<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">BG</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Biogeosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BG</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Biogeosciences</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1726-4189</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-17-2219-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition of organic production and its effect on ocean carbon storage in glacial-like model simulations</article-title><alt-title>Variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition in glacial-like simulations</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Variable {$\chem{C/P}$} composition in glacial-like simulations}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. Ödalen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ödalen</surname><given-names>Malin</given-names></name>
          <email>malin.odalen@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-7767</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nycander</surname><given-names>Jonas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-6859</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Ridgwell</surname><given-names>Andy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Oliver</surname><given-names>Kevin I. C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Peterson</surname><given-names>Carlye D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1839-7299</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nilsson</surname><given-names>Johan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-124X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Meteorology, Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of California–Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol University, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton  SO14 3ZH, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Malin Ödalen (malin.odalen@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>2219</fpage><lpage>2244</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Malin Ödalen et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020.html">This article is available from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e177">During the four most recent glacial maxima, atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been lowered by about 90–100 ppm with respect to interglacial concentrations. It is likely that most of the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> deficit was stored in the ocean. Changes in the biological pump, which are related to the efficiency of the biological carbon uptake in the surface ocean and/or of the export of organic carbon to the deep ocean, have been proposed as a key mechanism for the increased glacial oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage. The biological pump is strongly constrained by the amount of available surface nutrients. In models, it is generally assumed that the ratio between elemental nutrients, such as phosphorus, and carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio) in organic material is fixed according to the classical Redfield ratio. The constant Redfield ratio appears to approximately hold when averaged over basin scales, but observations document highly variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios on regional scales and between species. If the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio increases when phosphate availability is scarce, as observations suggest, this has the potential to further increase glacial oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage in response to changes in surface nutrient distributions. In the present study, we perform a sensitivity study to test how a phosphate-concentration-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio influences the oceanic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage in an Earth system model of intermediate complexity (cGENIE). We carry out simulations of glacial-like changes in albedo, radiative forcing, wind-forced circulation, remineralization depth of organic matter, and mineral dust deposition. Specifically, we compare model versions with the classical constant Redfield ratio and an observationally motivated variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, in which the carbon uptake increases with decreasing phosphate concentration. While a flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio does not impact the model's ability to simulate benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns seen in observational data, our results indicate that, in production of organic matter, flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can further increase the oceanic storage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in glacial model simulations. Past and future changes in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio thus have implications for correctly projecting changes in oceanic carbon storage in glacial-to-interglacial transitions as well as in the present context of increasing atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page2220?><p id="d1e378">During the last four glacial maxima, atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (henceforth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was lowered by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–100 ppm compared to the interglacials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.1"/>. Due to the difference in size between the oceanic, terrestrial, and atmospheric carbon reservoirs, where the oceanic reservoir is by far the largest with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of their summed carbon contents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">reviewed  by</named-content></xref>, it is likely that most of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that was removed from the atmosphere was stored in the glacial ocean. In addition, studies of paleo-proxy records indicate that carbon storage in the glacial terrestrial biosphere was smaller compared to in interglacial climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx82" id="paren.3"/>. During deglaciation, radiocarbon evidence indicates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was rapidly released from the ocean back to the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx96" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e464">Numerous processes, both physical and biological, have been identified as possible contributors to increased glacial oceanic storage. As glacial climate was substantially colder than interglacial climate, the global averages of surface and ocean temperature at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) are estimated to have been 3–8   and 2.0–3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C colder respectively, than the pre-industrial averages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.5"/>. Due to the temperature effect on solubility, a colder ocean can hold more carbon. However, glacial changes in salinity partly offset the temperature effect on solubility <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">reviewed by</named-content></xref>. A colder climate is also drier, and the dry conditions led to increased glacial dust deposition compared to interglacial climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.7"/>. It has been hypothesized that the addition of dust contributed to increased iron availability in the surface ocean and that this contributed to a strengthening of the biological sequestration of carbon in the glacial ocean compared to interglacials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.8"/>. The addition of iron would allow for more complete usage of other nutrients in regions where iron is limiting for biological production. Such strengthening of the retention of biologically sourced carbon in the deep ocean (or the so-called biological pump), through changes in nutrient availability, light conditions, and/or ocean circulation, has long been considered an important player in the glacial increase in ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx92" id="paren.9"/>. Other studies have pointed to changes in carbonate preservation in coral reefs and deep-sea marine sediments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.10"/>. It is likely that reduced ventilation of the deep water, through changes in ocean circulation and expanded sea ice cover acting as a barrier for air–sea gas exchange, contributed to increasing the glacial ocean carbon retention <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx98 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Model studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.12"/> show that reduced Southern Hemisphere westerly winds produce reduced ventilation of Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) in line with evidence from proxy records of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> . In addition, it has been shown that strengthening of the winds over the Southern Ocean was a likely contributor to deglacial outgassing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the ocean to the atmosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.13"/>. Extensive summaries of the processes responsible for high glacial ocean carbon storage, and examples of their interactions, are given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.14"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.15"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.16"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="text.17"/>. Despite the efforts of identifying the responsible processes, models have been struggling to achieve the full lowering of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> expected for a glacial.</p>
      <p id="d1e573">In this paper, we focus on the biological pump and how it responds to glacial-like changes in climate. Our aim is to investigate how the level of simplification of the biological carbon uptake in an Earth system model may affect the glacial drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most biogeochemical models used in glacial climate studies have a simple representation of biological production, which assumes that carbon, C, and inorganic nutrients such as phosphorus, P, are taken up in fixed proportion to each other. This is modelled using the average ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the ocean organic matter originally observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.18"/> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or adjustments to these suggested in follow-up studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e641">We investigate whether allowing for a flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometric ratio increases model ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage in a glacial-like climate. This possibility was suggested in studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.20"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.21"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.22"/>, but the implications of Redfield versus flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for glacial ocean carbon storage have not previously been tested in an Earth system model. This type of non-Redfieldian dynamics was applied in the model used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.23"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.24"/>, but their results were not analysed in terms of difference from a Redfield model version. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.25"/> explored the importance of dynamic response of ocean biology, such as flexible stoichiometry, for modelled ocean biogeochemistry in pre-industrial simulations. They found that the dynamic response was fundamental for stabilizing the response of ocean dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) to changes in the physical circulation state.</p>
      <p id="d1e699">We conduct a sensitivity study, where we apply glacial-like changes to an interglacial control state. Changes in radiative forcing, albedo, wind-forced circulation, remineralization depth, and dust are applied separately and in combination. Here, changes in radiative forcing and albedo serve to cool the climate and to mimic glacial temperature and ice conditions. The surface wind stress is reduced in the polar regions, in order to pursue reduced AABW ventilation as suggested by paleo-proxy evidence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.26"/>. Ocean cooling reduces the degradation rate of sinking particulate organic carbon, which increases the average depth of remineralization of organic carbon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.27"/>. Drier glacial climate resulted in increased dust deposition, and thereby iron flux, to the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.28"/>. All these changes act to increase ocean carbon storage and thereby reduce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The applied changes are not expected to induce a full glacial maximum model state, but they allow us to explore several important effects on the biological and solubility carbon pumps and produce a state with glacial-like climate conditions.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2221?><p id="d1e726">We apply the perturbations in two different versions of the Earth system model cGENIE: an original version using fixed Redfield stoichiometry of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.29"/> plus a co-limitation by iron <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.30"/> for biological production and a modified version using the non-Redfieldian, nutrient-concentration-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometry suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.31"/> and iron co-limitation.</p>
      <p id="d1e762">We show that flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stoichiometry allows a larger glacial ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage, as predicted by the box-model study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.32"/>, and that flexible stoichiometry has the largest impact for perturbations in remineralization depth and dust forcing. Additionally, we show that flexible stoichiometry allows for increased ocean carbon storage without decreasing the storage of preformed nutrients in the deep ocean.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d1e806">cGENIE is an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, with a 3D frictional-geostrophic ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equal-area horizontal grid, 16 depth levels), 2D energy–moisture balance atmosphere with prescribed wind fields, and interactive atmospheric chemistry and ocean biogeochemistry. The model code and user handbook can be found in the cGENIE GitHub repository <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.33"/>. We run a version of cGENIE with the same phosphorus-plus-iron (Fe) co-limitation scheme as used in the iron cycle model inter-comparison study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.34"/>. The model branch enabled for use with flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>) is tagged as release v0.9.5, and the model configurations used in this paper are included in this release <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.35"><named-content content-type="post">see Code availability for details</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Stoichiometry</title>
      <p id="d1e855">In the original version of the cGENIE Earth system model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.36"/>, as well as in the version of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="text.37"/>, the stoichiometric ratios are based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.38"/>. Thus, there is a fixed relationship between the number of moles of the elements that are taken up (positive) or released (negative) during production of organic matter in the ocean.  This relationship is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">138</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is dissolved oxygen (nitrogen is assumed only implicitly for the purpose of accounting for organic matter creation and remineralization-related alkalinity transformations in the ocean; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="altparen.39"/>). An exception is iron, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies as a function of iron availability as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="text.40"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e931">Although the average elemental composition of organic matter in the ocean is close to the Redfield ratios, the stoichiometry of production of new organic material has shown high in situ variability. Variability occurs between species, but also within the same species, and has been shown to depend on environmental factors such as nutrient availability, water temperature, and light <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. We test the importance of this variability for glacial ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage by running the same experiments with the fixed Redfield stoichiometry version of cGENIE and with a model version where we have implemented the linear regression model presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.42"/> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). These two model versions are henceforth denoted RED and GAM.</p>
      <p id="d1e955">The flexible stoichiometry in GAM depends on the ambient concentration of dissolved phosphate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the water:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molL</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0060</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1030">This relation shows that, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is low, organisms bind more C per atom of P than they do under high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) is applied in cGENIE in the calculations of biological C uptake at the surface ocean based on the surface concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2"/>, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) is also used to translate model surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fields to the corresponding surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios for the organic matter produced in each grid cell. Note that, while we change the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains the same in all experiments. As a result, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio changes between experiments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1152">Flexible stoichiometry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) dependent on the P concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis), as described by Eq. (1). Here, we extend the relationship beyond the observational interval 0–1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (bounded by dashed line) which forms the basis of the relation derived by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.43"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Experiments</title>
      <?pagebreak page2222?><p id="d1e1237">We start all experiments from an interglacial–modern (IG-M) control state, which has been run for 10 000 years to steady state, using either Redfield (Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) or variable (Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) stoichiometry. The control states have a prescribed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 278 ppm and the same climate (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). However due to the differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, they have different ocean carbon inventories (Table S1 in the Supplement). In Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the export flux of organic matter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref> has a global average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and thus the global ocean carbon storage is larger than in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This also suggests that a perturbation, which increases ocean storage of P through the biological pump, could cause storage of 15 (i.e. 121–106) more carbon atoms in simulations using GAM compared to RED, simply because the average composition of the formed biological material is different. To distinguish between the role of the flexibility of the stoichiometry and the change in the mean composition of organic material, we add a control state with fixed stoichiometry where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (henceforth denoted Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1379">List of experiments. Ensemble member acronyms, short descriptions of what the simulation tests, and specifications of parameter settings for each ensemble member. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is either prescribed to pre-industrial level (PI) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 278 ppm or freely varying with changes in climate and ocean circulation. The radiative forcing is either coupled to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the atmospheric chemistry module of the model or fixed at a value corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">185</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm. The zonal albedo profile is either representative of IG-M conditions or of the LGM. The wind stress is either IG-M or has an adjusted peak in wind stress at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The IG-M remineralization length scale (RLS) is 590 m. If RLS is changed, it is multiplied by a factor (fr). Dust forcing is either IG-M or representative of LGM. Each experiment is conducted using model versions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.45"><named-content content-type="post"> denoted RED</named-content></xref>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variable with surface ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="post">denoted GM15</named-content></xref>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fixed at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (denoted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ensemble</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Short</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Radiative</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Zonal<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Wind stress<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">RLS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Dust</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">member</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">forcing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">albedo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">forcing<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ctrl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Control</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">278 ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coupled</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">590</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IG-M</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(restored)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMrf</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGM radiative</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">fixed at</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">590</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IG-M</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">forcing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">185 ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMalb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGM zonal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coupled to</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">LGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">590</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IG-M</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">albedo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMphy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGMrf<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">fixed at</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">590</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IG-M</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGMalb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">185 ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wind stress at</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coupled to</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">590</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IG-M</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N reduced</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RLS changed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coupled</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">590</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IG-M</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">by factor fr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMdust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">coupled to</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">590</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">dust flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLcomb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">“Glacial-like” (GL)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">fixed at</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">590</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LGM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(all forcings)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">185 ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acomb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">“GL” with</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">fixed at</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">LGM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">IG-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">590</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">LGM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PI wind</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">185 ppm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1544">
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Calculated from the HADCM3 LGM (21 ka) simulation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.47"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>See <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.48"/> for example of reduced peak wind profile for the Southern Hemisphere.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Re-gridded LGM dust flux from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.49"/>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fr denotes multiplication factor for remineralization length scale. We test multiplication factors between 0.75 and 1.75, corresponding to a change in RLS between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>75 %.
