<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-17-2169-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Understanding the effects of early degradation on isotopic tracers:
implications for sediment source attribution using compound-specific isotope
analysis (CSIA)</article-title><alt-title>Understanding the effects of early degradation on isotopic tracers</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Understanding the effects of early degradation on isotopic tracers}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P. Hirave et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hirave</surname><given-names>Pranav</given-names></name>
          <email>pranav.hirave@unibas.ch</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wiesenberg</surname><given-names>Guido L. B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Birkholz</surname><given-names>Axel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Alewell</surname><given-names>Christine</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Environmental Geosciences, Department of Environmental Sciences,
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geography,  University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Pranav Hirave (pranav.hirave@unibas.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>2169</fpage><lpage>2180</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Pranav Hirave et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e113">Application of compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA)
in sediment fingerprinting source apportionment studies is becoming more
frequent, as it can potentially provide robust land-use-based source
attribution of suspended sediments in freshwater and marine systems.
Isotopic tracers such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of vegetation-derived
organic compounds are considered to be suitable for the CSIA-based
fingerprinting method. However, a rigorous evaluation of tracer
conservativeness in terms of the stability of isotopic signature during
detachment and transport of soil during erosion is essential for the
suitability of the method. With the aim to identify potential fractionation
and shifts in tracer signature during early degradation of organic matter in
surface soils, we measured concentrations and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of
long-chain fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes from fresh plant biomass (as vegetation
is a direct source of these compounds to the soils), degraded organic
horizon (O horizon), and mineral soil (A horizon) from various forest
types with different humus forms (five sites). The bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values showed continuous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C enrichment through the degradation stages
from fresh plant material to the O and A horizons, ranging between 3.5 ‰ and
5.6 ‰. Compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values showed
a general <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C enrichment for both long-chain fatty acids (up to
5 ‰) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (up to 3.9 ‰) from fresh plant biomass to the O horizon overlying the A horizon.
However, only slight or no further changes occurred from the O to the A
horizon. We also compared compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values between
two soil particle size classes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)
from four sites and found no significant differences of tracer values
between them, with even less fractionation for the long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes
within the soil particle fractions. This points to the conclusion that
sampling and analysing bulk soil material might be valid for the isotopic
tracer applications. We further conclude that our results support the
suitability of studied isotopic tracers as a representative source soil
signature in the CSIA-based sediment source attribution, as they demonstrated
necessary stability in the plant–soil system during organic matter degradation.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e249">Soils play a key role in the storage of organic carbon in terrestrial
ecosystems (Schmidt et al., 2011;
Scharlemann et al., 2014). Plant lipids constitute a major part of soil
organic matter (OM) and can also be used as biomarkers for tracing plant-derived OM in soil. These plant lipids are continuously transferred into the
soil after their production, through litter deposition and abrasion of
cuticular waxes (Glaser,
2005; Jansen and Wiesenberg, 2017). Compound-specific isotope analysis
(CSIA) of lipid constituents such as long-chain fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes has
been routinely used as a valuable tool to infer soil OM source and turnover (Wiesenberg
et al., 2004; Zocatelli et al., 2012), reconstruct paleoenvironments
and paleovegetation (Glaser and Zech, 2005;
Eglinton and Eglinton, 2008), and fingerprint sediment-bound OM sources
in freshwater and marine environments (Canuel et al., 1997;
Galy et al., 2011). As freshwater ecosystems are currently under the threat
of high sediment input due to the intensification of anthropogenic
activities and associated land-use<?pagebreak page2170?> changes, the CSIA technique has recently
been adopted for improved quantification of the sediment sources from
different land uses (Gibbs, 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e259">Sediment fingerprinting based on CSIA utilizes the vegetation-specific
isotopic signatures of the lipid biomarkers to discriminate the sediment
sources by the fraction attributable to the major land uses present in the
catchment. In particular, carbon isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values) of individual long-chain fatty acids (Gibbs,
2008; Blake et al., 2012; Hancock and Revill, 2013; Alewell et al., 2016;
Brandt et al., 2016; Mabit et al., 2018), long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (Seki
et al., 2010; Cooper et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016),  and plant-family-specific biomarkers (e.g.
triterpenyl acetates produced by Asteraceae) (Lavrieux et
al., 2019) has been used to trace freshwater sediments (Lavrieux et al.,
2019). The CSIA technique is also complemented by the use
of molecular proxies based on the concentration of these compounds such as
the average chain length (ACL) values and carbon preference index (CPI)
(Cooper et al., 2015). An overview of the current understanding and progress on
CSIA-based sediment source attribution has been summarized by
Reiffarth et al. (2016) and Upadhayay et al. (2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e280">The vegetation specificity in isotopic composition of plant lipid components
is an important property for CSIA-based sediment source attribution. This
specificity generally depends on biological (i.e. photosynthesis) and
environmental factors (i.e. water stress) that play a role during lipid
synthesis and are subsequently transferred to the soil.
Huang et al. (1997) reported long-term degradation
and diagenesis processes did not result in the changes of carbon isotope
composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in agricultural soils after their transfer from
fresh plant material. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C signature of organic compounds
does not change by volatilization, dilution, dispersion, and sorption
(Blessing et al., 2008, and references therein).
However, large uncertainty is also observed in the isotopic stability of
these tracers in the plant–soil systems (Chikaraishi and
Naraoka, 2006; Nguyen Tu et al., 2011). Some studies report an increase of several per mil
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of the soils compared to the
dominant higher terrestrial plants (Ficken
et al., 1998; Nguyen Tu et al., 2004; Wiesenberg et al., 2004; Griepentrog
et al., 2016). Hence the effects of early degradation on these plant-derived
chemical assemblages across the soil horizons, in terms of their carbon
isotope ratios and molecular distributions, need to be understood in greater
detail. The degradation stage in the surface soils at which the tracer
signature becomes stable and shows no further changes needs to be identified,
not only for a reliable identification of source signature for the CSIA-based
sediment fingerprinting technique, but also for an assessment of the
relative stability of the isotopic signatures during detachment and
transport of sediments. Our approach is to compare the original C isotopic
signature from fresh plant material to the OM from the organic horizons and
upper mineral soil horizon (i.e. increasing degradation stages along the
organic horizons – topsoil profile). Also, it has been shown that within
the soil particle size fractions and density fractions, the stability and
composition of the tracer signal may change (Cayet
and Lichtfouse, 2001; Quénéa et al., 2006; Griepentrog et al.,
2016). In previous CSIA-based fingerprinting studies, the silt-clay fraction
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m fraction has been chosen
to extract the representative source signature (Gibbs,
2008; Blake et al., 2012; Hancock and Revill, 2013; Cooper et al., 2015).
