<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-17-1765-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Microstructure and composition of marine aggregates as co-determinants for vertical particulate organic carbon<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> transfer in the global ocean</article-title><alt-title>Microcomposition of marine aggregates as co-determinant for global POC fluxes</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Microcomposition of marine aggregates as co-determinant for global POC fluxes}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Maerz et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Maerz</surname><given-names>Joeran</given-names></name>
          <email>joeran.maerz@mpimet.mpg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3716-3316</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Six</surname><given-names>Katharina D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4594-2793</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Stemmler</surname><given-names>Irene</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ahmerkamp</surname><given-names>Soeren</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0897-0784</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ilyina</surname><given-names>Tatiana</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3475-4842</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M), Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology (MPI-MM), Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>a</label><institution>present address: wobe-systems GmbH, Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Joeran Maerz (joeran.maerz@mpimet.mpg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>1765</fpage><lpage>1803</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Joeran Maerz et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e132">Marine aggregates are the vector for biogenically bound carbon and nutrients from the euphotic zone to the interior of the oceans. To improve the representation of this biological carbon pump in the global biogeochemical HAMburg Ocean Carbon Cycle (HAMOCC) model, we implemented a novel Microstructure, Multiscale, Mechanistic, Marine Aggregates in the Global Ocean (M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO) sinking scheme. M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO explicitly represents the size, microstructure, heterogeneous composition, density and porosity of aggregates and ties ballasting mineral and particulate organic carbon (POC) fluxes together. Additionally, we incorporated temperature-dependent remineralization of POC. We compare M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO with the standard HAMOCC version, where POC fluxes follow a Martin curve approach with (i) linearly increasing sinking velocity with depth and (ii) temperature-independent remineralization. Minerals descend separately with a constant speed. In contrast to the standard HAMOCC, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO reproduces the latitudinal pattern of POC transfer efficiency, as recently constrained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.1"/>. High latitudes show transfer efficiencies of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the subtropical gyres show lower values of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition to temperature as a driving factor for remineralization, diatom frustule size  co-determines POC fluxes in silicifier-dominated ocean regions, while calcium carbonate enhances the aggregate excess density and thus sinking velocity in subtropical gyres. Prescribing rising carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations in stand-alone runs (without climate feedback), M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO alters the regional ocean atmosphere <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes compared to the standard model. M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO exhibits higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake in the Southern Ocean compared to the standard run, while in subtropical gyres, less <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken up. Overall, the global oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake remains the same. With the explicit representation of measurable aggregate properties, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO can serve as a test bed for evaluating the impact of aggregate-associated processes on global biogeochemical cycles and, in particular, on the biological carbon pump.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page1766?><p id="d1e293">Marine aggregates transfer biologically bound carbon and nutrients from the sunlit surface waters, the euphotic zone, to the interior of the oceans. While uncertainty with respect to primary production estimates exists, about 4.0 to 11.2 Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of biologically bound carbon is annually exported out of the euphotic zone of the global ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100 bib1.bibx132 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.2"/>. The net withdrawal of carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the ocean surface through export of carbon bound in particulate organic matter (POM) and biogenic minerals and subsequent release through  microbial remineralization and dissolution during aggregate descent determine the strength of the so-called biological carbon pump. The  biological carbon pump critically depends on phytoplankton growth, the replenishment of the euphotic zone with nutrients through mixing and upwelling processes, and the  efficiency of biologically bound carbon transfer from surface waters to the interior of the oceans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx171" id="paren.3"/>. The region and depth of carbon sequestration eventually determine the residence time of the biologically bound carbon upon recurrence at the ocean surface. Representing transport and fate of marine aggregates in Earth system models (ESMs) is therefore key in quantifying the future evolution of biogeochemical cycles and particularly the biological carbon pump and its feedback on the Earth system under climate change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.4"/>. In the present study, we thus aim to advance the representation of marine aggregates in an ESM framework.</p>
      <p id="d1e328">Marine aggregates are porous entities which are heterogeneously composed of POM, biogenic and inorganic minerals.  The sinking velocity of marine aggregates, their microbial remineralization and zooplankton grazing govern the attenuation of vertical particulate organic carbon (POC) fluxes. The sinking velocity of aggregates is primarily determined by their size. In addition, the internal microstructure, defined by the porosity  and heterogeneous composition,  entails high variability in excess density and thus sinking speed of aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.5"/>. Biogenic calcium carbonate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and opal structures, primarily formed by coccolithophores and diatoms, act as ballasting minerals in organic aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.6"/>. On the contrary, the available amount of POC, acting as glue, is suggested to limit the uptake capability for ballasting minerals before aggregates disintegrate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx136 bib1.bibx137 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.7"/>. Ballasting increases the POC transfer efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.8"/>, defined as the fraction of POC exported out of the euphotic zone that reaches a particular depth, e.g., 1000 m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.9"/>. As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is significantly denser than opal,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is suggested to be a more effective ballasting material for marine aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.10"/>, implying  higher POC transfer efficiency in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-production-dominated regions. Phytoplankton communities possess spatio-temporally varying patterns and prime the sinking flux ratios of detritus to ballasting minerals, i.e., the rain ratios. High <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-opal ratios are found in oligotrophic regions of the mid-latitude subtropical gyres, while opal is the prevalent ballasting mineral in high latitudes and upwelling-influenced equatorial regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.11"/>.  However, simple ballasting relationships on aggregates are questioned, and the prevailing plankton network is suggested as an additional driver for POC fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx172 bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.12"/>. For example, cell size and morphology present in the phytoplankton community are suggested as a primary determining factor for sinking velocity of marine aggregates  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.13"/>. In turn, the attenuation of POC fluxes is hypothesized to be modulated by microbial remineralization and by zooplankton grazing in oligotrophic and eutrophic regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.14"/>. Since temperature controls enzymatic reaction kinetics, and thus microbial remineralization of POC, slower attenuation and thus higher transfer efficiency are suggested in cold high latitudes compared to warm oligotrophic regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="paren.15"/>. For a long time, the aforementioned variable factors and processes, the limited understanding of aggregation and fragmentation processes that shape the aggregate size spectrum, and the sparse number of data have retarded the emergence of a detailed picture of global pattern of POC fluxes attenuation and thus transfer efficiency.</p>
      <p id="d1e421">However, quantification of the regionally varying POC transfer efficiency and its variability is key in understanding global biogeochemical cycles, in particular the carbon cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.16"/>.
Recently, global POC fluxes have been constrained to possess high transfer efficiency in high latitudes and upwelling regions and lower efficiency in the subtropical gyres <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="paren.17"/>. The underlying  controls for the transfer efficiency pattern seem to exhibit a distinct latitudinal variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.18"/>. The simplified model study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.19"/> suggests aggregate size, ballasting of particles by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and opal, temperature effects on microbial aerobic and anaerobic remineralization, water density, and molecular viscosity as major controls of the transfer efficiency pattern.</p>
      <p id="d1e447">Processes of marine snow formation, ballasting and sinking are currently underrepresented in  ESMs despite the  relevance of aggregates for the transfer and sequestration of POC to the deep ocean. Only a few global models explicitly incorporate aggregation of phytoplankton mechanistically <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx147" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> while neglecting ballasting effects or vice versa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.21"/>. POC sinking velocities in ESMs are typically formulated to reproduce the Martin curve  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="paren.22"/> or heuristically describe ballasting of POC with opal and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.23"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, which limits the process-based adaptation of sinking velocities under changing environmental conditions associated with climate change.</p>
      <p id="d1e478">As a first step, we develop the Microstructure, Multiscale, Mechanistic, Marine Aggregates in the Global Ocean (M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO) sinking scheme that explicitly represents composition, microstructure, and related properties such as porosity and density of aggregates. We aim to consistently define marine aggregates with their in situ measurable properties in an ESM framework. We implement M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO in the global HAMburg Ocean Carbon Cycle (HAMOCC) model, which is part of the Max Planck Institute – Earth system model (MPI-ESM), to explicate the emerging pattern of aggregate properties and examine their effect on sinking velocity and the global pattern of POC transfer efficiency.  We particularly aim to (i) represent the  POC transfer efficiency pattern of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.24"/>, (ii) provide further understanding into the underlying driving factors for this pattern and (iii) give insights into the impact of M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO on the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux pattern.  We focus on the transfer efficiency pattern identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.25"/>, as it was derived by diagnosing  phosphate fluxes from World Ocean Atlas 2009 phosphate<?pagebreak page1767?> concentration via inverse modeling. This approach benefits from  many more observations used compared to direct flux observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx164 bib1.bibx168" id="paren.26"/> and can thus be regarded as, to date, more reliable than previous estimates with a partly opposing  latitudinal  pattern <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx116" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e534">With M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, we represent marine aggregates at the global scale to provide a test bed for future investigations of aggregate-associated processes in ESMs, e.g., particle-size-, microstructure- and composition-dependent remineralization rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e554">The HAMburg Ocean Carbon Cycle (HAMOCC) model is a global biogeochemical model which features biology and resolves the carbon chemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx154 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx138 bib1.bibx121" id="paren.28"/>. HAMOCC assumes a fixed stoichiometry for dead and living organic matter and represents the nutrients phosphate, nitrate, silicate and iron. Phytoplankton in HAMOCC, namely bulk phytoplankton and diazotrophs, can thus experience nutrient co-limitation. Diazotrophs assimilate gaseous dinitrogen under nitrate limitation and compete for phosphorus with bulk phytoplankton. Diazotrophs grow slower than bulk phytoplankton and have their optimal growth temperature at about 28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx138 bib1.bibx139" id="paren.29"/>. Zooplankton feeds on bulk phytoplankton and releases POM, which enters the common detritus pool. During detritus formation through bulk phytoplankton or zooplankton, opal or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is produced depending on silicate availability. This treatment  adequately depicts the spatial distribution of silicifying and calcifying plankton communities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.30"/>. HAMOCC represents sediment processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.31"/> and
is coupled to the global three-dimensional Max Planck Institute Ocean Model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.32"><named-content content-type="pre">MPIOM; </named-content></xref>.
HAMOCC is described and evaluated in previous studies; for details, see, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx154" id="text.33"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.34"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx138" id="text.35"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="text.36"/>. In the following, we therefore focus on processes in the standard version, i.e., sinking and remineralization, which we modify with the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO sinking scheme. A table with the used mathematical symbols can be found in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="App1.Ch1.S4.T3"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>HAMOCC standard representation of sinking fluxes and remineralization</title>
      <p id="d1e628">The  standard version of HAMOCC  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="paren.37"/> represents  sinking fluxes of POC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, according to the concept of the Martin curve <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx94" id="paren.38"/>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M34" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the POC flux out of the euphotic zone at export depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For simplicity, the export depth is globally defined as being <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in HAMOCC. Above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a constant sinking speed of 3.5 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed. Below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we assume a linearly increasing mass concentration-weighted mean sinking velocity with depth. The ratio between the remineralization rate of POC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the vertical gradient of the sinking velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  determines the  POC flux  slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.39"/>. In the standard version of HAMOCC, remineralization of POC is temperature-independent and comprehends oxygen-concentration-dependent aerobic remineralization as well as sulfate reduction and denitrification under sub-anoxic and anoxic conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e854">The sinking tracers, opal and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are treated separately from POC and sink with their own, constant sinking velocity. Aeolian dust is, apart from the release of bioavailable iron in surface waters, inert and sinks slowly through the water column. The opal dissolution rate in the standard model is linearly temperature-dependent. HAMOCC
accounts for dissolution in carbonate ion undersaturated conditions below the dynamically emerging lysocline.   In the following, we refer to this version of HAMOCC as “standard”.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The novel M${}^{4}$AGO sinking scheme in HAMOCC}?><title>The novel M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO sinking scheme in HAMOCC</title>
      <p id="d1e886">Natural waters exhibit a size spectrum of aggregates whose diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, composition and microstructure determine their terminal sinking velocity. In the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO approach, we explicitly represent  microstructure and heterogeneous composition of aggregates. For the aggregate size spectrum, we limit the representation to  a variable power law number distribution, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and power law factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx147" id="paren.40"><named-content content-type="pre">following e.g.,</named-content></xref>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M51" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This way, we avoid the computational costs of size-class-based model approaches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81 bib1.bibx155 bib1.bibx149" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e971">The local concentration-weighted mean sinking velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO is eventually computed from the number distribution (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) that is truncated at the minimum and maximum aggregate sizes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, and expressions for the aggregate mass,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the sinking velocity of aggregates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of a particular diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Integration over the aggregate size spectrum yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M60" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          We only implicitly account for aggregation and fragmentation and explicitly represent the temporally and spatially<?pagebreak page1768?> variable heterogeneity and microstructure of aggregates and their effect on the mean sinking velocity.  We refrain from representing the potential heterogeneity of aggregate composition within the local size spectrum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.42"><named-content content-type="pre">see, e.g.,</named-content></xref>.
Consequently, and in contrast to the standard configuration, the settling tracers in HAMOCC, opal, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, detritus and dust sink in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO at the same mean sinking velocity of aggregates (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). In contrast to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.43"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx147" id="text.44"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.45"/>, we explicitly incorporate both variable aggregate size and ballasting through heterogeneous composition. Under the above assumptions, we derive the terms for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the following sections.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Representation of aggregate microstructure and heterogeneous composition</title>
      <p id="d1e1292">Marine aggregates are porous <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.46"/> and feature a self-similar
microstructure which can be described via a fractal dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx91" id="paren.47"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would depict a chain of aggregate constituents, where the length equals the aggregate diameter, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes a solid sphere. Consequently, the mass of an aggregate,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, grows disproportionately to the aggregates volume and can be expressed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a mass factor for the smallest entity. Thus, the density of an aggregate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decreases with increasing diameter. Aggregates consist of,
for example, phytoplankton cells or coccolithophore shells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.48"/>, which we consider to be spherical primary particles. Primary particles exhibit their own density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Taking the fractal scaling of aggregate mass into account, the
excess density of an aggregate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
surrounding fluid density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="paren.49"/>
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>for </mml:mtext><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Furthermore, the aggregate porosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>for </mml:mtext><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and, hence, both excess density and porosity are regulated by the fractal dimension and primary-particle size.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be introduced to the well-known <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx156" id="text.50"/> terminal sinking velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M84" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            For small particle Reynolds numbers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the drag coefficient is  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the  sinking velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, becomes
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are  molecular dynamic and kinematic viscosity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120" id="paren.51"/>, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravitational acceleration constant.
However, this approach assumes homogeneous, mono-sized primary particles, while it displays the potential importance of primary-particle size and density as well as aggregate microstructure for sinking velocity.  To better represent aggregates in natural systems, the heterogeneity of primary particles was thus far considered either for size or density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx86" id="paren.52"/>.
With M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, we  represent aggregates composed
of poly-dense, poly-sized primary particles under the assumption of a singled value fractal
dimension throughout the aggregate size spectrum. This
allows for representing heterogeneous primary particles such as diatom
frustules, coccoliths, dust particles and detritus as principal components of
marine aggregates.</p>
      <p id="d1e1859"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.53"/> derived a representation of the mean primary-particle size,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M93" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            for an aggregate that is composed of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mono-dense spherical primary
particles of different diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Poly-sized formed aggregates disobey the traditional mass fractal relationship,
but the fractal nature continues to emerge in a power law scaling for the mass
present in a radial shell from an occupied point in the aggregate
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.54"/>. The approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.55"/> conserves the size
of the aggregate and the encapsulated solid volume of the primary particles,
and thus the porosity of the aggregate is unimpaired, while the calculation does not presume an equal number of mean, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and individual primary particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (hence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for poly-sized primary particles), which is negligible in the following, as we do not consider <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> any further.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1769?><p id="d1e2096">Under the assumption that aggregates feature the same composition and hence same
heterogeneity in a size spectrum, the aggregate-composing primary-particle types
are always the same for any aggregate of diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in a unit volume and
thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">constant</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  This further implies that the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
between the total number of primary particles of one particle type, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
the total number of primary particles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in a unit
volume  is equal to the ratio found in an individual aggregate:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M106" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Rewriting Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>),  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and inserting it into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) gives
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M108" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where the factors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed in HAMOCC via the concentration of
each aggregate-forming tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Namely, we consider the HAMOCC tracers
detritus, opal, calcite and dust in taking part in the formation of
heterogeneously composed aggregates.
Calculating the number of primary particles from the tracer concentration
requires the molecular concentration to mass factor, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
tracer-related primary-particle diameter, volume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and density
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            The advantage of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>) is that it allows us to determine
the mean primary-particle
diameter in HAMOCC while solid volume and density of primary particles
are conserved. Ensuring mass conservation, we introduce the
volume-weighted primary-particle mean density
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M115" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            and, hence, multiplication by the volume of the mean primary particle then yields the mass of a mean primary particle (see also
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>):
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M116" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Substituting Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>) into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>),
we derive the mass factor for heterogeneous aggregates
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The derivation of the mean primary-particle diameter
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>), density (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) and mass
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>)  allows for applying common fractal laws for the
calculation of aggregate mass, density and thus sinking velocity. Hence,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be expressed as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
For a single type of primary particle, all underlying
equations reduce to the traditional fractal-scaling relationship <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx91" id="paren.56"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2803">Underlying assumptions for the representation of aggregates composed
of poly-dense, poly-sized primary particles. Primary particles, like dust particles, coccoliths and diatom frustules <bold>(a)</bold>, are assumed to be spherical and exhibit their characteristic density <bold>(b)</bold>. Once aggregated, we assume the diameter of the aggregate to be constant and the total volume and mass of primary particles to be preserved <bold>(c)</bold>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the primary-particle volume, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the primary-particle density and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the primary-particle diameter of primary-particle type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mass of an aggregate of diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent mean primary-particle diameter and density, respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Mean sinking velocity of marine aggregates</title>
      <?pagebreak page1770?><p id="d1e2937">In the preceding section, we derived a
formulation for the mean primary-particle size (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>),
which we apply as a lower integration bound in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), and, hence, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.57"><named-content content-type="pre">following </named-content></xref>.
The maximum aggregate diameter of the size spectrum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is
limited by fragmentation of particles.  Several mechanisms can cause
fragmentation of aggregates.  Flow-induced turbulent shear has been suggested as the
dominant process in the upper ocean, where turbulent shear reaches
typical values of the order of 1 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.58"/>. By contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.59"/> showed that marine aggregates often withstand oceanic turbulence conditions and suggested biological processes as a mediating factor for shaping the size distribution. Zooplankton also generates
turbulent shear that is strong enough to rupture aggregates
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.60"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.61"/> proposed an alternative control on
aggregate size, namely the sinking of aggregates that produces shear of the
same order of magnitude as ambient turbulent shear  in the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.62"/>. Sinking could
thus  cause fragmentation in deeper regions of the ocean,
where turbulent shear is small <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx167" id="paren.63"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0.01 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>);</named-content></xref>.
Since modeling of particle-reactive thorium
suggests continued fragmentation during particle descent in the
deep ocean  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.64"/>, we adopt the hypothesis of sinking-induced fragmentation and limit the
size distribution based on the particle Reynolds number, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M134" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.65"/> suggested the particle Reynolds number being in a typical
range of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.66"/> measured particle
Reynolds numbers of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Aggregates thus can exhibit larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the laminar case (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The drag coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) can be represented by the expression for solid spheres of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx169" id="text.67"/>, valid up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M141" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            This drag representation leads to smaller settling velocities for large aggregates than the classical Stokes drag (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Hence, aggregates can grow larger until they reach the globally fixed critical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for fragmentation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which leads to a more realistic representation of the size range of aggregates.
We approximate the White drag representation to be <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.68"/>
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M145" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            to avoid iteration and to allow for an analytical solution of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). Applying the parameter values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.871</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.547</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  introduces  maximum errors of less than 10 % compared to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/>) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.69"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3576">By introducing Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E17"/>) in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>), and applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) using mean primary-particle properties, the approximation for the sinking velocity becomes
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>18</label><mml:math id="M152" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            By substituting
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E18"/>) into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E15"/>), the piecewise integration boundaries, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, according to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approximation for Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), become a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E19" content-type="numbered"><label>19</label><mml:math id="M156" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Consequently, the concentration-weighted mean
sinking velocity (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) can then be expressed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E20" content-type="numbered"><label>20</label><mml:math id="M157" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.1}{8.1}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum diameter of aggregates, and by applying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lower integration boundary equals the mean primary-particle diameter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The particle distribution slope, $b$}?><title>The particle distribution slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4222">Observed aggregate size spectra in the ocean exhibit a spatio-temporally
dependent  slope ranging between approximately 3.2 and 5.4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.70"/>
or even lower <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.71"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref>. A smaller slope parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, translates to more large aggregates relative to a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and enhances mean sinking
velocity.
The evolution of the particle-size spectra underlies the interacting processes of
growth and decay of phytoplankton,  aggregation, fragmentation and sinking of
aggregates. Instead of modeling the processes of aggregation and fragmentation
explicitly or prescribing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we assume a dynamic steady state between aggregation and fragmentation to describe the slope of the number distribution.
According to dimensional analysis, the slope of the number distribution in dynamic steady state depends on the fractal dimension of aggregates and the process of aggregation, aggregation due to shear, differential sinking and Brownian motion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.72"/>.
Aggregation due to Brownian motion
is only relevant for particles smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124" id="paren.73"/>, which we neglect here.
We further assume that aggregation
in the majority of the global ocean is dominated by differential settling and
express the particle distribution slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.74"/>
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E21" content-type="numbered"><label>21</label><mml:math id="M168" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a fixed parameter for the sinking velocity dependency on the
particle Reynolds number that we fix for simplicity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The assumption of differential-settling-dominated
aggregation is likely violated in the euphotic zone, where shear aggregation
is probably more relevant and steady-state assumption is questionable,  which we will
address in the discussion (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS10"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>2.2.4</label><title>Heuristic approach to variable aggregate stickiness and
fractal dimension</title>
      <?pagebreak page1771?><p id="d1e4414">Adhesion properties of particles affect the fractal structure of aggregates and
the collision efficiency (“stickiness”) of particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx125 bib1.bibx106" id="paren.75"/>.
Theoretical studies show that the stronger the surface adhesive forces are, the higher
the stickiness of particles and the smaller the intrusion of particles and particle clusters into each other are <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.76"/>.
As a result, this leads to a looser structure, which translates to a small fractal dimension.
Stickiness of phytoplankton is species-specific <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.77"/> and depends on
the growth phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx153" id="paren.78"/>. Furthermore, phytoplankton releases extracellular polymeric substances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.79"><named-content content-type="pre">EPS; </named-content></xref> such as transparent exopolymer particles (TEPs), which are suggested to be aggregation-priming, sticky materials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx160 bib1.bibx135 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.80"/>.
The resulting fractal dimension is typically determined as one value across all aggregate sizes.
We thus assign a single fractal dimension to an aggregate population and depict the linkage  between stickiness and fractal dimension in a qualitative manner. We attribute a stickiness value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to each sinking tracer in HAMOCC and calculate the mean stickiness for the aggregates that is then mapped to a fractal dimension. Since adhesion, and thus stickiness, is a surface property, we calculate the mean stickiness,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E22" content-type="numbered"><label>22</label><mml:math id="M172" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">where</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            weighted by the primary-particle surfaces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We map the mean stickiness to a range between 0 and 1:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E23" content-type="numbered"><label>23</label><mml:math id="M174" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">map</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4646"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx134" id="text.81"/> introduced a scaling parameter for the effective aggregation range in microscopic aggregation models to stipulate a defined fractal dimension across aggregate sizes. The scaling parameter
can be perceived
as an indicator of stickiness that defines the effective aggregation range;
i.e., higher  stickiness results in a  larger
effective aggregation range. We  introduce, as an analogy for the dependency of
the fractal dimension on the scaling parameter of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx134" id="text.82"/>,
a transfer function for the mapped mean stickiness to fractal dimension,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">map</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E24" content-type="numbered"><label>24</label><mml:math id="M178" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">map</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">map</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the parameterized minimum and maximum
fractal dimension of aggregates.
Modeled stickier aggregates thus exhibit lower fractal dimensions than non-sticky particles, which is
in qualitative agreement with previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx125 bib1.bibx106 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx134" id="paren.83"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>2.2.5</label><title>Diatoms as a special case of primary particles</title>
      <p id="d1e4824">Diatoms are silicifying phytoplankton that possesses a hollow opal skeleton,
the diatom frustule, and are thus different from a homogeneous, solid primary particle like a
coccolith. Diatoms feature a wide range of sizes, from about a few microns to millimeters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.84"/>.  Since sinking velocities of aggregates are
proportional to their diameter, primary-particle density and size
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>), aggregate-incorporated large diatom shells
likely enhance the sinking velocity of particles. Indeed, un-remineralized, intact diatom
frustules were even found in deeper regions of the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.85"/>,
which is in agreement with previously found high sinking speeds of large diatom
aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.86"/>. We therefore explicitly account for diatom shells
by treating them as hollow opal spheres, filled (i) with detritus and (ii) increasing water content with ongoing remineralization while sinking (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4842">Diatom frustule and the remineralization state-dependent composition
of the void. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the thickness of the opal shell with volume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the encapsulated volumes of water and POM, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diameter of the diatom frustule.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=99.584646pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e4907">The opal volume of a modeled diatom is
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E25" content-type="numbered"><label>25</label><mml:math id="M187" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diameter of the diatom,
whose opal shell thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is expressed in terms of the fixed
opal-to-phosphorus formation ratio. The number of diatom frustules per unit
volume,
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E26" content-type="numbered"><label>26</label><mml:math id="M190" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            can therefore be deduced from the present opal concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
opal mole-to-weight factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>).
