Potential bioavailability of organic matter from atmospheric particles to marine heterotrophic bacteria

. The surface ocean receives important amounts of organic carbon from atmospheric deposition. The degree of bioavailability of this source of organic carbon will determine its impact on the marine carbon cycle. In this study, the potential availability of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leached from both desert dust and anthropogenic aerosols to marine heterotrophic bacteria was investigated. The experimental design was based on 16 d incubations


Introduction
Marine dissolved organic matter (DOM) is the largest reservoir of reduced carbon in the ocean.Estimated at 662 Pg C, which is comparable to that present as atmospheric CO 2 , DOM plays a key role in the ocean carbon cycle as it is an important pathway of carbon export (Hansell et al., 2009;Moran et al., 2016).At the global scale, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export from the surface to the deep ocean contributes to 20 % of the total organic carbon flux (Hansell et al., 2009).This percentage reaches more than 50 % of the total carbon export in the oligotrophic oceans (Carlson et Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. al., 1994;Guyennon et al., 2015;Letscher and Moore, 2015;Roschan and DeVries, 2017;Bif et al., 2018).
Nutrient availability and microbial community structure regulate the accumulation and the remineralization of DOM, thus influencing the DOC export efficiency (Carlson et al., 2002;Letscher and Moore;2015;Romera-Castillo et al., 2016).From extensive field studies, it is well known that DOM flux into heterotrophic bacteria is a major pathway in the regulation of carbon fluxes in the ocean (i.e., Azam et al., 1983;Moran et al., 2016).Heterotrophic bacteria are an especially important component of marine oligotrophic regions in which their biomass is comparable to that of phytoplankton.In such oligotrophic areas, half of oceanic primary production is channeled via heterotrophic bacteria to the microbial loop (Fuhrman, 1992;Azam, 1998), driving a wide range of biogeochemical processes that are important for the carbon cycle (Bunse and Pinhassi, 2017;Gasol and Kirchman, 2018, and references therein).Among these processes, the microbial activity has been identified as involved in the alteration of the chemical composition of the DOM pool, thereby influencing the residence time of the carbon in the ocean (Microbial carbon pump, Jiao et al., 2010).
The open ocean receives a continuous flux of anthropogenic particles from the atmosphere, resulting from both industrial and agricultural activities, as well as pulsed fluxes of natural origin such as desert dust (De Leeuw et al., 2014, and references therein).During their transport to the ocean, dust particles mix with anthropogenic aerosols and gas, supplying the water column with a wide variety of compounds including macro-and micronutrients (N, P, Fe, etc.) (Duce et al., 1991;Jickells et al., 2005), as well as potentially toxic elements (Paytan et al., 2009;Jordi et al., 2012).By bringing new nutrients to the upper waters, atmospheric deposition plays a key role in some oligotrophic regions such as the Mediterranean Sea and the northern Atlantic and Pacific gyres, particularly under stratified conditions (Guieu et al., 2014;Letelier et al., 2019).The relative response of phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria to dust deposition has been shown to depend on the nutritional status of the environment in which they develop.Indeed, the reported positive effect of dust deposition on primary production in the central Atlantic Ocean decreased with increasing oligotrophy of the seawater (Maranon et al., 2010), suggesting a competitive advantage of heterotrophic bacteria over phytoplankton in the oligotrophic ocean.Nevertheless, recently, the contrasted influence of Saharan dust versus anthropogenic aerosols on bacterioplankton composition and metabolism has been getting attention (Herut et al., 2016;Marín et al., 2017a).
Most studies on the biogeochemical role of atmospheric deposition have focused on the potential of inorganic compounds to relieve nutrient limitation (Duce et al., 1991;Guieu et al., 2014).However, there is increasing evidence that a significant fraction of atmospheric deposition occurs as organic forms (Duce et al., 2008;Kanakidou et al., 2012;Djaoudi et al., 2018;Violaki et al., 2018;Vila-Costa et al., 2019).The extent of organic compounds coating onto dust has been related, among others, to the transport pathway and the reactivity of organic species in the atmosphere (Falkovich et al., 2004;Dall'Osto et al., 2010;Theodosi et al., 2018).Therefore, dust has been considered an excellent medium of longrange transport of organic matter (Falkovich et al., 2004).
Despite that several studies highlighted the positive influence of atmospheric deposition of inorganic nutrients on microbial activity (i.e., Pulido-Villena et al., 2008, 2010;Tsagaraki et al., 2017), there is a paucity of information regarding the bioavailability of atmospheric organic carbon and its fate in the ocean (Djaoudi et al., 2018).In this context, we here investigate the bioavailability to marine heterotrophic bacteria of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leached from aerosols.For this purpose, we performed a set of in vitro biodegradation experiments in which a marine bacterial inoculum was exposed to water-soluble fractions of anthropogenic and Saharan dust aerosols, as well as to glucose-amended and non-amended (control) treatments.