</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2388">In order to explore the effects of variable stoichiometry, we make a sensitivity study where we apply changes to boundary conditions, individually and in combination (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3"/>), that may be representative of changes that occurred during glacial periods.  All experiments are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2396">The applied changes in boundary conditions are
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2401">physical perturbations (colder climate) of
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e2406">radiative forcing corresponding to LGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 185 ppm and</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e2428">zonal albedo profile representative of LGM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">calculated from the LGM climate simulation of</named-content></xref>;</p></list-item></list></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2437">physical perturbations (weaker overturning) of
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e2442">reduced wind forcing over the Southern Ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.51"><named-content content-type="post">e.g.</named-content></xref> and north of 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1"/>); and</p></list-item></list></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2462">biological perturbations of
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e2467">changed remineralization length scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e2476">increased dust forcing, as simulated for the LGM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.53"><named-content content-type="pre">regridded from</named-content></xref>.</p></list-item></list></p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2484">By applying the above perturbations, we aim to approach, but not fully resolve, some of the characteristics of the LGM ocean, which appears to have had a global average ocean temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) 2.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C colder than the Holocene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.54"/>, a weakly ventilated deep ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and a more efficient biological pump <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx92" id="paren.56"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. We also aim to increase carbon retention in the deep ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.57"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2537">The physical perturbations serve to achieve a colder climate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> cools by 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C compared to Ctrl, thus 80 % of the observed 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>) and weaker overturning (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) with a longer residence time of the Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) cell compared to Ctrl. Colder conditions achieve a stronger solubility pump, thereby strengthening the retention of carbon in the deep ocean. As the physical perturbations affect the ocean circulation and temperature, they also affect the nutrient distribution and the rates of nutrient upwelling and biological growth (slower growth in colder water). They thereby affect the biological productivity  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.58"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2584">The Eulerian component of the global <bold>(a, b)</bold>, Atlantic <bold>(c, d)</bold>, and  Pacific <bold>(e, f)</bold> ocean meridional overturning stream function (1 Sv <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b, d, f)</bold>. Note that the eddy-induced transport of tracers is taken into account through a skew-diffusive flux <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.59"/> that is present in the velocity fields used to compute the Eulerian stream function.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2670">The biological perturbations serve to achieve a more efficient biological pump, which is connected with increased retention of nutrients and carbon in the deep ocean, and lower surface nutrient concentrations in productive regions (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4"/>). With flexible stoichiometry, lower surface nutrient concentrations result in higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, further increasing the export production and thereby the carbon retention in the deep ocean. In our experiments, we show that the flexible stoichiometry amplifies the response of the biological pump to both physical and biological perturbations.</p>
      <p id="d1e2690">The perturbations and the experiments are described in detail in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1"/>–<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Physical perturbations</title>
      <p id="d1e2704">We change the physical conditions for climate by changing radiative forcing and albedo to LGM-like conditions and denote these changes as LGMphy. We set the radiative forcing in the model to correspond to an atmosphere with 185 ppm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of 278. However, we allow the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to freely evolve (starting from the value of 278 ppm of the Ctrl-state atmosphere) in response to the cooler climate. For albedo, we apply a zonal LGM albedo profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">calculated from the LGM climate simulation of</named-content></xref>. Assumptions of a simple zonal profile, instead of a 2D field re-gridded from PMIP LGM simulations, allow for a better consistency with the original zonal mean albedo profile developed for the modern configuration of GENIE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.61"/>. Together, the changes in radiative forcing and albedo cause the global ocean average temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) to decrease by 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C compared to Ctrl (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2767">To achieve a longer residence time of the AABW water mass, and an associated increase in carbon and nutrient retention, we apply weaker winds (denoted WNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We use the Southern Ocean wind profile of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.62"/>, where the peak westerly wind strength at 50°S has been halved compared to the control state (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3"/>). The winds north and south of the peak are reduced accordingly to give a continuous profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.63"><named-content content-type="pre">see Fig. 2a of</named-content></xref>. The result is a weaker overturning (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>) and a longer residence time of the AABW as may be expected for the glacial ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.64"/> (see also Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS5"/>). Thus, this approach is justifiable in a model of reduced complexity. However, there are studies suggesting that the Southern Ocean winds may in fact have been stronger during glacial times <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx95 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.65"/>. To avoid an expansion<?pagebreak page2223?> of the North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) overturning cell that would be inconsistent with the glacial ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.66"/>, winds north of 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N are also gradually reduced so that the wind strength north of 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N is reduced by half compared to the control state. In cGENIE, gas transfer velocities are calculated as a function of wind speed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.67"><named-content content-type="pre">described in</named-content></xref>, and following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="text.68"/>. Consequently, weaker winds also lead to reduced gas exchange with the atmosphere.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2834">Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ppm); global ocean averages of temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>); Atlantic overturning stream function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, sverdrups (Sv)); and maximum and minimum north of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, for observations, and for selected ensemble members in each model version (RED and GAM). Climatological modern-day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> were computed using the World Ocean Atlas 2018 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.69"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modern-day ocean is estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.70"/>. Average modern-day AMOC strength is estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.71"/> from the RAPID-MOCHA array at 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (corresponding to Atlantic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model). Note that observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given for pre-industrial (PI) climate, as we do not model anthropogenic release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Atlantic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Atlantic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(ppm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">( <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sv)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sv)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Obs. modern</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">278 (PI)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">172</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ensemble</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">member</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">278.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">166</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">278.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">144</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMphy<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">245.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">171</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMphy<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">244.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">149</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">264.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">155</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">262.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">129</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">262.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">152</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">256.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">265.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">141</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">261.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">222.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">148</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">214.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">116</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">214.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">122</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">198.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Biological perturbations</title>
      <p id="d1e3984">In the ocean, phytoplankton growth rates and remineralization of particulate organic carbon are processes that both work more slowly at colder temperatures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.72"/>. Cooling of the ocean would thus lead to decreased production of particulate organic matter (POC) and simultaneously to a slower degradation of POC, with competing effects on export production (i.e. the amount of C captured by primary production that leaves the surface ocean without being remineralized) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.73"/>. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.74"/> shows that the effect of slower remineralization dominates the effect on export production. It has therefore been hypothesized that the cooling of the glacial ocean led to a deepening of the remineralization length scale (henceforth denoted RLS) in the ocean and thereby more efficient retention of organic carbon in the deep ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.75"/>, which in turn caused a lowering of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.76"/> find that such a deepening results in model changes in export production in poor agreement with paleo-proxies, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.77"/> find improved model agreement with the glacial proxy records of export production and stable carbon isotopes for temperature-dependent growth rates and<?pagebreak page2224?> remineralization. Deeper remineralization also results in increased nutrient retention in the deep ocean, thus causing changes in surface nutrient fields and in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of GAM. We test the effect of changes in RLS by multiplying the model default RLS by a factor fr (RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> fr; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3"/> ).</p>
      <p id="d1e4042">Increased dust forcing leads to increased iron (Fe) availability. This allows for increased productivity (and hence more efficient usage of other nutrients) in the high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) regions in the North Pacific, equatorial Pacific, and Southern Ocean, where iron (Fe) is the limiting micronutrient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.78"/>. The variable stoichiometry in GAM is expected to be influential if the concentrations of P decrease in such regions as a result of increased Fe availability. This process may hence be of importance in a glacial scenario where dust forcing increases as a result of the drier conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.79"/>. We apply the regridded LGM dust fields of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.80"/> and denote this change as LGMdust.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Sensitivity experiments and combined simulations</title>
      <p id="d1e4062">In the sensitivity study, for each of the three <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterizations, we first change one forcing at a time (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). We run simulations where we individually apply the LGM boundary conditions for radiative forcing (LGMrf), albedo (LGMalb), and dust (LGMdust) and one simulation with halved wind stress near the poles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 and 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) (WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the remineralization length scale (RLS), we test a range of values of the multiplication factor  RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fr</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This allows us to test the sensitivity to deep-ocean retention of organic carbon.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2225?><p id="d1e4140">We then run simulations where we combine several changes in forcing. We get a colder climate simulation (LGMphy) by combining LGMrf and LGMalb. In simulation Acomb, we combine LGMrf, LGMalb, LGMdust, and RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.81"/> show that small changes in remineralization depth can cause substantial changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. With the RLS deepening of 25 %, we keep the corresponding changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from exceeding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–30 ppm obtained in other studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.82"/>. We finally run a glacial-like simulation GLcomb (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>), which is similar to Acomb but also includes the change in wind stress WSN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The achieved GLcomb model state does not represent a full glacial maximum state but is more glacial-like compared to the control state; it has a colder climate (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), reduced deep-ocean ventilation, and more carbon retention in the deep ocean.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Observations</title>
      <p id="d1e4225">For comparison and validation of model results, we use records of ocean-state variables from climatological mean fields of modern observations and proxy observations from the LGM.</p>
      <p id="d1e4228">Modern data of ocean temperature, oxygen, and nutrients are retrieved from the World Ocean Atlas 2018 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.83"/> and we use the proxy estimates of LGM ocean temperature from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.84"/>. Average modern-day strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is estimated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.85"/> from the RAPID-MOCHA array at 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2226?><p id="d1e4249">We use model–data comparison of benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to assess the statistical similarity (correlation) between both the model control state and glacial-like state (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) to benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data representing the late Holocene (0–6 ka, HOL) and Last Glacial Maximum (19–23 ka, LGM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.86"/>. Locations of core sites can be seen in Fig. S1 in the Supplement (see also Fig. 1 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="altparen.87"/>). Note that LGM benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted than that in the Holocene due to the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted terrestrial carbon to the glacial ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.88"/>, which is not simulated in our model experiments. Therefore, to compare our glacial-like simulations (GLcomb) to LGM observations, we subtract a Holocene–LGM global average difference of 0.32 ‰ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.89"/> from the GLcomb experiments. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.90"/> state that the wide range of error for the estimate of glacial-to-modern change in benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suffers from a lack of observations in all ocean basins but the Atlantic. Therefore, we place more emphasis on the results of the model–data comparison in the Atlantic than in the Indo-Pacific sector.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Nutrient utilization efficiency</title>
      <p id="d1e4375">The extent to which biology succeeds in using the available nutrients can be determined by calculating the nutrient utilization efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.91"/>,
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M221" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          which is the fraction of remineralized (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">reg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to total (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) nutrients (in this case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the ocean. Overlines denote global averages. Remineralized nutrients have been transported from the surface to the interior ocean by the biological pump, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M226" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4505">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is preformed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that was present in the water parcel as it sank, and thus the fraction that was not used by biology in the surface ocean. In cGENIE, the concentration of preformed tracers is set in the surface ocean and then passively advected through the ocean interior <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.92"/>. The biological pump also captures carbon, and a similar relationship can be used for concentrations of DIC, where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M230" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to compute the ocean storage of remineralized acidic carbon (AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>). AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is biological carbon that entered the ocean in the form of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in soft tissue (as opposed to carbonates in hard tissue), measured independently of oxygen consumption and/or remineralized phosphate.</p>
      <p id="d1e4612">In cGENIE, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are modelled as passive tracers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.93"/>. Hence, we can use the model output for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pre</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) to compute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e4668">In a model with a fixed Redfield ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> determines the effect of the biological pump on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, it has been found that a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> in the initial state gives a lower potential for drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to similar perturbations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.94"/>. However, with variable stoichiometry this is no longer true, since the amount of carbon retained in the deep ocean is not necessarily proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4750">Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <bold>(a, c)</bold> and corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as calculated using parametrization of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.95"/> <bold>(b, d)</bold>. Panels show Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a, b)</bold> and climatological mean fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.96"><named-content content-type="pre">World Ocean Atlas 2018,</named-content></xref> <bold>(c, d)</bold>. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Control states</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Ocean temperature and circulation</title>
      <p id="d1e4847">As the three control states Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are driven by the same physical forcings and have the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, they have the same ocean circulation pattern (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, c, e and Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> and S2) and climate (exemplified by global ocean average temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>)  in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> and  S2). The surface ocean nutrient fields are fairly similar, with small differences due to the different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterizations (compare Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a and S2). The strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), diagnosed in the model as the maximum of the Atlantic meridional overturning stream function deeper than 1000 m, is 14 Sv (1 Sv <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in all control states (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>,  S2). Results from the RAPID-MOCHA array at 26<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N suggest an average AMOC strength of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Sv <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.97"/>; thus our control-state AMOC is a little bit weaker than in the present-day climate. The observational estimate for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> according to the World Ocean Atlas 2018 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.98"/> is 3.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, thus comparable to the 3.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of our Ctrl simulations. The surface nutrient concentrations of our control-state Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a) compare reasonably well with observed surface ocean concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c), with some underestimation in the Pacific equatorial region, the North Pacific Ocean, and the Labrador Sea. The agreement with observations is better for Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than for Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Surface nutrient distribution and {$\protect\chem{C/P}$} ratios}?><title>Surface nutrient distribution and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e5092">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> we see that surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fields (left-hand column) and the corresponding fields of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios (as given by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), right-hand column) of Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a, b) and of climatological mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  fields (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, d) are similar in their pattern as well as in the magnitudes of values. Note that high concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correspond to low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, and vice versa. The highest climatological mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the northern and equatorial Pacific are not fully reproduced by the model, but the pattern is  reproduced well. In the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> field of Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b), we see the signature of very high nutrient concentrations in the Southern Ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) as a band of low ratios, with the most extreme values near the Antarctic continent, as seen in the climatological mean fields (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d).</p>
      <p id="d1e5234">The nutrient utilization efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) in the three control states differs by a few percent: 0.43, 0.46, and 0.42 in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The fraction of DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in DIC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>, Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>, Table S1) is 0.065, 0.077, and  0.072 in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2227?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Ocean dissolved {$\protect\chem{O_{{2}}}$}}?><title>Ocean dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e5353">The most apparent difference between Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is in deep-ocean oxygen concentrations, where the global ocean average dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is lower than in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (166 and 152 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively). Compared to climatological mean fields (World Ocean Atlas 2018, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a–b), both Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c–d) and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>e–f) agree reasonably well with the real ocean.  Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> appears to better capture  the equatorial oxygen minimum in the Atlantic basin than Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> but is too low in the North Pacific. In Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>f), the North Pacific is markedly lower in oxygen than in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d) and even anoxic in the oxygen minimum zone (OMZ). This should be kept in mind when analysing the oxygen sections of the glacial-like states GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>g–h) and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>i–j). Global averages for dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5576">Sections of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) along 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in the Atlantic basin (left-hand column) and along 135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in the Pacific basin (right-hand column). Panels show climatological mean fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.99"><named-content content-type="pre">World Ocean Atlas 2018,</named-content></xref> <bold>(a, b)</bold> and model states Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c, d)</bold>, Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(e, f)</bold>, GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(g, h)</bold>, and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(i, j)</bold>. </p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>3.1.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Ocean {$\protect\chem{\delta{{}^{{13}}C}}$}}?><title>Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e5713">By comparing Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Holocene (0–6 ka, HOL) benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, we estimate a global model–data correlation of 0.78 (Table S3). The modern-day Atlantic Ocean has a distinctive spatial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pattern (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a,  S1) with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-enriched values in the intermediate-depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) North Atlantic and Nordic Seas and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted values in the deep (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) South Atlantic. While the model produces a weaker gradient than the observed HOL Atlantic Ocean (corr. 0.50, Table S3) the model correlates well with eastern Atlantic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records (Fig. S1). For the Indo-Pacific, the weaker benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient is well represented by the model (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>e). This pattern emerges mainly due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted, biologically sourced carbon that is accumulated in the weak circulation region of the interior North Pacific <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.100"/>. However, Indo-Pacific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are overall lower than the HOL observations. The overall model–data correlation for the Indo-Pacific is 0.39 (Table S3). Comparing the control states of the RED and GAM model versions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, e and  S3a, e) and model–data correlations with HOL observations (Table S3) are similar between the model versions, with somewhat lower correlations for GAM.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5902">Model ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (contours) compared to the two proxy record time slices (HOL and LGM) of benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (circles) of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.101"/>. The upper half of the figure shows the Atlantic Ocean <bold>(a–d)</bold>, while the lower half shows the Pacific Ocean <bold>(e–h)</bold>. The columns represent the model simulations (Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), while each row represents one of the proxy record time slices (HOL or LGM). The left-hand column shows Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a, c, e, g)</bold> and the right-hand column shows GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b, d, f, h)</bold>. The rows show, from top to bottom, <bold>(a, b)</bold> HOL Atlantic, <bold>(c, d)</bold> LGM Atlantic, <bold>(e, f)</bold> HOL Pacific, and <bold>(g, h)</bold> LGM Pacific. Note that, before we compare GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to LGM observations <bold>(d, h)</bold>, a constant of 0.32 ‰ is subtracted from the simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to account for terrestrial release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted terrestrial carbon which is not modelled. The corresponding comparison for model version GAM is shown in Fig. S3.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Sensitivity experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e6054">The applied changes listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> cause changes in ocean characteristics such as overturning circulation, temperature, surface nutrient distributions, and biological productivity, which result in changed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting steady-state global average values for temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>), dissolved oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>), and nutrient utilization efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as the maximum and minimum of the Atlantic meridional overturning stream function, are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>