The bulk soil fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) has also been used
(Alewell et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e366">We measured carbon isotopic composition and concentration of long-chain
fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes from fresh leaves, needles, mosses, degraded
organic horizons, and mineral soil (Oi–Oe–Oa–A horizons) from various forest
types with different humus forms, in order to (1) understand the effect of
early degradation on the isotopic tracer signals employed in the CSIA-based
sediment fingerprinting technique and (2) compare the two biomarker classes
in terms of their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values and molecular distribution in the
plant–soil system for potential suitability as a representative source soil
signature for sediment fingerprinting. We also analysed the
compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values from two soil particle size
fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) to (3) understand the
soil particle-size-dependent isotopic fractionation and its implication for
CSIA-based sediment source attribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d1e442">For studying the degradation effect on the vegetation-specific tracers, five
sampling sites were selected (Fig. 1) of which two are in the Southern
Black Forest (Germany), two in the Lake Baldegg catchment (Switzerland), and
one in the Upper Sûre Lake catchment (Luxembourg) (Table 1). The broadleaved
forest site in the Southern Black Forest (site 1; BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">beech</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) was mainly
stocked with beech (<italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic>), under which a moder-type (duff mull) humus with
clearly separable Oi (undecomposed OM) and Oe (partly decomposed OM)
horizons, but a diffused boundary between the O and A horizons, has developed due
to the absence of a separate Oa (decomposed OM, humus layer) horizon. The
second site in the Southern Black Forest is a coniferous forest where the sole
tree species is spruce (<italic>Picea abies</italic>, site 2a; BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a thick cover of moss
(<italic>Sphagnum quinquefarium</italic>, site 2b; BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is growing under very acidic conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pH</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) characterized by the development of raw humus with an
easily separable sequence of Oi–Oe–Oa and A horizons. One of the two sites
in the Lake Baldegg catchment has mull-type humus with a thin Oi layer on
top of the A layer (Site 4; LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). The mixed-forest site in the
Upper Sûre Lake catchment has oak (<italic>Quercus robur</italic>) and spruce (<italic>Picea abies</italic>) cover with moder-type
humus (site 5; LX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixed</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). All sampling sites have acidic soils with pH
values in the range of 3–4.2. As we are aware that a range of soil pH<?pagebreak page2171?> values
might have been preferable, fully developed organic horizons are not found
in slightly acidic or alkaline soils.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e520">Map of all sampling sites.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" orientation="landscape"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e532">Main characteristics of the investigated sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Forest type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Site/sub-</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Dominant vegetation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Humus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Soil type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">MAT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">MAP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Altitude</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">site no.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">form</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(m a.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Black Forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Beech forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Site 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">beech</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> (beech)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Moder</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">Stagnosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">1155</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">535</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coniferous forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Site 2a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><italic>Picea abies</italic> (spruce)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Raw humus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">Podzol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">1800</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10">965</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Site 2b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>Sphagnum quinquefarium</italic> (moss)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Raw humus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Podzol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1800</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">965</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lake Baldegg catchment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coniferous forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Site 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>Picea abies</italic> (spruce), <italic>Thuidium</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Raw humus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Cambisol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">608</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><italic>tamariscinum</italic> (moss)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Coniferous forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Site 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>Picea abies</italic> (spruce)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mull</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Cambisol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">573</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Upper Sûre Lake catchment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mixed forest</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Site 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">LX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixed</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>Picea abies</italic> (spruce),</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Moder</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Cambisol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">970</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">429</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>Quercus robur</italic> (oak)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e535">Abbreviations: Black Forest (BF), Lake Baldegg (LB), Upper Sûre Lake
catchment – Luxembourg (LX). MAT denotes mean annual temperature and MAP denotes mean annual precipitation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e973">Fresh leaves, needles, and mosses were collected in autumn. Multiple
leaves and needles (15–20) from different directions at ca. 3 m above ground
were collected from an individual tree and mixed to form a sample of fresh
material. The O horizon was sampled and subhorizons within it were
separated according to the humus form observed. The underlying A horizon was
sampled to a maximum depth of 5 cm. Each sample was formed from a composite
mixture of three subsamples taken at a distance of ca. 1 m from each other.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Sample preparation and bulk isotope analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e984">Collected samples were oven-dried at 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 72 h. Soils were
dry sieved to a particle size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and macroscopic plant remains
and stones were removed with tweezers. All the samples were roughly ground
with a mortar and pestle. An aliquot of ground samples was finely powdered
with a ball mill (Retsch MM 400, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) for 90 s at a
frequency of 24 s min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for analysis of bulk carbon concentration and
isotopic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) composition. Powdered samples were weighed in
tin capsules, and subsequently stable carbon isotope ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and C content were measured with an elemental analyser
coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA–IRMS) (Sercon Integra2,
Sercon Ltd., Crewe, UK). The carbon isotope values of samples are reported
in a delta notation relative to the Vienna Peedee Belemnite (V-PDB) standard. The instrumental
standard deviation is lower than 0.1 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2172?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Particle size separation</title>
      <p id="d1e1069">The particle fraction of size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m was separated from four A
horizon soil samples collected from various forest types (beech forest (site 1), coniferous forest (site 2a), coniferous forest with moss cover (site 3),
and mixed forest (site 5)). Prior to the separation, soil aggregates were
disrupted by ultrasonic dispersion using an ultrasonic probe (Branson 250
model, Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA). A 500 J mL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ultrasonic
energy was applied as described in
Schmidt et al. (1999). This energy is
sufficient for total disruption of aggregates without redistribution and
compositional changes in OM. After disruption, the fraction of size
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m was separated by wet sieving and water was removed by
sedimentation and centrifugation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Total lipid extraction and compound separation</title>
      <p id="d1e1129">Powdered samples were extracted using an accelerated solvent extraction
system (ASE 350, Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with dichloromethane
(DCM) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> methanol (MeOH) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over three extraction cycles at
100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The total lipid extract (TLE) was volume reduced by vacuum
evaporation (Rocket Synergy evaporator, Genevac Ltd., Ipswich, UK). The TLE was
subsequently separated into neutral, acidic, and polar fractions by
solid-phase extraction using aminopropyl-bonded silica gel as the stationary
phase (Jacob et al., 2005). The acidic fraction (including free fatty acids)
was methylated at 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 1 h using 1 mL of 12 %–14 % boron
trifluoride (BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in MeOH, and fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were
extracted with hexane and 0.1 M KCl. The aliphatic hydrocarbons containing
long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes were separated from the neutral fraction obtained earlier
using a column filled with an activated silica gel by eluting with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-heptane.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Biomarker analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1213">Individual compounds in the FAMEs and aliphatic hydrocarbon fractions were
identified using a TRACE GC Ultra gas chromatograph coupled with a DSQ II
mass spectrometer (MS) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantification
was performed using the same GC coupled with a flame ionization detector
(FID) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The GC method was set to be identical
during both measurements as described in
Alewell et al. (2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <label>2.7</label><title>Compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA)</title>
      <p id="d1e1224">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotopic composition of individual FAMEs and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes was determined using a Trace 1310 GC with split/splitless injector
and FID detector interfaced online via a GC-IsoLink II to a ConFlo IV and
Delta V Plus isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen,
Germany). A DB-5MS capillary column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm i.d., 0.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m
film thickness, J &amp; W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) was used. The GC
temperature programme for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes was 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (held 4 min) to
320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (held 35 min) at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The GC
temperature programme for FAMEs was 70 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (held 4 min) to
150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and afterwards to
320 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (held 40 min) at 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. He (purity grade 5.0)
