. Based on our results, we suggest that in addition to
land-use intensification, increasing temperatures in a changing climate may
promote soil carbon and nitrogen losses, thus altering the otherwise stable
soil organic matter dynamics of Mount Kilimanjaro's forest ecosystems.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page410?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e481">Conversion of natural ecosystems to agriculture is a worldwide phenomenon,
which is of particular significance in tropical regions where human
population growth rates are currently the highest (FAO and JRC, 2012).
Changes in climate and land use significantly alter vegetation composition
and biogeochemical cycles, causing a strong impact on carbon (C) and
nitrogen (N) turnover and stocks (Smith et al., 2014). Tropical forest
biomes are particularly relevant in this context, as they are significant C
storages and N turnover hotspots (Bai et al., 2012; Hedin et al., 2009;
Lewis et al., 2009; Pan et al., 2011; Vitousek, 1984). Considering the
increasing pressure on natural land, it is becoming even more crucial to understand
how anthropogenic interventions affect ecosystem C and N cycling and gain
better knowledge about the main drivers of nutrient cycling, as well as the associated
exchange processes with the atmosphere and hydrosphere in tropical
environments.</p>
      <p id="d1e484">Research exploiting the natural abundance of stable isotopes has proved quite
suitable for investigating potential impacts of land-use and/or climate
change on C and N cycling in terrestrial systems (Michener and Lajtha, 2007;
Panettieri et al., 2017;
Saiz et al., 2015a). Variations in the stable isotopic composition of C
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and N (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in plants and soils are the
result of fractionation processes occurring during ecosystem exchange of C
and N. Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can serve as
valuable indicators about ecosystem state and provide useful insights on how
these systems respond to biotic and abiotic factors (Dawson et al., 2002;
Högberg, 1997; Ma et al., 2012; Pardo and Nadelhoffer, 2010; Peterson and
Fry, 1987; Robinson, 2001).</p>
      <p id="d1e539">Plants discriminate against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (carbon dioxide) during photosynthetic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation depending
on plant metabolism (i.e. C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photosynthetic pathways). Most
tropical grasses typically employ the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photosynthetic pathway
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), while trees and
shrubs use the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> photosynthetic pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) (Bird et al., 1994; Bird and Pousai, 1997;
Cernusak et al., 2013; Farquhar et al., 1980). The distribution of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation shows clear patterns along elevational gradients, with
increasing abundance of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species towards high elevations (Bird et al.,
1994; Körner et al., 1991; Tieszen et al., 1979). Environmental
conditions such as water availability also exert a significant influence on
isotopic discrimination during atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation.
Accordingly, compared to optimal moisture conditions, water stress leads to
the enrichment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants (Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982),
while this isotopic fractionation is less obvious or even absent in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
plants (Ma et al., 2012; Swap et al., 2004).</p>
      <p id="d1e726">The soil organic matter (SOM) pool integrates the isotopic signature of the
precursor biomass over different spatio-temporal scales (Saiz et al., 2015a).
Variation in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values represents a valuable tool to
better assess SOM dynamics, mineralization processes, or reconstruct past
fire regimes (Saiz et al., 2015a; Wynn and Bird, 2007). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of SOM in a given ecosystem is greatly controlled by the relative abundance
of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants due to their contrasting C isotopic
composition. Therefore, strong variations in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
also be used to identify sources of particulate organic matter and
vegetation shifts such as woody thickening. However, fractionation effects
associated with differential stabilization of SOM compounds, microbial
reprocessing of SOM, soil physico-chemical characteristics, and the
terrestrial Seuss effect preclude a straightforward interpretation of soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Saiz et al., 2015a).</p>
      <p id="d1e801">Plant and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relate to environmental and management
conditions controlling N turnover, availability, and losses. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in soils are generally more positive than those of vegetation
due to the relatively large isotopic fractionation occurring during soil N
transformations (Dawson et al., 2002). The N cycle of a given ecosystem may
be characterized as closed if both efficient microbial N retention and
the absence of external N inputs (e.g. atmospheric deposition and fertilizer
additions) prevent substantial gaseous and/or leaching N losses. In contrast,
open ecosystem N cycling is characterized by significant inputs and losses of
N. On the one hand, gaseous N losses from soils are strongly depleted in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the high fractionation factors associated with these
processes (Denk et al., 2017). This results in high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of the residual substrate, which consequently leaves less importance
to impacts of external N additions (Robinson, 2001; Zech et al., 2011). On
the other hand, N leaching seems to only discriminate slightly against
ecosystem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to Houlton and Bai (2009)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of drained water agree well with those of soils
across various natural ecosystems worldwide. Moreover, it is also important
to consider the possibility that soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may also be influenced by other
factors including rooting depth, uptake of different N compounds, and
symbiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixation (Nardoto et al., 2014). Variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of plants and soils have been successfully applied
to characterize N cycling across a large variety of ecosystems worldwide
(Amundson et al., 2003; Booth et al., 2005; Craine et al., 2015a, b;
Martinelli et al., 1999; Nardoto et al., 2014). This includes research work
that has particularly focused on the study of N losses derived from land-use
changes or intensification (Eshetu and Högberg, 2000; Piccolo et al.,
1996; Zech et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e918">Information on ecosystem C and N cycling is still scarce in many tropical
ecosystems, particularly in remote regions of Africa (Abaker et al., 2016;
2018; Saiz et al., 2012; Townsend et al., 2011). Furthermore, feedbacks
between C and N cycles, such as limitations of N availability in ecosystem C
sequestration and net primary productivity in tropical forest, require urgent
investigations (Gruber and Galloway, 2008; Zaehle, 2013). In such a context,
the Kilimanjaro region in Tanzania offers the rare possibility to study a
broad range of tropical ecosystems across contrasting land-use management
intensities and varying climatic conditions. This region hosts a large
variety of semi-natural and managed<?pagebreak page411?> ecosystems as a result of the strong
elevational and land-use gradient.</p>
      <p id="d1e921">We hypothesized that (i) vegetation composition (C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the main control for ecosystem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, whereas
(ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are rather controlled by land-use management
and climatic conditions. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the
potential of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in plant and
soil material to assess C and N cycling across a broad variety of
semi-natural and managed ecosystems under varying climatic conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study sites</title>
      <p id="d1e1016">This study was conducted on the southern slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro
(3.07<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 37.35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 5895 m a.s.l.) in north-east
Tanzania. The climate is characterized by a bimodal precipitation pattern
with a major rainy season between March and May and the other peak between
October and November. Recently, Appelhans et al. (2016) used a network of 52
meteorological stations strategically deployed in the Kilimanjaro region to
measure air temperature and precipitation. They then used geo-statistical and
machine-learning techniques for the gap filling of the recorded
meteorological time series and their regionalization, which provides the
means to calculate the meteorological data used for the complete set of sites
(60) used in our work. Please refer to Appelhans et al. (2016) for more
details. Maximum mean annual precipitation (MAP) of 2552 mm occurs at an
elevation of around 2260 m a.s.l., decreasing towards lower and higher elevations, reaching 657 and 1208 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 871 and 4550 m,
respectively (Table 1). Variations in air temperature are dominated by
diurnal rather than seasonal patterns (Duane et al., 2008). Mean annual
temperature (MAT) decreases with increasing elevation, ranging from
24.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 860 m to 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 4550 m (Table 1).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e1070">General characteristics of ecosystems investigated at Mount
Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.84}[.84]?><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ecosystem</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Land-use type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Elevation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MAP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MAT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col12" align="center">Soil properties </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Soil type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">pH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Clay   (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Sand   (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">carbon (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">nitrogen (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">ratio</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Savanna   (Sav)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(M) extensive grazing, grass cutting</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">971 (40)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">764 (50)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.7 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Leptosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6.6 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">27.3 (4.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">39.3 (8.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.5 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.2 (0.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">13.5 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Maize field   (Mai)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(M) cropped agriculture</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">938 (25)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">674 (34)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.6 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Nitosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.6 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37.4 (4.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">20.3 (7.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.6 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.1 (0.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">11.8 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coffee plantation   (Cof)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(M) cropped agriculture</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1349 (78)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1393 (96)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.8 (0.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Vertisol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.5 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">45.2 (8.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.8 (4.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.2 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.4 (0.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">10.5 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Home garden   (Hom)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(M) cropped agroforestry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1478 (112)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1656 (177)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.7 (0.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.4 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">45.4 (8.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.5 (5.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.7 (1.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.6 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">11.5 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Grassland   (Gra)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(M) extensive grazing, grass cutting</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1506 (84)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1610 (135)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.9 (0.7)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Umbrisol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.1 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.1 (8.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.0 (5.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.3 (2.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.4 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">12.6 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lower montane forest (Flm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(S-N) montane forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1806 (71)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2201 (33)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.5 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.7 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">47.3 (5.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.5 (2.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">22.7 (4.9)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.6 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">13.3 (1.5)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Ocotea</italic> forest   (Foc)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(S-N) montane forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2464 (106)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2388 (73)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.5 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.5 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">52.3 (4.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.4 (2.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">40.2 (1.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.7 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">14.9 (0.7)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Ocotea</italic> forest disturbed   (Fod)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(S-N) montane forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2378 (56)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2334 (35)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.9 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.6 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">53.9 (3.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.1 (2.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">32.0 (1.8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.2 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">15.1 (1.3)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Podocarpus</italic> forest <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Fpo)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(S-N) montane forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2856 (41)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2036 (27)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.6 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.8 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.7 (1.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.4 (1.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">37.0 (1.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.4 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">15.5 (0.8)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Podocarpus</italic> forest disturbed (Fpd)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(S-N) montane forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2904 (48)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2056 (29)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.7 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4.0 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">45.8 (3.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.6 (3.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">33.8 (2.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.7 (0.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">19.9 (1.4)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Erica</italic> forest <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Fer)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(S-N) montane forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3716 (77)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1517 (54)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.2 (0.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.9 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29.5 (5.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">24.1 (6.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">28.1 (2.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.5 (0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">18.9 (0.7)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><italic>Helichrysum</italic> vegetation (Hel)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(S-N) alpine scrub vegetation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4250 (100)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1293 (31)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.2 (0.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Andosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.7 (0.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.9 (1.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">69.9 (9.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.1 (3.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.3 (0.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">12.0 (1.1)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.84}[.84]?><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1073">Land uses are generically classified as
managed (M) and semi-natural ecosystems (S-N). MAP and MAT stand for mean
annual precipitation and temperature, respectively. Climatic values are
according to Appelhans et al. (2016). Data represent mean values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SE</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for different ecosystems. The most representative soil type is
shown for each ecosystem. Soil properties are given for topsoil (0–10 cm
for pH and soil texture, 0–5 cm for soil organic carbon and total
nitrogen).</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page412?><p id="d1e1762">Five altitudinal transects ranging from 860 to 4550 m a.s.l. were
established along the mountain slopes. At each transect, 12 ecosystems
occurring over a strong land-use gradient encompassing intensively managed
cropping systems and semi-natural stands were investigated. Hence, the total
number of plots studied was 60 (5 transects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 ecosystems; Table 1
and Fig. 1). The cropping systems comprised multilayer and multi-crop
agroforestry home gardens (Hom), monoculture coffee plantations (Cof) with
dispersed shading trees, and maize fields (Mai) subject to regular albeit
moderate fertilizer and pesticide applications. Plant litter is regularly
removed from Cof and Mai sites. Home gardens are manually ploughed, while
combustion engine machinery is used for ploughing coffee plantations and
maize fields. Coffee plantations are irrigated with drip irrigation systems.
Both Hom and Cof sites still host indigenous forest trees that include
<italic>Albizia schimperi</italic>, a species that may potentially fix atmospheric N.
This is one of the five most abundant species in two and four of the Hom and
Cof sites, respectively, making up less than 25 % of the vegetation cover
in all cases. Grasslands (Gra) and savannas (Sav) are extensively managed by
means of domestic grazing and occasional grass cutting, thus having
significantly lower anthropogenic disturbances than cropping systems.
Semi-natural ecosystems include several montane forest stands. These include
lower montane (Flm), <italic>Ocotea</italic> (Foc), <italic>Podocarpus</italic> (Fpo),
<italic>Erica</italic> (Fer), and alpine shrub vegetation <italic>Helichrysum</italic> (Hel).