We assume that the modeled detritus pool can be split into a free external,
non-diatom and a diatom frustule-related, void-filling detritus part. We
further assume that the external pool is remineralized before the intracellular
pool of volume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus neglect cell lysis observed prior to aggregation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.87"/> and rather assume mineral protection of detritus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.88"/>. If more detritus is remineralized than the frustules void would hold,
it is replaced with the respective volume of water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of density
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The frustule density is thus
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E27" content-type="numbered"><label>27</label><mml:math id="M196" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            During growth and decay, diatoms excrete TEPs
which are positively buoyant and possess a density of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to 840 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx115" id="paren.89"/>. TEPs are suggested to play a prominent role in aggregation processes, as they are
probably sticky and thus enhance aggregation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx135" id="paren.90"/>.
In HAMOCC,
phytoplankton excretion of TEPs is not resolved explicitly. We therefore treat TEPs
virtually and assume a linear
dependency of diatom stickiness and density on the freshness of
detritus, defined as the mass ratio between the
actual amount of detritus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the potential mass of detritus linked to
diatom frustules, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">potential</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An additional underlying assumption is
that TEPs are remineralized with the same rates as normal detritus.
Hence, we define the stickiness of diatoms as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E28" content-type="numbered"><label>28</label><mml:math id="M201" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diatom</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">potential</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">potential</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">potential</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the stickiness of
TEPs and pure opal, respectively. To account for the additional buoyancy through TEPs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx115" id="paren.91"/>, here we simplify and assume that the frustule density is lowered by TEPs in dependency on the freshness of detritus. Eventually, the diatom density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diatom</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, becomes
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E29" content-type="numbered"><label>29</label><mml:math id="M206" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diatom</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">potential</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">potential</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
           <?pagebreak page1772?> TEPs thus have a 2-fold effect on aggregates in our model: (i) TEPs increase
stickiness and loosen the aggregate structure, thus decreasing the fractal dimension of aggregates, and (ii) TEPs decrease the fresh diatom frustules'
density and thus add buoyancy without
violating tracer mass conservation (see also model discussion in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS10"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Temperature-dependent opal dissolution and POC  remineralization</title>
      <p id="d1e5460">Marine aggregates tie heterogeneous components together that are disparately
remineralized or dissolved. By contrast, in the standard model, detritus, opal and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were sinking separately from each other, and the global remineralization and dissolution rates are tuned independently because the processes are artificially decoupled. In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, remineralization of detritus and dissolution of, in particular, opal
is tightly linked through the same sinking velocity which let us re-evaluate and revise the formulations for opal dissolution and remineralization.</p>
      <p id="d1e5483">Opal dissolution is temperature-dependent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx141 bib1.bibx142" id="paren.92"/> and is
microbially mediated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.93"/>. Intact diatom frustules are protected from
dissolution by an organic matrix <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.94"/>.  Once the organic
protection surrounding the silicate frustule becomes utilized by
temperature-dependent microbes, they initiate and  mediate the dissolution of
opal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.95"/>. Hence, opal dissolution follows a sequential process:
(i) an initial temperature-dependent remineralization of the organic coating of
the silicate frustule and (ii) the microbially mediated dissolution of opal
with a temperature dependency of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.96"/>.
We here focus on the temperature-dependent microbially mediated dissolution and introduce a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature-dependent opal dissolution:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E30" content-type="numbered"><label>30</label><mml:math id="M211" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dissolution</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the opal dissolution rate at the reference water temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ambient water temperature.
In the standard version, we remain with the former linearly temperature-dependent opal dissolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx141 bib1.bibx148" id="paren.97"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5695">Analogously to opal, we incorporate a temperature-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factor to aerobic POC remineralization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx129" id="paren.98"/> which depends on oxygen concentration, [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="paren.99"/>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the half-saturation constant in Michaelis–Menten kinetics, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the remineralization rate at reference
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E31" content-type="numbered"><label>31</label><mml:math id="M221" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          We keep the anaerobic remineralization temperature-independent, since we do not expect temperature shifts in ocean depths, where oxygen minimum zones appear in HAMOCC. In the standard run, the remineralization rates are temperature-independent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Model setup, parametrization and evaluation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>General model setup</title>
      <p id="d1e5898">The M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO sinking scheme was implemented in HAMOCC, which is coupled to the MPIOM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.100"/>. For the flow of calculations in the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO sinking scheme, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.
We run both the standard and the  M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run in a GR15/L40 setup with climatological forcing. This translates to a horizontal resolution of about 1.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 40 uneven vertical layers with highest resolution in the first few hundred meters of the ocean.
The climatological atmospheric boundary conditions are derived from the second European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx152 bib1.bibx144" id="paren.101"><named-content content-type="pre">ERA-40; </named-content></xref>. The mean annual cycle of wind stress, heat and freshwater fluxes is resolved on a daily basis. The continental freshwater runoff is provided by means of a runoff model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx144" id="paren.102"/>.
The loss of POM, opal and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to  sedimentation and subsequent burial was accounted for through homogeneously applied weathering rates which were adjusted for the standard run (and the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run):
globally, we add <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (101.5) G mol P yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as dissolved organic phosphorus and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.3) T mol Si yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To compensate for the loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we add <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (26.5) T mol C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to surface dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and a corresponding amount to surface total alkalinity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as in DIC : 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
We start the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run from the standard run at steady state and spin it up until steady state is reached in surface and mesopelagic waters, which translates to 1700 model years. Through the long overturning times of the global ocean, we still see drifts of nutrient concentrations in deep, old North Pacific waters at this state (i.e., on average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol P m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per century below 2000 m, which amounts to a centennial change of about 0.25 %). We neglect this drift, as we focus on the aggregate properties and their effects on POC fluxes throughout the euphotic and mesopelagic zone.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e6113">Flow diagram of calculations for the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO sinking scheme carried out at every ocean grid point and time step. Marine aggregates in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO are composed of spherical primary particles derived from HAMOCC tracers. Primary particles featuring size, density and stickiness are detritus, diatom frustules, coccoliths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and dust minerals. <?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{height=7.682244pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-g01.png"/> The number of diatom frustules (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E26"/>), related diatom density (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E29"/>) and stickiness (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E28"/>) are estimated from opal and detritus concentration. Diatoms are then considered to be primary particles which feature particular characteristics. <?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{height=7.682244pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-g02.png"/> The remaining detritus is considered to be detritus primary particles. <?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{height=7.682244pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-g03.png"/> The calculation of the fractal dimension (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E24"/>) and <?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{height=7.682244pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-g04.png"/> the calculations of mean primary-particle size (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>) and density (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) are carried out. <?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{height=7.682244pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-g05.png"/> The fractal dimension determines the number distribution slope (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E21"/>). <?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{height=7.682244pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-g06.png"/> The minimum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and maximum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, aggregate diameter (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E19"/>) are estimated. <?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{height=7.682244pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-g07.png"/> The mean sinking velocity (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E20"/>), with which the tracers sink, can eventually be determined.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Parameters of the M${}^{4}$AGO scheme}?><title>Parameters of the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO scheme</title>
      <p id="d1e6266">The M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO sinking scheme introduces a set of new parameters, in particular the primary-particle characteristics, which require constraining and tuning (summarized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e6283">Model parameters for  M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and, if adjusted in comparison to the standard HAMOCC, the standard values.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.84}[.84]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="128.037402pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="48.369685pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="165.025984pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Value in<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>HAMOCC standard/<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Literature range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of detritus particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.103"/>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">aggregates,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx153" id="text.104"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.105"/>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dust</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of dust mineral particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">see text</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.106"/>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of opal particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.107"/>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of TEP particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.108"/>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx158" id="text.109"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Slope parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.871</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.547, 0.871, 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="text.110"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum fraction of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.20/0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dust</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle diameter of dust<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>minerals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113" id="text.111"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx114" id="text.112"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle diameter of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.5 to 15.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx174" id="text.113"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.114"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle diameter of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>diatom frustule</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 to<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>58/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m to<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="text.115"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle diameter of<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>detritus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Minimum fractal dimension of <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>aggregates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.26 to 2.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="text.116"/>,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="text.117"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum fractal dimension of <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>aggregates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Q10 factor for opal dissolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) to 2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.118"/>; based on their values</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Q10 factor for detritus<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>remineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0/2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 to 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx129" id="text.119"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.120"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dissolution rate opal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.010/0.023</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001  to<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.138 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>to 33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.121"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Remineralization rate<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>POC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.026/0.120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>0.08 to 0.21 (at 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.122"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of TEP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">800</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">700 to 840</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.123"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of detritus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">900 to 1300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.124"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of opal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2600 to 2800</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.125"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dust</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of dust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2600</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2300 to 2800</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Clay, quartz; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.126"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Silicon-mole-to-opal-mass factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (kmol Si)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carbon-mole-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>mass factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (kmol C)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">P-mole-to-detritus-mass<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3166</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">kg POM (kmol P)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx157" id="text.127"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Silicate-to-phosphate production<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">mol Si (mol P)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Critical particle Reynolds number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(20 to 30)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.128"/>,<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.129"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reference temperature for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e6304"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Refers to manual tuning of parameter – all other parameters were fixed from beginning. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Measured dissolution and remineralization rates include temperature-dependence,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> which is represented by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factor in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page1774?><p id="d1e7791">We applied HAMOCC's standard sediment densities for opal, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dust to the densities of primary particles, namely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dust</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For suspended detritus, we chose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.130"/>. As density of TEPs, we applied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is within the measured range of 700 to 840 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.131"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e7961">While the density of primary particles is comparably well constrained, the adhesion forces of primary particles, namely related stickiness and fractal dimension of aggregates, are less studied and are weakly constrained. There is still no standardized way to investigate stickiness, fractal dimension and their interdependence for aggregates in natural waters. Stickiness is experimentally defined as the interparticle attachment rate  divided by the interparticle collision rate. Uncertainties in either of the two rates, e.g., due to ignoring the fractal structure of aggregates, aggregate permeability, etc., directly affect the calculated stickiness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.132"/>. In addition, stickiness is phytoplankton species-specific <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.133"/> and depends on the growth phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx153" id="paren.134"/>. The methodological limitations, the heterogeneity of marine aggregate constituents and their variable formation process lead to a wide spread of indirectly inferred values for stickiness and fractal dimension <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.135"><named-content content-type="pre">see, e.g.,</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for a broader overview</named-content></xref>. Diatom aggregates seem to feature a  wide spread of fractal dimensions ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.136"/> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about 0.03 to 0.88 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.137"/>. Indirectly inferred fractal dimensions for reworked aggregates exhibit values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.138"/>, and mineral-dominated aggregates also feature high fractal dimensions of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx173" id="paren.139"/> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="paren.140"/> and low stickiness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx158" id="paren.141"/>.
Since stickiness of in situ primary particles is seldom measured, we choose it to our best knowledge and order the stickiness for modeled primary particles according to the mean stickiness of observed aggregate types:  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dust</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see also Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).  Hence, detritus and TEP-rich aggregates are modeled with a loose structure and low fractal dimension, while degraded, mineral-rich aggregates are more compact and thus feature a higher fractal dimension (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E24"/>) which is in congruence with the present conceptual understanding of aggregates becoming compacted during their descent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.142"/>.  For the minimum and maximum fractal dimension of marine aggregates, we chose conservative bounds of 1.6 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.143"/> and 2.4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.144"><named-content content-type="pre">in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.46</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for reworked aggregates;</named-content></xref>, which is well within the observed range of 1.26 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="paren.145"/> to 2.6 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="paren.146"/> for marine particles.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1775?><p id="d1e8218">For the primary-particle sizes, we conceptually assume that the tracer characteristics of opal and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are primarily related to phytoplankton mineral structures such as diatom silicate frustules and the coccoliths of coccolithophores. This implies that modeled zooplankton egests biogenic mineral structures of algae, while their own larger mineral body structures play, in numbers, a minor role in biogenic mineral fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx175 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.147"><named-content content-type="pre">as described by, for example,</named-content></xref>. Coccolith diameters range from about 1.5 to 15.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx174 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.148"/>. The globally ubiquitous coccolithophore <italic>Emiliania Huxleyi</italic> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx143" id="paren.149"/> exhibits  coccoliths of about 3 to 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in diameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx174" id="paren.150"/>. We set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, which is thus at the lower bound of the observed range, to account for the volumetric density effect of non-spherical plate-like coccoliths. Diatom frustules feature sizes of a few micrometers to millimeters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.151"/>, with a dominant size range of about 12 to 58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.152"><named-content content-type="pre">equivalent spherical diameter of body volumes 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;</named-content></xref>. We define the diatom frustule size as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The primary-particle size of detritus is weakly constrained and likely ranges from sub-micrometers of microgels and bacteria to millimeter scales of zooplankton body structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx165" id="paren.153"/>. We here chose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. Aeolian dust particles feature a typical size ranging from submicron to about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m in size, with a mass median diameter of about 1.5 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx114" id="paren.154"/>. In summary, we assumed the following order of primary-particle sizes for the tracers: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dust</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8477">The size distribution-limiting maximum aggregate diameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is variable in the model domain and depends on the critical particle Reynolds number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.   <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its potential dependency on aggregate properties are weakly constrained, which lets us fix the value globally to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a conservative value compared to the measured maximum  particle Reynolds number of up to 32 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.155"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8531">Opal dissolution and detritus remineralization are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature-dependent in  M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO. Typically, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factor for biological processes is in the range between 2 and 3. We here chose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx129" id="paren.156"><named-content content-type="pre">similar to </named-content><named-content content-type="post">who applied <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></named-content></xref>. For opal, we tuned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to 2.3 suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.157"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>2.4.3</label><title>Model tuning and evaluation</title>
      <p id="d1e8643">The newly parameterized processes of sinking and remineralization directly affect the transfer efficiency and thus the climatological nutrient fields. This close connectedness hampers the clear distinction between data employed for model tuning or for model evaluation, when  comparing the model results to literature values for transfer efficiency  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="paren.158"/> and World Ocean Atlas data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.159"/>. The transfer efficiency, in combination with the general circulation pattern, affects the nutrient climatology in the long term. In turn, sinking velocity, remineralization and dissolution define the transfer efficiency on timescales of days to months. A direct comparison of modeled to observed sinking velocities and fluxes is  challenging, as scale dissimilarities  introduce uncertainty for comparisons between models and observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.160"/>. Furthermore, sediment trap data for POC and mineral fluxes exhibit high uncertainties which complicate model comparisons and even make different parameterizations for vertical fluxes undistinguishable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.161"/>. As a consequence, we perform a general evaluation of our model results.</p>
      <p id="d1e8658">Long simulations with high computational costs to reach steady state are required in the process of model tuning, which prevents intensive parameter variations.
We performed parameter variations aiming at a quantitative agreement with the transfer efficiency of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.162"/>. Since the adjustment of the sinking velocity versus the remineralization and dissolution rates, and thus the transfer efficiency, occurs within a few years, this strategy was useful for selecting for promising parameter sets.
With respect to the primary-particle characteristics, we kept the stickiness values, once chosen to our best knowledge, untouched and minimally varied the primary-particle sizes within the range of literature values. We primarily focused on tuning the remineralization and dissolution rates of POC and opal, respectively. We choose this strategy since reliable remineralization and dissolution rate measurements are available to evaluate the tuned rates (see ranges in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).
We aimed at keeping global mean values of primary production, export production of POC, opal and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and their fluxes to sediment within estimated literature ranges. This let us minimally vary the fraction of maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO compared to the standard run.</p>
      <p id="d1e8709">We here compare and evaluate the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run with respect to (i) where possible, the standard run, (ii) the regional transfer efficiency, as derived by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.163"/>, (iii) World Ocean Atlas data from the World Ocean Database <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.164"/>,  and, independently, (iv) sediment trap-sampled POC and biogenic mineral fluxes compiled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx130 bib1.bibx131" id="text.165"/>. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx130 bib1.bibx131" id="text.166"/> data were time- and depth-weighted to receive monthly climatological values for the respective grid boxes in MPIOM, where the sediment trap records were taken. Model results are presented as yearly mean of the last simulated year, unless stated otherwise.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e8743">In the following, we evaluate the global net primary production, the export of POC to the mesopelagic zone and the associated pattern of biogenic mineral fluxes (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>).  In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, the pattern of POC and associated minerals determines the aggregate properties, which we explicate in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>, we present the global pattern of transfer efficiency. In Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>, we examine the contributions of remineralization rates, sinking velocity and aggregate properties to the transfer efficiency pattern. Thereafter, we evaluate the modeled rain ratios (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS6"/>) and the biogeochemical tracer distributions (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS7"/>). In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS8"/>, we discuss the consequence of the transfer efficiency pattern on regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes. Subsequently, we examine the sensitivity of the transfer efficiency to selected model parameters (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS9"/>) and  conclude with a critical review of  underlying assumptions of M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO  (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS10"/>).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Spatial distribution of POC export fluxes and associated biogenic minerals</title>
      <p id="d1e8804">The global pattern of the depth-integrated primary production is dominated by  global circulation and thus nutrient transport. The global pattern of annual mean integrated primary production therefore remains similar between the standard and the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).
Globally integrated, the annual net primary production is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the standard run.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e8874">Yearly mean integrated primary production in <bold>(a)</bold> the standard and <bold>(b)</bold> the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run. The export efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio) in <bold>(c)</bold> the standard  and <bold>(d)</bold> the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1776?><p id="d1e8921">The ratio between carbon export out of the euphotic zone at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m and the net primary production, NPP,
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E32" content-type="numbered"><label>32</label><mml:math id="M389" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mtext> ratio</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depth</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NPP</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          provides an estimate of how efficient the export is with respect to the net primary production. Globally, about 5.56 and 6.28 Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is exported out of the euphotic zone in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO and the standard run, respectively. In the standard run, the subtropical gyres exhibit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of more than 0.2, and the high latitudes feature lower export efficiency (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c). In the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run, the equatorial Pacific exhibits the lowest export efficiencies, the subtropical gyres feature maximum values of about 0.14–0.16 and the Arctic region maximum value is about 0.20 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d). The M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run thus possesses smaller latitudinal variability in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio compared to the standard run.</p>
      <p id="d1e9046">In comparison to previous estimates on global primary production, both model runs are well within the range of 30 to 70 Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  and show similar pattern of NPP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.167"/>. The higher NPP in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO is due to the enhanced remineralization rates in surface waters, which also lead to the lower export efficiencies in the equatorial and subtropical regions. Estimates of the  export efficiency from satellite data, in situ observations or models lead to partly contrasting patterns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx110 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx133 bib1.bibx151 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.168"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In contrast to our two model runs, the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are suggested to be found in the North Pacific and Antarctic Ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.169"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In the tropical and subtropical regions, the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run reduces the bias with respect to previously found low export efficiencies of about 1 % to  10 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx133" id="paren.170"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e9105">Yearly mean flux ratios of opal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to POC in <bold>(a)</bold> the standard and <bold>(b)</bold> the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run. Yearly mean flux ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to POC  in <bold>(c)</bold> the standard and <bold>(d)</bold> the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9167">The exported POC is accompanied by  biogenic minerals and dust. The export flux ratios between opal and detritus exhibit a clear latitudinal pattern, with high values in the high latitudes and upwelling regions compared to the subtropical gyres (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, b). Both model simulations show a similar pattern of opal-to-detritus flux ratios. Higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus flux ratios are confined to equatorial and subtropical regions where silicate depletion favors calcification (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c, d). M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO exhibits a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus-mass flux ratio in the western tropical and subtropical Pacific than the standard run. The higher remineralization in the surface waters in this region reduces the amount of detritus that can coalesce with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spatial distributions of sinking tracers and their ratios prime the marine aggregate properties in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Spatial distribution of marine aggregate properties</title>
      <p id="d1e9234">The spatial patterns of detritus and mineral fluxes are reflected in the distribution of aggregate properties (cf. pattern in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b and d to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a–f).
The primed  characteristics further evolve while aggregates descend through the water column and become remineralized.
Hence, the information of the tracer distribution in the euphotic zone propagates into the mesopelagic zone.
The mean primary-particle density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranges at export depth (100 m) from about 1100 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in diatom-dominated regions to 1850 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the western Pacific, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus export ratios are high (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b and d and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a). In the Arctic, some regions harbor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of maximum 2600 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> where aggregates in our model are dominated by dust particles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a).
Particularly in regions of high  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus export ratios,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with depth  (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and g and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a). Accordingly, the volume-weighted mean excess aggregate density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exhibits the same pattern as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while it ranges from about 2 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in diatom-dominated regions to 35 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in calcifier-dominated regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d). Note that we chose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to account for the increasing porosity with size (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), thus decreasing aggregate excess density with size (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>). As a mean value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thus<?pagebreak page1777?> underestimates excess density for small aggregates, while it overestimates excess density for large aggregates.
Generally both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tend to increase with depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, d).
In the Pacific, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as ballasting mineral becomes dissolved below the lysocline, and modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases again in the deep ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, d).
The mean primary-particle size, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ranges between the attributed minimum and maximum primary-particle size of tracers, 2 to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, respectively. Mean primary-particle size shows an opposing pattern to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a, b, g and h and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a and b), since regions are either dominated by small, dense coccoliths or large, less dense diatom frustules. The global pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, primed through export fluxes of detritus and minerals, varies only little throughout the water column (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b), since we assumed invariance of primary-particle size to remineralization, dissolution and other processes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e9591">Modeled marine aggregate properties at <bold>(a–f)</bold> 100 m and <bold>(g–l)</bold> 960 m depth. Mathematical symbols are as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – mean primary-particle density; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – mean primary particle diameter; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – microstructure (fractal dimension); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – volume-weighted mean excess aggregate density; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – maximum aggregate diameter; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – concentration-weighted mean sinking velocity of aggregates. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> comprises the full range of many micrometer-sized to rare, large aggregates with low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(1 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)) and high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)) sinking velocities. For the mean stickiness, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, volume-weighted mean porosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the number distribution slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e9797">Modeled marine aggregate properties on the Pacific WOA transect P16, which is located at about 150<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. For symbol descriptions, see caption of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e9818">Our simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is largest in the surface waters of the Southern Ocean and upwelling regions, where TEP-rich aggregates prevail. In calcifier-dominated regions, the maximum aggregate size is small. Generally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to decrease with depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>e).</p>
      <p id="d1e9845">The microstructure of marine aggregates, modeled as fractal dimension, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, shows a pronounced spatial distribution. At 100 m depth, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from about 1.7 in upwelling regions and the Southern Ocean to about 2.2 in the western equatorial Pacific and features maximum values of 2.38 in  Arctic regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). With increasing depth in the mesopelagic zone, aggregates tend to experience a rapid compaction as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c). Ongoing POM remineralization during aggregates' descent shifts the aggregate composition towards mineral components, which feature lower stickiness in our model. Thus the fractal dimension increases, which mimics compaction of aggregates. The global pattern tends to homogenize with depth at about 1000 m, where modeled aggregates feature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of about 2.2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>i).
Exceptions are upwelling regions, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains low, since detritus is slowly remineralized anaerobically in the associated oxygen minimum zones (OMZs). Below 1000 m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> only increases slowly with depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c).</p>
      <p id="d1e9923">Particle properties and molecular dynamic viscosity determine the concentration-weighted mean sinking velocity of aggregates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>f, l). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO considers particle sizes ranging from few micrometers to millimeters and thus the full size spectrum, where sinking velocities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(1 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are represented. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thus can significantly differ from reported sinking velocities for large individual aggregates.
At the export depth, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranges from about 10 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Southern Ocean and North Pacific region to about 35 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the western equatorial Pacific and reaches maximum values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in dust-dominated Arctic regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>f, l).  Upwelling-influenced surface waters tend to show smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the western equatorial Pacific. Generally,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears to increase rapidly with depth within the mesopelagic zone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f). At about 1000 m, the latitudinal pattern changes and the high latitudes, in the Southern Ocean at around 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, exhibit the highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of about 65 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Along the Equator, outside the OMZs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits similarly high values of about 55 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f). Inside the OMZs, where remineralization is slower than in oxygenated waters, the detritus residence time is longer and leads to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>l). The subtropical regions, dominated by calcifiers, show a rather homogeneous mean sinking velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) throughout the water column apart from the first few hundred meters and near bottom regions.