Aerosol sampling
Anthropogenic and Saharan dust aerosols were collected on Pall Flex ® tissue-quartz pre-combusted (450 • C, 6 h) filters (20.3×25.4cm 2 ), by using high-volume samplers (Tisch Environmental Inc., OH, USA).Anthropogenic aerosols were collected during March 2016, in an urban zone in Marseille (southeast of France: 43.3 • N, 5.4 • E; Fig. 1), for 15 d with an average flow rate of 1.42 m 3 min −1 (Fig. 1).Saharan dust aerosols were collected during June 2016 close to Medenine (southeast of Tunisia: 33.3 • N, 10.5 • E; Fig. 1), a major source of desert dust to the Mediterranean Sea (Prospero et al., 2012), over periods of 24 h with an average flow rate of 0.7 m 3 min −1 (Fig. 1).High-volume samplers were calibrated for flow rate just before sampling.Aerosol filters were individually wrapped in a double pre-combusted aluminum foil and then stored at −20 • C until the start of the experiment.
The content of total organic carbon (TOC) in collected aerosols was analyzed using a thermo-optical method (EC/OC analyzer, Sunset Laboratories Inc.) on the basis of EUSAAR protocol (Cavalli et al., 2010).The amount of DOC contained in the water-soluble fraction of both anthropogenic and Saharan dust aerosols was assessed by leaching 1 cm 2 of filters in 30 mL of ultrapure water.After sonication during 40 min, it was filtered through a pre-combusted (450 • C, 6 h) GF/F filter prior to analysis.

Experimental design
Bioassay experiments were run in triplicates (7 L each) on DOC-free artificial seawater in order to set aerosol-derived DOC as the sole carbon source for marine heterotrophic The experiment consisted of three treatments differing on the carbon source at a similar initial concentration.Experimental treatments were amended with Saharan dust (D), anthropogenic aerosols (A), and glucose (G) as a proxy of bioavailable carbon sources.An unamended DOC treatment (control; C) was run in parallel and consisted only of artificial seawater.As the amount of DOC in the water-soluble fraction was lower in Saharan dust than anthropogenic aerosols (Table 1), the amount of aerosol added was set based on the C content in Saharan dust aerosol filter in order to fix a similar initial DOC concentration among all amended incubation bottles (36 µM).To do so, particles from two whole Saharan dust filters and from 7.9 × 7.9 cm 2 of the anthropogenic aerosol filter were firstly leached, each in 650 mL ultrapure water.After being sonicated for 40 min, the suspended particles were filtered through pre-combusted GF/F filters (450 • C, 6 h) to recover the dissolved fraction.A volume of 200 mL of each leachate was finally introduced in the corresponding aerosol-amended treatments (D and A).Thus, this protocol simulated an input of atmospheric water-soluble organic carbon through aerosol wet deposition, i.e., an input of atmospheric DOC.The same DOC concentration (36 µM) was also set for the glucose treatment.
A microbial inoculum was introduced in all incubation bottles.To prepare the microbial inoculum, surface seawater was collected at 5 m depth with a Niskin bottle at the MOOSE-Antares offshore station in the Mediterranean Sea (42 • 48 N, 6 • 10 E; Fig. 1), on board R/V Téthys II.Seawater was first filtered on board through a 40 µm mesh plankton and then through 0.8 µm pre-cleaned (10 % HCl and ultrapure water) polycarbonate filter to remove larger particles and plankton.Once in the laboratory, the microbial inoculum was further concentrated 30 times on a 0.2 µm pre-cleaned (10 % HCl and ultrapure water) polycarbonate filter in a final volume of 180 mL.The DOC concentration in the 180 mL inoculum was 120 µM.A volume of 15 mL of the bacterial inoculum was added to each experimental bottle.This approach minimizes the volume of seawater (and therefore the amount of DOC) added to the experimental bottles with the microbial inoculum (Lechtenfeld et al., 2015), allowing us to set the aerosol-derived DOC as the main carbon source for heterotrophic bacteria.After dilution in the incubated volume (7 L), the contribution of marine DOC was < 0.3 µM.All experimental bottles were incubated in a controlled temperature room at 18 • C for 16 d in the dark and were regularly gently shaken.