Even though lower montane forests are currently under protection they are
still subject to sporadic illegal logging. In addition to sampling
undisturbed forest ecosystems of <italic>Ocotea</italic> and <italic>Podocarpus</italic>, we
purposely studied sites that had been affected by logging activities and fire
events prior to the establishment of the Kilimanjaro National Park (Soini,
2005): <italic>Ocotea</italic> (Fod) and <italic>Podocarpus</italic> (Fpd) (Table 1). Erica
forests represent Africa's highest forests in the subalpine zone. Higher
above is the alpine zone, the realm of <italic>Helichrysum</italic> vegetation that
is dominated by cushion plants and tussock grasses (Ensslin et al., 2015;
Hemp, 2005). Potential ecosystem productivity and decomposition rates show a
hump-shaped pattern resembling that of precipitation (Supplement Fig. S1). It
is interesting to see the close match between the two variables along the
elevation range, although this trend weakens slightly towards
higher-elevation sites. Optimum growth and decomposition conditions are shown
between 1800 and 2500 m a.s.l. These locations correspond to low-altitude
forest ecosystems (Flm and Foc) that do not experience severe seasonal
limitations in moisture or temperature as is otherwise the case in lower- and
higher-elevation systems that are moisture and temperature limited,
respectively (Becker and Kuzyakov, 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1806">Geographical distribution of investigated ecosystems:
<bold>(a)</bold> along the elevational and land-use gradient. MAP denotes mean
annual precipitation and MAT mean annual temperature. The colours of the
boxes framing the ecosystem names match the colours of symbols in the GeoTIFF
panel below; <bold>(b)</bold> along the southern slope of Mount Kilimanjaro.
Symbols represent individual ecosystems (12) replicated five times (60 study
sites in total).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1821">Detailed physico-chemical characteristics of the dominant soils are listed in
Table 1. Soils in the Mount Kilimanjaro region are mainly derived from volcanic
rocks and ashes. The wide array of climatic conditions present along the
elevational gradient influence soil genesis, which results in the occurrence
of andosols at high elevations and soils of more advanced genesis at lower
elevations (e.g. nitosols) (Majule, 2003).</p>
      <p id="d1e1824">It is extremely difficult to provide reliable estimates of both fertilizer
and pesticide rates used in small household farms in sub-Saharan Africa. This
is because the actual use of these products is strongly dependent on both its
availability in the local and/or regional market, the economic circumstances of each
individual farmer, and individual perceptions about their use (Saiz and
Albrecht, 2016). The only sites receiving fertilizer are the two
monocultures, maize (Mai) fields and coffee (Cof) plantations, and to a
lesser extent the home garden (Hom) sites. In the latter sites Gütlein et
al. (2018) report that weed control is mainly done by hand, and the use of
mineral or organic N fertilizers is low or non-existent. Extensively managed
sites (i.e. Sav and Gra) receive varying amounts of organic inputs as a
result of grazing activities, but again, their actual rates are unknown. A
more detailed explanation on fertilizer and pesticide inputs used in the
region is provided in the Supplement (Table S1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sampling and analyses</title>
      <?pagebreak page413?><p id="d1e1833">Fieldwork took place in February and March in 2011 and 2012. Sampling was
conducted on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m plots established at each of the 60 studied sites (12
ecosystems <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 transects). Surface litter and mineral topsoil (0–5 cm) were
sampled at five locations (four corners and the central point) at each plot.
Additionally, fresh mature leaves of the five most abundant plant species
covering 80 % of total plant biomass per site were collected (Schellenberg
Costa et al., 2017). All sampled materials (leaves, litter, and soil) were
air-dried until constant weight, and leaf material was subsequently
oven-dried at 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 60 h prior to grinding. Soil was sieved
to 2 mm with visible root fragments being further removed prior to grinding
with a mixer mill (MM200, Retsch, Haan Germany). Soil pH was determined with
a pH meter (MultiCal SenTix61, WTW, Weilheim, Germany) in a 0.01 M <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
solution, with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-soil ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Particle size
distribution was determined gravimetrically using the pipette method (van
Reeuwijk, 2002).</p>
      <p id="d1e1899">All soil, litter, and leaf samples were analysed with a dry combustion
elemental analyser (Costech International S.p.A., Milano, Italy) fitted with
a zero-blank autosampler coupled to a ThermoFinnigan DeltaPlus XL using
continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (CF-IRMS) for the determination
of the abundance of elemental C and N and their stable isotopic composition
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Precisions (standard deviations)
on internal standards for elemental C and N concentrations and stable
isotopic compositions were better than 0.08 % and 0.2 ‰,
respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1928">Natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundances are expressed in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> units
according to Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">standard</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">standard</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sample</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the sample, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">standard</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the ratios in Pee Dee Belemnite or
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (international standards for C and N, respectively). The
average values for the plant samples were weighted considering their
relative abundance at each site. Individual values for soil, litter, and
leaves were averaged for each plot.</p>
      <p id="d1e2080">In addition, both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based
enrichment factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calculated following Eqs. (2) and (3):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">litter</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">litter</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2205">These were used as indicators for SOM decomposition dynamics and ecosystem N
status (Garten et al., 2008; Mariotti et al., 1981). Note that we use the
stable isotopic values of litter material rather than fresh leaves
from various species to calculate enrichment factors, since litter provides
a more unbiased representation of the quality, quantity, and spatio-temporal
dynamics of organic inputs entering the SOM pool (Saiz et al., 2015a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2214">The normal distribution of the data was confirmed with the Shapiro–Wilk test.
One-way ANOVA was performed to test for significant differences between
ecosystems, while Tukey's HSD was used as a post hoc procedure to test for
significant differences across sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Correlation analyses
were performed to identify soil, foliar, and climatic variables influencing
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Subsequently, a principal component analysis
(PCA) was conducted to reveal relationships between the main variables
affecting soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The PCA was based on a correlation
matrix including soil (C and N concentrations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH values, sand and clay contents) and climatic
parameters (MAT and MAP). A stepwise multiple regression was used to identify
the main driving parameters determining soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the
elevational transect. All statistical analyses were conducted with R
(version 3.2.2; R Core Team, 2015).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>General soil characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e2306">Soil C and N contents were the highest in forest ecosystems and showed a
decreasing trend towards managed sites (i.e. home gardens, grasslands,
coffee,
and maize fields) (Table 1). Also, natural savannas and <italic>Helichrysum</italic>
ecosystems had lower soil C and N values compared to forest ecosystems. The
low temperatures and sandy nature of the <italic>Helichrysum</italic> sites play a
strong role in their characteristically low productivity and moderate
decomposition potentials (Table 1; Fig. S1), which unquestionably affects the
comparatively low soil C and N contents of these alpine systems.</p>
      <p id="d1e2315">An opposite trend to that of soil C and N abundance was observed for soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, whereby managed sites showed significantly lower values
compared to those of semi-natural ecosystems. Soil pH values revealed acidic
conditions at all sites, with the lowest values observed in forest sites
having comparatively higher MAP (Table 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Variation of {$\protect\chem{\delta^{{13}}C}$} values along the elevational and
land-use gradient}?><title>Variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the elevational and
land-use gradient</title>
      <p id="d1e2350">There were large variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the
elevational and land-use gradient, with distinct differences between managed
and semi-natural ecosystems (Fig. 2). Compared to soils and litter, leaves
invariably showed the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in all the studied
ecosystems, with the exception of grasslands and savannas that exhibited
lower soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than plant material.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e2394">Variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for leaves, litter, and soil
along the Kilimanjaro elevational and land-use gradient. Ecosystem data
represent the average values of five sites (one per each transect), with
each site being composed of five samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Box plots show median
values per ecosystem with whiskers representing the first and third
quartiles. Dots represent outliers. The shaded region represents managed
ecosystems (both intensively and extensively), while those unshaded
indicate semi-natural ecosystems. Lower-case letters show significant
differences between sampled materials within each ecosystem (one-way ANOVA
followed by Tukey's HSD test as a post hoc procedure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
ecosystem acronyms used are as per Table 1. Mai, Cof, and Hom are managed
cropping sites, Gra and Sav are extensively managed grasslands and savannas,
and the rest represent semi-natural ecosystems. Sites are ordered by
increasing altitude.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2440">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of semi-natural ecosystems ranged between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE: soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰;
litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰; leaves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰),
showing a progressive reduction with decreasing elevation (i.e. from 4500 to
1750 m a.s.l.; Fig. S2). The variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values was
much higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) in managed ecosystems located at
lower elevations (i.e. between 860 and 1750 m a.s.l.; Fig. S2). The highest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated ecosystems
(i.e. savannas, maize fields, and grasslands; soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰,
litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, leaves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), while
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were obtained for coffee
plantations and home gardens (soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, leaves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Coffee
plantations showed a slight influence of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation in the soil
data as a result of grasses growing between the rows of coffee plants. No
significant variations were observed between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
soils and those of<?pagebreak page414?> litter and leaves in the ecosystems with a predominance of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>vegetation (savannas, maize fields, and grasslands). Exploratory data
analyses revealed that in most cases soil, litter, leaf, and climatic
variables cross-correlated with each other (Table S2 in the Supplement).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e2716"><bold>(a)</bold> Variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment
factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>itter-soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with elevation;
<bold>(b)</bold> relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment
factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>itter-soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SOC concentration (log
SOC); and <bold>(c)</bold> relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based
enrichment factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>itter-soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. Note: a savanna site with large C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> influence
was removed from the figure for clarity.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2868">Figure 3 shows relatively small variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment
factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) both in undisturbed semi-natural and
extensively managed sites along the elevational gradient, while managed and
disturbed sites show higher and more variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment
factors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2912">Variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment factors along the Kilimanjaro
elevational and land-use gradient. <bold>(a)</bold> Variation in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for leaves, litter, and soil material sampled
along the Kilimanjaro elevational and land-use gradient. Box plots show
median values per ecosystem with whiskers representing the first and third
quartiles. Dots represent outliers. Ecosystem data represent the average
values of five sites (one per each transect), with each site being composed
of five samples. Lower-case letters show significant differences between
sampled materials within each ecosystem (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's
HSD test as a post hoc procedure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> Variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>litter-soil</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated for the different ecosystems along
the elevational and land-use gradient. Dotted box plots indicate ecosystems
dominated by C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation. Capital letters indicate significant
differences between ecosystems (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test as
a post hoc procedure, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The ecosystem acronyms used are the same
as those in Table 1. Sites are ordered by increasing altitude.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Variation of {$\protect\chem{\delta^{{15}}N}$} values along the elevational and
land-use gradient}?><title>Variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the elevational and
land-use gradient</title>
      <?pagebreak page415?><p id="d1e3057">Significantly higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were observed for all sampled
materials in the intensively managed (cropping) systems compared to
semi-natural and grass-dominated ecosystems (Fig. 4a). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for managed systems ranged between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 7.8 ‰
(mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SE: soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, leaves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). By contrast,
semi-natural ecosystems had considerably lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
which ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to 3.6 ‰ (soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰,
litter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, leaves <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). Soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were significantly higher than those of leaves and
litter across all the ecosystems studied, with the only exception being
agroforestry home gardens (Fig. 4a). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of leaves and
litter did not show significant differences within any given ecosystem.</p>
      <p id="d1e3230">Calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment factors showed high
variability across all ecosystems with values ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (Fig. 4b). A differentiation between managed and natural ecosystems
was less clear than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The most negative
enrichment factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) were observed for
<italic>Helichrysum, Erica, Podocarpus</italic> disturbed, and grass-dominated
ecosystems (savannas and grasslands). These enrichment factors were
significantly less negative for montane forests at lower elevations
(<italic>Podocarpus</italic>, <italic>Ocotea</italic>, and lower montane) and intensively
managed (cropping) systems (i.e. home garden, coffee, and maize; Fig. 4b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Impacts of soil and climatic variables on soil {$\protect\chem{\delta^{{15}}N}$}
values}?><title>Impacts of soil and climatic variables on soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values</title>
      <p id="d1e3322">Two principal components (PCs) explained 78.3 % of the total soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation (Fig. 5). The first component explained 55.8 % of the
variability, and included soil chemistry and climatic variables (soil C and N
concentrations, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, soil pH, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
MAP,
and MAT). Highly significant correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were obtained
between PC 1 and the above factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.93, 0.61, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
0.87, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively; Table S3). The second component explained an
additional 22.5 % of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability and included
soil texture (clay and sand contents) and MAT. These variables were highly
correlated with PC 2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.82, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table S3). The principal
component bi-plot showed a strong grouping between managed and semi-natural
ecosystems (Fig. 5). Managed sites clustered around MAT, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and soil pH, while C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated ecosystems (grassland,
savannas, and maize fields) were preferentially influenced by the latter two
variables. In contrast, semi-natural montane forest ecosystems rather
grouped around soil chemical properties such as C and N contents, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio, and MAP, while alpine <italic>Helichrysum</italic> ecosystems clustered
around soil sand content.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e3497">Principal component analysis bi-plot for soil and climate variables
potentially controlling soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Symbols are as per all
previous figures. Acronyms are as per Table 1. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, C: soil carbon content, N: soil nitrogen
content, MAP: mean annual precipitation, clay: soil clay content,
MAT: mean annual temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and pH: soil pH.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3571">In addition to PCA, multiple regression analyses were performed using a
stepwise procedure that identified soil N content and MAT as the main driving
variables explaining the variation in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A paraboloid
model explained 68 % of this variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 6). The
combination of relatively high soil N contents (1 % to 3 %) and low MAT (up
to 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) invariably corresponded to low soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) characteristic of semi-natural ecosystems.