By contrast, diatom-dominated waters feature a significantly increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with depth, which reaches values of up to approximately 80 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f). Diatom-dominated aggregates in surface waters feature a high buoyancy through TEPs and a loose structure which diminishes with continuous remineralization during their descent.</p>
      <p id="d1e10272">The aggregate properties entering the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO scheme are all directly or indirectly measurable. The comparison of simulated and measured aggregate properties is, however, difficult, as M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO depicts mean values of aggregate populations that in situ encompass heterogeneous composition among size spectra. In addition, measurements are often limited to particular aggregate characteristics, while others remain unconstrained within the same data set. We therefore compare M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO to  field and laboratory measurements which
examine subsets of the simulated aggregate characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d1e10302">The modeled aggregate excess densities in diatom-dominated regions compare well to former field and laboratory measurements, where marine aggregates showed excess densities of about 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx140 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx98" id="paren.171"/>. In calcifier-dominated regions, aggregate excess densities are  about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is in the upper range of measured values of 2.1 to 41 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.172"/>. The increased excess density of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated aggregates of about 100 to 150 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in about 1000 m depth compares well with that of observed fecal pellets egested by coccolith-consuming zooplankton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx170" id="paren.173"/>. These fecal pellets also show similar mean sinking velocities to our modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The change of the excess density is linked to the increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aggregates with depth that is in qualitative agreement with present conceptual understanding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.174"/>. The increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  depicts the expected continuous repacking of aggregates and the zooplankton-mediated compaction in fecal pellets. The latter particularly takes place in the upper few hundred meters of the ocean and is a major pathway of coccolith transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.175"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1778?><p id="d1e10454">The general difference in typical size between diatom-rich aggregates and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shell-enriched aggregates compares well to observations that also showed smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.176"/>. The decreasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with depth is in qualitative agreement with observed vertically decreasing aggregate mean diameters  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.177"/>. Decreasing maximum aggregate sizes with depth and reduced organic matter content also agree qualitatively well with experiments of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.178"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx137" id="text.179"/>. Both studies showed a significant decrease in aggregate size with increasing mineral components. In their experimental setups, it remains elusive if a certain threshold of carrying capacity of POM was reached <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx137" id="paren.180"/> or if the balance between adhesive forces within the aggregates and the sinking-induced shear forces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.181"/> was shifted towards smaller aggregates. It is likely  that both effects happen at the same time, since natural polymers  possess stronger adhesive surface properties than biogenic minerals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.182"/>. In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, only the compaction towards higher fractal dimensions through lower internal binding forces, expressed as stickiness of the primary particles, is represented. Compaction can coincide  with an increasing number of binding links in aggregates, which can lower the overall susceptibility of aggregates to shear stress. In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, we disregard this effect and keep <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> globally constant.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1779?><p id="d1e10543">In summary, the resulting mean sinking velocity in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO is of same order of magnitude as that found in observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx170 bib1.bibx166" id="paren.183"/>. We note, however, that mean sinking velocities estimated from observations potentially overestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as they (i) are methodologically constrained to particles larger than a lower detection limit, which is typically much larger than primary-particle size, and (ii) depend on often uncertain size-to-mass relationships. We emphasize further that our modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> embraces numerous slowly sinking aggregates of primary-particle size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(1 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)) as well as rare, but large, fast sinking aggregates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(1000 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)). This range hence encompasses observations for single cells and coccoliths up to large marine snow aggregates and fecal pellets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx127 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.184"/>.
Generally, the spatio-temporal variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO differs significantly from the simple underlying assumption of a linearly increasing sinking velocity with depth in the standard run. M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO resembles the strongly increasing sinking velocity found in the mesopelagic zone in observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx166" id="paren.185"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and a modeling approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.186"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Global pattern of transfer efficiency</title>
      <p id="d1e10696">The transfer efficiency of POC from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m to depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E33" content-type="numbered"><label>33</label><mml:math id="M513" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depth</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">depth</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          provides an estimate on the fraction of exported POC that reaches a particular depth and is determined by sinking velocity and remineralization. In the Martin curve (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), the slope constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, prescribes the transfer efficiency,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E34" content-type="numbered"><label>34</label><mml:math id="M515" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Martin</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          to a particular depth and leads to an almost homogeneous global transfer efficiency of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Martin</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to about 1000 m depth in our standard run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a).
The lower remineralization rates in sub-anoxic or even anoxic OMZs compared to oxygenated regions lead to higher transfer efficiencies, visible
in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean, the northern Indian Ocean, and
upwelling regions off the coast of Peru and Africa. Apart from these regions, the standard run features only little variability, as expected from the relationship between the Martin curve slope parameter and the transfer efficiency. The remaining variability is related to  ocean currents and spatially variable turbulent mixing.  By contrast, the transfer efficiency in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO exhibits a distinct global pattern and possesses higher efficiency in high-latitude and upwelling regions compared to the subtropical gyres where low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears. Similar to the standard run, the OMZ regions feature high transfer efficiencies in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO. Since local Martin curves provide  meaningful information on the attenuation of POC fluxes with depth, we analyzed the effective slope parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for both the standard and the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run. We fitted the Martin curve (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), to modeled POC fluxes below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As expected, the standard run shows little spatial variability apart from the OMZs and features a global, area-weighted mean slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Martin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In agreement with the transfer efficiency pattern, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO possesses a strong latitudinal pattern of the effective slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that varies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59 and 0.67 in high latitudes (Antarctic zone – AAZ; North Pacific – NP; subantarctic zone – SAZ) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in OMZ regions and with a maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the subtropical Pacific gyres (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F17"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e11068">Annual mean transfer efficiency for POC in <bold>(a)</bold> standard and <bold>(b)</bold> M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO from export depth (100 m) to about 1000 m (960 m). In <bold>(c)</bold> the mean transfer efficiency in regions, as defined in <bold>(a)</bold>, is compared to the reconstructed transfer efficiency by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.187"/>. Error bars for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.188"/> represent uncertainty for the reconstruction of the regional transfer efficiency. For the model results, error bars indicate the spatial standard deviation.
For the resulting effective <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F17"/>. For a seasonal evolution of the transfer efficiency in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.F18"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1780?><p id="d1e11139">Recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.189"/> reconstructed the global transfer efficiency pattern by diagnosing particulate organic phosphate fluxes. Reconstructing the transfer efficiency via inverse modeling from phosphate concentrations circumnavigates the obstacle of sparse direct observations of fluxes  and allows for a more reliable constrain on POC transfer efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx164 bib1.bibx168" id="paren.190"/>.
The comparison of the standard and M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run reveals the inherent inability of the Martin approach to capture the latitudinal variability (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a–c). M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO agrees qualitatively and quantitatively well with the reconstructed transfer efficiency pattern of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.191"/>. The overestimation of the transfer efficiency in the equatorial tropical Pacific (ETP) by both the standard and M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run is due to the models overestimation of OMZs extensions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.192"/>. The large OMZ causes diminished remineralization and, hence, reduced attenuation of POC fluxes. In general, however, the increased transfer efficiency associated to OMZs is in agreement with observations that suggest lower flux attenuation and, hence, small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx145 bib1.bibx109 bib1.bibx102" id="paren.193"/>. Lower remineralization in OMZs keeps the POC-to-ballasting-minerals ratio higher when compared to oxygenated waters. Thus, the lower remineralization rates are potentially accompanied by lower sinking velocities, which provides a positive feedback loop on the OMZ evolution. The larger the vertical extent of the OMZ becomes, the longer the retention time becomes through higher POM aggregate content and lower sinking velocities. Eventually, OMZ evolution is balanced by the oxygen supply through mixing and transport processes. The global pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO agrees well with the geographical range and pattern found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.194"/> and suggested  by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="text.195"/>. However, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO shows lower maximum values of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="text.196"/>.  Globally averaged, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO exhibits an effective slope parameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AGO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower than the slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, originally published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="text.197"/> based on local observations.  Noticeably, however, the trend of smaller to larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the nearshore to open waters off the Pacific US coast is in agreement with the elusive trend found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118" id="text.198"/>. Overall, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO clearly improves the representation of the POC transfer efficiency pattern compared to the standard Martin approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Contributions of $\langle w_{\mathrm{s}}\rangle$ and temperature-dependent remineralization to the transfer efficiency pattern}?><title>Contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and temperature-dependent remineralization to the transfer efficiency pattern</title>
      <?pagebreak page1781?><p id="d1e11372">The attenuation of POC fluxes is primarily regulated by the sinking velocity and total remineralization rate of POC. Depth-dependent, sheared lateral transport and vertical water motion can additionally affect the vertical distribution of particulate matter and thus vertical fluxes. We neglect these processes in the following, since (i) the timescale of sinking from one layer to the next layer below is typically shorter than the lateral transport at grid resolutions used  in our model runs, and (ii) sinking velocity is  faster than typical vertical motions represented by models with this grid resolution. The remineralization length scale (RLS), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is given by the local ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to remineralization (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E35" content-type="numbered"><label>35</label><mml:math id="M553" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          and defines the vertical distance in which POC would decay to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) of its initial value, the POC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.199"/>.
The RLS can be locally calculated and enables (i) exploring the local effects of remineralization and sinking velocity on the attenuation of POC fluxes and (ii) better understanding the depth-integrated information provided by the transfer efficiency or Martin's effective slope parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e11507"><bold>(a)</bold> Remineralization length scale ratio of M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO to the standard model version at the World Ocean Atlas transect P16. We here focus on showcasing the temperature effect on remineralization and calculated the remineralization length scales, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  without oxygen limitation of remineralization, which cancels out for equal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. Values smaller than 1 imply stronger POC flux attenuation in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO than in the standard run. For reference, the RLS in the standard run is given in the top left. The standard RLS increases due to increasing sinking velocity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with depth (shown bottom left). Contour lines provide the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factor temperature-dependent remineralization rates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at reference temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO. In the standard run, the aerobic rate is globally constant (0.026 d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).  <bold>(b)</bold> Relative contributions of sinking, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and remineralization, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to difference between standard and M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run. Contour lines provide the relative contribution of remineralization.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e11676">The RLSs in surface waters and the upper mesopelagic zone of subtropical and equatorial regions are shorter in the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run than in the standard run by more than a factor of 2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a). This higher turnover causes the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO  compared to the standard run in these regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b).
In the mesopelagic zone, the RLSs in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO are similar or pronounced longer and decrease again in deeper regions compared to the standard run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a).
The longer RLSs  in the mesopelagic zone of the high-latitude ocean are the reason for the higher transfer efficiency of M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO compared to the standard run. In order to analyze which of the two processes, sinking or remineralization, is of primary importance for the change in the RLS and thus the transfer efficiency, we define their relative contributions to the difference between M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO and the standard run as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E36" content-type="numbered"><label>36</label><mml:math id="M577" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RC</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the processes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, refer to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E35"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the partial derivative of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the process <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (applying the standard run rates), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference between the value in the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run and the standard run at spatial point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO possesses generally higher remineralization rates than the standard run, which would increase the flux attenuation compared to the standard run. The temperature-dependent remineralization in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO shows lower rates in the cold waters of the high latitudes than in the equatorial and subtropical regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a). Within M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, this pattern enhances the RLSs, and thus transfer efficiency, in the high latitudes compared to the equatorial regions, which is in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116" id="text.200"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.201"/>.  Compared to the standard run,  higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  overcompensates the effect of intensified remineralization below the thermocline and leads to a longer RLS (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b) in the mesopelagic zone, which is particularly true in diatom-dominated regions. In <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated subtropical gyres, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> falls below the sinking velocity of the standard model in regions deeper than 3000 m and thus contributes further to the stronger flux attenuation compared to the standard run. The higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO turns out to dominate over remineralization and increases the RLS, and hence the transfer efficiency, in the mesopelagic zone of the high latitudes. In summary, the temperature dependence of remineralization in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO induces a latitudinal pattern of longer RLSs, and thus higher transfer efficiency, in high latitudes, which is further amplified by high sinking velocities of diatom-dominated aggregates in the mesopelagic zone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Impact of mineral size and ballasting effect on sinking velocity</title>
      <p id="d1e12082">The  analysis of the RLS changes compared to the standard run emphasizes the role of sinking velocity for the longer RLS in the mesopelagic zone in high latitudes and thus for the enhanced transfer efficiency. We therefore aim to better understand the underlying factors that control the mean sinking velocity. We suggest in the following that the size of<?pagebreak page1782?> primary particles might be as important as the density of the ballasting material for defining the sinking velocity of aggregates.</p>
      <p id="d1e12085">M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO allows for assessing the contributions of aggregate properties and molecular viscosity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We define the relative contributions of the modeled particle properties and the molecular viscosity that control <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at particular depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on a first-order approach:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E37" content-type="numbered"><label>37</label><mml:math id="M598" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the global mean of the contributing property at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The relative contributions provide information about the main driving factors for the local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of global average aggregates. For
example, what is the percentage-wise contribution to the local sinking
velocity by local primary-particle density compared to the global mean
primary-particle density? By neglecting the higher-order terms, we provide only qualitative insights into the role of the different aggregate properties and molecular viscosity in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e12508">Qualitative first-order relative contributions of marine aggregate properties to the change of local mean sinking velocity compared to a global mean aggregate spectrum at depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a–f)</bold> 100 m; <bold>(g–l)</bold> 960 m. Mathematical symbols are as follows: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – mean primary-particle density; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – mean primary-particle diameter; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – fractal dimension; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – dynamic molecular viscosity; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – maximum aggregate diameter; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – aggregate number distribution slope.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e12598"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acts as a strong positive, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-increasing factor for sinking velocities in the equatorial and subtropical regions due to its high primary-particle density (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a). As an exogenous factor, the low molecular viscosity in warm regions contributes positively to sinking velocity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>d). Additionally, in our model, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases particle excess density and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich areas (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c).
In the Southern Ocean, North Pacific, North Atlantic and upwelling regions, particularly the large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diatom-dominated regions enhances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b).
According to our model, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aggregates and the number distribution slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, contribute positively to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the high latitudes, except for the Arctic Ocean, where mineral material strongly affects the aggregate properties.
The pattern of highly variable endogenous and exogenous controls on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emerges particularly in the upper ocean, while in deeper regions of about 1000 m depth, the aggregate properties become more and more homogeneous, except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and in OMZs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>g–l).
With homogenization of most aggregate properties with depth, the contrasting relative contributions of dense mean primary particles and large mean primary particles to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> become even more pronounced. Denser, small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles contribute to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the subtropical, oligotrophic regions of the oceans, while comparably less dense but larger opal frustules lead to high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in nutrient-rich upwelling and high-latitude regions. Even though our formulation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highly non-linear, we expect the qualitative pattern of the relative contributions to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to be coherent. In sum, we therefore emphasize  the potential role of primary-particle size, in particular that of diatom frustules, in determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus POC fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d1e12916">The effects of microstructure on in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not well studied, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aggregates is weakly constrained. It therefore warrants further investigation, especially if a spatially variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect occurs on in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  in the upper ocean. Vertically varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been suggested <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.202"/>, and given the general importance of the microstructure for sinking velocity, a deeper understanding of the factors and processes influencing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is hence highly desirable.</p>
      <p id="d1e12997">Microstructure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly prescribes the aggregate number distribution slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"/>c and f for a map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Observations show a higher variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.203"/> than in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.19 and 3.76 and thus likely underestimates the spatial variability and relative contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
At present, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO is limited to the steady-state size distribution that represents the characteristic processes of aggregation and fragmentation in the system.
Explicit modeling of the dynamics of the aggregate size spectrum would be required to cover the variability in measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which would further enhance the variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We briefly discuss this current model limitation in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e13131">Previous studies support our finding that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acts as a strong ballasting agent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.204"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.
By contrast, opal density of the hollow silicate structures has a smaller effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a). Instead, silicate frustule size of diatoms significantly affects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b and h and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b). This contrasts the assumption of opal acting solely as ballasting material <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.205"/> and is congruent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.206"/>, who noticed that factors other than particle density likely play a role. As indicated by Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), primary-particle size affects the excess density and porosity of aggregates, which have decisive effects on sinking velocity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.207"/>. Deciphering the size effect of primary particles on in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and fluxes  might be particularly challenging in regions with a diverse size structure of the phytoplankton community. Oligotrophic regions typically harbor a narrower size distribution of phytoplankton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.208"><named-content content-type="pre">see, e.g., size ranges and standing stocks in</named-content></xref>, which may produce more homogeneous aggregates and thus more predictable POC fluxes, as found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.209"/>, who correlated POC fluxes to the oligotrophic phytoplankton community. In addition, interannual variability in the dominant size of primary producers has been suggested to drive the interannual change in export fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.210"/>. In contrast to oligotrophic phytoplankton communities, diatom-dominated communities feature a higher size diversity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx163" id="paren.211"/> and different morphologies, which both affect the sinking velocity of aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.212"/>. Phytoplankton community size structure and morphology thus introduce higher variability to sinking velocity, which complicates attribution of cell size and morphology effects on POC fluxes. The higher size and morphology variability in diatom-dominated phytoplankton<?pagebreak page1783?> communities, together with variable cellular silicate-to-carbon ratios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.213"/>,   likely explains the poor correlations of opal to POC fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.214"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., found by</named-content></xref>. Similarly, the correlation between POC fluxes and, by number and size, more variable foraminiferal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is weaker than for coccolith fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.215"/>.   We therefore suggest to factor in, or even focus on, frustule sizes and morphology as explanatory variables for POC fluxes when carrying out mineral ballasting and rain ratio studies in diatom-dominated regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Regional fluxes and rain ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e13264">Biogenic minerals, dust particles and detritus are tied together in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO and define the composition, microstructure and thus sinking velocity of aggregates. In turn, the tracers are independently remineralized or dissolved. Both processes affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding depth of tracers. For example, the remineralization of POC increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of diatom-dominated aggregates and thus increases the dissolution length scale of opal, which we refer to as the “opal RLS”. The combined sinking thus (i) affects the RLS of POC and opal (and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when dissolution takes place) and (ii) couples the timing of mineral and POC fluxes at depth.</p>
      <p id="d1e13324">The Martin curve concept can be applied to represent the effective attenuation of opal fluxes. The effective Martin curve slope for opal, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, exhibits similar regional variability in the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run compared to the standard run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>). However, the equatorial tropical Pacific (ETP) region shows higher spatial variability. The low POC remineralization in OMZs leads to small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aggregates and decreases the opal RLS and thus increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Similar to POC fluxes, opal fluxes exhibit shorter opal RLSs in the surface waters, while they exceed the standard RLSs in the mesopelagic zone and below (not shown). Particularly in the deep waters of the high latitudes, the opal RLSs are longer than in the standard run. This is due to the aggregates' higher sinking velocity than the 25 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> opal sinking speed in the standard run<?pagebreak page1784?> and partially to the reformulation of temperature-dependent opal dissolution.  In the subtropical regions, opal is remineralized faster below 2000 m and fluxes are generally small (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e13396">Area-weighted mean effective power function slopes for opal fluxes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in the regions  defined in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. Calculated for opal fluxes below  100 m. Error bars show regional standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e13428">In sum, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO estimates that globally <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gt Si yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gt Si yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the standard run) reaches the seafloor, which is in good agreement with present estimates of about 1 Gt Si yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx162" id="paren.216"/>. Generally, the modeled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is well within the range of observations with estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.217"/>. In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, dissolution of opal has the implication that ballasting mineral ratios between opal and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shift towards higher importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with depth. Since the dissolution of opal is temperature-dependent, the  preservation efficiency for opal-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios is thus lowest in regions with strong vertical temperature gradients.</p>
      <p id="d1e13580">The direct coupling of POC and biogenic mineral fluxes through marine aggregates potentially enhances the models' ability to represent rain ratios in space and time. We therefore aggregated the sediment trap data set of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx130 bib1.bibx131" id="text.218"/> with 15 792 individual POC flux measurements at 673 unique locations to a monthly climatology of POC, particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) and silicate fluxes. We accounted for the time spans of sediment trap deployment ranging from hours to years by time-weighting with a minimum weight of 1 d per month in cases of few hours of measurement and for each covered month the full monthly weight in cases of a yearly measurement. We compared the climatologies to modeled monthly mean flux ratios at the stations at their respective depths. The M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run represents the  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PIC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux ratio equally as well as the standard run (not shown). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, the scatter around the 1 : 1 line  is reduced in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO compared to the standard run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e13633">Monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rain  ratios in the standard run and in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO compared to the monthly climatological mean derived from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx130 bib1.bibx131" id="text.219"/> data set. The black line denotes the 1 : 1 line. Notice that the axes are in log and have different limits among regions but are comparable between runs. No data are available for opal fluxes in the equatorial tropical Atlantic (ETA), where opal fluxes are small (refer to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, b). Correlation coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and significance value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, are given if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e13695">However, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO introduces a bias in regions deeper than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m  towards smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. The RLSs in the deep ocean are hence too short in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO. While the scatter of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio reduces in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, the overall variability in the flux ratios becomes compressed compared to the measured variability. This compression might be caused by several factors. First, we assume a tight connection of aggregate components and ignore heterogeneous composition among local particle-size spectra which would potentially cause different sinking velocities among the different components. Second, HAMOCC ignores changing diatom silicification caused by temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx142" id="paren.220"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref> and by seasonal changes in nutrient availability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.221"/>.
Generally, deficits exist in both the model runs and sediment trap data. The lack of resolving small-scale variability through eddies and their role in shaping the phytoplankton community, as well as general timing, internal variability, and spatial current shifts, limit the global models' ability to represent local features. Measurement limitations of sediment traps have the potential to additionally increase the mismatch <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx164" id="paren.222"><named-content content-type="pre">see, e.g.,</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><title>Evaluation of biogeochemical tracer distributions</title>
      <p id="d1e13785">We evaluate the simulated spatial distribution of nutrients, oxygen and alkalinity by comparison to gridded observation climatologies. Silicate, phosphate, nitrate and oxygen are compared to the World Ocean Atlas  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.223"><named-content content-type="pre">WOA; </named-content></xref>. Alkalinity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is compared to the Global Ocean Data Analysis Project (GLODAPv2) climatology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.224"/>. We present the results in Taylor diagrams <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx159" id="paren.225"/>, which aggregate correlation,  root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), and standard deviation of simulated and observed variables into distances between model results and the reference observations  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a–d). Here, we use spatial grid-cell-wise statistics derived from temporally averaged (100 year mean) fields for which we interpolated the observational data to the model grid. To be able to show all parameters in one plot, we derive normalized standard deviations and RMSDs. We evaluate the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean separately to account for their different hydrographical features. For example, the Atlantic Ocean is characterized by ventilation through deep water formation in the high latitudes, a feature that does not exist in the Pacific.
Furthermore, we select four depth levels: surface waters (6 m depth); the two depths that determine the transfer efficiency, 100 m and approximately 1000 m; and an intermediate depth in the mesopelagic zone, 362 m.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e13814"><bold>(a–d)</bold> Taylor diagram for tracers (oxygen – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; nitrate – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; phosphate – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; silicate – Si) in comparison to the World Ocean Atlas data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.226"/> and, in the case of total alkalinity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to GLODAPv2 data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.227"/>. <bold>(a, c)</bold> Pacific and <bold>(b, d)</bold> Atlantic for <bold>(a, b)</bold> 6 and 100 m; <bold>(c, d)</bold> are for 362 and 960 m. <bold>(e)</bold> Surface phosphate concentration in WOA <bold>(f)</bold> in the standard run and <bold>(g)</bold> difference plot between M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO and the standard run.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1785?><p id="d1e13914">Generally, the two model runs represent nutrients, silicate and oxygen distributions equally well at these depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a–d); i.e., differences to observations are larger than among the two models.
This is expected, as tracer distributions in the model are predominantly determined by the flow field and both simulations use identical physical model conditions.
The Taylor diagram captures matches of spatial pattern such as location of fronts, extension of gyres and the location of water masses in an aggregated form. The ocean model represents such features realistically <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.228"/>, but we cannot expect a perfect match of the circulation pattern with in situ conditions for multiple reasons. The climatological, simplistic atmospheric forcing damps in particular the interannual variability in ocean currents and can contribute to spatial shifts of, for example, frontal regions with respect to the observed climatology. In addition, the coarse horizontal resolution of the model and atmospheric forcing affects features such as upwelling strength <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx128" id="paren.229"/> and location. In turn, the spatio-temporal interpolation of data, necessary through scarcity of observations, limits the resolution of nutrient variability and introduces uncertainty, particularly in deeper regions, where the density of observations is lower than in surface waters. As a consequence, a mismatch between modeled biogeochemical tracers and the climatological mean of observations is expected.</p>
      <p id="d1e13926">Tracers undergoing less complex biogeochemical cycling, such as phosphate or silicate, reflect the quality of the flow field more directly than tracers such as nitrate, oxygen or alkalinity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.230"><named-content content-type="pre">see also</named-content></xref>. The latter tracers are therefore generally more prone to biogeochemical model reformulation, and larger differences can be expected between M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO and the standard run. In addition, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO links the cycles of phosphate and silicate closer to nitrate and oxygen through common sinking of particulate matter. Phosphate and silicate therefore experience an additional biogeochemical cycle imprint in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO compared to the standard run. In surface waters of the Pacific, this led, for example, to a slight improvement of the phosphate correlation with WOA observations, while it increased the normalized standard deviation compared to the standard run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>a). The improvement is related to the better representation of surface phosphate concentrations off the coast of Peru and the western coast of North America (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>e–g).</p>
      <p id="d1e13966">In both simulations, biogeochemical tracer distributions in the Pacific are strongly influenced by the OMZ in the eastern boundary upwelling region. An exception is oxygen in surface waters, which is primarily determined by gas exchange processes. As a common feature of all state-of-the-art global ocean biogeochemistry models, OMZs are too large and result from nutrient trapping through a sluggish circulation and associated insufficient supply of oxygen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.231"/>. The sluggish circulation and mixing are likely associated with underrepresented equatorial currents, particularly the equatorial intermediate current system and equatorial deep jets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx150" id="paren.232"/>. The OMZ shape in the eastern Pacific Ocean, though, changes between the runs. In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, the water column above 800 m is more oxygenated and below 800 m is less oxygenated than in the standard run. The change in OMZ shape imprints on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as anaerobic and aerobic remineralization processes change alkalinity in a different manner; i.e., denitrification and sulfate reduction increase alkalinity, whereas aerobic remineralization decreases alkalinity. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and silicate are generally worse than other tracers when compared to observations, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO improves the representation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Pacific at 360 m compared to the standard run.  This is visible through the higher correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to 0.4) and lower RMSD of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the standard run (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>c; 362 m depth). The increased RMSD of silicate in surface waters and 100 m in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO  are associated to the eastern equatorial and upwelling regions in the Pacific. The lower remineralization in OMZs not only decreases the sinking velocity of detritus but also increases the retention time of the tightly coupled opal in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO and thus enhances the opal dissolution and<?pagebreak page1787?> silicate concentration.