was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
known <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotopic composition used as reference gas was
automatically introduced via ConFlo IV into the isotope ratio mass
spectrometer in a series of five pulses at the beginning and four pulses at the
end of each analysis during every measurement. The system was externally
calibrated with standard mixtures A6 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and F8-3 for FAMEs (even chain fatty acid methyl and ethyl esters
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), both obtained from Arndt Schimmelmann,
Indiana University, IN, USA. Isotopically certified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Arndt Schimmelmann, Indiana University, IN, USA) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) FAMEs were
further added to the F8-3 mixture. The carbon isotope values of samples are
reported in delta notation relative to the standard V-PDB, averaging at
least three replicate measurements. The analytical uncertainty is lower than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰. The reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of
FAMEs were corrected for the additional carbon atom introduced during
methylation using the following formula:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M103" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FAME</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Methanol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio of C atoms in the FA to the C atoms in the
corresponding FAME. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Methanol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured with an
elemental analyser coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA–IRMS),
using similar instrumental parameters as the bulk C isotope analysis
described above.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1703">Concentration of long-chain fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in fresh
plant biomass and underlying horizons from different sites (note the
different scales of fatty acid and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane concentration). Abbreviations:
Black Forest (BF), Lake Baldegg (LB), Upper Sûre Lake
catchment – Luxembourg (LX).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Concentration of biomarkers</title>
      <p id="d1e1742">The lipids from fresh leaves as well as O and A horizons showed
even-over-odd predominance in long-chain fatty acids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and odd-over-even predominance in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), a property usually ascribed to the lipids derived from higher plant biomass (Eglinton et al.,
1962; Kolattukudy et al., 1976; Amblès et al., 1994a). To quantify this
pattern of the chain length preference, carbon preference index (CPI) values
were also calculated (Eglinton et al., 1962). Mean
CPI values of fatty acids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) were 5.7 and 5.5 respectively, indicating the input from
higher plants. Similar concentrations (relative abundance with regard to
total OM) of both of the compound classes were observed between fresh plant
biomass and degraded OM, with a slight increase within the O horizon (Fig. 2). We
also defined concentration in mineral soil with regard to total soil OM and
not to soil weight for its better comparability to the fresh plant biomass
and O horizon.<?pagebreak page2173?> We found a strong increase in compound concentrations in the
mineral soils collected from various sites (Fig. 2), except site
BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The strong increase in the concentrations from the O horizon to
mineral soil (A horizon) indicates a preferential preservation of long-chain
fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes compared to soil bulk OM (Fig. 2). In general,
long-chain fatty acids were relatively more abundant than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in the
plant–soil system, similar to previously reported findings
(van Bergen et al., 1998; Naafs et al., 2004; Chikaraishi and Naraoka, 2006).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1885">Average chain length (ACL, C atoms) of fatty acids (ACL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (ACL<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). Abbreviations: Black Forest (BF), Lake Baldegg
(LB), Upper Sûre Lake catchment – Luxembourg (LX).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1929">Interspecies variability was recorded by the molecular distribution patterns
of the compounds in fresh plant biomass (Fig. S1a and b in the Supplement). The coniferous
trees had relatively high concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alkane and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fatty acid. Fresh leaves of broadleaved trees showed
relatively high concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alkane and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fatty
acid. The <italic>sphagnum</italic> species were characterized by high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alkane,
differing from conifers and broadleaved trees, also consistent with
previously reported distribution patterns
(Maffei et al., 2004; Bush and
McInerney, 2013).</p>
      <p id="d1e2048">However, molecular distribution patterns observed in fresh plant biomass
were not necessarily transferred to the O and A horizons (Fig. S1a and b).
This was shown by the changes in average chain length (ACL) values of both
compound classes (Fig. 3). Relatively higher ACL values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in the A
horizon compared to overlying horizons from some of the sites might have
been the result of preferential degradation of shorter-chained homologues
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and preservation of longer-chained homologues from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and higher (Lichtfouse
et al., 1998; van Bergen et al., 1998; Marseille et al., 1999). In the case of
long-chain fatty acids, changes in the molecular distribution patterns (Fig. S1a) and a decrease in the ACL values (Fig. 3) from fresh matter to the A
horizon were observed at most sites. This might be explained by the
production of long-chain fatty acids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the O
and A horizons from the oxidation of other components of vegetation-derived
lipids such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanols (Amblès
et al., 1994a, b; Marseille et al., 1999) and also a contribution of
shorter-chained homologues from<?pagebreak page2174?> microorganisms (Lichtfouse et al.,
1995; Chikaraishi and Naraoka, 2006).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Stable carbon isotopic composition ($\delta^{{13}}$C values)}?><title>Stable carbon isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values)</title>
      <p id="d1e2154">The bulk stable carbon isotope values were in between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, similar to the
typical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plant–soil system
(Diefendorf et al., 2010).
During degradation, the carbon isotopic composition generally showed
consecutive enrichment in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from fresh plant biomass (leaves, needles,
and mosses) via organic horizons to the mineral soil. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
increment from fresh plant biomass to the A horizon varied between
3.5 ‰ (BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">beech</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 5.6 ‰
(BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 4). Selective degradation of bulk OM with depleted
carbon isotopic signature has been observed previously, but with fewer
significant changes probably related to short timescales
(Nguyen Tu et al., 2004). Our findings
report consistent degradation (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72 denoting similar extent
of degradation across studied forest systems) as well as consecutive
increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values through degradation stages (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denoting significantly different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values).
Hence the cautious use of bulk carbon isotope values for using it as source
soil signatures is necessary, especially when the vegetation sources found
are either C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> only.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2310">Bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values (‰) of fresh
plant biomass (leaves, needles, and mosses) and underlying horizons.
Abbreviations: Black Forest (BF), Lake Baldegg (LB), Upper Sûre Lake
catchment – Luxembourg (LX).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2333">Compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of long-chain fatty
acids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in fresh plant biomass (leaves, needles, and mosses) and across
the underlying horizons (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement error of three replicates).
Black Forest (beech (1), spruce (2a), moss (2b)), Lake Baldegg (spruce<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (3),
spruce (4)), Upper Sûre Lake catchment – Luxembourg (mixed forest (5)).
Abbreviations: fatty acids (FA); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (Alk). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values
generally remained stable after the horizon indicated by a horizontal dotted
line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2477">Range of compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values between the A
horizon and fresh plant biomass average (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and between the A
horizon and overlying O horizon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (significance levels
derived from ANOVA or Tukey's honestly significant difference test for the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values, given in parentheses).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="1">Fatty acids  </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col7" nameend="col10" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Alkanes </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">value (‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">beech</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.7 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.4 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.8 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.2 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.8 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.9 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.6 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.1 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.8 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.5 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.6 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">7.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.7 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.7 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.1 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">-0.3 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3.9 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.4 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.4 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.6 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.1 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.6 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.3 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.6 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.5 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.5 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.8 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.9 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.3 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.0 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.4 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixed</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.2 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.0 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.1 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.8 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.4 (n.s.)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2524">Significance codes: non-significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), n.s.; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Abbreviations: Black Forest (BF), Lake Baldegg (LB), Upper Sûre Lake
catchment – Luxembourg (LX).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page2176?><p id="d1e3715">Compared to bulk isotopic composition of fresh plant biomass,
compound-specific isotope values of long-chain fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes were
generally lower by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰
respectively (Figs. 4 and 5), in agreement with previous studies (Collister
et al., 1994; Huang et al., 1997; Nguyen Tu et al., 2011). The
compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of long-chain fatty acids
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) showed
a general increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values from fresh plant biomass to the
O horizon overlying the mineral soil (A horizon); however there were only slight or no
further changes to the A horizon (Fig. 5, Table 2). Both the compound
classes showed similar trends of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C enrichment at each site.
