<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-4601-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production in tropical peat soil microcosms</article-title><alt-title>Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and {$\chem{N_{{2}}O}$}
production}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~Buessecker et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Buessecker</surname><given-names>Steffen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tylor</surname><given-names>Kaitlyn</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Nye</surname><given-names>Joshua</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Holbert</surname><given-names>Keith E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-1954</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Urquiza Muñoz</surname><given-names>Jose D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Glass</surname><given-names>Jennifer B.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0775-2486</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff8">
          <name><surname>Hartnett</surname><given-names>Hilairy E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-7844</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff9">
          <name><surname>Cadillo-Quiroz</surname><given-names>Hinsby</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State
University, Tempe, Arizona, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Laboratory of Soil Research, Research Institute of Amazonia's Natural
Resources, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>National University of the Peruvian Amazon, Iquitos, Loreto,
Peru</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>School of Forestry, National University of the Peruvian Amazon, Pevas
584, Iquitos, Loreto, Peru</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department for Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University,
Tempe, Arizona, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">H. Cadillo-Quiroz (hinsby@asu.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>4601</fpage><lpage>4612</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>15</day><month>July</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Steffen Buessecker et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e229">Chemodenitrification – the non-enzymatic process of nitrite reduction –
may be an important sink for fixed nitrogen in tropical peatlands. Rates and
products of chemodenitrification are dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, and organic matter composition, which are variable across peat
soils. Assessing abiotic reaction pathways is difficult because
sterilization and inhibition agents can alter the availability of reactants by
changing iron speciation and organic matter composition. We compared six
commonly used soil sterilization techniques – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation,
chloroform, autoclaving, and the use of three different chemical inhibitors (mercury, zinc, and
azide) – for their compatibility with chemodenitrification assays
for tropical peatland soils (organic-rich, low-pH soil from the eastern
Amazon). Out of the six techniques, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation resulted in soil
treatments with the lowest cell viability and denitrification activity and
the least effect on pH, iron speciation, and organic matter composition. Nitrite
depletion rates in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiated soils were highly similar to
untreated (live) soils, whereas other sterilization techniques showed
deviations. Chemodenitrification was a dominant process of nitrite
consumption in tropical peatland soils assayed in this study. Nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
one possible product of chemodenitrification reactions. Abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production was low to moderate (3 %–16 % of converted nitrite), and
different sterilization techniques lead to significant variations on
production rates due to inherent processes or potential artifacts. Our work
represents the first methodological basis for testing the abiotic
denitrification and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production potential in tropical peatland soil.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e327">Across ecosystems, physical and chemical factors, such as solar radiation or
redox gradients, can drive abiotic chemical transformations. The nitrogen
(N) cycle, in particular, includes abiotic reactions that can affect the
retention of nutrients or substrates (Clark, 1962; McCalley
and Sparks, 2009; Parton et al., 2007). Abiotic formation of N-containing
gases has long been known (Jun et al., 1970; Wullstein and Gilmour,
1966). A major abiotic process in the N cycle is chemodenitrification, the
stepwise reduction of nitrite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to gaseous products, namely
nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), or dinitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), often
coupled to iron (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) oxidation, as described in Eqs. (1) and (2)
(Davidson et al., 2003; Kampschreur et
al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2013; Zhu-Barker et al., 2015).

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M15" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

         <?pagebreak page4602?> Equations (1) and (2) are plausible in soils and sediments (Jones et al.,
2015). The abiotic reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not well known. It
has been associated with the presence of copper (Moraghan and Buresh,
1977), but this species is unlikely to be present at sufficient levels in
peat soils to promote this reaction. Anoxic tropical peat soils are expected
to have the ideal conditions for chemodenitrification: low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, low pH,
high organic matter (OM), and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kappelmeyer
et al., 2003; Nelson and Bremner, 1969; Porter, 1969; Van Cleemput et al.,
1976). In these ecosystems, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is supplied by nitrification
fueled by organic N mineralization or from external sources (fertilization,
wet or dry deposition). Besides metals, reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compounds can also be mediated by organic functional groups found in
soils. Abiotic phenol oxidation occurs at oxic–anoxic interfaces in tropical
soils and may be linked to the N cycle (Hall and Silver, 2013).
In such reactions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be reduced by phenolic groups to form
the nitrosonium cation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can either (1) remain fixed within
the organic compound as nitrosophenol (Thorn and Mikita, 2000; Thorn
et al., 2010) or (2) be emitted in gaseous form. After tautomerization to
an oxime (Raczyńska et al., 2005) and reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from a second <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion, hyponitrous acid
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be produced, which further decomposes to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Scheme 1; Porter, 1969; Stevenson et al., 1970).</p><?xmltex \setfigures?><?xmltex \setschemes?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Scheme 1</label><caption><p id="d1e681">Putative nitrous oxide formation pathway formed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction by phenolic groups.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019-s01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e703">Other OM-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction pathways can produce NO and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (McKenney et al., 1990; Thorn et al., 2010) instead of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e744">The importance of abiotic N transformations in environmental samples has
been notoriously difficult to quantify due to the artifacts emerging from
physical or chemical “killing” methods intended to eliminate biological
activity but affecting metals, organic matter, or other pools. In order to
distinguish denitrification from chemodenitrification, enzymes contributing
to gaseous N production must be inactivated, most commonly by addition of
sterilants or inhibitors. An efficient sterilization treatment ideally (1) contains a negligible number of live cells, (2) eliminates biological
activity, and (3) has little or no effect, directly or indirectly, on
abiotic reactions (e.g., it should neither alter mineral structure nor lyse
cells because release of cellular contents could influence abiotic
reactions). Because rates and products of chemodenitrification are dependent
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, and OM composition, it is important
to assess whether a sterilant or inhibitor elicits a physicochemical change
that can affect the availability or interaction of these reactants.</p>
      <p id="d1e772">Soil sterilization techniques include <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation, chloroform
(CHCl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fumigation, autoclaving, and addition of chemical inhibitors
such as mercury (Hg), zinc (Zn), or azide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Highly energetic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation damages enzymes and cell components, rendering cells
nonviable and inactive, generally with minimal effect on soil chemistry
(Trevors, 1996). Autoclaving with high-pressure steam disrupts cell
membranes, denatures proteins, and decreases aromaticity and
polycondensation of soil OM (Berns et al.,
2008; Jenkinson and Powlson, 1976b; Trevors, 1996). Fumigation with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> induces cell lysis and has minimal effect on enzymes
(Blankinship et al., 2014). Chemicals like Hg, Zn, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> do the
opposite: they inhibit enzymes (Bowler et al., 2006; McDevitt
et al., 2011) but do not lyse cells (Wolf et al., 1989).</p>
      <p id="d1e835">We evaluated the appropriateness of six sterilants (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation,
autoclaving, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Hg, Zn, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for chemodenitrification
measurements in low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, low-pH, high-OM soils from a tropical peatland. First, we
tested the effects of sterilants on cell membrane viability and biological
denitrification activity. Next, we evaluated the effects of sterilants on
soil chemistry (pH, OM composition, and extractable Fe). Finally, we
assessed the effects of the six sterilants on chemodenitrification measured
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Sample characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e920">Soil samples were collected in October 2015 from a tropical peatland,
locally known as Quistococha (03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50.024<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S 73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>19.235<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), near
Iquitos (Loreto, Peru). The soil geochemistry of this site has been
described previously (Lawson et al., 2014; Lähteenoja et al.,
2009). The samples were obtained from depths of 15–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below the water
table and kept strictly anoxic during transport and storage at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the dark. Water saturation and organic carbon content were determined
by oven drying and loss on ignition, respectively. Dissolved organic carbon
(DOC) was determined by high-temperature combustion using a Shimadzu TOC-V
Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia,
MD). Inorganic N species were quantified photometrically using an AQ2
Discrete Analyzer (Seal Analytical, Southampton, UK) and method EPA-103-A
Rev.10 for ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; LoD 0.004 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, range 0.02–2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and method EPA-127-A for nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)/nitrite
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; LoD 0.003 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, range 0.012–2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Hydroxylamine was measured photometrically using the iodate method
(Afkhami et al., 2006).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Soil sterilization and slurry incubations</title>
      <p id="d1e1108">Experiments were started within 6 weeks of soil collection. For each
sterilization procedure, anoxic wet soil was exposed to the chemical
sterilant 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to start of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> incubation or
sterilized by physical treatment and allowed to equilibrate for at least 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The untreated (live) control was incubated as a slurry without any
additions or treatments for 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prior to start of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
incubation. Anoxic vials filled with wet soil were irradiated with a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Co</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source for 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, yielding a final radiation dose of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mrad</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kGy</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The irradiated soil was then prepared for incubation in an anoxic
glove box (0.5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with disinfected surfaces and
sterilized materials to prevent contamination. For autoclaved samples, soil
was prepared for incubation in closed vials and autoclaved at 121 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-treated samples were fumigated
for 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under a 100 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atmosphere. Because volatilized
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3<?pagebreak page4603?></mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corrodes electron capture detectors used for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection
(see below), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was removed by flushing the vials with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
5–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> immediately before the start of incubations.</p>
      <p id="d1e1334">In contrast to the physical sterilization treatments, soil samples were
continuously exposed to the chemical inhibitors throughout their incubation.