Subsampling and analyses
Subsamples were collected from the experimental bottles at 13 selected times for heterotrophic bacterial abundance (BA) and heterotrophic bacterial production (BP) and at three selected times for ectoenzymatic activity (EEA), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), and dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) (see Table S1 in the Supplement for details of subsampling).
Samples for BA (1.8 mL) were fixed with 18 µL of a preservative solution (glutaraldehyde 0.25 % final -pluronic 0.01 % final), kept for 15 min at room temperature in the dark and then transferred to a −80 • C freezer until analysis, within a few days.Frozen samples were thawed at room temperature and were analyzed using the FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) flow cytometer (PRECYM flow cytometry platform, http://precym.mio.univ-amu.fr,last access: 24 November 2020).For BA cell counts, samples (0.3 mL) were incubated with SYBR Green II solution 1 : 10 (2 µL, Molecular Probes) for 15 min in the dark, in order to stain the nucleic acids.Each cell was characterized by three optical parameters: light diffusion parameter side-scatter (SSC), green fluorescence (515-545 nm; SYBRgreen), and red fluorescence (670 LP; chlorophyll a, in order to exclude autotrophic prokaryotes).Combining SYBRGreen fluorescence and SSC allowed us to distinguish the cells from inorganic particles, detritus, and free DNA (Marie et al., 2002).Data were processed using the CellQuest software (BD Biosciences), and BA was further determined using Summit 4.3 software (Beckman Coulter).
BP was estimated by 3 H-leucine incorporation applying the centrifugation method (Smith and Azam, 1992).Samples (1.5 mL) were incubated in the dark between 1 and 6 h at 18 • C with a mixture of 3 H-leucine (Perkin Elmer ® specific activity 106 Ci mmol −1 ) and non-radioactive leucine to a final concentration of 20 nM (6 nM 3 H-leucine + 14 nM cold leucine) in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes.Incorporations were stopped by addition of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) to a final concentration at 5 %.The control was prepared for each treatment by the addition of TCA, before the addition of 3 H-leucine.Samples were then centrifuged for 10 min at 16 000 g three times, first with the fixed sample, second with TCA 5 %, and finally with ethanol 80 %.After resuspension of the pellet in 1.5 mL scintillation liquid (Ultima Gold MV), radioactivity was determined by a liquid scintillation counter.Leucine incorporation rates were converted into carbon production using the conversion factors of 1.5 kg C per mole of leucine incorporated (Kirchman, 1993).
EEAs were measured fluorometrically, using two fluorogenic model substrates, 4-methylumbelliferyl -βDglucopyranoside (MUF-βglu) and L-leucine-7-amido-4methyl-coumarin (Leu-MCA) as representative of βglucosidase and aminopeptidase, respectively (Hoppe, 1983).Hydrolysis rates were determined by incubating in black 24 microtiter-plate 2 mL of the D and A treatments with six (0.05, 0.2, 1, 2, 5, and 10 µM) concentrations of each substrate model.To ensure linearity of the hydrolysis rate, the increase in fluorescence was measured at multiple time points during the incubation period (ex/em: 380/440 nm for MCA and 365/450 nm for MUF, wavelength width 5 nm) in a Varioskan LUX microplate reader.The instrument was calibrated with standards of MCA and MUF solutions diluted in < 0.2 µm filtered seawater.
Samples for DOC analysis (10 mL) were filtered in line, through pre-combusted (450 • C, 6 h) 47 mm GF/F filters.The filtrates were then transferred into pre-combusted glass tubes where 50 µL of phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 , 85 %) was added.The glass tubes were sealed and stored in the dark at 4 • C until analysis.DOC was analyzed using the hightemperature catalytic oxidation (HTCO) technique with a Shimadzu TOC-V analyzer.The daily calibration curve was based on four standard solutions (0, 50, 100, and 150 µM) of potassium acid phthalate (1000 ng L −1 ).The analytical precision of the procedure, based on three to five injections and analysis of the same sample, was 1.8 % on average.The accuracy of the instrument was determined by the analysis of a deep-seawater reference provided by the Hansell CRM program (Hansell, 2005).The average DOC concentration in the deep-seawater reference was 45 ± 3 µM.
DON and DOP were determined after subtraction of the dissolved inorganic fraction of nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP) from the total dissolved fractions (TDN and TDP), respectively.Samples for TDN, TDP, DIP, and DIN (60 mL) were filtered online through pre-cleaned (HCl 10 % and ultrapure water) 47 mm 0.2 µm polycarbonate filters and then transferred into precleaned (HCl 10 % and ultrapure water) 60 mL HDPE bottles.Samples were kept frozen (−20 • C) until analysis through the conventional automated colorimetric procedure (Aminot and Kerouel, 2007).Prior to analysis, TDN and TDP were submitted to a wet oxidation according to Pujo-Pay and Raimbault (1994).The detection limits for DIN (NO − 3 + NO − 2 ) and DIP (PO 3− 4 ) analysis were 0.05 and 0.02 µM, respectively.

Determination of labile DOC, bacterial growth efficiency, and kinetic parameters
The percentage of the labile dissolved organic carbon (LDOC) was calculated as Bacterial growth efficiency (BGE, %) was calculated by dividing the time-integrated BP by the corresponding labile fraction of DOC (LDOC).
Maximum hydrolysis rate (V max ) and Michaelis-Menten constant (K m ) were determined by fitting the EEA data using a nonlinear regression on the rectangular hyperbolic function following where V is the MUF-βglu or MCA-leu hydrolysis rate and S the concentration of the fluorogenic substrate.

Statistics
The three-replicate average values of bacterial activity (BA, BP, and EEA) and nutrient concentrations (DOC, DON, and DOP) in the G, D, A, and C treatments were compared, over the incubation period, using a one-way ANOVA statistical test.ANOVA returns a p value higher than 0.05 for the null hypothesis that the means of the different studied treatments are equal.

Total and dissolved organic carbon
The content of TOC in aerosols and of DOC in the watersoluble fractions was higher in anthropogenic (0.155 and 0.05 g C g −1 aerosol, respectively) than in Saharan dust aerosols (0.063 and 0.008 g C g −1 aerosol, respectively) (Table 1).Likewise, the dissolved fraction resulting from leaching was higher in the anthropogenic aerosols (32 %) than in Saharan dust (13 %) (Table 1).About 1 h after aerosol amendments (T 0 ), the measured initial concentration of DOC in the control treatment (14 ± 1 µM) was higher than the expected value of 6.3 µM (DOC concentration in artificial seawater + inoculum; see the Method section).This "extra DOC" was not observed in the amended treatments, where concentrations of 40 ± 3, 36, and 34 ± 3 µM were observed in the G, A, and D treatments, respectively, consistent with the amount of DOC added through amendments (36 µM final concentration in the incubation bottles; see the Method section) (Table 1).Over the incubation period (T 0 − T final ), DOC concentration decreased in the three amended treatments (Fig. 2a).This decrease was highest in the G treatment (22 ± 2 µM) followed by both the D (9 ± 2 µM) and A (9 µM) treatments (Table 2; Fig. 2a).In the C treatment, a net decrease in DOC, of 5 ± 1 µM, was detected only after T 5.7 (between T 5.7 and T final ).As no extra DOC was observed in the G, A, and D treatments, the variation in DOC in the control was not taken into consideration in the calculation of labile DOC in the G, D, and A treatments.Therefore, the resulting labile DOC fractions were 55 ± 2 %, 25 ± 4 %, and 24 ± 8 % in the G, D, and A treatments, respectively (Table 2).