Conversely, the relatively high soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) observed in managed ecosystems corresponded to low soil N
contents (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and comparatively high MAT (17 to 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e3682">Measured and modelled soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values predicted as a
function of soil N abundance and mean annual temperature (MAT). Data points
are classified by generic land uses (i.e. intensively managed cropping
sites, extensively managed grassland and savannas, and semi-natural
ecosystems) observed along the elevational and land-use gradient. The
regression takes the following form: soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MAT) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.86 (soil N) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 (MAT)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (soil N)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adj <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/409/2019/bg-16-409-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3816">The relationship between soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and climatic and
edaphic variables provided valuable information about potentially different
SOM dynamics in the various ecosystems studied, with data showing a clear
differentiation<?pagebreak page416?> between semi-natural and managed ecosystems (Fig. S4). The
former is characterized by comparatively higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (averaging 15.5 ‰ and 1.5 ‰, respectively), while
the latter showed lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values (averaging 11.9 ‰ and 3.5 ‰, respectively). Managed ecosystems
further grouped into intensively cropped (home gardens, maize fields, and
coffee plantations) and extensively managed grass-dominated ecosystems
(savannas and grasslands).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Factors influencing the variation of {$\protect\chem{\delta^{{13}}C}$} values along the
elevational and land-use gradient}?><title>Factors influencing the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the
elevational and land-use gradient</title>
      <p id="d1e3909">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of leaves in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated (semi-natural)
ecosystems at Mount Kilimanjaro increased with elevation (Figs. 1 and S2),
which is in agreement with findings from other mountainous ecosystems in the
tropics, Europe, and North America (Bird et al., 1994; Körner et al.,
1991; Ortiz et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2009). The wider
scatter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed in leaves relative to soils is
most certainly due to the inherently large (interspecific and intraspecific)
variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in plants (Bird et al., 1994). Different
tissues within the plant can present widely divergent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values as a result of fractionation processes associated with the C compounds
involved in their construction (Dawson et al., 2002). Moreover, other factors
including light intensity, humidity, and the reutilization of previously
respired low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the canopy may further contribute
to the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in leaf tissues (Ometto et al.,
2006; van der Merwe and Medina, 1989).</p>
      <p id="d1e4010">While fractionation effects preclude a straightforward interpretation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SOM, this variable provides an integrated measure of
the isotopic composition of the precursor biomass at the ecosystem level
(Bird et al., 2004; Saiz et al., 2015a). Mass balance calculations that
assume (i) 5 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) average root mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) in soil samples
and (ii) leaves having similar isotopic signals as roots show that the
removal of visible sieved roots might cause a very small effect on soil
isotopic values. This would amount to values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰
higher than the original soil isotopic values, with such discrepancy being
even smaller if root samples were considered to have values 0.5 ‰–1 ‰
higher than leaves, as is commonly reported in the literature (calculations
not shown). Besides the natural variability of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values observed in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated semi-natural ecosystems, there were
distinct patterns in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of soil samples collected in
extensively managed, low-elevation ecosystems where woody and grass
vegetation coexist (i.e. grasslands and savannas), which indicates the strong
influence exerted by C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation on the C isotopic composition of all
sampled materials (Fig. 2). The results obtained in semi-natural ecosystems
at Mount<?pagebreak page417?> Kilimanjaro fit well within the interpretative framework for
elevational soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data proposed by Bird et al. (1994).
These authors suggest that besides temperature and atmospheric pressure,
other primary factors influencing soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are the age
and degree of decomposition of SOM and variables related to the
characteristics of the canopy, including the proportion of respired
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is recycled during photosynthesis, the relative
contribution of leaf and woody litter to SOM, and soil moisture.</p>
      <p id="d1e4141">Besides the factors explained above, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are
strongly influenced by the balance between ecosystem C inputs and outputs. It
seems reasonable to assume that in the case of natural ecosystems there may
be a steady state between SOM inputs and decomposition rates. This should be
in contrast with the typically altered nutrient dynamics of disturbed
systems, particularly those under agricultural management (Wang et al.,
2018). Low fractionation factors in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are commonly reported
between plant material and topsoils in natural systems, mainly because of the
relatively limited humification of recent organic matter prevalent in
topsoils (Acton et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2018). Thus, we hypothesized that
if C inputs and outputs were roughly in balance, then the difference in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values between plant material and topsoil would be
smaller in undisturbed sites compared to managed or disturbed sites. The
results shown in Fig. 3 agree well with this notion.</p>
      <p id="d1e4183">Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values decreased with increasing MAP and decreasing
MAT, which also corresponded with higher SOC contents (Fig. S3). This
suggests that the relatively cooler and wetter conditions of high-elevation
semi-natural forest ecosystems (i.e. Foc, Fpo) promote the accumulation of
SOM, which is similar to previous findings of work conducted along
elevational gradients (Bird et al., 1994; Kohn, 2010). Compared to
high-elevation locations, the climatic conditions of mid-elevation ecosystems
are more favourable for the activities of SOM decomposers, as these sites are
consistently warmer and drier than the characteristically cool and
occasionally waterlogged high-altitude ecosystems (Fig. S1; Becker and
Kuzyakov, 2018; Borken and Matzner, 2009; Garten et al., 2009; Kirschbaum,
1995; Leirós et al., 1999). The comparatively high soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed in the disturbed <italic>Podocarpus</italic>
(Fpd) and <italic>Erica</italic> forest (Fer) plots may have been partly caused by
recurrent fire events (Hemp, 2005) leading to reduced SOC contents and higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (Saiz et al., 2015a). Further variations in soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values could also be related to the biochemical
composition of the precursor biomass. For instance, herbaceous vegetation is
pervasive at high elevations and contains relatively low amounts of lignin
– an organic compound characteristically depleted in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Benner et
al., 1987). This may contribute to explaining the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values observed in plant and soil materials in alpine ecosystems dominated by
<italic>Helichrysum</italic> vegetation compared to forest ecosystems at lower
elevations (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e4273">Elevation also has a strong influence on the seasonal litterfall dynamics
observed in Mount Kilimanjaro and thus may have significant implications in the
SOM cycling across the various ecosystems. Becker et al. (2015)
suggest that the large accumulation of particulate organic matter
observed at the end of the dry season in low- and mid-altitude ecosystems may
result in the increased mineralization of easily available substrates (Mganga
and Kuzyakov, 2014) and nutrient leaching (Gütlein et al., 2018) during
the following wet season. Agricultural practices such as the removal of
biomass or ploughing deplete SOM, particularly in intensively managed
systems (i.e. maize, home gardens, and coffee plantations), thus leading to
lower SOC contents and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and slightly higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values than those observed in semi-natural ecosystems at comparable
elevations (e.g. lower montane forests; Fig. S3). Indeed, the relationship
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enrichment factors and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
shown in Fig. 3 is quite informative regarding SOM dynamics. As previously
mentioned, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios provide a good indication of SOM
decomposition processes, typically showing comparatively low values in
managed and disturbed systems. These correspond well with sites having large
enrichment factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰; i.e. intensively managed and
disturbed sites), which agrees with the notion of altered SOM dynamics.
Therefore, besides the systematic removal of plant biomass characteristic of
agricultural systems, annual litterfall patterns may also explain the
comparatively lower contents of C and N observed in the topsoils of
intensively managed sites (Table 1; Figs. S3, S4). Moreover, low-elevation
ecosystems contain a variable mixture of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation,
which have been shown to have differential mineralization dynamics as
demonstrated by incubation experiments (Wynn and Bird, 2007) and field-based
research (Saiz et al., 2015a).</p>
      <p id="d1e4370">Our data show strong relationships between temperature and variables directly
related to SOM dynamics such as soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, C, N, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios (Table S2). These results agree well with recent findings by Becker
and Kuzyakov (2018), who studied SOM decomposition dynamics at these very
sites. An important finding revealed by that study is seasonal
variation in temperature being a major factor controlling litter
decomposition. Their study shows that small seasonal variations in
temperature observed at high-elevation sites exert a strong effect on litter
decomposition rates. Therefore, the authors argue that the projected increase
in surface temperature may result in potentially large soil C losses at these
sites due to the comparatively strong temperature sensitivity to
decomposition that is commonly observed at low temperatures and at high-elevation sites (Blagodatskaya et al., 2016).</p>
      <?pagebreak page418?><p id="d1e4398">Savannas and grasslands are subject to recurrent fire events, and thus the
soils of these ecosystems may potentially contain significant amounts of
fire-derived (pyrogenic) C (Saiz et al., 2015b). This can be partly
demonstrated by the higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios observed in these
ecosystems compared to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated agricultural systems protected from
fire (e.g. maize plantations; Fig. S3d). Moreover, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of soils in grasslands and savannas were lower than those of leaves,
which may be due to the savanna isotope disequilibrium effect (SIDE) (Bird
and Pousai, 1997; Saiz et al., 2015b). The latter concept explains the
difference in C isotopic composition between the precursor vegetation and
pyrogenic C compounds produced during the combustion of biomass. Saiz et al. (2015b)
have demonstrated that savanna fires produce pyrogenic C that is
relatively <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depleted with respect to the precursor biomass.
Furthermore, the combustion of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation produces finer pyrogenic C
particles than woody biomass, resulting in the preferential export of
grass-derived pyrogenic particles from the site of burning, which further
enhances the depletion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these soils (Saiz et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Variation of {$\protect\chem{\delta^{{15}}N}$} values along the elevational and
land-use gradient}?><title>Variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values along the elevational and
land-use gradient</title>
      <p id="d1e4489">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of leaves, litter, and topsoil presented here
(Fig. 4a) agree well with the range of data reported from earlier
investigations in the same study region (Amundson et al., 2003; Zech et al.,
2011), but with our study involving more ecosystems, replicate sites, and a
far larger spatial sampling domain. Overall, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
for montane tropical forest ecosystems in Mount Kilimanjaro are considerably
lower than the mean values reported for a broad variety of tropical lowland
forests worldwide (soil values ranging from 3 ‰ to 14 ‰; de Freitas et
al., 2015; Martinelli et al., 1999; Nardoto et al., 2014; Piccolo et al.,
1996; Sotta et al., 2008). Rather, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed in
the montane forests investigated are in the same range of temperate forest
ecosystems reported in a comprehensive literature review by Martinelli et
al. (1999). These authors argue that, compared to tropical lowland forests, the
lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of temperate and montane tropical forests
result from their lower N availability and thus lower ecosystem N losses.