<?pagebreak page2228?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Radiative forcing and albedo</title>
      <?pagebreak page2229?><p id="d1e6126">In the simulations where radiative forcing and albedo are changed to represent LGM conditions (LGMrf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LGMalb <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LGMphy), the reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are similar in the RED and the GAM model versions. In LGMphy, the resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 245.4 and 244.9 ppm, thus showing a reduction of 33 ppm compared to the Ctrl 278 ppm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Here, variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not impact the results, because changes in the surface nutrient distribution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a), and the associated changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a), are limited to very high latitudes where productivity is already low in the control state, due to low temperatures and a lack of light and iron. The drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can mainly be attributed to the increase in solubility carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), due to ocean cooling, and to an increase in sea ice, which prevents air–sea gas exchange and therefore causes an increase in disequilibrium carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.102"/>. Ocean cooling amounts to 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in LGMphy compared to Ctrl (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). In cGENIE, the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with ocean cooling corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.103"><named-content content-type="post">Supplement  Fig. S1</named-content></xref>. Thus, in LGMphy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should contribute roughly 40 % and 60 % respectively of the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Note that cGENIE underestimates the true effect of ocean cooling on solubility, due to a temperature restriction on the solubility constants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.104"/>. This temperature restriction limits solubility from changing below 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In this case, the solubility effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (from 3.6  to 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm) is thus comparable to only 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C of cooling (from 3.6  to 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm), and the solubility effect is underestimated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm. As we do not change salinity, we are simultaneously likely to overestimate the increase in solubility between Ctrl and a glacial-like state by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.105"/>. This effect is consistent for any choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parametrization and is therefore not explored further.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e6511">Resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly, with respect to the control-state 278 ppm, of the sensitivity experiments LGMphy (plus symbol),  RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (times symbol), LGMdust (upward arrowheads), and WSN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (circles) and of the combined experiments Acomb (stars) and GLcomb (downward arrowheads). Results of the different model versions RED, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, and GAM are shown in red, yellow, and blue respectively. The vertical dashed line separates simulations without (left) and with (right) wind perturbation.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6560">Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with respect to surface concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a), for <bold>(a)</bold> LGMphy<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> WSN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> Acomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(f)</bold> GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Changes in surface nutrient fields are similar for all three model versions (RED, GAM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>); thus only GAM is shown.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Reduced wind forcing</title>
      <?pagebreak page2230?><p id="d1e6710">When the peak of Southern Ocean (henceforth SO) winds is reduced, the strength of the overturning circulation of AABW decreases (see difference in Southern Hemisphere overturning stream function between Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a and b). Thus, given that the volume of AABW does not change, its residence time increases. This also means that the upwelling nutrient-rich water in the SO stays near the surface for longer and loses more nutrients before being subducted. This decreases the SO concentration of preformed phosphate in WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to Ctrl, as seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b, and increases the nutrient utilization efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). This leads to a drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 12.9 ppm compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). As the nutrient concentration in the SO decreases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b), the flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b) leads to an increased carbon capture efficiency in GAM compared to RED (see GLcomb-Ctrl of biologically sourced carbon (AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>), which is partly compensated for by a reverse effect in the Pacific equatorial region. Consequently, in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we get a reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 16.3 ppm compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). Hence, for halved peak wind stress at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, the flexible stoichiometry increases the drawdown by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e6879">Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly, with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b), for <bold>(a)</bold> LGMphy<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> WSN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold> RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> Acomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(f)</bold> GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e7007">Remineralized acidic carbon (AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALK</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>) as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Simulations using model versions RED and GAM are shown in red and blue respectively. Different symbols indicate the sensitivity experiments, listed in the panel on the right-hand side. Red and blue lines show linear least-squares fits to the separate ensembles for RED and GAM. Panels illustrate <bold>(a)</bold> the deviation from the least-squares fit of the GAM ensemble as opposed to the RED ensemble, <bold>(b)</bold> the linear fits extrapolated to the origin, and <bold>(c)</bold> a zoom-in around the origin, where the RED (red) line goes through the origin, while the GAM (blue) does not.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/2219/2020/bg-17-2219-2020-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Remineralization length scale</title>
      <p id="d1e7086">When the remineralization length scale (RLS) increases, the biological material reaches deeper before it is remineralized, and it takes longer for it to be returned to the surface. Therefore, more of the biologically sourced carbon (AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and nutrients are present in the deep ocean at any given time, leading to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) and a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The deeper we make the RLS, the bigger the drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – in RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases by 14 and 33 ppm respectively compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In GAM, the drawdown in each experiment is increased by an additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; thus RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.75</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> see a reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 18 and 44 ppm respectively compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S2). Our changes in RLS cause very small, but global, changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations (global average anomaly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>M, RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c), which, through the small resulting changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c), still contribute to the additional drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in GAM.</p>
      <p id="d1e7336">In a sensitivity test where we make the RLS 25 % shallower (which would be representative of a warmer climate compared with Ctrl), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by 18 and 23 ppm in RED and GAM respectively compared to their control states (see RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Table S2). Interestingly, the response in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is again <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % larger in GAM. The variable stoichiometry thus amplifies the effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by any change in RLS. The potential implications of this result for warm climate scenarios are further discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Dust forcing</title>
      <p id="d1e7432">The simulations with LGM dust forcing (LGMdust, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) show the largest difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the RED and the GAM. In LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases by 16 ppm compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sees a reduction of 21 ppm compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The drawdown is thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % larger with variable stoichiometry. About a third (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) of the increase in drawdown can be explained by a change in average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition of the organic material that is exported out of the surface ocean (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e7551">As anticipated, the iron added by the dust forcing allows more efficient usage of P in the HNLC regions, which increases the ocean storage of biologically sourced carbon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). This reduces the surface nutrient concentrations in these areas (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d). In the GAM model version, this is followed by increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios in these areas (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>d), resulting in a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than in LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The largest anomalies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, and consequently in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are observed in the subantarctic zone of the Southern Ocean, particularly in the Atlantic and Indian sectors. This subantarctic increase in biological efficiency is consistent with radionuclide proxy data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">230</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Th, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">231</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Pa) from the LGM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.106"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Combined experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e7695">We show the results of two different combined simulations; Acomb and GLcomb. GLcomb is the “glacial-like” simulation, which combines all the sensitivity experiments (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). Acomb omits the reduction in wind stress.</p>
<?pagebreak page2231?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Ocean temperature and circulation</title>
      <p id="d1e7707">In the glacial-like simulations, GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the global average ocean temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>) is 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C lower than in the respective control states (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.107"/> estimate LGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> to have been <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C colder than the modern ocean, while a more recent estimate by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.108"/> constrains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.57</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. GLcomb is thus just outside the 1 standard deviation limit of the warm end of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.109"/> estimate for the LGM. In Acomb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C cooler than Ctrl; thus this simulation falls within the uncertainty of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.110"/> estimate. Compared to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.111"/> estimate, our combined experiments GLcomb and Acomb achieve 64 % and 82 % of the glacial–interglacial difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">oce</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively. As anticipated, our combined forcings do not induce a full glacial maximum state but rather a state with glacial-like climate conditions.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2232?><p id="d1e7869">Ocean overturning circulation weakens in GLcomb compared to Ctrl (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), mainly as a result of the wind stress reduction. For example, the AMOC (here measured as the maximum of the Atlantic overturning stream function) reduces in strength by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, from 14   to 12 Sv (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>). The global meridional overturning stream function reveals that the SO overturning cell sees a reduction in transport (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d), which is associated with weaker upwelling and thus longer residence time for AABW, as hypothesized for the glacial ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx97" id="paren.112"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In Acomb, where the wind stress is kept at modern values, the ocean overturning circulation remains similar to the control state (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Surface nutrient distribution and {$\protect\chem{C/P}$} ratios}?><title>Surface nutrient distribution and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e7919">In the surface nutrient anomalies (GLcomb-Ctrl, shown for GAM in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f), we see the strongest response in the Southern Ocean, with different effects south and north of the so-called biogeochemical divide described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.113"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.114"/> show that the air–sea balance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is dominated by processes in the waters close to Antarctica, whereas global export production is instead controlled by the biological pump and circulation in the subantarctic region. The border between these two regimes is referred to as the biogeochemical divide. South of the biogeochemical divide, close to the Antarctic continent, we see an increase in GLcomb nutrient concentrations compared to Ctrl (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f), which coincides with an increase in sea ice in this area (Fig. S4). Colder conditions due to changed albedo and radiative forcing, with more sea ice than in the control state, cause a reduction in biological production, leaving more unused P in the surface layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a). North of the biogeochemical divide, increased aeolian dust flux increases the productivity of the biology, which reduces P in the surface compared to the control (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d). In combination with<?pagebreak page2233?> circulation changes, resulting from the reduced SO wind stress (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b), and deeper remineralization (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c), P concentrations in the subantarctic region are strongly reduced (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f). In the equatorial and North Pacific, there is also a reduction of P (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f), mainly due to the increased dust flux (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>d). There is an increase in P seen in the Arctic, again coincident with an increase in sea ice in the same area. As a result of these changes, we see strong positive anomalies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the HNLC regions and negative anomalies in the highest latitude bands (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>f). The organic matter that is exported out of the upper layer (henceforth referred to as export production) in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has a global average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Ocean dissolved {$\protect\chem{O_{{2}}}$}}?><title>Ocean dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e8025">Despite colder conditions, which allow for more dissolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is evident in the GLcomb simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). This mirrors the increase in AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction is about 50 % larger in GAM compared to RED. As the initial-state Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is already lower in oxygen than Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">166</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and variable stoichiometry allows for additional ocean storage of organic carbon, the end-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is drastically lower in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">122</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>3.3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Ocean {$\protect\chem{\delta{{}^{{13}}C}}$}}?><title>Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page2234?><p id="d1e8248">In GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (contours in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b, d), the Atlantic north–south gradient in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is stronger than in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (contours in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, c). This strong gradient is not observed in the Holocene Atlantic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data (dots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, b), but it is prominent in the LGM time slice (dots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c, d). The LGM observations are reproduced well in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (corr. 0.62, Table S3), especially in the east Atlantic (corr. 0.77). When we correct GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the absence of injected terrestrial carbon, we see clear similarities with LGM observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d), though the southernmost cores still indicate more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted conditions than the model. In the Indo-Pacific, GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is too <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-depleted compared to LGM observations, particularly with the correction for the absence of a terrestrial signal (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>h), and the model–data correlation is poor (0.05). For the Indo-Pacific, the model–data correlation for Holocene data is similar between GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.24 and 0.39 respectively, Table S3). This suggests that the poor correlation with LGM benthic records is simply due to our changes in forcings being insufficient to achieve the required rearrangements in Indo-Pacific circulation patterns. In GLcomb, similarly as in Ctrl, there is very little difference between the RED and GAM model versions in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns (compare Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>d, h to Fig. S3d, h) and model–data correlations (Table S3). However, there are overall lower values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in GAM, reflecting the larger storage of biologically sourced carbon in the deep ocean in this model version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS5">
  <label>3.3.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Atmospheric {$\protect\chem{CO_{{2}}}$}}?><title>Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e8430">In the combined experiments Acomb and GLcomb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases strongly compared to the control state (reduction of between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). This is partly a result of colder conditions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>), which lead to increased solubility for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in seawater and an expanded sea-ice cover (Fig. S4) which restricts air–sea gas exchange. The latter slows down the equilibration of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-rich upwelling water with the atmosphere before it is subducted into the deep ocean and thus causes increased C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dis</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Acomb and GLcomb, changes in biological production (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2"/>) and storage of biologically sourced carbon (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) also contribute strongly to the reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8523">The combined experiments show a striking difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the model versions RED and GAM; in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we achieve drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm respectively, from the 278 ppm of the control states (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). This corresponds to an increase in ocean carbon storage of 139  and 173 PgC respectively (Table S1). The drawdown is thus 25 % larger in GAM than in RED. In Acomb, where the perturbation in wind stress is omitted, drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller than in GLcomb and the difference between model versions is less pronounced, but there is still a 14 % difference between Acomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Acomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm respectively (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Accounting for variable {$\protect\chem{C/P}$} in ocean carbon cycle models}?><title>Accounting for variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in ocean carbon cycle models</title>
      <p id="d1e8683">The representation of ocean biology in general circulation models (GCMs) tends to be oversimplified <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.115"/> and the development of the models is often held back by constraints imposed by maintaining the computational efficiency of the model. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.116"/> empirical model is simple and based on nutrient variables that are already present in biogeochemical models (nitrate and phosphate). By implementing the GAM parametrization, or possibly a power law such as that described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="text.117"/>, an additional facet of the complexity of ocean biology can be implicitly accounted for at a relatively small computational cost. Previous model ensemble studies have shown that this type of dynamical response of the biology to changes in the modelled ocean state can improve the model's ability to realistically simulate ocean biogeochemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.118"/>. In pre-industrial and future simulations respectively, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.119"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="text.120"/> find that the flexible stoichiometry acts to stabilize the response of ocean DIC to changes in the physical (circulation) state. In our glacial-like simulations, we find that the response of ocean DIC, and thus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to the combined perturbations is greater in the simulations with flexible stoichiometry. Nonetheless, our study confirms the potential importance of dynamical biological response for the outcome of model studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e8720">The approach taken by both <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.121"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="text.122"/> is to adapt a function to species-independent C : P observations. This means that they account for the adaptation of plankton to the surrounding conditions, in terms of both species composition and individuals being more frugal in low-nutrient conditions. This is one of the main advantages of such an approach, as it can be applied in a model without different plankton functional types, which is what we use here. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.123"/> appear to succeed with full glacial–interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles in CLIMBER-2, which does not have flexible stoichiometry for primary producers but which has a temperature limitation on growth and explicit phyto- and zooplankton with different C uptake rates. This combination may perhaps achieve a similar response in carbon export in their simulations, when moving into a colder climate, as the flexible stoichiometry does in our simulations. The next step to approach a more realistic modelling of the biological pump would be to include a representation of preferential remineralization of nutrients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.124"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, but this goes beyond the scope of the present study.</p>
      <p id="d1e8748">One drawback of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.125"/> approach is that it assumes that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio continues to increase continuously with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As such, in a high-surface-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> region like the Southern Ocean, GAM does not represent the effects on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of temperature and light and the associated non-linear effects that could be of importance here <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.126"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the GAM parametrization fits the binned observational data well  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.127"><named-content content-type="pre">see Figs. 1 and S2 in</named-content></xref>. To account for the lack of observational data at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.128"/>, we have tested the effect of saturation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Ctrl and GLcomb simulations where we kept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The increase in ocean carbon storage and decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between Ctrl and GLcomb are nearly identical with GAM; thus saturation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio at very high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> causes no noticeable impact on our results.</p>
      <p id="d1e8981">Our sensitivity experiments RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RLS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reveal that the response in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the perturbation is enhanced in GAM compared to RED for both increased and decreased RLS. While increased RLS would be an effect of ocean cooling, and thus of interest for glacial studies, reduced RLS would be a consequence of ocean warming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.129"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.130"/> describes how decreased RLS would have a positive feedback on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a future warming climate. Our results imply that flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could have a further reinforcing effect on this feedback. It would<?pagebreak page2235?> therefore be of interest to apply a parametrization of flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in models used for simulations of future climate feedbacks.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Decoupling of biologically sourced carbon and nutrient utilization efficiency</title>