Exceptionally, some <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane homologues showed a strong enrichment between the O
and A horizons, e.g. BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and LX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixed</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) sites. Fresh moss material
exhibited the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values for both the compound classes,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> FA) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alkane) of <italic>Sphagnum quinquefarium</italic> (BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> FA) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alkane) of
<italic>Thuidium tamariscinum</italic> (LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), similar to previously reported <italic>sphagnum</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane isotope values
(Brader et al., 2010). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of mosses are lower as they generally grow in wet and humid
conditions and experience less water loss due to evapotranspiration
(Sachse et al., 2006). Sites 2a
(BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 2b (BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are both located in a spruce forest
with thick moss cover. Hence the strong isotopic enrichment in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alkanes (3.9 ‰ and
2.4 ‰ respectively) observed from the O horizon to mineral
soil (A horizon) at BF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moss</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> might have been caused by significantly higher
long-term input from spruce (with a comparatively higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
value) compared to the fresh and degraded moss to the mineral soil. However,
supportive data of, for example, long-term biomass inputs to soil from different
species present at the particular site, were not available. Also, site
LX<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixed</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has a vegetation cover of two distinct species (Table 1). The
difference in isotopic composition of fresh plant biomass of these two
species along with its seasonal variability might be a cause of changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values during degradation. Also, isotopically distinct
microbial input of long-chain compounds cannot be excluded
(Marseille
et al., 1999; Chikaraishi and Naraoka, 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e4234">At sites where a single dominant vegetation is present, we observed increase
up to 5 ‰ in long-chain fatty acids and up to
3.2 ‰ in long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes from fresh plant biomass to the
A horizon, similar to previous findings (Chikaraishi
and Naraoka, 2006; Griepentrog et al., 2015, 2016). It was found that most
of the degradation effect on isotopic composition took place up to the O
horizon, and slight or no further changes were observed during transfer to
the A horizon from the overlying O horizon. Table 2 summarizes this finding
where we compared the changes in compound-specific isotope values with the
level of significance. We calculated the magnitude of enrichment or depletion
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C from the mineral soil horizon with respect to fresh biomass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and also with respect to the overlying O horizon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M314" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">horizon</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fresh</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">biomass</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">horizon</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">overlying</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">horizon</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            For the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 2), we excluded the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
values of fresh moss to obtain the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fresh</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">plant</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">biomass</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value, only at site 3. This was done to eliminate the
overestimation of the magnitude of isotopic change, as mosses had
considerably low isotope values compared to other fresh materials (Fig. 5).</p>
      <p id="d1e4447">The bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values showed a continuous increase from fresh
plant material through the degradation stages to the A horizon and did not
exhibit the stability needed for use as an isotope tracer. Furthermore,
fresh plant biomass generally exhibited a wider range of compound-specific
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values (7.5 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> alkane and
3.9 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fatty acid) than bulk isotope
values (1.6 ‰) across all the sites. Hence in terms of
the stability during early degradation in soils and interspecies
variability, our results confirm that the compound-specific isotope analysis
is a more useful technique for sediment source attribution, and the analysis
should not rely on bulk isotope values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e4515">Comparison of compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values from two particle size
fractions in soil from four sites (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement error of three
replicates). Abbreviations: Black Forest (BF), Lake Baldegg (LB), Upper
Sûre Lake catchment – Luxembourg (LX).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2169/2020/bg-17-2169-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Compound-specific isotopic composition of soil particle size fractions</title>
      <?pagebreak page2177?><p id="d1e4550">We compared the compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of long-chain
fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes from the bulk soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) to the fine
silt plus clay fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) (Fig. 6). None of the fatty
acids showed a significant difference in their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values
between the two soil particle size fractions. Only for the LB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">spruce</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> site were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values of long-chain fatty acids considerably
(up to 2.1 ‰) but not significantly different among the
studied fractions. Similar results were obtained for long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes,
where none of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes from studied sites differed significantly between
the different particle size fractions, with a difference of up to
1 ‰ (Fig. 6). Cayet
and Lichtfouse (2001) reported preferential input of long-chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in
soils via a larger (200–2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) particle size fraction. However in
terms of isotopic composition of soils, Quénéa et al. (2006)
reported a less than 1 ‰ difference in long-chain
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C among the soil size fractions. In accordance with
previous findings on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, our results simultaneously studying
long-chain fatty acids and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes confirm that the
compound-specific carbon isotope values of both compound classes were not
significantly different between the two particle sizes. Long-chain
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes were found to be even less prone to the isotopic fractionation
within the soil particle size fractions. These results indicate that the
analysis of bulk soil material instead of the fine soil fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) might be suitable for sediment source attribution from soils
to freshwater systems, which might not only increase work and cost
effectiveness of the method but also reduce potential error sources due to
particle size fractionation effects. In general, the results above further
strengthen the necessary requirement of conservativeness of tracer signature
during erosion processes like detachment, dispersion, and sediment transport,
for CSIA-based sediment source apportionment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4732">We tested the potential stability of compound-specific carbon isotope values
of long-chain fatty acid and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes during early degradation in the soil,
usually employed as tracers in a sediment source fingerprinting technique based on compound-specific isotope analysis. We assumed that the potential
stability of a tracer signature during degradation stages from fresh plant
material to the mineral soil might indicate its suitability for detachment
and transport processes during soil erosion. We determined a clear increase
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values for both compound classes from above-ground plant
biomass to the O horizon overlaying the mineral soil (A horizon); however
only slight or no further changes were observed between the O and A horizons.