Dissolved organic nitrogen and phosphate
The initial DON and DOP concentrations in the C treatment were 1.6 ± 0.1 µM and below the detection limit, respectively.The G treatment exhibited the same initial DON concentration as the C treatment, with values of 1.8 ± 0.2 µM https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6271-2020Biogeosciences, 17, 6271-6285, 2020 while DOP concentrations reached 0.03 ± 0.01 µM (Fig. 2b,  c).In the A and D treatments, the concentration of both DON and DOP increased immediately after aerosol addition (T 0 ).The DON concentration reached 4.3 and 3.7 ± 0.2 µM in the A and D treatments, respectively (Fig. 2a), resulting in lower C : N and higher N : P elemental ratios in the A and D treatments than in the G treatment (Table S2).The increase in DOP after aerosol addition in the D treatment was of 0.02 ± 0.005 µM and was similar to that observed in the G treatment.In the A treatment, the increase in DOP was slightly higher, reaching a value of 0.04 µM (Fig. 2b), which resulted in lower C : P ratios in A than in both D and G in the beginning of the experiment (Table S2).
In all treatments, over the incubation period, DON concentrations remained constant while DOP concentrations exhibited a significant increase between T 0 and T = 5.7 d, to finally decrease to values below the detection limit at the end of the incubation period (Fig. 1b and c).Over the incubation period, C : N elemental ratios decreased slightly in the A (ANOVA; p < 0.05; F = 5.3; df = 5) and G (ANOVA; p < 0.05; F = 31.5;df = 8) treatments while they remained constant in the D (ANOVA; p > 0.05; F = 0.1; df = 8) and C (ANOVA; p > 0.05; F = 0.5; df = 8) treatments (Table S2).In contrast, C : P and N : P elemental ratios were similar in the A treatment while they decreased significantly in both the D and G treatments (Table S2).

Microbial activity over the incubation period
In all the experimental bottles, an increase in both bacterial abundance (BA) and bacterial production (BP) was observed during the incubation time.One replicate from the A treatment diverged completely from the other replicates (it did not show any bacterial growth and BP fluxes collapsed suddenly on day 6) and it was excluded from the data processing.
At the beginning of the incubations (T 0 ), BA was similar in all treatments (ANOVA; p > 0.05; F = 0.64; df = 10), with an average value of 2.3 ± 0.1 × 10 5 cells mL −1 (Fig. 3a).After 1.7 d of incubation, BA exhibited a 3-fold decrease in all treatments.Following this decrease, a lag time phase was observed, during which BA continued to decrease slowly in all treatments.This lag phase period was longer in the C treatment (7.7 d), followed by both the A and D treatments (5.7 d) and finally by the G treatment (3.7 d; Fig. 3a).After that period, an exponential growth of BA was observed first in the G treatment, followed then by both the A and D treatments and finally by the C treatment (Table 3).During that exponential growth period, BA reached similar values (ANOVA; p = 0.34; F = 1.31; df = 10) in the G (6 ± 3 × 10 5 cells mL −1 ), A (5×10 5 cells mL −1 ), and D (5 ± 1 × 10 5 cells mL −1 ) treatments (Fig. 3a).In the control treatment, until t = 6.7 d, BA remained low, < 0.6 × 10 5 cells mL −1 and then increased up to 2.5 ± 0.6 × 10 5 cells mL −1 during the exponential growth phase (Fig. 3a).At the end of the incubation period, BA continued to increase in all treatments, reaching up to twice the observed BA during the exponential growth phase (Fig. 3a).
Initial BP was low in all experimental bottles, with an average value of 0.042 ± 0.035 ng C L −1 h −1 (Fig. 3b).BP started to increase first in the G treatment followed by the D and then A treatments (Fig. 3b; Table 3).Like BA, BP also exhibited an exponential growth phase, which started after a lag phase shorter than that of BA (Table 3).During the exponential growth period (Table 3), BP growth rates were similar in the G and D treatments (ANOVA, F = 6.76; p > 0.05; df = 5) and were significantly higher than in the A and C treatments (ANOVA, F = 10.47;p < 0.05; df = 10) (Table 3).Likewise, maxima of BP reached were similar in the D (879 ± 64 ng C L −1 h −1 ) and G (648 ± 156 ng C L −1 h −1 ) treatments (ANOVA, F = 5.63; p > 0.05; df = 5) and were significantly higher (ANOVA, F = 43.4;p < 0.05; df = 10) than in the A (124 ng C L −1 h −1 ) and C (120 ± 56 ng C L −1 h −1 ) treatments.In the C treatment, until t = 6.7 d, BP was low (< 2 ng C L −1 h −1 ) and then increased at the end of the incubation period (Fig. 3b).
The Michaelis-Menten fit of aminopeptidase and β glucosidase activities was significant only at the end of the incubation period (T = 15.7 d).Thereby, only these data are presented (Fig. S1 in the Supplement).The average aminopeptidase V m in the D treatment was 1.3 ± 0.2 nM h −1 and was significantly lower by approximately 4 times (ANOVA, F = 34.3;p < 0.05; df = 4) than that observed in the A treatment (4.4 nmol h −1 ).β-glucosidase V m was much lower than that of aminopeptidase in both the A and D treatments.Opposite to what was obtained with MCA-leucine, and although not significantly different due to the variability within triplicates (ANOVA, F = 6.24, p > 0.05, df = 4), the average β-glucosidase V m was slightly higher in D, with values rang-ing from 0.08 to 0.16 nM h −1 compared to 0.02-0.03nM h −1 in A. These differences between treatments were still observed considering specific V m (per bacterial cell, Fig. 4).Indeed, like for volumetric V m rates, cell-specific aminopeptidase V m values (Fig. 4) were lower in D than A (ANOVA, F = 650.5;p < 0.05; df = 4).Likewise, cell-specific β glucosidase V m showed slightly higher values in D (0.06-0.16×10 −18 mol cell L −1 h −1 ) compared to A (range 0.015-0.026× 10 −18 mol cell L −1 h −1 ), although not significantly different between the two aerosol treatments (Fig. 4).The opposite trend was noticed for β glucosidase K m , with lower values in the D (0.06-0.16) than A (0.4-2.3) treatment.