Sodium azide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaN</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eastman Organic Chemicals), zinc chloride
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZnCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fisher Scientific), and mercuric chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 99.5 %, Acros Organics) were added from anoxic stock solutions to final
concentrations of 150, 87.5, and 3.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mM</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The Hg concentration
was the minimum needed to eliminate microbial heterotrophic growth based on
visual inspection of soil extract on agar plates exposed to 0.5 to 92.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which includes concentrations demonstrated to be effective
previously (Tuominen et al., 1994).</p>
      <p id="d1e1395">After the initial physical or chemical treatment, triplicate incubations
were diluted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of autoclaved 18.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water in
60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> glass serum vials. All microcosms were prepared in an anaerobic glove
box (0.5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) prior to incubation. Triplicate soil
slurries were amended from an anoxic, sterile stock solution to a final
concentration of 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
sealed with thick butyl rubber stoppers. A parallel set of samples was
amended with 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to evaluate denitrification
potential with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. Control incubations received an
equivalent volume of autoclaved 18.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water without
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Soil microcosms were incubated in the dark at a constant
temperature of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was quantified in all soil
treatments using the Griess assay (Promega, Kit G2930).
pH measurements were taken with an Orion 3 Star meter (Thermo Scientific)
before and after sterilization, and at the end of the experiment after 70–76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of incubation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Gas chromatography</title>
      <p id="d1e1595">To quantify <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production, 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of headspace gas
was sampled with a gas-tight syringe (VICI Precision Sampling) and injected
onto a gas chromatograph (GC, SRI Instruments) equipped with both an
electron-capture detector (ECD) and a flame-ionization detector (FID). Two
continuous HayeSep-D columns were kept at 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (oven
temperature); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (UHP grade 99.999 %, Praxair Inc.) was used as
carrier gas, and for FID combustion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was supplied by a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
generator (GCGS-7890, Parker Balston). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, a
methanizer (which reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the detectable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via a Ni
catalyst at 355 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was run in line before the FID. The ECD
current was 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the ECD cell was kept at 350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were calibrated using customized standard
mixtures (Scott Specialty Gases, accuracy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) over a range of
1–400 and 5–5000 ppmv, respectively. Gas accumulation in the
incubation vials was monitored over time. Gas concentrations were corrected
using Henry's law and the dimensionless concentration constants
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6112</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8313</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Stumm and Morgan, 2012) to account for gas partitioning into the aqueous
phase at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Live or dead cell staining</title>
      <p id="d1e1855">To assess the efficacy of sterilants or inhibitors visually, the bacterial
viability kit LIVE/DEAD BacLight L7012 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen)
containing SYTO9 and propidium iodide dyes was used to stain and distinguish
dead and living cells on the basis of intact cell walls. The green (live)
and red (dead) signals were counted at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnification from 10 squares of
0.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> randomly distributed in the center of a 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Neubauer
chamber, using an Olympus BX-61 microscope with the FITC/Cy5 filter set.
Photographs were taken with an Olympus DP-70 camera attached to the
microscope. Particles were counted with ImageJ software version 1.50i
(Abràmoff et al., 2004).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Fe extraction and quantification</title>
      <p id="d1e1898">Dissolved Fe species were extracted from peat soil incubations following
the protocol of Veverica et al. (2016). The method is based on an
ionic liquid extraction using <italic>bis</italic>-2-ethylhexyl phosphoric acid (Pepper
et al., 2010), which was<?pagebreak page4604?> shown to be more suitable for extraction of Fe from
humic-rich matrices than the traditional ferrozine or phenanthroline
methods. Briefly, 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of soil slurry was filtered (0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nylon
filter; Celltreat Scientific Products) and mixed with 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of HCl (0.67 N)
in an extraction vial in a 0.5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> glove box. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in the glove box was continuously monitored and
remained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm. To separate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>bis</italic>-2-ethylhexyl phosphate (95 %, Alfa Aesar) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-heptane (99.5 %,
Acros Organics) was added to the acidified sample. Next, the organo-aqueous
emulsion was shaken at 250 rpm in closed extraction vials for 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
<italic>bis</italic>-2-ethylhexyl phosphate chelates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more effectively than it
chelates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing aqueous phase was sampled into
a 3-fold HCl-washed HDPE vial (Nalgene) in the glove box. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fraction chelated in the organic phase was then back-extracted into an
aqueous phase by the addition of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 N HCl and shaking at 250 rpm in
closed extraction vials for 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractions were quantified separately in acidified aqueous solution by
inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; Thermo iCAP6300 at the Goldwater Environmental Laboratory at Arizona State
University). The ICP-OES pump rate for the Ar carrier was set to 50 rpm, and
Fe2395 and Fe2599 lines were used for Fe quantification. Iron concentrations
were determined from a calibration curve (0.01–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by diluting a
standard solution (100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, VHG Labs, product no. SM75B-500) in
0.02 N <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Dissolved organic matter fluorescence analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2195">Three-dimensional fluorescence analysis was performed on a Horiba Jobin-Yvon Fluoromax 4
spectrofluorometer. Excitation–emission matrices (EEMs) were generated by
obtaining emission spectra (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Em</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at a step size
of 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at excitation wavelengths from 240 to 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> step size. All
EEMs were blank-corrected and normalized daily to the Raman peak of
ultrapure water (deionized, carbon-free,18.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Barnstead<sup>™</sup> NanoPure). The samples were taken at the same time as those
for Fe analysis. Prior to analysis, soil slurries were filtered using a
solvent-rinsed Whatman Glass Microfiber Grade F GF/F filters (nominal pore size 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> filtrate. Samples were diluted with ultrapure
water if their UV absorbance exceeded 0.3 so that inner-filter corrections
could be made (Stedmon et al., 2003). We calculated total fluorescence as the
matrix sum of all signals in the EEM. Fluorescence indices were used to
characterize various classes of fluorophores in the dissolved organic matter
(DOM) pool. Fluorescence index (FI) was calculated as the sum of the
intensity signal in the emission spectra from 470 to 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collected at an
excitation wavelength of 370 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cory and McKnight, 2005). Humification
index (HIX) was determined from the peak area under the emission spectrum
from 435 to 480 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, divided by the area from 300 to 445 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both collected at an
excitation wavelength of 254 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ohno, 2002). The “freshness” was
determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the ratio of emission intensity at 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to the emission intensity maximum between 420 and 435 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both collected at
an excitation wavelength of 310 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wilson and Xenopoulos, 2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Statistical analyses</title>
      <p id="d1e2376">All basic statistical tests were performed with JMP Pro software (Version 13.1.0, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Composition of high-OM tropical soils</title>
      <p id="d1e2395">The tropical peat soil used for the incubation experiments had 5.5–5.8 pH,
92.2 % water content, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">307</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOC</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry weight, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil. The extractable iron fraction
partitioned as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">213</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The native soil pore water had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DOC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">436</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hydroxylamine was below detection in
all cases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Soil pH dropped from 5.5 to 5.8 in untreated
soil to 3.6, 4.8, 5.0, 5.2, and 5.4 after treatment with Hg, Zn, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation, autoclaving, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
treatment increased soil pH (to 6.4).</p><?xmltex \setfigures?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2747">Live and dead microbial cell counts of tropical peatland soils. The
numbers above the bars indicate the live to dead signal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ratio</mml:mtext><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SD</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. No
detectable signal was observed in autoclaved samples. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents
treatments (live: no treatment; Zn: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZnCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Hg: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HgCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Azide: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaN</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Effects of sterilants on cell integrity and potential of denitrifying activity</title>
      <?pagebreak page4605?><p id="d1e2816">Live and dead dyes were used to assess microbial viability by means of membrane
integrity, where a “dead” signal indicates disrupted or broken cell
membranes (Stiefel et al., 2015). The majority (74 %) of cells in the
live incubation displayed the “live” signal (Fig. 1). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiated treatments were most effective at reducing the number
of viable cells (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % intact membranes after
sterilization). Chemical inhibitors (Hg, Zn, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were less
effective at killing cells (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % intact membranes after
sterilization). Autoclaved samples did not fluoresce, likely due to cell
lysis during steam pressurization.</p>
      <p id="d1e2868">Biological denitrification activity was measured over 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in live and
sterilized soils based on the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production with and
without added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An efficient sterilization treatment would
show no changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> beyond those due to equilibration between the gas
phase and aqueous phase. Nitrate stimulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in live soil
(ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and not in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiated, Zn, Hg,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or autoclaved incubations (Fig. 2), indicating that residual cells
in the sterilized treatments were not capable of denitrification.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2958"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates in 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> soil slurry incubations of
Quistococha peat soil amended with and without 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mM</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Error
bars are 1 SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Columns marked with the same letter are not
statistically different from each other (Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents treatments, as in the legend of Fig. 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3055">Changes in extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (left) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (right)
concentration in Quistococha peat soil incubations after sterilization
(difference between sterilization baseline and live baseline value) and
after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amendment and incubation (difference between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and control incubations). Note the difference in scales.