In general, the tighter coupling of silicate to nutrients through common sinking in aggregates leads to a higher sensitivity of silicate to ocean circulation and temperature deficiencies in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO than in the standard run. The high RMSD and low correlation for silicate compared to observations, particularly in the euphotic zone, can have additional implications for M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, since the silicate distribution in the euphotic zone directly affects opal production and thus the sinking velocity of aggregates, transfer efficiency and nutrient distributions. The tighter coupling of silicate to other biogeochemical cycles in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO therefore warrants further future investigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS8">
  <label>3.8</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Regional  {$\protect\chem{CO_{2}}$} fluxes}?><title>Regional  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes</title>
      <p id="d1e14125">In a 100-year climatological steady state, both model runs show the Southern Hemisphere ocean acting   as a net source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere, while the Northern Hemisphere acts as a net sink (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>a). Consequently, net oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport across the Equator from the Northern to the Southern Hemisphere exists.  In the simulation with M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, a stronger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake compared to the standard run occurs in the region between 60 and 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, which coincides with deeper transfer of POM reflected by an increased transfer efficiency (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). In both model runs, the tropical regions outgas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere. As is visible from the decreasing difference between the cumulative zonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO exhibits stronger outgassing in the tropical region, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>a). Even though a small residual of zonally integrated fluxes of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two model runs remains, the small residual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux imbalance of 0.07 and 0.05 Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO and the standard run, respectively, indicate well-spun-up model runs.
In general, the latitudinal zonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and the cross-equatorial southward oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport agree qualitatively and quantitatively well with former forward-integrated models for preindustrial conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx146 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx126" id="paren.233"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e14299"><bold>(a)</bold> Climatological cumulative zonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in the standard and the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run (from south to north). Generally, negative fluxes represent net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by the ocean. Note the second <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis for the difference between the two runs (also in <bold>c–k</bold>). <bold>(b)</bold> Global annual net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux under linearly increasing atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration.  <bold>(c–k)</bold> Regional cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes under increasing atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (regions as defined in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e14405">To study the effect of the changed transfer efficiency in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake without indirect climate effects, we perform model runs in which we linearly increase the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration with a yearly increment from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">285</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 400 ppm within 150 years. The transient forcing does not feed back onto the physical climate state. We therefore emphasize that no climate feedback on, for example, ocean temperature, stratification, and thus primary production and remineralization occurs in these model runs.</p>
      <p id="d1e14450">During the  atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase, both model runs show similar global annual oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>b). About 181–185 Gt C is taken up by the global ocean throughout the 150-year period. The discrepancy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gt C  between the two runs arises to a large extent from the residual imbalance of  0.02 Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake, cumulated over 150 years.</p>
      <p id="d1e14499">The general trends in the regional cumulative fluxes remain the same between the two model runs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>c–k), and most regions act as net sinks of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only the upwelling regions of the equatorial tropical Atlantic (ETA) and Pacific (ETP) are net sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the atmosphere at the end of the 150-year period.  The magnitude of the regional cumulative fluxes, however, varies among the two model runs.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1788?><p id="d1e14526">Since we can rule out temperature-driven effects on the differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake when comparing the two climatologically forced runs, a different state and/or changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration determine the partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">p</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes. In our runs, major changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC can locally occur due to a change in, first, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus rain ratio as a result of varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and POM production and remineralization, or, second, an increase in the POC transfer efficiency, for example, which reflects a transfer of carbon to deeper waters where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is withdrawn from immediate exchange with the atmosphere. In addition, such different signals can be transported by the flow field, and remote effects can appear. Quantitatively,  differences of regional cumulative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes larger than 5 Gt C appear in the Antarctic zone (AAZ), the subtropical Pacific (STP), the equatorial tropical Pacific (ETP) and the Indic Ocean (IO; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>c–k). In the upwelling and high-latitude regions, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">p</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO than in the standard run, which translates to higher oceanic uptake (in AAZ and NP) or less outgassing (in ETP). Qualitatively, this coincides well with the primary production, respective export and the higher transfer efficiencies  in these regions (cf. Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>). In regions of higher transfer efficiency but similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes when compared to the standard run, either POC export fluxes are small (e.g., in the Arctic Ocean) or physical processes such as mixing or upwelling dominate over biologically induced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (e.g., in the SAZ). In the STP region, where high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus rain ratios occur (refer to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is about 0.2 % lower in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO than in the standard run, which enhances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">p</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by about 2 % and thus decreases the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake.</p>
      <p id="d1e14751">In summary, under linearly increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a non-interactive mode, the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes remain similar for the standard and the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run. However, regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes change, which is potentially linked to the changing pattern of transfer efficiency and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus rain ratio.
A detailed study on the feedbacks between the transfer efficiency, represented by M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, and a transient climate on oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake is out of the scope of this paper and will be part of future investigations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS9">
  <label>3.9</label><title>Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e14836">With M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, the processes of temperature-dependent remineralization and a number of new model parameters to represent variable sinking velocity of marine aggregates were introduced to HAMOCC. We carried out three sensitivity experiments to provide insights into the response of HAMOCC to the uncertainty of selected parameters (see below for the criteria). As target variables, we chose (i) the transfer efficiency, (ii) phosphate as an essential nutrient for primary production, and (iii) silicate as a nutrient and circulation-reflecting agent.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e14850">Sensitivity of <bold>(a–c)</bold> surface phosphate, <bold>(d–f)</bold> silicate  concentrations, and <bold>(g)</bold> POC transfer efficiency to diatom frustule size, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, modified from 20 to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), the half-saturation constant for phosphate uptake by diazotrophs  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diaz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, modified from 0.05 to 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and fractal dimension, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from variable to constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Error bars in <bold>(g)</bold> represent regional standard deviation and, for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.234"/>, the uncertainty for the reconstruction of the regional transfer efficiency.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e15009">Previously in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5"/>, we suggested the size of primary particles, particularly that of opal frustules, to be an important factor for regulating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus the transfer efficiency. We thus study the effect of primary-particle size in the sensitivity experiment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exemplarily for diatom frustules because (i) diatom size is highly variable, (ii) HAMOCC does not explicitly represent algae size classes and (iii) algae body size is expected to decrease with rising water temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.235"/>.  We decrease their size by 50 %, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.
In the second sensitivity experiment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the varying fractal dimension, ranging between 1.6 and 2.4 in the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run, is set to a constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to eliminate its  variable effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In the third experiment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diaz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we showcase the sensitivity of phosphate concentration in the subtropical gyres to diazotrophs' standing stock, which we noticed during the process of tuning the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run. Here, we  increase the half-saturation constant for phosphate uptake by diazotrophs from 0.05  to 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All sensitivity runs are in a quasi-steady state, as reflected by surface properties that are in steady state.</p>
      <p id="d1e15225">Decreasing the opal frustule size by 50 % compared to the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus the RLS in diatom-dominated regions. As a consequence, the transfer efficiency in silicifier-dominated regions is lower in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>g). Accordingly, opal dissolves closer to surface waters and the silicate concentration increases compared to the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO  run in silicifier-dominated regions, particularly in and downstream of coastal upwelling regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>d). In the subtropical gyres, where silicate is diminished, it further decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The higher remineralization in the euphotic zone in upwelling regions increases the phosphate concentrations downstream in the subtropical gyres (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>a). In sum, the sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> underpins the potential importance of primary-particle size for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and thus for biogeochemical cycling.</p>
      <p id="d1e15352">Generally, eco-physiological responses of primary producers are typically neglected in ESM-type models such as HAMOCC. Under the premise that the size of primary particles is of importance to represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as depicted by M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, changes of the phytoplankton size structure with ongoing ocean warming could affect RLSs, transfer efficiency and thus the biological carbon pump. Indeed, body size decreases with increasing water temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.236"/>. The increasing water temperature has been suggested to shift eco-physiological regions polewards by rates of about 22 to 36 km per decade <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="paren.237"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows that decreasing primary-particle size reduces the transfer efficiency and thus likely weakens the biological carbon pump. Yet, the net effect of such eco-physiological responses and adaptability of primary producers on transfer efficiency and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake under ongoing climate change remains elusive and thus demands further future investigation.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1789?><p id="d1e15421">In the sensitivity study <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in surface waters is increased in diatom-dominated waters and reduced in calcifier-dominated waters compared to the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run (cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c). In the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run, aggregates experience rapid compaction within the depth of about 150 to 250 m in diatom-dominated regions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases rapidly (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c) and, hence, so does <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is  only enhanced in the productive surface waters of the SAZ, upwelling regions and the associated OMZs due to the larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the dependent smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in large parts of the mesopelagic zone and below leads to a generally decreased transfer efficiency in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>g). Consequently, the RLSs are shorter and enhance the  silicate concentrations in surface waters in diatom-dominated regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>e). In the subtropical gyres, the silicate diminishes even further, which is likely related to the enhanced bulk phytoplankton growth through higher phosphate concentrations. Phosphate is remineralized more rapidly than silicate and thus can be transported downstream the equatorial current into the subtropical gyres, where it is enhanced in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M830" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M831" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>b).  As a consequence of the potential sensitivity of biogeochemical cycles on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M832" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, more knowledge of processes affecting the aggregate microstructure is required, among them, for example, are compaction through repacking and zooplankton egestion of fecal pellets.</p>
      <p id="d1e15628">Diazotrophs in HAMOCC can grow independently of nitrate on phosphate. They are regionally confined to warm tropical and subtropical regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx138 bib1.bibx139" id="paren.238"/>. Diazotrophs modulate the phosphate concentration in  the subtropical gyres. The diazotrophs' global primary production increases from about 2.2 Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M833" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the standard run to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M834" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M835" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  in the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M836" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO run. A slower growth response to phosphate concentrations, enforced by raising the half-saturation constant from  0.05 to 0.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M837" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M838" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M839" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diaz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, increases the phosphate concentrations in the subtropical gyres to more than 150 % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>c). The primary production through diazotrophs reduces significantly from a former global value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M840" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M841" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M842" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M843" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diaz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and regionally particularly in the equatorial Panama Basin. By contrast, diazotrophs feature primary production of more than 5  and 7 Gt C yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M844" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M845" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M846" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,  due to the increased phosphate concentrations in the subtropical gyres. Diazotrophs in the model only produce organic matter. In <inline-formula><mml:math id="M847" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diaz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lower diazotroph primary production   in the equatorial upwelling regions (ETA and ETP) thus leads to a shift of the aggregate composition  towards higher opal-to-detritus ratios, which slightly increases the transfer efficiency and reduces the available silicate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>f).
Phosphate previously utilized by diazotrophs in the Panama Basin now partially populates the downstream equatorial current and reaches the subtropical gyres.  In comparison to the standard run,  this phenomenon is generally intensified in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M848" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO  through the shallower remineralization and lower transfer efficiency in the subtropical gyres (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c). In conclusion, the representation and effects of diazotrophs in HAMOCC, particularly in conjunction with M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M849" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, require further future evaluation.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1790?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS10">
  <label>3.10</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Current limitations of M${}^{4}$AGO}?><title>Current limitations of M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M850" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO</title>
      <p id="d1e15892">Developing M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M851" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, we followed a process-oriented approach and explicitly incorporated ballasting and microstructure of aggregates of heterogeneous composition to calculate the mean sinking velocity. Introducing such complexity in ESMs typically comes at the cost of high computational efforts. This is a non-negligible factor for model development which we  reduce to a minimum with M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M852" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO. Acknowledging the trade-off between increasing model complexity and computational limitations  lets us deploy a number of simplifying assumptions that we critically review in the following.</p>
      <p id="d1e15913">In the euphotic zone of the oceans, changing phytoplankton community structure, phytoplankton growth, decay and grazing through zooplankton lead to a dynamic supply of various small particles that potentially aggregate and eventually sink and become remineralized. Assuming homogeneous composition of aggregates throughout a dynamic steady-state size distribution is therefore only the first step towards a model representation of marine snow, where local diversity of particles  and the processes of aggregation and fragmentation are explicitly resolved. By assuming a dynamic steady state for the size distribution, we only represent the characteristic processes within the system and underestimate the variability in the number distribution slope, which ranges between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M853" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.19 and 3.76, compared to measurements, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M854" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.239"/>. As a consequence, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M855" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO probably underestimates the variability in sinking velocity, particularly in the upper ocean, where the  size distribution dynamically evolves.</p>
      <p id="d1e15950">In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M856" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, TEPs are simplistically considered. In agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="text.240"/>, TEPs are microstructure-loosening and buoyancy-adding for diatom-dominated aggregates. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M857" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we only considered the coccolith size which decreases sinking velocity compared to an aggregate composed of intact coccospheres. For simplicity, we assumed that aggregated TEP and intact cells sink as fast as coccoliths and detritus. To decipher the role of TEPs for aggregate formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx135 bib1.bibx115" id="paren.241"/>, our model would require (i) representing TEPs and disintegrating coccospheres and (ii) considering aggregation and fragmentation processes explicitly to depict the dynamic evolution of marine aggregate distributions. Such a dynamic approach is  necessary for, for example, studying short-term events of high POC export hypothesized to be driven by silicate depletion and TEP release by diatoms and their subsequent aggregation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119" id="paren.242"/>. More detailed models, such as, for example, the 1-D Lagrangian approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.243"/>, can likely provide more insights into aggregate dynamics and can help to further improve the aggregate representation in ESM frameworks. Furthermore, an explicit representation of aggregation and fragmentation enables transient size distributions and would allow for a direct comparison to a growing number of particle distribution slope measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.244"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e16000">We implemented the novel Microstructure, Multiscale, Mechanistic, Marine Aggregates in the Global Ocean (M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M858" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO) scheme in HAMOCC to improve the representation of the biological carbon pump in an Earth system model framework. M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M859" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO accounts for the heterogeneity and microstructure of aggregates and thus clearly defines measurable statistic aggregate properties in HAMOCC. M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M860" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO links the nutrient and silicate cycle closer together by incorporating opal and other ballasting minerals in aggregate formation and sinking. This lets us introduce a consistent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M861" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature-dependent dissolution and aerobic remineralization of opal and POC, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e16041">In contrast to the standard HAMOCC version, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M862" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO provides a mechanistic understanding for the recently published global transfer efficiency pattern and represents it well. We identify primary-particle size, particularly of diatom frustules, and the compaction of aggregates with depth as strong driving factors for sinking velocity that, in combination with temperature-dependent remineralization, co-determine the high POC transfer efficiency in high latitudes and upwelling regions. Our model results support  previous findings that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M863" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with its high density acts as ballasting mineral in calcifier-dominated regions of the ocean. The changed transfer efficiency pattern in combination with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M864" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-detritus rain ratio alters regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M865" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, while the global uptake remains the same as in the standard run, when atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M866" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is linearly increased without climate feedbacks.</p>
      <p id="d1e16097">The highest uncertainties in parametrizing M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M867" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO  are with respect to the weakly constrained primary-particle surface properties and their likely effect on the related microstructure of aggregates. Since sinking velocity and transfer efficiency are highly sensitive to the microstructure of aggregates, gaining insights into the controlling factors and processes for microstructure is desirable. Future model development for the representation of marine aggregates would highly benefit from sub-aggregate-scale measurements of microstructure, adhesive surface properties and primary-particle composition.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1791?><p id="d1e16109">Our findings and the underlying model concept suggest a number of implications. First, the finding that the size of aggregate constituents, particularly of diatom frustules, acts as a potential factor for high sinking velocities, suggests widening the perspective of mineral ballast studies towards a size-and-ballast hypothesis. Further, such an extended size-and-ballast hypothesis requires factoring in the different temperature-dependent remineralization and dissolution rates that aggregates experience during their descent. Accounting for cell size and morphology will aid in better assessing the role of the phytoplankton community size structures in POC fluxes, particularly in nutrient-rich upwelling regions, where a  wide, variable size spectrum of diatoms prevails. Second, the indirect temperature effect on phytoplankton cell size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.245"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> poses the challenging task of resolving the temperature-adapting cell size structure of the phytoplankton community in global carbon cycle models to depict the potential effect on sinking velocity and thus the biological feedback on rising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M868" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e16129"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In conclusion, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M869" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO provides well-defined aggregate properties in an ESM framework and can thus serve as a test bed for upscaling aggregate-associated processes to potential global impacts on biogeochemical cycles and, in particular, on the biological carbon pump.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page1792?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Additional aggregate properties</title>
      <p id="d1e16155">In addition to the aggregate properties presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M870" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO involves the aggregate mean stickiness and the number distribution slope that are tightly connected to each other via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M871" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"/>). In addition, the porosity of aggregates (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) can be deduced from aggregate size, primary-particle size and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M872" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Porosity is frequently calculated for aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx140" id="paren.246"/>. Its potential dependency on the microstructure and primary-particle size is, however, seldom covered. We therefore calculated the mean volume-weighted porosity of aggregates, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M873" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to provide perspective on how aggregate porosity varies with the aggregate properties shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> in the global ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e16218">As defined by the attributed primary-particle stickiness, aggregates in diatom-dominated regions show the highest stickiness values in surface waters, since the virtual TEP particles linked to detritus increase the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M874" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M875" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"/>). At the bottom of the mesopelagic zone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M876" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is almost homogeneous apart from the OMZ regions, where the lower anaerobic remineralization retains higher detritus concentrations that lead to higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M877" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in conjunction with diatom frustules. The number distribution shows an inverted picture compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M878" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the smallest decay slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M879" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in diatom-dominated and OMZ regions and the strongest decline in calcifier-dominated surface waters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"/>c, f). In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M880" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M881" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is tightly connected  to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M882" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the euphotic zone (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"/>b). With increasing depth, aggregates get compacted, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M883" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases and the maximum size of aggregates decreases. Both lead to lower  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M884" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly in the diatom-dominated regions. In OMZs, however,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M885" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is high. Generally, the exceptional behavior of aggregate properties in OMZs due to implicitly modeled TEPs is likely overestimated. TEPs possess higher remineralization rate than detritus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx115" id="paren.247"/>, which likely reduces the TEPs occurrence in deep OMZs and thus their influence on aggregate properties.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e16375">Mean stickiness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M886" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E22"/>), volume-weighted porosity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M887" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the number distribution slope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M888" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E21"/>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page1793?><app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Effective Martin slope in M${}^{4}$AGO}?><title>Effective Martin slope in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M889" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO</title>
      <p id="d1e16444">The effective Martin curve slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M890" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provides a meaningful measure on the attenuation of POC fluxes. This made <inline-formula><mml:math id="M891" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a widely used measure to evaluate POC concentration and flux observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx116" id="paren.248"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.
In M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M892" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, we found a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M893" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern similar to the inverse of the transfer efficiency (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.F17"/> compared to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, respectively). The smallest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M894" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are found in the models OMZ regions and the shallow Arctic shelf regions. In the North Pacific and North Atlantic, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M895" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> features values of about 0.47 to 0.60 and reaches maximum values of about 1.31 in the subtropical gyres. Qualitatively, the pattern thus follows and underpins the previously suggested POC flux attenuation pattern <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx116 bib1.bibx168 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.249"/>. By contrast, in our standard run, we found, apart from OMZs, a rather homogeneous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M896" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a global value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M897" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Martin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is smaller than the prescribed value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M898" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in oxygen-saturated waters. This discrepancy can be attributed to a number of processes. First, the global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M899" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Martin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced by the lower anaerobic remineralization in OMZs. Second, turbulent diffusion and vertical transport processes represented by MPIOM in addition to sinking contribute to vertical POC concentration profiles and fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.250"/>. Third, the artificial numerical diffusion  inherent in HAMOCC's implicit upstream scheme for particle sinking contributes to higher mass transport to depth than prescribed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M900" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This inherent numerical diffusion is, however, implicitly accounted for during the process of tuning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M901" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S2.F17"><?xmltex \currentcnt{B1}?><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d1e16622">Effective Martin curve slope for POC in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M902" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M903" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f17.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page1794?><app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{C}?><label>Appendix C</label><title>Seasonal transfer efficiency</title>
      <p id="d1e16661">The inversely identified transfer efficiency pattern by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx168" id="text.251"/> provides an estimate on time-integrated climatological POC fluxes. In regions of high seasonal variability in primary production, POC fluxes can undergo strong seasonal variation, and so does transfer efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx111" id="paren.252"/>. For example, if we assume an average sinking speed of about 25 m d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M904" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a pulsed flux at 100 m reaches the depth of 1000 m about a month later and can strongly alter flux and concentration profiles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.253"/>. Accordingly, single measured POC concentration profiles can even show higher concentration at depth than in surface waters, which results in negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M905" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and thus higher transfer efficiency than 1. In turn, transfer efficiency can  be extremely small at the beginning of a phytoplankton bloom. Seasonal transfer efficiency can thus heavily deviate from the climatological state.