The latter was in clear contrast to bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C values, which
continued to become enriched in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C through all degradation stages from
fresh plant biomass to mineral soil (A horizon).</p>
      <p id="d1e4773">We conclude that this finding emphasizes the suitability of
compound-specific isotope analysis compared to the bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
analysis for sediment fingerprinting source attribution using stable carbon
isotope. The finding was consistent through the various forest types with
different vegetation and humus forms studied. The degree of variability in
compound-specific carbon isotopic signatures in the plant–soil system was
mostly similar between both compound classes (long-chain fatty acids and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes). Beyond sediment source attribution, this study also suggests
necessity for careful evaluation of bulk and compound-specific isotope
values for reconstruction of past C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vegetation changes in
soils. Comparing the tracer signatures between bulk soil material and the
fine soil particle size fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), the long-chain
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes were found to be less prone to the particle-size-dependent isotopic
fractionation than fatty acids. However<?pagebreak page2178?> none of the compounds showed
significant differences between studied particle sizes. Hence, we suggest
that our results indicate that the bulk soil (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) can be safely
used to determine tracer signatures in CSIA-based sediment source
fingerprinting, irrespective of the particle size of sediments collected. This
is particularly important as isotope values could also be considered to be
not affected by the particle size sorting during sediment transport in a
stream. The 10-fold higher concentrations of the long-chain fatty acids
compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in surface soils suggest a better analytical certainty
in extraction and measurements of fatty acids in soils and sediments with
low lipid content, but the joint investigation of fatty acids and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes would add an additional component in CSIA-based sediment source
fingerprinting, and thus more robust results can be expected if an analytically
reliable quantity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes is extracted from samples.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e4874">Data from isotopic and molecular measurements are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3228446" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3228446</ext-link> (Hirave et al., 2019).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4880">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2169-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2169-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4889">PH helped in designing the study; carried out the sampling, lab work,
biomarker quantification, and isotope analyses; evaluated data; and
wrote the manuscript. GLBW assisted in analytical method
development, isotope analyses, data evaluation, and interpretation and
contributed to the writing. AB provided support for isotope analyses and data
interpretation and contributed to the writing. CA primarily conceptualized
the study, provided support for sampling and data interpretation, and
contributed to the writing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4895">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4901">We thank Marlène Lavrieux for her support in sampling and Thomas Kuhn, from University of Basel, for his assistance in isotope measurements.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4906">This paper was edited by Aninda Mazumdar and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alewell, C., Birkholz, A., Meusburger, K., Schindler Wildhaber, Y., and Mabit, L.: Quantitative sediment source attribution with compound-specific isotope analysis in a C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plant-dominated catchment (central Switzerland), Biogeosciences, 13, 1587–1596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1587-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-1587-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Amblès, A., Jambu, P., Parlanti, E., Joffre, J., and Riffe, C.:
Incorporation of natural monoacids from plant residues into an hydromorphic
forest podzol, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 45, 175–182,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1994.tb00499.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1994.tb00499.x</ext-link>, 1994a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Amblès, A., Parlanti, E., Jambu, P., Mayoungou, P., and Jacquesy, J.-C.:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Alkane oxidation in soil, Formation of internal monoalkenes, Geoderma,
64, 111–124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)90092-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7061(94)90092-2</ext-link>, 1994b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blake, W. H., Ficken, K. J., Taylor, P., Russell, M. A., and Walling, D. E.:
Tracing crop-specific sediment sources in agricultural catchments,
Geomorphology, 139–140, 322–329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.036</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blessing, M., Jochmann, M. A., and Schmidt, T. C.: Pitfalls in
compound-specific isotope analysis of environmental samples, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem., 390, 591–603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1588-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00216-007-1588-1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brader, A. V., van Winden, J. F., Bohncke, S. J. P., Beets, C. J., Reichart,
G.-J., and de Leeuw, J. W.: Fractionation of hydrogen, oxygen and carbon
isotopes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes and cellulose of three <italic>Sphagnum</italic> species, Org. Geochem., 41,
1277–1284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.09.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.09.006</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brandt, C., Cadisch, G., Nguyen, L. T., Vien, T. D., and Rasche, F.:
Compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotopes and Bayesian inference for
erosion estimates under different land use in Vietnam, Geoderma Reg., 7,
311–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.06.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.06.001</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bush, R. T. and McInerney, F. A.: Leaf wax <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane distributions in and
across modern plants: Implications for paleoecology and chemotaxonomy,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 117, 161–179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.04.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2013.04.016</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canuel, E. A., Freeman, K. H., and Wakeham, S. G.: Isotopic compositions of
lipid biomarker compounds in estuarine plants and surface sediments, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 42, 1570–1583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.7.1570" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1997.42.7.1570</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cayet, C. and Lichtfouse, E.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of plant-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in
soil particle-size fractions, Org. Geochem., 32, 253–258,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00172-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00172-8</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, F., Fang, N., and Shi, Z.: Using biomarkers as fingerprint properties
to identify sediment sources in a small catchment, Sci. Total Environ.,
557–558, 123–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.028</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chikaraishi, Y. and Naraoka, H.: Carbon and hydrogen isotope variation of
plant biomarkers in a plant–soil system, Chem. Geol., 231, 190–202,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.01.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.01.026</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Collister, J. W., Rieley, G., Stern, B., Eglinton, G., and Fry, B.:
Compound-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C analyses of leaf lipids from plants with
differing carbon dioxide metabolisms, Org. Geochem., 21, 619–627,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90008-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0146-6380(94)90008-6</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cooper, R. J., Pedentchouk, N., Hiscock, K. M., Disdle, P., Krueger, T., and
Rawlins, B. G.: Apportioning sources of organic matter in streambed
sediments: An integrated molecular and compound-specific stable isotope
approach, Sci. Total Environ., 520, 187–197,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.058</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Diefendorf, A. F., Mueller, K. E., Wing, S. L., Koch, P. L., and Freeman, K.
H.: Global patterns in leaf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C discrimination and implications for
studies of past an<?pagebreak page2179?>d future climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
5738–5743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910513107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910513107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eglinton, G., Gonzalez, A. G., Hamilton, R. J.,  and Raphael, R. A.:
Hydrocarbon constituents of the wax coatings of plant leaves: A taxonomic
survey, Phytochemistry, 1, 89–102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)88006-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0031-9422(00)88006-1</ext-link>,
1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eglinton, T. I. and Eglinton, G.: Molecular proxies for paleoclimatology,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 275, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.012</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ficken, K. J., Barber, K. E., and Eglinton, G.: Lipid biomarker, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and plant macrofossil stratigraphy of a Scottish montane peat bog
over the last two millennia, Org. Geochem., 28, 217–237,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00126-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00126-5</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Galy, V., Eglinton, T., France-Lanord, C., and Sylva, S.: The provenance of
vegetation and environmental signatures encoded in vascular plant biomarkers
carried by the Ganges–Brahmaputra rivers, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 304,
1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.003</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gibbs, M. M.: Identifying Source Soils in Contemporary Estuarine Sediments:
A New Compound-Specific Isotope Method, Estuaries Coasts, 31, 344–359,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-007-9012-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12237-007-9012-9</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Glaser, B.: Compound-specific stable-isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C) analysis in
soil science, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 168, 633–648,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521794" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jpln.200521794</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Glaser, B. and Zech, W.: Reconstruction of climate and landscape changes in
a high mountain lake catchment in the Gorkha Himal, Nepal during the Late
Glacial and Holocene as deduced from radiocarbon and compound-specific
stable isotope analysis of terrestrial, aquatic and microbial biomarkers,
Org. Geochem., 36, 1086–1098, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.01.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.01.015</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Griepentrog, M., Eglinton, T. I., Hagedorn, F., Schmidt, M. W. I., and
Wiesenberg, G. L. B.: Interactive effects of elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and nitrogen
deposition on fatty acid molecular and isotope composition of above- and
belowground tree biomass and forest soil fractions, Glob. Change Biol.,
21, 473–486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.12666</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Griepentrog, M., Bodé, S., Boeckx, P., and Wiesenberg, G. L. B.: The fate
of plant wax lipids in a model forest ecosystem under elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration and increased nitrogen deposition, Org. Geochem., 98,
131–140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.05.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.05.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hancock, G. J. and Revill, A. T.: Erosion source discrimination in a rural
Australian catchment using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA),
Hydrol. Process., 27, 923–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9466" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.9466</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hirave, P., Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Birkholz, A., and Alewell, C.: Data from isotopic and molecular measurements for: Understanding the effects of early degradation on isotopic tracers: implications for sediment source attribution using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA), Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3228446" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3228446</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Eglinton, G., Ineson, P., Latter, P. M., Bol, R., and Harkness, D.