Values represent the extractable fraction of both species. Error bars are
1 SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents treatments, as in the legend of Fig. 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Effects of sterilants on soil chemistry</title>
      <p id="d1e3146">In general, sterilization increased extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relative to live controls (Fig. 3). This trend was particularly
pronounced in Zn treatments, which had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1915</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than live controls. The Hg treatment showed the second-largest
increases. In the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreased and extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased in live, Zn, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fumigated treatments, as expected if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was oxidized by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during chemodenitrification. However, autoclaving, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lowered <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, suggesting the
influence of unknown concomitant reactions. For instance, autoclaving
(largest drop in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) already showed lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
after sterilization. Production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-reduction artifacts in
treatments could lead to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion and, hence, mask increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to chemodenitrification. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition resulted in
near-complete depletion of extractable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in live,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fumigated, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiated soils. Changes in Fe
speciation with other sterilants were more moderate. Minimal changes were
observed for other metals in soil samples (e.g., Mn, Al, Cu, and Zn; data
not shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3501">Representative plots of DOM fluorescence in soil slurry
incubations of Quistococha peat soils. DOM fluorescence is presented as
excitation–emission matrices (EEMs) collected for each treatment (rows)
after the sterilization procedure or live control (left column), after
incubation with no amendment (“after incubation” control, middle column),
and after incubation with 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (same time point as
control, right column). The colored bar shows the individual signal
intensity. All but the “autoclaving” treatment have same scale of signal
intensity, autoclaving effects increased to about 5 times the signal intensity
scale. Treatments are as in the legend of Fig. 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3528">Fluorescence analysis of soil extracts using excitation–emission matrices
(EEMs) was used to evaluate changes in DOM-containing aromatic moieties or
conjugated double bonds (Stedmon et al., 2003; Fig. 4). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
treatment was excluded from this analysis due to an interference with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorbance that prevented inner-filter corrections from being made.
The EEM signals showed the greatest change in the “humic” region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ex</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–270 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Em</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">460</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fellman et al., 2010), especially in Zn and Hg treatments,
which significantly increased the FI from 1.20 (in live soil baseline, prior
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> incubation) to 1.49 (Table 1). Zn and Hg may elicit direct
fluorescence quenching through the formation of Zn and Hg metal complexes
(McKnight et al., 2001) or possibly due to indirect quenching by
more highly dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Signal strength in the humic region was enhanced
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition in the live, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fumigated, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiated treatments. All five sterilization treatments had lower
aromaticity (HIX) than live controls (Table 1). Autoclaved samples had
10-fold higher total fluorescence compared to live soils, suggesting that
autoclaving degraded insoluble humics into more soluble and less condensed
OM.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3662">Characteristics of dissolved organic matter in soil extracts from
incubations of peat from Quistococha, Peru. FI, HIX, and freshness indices
were calculated as described in the Methods section. The “tyrosine-like”
region is defined at an excitation of 270–275 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an emission of 304–312 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fellman et al., 2010). The signal for that region was
averaged across replicates and expressed as percent difference between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> additions and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>controls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SD</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
replicates. A drop in the signal intensity was consistently apparent but clear
differences between the treatments were not, due to high standard deviation
of replicates.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">Treatment </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">FI**</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">HIX***</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Freshness</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Drop in mean</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">fluorescence of the</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">tyrosine-like region</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(% over control)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Live soil</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baseline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">a</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.57</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">a</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.72</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.41</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nitrite-added</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.16</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">*</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.11</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">*</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Zn</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baseline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.49</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">b</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">b</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.58</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.59</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nitrite-added</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.55</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">*</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.05</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.62</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Autoclaving</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baseline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">a</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.54</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">b</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.47</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.83</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.46</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nitrite-added</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.97</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2">Chloroform</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baseline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.23</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">c</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.79</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">b</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.43</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.70</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nitrite-added</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.14</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">*</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">*</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.40</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baseline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.30</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">d</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.90</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">b</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.57</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.27</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.35</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nitrite added</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.21</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">*</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.95</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.52</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="2">Hg</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baseline</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.49</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">b</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.20</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">b</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.57</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.50</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.60</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nitrite added</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.44</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">*</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.12</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.51</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3706">* indicates significant difference to control. <?xmltex \hack{\\}?><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>** Fluorescence index.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>*** Humification index.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?>Mean values marked with the same letter are insignificantly different from each other.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4341"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption (left) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (right)
for different sterilant treatments in soil slurry incubations of Quistococha
peat soil. Both N species were simultaneously measured in all treatments.
The product yield represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N as molar fraction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N. Note the difference in the left and right <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis scales. Error
bars are 1 SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Treatments are as in the legend of Fig. 1.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/4601/2019/bg-16-4601-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page4606?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Effects of sterilants on chemodenitrification and abiotic {$\protect\chem{N_{{2}}O}$} production}?><title>Effects of sterilants on chemodenitrification and abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production</title>
      <p id="d1e4442">In the first 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rates were the
highest in live soil (5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), closely followed by
irradiated samples (4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 5). The major
chemodenitrification pathway for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation was likely
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in consumption of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and accumulation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the live control (Fig. 3).
After 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion continued to completion in the live
control but slowed in all treatments other than the metal additions. After
72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of incubation, 3 %–16 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N was converted to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N across treatments. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates were assessed by
linear regression of data points over the whole duration of the experiment.
Higher rates were observed in live, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments
(0.5–0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) than in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiated, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fumigated, autoclaved, and Hg treatments
(0.1–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Production rates within treatments showing high or low rates were not
significantly different (Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), although
comparisons across treatments with high or low rates were statistically
different (Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Thus, we identified a higher and
lower group of sterilant-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates from the same
soil samples. The live control showed logarithmic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accumulation,
while the sterilized treatments had linear accumulation over time; the latter
is expected in abiotic accumulation (Fig. 5).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Chemodenitrification is a dominant {$\protect\chem{NO_{{2}}^{{-}}}$} consumption process in slurry incubations of tropical peat soils}?><title>Chemodenitrification is a dominant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption process in slurry incubations of tropical peat soils</title>
      <p id="d1e4910">Similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rates between live and
irradiated treatments imply that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion was dominated by
abiotic processes over the first 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In general, abiotic reactions
tend to be linear processes, whereas microbially mediated reactions can be
affected by enhanced expression of genes or<?pagebreak page4607?> cell reproduction in a nonlinear
fashion (Duggleby, 1995). Linearity is more reflected in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
curve than in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curve. The difference in linearity of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in sterilized vs. live treatments (Fig. 5) suggests that
biological denitrification did not occur in sterilized soils.</p>
      <p id="d1e4987">Compared to our study, incubations of artificial media with 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.5–8.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mM</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and pH 7–8 had similar rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher rates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction, and
higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–50 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields (Buchwald
et al., 2016; Jones et al., 2015). In our peat incubations, reactive OM
likely trapped <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the soil matrix via OM-bound nitrosation
reactions (Thorn and Mikita, 2000; Thorn et al., 2010) and the lower
pH likely promoted conversion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO (Kappelmeyer
et al., 2003; Porter, 1969) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Stevenson et al., 1970).