However, this hypothesis may not completely hold for the montane forest
ecosystems of our study, since Gütlein et al. (2018) reported elevated
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DON concentrations at deep soil solution (80 cm) and
significant nitrogen leaching rates of 10–15 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
relatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment factors observed in the
lower montane, <italic>Ocotea</italic>, and undisturbed <italic>Podocarpus</italic> forest
(Fig. 4b) were probably due to the prevalence of biological dinitrogen
fixation (BNF) at these ecosystems. The assumption of significant BNF is
supported by leaf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values close to 0 ‰ (Fig. 4a)
and is in line with previous works (Craine et al., 2015a; Nardoto et al.,
2014; Robinson, 2001). Furthermore, sporadic measurements of N compounds in
rainfall and throughfall conducted at our forest sites showed substantial
input of N via atmospheric deposition, which may be of the order of N
leaching losses (unpublished results). This agrees well with findings from
Bauters et al. (2018) reporting 18 kg N ha<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N inputs via wet
deposition into tropical forests of the Congo Basin, which are predominantly
derived from biomass burning and long-range atmospheric transport. High N
inputs into these forest ecosystems are likely to be in a similar range as N
outputs (prevailed by leaching losses, particularly where MAP is highest;
Gütlein et al., 2018), and therefore they would not translate to strong
effects on ecosystem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The significantly more
negative enrichment factors observed in the disturbed <italic>Podocarpus</italic> and
<italic>Erica</italic> forests (Fig. 4b) may be related to past fire events (Hemp,
2005; Zech et al., 2011). Burning of vegetation may cause losses of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas and N leachate, resulting in higher soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, thus producing variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment factors (Zech et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e4713">Previous studies have shown that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values generally
increase with land-use intensification (Martinelli et al., 1999; Stevenson et
al., 2010), which corresponds well with the more positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values observed in the intensively managed agricultural systems occurring at
the mountain's foot slope (Fig. 4a). Indeed, agronomic practices such as
fertilization, the removal of plant material after harvest, and ploughing are
factors known to impact N turnover processes that strongly affect
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Bedard-Haughn et al., 2003; Saiz et al., 2016).
However, our values are in the lower range of published data for other
land-use gradients (Aranibar et al., 2008; Eshetu and Högberg, 2000;
Traoré et al., 2015) and may partly be the result of comparably low to
moderate organic and inorganic N fertilization rates currently applied in the
region (anecdotal evidence gathered by the authors and found in the
Supplement). Additionally, the nitrogen isotopic signal of mineral
fertilizers commonly used in the region is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (Bateman and
Kelly, 2007), and thus it may not exert a significant additional bias on the
interpretation of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. However, the addition of
manure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) in Hom systems, although
used in low quantities (Gütlein et al., 2018), may well have contributed
to the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed in this ecosystem (Fig. 4).
Also, we suggest that the use of pesticides may not pose a strong bias in our
isotopic results since their use is limited to intensively managed sites, and
the actual isotopic values of pesticides work in the opposite direction to
the observed data (Fig. 4; Supplement).</p>
      <p id="d1e4815">Compared to other low-elevation managed stands such as home gardens and coffee
plantations, the higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based enrichment factors observed
in maize fields and in grass-dominated ecosystems (grasslands and savannas)
(Fig. 4b) may be related to both the organic inputs resulting from grazing
activities and the influence of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation. Both Aranibar et al. (2008)
and Wang et al. (2010) have suggested that variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values within a given ecosystem could be due to C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
plants preferentially absorbing chemical forms of N with differing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
abundances. Moreover, recurrent fires characteristic of tropical grasslands
and savannas may have also influenced their comparatively high soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, causing the relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based
enrichment factors.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page419?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Factors controlling soil {$\protect\chem{\delta^{{15}}N}$} along the elevational and
land-use gradient}?><title>Factors controlling soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the elevational and
land-use gradient</title>
      <p id="d1e4930">The strong controlling effects exerted by climatic and edaphic factors on
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values agree well with numerous previous works
(Amundson et al., 2003; Conen et al., 2013; Eshetu and Högberg, 2000;
Martinelli et al., 1999; Stevenson et al., 2010). The principal component
analysis of factors controlling soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> revealed a strong
clustering between managed and semi-natural ecosystems (Fig. 5), which was
also reflected in the multiple regression analysis and graphical
representation depicting soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of soil N
concentration and MAT (Fig. 6). Semi-natural ecosystems were characterized by
relatively low soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and occurred across a broad
range of soil N contents in locations with low to medium MAT. By contrast,
intensively managed ecosystems had higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and
corresponded to locations with low soil N contents and high MAT. The negative
correlation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values with soil nitrogen content and the
positive correlation with mean annual temperature suggest reduced
mineralization rates and thus limited nitrogen availability, at least in
high-elevation ecosystems.</p>
      <p id="d1e5012">The sharp contrast observed both in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values between managed and semi-natural ecosystems offers
additional useful information about their potentially contrasting SOM
dynamics (Fig. S4d). Intensively managed sites consistently showed low soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and high soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, which may
initially suggest a more open N cycle and potentially greater N losses as
reported by Gerschlauer et al. (2016) for some of these ecosystems. This may
be
due to the C limitation of heterotrophic microbial N retention under low
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (Butterbach-Bahl and Dannenmann, 2012). However, nitrate
leaching is quite a relevant process that discriminates only slightly against
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Denk et al., 2017), which may confound the interpretation of soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Indeed, Gütlein et al. (2018) have recently
shown that nitrate leaching may be quite significant in Mount Kilimanjaro's
semi-natural forests. Therefore, at least in these ecosystems, claims about
the nature of the N cycle (i.e. open or closed) should not be made solely on the
basis of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5116">Grass-dominated ecosystems (grasslands and savannas) were noticeably
different to the intensively managed croplands, as demonstrated by the higher
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and lower soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the former,
which suggests a lower degree of decomposition of organic matter and
potentially lower N turnover rates (Saiz et al., 2016). Within the
intensively managed sites, the stands under maize cultivation show an
interesting case of enhanced SOM dynamics. These sites are under an intensive
management regime that involves the removal of aboveground vegetation after
harvest. This fact combined with the faster decomposition rates reported for
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived SOM (Saiz et al., 2015a, 2016; Wynn and Bird, 2007) may
invariably lead to their characteristically low SOC and N contents (Table 1;
Figs. S3, S4). Furthermore, low soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios have been reported to
enhance gaseous losses in semi-arid systems, which leads to increased soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Aranibar et al., 2004) and may explain why maize
stands showed the highest soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of all the land
uses studied.</p>
      <p id="d1e5192">Semi-natural ecosystems showed rather high soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios and low
soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values compared to managed sites (Fig. S4d). The
more humid and cooler conditions prevalent in forest ecosystems may limit
decomposition processes, thereby contributing significantly to their higher
SOM abundance (Table 1). A small variation range in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values was also reported by Zech et al. (2011) for semi-natural ecosystems
(Foc and Fpo) when working along the same land-use and elevation gradient.
Like us, these authors also observed a strong significant correlation of soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with MAT, but not with MAP (Table S2). Additionally,
site-specific soil characteristics and the structural composition of
vegetation have a strong influence on ecosystem nutrient dynamics (Saiz et
al., 2012, 2015a). Ecosystem disturbances (e.g. fire, selective logging,
etc.) cause changes in vegetation cover that affect SOM cycling and may
translate into variations in soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (Saiz et al., 2016). Both
<italic>Ocotea </italic>and <italic>Podocarpus</italic> forests contain disturbed (Fod, Fpd)
and undisturbed stands (Foc, Fpo), though only the <italic>Podocarpus</italic>
ecosystems allow for a general overview of disturbance impacts on SOM-related
properties. While changes in the isotopic composition of C and N were not
significant, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were heavily influenced by disturbance
(Fig. S4). Compared to non-disturbed sites, the lower C and N contents
observed in the soil of disturbed ecosystems indicate reduced OM inputs to
the soil and/or enhanced decomposition of SOM (Table 1). The higher soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios observed in the <italic>Podocarpus</italic> disturbed and
<italic>Erica</italic> forests may well be the result of fire, which may
preferentially promote N losses while accruing relatively recalcitrant C
forms (i.e. pyrogenic C). Woody biomass combustion produces pyrogenic C that
accumulates preferentially close to the site of production (Saiz et al.,
2018), thus likely contributing to the higher soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios observed
at these disturbed ecosystems. The lowest soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios among all
semi-natural ecosystems were observed at the alpine <italic>Helichrysum</italic>
sites, which may relate to their characteristically sparse vegetation and
extremely low MAT. Under such circumstances, soil development, biomass inputs,
decomposition processes, and thus soil N turnover may be strongly limited,
as was confirmed by a recent study conducted at one of these sites
(Gütlein et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5333">The variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values combined
with the interpretation of other indices, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based
enrichment factors and soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, enabled a
qualitative characterization of regional differences in C and N<?pagebreak page420?> dynamics as
affected by vegetation characteristics, environmental conditions, and
management activities.</p>
      <p id="d1e5400">Our data show that SOM contents are higher in cold and wet high-elevation
ecosystems than at low-elevation managed sites. Management practices such as
tillage, harvest, and vegetation burning promote the loss of OM, with SOM
decomposition being further enhanced by the warm and moderately wet
conditions of the mountain's foot slope. Based on our results, we suggest
that besides management, increasing temperatures in a changing climate may
promote C and N losses, thus altering the otherwise stable SOM dynamics of
Mount Kilimanjaro's forest ecosystems. Moreover, the current situation of low
N inputs in managed systems of sub-Saharan Africa is likely to change, since
national efforts that aim to increase fertilizer use are currently at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
of recommended rates (Hickman et al., 2014). Therefore, our data may
also be valuable as a generic reference for low-elevation tropical
agrosystems managed under low N inputs, while it may also allow for the
monitoring of expected changes in agricultural management and associated
impacts on the ecosystem N cycle through the study of variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p>
      <p id="d1e5427">In addition to climatic and edaphic factors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of
plant and soil material can largely depend on both the amount and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
signal of atmospheric deposition and BNF, which highlights the
importance of conducting additional measurements of site-specific N cycling
when comparing ecosystem <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values across different biomes
and regions. The combination of qualitative isotope natural abundance studies
at a large number of sites (this study) with more elaborated quantitative
process studies using enriched isotope labelling and N losses on a lower
number of selected sites represents an ideal approach to characterize
the ecosystem C and N cycling of the larger Mount Kilimanjaro region with its
diverse ecosystems, climate, and management.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e5473">Research data can be requested and accessed through the
following link:
<uri>https://www.kilimanjaro.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de/Data/Data.aspx</uri>
(Gerschlauer and Kiese, 2016).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5479">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-409-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-409-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e5488">FG contributed to design, performed the study, and co-wrote the paper; GS
contributed to analyses and co-wrote the paper; DSC and MK provided plant
samples and contributed to writing; MD contributed to writing; and RK
designed the study and contributed to analyses and writing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e5494">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5500">This study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG: KI 1431/1-1 and
KI 1431/1-2) within research unit 1246 (KiLi) and supported by the Tanzanian
Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH), the Tanzania Wildlife
Research Institute (TAWIRI), and the Mount Kilimanjaro National Park
(KINAPA). In addition, the authors thank Andreas Hemp for the selection and
preparation of the research plots, Bernd Huwe for the correction of soil
texture data, all local helpers in Tanzania, and the assistants in the
laboratory of IMK-IFU in Germany. Technical support by the Center of Stable
Isotopes at KIT/IMK-IFU is gratefully acknowledged. Further thanks go to the
following persons from the KiLi project: Tim Appelhans and Thomas Nauss,
Jie Zhang, Gemma Rutten, and Andreas Hemp for providing georeferenced points
underlying the GeoTIFF in Fig. 1b. We also thank four anonymous reviewers and
Jonathan Wynn for insightful comments on the paper.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> The article processing charges for this open-access
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre
of the Helmholtz Association. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:
Yakov Kuzyakov <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: four anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abaker, W. E., Berninger, F., Saiz, G., Braojos, V., and Starr, M.: Contribution
of Acacia senegal to biomass and soil carbon in plantations of varying age
in Sudan, Forest Ecol. Manag., 368, 71–80,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.003</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Abaker, W. E., Berninger, F., Saiz, G., Pumpanen, J., and Starr, M.: Linkages
between soil carbon, soil fertility and nitrogen fixation in Acacia senegal
plantations of varying age in Sudan, PeerJ, 6, e5232,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7717/peerj.5232</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Acton, P., Fox, J., Campbell, E., Rowe, H., and  Wilkinson, M.:
Carbon isotopes for estimating soil decomposition and physical mixing in
well-drained forest soils,   J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 1532–1545, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Amundson, R., Austin, A. T., Schuur, E. A. G., Yoo, K., Matzek, V., Kendall,
C., Uebersax, A., Brenner, D., and Baisden, W. T.: Global patterns of the
isotopic composition of soil and plant nitrogen, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17,
1031, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GB001903</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Appelhans, T., Mwangomo, E., Otte, I., Detsch, F., Nauss, T., and Hemp, A.:
Eco-meteorological characteristics of the southern slopes of Kilimanjaro,
Tanzania, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 3245–3258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4552</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Aranibar, J. N., Otter, L., Macko, S. A., Feral, C. J., Epstein, H. E.,
Dowty, P. R., Eckardt, F., Shugart, H. H., and Swap, R. J.: Nitrogen cycling
in the soil–plant system along a precipitation gradient in the Kalahari
sands, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 359-373.