This seasonal behavior is reflected in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M906" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO, which shows high transfer efficiency in late autumn and early times of low primary production after the bloom in high latitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S3.F18"/>). Even though the standard run exhibits a similar qualitative pattern, the seasonal amplitude of the transfer efficiency in high latitudes is lower in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M907" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO compared to the standard run.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S3.F18"><?xmltex \currentcnt{C1}?><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d1e16719">Seasonal evolution of the transfer efficiency in M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M908" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO. Note the difference of the color bar values compared to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/1765/2020/bg-17-1765-2020-f18.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>

<?pagebreak page1795?><app id="App1.Ch1.S4">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{D}?><label>Appendix D</label><title>Mathematical symbols</title>

<?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S4.T2"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{D1}?><label>Table D1</label><caption><p id="d1e16755">Mathematical symbols and their description.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="341.433071pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Symbol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Units</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M909" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean aggregate stickiness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M910" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diatom</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of a diatom frustule</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M911" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of primary-particle type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M912" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M913" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum stickiness of primary particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M914" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">map</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mapped mean stickiness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M915" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Minimum stickiness of primary particles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M916" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of opal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M917" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Stickiness of TEPs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M918" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total surface area of primary particles in an aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M919" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M920" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Power law factor for the aggregate number distribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M921" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M922" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface area of a primary particle of type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M923" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M924" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M925" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drag approximation factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M926" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Slope of the aggregate number distribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M927" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Martin curve POC flux slope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M928" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Effective Martin curve slope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M929" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Slope of fractal dimension-mapping function</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M930" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drag approximation power slope for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M931" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M932" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drag approximation power slope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M933" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Drag coefficient for sinking</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M934" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Concentration of HAMOCC  tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M935" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M936" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M937" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Diameter of an aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M938" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3-D mass fractal dimension</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M939" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum fractal dimension</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M940" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Minimum fractal dimension</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M941" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aggregate diameter at integration boundary</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M942" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maximum aggregate diameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M943" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Minimum aggregate diameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M944" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle diameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M945" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean primary-particle diameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M946" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Outer diameter of diatom frustule</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M947" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle diameter of primary-particle type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M948" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M949" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aggregate excess density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M950" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M951" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume-weighted mean aggregate excess density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M952" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M953" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">POC flux at export depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M954" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M955" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M956" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M957" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Flux of tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M958" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M959" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M960" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) or (kmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M961" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M962" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M963" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gravitational acceleration constant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M964" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M965" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle number ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M966" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Half-saturation constant for oxygen</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M967" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M968" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Diatom shell thickness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M969" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Molecular dynamic viscosity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M970" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M971" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M972" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mass of an aggregate of diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M973" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M974" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Actual mass of detritus in diatom frustules</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M975" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mass factor for smallest entity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M976" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M977" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">potential</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mass of detritus that could fill the void in diatom frustules</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M978" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aggregate number distribution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">( m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M979" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M980" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of primary particles of type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M981" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in an aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M982" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of primary particles of type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M983" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per unit volume</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M984" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M985" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Number of diatom frustules per unit volume</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M986" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.S4.T3"><?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?><?xmltex \currentcnt{D1}?><label>Table D1</label><caption><p id="d1e18161">Continued.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="341.433071pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="56.905512pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Symbol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Units</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M987" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total number of primary particles in an aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M988" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Molecular kinematic viscosity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M989" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M990" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M991" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aggregate porosity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M992" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume-weighted mean aggregate porosity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M993" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M994" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Factor for opal dissolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M995" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M996" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Factor for POC remineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M997" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ambient water density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M998" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M999" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1000" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1001" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1002" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of detritus (POM)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1003" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1004" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dust</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of dust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1005" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1006" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aggregate density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1007" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1008" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">diatom</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of a diatom frustule incl. TEP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1009" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1010" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">frustule</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of a diatom frustule incl. water and POM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1011" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1012" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Density of opal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1013" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1014" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dissolution rate of opal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1015" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1016" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1017" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1018" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean primary-particle density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1019" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1020" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Primary-particle density of primary-particle type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1021" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1022" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1023" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle Reynolds number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1024" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">Re</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">crit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Critical particle Reynolds number for fragmentation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1025" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">calc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carbon-mole-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1026" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-mass factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1027" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1028" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">det</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">P-mole-to-detritus-mass factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1029" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1030" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mole-to-mass factor for tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1031" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1032" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1033" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Silicon-mole-to-opal-mass factor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(kg mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1034" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1035" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Specific POC remineralization rate at reference temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1036" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1037" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1038" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">remin</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total POC remineralization rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1039" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1040" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Silicate-to-phosphate production ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1041" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1042" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1043" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1044" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Transfer efficiency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(–)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1045" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reference temperature for opal dissolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1046" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1047" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reference temperature for POC remineralization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1048" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1049" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume of water in the void of the diatom frustule</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1050" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1051" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">opal</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume of the opal spherical shell of the diatom frustule</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1052" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1053" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume of POM in the void of the diatom frustule</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1054" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1055" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Volume of primary particle of type <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1056" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1057" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1058" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Terminal sinking velocity of aggregates of diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1059" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1060" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1061" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Concentration-weighted mean sinking velocity for the Martin curve parametrization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1062" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1063" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Concentration-weighted mean sinking velocity of aggregates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1064" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1065" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1066" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Export depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1067" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1068" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Remineralization length scale for POC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e19552">Primary data and code for this study are stored and made available through the Max Planck Society
Publication Repository (<uri>https://pure.mpg.de/</uri>; last access: 17 March 2020): <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-BD3E-3</uri> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx123" id="altparen.254"/>). The respective MPIOM and HAMOCC model code (revision numbers: r4981 and r5003) is available on request after agreeing to the MPI-ESM license agreement and registering at the MPI-ESM-Forum (<uri>https://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/licenses/</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx122" id="altparen.255"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e19573">JM performed the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1069" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO model development and the HAMOCC model runs and wrote the paper. KDS and IS significantly contributed in tuning the M<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1070" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>AGO sinking scheme in HAMOCC and aided during implementation. SA contributed significant discussions on aggregate microphysics. All authors of the paper critically discussed the presented results and contributed by providing valuable feedback during the paper compilation.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e19597">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e19603">The authors thank Thomas Weber for sharing the results on the transfer efficiency and Adrian Burd for the discussion on fractal dimension of aggregates. The authors thank Bo Liu for the internal review and comments on the paper. The authors thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments on the paper. Joeran Maerz thanks Ulrike Feudel for earlier discussions on the topic of marine aggregates. The Multiscale Approach on the Role of Marine Aggregates (MARMA) project is funded by the Max Planck Society (MPG).  This work contributes to the project PalMod of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as a Research for Sustainable Development (FONA) initiative. Thanks to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx161" id="text.256"/> for providing the cmocean colormap. All simulations were performed at the German Climate Computing Center (DKRZ).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e19611">This research has been supported by the European Commission H2020 Research Infrastructures (CRESCENDO (grant no. 641816)).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by the Max Planck Society.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e19622">This paper was edited by Carolin Löscher and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adler(1979)</label><?label Adler_1979?><mixed-citation>
Adler, P. M.: A study of disaggregation effects in sedimentation, AlChE
Journal, 25, 487–493, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Alldredge(1998)</label><?label Alldredge_1998?><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A.: The carbon, nitrogen and mass content of marine snow as a
function of aggregate size, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 45, 529–541, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Alldredge and Gotschalk(1988)</label><?label Alldredge_1988?><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Gotschalk, C.: In situ settling behaviour of marine
snow, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33, 339–351, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Alldredge and Gotschalk(1990)</label><?label Alldredge_1990a?><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Gotschalk, C. C.: The relative contribution of marine
snow of different origins to biological processes in coastal waters,
Cont. Shelf Res., 10, 41–58, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Alldredge and McGillivary(1991)</label><?label Alldredge_1991?><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and McGillivary, P.: The attachment probabilities of marine
snow and their implications for particle coagulation in the ocean, Deep-Sea
Res., 38, 431–443, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Alldredge et al.(1990)</label><?label Alldredge_1990b?><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Granata, T. C., Gotschalk, C. C., and Dickey, T. D.: The
physical strength of marine snow and its implications for particle
disaggregation in the ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 1415–1428,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Alldredge et al.(1993)</label><?label Alldredge_1993?><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Passow, U., and Logan, B. E.: The abundance and significance
of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 40, 1131–1140, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Armbrecht et al.(2014)</label><?label Armbrecht_2014?><mixed-citation>
Armbrecht, L. H., Smetacek, V., Assmy, P., and Klaas, C.: Cell death and
aggregate formation in the giant diatom Coscinodiscus wailesii (Gran &amp;
Angst, 1931), J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 452,
31–39, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Armbrust(2009)</label><?label Armbrust_2009?><mixed-citation>
Armbrust, E. V.: The life of diatoms in the world's ocean, Nature, 459,
185–192, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Armstrong et al.(2002)</label><?label Armstrong_2002?><mixed-citation>
Armstrong, R. A., Lee, C., Hedges, J. I., Honjo, S., and Wakeham, S. G.: A
new, mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the
quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. II, 49, 219–236, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Assmy et al.(2013)</label><?label Assmy_2013?><mixed-citation>Assmy, P., Smetacek, V., Montresor, M., Klaas, C., Henjes, J., Strass, V. H.,
Arieta, J. M., Bathmann, U., Berg, G. M., Breitbarth, E., Cisewski, B.,
Friedrichs, L., Fuchs, N., Herndl, G. J., Jansen, S., Krägefsky, S.,
Latasa, M., Peeken, I., Röttgers, R., Scharek, R., Schüller, S. E.,
Steigenberger, S., Webb, A., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Thick-shelled, grazer
protected diatoms decouple ocean carbon and silicon cycles in the
iron-limited Antarctic Circumpolar Current, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 20633–20638, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309345110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1309345110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Azam and Malfatti(2007)</label><?label Azam_2007?><mixed-citation>
Azam, F. and Malfatti, F.: Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems,
Nature, 5, 782–791, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Azetsu-Scott and Passow(2004)</label><?label Azetsu-Scott_2004?><mixed-citation>
Azetsu-Scott, K. and Passow, U.: Ascending marine particles: Significance of
transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the upper ocean, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 49, 741–748, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Bach et al.(2016)</label><?label Bach_2016?><mixed-citation>Bach, L. T., Boxhammer, T., Larsen, A., Hildebrandt, N., Schulz, K. G., and
Riebesell, U.: Influence of plankton community structure on the sinking
velocity of marine aggregates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 971–994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GB005372</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Bagster and Tomi(1974)</label><?label Bagster_1974?><mixed-citation>
Bagster, D. F. and Tomi, D.: The stresses within a sphere in simple flow
fields, Chem. Eng. Sci., 29, 1773–1783, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Balch et al.(2010)</label><?label Balch_2010?><mixed-citation>Balch, W. M., Bowler, B. C., Drapeau, D. T., Poulton, A. J., and Holligan,
P. M.: Biominerals and the vertical flux of particulate organic carbon from
the surface ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044640" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL044640</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Berelson et al.(2007)</label><?label Berelson_2007?><mixed-citation>Berelson, W. M., Balch, W. M., Najjar, R., Feely, R. A., Sabine, C., and Lee,
K.: Relating estimates of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1071" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production, export, and dissolution
in the water column to measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1072" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rain into sediment traps
and dissolution on t<?pagebreak page1798?>he sea floor: A revised global carbonate budget,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002803</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Bidle et al.(2002)</label><?label Bidle_2002?><mixed-citation>
Bidle, K. D., Manganelli, M., and Azam, F.: Regulation of oceanic silicon and
carbon preservation by temperature control on bacteria, Science, 298,
1980–1984, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Biermann and Engel(2010)</label><?label Biermann_2010?><mixed-citation>Biermann, A. and Engel, A.: Effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1073" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the properties and sinking velocity of aggregates of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi, Biogeosciences, 7, 1017–1029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1017-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-1017-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Bisson et al.(2018)</label><?label Bisson_2018?><mixed-citation>Bisson, K. M., Siegel, D. A., DeVries, T., Cael, B. B., and Buesseler, K. O.:
How data set characteristics influence ocean carbon export models, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1312–1328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GB005934</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Block et al.(1991)</label><?label Block_1991?><mixed-citation>
Block, A., von Bloh, W., and Schellnhuber, H. J.: Aggregation by attractive
particle-cluster interaction, J. Phys. A-Math. Gen., 24, L1037–L1044, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Bopp et al.(2013)</label><?label Bopp_2013?><mixed-citation>Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Boyd and Newton(1995)</label><?label Boyd_1995?><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. and Newton, P.: Evidence of the potential influence of planctonic
community structure on the interannual variability of particulate organic
carbon flux, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 42, 619–639, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Boyd et al.(2017)</label><?label Boyd_2017?><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W., Ellwood, M. J., Tagliabue, A., and Twining, B. S.: Biotic and
abiotic retention, recycling and remineralization of metals in the ocean,
Nat. Geosci., 10, 167–174, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Boyd et al.(2019)</label><?label Boyd_2019?><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W., Claustre, H., Levy, M., Siegel, D. A., and Weber, T.:
Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean,
Nature, 568, 327–335, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Boyer et al.(2013)</label><?label Boyer_2013?><mixed-citation>Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K., Coleman, C., Garcia, H. E.,
Grodsky, A., Johnson, D. R., Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., O'Brien,
T. D., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Smolyar, I. V., and Zweng,
M. M.: World Ocean Database 2013, Tech. rep., NOAA National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, National Oceanographic Data Center User Services Team, NOAA/NESDIS
E/OC1, Silver Spring, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7289/V5NZ85MT" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7289/V5NZ85MT</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Brakalov(1987)</label><?label Brakalov_1987?><mixed-citation>
Brakalov, L. B.: A connection between the orthokinetic coagulation capture
efficiency of aggregates and their maximum size, Chem. Eng.
Sci., 42, 2373–2383, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Brandt et al.(2012)</label><?label Brandt_2012?><mixed-citation>Brandt, P., Greatbatch, R. J., Claus, M., Didwischus, S.-H., Hormann, V., Funk,
A., Hahn, J., Krahmann, G., Fischer, J., and Körtzinger, A.: Ventilation
of the equatorial Atlantic by the equatorial deep jets, J.
Geophys. Res., 117, C12015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008118" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008118</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Brzezinski(1985)</label><?label Brzezinski_1985?><mixed-citation>Brzezinski, M. A.: The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1074" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of marine diatoms: interspecific
variability and the effect of some environmental variables, J. Phycol., 21,
347–357, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Buesseler(1998)</label><?label Buesseler_1998?><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O.: The decoupling of production and particulate export in the
surface ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 297–310, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Buesseler and Boyd(2009)</label><?label Buesseler_2009?><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O. and Boyd, P. W.: Shedding light on processes that control
particle export and flux attenuation in the twilight zone of the open ocean,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 1210–1232, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Bushell and Amal(1998)</label><?label Bushell_1998?><mixed-citation>
Bushell, G. and Amal, R.: Fractal aggregates of polydisperse particles,
J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 205, 459–469, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Cael and Bisson(2018)</label><?label Cael_2018b?><mixed-citation>Cael, B. B. and Bisson, K.: Particle flux parameterizations: quantitative and
mechanistic similarities and differences, Frontiers in Marine Science, 5,
395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2018.00395</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Carr et al.(2006)</label><?label Carr_2006?><mixed-citation>
Carr, M.-E., Friedrich, M. A. M., Schmeltz, M., Aita, M. N., Antoine, D.,
Arrigo, K. R., Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Barber, R., Behrenfeld, M., Bidigare,
R. E. T., Campbell, J., Ciotti, A., Dierssen, H., Dowell, M., Dunne, J.,
Esaias, W., Gentili, B., Gregg, W., Groom, S., Hoepffner, N., Ishizaka, J.,
Kameda, T., Le Quéré, C., Lohrenz, S., Marra, J., Mélin, F.,
Moore, K., Morel, A., Reddy, T. E., Ryan, J., Scardi, M., Smyth, T., Turpie,
K., Tilstone, G., Waters, K., and Yamanaka, Y.: A comparison of global
estimates of marine primary production from ocean color, Deep-Sea Res.,
53, 741–770, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Cram et al.(2018)</label><?label Cram_2018?><mixed-citation>Cram, J. A., Weber, T., Leung, S. W., McDonnell, A. M. P., Liang, J.-H., and
Deutsch, C.: The role of particle size, ballast, temperature, and oxygen in
the sinking flux to the deep sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 858–876, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017GB005710</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Dam and Drapeau(1995)</label><?label Dam_1995?><mixed-citation>
Dam, H. G. and Drapeau, D. T.: Coagulation efficiency, organic-matter glues
and the dynamics of particles during a phytoplankton bloom in a mesocoms
study, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42, 111–123, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Daufresne et al.(2009)</label><?label Daufresne_2009?><mixed-citation>
Daufresne, M., Lengfeller, K., and Sommer, U.: Global warming benefits the
small in aquatic ecosystems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 12788–12793, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>De La Rocha and Passow(2007)</label><?label DeLaRocha_2007?><mixed-citation>
De La Rocha, C. L. and Passow, U.: Factors influencing the sinking of POC
and the efficiency of the biological carbon pump, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 54,
639–658, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>De La Rocha et al.(2008)</label><?label DeLaRocha_2008?><mixed-citation>De La Rocha, C. L., Nowald, N., and Passow, U.: Interactions between diatom
aggregates, minerals, particulate organic carbon, and dissolved organic
matter: Further implications for the ballast hypothesis, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB4005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003156</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Decho(1990)</label><?label Decho_1990?><mixed-citation>
Decho, A. W.: Microbial exopolymer secretions in oceanic environments: their
role(s) in food webs and marine processes, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.,
28, 73–153, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Dell et al.(2011)</label><?label Dell_2011?><mixed-citation>
Dell, A. I., Pawar, S., and Savage, V. M.: Systematic variation in the
temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
10591–10596, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>DeVries and Weber(2017)</label><?label DeVries_2017?><mixed-citation>
DeVries, T. and Weber, T.: The export and fate of organic matter in the ocean:
New constraints from combining satellite and oceanographic tracer
observations, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 535–555, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>DeVries et al.(2014)</label><?label DeVries_2014?><mixed-citation>DeVries, T., Liang, J.-H., and Deutsch, C.: A mechanistic particle flux model applied to the oceanic phosphorus cycle, Biogeosciences, 11, 5381–5398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Dietze and Loeptien(2013)</label><?label Dietze_2013?><mixed-citation>Dietze, H. and Loeptien, U.: Revisiting “nutrient trapping” in global
coupled biogeochemical ocean circulation models, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 27, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/gbc.20029</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Dilling and Alldredge(2000)</label><?label Dilling_2000?><mixed-citation>
Dilling, L. and Alldredge, A. L.: Fragmentation of marine snow by swimming
macrozooplankton: A new process impacting carbon cycling in the sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 47, 1227–1245, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Dunne et al.(2005)</label><?label Dunne_2005?><mixed-citation>Dunne, J. P., Armstrong, R. A., Gnanadesikan, A., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
Empirical and mechanistic mode<?pagebreak page1799?>ls for the particle export ratio, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002390</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Eisma(1986)</label><?label Eisma_1986?><mixed-citation>
Eisma, D.: Flocculation and de-flocculation of suspended matter in estuaries,
Neth. J. Sea Res., 20, 183–199, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Engel et al.(2004)</label><?label Engel_2004a?><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Thoms, S., Riebesell, U., Rochelle-Newall, E., and Zondervan, I.:
Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic
carbon, Nature, 428, 929–932, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Engel et al.(2009)</label><?label Engel_2009b?><mixed-citation>Engel, A., Szlosek, J., Abramson, L., Liu, Z., and Lee, C.: Investigating the
effect of ballasting by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1075" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <italic>Emiliania huxleyi</italic>, I.
Formation, settling velocities and physical properties of aggregates,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 1396–1407, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>England and Maier-Reimer(2001)</label><?label England_2001?><mixed-citation>
England, M. H. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Using chemical tracers to assess ocean
models, Rev. Geophys., 39, 29–70, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Falkowski et al.(1998)</label><?label Falkowski_1998?><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., and Smetacek, V.: Biogeochemical Controls and
Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Productivity, Science, 281, 200–206, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Fettweis(2008)</label><?label Fettweis_2008?><mixed-citation>
Fettweis, M.: Uncertainty of excess density and settling velocity of mud flocs
derived from in situ measurements, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 78, 426–436, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Filella(2007)</label><?label Filella_2007?><mixed-citation>
Filella, M.: Colloidal properties of submicron particles in natural waters,
in: Environmental Colloids and Particles: Behaviour, Separation and
Characterisation, IUPAC Series on Analytical and Physical Chemistry of
Environmental Systems, chap. 2,   17–93, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.,  Chichester, UK, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fischer and Karaka\k{s}(2009)}}?><label>Fischer and Karakas̨(2009)</label><?label Fischer_2009?><mixed-citation>Fischer, G. and Karakaş, G.: Sinking rates and ballast composition of particles in the Atlantic Ocean: implications for the organic carbon fluxes to the deep ocean, Biogeosciences, 6, 85–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-85-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-85-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Fischer et al.(2016)</label><?label Fischer_2016?><mixed-citation>Fischer, G., Romero, O., Merkel, U., Donner, B., Iversen, M., Nowald, N., Ratmeyer, V., Ruhland, G., Klann, M., and Wefer, G.: Deep ocean mass fluxes in the coastal upwelling off Mauritania from 1988 to 2012: variability on seasonal to decadal timescales, Biogeosciences, 13, 3071–3090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3071-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-3071-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Francois et al.(2002)</label><?label Francois_2002?><mixed-citation>Francois, R., Honjo, S., Krishfield, R., and Manganini, S.: Factors
controlling the flux of organic carbon to the bathypelagic zone of the
ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001722</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Garcia et al.(2014a)</label><?label Garcia_2014?><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K.,
Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2013,
NOAA Atlas NESDIS 75, Volume 3: Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen
Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation, 27 pp., 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Garcia et al.(2014b)Garcia, Locarnini, Boyer, Antonov,
Baranova, Zweng, Reagan, and Reagan</label><?label Garcia_2014a?><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K.,
Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Reagan, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2013,
NOAA Atlas NESDIS 76, Volume 4: Dissolved Inorganic Nutrients (phosphate,
nitrate, silicate), 25pp, 2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Gehlen et al.(2006)</label><?label Gehlen_2006?><mixed-citation>Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Emprin, N., Aumont, O., Heinze, C., and Ragueneau, O.: Reconciling surface ocean productivity, export fluxes and sediment composition in a global biogeochemical ocean model, Biogeosciences, 3, 521–537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-521-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-3-521-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Giering et al.(2017)</label><?label Giering_2017?><mixed-citation>
Giering, S. L. C., Sanders, R., Martin, A. P., Henson, S. A., Riley, J. S.,
Marsay, C. M., and Johns, D. G.: Particle flux in the oceans: Callenging
the steady state assumption, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 159–171,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Gloor et al.(2003)</label><?label Gloor_2003?><mixed-citation>Gloor, M., Gruber, N., Sarmiento, J., Sabine, C. L., Feely, R. A., and
Rödenbeck, C.: A first estimate of present and preindustrial air-sea
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1076" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux patterns based on ocean interior carbon measurements and
models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015594" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015594</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Guidi et al.(2008)</label><?label Guidi_2008?><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Jackson, G. A., Stemmann, L., Miquel, J. C., Picheral, M., and
Gorsky, G.: Relationship between particle size distribution and flux in the
mesopelagic zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 55, 1364–1374, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Guidi et al.(2009)</label><?label Guidi_2009?><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Stemmann, L., Jackson, G. A., Ibanez, F., Claustre, H., Legendre,
L., Picheral, M., and Gorsky, G.: Effects of phytoplankton community on
production, size and export of large aggregates: A world-ocean analysis,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 1951–1963, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Guidi et al.(2016)</label><?label Guidi_2016?><mixed-citation>Guidi, L., Chaffron, S., Bittner, L., Eveillard, D., Larhlimi, A., Roux, S.,
Darzi, Y., Audic, S., Berline, L., Brum, J. R., Coelho, L. P., Espinoza, J.
C. I., Malviya, S., Sunagawa, S., Dimier, C., Kandels-Lewis, S., Picheral,
M., Poulain, J., Searson, S., <italic>Tara</italic> Oceans Consortium Coordinators,
Stemmann, L., Not, F., Hingamp, P., Speich, S., Follows, M., Karp-Boss, L.,
Boss, E., Ogata, H., Pesant, S., Weissenbach, J., Wincker, P., Acinas, S. G.,
Bork, P., de Vargas, C., Iudicone, D., Sullivan, M. B., Raes, J., Karsenti,
E., Bowler, C., and Gorsky, G.: Plankton networks driving carbon export in
the oligotrophic ocean, Nature, 532, 465–481, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Hamm(2002)</label><?label Hamm_2002?><mixed-citation>
Hamm, C. E.: Interactive aggregation and sedimentation of diatoms and
clay-sized lithogenic material, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 1790–1795, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hansen and Ki{\o}rboe(1997)}}?><label>Hansen and Kiørboe(1997)</label><?label Hansen_1997?><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J. L. S. and Kiørboe, T.: Quantifying interspecific coagulation
efficiency of phytoplankton, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 159, 75–79,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Hedges et al.(2001)</label><?label Hedges_2001?><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. L., Baldock, J. A., Gélinas, Y., Lee, C., Peterson, M., and
Wakeham, S. G.: Evidence for non-selective preservation of organic matter in
sinking marine particles, Nature, 409, 801–804, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Heinemann et al.(2019)</label><?label Heinemann_2019?><mixed-citation>Heinemann, M., Segschneider, J., and Schneider, B.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1077" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown due to particle ballasting by glacial aeolian dust: an estimate based on the ocean carbon cycle model MPIOM/HAMOCC version 1.6.2p3, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1869–1883, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Heinze et al.(1999)</label><?label Heinze_1999?><mixed-citation>
Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., Winguth, A. M. E., and Archer, D.: A global
oceanic sediment model for long-term climate studies, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 13, 221–250, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Henderiks(2008)</label><?label Henderiks_2008a?><mixed-citation>
Henderiks, J.: Coccolithophore size rules – Reconstructing ancient cell
geometry and cellular calcite quota from fossil coccoliths, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 67, 143–154, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Henderiks and Pagani(2008)</label><?label Henderiks_2008?><mixed-citation>Henderiks, J. and Pagani, M.: Coccolithophore cell size and the Paleogene
decline in atmopheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1078" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 269,
576–584, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Henson et al.(2011)</label><?label Henson_2011?><mixed-citation>Henson, S. A., Sanders, R., Madsen, E., Morris, P. J., Le Moigne, F., and
Quartly, G. D.: A reduced estimate of the strength of the ocean's biological
carbon pump, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL046735</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Henson et al.(2012)</label><?label Henson_2012?><mixed-citation>Henson, S. A., Sanders, R., and Madsen, E.: Global patterns in efficiency of
particulate organic carbon export and transfer to the deep ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 265, GB1028, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GB004099</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Hill(1998)</label><?label Hill_1998a?><mixed-citation>
Hill, P. S.: Controls on floc size in the sea, Oceanography, 11, 13–18,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Honjo(1976)</label><?label Honjo_1976?><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S.: Coccoliths: Production, transportation and sedimentation, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 1, 65–79, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1800?><ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Ilyina and Friedlingstein(2016)</label><?label Ilyina_2016?><mixed-citation>Ilyina, T. and Friedlingstein, P.: WCRP Grand Challenge – Carbon feedbacks in
the climate system, Tech. rep., WCRP,
available at: <uri>https://www.wcrp-climate.org/JSC37/Documents/BGCGC_whitepaper_submission.pdf</uri> (last access: 19 March 2020),
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Ilyina et al.(2013)</label><?label Ilyina_2013?><mixed-citation>
Ilyina, T., Six, K. D., Segschneider, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Li, H., and
Núñez-Riboni, I.: Global ocean biogeochemistry model HAMOCC:
Model architecture and performance as component of the MPI-Earth system
model in different CMIP5 experimental realizations, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 5, 1–29, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Iversen and Ploug(2010)</label><?label Iversen_2010?><mixed-citation>Iversen, M. H. and Ploug, H.: Ballast minerals and the sinking carbon flux in the ocean: carbon-specific respiration rates and sinking velocity of marine snow aggregates, Biogeosciences, 7, 2613–2624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Iversen and Ploug(2013)</label><?label Iversen_2013?><mixed-citation>Iversen, M. H. and Ploug, H.: Temperature effects on carbon-specific respiration rate and sinking velocity of diatom aggregates – potential implications for deep ocean export processes, Biogeosciences, 10, 4073–4085, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4073-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-4073-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Iversen and Robert(2015)</label><?label Iversen_2015?><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H. and Robert, M. L.: Ballasting effects of smectite on aggregate
formation and export from a natural plankton community, Mar. Chem.,
175, 18–27, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Jackson(1990)</label><?label Jackson_1990?><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.: A model of the formation of marine algal flocs by physical
coagulation processes, Deep-Sea Res., 37, 1197–1211, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Jackson(1998)</label><?label Jackson_1998?><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.: Using fractal scaling and two-dimensional particle size
spectra to calculate coagulation rates for heterogeneous systems, J.