Studies in low-pH northern temperate peat soils have shown the primary
product of abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction was NO and not <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (McKenney
et al., 1990).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Artifacts due to sterilization methods for chemodenitrification assays</title>
      <p id="d1e5158">Azide and Zn exhibited enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at
rates at least 2 to 5 times as high as those measured for the other
sterilants (Fig. 5), likely due to higher pH and Fe availability,
respectively. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments, elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production could
be explained by the reaction of protonated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a
pH-dependent manner (Stedman, 1959) and other changes in soil solution that
originated from the increase in pH. Nitrite reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been
characterized in marine and freshwater solutions reaching its maximum at pH 4.5 and proceeding slowly yet significantly (20 % conversion in 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at
pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (McIlvin and Altabet, 2005), as in our slurries.
Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>'s self-fluorescence impeded OM measurements, making
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> an incompatible sterilizing agent for chemodenitrification studies.
Zn increased Fe availability and may have increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> affinity
for reactive OM groups; both effects would lead to an abiotic increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (Clark, 1962; McCalley and Sparks, 2009; Parton<?pagebreak page4608?> et al.,
2007). Zinc treatment lowered the soil pH, which may have promoted cation
displacement and stability of dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hutchins et al.,
2007), thus enhancing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. Several studies have used Zn
treatments as a valuable agent for field applications (Babbin
et al., 2015; Ostrom et al., 2016). Zn is less hazardous to humans than some
of the other sterilants. We propose that the use of Zn could provide useful
information about abiotic in situ rates as long as Zn-induced chemodenitrification
is accounted for. A correction could be applied if a complementary
laboratory assessment (using the more efficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation) were
used to develop an ecosystem-specific correction factor.</p>
      <p id="d1e5348">Divalent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be abiotically methylated by fulvic acid-type
substances (Rogers, 1977). The reaction oxidizes OM and can diminish its
reducing power, as indicated by decreased reactivity of humic acid with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gu et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2011), thus
interfering with the abiotic assay. Given the pH effect of the Hg treatment,
we cannot rule out that decomposition of nitrous acid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
contributed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption (Fig. 5, Park and Lee, 1988).
Another potential factor associated with the Hg treatments is metal
sorption. At low pH (3.6), 98 % of Hg was sorbed to humic acids, whereas
only 29 % of Zn was sorbed at pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Kerndorff and
Schnitzer, 1980). Full sorption capacity of peat is presumably reached in
seconds (Bunzl et al., 1976), and the differing sorption
behavior of Hg and Zn may play a role in the reaction potential of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with OM. It has been demonstrated that Hg introduced into
peat soil leads to sorption of Hg ions to various functional groups,
including phenols (Drexel et al., 2002; Xia et al., 1998). Hence,
it is plausible that Hg sorbed to functional groups subject to electrophilic
attack by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., nitrosophenol, Scheme 1) may hamper
nitrosation, and therefore protect OM from reacting with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This could lead to a selective suppression of the OM-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production pathway.</p>
      <p id="d1e5463">Chloroform fumigation resulted in potential <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates within
the lower production range treatments with minor differences in Fe
speciation and DOM fluorescence. However, unlike the other sterilized
samples, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fumigated samples showed enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production
stimulated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition. Removal of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from our
samples before substrate addition could have provided an opportunity for a
few surviving heterotrophs to regrow and use the easily degradable organic
material derived from dead cells. Indeed, chloroform can lyse cells,
providing substrates for growth to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-resistant microorganisms
(Zelles et al., 1997). Continued exoenzyme activity has been also
described as a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source; however, this would not include
denitrification enzymes, since no enzymes involved in the denitrification
pathway are exoenzymes (Blankinship et al., 2014; Jenkinson and
Powlson, 1976a). Chlorination of natural OM may prompt formation of quinones
(Criquet et al., 2015), which are intermediates in the OM-based
abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production (Thorn and Mikita, 2000); indeed, regions of
the EEMs corresponding to hydroquinones (Cory and McKnight, 2005) appear
to be slightly higher in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> treatments. The benzene derivative
produced during nitrosophenol reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to reduced
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> electron delocalization (Scheme 1). Because excitation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> electrons produces fluorescence, reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might
be expected to reduce OM fluorescence. However, the experiment duration is
important, and if microbial cells indeed reproduce after the treatment, short
experimental periods (e.g., hours or days) or reapplication of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
might keep down the numbers of any potential denitrifiers improving the use
of this method.</p>
      <p id="d1e5624">Autoclaved peat soil revealed abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates close to the
average of the lower production range group, along with ICP-OES and
fluorescence spectroscopy results that showed significant changes in Fe
speciation and DOM composition. EEMs demonstrate lower values for the HIX in
autoclaved peats (Table 1), consistent with fluorescence data from a study
that demonstrated a decrease in the aromaticity and polycondensation of soil
extracts from autoclaved soil (Berns et al., 2008).
Autoclaving likely caused degradation and solubilization of insoluble humic
components. The direct effects of autoclaving are very much dependent on the
heat and pressure stability of the indigenous soil constituents, but the
substantial soil structural changes likely introduce chemical artifacts that
are absent in the native live soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Gamma irradiation is the preferred sterilization method for chemodenitrification assays</title>
      <p id="d1e5648">The fewest chemical artifacts were observed in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-irradiated
samples. Soil that had been exposed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> rays showed the lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates, approximately one-fifth of those observed in live
samples. Irradiation also caused only very small changes in Fe speciation
relative to live controls<?pagebreak page4609?> and yielded EEMs that were remarkably similar to
those obtained from live soil extracts. Our measurements of sterility and
respiratory activity indicated the lowest potential for biological activity
and hence the least amount of interference for the time period tested. We
therefore confirmed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation to be a preferred method for
sterilizing soil (Trevors, 1996) and for assessing abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production potential. In practice, the long preparation time needed to
reach a sufficient dose (dependent on radiation source; see Methods) was
compensated for by the lack of chemical artifacts during the experiment and
the reduced number of hazardous waste products. Limited accessibility to
irradiation facilities and the absence of a field portable option remain the
main challenges to wide distribution of this approach.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e5708">High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions occur in tropical regions with water-saturated
soils (Liengaard et al., 2014; Park et al., 2011;
Pérez et al., 2001). Whether these tropical N emissions are solely
biotic or have abiotic contributions is not well known because rates of
chemodenitrification are not commonly evaluated. Abiotic processes in the N
cycle remain overlooked, partly due to the lack of reliable means of
quantifying abiotic reactions. This study showed that chemodenitrification
occurs in a tropical peat soil, leading to a low to moderate fraction of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion from nitrite amendment. We also demonstrated that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> irradiation is the “gold standard” for chemodenitrification
assays. The application of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to quantify abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production
is unsuitable because changes associated with the fraction of the sterilant itself
may react to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and affect increased pH. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> rays have slightly reducing effects on the soil Fe pool and might lead to
a weak discrimination against pathways involving Fe as a reactant. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fumigation was another approach with limited effects on Fe chemistry that
lowered the number of viable cells greatly; however, the potential for
microbial regrowth after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> removal is its main drawback.