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00698.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00698.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Aranibar, J. N., Anderson, I. C., Epstein, H. E., Feral, C. J. W., Swap, R. J.,
Ramontsho, J., and Macko, S. A.: Nitrogen isotope composition of soils, C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
plants along land use gradients in southern Africa, J. Arid Environ., 72,
326–337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.06.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.06.007</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page421?><ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bai, E., Houlton, B. Z., and Wang, Y. P.: Isotopic identification of nitrogen
hotspots across natural terrestrial ecosystems, Biogeosciences, 9,
3287–3304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3287-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-3287-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bateman, A. S. and Kelly, S. D.: Fertilizer nitrogen isotope signatures,
Isot. Environ. Heal. S., 43, 237–247, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bauters, M., Drake, T. W., Verbeeck, H., Bodé, S.,
Hervé-Fernández, P., Zito, P., Podgorski, D. C., Boyemba, F.,
Makelele, I., Ntaboba, L. C., Spencer, R. G. M., and Boeckx, P.: High
fire-derived nitrogen deposition on central African forests, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 115, 549–554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714597115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1714597115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Becker, J., Pabst, H., Mnyonga, J., and Kuzyakov, Y.: Annual litterfall
dynamics and nutrient deposition depending on elevation and land use at Mt.
Kilimanjaro, Biogeosciences, 12, 5635–5646,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5635-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-5635-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Becker, J. N. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Teatime on Mount Kilimanjaro: Assessing
climate and land-use effects on litter decomposition and stabilization using
the Tea Bag Index, Land Degrad. Dev., 29, 2321–2329, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Bedard-Haughn, A., van Groenigen, J. W., and  van Kessel, C.: Tracing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through landscapes: potential uses and precautions, J. Hydrol.,
272, 175–190, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00263-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00263-9</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Benner, R., Fogel, M. L., Sprague, E. K., and Hodson, R. E.: Depletion of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in lignin and its implications for stable carbon isotope
studies, Nature, 329, 708–710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/329708a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/329708a0</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Bird, M. I., Haberle, S. G., and Chivas, A. R.: Effect of altitude on the
carbon-isotope composition of forest and grassland soils from Papua New
Guinea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 13–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03487" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93GB03487</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Bird, M. I. and Pousai, P.: Variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the surface
soil organic carbon pool, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 313–322,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GB01197</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Bird, M. I., Veenendaal, E. M., and Lloyd, J. J.: Soil carbon inventories and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along a moisture gradient in Botswana, Glob. Change
Biol., 10, 342–349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00695.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00695.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Blagodatskaya, E., Blagodatsky, S., Khomyakov, N., Myachina, O., and
Kuzyakov, Y.: Temperature sensitivity and enzymatic mechanisms of soil
organic matter decomposition along an altitudinal gradient on Mount
Kilimanjaro, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 22240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22240" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep22240</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Booth, M. S., Stark, J. M., and Rastetter, E.: Controls on Nitrogen Cycling
in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Synthetic Analysis of Literature Data, Ecol.
Monogr., 75, 139–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0988" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/04-0988</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Borken, W. and Matzner, E.: Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C
and N mineralization and fluxes in soils, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 808–824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01681.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01681.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Butterbach-Bahl, K. and Dannenmann, M.: Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Interactions
and Biosphere-Atmosphere Exchange of Nitrous Oxide and Methane, in:
Recarbonization of the Biosphere, edited by: Lal, R., Lorenz, K., Hüttl,
R. F., Schneider, B. U., and von Brau, J., Springer, the Netherlands,
429–443, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Cernusak, L. A., Ubierna, N., Winter, K., Holtum, J. A. M., Marshall, J. D.,
and Farquhar, G. D.: Environmental and physiological determinants of carbon
isotope discrimination in terrestrial plants, New Phytol., 200, 950–965,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/nph.12423</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Conen, F., Yakutin, M. V., Carle, N., and Alewell, C.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
natural abundance may directly disclose perturbed soil when related to
C : N ratio, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 27, 1101–1104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6552" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.6552</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Craine, J. M., Brookshire, E. N. J., Cramer, M. D., Hasselquist, N. J., Koba,
K., Marin-Spiotta, E., and Wang, L.: Ecological interpretations of nitrogen
isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils, Plant Soil, 396, 1–26,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Craine, J. M., Elmore, A. J., Wang, L., Augusto, L., Baisden, W. T.,
Brookshire, E. N. J., Cramer, M. D., Hasselquist, N. J., Hobbie, E. A.,
Kahmen, A., Koba, K., Kranabetter, J. M., Mack, M. C., Marin-Spiotta, E.,
Mayor, J. R., McLauchlan, K. K., Michelsen, A., Nardoto, G. B., Oliveira, R.
S., Perakis, S. S., Peri, P. L., Quesada, C. A., Richter, A., Schipper, L.
A., Stevenson, B. A., Turner, B. L., Viani, R. A. G., Wanek, W., and Zeller,
B.: Convergence of soil nitrogen isotopes across global climate gradients,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 8280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08280" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep08280</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Dawson, T. E., Mambelli, S., Plamboeck, A. H., Templer, P. H., and Tu, K. P.:
Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 33, 507–559,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>de Freitas, A. D. S., de Sá Barretto Sampaio, E. V., de Souza Ramos, A.
P., de Vasconcellos Barbosa, M. R., Lyra, R. P., and Araújo, E. L.:
Nitrogen isotopic patterns in tropical forests along a rainfall gradient in
Northeast Brazil, Plant Soil, 391, 109–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2417-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-015-2417-5</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Denk, T. R. A., Mohn, J., Decock, C., Lewicka-Szczebak, D., Harris, E.,
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Kiese, R., and Wolf, B.: The nitrogen cycle: A review of
isotope effects and isotope modeling approaches, Soil Biol. Biochem., 105,
121–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.015</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Duane, W., Pepin, N., Losleben, M., and Hardy, D.: General Characteristics of
Temperature and Humidity Variability on Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Arct. Antarct.
Alp. Res., 40, 323–334, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ensslin, A., Rutten, G., Pommer, U., Zimmermann, R., Hemp, A., and Fischer,
M.: Effects of elevation and land use on the biomass of trees, shrubs and
herbs at Mount Kilimanjaro, Ecosphere, 6, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00492.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/ES14-00492.1</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Eshetu, Z. and Högberg, P.: Effects of land use on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> natural
abundance of soils in Ethiopian highlands, Plant Soil, 222, 109–117, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
FAO and JRC: Global forest land-use change 1990–2005, in: FAO Forestry Paper
No. 16, edited by: Lindquist, E. J., D'Annunzio, R., Gerrand, A., MacDicken,
K., Achard, F., Beuchle, R., Brink, A., Eva, H. D., Mayaux, P.,
San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., and Stibig, H.-J., Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations and European Comission Joint Research Centre, Rome, FAO,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Farquhar, G. D. and Sharkey, T. D.: Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis,
Annu. Rev. Plant Phys., 33, 317–345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page422?><ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., and Berry, J. A.: A biochemical model of
photosynthetic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assimilation in leaves of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species,
Planta, 149, 78–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00386231</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Garten, J. C., Hanson, P., Todd, J. D., Lu, B., and Brice, D.: Natural
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance as indicators of forest N status
and soil C dynamics, in: Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental
Science, second ed., edited by: Michener, R., Lajtha, K., Blackwell Science,
Oxford, 61–82, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Garten, C. T., Classen, A. T., and Norby, R. J.: Soil moisture surpasses
elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and temperature as a control on soil carbon dynamics in
a multi-factor climate change experiment, Plant Soil, 319, 85–94,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9851-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-008-9851-6</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Gerschlauer, F. and Kiese, R.: SP3_d15N/d13C natural abundance, TN, and SOC,
<uri>https://www.kilimanjaro.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de/Data/Data.aspx</uri>,
last access: 31 August 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Gerschlauer, F., Dannenmann, M., Kühnel, A., Meier, R., Kolar, A.,
Butterbach-Bahl, K., and Kiese, R.: Gross Nitrogen Turnover of Natural and
Managed Tropical Ecosystems at Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Ecosystems, 19,
1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0001-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10021-016-0001-3</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Gruber, N. and Galloway, J. N.: An Earth-system perspective of the global
nitrogen cycle, Nature, 451, 293–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06592</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Gütlein, A., Zistl-Schlingmann, M., Becker, J. N., Cornejo, N. S.,
Detsch, F., Dannenmann, M., Appelhans, T., Hertel, D., Kuzyakov, Y., and
Kiese, R.: Nitrogen turnover and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical
alpine ecosystem, Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Plant Soil, 411, 243–259,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3029-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11104-016-3029-4</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Gütlein, A., Gerschlauer, F., Kikoti, I., and Kiese, R.: Impacts of
climate and land use on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from tropical
ecosystems in the Mt. Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania, Glob. Change Biol., 24,
1239–1255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13944" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.13944</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Hedin, L. O., Brookshire, E. N. J., Menge, D. N. L., and Barron, A. R.: The
Nitrogen Paradox in Tropical Forest Ecosystems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S.,
40, 613–635, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110246" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110246</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Hemp, A.: Climate change-driven forest fires marginalize the impact of ice
cap wasting on Kilimanjaro, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 1013–1023,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00968.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00968.x</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Hickman, J. E., Palm, C. A., Mutuo, P., Melillo, J. M., and Tang, J.: Nitrous
oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions in response to increasing fertilizer addition
in maize (Zea mays L.) agriculture in western Kenya, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys.,
100, 177–187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9636-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10705-014-9636-7</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Högberg, P.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> natural abundance in soil-plant systems,
Tansley Review No. 95, New Phytol., 137, 179–203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00808.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00808.x</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Houlton, B. Z. and Bai, E.: Imprint of denitrifying bacteria on the global
terrestrial biosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 21713–21716,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912111106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0912111106</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Kirschbaum, M. U. F.: The temperature dependence of soil organic matter
decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 753–760, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Kohn, M. J.: Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plants as
indicators of (paleo)ecology and (paleo)climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
107, 19691–19695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004933107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1004933107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Körner, C., Farquhar, G. D., and Wong, S. C.: Carbon Isotope
Discrimination by Plants Follows Latitudinal and Altitudinal Trends,
Oecologia, 88, 30–40, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Leirós, M. C., Trasar-Cepeda, C., Seoane, S., and Gil-Sotres, F.:
Dependence of mineralization of soil organic matter on temperature and
moisture, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 327–335,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00129-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00129-1</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Lewis, S. L., Lloyd, J., Sitch, S., Mitchard, E. T. A., and Laurance, W. F.:
Changing Ecology of Tropical Forests: Evidence and Drivers, Annu. Rev. Ecol.