D.: Absence of carbon isotope fractionation of individual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in a
23-year field decomposition experiment with Calluna vulgaris, Org. Geochem.,
26, 497–501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00027-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00027-2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jacob, J., Disnar, J.-R., Boussafir, M., Spadano Albuquerque, A. L., Sifeddine, A., and Turcq, B.: Pentacyclic triterpene methyl ethers in recent lacustrine sediments (Lagoa do Caçó, Brazil), Org. Geochem., 36, 449–461, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jansen, B. and Wiesenberg, G. L. B.: Opportunities and limitations related
to the application of plant-derived lipid molecular proxies in soil science,
SOIL, 3(4), 211–234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-211-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/soil-3-211-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kolattukudy, P. E., Croteau, R., and Buckner, J. S.:
Biochemistry of plant waxes, edited by:
Kolattukudy, P. E., Chemistry and Biochemistry of Natural Waxes, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 289–347, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lavrieux, M., Birkholz, A., Meusburger, K., Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Gilli, A., Stamm, C., and Alewell, C.: Plants or bacteria? 130 years of mixed imprints in Lake Baldegg sediments (Switzerland), as revealed by compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) and biomarker analysis, Biogeosciences, 16, 2131–2146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2131-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-16-2131-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lichtfouse, É., Berthier, G., Houot, S., Barriuso, E., Bergheaud, V., and
Vallaeys, T.: Stable carbon isotope evidence for the microbial origin of
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanoic acids in soils, Org. Geochem., 23, 849–852,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(95)80006-D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0146-6380(95)80006-D</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lichtfouse, É., Chenu, C., Baudin, F., Leblond, C., Da Silva, M., Behar,
F., Derenne, S., Largeau, C., Wehrung, P., and Albrecht, P.: A novel pathway
of soil organic matter formation by selective preservation of resistant
straight-chain biopolymers: chemical and isotope evidence, Org. Geochem.,
28, 411–415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00005-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00005-9</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mabit, L., Gibbs, M., Mbaye, M., Meusburger, K., Toloza, A., Resch, C.,
Klik, A., Swales, A., and Alewell, C.: Novel application of Compound Specific
Stable Isotope (CSSI) techniques to investigate on-site sediment origins
across arable fields, Geoderma, 316, 19–26,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.008</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Maffei, M., Badino, S., and Bossi, S.: Chemotaxonomic significance of leaf
wax <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes in the Pinales (Coniferales), J. Biol. Res., 1, 3–19, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marseille, F., Disnar, J. R., Guillet, B., and Noack, Y.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Alkanes and free
fatty acids in humus and A1 horizons of soils under beech, spruce and grass
in the Massif-Central (Mont-Lozère), France, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 50,
433–441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00243.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00243.x</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Naafs, D. F. W., Bergen, P. F. V., Jong, M. A. D., Oonincx, A., and Leeuw, J.
W. D.: Total lipid extracts from characteristic soil horizons in a podzol
profile, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 55, 657–669,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00633.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00633.x</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nguyen Tu, T. T., Derenne, S., Largeau, C., Bardoux, G., and Mariotti, A.:
Diagenesis effects on specific carbon isotope composition of plant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes, Org. Geochem., 35, 317–329,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.10.012</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nguyen Tu, T. T., Egasse, C., Zeller, B., Bardoux, G., Biron, P., Ponge,
J.-F., David, B., and Derenne, S.: Early degradation of plant alkanes in
soils: A litterbag experiment using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C-labelled leaves, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 43, 2222–2228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.009</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Quénéa, K., Largeau, C., Derenne, S., Spaccini, R., Bardoux, G., and
Mariotti, A.: Molecular and isotopic study of lipids in particle size
fractions of a sandy cultivated soil (Cesta<?pagebreak page2180?>s cultivation sequence, southwest
France): Sources, degradation, and comparison with Cestas forest soil, Org.
Geochem., 37, 20–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.08.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.08.021</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reiffarth, D. G., Petticrew, E. L., Owens, P. N., and Lobb, D. A.: Sources of
variability in fatty acid (FA) biomarkers in the application of
compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSIs) to soil and sediment
fingerprinting and tracing: A review, Sci. Total Environ., 565, 8–27,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.137" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.137</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sachse, D., Radke, J., and Gleixner, G.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D values of individual
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkanes from terrestrial plants along a climatic gradient – Implications
for the sedimentary biomarker record, Org. Geochem., 37, 469–483,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.12.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.12.003</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scharlemann, J. P., Tanner, E. V., Hiederer, R., and Kapos, V.: Global soil
carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool,
Carbon Manag., 5, 81–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.77" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4155/cmt.13.77</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmidt, M. W. I., Rumpel, C., and Kögel-Knabner, I.: Evaluation of an
ultrasonic dispersion procedure to isolate primary organomineral complexes
from soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 50, 87–94,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00211.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00211.x</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G.,
Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D.
A. C., Nannipieri, P., Rasse, D. P., Weiner, S., and Trumbore, S. E.:
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property, Nature,
478, 49–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10386</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seki, O., Nakatsuka, T., Shibata, H., and Kawamura, K.: A compound-specific
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D approach for assessing source and
delivery processes of terrestrial organic matter within a forested watershed
in northern Japan, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 599–613,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.025</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Bergen, P. F., Nott, C. J., Bull, I. D., Poulton, P. R., and Evershed, R.
P.: Organic geochemical studies of soils from the Rothamsted Classical
Experiments – IV. Preliminary results from a study of the effect of soil pH
on organic matter decay, Org. Geochem., 29, 1779–1795,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00188-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00188-0</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Upadhayay, H. R., Bodé, S., Griepentrog, M., Huygens, D., Bajracharya,
R. M., Blake, W. H., Dercon, G., Mabit, L., Gibbs, M., Semmens, B. X.,
Stock, B. C., Cornelis, W., and Boeckx, P.: Methodological perspectives on
the application of compound-specific stable isotope fingerprinting for
sediment source apportionment, J. Soils Sediments, 17, 1537–1553,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1706-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11368-017-1706-4</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Schwarzbauer, J., Schmidt, M. W. I., and Schwark, L.:
Source and turnover of organic matter in agricultural soils derived from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-alkane/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-carboxylic acid compositions and C-isotope signatures, Org.
Geochem., 35, 1371–1393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.03.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.03.009</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zocatelli, R., Lavrieux, M., Disnar, J.-R., Milbeau, C. L., Jacob, J., and
Bréheret, J. G.: Free fatty acids in Lake Aydat catchment soils (French
Massif Central): sources, distributions and potential use as sediment
biomarkers, J. Soils Sediments, 12, 734–748,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0505-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11368-012-0505-1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Understanding the effects of early degradation on isotopic tracers: implications for sediment source attribution using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Application of compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA)
in sediment fingerprinting source apportionment studies is becoming more
frequent, as it can potentially provide robust land-use-based source
attribution of suspended sediments in freshwater and marine systems.
Isotopic tracers such as <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C values of vegetation-derived
organic compounds are considered to be suitable for the CSIA-based
fingerprinting method. However, a rigorous evaluation of tracer
conservativeness in terms of the stability of isotopic signature during
detachment and transport of soil during erosion is essential for the
suitability of the method. With the aim to identify potential fractionation
and shifts in tracer signature during early degradation of organic matter in
surface soils, we measured concentrations and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C values of
long-chain fatty acids and <i>n</i>-alkanes from fresh plant biomass (as vegetation
is a direct source of these compounds to the soils), degraded organic
horizon (O horizon), and mineral soil (A horizon) from various forest
types with different humus forms (five sites). The bulk <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C
values showed continuous <sup>13</sup>C enrichment through the degradation stages
from fresh plant material to the O and A horizons, ranging between 3.5&thinsp;‰ and
5.6&thinsp;‰. Compound-specific <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C values showed
a general <sup>13</sup>C enrichment for both long-chain fatty acids (up to
5&thinsp;‰) and <i>n</i>-alkanes (up to 3.9&thinsp;‰) from fresh plant biomass to the O horizon overlying the A horizon.