Autoclaving seemed to have minor disadvantages for abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
production, despite the substantial changes to soil OM.</p>
      <p id="d1e5835">Unlike other lab-intensive treatments, the application of Zn and Hg are
amenable for field experiments; however, we observed distinct chemical
artifacts when using both of these options. Care is warranted if using Zn
and Hg chemical inhibitors, which can increase Fe availability and may thus
overestimate Fe-dependent abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rate. A potential
disadvantage of the application of toxic metals is a decrease in soil pH. We
cannot exclude pH-driven effects on N intermediates; however, no major
deviation in the final <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rate related to acidification was
observed. With the methodological evaluation presented here, we determined
that a directed selection of approaches can allow for better constrained and
more detailed studies of the role of abiotic pathways and soil components
shaping denitrification and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes from soil ecosystems.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5881">All data presented in this paper are available in
the Figshare repository under the following DOI: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10043177.v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6084/m9.figshare.10043177.v1</ext-link> (Buessecker, 2019).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5890">HCQ and SB designed study; SB, KT, JN, KEH, JDUM, JBG, HEH, and HCQ contributed to field collection, laboratory experiments, and data analysis; SB and HCQ developed the first manuscript draft; and all authors contributed to final manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5896">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5902">We thank Chris Laurel, Roy Erickson, and Cathy Kochert for training and
assistance with the ICP-OES analysis at ASU's Goldwater Environmental
Laboratory and Steven Hart for advice on optimizing the epifluorescence
microscopy. We also thank Nabil Fidai, Jaime Lopez, Analissa Sarno, and Mark Reynolds of the Cadillo Lab for their enduring support during the
experimental phase. The results
reported herein also benefited from collaborations and/or information
exchange within NASA's Nexus for Exoplanet System Science (NExSS) research
coordination network, sponsored by NASA's Science Mission Directorate.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e5907">This research has been supported by the National Sciences Foundation (grant no. 1355066), a NASA award (grant no. NNX15AD53G) to Hilairy E. Hartnett, and an NSF-DEB award (no. 1355066)
to Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e5913">This paper was edited by Perran Cook and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Abràmoff, M. D., Magalhães, P. J., and Ram, S. J.: Image processing
with ImageJ, Laurin Publishing, Pittsfield, MA, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Afkhami, A., Madrakian, T., and Maleki, A.: Indirect Kinetic
Spectrophotometric Determination of Hydroxylamine Based on Its Reaction with
Iodate, Anal. Sci., 22, 329–331, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.22.329" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2116/analsci.22.329</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Babbin, A. R., Bianchi, D., Jayakumar, A., and Ward, B. B.: Rapid nitrous
oxide cycling in the suboxic ocean, Science, 348, 1127–1129,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaa8380</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berns, A. E., Philipp, H., Narres, H. D., Burauel, P., Vereecken, H., and
Tappe, W.: Effect of gamma?sterilization and autoclaving on soil organic
matter structure as studied by solid state NMR<?pagebreak page4610?>, UV and fluorescence
spectroscopy, J. Soil Sci., 59, 540–550,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blankinship, J. C., Becerra, C. A., Schaeffer, S. M., and Schimel, J. P.:
Separating cellular metabolism from exoenzyme activity in soil organic
matter decomposition, Soil Biol. Biochem., 71, 68–75,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bowler, M. W., Montgomery, M. G., Leslie, A. G. W., and Walker, J. E.: How
azide inhibits ATP hydrolysis by the F-ATPases, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
103, 8646–8649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602915103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0602915103</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buchwald, C., Grabb, K., Hansel, C. M., and Wankel, S. D.: Constraining the
role of iron in environmental nitrogen transformations: Dual stable isotope
systematics of abiotic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction by Fe(II) and its production
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 186, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.041</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bunzl, K., Schmidt, W., and Sansoni, B.: Kinetics of Ion Exchange in Soil
Organic Matter. Iv. Adsorption and Desorption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cd</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Zn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by Peat, J. Soil Sci., 27,
32–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1976.tb01972.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1976.tb01972.x</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Buessecker, S.: Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in tropical peat soil microcosms, figshare, Dataset, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10043177.v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6084/m9.figshare.10043177.v1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Clark, F. E.: Losses of nitrogen accompanying nitrification, Trans. Int. Soc. Soil Sci., Com. IV and V, 173–176, 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cory, R. M. and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Reveals
Ubiquitous Presence of Oxidized and Reduced Quinones in Dissolved Organic
Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0506962</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Criquet, J., Rodriguez, E. M., Allard, S., Wellauer, S., Salhi, E., Joll, C.
A., and von  Gunten, U.: Reaction of bromine and chlorine with phenolic
compounds and natural organic matter extracts – Electrophilic aromatic
substitution and oxidation, Water Res., 85, 476–486,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.051</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Davidson, E. A., Chorover, J., and Dail, D. B.: A mechanism of abiotic
immobilization of nitrate in forest ecosystems: the ferrous wheel
hypothesis, Global Change Biol., 9, 228–236,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00592.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00592.x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drexel, T. R., Haitzer, M., Ryan, J. N., Aiken, G. R., and Nagy, K. L.:
Mercury(II) Sorption to Two Florida Everglades Peats: Evidence for Strong
and Weak Binding and Competition by Dissolved Organic Matter Released from
the Peat, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4058–4064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0114005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0114005</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Duggleby, R. G.: Analysis of enzyme progress curves by nonlinear
regression, in: Methods in Enzymology, 249, 61–90, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fellman, J. B., Hood, E., and Spencer, R. G. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy
opens new windows into dissolved organic matter dynamics in freshwater
ecosystems: A review, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2452–2462,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.6.2452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2010.55.6.2452</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gu, B., Bian, Y., Miller, C. L., Dong, W., Jiang, X., and Liang, L.: Mercury
reduction and complexation by natural organic matter in anoxic environments,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008747108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1008747108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hall, S. J. and Silver, W. L.: Iron oxidation stimulates organic matter
decomposition in humid tropical forest soils, Global Change Biol., 19,
2804–2813, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12229" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12229</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hutchins, C. M., Teasdale, P. R., Lee, J., and Simpson, S. L.: The effect of
manipulating sediment pH on the porewater chemistry of copper- and
zinc-spiked sediments, Chemosphere, 69, 1089–1099,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.029</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jenkinson, D. S. and Powlson, D. S.: The effects of biocidal treatments on
metabolism in soil – I. Fumigation with chloroform, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 8, 167–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8</ext-link>, 1976a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jenkinson, D. S. and Powlson, D. S.: The effects of biocidal treatments on
metabolism in soil – V: A method for measuring soil biomass, Soil Biol. Biochem., 8, 209–213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5</ext-link>, 1976b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jones, L. C., Peters, B., Pacheco, J. S. L., Casciotti, K. L., and Fendorf,
S.: Stable Isotopes and Iron Oxide Mineral Products as Markers of
Chemodenitrification, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3444–3452,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es504862x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es504862x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jun, L. A. B., Gilmour, C. M., and Bollen, W. B.: Non-biological Reduction of
Nitrite in Soil, Nature, 225, 664–664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/225664a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/225664a0</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kampschreur, M. J., Kleerebezem, R., de Vet, W. W. J. M., and van Loosdrecht,
M. C. M.: Reduced iron induced nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emission,
Water Res., 45, 5945–5952, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.056</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kappelmeyer, U., Kuschk, P., and Stottmeister, U.: Model Experiments on the
Influence of Artificial Humic Compounds on Chemodenitrification, Water Air
Soil Pollut., 147, 317–330, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024518027312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1024518027312</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kerndorff, H. and Schnitzer, M.: Sorption of metals on humic acid,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 44, 1701–1708,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(80)90221-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(80)90221-5</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lähteenoja, O., Ruokolainen, K., Schulman, L., and Alvarez, J.: Amazonian
floodplains harbour minerotrophic and ombrotrophic peatlands, CATENA, 79,
140–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2009.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2009.06.006</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lawson, I. T., Jones, T. D., Kelly, T. J., Coronado, E. N. H., and Roucoux,
K. H.: The Geochemistry of Amazonian Peats, Wetlands, 34, 905–915,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0552-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13157-014-0552-z</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liengaard, L., Figueiredo, V., Markfoged, R., Revsbech, N. P., Nielsen, L.