      <p id="d1e9073">Many studies have suggested increased ocean storage of organic carbon as a potentially important contributor to the low glacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx92" id="paren.131"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, biological production depends on water temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.132"/> and decreases in cold conditions. This temperature effect is parameterized in cGENIE as a local temperature-dependent uptake rate modifier proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and we see overall reduced productivity in our cold climate simulations (see e.g. LGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">phy</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Table S1). As the climate cools, the temperature effect leads to a decrease in biological productivity and a subsequent decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> (see LGM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">phy</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). If productivity decreases, other mechanisms are needed to offset this decrease, if the total ocean storage of organic carbon is to increase. Mechanisms that can contribute to increased deep-ocean carbon retention are for example reduced SO overturning circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.133"><named-content content-type="pre">increased residence time of the AABW;</named-content></xref>  and deeper remineralization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.134"/>, which we apply through our perturbations in winds (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2"/>) and RLS (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3"/>). From our results, it is evident that variable stoichiometry can be another contributing factor. In our simulations, global average export production decreases, in terms of both POP (particulate organic phosphorus) and POC (particulate organic carbon), by 15 % between Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> because of the colder climate. However, the variable stoichiometry in GAM partly offsets this decrease in biological carbon capture – while the export production in terms of POP decreases by 17 %, the corresponding decrease in POC is only 10 %. Thus, in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> we achieve an increase in ocean inventory of remineralized carbon, which exceeds the one of GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e9213">Due to the competing effects between decreased export production and increased retention that are introduced by the different forcing components, the net change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and thus in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, is very small when moving from the control state (Ctrl) to the glacial-like state (GLcomb) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). In the fixed stoichiometry case (RED), there is a small net increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.020 in GLcomb compared to Ctrl, which is linearly related to a small increase in storage of AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean. In the case with variable stoichiometry (GAM), there is instead a very small decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.003. With a linear response, we would thus expect a decrease in storage of AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as well. Instead, we see a reasonably large increase in global average AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In summary, we suggest this is a result of changes in surface P fields (see Fig. 7).</p>
      <p id="d1e9299"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, can be explained by the non-linearity introduced by the local variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When changes in ocean circulation, remineralization depth, and dust deposition cause the local nutrient availability in the surface waters to change, this affects the elemental composition of the exported organic material (Fig. S5). In GLcomb, there is a reduction of the surface layer P concentration compared to Ctrl in some key (HNLC) regions. In GAM, this decrease in surface P results in an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This further strengthens the biological pump in these key regions, resulting in a non-linear relationship between storage of remineralized phosphate and biologically sourced carbon (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). In Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the average elemental <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, this average is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S1, Fig. S5). This means that even though the same amount of P is exported to the deep ocean, the organic molecules carry more carbon, which is released in the deep ocean during remineralization. In Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the global average concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (compared with 1.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). By increasing the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition of 1.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> organic molecules from 121 to 134 (i.e. by 13 units), this causes an increase in C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which corresponds to the observed increase in AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. From this, we conclude that, in a system where stoichiometry is variable on a local scale, ocean storage of biologically sourced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can change while the amount of remineralized nutrients remains constant.</p>
      <p id="d1e9575">Note also that Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has a larger inventory of DIC as well as C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.135"/> found that drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to a perturbation is larger when the control state has a smaller inventory of DIC and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soft</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Yet, the effect of applying the same perturbation results in a larger drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in GAM than in RED. This is opposite of the conclusions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.136"/>. The reason is that the flexible stoichiometry in effect increases the drawdown potential, which more than compensates for the increased carbon inventory in the control state. In GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in global average export production increases from the control <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">134</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which reflects the increased storage of organic carbon allowed by the flexible stoichiometry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Implications of flexible {$\protect\chem{C/P}$} for deep-ocean oxygen}?><title>Implications of flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for deep-ocean oxygen</title>
      <p id="d1e9718">Studies have shown that deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were lower during the LGM than in the Holocene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.137"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Here, we discuss implications of using flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the model's ability to reproduce ocean oxygen patterns and concentrations in the different time periods.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2236?><p id="d1e9749">In the Atlantic, Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4e) reproduces the climatological mean extent of the oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) (Fig. 4a) better than Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4c) does. In the Pacific Ocean, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient in the climatological mean fields (Fig. 4b) is more gradual compared to that of the control states (Fig. 4d, f), but the core of the OMZ is well reproduced by the model. The forcings applied to GLcomb are not sufficient to reproduce a full glacial state. Still, we do get a vertical expansion of the OMZ in GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4h) compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4c), in agreement with the findings of Hoogakker et al. (2018). In GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, oxygen depletion is too extensive (see below), but the tendency of vertical expansion compared to the control state is present here as well.</p>
      <p id="d1e9809">In our glacial-like states, we see a significant reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the control state in both RED and GAM (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>d and e). This response is expected when we apply increased dust deposition and deeper remineralization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.138"/>, and the direction of the overall response of deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the glacial-like forcings is in line with observations. The reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is stronger in GAM, due to the larger storage of respired carbon in this model version.</p>
      <p id="d1e9851">Finally, it should be noted that Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c) displays deeper oxygen minima in the oxygen minimum zones of both the Atlantic equatorial region and the North Pacific compared to what is seen in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b) and in climatological mean fields. In Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, a large part of the interior North Pacific is anoxic (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c), while the climatological mean fields (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a) indicate very low oxygen levels, but not anoxia. As illustrated by simulations in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.139"/>, variable stoichiometry in itself is not always sufficient to achieve widespread deep-ocean de-oxygenation in a model under glacial-like climate change. Among other factors, model ocean oxygen conditions are also dependent on deep water formation characteristics of the model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.140"/>. The deep water formation characteristics of a model affect the amount of time available for remineralization and, consequently, the oxygen consumption. In addition, due to a lack of resolution deep water formation in climate models generally happens as open water convection, rather than as dense plumes along slopes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.141"/>. This may cause too much oxygen to be entrained into the deep ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.142"/>. In cGENIE, this effect is small enough not to cancel the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption caused by the higher average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9944">In summary, the GAM version of the model quantitatively reproduces the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns of both the LGM and the Holocene, but with too low concentrations. If this parametrization of variable stoichiometry is to be used in cGENIE in future studies, we suggest some retuning, for example by reducing the global average concentration of nutrients, to improve the representation of observed modern-day ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in the GAM control state.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Effect of modified but fixed {$\protect\chem{C/P}$}}?><title>Effect of modified but fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e9989">Part of the observed difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> results from a difference in global average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the control states (Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). In Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the export production is close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">106</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. We illustrate the consequences of this difference by running parallel simulations with fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (model version <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e10142">In a simulation with reduced wind stress (WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm compared to Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S2). The corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown in WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and WNS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm respectively. This indicates that, for the reduced wind stress case, about half of the enhanced drawdown achieved by the flexible stoichiometry can be attributed to a difference in the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition of the organic material between the control states Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Similarly, for the enhanced dust deposition experiments, LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> explains about one-third of the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and LGMdust<inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S2). In the combined experiment GLcomb, we can attribute about half (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm) of the observed difference in drawdown between RED and GAM to the difference in control-state average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Acomb, the control-state difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for about two-thirds of the difference between model versions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm). Evidently, the individual perturbation simulations and GLcomb have smaller fractions of the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that are due to changed average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As shown above, the simulations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate that, depending on the change in forcing, between one-third and two-thirds of the difference in drawdown between RED and GAM is due to the difference in average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the control states (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, Table  S2). From this, we conclude that the effects of the perturbations do not add linearly.</p>
      <p id="d1e10441">As outlined in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>, an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduces deep-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, through an increase in regenerated carbon. In this respect, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> experiments fall between the corresponding RED and GAM experiments. For example, the global ocean average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, in Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is 152 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower than Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (166 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but higher than Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (144 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Similarly, GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">121</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> than GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (96 compared to 122 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but higher than GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e10668">The observed effects of modified average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could have implications for model intercomparison projects, if they compare results from models that use different versions of fixed stoichiometry (for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="altparen.143"/> or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="altparen.144"/> stoichiometries, compared to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="altparen.145"/>). The problem with different stoichiometry assumptions in models is extensively discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.146"/>. Our study shows a direct consequence of such<?pagebreak page2237?> differences, with a different model response to the same perturbation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{What can we learn from the model--data comparison of {$\protect\chem{\delta{{}^{{13}}C}}$} ?}?><title>What can we learn from the model–data comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ?</title>
      <p id="d1e10719">Proxy records of benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate a change in ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the deglaciation. The whole ocean deglacial change has been estimated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.147"/>, and the surface-to-deep gradient weakened <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx81" id="paren.148"><named-content content-type="pre">shown in numerous studies; see e.g.</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>. Here we compare model ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of our simulations to the benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records, to see how well the simulations capture the observed patterns and whether there is a difference in model–data correlation between RED and GAM.</p>
      <p id="d1e10799">The model–data comparison in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4"/>) suggests that the Ctrl simulations are overall well correlated with Holocene benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data (HOL in Table S3). For the Atlantic, the correlation of the Ctrl simulations is higher with the LGM benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (LGM in Table S3) than with HOL. However, the standard deviations (SDs) suggest that the Atlantic north–south gradient is not as strong as in an LGM ocean state and thus more similar to the modern ocean.</p>
      <p id="d1e10846">When we apply our combined forcings in the GLcomb simulations, we achieve a stronger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient in the Atlantic, allowing for a closer match with LGM data in terms of SDs. A stronger gradient in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and more depleted values suggest weaker ventilation of the deep ocean. The poor correlation in the Indo-Pacific, which may be partly due to sparse mid-ocean observations for almost 70 % of the ocean volume, makes the global statistics for LGM observations difficult to interpret. The forcings applied to GLcomb are factors that are likely to be important for the glacial ocean circulation and biogeochemistry. However, these forcings are not sufficient to reproduce a full glacial state (i.e. the use of the term <italic>glacial-like simulations</italic> rather than <italic>LGM simulation</italic>). Other forcings that have shown to be important for modelling of glacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are, for example, brine rejection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.149"/>, and freshwater forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.150"/>. The fact that some important forcings are missing is likely the main cause for the model–data discrepancy, and the reason for why we do not achieve a glacial Pacific Ocean circulation consistent with observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns.</p>
      <p id="d1e10919">Each of the two observational datasets (HOL and LGM) displays similar correlations across the two model simulations. The correlation of the HOL <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records with Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ctrl<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is in all cases between 0.76 and 0.78. Meanwhile, the correlation of LGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records with the same four simulations is in all cases between 0.55 and 0.58. That our GLcomb simulations still correlate so well with the HOL dataset suggests the applied forcings have not caused these simulations to be clearly different from Ctrl in terms of water mass distribution. For the same reason, the correlation with LGM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> records does not significantly improve from Ctrl to GLcomb. The water mass distribution in cGENIE is strongly constrained by the resolution of the model, especially in the vertical. Changes in temperature and salinity that should cause changes in water mass volume may not be sufficient to allow a water mass to extend to the next vertical level of the model. As a consequence, while the gradient between water masses may become more or less pronounced, the interface of water masses may still remain at the same depth. The applied changes affect the chemical and biological conditions for ocean carbon storage, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solubility (temperature dependent) and nutrient availability, more than the physical conditions, such as water mass volume and turnover time. To achieve a full glacial state with cGENIE, with a more glacial-like water mass distribution, additional physical forcings (see above) are likely to be required.</p>
      <p id="d1e11012">How <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is represented in cGENIE is detailed in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>. The very small differences between RED and GAM suggests that using variable stoichiometry does not impact our ability to represent the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> patterns seen in observational data. However, we note that some retuning of the modern control state is recommended before cGENIE with variable stoichiometry is used in other studies.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e11055">In this paper, we examine the potential role of variable stoichiometry in biological production for glacial ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage. We show that flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> composition of organic matter allows a stronger response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to glacial-like changes in climate, remineralization length scale, and aeolian dust flux. We conclude that variable stoichiometry may be important for glacial ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storage and for achieving the full extent of drawdown of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in model simulations. In the experiment GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RED</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with glacial-like climate and Redfield stoichiometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.151"/>, ocean carbon storage increases by 139 PgC and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases by 64 ppm. In GLcomb<inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GAM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, with glacial-like climate changes and variable stoichiometry, the corresponding numbers are 173 PgC and 80 ppm. Hence, the drawdown of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by 25 % when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is variable.</p>
      <p id="d1e11174">About half of the increased drawdown of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results from different global average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the export production. In addition, flexible stoichiometry allows increased carbon capture through the biological pump, while maintaining or even decreasing the ratio of remineralized to total nutrients in the deep ocean. With fixed stoichiometry, an increase in remineralized carbon is inevitably tied to a corresponding increase in remineralized nutrients.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2238?><p id="d1e11200">We apply variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterized as a simple function of the surface water concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.152"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102" id="text.153"/> suggest that it is unrealistic for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to continue to increase indefinitely with increased [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and therefore suggest a more complex power-law function, which takes into account saturation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio at high concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, we found that saturation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio at concentrations higher than the observational upper bound of 1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> causes no noticeable impact on our results.</p>
      <p id="d1e11301">The representation of flexible stoichiometry used in this study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.154"/> can be used without large increases in computational cost. It makes it possible to take into account, to first approximation, the complex biological changes that occur in the ocean during long-timescale climate change scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.155"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.</named-content></xref>. We show here that, for glacial–interglacial cycles, this complexity contributes to changes in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. Flexible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also has the potential to be an additional positive feedback of ocean warming on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in future climate.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page2239?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Regenerated acidic carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e11375">Carbon enters the ocean mainly in the form of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and dissolved carbonate. Despite this, the major fraction of carbon in the ocean is as bicarbonate ions. The source-related state variables acidic and basic carbon (AC and BC respectively) allow us to separate the ocean DIC inventory into the sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (AC) and dissolved carbonate (BC). The concept of the sourced related state variables was first described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104" id="text.156"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11403">AC and BC are defined from DIC and alkalinity (ALK) as

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M722" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALK</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALK</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e11457">Total AC and BC include all ocean sources of carbon, including (but not limited to) river runoff, air–sea gas exchange, and the biological pump.</p>
      <p id="d1e11460">To isolate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that was supplied to the ocean via biological soft tissue, we make use of the separation of DIC and ALK into their preformed and remineralized fractions (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>). Thus, we then compute the remineralized acidic carbon (AC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) as
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M725" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ALK</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rem</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{B}?><label>Appendix B</label><?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{\delta{{}^{{13}}C}}$} in cGENIE}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cGENIE</title>
      <p id="d1e11539">cGENIE represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an explicit tracer (separate from and in addition to bulk carbon) in the model, tracking its concentration in all the same gaseous, dissolved, and solid forms that carbon exists in, reporting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in per mille relative to the standard Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). The current scheme is based on that described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.157"/> and updated as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.158"/> and is evaluated for the modern ocean (alongside simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in cGENIE, in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="text.159"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11592">In the aqueous phase, the isotopic partitioning of carbon between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is resolved and follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108" id="text.160"/> (their Sect. 3.2). The empirical fractionation factors used are from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="text.161"/>. The air–sea fractionation scheme follows that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="text.162"/> with the individual fractionation factors again taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="text.163"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11648">For the isotopic composition of organic carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.164"/> is adapted, assuming that the isotopic signature of exported POC reflects that of phytoplankton biomass. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.165"/>, the full equation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.166"/> is simplified to
          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>B1</label><mml:math id="M734" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(aq)] is the ambient concentration of aqueous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is its isotopic composition. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a temperature-only-dependent approximation of the full cell-dependent size and growth rate parameterization in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.167"/> model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.168"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>. We take an intermediate value for the enzymatic isotope fractionation factor associated with intracellular C fixation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx85" id="text.169"/>, and we assume a temperature-invariant value for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.7 ‰.</p>
      <p id="d1e11874">The result of applying this scheme in cGENIE is a zonal mean profile characterized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21 ‰ in the tropics, declining with increasing latitude to reach <inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 ‰ in the Southern Ocean. This latitudinal pattern is comparable to measurements made on suspended particulate organic matter as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="text.170"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e11926">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractionation into biogenic carbonates at the ocean surface (e.g. foraminiferal tests and coccolithophorid coccoliths), cGENIE follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.171"/> and employs a simple temperature-dependent fractionation between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aqueous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and calcite.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e11976">The code for the cGENIE.muffin model is hosted on GitHub. The specific version used in this paper, tagged as release v0.9.5, can be obtained at <uri>https://github.com/derpycode/cgenie.muffin/releases/tag/v0.9.5</uri>, last access: 12 April 2020 and is assigned a DOI <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3235761" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3235761</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.172"/>.