Colloid Interf. Sci., 202, 20–29, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Jiang and Logan(1991)</label><?label Jiang_1991?><mixed-citation>
Jiang, Q. and Logan, B. E.: Fractal dimension of aggregates determined from
steady-state size distributions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 2031–2038,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Jokulsdottir and Archer(2016)</label><?label Jokulsdottir_2016?><mixed-citation>Jokulsdottir, T. and Archer, D.: A stochastic, Lagrangian model of sinking biogenic aggregates in the ocean (SLAMS 1.0): model formulation, validation and sensitivity, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1455–1476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1455-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-1455-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Jungclaus et al.(2013)</label><?label Jungclaus_2013?><mixed-citation>Jungclaus, J. H., Fischer, N., Haak, H., Lohmann, K., Marotzke, J., Matei, D.,
Mikolajewicz, U., Notz, D., and von Storch, J. S.: Characteristics of the
ocean simulations in the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model (MPIOM)
the ocean component of the MPI-Earth system model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 5, 422–446, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jame.20023</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Khelifa and Hill(2006)</label><?label Khelifa_2006?><mixed-citation>
Khelifa, A. and Hill, P. S.: Models for effective density and settling
velocity of flocs, J. Hydraul. Res., 44, 390–401, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ki{\o}rboe et~al.(1990)}}?><label>Kiørboe et al.(1990)</label><?label Kiorboe_1990?><mixed-citation>
Kiørboe, T., Andersen, K. P., and Dam, H. G.: Coagulation efficiency and
aggregate formation in marine phytoplankton, Mar. Biol., 107, 235–245,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ki{\o}rboe et~al.(2001)}}?><label>Kiørboe et al.(2001)</label><?label Kiorboe_2001?><mixed-citation>
Kiørboe, T., Ploug, H., and Thygesen, U. H.: Fluid motion and solute
distribution around sinking aggregates. I. Small-scale fluxes and
heterogeneity of nutrients in the pelagic environment, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 211, 1–13, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Klaas and Archer(2002)</label><?label Klaas_2002?><mixed-citation>Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.: Association of sinking organic matter with
various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: Implications for the rain
ratio, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GB001765</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Kostadinov et al.(2016)</label><?label Kostadinov_2016?><mixed-citation>Kostadinov, T. S., Milutinović, S., Marinov, I., and Cabré, A.: Carbon-based phytoplankton size classes retrieved via ocean color estimates of the particle size distribution, Ocean Sci., 12, 561–575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-561-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-12-561-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Kranenburg(1994)</label><?label Kranenburg_1994?><mixed-citation>
Kranenburg, C.: The fractal structure of cohesive sediment aggregates,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 39, 451–460, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Kranenburg(1999)</label><?label Kranenburg_1999?><mixed-citation>
Kranenburg, C.: Effects of floc strength on viscosity and deposition of
cohesive sediment suspensions, Cont. Shelf Res., 19, 1665–1680,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Kriest and Evans(1999)</label><?label Kriest_1999?><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and Evans, G. T.: Representing phytoplankton aggregates in
biogeochemical models, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 46, 1841–1859, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2008)</label><?label Kriest_2008?><mixed-citation>Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: On the treatment of particulate organic matter sinking in large-scale models of marine biogeochemical cycles, Biogeosciences, 5, 55–72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-55-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-5-55-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Lam and Marchal(2015)</label><?label Lam_2015?><mixed-citation>
Lam, P. J. and Marchal, O.: Insights into particle cycling from thorium and
particle data, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 7, 159–184, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Lam et al.(2011)</label><?label Lam_2011a?><mixed-citation>Lam, P. J., Doney, S. C., and Bishop, J. K. B.: The dynamic ocean biological
pump: Insights from a global compilation of particulate organic carbon,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1079" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and opal concentration profiles from the mesopelagic, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003868</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Laurenceau-Cornec et al.(2015)</label><?label Laurenceau-Cornec_2015?><mixed-citation>
Laurenceau-Cornec, E. C., Trull, T. W., Davies, D. M., De La Rocha, C. L.,
and Blain, S.: Phytoplankton morphology controls on marine snow sinking
velocity, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 520, 35–56, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Laurenceau-Cornec et al.(2019)</label><?label Laurenceau-Cornec_2019?><mixed-citation>Laurenceau-Cornec, E. C., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Gallinari, M., Moriceau, B.,
Toullec, J., Iversen, M. H., Engel, A., and De La Rocha, C. L.: New
guidelines for the application of Stokes' models to the sinking velocity of
marine aggregates, Limnol. Oceanogr., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/lno.11388</ext-link>, online first, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Lauvset et al.(2016)</label><?label Lauvset_2016?><mixed-citation>Lauvset, S. K., Key, R. M., Olsen, A., van Heuven, S., Velo, A., Lin, X., Schirnick, C., Kozyr, A., Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jutterström, S., Steinfeldt, R., Jeansson, E., Ishii, M., Perez, F. F., Suzuki, T., and Watelet, S.: A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1080" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1081" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1082" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> GLODAP version 2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 325–340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-325-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-325-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Laws et al.(2000)</label><?label Laws_2000?><mixed-citation>
Laws, E. A., Falkowski, P. G., Smith Jr., W. O., Ducklow, H., and McCarthy,
J. J.: Temperature effects on export production in the open ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 1231–1246, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Lefort et al.(2015)</label><?label Lefort_2015?><mixed-citation>Lefort, S., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Arsouze, T., Gehlen, M., and Maury, O.:
Spatial and body-size dependent response of marine pelagic communities to
projected global climate change, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 154–164,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12679" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12679</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Le Moigne et al.(2017)</label><?label LeMoigne_2017?><mixed-citation>Le Moigne, F. A. C., Cisternas-Novoa, C., Piontek, J., Maßmig, M., and
Engel, A.: On the effect of low oxygen concentrations on bacterial
degradation of sinking particles, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 16722,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16903-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-16903-3</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Lewin(1961)</label><?label Lewin_1961?><mixed-citation>
Lewin, J. C.: The dissolution of silica from diatom walls, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 21, 182–198, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Li and Logan(1995)</label><?label Li_1995?><mixed-citation>
Li, X. and Logan, B. E.: Size distributions and fractal properties of
particles during a simulated phytoplankton bloom in a mesocosm, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. II, 42, 125–138, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Litchman et al.(2009)</label><?label Litchman_2009?><mixed-citation>
Litchman, E., Klausmeier, C. A., and Yoshiyama, K.: Contrasting size evolution
in marine and freshwater diatoms , P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 2665–2670, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Liu et al.(1990)</label><?label Liu_1990?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Shih, W. Y., Sarikaya, M., and Aksay, I. A.: Fractal colloidal
aggregates with finite interparticle interactions: Energy dependence of the
fractal dimension, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 3206–3213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.41.3206" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevA.41.3206</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Logan and Alldredge(1989)</label><?label Logan_1989?><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E. and Alldredge, A. L.: Potential for increased nutrient uptake by
flocculating diatoms, Mar. Biol., 101, 443–450, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1801?><ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Logan and Wilkinson(1990)</label><?label Logan_1990?><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E. and Wilkinson, D. B.: Fractal geometry of marine snow and other
biological aggregates, Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 130–136, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{L{\"{o}}scher et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Löscher et al.(2016)</label><?label Loescher_2016?><mixed-citation>Löscher, C. R., Bange, H. W., Schmitz, R. A., Callbeck, C. M., Engel, A., Hauss, H., Kanzow, T., Kiko, R., Lavik, G., Loginova, A., Melzner, F., Meyer, J., Neulinger, S. C., Pahlow, M., Riebesell, U., Schunck, H., Thomsen, S., and Wagner, H.: Water column biogeochemistry of oxygen minimum zones in the eastern tropical North Atlantic and eastern tropical South Pacific oceans, Biogeosciences, 13, 3585–3606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Lutz et al.(2002)</label><?label Lutz_2002?><mixed-citation>Lutz, M., Dunbar, R., and Caldeira, K.: Regional variability in the vertical
flux of particulate organic carbon in the ocean interior, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GB001383</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Lutz et al.(2007)</label><?label Lutz_2007?><mixed-citation>Lutz, M. J., Caldeira, K., Dunbar, R. B., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Seasonal
rhythms of net primary production and particulate organic carbon flux to
depth describe the efficiency of biological pump in the global ocean,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, C10011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003706" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JC003706</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Maggi(2009)</label><?label Maggi_2009?><mixed-citation>
Maggi, F.: Biological flocculation of suspended particles in nutrient-rich
aqueous ecosystems, J. Hydrol., 376, 116–125, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Maher et al.(2010)</label><?label Maher_2010?><mixed-citation>
Maher, B. A., Prospero, J. M., Mackie, D., Gaiero, D., Hesse, P. P., and
Balkanski, Y.: Global connections between aeolian dust, climate and ocean
biogeochemistry at the present day and at the last glacial maximum,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 99, 61–97, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Mahowald et al.(2014)</label><?label Mahowald_2014?><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward,
D. S., and Flanner, M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and
its impact on the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 15, 53–71, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Mari et al.(2017)</label><?label Mari_2017?><mixed-citation>
Mari, X., Passow, U., Migon, C., Burd, A. B., and Legendre, L.: Transparent
exopolymer particles: Effects on carbon cycling in the ocean, Prog.
Oceanogr., 151, 13–37, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Marsay et al.(2015)</label><?label Marsay_2015?><mixed-citation>
Marsay, C. M., Sanders, R. J., Henson, S. A., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg,
E. P., and Lampitt, R. S.: Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon
flux through the mesopelagic ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 1089–1094, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Marsland et al.(2003)</label><?label Marsland_2003?><mixed-citation>
Marsland, S. J., Haak, H., Jungclaus, J. H., Latif, M., and Röske, F.: The
Max-Planck-Institute global ocean/sea ice model with orthogonal
curvilinear coordinates, Ocean Model., 5, 91–127, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Martin et al.(1987)</label><?label Martin_1987?><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: VERTEX:
carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 34, 267–285,
1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Martin et al.(2011)</label><?label Martin_2011?><mixed-citation>
Martin, P., Lampitt, R. S., Perry, M. J., Sanders, R., Lee, C., and D'Asaro,
E.: Export and mesopelagic particle flux during a North Atlantic spring
diatom bloom, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 338–349, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Matth{\"{a}}us(1972)}}?><label>Matthäus(1972)</label><?label Matthaeus_1972?><mixed-citation>
Matthäus, W.: Die Viskosität des Meerwassers, Beitr.
Meereskd., 29, 93–107,  1972 (in German).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx121"><label>Mauritsen et al.(2019)</label><?label Mauritsen_2019?><mixed-citation>Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T., Behrens, J., Bittner, M., Brokopf, R.,
Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fast, I., Fiedler, S.,
Fläschner, D., Gayler, V., Giorgetta, M., Goll, D. S., Haak, H.,
Hagemann, S., Hedemann, C., Hohenegger, C., Ilyina, T., Jahns, T.,
Jimenéz-de-la Cuesta, D., Jungclaus, J., Kleinen, T., Kloster, S.,
Kracher, D., Kinne, S., Kleberg, D., Lasslop, G., Kornblueh, L., Marotzke,
J., Matei, D., Meraner, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Modali, K., Möbis, B.,
Müller, W. A., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nam, C. C. W., Notz, D., Nyawira,
S.-S., Paulsen, H., Peters, K., Pincus, R., Pohlmann, H., Pongratz, J., Popp,
M., Raddatz, T. J., Rast, S., Redler, R., Reick, C. H., Rohrschneider, T.,
Schemann, V., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R., Schulzweida, U., Six, K. D., Stein,
L., Stemmler, I., Stevens, B., von Storch, J.-S., Tian, F., Voigt, A.,
Vrese, P., Wieners, K.-H., Wilkenskjeld, S., Winkler, A., and Roeckner, E.:
Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2
(MPI-ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1083" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018MS001400</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx122"><label>Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg and Max
Planck Society, Munich(2020)</label><?label max2020b?><mixed-citation>Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg and Max
Planck Society, Munich:
MPI-ESM User Forum, available at: <uri>https://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/licenses/</uri>,
last access: 17 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx123"><label>Max Planck Society, Munich(2020)</label><?label max2020?><mixed-citation>Max Planck Society, Munich: Max Planck Society Publication Repository MPG.PuRe, available at: <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-BD3E-3</uri>, last access: 17 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx124"><label>McCave(1984)</label><?label McCave_1984?><mixed-citation>
McCave, I. N.: Size spectra and aggregation of suspended particles in the deep
ocean, Deep-Sea Res., 31, 329–352, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx125"><label>Meakin(1988)</label><?label Meakin_1988?><mixed-citation>
Meakin, P.: Models for colloidal aggregation, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 39,
237–267, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx126"><label>Mikaloff Fletcher et al.(2007)</label><?label Fletscher_2007?><mixed-citation>Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Gruber, N., Jacobson, A. R., Gloor, M., Doney,
S. C., Dutkiewicz, S., Gerber, M., Follows, M., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Menemenlis, D., Mouchet, A., Müller, S. A., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
Inverse estimates of the oceanic sources and sinks of natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1084" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the implied oceanic carbon transport, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1010,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002751</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx127"><label>Miklasz and Denny(2010)</label><?label Miklasz_2010?><mixed-citation>
Miklasz, K. A. and Denny, M. W.: Diatom sinking speeds: Improved predictions
and insights from a modified Stokes' law, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55,
2513–2525, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx128"><label>Milinski et al.(2016)</label><?label Milinski_2016?><mixed-citation>Milinski, S., Bader, J., Haak, H., Siongco, A. C., and Jungclaus, J. H.: High
atmospheric horizontal resolution eliminates the wind-driven coastal warm
bias in the southeastern tropical Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 10455–10462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL070530</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx129"><label>Mislan et al.(2014)</label><?label Mislan_2014?><mixed-citation>
Mislan, K. A. S., Stock, C. A., Dunne, J. P., and Sarmiento, J.: Group
behaviour among model bacteria influences particulate carbon mineralization
depths, J. Mar. Res., 72, 183–218, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx130"><label>Mouw et al.(2016a)</label><?label Mouw_2016?><mixed-citation>Mouw, C. B., Barnett, A., McKinley, G. A., Gloege, L., and Pilcher, D.: Global ocean particulate organic carbon flux merged with satellite parameters, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 531–541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-531-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-531-2016</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx131"><label>Mouw et al.(2016b)</label><?label Mouw_2016_PANGAEA?><mixed-citation>Mouw, C. B., Barnett, A., McKinley, G. A., Gloege, L., and Pilcher, D.: Global Ocean Particulate Organic Carbon flux merged with satellite parameters,
PANGAEA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.855600</ext-link>,
2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx132"><label>Najjar et al.(2007)</label><?label Najjar_2007?><mixed-citation>Najjar, R. G., Jin, X., Louanchi, F., Aumont, O., Caldeira, K., Doney, S. C.,
Dutay, J.-C., Follows, M., Gruber, N., Joos, F., Lindsay, K., Maier-Reimer,
E., Matear, R. J., Matsumoto, K., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Orr, J. C.,
Plattner, G.-K., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R. D., Weirig,
M. F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Impact of circulation on export
production, dissolved organic matter, and dissolved oxygen in the ocean:
Results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model
Intercomparison Project (OCMIP-2), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB3007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002857</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx133"><label>Neuer et al.(2002)</label><?label Neuer_2002?><mixed-citation>Neuer, S., Davenport, R., Freudenthal, T., Wefer, G., Llinás, O., Rueda,
M.-J., Steinberg, D. K., and Ka<?pagebreak page1802?>rl, D. M.: Differences in the biological
carbon pump at three subtropical ocean sites, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
29, 1885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015393</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx134"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Nicol{\'{a}}s-Carlock et~al.(2016)}}?><label>Nicolás-Carlock et al.(2016)</label><?label Nicolas-Carlock_2016?><mixed-citation>Nicolás-Carlock, J. R., Carrillo-Estrada, J. L., and Dossetti, V.: Fractality
à la carte: a general particle aggregation model, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6,
19505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep19505</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx135"><label>Passow(2002)</label><?label Passow_2002?><mixed-citation>
Passow, U.: Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in aquatic environments,
Prog. Oceanogr., 55, 287–333, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx136"><label>Passow(2004)</label><?label Passow_2004?><mixed-citation>Passow, U.: Switching perspectives: Do mineral fluxes determine particulate
organic carbon fluxes or vice versa?, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, Q04002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000670" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GC000670</ext-link>
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx137"><label>Passow and De La Rocha(2006)</label><?label Passow_2006?><mixed-citation>Passow, U. and De La Rocha, C. L.: Accumulation of mineral ballast on
organic aggregates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GB002579</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx138"><label>Paulsen et al.(2017)</label><?label Paulsen_2017?><mixed-citation>Paulsen, H., Ilyina, T., Six, K. D., and Stemmler, I.: Incorporating a
prognostic representation of marine nitrogen fixers into the global ocean
biogeochemical model HAMOCC, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,
9, 438–464, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016MS000737</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx139"><label>Paulsen et al.(2018)</label><?label Paulsen_2018?><mixed-citation>Paulsen, H., Ilyina, T., Jungclaus, J. H., Six, K. D., and Stemmler, I.: Light absorption by marine cyanobacteria affects tropical climate mean state and variability, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1283–1300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1283-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-9-1283-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx140"><label>Ploug et al.(2008)</label><?label Ploug_2008?><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., and Fischer, G.: Ballast, sinking velocity, and
apparent diffusivity within marine snow and zooplankton fecal pellets:
Implications for substrate turnover by attached bacteria, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 53, 1878–1886, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx141"><label>Ragueneau et al.(2000)</label><?label Ragueneau_2000?><mixed-citation>
Ragueneau, O., Teguér, P., Leynaert, A., Anderson, R. F., Brzezinski,
M. A., DeMaster, D. J., Dugdale, R. C., Dymond, J., Fischer, G.,
François, R., Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., Martin-Jézéquel, V.,
Nelson, D. M., and Quéguiner, B.: A review of the Si cycle in the
modern ocean: recent progress and missing gaps in the application of biogenic
opal as a paleoproductivity proxy, Global Planet. Change, 26,
317–365, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx142"><label>Ragueneau et al.(2006)</label><?label Ragueneau_2006?><mixed-citation>Ragueneau, O., Schultes, S., Bidle, K., Claquin, P., and Moriceau, B.: Si and
C interactions in the world ocean: Importance of ecological processes and
implications for the role of diatoms in the biological pump, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4S02, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002688" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GB002688</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx143"><label>Read et al.(2013)</label><?label Read_2013?><mixed-citation>Read, B. A., Kegel, J., Klute, M. J., Kuo, A., Lefebvre, S. C., Maumus, F.,
Mayer, C., Miller, J., Monier, A., Salamov, A., Young, J., Aguilar, M.,
Claverie, J.-M., Frickenhaus, S., Gonzalez, K., Herman, E. K., Lin, Y.-C.,
Napier, J., Ogata, H., Sarno, A. F., Shmutz, J., Schroeder, D., de Vargas,
C., Verret, F., von Dassow, P., Valentin, K., Van de Peer, Y., Wheeler,
G., Consortium, E. H. A., Allen, A. E., Bidle, K., Borodovsky, M., Bowler,
C., Brownlee, C., Mark, C. J., Elias, M., Gladyshev, V. N., Groth, M., Guda,
C., Hadaegh, A., Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez, M., Jenkins, J., Jones, B. M.,
Lawson, T., Leese, F., Lindquist, E., Lobanov, A., Lomsadze, A., Malik,
S.-B., Marsh, M. E., Mackinder, L., Mock, T., Mueller-Roeber, B., Pagarete,
A., Parker, M., Probert, I., Quesneville, H., Raines, C., Rensing, S. A.,
Riaño-Pachón, D. M., Richier, S., Rokitta, S., Shiraiwa, Y., Soanes,
D. M., van der Giezen, M., Wahlund, T. M., Williams, B., Wilson, W., Wolfe,
G., Wurch, L. L., Dacks, J. B., Delwiche, C. F., Dyhrman, S. T.,
Glöckner, G., John, U., Richards, T., Worden, A. Z., Zhang, X., and
Grigoriev, I. V.: Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its
global distribution, Nature, 499, 209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12221</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx144"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{R{\"{o}}ske(2005)}}?><label>Röske(2005)</label><?label Roeske_2005?><mixed-citation>
Röske, F.: Global oceanic heat and fresh water forcing datasets based on
ERA-40 and ERA-15, Tech. Rep. 13, Max Planck Institue for Meteorology, Hamburg, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx145"><label>Roullier et al.(2014)</label><?label Roullier_2014?><mixed-citation>Roullier, F., Berline, L., Guidi, L., Durrieu De Madron, X., Picheral, M., Sciandra, A., Pesant, S., and Stemmann, L.: Particle size distribution and estimated carbon flux across the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone, Biogeosciences, 11, 4541–4557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx146"><label>Sarmiento et al.(2000)</label><?label Sarmiento_2000?><mixed-citation>Sarmiento, J. L., Monfray, P., Maier-Reimer, E., Aumont, O., Murnane, R. J.,
and Orr, J. C.: Sea-air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1085" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and carbon transport: A comparison
of three ocean general circulation models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14,
1267–1281, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx147"><label>Schwinger et al.(2016)</label><?label Schwinger_2016b?><mixed-citation>Schwinger, J., Goris, N., Tjiputra, J. F., Kriest, I., Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Ilicak, M., Assmann, K. M., and Heinze, C.: Evaluation of NorESM-OC (versions 1 and 1.2), the ocean carbon-cycle stand-alone configuration of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM1), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2589–2622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2589-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-2589-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx148"><label>Segschneider and Bendtsen(2013)</label><?label Segschneider_2013?><mixed-citation>Segschneider, J. and Bendtsen, J.: Temperature-dependent remineralization in a
warming ocean increases surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1086" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through changes in marine ecosystem
composition, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1214–1225, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx149"><label>Sherwood et al.(2018)</label><?label Sherwood_2018?><mixed-citation>Sherwood, C. R., Aretxabaleta, A. L., Harris, C. K., Rinehimer, J. P., Verney, R., and Ferré, B.: Cohesive and mixed sediment in the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS v3.6) implemented in the Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere–Wave–Sediment Transport Modeling System (COAWST r1234), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1849–1871, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1849-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-1849-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx150"><label>Shigemitsu et al.(2017)</label><?label Shigemitsu_2017?><mixed-citation>Shigemitsu, M., Yamamoto, A., Oka, A., and Yamanaka, Y.: One possible
uncertainty in CMIP5 projections of low-oxygen water volume in the
Eastern Tropical Pacific, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 804–820,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GB005447</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx151"><label>Siegel et al.(2014)</label><?label Siegel_2014?><mixed-citation>
Siegel, D. A., Buesseler, K. O., Doney, S. C., Sailley, S. F., Behrenfeld,
M. J., and Boyd, P. W.: Global assessment of ocean carbon export by
combining satellite observations and food-web models, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 28, 181–196, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx152"><label>Simmons and Gibson(2000)</label><?label Simmons_2000?><mixed-citation>
Simmons, A. J. and Gibson, J. K.: The ERA-40 Project Report Series 1,
Tech. rep., ECMWF, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx153"><label>Simon et al.(2014)</label><?label Simon_2014?><mixed-citation>
Simon, H., Lipsewers, Y. A., Giebel, H.-A., Wiltshire, K. H., and Simon, M.:
Temperature effects on aggregation during a spring diatom bloom, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 59, 2089–2100, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx154"><label>Six and Maier-Reimer(1996)</label><?label Six_1996?><mixed-citation>
Six, K. D. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Effects of plankton dynamics on seasonal
carbon fluxes in an ocean general circulation model, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 559–583, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx155"><label>Stemmann et al.(2004)</label><?label Stemmann_2004a?><mixed-citation>
Stemmann, L., Jackson, G. A., and Ianson, D.: A vertical model of particle
size distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that includes biological
and physical processes – Part I: model formulation, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
51, 865–884, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx156"><label>Stokes(1851)</label><?label Stokes_1851?><mixed-citation>
Stokes, G. G.: On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion
of pendulums, Cambridge Philos Trans, IX, 8–106, 1851 (reprinted in Mathematical
and Physical Papers, 2nd Edn., Vol. 3, New York, Johnson Reprint Corp., 1 pp.,
1966).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx157"><label>Takahashi et al.(1985)</label><?label Takahashi_1985?><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., and Langer, S.: Redfield ratio based on
chemical data from isopycnical surfaces, J. Geophys. Res.,
90, 6907–6924, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx158"><label>Tambo and Hozumi(1979)</label><?label Tambo_1979b?><mixed-citation>
Tambo, N. and Hozumi, H.: Physical aspect of flocculation process-II.