P., Prast, A. E., and Kühl, M.: Hot moments of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transformation
and emission in tropical soils from the Pantanal and the Amazon (Brazil),
Soil Biol. Biochem., 75, 26–36,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.015</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McCalley, C. K. and Sparks, J. P.: Abiotic Gas Formation Drives Nitrogen
Loss from a Desert Ecosystem, Science, 326, 837–840,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178984" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1178984</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McDevitt, C. A., Ogunniyi, A. D., Valkov, E., Lawrence, M. C., Kobe, B.,
McEwan, A. G., and Paton, J. C.: A Molecular Mechanism for Bacterial
Susceptibility to Zinc, edited by: Imlay, J., PLoS Pathog., 7, 1–9,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.ppat.1002357</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McIlvin, M. R. and Altabet, M. A.: Chemical Conversion of Nitrate and
Nitrite to Nitrous Oxide for Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotopic Analysis in
Freshwater and Seawater, Anal. Chem., 77, 5589–5595,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050528s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac050528s</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4611?><ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McKenney, D. J., Lazar, C., and Findlay, W. J.: Kinetics of the Nitrite to
Nitric Oxide Reaction in Peat, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
54, 106–112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010016x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010016x</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McKnight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P. K., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T.,
and Andersen, D. T.: Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved
organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 38–48, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moraghan, J. T. and Buresh, R. J.: Chemical Reduction of Nitrite and Nitrous
Oxide by Ferrous Iron, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 41,
47–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010017x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010017x</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nelson, D. W. and Bremner, J. M.: Factors affecting chemical transformations
of nitrite in soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 1, 229–239,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90023-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(69)90023-6</ext-link>, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ohno, T.: Fluorescence Inner-Filtering Correction for Determining the
Humification Index of Dissolved Organic Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
36, 742–746, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0155276" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0155276</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ostrom, N. E., Gandhi, H., Trubl, G., and Murray, A. E.: Chemodenitrification
in the cryoecosystem of Lake Vida, Victoria Valley, Antarctica, Geobiology,
14, 575–587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12190" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gbi.12190</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, J. Y. and Lee, Y. N.: Solubility and decomposition kinetics of nitrous
acid in aqueous solution, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 6294–6302,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100333a025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/j100333a025</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Park, S., Pérez, T., Boering, K. A., Trumbore, S. E., Gil, J., Marquina,
S., and Tyler, S. C.: Can <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stable isotopes and isotopomers be useful
tools to characterize sources and microbial pathways of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production
and consumption in tropical soils?, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 25,
1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GB003615</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Parton, W., Silver, W. L., Burke, I. C., Grassens, L., Harmon, M. E.,
Currie, W. S., King, J. Y., Adair, E. C., Brandt, L. A., Hart, S. C., and
Fasth, B.: Global-Scale Similarities in Nitrogen Release Patterns During
Long-Term Decomposition, Science, 315, 361–364,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1134853</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pepper, S. E., Borkowski, M., Richmann, M. K., and Reed, D. T.: Determination
of ferrous and ferric iron in aqueous biological solutions, Anal.
Chim. Acta, 663, 172–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.056</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pérez, T., Trumbore, S. E., Tyler, S. C., Matson, P. A., Monasterio, I.
O., Rahn, T., and Griffith, D. W. T.: Identifying the agricultural imprint on
the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget using stable isotopes, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 106, 9869–9878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900809</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Porter, L. K.: Gaseous Products Produced by Anaerobic Reaction of Sodium
Nitrite with Oxime Compounds and Oximes Synthesized from Organic Matter 1,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 33, 696–702,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300050023x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300050023x</ext-link>, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Raczyńska, E. D., Krygowski, T. M., Zachara, J. E., Ośmiałowski,
B., and Gawinecki, R.: Tautomeric equilibria, H-bonding and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-electron
delocalization in o-nitrosophenol. A B3LYP/6-311+G(2df,2p) study, J.
Phys. Org. Chem., 18, 892–897, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/poc.963</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rogers, R. D.: Abiological Methylation of Mercury in Soil 1, J.
Environ. Qual., 6, 463–467,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1977.00472425000600040029x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq1977.00472425000600040029x</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stedman, G.: Mechanism of the azide–nitrite reaction – Part II, J. Chem.
Soc., 2949–2954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9590002949" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/JR9590002949</ext-link>, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S., and Bro, R.: Tracing dissolved organic matter
in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy,
Mar. Chem., 82, 239–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(03)00072-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-4203(03)00072-0</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stevenson, F. J., Harrison, R. M., Wetselaar, R., and Leeper, R. A.:
Nitrosation of Soil Organic Matter: III. Nature of Gases Produced by
Reaction of Nitrite with Lignins, Humic Substances, and Phenolic
Constituents Under Neutral and Slightly Acidic Conditions 1, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 34, 430–435,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400030024x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400030024x</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stiefel, P., Schmidt-Emrich, S., Maniura-Weber, K., and Ren, Q.: Critical
aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9
and propidium iodide, BMC Microbiology, 15, 36,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J. (Eds.): Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed., John Wiley
&amp; Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thorn, K. A. and Mikita, M. A.: Nitrite Fixation by Humic Substances
Nitrogen-15 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Evidence for Potential Intermediates
in Chemodenitrification, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64,
568–582, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642568x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2000.642568x</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thorn, K. A., Younger, S. J., and Cox, L. G.: Order of Functionality Loss
during Photodegradation of Aquatic Humic Substances, J.
Environ. Qual., 39, 1416–1428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq2009.0408</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trevors, J. T.: Sterilization and inhibition of microbial activity in soil,
J. Microbiol. Methods, 26, 53–59,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(96)00843-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0167-7012(96)00843-3</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tuominen, L., Kairesalo, T., and Hartikainen, H.: Comparison of Methods for
Inhibiting Bacterial Activity in Sediment, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60,
3454–3457, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Cleemput, O., Patrick, W. H., and McIlhenny, R. C.: Nitrite Decomposition
in Flooded Soil Under Different pH and Redox Potential Conditions, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 40, 55–60,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000010018x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000010018x</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Veverica, T. J., Kane, E. S., Marcarelli, A. M., and Green, S. A.: Ionic
Liquid Extraction Unveils Previously Occluded Humic-Bound Iron in Peat Soil
Pore Water, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 80, 771–782,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.10.0377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2015.10.0377</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilson, H. F. and Xenopoulos, M. A.: Effects of agricultural land use on the
composition of fluvial dissolved organic matter, Nat. Geosci., 2,
37–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo391" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo391</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wolf, D. C., Dao, T. H., Scott, H. D., and Lavy, T. L.: Influence of
Sterilization Methods on Selected Soil Microbiological, Physical, and
Chemical Properties, J. Environ. Qual., 18, 39–44,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800010007x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800010007x</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wullstein, L. H. and Gilmour, C. M.: Non-enzymatic Formation of Nitrogen
Gas, Nature, 210, 1150–1151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/2101150a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/2101150a0</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xia, K., Skyllberg, U. L., Bleam, W. F., Bloom, P. R., Nater, E. A., and
Helmke, P. A.: X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Evidence for the Complexation
of Hg(II) by Reduced Sulfur i<?pagebreak page4612?>n Soil Humic Substances, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 33, 257–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es980433q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es980433q</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zelles, L., Palojärvi, A., Kandeler, E., Von Lützow, M., Winter, K.,
and Bai, Q. Y.: Changes in soil microbial properties and phospholipid fatty
acid fractions after chloroform fumigation, Soil Biol. Biochem.,
29, 1325–1336, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zheng, W., Liang, L., and Gu, B.: Mercury Reduction and Oxidation by Reduced
Natural Organic Matter in Anoxic Environments, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 292–299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es203402p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es203402p</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, X., Silva, L. C. R., Doane, T. A., and Horwath, W. R.: Iron: The
Forgotten Driver of Nitrous Oxide Production in Agricultural Soil, edited by: Bond-Lamberty,
B., PLOS ONE, 8, e60146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060146" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0060146</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu-Barker, X., Cavazos, A. R., Ostrom, N. E., Horwath, W. R., and Glass, J.