However, only slight or no further changes occurred from the O to the A
horizon. We also compared compound-specific <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C values between
two soil particle size classes ( &lt; 2&thinsp;mm and  &lt; 63&thinsp;µm)
from four sites and found no significant differences of tracer values
between them, with even less fractionation for the long-chain <i>n</i>-alkanes
within the soil particle fractions. This points to the conclusion that
sampling and analysing bulk soil material might be valid for the isotopic
tracer applications. We further conclude that our results support the
suitability of studied isotopic tracers as a representative source soil
signature in the CSIA-based sediment source attribution, as they demonstrated
necessary stability in the plant–soil system during organic matter degradation.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alewell, C., Birkholz, A., Meusburger, K., Schindler Wildhaber, Y., and Mabit, L.: Quantitative sediment source attribution with compound-specific isotope analysis in a C<sub>3</sub> plant-dominated catchment (central Switzerland), Biogeosciences, 13, 1587–1596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1587-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1587-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Amblès, A., Jambu, P., Parlanti, E., Joffre, J., and Riffe, C.:
Incorporation of natural monoacids from plant residues into an hydromorphic
forest podzol, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 45, 175–182,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1994.tb00499.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1994.tb00499.x</a>, 1994a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Amblès, A., Parlanti, E., Jambu, P., Mayoungou, P., and Jacquesy, J.-C.:
<i>n</i>-Alkane oxidation in soil, Formation of internal monoalkenes, Geoderma,
64, 111–124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)90092-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(94)90092-2</a>, 1994b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Blake, W. H., Ficken, K. J., Taylor, P., Russell, M. A., and Walling, D. E.:
Tracing crop-specific sediment sources in agricultural catchments,
Geomorphology, 139–140, 322–329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.036</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Blessing, M., Jochmann, M. A., and Schmidt, T. C.: Pitfalls in
compound-specific isotope analysis of environmental samples, Anal. Bioanal.
Chem., 390, 591–603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1588-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1588-1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brader, A. V., van Winden, J. F., Bohncke, S. J. P., Beets, C. J., Reichart,
G.-J., and de Leeuw, J. W.: Fractionation of hydrogen, oxygen and carbon
isotopes in <i>n</i>-alkanes and cellulose of three <i>Sphagnum</i> species, Org. Geochem., 41,
1277–1284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.09.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.09.006</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brandt, C., Cadisch, G., Nguyen, L. T., Vien, T. D., and Rasche, F.:
Compound-specific <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C isotopes and Bayesian inference for
erosion estimates under different land use in Vietnam, Geoderma Reg., 7,
311–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.06.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.06.001</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bush, R. T. and McInerney, F. A.: Leaf wax <i>n</i>-alkane distributions in and
across modern plants: Implications for paleoecology and chemotaxonomy,
Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 117, 161–179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.04.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.04.016</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Canuel, E. A., Freeman, K. H., and Wakeham, S. G.: Isotopic compositions of
lipid biomarker compounds in estuarine plants and surface sediments, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 42, 1570–1583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.7.1570" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.7.1570</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cayet, C. and Lichtfouse, E.: <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of plant-derived <i>n</i>-alkanes in
soil particle-size fractions, Org. Geochem., 32, 253–258,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00172-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00172-8</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, F., Fang, N., and Shi, Z.: Using biomarkers as fingerprint properties
to identify sediment sources in a small catchment, Sci. Total Environ.,
557–558, 123–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.028</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chikaraishi, Y. and Naraoka, H.: Carbon and hydrogen isotope variation of
plant biomarkers in a plant–soil system, Chem. Geol., 231, 190–202,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.01.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.01.026</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Collister, J. W., Rieley, G., Stern, B., Eglinton, G., and Fry, B.:
Compound-specific <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C analyses of leaf lipids from plants with
differing carbon dioxide metabolisms, Org. Geochem., 21, 619–627,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90008-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(94)90008-6</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cooper, R. J., Pedentchouk, N., Hiscock, K. M., Disdle, P., Krueger, T., and
Rawlins, B. G.: Apportioning sources of organic matter in streambed
sediments: An integrated molecular and compound-specific stable isotope
approach, Sci. Total Environ., 520, 187–197,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.058</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Diefendorf, A. F., Mueller, K. E., Wing, S. L., Koch, P. L., and Freeman, K.
H.: Global patterns in leaf <sup>13</sup>C discrimination and implications for
studies of past and future climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107,
5738–5743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910513107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910513107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Eglinton, G., Gonzalez, A. G., Hamilton, R. J.,  and Raphael, R. A.:
Hydrocarbon constituents of the wax coatings of plant leaves: A taxonomic
survey, Phytochemistry, 1, 89–102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)88006-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)88006-1</a>,
1962.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Eglinton, T. I. and Eglinton, G.: Molecular proxies for paleoclimatology,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 275, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.012</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Ficken, K. J., Barber, K. E., and Eglinton, G.: Lipid biomarker, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and plant macrofossil stratigraphy of a Scottish montane peat bog
over the last two millennia, Org. Geochem., 28, 217–237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00126-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00126-5</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Galy, V., Eglinton, T., France-Lanord, C., and Sylva, S.: The provenance of
vegetation and environmental signatures encoded in vascular plant biomarkers
carried by the Ganges–Brahmaputra rivers, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 304,
1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.003</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gibbs, M. M.: Identifying Source Soils in Contemporary Estuarine Sediments:
A New Compound-Specific Isotope Method, Estuaries Coasts, 31, 344–359,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-007-9012-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-007-9012-9</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Glaser, B.: Compound-specific stable-isotope (<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C) analysis in
soil science, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 168, 633–648,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521794" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521794</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Glaser, B. and Zech, W.: Reconstruction of climate and landscape changes in
a high mountain lake catchment in the Gorkha Himal, Nepal during the Late
Glacial and Holocene as deduced from radiocarbon and compound-specific
stable isotope analysis of terrestrial, aquatic and microbial biomarkers,
Org. Geochem., 36, 1086–1098, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.01.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.01.015</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Griepentrog, M., Eglinton, T. I., Hagedorn, F., Schmidt, M. W. I., and
Wiesenberg, G. L. B.: Interactive effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and nitrogen
deposition on fatty acid molecular and isotope composition of above- and
belowground tree biomass and forest soil fractions, Glob. Change Biol.,
21, 473–486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12666" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12666</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Griepentrog, M., Bodé, S., Boeckx, P., and Wiesenberg, G. L. B.: The fate
of plant wax lipids in a model forest ecosystem under elevated CO<sub>2</sub>
concentration and increased nitrogen deposition, Org. Geochem., 98,
131–140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.05.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2016.05.005</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hancock, G. J. and Revill, A. T.: Erosion source discrimination in a rural
Australian catchment using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA),
Hydrol. Process., 27, 923–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9466" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9466</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hirave, P., Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Birkholz, A., and Alewell, C.: Data from isotopic and molecular measurements for: Understanding the effects of early degradation on isotopic tracers: implications for sediment source attribution using compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA), Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3228446" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3228446</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Y., Eglinton, G., Ineson, P., Latter, P. M., Bol, R., and Harkness, D.