Configuration files for the specific experiments presented in the paper can be found in the
directory cgenie.muffin/genie-userconfigs/MS/odalenetal.BG.2019. Details of the different experiments, plus the command line needed to run each one, are given in readme.txt.
A corresponding user manual detailing software installation and configuration, plus
cGENIE.muffin model tutorials, is available from <uri>https://github.com/derpycode/muffindoc/releases/tag/1.9.1b</uri>, last access: 12 April 2020 and is assigned a DOI <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1407658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1407658</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.173"/>.
Datasets are available upon request (e-mail to malin.odalen@gmail.com).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e11998">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2219-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2219-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e12007">MÖ, JonN, KICO, and AR designed the model experiments. AR developed the original cGENIE model code. MÖ and KICO adapted the model code and forcings for the experimental design. MÖ performed the model simulations and produced the tables and figures. CDP provided expertise on ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis. MÖ prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e12027">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e12033">The authors thank Pearse James Buchanan and the one anonymous referee for their helpful comments which improved the paper. Malin Ödalen is grateful to Eric Galbraith for helpful discussions in the early stages of this work. Model simulations were performed on resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at the National Supercomputer Centre (NSC), Sweden. Malin Ödalen would like to acknowledge support from the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Research Areas 1 and 6.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e12038">Andy Ridgwell was supported by a Heising-Simons Foundation award and by EU (grant ERC 2013-CoG-617313).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> The article processing charges for this open-access<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by Stockholm University.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e12049">This paper was edited by Katja Fennel and reviewed by Pearse Buchanan and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adams and Faure(1998)</label><?label AdamsFaure1998?><mixed-citation>
Adams, J. M. and Faure, H.: A new estimate of changing carbon storage on land
since the last glacial maximum, based on global land ecosystem
reconstruction, Glob. Planet. Change, 16, 3–24, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Adkins(2013)</label><?label Adkins2013?><mixed-citation>
Adkins, J. F.: The role of deep ocean circulation in setting glacial climates,
Paleoceanography, 28, 539–561, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Anderson and Sarmiento(1994)</label><?label AndersonSarmiento1994?><mixed-citation>
Anderson, L. A. and Sarmiento, J. L.: Redfield ratios of remineralization
determined by nutrient data analysis, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8,
65–80, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Archer and Maier-Reimer(1994)</label><?label ArcherMR1994?><mixed-citation>Archer, D. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Effect of deep-sea sedimentary calcite
preservation on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, Nature, 367, 260–263, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Archer et al.(2000)</label><?label ArcherEtAl2000caused?><mixed-citation>Archer, D., Winguth, A., Lea, D., and Mahowald, N.: What caused the
glacial/interglacial atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles?, Rev. Geophys.,
38, 159–189, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bereiter et al.(2018)</label><?label BereiterEtAl2018?><mixed-citation>
Bereiter, B., Shackleton, S., Baggenstos, D., Kawamura, K., and Severinghaus,
J.: Mean global ocean temperatures during the last glacial transition,
Nature, 553, 39–44, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Berger(1982)</label><?label Berger1982coral?><mixed-citation>Berger, W.: Deglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> buildup: constraints on the coral-reef model,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 40, 235–253, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bouttes et al.(2010)</label><?label BouttesEtAl2010?><mixed-citation>Bouttes, N., Paillard, D., and Roche, D. M.: Impact of brine-induced stratification on the glacial carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 6, 575–589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-575-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-6-575-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bouttes et al.(2011)</label><?label BouttesEtAl2011?><mixed-citation>Bouttes, N., Paillard, D., Roche, D. M., Brovkin, V., and Bopp, L.: Last
Glacial Maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> successfully reconciled, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 38, L02705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL044499</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bouttes et al.(2012)</label><?label BouttesEtAl2012?><mixed-citation>Bouttes, N., Roche, D. M., and Paillard, D.: Systematic study of the impact of
fresh water fluxes on the glacial carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 8,
589–607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-589-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-8-589-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Boyle and Keigwin(1987)</label><?label BoyleKeigwin1987?><mixed-citation>
Boyle, E. A. and Keigwin, L.: North Atlantic thermohaline circulation during
the past 20,000 years linked to high-latitude surface temperature, Nature,
330, 35–40, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Bradtmiller et al.(2010)</label><?label BradtmillerEtAl2010?><mixed-citation>
Bradtmiller, L., Anderson, R., Sachs, J., and Fleisher, M.: A deeper respired
carbon pool in the glacial equatorial Pacific Ocean, Earth  Planet.
Sc. Lett., 299, 417–425, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Broecker(1982a)</label><?label Broecker1982?><mixed-citation>Broecker, W. S.: Glacial to interglacial changes in ocean chemistry, Prog. Oceanogr., 11, 151–197,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6</ext-link>,
1982a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Broecker(1982b)</label><?label Broecker1982OceanC?><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S.: Ocean chemistry during glacial time, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 46, 1689–1705, 1982b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Brovkin et al.(2007)</label><?label BrovkinEtAl2007?><mixed-citation>Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.: Lowering of glacial
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in response to changes in oceanic circulation and marine
biogeochemistry, Paleoceanography, 22, PA4202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006PA001380</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Buchanan et al.(2018)</label><?label BuchananEtAl2018?><mixed-citation>
Buchanan, P., Matear, R., Chase, Z., Phipps, S., and Bindoff, N.: Dynamic
biological functioning important for simulating and stabilizing ocean
biogeochemistry, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 565–593, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>cGENIE GitHub repository(2019)</label><?label GitHubGENIE?><mixed-citation>cGENIE GitHub repository:   available at: <uri>https://github.com/derpycode</uri> (last access: 12 April 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>cGENIE release 1.9.1b(2018)</label><?label GitHubGENIE_user_manual?><mixed-citation>cGENIE release 1.9.1b: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1407658" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1407658</ext-link>, available at:
<uri>https://github.com/derpycode/muffindoc/releases/tag/1.9.1b</uri> (last access: 12 April 2020),
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>cGENIE release v0.9.5(2019)</label><?label GitHubGENIE_v095?><mixed-citation>cGENIE release v0.9.5: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3235761" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3235761</ext-link>, available at:
<uri>https://github.com/derpycode/cgenie.muffin/releases/tag/v0.9.5</uri> (last access: 12 April 2020),
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2241?><ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Chikamoto et al.(2012)</label><?label ChikamotoEtAl2012?><mixed-citation>Chikamoto, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., Oka, A., and Smith, S. L.: Temperature-induced
marine export production during glacial period, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L21601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL053828</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Ciais et al.(2012)</label><?label CiaisEtAl2012?><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Tagliabue, A., Cuntz, M., Bopp, L., Scholze, M., Hoffmann, G.,
Lourantou, A., Harrison, S. P., Prentice, I. C., Kelley, D., Koven, C., and
Piao, S. L.: Large inert
carbon pool in the terrestrial biosphere during the Last Glacial Maximum,
Nat. Geosci., 5, 74–79, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Ciais et al.(2013)</label><?label CiaisEtAl2013IPCC?><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J., Chhabra,
A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le Quéré,
C., Myeni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and other biogeochemical
cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and
Midgley, P. M., chap. 6,   Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 465–570, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Crowley(1995)</label><?label Crowley1995?><mixed-citation>
Crowley, T. J.: Ice age terrestrial carbon changes revisited, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 9, 377–389, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Curry and Oppo(2005)</label><?label CurryOppo2005?><mixed-citation>Curry, W. B. and Oppo, D. W.: Glacial water mass geometry and the distribution
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the western Atlantic Ocean,
Paleoceanography, 20, PA1017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004PA001021</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Curry et al.(1988)</label><?label CurryEtAl1988?><mixed-citation>Curry, W. B., Duplessy, J.-C., Labeyrie, L., and Shackleton, N. J.: Changes in
the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of deep water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the last
glaciation and the Holocene, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 3,
317–341, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Davies-Barnard et al.(2017)</label><?label Davies-BarnardEtAl2017?><mixed-citation>Davies-Barnard, T., Ridgwell, A., Singarayer, J., and Valdes, P.: Quantifying
the influence of the terrestrial biosphere on glacial–interglacial climate
dynamics, Clim. Past, 13, 1381–1401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1381-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-1381-2017</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Duplessy et al.(1988)</label><?label DuplessyEtAl1988?><mixed-citation>
Duplessy, J., Shackleton, N., Fairbanks, R., Labeyrie, L., Oppo, D., and
Kallel, N.: Deepwater source variations during the last climatic cycle and
their impact on the global deepwater circulation, Paleoceanography, 3,
343–360, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Eggleston and Galbraith(2018)</label><?label EgglestonGalbraith2018?><mixed-citation>Eggleston, S. and Galbraith, E. D.: The devil's in the disequilibrium: multi-component analysis of dissolved carbon and oxygen changes under a broad range of forcings in a general circulation model, Biogeosciences, 15, 3761–3777, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3761-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-3761-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Eppley(1972)</label><?label Eppley1972?><mixed-citation>
Eppley, R. W.: Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea, Fish. Bull, 70,
1063–1085, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Galbraith and de Lavergne(2018)</label><?label GalbraithLavergne2018?><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. and de Lavergne, C.: Response of a comprehensive climate model to
a broad range of external forcings: relevance for deep ocean ventilation and
the development of late Cenozoic ice ages, Clim. Dynam., 52, 653–679, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Galbraith and Jaccard(2015)</label><?label GalbraithJaccard2015?><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. D. and Jaccard, S. L.: Deglacial weakening of the oceanic soft
tissue pump: global constraints from sedimentary nitrogen isotopes and
oxygenation proxies, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 109, 38–48, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Galbraith and Martiny(2015)</label><?label GalbraithMartiny2015?><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. D. and Martiny, A. C.: A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism for
predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 8199–8204, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Ganopolski and Brovkin(2017)</label><?label GanopolskiBrovkin2017?><mixed-citation>Ganopolski, A. and Brovkin, V.: Simulation of climate, ice sheets and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> evolution during the last four glacial cycles with an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, Clim. Past, 13, 1695–1716, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Garcia et al.(2018a)Garcia, Baer, Garcia, Rauschenberg,
Twining, Lomas, and Martiny</label><?label GarciaEtAl2018?><mixed-citation>Garcia, C. A., Baer, S. E., Garcia, N. S., Rauschenberg, S., Twining, B. S.,
Lomas, M. W., and Martiny, A. C.: Nutrient supply controls particulate
elemental concentrations and ratios in the low latitude eastern Indian Ocean,
Nat. Commun., 9, 4868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06892-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-06892-w</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Garcia et al.(2018b)</label><?label WOA18Nutrients?><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Weathers, K., Paver, C. R., Smolyar, I., Boyer, T. P.,
Locarnini, R. A., Zweng, M. M., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O., Seidov, D.,
and Reagan, J. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2018, Volume 4: Dissolved Inorganic
Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), Tech. Rep. 84, NOAA Atlas NESDIS,
35 pp., 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Garcia et al.(2018c)</label><?label WOA18Oxygen?><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Weathers, K., Paver, C. R., Smolyar, I., Boyer, T. P.,
Locarnini, R. A., Zweng, M. M., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Seidov, D.,
and Reagan, J. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2018, Volume 3: Dissolved Oxygen,
Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation), Tech. Rep. 82, NOAA
Atlas NESDIS, 38 pp., 2018c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Gebbie et al.(2015)</label><?label GebbieEtAl2015?><mixed-citation>Gebbie, G., Peterson, C. D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Spero, H. J.: Global-mean
marine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its uncertainty in a glacial state estimate,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 125, 144–159, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Griffies(1998)</label><?label Griffies1998?><mixed-citation>
Griffies, S. M.: The Gent–McWilliams skew flux, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 28, 831–841, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Hain et al.(2010)</label><?label HainEtAl2010?><mixed-citation>Hain, M. P., Sigman, D. M., and Haug, G. H.: Carbon dioxide effects of
Antarctic stratification, North Atlantic Intermediate Water formation, and
subantarctic nutrient drawdown during the last ice age: Diagnosis and
synthesis in a geochemical box model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB4023, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003790" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GB003790</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Headly and Severinghaus(2007)</label><?label HeadlySeverin2007?><mixed-citation>Headly, M. A. and Severinghaus, J. P.: A method to measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios in air
bubbles trapped in ice cores and its application in reconstructing past mean
ocean temperature, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
D19105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD008317</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Herguera et al.(2010)</label><?label HergueraEtAl2010?><mixed-citation>
Herguera, J., Herbert, T., Kashgarian, M., and Charles, C.: Intermediate and
deep water mass distribution in the Pacific during the Last Glacial Maximum
inferred from oxygen and carbon stable isotopes, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
29, 1228–1245, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Hesse et al.(2011)</label><?label HesseEtAl2011?><mixed-citation>Hesse, T., Butzin, M., Bickert, T., and Lohmann, G.: A model-data comparison of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the glacial Atlantic Ocean, Paleoceanography, 26, PA3220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010PA002085</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heuz{\'{e}} et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Heuzé et al.(2013)</label><?label HeuzeEtAl2013?><mixed-citation>
Heuzé, C., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P., and Ridley, J. K.: Southern
Ocean bottom water characteristics in CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 1409–1414, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Hewitt et al.(2006)</label><?label HewittEtAl2006?><mixed-citation>
Hewitt, C. D., Broccoli, A., Crucifix, M., Gregory, J., Mitchell, J., and
Stouffer, R.: The effect of a large freshwater perturbation on the glacial
North Atlantic Ocean using a coupled general circulation model, J.