B.: The importance of abiotic reactions for nitrous oxide production,
Biogeochemistry, 126, 251–267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0166-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10533-015-0166-4</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N<sub>2</sub>O production in tropical peat soil microcosms</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Chemodenitrification – the non-enzymatic process of nitrite reduction –
may be an important sink for fixed nitrogen in tropical peatlands. Rates and
products of chemodenitrification are dependent on O<sub>2</sub>, pH, Fe<sup>2+</sup>
concentration, and organic matter composition, which are variable across peat
soils. Assessing abiotic reaction pathways is difficult because
sterilization and inhibition agents can alter the availability of reactants by
changing iron speciation and organic matter composition. We compared six
commonly used soil sterilization techniques – <i>γ</i> irradiation,
chloroform, autoclaving, and the use of three different chemical inhibitors (mercury, zinc, and
azide) – for their compatibility with chemodenitrification assays
for tropical peatland soils (organic-rich, low-pH soil from the eastern
Amazon). Out of the six techniques, <i>γ</i> irradiation resulted in soil
treatments with the lowest cell viability and denitrification activity and
the least effect on pH, iron speciation, and organic matter composition. Nitrite
depletion rates in <i>γ</i>-irradiated soils were highly similar to
untreated (live) soils, whereas other sterilization techniques showed
deviations. Chemodenitrification was a dominant process of nitrite
consumption in tropical peatland soils assayed in this study. Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is
one possible product of chemodenitrification reactions. Abiotic N<sub>2</sub>O
production was low to moderate (3&thinsp;%–16&thinsp;% of converted nitrite), and
different sterilization techniques lead to significant variations on
production rates due to inherent processes or potential artifacts. Our work
represents the first methodological basis for testing the abiotic
denitrification and N<sub>2</sub>O production potential in tropical peatland soil.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abràmoff, M. D., Magalhães, P. J., and Ram, S. J.: Image processing
with ImageJ, Laurin Publishing, Pittsfield, MA, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Afkhami, A., Madrakian, T., and Maleki, A.: Indirect Kinetic
Spectrophotometric Determination of Hydroxylamine Based on Its Reaction with
Iodate, Anal. Sci., 22, 329–331, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.22.329" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.22.329</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Babbin, A. R., Bianchi, D., Jayakumar, A., and Ward, B. B.: Rapid nitrous
oxide cycling in the suboxic ocean, Science, 348, 1127–1129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8380" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8380</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Berns, A. E., Philipp, H., Narres, H. D., Burauel, P., Vereecken, H., and
Tappe, W.: Effect of gamma?sterilization and autoclaving on soil organic
matter structure as studied by solid state NMR, UV and fluorescence
spectroscopy, J. Soil Sci., 59, 540–550,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01016.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Blankinship, J. C., Becerra, C. A., Schaeffer, S. M., and Schimel, J. P.:
Separating cellular metabolism from exoenzyme activity in soil organic
matter decomposition, Soil Biol. Biochem., 71, 68–75,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.010</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bowler, M. W., Montgomery, M. G., Leslie, A. G. W., and Walker, J. E.: How
azide inhibits ATP hydrolysis by the F-ATPases, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
103, 8646–8649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602915103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602915103</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Buchwald, C., Grabb, K., Hansel, C. M., and Wankel, S. D.: Constraining the
role of iron in environmental nitrogen transformations: Dual stable isotope
systematics of abiotic NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> reduction by Fe(II) and its production
of N<sub>2</sub>O, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 186, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.04.041</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bunzl, K., Schmidt, W., and Sansoni, B.: Kinetics of Ion Exchange in Soil
Organic Matter. Iv. Adsorption and Desorption of Pb<sup>2+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup>,
Cd<sup>2+</sup>, Zn<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup> by Peat, J. Soil Sci., 27,
32–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1976.tb01972.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1976.tb01972.x</a>, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Buessecker, S.: Effects of sterilization techniques on chemodenitrification and N<sub>2</sub>O production in tropical peat soil microcosms, figshare, Dataset, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10043177.v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10043177.v1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, F. E.: Losses of nitrogen accompanying nitrification, Trans. Int. Soc. Soil Sci., Com. IV and V, 173–176, 1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cory, R. M. and McKnight, D. M.: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Reveals
Ubiquitous Presence of Oxidized and Reduced Quinones in Dissolved Organic
Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8142–8149, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0506962</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Criquet, J., Rodriguez, E. M., Allard, S., Wellauer, S., Salhi, E., Joll, C.
A., and von  Gunten, U.: Reaction of bromine and chlorine with phenolic
compounds and natural organic matter extracts – Electrophilic aromatic
substitution and oxidation, Water Res., 85, 476–486,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.051</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Davidson, E. A., Chorover, J., and Dail, D. B.: A mechanism of abiotic
immobilization of nitrate in forest ecosystems: the ferrous wheel
hypothesis, Global Change Biol., 9, 228–236,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00592.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00592.x</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Drexel, T. R., Haitzer, M., Ryan, J. N., Aiken, G. R., and Nagy, K. L.:
Mercury(II) Sorption to Two Florida Everglades Peats: Evidence for Strong
and Weak Binding and Competition by Dissolved Organic Matter Released from
the Peat, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4058–4064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0114005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0114005</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Duggleby, R. G.: Analysis of enzyme progress curves by nonlinear
regression, in: Methods in Enzymology, 249, 61–90, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fellman, J. B., Hood, E., and Spencer, R. G. M.: Fluorescence spectroscopy
opens new windows into dissolved organic matter dynamics in freshwater
ecosystems: A review, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 2452–2462,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.6.2452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.6.2452</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, B., Bian, Y., Miller, C. L., Dong, W., Jiang, X., and Liang, L.: Mercury
reduction and complexation by natural organic matter in anoxic environments,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008747108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008747108</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Hall, S. J. and Silver, W. L.: Iron oxidation stimulates organic matter
decomposition in humid tropical forest soils, Global Change Biol., 19,
2804–2813, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12229" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12229</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hutchins, C. M., Teasdale, P. R., Lee, J., and Simpson, S. L.: The effect of
manipulating sediment pH on the porewater chemistry of copper- and
zinc-spiked sediments, Chemosphere, 69, 1089–1099,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.029</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkinson, D. S. and Powlson, D. S.: The effects of biocidal treatments on
metabolism in soil – I. Fumigation with chloroform, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 8, 167–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90001-8</a>, 1976a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkinson, D. S. and Powlson, D. S.: The effects of biocidal treatments on
metabolism in soil – V: A method for measuring soil biomass, Soil Biol. Biochem., 8, 209–213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90005-5</a>, 1976b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, L. C., Peters, B., Pacheco, J. S. L., Casciotti, K. L., and Fendorf,
S.: Stable Isotopes and Iron Oxide Mineral Products as Markers of
Chemodenitrification, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3444–3452,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es504862x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es504862x</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jun, L. A. B., Gilmour, C. M., and Bollen, W. B.: Non-biological Reduction of
Nitrite in Soil, Nature, 225, 664–664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/225664a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/225664a0</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kampschreur, M. J., Kleerebezem, R., de Vet, W. W. J. M., and van Loosdrecht,
M. C. M.: Reduced iron induced nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emission,
Water Res., 45, 5945–5952, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.056</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kappelmeyer, U., Kuschk, P., and Stottmeister, U.: Model Experiments on the
Influence of Artificial Humic Compounds on Chemodenitrification, Water Air
Soil Pollut., 147, 317–330, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024518027312" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024518027312</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kerndorff, H. and Schnitzer, M.: Sorption of metals on humic acid,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 44, 1701–1708,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(80)90221-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(80)90221-5</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lähteenoja, O., Ruokolainen, K., Schulman, L., and Alvarez, J.: Amazonian
floodplains harbour minerotrophic and ombrotrophic peatlands, CATENA, 79,
140–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2009.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2009.06.006</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Lawson, I. T., Jones, T. D., Kelly, T. J., Coronado, E. N. H., and Roucoux,
K. H.: The Geochemistry of Amazonian Peats, Wetlands, 34, 905–915,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0552-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-014-0552-z</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Liengaard, L., Figueiredo, V., Markfoged, R., Revsbech, N. P., Nielsen, L.