D.: Absence of carbon isotope fractionation of individual <i>n</i>-alkanes in a
23-year field decomposition experiment with Calluna vulgaris, Org. Geochem.,
26, 497–501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00027-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(97)00027-2</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Jacob, J., Disnar, J.-R., Boussafir, M., Spadano Albuquerque, A. L., Sifeddine, A., and Turcq, B.: Pentacyclic triterpene methyl ethers in recent lacustrine sediments (Lagoa do Caçó, Brazil), Org. Geochem., 36, 449–461, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.09.005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Jansen, B. and Wiesenberg, G. L. B.: Opportunities and limitations related
to the application of plant-derived lipid molecular proxies in soil science,
SOIL, 3(4), 211–234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-211-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-211-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kolattukudy, P. E., Croteau, R., and Buckner, J. S.:
Biochemistry of plant waxes, edited by:
Kolattukudy, P. E., Chemistry and Biochemistry of Natural Waxes, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 289–347, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lavrieux, M., Birkholz, A., Meusburger, K., Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Gilli, A., Stamm, C., and Alewell, C.: Plants or bacteria? 130 years of mixed imprints in Lake Baldegg sediments (Switzerland), as revealed by compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) and biomarker analysis, Biogeosciences, 16, 2131–2146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2131-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-2131-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lichtfouse, É., Berthier, G., Houot, S., Barriuso, E., Bergheaud, V., and
Vallaeys, T.: Stable carbon isotope evidence for the microbial origin of
C<sub>14</sub>–C<sub>18</sub> <i>n</i>-alkanoic acids in soils, Org. Geochem., 23, 849–852,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(95)80006-D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(95)80006-D</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lichtfouse, É., Chenu, C., Baudin, F., Leblond, C., Da Silva, M., Behar,
F., Derenne, S., Largeau, C., Wehrung, P., and Albrecht, P.: A novel pathway
of soil organic matter formation by selective preservation of resistant
straight-chain biopolymers: chemical and isotope evidence, Org. Geochem.,
28, 411–415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00005-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00005-9</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Mabit, L., Gibbs, M., Mbaye, M., Meusburger, K., Toloza, A., Resch, C.,
Klik, A., Swales, A., and Alewell, C.: Novel application of Compound Specific
Stable Isotope (CSSI) techniques to investigate on-site sediment origins
across arable fields, Geoderma, 316, 19–26,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.12.008</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Maffei, M., Badino, S., and Bossi, S.: Chemotaxonomic significance of leaf
wax <i>n</i>-alkanes in the Pinales (Coniferales), J. Biol. Res., 1, 3–19, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Marseille, F., Disnar, J. R., Guillet, B., and Noack, Y.: <i>n</i>-Alkanes and free
fatty acids in humus and A1 horizons of soils under beech, spruce and grass
in the Massif-Central (Mont-Lozère), France, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 50,
433–441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00243.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00243.x</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Naafs, D. F. W., Bergen, P. F. V., Jong, M. A. D., Oonincx, A., and Leeuw, J.
W. D.: Total lipid extracts from characteristic soil horizons in a podzol
profile, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 55, 657–669,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00633.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00633.x</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen Tu, T. T., Derenne, S., Largeau, C., Bardoux, G., and Mariotti, A.:
Diagenesis effects on specific carbon isotope composition of plant
<i>n</i>-alkanes, Org. Geochem., 35, 317–329,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.10.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.10.012</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Nguyen Tu, T. T., Egasse, C., Zeller, B., Bardoux, G., Biron, P., Ponge,
J.-F., David, B., and Derenne, S.: Early degradation of plant alkanes in
soils: A litterbag experiment using <sup>13</sup>C-labelled leaves, Soil Biol.
Biochem., 43, 2222–2228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.009</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Quénéa, K., Largeau, C., Derenne, S., Spaccini, R., Bardoux, G., and
Mariotti, A.: Molecular and isotopic study of lipids in particle size
fractions of a sandy cultivated soil (Cestas cultivation sequence, southwest
France): Sources, degradation, and comparison with Cestas forest soil, Org.
Geochem., 37, 20–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.08.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.08.021</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Reiffarth, D. G., Petticrew, E. L., Owens, P. N., and Lobb, D. A.: Sources of
variability in fatty acid (FA) biomarkers in the application of
compound-specific stable isotopes (CSSIs) to soil and sediment
fingerprinting and tracing: A review, Sci. Total Environ., 565, 8–27,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.137" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.137</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Sachse, D., Radke, J., and Gleixner, G.: <i>δ</i>D values of individual
<i>n</i>-alkanes from terrestrial plants along a climatic gradient – Implications
for the sedimentary biomarker record, Org. Geochem., 37, 469–483,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.12.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.12.003</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Scharlemann, J. P., Tanner, E. V., Hiederer, R., and Kapos, V.: Global soil
carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool,
Carbon Manag., 5, 81–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.77" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.77</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, M. W. I., Rumpel, C., and Kögel-Knabner, I.: Evaluation of an
ultrasonic dispersion procedure to isolate primary organomineral complexes
from soils, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 50, 87–94,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00211.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00211.x</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G.,
Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D.
A. C., Nannipieri, P., Rasse, D. P., Weiner, S., and Trumbore, S. E.:
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property, Nature,
478, 49–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10386</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Seki, O., Nakatsuka, T., Shibata, H., and Kawamura, K.: A compound-specific
<i>n</i>-alkane <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i>D approach for assessing source and
delivery processes of terrestrial organic matter within a forested watershed
in northern Japan, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 599–613,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.025</a>, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
van Bergen, P. F., Nott, C. J., Bull, I. D., Poulton, P. R., and Evershed, R.
P.: Organic geochemical studies of soils from the Rothamsted Classical
Experiments – IV. Preliminary results from a study of the effect of soil pH
on organic matter decay, Org. Geochem., 29, 1779–1795,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00188-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00188-0</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Upadhayay, H. R., Bodé, S., Griepentrog, M., Huygens, D., Bajracharya,
R. M., Blake, W. H., Dercon, G., Mabit, L., Gibbs, M., Semmens, B. X.,
Stock, B. C., Cornelis, W., and Boeckx, P.: Methodological perspectives on
the application of compound-specific stable isotope fingerprinting for
sediment source apportionment, J. Soils Sediments, 17, 1537–1553,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1706-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1706-4</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Wiesenberg, G. L. B., Schwarzbauer, J., Schmidt, M. W. I., and Schwark, L.:
Source and turnover of organic matter in agricultural soils derived from
<i>n</i>-alkane/<i>n</i>-carboxylic acid compositions and C-isotope signatures, Org.
Geochem., 35, 1371–1393, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.03.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.03.009</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Zocatelli, R., Lavrieux, M., Disnar, J.-R., Milbeau, C. L., Jacob, J., and
Bréheret, J. G.: Free fatty acids in Lake Aydat catchment soils (French
Massif Central): sources, distributions and potential use as sediment
biomarkers, J. Soils Sediments, 12, 734–748,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0505-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0505-1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