Clim., 19, 4436–4447, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Ito and Follows(2005)</label><?label ItoFollows2005?><mixed-citation>Ito, T. and Follows, M. J.: Preformed phosphate, soft tissue pump and
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Mar. Res., 63, 813–839, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Jaccard and Galbraith(2012)</label><?label JaccardGalbraith2012?><mixed-citation>
Jaccard, S. L. and Galbraith, E. D.: Large climate-driven changes of oceanic
oxygen concentrations during the last deglaciation, Nat. Geosci., 5,
151–159, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Kohfeld et al.(2013)</label><?label KohfeldEtAl2013?><mixed-citation>
Kohfeld, K., Graham, R., De Boer, A., Sime, L., Wolff, E., Le Quéré,
C., and Bopp, L.: Southern Hemisphere westerly wind changes during the Last
Glacial Maximum: paleo-data synthesis, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 68,
76–95, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2242?><ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Kohfeld and Ridgwell(2009)</label><?label KohfeldRidgwell2009?><mixed-citation>Kohfeld, K. E. and Ridgwell, A.: Glacial-Interglacial Variability in
Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in: Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere Processes, edited by:
Le Quéré, C. and S., S. E.,   American Geophysical Union,
Washington, DC, 251–286, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Kohfeld et al.(2005)</label><?label KohfeldEtAl2005?><mixed-citation>Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., Harrison, S. P., and Anderson, R. F.:
Role of marine biology in glacial-interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cycles, Science, 308,
74–78, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Kolowith et al.(2001)</label><?label KolowithEtAl2001?><mixed-citation>
Kolowith, L. C., Ingall, E. D., and Benner, R.: Composition and cycling of
marine organic phosphorus, Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 309–320, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Kumar et al.(1995)</label><?label KumarEtAl1995?><mixed-citation>
Kumar, N., Anderson, R., Mortlock, R., Froelich, P., Kubik, P.,
Dittrich-Hannen, B., and Suter, M.: Increased biological productivity and
export production in the glacial Southern Ocean, Nature, 378, 675–680, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Kwon et al.(2009)</label><?label KwonEtAl2009?><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento, J. L.: The impact of remineralization
depth on the air–sea carbon balance, Nat. Geosci., 2, 630–635, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Lauderdale et al.(2013)</label><?label LauderdaleEtAl2013?><mixed-citation>Lauderdale, J. M., Garabato, A. C. N., Oliver, K. I. C., Follows, M. J., and
Williams, R. G.: Wind-driven changes in Southern Ocean residual circulation,
ocean carbon reservoirs and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Clim. Dynam., 41,
2145–2164, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Laws et al.(2000)</label><?label LawsEtAl2000?><mixed-citation>
Laws, E. A., Falkowski, P. G., Smith Jr, W. O., Ducklow, H., and McCarthy,
J. J.: Temperature effects on export production in the open ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 1231–1246, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Le~Qu{\'{e}}r{\'{e}} et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Le Quéré et al.(2005)</label><?label LeQuereEtAl2005?><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E. T.,
Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud,
X., Klaas, C., Kohfeld, K. E., Legendre, L.,
Manizza, M., Platt, T., Rivkin, R. B., Sathyendranath,
S., Uitz, J., Watson, A. J., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global
ocean biogeochemistry models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2016–2040, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Letscher and Moore(2015)</label><?label LetscherMoore2015?><mixed-citation>
Letscher, R. T. and Moore, J. K.: Preferential remineralization of dissolved
organic phosphorus and non-Redfield DOM dynamics in the global ocean: Impacts
on marine productivity, nitrogen fixation, and carbon export, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 325–340, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Locarnini et al.(2018)</label><?label WOA18Temp?><mixed-citation>
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Boyer, T. P., Zweng, M. M.,
Garcia, H. E., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Weathers, K., Paver, C. R., and
Smolyar, I.: World Ocean Atlas 2018, Volume 1: Temperature, Tech. Rep. 81,
NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 52 pp., 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{L{\"{u}}thi et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Lüthi et al.(2008)</label><?label LuthiEtAl2008epica?><mixed-citation>Lüthi, D., Le Floch, M., Bereiter,
B., Blunier, T., Barnola, J.-M., Siegenthaler, U., Raynaud, D., Jouzel, J., Fischer,
H., Kawamura, K., and Stocker, T. F.: High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration
record 650,000–800,000 years before present, Nature, 453, 379–382,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06949</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Lynch-Stieglitz et al.(1999)</label><?label LynchEtAl1999?><mixed-citation>
Lynch-Stieglitz, J., Curry, W. B., Slowey, N., and Schmidt, G. A.: The
overturning circulation of the glacial Atlantic, in: Reconstructing Ocean
History,  Springer, 7–31, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Mahowald et al.(2006)</label><?label MahowaldEtAl2006?><mixed-citation>Mahowald, N. M., Muhs, D. R., Levis, S., Rasch, P. J., Yoshioka, M., Zender,
C. S., and Luo, C.: Change in atmospheric mineral aerosols in response to
climate: Last glacial period, preindustrial, modern, and doubled carbon
dioxide climates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111,
D10202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006653" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006653</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Marchal et al.(1998)</label><?label MarchalEtAl1998?><mixed-citation>
Marchal, O., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A latitude-depth,
circulation-biogeochemical ocean model for paleoclimate studies, Development
and sensitivities, Tellus B, 50, 290–316,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Marchitto and Broecker(2006)</label><?label MarchittoBroecker2006?><mixed-citation>Marchitto, T. M. and Broecker, W. S.: Deep water mass geometry in the glacial
Atlantic Ocean: A review of constraints from the paleonutrient proxy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q12003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001323" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GC001323</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Marchitto et al.(2007)</label><?label MarchittoEtAl2007?><mixed-citation>Marchitto, T. M., Lehman, S. J., Ortiz, J. D., Flückiger, J., and van Geen,
A.: Marine radiocarbon evidence for the mechanism of deglacial atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rise, Science, 316, 1456–1459, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Marinov et al.(2006)</label><?label MarinovEtAl2006?><mixed-citation>
Marinov, I., Gnanadesikan, A., Toggweiler, J., and Sarmiento, J.: The southern
ocean biogeochemical divide, Nature, 441, 964–967, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Marinov et al.(2008)</label><?label MarinovEtAl2008GBC?><mixed-citation>Marinov, I., Gnanadesikan, A., Sarmiento, J. L., Toggweiler, J. R., Follows,
M., and Mignone, B. K.: Impact of oceanic circulation on biological carbon
storage in the ocean and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22, GB3007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB002958</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Marsh et al.(2011)</label><?label MarshEtAl2011?><mixed-citation>Marsh, R., Müller, S. A., Yool, A., and Edwards, N. R.: Incorporation of the C-GOLDSTEIN efficient climate model into the GENIE framework: “eb_go_gs” configurations of GENIE, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 957–992, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-957-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-4-957-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Martin(1990)</label><?label Martin1990?><mixed-citation>Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change: The iron hypothesis,
Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Matsumoto(2007)</label><?label Matsumoto2007?><mixed-citation>Matsumoto, K.: Biology-mediated temperature control on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and ocean biogeochemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L20605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031301</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2002)</label><?label MatsumotoEtAl2002?><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K., Oba, T., Lynch-Stieglitz, J., and Yamamoto, H.: Interior
hydrography and circulation of the glacial Pacific Ocean, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 21, 1693–1704, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Mayr et al.(2013)</label><?label MayrEtAl2013?><mixed-citation>Mayr, C., Lücke, A., Wagner, S., Wissel, H., Ohlendorf, C., Haberzettl, T.,
Oehlerich, M., Schäbitz, F., Wille, M., Zhu, J., and Zolitschka, B.: Intensified
Southern Hemisphere Westerlies regulated atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the last
deglaciation, Geology, 41, 831–834, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>McCarthy et al.(2015)</label><?label McCarthyEtAl2015?><mixed-citation>
McCarthy, G., Smeed, D., Johns, W. E., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B., Rayner,
D., Baringer, M., Meinen, C., Collins, J., and Bryden, H.: Measuring the
Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26 N, Prog.
Oceanogr., 130, 91–111, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>McInerney and Wing(2011)</label><?label McInerneyWing2011?><mixed-citation>
McInerney, F. A. and Wing, S. L.: The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: A
perturbation of carbon cycle, climate, and biosphere with implications for
the future, Ann. Rev. Earth  Planet. Sc., 39, 489–516,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Menviel et al.(2012)Menviel, Joos, and Ritz</label><?label MenvielEtAl2012?><mixed-citation>Menviel, L., Joos, F., and Ritz, S.: Simulating atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the marine carbon cycle during the Last Glacial–Interglacial cycle:
possible role for a deepening of the mean remineralization depth and an
increase in the oceanic nutrient inventory, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 56,
46–68, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Menviel et al.(2017)</label><?label MenvielEtAl2017?><mixed-citation>
Menviel, L., Yu, J., Joos, F., Mouchet, A., Meissner, K., and England, M.:
Poorly ventilated deep ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum inferred from carbon
isotopes: A data-model comparison study, Paleoceanogr.
Paleocl., 32, 2–17, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Mook(1986)</label><?label Mook1986?><mixed-citation>Mook, W.: 13C in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Neth. J. Sea Res., 20,
211–223, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Moore et al.(2013)</label><?label MooreEtAl2013?><mixed-citation>
Moore, C., Mills, M., Arrigo, K., Berman-Frank, I., Bopp, L., Boyd, P.,
Galbraith, E., Geider, R., Guieu, C., Jaccard, S. L., Jickells, T. D.,
La Roche, J., Lenton, T. M., Mahowald, N. M., Maranon, E., Marinov, I., Moore, J.
K., Nakatsuka, T., Oschlies, A., Saito, M. A., Thingstad, T. F., Tsuda, A., and Ulloa,
O.: Processes and
patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation, Nat. Geosci., 6, 701–710,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Moreno et<?pagebreak page2243?> al.(2018)</label><?label MorenoEtAl2018?><mixed-citation>Moreno, A. R., Hagstrom, G. I., Primeau, F. W., Levin, S. A., and Martiny, A. C.: Marine phytoplankton stoichiometry mediates nonlinear interactions between nutrient supply, temperature, and atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Biogeosciences, 15, 2761–2779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2761-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-2761-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Muglia et al.(2018)</label><?label MugliaEtAl2018?><mixed-citation>
Muglia, J., Skinner, L. C., and Schmittner, A.: Weak overturning circulation
and high Southern Ocean nutrient utilization maximized glacial ocean carbon,
Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett., 496, 47–56, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{\"{O}dalen et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Ödalen et al.(2018)</label><?label OdalenEtAl2018?><mixed-citation>Ödalen, M., Nycander, J., Oliver, K. I. C., Brodeau, L., and Ridgwell, A.:
The influence of the ocean circulation state on ocean carbon storage and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drawdown potential in an Earth system model, Biogeosciences, 15,
1367–1393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1367-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-15-1367-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Paulmier et al.(2009)</label><?label PaulmierEtAl2009?><mixed-citation>Paulmier, A., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.: Stoichiometries of remineralisation and denitrification in global biogeochemical ocean models, Biogeosciences, 6, 923–935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-6-923-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Peterson and Lisiecki(2018)</label><?label PetersonLisecki2018?><mixed-citation>Peterson, C. D. and Lisiecki, L. E.: Deglacial carbon cycle changes observed in a compilation of 127 benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series (20–6 ka), Clim. Past, 14, 1229–1252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1229-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-14-1229-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Peterson et al.(2014)</label><?label PetersonEtAl2014?><mixed-citation>Peterson, C. D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Stern, J. V.: Deglacial whole-ocean
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change estimated from 480 benthic foraminiferal records,
Paleoceanography, 29, 549–563, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Petit et al.(1999)</label><?label PetitEtAl1999Vostok?><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile,
I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M., Kotlyakov, V. M.,
Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C., Pépin, L., Ritz, C., Saltzman, E.,
and Stievenard, M.: Climate and
atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core,
Antarctica, Nature, 399, 429–436, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Rau et al.(1996)</label><?label RauEtAl1996?><mixed-citation>Rau, G. H., Riebesell, U., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: A model of photosynthetic 13C
fractionation by marine phytoplankton based on diffusive molecular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
uptake, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 133, 275–285, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Rau et al.(1997)</label><?label RauEtAl1997?><mixed-citation>Rau, G. H., Riebesell, U., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent photosynthetic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fractionation in the ocean: A model versus measurements, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 267–278, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Redfield(1963)</label><?label Redfield1963?><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The influence of organisms on the composition of sea–water,
The Sea, 2, 26–77, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Ridgwell et al.(2007)</label><?label RidgwellEtAl2007?><mixed-citation>Ridgwell, A., Hargreaves, J. C., Edwards, N. R., Annan, J. D., Lenton, T. M., Marsh, R., Yool, A., and Watson, A.: Marine geochemical data assimilation in an efficient Earth System Model of global biogeochemical cycling, Biogeosciences, 4, 87–104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-87-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-4-87-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Ridgwell(2001)</label><?label Ridgwell2001?><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A. J.: Glacial-interglacial perturbations in the global carbon
cycle, Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia, 146 pp., 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Sarmiento and Toggweiler(1984)</label><?label SarmientoToggweiler1984?><mixed-citation>Sarmiento, J. and Toggweiler, J.: A new model for the role of the oceans in
determining atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 308, 621–624, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Schmittner et al.(2002)</label><?label SchmittnerEtAl2002?><mixed-citation>Schmittner, A., Meissner, K., Eby, M., and Weaver, A.: Forcing of the deep
ocean circulation in simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum,
Paleoceanography, 17, 1015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001PA000633" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001PA000633</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Shackleton(1977)</label><?label Shackleton1977?><mixed-citation>Shackleton, N.: Carbon-13 in Uvigerina: Tropical rain forest history and the
equatorial Pacific carbonate dissolution cycle, in: The fate of fossil fuel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the oceans, Plenum Press,
401–428, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Sigman and Boyle(2000)</label><?label SigmanBoyle2000?><mixed-citation>
Sigman, D. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Glacial/interglacial variations in atmospheric
carbon dioxide, Nature, 407, 859–869, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Sigman et al.(2010)</label><?label SigmanEtAl2010?><mixed-citation>Sigman, D. M., Hain, M. P., and Haug, G. H.: The polar ocean and glacial cycles
in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration, Nature, 466, 47–55, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Sime et al.(2013)</label><?label SimeEtAl2013?><mixed-citation>
Sime, L. C., Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., Wolff, E. W., de Boer,
A. M., Graham, R. M., and Bopp, L.: Southern Hemisphere westerly wind changes
during the Last Glacial Maximum: model-data comparison, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 64, 104–120, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Sime et al.(2016)</label><?label SimeEtAl2016?><mixed-citation>Sime, L. C., Hodgson, D., Bracegirdle, T. J., Allen, C., Perren, B., Roberts, S., and de Boer, A. M.: Sea ice led to poleward-shifted winds at the Last Glacial Maximum: the influence of state dependency on CMIP5 and PMIP3 models, Clim. Past, 12, 2241–2253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Skinner et al.(2010)</label><?label SkinnerEtAl2010?><mixed-citation>Skinner, L., Fallon, S., Waelbroeck, C., Michel, E., and Barker, S.:
Ventilation of the deep Southern Ocean and deglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rise, Science,
328, 1147–1151, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Skinner et al.(2017)</label><?label SkinnerEtAl2017?><mixed-citation>Skinner, L., Primeau, F., Freeman, E., de la Fuente, M., Goodwin, P.,
Gottschalk, J., Huang, E., McCave, I., Noble, T., and Scrivner, A.:
Radiocarbon constraints on the glacial ocean circulation and its impact on
atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nat. Commun., 8, 16010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms16010</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Stephens and Keeling(2000)</label><?label StephensKeeling2000?><mixed-citation>Stephens, B. B. and Keeling, R. F.: The influence of Antarctic sea ice on
glacial–interglacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variations, Nature, 404, 171–174, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Stocker(2014)</label><?label IPCC2013?><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T.: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I
contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2016)</label><?label TagliabueEtAl2016?><mixed-citation>
Tagliabue, A., Aumont, O., DeAth, R., Dunne, J. P., Dutkiewicz, S., Galbraith,
E., Misumi, K., Moore, J. K., Ridgwell, A., Sherman, E., Stock, C., Vichi, M., Völker, C., and
Yool, A.: How well do
global ocean biogeochemistry models simulate dissolved iron distributions?,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 149–174, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Takahashi et al.(1985)</label><?label Takahashi1985Redfield?><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., and Langer, S.: Redfield ratio based on
chemical data from isopycnal surfaces, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 90, 6907–6924, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Tanioka and Matsumoto(2017)</label><?label TaniokaMatsumoto2017?><mixed-citation>
Tanioka, T. and Matsumoto, K.: Buffering of ocean export production by flexible
elemental stoichiometry of particulate organic matter, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 31, 1528–1542, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Turner and Ridgwell(2016)</label><?label TurnerRidgwell2016?><mixed-citation>
Turner, S. K. and Ridgwell, A.: Development of a novel empirical framework for
interpreting geological carbon isotope excursions, with implications for the
rate of carbon injection across the PETM, Earth  Planet. Sc.