Influence of the aerosol source on marine heterotrophic bacterial activity
In this study, the addition of Saharan dust and anthropogenic aerosols as a sole C source to marine bacteria stimulated both heterotrophic bacterial abundance (BA) and production (BP), evidencing the bioavailability of aerosol-derived DOC.However, at the beginning of the experiment, a lag time period was observed in all treatments, during which BA dropped by 3 times its initial value.This consistent decrease in BA may be attributed to a stress of marine heterotrophic bacteria during the preparation of the inoculum and to their contact with a new environment/matrix, containing an unusual source of carbon.Indeed, although a lag time period was also recorded in the G treatment, it was shorter than that in the A and D treatments, which could suggest a non-immediate bioavailability of aerosol organic matter compared to glucose.This non-immediate bioavailability of the dissolved pool of organic matter has been highlighted in the ocean in a review on marine DOM incubation experiments (Lønborg and Alavrez-Salgado, 2012;Sipler and Bronk, 2015, and references therein).Other factors including potential additions of toxic molecules and/or viruses from the aerosol leachate could have exerted a control on marine heterotrophic bacteria at the beginning of the experiment, explaining the observed lag time period.
After the lag phase, an increase in BA and BP was observed first in the G treatment, followed by the D and then A treatment, with bacterial growth rates significantly higher in the G and D treatments than in the A treatment.In contrast to Marín et al. (2017b), in which BA and BP exhibited a contrasted response following mineral dust and anthropogenic aerosol addition, the observed increase in both BA and BP in this study was higher in the D treatment than in A. Followhttps://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6271-2020 Biogeosciences, 17, 6271-6285, 2020 Table 3. Duration of the exponential growth phase for bacterial abundance (BA) and bacterial production (BP), bacterial growth rate (µ) estimated from both BP and BA changes during the exponential growth phase, time-integrated BP during the exponential growth phase, and bacterial growth efficiency (BGE).Data from each triplicate and average (± SD) values are given for the control (C), glucose, anthropogenic, and Saharan dust treatments.ing this increase in bacterial activity, DOC was consumed, highlighting a higher LDOC fraction in the G treatment than in the A and D treatments.In those two treatments, LDOC fractions were quantitatively similar, despite a higher solubility of organic carbon derived from anthropogenic aerosols compared to Saharan dust aerosols.Nevertheless, contrasted metabolic pathways were evolved by marine heterotrophic bacteria in the A and D treatments over the timescale of the incubation period.Indeed, the BGE in the D treatment (14.2 ± 5.5 %) compares well with that of the G treatment (7.6 ± 2 %), and both values were significantly higher than that of the A treatment (1.7 %).This result suggests that, in the experimental conditions of this study, the metabolic use of LDOC in the G and D treatments was energetically equivalent, with evidence of approximatively 1/10 of DOC incorporated going into structural components.In contrast, the carbon consumed in the A treatment was mostly catabolized.The use of BP in the calculation of BGE could be biased as BP is determined using a leucine-to-carbon conversion factor.However, in this study, we still preferred using BP rather than BA in this calculation, as BA could also be subjected to a number of biases.Indeed, the determination of BGE using BA requires the utilization of an abundancebiomass conversion factor, and yet biovolume varies substantially during the growth.Furthermore, the variation in cell abundance is the result of a net balance between growth and mortality.This is visible through observations of apparent growth rates, calculated from exponential growth phases of both BP and BA (Table 3), lower for BA than BP.Likewise, this is also visible regarding the lag phase, shorter for BP than BA (Table 3).This is a classical issue occurring during dilution experiments for BGEs but also leucine conversion factor determinations (Kirchman et al., 1982;Ammerman et al., 1984).The factors controlling whether organic carbon is catabolized or incorporated into microbial biomass are still poorly resolved.Nevertheless, the conversion of carbon into biomass only occurs after non-growth requirements have been satisfied and sufficient excess of carbon and energy is available (Del Giorgio and Cole, 1998).To explain the differences in BGE observed in this study among glucose, Saharan dust, and anthropogenic aerosol amendments, several hypotheses can be proposed (see below).