Contact flocculation, Water Res., 13, 441–448, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1803?><ref id="bib1.bibx159"><label>Taylor(2001)</label><?label Taylor_2001?><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7183–7192, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx160"><label>Thornton(2002)</label><?label Thornton_2002?><mixed-citation>
Thornton, D. C. O.: Diatom aggregation in the sea: mechanisms and ecological
implications, Eur. J. Phycol., 37, 149–161, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx161"><label>Thyng et al.(2016)</label><?label Thyng_2016?><mixed-citation>
Thyng, K. M., Greene, C. A., Hetland, R. D., Zimmerle, H. M., and DiMarco,
S. F.: True colors of oceanography: Guidelines for effective and accurate
colormap selection, Oceanography, 29, 9–13, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx162"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tr{\'{e}}guer(2002)}}?><label>Tréguer(2002)</label><?label Treguer_2002?><mixed-citation>
Tréguer, P.: Silica and the cycle of carbon in the ocean, CR
Geosci., 334, 3–11, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx163"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tr{\'{e}}guer et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Tréguer et al.(2018)</label><?label Treguer_2018?><mixed-citation>
Tréguer, P., Bowler, C., Moriceau, B., Dutkiewicz, S., Gehlen, M., Aumont,
O., Bittner, L., Dugdale, R., Finkel, Z., Iudicone, D., Jahn, O., Guidi, L.,
Lasbleiz, M., Leblanc, K., Levy, M., and Pondaven, P.: Influence of diatom
diversity on the ocean biological carbon pump, Nat. Geosci., 11,
27–37, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx164"><label>Usbeck et al.(2003)</label><?label Usbeck_2003?><mixed-citation>
Usbeck, R., Schlitzer, R., Fischer, G., and Wefer, G.: Particle fluxes in the
ocean: comparison of sediment trap data with results from inverse modeling,
J. Marine Syst., 39, 167–183, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx165"><label>Verdugo et al.(2004)</label><?label Verdugo_2004?><mixed-citation>
Verdugo, P., Alldredge, A. L., Azam, F., Kirchman, D. L., Passow, U., and
Santschi, P. H.: The oceanic gel phase: a bridge in the DOM-POM
continuum, Mar. Chem., 92, 67–85, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx166"><label>Villa-Alfagame et al.(2016)</label><?label Villa-Alfagame_2016?><mixed-citation>Villa-Alfagame, M., de Soto, F. C., Ceballos, E., Giering, S. L. C., Le
Moigne, F. A. C., Henson, S., Mas, J. L., and Sanders, R. J.: Geographical,
seasonal, and depth variation in sinking particle speeds in the North
Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 8609–8616,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069233" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069233</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx167"><label>Waterhouse et al.(2014)</label><?label Waterhouse_2014?><mixed-citation>Waterhouse, A. F., MacJinnon, J. A., Nash, J. D., Alford, M. H., Kunze, E.,
Simmons, H. L., Polzin, K. L., Laurent, L. C. S., Sun, O. M., Pinkel, R.,
Talley, L. D., Whalen, C. B., Huussen, T. N., Carter, G. S., Fer, I.,
Waterman, S., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Sanford, T. B., and Lee, C. M.:
Global Patterns of Diapycnal Mixing from Measurements of the Turbulent
Dissipation Rate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 1854–1872, 2014.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx168"><label>Weber et al.(2016)</label><?label Weber_2016?><mixed-citation>
Weber, T., Cram, J. A., Leung, S. W., DeVries, T., and Deutsch, C.: Deep ocean
nutrients imply large latitudinal variation in particle transfer efficiency,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 8606–8611, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx169"><label>White(2005)</label><?label White_2005?><mixed-citation>
White, F. M.: Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx170"><label>White et al.(2018)</label><?label White_2018?><mixed-citation>White, M. M., Waller, J. D., Lubelczyk, L., Drapeau, D. T., Bowler, B. C.,
Balch, W. M., and Fields, D. M.: Coccolith dissolution within copepod guts
affects fecal pellet density and sinking rate, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 9758,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28073-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-28073-x</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx171"><label>Williams and Follows(2011)</label><?label Williams_2011?><mixed-citation>
Williams, R. G. and Follows, M. J.: Ocean Dynamics and the Carbon Cycle:
Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx172"><label>Wilson et al.(2012)</label><?label Wilson_2012?><mixed-citation>Wilson, J. D., Barker, S., and Ridgwell, A.: Assessment of the spatial
variability in particulate organic matter and mineral sinking fluxes in the
ocean interior: Implications for the ballast hypothesis, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB4011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GB004398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GB004398</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx173"><label>Winterwerp(1998)</label><?label Winterwerp_1998?><mixed-citation>
Winterwerp, J. C.: A simple model for turbulence induced flocculation of
cohesive sediment, J. Hydraul. Res., 36, 309–326, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx174"><label>Young and Ziveri(2000)</label><?label Young_2000?><mixed-citation>
Young, J. R. and Ziveri, P.: Calculation of coccolith volume and its use in
calibration of carbonate flux estimates, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47,
1679–1700, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx175"><label>Ziveri et al.(2007)</label><?label Ziveri_2007?><mixed-citation>
Ziveri, P., de Bernardi, B., Baumann, K.-H., Stoll, H. M., and Mortyn, P. G.:
Sinking of coccolith carbonate and potential contribution to organic carbon
ballasting in the deep ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 54, 659–675, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Microstructure and composition of marine aggregates as co-determinants for vertical particulate organic carbon transfer in the global ocean</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Marine aggregates are the vector for biogenically bound carbon and nutrients from the euphotic zone to the interior of the oceans. To improve the representation of this biological carbon pump in the global biogeochemical HAMburg Ocean Carbon Cycle (HAMOCC) model, we implemented a novel Microstructure, Multiscale, Mechanistic, Marine Aggregates in the Global Ocean (M<sup>4</sup>AGO) sinking scheme. M<sup>4</sup>AGO explicitly represents the size, microstructure, heterogeneous composition, density and porosity of aggregates and ties ballasting mineral and particulate organic carbon (POC) fluxes together. Additionally, we incorporated temperature-dependent remineralization of POC. We compare M<sup>4</sup>AGO with the standard HAMOCC version, where POC fluxes follow a Martin curve approach with (i) linearly increasing sinking velocity with depth and (ii) temperature-independent remineralization. Minerals descend separately with a constant speed. In contrast to the standard HAMOCC, M<sup>4</sup>AGO reproduces the latitudinal pattern of POC transfer efficiency, as recently constrained by Weber et al. (2016). High latitudes show transfer efficiencies of   ≈ 0.25±0.04, and the subtropical gyres show lower values of about 0.10±0.03. In addition to temperature as a driving factor for remineralization, diatom frustule size  co-determines POC fluxes in silicifier-dominated ocean regions, while calcium carbonate enhances the aggregate excess density and thus sinking velocity in subtropical gyres. Prescribing rising carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations in stand-alone runs (without climate feedback), M<sup>4</sup>AGO alters the regional ocean atmosphere CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes compared to the standard model. M<sup>4</sup>AGO exhibits higher CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in the Southern Ocean compared to the standard run, while in subtropical gyres, less CO<sub>2</sub> is taken up. Overall, the global oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake remains the same. With the explicit representation of measurable aggregate properties, M<sup>4</sup>AGO can serve as a test bed for evaluating the impact of aggregate-associated processes on global biogeochemical cycles and, in particular, on the biological carbon pump.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adler(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Adler, P. M.: A study of disaggregation effects in sedimentation, AlChE
Journal, 25, 487–493, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Alldredge(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A.: The carbon, nitrogen and mass content of marine snow as a
function of aggregate size, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 45, 529–541, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Alldredge and Gotschalk(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Gotschalk, C.: In situ settling behaviour of marine
snow, Limnol. Oceanogr., 33, 339–351, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Alldredge and Gotschalk(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and Gotschalk, C. C.: The relative contribution of marine
snow of different origins to biological processes in coastal waters,
Cont. Shelf Res., 10, 41–58, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Alldredge and McGillivary(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L. and McGillivary, P.: The attachment probabilities of marine
snow and their implications for particle coagulation in the ocean, Deep-Sea
Res., 38, 431–443, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Alldredge et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Granata, T. C., Gotschalk, C. C., and Dickey, T. D.: The
physical strength of marine snow and its implications for particle
disaggregation in the ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 1415–1428,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Alldredge et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Alldredge, A. L., Passow, U., and Logan, B. E.: The abundance and significance
of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 40, 1131–1140, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Armbrecht et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Armbrecht, L. H., Smetacek, V., Assmy, P., and Klaas, C.: Cell death and
aggregate formation in the giant diatom Coscinodiscus wailesii (Gran &amp;
Angst, 1931), J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 452,
31–39, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Armbrust(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Armbrust, E. V.: The life of diatoms in the world's ocean, Nature, 459,
185–192, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Armstrong et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Armstrong, R. A., Lee, C., Hedges, J. I., Honjo, S., and Wakeham, S. G.: A
new, mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the
quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals, Deep-Sea Res.
Pt. II, 49, 219–236, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Assmy et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Assmy, P., Smetacek, V., Montresor, M., Klaas, C., Henjes, J., Strass, V. H.,
Arieta, J. M., Bathmann, U., Berg, G. M., Breitbarth, E., Cisewski, B.,
Friedrichs, L., Fuchs, N., Herndl, G. J., Jansen, S., Krägefsky, S.,
Latasa, M., Peeken, I., Röttgers, R., Scharek, R., Schüller, S. E.,
Steigenberger, S., Webb, A., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Thick-shelled, grazer
protected diatoms decouple ocean carbon and silicon cycles in the
iron-limited Antarctic Circumpolar Current, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 20633–20638, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309345110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309345110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Azam and Malfatti(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Azam, F. and Malfatti, F.: Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems,
Nature, 5, 782–791, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Azetsu-Scott and Passow(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Azetsu-Scott, K. and Passow, U.: Ascending marine particles: Significance of
transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in the upper ocean, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 49, 741–748, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Bach et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Bach, L. T., Boxhammer, T., Larsen, A., Hildebrandt, N., Schulz, K. G., and
Riebesell, U.: Influence of plankton community structure on the sinking
velocity of marine aggregates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 971–994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005372</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Bagster and Tomi(1974)</label><mixed-citation>
Bagster, D. F. and Tomi, D.: The stresses within a sphere in simple flow
fields, Chem. Eng. Sci., 29, 1773–1783, 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Balch et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Balch, W. M., Bowler, B. C., Drapeau, D. T., Poulton, A. J., and Holligan,
P. M.: Biominerals and the vertical flux of particulate organic carbon from
the surface ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044640" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044640</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Berelson et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Berelson, W. M., Balch, W. M., Najjar, R., Feely, R. A., Sabine, C., and Lee,
K.: Relating estimates of CaCO<sub>3</sub> production, export, and dissolution
in the water column to measurements of CaCO<sub>3</sub> rain into sediment traps
and dissolution on the sea floor: A revised global carbonate budget,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002803</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Bidle et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Bidle, K. D., Manganelli, M., and Azam, F.: Regulation of oceanic silicon and
carbon preservation by temperature control on bacteria, Science, 298,
1980–1984, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Biermann and Engel(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Biermann, A. and Engel, A.: Effect of CO<sub>2</sub> on the properties and sinking velocity of aggregates of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi, Biogeosciences, 7, 1017–1029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1017-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1017-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Bisson et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Bisson, K. M., Siegel, D. A., DeVries, T., Cael, B. B., and Buesseler, K. O.:
How data set characteristics influence ocean carbon export models, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 1312–1328, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005934</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Block et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Block, A., von Bloh, W., and Schellnhuber, H. J.: Aggregation by attractive
particle-cluster interaction, J. Phys. A-Math. Gen., 24, L1037–L1044, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Bopp et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Bopp, L., Resplandy, L., Orr, J. C., Doney, S. C., Dunne, J. P., Gehlen, M., Halloran, P., Heinze, C., Ilyina, T., Séférian, R., Tjiputra, J., and Vichi, M.: Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models, Biogeosciences, 10, 6225–6245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6225-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Boyd and Newton(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. and Newton, P.: Evidence of the potential influence of planctonic
community structure on the interannual variability of particulate organic
carbon flux, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 42, 619–639, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Boyd et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W., Ellwood, M. J., Tagliabue, A., and Twining, B. S.: Biotic and
abiotic retention, recycling and remineralization of metals in the ocean,
Nat. Geosci., 10, 167–174, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Boyd et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, P. W., Claustre, H., Levy, M., Siegel, D. A., and Weber, T.:
Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean,
Nature, 568, 327–335, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Boyer et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K., Coleman, C., Garcia, H. E.,
Grodsky, A., Johnson, D. R., Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., O'Brien,
T. D., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Smolyar, I. V., and Zweng,
M. M.: World Ocean Database 2013, Tech. rep., NOAA National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, National Oceanographic Data Center User Services Team, NOAA/NESDIS
E/OC1, Silver Spring, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7289/V5NZ85MT" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7289/V5NZ85MT</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Brakalov(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Brakalov, L. B.: A connection between the orthokinetic coagulation capture
efficiency of aggregates and their maximum size, Chem. Eng.
Sci., 42, 2373–2383, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Brandt et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Brandt, P., Greatbatch, R. J., Claus, M., Didwischus, S.-H., Hormann, V., Funk,
A., Hahn, J., Krahmann, G., Fischer, J., and Körtzinger, A.: Ventilation
of the equatorial Atlantic by the equatorial deep jets, J.
Geophys. Res., 117, C12015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008118" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008118</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Brzezinski(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Brzezinski, M. A.: The Si : C : N ratio of marine diatoms: interspecific
variability and the effect of some environmental variables, J. Phycol., 21,
347–357, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Buesseler(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O.: The decoupling of production and particulate export in the
surface ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 12, 297–310, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Buesseler and Boyd(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Buesseler, K. O. and Boyd, P. W.: Shedding light on processes that control
particle export and flux attenuation in the twilight zone of the open ocean,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 1210–1232, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Bushell and Amal(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Bushell, G. and Amal, R.: Fractal aggregates of polydisperse particles,
J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 205, 459–469, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Cael and Bisson(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Cael, B. B. and Bisson, K.: Particle flux parameterizations: quantitative and
mechanistic similarities and differences, Frontiers in Marine Science, 5,
395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00395</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Carr et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Carr, M.-E., Friedrich, M. A. M., Schmeltz, M., Aita, M. N., Antoine, D.,
Arrigo, K. R., Asanuma, I., Aumont, O., Barber, R., Behrenfeld, M., Bidigare,
R. E. T., Campbell, J., Ciotti, A., Dierssen, H., Dowell, M., Dunne, J.,
Esaias, W., Gentili, B., Gregg, W., Groom, S., Hoepffner, N., Ishizaka, J.,
Kameda, T., Le Quéré, C., Lohrenz, S., Marra, J., Mélin, F.,
Moore, K., Morel, A., Reddy, T. E., Ryan, J., Scardi, M., Smyth, T., Turpie,
K., Tilstone, G., Waters, K., and Yamanaka, Y.: A comparison of global
estimates of marine primary production from ocean color, Deep-Sea Res.,
53, 741–770, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Cram et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Cram, J. A., Weber, T., Leung, S. W., McDonnell, A. M. P., Liang, J.-H., and
Deutsch, C.: The role of particle size, ballast, temperature, and oxygen in
the sinking flux to the deep sea, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 858–876, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005710</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Dam and Drapeau(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Dam, H. G. and Drapeau, D. T.: Coagulation efficiency, organic-matter glues
and the dynamics of particles during a phytoplankton bloom in a mesocoms
study, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42, 111–123, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Daufresne et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Daufresne, M., Lengfeller, K., and Sommer, U.: Global warming benefits the
small in aquatic ecosystems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 12788–12793, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>De La Rocha and Passow(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
De La Rocha, C. L. and Passow, U.: Factors influencing the sinking of POC
and the efficiency of the biological carbon pump, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 54,
639–658, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>De La Rocha et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
De La Rocha, C. L., Nowald, N., and Passow, U.: Interactions between diatom
aggregates, minerals, particulate organic carbon, and dissolved organic
matter: Further implications for the ballast hypothesis, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB4005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003156</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Decho(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Decho, A. W.: Microbial exopolymer secretions in oceanic environments: their
role(s) in food webs and marine processes, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.,
28, 73–153, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Dell et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Dell, A. I., Pawar, S., and Savage, V. M.: Systematic variation in the
temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108,
10591–10596, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>DeVries and Weber(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
DeVries, T. and Weber, T.: The export and fate of organic matter in the ocean:
New constraints from combining satellite and oceanographic tracer
observations, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 535–555, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>DeVries et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
DeVries, T., Liang, J.-H., and Deutsch, C.: A mechanistic particle flux model applied to the oceanic phosphorus cycle, Biogeosciences, 11, 5381–5398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5381-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Dietze and Loeptien(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Dietze, H. and Loeptien, U.: Revisiting “nutrient trapping” in global
coupled biogeochemical ocean circulation models, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 27, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20029</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Dilling and Alldredge(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Dilling, L. and Alldredge, A. L.: Fragmentation of marine snow by swimming
macrozooplankton: A new process impacting carbon cycling in the sea,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 47, 1227–1245, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Dunne et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Dunne, J. P., Armstrong, R. A., Gnanadesikan, A., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
Empirical and mechanistic models for the particle export ratio, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB4026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002390" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002390</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Eisma(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Eisma, D.: Flocculation and de-flocculation of suspended matter in estuaries,
Neth. J. Sea Res., 20, 183–199, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Engel et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Thoms, S., Riebesell, U., Rochelle-Newall, E., and Zondervan, I.:
Polysaccharide aggregation as a potential sink of marine dissolved organic
carbon, Nature, 428, 929–932, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Engel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Engel, A., Szlosek, J., Abramson, L., Liu, Z., and Lee, C.: Investigating the
effect of ballasting by CaCO<sub>3</sub> in <i>Emiliania huxleyi</i>, I.
Formation, settling velocities and physical properties of aggregates,
Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 56, 1396–1407, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>England and Maier-Reimer(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
England, M. H. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Using chemical tracers to assess ocean
models, Rev. Geophys., 39, 29–70, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Falkowski et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., and Smetacek, V.: Biogeochemical Controls and
Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Productivity, Science, 281, 200–206, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Fettweis(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Fettweis, M.: Uncertainty of excess density and settling velocity of mud flocs
derived from in situ measurements, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 78, 426–436, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Filella(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Filella, M.: Colloidal properties of submicron particles in natural waters,
in: Environmental Colloids and Particles: Behaviour, Separation and
Characterisation, IUPAC Series on Analytical and Physical Chemistry of
Environmental Systems, chap. 2,   17–93, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.,  Chichester, UK, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Fischer and Karakas̨(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, G. and Karakaş, G.: Sinking rates and ballast composition of particles in the Atlantic Ocean: implications for the organic carbon fluxes to the deep ocean, Biogeosciences, 6, 85–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-85-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-85-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Fischer et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, G., Romero, O., Merkel, U., Donner, B., Iversen, M., Nowald, N., Ratmeyer, V., Ruhland, G., Klann, M., and Wefer, G.: Deep ocean mass fluxes in the coastal upwelling off Mauritania from 1988 to 2012: variability on seasonal to decadal timescales, Biogeosciences, 13, 3071–3090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3071-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3071-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Francois et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Francois, R., Honjo, S., Krishfield, R., and Manganini, S.: Factors
controlling the flux of organic carbon to the bathypelagic zone of the
ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001722</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Garcia et al.(2014a)</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K.,
Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Johnson, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2013,
NOAA Atlas NESDIS 75, Volume 3: Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen
Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation, 27 pp., 2014a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Garcia et al.(2014b)Garcia, Locarnini, Boyer, Antonov,
Baranova, Zweng, Reagan, and Reagan</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Boyer, T. P., Antonov, J. I., Baranova, O. K.,
Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., and Reagan, D. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2013,
NOAA Atlas NESDIS 76, Volume 4: Dissolved Inorganic Nutrients (phosphate,
nitrate, silicate), 25pp, 2014b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Gehlen et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Gehlen, M., Bopp, L., Emprin, N., Aumont, O., Heinze, C., and Ragueneau, O.: Reconciling surface ocean productivity, export fluxes and sediment composition in a global biogeochemical ocean model, Biogeosciences, 3, 521–537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-521-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-521-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Giering et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Giering, S. L. C., Sanders, R., Martin, A. P., Henson, S. A., Riley, J. S.,
Marsay, C. M., and Johns, D. G.: Particle flux in the oceans: Callenging
the steady state assumption, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 159–171,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Gloor et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Gloor, M., Gruber, N., Sarmiento, J., Sabine, C. L., Feely, R. A., and
Rödenbeck, C.: A first estimate of present and preindustrial air-sea
CO<sub>2</sub> flux patterns based on ocean interior carbon measurements and
models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015594" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015594</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Guidi et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Jackson, G. A., Stemmann, L., Miquel, J. C., Picheral, M., and
Gorsky, G.: Relationship between particle size distribution and flux in the
mesopelagic zone, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 55, 1364–1374, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Guidi et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Stemmann, L., Jackson, G. A., Ibanez, F., Claustre, H., Legendre,
L., Picheral, M., and Gorsky, G.: Effects of phytoplankton community on
production, size and export of large aggregates: A world-ocean analysis,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 1951–1963, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Guidi et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Guidi, L., Chaffron, S., Bittner, L., Eveillard, D., Larhlimi, A., Roux, S.,
Darzi, Y., Audic, S., Berline, L., Brum, J. R., Coelho, L. P., Espinoza, J.
C. I., Malviya, S., Sunagawa, S., Dimier, C., Kandels-Lewis, S., Picheral,
M., Poulain, J., Searson, S., <i>Tara</i> Oceans Consortium Coordinators,
Stemmann, L., Not, F., Hingamp, P., Speich, S., Follows, M., Karp-Boss, L.,
Boss, E., Ogata, H., Pesant, S., Weissenbach, J., Wincker, P., Acinas, S. G.,
Bork, P., de Vargas, C., Iudicone, D., Sullivan, M. B., Raes, J., Karsenti,
E., Bowler, C., and Gorsky, G.: Plankton networks driving carbon export in
the oligotrophic ocean, Nature, 532, 465–481, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Hamm(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Hamm, C. E.: Interactive aggregation and sedimentation of diatoms and
clay-sized lithogenic material, Limnol. Oceanogr., 47, 1790–1795, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Hansen and Kiørboe(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J. L. S. and Kiørboe, T.: Quantifying interspecific coagulation
efficiency of phytoplankton, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 159, 75–79,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Hedges et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Hedges, J. L., Baldock, J. A., Gélinas, Y., Lee, C., Peterson, M., and
Wakeham, S. G.: Evidence for non-selective preservation of organic matter in
sinking marine particles, Nature, 409, 801–804, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Heinemann et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Heinemann, M., Segschneider, J., and Schneider, B.: CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown due to particle ballasting by glacial aeolian dust: an estimate based on the ocean carbon cycle model MPIOM/HAMOCC version 1.6.2p3, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1869–1883, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1869-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Heinze et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., Winguth, A. M. E., and Archer, D.: A global
oceanic sediment model for long-term climate studies, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 13, 221–250, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Henderiks(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Henderiks, J.: Coccolithophore size rules – Reconstructing ancient cell
geometry and cellular calcite quota from fossil coccoliths, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 67, 143–154, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Henderiks and Pagani(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Henderiks, J. and Pagani, M.: Coccolithophore cell size and the Paleogene
decline in atmopheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Earth  Planet. Sc. Lett., 269,
576–584, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Henson et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Henson, S. A., Sanders, R., Madsen, E., Morris, P. J., Le Moigne, F., and
Quartly, G. D.: A reduced estimate of the strength of the ocean's biological
carbon pump, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046735</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Henson et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Henson, S. A., Sanders, R., and Madsen, E.: Global patterns in efficiency of
particulate organic carbon export and transfer to the deep ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 265, GB1028, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004099</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Hill(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Hill, P. S.: Controls on floc size in the sea, Oceanography, 11, 13–18,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Honjo(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
Honjo, S.: Coccoliths: Production, transportation and sedimentation, Mar.
Micropaleontol., 1, 65–79, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Ilyina and Friedlingstein(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Ilyina, T. and Friedlingstein, P.: WCRP Grand Challenge – Carbon feedbacks in
the climate system, Tech. rep., WCRP,
available at: <a href="https://www.wcrp-climate.org/JSC37/Documents/BGCGC_whitepaper_submission.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 March 2020),
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Ilyina et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Ilyina, T., Six, K. D., Segschneider, J., Maier-Reimer, E., Li, H., and
Núñez-Riboni, I.: Global ocean biogeochemistry model HAMOCC:
Model architecture and performance as component of the MPI-Earth system
model in different CMIP5 experimental realizations, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 5, 1–29, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Iversen and Ploug(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H. and Ploug, H.: Ballast minerals and the sinking carbon flux in the ocean: carbon-specific respiration rates and sinking velocity of marine snow aggregates, Biogeosciences, 7, 2613–2624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Iversen and Ploug(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H. and Ploug, H.: Temperature effects on carbon-specific respiration rate and sinking velocity of diatom aggregates – potential implications for deep ocean export processes, Biogeosciences, 10, 4073–4085, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4073-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4073-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Iversen and Robert(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Iversen, M. H. and Robert, M. L.: Ballasting effects of smectite on aggregate
formation and export from a natural plankton community, Mar. Chem.,
175, 18–27, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Jackson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.: A model of the formation of marine algal flocs by physical
coagulation processes, Deep-Sea Res., 37, 1197–1211, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Jackson(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Jackson, G. A.: Using fractal scaling and two-dimensional particle size
spectra to calculate coagulation rates for heterogeneous systems, J.