Lett., 435, 1–13, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Walin et al.(2014)</label><?label WalinEtAl2014?><mixed-citation>
Walin, G., Hieronymus, J., and Nycander, J.: Source-related variables for the
description of the oceanic carbon system, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 15, 3675–3687, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Wanninkhof(1992)</label><?label Wanninkhof1992?><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between gas exchange and wind speed over the
ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7373–7382, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Watson et al.(2000)</label><?label WatsonEtAl2000?><mixed-citation>Watson, A. J., Bakker, D., Ridgwell, A., Boyd, P., and Law, C.: Effect of iron
supply on Southern Ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake and implications for glacial atmospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nature, 407, 730–733, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Yvon-Durocher et al.(2015)</label><?label YvonDurocherEtAl2015?><mixed-citation>
Yvon-Durocher, G., Dossena, M., Trimmer, M., Woodward, G., and Allen, A. P.:
Temperature and the biogeography of algal stoichiometry, Glob. Ecol.
Biogeogr., 24, 562–570, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Zeebe and Wolf-Gladrow(2001)</label><?label ZeebeWolfGladrow2001?><mixed-citation>Zeebe, R. E. and Wolf-Gladrow, D. A.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in seawater: equilibrium,
kinetics, isotopes, 65, Gulf Professional Publishing, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2244?><ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Zhang et al.(1995)</label><?label ZhangEtAl1995?><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Quay, P., and Wilbur, D.: Carbon isotope fractionation during
gas-water exchange and dissolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
59, 107–114, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Variable C∕P composition of organic production and its effect on ocean carbon storage in glacial-like model simulations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>During the four most recent glacial maxima, atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> has been lowered by about 90–100&thinsp;ppm with respect to interglacial concentrations. It is likely that most of the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> deficit was stored in the ocean. Changes in the biological pump, which are related to the efficiency of the biological carbon uptake in the surface ocean and/or of the export of organic carbon to the deep ocean, have been proposed as a key mechanism for the increased glacial oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> storage. The biological pump is strongly constrained by the amount of available surface nutrients. In models, it is generally assumed that the ratio between elemental nutrients, such as phosphorus, and carbon (C∕P ratio) in organic material is fixed according to the classical Redfield ratio. The constant Redfield ratio appears to approximately hold when averaged over basin scales, but observations document highly variable C∕P ratios on regional scales and between species. If the C∕P ratio increases when phosphate availability is scarce, as observations suggest, this has the potential to further increase glacial oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> storage in response to changes in surface nutrient distributions. In the present study, we perform a sensitivity study to test how a phosphate-concentration-dependent C∕P ratio influences the oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> storage in an Earth system model of intermediate complexity (cGENIE). We carry out simulations of glacial-like changes in albedo, radiative forcing, wind-forced circulation, remineralization depth of organic matter, and mineral dust deposition. Specifically, we compare model versions with the classical constant Redfield ratio and an observationally motivated variable C∕P ratio, in which the carbon uptake increases with decreasing phosphate concentration. While a flexible C∕P ratio does not impact the model's ability to simulate benthic <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C patterns seen in observational data, our results indicate that, in production of organic matter, flexible C∕P can further increase the oceanic storage of CO<sub>2</sub> in glacial model simulations. Past and future changes in the C∕P ratio thus have implications for correctly projecting changes in oceanic carbon storage in glacial-to-interglacial transitions as well as in the present context of increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adams and Faure(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Adams, J. M. and Faure, H.: A new estimate of changing carbon storage on land
since the last glacial maximum, based on global land ecosystem
reconstruction, Glob. Planet. Change, 16, 3–24, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Adkins(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Adkins, J. F.: The role of deep ocean circulation in setting glacial climates,
Paleoceanography, 28, 539–561, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Anderson and Sarmiento(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, L. A. and Sarmiento, J. L.: Redfield ratios of remineralization
determined by nutrient data analysis, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8,
65–80, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Archer and Maier-Reimer(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D. and Maier-Reimer, E.: Effect of deep-sea sedimentary calcite
preservation on atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, Nature, 367, 260–263, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Archer et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, D., Winguth, A., Lea, D., and Mahowald, N.: What caused the
glacial/interglacial atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> cycles?, Rev. Geophys.,
38, 159–189, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bereiter et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Bereiter, B., Shackleton, S., Baggenstos, D., Kawamura, K., and Severinghaus,
J.: Mean global ocean temperatures during the last glacial transition,
Nature, 553, 39–44, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Berger(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Berger, W.: Deglacial CO<sub>2</sub> buildup: constraints on the coral-reef model,
Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 40, 235–253, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bouttes et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Bouttes, N., Paillard, D., and Roche, D. M.: Impact of brine-induced stratification on the glacial carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 6, 575–589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-575-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-575-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bouttes et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Bouttes, N., Paillard, D., Roche, D. M., Brovkin, V., and Bopp, L.: Last
Glacial Maximum CO<sub>2</sub> and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C successfully reconciled, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 38, L02705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044499</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bouttes et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Bouttes, N., Roche, D. M., and Paillard, D.: Systematic study of the impact of
fresh water fluxes on the glacial carbon cycle, Clim. Past, 8,
589–607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-589-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-8-589-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Boyle and Keigwin(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyle, E. A. and Keigwin, L.: North Atlantic thermohaline circulation during
the past 20,000 years linked to high-latitude surface temperature, Nature,
330, 35–40, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Bradtmiller et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Bradtmiller, L., Anderson, R., Sachs, J., and Fleisher, M.: A deeper respired
carbon pool in the glacial equatorial Pacific Ocean, Earth  Planet.
Sc. Lett., 299, 417–425, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Broecker(1982a)</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S.: Glacial to interglacial changes in ocean chemistry, Prog. Oceanogr., 11, 151–197,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(82)90007-6</a>,
1982a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Broecker(1982b)</label><mixed-citation>
Broecker, W. S.: Ocean chemistry during glacial time, Geochim.
Cosmochim. Ac., 46, 1689–1705, 1982b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Brovkin et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Brovkin, V., Ganopolski, A., Archer, D., and Rahmstorf, S.: Lowering of glacial
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in response to changes in oceanic circulation and marine
biogeochemistry, Paleoceanography, 22, PA4202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001380</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Buchanan et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Buchanan, P., Matear, R., Chase, Z., Phipps, S., and Bindoff, N.: Dynamic
biological functioning important for simulating and stabilizing ocean
biogeochemistry, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 32, 565–593, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>cGENIE GitHub repository(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
cGENIE GitHub repository:   available at: <a href="https://github.com/derpycode" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 April 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>cGENIE release 1.9.1b(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
cGENIE release 1.9.1b: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1407658" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1407658</a>, available at:
<a href="https://github.com/derpycode/muffindoc/releases/tag/1.9.1b" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 April 2020),
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>cGENIE release v0.9.5(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
cGENIE release v0.9.5: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3235761" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3235761</a>, available at:
<a href="https://github.com/derpycode/cgenie.muffin/releases/tag/v0.9.5" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 April 2020),
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Chikamoto et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Chikamoto, M., Abe-Ouchi, A., Oka, A., and Smith, S. L.: Temperature-induced
marine export production during glacial period, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
39, L21601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053828</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Ciais et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Tagliabue, A., Cuntz, M., Bopp, L., Scholze, M., Hoffmann, G.,
Lourantou, A., Harrison, S. P., Prentice, I. C., Kelley, D., Koven, C., and
Piao, S. L.: Large inert
carbon pool in the terrestrial biosphere during the Last Glacial Maximum,
Nat. Geosci., 5, 74–79, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Ciais et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Ciais, P., Sabine, C., Bala, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Canadell, J., Chhabra,
A., DeFries, R., Galloway, J., Heimann, M., Jones, C., Le Quéré,
C., Myeni, R. B., Piao, S., and Thornton, P.: Carbon and other biogeochemical
cycles, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K.,
Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and
Midgley, P. M., chap. 6,   Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 465–570, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Crowley(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Crowley, T. J.: Ice age terrestrial carbon changes revisited, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 9, 377–389, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Curry and Oppo(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Curry, W. B. and Oppo, D. W.: Glacial water mass geometry and the distribution
of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of ΣCO<sub>2</sub> in the western Atlantic Ocean,
Paleoceanography, 20, PA1017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001021</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Curry et al.(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Curry, W. B., Duplessy, J.-C., Labeyrie, L., and Shackleton, N. J.: Changes in
the distribution of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of deep water ΣCO<sub>2</sub> between the last
glaciation and the Holocene, Paleoceanogr. Paleocl., 3,
317–341, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Davies-Barnard et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Davies-Barnard, T., Ridgwell, A., Singarayer, J., and Valdes, P.: Quantifying
the influence of the terrestrial biosphere on glacial–interglacial climate
dynamics, Clim. Past, 13, 1381–1401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1381-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1381-2017</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Duplessy et al.(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Duplessy, J., Shackleton, N., Fairbanks, R., Labeyrie, L., Oppo, D., and
Kallel, N.: Deepwater source variations during the last climatic cycle and
their impact on the global deepwater circulation, Paleoceanography, 3,
343–360, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Eggleston and Galbraith(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Eggleston, S. and Galbraith, E. D.: The devil's in the disequilibrium: multi-component analysis of dissolved carbon and oxygen changes under a broad range of forcings in a general circulation model, Biogeosciences, 15, 3761–3777, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3761-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3761-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Eppley(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Eppley, R. W.: Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea, Fish. Bull, 70,
1063–1085, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Galbraith and de Lavergne(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. and de Lavergne, C.: Response of a comprehensive climate model to
a broad range of external forcings: relevance for deep ocean ventilation and
the development of late Cenozoic ice ages, Clim. Dynam., 52, 653–679, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Galbraith and Jaccard(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. D. and Jaccard, S. L.: Deglacial weakening of the oceanic soft
tissue pump: global constraints from sedimentary nitrogen isotopes and
oxygenation proxies, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 109, 38–48, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Galbraith and Martiny(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Galbraith, E. D. and Martiny, A. C.: A simple nutrient-dependence mechanism for
predicting the stoichiometry of marine ecosystems, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 8199–8204, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Ganopolski and Brovkin(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Ganopolski, A. and Brovkin, V.: Simulation of climate, ice sheets and CO<sub>2</sub> evolution during the last four glacial cycles with an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, Clim. Past, 13, 1695–1716, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1695-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Garcia et al.(2018a)Garcia, Baer, Garcia, Rauschenberg,
Twining, Lomas, and Martiny</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, C. A., Baer, S. E., Garcia, N. S., Rauschenberg, S., Twining, B. S.,
Lomas, M. W., and Martiny, A. C.: Nutrient supply controls particulate
elemental concentrations and ratios in the low latitude eastern Indian Ocean,
Nat. Commun., 9, 4868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06892-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06892-w</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Garcia et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Weathers, K., Paver, C. R., Smolyar, I., Boyer, T. P.,
Locarnini, R. A., Zweng, M. M., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O., Seidov, D.,
and Reagan, J. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2018, Volume 4: Dissolved Inorganic
Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), Tech. Rep. 84, NOAA Atlas NESDIS,
35 pp., 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Garcia et al.(2018c)</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, H. E., Weathers, K., Paver, C. R., Smolyar, I., Boyer, T. P.,
Locarnini, R. A., Zweng, M. M., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Seidov, D.,
and Reagan, J. R.: World Ocean Atlas 2018, Volume 3: Dissolved Oxygen,
Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation), Tech. Rep. 82, NOAA
Atlas NESDIS, 38 pp., 2018c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Gebbie et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Gebbie, G., Peterson, C. D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Spero, H. J.: Global-mean
marine <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and its uncertainty in a glacial state estimate,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 125, 144–159, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Griffies(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Griffies, S. M.: The Gent–McWilliams skew flux, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 28, 831–841, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Hain et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Hain, M. P., Sigman, D. M., and Haug, G. H.: Carbon dioxide effects of
Antarctic stratification, North Atlantic Intermediate Water formation, and
subantarctic nutrient drawdown during the last ice age: Diagnosis and
synthesis in a geochemical box model, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, GB4023, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003790" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003790</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Headly and Severinghaus(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Headly, M. A. and Severinghaus, J. P.: A method to measure Kr∕N<sub>2</sub> ratios in air
bubbles trapped in ice cores and its application in reconstructing past mean
ocean temperature, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112,
D19105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008317</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Herguera et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Herguera, J., Herbert, T., Kashgarian, M., and Charles, C.: Intermediate and
deep water mass distribution in the Pacific during the Last Glacial Maximum
inferred from oxygen and carbon stable isotopes, Quaternary Sci. Rev.,
29, 1228–1245, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Hesse et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Hesse, T., Butzin, M., Bickert, T., and Lohmann, G.: A model-data comparison of
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C in the glacial Atlantic Ocean, Paleoceanography, 26, PA3220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010PA002085</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Heuzé et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Heuzé, C., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P., and Ridley, J. K.: Southern
Ocean bottom water characteristics in CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 1409–1414, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Hewitt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hewitt, C. D., Broccoli, A., Crucifix, M., Gregory, J., Mitchell, J., and
Stouffer, R.: The effect of a large freshwater perturbation on the glacial
North Atlantic Ocean using a coupled general circulation model, J.