Potential controlling factors of the bacterial growth efficiency
A number of parameters were controlled at the beginning and/or during the incubation period and can thus be reasonably excluded.Indeed, temperature and initial microbial inoculum were equal among all treatments.Since DIN and DIP were added in excess, N and P availability were not growth limiting over the incubation period.Alongside those nutrient enrichments, aerosol amendments resulted in initial N concentrations up to 7 µM (6 and 7 µM in D and A, respectively) and initial P concentrations up to 0.4 µM (0.40 and 0.34 µM in D and A, respectively).Different BGE values were observed between the D and A treatments despite similar initial nutrient concentration.Moreover, BGE in D was similar to that of the G treatment despite a higher nutrient concentration, suggesting that inorganic nutrients were weakly involved in the control of BGE.Conversely, DOM composition or quality and/or micronutrient availability (i.e., Fe, Zn) may have influenced the BGE in the A and D aerosol treatments, as they are reported as the main variables controlling the BGE in fresh and marine waters (Fenchel and Blackburn, 1979;Biddanda et al., 1994;Carlson and Ducklow, 1996;Kirchman, 2018, and references therein).
In this study, BGE was lower in A than in both the D and G treatments, which could suggest a DOM pool of a lower quality in anthropogenic aerosols with respect to Saharan dust.The observed differences in ectoenzymatic activities between the D and A treatments support this hypothesis.The higher cell-specific aminopeptidase activity in the A treatment combined with its enzymatic system adapted to low concentrations (low K m ) presumably suggest a lower bacterial access to amino acids despite a higher DON concentration in A than in the D treatment.Thus, the versatility in catabolic enzymatic synthesis was probably limited due to less access to amino acids, contributing to the observed low BGE in the A treatment.In the D treatment, the lower development of aminopeptidase together with a better development of βglucosidase capacities (higher specific V m , lower K m , and thus a better affinity for substrate) suggested that molecules derived from carbohydrates were used for anabolism and as a source of energy on the one hand and that organic nitrogen sources were more available to heterotrophic bacteria on the other hand, leading to a better global benefit for heterotrophic bacteria as shown by the higher BGE.
The observed differences in ectoenzymatic activities may have been potentially upregulated by trace metals and/or vitamin cofactors or inhibited due to a supply of toxic elehttps://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6271-2020 Biogeosciences, 17, 6271-6285, 2020 ments.Saharan dust deposition has been suggested as an important source of iron to surface waters (Jickells et al., 2005).
There is increasing evidence on the potential role of iron as a cofactor requirement for several enzymes involved in photosynthesis, N 2 fixation, and remineralization (Wu et al., 2000;Twining et al., 2004;Browning et al., 2017).In this study, a potential supply of iron or other trace metal elements (i.e., zinc, cobalt) following Saharan dust aerosol addition may have stimulated the bacterial ectoenzymatic activity and/or other metabolic pathways in the D treatment.Conversely, an eventual upload of toxic elements, following anthropogenic aerosols (Paytan et al., 2009;Jordi et al., 2012), may have constrained the bacterial biosynthesis in the A treatment.A significant amount of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was leached from both A and D aerosols, highlighting the important contribution of not only C but also N-containing organic molecules to atmospheric deposition, such as previously reported through atmospheric flux quantification and modeling (Markaki et al., 2010;Djaoudi et al., 2018;Kanakidou et al., 2012Kanakidou et al., , 2018;;Galletti et al., 2020).This DON supply resulted in a significant decrease in C : N elemental ratios in both the A and D treatments with respect to G, immediately after seeding (Table S2).BGE of natural assemblages of marine bacteria grown on a range of substrates has been shown to be inversely related to the C : N ratio of the substrate.Indeed, Goldman al. (1987) showed that the BGE was independent of the source of C and N but increased as the C : N ratio of the substrate decreased.In this study, although C : N stoichiometric ratios were similar in the D and A aerosol treatments over the incubation period, contrasted BGEs were observed, suggesting that elemental ratios alone were not sufficient to explain the differences between the A and D treatments, in the conditions of the experiment.
The contrasted BGE and ectoenzymatic development toward access to organic molecules in both the D and A treatments may have been linked to the primary sources and the chemical composition and/or structure of aerosols as well.Anthropogenic aerosols are associated with various combustion processes, including industrial production, vehicle exhaust, and domestic or waste burning, producing mainly soot particles (Li et al., 2001;Alves et al., 2012;Kanakidou et al., 2012Kanakidou et al., , 2018)).These soot particles are generally coated with various organic compounds, forming complex mixtures of highly condensed organic matter.For example, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and a large number of aliphatic compounds are ubiquitous within anthropogenic aerosols (Omar et al., 2006;Alves et al., 2012;Barhoumi et al., 2018).However, these compounds have low water solubility, and thus their contribution to the DOC pool could not alone explain the low BGE observed in the A treatment with respect to both the D and G treatments.
In Mediterranean big cities, the atmospheric organic fraction is also related to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation, with a contribution to the fine fraction of aerosols, ranging between 60 % and 80 % (Amato et al., 2016).
In urban atmospheric aerosols, the water-soluble organic carbon has been highlighted as mostly aliphatic in nature (approximately 95 % by C mass), with major contributions from alkyls and oxygenated alkyls (∼ 80 %), carboxylic acids (∼ 10 %), and to a lower extent the aromatic functional group (∼ 4 %).Among the organic species found in anthropogenic aerosols, alkyls or oxygenated alkyls, (poly)carboxylic acids/carboxylates (e.g., formate and oxalate), sugars (e.g., levoglucosan), and humic-like substances (HULISs) have been reported as the main contributors (Jaffrezo et al., 2005;Sannigrahi et al., 2006;Salma et al., 2013;Theodosi et al., 2018).Recently, HULISs, which are a mixture of high-molecular-weight organic (hydrophobic aliphatic and aromatic) compounds, have been highlighted as contributing a significant proportion of water-soluble organic carbon (up to 70 %) (Zheng et al., 2013;Violotis et al., 2017).Thus, the HULIS compounds' potential contribution to the DOC pool in the A treatment may have constrained the overall bioavailability of energy and carbon and thus the potential of marine bacteria for biosynthesis.Otherwise, an enrichment of anthropogenic aerosols by organic compounds such as formate, acetate, and oxalic and malonic acids has been previously reported in the atmosphere close to emission sources or after atmospheric transport (Sullivan and Prather, 2007;Leaitch et al., 2009;Paris et al., 2010).Some of these compounds (i.e., formate, malonic acids), as being involved in microbial metabolic pathways, could promote respiration and thus a low BGE.
The most abundant organic compounds in dust aerosols revealed a vegetal origin and are more particularly highlighted as the reflection of the past vegetation cover of soils, from which dust aerosols were emitted (Eglinton, 2002).Thus, organic carbon was associated with more or less decomposed biological residues, including microorganism debris, as well as humic substances (Conen et al., 2011).In this study, Saharan dust aerosols were locally sampled within the short timescale of the dust event (48 h).This may prevent internal mixing of Saharan dust aerosols with other organic compounds in the atmosphere, revealing a higher bioavailable character of the Saharan-dust-derived DOC for marine bacteria, when compared to the anthropogenic-aerosol-derived DOC.Thereby, the higher BGE in the D treatment with respect to A may have been the result of a DOC pool of a vegetal origin, more available to marine bacteria than that derived from anthropogenic emissions.For instance, a probable richness in cellulose-containing molecules in the "fresh" dust used in this study could explain the higher β glucosidase activity in the D treatment.