P., Prast, A. E., and Kühl, M.: Hot moments of N<sub>2</sub>O transformation
and emission in tropical soils from the Pantanal and the Amazon (Brazil),
Soil Biol. Biochem., 75, 26–36,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.015</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
McCalley, C. K. and Sparks, J. P.: Abiotic Gas Formation Drives Nitrogen
Loss from a Desert Ecosystem, Science, 326, 837–840,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178984" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178984</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
McDevitt, C. A., Ogunniyi, A. D., Valkov, E., Lawrence, M. C., Kobe, B.,
McEwan, A. G., and Paton, J. C.: A Molecular Mechanism for Bacterial
Susceptibility to Zinc, edited by: Imlay, J., PLoS Pathog., 7, 1–9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002357</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
McIlvin, M. R. and Altabet, M. A.: Chemical Conversion of Nitrate and
Nitrite to Nitrous Oxide for Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotopic Analysis in
Freshwater and Seawater, Anal. Chem., 77, 5589–5595,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050528s" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050528s</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
McKenney, D. J., Lazar, C., and Findlay, W. J.: Kinetics of the Nitrite to
Nitric Oxide Reaction in Peat, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,
54, 106–112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010016x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010016x</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
McKnight, D. M., Boyer, E. W., Westerhoff, P. K., Doran, P. T., Kulbe, T.,
and Andersen, D. T.: Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved
organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 38–48, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Moraghan, J. T. and Buresh, R. J.: Chemical Reduction of Nitrite and Nitrous
Oxide by Ferrous Iron, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 41,
47–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010017x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010017x</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Nelson, D. W. and Bremner, J. M.: Factors affecting chemical transformations
of nitrite in soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 1, 229–239,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90023-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90023-6</a>, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ohno, T.: Fluorescence Inner-Filtering Correction for Determining the
Humification Index of Dissolved Organic Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
36, 742–746, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0155276" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0155276</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ostrom, N. E., Gandhi, H., Trubl, G., and Murray, A. E.: Chemodenitrification
in the cryoecosystem of Lake Vida, Victoria Valley, Antarctica, Geobiology,
14, 575–587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12190" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12190</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Park, J. Y. and Lee, Y. N.: Solubility and decomposition kinetics of nitrous
acid in aqueous solution, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 6294–6302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100333a025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/j100333a025</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S., Pérez, T., Boering, K. A., Trumbore, S. E., Gil, J., Marquina,
S., and Tyler, S. C.: Can N<sub>2</sub>O stable isotopes and isotopomers be useful
tools to characterize sources and microbial pathways of N<sub>2</sub>O production
and consumption in tropical soils?, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 25,
1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GB003615</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Parton, W., Silver, W. L., Burke, I. C., Grassens, L., Harmon, M. E.,
Currie, W. S., King, J. Y., Adair, E. C., Brandt, L. A., Hart, S. C., and
Fasth, B.: Global-Scale Similarities in Nitrogen Release Patterns During
Long-Term Decomposition, Science, 315, 361–364,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134853</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Pepper, S. E., Borkowski, M., Richmann, M. K., and Reed, D. T.: Determination
of ferrous and ferric iron in aqueous biological solutions, Anal.
Chim. Acta, 663, 172–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.056</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Pérez, T., Trumbore, S. E., Tyler, S. C., Matson, P. A., Monasterio, I.
O., Rahn, T., and Griffith, D. W. T.: Identifying the agricultural imprint on
the global N<sub>2</sub>O budget using stable isotopes, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 106, 9869–9878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900809</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Porter, L. K.: Gaseous Products Produced by Anaerobic Reaction of Sodium
Nitrite with Oxime Compounds and Oximes Synthesized from Organic Matter 1,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 33, 696–702,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300050023x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300050023x</a>, 1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Raczyńska, E. D., Krygowski, T. M., Zachara, J. E., Ośmiałowski,
B., and Gawinecki, R.: Tautomeric equilibria, H-bonding and <i>π</i>-electron
delocalization in o-nitrosophenol. A B3LYP/6-311+G(2df,2p) study, J.
Phys. Org. Chem., 18, 892–897, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.963" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.963</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Rogers, R. D.: Abiological Methylation of Mercury in Soil 1, J.
Environ. Qual., 6, 463–467,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1977.00472425000600040029x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1977.00472425000600040029x</a>, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Stedman, G.: Mechanism of the azide–nitrite reaction – Part II, J. Chem.
Soc., 2949–2954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9590002949" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9590002949</a>, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S., and Bro, R.: Tracing dissolved organic matter
in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy,
Mar. Chem., 82, 239–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(03)00072-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(03)00072-0</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, F. J., Harrison, R. M., Wetselaar, R., and Leeper, R. A.:
Nitrosation of Soil Organic Matter: III. Nature of Gases Produced by
Reaction of Nitrite with Lignins, Humic Substances, and Phenolic
Constituents Under Neutral and Slightly Acidic Conditions 1, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 34, 430–435,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400030024x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1970.03615995003400030024x</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Stiefel, P., Schmidt-Emrich, S., Maniura-Weber, K., and Ren, Q.: Critical
aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9
and propidium iodide, BMC Microbiology, 15, 36,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0376-x</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Stumm, W. and Morgan, J. J. (Eds.): Aquatic Chemistry, 3rd ed., John Wiley
&amp; Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Thorn, K. A. and Mikita, M. A.: Nitrite Fixation by Humic Substances
Nitrogen-15 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Evidence for Potential Intermediates
in Chemodenitrification, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64,
568–582, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642568x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642568x</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Thorn, K. A., Younger, S. J., and Cox, L. G.: Order of Functionality Loss
during Photodegradation of Aquatic Humic Substances, J.
Environ. Qual., 39, 1416–1428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0408</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Trevors, J. T.: Sterilization and inhibition of microbial activity in soil,
J. Microbiol. Methods, 26, 53–59,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(96)00843-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(96)00843-3</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Tuominen, L., Kairesalo, T., and Hartikainen, H.: Comparison of Methods for
Inhibiting Bacterial Activity in Sediment, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60,
3454–3457, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Van Cleemput, O., Patrick, W. H., and McIlhenny, R. C.: Nitrite Decomposition
in Flooded Soil Under Different pH and Redox Potential Conditions, Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J., 40, 55–60,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000010018x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000010018x</a>, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Veverica, T. J., Kane, E. S., Marcarelli, A. M., and Green, S. A.: Ionic
Liquid Extraction Unveils Previously Occluded Humic-Bound Iron in Peat Soil
Pore Water, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 80, 771–782,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.10.0377" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.10.0377</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, H. F. and Xenopoulos, M. A.: Effects of agricultural land use on the
composition of fluvial dissolved organic matter, Nat. Geosci., 2,
37–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo391" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo391</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wolf, D. C., Dao, T. H., Scott, H. D., and Lavy, T. L.: Influence of
Sterilization Methods on Selected Soil Microbiological, Physical, and
Chemical Properties, J. Environ. Qual., 18, 39–44,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800010007x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800010007x</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wullstein, L. H. and Gilmour, C. M.: Non-enzymatic Formation of Nitrogen
Gas, Nature, 210, 1150–1151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/2101150a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/2101150a0</a>, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Xia, K., Skyllberg, U. L., Bleam, W. F., Bloom, P. R., Nater, E. A., and
Helmke, P. A.: X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Evidence for the Complexation
of Hg(II) by Reduced Sulfur in Soil Humic Substances, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 33, 257–261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es980433q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es980433q</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Zelles, L., Palojärvi, A., Kandeler, E., Von Lützow, M., Winter, K.,
and Bai, Q. Y.: Changes in soil microbial properties and phospholipid fatty
acid fractions after chloroform fumigation, Soil Biol. Biochem.,
29, 1325–1336, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Zheng, W., Liang, L., and Gu, B.: Mercury Reduction and Oxidation by Reduced
Natural Organic Matter in Anoxic Environments, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 292–299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es203402p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es203402p</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, X., Silva, L. C. R., Doane, T. A., and Horwath, W. R.: Iron: The
Forgotten Driver of Nitrous Oxide Production in Agricultural Soil, edited by: Bond-Lamberty,
B., PLOS ONE, 8, e60146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060146" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060146</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu-Barker, X., Cavazos, A. R., Ostrom, N. E., Horwath, W. R., and Glass, J.
B.: The importance of abiotic reactions for nitrous oxide production,
Biogeochemistry, 126, 251–267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0166-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0166-4</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