Evol. S., 40, 529–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173345" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173345</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Ma, J.-Y., Sun, W., Liu, X.-N., and Chen, F.-H.: Variation in the Stable
Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Composition of Plants and Soil along a
Precipitation Gradient in Northern China, PLOS ONE, 7, e51894,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051894" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0051894</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Majule, A. E.: Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Changes on Soil Degradation and
Biodiversity on the Slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, LUCID Project,
International Livestock Research Institute, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Mariotti, A., Germon, J. C., Hubert, P., Kaiser, P., Letolle, R., Tardieux,
A., and Tardieux, P.: Experimental determination of nitrogen kinetic isotope
fractionation: some principles; illustration for the denitrification and
nitrification processes, Plant Soil, 62, 413–430, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Martinelli, L. A., Piccolo, M. C., Townsend, A. R., Vitousek, P. M., Cuevas,
E., McDowell, W., Robertson, G. P., Santos, O. C., and Treseder, K.: Nitrogen
stable isotopic composition of leaves and soil: Tropical versus temperate
forests, Biogeochemistry, 46, 45–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01007573" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF01007573</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Mganga, K. Z. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Glucose decomposition and its incorporation
into soil microbial biomass depending on land use in Mt. Kilimanjaro
ecosystems, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 62, 74–82, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Michener, R. H. and Lajtha, K. (Eds.): Stable isotopes in ecology and
environmental science, 2nd ed., Ecological methods and concepts series,
Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Nardoto, G. B., Quesada, C. A., Patiño, S., Saiz, G., Baker, T. R.,
Schwarz, M., Schrodt, F., Feldpausch, T. R., Domingues, T. F., Marimon, B.
S., Junior, B.-H. M., Vieira, I. C. G., Silveira, M., Bird, M. I., Phillips,
O. L., Lloyd, J., and Martinelli, L. A.: Basin-wide variations in Amazon
forest nitrogen-cycling characteristics as inferred from plant and soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, Plant Ecol. Divers., 7, 173–187,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2013.807524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17550874.2013.807524</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Ometto, J. P. H. B., Ehleringer, J. R., Domingues, T. F., Berry, J. A.,
Ishida, F. Y., Mazzi, E., Higuchi, N., Flanagan, L. B., Nardoto, G. B., and
Martinelli, L. A.: The stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of
vegetation in tropical forests of the Amazon Basin, Brazil, Biogeochemistry,
79, 251–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9008-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-006-9008-8</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Ortiz, C., Vázquez, E., Rubio, A., Benito, M., Schindlbacher, A., Jandl,
R., Butterbach-Bahl, K., and Díaz-Pinés, E.: Soil organic matter
dynamics after afforestation of mountain grasslands in both a Mediterranean
and a temperate climate, Biogeochemistry, 131, 267–280,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0278-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-016-0278-5</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page423?><ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz, W. A.,
Phillips, O. L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S. L., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P.,
Jackson, R. B., Pacala, S. W., McGuire, A. D., Piao, S., Rautiainen, A.,
Sitch, S., and Hayes, D.: A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's
Forests, Science, 333, 988–993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1201609</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Panettieri, M., Rumpel, C., Dignac, M. F., and Chabbi, A.: Does grassland
introduction into cropping cycles affect carbon dynamics through changes of
allocation of soil organic matter within aggregate fractions?, Sci. Total
Environ., 576, 251–263, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Pardo, L. H. and Nadelhoffer, K. J.: Using Nitrogen Isotope Ratios to Assess
Terrestrial Ecosystems at Regional and Global Scales, in: Isoscapes, edited
by: West, J. B., Bowen, G. J., Dawson, T. E., and Tu, K. P., Springer, the
Netherlands, Dordrecht, 221–249, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Peterson, B. J. and Fry, B.: Stable Isotopes in Ecosystem Studies, Annu. Rev.
Ecol. Syst., 18, 293–320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001453</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Piccolo, M. C., Neill, C., Melillo, J. M., Cerri, C. C., and Steudler, P. A.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> natural abundance in forest and pasture soils of the Brazilian
Amazon Basin, Plant Soil, 182, 249–258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00029056</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, D.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an integrator of the nitrogen cycle,
Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 153–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02098-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02098-X</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G. and Albrecht, A.: Methods for smallholder quantification of soil
carbon stocks and stock changes, in: Measurement methods Standard
Assessment Of Agricultural Mitigation Potential And Livelihoods (SAMPLES),
edited by: Rosenstock, T. S., Rufino, M. C., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Wollenberg,
E., and Richards, M., ISBN 978-3-319-29792-7, CGIAR Research Program on
Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, 135–162, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Saiz, G., Bird, M., Domingues, T., Schrodt, F., Schwarz, M., Feldpausch, T.,
Veenendaal, E., Djagbletey, G., Hien, F., Compaore, H., Diallo, A., and
Lloyd, J.: Variation in soil carbon stocks and their determinants across a
precipitation gradient in West Africa, Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1670–1683,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02657.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02657.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Saiz, G., Bird, M., Wurster, C., Quesada, C. A., Ascough, P., Domingues, T.,
Schrodt, F., Schwarz, M., Feldpausch, T. R., Veenendaal, E., Djagbletey, G.,
Jacobsen, G., Hien, F., Compaore, H., Diallo, A., and Lloyd, J.: The
influence of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation on soil organic matter dynamics
in contrasting semi-natural tropical ecosystems, Biogeosciences, 12,
5041–5059, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5041-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-5041-2015</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Saiz, G., Wynn, J. G., Wurster, C. M., Goodrick, I., Nelson, P. N., and Bird,
M. I.: Pyrogenic carbon from tropical savanna burning: production and stable
isotope composition, Biogeosciences, 12, 1849–1863,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1849-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-12-1849-2015</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Saiz, G., Wandera, F. M., Pelster, D. E., Ngetich, W., Okalebo, J. R.,
Rufino, M. C., and Butterbach-Bahl, K.: Long-term assessment of soil and
water conservation measures (Fanya-juu terraces) on soil organic matter in
South Eastern Kenya, Geoderma, 274, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.022</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Saiz, G., Goodrick, I., Wurster, C., Nelson, P. N., Wynn, J., and Bird, M.:
Preferential Production and Transport of Grass-Derived Pyrogenic Carbon in
NE-Australian Savanna Ecosystems, Front. Earth Sci., 5, 115,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2017.00115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Schellenberger Costa, D., Gerschlauer, F., Pabst, H., Kühnel, A., Huwe,
B., Kiese, R., Kuzyakov, Y., Kleyer, M., and Kühn, I.: Community-weighted
means and functional dispersion of plant functional traits along
environmental gradients on Mount Kilimanjaro, J. Veg. Sci., 28, 684–695,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12542" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/jvs.12542</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, P., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E.A., Haberl, H., Harper, R.,
House, J., Jafari, M., Masera, O., Mbow, C., Ravindranath, N. H., Rice, C.
W., Roble do Abad, C., Romanovskaya, A., Sperling, F., and Tubiello, F.:
Chapter 11 – Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), in: Climate
Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, IPCC Working Group III
Contribution to AR5, Cambridge University Press, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Soini, E.: Land use change patterns and livelihood dynamics on the slopes of
Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Agric. Syst., 85, 306–323,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.013</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Sotta, E. D., Corre, M. D., and Veldkamp, E.: Differing N status and N
retention processes of soils under old-growth lowland forest in Eastern
Amazonia, Caxiuanã, Brazil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 40, 740–750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.10.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.10.009</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Stevenson, B. A., Parfitt, R. L., Schipper, L. A., Baisden, W. T., and Mudge,
P.: Relationship between soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and N
losses across land uses in New Zealand, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 139,
736–741, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.020</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Swap, R. J., Aranibar, J. N., Dowty, P. R., Gilhooly, W. P., and Macko, S.
A.: Natural abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation of southern Africa: patterns and implications, Glob.
Change Biol., 10, 350–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00702.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00702.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Tieszen, L. L., Senyimba, M. M., Imbamba, S. K., and Troughton, J. H.: The
distribution of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> grasses and carbon isotope discrimination
along an altitudinal and moisture gradient in Kenya, Oecologia, 37, 337–350,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347910" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00347910</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Townsend, A. R., Cleveland, C. C., Houlton, B. Z., Alden, C. B., and White,
J. W.: Multi-element regulation of the tropical forest carbon cycle, Front.
Ecol. Environ., 9, 9–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/100047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1890/100047</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Traoré, S., Ouattara, K., Ilstedt, U., Schmidt, M., Thiombiano, A.,
Malmer, A., and Nyberg, G.: Effect of land degradation on carbon and nitrogen
pools in two soil types of a semi-arid landscape in West Africa, Geoderma,
241–242, 330–338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.027</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>van der Merwe, N. J. and Medina, E.: Photosynthesis and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios in Amazonian rain forests, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 53, 1091–1094,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90213-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(89)90213-5</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
van Reeuwijk, L. (Ed.): Procedures for Soil Analysis 9, Technical Paper,
International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Vitousek, P. M.: Litterfall, Nutrient Cycling, and Nutrient Limitation in
Tropical Forests, Ecology, 65, 285–298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1939481" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1939481</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page424?><ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Wang, C., Houlton, B. Z., Liu, D., Hou, J., Cheng, W., and Bai, E.: Stable
isotopic constraints on global soil organic carbon turnover, Biogeosciences,
15, 987–995, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-987-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-987-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., D'Odorico, P., Ries, L., and Macko, S. A.: Patterns and
implications of plant-soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
in African savanna ecosystems, Quaternary Res., 73, 77–83,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2008.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.yqres.2008.11.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Wynn, J. G. and Bird, M. I.: C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived soil organic carbon decomposes
faster than its C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> counterpart in mixed C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> soils, Glob.
Change Biol., 13, 2206–2217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01435.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01435.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zaehle, S.: Terrestrial nitrogen–carbon cycle interactions at the global
scale, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20130125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0125" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2013.0125</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Zech, M., Bimüller, C., Hemp, A., Samimi, C., Broesike, C., Hörold,
C., and Zech, W.: Human and climate impact on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> natural abundance
of plants and soils in high-mountain ecosystems: a short review and two
examples from the Eastern Pamirs and Mt. Kilimanjaro, Isotopes Environ.