Colloid Interf. Sci., 202, 20–29, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Jiang and Logan(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, Q. and Logan, B. E.: Fractal dimension of aggregates determined from
steady-state size distributions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 2031–2038,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Jokulsdottir and Archer(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Jokulsdottir, T. and Archer, D.: A stochastic, Lagrangian model of sinking biogenic aggregates in the ocean (SLAMS 1.0): model formulation, validation and sensitivity, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1455–1476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1455-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1455-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Jungclaus et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Jungclaus, J. H., Fischer, N., Haak, H., Lohmann, K., Marotzke, J., Matei, D.,
Mikolajewicz, U., Notz, D., and von Storch, J. S.: Characteristics of the
ocean simulations in the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model (MPIOM)
the ocean component of the MPI-Earth system model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 5, 422–446, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20023</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Khelifa and Hill(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Khelifa, A. and Hill, P. S.: Models for effective density and settling
velocity of flocs, J. Hydraul. Res., 44, 390–401, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Kiørboe et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Kiørboe, T., Andersen, K. P., and Dam, H. G.: Coagulation efficiency and
aggregate formation in marine phytoplankton, Mar. Biol., 107, 235–245,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Kiørboe et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kiørboe, T., Ploug, H., and Thygesen, U. H.: Fluid motion and solute
distribution around sinking aggregates. I. Small-scale fluxes and
heterogeneity of nutrients in the pelagic environment, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 211, 1–13, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Klaas and Archer(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Klaas, C. and Archer, D. E.: Association of sinking organic matter with
various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea: Implications for the rain
ratio, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Kostadinov et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kostadinov, T. S., Milutinović, S., Marinov, I., and Cabré, A.: Carbon-based phytoplankton size classes retrieved via ocean color estimates of the particle size distribution, Ocean Sci., 12, 561–575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-561-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-561-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Kranenburg(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Kranenburg, C.: The fractal structure of cohesive sediment aggregates,
Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 39, 451–460, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Kranenburg(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Kranenburg, C.: Effects of floc strength on viscosity and deposition of
cohesive sediment suspensions, Cont. Shelf Res., 19, 1665–1680,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Kriest and Evans(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and Evans, G. T.: Representing phytoplankton aggregates in
biogeochemical models, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 46, 1841–1859, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Kriest and Oschlies(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Kriest, I. and Oschlies, A.: On the treatment of particulate organic matter sinking in large-scale models of marine biogeochemical cycles, Biogeosciences, 5, 55–72, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-55-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-55-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Lam and Marchal(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Lam, P. J. and Marchal, O.: Insights into particle cycling from thorium and
particle data, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 7, 159–184, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Lam et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lam, P. J., Doney, S. C., and Bishop, J. K. B.: The dynamic ocean biological
pump: Insights from a global compilation of particulate organic carbon,
CaCO<sub>3</sub>, and opal concentration profiles from the mesopelagic, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 25, GB3009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003868</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Laurenceau-Cornec et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Laurenceau-Cornec, E. C., Trull, T. W., Davies, D. M., De La Rocha, C. L.,
and Blain, S.: Phytoplankton morphology controls on marine snow sinking
velocity, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 520, 35–56, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Laurenceau-Cornec et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Laurenceau-Cornec, E. C., Le Moigne, F. A. C., Gallinari, M., Moriceau, B.,
Toullec, J., Iversen, M. H., Engel, A., and De La Rocha, C. L.: New
guidelines for the application of Stokes' models to the sinking velocity of
marine aggregates, Limnol. Oceanogr., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11388</a>, online first, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Lauvset et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Lauvset, S. K., Key, R. M., Olsen, A., van Heuven, S., Velo, A., Lin, X., Schirnick, C., Kozyr, A., Tanhua, T., Hoppema, M., Jutterström, S., Steinfeldt, R., Jeansson, E., Ishii, M., Perez, F. F., Suzuki, T., and Watelet, S.: A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: the 1°&thinsp; × &thinsp;1° GLODAP version 2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 325–340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-325-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-325-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Laws et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Laws, E. A., Falkowski, P. G., Smith Jr., W. O., Ducklow, H., and McCarthy,
J. J.: Temperature effects on export production in the open ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 1231–1246, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Lefort et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Lefort, S., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Arsouze, T., Gehlen, M., and Maury, O.:
Spatial and body-size dependent response of marine pelagic communities to
projected global climate change, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 154–164,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12679" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12679</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Le Moigne et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Le Moigne, F. A. C., Cisternas-Novoa, C., Piontek, J., Maßmig, M., and
Engel, A.: On the effect of low oxygen concentrations on bacterial
degradation of sinking particles, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 16722,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16903-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16903-3</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Lewin(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Lewin, J. C.: The dissolution of silica from diatom walls, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 21, 182–198, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Li and Logan(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X. and Logan, B. E.: Size distributions and fractal properties of
particles during a simulated phytoplankton bloom in a mesocosm, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. II, 42, 125–138, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Litchman et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Litchman, E., Klausmeier, C. A., and Yoshiyama, K.: Contrasting size evolution
in marine and freshwater diatoms , P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 2665–2670, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Liu et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Shih, W. Y., Sarikaya, M., and Aksay, I. A.: Fractal colloidal
aggregates with finite interparticle interactions: Energy dependence of the
fractal dimension, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 3206–3213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.41.3206" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.41.3206</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Logan and Alldredge(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E. and Alldredge, A. L.: Potential for increased nutrient uptake by
flocculating diatoms, Mar. Biol., 101, 443–450, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Logan and Wilkinson(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Logan, B. E. and Wilkinson, D. B.: Fractal geometry of marine snow and other
biological aggregates, Limnol. Oceanogr., 35, 130–136, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Löscher et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Löscher, C. R., Bange, H. W., Schmitz, R. A., Callbeck, C. M., Engel, A., Hauss, H., Kanzow, T., Kiko, R., Lavik, G., Loginova, A., Melzner, F., Meyer, J., Neulinger, S. C., Pahlow, M., Riebesell, U., Schunck, H., Thomsen, S., and Wagner, H.: Water column biogeochemistry of oxygen minimum zones in the eastern tropical North Atlantic and eastern tropical South Pacific oceans, Biogeosciences, 13, 3585–3606, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3585-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Lutz et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Lutz, M., Dunbar, R., and Caldeira, K.: Regional variability in the vertical
flux of particulate organic carbon in the ocean interior, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001383</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Lutz et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Lutz, M. J., Caldeira, K., Dunbar, R. B., and Behrenfeld, M. J.: Seasonal
rhythms of net primary production and particulate organic carbon flux to
depth describe the efficiency of biological pump in the global ocean,
J. Geophys. Res., 112, C10011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003706" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003706</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Maggi(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Maggi, F.: Biological flocculation of suspended particles in nutrient-rich
aqueous ecosystems, J. Hydrol., 376, 116–125, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Maher et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Maher, B. A., Prospero, J. M., Mackie, D., Gaiero, D., Hesse, P. P., and
Balkanski, Y.: Global connections between aeolian dust, climate and ocean
biogeochemistry at the present day and at the last glacial maximum,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 99, 61–97, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Mahowald et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N., Albani, S., Kok, J. F., Engelstaeder, S., Scanza, R., Ward,
D. S., and Flanner, M. G.: The size distribution of desert dust aerosols and
its impact on the Earth system, Aeolian Res., 15, 53–71, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Mari et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Mari, X., Passow, U., Migon, C., Burd, A. B., and Legendre, L.: Transparent
exopolymer particles: Effects on carbon cycling in the ocean, Prog.
Oceanogr., 151, 13–37, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Marsay et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Marsay, C. M., Sanders, R. J., Henson, S. A., Pabortsava, K., Achterberg,
E. P., and Lampitt, R. S.: Attenuation of sinking particulate organic carbon
flux through the mesopelagic ocean, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 1089–1094, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Marsland et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Marsland, S. J., Haak, H., Jungclaus, J. H., Latif, M., and Röske, F.: The
Max-Planck-Institute global ocean/sea ice model with orthogonal
curvilinear coordinates, Ocean Model., 5, 91–127, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Martin et al.(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H., Knauer, G. A., Karl, D. M., and Broenkow, W. W.: VERTEX:
carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific, Deep-Sea Res., 34, 267–285,
1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Martin et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, P., Lampitt, R. S., Perry, M. J., Sanders, R., Lee, C., and D'Asaro,
E.: Export and mesopelagic particle flux during a North Atlantic spring
diatom bloom, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 58, 338–349, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>Matthäus(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Matthäus, W.: Die Viskosität des Meerwassers, Beitr.
Meereskd., 29, 93–107,  1972 (in German).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>Mauritsen et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T., Behrens, J., Bittner, M., Brokopf, R.,
Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T., Esch, M., Fast, I., Fiedler, S.,
Fläschner, D., Gayler, V., Giorgetta, M., Goll, D. S., Haak, H.,
Hagemann, S., Hedemann, C., Hohenegger, C., Ilyina, T., Jahns, T.,
Jimenéz-de-la Cuesta, D., Jungclaus, J., Kleinen, T., Kloster, S.,
Kracher, D., Kinne, S., Kleberg, D., Lasslop, G., Kornblueh, L., Marotzke,
J., Matei, D., Meraner, K., Mikolajewicz, U., Modali, K., Möbis, B.,
Müller, W. A., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Nam, C. C. W., Notz, D., Nyawira,
S.-S., Paulsen, H., Peters, K., Pincus, R., Pohlmann, H., Pongratz, J., Popp,
M., Raddatz, T. J., Rast, S., Redler, R., Reick, C. H., Rohrschneider, T.,
Schemann, V., Schmidt, H., Schnur, R., Schulzweida, U., Six, K. D., Stein,
L., Stemmler, I., Stevens, B., von Storch, J.-S., Tian, F., Voigt, A.,
Vrese, P., Wieners, K.-H., Wilkenskjeld, S., Winkler, A., and Roeckner, E.:
Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2
(MPI-ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO<sub>2</sub>, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 1–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg and Max
Planck Society, Munich(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg and Max
Planck Society, Munich:
MPI-ESM User Forum, available at: <a href="https://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/licenses/" target="_blank"/>,
last access: 17 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>Max Planck Society, Munich(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Max Planck Society, Munich: Max Planck Society Publication Repository MPG.PuRe, available at: <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-BD3E-3" target="_blank"/>, last access: 17 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>McCave(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
McCave, I. N.: Size spectra and aggregation of suspended particles in the deep
ocean, Deep-Sea Res., 31, 329–352, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>Meakin(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Meakin, P.: Models for colloidal aggregation, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 39,
237–267, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>Mikaloff Fletcher et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Gruber, N., Jacobson, A. R., Gloor, M., Doney,
S. C., Dutkiewicz, S., Gerber, M., Follows, M., Joos, F., Lindsay, K.,
Menemenlis, D., Mouchet, A., Müller, S. A., and Sarmiento, J. L.:
Inverse estimates of the oceanic sources and sinks of natural CO<sub>2</sub> and
the implied oceanic carbon transport, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB1010,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002751</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>Miklasz and Denny(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Miklasz, K. A. and Denny, M. W.: Diatom sinking speeds: Improved predictions
and insights from a modified Stokes' law, Limnol. Oceanogr., 55,
2513–2525, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>Milinski et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Milinski, S., Bader, J., Haak, H., Siongco, A. C., and Jungclaus, J. H.: High
atmospheric horizontal resolution eliminates the wind-driven coastal warm
bias in the southeastern tropical Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 10455–10462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070530</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>Mislan et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mislan, K. A. S., Stock, C. A., Dunne, J. P., and Sarmiento, J.: Group
behaviour among model bacteria influences particulate carbon mineralization
depths, J. Mar. Res., 72, 183–218, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>Mouw et al.(2016a)</label><mixed-citation>
Mouw, C. B., Barnett, A., McKinley, G. A., Gloege, L., and Pilcher, D.: Global ocean particulate organic carbon flux merged with satellite parameters, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 531–541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-531-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-531-2016</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>Mouw et al.(2016b)</label><mixed-citation>
Mouw, C. B., Barnett, A., McKinley, G. A., Gloege, L., and Pilcher, D.: Global Ocean Particulate Organic Carbon flux merged with satellite parameters,
PANGAEA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855600" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.855600</a>,
2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>Najjar et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Najjar, R. G., Jin, X., Louanchi, F., Aumont, O., Caldeira, K., Doney, S. C.,
Dutay, J.-C., Follows, M., Gruber, N., Joos, F., Lindsay, K., Maier-Reimer,
E., Matear, R. J., Matsumoto, K., Monfray, P., Mouchet, A., Orr, J. C.,
Plattner, G.-K., Sarmiento, J. L., Schlitzer, R., Slater, R. D., Weirig,
M. F., Yamanaka, Y., and Yool, A.: Impact of circulation on export
production, dissolved organic matter, and dissolved oxygen in the ocean:
Results from Phase II of the Ocean Carbon-cycle Model
Intercomparison Project (OCMIP-2), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB3007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002857</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>Neuer et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Neuer, S., Davenport, R., Freudenthal, T., Wefer, G., Llinás, O., Rueda,
M.-J., Steinberg, D. K., and Karl, D. M.: Differences in the biological
carbon pump at three subtropical ocean sites, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
29, 1885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015393</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>Nicolás-Carlock et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Nicolás-Carlock, J. R., Carrillo-Estrada, J. L., and Dossetti, V.: Fractality
à la carte: a general particle aggregation model, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6,
19505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19505</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>Passow(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U.: Transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in aquatic environments,
Prog. Oceanogr., 55, 287–333, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>Passow(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U.: Switching perspectives: Do mineral fluxes determine particulate
organic carbon fluxes or vice versa?, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 5, Q04002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000670" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000670</a>
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>Passow and De La Rocha(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Passow, U. and De La Rocha, C. L.: Accumulation of mineral ballast on
organic aggregates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1013, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002579" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002579</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>Paulsen et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulsen, H., Ilyina, T., Six, K. D., and Stemmler, I.: Incorporating a
prognostic representation of marine nitrogen fixers into the global ocean
biogeochemical model HAMOCC, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy.,
9, 438–464, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000737</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>Paulsen et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulsen, H., Ilyina, T., Jungclaus, J. H., Six, K. D., and Stemmler, I.: Light absorption by marine cyanobacteria affects tropical climate mean state and variability, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 1283–1300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1283-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-1283-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>Ploug et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Ploug, H., Iversen, M. H., and Fischer, G.: Ballast, sinking velocity, and
apparent diffusivity within marine snow and zooplankton fecal pellets:
Implications for substrate turnover by attached bacteria, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 53, 1878–1886, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>Ragueneau et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Ragueneau, O., Teguér, P., Leynaert, A., Anderson, R. F., Brzezinski,
M. A., DeMaster, D. J., Dugdale, R. C., Dymond, J., Fischer, G.,
François, R., Heinze, C., Maier-Reimer, E., Martin-Jézéquel, V.,
Nelson, D. M., and Quéguiner, B.: A review of the Si cycle in the
modern ocean: recent progress and missing gaps in the application of biogenic
opal as a paleoproductivity proxy, Global Planet. Change, 26,
317–365, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>Ragueneau et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Ragueneau, O., Schultes, S., Bidle, K., Claquin, P., and Moriceau, B.: Si and
C interactions in the world ocean: Importance of ecological processes and
implications for the role of diatoms in the biological pump, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4S02, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002688" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002688</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib143"><label>Read et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Read, B. A., Kegel, J., Klute, M. J., Kuo, A., Lefebvre, S. C., Maumus, F.,
Mayer, C., Miller, J., Monier, A., Salamov, A., Young, J., Aguilar, M.,
Claverie, J.-M., Frickenhaus, S., Gonzalez, K., Herman, E. K., Lin, Y.-C.,
Napier, J., Ogata, H., Sarno, A. F., Shmutz, J., Schroeder, D., de Vargas,
C., Verret, F., von Dassow, P., Valentin, K., Van de Peer, Y., Wheeler,
G., Consortium, E. H. A., Allen, A. E., Bidle, K., Borodovsky, M., Bowler,
C., Brownlee, C., Mark, C. J., Elias, M., Gladyshev, V. N., Groth, M., Guda,
C., Hadaegh, A., Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez, M., Jenkins, J., Jones, B. M.,
Lawson, T., Leese, F., Lindquist, E., Lobanov, A., Lomsadze, A., Malik,
S.-B., Marsh, M. E., Mackinder, L., Mock, T., Mueller-Roeber, B., Pagarete,
A., Parker, M., Probert, I., Quesneville, H., Raines, C., Rensing, S. A.,
Riaño-Pachón, D. M., Richier, S., Rokitta, S., Shiraiwa, Y., Soanes,
D. M., van der Giezen, M., Wahlund, T. M., Williams, B., Wilson, W., Wolfe,
G., Wurch, L. L., Dacks, J. B., Delwiche, C. F., Dyhrman, S. T.,
Glöckner, G., John, U., Richards, T., Worden, A. Z., Zhang, X., and
Grigoriev, I. V.: Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its
global distribution, Nature, 499, 209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12221</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib144"><label>Röske(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Röske, F.: Global oceanic heat and fresh water forcing datasets based on
ERA-40 and ERA-15, Tech. Rep. 13, Max Planck Institue for Meteorology, Hamburg, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib145"><label>Roullier et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Roullier, F., Berline, L., Guidi, L., Durrieu De Madron, X., Picheral, M., Sciandra, A., Pesant, S., and Stemmann, L.: Particle size distribution and estimated carbon flux across the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone, Biogeosciences, 11, 4541–4557, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4541-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib146"><label>Sarmiento et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. L., Monfray, P., Maier-Reimer, E., Aumont, O., Murnane, R. J.,
and Orr, J. C.: Sea-air CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and carbon transport: A comparison
of three ocean general circulation models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14,
1267–1281, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib147"><label>Schwinger et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwinger, J., Goris, N., Tjiputra, J. F., Kriest, I., Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Ilicak, M., Assmann, K. M., and Heinze, C.: Evaluation of NorESM-OC (versions 1 and 1.2), the ocean carbon-cycle stand-alone configuration of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM1), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2589–2622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2589-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2589-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib148"><label>Segschneider and Bendtsen(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Segschneider, J. and Bendtsen, J.: Temperature-dependent remineralization in a
warming ocean increases surface <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> through changes in marine ecosystem
composition, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 1214–1225, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib149"><label>Sherwood et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Sherwood, C. R., Aretxabaleta, A. L., Harris, C. K., Rinehimer, J. P., Verney, R., and Ferré, B.: Cohesive and mixed sediment in the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS v3.6) implemented in the Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere–Wave–Sediment Transport Modeling System (COAWST r1234), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1849–1871, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1849-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1849-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib150"><label>Shigemitsu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Shigemitsu, M., Yamamoto, A., Oka, A., and Yamanaka, Y.: One possible
uncertainty in CMIP5 projections of low-oxygen water volume in the
Eastern Tropical Pacific, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 31, 804–820,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005447" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005447</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib151"><label>Siegel et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Siegel, D. A., Buesseler, K. O., Doney, S. C., Sailley, S. F., Behrenfeld,
M. J., and Boyd, P. W.: Global assessment of ocean carbon export by
combining satellite observations and food-web models, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 28, 181–196, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib152"><label>Simmons and Gibson(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Simmons, A. J. and Gibson, J. K.: The ERA-40 Project Report Series 1,
Tech. rep., ECMWF, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib153"><label>Simon et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Simon, H., Lipsewers, Y. A., Giebel, H.-A., Wiltshire, K. H., and Simon, M.:
Temperature effects on aggregation during a spring diatom bloom, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 59, 2089–2100, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib154"><label>Six and Maier-Reimer(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Six, K. D. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Effects of plankton dynamics on seasonal
carbon fluxes in an ocean general circulation model, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 10, 559–583, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib155"><label>Stemmann et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Stemmann, L., Jackson, G. A., and Ianson, D.: A vertical model of particle
size distributions and fluxes in the midwater column that includes biological
and physical processes – Part I: model formulation, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
51, 865–884, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib156"><label>Stokes(1851)</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, G. G.: On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion
of pendulums, Cambridge Philos Trans, IX, 8–106, 1851 (reprinted in Mathematical
and Physical Papers, 2nd Edn., Vol. 3, New York, Johnson Reprint Corp., 1 pp.,
1966).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib157"><label>Takahashi et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., and Langer, S.: Redfield ratio based on
chemical data from isopycnical surfaces, J. Geophys. Res.,
90, 6907–6924, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib158"><label>Tambo and Hozumi(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Tambo, N. and Hozumi, H.: Physical aspect of flocculation process-II.
Contact flocculation, Water Res., 13, 441–448, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib159"><label>Taylor(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7183–7192, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib160"><label>Thornton(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Thornton, D. C. O.: Diatom aggregation in the sea: mechanisms and ecological
implications, Eur. J. Phycol., 37, 149–161, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib161"><label>Thyng et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Thyng, K. M., Greene, C. A., Hetland, R. D., Zimmerle, H. M., and DiMarco,
S. F.: True colors of oceanography: Guidelines for effective and accurate
colormap selection, Oceanography, 29, 9–13, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib162"><label>Tréguer(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Tréguer, P.: Silica and the cycle of carbon in the ocean, CR
Geosci., 334, 3–11, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib163"><label>Tréguer et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Tréguer, P., Bowler, C., Moriceau, B., Dutkiewicz, S., Gehlen, M., Aumont,
O., Bittner, L., Dugdale, R., Finkel, Z., Iudicone, D., Jahn, O., Guidi, L.,
Lasbleiz, M., Leblanc, K., Levy, M., and Pondaven, P.: Influence of diatom
diversity on the ocean biological carbon pump, Nat. Geosci., 11,
27–37, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib164"><label>Usbeck et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Usbeck, R., Schlitzer, R., Fischer, G., and Wefer, G.: Particle fluxes in the
ocean: comparison of sediment trap data with results from inverse modeling,
J. Marine Syst., 39, 167–183, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib165"><label>Verdugo et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Verdugo, P., Alldredge, A. L., Azam, F., Kirchman, D. L., Passow, U., and
Santschi, P. H.: The oceanic gel phase: a bridge in the DOM-POM
continuum, Mar. Chem., 92, 67–85, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib166"><label>Villa-Alfagame et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Villa-Alfagame, M., de Soto, F. C., Ceballos, E., Giering, S. L. C., Le
Moigne, F. A. C., Henson, S., Mas, J. L., and Sanders, R. J.: Geographical,
seasonal, and depth variation in sinking particle speeds in the North
Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 8609–8616,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069233" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069233</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib167"><label>Waterhouse et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Waterhouse, A. F., MacJinnon, J. A., Nash, J. D., Alford, M. H., Kunze, E.,
Simmons, H. L., Polzin, K. L., Laurent, L. C. S., Sun, O. M., Pinkel, R.,
Talley, L. D., Whalen, C. B., Huussen, T. N., Carter, G. S., Fer, I.,
Waterman, S., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Sanford, T. B., and Lee, C. M.:
Global Patterns of Diapycnal Mixing from Measurements of the Turbulent
Dissipation Rate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 1854–1872, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib168"><label>Weber et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, T., Cram, J. A., Leung, S. W., DeVries, T., and Deutsch, C.: Deep ocean
nutrients imply large latitudinal variation in particle transfer efficiency,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 8606–8611, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib169"><label>White(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
White, F. M.: Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib170"><label>White et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
White, M. M., Waller, J. D., Lubelczyk, L., Drapeau, D. T., Bowler, B. C.,
Balch, W. M., and Fields, D. M.: Coccolith dissolution within copepod guts
affects fecal pellet density and sinking rate, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 9758,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28073-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28073-x</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib171"><label>Williams and Follows(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, R. G. and Follows, M. J.: Ocean Dynamics and the Carbon Cycle:
Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib172"><label>Wilson et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, J. D., Barker, S., and Ridgwell, A.: Assessment of the spatial
variability in particulate organic matter and mineral sinking fluxes in the
ocean interior: Implications for the ballast hypothesis, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 26, GB4011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GB004398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GB004398</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib173"><label>Winterwerp(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Winterwerp, J. C.: A simple model for turbulence induced flocculation of
cohesive sediment, J. Hydraul. Res., 36, 309–326, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib174"><label>Young and Ziveri(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Young, J. R. and Ziveri, P.: Calculation of coccolith volume and its use in
calibration of carbonate flux estimates, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47,
1679–1700, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib175"><label>Ziveri et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Ziveri, P., de Bernardi, B., Baumann, K.-H., Stoll, H. M., and Mortyn, P. G.:
Sinking of coccolith carbonate and potential contribution to organic carbon
ballasting in the deep ocean, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 54, 659–675, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