Clim., 19, 4436–4447, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Ito and Follows(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T. and Follows, M. J.: Preformed phosphate, soft tissue pump and
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, J. Mar. Res., 63, 813–839, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Jaccard and Galbraith(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Jaccard, S. L. and Galbraith, E. D.: Large climate-driven changes of oceanic
oxygen concentrations during the last deglaciation, Nat. Geosci., 5,
151–159, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Kohfeld et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kohfeld, K., Graham, R., De Boer, A., Sime, L., Wolff, E., Le Quéré,
C., and Bopp, L.: Southern Hemisphere westerly wind changes during the Last
Glacial Maximum: paleo-data synthesis, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 68,
76–95, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Kohfeld and Ridgwell(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kohfeld, K. E. and Ridgwell, A.: Glacial-Interglacial Variability in
Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, in: Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere Processes, edited by:
Le Quéré, C. and S., S. E.,   American Geophysical Union,
Washington, DC, 251–286, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Kohfeld et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., Harrison, S. P., and Anderson, R. F.:
Role of marine biology in glacial-interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> cycles, Science, 308,
74–78, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Kolowith et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Kolowith, L. C., Ingall, E. D., and Benner, R.: Composition and cycling of
marine organic phosphorus, Limnol. Oceanogr., 46, 309–320, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Kumar et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, N., Anderson, R., Mortlock, R., Froelich, P., Kubik, P.,
Dittrich-Hannen, B., and Suter, M.: Increased biological productivity and
export production in the glacial Southern Ocean, Nature, 378, 675–680, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Kwon et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kwon, E. Y., Primeau, F., and Sarmiento, J. L.: The impact of remineralization
depth on the air–sea carbon balance, Nat. Geosci., 2, 630–635, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Lauderdale et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Lauderdale, J. M., Garabato, A. C. N., Oliver, K. I. C., Follows, M. J., and
Williams, R. G.: Wind-driven changes in Southern Ocean residual circulation,
ocean carbon reservoirs and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Clim. Dynam., 41,
2145–2164, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Laws et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Laws, E. A., Falkowski, P. G., Smith Jr, W. O., Ducklow, H., and McCarthy,
J. J.: Temperature effects on export production in the open ocean, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 1231–1246, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Le Quéré et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Le Quéré, C., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E. T.,
Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud,
X., Klaas, C., Kohfeld, K. E., Legendre, L.,
Manizza, M., Platt, T., Rivkin, R. B., Sathyendranath,
S., Uitz, J., Watson, A. J., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global
ocean biogeochemistry models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2016–2040, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Letscher and Moore(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Letscher, R. T. and Moore, J. K.: Preferential remineralization of dissolved
organic phosphorus and non-Redfield DOM dynamics in the global ocean: Impacts
on marine productivity, nitrogen fixation, and carbon export, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 325–340, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Locarnini et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Baranova, O. K., Boyer, T. P., Zweng, M. M.,
Garcia, H. E., Reagan, J. R., Seidov, D., Weathers, K., Paver, C. R., and
Smolyar, I.: World Ocean Atlas 2018, Volume 1: Temperature, Tech. Rep. 81,
NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 52 pp., 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Lüthi et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Lüthi, D., Le Floch, M., Bereiter,
B., Blunier, T., Barnola, J.-M., Siegenthaler, U., Raynaud, D., Jouzel, J., Fischer,
H., Kawamura, K., and Stocker, T. F.: High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration
record 650,000–800,000 years before present, Nature, 453, 379–382,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06949</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Lynch-Stieglitz et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Lynch-Stieglitz, J., Curry, W. B., Slowey, N., and Schmidt, G. A.: The
overturning circulation of the glacial Atlantic, in: Reconstructing Ocean
History,  Springer, 7–31, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Mahowald et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Mahowald, N. M., Muhs, D. R., Levis, S., Rasch, P. J., Yoshioka, M., Zender,
C. S., and Luo, C.: Change in atmospheric mineral aerosols in response to
climate: Last glacial period, preindustrial, modern, and doubled carbon
dioxide climates, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111,
D10202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006653" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006653</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Marchal et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchal, O., Stocker, T. F., and Joos, F.: A latitude-depth,
circulation-biogeochemical ocean model for paleoclimate studies, Development
and sensitivities, Tellus B, 50, 290–316,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Marchitto and Broecker(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchitto, T. M. and Broecker, W. S.: Deep water mass geometry in the glacial
Atlantic Ocean: A review of constraints from the paleonutrient proxy C<sub>d</sub>∕C<sub>a</sub>,
Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, Q12003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001323" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001323</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Marchitto et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchitto, T. M., Lehman, S. J., Ortiz, J. D., Flückiger, J., and van Geen,
A.: Marine radiocarbon evidence for the mechanism of deglacial atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub> rise, Science, 316, 1456–1459, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Marinov et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Marinov, I., Gnanadesikan, A., Toggweiler, J., and Sarmiento, J.: The southern
ocean biogeochemical divide, Nature, 441, 964–967, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Marinov et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Marinov, I., Gnanadesikan, A., Sarmiento, J. L., Toggweiler, J. R., Follows,
M., and Mignone, B. K.: Impact of oceanic circulation on biological carbon
storage in the ocean and atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
22, GB3007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002958</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Marsh et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Marsh, R., Müller, S. A., Yool, A., and Edwards, N. R.: Incorporation of the C-GOLDSTEIN efficient climate model into the GENIE framework: “eb_go_gs” configurations of GENIE, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 957–992, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-957-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-957-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Martin(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Martin, J. H.: Glacial-interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> change: The iron hypothesis,
Paleoceanography, 5, 1–13, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Matsumoto(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K.: Biology-mediated temperature control on atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>
and ocean biogeochemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L20605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031301</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Matsumoto et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Matsumoto, K., Oba, T., Lynch-Stieglitz, J., and Yamamoto, H.: Interior
hydrography and circulation of the glacial Pacific Ocean, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 21, 1693–1704, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Mayr et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Mayr, C., Lücke, A., Wagner, S., Wissel, H., Ohlendorf, C., Haberzettl, T.,
Oehlerich, M., Schäbitz, F., Wille, M., Zhu, J., and Zolitschka, B.: Intensified
Southern Hemisphere Westerlies regulated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the last
deglaciation, Geology, 41, 831–834, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>McCarthy et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
McCarthy, G., Smeed, D., Johns, W. E., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B., Rayner,
D., Baringer, M., Meinen, C., Collins, J., and Bryden, H.: Measuring the
Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26 N, Prog.
Oceanogr., 130, 91–111, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>McInerney and Wing(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
McInerney, F. A. and Wing, S. L.: The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: A
perturbation of carbon cycle, climate, and biosphere with implications for
the future, Ann. Rev. Earth  Planet. Sc., 39, 489–516,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Menviel et al.(2012)Menviel, Joos, and Ritz</label><mixed-citation>
Menviel, L., Joos, F., and Ritz, S.: Simulating atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, <sup>13</sup><i>C</i>
and the marine carbon cycle during the Last Glacial–Interglacial cycle:
possible role for a deepening of the mean remineralization depth and an
increase in the oceanic nutrient inventory, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 56,
46–68, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Menviel et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Menviel, L., Yu, J., Joos, F., Mouchet, A., Meissner, K., and England, M.:
Poorly ventilated deep ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum inferred from carbon
isotopes: A data-model comparison study, Paleoceanogr.
Paleocl., 32, 2–17, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Mook(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Mook, W.: 13C in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Neth. J. Sea Res., 20,
211–223, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Moore et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, C., Mills, M., Arrigo, K., Berman-Frank, I., Bopp, L., Boyd, P.,
Galbraith, E., Geider, R., Guieu, C., Jaccard, S. L., Jickells, T. D.,
La Roche, J., Lenton, T. M., Mahowald, N. M., Maranon, E., Marinov, I., Moore, J.
K., Nakatsuka, T., Oschlies, A., Saito, M. A., Thingstad, T. F., Tsuda, A., and Ulloa,
O.: Processes and
patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation, Nat. Geosci., 6, 701–710,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Moreno et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Moreno, A. R., Hagstrom, G. I., Primeau, F. W., Levin, S. A., and Martiny, A. C.: Marine phytoplankton stoichiometry mediates nonlinear interactions between nutrient supply, temperature, and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Biogeosciences, 15, 2761–2779, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2761-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2761-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Muglia et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Muglia, J., Skinner, L. C., and Schmittner, A.: Weak overturning circulation
and high Southern Ocean nutrient utilization maximized glacial ocean carbon,
Earth   Planet. Sc. Lett., 496, 47–56, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Ödalen et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Ödalen, M., Nycander, J., Oliver, K. I. C., Brodeau, L., and Ridgwell, A.:
The influence of the ocean circulation state on ocean carbon storage and
CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown potential in an Earth system model, Biogeosciences, 15,
1367–1393, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1367-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-1367-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Paulmier et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Paulmier, A., Kriest, I., and Oschlies, A.: Stoichiometries of remineralisation and denitrification in global biogeochemical ocean models, Biogeosciences, 6, 923–935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-923-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Peterson and Lisiecki(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, C. D. and Lisiecki, L. E.: Deglacial carbon cycle changes observed in a compilation of 127 benthic <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C time series (20–6&thinsp;ka), Clim. Past, 14, 1229–1252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1229-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1229-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Peterson et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, C. D., Lisiecki, L. E., and Stern, J. V.: Deglacial whole-ocean
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C change estimated from 480 benthic foraminiferal records,
Paleoceanography, 29, 549–563, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Petit et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Petit, J.-R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N. I., Barnola, J.-M., Basile,
I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M., Kotlyakov, V. M.,
Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V. Y., Lorius, C., Pépin, L., Ritz, C., Saltzman, E.,
and Stievenard, M.: Climate and
atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core,
Antarctica, Nature, 399, 429–436, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Rau et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Rau, G. H., Riebesell, U., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: A model of photosynthetic 13C
fractionation by marine phytoplankton based on diffusive molecular CO<sub>2</sub>
uptake, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 133, 275–285, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Rau et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Rau, G. H., Riebesell, U., and Wolf-Gladrow, D.: CO<sub>2</sub>aq-dependent photosynthetic
<sup>13</sup>C fractionation in the ocean: A model versus measurements, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 267–278, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Redfield(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
Redfield, A. C.: The influence of organisms on the composition of sea–water,
The Sea, 2, 26–77, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Ridgwell et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A., Hargreaves, J. C., Edwards, N. R., Annan, J. D., Lenton, T. M., Marsh, R., Yool, A., and Watson, A.: Marine geochemical data assimilation in an efficient Earth System Model of global biogeochemical cycling, Biogeosciences, 4, 87–104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-87-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-87-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Ridgwell(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Ridgwell, A. J.: Glacial-interglacial perturbations in the global carbon
cycle, Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia, 146 pp., 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Sarmiento and Toggweiler(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarmiento, J. and Toggweiler, J.: A new model for the role of the oceans in
determining atmospheric <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 308, 621–624, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Schmittner et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmittner, A., Meissner, K., Eby, M., and Weaver, A.: Forcing of the deep
ocean circulation in simulations of the Last Glacial Maximum,
Paleoceanography, 17, 1015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001PA000633" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001PA000633</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Shackleton(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Shackleton, N.: Carbon-13 in Uvigerina: Tropical rain forest history and the
equatorial Pacific carbonate dissolution cycle, in: The fate of fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub>
in the oceans, Plenum Press,
401–428, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Sigman and Boyle(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Sigman, D. M. and Boyle, E. A.: Glacial/interglacial variations in atmospheric
carbon dioxide, Nature, 407, 859–869, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Sigman et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Sigman, D. M., Hain, M. P., and Haug, G. H.: The polar ocean and glacial cycles
in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, Nature, 466, 47–55, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Sime et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Sime, L. C., Kohfeld, K. E., Le Quéré, C., Wolff, E. W., de Boer,
A. M., Graham, R. M., and Bopp, L.: Southern Hemisphere westerly wind changes
during the Last Glacial Maximum: model-data comparison, Quaternary Sci.
Rev., 64, 104–120, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Sime et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Sime, L. C., Hodgson, D., Bracegirdle, T. J., Allen, C., Perren, B., Roberts, S., and de Boer, A. M.: Sea ice led to poleward-shifted winds at the Last Glacial Maximum: the influence of state dependency on CMIP5 and PMIP3 models, Clim. Past, 12, 2241–2253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2241-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Skinner et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Skinner, L., Fallon, S., Waelbroeck, C., Michel, E., and Barker, S.:
Ventilation of the deep Southern Ocean and deglacial CO<sub>2</sub> rise, Science,
328, 1147–1151, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Skinner et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Skinner, L., Primeau, F., Freeman, E., de la Fuente, M., Goodwin, P.,
Gottschalk, J., Huang, E., McCave, I., Noble, T., and Scrivner, A.:
Radiocarbon constraints on the glacial ocean circulation and its impact on
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Nat. Commun., 8, 16010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16010</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Stephens and Keeling(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, B. B. and Keeling, R. F.: The influence of Antarctic sea ice on
glacial–interglacial CO<sub>2</sub> variations, Nature, 404, 171–174, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Stocker(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Stocker, T.: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: Working Group I
contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Tagliabue et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Tagliabue, A., Aumont, O., DeAth, R., Dunne, J. P., Dutkiewicz, S., Galbraith,
E., Misumi, K., Moore, J. K., Ridgwell, A., Sherman, E., Stock, C., Vichi, M., Völker, C., and
Yool, A.: How well do
global ocean biogeochemistry models simulate dissolved iron distributions?,
Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 149–174, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Takahashi et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, T., Broecker, W. S., and Langer, S.: Redfield ratio based on
chemical data from isopycnal surfaces, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 90, 6907–6924, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Tanioka and Matsumoto(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Tanioka, T. and Matsumoto, K.: Buffering of ocean export production by flexible
elemental stoichiometry of particulate organic matter, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 31, 1528–1542, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Turner and Ridgwell(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, S. K. and Ridgwell, A.: Development of a novel empirical framework for
interpreting geological carbon isotope excursions, with implications for the
rate of carbon injection across the PETM, Earth  Planet. Sc.
Lett., 435, 1–13, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Walin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Walin, G., Hieronymus, J., and Nycander, J.: Source-related variables for the
description of the oceanic carbon system, Geochem. Geophy.
Geosy., 15, 3675–3687, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Wanninkhof(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between gas exchange and wind speed over the
ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7373–7382, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Watson et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, A. J., Bakker, D., Ridgwell, A., Boyd, P., and Law, C.: Effect of iron
supply on Southern Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> uptake and implications for glacial atmospheric
CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 407, 730–733, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Yvon-Durocher et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Yvon-Durocher, G., Dossena, M., Trimmer, M., Woodward, G., and Allen, A. P.:
Temperature and the biogeography of algal stoichiometry, Glob. Ecol.
Biogeogr., 24, 562–570, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Zeebe and Wolf-Gladrow(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Zeebe, R. E. and Wolf-Gladrow, D. A.: CO<sub>2</sub> in seawater: equilibrium,
kinetics, isotopes, 65, Gulf Professional Publishing, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Zhang et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J., Quay, P., and Wilbur, D.: Carbon isotope fractionation during
gas-water exchange and dissolution of CO<sub>2</sub>, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.,
59, 107–114, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