Health Stud., 47, 286–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2011.596277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10256016.2011.596277</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y., Fan, J., Zhang, W., Harris, W., Zhong, H., Hu, Z., and Song, L.:
Factors influencing altitudinal patterns of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plant foliar carbon
isotope composition of grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China, Alpine
Bot., 121, 79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-011-0093-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00035-011-0093-5</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y., Jiang, Y., Liu, Q., Kang, M., Spehn, E. M., and Körner, C.:
Elevational Trends of Biodiversity and Plant Traits Do Not Converge – A Test
in the Helan Range, NW China, Plant Ecol., 205, 273–283, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of leaves, litter, and soils of various ecosystems along an elevational and land-use gradient at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Variations in the stable isotopic composition of carbon (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C)
and nitrogen (<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N) of fresh leaves, litter, and topsoils were
used to characterize soil organic matter dynamics of 12 tropical
ecosystems in the Mount Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania. We studied a total of
60 sites distributed along five individual elevational transects
(860–4550&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l.), which define a strong climatic and land-use gradient
encompassing semi-natural and managed ecosystems. The combined effects of
contrasting environmental conditions, vegetation, soil, and management
practices had a strong impact on the <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and
<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N values observed in the different ecosystems. The relative
abundance of C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> plants greatly determined the
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of a given ecosystem. In contrast, <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N
values were largely controlled by land-use intensification and climatic
conditions.</p><p>The large <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C enrichment factors
(<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>litter</sub>&thinsp;−&thinsp;<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>soil</sub>) and low soil C∕N ratios observed
in managed and disturbed systems agree well with the notion of altered SOM
dynamics. Besides the systematic removal of the plant biomass characteristic of
agricultural systems, annual litterfall patterns may also explain the
comparatively lower contents of C and N observed in the topsoils of these
intensively managed sites. Both <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N values and calculated
<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N-based enrichment factors
(<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N<sub>litter</sub>&thinsp;−&thinsp;<i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N<sub>soil</sub>) suggest the tightest nitrogen cycling at
high-elevation (<i>&gt;</i> 3000&thinsp;m&thinsp;a.s.l.) ecosystems and more open
nitrogen cycling both in grass-dominated and intensively managed cropping
systems. However, claims about the nature of the N cycle (i.e. open or closed)
should not be made solely on the basis of soil <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N as other
processes that barely discriminate against <sup>15</sup>N (i.e. soil nitrate
leaching) have been shown to be quite significant in Mount Kilimanjaro's forest
ecosystems. The negative correlation of <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N values with soil
nitrogen content and the positive correlation with mean annual temperature
suggest reduced mineralization rates and thus limited nitrogen availability,
at least in high-elevation ecosystems. By contrast, intensively managed
systems are characterized by lower soil nitrogen contents and warmer
conditions, leading together with nitrogen fertilizer inputs to lower
nitrogen retention and thus significantly higher soil <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N
values. A simple function driven by soil nitrogen content and mean annual
temperature explained 68&thinsp;% of the variability in soil <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N
values across all sites. Based on our results, we suggest that in addition to
land-use intensification, increasing temperatures in a changing climate may
promote soil carbon and nitrogen losses, thus altering the otherwise stable
soil organic matter dynamics of Mount Kilimanjaro's forest ecosystems.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abaker, W. E., Berninger, F., Saiz, G., Braojos, V., and Starr, M.: Contribution
of Acacia senegal to biomass and soil carbon in plantations of varying age
in Sudan, Forest Ecol. Manag., 368, 71–80,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.003</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Abaker, W. E., Berninger, F., Saiz, G., Pumpanen, J., and Starr, M.: Linkages
between soil carbon, soil fertility and nitrogen fixation in Acacia senegal
plantations of varying age in Sudan, PeerJ, 6, e5232,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5232</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Acton, P., Fox, J., Campbell, E., Rowe, H., and  Wilkinson, M.:
Carbon isotopes for estimating soil decomposition and physical mixing in
well-drained forest soils,   J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 1532–1545, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Amundson, R., Austin, A. T., Schuur, E. A. G., Yoo, K., Matzek, V., Kendall,
C., Uebersax, A., Brenner, D., and Baisden, W. T.: Global patterns of the
isotopic composition of soil and plant nitrogen, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17,
1031, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001903" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001903</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Appelhans, T., Mwangomo, E., Otte, I., Detsch, F., Nauss, T., and Hemp, A.:
Eco-meteorological characteristics of the southern slopes of Kilimanjaro,
Tanzania, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 3245–3258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4552</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Aranibar, J. N., Otter, L., Macko, S. A., Feral, C. J., Epstein, H. E.,
Dowty, P. R., Eckardt, F., Shugart, H. H., and Swap, R. J.: Nitrogen cycling
in the soil–plant system along a precipitation gradient in the Kalahari
sands, Glob. Change Biol., 10, 359-373.
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00698.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00698.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Aranibar, J. N., Anderson, I. C., Epstein, H. E., Feral, C. J. W., Swap, R. J.,
Ramontsho, J., and Macko, S. A.: Nitrogen isotope composition of soils, C<sub>3</sub> and
C<sub>4</sub>
plants along land use gradients in southern Africa, J. Arid Environ., 72,
326–337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.06.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.06.007</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bai, E., Houlton, B. Z., and Wang, Y. P.: Isotopic identification of nitrogen
hotspots across natural terrestrial ecosystems, Biogeosciences, 9,
3287–3304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3287-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3287-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bateman, A. S. and Kelly, S. D.: Fertilizer nitrogen isotope signatures,
Isot. Environ. Heal. S., 43, 237–247, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bauters, M., Drake, T. W., Verbeeck, H., Bodé, S.,
Hervé-Fernández, P., Zito, P., Podgorski, D. C., Boyemba, F.,
Makelele, I., Ntaboba, L. C., Spencer, R. G. M., and Boeckx, P.: High
fire-derived nitrogen deposition on central African forests, P. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 115, 549–554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714597115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714597115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Becker, J., Pabst, H., Mnyonga, J., and Kuzyakov, Y.: Annual litterfall
dynamics and nutrient deposition depending on elevation and land use at Mt.
Kilimanjaro, Biogeosciences, 12, 5635–5646,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5635-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5635-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Becker, J. N. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Teatime on Mount Kilimanjaro: Assessing
climate and land-use effects on litter decomposition and stabilization using
the Tea Bag Index, Land Degrad. Dev., 29, 2321–2329, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bedard-Haughn, A., van Groenigen, J. W., and  van Kessel, C.: Tracing
<sup>15</sup>N through landscapes: potential uses and precautions, J. Hydrol.,
272, 175–190, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00263-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00263-9</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Benner, R., Fogel, M. L., Sprague, E. K., and Hodson, R. E.: Depletion of
<sup>13</sup>C in lignin and its implications for stable carbon isotope
studies, Nature, 329, 708–710, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/329708a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/329708a0</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Bird, M. I., Haberle, S. G., and Chivas, A. R.: Effect of altitude on the
carbon-isotope composition of forest and grassland soils from Papua New
Guinea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 13–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03487" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03487</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bird, M. I. and Pousai, P.: Variations of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C in the surface
soil organic carbon pool, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 313–322,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01197" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB01197</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Bird, M. I., Veenendaal, E. M., and Lloyd, J. J.: Soil carbon inventories and
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C along a moisture gradient in Botswana, Glob. Change
Biol., 10, 342–349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00695.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00695.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Blagodatskaya, E., Blagodatsky, S., Khomyakov, N., Myachina, O., and
Kuzyakov, Y.: Temperature sensitivity and enzymatic mechanisms of soil
organic matter decomposition along an altitudinal gradient on Mount
Kilimanjaro, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 22240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22240" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22240</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Booth, M. S., Stark, J. M., and Rastetter, E.: Controls on Nitrogen Cycling
in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Synthetic Analysis of Literature Data, Ecol.
Monogr., 75, 139–157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0988" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0988</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Borken, W. and Matzner, E.: Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C
and N mineralization and fluxes in soils, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 808–824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01681.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01681.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Butterbach-Bahl, K. and Dannenmann, M.: Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Interactions
and Biosphere-Atmosphere Exchange of Nitrous Oxide and Methane, in:
Recarbonization of the Biosphere, edited by: Lal, R., Lorenz, K., Hüttl,
R. F., Schneider, B. U., and von Brau, J., Springer, the Netherlands,
429–443, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cernusak, L. A., Ubierna, N., Winter, K., Holtum, J. A. M., Marshall, J. D.,
and Farquhar, G. D.: Environmental and physiological determinants of carbon
isotope discrimination in terrestrial plants, New Phytol., 200, 950–965,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12423</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Conen, F., Yakutin, M. V., Carle, N., and Alewell, C.: <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N
natural abundance may directly disclose perturbed soil when related to
C&thinsp;:&thinsp;N ratio, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 27, 1101–1104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6552" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6552</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Craine, J. M., Brookshire, E. N. J., Cramer, M. D., Hasselquist, N. J., Koba,
K., Marin-Spiotta, E., and Wang, L.: Ecological interpretations of nitrogen
isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils, Plant Soil, 396, 1–26,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Craine, J. M., Elmore, A. J., Wang, L., Augusto, L., Baisden, W. T.,
Brookshire, E. N. J., Cramer, M. D., Hasselquist, N. J., Hobbie, E. A.,
Kahmen, A., Koba, K., Kranabetter, J. M., Mack, M. C., Marin-Spiotta, E.,
Mayor, J. R., McLauchlan, K. K., Michelsen, A., Nardoto, G. B., Oliveira, R.
S., Perakis, S. S., Peri, P. L., Quesada, C. A., Richter, A., Schipper, L.
A., Stevenson, B. A., Turner, B. L., Viani, R. A. G., Wanek, W., and Zeller,
B.: Convergence of soil nitrogen isotopes across global climate gradients,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 8280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08280" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08280</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Dawson, T. E., Mambelli, S., Plamboeck, A. H., Templer, P. H., and Tu, K. P.:
Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 33, 507–559,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
de Freitas, A. D. S., de Sá Barretto Sampaio, E. V., de Souza Ramos, A.
P., de Vasconcellos Barbosa, M. R., Lyra, R. P., and Araújo, E. L.:
Nitrogen isotopic patterns in tropical forests along a rainfall gradient in
Northeast Brazil, Plant Soil, 391, 109–122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2417-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2417-5</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Denk, T. R. A., Mohn, J., Decock, C., Lewicka-Szczebak, D., Harris, E.,
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Kiese, R., and Wolf, B.: The nitrogen cycle: A review of
isotope effects and isotope modeling approaches, Soil Biol. Biochem., 105,
121–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.015</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Duane, W., Pepin, N., Losleben, M., and Hardy, D.: General Characteristics of
Temperature and Humidity Variability on Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Arct. Antarct.
Alp. Res., 40, 323–334, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Ensslin, A., Rutten, G., Pommer, U., Zimmermann, R., Hemp, A., and Fischer,
M.: Effects of elevation and land use on the biomass of trees, shrubs and
herbs at Mount Kilimanjaro, Ecosphere, 6, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00492.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00492.1</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Eshetu, Z. and Högberg, P.: Effects of land use on <sup>15</sup>N natural
abundance of soils in Ethiopian highlands, Plant Soil, 222, 109–117, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
FAO and JRC: Global forest land-use change 1990–2005, in: FAO Forestry Paper
No. 16, edited by: Lindquist, E. J., D'Annunzio, R., Gerrand, A., MacDicken,
K., Achard, F., Beuchle, R., Brink, A., Eva, H. D., Mayaux, P.,
San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., and Stibig, H.-J., Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations and European Comission Joint Research Centre, Rome, FAO,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Farquhar, G. D. and Sharkey, T. D.: Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis,
Annu. Rev. Plant Phys., 33, 317–345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., and Berry, J. A.: A biochemical model of
photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation in leaves of C<sub>3</sub> species,
Planta, 149, 78–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Garten, J. C., Hanson, P., Todd, J. D., Lu, B., and Brice, D.: Natural
<sup>15</sup>N and <sup>13</sup>C abundance as indicators of forest N status
and soil C dynamics, in: Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental
Science, second ed., edited by: Michener, R., Lajtha, K., Blackwell Science,
Oxford, 61–82, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Garten, C. T., Classen, A. T., and Norby, R. J.: Soil moisture surpasses
elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and temperature as a control on soil carbon dynamics in
a multi-factor climate change experiment, Plant Soil, 319, 85–94,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9851-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9851-6</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Gerschlauer, F. and Kiese, R.: SP3_d15N/d13C natural abundance, TN, and SOC,
<a href="https://www.kilimanjaro.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de/Data/Data.aspx" target="_blank">https://www.kilimanjaro.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de/Data/Data.aspx</a>,
last access: 31 August 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Gerschlauer, F., Dannenmann, M., Kühnel, A., Meier, R., Kolar, A.,
Butterbach-Bahl, K., and Kiese, R.: Gross Nitrogen Turnover of Natural and
Managed Tropical Ecosystems at Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Ecosystems, 19,
1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0001-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0001-3</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N. and Galloway, J. N.: An Earth-system perspective of the global
nitrogen cycle, Nature, 451, 293–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06592" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06592</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Gütlein, A., Zistl-Schlingmann, M., Becker, J. N., Cornejo, N. S.,
Detsch, F., Dannenmann, M., Appelhans, T., Hertel, D., Kuzyakov, Y., and
Kiese, R.: Nitrogen turnover and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical
alpine ecosystem, Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Plant Soil, 411, 243–259,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3029-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3029-4</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Gütlein, A., Gerschlauer, F., Kikoti, I., and Kiese, R.: Impacts of
climate and land use on N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes from tropical
ecosystems in the Mt. Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania, Glob. Change Biol., 24,
1239–1255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13944" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13944</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Hedin, L. O., Brookshire, E. N. J., Menge, D. N. L., and Barron, A. R.: The
Nitrogen Paradox in Tropical Forest Ecosystems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S.,
40, 613–635, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110246" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110246</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Hemp, A.: Climate change-driven forest fires marginalize the impact of ice
cap wasting on Kilimanjaro, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 1013–1023,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00968.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00968.x</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Hickman, J. E., Palm, C. A., Mutuo, P., Melillo, J. M., and Tang, J.: Nitrous
oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions in response to increasing fertilizer addition
in maize (Zea mays L.) agriculture in western Kenya, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys.,
100, 177–187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9636-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9636-7</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Högberg, P.: <sup>15</sup>N natural abundance in soil-plant systems,
Tansley Review No. 95, New Phytol., 137, 179–203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00808.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00808.x</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Houlton, B. Z. and Bai, E.: Imprint of denitrifying bacteria on the global
terrestrial biosphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 21713–21716,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912111106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912111106</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kirschbaum, M. U. F.: The temperature dependence of soil organic matter
decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 753–760, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kohn, M. J.: Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C<sub>3</sub> plants as
indicators of (paleo)ecology and (paleo)climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
107, 19691–19695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004933107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004933107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Körner, C., Farquhar, G. D., and Wong, S. C.: Carbon Isotope
Discrimination by Plants Follows Latitudinal and Altitudinal Trends,
Oecologia, 88, 30–40, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Leirós, M. C., Trasar-Cepeda, C., Seoane, S., and Gil-Sotres, F.:
Dependence of mineralization of soil organic matter on temperature and
moisture, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 327–335,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00129-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00129-1</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Lewis, S. L., Lloyd, J., Sitch, S., Mitchard, E. T. A., and Laurance, W. F.:
Changing Ecology of Tropical Forests: Evidence and Drivers, Annu. Rev. Ecol.