Potential implications for the marine carbon cycle in the Mediterranean Sea
Atmospheric fluxes of DOC in the Mediterranean Sea have been reported to be 6 times higher than river fluxes (Djaoudi et al., 2018;Galletti et al., 2020), highlighting atmospheric deposition as a major allochthonous source of carbon to this marine region.Hereafter, we apply the partitioning between labile (LDOC) and refractory DOC (RDOC) in aerosols obtained in this study to these previously reported atmospheric DOC fluxes in the Mediterranean Sea to propose a tentative estimation of LDOC and RDOC fluxes from both Saharan dust and anthropogenic deposition and to which extent they could potentially contribute to the marine carbon cycle.
Although atmospheric deposition is a mixture of different particles from several sources (i.e., anthropogenic, Saharan dust, and/or biomass burning), in order to get a rough estimation of RDOC and LDOC fluxes, we assume that LDOC and RDOC fractions obtained in this study are valid for previous quantifications of atmospheric DOC fluxes (59-120 mmol m −2 yr −1 ) (Djaoudi et al., 2018;Galletti et al., 2020).Note that this assumption would apply to the case of wet deposition events in which an important fraction of atmospheric particles are solubilized in rainwater before deposition.In the case of dry deposition events, the labile and refractory fractions would depend on the potential solubility of atmospheric organic matter in seawater and its residence time in the euphotic layer.
In the Mediterranean Sea, bacterial carbon demand cannot be satisfied with DOC of autochthonous origin alone (i.e., for instance, phytoplankton DOC extracellular release; Anderson and Turley, 2003) or with terrestrial riverine DOC fluxes (Van Wambeke et al., 1996;Del Giorgio et al., 1997), emphasizing a critical lack in our understanding of sources and sinks of carbon in marine systems.Indeed, using a BGE of 10 %, Van Wambeke et al. (2020) examined autochthonous sources of C through macromolecule hydrolysis and showed that the cumulative hydrolysis rates of C proteins and C polysaccharides contributed a small amount to the bacterial carbon demand, on average 2.5 ± 1.3 % in the epipelagic waters during the spring period.Similarly, measured rates of photosynthetic DOC production represented only 25 % of estimated bacterial carbon demand in the Mediterranean Sea (Marañón et al., 2020).Thus, in such oligotrophic areas, atmospheric deposition of DOC might be one of the missing pieces constraining our understanding of the biogeochemical cycling of carbon, and its labile fraction would be one possible means of contribution to the bacterial carbon demand.
To get insight into this potential contribution, atmospheric fluxes of LDOC could be compared to photosynthetic DOC production rates.Such rates are generally obtained during 24 h long incubations with 14 C bicarbonate.It includes not only direct phytoplankton extracellular release but also excretion from grazers and byproducts from viral lysis during the incubations.In the Mediterranean Sea, such fluxes ranged between 4.2 and 10.8 mmol C m −2 d −1 (López-Sandoval et al., 2011).By applying the percentages of LDOC observed in this study to previously daily reported atmospheric fluxes (0.03-1.78 mmol C m −2 d −1 ) (Djaoudi et al., 2018;Galletti et al., 2020), atmospheric fluxes of LDOC would range between 0.007 and 0.534 mmol C m −2 d −1 for Saharan dust deposition and between 0.006 and 0.480 mmol C m −2 d −1 for anthropogenic deposition.These fluxes would thus represent up to 13 % of photosynthetic DOC production, supporting the hypothesis of a potential role of atmospheric deposition of DOC in sustaining secondary production.
The contrasted metabolic pathways evolved by marine heterotrophic bacteria, whether they are facing anthropogenic or Saharan dust aerosols, would potentially influence the fate of derived DOC.When facing anthropogenic aerosols, the result of the present study indicated that most of the consumed carbon is catabolized (BGE = 1.7 %) and thus would be returned to the atmosphere as CO 2 .However, when heterotrophic bacteria are facing Saharan dust aerosols, approximatively 1/10 of the LDOC was incorporated into biomass, resulting in a BGE of 14.2 ± 5.5 %.Nevertheless, atmospheric inputs of labile organic matter can lead to increased remineralization of the marine DOM, potentially acting as a priming effect.Likewise, the marine dissolved organic matter pool, by shaping bacterioplankton composition, could likely influence the microbial utilization of anthropogenic and Saharan-dust-derived organic matter as well, thus influencing BGE.Therefore, investigating the interplay between the different sources of DOM in link with microbial activity would allow further insight regarding the striking interaction between atmospheric deposition and the marine carbon cycle, particularly regarding the role of marine bacteria as a link or sink of carbon.