Evol. S., 40, 529–549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173345" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173345</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J.-Y., Sun, W., Liu, X.-N., and Chen, F.-H.: Variation in the Stable
Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Composition of Plants and Soil along a
Precipitation Gradient in Northern China, PLOS ONE, 7, e51894,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051894" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051894</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Majule, A. E.: Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Changes on Soil Degradation and
Biodiversity on the Slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, LUCID Project,
International Livestock Research Institute, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Mariotti, A., Germon, J. C., Hubert, P., Kaiser, P., Letolle, R., Tardieux,
A., and Tardieux, P.: Experimental determination of nitrogen kinetic isotope
fractionation: some principles; illustration for the denitrification and
nitrification processes, Plant Soil, 62, 413–430, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Martinelli, L. A., Piccolo, M. C., Townsend, A. R., Vitousek, P. M., Cuevas,
E., McDowell, W., Robertson, G. P., Santos, O. C., and Treseder, K.: Nitrogen
stable isotopic composition of leaves and soil: Tropical versus temperate
forests, Biogeochemistry, 46, 45–65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01007573" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01007573</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Mganga, K. Z. and Kuzyakov, Y.: Glucose decomposition and its incorporation
into soil microbial biomass depending on land use in Mt. Kilimanjaro
ecosystems, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 62, 74–82, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Michener, R. H. and Lajtha, K. (Eds.): Stable isotopes in ecology and
environmental science, 2nd ed., Ecological methods and concepts series,
Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Nardoto, G. B., Quesada, C. A., Patiño, S., Saiz, G., Baker, T. R.,
Schwarz, M., Schrodt, F., Feldpausch, T. R., Domingues, T. F., Marimon, B.
S., Junior, B.-H. M., Vieira, I. C. G., Silveira, M., Bird, M. I., Phillips,
O. L., Lloyd, J., and Martinelli, L. A.: Basin-wide variations in Amazon
forest nitrogen-cycling characteristics as inferred from plant and soil
<sup>15</sup>N  : <sup>14</sup>N measurements, Plant Ecol. Divers., 7, 173–187,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2013.807524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2013.807524</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Ometto, J. P. H. B., Ehleringer, J. R., Domingues, T. F., Berry, J. A.,
Ishida, F. Y., Mazzi, E., Higuchi, N., Flanagan, L. B., Nardoto, G. B., and
Martinelli, L. A.: The stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of
vegetation in tropical forests of the Amazon Basin, Brazil, Biogeochemistry,
79, 251–274, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9008-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9008-8</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ortiz, C., Vázquez, E., Rubio, A., Benito, M., Schindlbacher, A., Jandl,
R., Butterbach-Bahl, K., and Díaz-Pinés, E.: Soil organic matter
dynamics after afforestation of mountain grasslands in both a Mediterranean
and a temperate climate, Biogeochemistry, 131, 267–280,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0278-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0278-5</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz, W. A.,
Phillips, O. L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S. L., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P.,
Jackson, R. B., Pacala, S. W., McGuire, A. D., Piao, S., Rautiainen, A.,
Sitch, S., and Hayes, D.: A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's
Forests, Science, 333, 988–993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Panettieri, M., Rumpel, C., Dignac, M. F., and Chabbi, A.: Does grassland
introduction into cropping cycles affect carbon dynamics through changes of
allocation of soil organic matter within aggregate fractions?, Sci. Total
Environ., 576, 251–263, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Pardo, L. H. and Nadelhoffer, K. J.: Using Nitrogen Isotope Ratios to Assess
Terrestrial Ecosystems at Regional and Global Scales, in: Isoscapes, edited
by: West, J. B., Bowen, G. J., Dawson, T. E., and Tu, K. P., Springer, the
Netherlands, Dordrecht, 221–249, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, B. J. and Fry, B.: Stable Isotopes in Ecosystem Studies, Annu. Rev.
Ecol. Syst., 18, 293–320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001453</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Piccolo, M. C., Neill, C., Melillo, J. M., Cerri, C. C., and Steudler, P. A.:
<sup>15</sup>N natural abundance in forest and pasture soils of the Brazilian
Amazon Basin, Plant Soil, 182, 249–258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029056</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, D.: <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N as an integrator of the nitrogen cycle,
Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 153–162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02098-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02098-X</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G. and Albrecht, A.: Methods for smallholder quantification of soil
carbon stocks and stock changes, in: Measurement methods Standard
Assessment Of Agricultural Mitigation Potential And Livelihoods (SAMPLES),
edited by: Rosenstock, T. S., Rufino, M. C., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Wollenberg,
E., and Richards, M., ISBN 978-3-319-29792-7, CGIAR Research Program on
Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, 135–162, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G., Bird, M., Domingues, T., Schrodt, F., Schwarz, M., Feldpausch, T.,
Veenendaal, E., Djagbletey, G., Hien, F., Compaore, H., Diallo, A., and
Lloyd, J.: Variation in soil carbon stocks and their determinants across a
precipitation gradient in West Africa, Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1670–1683,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02657.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02657.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G., Bird, M., Wurster, C., Quesada, C. A., Ascough, P., Domingues, T.,
Schrodt, F., Schwarz, M., Feldpausch, T. R., Veenendaal, E., Djagbletey, G.,
Jacobsen, G., Hien, F., Compaore, H., Diallo, A., and Lloyd, J.: The
influence of C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> vegetation on soil organic matter dynamics
in contrasting semi-natural tropical ecosystems, Biogeosciences, 12,
5041–5059, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5041-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5041-2015</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G., Wynn, J. G., Wurster, C. M., Goodrick, I., Nelson, P. N., and Bird,
M. I.: Pyrogenic carbon from tropical savanna burning: production and stable
isotope composition, Biogeosciences, 12, 1849–1863,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1849-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1849-2015</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G., Wandera, F. M., Pelster, D. E., Ngetich, W., Okalebo, J. R.,
Rufino, M. C., and Butterbach-Bahl, K.: Long-term assessment of soil and
water conservation measures (Fanya-juu terraces) on soil organic matter in
South Eastern Kenya, Geoderma, 274, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.022</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Saiz, G., Goodrick, I., Wurster, C., Nelson, P. N., Wynn, J., and Bird, M.:
Preferential Production and Transport of Grass-Derived Pyrogenic Carbon in
NE-Australian Savanna Ecosystems, Front. Earth Sci., 5, 115,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Schellenberger Costa, D., Gerschlauer, F., Pabst, H., Kühnel, A., Huwe,
B., Kiese, R., Kuzyakov, Y., Kleyer, M., and Kühn, I.: Community-weighted
means and functional dispersion of plant functional traits along
environmental gradients on Mount Kilimanjaro, J. Veg. Sci., 28, 684–695,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12542" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12542</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, P., Clark, H., Dong, H., Elsiddig, E.A., Haberl, H., Harper, R.,
House, J., Jafari, M., Masera, O., Mbow, C., Ravindranath, N. H., Rice, C.
W., Roble do Abad, C., Romanovskaya, A., Sperling, F., and Tubiello, F.:
Chapter 11 – Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), in: Climate
Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, IPCC Working Group III
Contribution to AR5, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Soini, E.: Land use change patterns and livelihood dynamics on the slopes of
Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, Agric. Syst., 85, 306–323,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.013</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Sotta, E. D., Corre, M. D., and Veldkamp, E.: Differing N status and N
retention processes of soils under old-growth lowland forest in Eastern
Amazonia, Caxiuanã, Brazil, Soil Biol. Biochem., 40, 740–750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.10.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.10.009</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, B. A., Parfitt, R. L., Schipper, L. A., Baisden, W. T., and Mudge,
P.: Relationship between soil <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N, C∕N and N
losses across land uses in New Zealand, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 139,
736–741, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.020</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Swap, R. J., Aranibar, J. N., Dowty, P. R., Gilhooly, W. P., and Macko, S.
A.: Natural abundance of <sup>13</sup>C and <sup>15</sup>N in C<sub>3</sub> and
C<sub>4</sub> vegetation of southern Africa: patterns and implications, Glob.
Change Biol., 10, 350–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00702.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00702.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Tieszen, L. L., Senyimba, M. M., Imbamba, S. K., and Troughton, J. H.: The
distribution of C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> grasses and carbon isotope discrimination
along an altitudinal and moisture gradient in Kenya, Oecologia, 37, 337–350,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347910" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347910</a>, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Townsend, A. R., Cleveland, C. C., Houlton, B. Z., Alden, C. B., and White,
J. W.: Multi-element regulation of the tropical forest carbon cycle, Front.
Ecol. Environ., 9, 9–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1890/100047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1890/100047</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Traoré, S., Ouattara, K., Ilstedt, U., Schmidt, M., Thiombiano, A.,
Malmer, A., and Nyberg, G.: Effect of land degradation on carbon and nitrogen
pools in two soil types of a semi-arid landscape in West Africa, Geoderma,
241–242, 330–338, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.027</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
van der Merwe, N. J. and Medina, E.: Photosynthesis and <sup>13</sup>C<sup>12</sup>C
ratios in Amazonian rain forests, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 53, 1091–1094,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90213-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(89)90213-5</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
van Reeuwijk, L. (Ed.): Procedures for Soil Analysis 9, Technical Paper,
International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Vitousek, P. M.: Litterfall, Nutrient Cycling, and Nutrient Limitation in
Tropical Forests, Ecology, 65, 285–298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1939481" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1939481</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C., Houlton, B. Z., Liu, D., Hou, J., Cheng, W., and Bai, E.: Stable
isotopic constraints on global soil organic carbon turnover, Biogeosciences,
15, 987–995, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-987-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-987-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., D'Odorico, P., Ries, L., and Macko, S. A.: Patterns and
implications of plant-soil <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N values
in African savanna ecosystems, Quaternary Res., 73, 77–83,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2008.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2008.11.004</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wynn, J. G. and Bird, M. I.: C<sub>4</sub>-derived soil organic carbon decomposes
faster than its C<sub>3</sub> counterpart in mixed C<sub>3</sub>∕C<sub>4</sub> soils, Glob.
Change Biol., 13, 2206–2217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01435.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01435.x</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zaehle, S.: Terrestrial nitrogen–carbon cycle interactions at the global
scale, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20130125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0125" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0125</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Zech, M., Bimüller, C., Hemp, A., Samimi, C., Broesike, C., Hörold,
C., and Zech, W.: Human and climate impact on <sup>15</sup>N natural abundance
of plants and soils in high-mountain ecosystems: a short review and two
examples from the Eastern Pamirs and Mt. Kilimanjaro, Isotopes Environ.
Health Stud., 47, 286–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2011.596277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2011.596277</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y., Fan, J., Zhang, W., Harris, W., Zhong, H., Hu, Z., and Song, L.:
Factors influencing altitudinal patterns of C<sub>3</sub> plant foliar carbon
isotope composition of grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China, Alpine
Bot., 121, 79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-011-0093-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-011-0093-5</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y., Jiang, Y., Liu, Q., Kang, M., Spehn, E. M., and Körner, C.:
Elevational Trends of Biodiversity and Plant Traits Do Not Converge – A Test
in the Helan Range, NW China, Plant Ecol., 205, 273–283, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