Aside from a potential contribution of atmospheric DOC deposition in sustaining secondary production, the semilabile and/or refractory fractions of those atmospheric inputs would influence the ocean surface biogeochemistry as well as carbon export.At the timescale of the biodegradation experiment conducted in this study, a large fraction of the initial DOC concentration derived from both Saharan dust (70 %-78 %) and anthropogenic aerosols (73 %-81 %) remained non-consumed, suggesting a significant input of semi-labile and/or refractory DOC into seawater from aerosol dissolution.DOC export has been highlighted as playing a critical role within the biological carbon pump in the Mediterranean Sea, leading to an export of 17 g C m −2 yr −1 (Guyennon et al., 2015).Estimated as for LDOC, RDOC fluxes would range between 0.5 and 1.1 g C m −2 yr −1 for Saharan dust deposition and between 0.5 and 1.2 g C m −2 yr −1 for anthropogenic deposition.Thereby, the contribution of refractory DOC derived from Saharan dust and anthropogenic deposition would contribute to the DOC export of 3 %-6.5 % and 3 %-7 %, respectively, likely influencing the biological carbon pump, especially in increasing scenarios of atmospheric emissions.
Organic carbon derived from anthropogenic aerosols exhibited a higher solubility (32 %) with respect to Saharan dust (13 %).Despite such a difference, the amount of bioavailable dissolved organic carbon (DOC) to marine heterotrophic bacteria was quantitatively similar, with contributions of the labile dissolved organic carbon to the total dissolved organic fraction of 25 ± 4 % and 24 % in Saharan dust and anthropogenic aerosols, respectively.Interestingly, the bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) in the Saharan dust treatment (14.2 ± 5.5 %) was higher than that of the anthropogenic treatment (1.7 %), suggesting differences in the metabolic response depending on the aerosol source.This study reveals a new link between atmospheric deposition and the oceanic carbon cycle.Indeed, inputs of atmospheric anthropogenic carbon to the ocean could promote its respiration by bacterial communities.In contrast, carbon derived from Saharan dust aerosols may contribute to biomass production.These results question the future trajectory of ocean-climate feedbacks in oligotrophic oceans, particularly in increasing scenarios of anthropogenic emissions.
Data availability.Data used in this study are available from the corresponding author Kahina Djaoudi upon request at kdjaoudi@email.arizona.edu.
Author contributions.KDj and EPV conceived the study and the sampling design.KDj wrote the manuscript.NB collected seawater for the inoculum preparation.AN collected anthropogenic aerosols.MT, THdT, ML collected Saharan dust aerosols.KDe, SC analyzed atmospheric aerosols.KDj, EPV, FVW, AN, DL subsampled the mesocosms.KDj, FVW, AB, SN, CP analyzed the samples.KDj, EPV, FV analyzed the data, and all authors assisted with data discussion and contributed to the revision and editing of the final manuscript.All authors are aware of and accept responsibility for this paper and have approved the final submitted manuscript.
Competing interests.The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Special issue statement.This article is part of the special issue "Atmospheric deposition in the low-nutrient-low-chlorophyll (LNLC) ocean: effects on marine life today and in the future (ACP/BG interjournal SI)".It is not associated with a conference.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Changes in dissolved organic carbon (DOC, a), nitrogen (DON, b), and phosphate (DOP, c) concentrations over the incubation period in glucose (left, green bars), anthropogenic aerosols (middle, gray bars), and Saharan dust aerosols (right, orange bars).The control is plotted in each panel (blue bars).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Changes in heterotrophic bacterial abundance (BA; a) and production (BP, b) over the incubation period in glucose (left, green plots), anthropogenic aerosols (middle, gray plots), and Saharan dust aerosols (right, orange plots).The control is plotted in each panel: the average value is represented by the stars and the standard deviation by the bounded lines.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Cell-specific maximum aminopeptidase and β glucosidase hydrolysis rates per cell abundance in Saharan dust (orange bars) and anthropogenic (gray bars) aerosol treatments at the end of the incubation period.

Table 1 .
Total organic carbon (TOC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content in anthropogenic and Saharan dust aerosols used for bacterial incubations.

Table 2 .
Initial dissolved organic carbon concentration and its decrease and contribution to the initial DOC stocks (expressed as a percentage of labile dissolved organic carbon, LDOC).In the control treatment, LDOC was calculated between T 5.7 and T final .